20160860 Ver 1_Application_20160907

Carpenter,Kristi
From:Coggins, Tony C
Sent:Wednesday, September 07, 2016 10:28 AM
To:Tom Steffens ([e-mail]); Ridings, Rob; Carpenter,Kristi
Cc:Page, Jerry P; Clarke, William M
Subject:R5719 404/401 and Buffer Authorization request
Attachments:R5719 permit app.pdf
Need anything else let me know..

Chad Coggins
Environmental Officer (Div 4)
North Carolina Department of Transportation

252 296-3529 office
252 717-8699 mobile
[e-mail]

509 Ward Blvd.
PO Box 3165
Wilson, NC 27895

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the

North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1

iransportatian
September 6, 2016
Mr. Thomas Steffens
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 W 5th St.
Washington, NC 27889
Mr. Robert Ridings
DWQ-Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27609
PRT McCRC7RY
Covernor
N[CHQ�.AS J. TEI'JNYSQN
Secretary
Subject: R5719 Nationwide l4 Permit application for the conversion of an at grade
intersection at US 117 and SR 1135 (Country Club Road) to a grade
separated interchange in Wayne County.
WBS # 50473.1.FD1
Dear Sirs:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (1VCDOT) proposes to improve
the mobility and safety of vehicular travel along US 117 in Wayne County.
Specifically NCDOT plans to grade separate the US 117 and SR 1135 intersection.
This intersection has been ranked as the 25th most potentially hazardous
intersection in the state. There have been 46 crashes at this location since 2011.
The design at this location is the typical diamond type interchange with US 117
bridging over SR 1135 with on and off ramps in both directions.
Impacts to jurisdictional areas will occur primarily in the wetlands adjacent to
Brooks Swamp. There is a low quality jurisdictional ditch through an upland area
within the project foot print that will be impacted as well. Impacts to Brooks
Swamp are only temporary as we are proposing to only raise the elevation of the
headwalls and wingwalls of this culverted crossing. Brooks swamp is within the
Neuse River Basin and is subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules.
Impacts to wetlands within the project limits will require compensatory mitigation.
These impacts will be mitigated through the in-lieu fee program administered by
NCEEP. No buffer or stream mitigation is thought to be needed at this time. The
NCEEP Mitigation acceptance letter is attached.
�Nothing �Cornpares�,�
State of North Carolina I Department of Transportation � Div-4 Environmental Office
509 Ward Blvd. � PO Box 3165 I Wilson, North Carolina 27895
252-237-6164 T 252-234-6174 F

}�.a
Transportation
Pf�1' �C��{;�i�'
Gavernor
I�IIC�--IC?LAS ,J. TEi�]NYS�I�1
Secretary
For our files, please prov�de written notice that this activity is aut�orized. If yo�a
have any questions or need additf�nal infarrriaiion, pleas� co�ta�t Chad Coggins,
Division Environmental �fficer at [phone]. Yo�r ��me and assistance ar�
gre�tly appreeiated.
9
Respectfully Subxr�itted,
T.M. i le, PE
Division Engineer
�i��athi�ag C�mpar�s %�.
State ofNorth Carolina � Departrnent of'Pransportation .� Div-4 Environmental Office
509 Wazd Bivd: { PO Box 3165 � Wiison, North Cazolina 27895
_ 252-237-6164 T 252-234-6174 F

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: R-5719 grade separated interchange at US 117 and SR 1135
2b. County: Wayne
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Mount Olive
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state R-5719
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: � Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: Tim Little PE Division Engineer
4c. Business name NCDOT Div. of Highways
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: PO Box 3165
4e. City, state, zip: Wilson, NC 27895-3165
4f. Telephone no.: 252-237-6164x3501
4g. Fax no.: 252-234-6174
4h. Email address: tmlittle(a�ncdot.qov
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Chad Coggins
5b. Business name NCDOT Div. 4 Environmental Officer
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: same
5d. City, state, zip: same
5e. Telephone no.: 252-296-3529
5f. Fax no.: 252-234 6174
5g. Email address: tccoqgins ncdot.qov
Page 2 of 11

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.2387 Longitude: - 78.0584
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Brooks Swamp
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Forestry and Agriculture are the predominant land uses in the vicinity of this project.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.0 ac.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
200 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to improve the safety by removing this at grade intersection and building a
grade separated interchange
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
US 117 will "flyover" SR 1135 and ramps will be built get on and off US 117 in both directions. Typical
heavy construction roadway equipment will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown
Comments: stream shown on topo map wetlands delineated
by DEO
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands � Streams - tributaries � Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem orar T
W2 � P❑ T fill � Yes � Corps 0.23
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W2 � P❑ T excavation ❑ Yes ❑ Corps <0.01
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W2 � P❑ T MC ❑ Yes ❑ Corps 0.12
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P� T HC ❑ Yes ❑ Corps 0.15
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W3 � P❑ T MC ❑ Yes ❑ Corps <0.01
❑ No ❑ DWQ
XX ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.36 perm
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 � P❑ T pipe UT to Brooks ❑ PER � Corps 3 146
Swamp � INT ❑ DWQ
Stabilization, ditch UT to Brooks ❑ PER � Corps
S1 ❑ P� T tie-ins and p � INT ❑ DWQ 3 119
dewatering Swam
S2 ❑ P� T dewatering Brooks Swamp � PER � Corps 15 23
� INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts Perm 146
3i. Comments: Site 1 Permanently piped 146 LF. Site 1 is an intermittent ditch through high ground; it is not on soils or topo
maps. Simply a ditch with an OHWM. Site 2 we are just extending headwalls vertically, the 23 LF' dewatering is only
proposed in case contactor needs to dewater in order to insure live concrete containment.
Page 4 of 11

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 5 of 11

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
� Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T re uired?
B1 � P❑ T Widening grooks Swamp � NoS 5347 3231
fill section
B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B4❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts 5347 3231
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. We steepened up
slopes to 3:1 in environmentally sensitive areas. Also culvert headwalls were extended vertically in order to catch the
slope instead of having to extend the culvert at site 2.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. All
construction equipment will be staged and operated from upland areas. DOT will also install silt fencing to protect the
streams and wetlands adjacent to this project, and safety fencing will be used to delineate those environmentally sensitive
areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires � Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
� Yes ❑ No
Comments: all stormwater will be allowed to flow over grass shoulders and ditches
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
1800' of ditch classifies as grassed swale are providing storm water treatment
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? N/A
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Yes � No, MCDC is
letter.) on file
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

«
5. Endangered Species and Designa#ec8 Cr'sfiical Fiabitat 4Corps Requireo�a�aat)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ��o
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangereu Species Act � Yes � No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. if yes, indicate the USFWS Field Otfice you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact E�dangered Species or Designated Criiical
Habitat?
� 8
GIS search and habitat assessment made onsite
6, Essential Fish Habitat (Corps l2equareanent�
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to deterrr�ine whether yo►ar site would im�act Essential Fish i�abitat?
GIS search
7. Fiistoric or Prehistormc Cultural Resources (Corps Requirernent�
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservafion � Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties signiflcant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impacf historic or archeological resources?
Clearance from NC SHPO
8. Flood Zone Desegnataon (Corps Reqa�ireenera��
8a. Will this project occur in a FENQA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ��o
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Road does not overtop ir� this area
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determinatfon? FRIS
�� � . � `� 9/6/2016
v�. r
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name �pp0� a Ageni's Signature � ��t�
(Agent's signa4ure i� v id only if an authorization letter from the
applicant is provided.)
•.�- •

,;�
.� .:,
Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAI OUALITY
PAT MCCRORY
c.» ��-, „o,
DONAL.� R. VAN DL,R VAART
Se� ^retnr �
Mr. Chad Coggins
NCDOT Division 4 Environmental Ofiicer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 3165
Wilson, North Carolina 27895
Dear Mr. Coggins:
September 2, 2016
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
Division 4 Project, TIP R-5719, Improvements to SR 1135 (Country Club Road), Wayne
County, WBS Number 50473.1.FD1
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (NCDEQ DMS)
will provide the compensatory stream and wetland mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information
supplied by you on August 29, 2016, the impacts are located in CU 03020201 of the Neuse River basin in the
Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region, and are as follows:
Neuse
03020201
Cp Cold
Impacts �
Stream
Cool Warm
0 0
Wetlands
Riparian Non- Coastal
Riparian Marsh
1 :
Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
Zone 1 I Zone 2
*Some of the stream and wetland impacts may be proposed to be mitigated at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. See permit
This impact and associated mitigation need were under projected by the NCDOT in the 2016 impact data.
NCDEQ DMS will commit to implement sufficient compensatory stream and wetland mitigation credits to offset the
impacts associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies using the delivery timeline listed in
Section F.3.c.iii of the In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are
revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be
required from EEP.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420.
Sincerely,
James B, t nfill
Credit Management Supervisor
cc: Mr. Tom Steffens, USACE Washington Regulatory Field Office
Ms. Amy Chapman, NCDWR
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT — PDEA
File: R-5719_SR 1135 Improvements — Division 4
State of North Carolina Environmental Quality Mitiga[ion Services
1652 Mail Service Center � 217 W. Jones Sheet, Suite 3000 I Raleigh, NC 27609-1652
919 707 8976 T

�
�
�
�
•,
�
V
�
�
O
V
See Sheet 9-A f��or Index of Sheets
�5���� �� ����$1°��� ���$�1.��1��
s T�
�., �-� ����
STwTe PR0J6cT RCPERENCE NO.
n r_ � � A
7
SHE�ET SOTAI.
HEP.TS
�
PE
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 7 OF 9
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III
THIS IS A CONTROLLED ACCESS PROJECT WITH ACCESS BEING LIMITED TO INTERCHANGES.
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA
ADT 2015 = 14400
0 50 100 ADT 2040 = 27700
PLANS K = 9 %
D = 55 %
0 50 l00 T= 11 %*
V = 70 MPH
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
� , 0 l0 ?0 *n5T=8% DUAL=3°/a
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT R-5719 = 1.076 MI
LENGTH STR UCTURE TIP PROJECT R-5719 = 0.022 MI
TOTAL LEIVGTH TIP PROJECT R-5719 = I.098 MI
Prepared /n ll�e O�flce of:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
]000 Barch Ridge Or., Raleigh NC, 27610
ZOl2 STANDARD SPEC7FICAT70NS
RIGHT OF WAY DATE: T.M. LITfLE, PE
AUGUST ZB.�_?0�.6_ f'ROJECTENGINEER
LETTING DATE: D.R. ETHRIDGE
J U N E 2 0, �L O� 7 PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
HI'DRAULICS ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.E.
P.E.
1������.��� ��.���
DO rOT USE POR RBW ACOUISITION
ff�lE81E][,Il�i IINP\]E3�' 1(�]L.�1`.Y�
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 - STA. 42+43 to 43+92 L ROADWAY WIDENING 0.02 0.01 146 119
2 -L- STA. 54+17 to 60+88 ROADWAY WIDENING 0.23 < 0.01 0.12 0.15 0.02 23
3 - STA. 60+97 to 62+58 L ROADWAY WIDENING < 0.01
TOTALS*: 0.23 < 0.01 0.12 0.15 0.02 0.03 146 142 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
2013 10 24

k 11�;11��'<14' North Carolina Department of Transportation ��
SL[�rtl]�YdtPf Highway Stormwater Program
���`
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ��--•
(Version 2.04; Released November 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 50473.1.FD1 TIP No.: R-5719 County(ies): Wayne Page 1 of 3
General Project Information
WBS Element: 50473.1.FD1 TIP Number: R-5719 Project Type: Other Date: 3/2/2016
NCDOT Contact: Chad Coggins - Division 4 Environmental Officer Contractor I Designer: Wetherill Engineerin Inc.
Address: 509 Ward Blvd. Address: 1223 Jones Franklin Road
PO Box 3165 Raleigh, NC 27606
Wilson, NC 27895
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Email: cco ins ncdot. ov Email: 'davis wetherillen .com
Cit ITown: Bro den, NC Count ies): Wa ne
River Basin s: Neuse CAMA County? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Pro'ect Description
Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 1.1 Miles along US-117 Surroundin Land Use: Rural
Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site
Pro'ect Buiit-Upon Area ac. 15.4 ac. 10.0 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: Proposed grade separation and diamond interchange at US-117 and SR 1135 (Country Existing at-grade intersection at US-117 and SR 1135. Existing US-117 is a divided 4-
Club Road). 4' inside and 10' outside paved shoulders will be added to US-117. Median lane roadway (12' lanes with 2' paved shoulders) with 52' wide median.
will be widened from 52' to 60'.
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Design/Future: Not Available Year: Existin : Not Available Year:
General Project Narrative: Grade change to take US-117 over SR-1135. The proposed -L- line and interchange ramps are mostly in a fill section. Storm water runoff from ramps and mainline will be
(Description of Minimization of Water intercepted and conveyed to cross pipes by lateral ditches at toe of fills. Runoff into grassed median will be conveyed by median ditch and intercepted by 2GI inlets. Existing
Quality Impacts) drainage patterns are being maintained without diversion. 1800' of ditch classifies as grassed swale providing storm water treatment. At the existing triple barrel Reinforced
Concrete Box Culvert (RCBC) conveyance of Brooks Swamp, the existing headwalls of the RCBC will be raised in order to avoid extending the RCBC. This will result in fewer
impacts to Brooks Swamp and surrounding wetlands.
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1): Brooks Swamp NCDWR Stream Index No.: 27-54-5-2
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Water Supply IV (WS-IV)
Supplemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments: None
Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: Neuse
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? No Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)

E i1�S;tl\!'�lti' North Carolina Department of Transportation
5Cc)l"41�i��L'�lE(-'f .
, Highway Stormwater Program �'`
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN �'�::'=a'°'
(Version 2.04; Released November 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 50473.1.FD1 TIP No.: R-5719 County(ies): Wayne Page 2 of 3
Additional Waterbod Information
Surface Water Body (2): Lee Swamp NCDWR Stream Index No.: 27-54-5-2-1- 1
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Prima Classification: Class C
Supplemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters NSW
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments: None
Aquatic T8E Species? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: Neuse
Project Includes Brid e Spannin Water Bod ? No Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? N/A Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? N/A (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)
Surtace Water Bod 3): Lee Swamp NCDWR Stream Index No.: 27-54-5-2-1- 2
NCDWR Surtace Water Classification for Water Body Primar Classification: Water Suppl IV WS-IV
Supplemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments: None
Aquatic TB,E Species? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: Neuse
Pro'ect Inciudes Brid e Spanning Water Bod ? No Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? No
Deck Drains Dischar e Over Water Bod ? N/A (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)
Surface Water Body (4): NCDWR Stream Index No.:
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification:
Supplemental Classification:
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments:
Aquatic T&E Species? Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect:
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)
Surface Water Bod 5): NCDWR Stream Index No.:
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primar Classification:
Supplemental Classification:
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments:
Aquatic T&E Species? Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect:
Pro'ect Includes Brid e Spannin Water Bod ? Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?
Deck Drains Dischar e Over Water Bod ? (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)

/ '.: �
1 it�;h.���xr' North Carolina Department of Transportation
S lClYl t]�bdtf"[' Highway Stormwater Program
�;i
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN � •-= ' `
(Version 2.04; Released November 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 50473.1.FD1 TIP No.: R-5719 County ies : Wayne Page 3 of 3
Swales
Station & Coordinates Surface Base Front Back Drainage Recommended Actual Longitudinal Rock BMP
Sheet (Road and Non Road Water Width Slope Slope Area Treatm't Length Length Slope Q2 V2 Q10 V10 Checks Associated w/
No. Pro'ects Bod it H:1 H:1 ac ft ft % cfs f s cfs f s Used Buffer Rules?
5& 6 2�+50 RPC RT. grooks Sw 0.0 3.0 3.0 6.6 660 600 0.33°/ 18.0 1.7 24.0 1.8 No No
5& 6 20+50 RPB LT. Brooks Sw 0.0 3.0 3.0 4.9 490 600 0.30°/ 10.0 1.4 13.0 1.6 No No
6 37+50 -L- LT. grooks Sw 0.0 3.0 3.0 4.9 490 600 0.30°/ 10.0 1.4 13.0 1.6 No No
Additional Comments

�
�
�
•,
�
V
�
�
O
V
�
See Sheet 9-A f��or Index of Sheets
�5���� �� ����$1°��� ���$�1.��1��
sTAT�
Y //�
sTwTa aamsc-r neaeaexce No.
n r_ � � A
7
SHE�ET I SOTAI.
xePrs
i
� i
PE
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III
THIS IS A CONTROLLED ACCESS PROJECT WITH ACCESS BEING LIMITED TO INTERCHANGES.
GRAPHIC SCALES
0 50 l00
PLANS
0 50 l00
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
0 10 20
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2015 = 14400
ADT 2040 = 27700
K = 9 %
D = 55 %
T = 11 % *
V = 70 MPH
*TTST=8% DUAL=3°/a
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT R-5719 = 1.076 MI
LENGTH STR UCTURE TIP PROJECT R-5719 = 0.022 MI
TOTAL LEIVGTH TIP PROJECT R-5719 = I.098 MI
Prepared /n ll�e O�flce of:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
]000 Barch Ridge Or., Raleigh NC, 27610
ZOl2 STANDARD SPEC7FICAT70NS
RIGHT OF WAY DATE: T.M. LITfLE, PE
AUGUST ZB.�_?0�.6_ f'ROJECTENGINEER
LETTING DATE: D.R. ETHRIDGE
J U N E 2 0, �L O� 7 PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
HI'DRAULICS ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.E.
P.E.
oUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 4
ING'�ld][1�1L1E°Il°1E 1P1L.�N�
DO NOT USE POR RB W ACOUISITION
ff�lE81E]LIl�i ][NP\]E3�' 1(�]L.�1`.Y�
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACT BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT
STRUCTURE SIZE / STATION ROAD PARALLEL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2
SITE NO. TYPE (FROM/TO) CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ft2) (ft2) (ftZ) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2)
1 Box Culvert -L- STA. 56+04 to 58+55 X 5346.7 3230.7 8577.4
TOTAL: 5346.7 3230.7 8577.4 0.0 0.0 0.0

Rev.Jan 2009