20120107 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report Ph III_2014_20151103

FIRST ANNUAL (2014) REPORT FOR THE
P AND U LANDS RESTORATION SITE PHASE 3
RICHLAND TOWNSHIP
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Bay City RestoratioSite
1
South Creek
Headwaters of Gum Swamp
Run in Phase 3 A
Prepared for:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Prepared by:
CZR Incorporated
October 2015

FIRST ANNUAL (2014) REPORT FOR THE
P AND U LANDS RESTORATION SITE PHASE 3
RICHLAND TOWNSHIP
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Prepared by:
CZR Incorporated
October 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
PROJECT OVERVIEW ......................
1.1
History ................................................
1.2
Location ..............................................
1.3
Goals and Performance Criteria.........
2.0
REQUIREMENTS ..............................
2.1
Normal Rainfall and Growing Season
2.2
Hydrology ...........................................
2.3
Flow ....................................................
2.4
Vegetation ..........................................
2.5
Photographic Documentation .............
3.0
2014 RESULTS .................................
3.1
Rainfall ...............................................
3.2
Hydrology ...........................................
3.3
Flow ....................................................
3.4
Vegetation ..........................................
3.5
Photographic Documentation .............
4.0
SUMMARY ........................................
LITERATURE CITED
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
101
Cover Photos -Top: Aerial photo looking northeast over Phase 3, with Bay City in the background.
Bottom: Aerial photo looking north over the section of Phase 3 that contains the upper headwater
valley of Gum Swamp Run.
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 P and U Lands Phase 3 performance criteria, methods summary, and current
status.......................................................................................................................... T-1
Table 2 Hydroperiods of 96 non -riparian monitoring wells at P and U Lands Phase 3
restoration site and three Rodman control wells during all rainfall conditions in
2014............................................................................................................................ T-2
Table 3 Hydroperiods of 96 non -riparian monitoring wells at P and U Lands Phase 3
restoration site and three Rodman control wells during normal and below normal
rainfallin 2014.......................................................................................................... T-17
Table 4 First annual survival of trees and shrubs planted in 94 0.3 -acre plots at P and U
LandsPhase 3 ................................................... .......................................... ..T-28
Table 5 First annual survival of trees and shrubs planted in four 0.11 -acre buffer plots
along Gum Swamp Run and two 0.11 -acre buffer plots along a low energy
headwater valley south of Gum Swamp Run at P and U Lands Phase 3 ..............T-30
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 Monitoring Locations
Figure 3 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 Soils
Figure 4 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 Monitoring Locations on As Built LiDAR
Figure 5 2014 Bay City and WETS -Aurora Rainfall
Figure 6 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 2014 Longest Hydroperiods and
Estimated Hydrologic Zones during All Rainfall Conditions
Figure 7 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 3 2014 Hydroperiods and Estimated
Hydrologic Zones during WETS Normal and Below Normal Rainfall
APPENDICES
Appendix A Stem Counts at Individual Plots at P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3
Appendix B Gum Swamp Run Stream 2014 Survey and Evidence of Flow
Appendix C Selected First Annual Restoration Photographs
NOTE: Copy of entire report and hydrology data included on accompanying CD.
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 iii PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
1.1 History. The approximately 3,667 -acre P and U Lands restoration site is part of
the PCS Phosphate Company Inc.'s (PCS) compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable impacts
to wetlands and waters authorized under United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Action
ID: 200110096 and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Water Quality Certification
(WQC) #2008-0868 version 2.0. As described in the mitigation plan prepared for the pre -
construction notification (PCN) to the USACE (CZR 2012), the site was planned to be constructed
in three phases as shown on Figure 1. This report concerns first annual monitoring of the 1,755
acres of Phase 3 conducted by CZR Incorporated (CZR) of Wilmington, NC. (The P and U
designation have no special meaning other than that was the historic label given to PCS and
Weyerhaeuser properties with similar ownership agreements.)
The design team consisted of Jonathan T. Ricketts, Inc. of Palm Beach Gardens, FL, the
restoration design engineer, PCS, and CZR. Earthwork was performed by Sawyer's Land
Developing, Inc. out of Belhaven, NC and supervised by the design team. Phase 1 and 2
restoration activities occurred September 2011 -March 2013. Phase 3 construction began in Gum
Swamp Run on 9 May 2012 and on 22 June 2012 on the larger Phase 3 area. Phase 3 was
constructed with a total of 14 NC Division of Land Resources Erosion and Sediment Control (DLR)
permits for land clearing which were subsequently modified to all for the construction of the interior
ditch plugs and perimeter berms and ditches. Planting of Phase 3 occurred February 2014. Further
details of construction are included in the As Built Report for P and U Lands Phase 3 (CZR 2015).
The P and U Lands site is a key component linking PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.'s (PCS)
Parker Farm Mitigation Site, Bay City Farm Mitigation Site, Gum Run Mitigation Site, and the South
Creek Corridor into a large and varied collection of restored wetland and preserved natural areas
(South Creek Corridor Complex). Restoration of the headwaters and upper valley of historic Gum
Swamp Run, a tributary to South Creek, is one of the goals of Phase 3. Unlike most other PCS
mitigation sites, the P and U Lands are not prior -converted agricultural fields. Other than the
existing roads, most of the acreage in which earthwork occurred was in some stage of silviculture,
usually various -aged pine stands, and contained regularly spaced ditches (deeper than the
agricultural ditches on other restoration sites that were filled in as part of restoration work) and the
bedding common to pine plantations. The removal of all standing timber and stumps and post-
harvest debris presented particular challenges as the organic soils precluded safe burning of the
timber slash on site. Consequently, some of the debris was piled into somewhat evenly shaped
and sized mounds throughout the site which provide additional wildlife habitat.
1.2 Location. The P and U Lands site is located east and west of Bay City Road
(SR1002), approximately 4.5 miles southeast of Aurora, Richland Township, North Carolina. Bay
City Road runs through the P Lands portion of the site, which is bounded on the east by SR 1918
(Peele Road is the unpaved extension of SR 1918) and on the south by "County Line Road" (a
gated gravel road along the Beaufort/Pamlico County border). The U Lands portion of the site lies
west and southwest of Bay City Farm (the western portion of the P Lands site referred to as the
"panhandle" separates Bay City Farm from the U Lands). South Creek and the South Creek Canal
form the northern and northwestern boundaries, Bonner/Rodman Road forms the western
boundary, and the Pamlico/Beaufort County line forms the southern boundary of the U Lands
(County Line Road itself is the southern boundary of only the eastern half of the U Lands as the
western limit of County Line Road terminates at the midpoint of the south property line). The entire
site is accessed via multiple gated roads along Bay City Road, Peele Road, County Line Road,
and/or Jaime/Executive Road. The site is located within the Pamlico Hydrologic Unit 03020104 of
the Tar -Pamlico River basin within the South Creek subbasin at latitude 35.233831 and longitude
76.775742. Portions of the site can be found on the USGS Aurora, Bayboro, South Creek, and
Vandemere quadrangles (Figures 1 and 2).
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

1.3 Goals and Performance Criteria. The primary goal of the entire project is to re-
establish a self-sustaining functional wetland complex to allow surface flow to move through
vegetated wetlands before reaching any stream. Mitigation yields are estimated and performance
criteria are described for the project in detail in the Compensatory Mitigation Plan for P and U Lands
Restoration Site (CZR 2012). Performance criteria for Phase 3 are summarized in Table 1. Over
time the 1,755 -acre Phase 3 portion of the site is expected to successfully re-establish
approximately:
150 wetland acres of headwater forest
580 wetland acres of non-riverine swamp forest,
479 acres of pond -pine pocosin forest,
96 wetland acres of hardwood flat forest,
33 acres of Tar -Pamlico riparian buffer (under the new consolidated rules, the estimated
acres may increase),
7,141 linear feet of zero and first order stream including a low energy stream (Gum Swamp
Run), and
31 acres of open water in plugged ditches.
The work is also expected to successfully rehabilitate 271 acres of existing forested
wetland. This area would include the wooded area along the east property line south of Gum
Swamp Run and the wooded area north and east of the north end of Gum Road.
The remaining 57.84 acres are comprised of existing roads, perimeter berms, and other
man -dominated areas. Approximately 18,301 linear feet of jurisdictional waters in roadside ditches
and canals will be plugged in order to increase the hydroperiods within the adjacent planted areas
(these plugged jurisdictional ditches and canals are included in the315 acres of reestablished open
water). At the time of this report, approximately 12,980 feet of roadside ditches parallel to Gum
Road and a 3,400 -foot roadside ditch north of Bay City 4 remain unplugged; however, plugs will be
installed in these ditch sections upon completion of the 2015 portion of Phase 3 (referred to as
"Phase 4" for reporting purposes).
2.0 REQUIREMENTS
2.1 Normal Rainfall and Growing Season. A continuous electronic rain gauge on the
adjacent Bay City Mitigation Site is downloaded once a month and its data are used in conjunction
with data from nearby automated weather stations (e.g., NRCS WETS data from NOAA's site at
Aurora and rain gauges at other nearby monitoring sites) to determine normal rainfall during the
monitoring period. Bay City data were compared to the WETS range of normal precipitation to
determine if Bay City rainfall was within the normal range. The range of normal precipitation for
this report refers to the 30th and 701h percentile thresholds of the probability of having onsite rainfall
amounts less than or higher than those thresholds. The range of normal and the 30 -day rolling
total data lines begin on the last day of each month and the 2013 WETS -Aurora monthly
precipitation total is plotted on the last day of each month.
Under the 2010 regional guidance from the Corps of Engineers for wetland hydroperiods,
the normal growing season for Beaufort County is 28 February to 6 December or 282 days (WETS
table for Beaufort County first/last freeze date 28 degrees F 50 percent probability) (US Army Corps
of Engineers 2010). At the suggestion of the Corps' Washington regulatory field office, data
collected between 1 February and 27 February provide important information related to analyses
of site hydrology during the early growing season, but are not part of the hydroperiod calculation
for success.
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

2.2 Hydrology. Figure 2 depicts the locations of hydrology monitoring equipment, Figure
3 shows these locations on Beaufort County soil polygons, and Figure 4 shows all monitoring
locations on the as -built LiDAR. To document surface storage and hydroperiods of all wetland
types on the site, 96 semi -continuous electronic LevelTroll water level monitoring wells
(manufactured by InSitu) are deployed at a density of approximately 1 well/15 acres across all
planted areas of Phase 3, with the exception of two wells that were installed near a ditch to be used
in conjunction with a nearby well to monitor lateral drainage effects from the open perimeter ditches.
Exclosures constructed of barbed wire wrapped around metal fence posts were built around all
wells to reduce likelihood of disturbance or equipment loss by black bears.
Three wells were installed 13 March 2013 in a recently timbered tract west of Rodman
Road in the Ponzer soil series as controls for the P and U Lands wells in the same soil type (Figures
1-4). To serve as additional controls, in late 2015, four wells will be installed at previous well
locations within the adjacent Bay City Farm. According to the LiDAR data, these four locations will
also represent Ponzer soils but at lower elevations than the three Rodman wells.
Electronic wells collect data every 1.5 hours, are downloaded once a month, and the data
evaluated to document wetland hydroperiods. Wetland hydroperiods are calculated by counting
consecutive days with water level no deeper than 12 inches below the soil surface during the
growing season under normal or below normal rainfall conditions and then for all rainfall conditions.
2.3 Flow. Stream surveys will be conducted annually to document conditions in the
restored headwater stream valley of Gum Swamp Run and the valley to the south. The entire length
of the valley will be walked. Active flow and features formed by previous flow will be documented
with GPS, photo and/or video. In the first few years, the surveys will be performed usually twice
annually (once in the dry time of year and once in the wet); however, herbaceous vegetation
colonization may vary this schedule. In addition, during each monthly well check, near adjacent
wells at five locations along the Gum Swamp Run valley, and at two locations along the valley to
the south, biologists will document flow qualitatively. Also as an experiment to potentially document
flow more regularly, CZR installed two HD video trail cameras (Little Acorn 621 OMC -9400 at two
locations along Gum Swamp Run, one near the downstream end of the transition area or "bowl"
and one along the upper channel on the north side of the existing forest. The cameras will be
programmed to record twice each day.
2.4 Vegetation. The first annual survey of the 94 0.3 -acre planted vegetation
monitoring plots occurred June -August 2014. The plots represent 2 percent of the restoration area
(Figure 2). Six additional 0.11 -acre plots were established and surveyed in November 2015 to
monitor stem density in potential stream buffer zones along the restored Gum Run headwaters
(four plots) and the low-energy headwater valley system south of Gum Swamp Run (Figure 2).
2.5 Photographic Documentation. Fifteen permanent photo point locations were
established along the perimeter of the restoration area (Figure 2). The first annual photos were
taken October 2013.
3.0 2014 RESULTS
3.1 Rainfall. Total rainfall in 2014 at Bay City was 54 inches, almost 10 inches more
than 2013. The 30 -day rolling total of 2014 Bay City rainfall was considered above normal WETS
rainfall June 19 -July 20 and August 3 -August 30 (Figure 5). Wetland hydroperiods were calculated
for the entire year regardless of rainfall and with the two above normal rainfall time periods
excluded.
The US Drought Monitor (http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu) provides a synthesis of multiple
indices and reflects the consensus of federal and academic scientists on regional conditions on a
weekly basis (updated each Thursday). For North Carolina's Beaufort County in 2014, during the
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

41 -week long growing season, the monitor reported the last four weeks of the growing season had
a drought status of abnormally dry (DO) in the vicinity of P Lands project area; the remainder of the
growing season was normal.
3.2 Hydrology. During all rainfall conditions, 15 of the 96 wells did not record a wetland
hydroperiod (Table 2, Figure 6). Most wells recorded wetland hydroperiods frequently during the
year and five wells recorded a continuous wetland hydroperiod for the entire growing season (Table
2). Two wells (2.1 percent) recorded a wetland hydroperiod less than 10 percent, while 63 wells
(66 percent) recorded a wetland hydroperiod >12.5 percent to 75 percent.
After exclusion of abnormally high rainfall periods, 15 wells did not record a wetland
hydroperiod (Table 3, Figure 7). Most wells still recorded wetland hydroperiods frequently during
the year. Two wells (2.1 percent) recorded a wetland hydroperiod less than 10 percent, while 67
wells (70 percent) recorded a wetland hydroperiod >12.5 percent to 75 percent. As evidenced by
the cumulative days, many wells had water levels shallower than 12 inches below the surface in
addition to the continuous hydroperiods (Tables 2 and 3). The three Rodman control wells recorded
water levels similar to Phase 3 wells (Table 2, Table 3). Tables depicting 2014 daily well readings
and rainfall are included on a companion CD with this report.
3.3 Flow. In 2014, there was only one formal stream survey performed in Gum Swamp
Run; however, during several earlier site visits during 2014, flow events were recorded by
camera/video. During two April 2014 site visits for other purposes, the stream valley of Gum Swamp
Run and the shorter headwater valley to the south were walked and photos and videos were taken
at various locations which documented flow or other specific features. An additional visit occurred
in July where many of the same locations and features were also documented. In November 2014,
the 40 -foot valley was walked, current or past flow features were GPSd and photos/videos were
taken. Flow was documented along the entire length of the 2 -foot channel during the February,
April, and July visits and flow, or evidence of flow, was documented along xxx feet of the 40 -foot
channel in April and/or November of 2014. Appendix B contains the flow information collected in
Phase 3 valleys in 2014.
3.4 Vegetation. Planting zones of Phase 3 were divided into several community types:
riverine swamp forest (Z1), headwater forest (Z2), non- riverine swamp forest (Z3), pond pine
pocosin forest (Z4), and two zones of hardwood flat (Z5 and Z6). Using only the number of planted
stems that were unquestionably alive in the monitoring plots, the most conservative estimate of
survival is presented. Many stems appeared dead or questionable, but based on prior monitoring
experience, a stem needs to appear dead (or not be found) for two sampling events before it can
be confidently counted as dead. At the year one 2014 survey, with the exception of Z6, percent
survival of most zones was similar: 91, 89, 93, 91, 91 and 69, respectively. Two of the four Z6 plots
had higher numbers of stems counted as unsure at the 2014 survey and hydrology in 2014 at three
of the four wells in Z6 was wetter than anticipated which may have contributed to stress for the
stems in those two plots. Appendix A contains the number of stems that were alive in each plot for
the fall 2014 survey.
Overall survival of trees that were unquestionably alive in the 94 plots from the time of
planting to the first annual fall survey was 98 percent, with a corresponding density of 391 trees
per acre (Table 4). If trees with uncertain survival status (stem appeared dead but could not be
confirmed) are included with trees that were definitely alive, survival increases to 100 percent
(because a stem could not be considered dead at the first survey) and a density of 398 trees per
acre. Excluding unknown species/uncertain survivals (and those with only a few stems), red bay
(Persea borbonia) had the lowest apparent survival (95 percent, Table 4). The 26 remaining
identified species had survivals of 96 percent and higher, with 18 at 100 percent.
Overall survival of shrubs that were unquestionably alive from the time of planting to the
first annual fall survey was 100 percent with a corresponding density of 10 shrubs per acre
scattered among the 11 species planted (Table 4).
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

After combining the trees, shrubs and unknown species that were definitely alive, density
increases to 422 stems per acre and if stems with uncertain survival are added, the density
increases to 463 stems per acre. At year one, many different species of trees are surviving and
there is a diverse assemblage of trees interspersed with a healthy shrub component. In many
areas of the site, volunteer woody wetland stems (e.g. red bay [Persea borbonia], sweet bay
[Magnolia virginiana]) are prolific and will enhance the diversity and density of the site. The
volunteers will be counted in year five.
The six riparian buffer plots were established after many stems had already lost leaves and
it was suspected that some stems were hidden in herbaceous vegetation and untagged; therefore,
at an early spring 2015 visit before the herbaceous vegetation became green a 19 more baseline
stems were tagged. A total of 293 stems among 11 large tree species and one small tree species
were found in the buffer plots along with some alive stems with uncertain identifications due to lack
of leaves (Table 5). Most of the identified trees were swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii),
bald cypress (Taxodium disctichum), and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica); no shrubs were
tagged in any of the buffer plots. Based on the six plots, the total density of stems alive in the buffer
area is 442 stems per acre at year one survey and 444 if the one unsure stem is added. The results
from the six buffer plots were not added to the results from the other plots.
3.5 Photographic Documentation. A few photos representative of 2014 conditions are
included with this report (Appendix C). More are available upon request.
4.0 SUMMARY
According to WETS rainfall calculations, Bay City rainfall was normal or below normal
WETS rainfall except for June 19 -July 20 and August 3 -August 30. Post -restoration wetland
hydrology monitoring for success officially began in 2014. During all rainfall conditions, 15 wells
did not record a wetland hydroperiod, and five wells recorded a continuous wetland hydroperiod for
the entire length of the growing season. Approximately two-thirds of the wells (63) recorded
wetland hydroperiods >12.5 percent to 75 percent of the growing season. Six wells had a wetland
hydroperiod for greater than 75 percent of the growing season. During periods of WETS normal or
below normal rainfall, most wells still recorded wetland hydroperiods frequently during the year.
Fifteen (15) wells did not record a wetland hydroperiod and two wells recorded a wetland
hydroperiod less than 10 percent of the growing season. Approximately 68 percent of wells
recorded a wetland hydroperiod >12.5 percent to 75 percent. As evidenced by the cumulative
days, many wells had water levels shallower than 12 inches below the surface in addition to the
continuous hydroperiods
Overall survival of trees that were unquestionably alive in the 94 plots from the time of
planting to the first annual fall survey was 98 percent, with a corresponding density of 391 trees
per acre. Overall survival of shrubs that were unquestionably alive from the time of planting to the
first annual fall survey was 100 percent with a corresponding density of 10 shrubs per acre. After
combining the trees, shrubs and unknown species that were definitely alive, density increases to
422 stems per acre and if stems with uncertain survival are added, the density increases to 463
stems per acre. Density of alive stems in the riparian buffer plots is 441 per acre.
Many different species of trees and shrubs are surviving well in the first year and there is
a diverse assemblage of trees interspersed with a healthy shrub component. In many areas of the
site, volunteer woody wetland stems (e.g. red bay [Persea borbonia], sweet bay [Magnolia
virginiana]) are prolific and will enhance the diversity and density of the site.
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

LITERATURE CITED
CZR Incorporated. 2012. Compensatory Mitigation Plan for P and U Lands Restoration Site.
CZR Incorporated. 2015. As -Built Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3.
Kirby, Robert M. 1995. The soil survey of Beaufort County, North Carolina. Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2002. Regulatory guidance letter (RGL) 02-02. Guidance on
Compensatory mitigation projects for aquatic resource impacts under the Corps regulatory
program pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2005. Technical Standard for Water -Table Monitoring of Potential
Wetland Sites. WRAP Technical Notes Collection (ERDC TN -WRAP -05-2.) U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008. Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 08-03. Minimum
monitoring requirements for compensatory mitigation projects involving the restoration,
establishment, and/or enhancement of aquatic resources.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional supplement to the Corps of Engineers wetland
delineation manual: Atlantic and Gulf coastal plain region. Version 2.0. J.S. Wakeley,
R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble, eds. ERCD/EL TR -08-30, Vicksburg, MS.
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 6 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

-p
a L RS a)
a) 0)— U)
M a) a L N
T 5
C
O N 7 0
N a iv .r
_O
a N c6 O-0 a) O -o Ea?
CO
C> p_ a) C N
C: 3 ° o
'' .Z w o o -ap a")
a
a
m m L a .0
co a) ti p
a)
3> m m-0 0
M U)
E Q c s
n 3 o w>
o
L
4 RS � O_ C U
O m T O C 0 O '>
�
U U 6)
p'
O C O 2 0_ 0
@ � C O �- C E
a c6 ?�
(9 O N >, C L
L .0 L N O
N O U _ N
a3 Q) E
f6 O CO
C p_ 'C C
_ N N
cn v) O L O C@ L
i >
3 N O Ur
>
C O T> Q
O
OC a
U 0
>
B L>
L.L
O Q C 6) 2 V O'
L 3
7
N U
LL O
N> U V
O
co cn
F— —
La) W C
O
p O p
)
n *k a) a
O nl 0 CJ' O Q
CO
N
O
Q -_ E
M •2 N .C. D O O Z
E
O
C p
w p
D) w '06 O N cn Q 61
0 O- p
Up,
p
N
E
a) H
>' W (L n3
C 0
U m m
•E E N
(9
�o
a
a)E
.0
E0 W
cc ��2N
5p
C
-S
C C p
'3 Q
C
QO
N 4 C
O
W p a C op
a)
U
U Z C
0 L N U� O N�0
(D
LL N
—
a)
(6
O
C a)
O O p
L Q a) 7
O
L
c
O�
C U
E
00
X O
U
O O�
U
U) C a)
a o
O a) .�
cC
C U O
O T
(6 7 L
E O-0 O C i
Lc6 07
t6 w
Ofn U .0 N
E
C T a a)
EwQ
o�
a)E
00co
oa)
a)
U
;

co
N
N
(6
L
U)
C
O
J
C
m
� N
O
0
�o
O> V
C
O
C co
O r
E N
O O
c� ro
o_
U)
O ro
c
a�
O
O �
� N
O
V
0-0
LO N
- O
2 co
C
N O
o :a
Q O
�
O
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 T-2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015
L
r`
A
0
LO
1-
6 6
CN
N
A
C
O
o
U
LO
N
O
LO
x
X
O
N
T
A
_
8
Ln
N
X
X
co
Al
v
v
X
X
X
0
o
o m
'
L) 0 m N
r
O
v
Lo
v
Lo
v
co
6j
Lo
v
CO
U
d
LO O V O O O
N
co co r- r --
N
N
N
r
LC)
r
r-
r
O
r
`—
r
r
V
r
Lo
r
r-
r
r
r
O
Q
Q
O
r
Q
(B
O
N
CO
O
O
N
f�
O'
Ln
M
M W
r
N
r-
O
M
Z
Z
O
Z
O
\
N
NN
—
N
N
CO
M
O
N
4
CO
ti O
83
O
N
V 0
0')
cn N O
-E N
_O > N
j N 0
d'
(0Lf)
@ O
Lf)
CO
N
O
LC)
O
LC)
LC7 LC)
M
61
O
LC7
V
It
M
N
M
r
M
N
N
V
N
M
N r
M
N
N
M
N r
V
V
N
V
U O Q
U) N LL
O -r-
C)
U 3 U)
a�
T j U
Q 0
j a)@ (9
O
O
M
co
(0 � O a
N
N
N
m
�2
-t
O O N LL
r
N O
UU) N
m o a�
3 = LL
O N
r N
O U r
O �
N O
@ -am N
o
O
N
M
LO
v
co
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 T-2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
L0
r—
A
0
Lf)
X
X
LO
04
O
A
C
O
o
U
�
N
o
Lf)
X
X
O
N
�
n
2
8
N
(6
AI
v
O C >
O M
Cl)
N
U
O O N N
V
N
cli
d O 00
N
N
p ~
N
l!j
00
00
LO
N
N
Cl)
L\
M
M
Ln
(O
N
N
L!)
7
d'
In
I�
O
O
N
Lf)
h.
00
O
In
f
pp
i
i
M
0
00
0' N
t`
M
N
00
N
00
a0
N
00
Nob
N
6
7
N
7
7
00
Nr--
N
N
(p O
N
(O 00
6)
O
N
N
(fl
N
M
O
N
4
(O
00
M
O
O O 00
N
OCo> U
N
> 2 �
Co (E Co
t`
N r-
O
t`
_
d'
I-
N
'ITM
_
O)
M
r-
r-
Ln
00
CO
O
3 L
U O 2
00
N
N
M
N
N
N
I-
M
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
(V LL
O =
U 3 <n
-
T O > U
> (0
,,(D.
f6 O
00
LO
M
00
N
N
1`
6)
N
N
ON r U-
E i 00
U�' N
L
C6 O LL
N 1-
L 7 N
O N r
>
U)
TCo
Co
I�
M
O
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
L0
r—
A
0
LO
x
x
LO
O
04
A
C
N
o
_
U
�
N
O
Lf)
x
X
O
N
�
T
n
_
\'
lO
N
Al
(fl
v
O C >
.� N"00
Cl)
N
(p
N
U O N
00
M
N
d O O N
M
I`
O
N
M O
~
O
N
N
t`
I`N
C\
N
I-
LO L,.)
O N CO
N
�
-
-
cp
N
N N
f�
N
M
N I
r
r
N
LO
N
N 6)
00
r r
N
LO
O
N O
00
N
N
(O P-
O
N
(O
N't
(p
ti CO
6)
O
N
4
(fl
W
6) O
-
N O 00
: -F N
M
>
O U
N
(E
LO
LO (O
IT
1:T CO
h
O
�
00
LO
LO LO
O
M O
Cl)
00
1-
� O
00 N O
7 L
1-
M d'
O
P-
M
M
N
N
N
M
N
N
N N
It
N
M
N —
N N N
U O -0
a) (V 11
O =
U 3 U)
- (D
-
T O > U
> (O
,,0.
— 03 O �'
00
LO
LO
00
N
O
Cl)
M 2, - O
N
N
N
N
7 O r U-
E , 00
U�' N
L
C6 O LL
N
L � N
O N r
>
U)
TCo
Co
� (6
N
CN
co
C\1
cl'
CN
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 T-5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015
0
A
0
LO
~
X
X
LO
N
A
C
O
c
V
Ln
N
�
O
Ln
X
O
N
�
T
n
LI?
N
X
AI
V
X
O C
. _ O M
N
00
V
Cl)
U O N N
N
�
In
L O
00
N
CO
U
N
M
Cfl
L)
00
00
N
(O
�' M
M
CO
NO
ON
23
NM
Ln
In
O
.-
7
M
00
�,:�
N
N
00
LSA
O
00
7
N
r-
00 M
00
CO
00 7
N
M
M'
O
N
N
00
N
7
N
00
\
N
N
00
N
N
O)
O
N
�
M
00
6)
C)
N CO
N
�
00 M
O
N
O O 00
-F N
� >
> .Q
M
d'
d'
00
CO
r--
V
00
-:1-00
M
O
d'
LO
�t O
M
d'
LO
r
M
�
N
Lf)
M
N
—
—
N
N
N
00
M
N
— M
N
N LL
O �
U3v,
a�
> U
T ECU
M
-0 0
>O
N
O
6)
VO
N
N
CO
N
0')
O
C (D N LL
N
U 3 U) N
o � �
io o a�
3 LL
� N
�
2' >
U O
(6
0
C
C
O
U
LO
CO
M
6)
N
r
N
N
N
N
O
n3
H
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 T-5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-6 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
�
X
X
A
0
LO
X
X
X
X
Ln
04
O
A
C
O
o
-
U
�
N
�
O
Lf)
X
O
N
"T
A
_
\'
l�lj
N
X
X
Al
(fl
v
O O C >
O O M
M
N
00
O
d'
LO
O
r
L!)
U O O
CD
C.0O
r
L(!
N
00O
N U N
d
O O
O
CD
Cl)
00
00
t
N
O
N
00
L2
N r -
Nd'
Ln
UTN
N
U
N
"7
)
U
N
'1
L? I�
00
U)
Lo
aD
u)
C')
N
O
a0
a0 O
00
ONO
Ln
O
00 O
00
00
O N
N
a0 O
N
N
7
O
N
ti
a0
a0
O
N
N O
N
N (O
N
N
N
N
N CQ
N
N
N
(O
N
ti
N
N (O
O 00
-
N
Mo
>
Q U
N
(0
(o
N
LO
(O
Ln
(0
N
O
N 00
O O
N
LO
"t
O
-'T
N
�
M M
�
-'3-
M
Cl)
N
O
00
N
M
N
00
N
M
N M
N
00
U O
O
U 3 <n
T O > U
> (O
.«Oj
Lo O
M
(D
r
N
00
0)
LO
Ln
Ln
N
00
ch
00
O
Lo
(0 2� c O
N
N
N
N
N
(N
—
N
ON r U-
E 4-), Oo
U�' N
L
Co O LL
(V
L � N
O M r
?' N >
TCo
Co
O
CY)
N
M
M
M
V
M
LO
M
O
Cl)
r-
M
O
M
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-6 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-7 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
L0
r—
A
0
LO
X
X
LO
O
04
A
C
0
0
U
�
N
O
Lf)
X
X
O
N
"T
A
_
\'
l�lj
N
X
AI
(°
v
X
.� O M
Lf)
(O
Lf)
N
L0Ua
d'
L O A N
00
M
r
LO
r
v
�
d O N
cN
M aD
N_
O
M
L)
O N
N I�
L\
O
N
a0
N
M
ao
L2
V
O
O
r
Lo
Ln
n, O)
O
O
Q
Ln
ti
O
O W
N
ONO
LO
N N
00
N p
ONO
(O
A N
00
N
Z
ONO
w
A
N
6)
N
N
W M
O
N
4
4
— L-
CO
O
(0
N (O
N
(D L-
(O
0)
0
O
N
�
(0
f�
M
N 0 00
� � N
j
aCo U
N
(0
(E
M
(D O
M
N
O
Lf) IT
Ln
t`
'14,
Cl)
O
Lf)
In
M
M
IT
Lf)
7 L I
O M
N
M
M
w
M
N
M 't
M
V
M
N
N
N
N
U O -0
a) (V LL
O =
U 3 U)
- (D
-
-
T -O > U
° 0
a
j (O
,,0.
f6 O
I--
Cl)
LO
N
Lf)
V
O
00
(O
CO
(6 2� c 0
N
N
N
N
7 0 r U-
E N , 00
U�' N
L
N O LL
N r—
L N
N 0 �
?' >
TCo
Co
� (6
O
M
O
'zT
V
N
'zT
M
TV
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-7 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-8 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
L
x
r -
A
0
LO
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
LO
04
O
A
C
O-
o
--
-
-
--
--
U
�
N
0
L{)
x
O
N
�
n
l8-lj
N
Cfl
Al
v
O O C >
.O O M
00
O
00
Cfl
Cl)
N
N
C)
U0-
O
O
N
M
(1i6
Ln
M
Ln
t�
LO
O N
00
O O U N
N
d'
Cfl
M
LC)
(fl
d
N
6)_ Cl)a0
M 00
I- O
aD
00
Ln
O O
N
r
N
N 00
O
O
N
N
Lf)
� 6)
O
N o
N NQ
L?Ln
f
N
L)
O p
i
N
Lf)
N
i
N
U)
N
CV
M
i?5
� N
i
_N
(6
OD
O NN
00
00
OD O
00 O
00
N
lf')
O
N
00
O
N
r
00
O i
00 N
00
N CO
00
CD
6 CO
N
N
CO
O
N
N Cfl
N r
N CO
N
CO
O
N
N
N r
N �
N CO
N
N
N
N
CO
O O 00
� � N
Co
>
O U
0)
CU
'�T
CA 'IT
O
Ln
O O
00
�
V
00
Il-
M N
N
Cfl
O
O
O
I
N
Cl)
N
L
a0
M d'
M
a0 r
a0
M
N
00
00 M
N
00
N
00
M
M
O
N
U O -0
(V LL
O =
U 3 U)
- (D
T O > U
> .«Oj O
L6 O �'
N
N
M
O
I�
(D
I-
Cl)
(D
ti'
Ln
00
r-
N
00
f -
�
M 2� c O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
ON r U-
E , Oo
U�' N
L
N C)
(V I-
L N
O N r
?' >
TCo
Co
� (6
�
�
V
�
O
C14
Lr)
M
Ln
V)
>N
r
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-8 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-9 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
L0
r -
A
0
LO
X
X
X
X
LO
O
04
A
C
N
o
U
N
o
Lf)
X
X
O
N
�
n
_
\
l�lj
N
Lfl
Al
v
O C >
O M
0'-?� N a
o
0)
c0
L0
00
U O CU N
00
L�f)
M
d'
_
LO
d O N
r
Lf)
lfj
LO
N
N
00
O
T
N
N
ti r--
M
N
NL!')
M
C
N
i
N
L()
Op
d' L?
N
M
00
6) O
N
\
N
N00
N
N
N
r
CO
LD
-
M N
CO
N
M
7
O
M (fl
M
(O
a0 6)
U O 00
� � N
j
aCo U
N
Co M
M
M
Lf)
O
ti
0)
r-
v
v v
O
M
N
r- (.0
r
O7
r--
'TLO
3 L(D
U O 2
0)
N
00
M
N
N
d' N
M
N
00 r
CO
N
M N
N
O
U 3 U)
- (D m
T -O > U
M M 0
j (0
,.0. "
M 0
r-
LO
00
N
ZO
O
U)
Ln
O
Cl)
(6 2� c O
N
N
N
N
N
ON r U-
E 4-), Oo
U�' N
L
M o LL
N r -
L N
O N r
?' >
TCo
Co
� M
Ln
LO
(0
L0
fl-
Lr)
00
LO
M
LD
O
C.0
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-9 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-10 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
x
x
x
A
0
LO
~
x
x
x
x
LO
N
A
C
O
c
V
Ln
N
�
O
Ln
O
N
�
T
n
Lq
N
X
X
X
(6
Al
v
o
.�_ O M
O
00
00
O
N
N
N
Cl)
�i -0
U O
C-�
T
O
M
O
6
Ln
UC
O
O N
00
C0
6)
(0
cc
(0
U
N 6) Lo
N m Lo
00
N
(D
N (D
co (D
O I� � O
O
N
Ln �
� Ln
N
N
7
7
N
N
LO f- M
00 M Lb
00 M 00
00
00 O
M
00
L\ N M
O
7 N
N 00
`— N T
N
N
N �
00 �
N
N
N
N
LO 0) N — �
CO 00
N
N CO
N
CO
CO
CO
CO 00
N
O 00
-F N
>
> O .Q
(B N
"t L2
� r— Lf)
04
O
M
04
LLQ
(0
0) N (D f— 00
O
�
Cl) N r
Cl) N r
00
N
0) 00
LV N
00
N
M
M
M
N N N
U O
N LL
O �
U3 v,
a�
T E > U
CU M
-0 0
>(D
LO
M
d'
N
N
N
O
O
N
L6 �'
d'
LC7
N
00
N
N
N
00
N
c0
N
r—
N
00
N
LD
M (D N LL
N
U 3 U) N
o
io o
L
O N ti
� N
�
2' >
U O
N
co
't
Ln
C0
I—
00
M
O
CO
C0
CO
LD
CO
CO
co
CO
LD
r-
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-10 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-11 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
A
0
LO
x
x
x
LC)
N
A
C
O
c
V
Ln
N
�
Ln
X
X
_O
O
N
�
T
n
Lq
N
x
O
Al
CO
V
x
x
O
C _ O M
co
G)
CO
CO
O
Ln
U-0
O N
LC)
LC)
O
M
U)
d'
V
L0
O
V
L
00
U
NO
NO -zi- 10
N
r
M S2)
N
N
O M 00
O�
O)N
� N
O N
—LD
I--
M
Q
Izz
C�
L)
fz
C
Q
00
CO
CO
O
Z
Ln
O
M
z
O
N
c0
M
N
�0
00
CO O
O
N
N
00
Cfl
N
O0
M CO
N
O
6)
U O 00
-F N
> N
> Q
(0
O
t`
00
LO
67
00
M
O
(o
m
O
,t
O
M
I`
M
Lf)
= O
�
00
00
00
M
N
N
M
M
00
V
M
N
co
'4
M
M
M
M
ZY
M
V
U O -0
N LL
O -E-
U
U 3 u)
a)
T E > U
CU M
-0 0
>O
N
M
N
I-
co
N
L()
L0
dt
N
M
N
O
N
Cl)
N
O
N
N
M (D N LL
N
U 3 U) N
io o Q)
3 LL
O N ti
� N
�
L .0
2' >
O
M
N
co
dt
LO
CO
I—
00
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-11 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-12 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
L0
r -
A
0
LO
x
x
Ln
04
N
A
C
O
o
U
�
N
o
Lf)
X
X
X
O
N_
_
\'
l�lj
N
AI
v
v
X
X
X
X
O C >
N "MO
Cl)
f�
N
(3)
LOLn
Ln
Ln
U O O N
N
LO
L6
cli
V
V
V
V
d O 00
N
N
O M
V
N
O
M
~
N
O
6)
ti
Ln
L\
O
m
M Lo
N
�
aO
O
M
Li')
Ln
r
�
O
�
ti
O
Q
Q
Q
Q
0
O N
00
f� (O
I\
(O
M
N
N_
00
(O
Ln
N
N
N
00
M
N
M
M
6)
Z
Z
Z
Z
M
N
(O r-
6)
M M
M
7
't
(O
1�
O
M
(V
7-
M
P-
6)
N
7-
Nt
(D
00 6)
-
N O M
7 N
f:
OCo> U
N
(E �
ti
O L()
w
O O
Ln
M
LO
M
h
Ln
Ln
M
N
r-
r-
N
r-
M M
V_
V_
V'
V'
7 L
I-
� N
N
ti
M
N
M
d'
N
M
M
M
-'tN
M
N
N
N
V
V
V
V
U O
(V LL
O =
U 3 <n
- (D
T O > U
f6 �
O
�
O
�
-
M
C:)~
o
(6 2� N
N
N
N
0)
ON r U-
E N , M
U- U) N
L
a) (V
L � N
O N r
>
U)
TCo
Co
� (6
O
r-
O
M
M
N
M
Cl)
co
V
M
Ln
M
M
M
�
M
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-12 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-13 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
LO
r—
A
0
LO
x
x
LO
04
N
A
C
0
0
U
�
N
0
Lf)
X
X
O
N_
T
A
_
_
\'
l�lj
N
X
(4
AI
v
v
X
X
X
0 C >
O M
6)
O
O
Cl)
00
LO
00
17
U OCU
N
00
M
L6
L6
~
v
N
�
d V) N
O
O
a0
O
O
M
O
7
NV
LoNr-
-t
OMO
ON
— O
N
(D
V
Lf)
�
1)
t` 6)
O
DO
Q
4
Lf)
h
�
OF'
04
LO
03
00
(p
M
N
N
O
w
(O
N
N
r
O
Z
a0
(p
O
N
00 N
N
4
(O
r
O
N
�
O
0)
O
M
a0
N
�
O
O
O
N O
N
M o
>
O U
N
(E
N
Ln
M
Ln
O
N
00
N �
N
Ln
V
LO
�
N
N
00
O
O
M
M N
N
CO
d'
O
N
N M
M
N
V
'IT
N
N
r-
00
U O -0
C a) (V LL
O =
U 3 U)
a)
T -O > U
> (0M
,,0.
L6 0 �'
V
O
O
N
O
LO
N
N
N
LO
O
N
N
N
N
0N r U-
E N , 00
U�' N
L
a
C6 O L L
N
L� N
ON r
_r_
.
3� N >
T Co
Co
00
00
O
N
O
M
O
(n
LO
6)
O
O
r-
O
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-13 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-14 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
Ln
r -
A
0
LO
X
X
LO
O
04
A
C
N
o
U
LO
N
o
Lf)
X
X
O
N
�
n
_
\'
l�lj
N
X
AI
v
O C >
O M
a
rn
(.0
() O N
00
_
N
_
Cl)
N
d O O N
M
�_ N
r
N
N
(D
(O
N
O
LO
N
N
N
.O-
i
pp
i
i
d'
Lf)
Izz
6)
T
4
l!i
O
L? �
O
M
00
(O
2
N N
r
W
M N
—
-
00
6
L'�00
(o
M
N
o0
(o
7
N
N
�
NN
O r
O
6
N
N
�
Na
O
O
N
N
O
O
O
N
N
a0
6
O O W
7 N
f:
>
aCo U
N
> (D -0 Q
M
M
Ln
O IT
_ O
IT
O M
O
M
O
IT
r-
O
M
O
U)
_
N
LO M
_
3 M L i
N
M 't
O N
N M
N
d'
(N
N
M
6)
V'
N
r
M
N M
L!7
U O -0
O
U 3 <n
- (D m
T -O > U
° 0
a
> (O
,,0.
M O
Ln
N
O
�
O
M
P-
N
O
(6 2� c O
N
N
N
ON r U-
E , M
U�' N
L
M o LL
(V
L � N
O M r
>
U)
TCo
Co
� M
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-14 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-15 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
L0
r -
A
0
LL)
X
LO
O
04
A
C
N
_
o
U
N
o
Lq
X
X
O
N
�
n
2
8-1
N
AI
(°
v
X
O C >
.� N M
Cl)
rn
U OCU N
00
N
M
d O O N
O
O
O
O
r
N
N
00
6)
N
N
r21
O
00
N
.O.
Lf'>
�
0�
i
i
Ln
(� M
i
4
In
t;
M
00
M
00
N_
N
00
N
I--
-
w
N
O
N
N
00
N
N
�
r 00
N
N
M
M
O
N
4
(O CO
M
N
�
00 M
N
M W
U O 00
� � N
OCo> U
N
(E
r-
LO
r-
Ln
N
O
'�r
M
00 N
M
U)
Ln
In
M O
LO
(O 'IT
7 L
M
N
M
N
M
N
N
M
N
M
W
N
It
M
M O
U O -0
(V 11
O
-
T O U
> 0
O
co
O
N
O
(6 2�
N
N
ON r U-
E , 00
UU) N
L
C6 O U-
a) (V
L � N
_
O N r
'-
?' >
Co
Co
� (6
O
O
O
_
N_
N
N
N
N
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-15 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

N
U)
O
C
O
U
C
CO
E
O
2'
0
L0
r -
A
X
0
LO
x
LO
N
04
A
C
N
_
o
U
�
O
Lq
O
O
N_
6)
�+
A
M
_
\'
l�lj
O
N
N
AI
M
h
h
M
M
O
I�
v
Cl)
=
O O
h O O I- t`
OO
O C >
M
N
=
M
ami 3 N M
M
=
M
U O CU
N
00
M
M
N
(n
M
d O N
I\
OLO
N
M
N
O
O
f�
N O
CDN
CO
N O
N N
6) O
00
N
N
CO
N
N
r
�
Ln i�z
1� N
O
O
N
O N
N 00
(O
00
M67
N ~
N O W
N
LO
OCo> U
N
CU
O
LO
7Co
L
U O -0
M
N N
d' O
N(V LL
N
O =
N
U 3 <n
a>
T O > U
N
N
> (O
N
,,0.
O
C
N
3
N N
ON r U-
E , op
UU) N
L
a) (V
L � N
O N r
>
U)
TCo
Co
�
M
N
N
U)
O
C
O
U
C
CO
E
O
2'
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-16 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
X
X
X
O
6)
M
O
N
M
h
h
M
M
O
I�
Cl)
=
O O
h O O I- t`
OO
M
M
N
=
M
t`
M
=
M
O
M
N
N
(n
M
O
I\
OLO
N
M
N
O
O
f�
N O
CDN
CO
N O
N N
6) O
00
N
N
CO
06C14
O
r
t`
w
N
N
O
O
N
O
W
00
N
N
(O
00
M67
N ~
LO
LO
N
N
N
I`
r-
r -
N
N
N
U
U
U
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-16 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

N
C
O
N
U
O
2
T
S
O
r
A
O
Ln
X
Lh
N
A
0
In
N
U�
X
X
N
A
0
LC)
N
X
X
A
C°
v
X
X
X
o T
o m
O
vLo
(D
Lo
Lo
rn
U p N
C6
(O
C�
v
O
v
v
00
0) O) U
O
M M O co
Lo
M C
�
�
N
N
00
N
'N
00
Ln
N
r--00
c0
Z
M
Z
Z
pp
N
N
00
\
N
N
N
M
N
4
O)
C-:1
N
6)
N
d'
6)
O'
N
a0 O-
U) N 00
N
O > N
> a�-00
�
�
�
2 C9
1-
LO
N
f-
O
LO
00
Cl)
M
O
LO
_
d'
r-
r-
O r- O
M
N
M
N
N
�t
N
M
N
N
CO
N
V
N
v
v
00
1- N N
C N LL
O
U3v,
a�
)
> CO
6)
00
M
coLO
00
co
O�
N
Cl)
N
N
M O N LL
d 00
UN
3
O i �
(0 O O
_ LL
O N ti
N
O N
U >
CU -0
M O
O
C\1
M
d'
LO
c0
I-
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 T-17 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-18 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
Ln
r -
A
0
LO
x
x
x
LO
04
O
A
C
N
_
o
U
N
o
Lq
X
X
X
O
N
�
n
2
8
N
AI
v
O C >
�.� N
NM
N
(O
-OpC15
U O CU N
N
M
N
d O)00
O N
.6-
L17
00 LIj
N
N
M
L\
-
(O
M
�
(Of�
N
M �
N
O
(O
N
N
t�
Cl)
(O
N
It
Ln O
O
't
m
O
i
i
i-6 N
Ln
�
O ii
N
4
L!5
C
;
i
N
i
M
OD
N
M
a0
N
N
7
o0
N
o0
N
6
7
o0-
N
ti
— N
7
M
N
�
N
'It 0')O
N
M
O
N
d'
)
O
N
N
N
N
07
N
N
4
M
O
(n 0) W
7 N
f:
OCoj U
N
'0
(E
r-
r-
NIT
M
M
h
d'
00
CO
O
LO
'IT
CO P-
O
00
0)
M
O
7 L I
M
N N
N
I-
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
1--
1--
M N
N
N
N
N
N
N(V LL
O =
U 3 <n
-
T O U
j (OM
,,0.
f6 O �'
OO
N
N
�
0')Ln
OO
LO
00
N
M 2: - O
N
N
N
N
ON r U-
E i 00
UU) N
L
C6 O LL
N
L 7 N
O N r
?' N >
TCo
Co
� (6
ap
O
(N
N
cli
Cl)
04
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-18 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-19 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
A
0
LO
~
X
X
LO
N
A
C
O
c
V
Ln
N
O
Ln
X
X
X
O
N
�
T
n
Lq
N
X
AI
V
X
O O
. _ O M
N
N
00
�
Cl)
0�
L) 3
O6
co
1
L O N
00
N
Cl)M
U
V
N
N CO
CO
N (D N
M Cfl
L0 00 CO
N
M CO
M (D M N
O
CQ
0) O
U
N
7
�
Ln
O
7
N
7
N
�
�_
'T
LO
O
.-
7
N
4
Ln 6 �
N
00
Li)
06
N
(�
M'
00
CO
7
N
co
M'
M'
Lo �- N
O
N
N
N
\
N M
N
N
N
N
00
N
M
OM
N
O
N
'IT
6
6
N 00
N
"IT6
O
N
N
V O
O 00
-F N
>
> 0) .Q
(0
M
00
00
N
O
00
Co
fl-
d'
00
M
O
V 00
LO
O
M
tet
Lr)
N
Lr) N CO
d'
N
N
N
N
N
Lf)
M
N
N
N
N
00 6)
M
N
M
N
V
N M N
N
C N LL
O
U3v,
a�
> U
T ECU
M
>L�
O
(D
N
O
6)
6)
M
N
V'
N
O
N
M
N
O')
O
N
M (D N LL
N
U 3 U) N
o
io o
L
O N t`
� N
�
2' >
U O
N
N
>O
(11
N
(Ij
N
MM
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-19 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

0
Li)
r—
A
0
LL)
x x x x x x x x
LO
04
O A
C
U LO
O LC)
O N
� n
T _
\'
Lf)
N X X
Al
(fl
v
O C >
.� N -Op M 00 �' 00 V r 00 L!) O 00
U M M Cl)r N Cl)N Cl)-
O CU N N
00
d O N
C -
O
U
N Cl) qzP LO (fl 00 Cn O
M M d'
a) r r
N
H
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 T-20 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015
O
O
ti
C4
00 O
M
00
N 1\
00
(fl
N
M
N
I�
I'
00
N
O
M
O N
N r -
U
N
Lf)
N
L()
N
r
C4 N
�,
Ln
L?
r
Cfl
N
Ln
jn
L?
t1')
L?
O
r
r
Ln
O
L!')
C6
aD
Op
OD
00
N
0p
O
N
CO
N
00
In
o6 N
OD
N
N
M
00
N
N
M
Op
N M
N Op
N
-
N M
N 00
N
N
M
00
N
NM
N
00
N
N
O
O
N
N
r
O O
-
N M
N 00
U O 00
f N
OCo> U
N
CE
N
00
M
00
00
Li)
d'
'�t Cn
00
'It
M
It
C))
(0
O
(fl
(14
6)
Lf)
It CT
U O -0
a) (V LL
O =
U 3 U)
T O > U
> .«Oj - O
C6 O
(0
I—
N
00
O
LO
LC)
Ln
N
00
d'
00
O
LC)
t`
Cl)
Lf)
N
Liz
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
ON r U-
E , 00
U�' N
L
C6 O
a) N
L N
O U r
U O O
Co C6
C -
O
U
N Cl) qzP LO (fl 00 Cn O
M M d'
a) r r
N
H
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 T-20 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-21 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
L0
r—
A
0
LO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
LO
04
O
A
C
N
o
U
LO
N
o
Lf)
X
X
O
N
�
n
_
-
8-1
Un
N
X
Al
(°
v
X
O C >
C• O M
3 U)-0
r
v
00
6
o
00
O)
o
LO
o
00
00
O M N
00
C6
�
N
M
v
Cl)
�
M
M
ai
N
v
Cl)
d M N
L\
O 00
N
M
00
d'
N M
Cl) 00
� O
� M
Ln
O
N
N
O
N 00
O
N
't
Ln O
p
Q
Ln
O
N
� O
N 6O
U) -
N N
Lo 7
N
Ln
-6
O
'
,
N
LO
�
,
N
Ln
N
Lp
00
N
C4
00
N
Z
00
N
O
7
O)
00 00
'
a0 '
00 6
N
N
i
I�
'
00
N
N
6)
N
N M
N M
N
00
N
M
N M
Cl)
Q
N O
N M
N 00
N
N
O
N
N M
N
00
� � N
OCo> U
N
Z'f--
M
V O
L()
Lo
Co
Ln
':T O
Lo O
6) 00
1 -P.
-N
N
O
-'T
O
V O
�
M
7 M L i
M
N M
V
M
N
N
00 M
CO M
CO M
M N
CO
M
N
CO
I-
N
00 I-
O
O
a) (V LL
O =
U 3 <n
T a > U
> (O
.,M.
M O
V
O
00
(O
(O
N
N
M
O
f—
ch
O
V'
Cl)
O
ch
LO
00
�
M 2� c N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
ON r U-
E 7 00
UU) N
-
L
M O LL
(V
7 N
O M r
?' N >
TCo
Co
Q M
V
V
V'
LO
LO
>N
'
LO
r
LO
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-21 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-22 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
L0
r—
A
0
LO
X
X
X
X
X
X
LO
04
O
A
C
N
o
U
�
N
o
Lq
X
X
O
N
a
T
�
_
\'
l!j
N
X
X
(6
Al
v
O C >
O M
'-?�
't
O
O
rn
c0
rn
rn
a0i N a_
U O C
M
M
M
M
M
N
00
Cl)
d O N
00 (4
d'
1\
L0
LO
Ln
N
N 00
00
O
r
N
N
M
N O
N M
N
N
7
(0 N
M
Lf>
M
lf')
N
—
N
Ln
O
O
d. Ln
N
O
L!')
O
Ln
�p
Q
'
N
'
i
CO
N
-
i
00
N
lf')
N
i
i
N
Ln
O
O
F
M
M O
N
00 O
N
N Cl)
N
M
M
00
N
N
O
O
N
N
O
M
M 00
M
6)
N
N
00
N
00
N
N
-
N O 00
7 N
f:
>
aCo U
N
Co M
M
M
M
M
O
O
I-
h
v
IT v
O
N
r--
r--
O
In
�
�
3 M LCO
CA
O
(D
N
O
W
N
M
N
N
O
N
00 W
M
N
N
M N
M N
U O 2
(V LL
O =
U 3 <n
T O > U
-0
>a)
.«Oj " (0N
M O
00
I`
I--
I`
(O
00
N
Il_
O
O
Lr)
Ln
O
Cl)
Cl)
V
Ln
-6
(6 2� - O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
ON r U-
E , 00
U�' N
L
M o LL
N
L � N
O N r
>
U)
TCo
Co
� M
N
M
d'
LO
(O
Il_
00
O
O
N
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-22 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-23 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
L0
r -
A
0
LO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
LO
04
O
A
C
N
o
U
�
N
�
O
Lq
O
N
�
T
n
\'
l!j
N
X
X
Al
(fl
v
.� O M
't
00
It
't
00
00
00
co
00
M
'
(D 3:U) a
U O CU
6
V
6
6
V
.4
.4
O
V
O
N
00
N
d O N
M
Cl)
M
Cl)
Cl)
Cl)
Cl)
—
M00
M
N
00 (4
00 (4
00 M
00 O
O
N O
M O
O O
Ln N
It O
a1
V N
N
N
� N
N
N
N
N
N M
d' 67
N
NN
O
O 7 O
N O
_
i
Cfl
,
,
L!)
L!)
Lo —
Ln
03
Q
aD
00
00
00
w
w
L\ M M
OD —
6 6 00
CO .
N M
N M
N
N Cl)
M
N
N M
N M
M T
M M
N ao
('') T
M M
N 00
N 00
N
N 00
00
00
� �
00
N 0')
00
--
-
-
--
-
- O 00
f N
OCo> U
N
Co CU
w
O 00
00
h w
Ln M
w M
O N 00
M
(o 00
LO O
O M
Co
7 L CO
O
(A (A
N
CA
C5) 67
67 CA
C5) 67
N N
M M
w �
M N M
00 LO
U O 2
(V LL
O =
U 3 U)
- (D
-
T O > U
> .«Oj 0
03 O
N
00
N
r-
OO
N
00
O
O
00
N
O
N
d'
O
Cl)
N
O
fl-
Cl)
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
ON r U-
E , 00
U�' N
L
N O
(V
L � N
O N r
?' N >
TCo
Co
N
M
O
V
(D
Ln
co
(O
O
f-
O
00
O
O
O
O
ti
N
r-
M
r-
V
r -
r
r
r
r
r
r
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-23 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-24 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
A
0
LO
~
X
X
LO
N
A
C
O
c
ULn
o
N
Ln
X
X
X
O
N
7
T
n
Lq
N
X
X
AI
CO
v
X
X
X
X
X
X
o
O M
LO
CP
Ln
LO
M
O
V
V
LO
LO
U O O N
V
-
-
V
N
N
C4
-
V
V
V
00
U
O M M
N N 6)
N -zt
-zi- N
O
O
Q
4
Lf)
O2
LC)
OD
Q
N
N
Q
Q
Q
Q
(6
Z
Ln
Ln
Z
Lp
Lp
Ln
00
6)
Z
Z
Z
Z
CO
00
CO
ap
N
aD
N
O
O 00
- N
>
>O Q
'
(0 O
'
(D
O
00
r—
r--
6) V
r--rN
N
O
V
M
N N
M
M
M
M
V
N N
f� O
M M
N N
N
M M
M M
N
M M
N
N
V
V
V
V
U O -0
N
N LL
O -E-
U u) U3Ln
a�
T E > U
>O
LO
N
LO
LO
d'
O
r—
LO
LO
O
(6 -'
(0 >:
LO
O
N
N
N
O
N
N
O
N
M
O
Lf)
c N
C 0) N LL
N 00
U 3 U) N
o � �
io o a�
3 LL
O N r-
� N
�
L .T
2' >
U O
LO
CO
rl-
00
6)
O
N
M
LO
CO
rl-
f
f�
r-
00
00
00
00
M
M
00
00
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-24 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

M O
M N
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 T-25 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015
0
r -
A
0
LO
~
X
X
LO
N
A
C:
O
c
ULn
N
O
Ln
X
X
X
O
N
�
T
n
Lq
N
X
>
AI
CO
v
X
X
X
o
_ o m
rn
rn
00
Ln
rn
Co
Cfl
r
U O N
00
M
d'
V
V
ti
V
M
N
O O O
CO
O M Or N
N
O
M D7
CO
N
r Cfl
O
�-
d'
�
Lf) O
�
Q
Q
�i
Q
�
� (D
LC) -
�
N N
�
�- �
N
�
N
00
(D
00
CO
N
Z
Z
Z
00
(D
N
00
00
CO OD
M
O
N
NN
00
M
N M
N
\
N
N4
M
00
O
M
N
4
O
N w
N
C)
O 00
-F N
>
> O Q
(0 O
N
Ln
O
N
00 N
Lf)
—
r` N
N
00 O
L!')
M 00
M
Lf)
O
(D
V
V
N
V
',I-
N "T
00 M
�
N M
N
N
U O
N
N LL
O �
U3v,
a�
T > U
Co
> CO
M
O
O
N
Ln
C
V'
N
O
N
N
L0
ti
N
N
N
L0
N
N
N
c
M O N LL
N op
U 3 U) N
o � �
io o
L
O N r•
� N
�
2' >
O
00
N
Cl)
d'
LO
CO
r-
00
M
O')
6)
6)
O)
0)
O)
O)
O)
C
C
M O
M N
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 T-25 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-26 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015
0
L0
r—
A
0
LO
X
X
LO
04
O
A
C
N
_
o
U
N
o
Lq
X
X
X
X
O
N
�
n
_
\
-
l�lj
N
AI
v
X
O C >
.� N -Op
0)
N
r
r
Cl)
0
U (a
O O N
00
Cl)
Ln
00
-
M
CV
N
M
L6
d O N
In
O
N
(DN
00 O)
N
O
O
(D
d'
lf'>
N
d'
Lf)
FO
4
Ln
N
O
�
Ln
�
N
Ln
�
M '
M
ONO
W
00NO
N
_
O
06)
C
N
O
00
NO00NN
N
O
N
O
N
4
C6
a
N
O
C'4
't (:11N4
OO
N M
U O 00
� � N
OCo> U
N
(E
M
O
O
M
67
N
Lo
h
Ln
N
O
�
M M
LO
�
LO
O
Lfi LO
N
O
d'
N M
N
lfj
M
N
M
N
N
M
N LO
N
IT
M
O
U O -0
N(V LL
O =
U 3 <n
- (D
T -O > U
(�6 0
>
.«O.
f6 O
O
Cl)
�
N
O
It
Cl)
O
1:T(6
O
2� c O
N
N
N
N
N
ON r U-
E , O
U�' N
L
C6 O LL
(V r -
L N
O N r
?' >
TCo
Co
� (6
LO
O
I-
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3
First Annual Report
T-26 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
October 2015

x
AM
V
LO �0
N N
00 N
N M
I-- O r- T
00 M N
-15
01
S
y
LO N
Ln r
00 00 N
N
I' -MT �
00
M
M
x
V
r -
LO
M
N � C'j N
L O
00 M' N
N -
N
fl- CO O
00 M N
M
07
0
r-
r -
N
N
N
N
07
A
C
0
O
LO
U
N
~
C
x
LO
N
A
O
C
of
O
c
U
Ln
Ln
_O
O
N
�
T
n
0
N
AI
V
O
O M
O')
U O C N
M
00
Lf�
67
CO
O
,Zt
Ln
N
M
00
N
�_
a0
N
"r
O')
O O 00
-F N
>
> O .Q
M
I--
V
O
U � O
Cl)
N
07
-0
N
C N LL
O -r-
U)
a�
T > U
CU
-0 0
> M CO
LO
N
co
M (D N LL
N
UJ-- U) N
o
io o a�
3 LL
O N ti
� N
�
2' >
N
� � O
N
c M
Q
0
7
U
C
O
U
co
M
�
N
O
M
H
x
AM
V
LO �0
N N
00 N
N M
I-- O r- T
00 M N
-15
01
S
y
LO N
Ln r
00 00 N
N
I' -MT �
00
M
M
x
V
r -
LO
M
N � C'j N
L O
00 M' N
N -
N
fl- CO O
00 M N
M
07
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 T-27 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015
r-
r-
r -
N
N
N
N
07
O
C
O
U
N
Cl)
C
M
O
of
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 T-27 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

m
E
co
(n
O
�
a) w
O
N
N
0
0
0
O'T
0
0
00
O
O—
M
O
r`
O
O
O
O
O
N
0')
It
O
N
O
� O
>
Co
I
M_
N
N_
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
>
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
p
i
�
r
r
r
[-
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
V1
C
U
j
0
0
0
0
0
0
CD
Lr)0
0
0
0�
0�
0
0
0
0
0
0
M
0
O
O
O
O
O
M
00
L
a)
O
O
O
O
O
O
OO
6
O
D)
O
r`
O
O
D7
D7
O
O
O
O
0
0
O
O
O
O
m
m
D)
i
d
Q
�
CU
�
r`
�
O
Cl)
(0=
O
Q0
M
0')
00
�'
LO
N
N
d'
N
r
N
O
r`
O
00
d•
M
Lf)
N
_
�
00
-
d7
=
�
r`
r`
-
-
•—
O
4
r
N
M
E
a)
N
a)
.—
O
O
C)
-t
N
O
N
O
M-
CD
'I
O
CD
Lo
O
O
N
O
co
�
O
O
O
O
N
M
O�
O
N
c6
00
rl-
cr
r`
MO
�
O
O
Ln
00
CO
O
V
M
r
cc
_00
O)
d•
Lf)
N
N
M
r
LO
"t
N
O�(0
000
cD
O
d•
M
O
Q
00
d7
r
co
r`
r`
r
O
�-
NLo
�=
M
0
C
00
M
M
O
N
Ln
M
Cl)
LO
CO
O
O
=
't
—
r`
d
N
00
0)
a)
U
O
Lf)
N
O
O
N
d.
r`
O
O
O
O
N
p
r`
r`
M
O
00
Nt
M
Lo
N
M
O
N
d
00
M
d
r`
r`
O
"
N
CO
co
N
N
o-
C6
O
N
a)
�
E
E
m
C
to
�
+O
L
Y
OO
C
O
U
E
O
U
O
Y
Q
N
O
O
T
O
N
O
0
O
N
N
W
V)
co
a)
Q�
�
O
Z
O
7
T
a)3:
O
U
O
,
0-0
C:
.r
M
co
-0
m
m
-0
a�
-0
a
a)
m
m
-a
a)
0
c.)
>1CC
_0
�
Q
CO
U)
0-
U)
5
O
U)
U
a
M
Q
co
H
IL
o(1)
0'
Q))
co
Q)
c
ca
a)
a)
w
a
U
V
U
a)
.�
E
co
y
O
i
c0
U
N
O
.M
co
O
Q
G
N
c0
c4
G
U
U
4
c0
_
>C
co
co
O
y
p
=
i
.;
(�
•i
O
a-
Q)n3
v,
o
m
a
o
E
E
i
c�a
o
a
oQ
co
c
m
o
11
v
in
a_
o
c
i
CO
a'z2
a
s
=
=
c
Q)
M
Z3
cB
�D
�,
Q
c
Q
U
R
c 6
N
i
O
j
-Q
(�D
x
X
rz
E
O
.�
(n
J
m
U
U
U
U
�L
Zi
Z
Z
Z
d-
rL
0
0
0
C3'
d
CJ
Cl
C i
I_
I_
fq
U
U'
Q
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 T-28 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

-0
/
/
(D
§
R
5 E
/
\ \
f
/
©/
«
\
o
n
«
\
/ ,
<
(D
�a2
Co
CU
cu0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2—
o
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0,
o
a@
¥
\
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
=
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
2 '
m
ƒ
\
t
n=
w=
_�
C\1\
o/
0 2
/
#
r
®
9
E
f
_=
p
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
_
j
7
f
\
\
2
«
\
%
&
7 2
\
k �
\
a
<
7
f$
\
2
o\%
7/\
M 2
0\
Co^
(�
\�
# 6
U) §
\ +®
(
§
1 0
E
3
E
7
�
z
S
2
0
f
±
/
\C'
n
\
\
\
\
=
/
=
\
\
7
$
E
N
0®
2
2
3
2/_=
m
q=
k\ƒ/\\
z
0-
k
\
U)
LL
��
/
2
E
\
\
�
=
e
\�—
c
§
3
n
N
m\
3\
CL
(
(\
@
\
/
\
\
E
/
\
n_
2
m
m\
9
5
2—
g=
2
»
o
ED
k
E
E\/\
o®
2
n&
k
k§
E
/
\
%
/
/
/
±
2
/
\
/
N
Pand uLands Restoration sb-mae3 aS PCSPhosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

to
0
Q
7
(D
U
M
7 Cl)
� N
N W
U �
t6 a
� U
a
O C
L
C J
O �
C -0
C
a �
N �
C +M
8
co
CL C
U) O
L Q
U M
a U)
M E
U C
N
T O
O rL
M O
> O
0 a�
CU
o �
co
N (6
0
_ N
M �
C 07
N C
i2 N
Lf
o
LO M
N M
C
O
H M
o U)
m
I;t
0
O to
o
N
N
O
O
O
O
�
O
N
O
O
O
O
O—
N
O
O—
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
I
L
O �
C
N
IL O
CU
c
>
N
M
O
O
Q
Q
Q
O
Q
O
O
O
Q
O
O
Q
O
O
O
Q
Q
O<
O
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
O
Q
p
O
O
r
O
r
Z
Z
Z
O
r
z
O
r
O
r
O
r
z
O
r
O
r
z
O
r
O
r
O
r
Z
Z
O
r
Z
O
r
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
O
r
z
O
�
Cn
C
0>
o
o
Q
Q
Q
O
Q
o
o
O
Q
o
o
Q
o
o
Q
Q
o
Q
o
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
o
Q
o
O
O
Z
Z
Z
o
Z�
0
0
0
Z�
0
0
Z
0
0
Z
Z�
0
Z
0
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
0
Z�
0
�
�
�
���
�
�
N
LO
O
O
OM
O
N
N
v
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
to
O
l()
co
O
I-
N
M
U
E
O
O
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
C
N
U)
M
CO
LO
O
O
O
M
O
NCD
d•
O
O
NC)
O
O
N
O
O
0)
O
O
O
O
U')
O
LO
�
Q
N
Cl)
C6
d
a
.C:
5
LO
O
O
O
M
O
N
N"t
O
r
O
r
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
to
OLo
W
M
N
M
co
H
y
M
O
O
CU
E
E
co
to
F�
E
Y
M
0
�
O
E
O
0-
E
N
0.
M
icn
0
0
O
E
NV
0.
73
N
L
Y
L
U
7
N
N
o
Y
Y
O
L
Y
i
Y
U
0_
0
U
�.
L
O3
M
-a
C
OM
O
O-
Q
Q
M
0-
O
CO
m
E
a
E
o
0)
�M
0
-00_
E—
Uca
C
0)
M
M
0
M
Y
c
M
—
a
o
CM
O
co
E
0
0
3
CD
C/)
J
O
U)
U
d
m
Q
U
0-
0
U)
W
co
M
yCU
,U
z
d
t0
d
z;
CU
-�
�,
C
C
CZ
M
z
f0
N
E
d
O
U
.,t_0
i
G
M
U
•�
U
.�
0
C
•�
•_
_
O
y
a'
i
•�
M
.a)
t0
a
O
s
L
U
o
Q
�°
:—
y
M
.�
y
,i
o
aMi
o
a
M
v,
y
v>i
a
0
C
S
M
M
N
i
M
CUw
t0
O
M
i
d
M
•�
Co
f6
.�
to
M
o
U
C°
i
M
U
i
o
a>
a
`a
�,
Q
o
Co
ll
w
CU
U
U
D
CL
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 T-30 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

Pand uLands Restoration s% -Phase! GS PCS Phosphate cmp9, Im.
First Annual Report October 2015
t
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
< <
§\\
g
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z z
2
a
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
< <
K
o
./
/
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z z
2
)
/
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
< <
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z z
2
±\
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0%
\ k
I---
E
}�
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
_�
/
@
\
_
M
/x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0\
/
\
<
#
(\
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0\
\}
/�
/�
ƒ\
-\
E
to(
0
7z-y
[
0
)
0
k
°
2 �
/
\
$
0
\
/
M
3
®
\
=
3
/
7
�
/
e
»
»
y
%
\
\
7 ±
%
/
\
\
\
/
\
2
}
/
\ \
\
\
W
\
E
\
2
/
(
\
\ \
c
_
_
\
J\\
U)
\
0\
M
5
-0
2
\
/
\
\
\
\
«
f
§
/
/
/
/
\
\ \
q
\
L)
4:
f
6
o
j
j
/
%
%
a %
-V
e
o
Q
\
..
_
&&
N
Pand uLands Restoration s% -Phase! GS PCS Phosphate cmp9, Im.
First Annual Report October 2015

Al1RORA •E r, } ;I rr
a. IyI Olt)
di y
SOUTH CREEK
- -- 'xCORRIDOR ., i S -• E.. �---. I
,
,
-
j-
P LANDS
SOUTH CREEK `q ,fig
CORRIDOR E po
.. -
.. ewuL— PHASE2
PH
-------- --
PHASE 2
TRACT
P LANDS
HOLLOWELL
pppSE
-
BAY CITY,[�iF,RM m PHASE 3
PHASE
PHASE 4PARKER
U LANDS - P LANDS
FARM
SECTIONS A -J
- 4., 35'14'15.04"
RODMAN
CONTROL
.., LONG: 76'46'19.20"
_ / ` _
-----
SITE
U LANDS
P LANDS 2 ➢
_ .
CASEY TRACT
- ` �/
U LANDS
V
{,
I ,
.....
-.'-
.+
LEGEND
P and U LANDS BOUNDARY
P and U LANDS PHASE 3
0 6,000 12,000
SOUTH CREEK CORRIDOR AND
PARKER FARM BOUNDARY
SCALE IN FEET
VICINITY MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
P AND U LANDS PHASE 3 AND RODMAN
TE LOCATION
P'and U LANDS
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SOURCE:
SCALE: AS SHOWN
APPROVED BY:
DRAWN BY: TLJ
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
DATE: 10/08/15
FILE: PLANDS_VIC_PH3_
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
2014
NAD 1983E UFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
CP#1745.59.32.3
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGES, NC STATEPLANE,
�^ �J ^ 4709 COLLEGE ACRES EIV2
USGS
lV_ L K
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
INCORPORATED TEL [phone]
FIGURE 1
NAD83, FEET, 1:24000 -SCALE, WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]

LEGEND
- PHASE 3 (1.755.10 ACRES)
P & U LANDS BOUNDARY
ROADS
-
®
BERMS AND PARKING AREAS
0
FORESTED WETLAND
0
FORESTED NON -WETLAND
D
OPENWATER
o
PHASE 3 WELL LOCATION
TREE SAMPLING PLOT
PHOTO STATION
CONTROL WELL
BUFFER PLOT LOCATION
J
SOUTH CREEK CANAL
EXECUTIVE ROAD/ 192 PLPS 22
JAIME ROAD 193~
PLPS 23 194 ie .PLPS 21
1961
_.mm
PLPS
y
PLPS 2 0197 787 w
RODMAN 198186
CONTROL 20; e
SITE RC -1
RC -2 184
RC -3 PHASE 4 1 O
83 /
U LANDS
C 182
W �
O C=7 /
TJ
79
207 0
1ZTt 206 D
�7 C7
O 177
0 � 2009 78
0 208
® U LANDS
%O 173 /
0 C 211 O 210
� ni
9i '
172 ®
D
Z 21 212 213
4LPS 2
0 J'
D
PLPS 25
PHASE 3 - AREAS PLANTED (1,357.28 ACRES):
ZONE 1 RIVERINE SWAMP FOREST
D ZONE 1A TAR-PAMLICO RIPARIAN BUFFER
D ZONE 2 HEADWATER FOREST
ZONE 2A TAR-PAMLICO RIPARIAN BUFFER
0 ZONE 3 NON-RIVERINE SWAMP FOREST
0 ZONE 4 POND PINE POCOSIN FOREST
0 ZONE 5 HARDWOOD FLAT 1
0 ZONE 6 HARDWOOD FLAT 2
PHASE 2
PHASE
PLPS 1
BUFFER PLOT
BAY CITY FARM
PHASE 4
U LANDS
SMALL ROAD
- 111
FER PLOT B
17
I�-—���BUFFER PLOT C
118
25 123
124 'd 121
C
12 __
126 BUFFER
OF R PLOT F 131 % PLOT DD
122
130 132 •*�
y °t® 12900
4 PLPS 6
� y BAY CITY No.
PLPS 5
o PHASE 1
N P LANDS
0
N BAY CITY t4-- 3
38
0737 x 135
14 , OY „
i • 141 i 139 136
l° ` 9 t 140 at®
ZO 142 147 ® _151
MC O 150 _i
Z
__--
9 ..144 O 148 149_____ r ---- O 0 \5 146 152
I N
143BAY CITY ,5e o Z 153
180
PLPS 19 158 O 1 155
i 180
0 ,I
PLPS 1 i54
M
--_.--- 169
1176 1590
P LANDS 166
167 168
owC
4 � 11184 169%0 ,
175 1161 162 1163c0 % -IV RON
PS 17
16
BAY CITY
15
ROYAL ROAD
BENFEWELL
ROYAL ROAD
PHASE 2
P LANDS
\<1\1
-
90
SMALL ROAD
PHASE 1
P LANDS
10
19
120 ,a Ay9
BUFFER sF
PLOT E
PHASE 3
PHASE 1
SOURCE:
D 1,800 3,600
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
SCALE IN FEET WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
NOTE:
P & U LANDS BOUNDARY (3,666.92 ACRES)
(TOTAL ACREAGE INCLUDES 12.52 ACRES OF
RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG STATE ROADS NOT
PLANTED)

Do
Pt
SOUTH CREEK CANAL Da Po
EXECUTIVE ROAD/ 192 To
JAIME ROAD 193
194 191
Pt 196
195 188
RODN9 187
CON OL 97
198 Po 186 185
SITE Po 201
RC -1
To RC -2 184
RC -3 PHASE 4
U 183 Da 61
LANDS 0
C 182
0 180
OTJ 179
Z 207 0
IT 206 D
A O
:O 209 178 177
206 U LANDS 174
Po
173
0 1 210
171
D 172
z 212 Po 213
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
2012 AERIALS DOWNLOAD FROM FROM NC ONE MAP
WEBSITE: http://data.nconemap
SOIL SURVEY OF BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, US DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONVERSATION SERVICE,
ISSUED: SEPTEMBER 1995
5GJ o
D
cG� �
S� cn
-1411
41& 0
0
Po PHASE 2 N
Pt
Po BAY CITY FARM
PHASE 4
U LANDS
ROYAL
SMALL ROAD
10
0113 , 112 111
11
116 119
\ 117
� _ 120
118 _
125 12
124 Da' 21
127
Wd 126 131 Po
122
130 132 13
128 129
4
BAY CITY NO.
` 1 %I
14
it
P LANDS
BAY CIT°���� *,
142 141 140 / / 136 135 134
139
147 151
150
14F162----",,
149
152
153
5 Po
0
154 169
1166167 168
161 _ , , ",, RO AI
r -n
O
mc: 143
Z
O {
N 16
Da
176
175
170
1
BAY CITY No.
I�
LEGEND
PERENNIAL
P AND U LANDS BOUNDARY
•
WELL LOCATION AND TREE MONITORING PLOT
Da
(WELLS TO MONITOR LATERAL DRAINAGE EFFECT
—
MAY NOT HAVE A TREE PLOT. LOCATIONS ARE
PO
APPROXIMATE.)
Pt
CONTROL WELL
.�7
f� SOILS
TARBORO SAND
�I SYMBOL
SOIL NAME
PERENNIAL
INTERMITTENT
Ap
ARAPAHOE (MINERAL)
Da
DARE (ORGANIC)
Do
DOROVAN (ORGANIC)
PO
PONZER (ORGANIC)
Pt
PORTSMOUTH (MINERAL)
TaB
TARBORO SAND
To
TOMOTLEY (MINERAL)
Wd
WASDA (ORGANIC)
0
HYDRIC SOILS
NOTE:
APPROVED BY:
ONLY HYDRIC SOILS ARE DESIGNATED MINERAL
OR ORGANIC.
SOILS
P AND
U LANDS PHASE 3 AND
RODMAN
PCS PHOSPHATE
COMPANY,
INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN
APPROVED BY:
DRAWN BY: TLJ/BFG
DATE: 08/05/15
FILE: P_LANDS_SOILS_PH3_
2014
d,
CP#1745.59.32.3
0 1,200 2,400
SCALE IN FEET
7
L
01,NCORPORATED
MV1ROMMM& CMSULTAM
4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
SUITE 2
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
FIGURE 3

LEGEND SMALL ROAD P LANDS
' PHASE 2 p r cN ' ° PHASE 1
1
PHASE 3 PLANTING AREA iii PHASE 3 1140 � �� 113
12 0 11
OPEN WATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH 1160 0117 . �0119 A
� NAN1zap
y�y ROADS "1 - it5
� O 1 z3 o 9s �F
® PERIMETER BERM AND PARKING AREAS p 125 1240 O ,o ct18
NANNEL 121 PHASE
® O 0 PHASE
0 FORESTED WETLAND 127 0126
tzs TRANSMON AREA rip
0
1310
FORESTED NON -WETLAND
^06 _ 1zz h
O WELL LOCATION 0130 1320 p 1330
M CONTROL WELL co 0128 t2s0 No 4
/ PHASE BAY CITY
PHASE 1 n
BAY CITY FARM
PHASE 4 0 PHASE 1
SOUTH CREEK CANAL U LAN DS-.
� � �� �' � N P LANDS
EXECUTIVE ROAD/
92
JAIME ROAD 193
0194
1sF�
W •r'
y O HYDROLOGIC
0 196 = N ZONES
195 188 WETLAND HYDROPERIODS
RODMANp W CITY No. = <6% OF THE GROWING SEASON
3
-d- W , 13s .37 BAY 0 •
CONTROLo 1� O 0 135
197 pial
0 las 1411 13P 0 O = >6 - 12.5 PERCENT OF THE GROWING
SITE 198 2010 O 1850 0 1400 1390 0136 SEASON
rn 142 147 0 O = >12.5 - 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING
RC -1 Z Q p 0 lest SEASON
RC -2 184 (Tl C 150
o Z 0 O = >25 - 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING
RC -3 PHASE 4 0183 0144 O 146 1480 0149 -�" O SEASON
U LANDS 181 ® 145 0 152 0 = >75 - 100 PERCENT OF THE GROWING
0 p N 143 BAY CITY 156 O.
2 0 150 SEASON
C 182 0 0 155
Q 0 0180 -- 158
160
179 O Y CITY Legend
169
Z 207 Q ---------0 0Value 154 NO. Elevation in Feet
1
� 206 O D
70
O 171
O 177 0 0 176 159 _ 0 z-4
70 0209 178 O 166 - - 4-5
O 0208 0 167 168 Q 5-6
0 174 1640 165 0 6-7
.Z7 0173 0 1750 161 162 1630T/ O 7-8
Q211 210 n, 0 0 AUNTY LINE ROAD s _ =9-90
O 0 0
C i 10-11
172 0 0170 m 011-12
D 12-13
p 0 0 / W 13-14
Z 212 213
H 14-15
Q 15-16
Q 16-21
21-48
MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS ON LIDAR
P AND U LANDS PHASE 3 AND RODMAN
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES, SCALE: AS SPPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ/BFG
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: HOWN A
11/19/2009
AND02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE DATE: 10/15/15 FILE;PLANDS_WELL_LIDAR_
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES, PH3-2014.DWG
NAD 1983 FEET.
1q
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM, BEAUFORT AND 0 1,400 2,800 p� " CP#1745.59.32.2
PAMLICO COUNTIES, LIDAR, NC STATEPLANE, NAD 1983, FEET, "� 4709 COLLEGE ACRESU TEV2
WWW.NCFLOODMAPS.COM OLINA 28403
SCALE IN FEET INCORPORATED WILMINGTON, NORTEL TH C910/392-9253 FIGURE 4
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]

k
z_
«
�
«
�
O
�
�
Q
�
LU
�
%
�
v
�
«
m
#
�
O
C14
&
\ )
_ /
$
a 5
j §
o
\� /E
_
\/ %/
E ° 7 2
�\
o ƒ _
\\
r § \
\ G ° /
2
bo
/§ \)
�
/
�y )
/
=o %2
J
�r
\ / = e
§ \
2
2
� 2
} \
a
/ _
\ \
\/ 25
2
�z e <
.E
(/a\.
5 � \ y B
�g
a�22/
0 2 5 2 e
7
2 2 2 2
_ , E
0
&§%//
�\k\
a
\©ƒ/k
{�
to
\d\\/
}
g % /
.10
\\�/ƒ
e
ra
CL _0
\
y�
§
/ § §
� & /
2 ƒ
\ } { k \ \
e
r \
� E � \ e �
co \
E ©� \ G /
B ®* ® 2 2
}
�f
\j==—
> Amd
0
/ / \
\ /
& ¥ \
% > 3
— z z = a
o
t %
e
§ /
7
/ § \
o
E
/
////�f
cu )
�r
//
Of
�& \\
\ K
3 <
z
�
N o%
%
�
bapul)HQ@e�§Qwow
Pee§mO
k
z_
«
�
«
�
O
�
�
Q
�
LU
�
%
�
v
�
«
m
#
�
O
C14
_ , E
�\k\
{�
/t=
G a \ § }
g % /
E _
\�\/�ƒ
y�
/ § §
2 ƒ
\ } { k \ \
e
� E � \ e �
J o
E ©� \ G /
B ®* ® 2 2
\j==—
/ / \
\ /
& ¥ \
% > 3
— z z = a
o
t %
e
§ /
7
/ § \
E
////�f
M,
E
_
�
�
Fig -5

LEGEND — PHASE 3 HYDROLOGIC
ZONES
P & U LANDS BOUNDARY
— ROADS 0
® BERMS AND PARKING AREAS
D
0 FORESTED WETLAND
0 FORESTED NON—WETLAND D
0 OPENWATER
D
0 UN—PLANTED 2 FOOT CHANNEL
o PHASE 3 WELL LOCATION
0 CONTROL WELL LOCATION
WETLAND HYDROPERIODS
• = <6% OF THE GROWING SEASON
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE PH3 (87.70 ACRES)
O = >6 — 12.5 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE PH3(176.88 ACRES)
0 = >12.5 — 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE PH3 (425.32 ACRES)
O = >25 — 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE PH3 (593.92 ACRES)
RODMAN CONTROL SITE (23.49 ACRES)
• = >75 — 100 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE PH3 (77.27 ACRES)
ROYAL ROAD
ROYAL ROAD
PHASE 2
P LANDS
�o
90
PHASE 1
P LANDS
SOURCE:
D 1,800 3,600
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
SCALE IN FEET WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
PHASE
PHASE 3
113
_ -
10
111
140
118e
0117
0119
Y
W
•
115
r
120 0 Ay
9s
U
125
1240
O 23 1180 0
+0e1Y1n 12 PHASE 3
O
0 PHASE t
\,
127
0126
1310 /
°122
W
0130
1320
U, 0128
129
h� W
PHASE
v
BAY CITY
No. 4
J
PHASE 1
n
oj0
BAY CITY FARM
<
o
PHASE 4
PHASE 1
SOUTH CREEK CANAL.
'� � �
U LANDS
A
P LANDS
EXECUTIVE ROAD/
JAIME ROAD°193/191
N
194
0
e 196O
195
166
BAY CITY No. 3
RODMAN
e187
`.
CONTROL
i 970
135
137 °
0
SIT E 198
186
0
14�
140
1390
134
2010
142
RC -1
. rP
14 6
151
184
K,c:
ISO °
NOTE:
RC -2
RC -3
e
°1�
z,
o.
0144
o4
148,
+�°
o
-
O
152
HYDROLOGIC ZONES ARE A VISUAL APPROXIMATION OF TOTAL ACRES
PHASE 4
161
^b
REPRESENTED BY WELL HYDROPERIOD CATEGORIES BASED ON ONE
U LANDS
BAY
CITY N° 2
1
WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR
ifiz
158
0
0
CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIOD
3
;
ISO®+�
°
155BAY
CITY No.
BOUNDARIES.
Z
Z
A
207 O
° O
o
179
-
157
•
0
154
0°
169
;o206
0
70
°
, 78
0176
59
P AND U LANDS PHASE 3 AND RODMAN
206 0209
t77°
P LA
167
168
2014 LONGEST HYDROPERIODS AND ESTIMATED HYDROLOGIC
o
° U LANDS
164
°
°
DURING ALL RAINFALL CONDITIONS
00
K
O 1741
173
• .
-
161 182
LINE ROAD
z
0zt1 ,210
0 0 ---
COUNTY
??
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
O
171
°
172
0170
vm rt1
212 2,3
• o
w
SCALE: AS SHOWN
APPROVED BY:
DRAWN BY: TLJj
SOURCE:
D 1,800 3,600
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
SCALE IN FEET WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.

LEGEND — PHASE 3
HYDROLOGIC
BENFEWELL ROAD
ZONES
1 10
P & U LANDS BOUNDARY
WETLAND HYDROPERIODS
— ROADS
O •
_ <6% OF THE GROWING SEASON
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE PH3 (87.70 ACRES)
118•
® BERMS AND PARKING AREAS
Wy
4i
D 0
= >6 — 12.5 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
RNROAD
0 FORESTED WETLAND
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE PH3 (208.67 ACRES)
'
0 FORESTED NON—WETLAND
O 0
= >12.5 — 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE PH3 (408.97 ACRES)
ROYAL ROAD
OPENWATER
0 PHASE 1
PHASE
. `
_ >25 — 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASONUN—PLANTED
P LANDRODMAN
2 FOOT CHANNEL
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE PH3 (655.75 ACRES)
PHASE 3
CONTROL SITE (23.49 ACRES)0
°122
WELL LOCATION
`
0
O CONTROL WELL
0130 1320 O
• o i °144 49
PHASE 4 °,e3 o� ,460 ,4e® ° ,b2
181 N
�] o •,43 BA CITY No. 2 50
U LANDS 156 °
182 O
DoISO 'ISO 10 155 CITY No. 1
z ,79 ° ° BAY
p 207 y 57 ,54 789
O 206 0 v 0
Z O 178 177 ®17e 59 0
0209 P LANDS ,88 16
O 205 , O
0 184 185
U LANDS °
O 174 0
O 0
173 16, 162 1630 LINE ROAD
°211 210 0 ° COUNTY
• 171 = y
172 ° 0170 vm rtt
212 2130 O
w
SOURCE:
1,800 3,600
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
SCALE IN FEET WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
PHASE 1
P LANDS
NOTE:
HYDROLOGIC ZONES ARE A VISUAL APPROXIMATION OF TOTAL ACRES
REPRESENTED BY WELL HYDROPERIOD CATEGORIES BASED ON ONE
WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR
CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIOD
BOUNDARIES.
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
1 10
140
118•
0117 0119
Wy
4i
115
x 120 0 Ay9
118 s'F.
00
U`
'
125 J23
1240 +o' amt+ 12 PHASE 3
-
O�
0 PHASE 1
. `
127
0126 /
1310
°122
`
0130 1320 O
O7 0128
129
v
PHASE3 "�
BAY CITY No 4
J
PHASE 1 n
oj0
BAY CITY FARM
<
o
PHASE 4
PHASE 1
SOUTH
CREEK CANAL
'� � � �
U LANDS
A
P LANDS
EXECUTIVE ROAD
JAIME ROAD
0193 91
O
O
N
0 194
+ +
0196
1as
, o
BAY CITY No. 3
RODMAN
197
•187
C ONTROL
SITE 198
Tae14�
S
• 185
O
1390O
135
137 ° 13�
B
2010
0 140
142
RC -1
RC -2,
184
r n
rZr1Z
14 �
151
ISS O
• o i °144 49
PHASE 4 °,e3 o� ,460 ,4e® ° ,b2
181 N
�] o •,43 BA CITY No. 2 50
U LANDS 156 °
182 O
DoISO 'ISO 10 155 CITY No. 1
z ,79 ° ° BAY
p 207 y 57 ,54 789
O 206 0 v 0
Z O 178 177 ®17e 59 0
0209 P LANDS ,88 16
O 205 , O
0 184 185
U LANDS °
O 174 0
O 0
173 16, 162 1630 LINE ROAD
°211 210 0 ° COUNTY
• 171 = y
172 ° 0170 vm rtt
212 2130 O
w
SOURCE:
1,800 3,600
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
SCALE IN FEET WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
PHASE 1
P LANDS
NOTE:
HYDROLOGIC ZONES ARE A VISUAL APPROXIMATION OF TOTAL ACRES
REPRESENTED BY WELL HYDROPERIOD CATEGORIES BASED ON ONE
WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR
CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIOD
BOUNDARIES.

APPENDIX A
Stem Counts at Individual Plots at
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 3

Appendix A. Individual tree/shrub plot counts from P and U Lands Phase 3 first annual (2014) fall monitoring. Numbers in each column indicate trees unquestionably alive at sampling. Plot size is 0.3 acre.
Zone 2
Zone 1
1 st
115 116 191 196 Total
Common name Scientific name
1st
Unknown
?
2
1
5
1
1
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
9
10
14
4
23
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
131
2
6
Paw paw
Asima triloba
1
1
6
River birch
Betula nigra
2
14
2
3
2
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
20
5
13
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
5
25
3
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
2
3
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
1
2
43
2
19
Buttonbush'
Cephalanthus occidentalis
1
5
1
1
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
2
1
2
4
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
23
30
1
1
2
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
183
156
1
1
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
6
19
1
1
Titi
Cyrilla racemiflora
4
1
5
2
2
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
1
6
3
1
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
1
6
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
17
34
5
27
83
Deciduous holly
Ilex decidua
3
6
5
2
7
Inkberry
L glabra
2
44
1
4
6
Winterberry
Ilex verticillate
14
12
10
9
72
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
86
5
10
19
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
84
1
223
102
91
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
78
689
1
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
2
1
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
3
2
5
Mulberry
Morus rubra
1
7
19
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
19
1
3
14
4
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
20
17
11
15
63
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
28
14
11
1
54
Red bay
Persea borbonia
1
2
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
76
97
112
115
89
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
882
9
9
Oak
Quercus spp.
White oak
Q. alba
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
1
1
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
2
2
10
17
31
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
48
19
27
11
105
Water oak
Q. nigra
Willow oak
Q. phellos
1
21
22
Cherrybark oak
Quercus pagodaefolia
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
Pond cypress
Taxodium ascendens
4
4
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
6
13
7
12
38
American elm
Ulmus americana
1
6
5
12
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
2
2
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
1
1
2
Dusty zenobia
Zenobia pulverulenta
TOTALI
124
102
102
115
443
Zone 2
112 114 117 118 193 1 194 195 197 198 Total
1 st
4
8
5
1
2
1
5
1
27
18
21
9
10
14
4
23
14
18
131
2
6
1
1
6
1
2
14
12
3
6
6
39
20
5
13
10
2
5
25
3
1
1
2
3
4
1
2
43
2
19
24
1
1
5
1
1
1
2
1
2
4
10
37
23
30
13
16
10
13
31
183
156
12
1
6
19
1
1
2
4
1
5
1
1
1
6
1
6
3
1
3
1
6
5
1
5
62
28
13
1
5
3
6
5
2
7
10
4
2
44
1
4
6
3
13
14
12
10
9
72
6
13
86
5
10
19
12
19
84
1
223
102
91
109
1
78
689
1
2
1
1
4
1
1
7
19
13
14
19
7
4
14
9
106
15
3
7
22
12
26
5
18
22
130
1
1
2
64
109
76
97
112
115
89
99
121
882
Zone 2A
121 122 123 125 126 127 Total
1 st
4
5
2
11
2
4
11
4
21
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
3
3
17
20
5
5
3
3
2
2
43
24
19
24
1
22
133
2
2
2
2
4
81
4
17
39
2
13
156
12
1
6
19
1
4
5
5
1
6
1
1
5
5
62
28
13
36
12
12
163
8
8
9
14
9
32
32
13
7
8
26
86
1
1
223
102
91
109
86
78
689
P and U Lands Phase 3 First Annual Report A-1

Appendix A. (continued)
P and U Lands Phase 3 First Annual Report A-2
Zone 3
111 119 120 124 128 129 130 131 132 133 135 136 137 1 138 139 140 141 142 147 149 150 151 178 179 182 183
1st
Common name Scientific name
Unknown ?
2
12
1
2
9
9
9
3
2
2
6
39
2
15
8
23
48
13
3
3
1
12 2 2
6
Serviceberry Amelanchier canadensis
Red chokeberry Aronia arbutifolia
Paw paw Asima triloba
River birch Betula nigra
3
American beautyberry Callicarpa americana
Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana
Water hickory Carya aquatica
Sugarberry Celtis laevigata
1
Buttonbush" Cephalanthus occidentalis
4
1
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
Atlantic white cedar Chamaecyparis thyoides
10
5
21
12
15
20
11
14
6
6
3
9
2
29
6
26
7
5
15
24 63 17
24
33
Sweet pepperbush Clethra alnifolia
1
9
9
5
4
1
5
2
5
4
1
3
1
4
Silky dogwood Cornus amomum
Swamp dogwood Cornus foemina
4
1
2
1
3
1
2
1
Titi Cyrilla racemiflora
2
6
6
2
1
1
31
2
1
1
1
6
Persimmon Diospora virginiana
Strawberry bush Euonymous americana
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
18
1
1
6
1
Deciduous holly Ilex decidua
Inkberry I. glabra
Winterberry Ilex verticillata
1
Virginia sweetspire Itea virginica
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
Swamp doghobble Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
Spicebush Lindera benzoin
Fetterbush Lyonia lucida
Sweetbay Magnolia virginiana
9
5
5
3
16
8
1
1
3
7
1
2
9
1
Mulberry Morus rubra
Unknown gum/tupelo Nyssa spp.
3
3
1
2
2
3
5
1
5
1
2
1
Water tupelo N. aquatica
22
1
13
12
22
8
4
9
14
5
25
12
10
22
21
12
16
14
16
5
6
4 17 26
16
15
Swamp tupelo Nyssa biflora
5
4
37
16
12
6
20
8
12
2
29
16
12
18
6
12
13
20
6
2
9
7 1
3
6
Red bay Persea borbonia
1
2
1
2
3
4
5 2
Pond pine Pinus serotina
1
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
3
Oak Quercus spp.
1
4
4
9
2
10
5
7
20
7
1
6
3
16
1
3
12
6
3
1
7 4
7
4
White oak Q. alba
Laurel oak Q. laurifolia
3
7
17
16
10
11
10
6
14
8
7
6
7
2
6
4
1
7
1
2
2
1 5 9
17
11
Overcup oak Q. lyrata
6
18
6
26
31
15
21
13
17
7
4
9
8
7
7
13
2
8
8
9 34 21
19
52
Swamp chestnut oak Q. michauxii
14
16
18
8
19
36
37
31
17
14
7
24
33
22
20
19
16
16
9
9
19
13 12 8
41
21
Water oak Q. nigra
Willow oak Q. phellos
6
4
20
5
24
37
15
5
10
11
7
1
3
14
7
17
4
13
6
9
4
12 2 6
32
20
Cherrybark oak Quercus pagodaefolia
1
Dwarf azalea Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose Rosa palustris
Pond cypress Taxodium ascendens
1
Bald cypress Taxodium distichum
16
1
28
5
17
27
7
14
18
21
15
25
20
16
11
10
19
23
18
34
8
18 16 22
16
23
American elm Ulmus americana
High bush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum
3
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
Possumhaw Viburnum nudum
3
3
3
3
2
3
2
1
1
1
2
1
3
Dusty zenobia Zenobia pulverulenta
TOTALI
102
1 72
1 171
1 120
1 186
1 205
1 166
1 133
1 136
1 147
1 123
1 140
1 120
1 136
1 113
1 148
1 138
1 161
1 81
1 92
1 82
1 130 1 151 1 119
1 182
1 186
P and U Lands Phase 3 First Annual Report A-2

Appendix A. (continued)
Zone 4
143 144 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160
Zone 3
184 186 187 188 201 206 207 1 208 209 210 211 212 213 Total
3
1st
Common name
Scientific name
Unknown
?
5
3
6
1
1
1 3
1
9
259
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
6 16 6
9
5
3
2
1 1
1
1
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
1
2
Paw paw
Asima triloba
6
1
3
1
River birch
Betula nigra
1
2
7
10
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
8
23
1
4
8
2
2
1
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
1
22
12
11
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
41 17 20
20
13
37
1
4
1
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
3
24
38 54 46
31
28
55
5
1
13
1
Buttonbush"
Cephalanthus occidentalis
2
3
9
7
1 2 1
2
3
13
19
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
21
21
1
4
5
31
7
14 14
24
31
20
576
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
1
2
2 5 8
8
4
10
1
57
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
1
11
3
8
24
15
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
15 10 20
1
6
2
1
2
4
2
12
45
Titi
Cyrilla racemiflora
2
4
5
2
139
135
83
108
75
73
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
168
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
11
38
Deciduous holly
Ilex decidua
Inkberry
I. glabra
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
1
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
2
1
1
14
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
2
2
2
77
Mulberry
Morus rubra
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
2
1
1
33
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
14
20
4
5
24
10
7
10
34 22
1
19
16
533
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
5
10
10
2
12
8
17
12 28
5
13
20
424
Red bay
Persea borbonia
20
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
1
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
5
8
Oak
Quercus spp.
8
3
2
7
8
5
4
4
1
3
188
White oak
Q. alba
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
30
12
2
15
28
15
22
18
28 21
37
48
20
486
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
15
10
6
18
5
24
37
30
7 29
23
9
17
591
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
24
28
18
10
14
28
20
29
16 17
11
22
16
752
Water oak
Q. nigra
Willow oak
Q. phellos
19
12
6
18
21
61
13
20
29 23
18
50
54
638
Cherrybark oak
Quercus pagodaefolia
1
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
Pond cypress
Taxodium ascendens
9
10
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
20
23
7
24
14
10
15
26
24 21
38
26
34
730
American elm
Ulmus americana
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
2
17
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
1
29
Dusty zenobia
Zenobia pulverulenta
TOTALI
160
149
108
106
134
164
156
157
166 187
175
220
209
5,631
Zone 4
143 144 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160
1st
5
3
12
16 12 8
21
35
5
1
3
7
5
17
8
15
6 16 6
9
5
3
2
1 1
1
1
1
2
6
1
3
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
8
23
1
4
8
2
2
1
1
22
12
11
46
25
41 17 20
20
13
37
1
4
1
56
50
3
24
38 54 46
31
28
55
5
1
13
3 1
2
3
9
7
1 2 1
2
3
13
3
1
1
4
8
18
1
3
2 5 8
8
4
10
1
11
3
8
24
15
4
2
15 10 20
20
35
41
4
2
1
139
135
83
108
75
120 122 114
122
124
168
P and U Lands Phase 3 First Annual Report A-3

Appendix A. (continued)
Zone 5
Zone 4
161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 1 169 170 171 174 175 176 180 Total
9
Common name Scientific name
1st
Unknown
?
3
16
3
16
15 3
5
12
2
2
7
2
17
4
220
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
3
3
1
10
2
2
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
4
4
8
11
2
7
4
32
4
Paw paw
Asima triloba
1
1
1
1
2
3
River birch
Betula nigra
7
4
17
9
17
12
16
4
12
70
7
3
20
9
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
69
1
1
5
11
16
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
6
5
3
5
32
17
9
13
24
16
10
89
12
25
17
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
76
11
17
23
29
12
30
122
4
12
17
8
8
40
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
1
2
2
1
7
3
8
1
1
13
112
128
Buttonbush"
Cephalanthus occidentalis
1
1
726
1
3
1
2
13
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
11
16
27
15
14
17 5
20
50
22
18
13
25
31
43
416
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
9
5
1
5
1 3
5
5
1
4
2
2
57
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
1
1
Titi
Cyrilla racemiflora
1
1
1
4
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Deciduous holly
Ilex decidua
1
3
Inkberry
1. glabra
1
2
1
4
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
4
3
4
5
2
25
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
1
6
2
8
5
3
2
36
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
1
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
1
7
1
9
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
4
6
7
2
1
2
1
8
3
5
3
4
5
102
Mulberry
Morus rubra
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
1
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
1
5
1
1
9
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
13
15
16
11
27
16 13
20
11
16
15
19
6
21
483
Red bay
Persea borbonia
1
5
2
5
2
4
1
1
3
1
31
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
35
24
27
66
34
38 56
10
46
62
42
35
29
48
937
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
Oak
Quercus spp.
3
4
2
8
3
1 5
2
2
3
2
8
1
69
White oak
Q. alba
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
9
11
2
2
9
3 3
3
15
4
27
16
9
12
166
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
5
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
4
Water oak
Q. nigra
1
1
Willow oak
Q. phellos
19
7
6
3
4
5 6
2
4
17
32
11
10
18
211
Cherrybark oak
Quercus pagodaefolia
1
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
Pond cypress
Taxodium ascendens
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
3
17
American elm
Ulmus americana
42
16
30
18
17
9 4
23
25
11
7
18
25
20
459
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
1
1
6
1
2
17
Dusty zenobia
Zenobia pulverulenta
1
2
TOTALI
158
140
124
147
114
107 100
73
105
166
145
152
140
148
175
3,304
Zone 5
110 172 173 177 181 185 Total
1st
9
3
2
10
5
13
42
2
2
20
2
2
2
26
3
3
3
1
10
2
2
4
4
8
11
2
7
4
32
4
4
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
7
4
17
9
17
12
16
4
12
70
7
3
20
9
26
4
69
1
1
5
11
16
4
9
6
5
3
5
32
17
9
13
24
16
10
89
12
25
17
11
11
76
11
17
23
29
12
30
122
4
12
17
8
8
40
89
1
1
2
2
1
7
3
8
1
1
13
112
128
120
136
115
115
726
P and U Lands Phase 3 First Annual Report A-4

Appendix A. (concluded)
Planted but in such a low density, did not show up in plots
Gum Swamp Run Buffer Plot
A B I C D I E F Total
Zone 6
134 145 146 148 Total
11
3
Common name
Scientific name
1st
Unknown
?
12
4
3
6
25
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
1
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
0
Paw paw
Asima triloba
0
River birch
Betula nigra
1
1
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
0
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
10
1
1
0
12
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
11
3
30
3
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
5
1 1
Buttonbush"
Cephalanthus occidentalis
1
3
3
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
1
14
14
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
1
1
1
3
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
3
0
3
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
1
1
Titi
Cyrilla racemiflora
1
1
1
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
2
1
1
4
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
7 25
24
21
20
6
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
3
15
5
28
Deciduous holly
Ilex decidua
12
23
3
56
Inkberry
1. glabra
0
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
0
16 53
47
51
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
166
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
3
1
4
Mulberry
Morus rubra
1
1
2
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
1
1
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
1
1
2
Red bay
Persea borbonia
2
1
1
4
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
Oak
Quercus spp.
7
6
13
White oak
Q. alba
4
6
1
4
15
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
1
1
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
2
2
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
2
2
Water oak
Q. nigra
10
2
7
19
Willow oak
Q. phellos
20
7
6
6
39
Cherrybark oak
Quercus pagodaefolia
12
12
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
Pond cypress
Taxodium ascendens
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
3
3
American elm
Ulmus americana
3
2
2
2
9
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
Dusty zenobia
Zenobia pulverulenta
TOTALI
89
1 36
1 38
1 59
1 222
Planted but in such a low density, did not show up in plots
Gum Swamp Run Buffer Plot
A B I C D I E F Total
1st
2 4
11
3
7
6
33
5
5
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 11
1
3
11
3
30
3
1
1
5
1 1
1
10
16
27
1
3
4
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 25
24
21
20
6
2
2
1 7
10
12
23
3
56
0
0
16 53
47
51
81
24
166
P and U Lands Phase 3 First Annual Report A-5

UAWWAOi•I►:M:1
2014 Evidence of Flow and Stream Survey Results
in Gum Swamp Run

Phase 3 Headwater Valley and Gum Swamp Run Flow Documentation
in February, April, July 2014
During planting in February, twice in April, and once in July, photos and/or videos were taken by
either CZR biologists or the design engineer to document conditions in the Gum Swamp Run
valley. Conditions in the two low energy headwater systems south of Gum Swamp Run valley
were documented in March and April 2014. Figure 1 shows the Gum Swamp Run stream
stationing plan over a 2012 aerial that also shows the eight filled ditches and their relationship
both to the stations and photos or videos referenced in this document.
GUM SWAMP RUN
Photos 1 and 2 taken 18 February 2014 upper 40 -foot valley. Left photo view upstream from northwest corner of
preserved woods in vicinity of station 10+00; right photo also upstream towards berm at boundary of Phase 3,
Casey Tract, and Parker Farm. Water depths 3 to 6 inches with low flow.
Photos 3 and 4. View of the upper end of the 40 -foot valley of Gum Swamp Run, 10 April 2014 taken from berm at
the edge of the adjacent Casey Tract; left photo, view downstream and right photo, view north along connector ditch
from Parker Farm towards the "dog -leg" of Small Road.
On 10 April flow was documented (video on CD: 1 PFarm flow into P3_1121) downstream of the
Parker Farm spillway near the southwest corner of the section of Phase 1 south of Small Road.
This flow connects the water from the Parker Farm into the unfilled ditch and then into the upper
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 B-1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

end of the 40 -foot Gum Swamp Run valley. That flow comes into the ditch about 600 feet north
of the tall pine visible in the Photo 4 above.
Flow was also documented with video in the 40 -foot valley all the way to the "bowl" on 10 April
with water depths ranging from 2 to 4 inches and low to moderate flow (videos on CD: 2 flow
near woods corner_ 1126; 3 flow 40 foot valley 1St curve_ 1128, 4 flow 40 ft valley_ 1129; 5 flow
40 ft 1St ditch fr woods_ 1133; 6 flow 40 ft valley at island_ 1134; 7 flow 40 ft valley_ 1139; 8 flow
flags near 3rd ditch- 1142) (date is incorrect in one audio). These videos document continuous
flow in the valley from the top to its connection with the "bowl" where no construction occurred.
The slope of the valley increases slightly to the west as it approaches the "bowl" which is
reflected by the changes in flow velocity visible on some of the videos listed above. In several
places in the lower 40 -foot valley, flow was constricted into one or more channels which
meandered across and down the valley as shown in Photos 5 and 6. Drier conditions on 24 July
in the 40 -foot valley are shown in Photos 7 and 8 at similar locations to Photos 5 and 6. In July,
the upper half of the 40 -foot valley had little to no water, but water and low flow was evident in
lower third of 40 -foot valley and throughout the 2 -foot channel.
Photos 5 and 6. View of 40 -foot valley channels/flowpaths downstream of second filled ditch west from woods edge
(left photo, view to southwest across valley near video "... island -1134) and near third filled ditch vicinity (right
photo, view downstream), 10 April 2014. Flags mark centers and edges of flow path(s).
Photos 7 and 8. Views downstream of flagged channel/flowpath in 40 -foot valley 24 July 2014; left photo, near
second filled ditch west of woods and right photo, further downstream near well 123.
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 B-2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

Another video from top of a debris pile between the first and second filled ditches west of the
preserved woods is included for perspective of the middle portion of the 40 -foot valley (video on
CD: 9 from top of debris pile— 1135).
The "bowl" is an area where the valley widens such that the design invert of the valley was well
represented in the bowl and no construction occurred. The silviculture beds from the pine
plantation operation and numerous ruts from passage of both silviculture and restoration
equipment criss cross the bowl. Nonetheless, on 10 April 2014, flow was documented where the
40 -foot valley joins the bowl (videos on CD: 10 to E 40 ft into bowl 1144; 11 to E flow thru
transi_1146 [this video was taken at third ditch from SR1002, not third ditch from woods as in
audio) and continued into the constructed 2 -foot channel from the connection to the bowl all the
way to the end of Gum Swamp Run (video on CD: 12 flow 2 ft at 2" d ditch from 1002 1147).
Photo 9 is a view upstream of the valley centerline (pink flag is Station 47+30) with the third
filled ditch east of SR1002 visible in the far middle distance. Construction of the 2 -foot channel
was designed to begin in vicinity of Station 45+00, near the third ditch fill and the bottom of the
bowl. However, like the bowl, the section of the valley shown by Photo 9 and another —50 feet
downstream was also so close to design elevation that no channel was cut. Photo 10 is a view
downstream of the 2 -foot channel of Gum Swamp Run at the first filled ditch east of SR 1002.
40
ev-
Photos 9 and 10. View upstream of Gum Swamp Run just upstream of beginning of construction of 2 -foot channel
(left photo) and view downstream of 2 -foot channel near first filled ditch east of SR 1002, 18 February 2014.
Photos 11 and 12. Views taken 24 July 2014 in same vicinity and perspective as Photos 9 and 10.
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 B-3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

Flow was observed and/or documented in the 2 -foot channel for the entire distance in the
February, April, and July visits (videos on CD: 13 flow 2 ft at 2nd dtch from 1002_1147; 14
2.18.14 riffle _1069 which shows flow in the Newberry riffle below the downstream end of the 2 -
foot channel, and 15 WP 20140416_010 GSR from riffle through sta 48+00 which includes the
22 -minute walk upstream along Gum Swamp Run from the riffle to Station 48+00). The
Newberry riffle was built to lower the invert of the valley to meet the elevation of the SR 1002
roadside ditch and Gum Swamp Run off site; an approximate 4 -foot difference in elevation.
Photos 13 and 14. View downstream of 2 -foot channel in vicinity of Station 67+00 near lower end of Gum Swamp
Run (left photo) and at the junction of the Newberry riffle with the end of Gum Swamp Run at Station 71+41 (right
photo). The two taller trees in the distance near the parked vehicles in Photo 14 are the same trees visible above the
distant treeline on the right side of Photo 13.
HEADWATER VALLEYS SOUTH OF GUM SWAMP RUN
The two low energy headwater valleys south of Gum Swamp Run visible on LiDAR also had no
construction but were expected to flow across the natural landscape post -restoration activities if
slope and conditions allowed. These valleys were visited on 18 March 2014 and locations
where flow was evident were marked with pin flags. On 16 April, conditions in portions of these
valleys were also documented with video (videos on CD: 16 WP 20140416_005 1st ditch -
southern signature; 17 WP 20140416_006 1st ditch southern signature; 18 WP 20140416_007
1st ditch middle signature, and; 19 WP 20140416_008 west of 1st ditch middle signature). As
shown in the videos, the first filled ditch east of SR 1002 crosses both of these systems and the
fill interrupts the natural flow down the valleys.
GUM SWAMP RUN 40 -FOOT VALLEY FLOW PATH SURVEY
On 12 November, with the 40 -foot valley in a mostly dry state, it was easy to see the naturally -
formed sinuosity in the valley invert since the flow paths were still wet but more narrowly
concentrated than when the valley was in bankfull state. The next week, CZR biologists walked
the entire 40 -foot valley on 20 November to GPS the sinuous flow path noted the previous
week. However, with rainfall just under 1 inch between the previous week and 20 November,
there was more ponded water and ice and the entire valley was saturated ---all of which
conspired to lower confidence in selection of the same flow paths so evident the previous week.
Photos were also taken in conjunction with collection of GPS of the flow features (or the lowest
invert where discernible). Areas of dried collections of algal mats or rooted aquatic -type
vegetation indicated areas of low to no flow and/or ponded water. Sections between these
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 B-4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015
� 1
w•�1
Photos 13 and 14. View downstream of 2 -foot channel in vicinity of Station 67+00 near lower end of Gum Swamp
Run (left photo) and at the junction of the Newberry riffle with the end of Gum Swamp Run at Station 71+41 (right
photo). The two taller trees in the distance near the parked vehicles in Photo 14 are the same trees visible above the
distant treeline on the right side of Photo 13.
HEADWATER VALLEYS SOUTH OF GUM SWAMP RUN
The two low energy headwater valleys south of Gum Swamp Run visible on LiDAR also had no
construction but were expected to flow across the natural landscape post -restoration activities if
slope and conditions allowed. These valleys were visited on 18 March 2014 and locations
where flow was evident were marked with pin flags. On 16 April, conditions in portions of these
valleys were also documented with video (videos on CD: 16 WP 20140416_005 1st ditch -
southern signature; 17 WP 20140416_006 1st ditch southern signature; 18 WP 20140416_007
1st ditch middle signature, and; 19 WP 20140416_008 west of 1st ditch middle signature). As
shown in the videos, the first filled ditch east of SR 1002 crosses both of these systems and the
fill interrupts the natural flow down the valleys.
GUM SWAMP RUN 40 -FOOT VALLEY FLOW PATH SURVEY
On 12 November, with the 40 -foot valley in a mostly dry state, it was easy to see the naturally -
formed sinuosity in the valley invert since the flow paths were still wet but more narrowly
concentrated than when the valley was in bankfull state. The next week, CZR biologists walked
the entire 40 -foot valley on 20 November to GPS the sinuous flow path noted the previous
week. However, with rainfall just under 1 inch between the previous week and 20 November,
there was more ponded water and ice and the entire valley was saturated ---all of which
conspired to lower confidence in selection of the same flow paths so evident the previous week.
Photos were also taken in conjunction with collection of GPS of the flow features (or the lowest
invert where discernible). Areas of dried collections of algal mats or rooted aquatic -type
vegetation indicated areas of low to no flow and/or ponded water. Sections between these
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 B-4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

areas were then selected as the lowest flow path based on various modes of evidence (lack of
vegetation, subtle cues of sinuosity, lack of seeds on surface, e.g.). The GPS lines collected
often coincided with points where flow was documented in earlier field visits in the valley but
some portions of lines represent only the perceived valley invert. In some sections of the valley,
in certain conditions, low laminar flow may occur across the entire valley and does not
concentrate into a narrower flow path as it appeared to do in other sections.
Areas where a GPS line was not connected represent the lack of confidence in consistent flow
path determination (paths were either too short or invisible). The upper portion adjacent to the
woods had many pockets of standing water and iced over puddles although two GPS flow paths
were collected. Figure 1 shows the GPS flow paths documented on 20 November.
Photos 15 and 16. View downstream (left photo) and upstream (right photo) near vicinity of first GPS segment which
began about halfway along the north woods border where flow comes out of unfilled ditch in the woods into the 40 -ft
valley, was evident for a short distance (-110 ft), and then became undefined. 20 November 2014.
Photos 17 and 18. View upstream at second short GPS segment (-90 feet) which began at northwest corner of
preserved woods (left photo- biologist with GPS walking valley edge along segment) and upstream view of a portion
of the much longer GPS segment (1,000 feet +) which began at end of tree plot at well 121 (right photo) and
continued 1,200 feet to vicinity of Station 26+50.20 November 2014.
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 B-5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

This --1,200-foot long segment occasionally was comprised of more than one flow path across
the valley and the flow paths would be of different widths along the segment with the upper
portion from 1 to 3 feet wide but by XS19, the flow path was -15 feet wide.
i
J
K-. } i »Y fig,-m�'. un �•
�: s ??' #��Ik �,+ : �' s �•a� b�' 'yY s.E �.ny�'^y; f % Y {� S1 3 f ?i ' N!� - F i
i� Y'.J .!'/ �° rV,� i � �'�� 3.+�1�F{{,�'nY �•�.} ���'���.e�t �a�s�•: � ��„ mol ,� t
Photos 19 and 20. View downstream (left photo) and upstream (right photo) of flow patterns evident in the valley
which aided in determination of flow path segments to GPS; both photos taken near lower end of 1,200 -foot
segment. 20 November 2014.
Photos 21 and 22. View upstream of -200-foot GPS segment near Station 32+00 (left photo) and downstream of
-190-foot GPS segment near Station 34+00 (right photo). 20 November 2015.
The two segments shown in Photos 21 and 22 mark the general flow way in this portion of the
valley, as there were less distinct signs of actual flow as along other segments further upstream.
As shown in the two photos, the valley floor had more hummocks and the water depths made it
difficult to discern the lowest flow path; by the lower end of the 40 -foot valley (top of the bowl),
either vegetation or water depth prevented confident GPS collection of the lowest flow path.
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 B-6 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

Photo 23. View downstream of —120 -foot flow segment documented at bottom of the bowl which flowed into the
upper end of non -constructed 2 -foot portion of Gum Swamp Run valley in middle distance. 20 November 2014.
P and U Lands Restoration Site - Phase 3 B-7 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report October 2015

PHASE 2 SMALL ROAD
A
O Xs1 XS3
XS2
116
71+41.78 °
°�° 60° XS10
115 6
s °° o XS4 XS7 Xs11 XS14
XS13 XS16
64+88± 2 XS5 XS6 XS8 XS9 X512 XS15 XS 17
XS18
Aq*
64+03±60+00 56 00 *00 N 46.00 °0 ti 0+00 XS19
° b
00 o O° 38+00 6'
o°
h� avx o0 123
54+32± 36+87± XS20 XS24
xs2s
3q+00
32+00 121
45+03± XS21 ti
127 30+00 1 +00 6+p0 4+00
Ze O'QP 0 1z+o0 s
N XS22 XS23 bo 3+60±
126 27+53± � 10+45±
1
o� 20+00 1Y3 0 12+70±
18+05±
122
��...
_--� CHASE 1 A
TY Nc
4
Ay C
BI .
LEGEND P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE — PHASE 3
P AND U LANDS GUM SWAMP RUN
CENTERLINE OF GUM RUN SWAMP PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
40—FOOT VALLEY FLOW PATH (11-20-14)
SOURCE: SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES, MONTHLY FLOW OBSERVATION IN
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009 DATE: 08/25/15 FILE: P—LANDS_GUMRUN_
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE CHANNEL OPPOSITE MONITORING PH3 014
WWW.CO. BEAU FORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES, WELL LOCATION 0 400 800 CP#1745.59.32.3
NAD 1983 FEET.
"� 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
2012 AERIALS DOWNLOAD FROM FROM NC ONE MAP xs1 CROSS SECTION NUMBER AND LOCATION ZR SUITE 2
WEBSITE: http://dato.nconemop WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 APPENDIX B
SCALE IN FEET INCORPORATED TEL [phone]
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone] FIGURE 1

APPENDIX C
Selected First Annual (2014) P and U Lands Phase 3 Restoration
Photographs

NOTE: A 10 -foot pole marked in one -foot increments held by a biologist about 25 feet from the
camera is visible in all photos. The photos are identified with the station number (see Figure 2)
and direction of view. Photos were taken 22 October 2014 and 23 October 2014.
PLPS 14: southeast, 22 October 2014
PLPS 15: northwest, 22 October 2014

4
}
40,

PLPS 18: northwest, 22 October 2014
PLPS 18: southwest, 22 October 2014

R
P.441
iAco
-ei� � IIIA OR
I
vim:`.

PLPS 20: northeast, 22 October 2014
PLPS 20: northwest, 22 October 2014
1
�
-ter.
PLPS 20: northeast, 22 October 2014
PLPS 20: northwest, 22 October 2014

G •a
0.
� h �
I
0.
� h �