20160671 Ver 1_More Info Received_20160831

-i—
UNC The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Department of Environment, Health & Safety
ENVIRONMENT, 1120 Estes Drive Ext., CB# 1650
HEALTH & SAFETY Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-1650
August 30, 2016
1I
Ms. Karen Higgins
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality d,
Ak
Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch -
1617 Mail Service Center `I
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Revision to July 5, 2016 Buffer Authorization Request
Finley Fields Expansion Project
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Orange County
Dear Ms. Higgins:
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC -CH) submits one original and two
copies of the revised Buffer Authorization form, three copies each of the revised Figure
4, Sheet SFG-1, the Jurisdictional Determination and the State Environmental Review
Clearinghouse's North Carolina Environmental Policy Act compliance letter. This
revision submittal was requested by Cherri Smith of the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources (DWR) on July 21, 2016 and by
Jason Robinson of DWR on August 4, 2016.
Please remove the Buffer Authorization Form and Figure 4 from the July 5, 2016
submittal package, and replace them with the attached revised submittal.
If you have questions regarding this submittal or need additional information, please
contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
"p",-". Q
- yj-,
Sharon A. Myers, L. G.
Environmental Compliance Officer
cc: Ms. Mary Beth Koza
Mr. Keith Snead

DWR
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 0213.0233 (8)(b), .0243 (8)(b), .0250 (11)(b), .0259 (8)(b), .0267 (11)(c), .0607 (e)(2) - Buffer Authorization
FORM: BA 10-2013
Riparian Buffer Authorization Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Project Information
1 a.
Name of project:
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Finley Fields Expansion project
1 b.
County:
Orange
1c.
Nearest municipality:
Chapel Hill
1 d.
Subdivision name:
1e.
Is the project located in any of North Carolina's
twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1f below.
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is the project located within a NC Division of Coastal
Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Owner Information
2a.
Name on Recorded Deed:
University of North Carolina
2b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB: 223, PG: 719
2c. Map Book and Page No.
(include a copy of the recorded
map that indicates when the lot
was created).-
reated):2d.
2d.
Responsible Party
(for Corporations):
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
2e.
Street address:
300 South Building, CB#1000
2f.
City, state, zip:
Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-1000
2g.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
2h.
Fax no.:
2i.
Email address:
I [e-mail]
3.
Applicant Information (if different
from owner)
3a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: UNC -CH Environmental Permitting Staff
3b.
Name:
Sharon Myers
3c.
Business name
(if applicable):
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Dept. of Environment, Health and
Safety
3d.
Street address:
1120 Estes Drive Extension, CB# 1650
3e.
City, state, zip:
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-1650
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
4.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
4a.
Name:
George Buchholz
4b.
Business name
(if applicable):
McAdams Company, Inc. 1 2016
/UU/
4c.
Street address:
2905 Meridian Parkway
4d.
City, state, zip:
Durham, NC, 27713 PFRNj� FS
4e.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
4f.
Fax no.:
[phone]
4g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 1 of 8

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
9798333326
1b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.898390
Longitude: -79.024340
1c.
Property size:
+ 18.5 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Morgan Creek, Meeting of the Waters, Chapel Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV, NSW
2c.
River basin:
Cape Fear: 030300020607; B Everett Jordan Lake —
New Hope River
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The proposed Finley Fields Expansion project is located along Old Mason Farm Road, just west of The University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's (UNC -CH's) Finley Golf Club and just north of the Orange Water and Sewer
Authority's (OWASA's) Mason Farm Wastewater Treatment Plant, in Chapel Hill, North Carolina (see Figure 1).
The project area is approximately 18.5 acres in size and comprised of forested areas, maintained grass areas and
three perennial streams (Morgan Creek, Meeting of the Waters and Chapel Creek). The project area has a
topographic gradient which generally slopes towards Morgan Creek. According to the Orange County, North
Carolina GIS database accessed on March 1, 2016, the project area is currently zoned as office and institutional.
Adjacent properties, including OWASA's Mason Farm Wastewater Treatment Plant, are also zoned for office and
institutional.
3b.
Attach an 8'/ x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of
the site. See attached Figure 1
3c.
Attach an 8 % x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey Map
depicting the project site. See attached Figure 2
3d.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
2,641 linear feet (LF) of streams are located on the property. See attached Figure 3.
3e.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide additional athletic training facilities by constructing two new
grass practice fields on the south side of Old Mason Farm Road. As a result, Jordan Lake Buffer impacts are
proposed.
3f.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
UNC -CH is planning to add two new grass fields that will serve as practice fields on the south side of Old Mason
Farm Road. Supporting infrastructure such as parking, repaving of an existing access road, field lighting, four
coach's stands and site irrigation will also be included. One of the coach's stands is anticipated to be constructed
within Zone 2 of the Jordan Lake Buffer. The coach's stand will utilize treated wood products for the construction
of floor landings and post supports. See Figure 4 for the project's schematic design and Figure 5 for the
schematic design of the Coach's Stand. (Note: The final design may vary slightly from the attached schematic
design). The athletic fields will utilize an underdrain system in which the outlets will be routed to existing ditches
with dissipators designed for full flow in order to meet buffer diffuse flow requirements (see Sheet SFG-1). Two
temporary sediment traps are proposed to be constructed outside the Jordan Lake Buffers; however, the
proposed emergency spillways associated with the temporary sediment basins will impact the Jordan Lake
Buffers. The two temporary sediment traps will be removed and the areas will be re -vegetated after construction.
UNC -CH proposes to re -vegetate the two emergency spillways located within the Jordan Lake Buffers by
integrating the native plant species observed at the project site with the procedures outlined in Guidelines for
Riparian Buffer Restoration (NCEEP 2004). The planting plan will consist of individual tree species with an
approximate 8 -foot by 8 -foot spacing. There is an existing access road that crosses Morgan Creek. Typical
construction equipment will be used for the project, such as a long-arm track -hoe, front end loader and bush hog
for the initial clearing.
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 2 of 8

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/
Comments:
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
4b. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/ Consultant Company: McAdams
Name (if known): George Buchholz
Company, Inc.
Other:
4c. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) field concurrence was conducted on May 17, 2016 by David Bailey.
UNC -CH received the Jurisdictional Determination from the USACE on August 5, 2016, and a copy of the
Jurisdictional Determination is attached.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this
❑ Yes ®No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain and detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
UNC -CH is also planning to upgrade the existing soccer field center located on the north side of Old Mason Farm
Road.
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 3 of 8

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Buffer Impacts
1 a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba
❑ Randleman ® Jordan ❑ Goose Creek
1 b. Individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this
form.
Buffer impact
Reason for
Type of impact
Stream name
Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number —
impact
(exempt, allowable,
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P)
allowable w/ mitigation)
required?
(sq ft)
(sq ft)
or Temporary T
131 ❑ P ® T
Grading
Exempt
Morgan Creek
❑ Yes ® No
12,056
B2 ❑ P ® T
Grading/Emergency
Allowable
Morgan Creek
❑ Yes ® No
1,196
Spillway
B3 ❑ P ® T
Grading/Emergency
Exempt
Morgan Creek
❑ Yes ® No
5,003
Spillway
B4 ❑ P ® T
Grading/Emergency
Exempt
Morgan Creek
❑ Yes ® No
2,098
Spillway
B5 ❑ P ® T
Grading/Emergency
Allowable
Morgan Creek
❑ Yes ® No
387
Spillway
B6 ❑ P ® T
Coach Stand
Allowable
Morgan Creek
❑ Yes ® No
150
B7 ❑ P ® T
Grading/Emergency
Allowable
Morgan Creek
❑ Yes ® No
980
Spillway
B8 ❑ P ® T
Grading/Emergency
Allowable
Morgan Creek
❑ Yes ® No
943
Spillway
B9 ®P ❑ T
Outlet Structure
Allowable
Morgan Creek
❑ Yes ® No
23
Total
buffer impacts
1,583
21,253
1 c. Comments: The allowable impacts in Zone 1 will be temporary, and these two areas of Zone 1 impact will be re -
vegetated with native vegetation following the completion of construction. With the exception of B9, the Zone 2
impacts will be reve etated with grass following construction.
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 4 of 8

C. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
- There is an existing access road that crosses Morgan Creek to access the site. Potential repaving
improvements are anticipated for the existing access road; however, widening of the existing access is not
anticipated at this time. Therefore, impacts to waters resources are not anticipated.
- 50 foot Jordan Lake Riparian Buffers are associated with Morgan Creek, Meeting of the Waters and Chapel
Creek. There are minimal, exempt impacts proposed as a result of grading within the outer 20 feet of the
riparian buffer.
- The athletic fields will utilize an underdrain system in which the outlets will be routed to existing ditches with
dissipators designed for full flow in order to meet buffer diffuse flow requirements.
- Two temporary sediment traps are proposed to be located outside the Jordan Lake Buffers; however, the
proposed emergency spillways associated with these temporary sediment basins will impact the Jordan Lake
Buffers. The two temporary sediment traps will be removed and the areas will be re -vegetated with native
vegetation following construction. The planting plan will consist of individual tree species with an approximate
8 -foot by 8 -foot spacing.
- The proposed project is located within a regulated floodway associated with Morgan Creek. An analysis of
the impact from the project on floodplain elevations will be conducted and it is anticipated, based on the
design of the project, no change in the floodplain elevation will occur as a result of the project. As a result, no
impacts to floodplains are anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The construction of the proposed project will have a minor impact on the Jordan Lake Riparian Buffers. Proper
erosion and sedimentation control measures will be utilized during all phases of construction, and a sedimentation
and erosion control permit will be obtained from NCDEQ. All work will take place during dry conditions and will be
facilitated from high, non -jurisdictional, stable ground. Silt fencing, inlet protection, sediment traps, diversion
ditches and tree protection will be installed. Clearing will be done only as necessary to install devices. All erosion
and sedimentation control measures will be checked for stability and operation following every runoff producing
rainfall, but in no case less than once every week. Any needed repairs to erosion and sedimentation control
measures will be made immediately. A weekly erosion control inspection report will be required and will be kept
on site by the site superintendent. Temporary and permanent seeding plans will be developed and implemented
to restore impacted areas. The proposed project will meet all applicable requirements for Best Management
Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control Structures as outlined in State and local stormwater regulations
and the UNC -CH Construction Guidelines.
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 5 of 8

C. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued
2. Buffer Mitigation
2a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer
mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation and
calculate the amount of mitigation required in the table below.
Zone
Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
feet (square feet
Zone 1
-(square
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
Total buffer mitigation required:
2c. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a
mitigation bank or NC EEP proposed?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2d. If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC EEP.
2e. If no, then discuss what type of mitigation is proposed.
2f. Comments:
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 6 of 8

E. Diffuse Flow Plan
All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of
® Diffuse flow
stormwater treatment. Include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be
❑ Other BMP
maintained. If a Level Spreader is proposed, attach a Level Spreader Supplement Form.
If due to site constraints, a BMP other than a level spreader is proposed, please provide a
plan for stormwater treatment as outlined in Chapter 8 of the NC Stormwater BMP
Manual and attach a BMP Supplement Form.
Two proposed temporary sediment traps will be located outside the Jordan Lake Buffers;
however, the proposed emergency spillways associated with the temporary sediment basins
will impact the Jordan Lake Buffers (see the attached Sheets EC -1 and EC -2). The two
temporary sediment traps will be removed and the areas will be re -vegetated after
construction. UNC -CH proposes to re -vegetate the two emergency spillways by integrating
the native plant species observed at the project site with the procedures outlined in Guidelines
for Riparian Buffer Restoration (NCEEP 2004). The planting plan will consist of individual tree
species with an approximate 8 -foot to 8 -foot spacing. The athletic fields will utilize an
underdrain system in which the outlets will be routed to existing ditches with dissipators
designed for full flow in order to meet the buffer diffuse flow requirements (see attached Sheet
SFG-1).
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 7 of 8

F.
Supplementary Information
by First Class Mail via the US Postal Service:
1.
Environmental Documentation
OR NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
® Yes ❑ No
Raleigh, NC 27604
public (federal/state) land?
For all other projects sent by delivery service
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
® Yes ❑ No
OR Karen Higgins
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North
NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1650
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document been finalized by the State
® Yes ❑ No
Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments: A copy of the final approval letter is attached.
2.
Violations
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .0500), Isolated Wetland
❑ Yes ® No
Rules (15A NCAC 02H .1300), DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian
Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
e— /21111
_ Matthew M. Fajack ,z
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name s Signature ate
(Ag t' signs v Nd n horizatinn letter from the applicant is provided.)
Send 3 complete sets of this form and accompanying documents to the following:
For government transportation projects sent
For government transportation projects sent
by First Class Mail via the US Postal Service:
by delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.):
NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit
OR NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1650
Raleigh, NC 27604
For all other projects sent by First Class Mail
For all other projects sent by delivery service
via the US Postal Service
(UPS, FedEx, etc.).-
tc.):Karen
KarenHiggins
OR Karen Higgins
NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1650
Raleigh, NC 27604
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 8 of 8

" n�1
LIMIT OF
_ OISTURB�
\tet
(TYP.)�` '-- BUFFER IMPACT /1
ZONE 2 EXEMPT BUFFER MORGAN CREEK�`�
IMPACT 12056 (SF) TOP OF BANK ��'' 1
(TYP.) -lam` �ti I i gz
CHNN LINK
`lit- - M0
30' ZONE t I
♦ . - - -- , o
BUFFER % 70
� ♦ �♦\` ♦\ t\Jr-_-_ `moi -- -- -- -�� � � I1 D
' t
D \� ♦ \ \ ``'t t. r ,`� J,aS� - 1 - ---- i J ''� ;�.�' J BUFF IMPACT #7 NE A
2 A OWABLE BUFFS t"
ANV PAD (T 'Y - -5+-' `20'_ ZONE •4 _ ',4 ' . U
ti t t COACH SAND IMP CT 980 (SF) x
g 5 i BUF�ER IMPACT /6 Z �r BUFFER ��/ " LIMIT OF
t ' _
-2-ALLOW E -
+� BUFFE�_ — � - - N � � DISTURBANCE
IMPACT 150 (SF) j - ♦ �� (TYP.)
' i \♦ I i h / y' ' BUFFER IMPACT X12
ZONE 1 ALLOWABLE B FER
- l +
' S � i ` t� � \ \� _ I 1• } tt IMPACT 1196 (SF)
/SOCCER FIELD ,a
/ 't I `♦ _ _ - ' - TEMPORARY \'
SEDIMENT TRAP ' 1'`� `
/ ti- - ' ♦ �` � TOP OF BANK ►�
�``♦ zs� t_� i ' syr -_-_` ut �a (TYP.)20
W
� 5
I ♦ _;`\,\\ \` 1 CO CI-1\STAND �' _' ,rr ♦\ Qui
' I gip' -`� ♦♦ ♦ i \, l AND PAD, (TYP.)
�a\\♦
I\\\ \� — — ♦♦ BUFFER IMPACT p3 ♦ I; \ z
' \ �♦ I t, '; \\��\ ,�, ` , \- ZONE 2 EXEMPT BUFFER ♦ I �I �
`�� `t- 5--- \``a♦ _�``\�� IMPACT 5003•(SF) r'\ + !,' ` r - d'
SOCCER FIELD
014
07
per_ r ` 20' ZONE 2
BUFFER
BUFFER IMbACT i4
ZONE 2 EXEMPT BUFFER
IMPACT 2Q98 (SF)
UPDATED: AUGUST 15, 2016 ; `\
j 1 1 J m
�,� ! \1 _ -♦ _ - t`'� J'� 30' ZON t
Tilrl .71
LEGEND ��( ��i - * * ! * �r 1J rr BUFFER W
J� i r
o
PROPOSED IMPACTS (SF) -
/ � w co
- i� ` tJ TOP OF ANK r1/ 00 I o
m ZONE 1 1583 ZONE 1 BUFFER ALLOWABLE IMPACT �\�I' \ (TYP. t cfl O W cI
o Ot tt 2UALLOWA FFER P CT E BUFFER �E>l�fl o _� If r'
? ZONE 2 19157 ZONE 2 BUFFER EXEMPT IMPACT TEMPORARY �- IMPACT {SF) r W w O 00
GRAPHIC SCALE SEDIMENT TRAPI BUFFER IMPACT 5 ZON i g w o
ZONE 1 !
I 't 1 ALL ABLE BUFFER I p
? 2096 ZONE 2 BUFFER ALLOWABLE IMPACT 60 0 30 &0 120 LIMIT Of I IMPA T 387 (SF) I a :. y.
DISTURBANCE
TOTAL 22836 (TYP.) BUFFER IMPACT 08 ZONE
1 inch = 60 ft. CHAIN LINK 2 ALLOWABLE BUFFER y
FENCE IMPACT 943 (SF) 0MCADAM7

SCO #15-12497-01
LEGEND , 1 � 19 _- � U
�§ ab
p WATER METER 250 0' CONTOUR J v
M BACKFLOW PREVDM 252 2CONTOUR
--- ��'�- EXISTING 10' CONTOUR �j F
w O'
WATER SERYCE LINE
-- -- ---- EMSTING 2' CONTOUR Q N2
.
- -
12• BASIN
GAS LINE _ _
PROPERTY LINE
3
`,
RIM EL 252.80
-NRH-OLA- OVERHEAD UTILITY
- - - -
EASEMENT LINE
�: m
�C
/ -
50.25
-IE-LIE- UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
C
.
SOW SLIT DRAINS 2' _OC
--r--r--t--r
GRAVEL
�
ACROSS THE ENTIRE FELD
- EASEMENT
0(�PLG
\
I
TYPICAL
PATTERN)
PROPOSEDrrt D COLLECTOR
BUFFER
a
A
12" BASIN
-x -x -x -z-
FENCE
d '
RIM EL 251.98
\
9.10
-XXX-
BALI. NETTING
00
V
5/SFD7
-382 LF 1 E PERF O 0.3%
-� T
/SFDI OPE PERF. %0..33%
4
- � 50 LF 10" H \ \ I
4 S 1 _
15 LF 8" HDPE PERF O .075
4/STOP
4l `12p 41ASIN 253-
\ - /M EL
248.95.30
/s/POSRW
1
FINE GRADING REO. FOR
_ PLAYA81 DRAINAGE AND
_ i
392 LF 10• H,J,% qx.% _
4/SM1
/�► � \\l I ���1/plll// llll / l/ lllll/ llll/ �l/ "�"fly/ I � \ 1
\ 1 A, FES -100
�
2,9 F. B 1w. OUT
ki
115 LF 8" HDPE PERF O 0.75 %
lT=1 Illl ll l �lrl lT7�r- 11 11- 111 It l `-
4/sFo,
PROPOSED �- V l l l l l >-I•l
WATER UNE
(SEE CML PLANS) 12" BASIN
RIM EL 253.80
`
INV. 250.60 \ \az T/ / / /� / / / / / l '' ��� �•.
Sur ��_ v \ i SANd
C,,,, DGESAND STYLE _ vDRAIN SYSTEMvv ///// dAM INFSTnE ///
l
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL NG 911 BEFORE DG. SEE NC811.ORG FOR DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS.INSTRUCTIONS.
CTN�I2
LATERAL 50 MM DRAINS
z. CONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A UNIVERSITY GG/lDCA110N PERMIT PRIOR ro C016IRI1CTKI1. 10' -OC
- � \ / _ � / \
3. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SNAIL BE N PLACE NRIL PROJECT COMPLETION MO FINAL \ \ _\ ` / / / / / • / / / A-4
STABILIZATION-
zz
4. ALL CONTRACTORS TO HAVE APPROPRIATE LICENSES FOR WORK AT HARD. 382 LF 10" HDPE PERF O 0.30% \ \ - \ F
s. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY cwIEM51ON5 PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. \
z
6. UNC MO ITS CONSULTING ENGINEER TO 0494= ALL EROSION CONTROL OEVICM 12• BASIN �. \ \ ' � \ / / ' � •
T. ANY DISTURBANCE CE OUTOF THE FIELD FENCE AREA W
9L BE SEEDED. S,wR�
LED MD FERTD. RIM EL 252.32 � A \ ,T.� �
SUBMIT BERMUDA SEED MD( AND FERTILIZE SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY THE 000" AND LANDSCAPE INV. 249.45'I33 \ _.\ \ I / 12" BASIN
( O
ARCHITECT. 5/SFD1 \ �. `\ \. _ RIM EL 251.
IRB
e. ALL OISitED AREAS INSIDE THAT THE FENCE LINE SEMIl BE SODDED WITH BERMUDA 419 Sao. INV. 247.47
51 LF 10" HOPE PERF O 0.3% 5/SFDI
` \ - \�
e. ALL CONTOURS AN
SWT ELEVATIONS TO REFLECT FINISHED GRADE � V A � � TM �
10. ALL FAL TO BE COMPACTED TOAm 9o1L cGMPALTION UNLESS OTHERWISE OIDIRECTED.4/SFD1 12• BASSI \\ \ 12 LF 10• DPE O
F . RIM EL 252 .15 '�.. \
4/SFD1
11. roN TO VERIFY POSITIVEDRAINAGE ON ALL T sCPESYNTHETIC tuTF FIELD AND INV. 249.30
suRRDL*Knu11AL GRASS AREAS. PONDING MEAS WILL NOeACCEPTED
5/SFD7
1T. TURF FIELD TO DRAIN AT A 1.0% AS SHOWN. 367 LF ,D• _ 406
13. SURVEY BENCHMARK TO BE VERIFIED BEFORE GRADING BEGINS. HDPE PERF. 0 0.5% \ \ / \ IJV. OUT 47.2 v
j ?p
14 CONTRACTOR To SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS ON ALL PRE STRUCTURES, CONNECTIONSMND QEAM OUTS FOR 4/SFDI \ \ \ r
APPROVAL
15. OUTFALLS MEAS TO CONTAIN RP RAP. SUBMIT SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVAL. LATERAL 50 MM DRAINS \ \ I \ I ? r \ TV% •" •A j�
16. CONTRACTOR Ma SUB CONTRACTORS SHALL ADHERE TO ALL UNIVERSITY RUES AND REGULATIONS OR BE
SUIIJECFED TO UNIVERSITY PENALTIES. 3/STOP
Tr. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES TO
N
REMAIN.
I L' Mn hrorn
\�� 5
Np 1589
vi
z
0
rn
a
zz
a�
aW ��
Q A
"asa°Lc�v
FLO�rz
azFzz
zz2.0
o�ax
E_' Min
M j Q
(il a V U
ZU
z }
0
U
O d0
O
0 a
W0z
w 2
Oa
°- EDF -16000
GRAPHIC SCALE DD
O.eormzT.43H35AT LLAT T. aNAwO ca+sTRucTpx \ �r \ ` \ o m 1 =40
ON
-T- IO TAPVR EAStxG uvuTE9 LflCATEv 1 ) tU
c0«rnACrOR3 CONTACT Axr LOaLU1-TN.TagpnDf- ...08 -12G -2-011I
OVAL LOGTOR9ERviCE3MOEnENOEM OF'NORM CAROON�ONE C/NL' \�\\/� \� \ Ivch - 40 TL. .
�R�RT.N.a�PEOANbE3TOTNEENGxEERWERA,ELr � \ � .SE
\\ I \
AMS
PRELIMIN\ 'IDYIMAFlB - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION TJ MCAD

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2016-01540 County: Orange U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -CHAPEL MILL,
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: University of North Carolina Received by EH5
Ann: Sharon Myers
Address: peoartment of Environment. Health and Safety
1120 Estes Drive Ext, CB# 1650 AUG 0 5 2016
Chanel Hill, NC 27599
Size (acres) —39 Nearest Town Chanel Hill
Nearest Waterway Morgan Creek River Basin Haw
USGS HUC 3030002 Coordinates 35.899395° N. -79.024901° W
Location description: The project area is located north and south of Masop FarmRogad, approximately 0 25 mile west
of its intersection with Finley Golf Course Road in Chapel Hilt Orange County North Carolina
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
❑ Based on preliminary information, there may be waters of the U.S., including wetlands on the above described project
area/property. We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army
(DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33
CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district
for further instruction. Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
(] There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a
change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from the date of this notification.
® There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands on the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
❑ We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U.S., including wetlands on your project arealproperty delineated. Due
to the size of your property and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation
in a timely manner. For a more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any
delineation must be verified by the Corps.
® The waters of the U.S. within your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the
Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and
verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA
jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are
subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the

law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the
date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David E. Bailey at [phone] extension 30 /
David.E.Bailev2()usace.a rmv.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: The site exhibits waterbodies with indicators of ordinary high water. The waters
on site. include Meeting of the Waters Creek and Chapel Creek — all Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs) that flow via
Morean Creek (RPW also on site), to Jordan Lake a Traditionally Navigable Water. This determination is based on a
field verification by David E. Bailey (USACE) on 5/17/2016
D. Remarks: The waters of the US on the property were flogged by George Rurkhnh (McAdams) and are
approximated on the attached sheet titled "Figure 3. Existing Conditions."
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. if you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room IOM IS
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by0/1 3/2016.
"It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence."* DigitalysignW by aA►u:YDAVIDEt379293736
DN: c -US, o=US.Government owDoD, a,-pKt,
: '.fou-- USA. M-RAIMY.DAVID.E.1379283736
Corps Regulatory Official: DAW20160.0412:2347 0400
Date: 8/4/201
Expiration Date: 8/42021
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level ojsupport to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so. please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit
htto://coMs-mapu.usace.armv mil/cm aMx/ftp=136.4.0 to complete the survey online.
Copy furnished:
George Buckholz, The John R. McAdams Company, Inc., 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
Chem Smith, NCDENR-DWR, 1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628

A lieant: Universit of North Caroli a Fife Number: SAW-2016-01540 Date. 4/2016
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission—) A
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
;SGTION The following identifies your rights and options regarding an adininistrativ a appeal of the above decision:
Add>hoiia! information may be.:found at-or hits l/www:usace.army inil/Missions/06RVorl:slReeulatorvProuramand ei�mfs
ar the Co " ;r ` " Iations at 33 :CFR Part33I.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section I1 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of
your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the pen-nit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENTAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section Il of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E; PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an tial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where yow reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
Z qk,!NFORMA
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
attn: David E. Bailey, Project Manager CESAD-PDO
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
69 Darlington Avenue 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opporturd to participate in all site investiI ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
I
I Signature of appellant or agent. I
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, attn:, David E. Bailey, Regulatory Specialist, 69 Darlington
Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

State Environmental
Review Clearinghouse
ADMINISTRATION
July 25, 2016
Mr. Keith Snead
UNC -Chapel Hill
Facilities Planning
103 Airport Drive, CB # 1090
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-1090
Kathryn Johnston
Secy ewy
J. Brian Ratledge
Cenervl Counsel
Re: SCH File # 16-E-6020-0396; WFONSI; Proposed is for the Finley Field Expansion
project. Project will construct two new practice fields on the south side of Old Mason
Farm Road and upgrade the existing soccer field center located on the north side of
Old Mason Farm Road.
Dear Mr. Snead:
The above referenced environmental impact information has been reviewed through the State
Clearinghouse under the provisions of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Attached to this letter are comments made in the review of this document. Because of the
nature of the comments, it has been determined that no further State Clearinghouse review
action on your part is needed for compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
The attached comments should be taken into consideration in project development.
Attachments
cc: Region J
Sincerely,
Crys�Be: ea
State Environmental Review Clearinghouse
Nothing Compares'
State of North Carolina I Administration
116 Wcst Jones St. 11301 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1301
state.clearinghouseG doa.ncgov 1 919 807 2419 T

Environmental
Quality
MEMORANDUM
To: Crystal Best
State Clearinghouse Coordinator
Department of Administration
FROM: Lyn Hardison t�Y
Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
Permit Assistance & Project Review Coordinator
PAT MCCRORY
cove"Vor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Sorrow y
RE: 16-0396
Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact
Proposal is for the Finley Field Expansion project to include the construction of two new practice
fields on the south side of Old Mason Farm Road and upgrade the existing soccer field center
located on the north side of Old Mason Farm Road
Orange County
Date: July 19, 2016
The Department of Environmental Quality has reviewed the proposal for the referenced project. Based on the
information provided, several of our agencies have identified permits that may be required and offered some
guidance to minimize impacts to the natural resources within the project area. The comments are attached for
the applicant's review.
The Department's agencies will continue to be available to assist the applicant through the environmental review
processes.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond.
Attachment
"Nothing C-ocn,01T e!:..
State of North Carolina l'cnv9ron-nentai Qualify
43 Wasringtorn Square N11,41 I WM,rigton, Nolh Caru'::na 27889
252-916.6483

North Carolina Wildlife_ Resources Commission K
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lyn Hardison, Environmental Assistance Coordinator
NCDEQ Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Services
FROM: Gabriela Garrison
Eastern Piedmont Coordinator
Habitat Conservation
DATE: July 18, 2016
SUBJECT: Comments for Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact: The
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Finley Field Expansion, Orange County,
DT -,Q Project No. 16-0396.
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the subject
document. Comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667e), North Carolina Environmental Poiicy Act (G.S.
1 13A-1 through 113A-10, I NCAC 25) and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
']"he University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNCCH) proposes to construct two soccer fields on the
south side of Old Mason Farm Road. in addition to upgrading the existing soccer field located along the
north side of Old Mason 'Farm Road; this area is located west of the UNCCH Finley Golf Club and north
of the Mason Farm Wastewater Treatment Plant. Supporting infrastructure, such as parking, field
lighting and site irrigation, will be included. The study area is approximately 39 acres in size. '['here are
three perennial streams in the project area: Chapel Creek, Morgan Creek and Meeting of the Waters. No
jurisdictional wetlands were located onsite.
Aerial rr,aps and images indicate the following Natural Heritage Natural Areas are located downstream of
the site: Morgan Creek Bluffs; Morgan Creek Floodplain Forest; and Mason Farm/Laurel Hill Oak -
I lickory Forest. The following recommendations wilt minimize impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife
resources:
1. Maintain or establish a minimum 100-t'oot undisturbed, native forested buffer along each side of
perennial streams and 50 -foot undisturbed, native forested buffer along each side of intermittent
streams and wetlands. Forested riparian buffers protect habitat areas and travel corridors for wildlife
species. In addition, forested riparian buffers protect water quality by stabilizing stream banks and
filtering stormwater runoff.
2. Use bridges for all permanent roadway crossings of streams and associated wetlands to eliminate the
need to fill and culvert, where practicable. If culverts must be used, the culvert should be designed to
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation Division • 172: Mail Service Center • Raleigh. NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Page 2
July 18, 2016
Finley Field Expansion
DEQ Project No.: 16-0396
allow aquatic life passage. Fords may be appropriate and preferred for intermittent stream crossings
or where crossings will be used only once or twice a year. For fords, crossings in riffles are preferred
with the banks lowered upstream and downstream of the crossing. Stabilize the stream bottom with
geo-textile fabric and rock; concrete should not be used for bed stabilization.
3. Stormwater runoff to receiving surface waters can be minimized by reducing impervious surfaces and
increasing infiltration onsite using Low Impact Development (LID) techniques. LID techniques
appropriate for this project may include permeable pavement and bioretention areas that can collect
Stormwater from the parking areas. Additional alternatives include narrower roads, swales versus
curbs/gutters and permeable surfaces such as turf stone, brick and cobblestone.
4. Re -seed disturbed areas with seed mixtures that are beneficial to wildlife. Avoid fescue -based
mixtures as fescue is invasive and provides little benefit to wildlife. A list of wildlife -friendly plants
is available upon request. In addition, the use of non-invasive, native species is recommended. Using
native species instead of orrtarrentals should reduce the need for water, fertilizers and pesticides.
S. Insecticides and herbicides should not be used within 100 feet of perennial streams and 50 feet of
intennittent streams, or within floodplains and wetlands associated with these streams.
6. Sediment and erosion control measures should be installed prior to any land -disturbing activity. The
use of biodegradable and wildlife -friendly sediment and erosion control devices is strongly
recommended. Silt fencing, fiber rolls and/or other products should have loose -weave netting that is
made of natural fiber materials with movable joints between the vertical and horizontal twines. Silt
fencing and similar materials that have been reinforced with plastic or metal mesh should be avoided
as they impede the movement of terrestrial wildlife species. Excessive silt and sediment loads can
have detrimental effects on aquatic resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation
of eggs and clogging of gills.
'I'he NCWPC encourages the applicant to consider additional measures to protect aquatic and terrestrial
wildlife species in developing landscapes. The NCWRC's Guidance Memorandum to Address and
:'Mitigate Secondary and Cumulative Impacts to Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife Resources and Water
Quatio,(August 2002; http://www.nc%vildlifc.orp/Portals/0/Conservinl.Jdocunrenisr2002
l.iltidanceiMe111orandu+nforSecondEuwan(lCunuilativelmnacts.ndt) details measures to minimize secondary
and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources; in addition, the NCWRC's Green
Growth Toolbox (Imp:1/2)0.27.39.101/areensrowth:l provides information on nature -friendly planning,
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If 1 can be of further assistance,
please contact me at [phone] or gabriela.garrison i';nc�� ildlite.orst.

Tom.
i
t
y '
6Vu:a�• :5; ern ur�em�, r:
Date: July 14, 2016
To: Michael Scott, Director
Division of Waste Management
Through: Dave Lown, Head
Federal Remediation Branch
From: Doug Rumford, Federal Remediation Branch
PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R. VAN DER V„AR'l
MIC11AF1, SC011
Subject: NEPA Project #16-0396, Finley Fields Expansion, Chapel Hill, Orange County, North Carolina
The Superfund Section has reviewed the proximity of CERCLIS and other sites under their jurisdiction to
the construction of the Finley Fields Expansion located on Old Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, Orange County.
The proposed project will consist of two (2) new grass fields that will serve as practice fields on the south side
of Old Mason Farm Road and upgrade of existing soccer field center located on the north side of Old Mason
Farm Road. The project will also include paved driving/parking areas, and concrete walkways.
One (1) sites were identified within one mile of the project as shown on the attached map and in the table
below. The Superfund Section recommends that site files be reviewed to ensure that appropriate
precautions are incorporated into any construction activities that encounter potentially contaminated soil or
groundwater. Superfund Section files can be viewed at: httys://deg.nc.Rov/about/divisions/waste-
manaeement/waste-management-rules-data/e-documents,
Please contact me at 919.707.8334 if you have any questions.
Site Name Status -
NCD980515308 UNIVERSITY OF NC AT 1 Open site on the Inactive Hazardous Sites
CHAPEL HILL I Invantnry i
State of North Carolina I Lnvironmcmai Qaaia) I Wastc management
1646 !tail Seni: Center: 217 Wcat Jones Stm i Raleigh, NC 2 7 557-164 6
91910'.5200 Telephone

Superfund Section SEPA Review
- cu•t! -
V
iNC-PHILLIPS HALL
J:1y 14, 2016
GZ mac5v0 Hazargou. Sika
One Mile Buffer
e All Sites
1:18,058
0 0.225 0.49 0.9 mi
0 0-35 0.7 1.4 km
So.—.ERN. MERE. D.I.—I. M+nnfp, "—1 P —,.,
GEBCO, Ue05, rAO. NFD, NRCAN, GIOe YI, K•N, K00%- NL
Ottitto a Saner. Ep1 11pRn, AM.m. a%d enrol (HIry Kene),
'�r'. N!(^'/Inry�a, O O/In!F.rw<1J r,. <•,nFQ•�.!.+� <, ��A q.e mt
User rn�•-..-�y
VV10 AP001,1 fa MrMS
Town 91 ChePel MIt V.k o1 /IOIfn I:+min• nOl, F -C VFRF., DIIIW-RFNFNT P, MI—" LMOS. MF TFNASA. EPA, VanAI

Alasie Muru2n,;<rrtrrr t
t.'.INi)'1 Litt1[F� .Uhif
DATE: July 12, 2016
PAT ,N1C._C'R0RY
DONALD R. VAN DE.R VAART
MICHAEL SCOTT
TO: Michael Scott, Division Director through Sharon Brinkley
OgyMny
FROM: Deb Aja, Western District Supervisor - Solid Waste Section ��y-✓c�- "",� -
aeo
RF.: SEPA Review Project #i 16-0396, Orange County
UNC -Chapel Hili: Project to Expand Finley Field
The Solid Waste Section has reviewed the Environmental Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impacts for the UNC -Chapel Hill Finley Field Expansion project. "I lie project will
construct two new practice fields on the south side of Old Mason Farm Road and upgrade the
existing soccer field center located on the north side of Old Mason Farm Road. in Orange
County, North Carolina. The review has been completed and has seen no adverse impact on
the surrounding community and likewise knows of no situations in the community, which
would affect this project from a solid waste perspective.
During the project. every feasible effort should be made to minimize the generation of
waste. to recycle materials for which viable markets exist, and to use recycled products and
materials in the development of this project where suitable. Any waste generated by this
project that cannot be beneficially reused or recycled must be disposed of at a solid waste
management facility approved to manage the respective waste type. The Section strongly
recommends that any contractors are required to provide proof of proper disposal for all
waste generated as part of the project. A list of permitted solid waste facilities is available
online at: htip://deq.nc gov/abotit/divisions/waste-management/waste-inaiiarrement-rules-
data/solid-waste-management-annual-reports/sol id -waste -permitted -facility -list.
Please contact Mr. John Patrone. Environmental Senior Specialist, for with any questions
regarding solid waste. Mr. Patrone may be reached at (336)-776-9673 or by email at
iolin.patroite ainedein'.gov.
Cc: Jason Watkins, Field Operations Branch I -lead
John Patrone, Environmental Senior Specialist
Sarah Rice, Compliance Officer
Stme o: \a1h Cuohns Irnvitn.'enenal (ryaGty Waste M"rctooct
2W) US 70 H y ; Smnnnus, NC 29778.8211
828 296 4500 T
r x
�oc'v6

Was re Management
EN V I RONW..NT _.l QUA l I l y
To:
From
July 14, 2016
Michael Scott, Director
Division of Waste Management
Rill Hunneke, Eastern Region Compliance Supervisor,
Compliance Branch, Hazardous Waste Section
PAT MCC'ROR1
DONALD R. VAN DFR l AAR'f
MIC'HAF 1, SC'011'
Subject: Hazardous Waste Section Comments Finley Field expansion project (Orange County)
Project Number: 16-0396
The Hazardous Waste Section (HWS) has reviewed the subject Scoping Request for the proposed Finley
Field expansion project (Orange County).
Any hazardous waste generated from the demolition, construction, operation, maintenance, and/or
remediation (e.g. excavated soil) from the proposed project must be managed in accordance with the North
Carolina Hazardous Waste Rules. The demolition, construction, operation, maintenance, and remediation
activities conducted will most likely generate a solid waste, and a determination must be made whether it
is a hazardous waste. If a project site generates more than 220 pounds of hazardous waste in a calendar
month, the HWS must be notified, and the site must comply w`.th the small quantity generator requirements.
If a project site generates more than 2240 pounds of hazardous waste in a calendar month, the HWS must
be notified, and the facility must comply with the large quantity generator requirements.
The proposed project site does not currently have an existing EPA Identification numbers for the generation
of hazardous waste.
Should any questions arise, please contact me at 252-364-8977.
Kind regards,
-4
� "-, , k'
William Hunneke
Eastern Region Compliance Supervisor
State of Noeh Carolina! E ironlnental Quality I Wastc .V "emam
1646 Mai; Sm ice Center 121' West 3m,es Sttect I Raleigh, KC 27699.1646
919 707 8200 t'

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS
Reviewing Office: RRO
Project Number 1.6-0396 Due Date: 7/18/2016
County -ORANGE
After review of this project it has bten delermined that the ENR permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in order for this project to comply with
North Carolina Law. Questions regarding these permits should be: addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form. Ali applications, information
and guirchrtes relative to these plans and permits are avaitao!e fron the some Regional Office
-
Normal Process'fime
PERMITS
SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREVENTS
(statmo), time limit)
❑t
Permit to construct & operate wastewater treatment facilities,
sewer system extensions k sewer syuert s not discharging
Application 9,3 dais before begin construction or award of constna;tion
30 days
: into state surface waters
contract%, On-site inspection. Post-appliculon technical conference usual.
(90 days)
NPDFS - permit to discharge into surface water and#or
Application 100 days before bon activity. Onsite inspection Pre -
permit to operate and construct waaewater facilities
application conference usual. Additionally, obtain permit to construct
90.120 days
discharging into sale surface waters
wastewater treatment facility -granted after NI'DES. Reply time, 30 days after
(.N.!A)
receipt ofpfatis or issue of MIMES petmit whichever is later
❑
Water Use Permit
Pte -application technics; contetence usually necessary
30 days
(NIA)
7 days
❑
Wel) Construction Permit
Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the
installation tire well.
115 days)
Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property owner.
❑
Dredge end Fill Permit
On-site inspection:. Pre -application conference usual. Filling may require
,55 days
Fisernent to Fill from N.C. Dena"incrit of Ataministration and
(90 days)
Federal Dredge and Fill Kirit.
❑
Permit ro const mi & operate Ait Pollution Abatement
fieilhies andlot Gmrssion Sources as 15 A NCAC
Application run he submitted umd permit received prior to
consinicteon and operation or the source tf a permitis regaittd in an
40 days
per
arca without loco zoning, then these are additional ndpiihcineras and
12Q.0100 flims 2Q.0300)
timehries(2Q.0! 13)•
❑Permit
to construct & operate Transportation Facility as per
Application must be submitted at least 90 days prior to construction
90 days '
I SA NCAC (2D OW, 2Q.0601
or modification of the source
®
Any open burning associated with sub)= proposal must be
in complumce with 15 A NCAC 2D.1900
Demolition or renovations of structures containing asbestos
®material
must be in compliance with 15 A NCAC 20.1116
60 days
(a) (1) which requires notification and removal prior to
t*rA
(90 days)
demolition. Contact Asbestos Control Group 919-707-5950
i ❑
Complex Source Permit required under IS A NCAC
2D.08W
EThe
Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be proparly addresses: fir, any land disturbing activity. An erosion & sedimentation
❑
control plan will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (Land Quality Section) At least 3fi
204,s
days before bepnning activity. A fee o; S6S fon the first acre or fury part of an acre. An express review option s avaiInbie with additions!
(30 days)
fees.
❑Sedvilemathon
and erosion control must be addressed in accordance with AICDOT's approved program. Particular attention should be Elven
(30 days)
to design and installation of appropriate perinicter sediment trapping devices as well as stable storinwater conveyances and outlets.
Oi-site inspection usual. Surety bond filed with ENR Bond amount varies
❑
Miming f'etmd
with type mitre and number ofacm of affected land Any ar_ mined greater
30 days
than one rete must be permitted. The appropriate bond most be received
(60 days)
before the permit can lice issued. '
1
.e
On-site inspection by N.C. Division FODW. Resources if permit exceeds 4 j
1 day
❑
North Carolina Ruming permit
days
On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources requited "if more than i
❑Spec
i�
at Ground Cicarance Burning Perrin - 22
five acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections should be I nay
counties in arastal KC with organic soils
requeved at least ten days before actual bum is planned." MA)
❑
Oil Refining Facdilies
NIA ^-- — — 90-120 days
If permit mquired. application 60. days before begin construction. Applicant
must hire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans, rispect consimction
certify construction is according to ENR approved plruts May sho require
❑
Darn Sa:ety Permit
permit under mosgtAo control program, And a 404 Fermd from Corps of 30 days
Engineers. An inspection of site is necessary to vedfy Hazard Classification.. ,, (60 days)
A minimum fee of S200,00 must accompany the application. An additional
processi-ig fee based on a percenlage or the total project cost will be required 1
upon Complelion '

County ORANGE Project Number: 16-0396 Due Date: 7/18/2.0_ _1_6
_ _._.. ----;,--...r:--._....
Initials No r
-- ----
Comments
Normal Process Tmr_
(statutory time limit)
- -- — - —
—
PERMITS
;PFCIAI. APPLICATION PROCFDISRFS or RF'Q',MI UMENTS
DAQ
ddm 10
Fdc surety bond of 55,000 with r:NR running to Stalc of KC conditional that any well
10 days
❑
Permit to drill exploratory oil or gas well opened hl' drill operator shall, upon shandonmcm. he ptugged according to ENI( rules
WA
6/6/16
I and regutanors
stormwater permit conditions (NCG010000)
t
Geophysical Exploraliun feria i Application filed with GNR at least 10 days prior to issue of permit. Applicanon Ey letter
10 days
l l
_ J No standard apphcn!;on form _ ...---._._.
Lakes Construction Prrmi; Application fee based on structure size is charged. Must include descnp:ions &
*!A
❑State
15 20 days
(Class C Waters) are all WS –IV NSW waters.
drawings of structure 1L• ptonrof ownership of riparian property.
WA
E]40)
Water � a)ity Cenirication
Nap
days
'I 30days)
r]CAMA
Permit for MAJOR development
$'_'5000 fee mua ny accompaapplication
SS days
(150 days)
❑CAMA Permit for MINOR development
r
S50 00 fee mus! accompany applicatior.
2 days
(25 daysi
Several geodetic monuments are located ir or near the project area. If any monument nerds to be moved or destroyed, please no lift':
comply with/secure a 404 permit from the USAGE, obtain a 401 Water
0) N.0 Geodetic Sunray, Box 27667 Raleigh. NC 27611
®�
Abandonment of any wells, drer;.nme must be in accordance with Title ISA Subchapter 2C.0.00
❑
Notifieatio•t or the propar regional office is rrquesled if' otphou" undeigraund stomga tanks (USTS) are discovered during any excavation operation
E]Compliance
with I SA NCAC 211 1000 (Coastnl Storrnwater Rules) is requirrd
a5 days
(NiA:
❑
Catawha, Jordan Late, Randalman. Tar Pamlico or Neuse Riparian Huffer Rules (equip?.
Plans and specifications for the construction, expansion, to alteration of a public water system muga be approved by the Divisioe of Water
®Readurces?vblic
Water Supply Section prior to the award of a contract of the initiation of cormnicoon to pa15A NCAC I BC .0300 et. seq. Pans and
be submired to 1634 Mai: Service Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27(599-1634 All public water supply systems must comply
)0 dav�
specifications should
1 wish store and federal drinling water monitoring requirements For more information, contact the Public Water Supply Section, [phone].
t
_
Irexisting water lixs will be relocated during the construction, plaits for the water line relocation must be submitted to the Division of Water
®
Reswices/Public Water Supply Section at 1634 Mai) Service CemeT, Raleigh„ North Caroli-ta I7699-1634 For more irformation• contact the Public
30 days
DEMLR (LQ & SW) JLH
I Water Supply Section, [phone].
6/24/16
..... ,»....:w...,.Y_.__.�.
Division
_ _._.. ----;,--...r:--._....
Initials No r
-- ----
Comments
Date l l
comment
Review
DAQ
ddm 10
A project that disturbs 1 acre or greater is required to secure an erosion
6/7/16
7/1/16
DWR-WQROS DS
(Aquifer & Surface) rb Ll
and sedimentation control plan and must comply with construction
6/6/16
stormwater permit conditions (NCG010000)
t
-Project is located in Cape Fear River Basin (Jordan Lake). Morgan Creek,
'f
Walters Creek, and C'haoel Creek Unnamed tributary to Upper Little River
(Class C Waters) are all WS –IV NSW waters.
-The USGS Topographic map depicted adjacent to the prcject footprint.
(Note: the soil survey was not reviewed.) The project will need to comply
`.
Watersupply watershed requirements.
if wetland or stream impacts are proposed, this project will need to
comply with/secure a 404 permit from the USAGE, obtain a 401 Water
Quality Certification authorization and comply with the Jordan Riparian
Buffer Rules.
-Sewer Extension Permit. This project may require a sewer extension
permit in accordance with ISA NCAC 02T.0301. (It is recommended that
permittee contact suoject municipality to determine if this is required for
this development.) If you have additional sewer extension permit
questions please contact Jason Robinsor at the RRO [phone].
DWR-PWS wah
See last two checked boxes
6/30/16
DEMLR (LQ & SW) JLH
No additional comments appear necessary at this time.
6/24/16
DWM - UST — MRP _
L--
6/27/16
REGIONAL OFFI.CF.S
Questions regarding these permits shou;d be addressed to the Regional Office (narked below.
February 11, 2015

❑ Asheville Regional Office ❑ Mooresville Regional Office ❑ Wilmington Regional Office
2090 LS Highway 70 610 Fast Center Avenue, Suite 301 127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Swannanoa, NC 28778 Mooresville, NC 28115 Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone] [phone] [phone]
❑ Fayetteville Regional Office
225 North Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
( 910) 433-3300
Febmary 11. M 5
® Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
❑ Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
[_] Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
[phone]

COUNTY: ORANGE
TH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERM1ENTAL REVIEW
B02: SCHOOLS !POST SECONDARY)
MS CARRIE ATKINSON
CLEARINGHOUSE COORD7N TOR
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATEWT.DE PLANNING - =_SC 41554
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
IDFPT OF NATURk" k C1-1:_TUR.2k-, RFS01:Rr'E
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATIOIi
DNCR .ZV OF PARKS AiiD RECREAI.ION
DPS - DIV OF E11ERGE>'NCY M. kNAGEMENT
TRIANGLE J COG
STATE NUNffiER: 16-E-6020-0396
DATE RECEIVED: 06/21/2016
AGENCY RESPONSE: 07I18/2C16
REVIEW CLOSED: 07/21/20'_6
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLTCANT: WC -Chapel Hill
TYPE: State Environmental Policy Act
Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact
DESC: Proposed is for the Finley Field Expansion project. Project will. construct twc
new practice fields on the south side of Old Mason Far -n Road and upgrade the
existing soccer field center located on the north side of Old Mason Farm Road.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergoverr_-ner_tal. review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review tine is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESrr-T 0- THIS R=- JIZW TETE OL7-06dING _S SUBMITTED: F� NO COMMENT COMMENTS ATTACHED
-'7
X(I
SIGNED BY: ! is
DATE:

Transportation
July 19, 2016
MEMO TO: North Carolina State Clearinghouse
Department of Administration
Intergovernmental Review
FROM: Julie B. Bollinger, P.E.'­
NCDOT-Transportation lanning Branch
PAT McCRORY
Governor
NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON
Secretary
SUBJECT: 16-E-6020-0396 — Construction of 2 New Practice Fields and Upgrade
of Soccer Field Center along Old Mason Farm Rd. (SR 1900) in
Chapel Hill - Located in Orange County
Thank you for allowing the Transportation Planning Branch to review the planned
expansion documents. In reviewing the site, there is one MTP project in the planned site
area.
The Durham -Chapel Hill -Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (DCHC MPO) has
a 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP, formerly called LRTP) that was approved
June 2013. In the 2040 MTP, there are proposed bicycle lanes along Old Mason Farm
Rd. (SR 1900).
There are no projects in the current 2016-2025 State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP) along Old Mason Farm Rd. (SR 1900).
A draft Comprehensive Transportation Plan is currently being developed
(http://tinyuri.com/DCHC-CTP).
Please see the following website for the DCHC MPO 2040 MTP report, maps, and
project lists for your consideration:
hftp:/twww.dchcmpo.org/programs/transport/2040mtp/default.asp. Please consult the
DCHC MPO (http://dchcmpo.orgo for verification of the project locations and their status
in the current TIP and 2040 MTP in the finalization of your project's proposed
improvements.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 919-707-0945.
!`-'Nothing Compares-,, -
Statc oM-41h Carolina, Depar hent or Ttmislwrtation, Transportation Mummg Branch
1554 Mail Scrvicc Ccntcr, I Sotnit Wilmington Street, Raleigh, NC. 27501
914-787-090U

COUNTY: ORANGE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
B02: SCHOOLS ( POST SECONDARY)
MS RENEE G!,EDHILL-EARLEY
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
JNCR - DIV OF ?ARKS AND RECREATION
MSC 46'_7 - ARCHIVES BUILDING
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF ENV I'RCNMENTA , QUA; T1r1V
DEPT OF NATURAL b:. CU TURA RESOURCE
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNCR - DIV OF PARKS AND RECREATION
:SPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY IVANAGEMENT
TRIANGLE J COG
STATE NUMBER: 1.6-E-6020-0396
DATE RECEIVED: 06/21/20--6
AGENCY RESPONSE: 07/18%20"6
REVIEW CLOSED: 07%21;20_6
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: UNC -Chapel Bili
TYPE: Sr_at.e Ervironmental Po'_ic_v Ac
Environmental Assessment/'Finding of No Significant Impact
DESC: Proposed is for the Finley Field Expansion project. Project will construct two
new practice fields on the south side of Old X-ason Farm Road and upgrade the
existing soccer field center located on the north side of Old Mason Farm Road.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the move
indicated date to 130 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
Tf additional review time is needed, please contact this office at ,9191807-2425.
AS A RESULT OF '_HIS REVIEW "HE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED:
SIGNED 3Y:
NO COMMENT F] COMMEENTS AT"rACHED
DATE: 7. ` • i G

NORTH OLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
U _ATMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
COUNTY: ORANG- B02: SCHOOLS (POST,SECONDARYJ
MS P.^NEE GLEDHILL-EP--LEY
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOP.
D13P'I• OF NAT•UF_��L & CULTURAL RESOURCE
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
MSC 4617 - ARCHIVES BUILDING
RALE=GH NC
STATE NUMBER: 16-E-6020-0396
DATE RECEIVED: 06/'21120"_6
AGENCY RESPONSE: 071118;2016
REVIEW CLOSED: 07;21;2016
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNCR - DIV OF PAP.KS AND RECREATION
DPS - DIV OF =RGENCY XANAGEYMJ_'
TRIANGLE 4 COG
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: UNC -Chapel Iil
TYPE: State Environmental Policy Act
Environmental AssessmentrF_nding of No Significant Impact
DESC: Proposed is for the Finley Field Expansion project. Project will construct two
new practice fields or, the south side of Old Mason Farm Road and upgrade the
existing soccer field center located on the north side of Old Mason Farm Road.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State. Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Nail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW TEE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: IV NO -COMMENT � COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: � DATE: �j • p� 4 j

COUNTY: ORANGE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVER101ENTAL REVIEW
B02: SCHOOLS ; ?OST SECONDARY)
MS PAULA CUTTS
CLEARTNGHOUSs COORDINATOR
DPS - DIV OF -% RGENCY HMAGEMENT
FLOODPLAIN IVANAGF,MENT PROGRAN
RISC # 4218
RALEIGF NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF Eh7N1R0NME'TTAL QUALITY
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL R.ESO,TRCF,
DEF?OF TRANS POP I'A':'1ON
DNCP. - DIV OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DPS - DTV OF EMHIRGENCY ?'. AGEYENT
TRIANGLE .; COC
'UN 21 0 216061
STATE NU14BXR: 16-E-6020-10396
DATE RECEIVED: 06/21!2016
AGENCY RESPONSE: 07%18!2x016
REVIEW CLOSED: 0-1i21i2016
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: UNC -Chapel Hil_
TYPE: Sta:.e Environ -mental Policy Act
Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact
DESC: Proposed is for _he Finley Field 7xpansion project. Project will construct two
new pra.ct:ce fields on the south side of Old Mason Farm Road- and upgrade the
existing soccef field cent_er.- located on rhe north side of Old Mason Farm Road.
The attached project has been submitted .o the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergoverr--rental review. Please rev:.ew and subm-,t your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
if additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLO6tTING IS SUBMITTED: ❑ NO COMMENT UL
COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: � t ri�.1��0��?.�-"`- DATE: 4

North Carolina Department_ of Public SafetyDPSJ_
Emergency Management
Pat McCrory, Governor Michael A. Sprayberry, Director
Frank L. Perry, Secretary
June 24, 2016
State Clearinghouse
N.C. Department of Administration
1301 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1301
Subject: Intergovernmental Review State Number: 16-E-6020-0396
Finley Field Expansion, University of North. Carolina at Chapel Hill, Orange County
As requested by the North Carolina State Clearinghouse, the North Carolina Department of
Public Safety Division of Emergency Management Risk Management reviewed the proposed
project listed above and offers the following comments:
1) The Environmental Assessment (EA) outlines the impacts to the Special Flood Hazard
Area (SFHA) and floodway in the vicinity of the project. The State Construction Office
has received the hydraulic analysis referenced in the EA and will provide review
comments. This office is able to assist with their technical review.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have any questions concerning the
above comments, please contact me at [phone], by email at dan.brubaker nc
Wds oy or
at the address shown on the footer of this document. pg
cc
Sincerely,
John D. Brubaker, P.E., CFM
NFIP Engineer
Risk Management
Tom Langan, Engineering Supervisor
John Gerber, NFIP State Coordinator
Herbert H. Neily, State Construction Office, Department of Administration
Michael S. Ali, State Construction Office, Department of Administration
File
MAILING ADDRESS:
4218 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 276994218
www.ncdps.gov
www.nctloodmaps.com
An Equal Opportunity Employer
GTM OFFICE LOCATION:
4105 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Fav [phone]