20120107 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report Ph I_2014_20150918

THIRD ANNUAL (2014) REPORT FOR THE
P AND U LANDS RESTORATION SITE PHASE
RICHLAND TOWNSHIP
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Phase 1
1
Phase 3
Prepared for:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Prepared by:
CZR Incorporated
September 2015

THIRD ANNUAL (2014) REPORT FOR THE
P AND U LANDS RESTORATION SITE PHASE
RICHLAND TOWNSHIP
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Prepared by:
CZR Incorporated
September 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
PROJECT OVERVIEW...................................................................................................1
1.1
History ............................................................................................................................1
1.2
Location..........................................................................................................................
1
1.3
Goals and Performance Criteria.....................................................................................
2
2.0
REQUIREMENTS...........................................................................................................2
2.1
Normal Rainfall and Growing Season............................................................................
2
2.2
Hydrology.......................................................................................................................2
2.3
Vegetation......................................................................................................................3
2.4
Photographic Documentation.........................................................................................
3
3.0
2014 RESULTS..............................................................................................................3
3.1
Rainfall...........................................................................................................................3
3.2
Hydrology.......................................................................................................................
3
3.3
Vegetation......................................................................................................................
4
3.4
Design Activities.............................................................................................................
5
3.5
Photographic Documentation.........................................................................................
5
4.0
SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................5
LITERATURE CITED.......................................................................................................................6
Cover Photos: Top left photo: southern portion of Phase 1, view is north, 28 Sept 2014
Top right photo: northern portion of Phase 1, view is north, 28 Sept 2014
Bottom photo: view is south, southern portion in upper right, northern
portion in middle, 28 Sept 2014
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 P and U Lands Phase 1 performance criteria, methods summary, and current
status.......................................................................................................................... T-1
Table 2 Hydroperiods of 60 non -riparian monitoring wells at P and U Lands Phase 1
restoration site during all rainfall conditions in 2014 ................................................... T-2
Table 3 Hydroperiods of 60 non -riparian monitoring wells at P and U Lands Phase 1
restoration site during normal and below normal rainfall in 2014 ............................... T-8
Table 4 Survival of trees and shrubs planted in 58 0.3 -acre plots at P and U Lands
Phase 1 from baseline (fall 2012) to fall 2014 .................................................T-14
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map P and U Lands Phase 1 and Rodman
Figure 2 Monitoring Locations P and U Lands Phase 1 and Rodman
Figure 3 Soils P and U Lands Phase 1 and Rodman
Figure 4 P and U Lands Phase 1 and Rodman Monitoring Well Locations on As -Built
LiDAR
Figure 5 2014 Bay City and WETS -Aurora Rainfall
Figure 6 P and U Lands Phase 1 and Rodman Longest 2014 Hydroperiods and
Estimated Hydrologic Zones During all Rainfall Conditions
Figure 7 P and U Lands Phase 1 and Rodman Longest 2014 Hydroperiods and
Estimated Hydrologic Zones During WETS Normal and Below Normal Rainfall
APPENDICES
Appendix A Stem Counts at Individual Plots at P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1
Appendix B Selected Second Annual (2014) Restoration Photographs
NOTE: Copy of entire report and hydrology tables from monitoring wells included on
accompanying CD.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 iii PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
1.1 History. The approximately 3,667 -acre P and U Lands restoration site is part of
the PCS Phosphate Company Inc.'s (PCS) compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable
impacts to wetlands and waters authorized under United States Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Action ID: 2001-10096 and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Water
Quality Certification (WQC) #2008-0868 version 2.0. As described in the mitigation plan prepared
for the pre -construction notification (PCN) to the USACE (CZR 2012), the site was planned to be
constructed in three phases as shown on Figure 1, but as Phase 3 was constructed/planted in
2014, completion of approximately 138 acres of Phase 3 was delayed until 2015. These 138
acres will comprise Phase 4 monitoring and will be one year behind Phase 3. This annual report
documents the third annual monitoring of the 970 acres of Phase 1 of the P Lands portion,
conducted by CZR Incorporated (CZR) of Wilmington, NC. (The P and U designation have no
special meaning other than that was the historic label given to PCS and Weyerhaeuser properties
with similar ownership agreements.)
The design team consisted of Jonathan T. Ricketts, Inc. of Palm Beach Gardens, FL, the
restoration design engineer, PCS, and CZR. Earthwork was performed by Sawyer's Land
Developing, Inc. out of Belhaven, NC and supervised by the design team. Restoration activities
occurred September 2011 -March 2013. Phase 1 construction was authorized with a total of six
NC Division of Land Resources Erosion and Sediment Control permits and included modifications
to four of those permits as construction progressed. Planting of Phase 1 occurred from 12-23
March 2012. Further details of construction are included in the As Built Report for P and U Lands
Phase 1 (CZR 2013), and the first and second annual reports (CZR 2013a and CZR 2013b).
The P and U Lands site is a key component linking PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.'s
(PCS) Parker Farm mitigation site, Bay City Farm mitigation site, Gum Run mitigation site, and
the South Creek Corridor into a large and varied collection of restored wetland and preserved
natural areas (South Creek Corridor Complex). The headwaters and upper valley of historic Gum
Swamp Run, a tributary to South Creek, will also be restored as part of the P and U Lands
mitigation site, in Phase 3. Unlike most other PCS mitigation sites, the P and U Lands are not
prior -converted agricultural fields. Other than the existing roads, all of Phase 1 acreage in which
earthwork occurred was in some stage of silvicultural activity, usually various -aged pine stands,
and contained regularly spaced ditches (deeper than the agricultural ditches on other restoration
sites that were filled in as part of restoration work). The removal of all standing timber and
stumps and post-harvest debris presented particular challenges as the organic soils precluded
safe burning of the timber slash on site. To compensate for this, much of the debris was pushed
into mostly uniform piles that provide habitat to many small animals and provide roosting sites for
birds.
1.2 Location. The P and U Lands site is located east and west of Bay City Road
(SR1002), approximately 4.5 miles southeast of Aurora, Richland Township, North Carolina. Bay
City Road runs through the P Lands portion of the site, which is bounded on the east by SR 1918
(Peele Road is the unpaved extension of SR 1918) and on the south by "County Line Road" (a
gated gravel road that functions as the Beaufort/Pamlico County border). The U Lands portion of
the site lies west and southwest of Bay City Farm (the western portion of the P Lands site
referred to as the "panhandle" separates Bay City Farm from the U Lands). South Creek and the
South Creek Canal form the northern and northwestern boundaries, Bonner Road forms the
western boundary, and the Pamlico/Beaufort County line forms the southern boundary of the U
Lands (County Line Road itself is the southern boundary of only the eastern half of the U Lands
as the western limit of County Line Road terminates at the midpoint of the south property line).
The entire site is accessed via multiple gated roads along Bay City Road, Peele Road, County
Line Road, and/or Jaime/Executive Road. The site is located within the Pamlico Hydrologic Unit
03020104 of the Tar -Pamlico River basin within the South Creek subbasin at latitude 35.233831
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

and longitude 76.775742. Portions of the site can be found on the USGS Aurora, Bayboro, South
Creek, and Vandemere quadrangles (Figure 1).
1.3 Goals and Performance Criteria. The primary goal of Phase 1 activities is to re-
establish a self-sustaining functional wetland complex to allow surface flow to move through
vegetated wetlands before it reaches any stream. Mitigation yields are estimated and
performance criteria are described for the project in detail in the Compensatory Mitigation Plan for
P and U Lands Restoration Site (CZR 2012). Performance criteria and the current status are
summarized in Table 1. Over time the Phase 1 portion of the site is expected to successfully re-
establish approximately:
302 wetland acres of non-riverine swamp forest,
327 wetland acres of pond pine pocosin forest,
238 wetland acres of hardwood flat forest,
25 acres of open water in plugged ditches, and
30 wetland acres of swales.
The remaining 49 acres are comprised of existing roads, perimeter berms, and other
man -dominated areas. Approximately 25,131 linear feet of jurisdictional waters in roadside
ditches and canals were plugged in order to increase the hydroperiods within the adjacent
planted areas (these plugged jurisdictional ditches and canals are included in the 25 acres of
reestablished open water). Approximately 8,700 feet of roadside ditch adjacent to Phase 1 along
the south side of Small Road were plugged in 2013.
Included in the planted communities above are 19.5 acres underlain by hydric soils which
may be "potential non -wetland" areas due to predicted drainage effects from perimeter ditches
that must remain open. Perimeter berm design included a "keyway" feature to interrupt the lateral
drainage effect from the open ditch. Monitoring well data will be used to determine the
effectiveness of the interruption.
2.0 REQUIREMENTS
2.1 Normal Rainfall and Growing Season. A continuous electronic rain gauge on the
adjacent Bay City Mitigation Site is downloaded once a month and its data are used in
conjunction with data from nearby automated weather stations (e.g., NRCS WETS data from
NOAA's site at Aurora and at other nearby monitored sites) to determine normal rainfall during
the monitoring period. Bay City rainfall data were compared to the WETS range of normal
precipitation to determine if Bay City rainfall was within the normal range. The range of normal
precipitation for this report refers to the 30th and 70th percentile thresholds of the probability of
having onsite rainfall amounts less than or higher than those thresholds. The range of normal
and the 30 -day rolling total data lines begin on the last day of each month and the 2013 WETS -
Aurora monthly precipitation total is plotted on the last day of each month.
Under the 2010 regional guidance from the Corps of Engineers for wetland hydroperiods,
the normal growing season for Beaufort County is 28 February to 6 December or 282 days,
(WETS table for Beaufort County first/last freeze date 28 degrees F 50 percent probability) (US
Army Corps of Engineers 2010). At the suggestion of the Corps' Washington regulatory field
office, data collected between 1 February and 27 February provide important information related
to analyses of site hydrology during the early growing season, but are not part of the hydroperiod
calculation for success.
2.2 Hydrology. Figure 2 depicts the locations of hydrology monitoring equipment,
Figure 3 shows the locations on Beaufort County soil polygons, and Figure 4 shows the
monitoring locations on the as -built LiDAR. To document surface storage and hydroperiods of all
wetland types on the site, 60 semi -continuous electronic LevelTroll water level monitoring wells
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

(manufactured by InSitu) are deployed at a density of approximately 1 well/15 acres across all
planted areas of Phase 1. There are also two well arrays to monitor lateral drainage effects from
the open perimeter ditches in the two soil types which underlay most of Phase 1. Bear
exclosures constructed of barbed wire wrapped around metal fence posts were built around all
wells. Three wells were installed 13 March 2013 in a recently timbered tract west of Rodman
Road in the Ponzer soil series as controls for the P and U Lands wells located in the same type of
soil according to the Beaufort County Soil Survey (Kirby 1995) (Figures 1 and 3).
Electronic wells record water levels every 1.5 hours, are downloaded once a month, and
the data evaluated on an annual basis to document wetland hydroperiods. Wetland hydroperiods
are calculated by counting consecutive days with water level no deeper than 12 inches below the
soil surface during the growing season under normal or below normal rainfall conditions as well
as for all rainfall conditions, if applicable.
2.3 Vegetation. The first annual survey of the 58 0.3 -acre planted tree and shrub
monitoring plots occurred July -August 2012. The second and third annual surveys occurred
September -October 2013 and 2014. The plots represent a two percent sample of the restoration
area (Figure 2). Nuisance monitoring plots (1 meter square) were established in 2013 at the
upper corner opposite the well (along the long axis of the plot) in all tree plots and all woody
stems taller than 1 foot were counted and identified.
2.4 Photographic Documentation. Four permanent photo point locations were
established along the perimeter of the restoration area and three were established at the end of
interior roads (Figure 2). Photographs were taken in the four cardinal directions (approximately).
Annual photos were taken October 2012, 2013, and 2014.
3.0 2014 RESULTS
3.1 Rainfall. Total rainfall in 2014 at Bay City was 54 inches, almost 10 inches more
than last year. The 30 -day rolling total of 2014 Bay City rainfall was considered above normal
WETS rainfall June 19 -July 20 and August 3 -August 30 (Figure 5) and so wetland hydroperiods
were calculated for the entire year regardless of rainfall and also calculated when the two above
normal rainfall time periods were excluded.
The US Drought Monitor (http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu) provides a synthesis of multiple
indices and reflects the consensus of federal and academic scientists on regional conditions on a
weekly basis (updated each Thursday). For North Carolina's Beaufort County in 2014, during the
41 -week long growing season, the monitor reported the last four weeks of the growing season
had a drought status of abnormally dry (DO) in the vicinity of P Lands project area; the remainder
of the growing season was normal.
3.2 Hydrology. The first full year of post -restoration hydrology data for the entire site
was 2013 because not all wells were installed at the start of the 2012 growing season because of
construction activities. However, they were all in the ground by early March 2012 and did not
miss much of the growing season. Tables depicting 2014 daily well readings and rainfall are
included on a companion CD with this report.
All but two wells exhibited wetland hydroperiods (Tables 2 and 3, Figures 6 and 7).
During all rainfall conditions, most wells (51 of 60) recorded continuous wetland hydroperiods for
the entire growing season. After excluding the two periods of above normal rainfall, most wells
(55 of 60) recorded wetland hydroperiods >25-75 percent of the growing season.
According to the Beaufort County soil survey, one of the wells (PUM35) that did not
exhibit a wetland hydroperiod is in a non -hydric soil type (Tarboro) that drains very quickly (Figure
3) and therefore might not ever record a wetland hydroperiod. That well and the other well that
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

did not record a wetland hydroperiod are also on slightly higher elevation areas than most of the
other wells (Figure 4). If the non-wetland areas persist, the amount of the site represented by the
wells is small and would add diversity to the site.
Both well pairs in place to monitor potential drainage effects from perimeter canals
(PUM4 and 5, and 25 and 26) recorded hydroperiods greater than 25 percent in 2014 even after
excluding above normal rainfall time periods. One of each pair is located 50 feet away from the
toe of the perimeter berm and the second is 100 feet away. The water level data at these four
wells for the past two years appear to demonstrate that the clay keyway incorporated into the
berm is retarding lateral water movement as designed.
The reference wells in the Rodman Control Site recorded water levels similar to Phase 1
wells and the hydroperiods were not affected by the above normal rainfall (Tables 2 and 3,
Figures 6 and 7).
3.3 Vegetation. The Corps determined that three tree species have the possibility to
outcompete young planted trees at a mitigation site due to their quick growth and need to be
monitored as nuisance species to ensure they do not take over a mitigation site. The three
species are loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), red maple (Acer rubrum), and sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua). In 2014, a total of 135 stems were found in all nuisance plots and only three stems
were of one of the three nuisance species-red maple. Young loblolly pine and pond pine are
often difficult to distinguish from each other and so some of the pond pine counted in nuisance
plots might be loblolly pine. However, pond pines are more likely to survive in the wet conditions
than loblolly pine. A total of seven pines were counted in the nuisance plots but they were
thought to be pond pine (pond pine was a planted species).
Using only the number of planted stems that were unquestionably alive in the monitoring
plots, the most conservative estimate of survival is presented. Many stems appeared dead or
questionable, but based on prior monitoring experience, a stem needs to appear dead (or not be
found) for two annual sample events before it can be confidently counted as dead. Appendix C
contains the number of stems that were alive in each plot for the fall 2014 survey compared to
baseline. Phase 1 is divided into four community types-swale, hardwood flat, pond pine-pocosin,
and non-riverine swamp forest. The hardwood flat areas had the highest survival and the swale
had the lowest survival, which is typical. The lower survival of the swale zone is likely a result of
large expanses of prolonged standing water despite being planted with species tolerant of such
conditions.
Overall survival of trees that were unquestionably alive in the 58 plots from the time of
planting to the third annual fall survey was 71 percent, with a corresponding density of 360 trees
per acre (Table 4). If trees with uncertain survival status (stem appeared dead but could not be
confirmed) are included with trees that were definitely alive, survival increases to 100 percent and
a density of 409 trees per acre. Excluding unknown/uncertain species, of the 26 tree species,
water hickory (Carya aquatica) and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana) had the lowest survival (both
17 percent), while mulberry (Morus rubra), white oak (Quercus alba), and persimmon (Diospyros
virginiana) had 100 percent survival (same as 2013) and swamp tupelo (Nyssa biflora) and bald
cypress (Taxodium distichum) had 98 percent (Table 4). Six of the remaining known species had
80 percent and higher survival. When the relatively poor survival of pond pine in Zones 4 and 4A
was noted in the first annual data evaluation, supplemental planting of pond pine was planned for
2013. However, no nursery had enough pines available to plant in 2013, and so supplemental
planting was pushed into early 2014. Approximately 30,000 stems of pond pine were planted in
these zones. Pond pine survival of the first planting appeared to be compromised by improper
planting across the site and by excessive wetness in some areas.
Overall survival of shrubs that were unquestionably alive from the time of planting to the
third annual fall survey was 61 percent with a corresponding density of eight shrubs per acre
(Table 4). If shrubs with uncertain survival status (stem appeared dead for the current sampling
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

event but will not be confirmed until next fall) are included with shrubs that were definitely alive
(less conservative estimate of survival), survival increases to 78 percent and a density of 11
shrubs per acre. Both estimates of survival are lower than last year. When excluding stems with
questionable survival, of the 16 species, swamp rose (Rosa palustris), swamp dogwood (Cornus
foemina), and dusty zenobia (Zenobia pulverulenta) had the lowest survival of 0 percent,
followed by spicebush (Lindera benzoin) with 33 percent. Two species had 100 percent survival -
American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana) and swamp doghobble (Leucothoe/Ebotrys
racemosa).
The current tree density is much higher than the 260 stems required for success and with
many trees surviving well in the third year, there is a diverse assemblage of trees interspersed
with a healthy shrub component. In many areas of the site, volunteer woody wetland stems (e.g.
red bay, sweet bay [Magnolia virginiana], titi [Cyrilla racemiflora]) are prolific and will enhance the
diversity and density of the site. The volunteers will be counted in year five.
3.4 Design Activities. Approximately 8,700 feet of roadside ditch adjacent to Phase 1
along the south side of Small Road were plugged in 2013. When original planting occurred, fill
was stored along open ditches to be used as future plugs, so those storage areas were not
planted in 2012. The fill was used to plug the roadside ditches and those areas were planted in
February 2014 in conjunction with Phase 3 planting. Approximately 14 acres were planted in
2014 with 7,750 stems of swamp chestnut oak (Q. michauxii), swamp black gum, willow oak (Q.
phellos), and bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) in various combinations dependent on planting
zone; these areas included the plugs, a segment inside the berm along Peele Road, and areas
adjacent to the NCWRC-requested parking lots at the west end of Bay City Roads 1 and 3 and on
the south side of Bay City 4. There are no monitoring plots within these planted areas.
3.5 Photographic Documentation. Although the planted stems seldom stand out
from the vegetation yet, a few photos representative of 2014 conditions are included with this
report (Appendix B). More are available upon request.
4.0 SUMMARY
According to WETS rainfall calculations, Bay City rainfall was normal or below normal
WETS rainfall except for June 19 -July 20 and August 3 -August 30. Post -restoration wetland
hydrology monitoring for success officially began March 2012. In 2014, all but two wells exhibited
wetland hydroperiods, one of which is in an area mapped as upland soil. Without excluding
above normal rainfall time periods, most wells recorded a continuous wetland hydroperiod for the
entire growing season and after excluding those time periods, most wells recorded a wetland
hydroperiods >25-75 percent of the growing season.
Overall survival of trees that were unquestionably alive in the 58 plots from the time of
planting (2012) to the third annual fall survey was 71 percent, with a corresponding density of 360
trees per acre. Overall survival of shrubs that were unquestionably alive from the time of planting
to the third annual fall survey was 61 percent with a corresponding density of eight shrubs per
acre. The density of unquestionably alive trees and shrubs combined is 368 stems per acre. The
current tree density is much higher than the 260 stems required for success and with many trees
surviving well in the third year, there is a diverse assemblage of trees interspersed with a healthy
shrub component. In many areas of the site, volunteer woody wetland stems (e.g. red bay, sweet
bay [Magnolia virginiana], titi [Cyrilla racemiflora]) are prolific and will enhance the diversity and
density of the site.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

LITERATURE CITED
CZR Incorporated.
2012. Compensatory Mitigation Plan for P and U Lands Restoration Site.
CZR Incorporated.
2013a. As -Built Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1
CZR Incorporated.
2013b. First Annual (2012) Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site
Phase 1.
CZR Incorporated.
2014. Second Annual (2013) Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site
Phase 1.
Kirby, Robert M. 1995. The soil survey of Beaufort County, North Carolina. Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2002. Regulatory guidance letter (RGL) 02-02. Guidance on
Compensatory mitigation projects for aquatic resource impacts under the Corps regulatory
program pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2005. Technical Standard for Water -Table Monitoring of Potential
Wetland Sites. WRAP Technical Notes Collection (ERDC TN -WRAP -05-2.) U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008. Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 08-03. Minimum
monitoring requirements for compensatory mitigation projects involving the restoration,
establishment, and/or enhancement of aquatic resources.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional supplement to the Corps of Engineers wetland
delineation manual: Atlantic and Gulf coastal plain region. Version 2.0. J.S. Wakeley, R.W.
Lichvar, and C.V. Noble, eds. ERCD/EL TR -08-30, Vicksburg, MS.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 6 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

k
m
2
CO
\ 7: 4--
0 ° ° 2 °
CO
/.$ .$ £ { n E E 2
a / U)-5 E m cn E
_
\ k m� 0 7 2 0
0£MO—C W
M 5 ® E k
}§ 0§ 3 CO k k 2/
o � m � o
®
/ / D 2 / / § 0 / / §
k��d % %
@ c 2 2
C) �
ƒ
—
\ f
0
■
CD
2 5
� 2
£ 0
7
2
3 ® /
- CU
-0
° o
/
y 2
0
6
m —
% m
=) 2
5 0®
R £ @
E
k
$
k
\ k
0
/
-0
0/
2 g
2
0 0)
o 2 c
-0
¥
§
o0 2
g
g@
Q
D-0§
Mƒ
R)
7
E
E %
34--
r-
U)) @
/
0
=) 7
°°
�
0
@
/ / 7
\ 7: 4--
0 ° ° 2 °
CO
/.$ .$ £ { n E E 2
a / U)-5 E m cn E
_
\ k m� 0 7 2 0
0£MO—C W
M 5 ® E k
}§ 0§ 3 CO k k 2/
o � m � o
®
/ / D 2 / / § 0 / / §
k��d % %
@ c 2 2
§
C.0 (n
m 2 2
U)
o c /
2 5
0
a) ILL!
2
2
0
� '§
$
/
C
/ 7
q 9 E
0
E
§
E
0
$
\
(L
c\&
/
.E « =
E
«
2
}/7
O 2
2
7f
CID
0
E
E %
34--
r-
U)) @
/
0
=) 7
°°
E
M
@
/ / 7
2
7 3
E
o -
0 .X
., m
> 0
$ ƒ
k
CO
k
E
§
c ƒ (n
m 2 2
U)
o c /
2 5
=o
\
ƒ AI
% 5
Q R
0
m
k? R E
)
04 G-0/
C
j
Q
E
0
a) 7
o
0, -r-ƒ -0
\
(L
Al/
U) k
Pak u Lands Restoration s6 Phase a1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015
§
U)
M
E _o R
/
:
� 0 c- Q—
/
R / 0 2 \
2 a f 2 E
°
.2 2
CO
% 0
C
3 m 2 .Fn
§ f o 0 o
/
0 / \
2 /
Pak u Lands Restoration s6 Phase a1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

N
t
v
M
N
N
8-1
LO i x x x x x i x x x
ti
A
0
L/i
11 x
LO
N
A
8-1
N
N
A
0
N
CO
AI
V
c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O00
o 0 0
N 3 U -O O O O O O O �,.j O O O O
L p N O O O O O O O O O O O
N O U N
d
LO
N N N N N N N N N N
n3 M 00 00 00 a0 00 N O 00 00 a0 00
N NN N N N N (O N N N N
O O O
> O N O
(0 p
N a) N LL
C a) .O
O L U N
U 3 '—
m
N
O
N
N
O
N
N
O
N
N
co
N
N
O
N
N
O
N
O
O
N
O
N
N
CO
N
N
O
N
N
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�o p0
O
O
N
O
j .) O
N p
N
O
N
00
N
O
N
00
N
O
N
O
CO
h
N
O
N
O
N
00
N
O
N
N
N
N
N
NN
N
N
N
N
LO
N N LL
LC
w
N
w
N
co
N
w
N
00
N
00
N
00
N
os
N
Cb
N
N 7
N
E
E 0 �
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N O
N
CU `o
Li
N
O r
O Vl
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
w
C'
0
> I I D D I D D D I D
a as a as a =a a a a a a
x I x I x I x I x I x I x I x I x I x
x
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
ao
N
w
N
w
N
co
N
w
N
00
N
00
N
00
N
os
N
Cb
N
N 7
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N O
00 NaAN I N N I N N'11 I N N'11 I N N I W
N N N N N N N N N N O
CO a0 CO a0 CO O O 00 O O I-
N
N N N N N N N N N N N
NINININININININININI N
N M cl' Ln t0 f- OD O O r N
r r r r r r r r N N N
a a a a a a a a a M a -
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

0
A
0
LO
11 x x x
LO
A
N o
U
O CO
O N
� n
T
U?
N
(6
Al
Co
V
O O C T
2� U) -O O O CO V O vi
L O CU N O O N (.0O N
O N
X
00
N
C4
CO
00
N
N
M
a.
x
N
0
CO
N
O
N
N
M
N
LOLO
W
O
00
r
\
O
N
Cfl
N
Ci)
O
N
N
O
N
N
V'
�_
d'
W
O
O
N
N
CO
N
N
NV
N
N
N00
O 0
0)
V
N
O
N
N
O
00
O
O
N
O
CO
00
N
N
M
a.
x
x
x
O
0
O
O
00
O
O
cc a
O 0)
O
NV
O
O
O
O 0
V
V
O
> Cfl
N
CO
N
00
Lr) LO 00 O
V'
N
N O lzt ti LO
UO N
N
N
h N N
CT
N
N N
N O N LL
Q
Q
00 N
C N 00
w
w
w
Z
Z
N :!
N
O U N
N
N
N CO
N
N
U 3 '—
N
a _0 0
N
O
N
O
N
00
O
N
00
r-
N
00
O
i0 2_ O
N
N
N
N
N
N
7 O N LL
E N M
U N
0
3 LL
(V
N r
N O
N
N
N
N
N
N
3 O N
O
U
f0 -0
N
D
i
M
CO
f-
00
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
a
a
a
a
a
CO
00
N
N
M
a.
x
00 1ONO 00 ONO w
N N N N V V
N NIw CO 00
N
N I N I N I N I N I N I N
Lr'CO
CO 71 C",
'I,
a
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015
x
x
O
O
O
O
00
O
O
O
O
NV
O
O
O
O
V
V
O
'IT
O
O
O
N
�
Q
Q
00 N
00
w
w
w
Z
Z
N :!
N
N
N
N
N CO
N
N
N
N
00 1ONO 00 ONO w
N N N N V V
N NIw CO 00
N
N I N I N I N I N I N I N
Lr'CO
CO 71 C",
'I,
a
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

0
n �
A
0
LO
n x x x x x x
LO
N A
C
N o
U
.5 N
O U? x
O N
� n
T
U?
N x
(6
Al
CD
V
O O) C T
n C) a) o M It LO
D a l
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015
.O O N
V
00
00
W
V
O
00
N
'�T
OO
V O CU N
N
N
O
cli
L6
NN
CND
C4
(4
CND
O N
N a) O
W
N O N
N CO
(0
O
C4
CD
U)
rN
4
t0
N
Z�3
N
n
O
N
LO
N
r -
N
N
N
N
M N
CD N
N
N
0
M
CD
�_
00
N
N
CV
00
N
O
N
00
00
N
n
00
M
00
00 O
M
N '6
00
M
C-4
N
CO
N
n
O
\
N
(0
N
N
� N
CO
N
N
r
CO
N
NN
N
Cfl
N O
N
N
(D
n
T
'00 O O
01 -0 0
> 2 (fl
Ln
O
00
O
IT
O
O
O
n
V'
O N
O
V
10
n
N
M O
W
-'T d'
O
O
CO
n
LIM O N
CO
00
M
00
N
N
n
—
N
00
M N
N
00
00
O
a7
00
N O N LL
C N M
O U N
U 3 '-
a 0
w@ O
0)
n
Nt
N
00
CD
C.0
O
CO
N
00
(.0
n
00
is)
co
(0 2r e N
r
N
N
N
N
N
N
7 O N LL
E N M
U N
0
3 LL
(V
N n
`- N
a) fn
n
N
N
n
N
n
N
n
N
n
N
r`
N
Fl-
N
i
>, O
n C) a) o M It LO
D a l
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

0
LO
A
0
(n
LO
c
A
N o
U
O (O
O N
� n
T
0
U?
N
(fl
AI
(o
V
O 01 C T
U) -0
L O N N
O N
x
N
N
� O O
N
(O N
� � \O
N
00
00
N 00 N r--
N
N O
N O
00
N O
00
N O
CO
N 00 M \
O
N O
It �
N CO
N (O
Cfl ti O
N \
M
M
N (
O
M
O
M
N
ccO M O O
r
CO
(O
N
(4
O
(fl
> (fl
ON
Lor- CDC)
--N
r- M (D'T
f- O
O
dt r- -MM �
(D O
N
O O
LIM
F NM
N N
0)
M CO
V
N
�
Z
N
LO
00 Cl)
N
�
(O
M �
zr Cfl
N
O
O
O
N
V (O
N�
(0
r- (4
N �
N
O O
� O O
N
(O N
� � \O
N
N
N
LO
N 00 N r--
N (O 00 N
N O
N O
N M N W N
N O
N
N O
N 00 M \
O
N O
It �
N CO
N (O
Cfl ti O
N \
N (
N
N (
ccO M O O
O 0
> (fl
ON
Lor- CDC)
--N
r- M (D'T
f- O
O
dt r- -MM �
(D O
N
O O
LIM
F NM
N N
0)
f-- N d' N N N
CO
00
O
N O N LL
C N O
O U N
a 0
j
I--
O
Ca
(n
O
M
O
(D
CO
N
00
O
r-
(0 2r e O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
7 O N LL
E N co
U�' N
0
3 LL
(V
N r
r CV
a)(nN
ti
N
N
N
ti
N
N
N
ti
N
3 O N
O
U
f0 -0
N
D
CO
f-
00
d'
O
07
N
LO
CO
(O
>—
CL
a
a-
a-
M
a-
0
CL
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

0
x x
r
A
0
LO
11 x x x x x
LO
c
A
N o
U
O LO
O N
� n
T
U?
N
(6
Al
Cfl
V
O O C T
.O O N C:., O O CO fD
V O<n -0 O
CU N O CMO CMO N M O O M
O N
LO L() LO LO LO
MCO
a,-
D
1O
Z)
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-6 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015
CO
N
O
00
CO
M
W
N
O
O
NN
> O M
O
O O
LO O
O W
LO N r- V Cfl O
�
NN
NL
O
W
r- M M N N
O M d' O
N
00 00 O
N O N LL
- N
C N O
(13C,j
O
N
OC
00
N
0N
0N
N00
ID
00
00
NO
N
N
N
N
C
00 00 M
—NOr--
N
ONNNr
N
N
a
LO L() LO LO LO
MCO
a,-
D
1O
Z)
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-6 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015
'0O M O O
O 0
> O M
O
N
CO
LO O
O W
LO N r- V Cfl O
1' 00 LO N
N
d' LO N
U3 N
O
W
r- M M N N
O M d' O
N
00 00 O
N O N LL
C N O
O U N
U 3 '—
a 0
@
> w CO
N
00
M
r
6)
c0
M
O
LO
N
00
M
(0 2r e O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
7 O N LL
E N co
U N
0
3 LL
N
O r
r CV
N O
�
N
�
N
fh-
N
il-
N
t1-
N
r-
N
�
N
3 N
>
T CU _0
LO L() LO LO LO
MCO
a,-
D
1O
Z)
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-6 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

U
O
0
A
0
LO
LO
N
A
0
Lfi
N
CU
N
A
0
U?
N
Cfl
AI
Cfl
V
O C T
L O N N
U N
U
D
'0O M O O
O -0 0
O _0
U 3 c N
N N N LL
C N W
O U N
U 3 '-
a _0 0
a m
7 N N LL
E N co
U N
3 0 LL
N (N r
L (n
U)
3 N N
O O
f0 U
D N
C'.
C
O
U
m
E
O
Of
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-7 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015
x
x
x
O
O
M
OM
M
LO
N
't
61
O
O
O
N O
N
LO
N
LO
Ict6
a
M
O
O
�
N
(fl
N
LO W f\ O
N Cl) N
O
N
N
O
O
N
N
N
O
O
W
O
N 00
O \
N
N
C.0
O
00
O
N
O
\
Il-
O
O
r`
�
�
r`
M O
�
Cfl
O
W
O
M
N
W
f—
M
W
O
M
N
CO
�
LO
N
N
N
N
N
N
U
U
U
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-7 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

$ LO
/
!
I
»
a
/
§
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
=
c
A
\0N
®
E c0
\
§\
2
6
C/)`
k
\
§
\
\
£
E0
2
\\
A
/
f
/
E
\/
*c��
8
G o =
¥
#
#
«
#
f
CO
#
¥
t
f
f
) 2
§/ q=
c
=
c
3
c
=
«
a
c
c
=
e
c(N
`\
CO
n
Cl)
n
z
n
n
r
r
CO
r
n
�B
±
-
} ƒ
= e
= e
= e
= e
CO e
= e
a w
= m
= _
= m_
_ _
CO _
g ƒ
2
§ ^
§ ^
§ ^
§ ^
§ ^
§ ^
/ ^
\
\
\
\
\
\ 2
d
) \
) \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
CO \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
= 2
R =
R =
a =
a =
a =
a =
& =
a =
� =
a =
a =
a =
CO
-
�}
¢o
= 3 0 =
} \
2 2 0 -0
/ §
\ §
\ §
\ §
\ §
\ 0)
& $
\ §
\ §
\ §
\ §
\ §
o7w=
ƒ2
0
e «—
�/
/\9°
\+
{}\�
\«
> I 9
Cl)
Cl)
n
\
CO\
\
Cl)
Cl)
Cl)
CO
\
£}
7;/ g
2
2
%
a
2
R
2
,<
(7N=
(=
2/3
S
®
—
-
5C
$�_
1
, o c
}\/
C148j
\
2
e;/
ww
N
C14
w
a
»
a
a
a
w
G
a
>
w
a
w
a
w
a
a
a
\ /
9
2
&O
�2
,
e =
\\
{LU
%
§
/
k
§
/
/
§
2
§
j
\
\
4
i
i
i
/
/
i
i
a
i
Z)
�
D
= a
5 t
=
z
=
23
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 28 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-9 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015
0
LO
A
0
In
11
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
LO
A
c
0
0
U
�
N
�
O
LO
O
N
_0
A
U?
N
(fl
Al
(o
V
0 01 C T
._ O (0
V
v
V
't
V
V
VT
V
00
�t
d -
UN -0
6
00
(3i
0�
6
6
W
6
6
7T
O)
6)
O U N
M
M
CO
Cl)
CO
M
CO
M
M
(n
M
01)
U N
W f0
00 (D
00 (D
00 (0
00 (D
00 CO
00 (O
00 CO
00 (O
00 CO
(O
W (O
U
U
� N
10
� N
Cfl
z Nfl
(O
N
(
N
CO
N
(O
N
(O r
N
Cfl
N
(4
N
N
Cfl —
N
Cfl
0
N M
W
N M
W
N M
00
N M
W
N M
00
N M
00
N M
0000
N M
N MN
M
00
N M
(n
NQ
N 00
N 00
N
N 00
N 00
N 00
N 00
N 00
N 00
N 00
N 00
N M
-
a O U
U �C)
O (fl
UO 0
00
(A
00
0)
00
0)
00
0)
M
(A
M
0)
00
M
00
0)
00
T 0)
r 00
M a
00
M
00
M
U N LL
N
C N 00
0 U N
U 3 '-
m
-
a 0
@
j .U+ CO
Cl)
N
M
N
M
N
M
N
CO
N
CO
N
M
N
M
N
M
N
M
M
N
M
N
(0 2r e U
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
7 U N LL
E N oo
U�' N
a>
0
3 LL
N
U r I-
U N
U
N
N
N
N
N
(N
N
N
N
N
N
N
3 U N
U-0 O
>
w -0
N
D
M
V-
([7
Q0
Il-
00
0)
O
N
M
c!°
—
N
N
N
N
N
2i
2i
2
c
2
2
:2
2
2i
2i
2
2
>0
0-
0-
D-
a_
n
M
d
a
a
a-
0-
CL
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-9 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-10 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015
0
N
LO
N
N
N
CO
M M
CO
:�
Cl)
CO
Cl)
rA
>—
A
a.
a
a
a
0
a.
a
a_
a_
a_
o
a
LO
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
LO
A
c
N
o
U
�
N
�
O
Ln
O
N
�
T
n
U?
N
(6
Al
v
v
x
x
O C T
._ O NCO
00
V'
LO
M
00
d.
V
�t
N N-0
L O N
O
4
CA
Lf)
-T
V
6
(T
0)
CT
V
V
O
N
M
M
N
CO
Cl)
Cl)
CO
07
Cl)
O N
CO LO
(D
00 (O
O d. N
d' O
r (D
00 O
00 (D
00 (D
00 O
U
N
!!N
7
N
CO
7 O
N N
N N
N
CO
N
CO
N
(O
N
(0
Q
Q
D
00
(p
N
00
00 N
W
00
OD
00
00
W
Z
Z
N
N O
M
N 00
N M
N W
N
N O O
N M
N 00
N M
N 00
N M
N W
N M
N W
N M
N 00
N M
N W
'0O O O
O 0
(9
to 00 O
V' 00
00
N fl- LO
O 00
O 00
00
M
00
00
UO N
h N N
O W
O
N
00 O)
00 CA
O
O
O
O
V
V
0) O N LL
C N M
O U N
U 3 '—
a _0 0
@O
> .Uj
OS p
r
O
a)
M
N
a)
Cfl
0')
J
O
M
N
c^
N
c')
N
Cl)
N
N 2r e U
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
7U N LL
E N O
U N
a>
0
3 LL
N
O r
a) U
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
T-0 O
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-10 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015
N
N
N
N
N
CO
M M
CO
:�
Cl)
CO
Cl)
>—
a.
a
a
a
a-
a.
a
a_
a_
a_
o
a
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-10 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

0
A
0
LO
LO
N
A
0
Lfi
N
Ln
N
A
0
U?
N x
AI
V
O 01 C T
._ O M V
N 3: U -0
L O N N
8) U N
U
4
CO
a O O
O 0
.0 N
3 LO 0 CO
N O N LL
C N 00
O U N
U 3 '—
a 0 D
>
7 U N LL
E N co
U N
a>
3 0 LL
N (N r
N
N U N
3 U N
U n n
x I I x I x I x I x I x I x
0
x
-'t
00
d' O
00
V
�
00
-'T
00
00
d.
00
N
00
Co.
O
O
00
N
N N
I* - N
W
r,-
N
00
O
O
O
m
O
O
00 O
N —
N
M
CO
N
N
N
O
M
M
M
CO
C
N
N
O
�
—
—
N
N
N
O
? (O
N
N
N
CO
N
(D
00
CO
Cfl
CO
CO
CO
N CO
N
\ON
00
�.
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
O
O N
O
LO
N
-
(O
-
�
-
O
-
LOO
-
N I�
00
f�
W
W
W
W
N
N
O
00
C
N
N
00
N
M
N
M
N
M
N
M
N
M
M
N
M
r
N
WN
O
N
N
W
N
00
N
CO
N
W
N
00
N
O
O
W
-'t
O
d' O
O r--
V
�
O
-'T
W
00
M
00
d'
00
00 00
Il- O
O
00
V'
N N
I* - N
W
r,-
N
00
O
O
O
m
O
O
00 O
N —
N
M
CO
O
O
(D
N
O
�
—
—
N
N
N
N
-
N
M COCO
O
a d
N I N I N I N N I N I rl-
N
r•
N
d'
D
a
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-11 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

8-1
L
rlA
LL!)
LO
N A
C
O
N o
o
U �
O Ln
O N
'T A
2
0
U?
N
AI
V
O 01 C T
N U) -0
L O N N
O N
x I x I x I x I x I x I x I x I x
0
U
O
V' Lf) O O
00
00
Lf) O
N
N
C0
O
V
00
'T
00
00
00
N M
00
N M
M
M
00
N M
N
00
N M
MMM
00
N M
N `' Cl) O
M
M
N O
N 00
N 00
N 00
N W
N W
N w
h
'0O O O
M) 00 M
N
�
O
M �
�. CO
N
O
CO
N
d' CO
N
00 CD
fD
N
CO CO
N f0
W fD
N
U
O
V' Lf) O O
N
Ln
O N
Lf) O
N
Lf)
N
C0
N
Ln
7- N
C0
� N
7-
N
-
9
0
O O 7 N
N 22
00
N M
00
N M
00 N
N
00
N M
00
N M
00
N M
00
N M
Cb
N M
00
N M
N `' Cl) O
N 33
N 00
N O
N 00
N 00
N 00
N W
N W
N w
'0O O O
O 0
M
0
t-- M O V
1- 00
O 00
V O O t-
CD 00
00
O 00
00
LO W
O w
0 3 0
M N N
O O
O
� N N N
00 O
O
Oto O
O
O M
O O
N O N LL
C N OC)
O U N
U 3 '—
a _0 0
@
> .Oj CD
O
O
N
N
6)
O
N
N
N
(0 2r e O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
D U N LL
E N M
U N
3 0
LL
(N
N r
N U
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
3 U N
U-0 O
>
w -0
N
D
f�
00
O
O
N
CO
't
LO
CD
>
>
D
D
Z)
D
Z)
Z)
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-12 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

x
a
0
r` r—
�
Ln
6:
ti
O O
LO
O
N
00
O
00
A
O
O
0
O
M
LO
11
X
X
x
x
LO
M
N
N
C
A
N
N
O
o
N
cli
N
U
�
N
N
N
M
N
N
�
O
LO
N
O
T-
O
N
L
O
_0
A
N
N
00
2
N
N
U?
N
N
Al
V
0 01 C T
_ O (0
(O
(4
O
U� N-0
O N
O
N
N
M
Gi
CO
N
CO
O
U N
M M O
N
N O
N
00 (O
N
N M
N
N
(f) O C
N
�
N
MN
0
N M
N ~
N M
N
N a 00
N O
N W
N O
'0O O O
O 0
O M
LIM O N
tf) O O
F- M N N
d' N
00 O
00'T
O
N
00 O
N O N LL
C N M
0 U N
U 3 '—
a 0
>
O
N
O
(0 2r e U
N
N
N
7 U N LL
E ` M
N
U�' N
a>
0
3 LL
N
O r
r N
N (n
r
N
ti
N
r
N
N
3 U N
U-0 O
f0 w
U
O
C
0
—
LO
00
(r;
M
U -)
O
(o
U
2
D
m
E
a
a
0
Of
x
a
I--
O
r` r—
�
Ln
6:
ti
O O
00
O
N
00
O
00
M N
O
O
O
M
O
M
N
�
N
N
N
cli
N
M
U
N
N
M
N
N
N
O
N
O
T-
L?O
of
L
O
Ott
N
N
00
N
N
N
N
I--
O
r` r—
�
Ln
O
ti
O O
00
M
N
00
M
00
M N
Cl)
O
M
O
N
N
N
N
M
U
U
U
Of
T-
of
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-13 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

E
o
U V)
O O N 0 0 "t r-- O O O M 00 CO O H O O O O O O V N
o
d o �
M N
j
L p
H
l0 h 00 00 0 M O CO 00 In 00 to O O O O 00 h 00 N � m h
ti 00 CO rn (O O) O V 00 (0 O W M r-- r-- O (D 00 O '� CO 0) h
O
CO
W
!
U >
O V r- r-- V) OO 00 N O N O 00 h O 00 O N U') C' O M
�* C)
�-
m Q
IL
(Mm 0')M v oo v I- LO I- LO 1- 0')U) 00 00 0) r-
r\
N
CO
C)(O N M N N O M N N M 00 Ln 7
CO V (fl 't O M O C00
Cn
6) �' Cl) w LO (fl
E
rn N
N
V N N CO O O N 00 N C O cl' M 00 O M N O N f` (fl
U') CT
r!
O C
r r r
00
N �
(V
Cl)
00 00
�' O V 00 CMO N N M N M� O
FN
CO
Q
O M- r te n 00 V N CV N
CO CO
r
(O
N
CO
(D 7 LC) LC) 6) LC) O Cl) 00 LC) (0 r O O O Lr) (fl
V (fl M O 00 V M CO n O V V CO CO CO w CO O h V
N- m N�
CO CO
O
to
N � n 7t n 0) 00 LO (D (D 00 ��
CF
E
N
O LC) '7 N N O N O O LO O CO CD M CD O CO 0 O O O N 04
COj C,
- C
d
Cp
N Z)
C6
m
D O O M LO 00 n LO M O M O O w O O r- �' V
cl' (fl C:) [I- '� M V (fl O V N M Cb O N M O N N (0 N CO O r- M
CLO CO
CT LO
't
Q
N- n n M M Ln (fl LC) 00 N
(V O
a .9
O
n Ln N LO Ln C}' M�
00
LC)
O
5
-1 w c -I N M i'i n�
� (O M O 00 � M 00 N O N i 00 O 00 N M M N
c -I N ci n c -I n CT ci Ln l0 w00 ci N ci
CC)
LC)
ZT @
(6 4
y
E m
N CF
3
5 r`
2-
p
D
C
C
En
O Y N
U O O
O
CO
-0 O a) O N Q
U
EU
O O_ Y T
5
(p
O
U
M
�, O Y m O Cn E Cll L
C
N
Q
L L d O Y O L S' i C Q O
C) L o? a .Q o 3 0 0 a o o °� >
Q))
3 c p E m c �_ m E o p U °)
�=
m
L o m n Q m 3 0> c L m> 3 m- m E 3= a) api >
U) � - 3 Q (7 : w 3: U) a cn S 3: -j O U) 3: 3: U m Q cn H a 0 cn O�
.a .M Lo
� a c °,
O
E
d U •p C�ji s; N O U
a
h i i N C C6 G U
a a Q')
y a a d .� ° o o y Q a°1i y a o
N
w
i U N CO N N h y m o
CO U
.� y ,+
y N V
d .c CO .� N O G U .p cio _� Q) U a CU N
a
i N
N
y Q' C6 k y Cab h N C6 s: k 'i i
U)
Qm z'zz'aao0000000 C) o�'ga
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 T-14 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

�
\\\
M m 0 2 r g o== o/,
o
�\}
5
M±
o 0 o wo# z z= w o o « o 0
CC)
\
o CO = w w 2 CO r / = z / /
'
®
k2
m@_®o=®= S r o w= o Cl)
_ z= c z r r« z=
e
ƒ#
=
\
Z N_ N r@= 2 a N— n o t#
—
COLO
7�
e
-
(
kS
- 5
CD o r= 2 0 o o———\a/
q 2
\ \
}
2
/ N r N 0 2 r g N N o= m 0
7<�
2
#
aM
S e e r/= g n=a/
2/
\ k
mƒ
E
\LO
�
x 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0� N o o
w o\
©
5©
m =
2
/
2 a = r / _ } a 2 /
\ »
CD N
\ CO
n
$ o
/
/ = m z g = / a n m = / 7 —
\ 2
/
\ §
f-0
r =
( \
§ 7
C/) &
§
]O
�2
,
d ]
E
CO
f
®
@
e o >
±
/ 2
E
> » 7 0-§
/
=3
k_ 0\ \/ S o j a]
%
G
C
5 © ° % ° § § 5 § ) 2 @
% C
{
\
o 2 E » , O % E %
§
%
» } / { %) z { \ \ \ M § —
\
}
/ / k � ƒ \ \ / ƒ ƒ } j ƒ / j k
/
0m
\ %
CIO
cQ �
( \ { 0 k
2 ° E #
-
)
2
a \ [ }
/ § § 0 E i w \ ! / 3 \ ±
[
@
, 3
a , ; 2 t > = s
g
e° t t/ m\/ R 2 G S G E E
9
`
0
_
m® a
aM$ » S 2— t®0.
s ! g g a o® t ! o/ E
0
°
� ,
w w!_= o o G= c
D
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 s» PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

AURORAy'
-{{{--t✓� CORRI
CREEK Tf_ - 1 �� , •' 3 ,
__......
G
ao.n,Ro� F
1 - '
SOUTH CREEK P LANDS �o
CORRIDOR3�p
:n ,e PHASE2 _ _.---�---
-.- ---
-- PHASE
—PHASE2
HOLLOWELL TRACT - P LANDS "-
PHASE 3
7-7
m PHASE 3
- BAY cITr�F'RRM 4 PHASE 1 epY
PHASE 4 P LANDS PARKER FARM
U LANDS SECTIONS A—J
LAT: 35' 14.15.04" - -
.. LONG: 76"46'19.20'.
RODMAN '"1 -
CON TROL'•
SITE
- PHASE 4 cnsEr TRACT
U LANDS P LANDS
U LANDS
LEGEND
P AND U LANDS BOUNDARY
SOUTH CREEK CORRIDOR AND 0 5,500 11,000
PARKER FARM BOUNDARY
SCALE IN FEET
NORTH CAROLINA VICINITY M A P
P AND U LANDS PHASE 1 AND RODMAN
SITE LOCATION
P LANDS PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SOURCE: SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: BFG/TLJ
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES, P LANDS_VIC_
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009 DATE: 08/03/15 FILE -
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE PH1 2014
WWW.CO. BEAUFORT. NC. US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET. '41v CP#1745.59.32.1
�Z ^ 4N, COLLEGE ACRESUI DRIVE
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGES, NC STATEPLANE, lV_ L K
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
NAD83, FEET, 1:24000—SCALE, WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG INCORPORATED TEL [phone] FIGURE 1
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]

4I
h�
J
BAY CITY FARM
PHASE 4
SOUTH CREEK CANAL U LANDS
EXECUTIVE ROAD/
JAIME ROAD
RODMAN
CONTROL
RC -1 SITE
RC -2 r n
RC -3 \ o Z _
J LPHA I'
c
UOK
0:DS Z
Z
�;7)0
O
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
N I BAY CITY No. 2.
P LANDS
PLPS 5
ROYAL ROAD of
P LANDS
\-76
o
SMALL ROAD
56 52000 47
9 ® 54 50�
SMALL ROAD ��pp ss P LANDS Willb
X60 1 _53151
49 �48
7
PLPS 6
BAY CITY NO' ti
37 4j 42
35 39
34 ` %38 28
�36 27 PLPS 4
0 t 9
32 25 26
33 31 24
No�• 3
BAY C 21_ 23
P LA {ND
20 �21
12
0 18
o1's 1� 10 PLPS 3
1
LINE ROADIIJPLPS 1
COUNTYvi
PLPS 2
LEGEND
PLPS 7
AREAS PLANTED IN PHASE 1:
D ZONE 3 NON-RIVERINE SWAMP FOREST
0 ZONE 4 POND PINE POCOSIN FOREST
® ZONE 4A POND PINE POCOSIN FOREST
0 ZONE 5 HARDWOOD FLAT 1
O ZONE 6 HARDWOOD FLAT 2
0 ZONE 7 SWALES
MONITORING LOCATIONS
P AND U LANDS PHASE 1 AND RODMAN
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ/BFG
0 1,800 3,600 DATE: 08/03/14 FILE: 2014 DWG WELL_PH1
ku" 4 CP#1745.59.32.1
7 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
SCALE IN FEET L SUITE 2
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
TEL [phone]
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUL ANTSS FAX [phone] FIGURE 2
PHASE 1 PLANTING AREA
OPEN WATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH
-
ROADS
+
PERIMETER BERM AND PARKING AREAS
TREE SAMPLING PLOT
O
WELL LOCATION AND TREE MONITORING PLOT
(WELLS TO MONITOR LATERAL DRAINAGE EFFECT MAY
NOT HAVE A TREE PLOT. LOCATIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.)
PHOTO STATION NUMBER AND LOCATION
PLPS 1
D
CONTROL WELL
AREAS PLANTED IN PHASE 1:
D ZONE 3 NON-RIVERINE SWAMP FOREST
0 ZONE 4 POND PINE POCOSIN FOREST
® ZONE 4A POND PINE POCOSIN FOREST
0 ZONE 5 HARDWOOD FLAT 1
O ZONE 6 HARDWOOD FLAT 2
0 ZONE 7 SWALES
MONITORING LOCATIONS
P AND U LANDS PHASE 1 AND RODMAN
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ/BFG
0 1,800 3,600 DATE: 08/03/14 FILE: 2014 DWG WELL_PH1
ku" 4 CP#1745.59.32.1
7 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
SCALE IN FEET L SUITE 2
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
TEL [phone]
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUL ANTSS FAX [phone] FIGURE 2

SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
SOIL SURVEY OF BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, US DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONVERSATION SERVICE,
ISSUED: SEPTEMBER 1995
LEGEND
w
ff 11
RVAM
PHASE 1 (970.38 ACRES)
WELL LOCATION AND TREE MONITORING PLOT
(WELLS TO MONITOR LATERAL DRAINAGE EFFECT
MAY NOT HAVE A TREE PLOT. LOCATIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.)
CONTROL WELL
SOILS
a
SYMBOL SOIL NAME
Da DARE (ORGANIC)(60.81 ACRES)
Po PONZER (ORGANIC)(751 .85 ACRES)
^' TaB TARBORO SAND (4.18 ACRES)
Wd WASDA (ORGANIC)(153.54 ACRES)
HYDRIC SOILS
® NON—HYDRIC SOILS
NOTE:
ONLY HYDRIC SOILS ARE DESIGNATED MINERAL
OR ORGANIC.
SOILS
P AND U
LANDS PHASE 1 AND RODMAN
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN2014
d
APPROVED BY:
DRAWN BY: TLJ
0 1,800 3,600
®
58
DATE: 08/03/15
t.54
CP#1745.59.32.1
LEGEND
w
ff 11
RVAM
PHASE 1 (970.38 ACRES)
WELL LOCATION AND TREE MONITORING PLOT
(WELLS TO MONITOR LATERAL DRAINAGE EFFECT
MAY NOT HAVE A TREE PLOT. LOCATIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.)
CONTROL WELL
SOILS
a
SYMBOL SOIL NAME
Da DARE (ORGANIC)(60.81 ACRES)
Po PONZER (ORGANIC)(751 .85 ACRES)
^' TaB TARBORO SAND (4.18 ACRES)
Wd WASDA (ORGANIC)(153.54 ACRES)
HYDRIC SOILS
® NON—HYDRIC SOILS
NOTE:
ONLY HYDRIC SOILS ARE DESIGNATED MINERAL
OR ORGANIC.
SOILS
P AND U
LANDS PHASE 1 AND RODMAN
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN2014
d
APPROVED BY:
DRAWN BY: TLJ
0 1,800 3,600
FILE: PLANDS_SOILS_PH1_
DATE: 08/03/15
.
CP#1745.59.32.1
SCALE IN FEET
7
` R
cr-c'-' R 0 A T E D,
A
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUL NTSS
z
4709 COLLEGE ACRESUITE DRIVE
WILMINGTONV-1, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
FIGURE 3

E s �
h
�• V
�.
A,
SOUTH CREEK CANAL
EXECUTIVE ROAD/
JAIME ROAD
�r
RODMAN
CONTROL x
RC -1 SITE
RC -2\ \
ZmPHASE 4
U LANDS
cl
GO Z_
O XOZ Do
U LANDS
v
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM, BEAUFORT AND
PAMLICO COUNTIES,LIDAR, NC STATEPLANE, NAD 1983, FEET,
WWW.NCFLOODMAPS.COM
E:0
ZO
mZ
Z�
o
m
n
SMALL ROAD
PHASE 2
PHASE 3 D
)
A f°�
PAM -
SMALL
SMALL ROAD PHASE 1
•56 520 • of
• 59 54 50• 47 F1
• 46 4 i F�
• 58 P LANDS • o
60 7 55 53 51 49 48 90
• • •
13-14
_ 14-15
LEGEND
_ 15-16
16-21
PHASE 1 PLANTING AREA
_
BAY CIT 0. 044 1
OPEN WATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH
P AND
U LANDS PHASE 1 AND
PHASE 3
PHASE 1
_ •37 410 42
39 •
ROADS
BAY
CITY FARM
SCALE: AS SHOWN
•35
•
DRAWN BY: TLJ/BFG
DATE: 08/03/15
FILE: PLANDS_PH1-WELL-
LIDAR-2014
0 1,800 3,600
+ + + PERIMETER BERM AND PARKING AREAS
/PHASE
4
ZR
34•
•43
038 040 028
WELL LOCATION
U LANDS
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
TEL [phone]
yM
36
: 7
Q CONTROL WELL
�
•30
z,
Y
�1
032
29
• 25 26
031 -.
E �
_
•
•33
• 24
CITY 3
BAY
19
21 23 - Legend
P L� N D.S
BEAUFORT AND PAM LICO LIDAF
Elevation in Feet
•
20 •21 Oil
0 0 - 2
•8
•
12
2-4
14 •10
® 4-5
2
•
1
5-66
BAY
CITY No.
015 • 13
09
_ 6 - 7
017
- -
__ _
BAY CLTY No. 1
Q 7 - 8
3 0
8-9
10
g 8
9-10
P
LANDS
0 4
10-11
5
l
11-12
COUNTY
LINE ROAD
1 _
12-13
13-14
_ 14-15
_ 15-16
16-21
0 21-48
MONITORING
WELL LOCATIONS ON AS—BUILT LIDAR
P AND
U LANDS PHASE 1 AND
RODMAN
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN
APPROVED BY:
DRAWN BY: TLJ/BFG
DATE: 08/03/15
FILE: PLANDS_PH1-WELL-
LIDAR-2014
0 1,800 3,600
�0
CP# 1745.59.32.1
ZR
4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
SUITE 2
SCALE IN FEET
INCORPORATED
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
TEL [phone]
FIGURE 4
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
FAX [phone]

16
14
s 12
U
C
10
T
8
C
O
et
c�
6
2.
0
4
0
NOTE: Rainfall source from 9-20 Aug 2014 comes from the PA II rain gauge due to an animal attack on the Bay City rain gauge. Rainfall source
from 16 Nov to 5 Dec 2014 from PA II because Bay City rain gauge was guessed to be clogged and not recording accurate data.
"Range of Normal" and "WETS Monthly Rainfall Total" plotted on last day of each month.
"Range of Normal" refers to the 30th and 70th percentile thresholds of the probability of onsite rainfall amounts outside of the normal range
(based on historical averages from 1971-2000). WETS Data subject to periodic revision. Data shown are latest available from
http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/climate/navigate_wets.htm
•
•
•
• •
tiI�K
a� eQ at fit, aJ o� �J� Sao eQ c� o� e�
otia o��C 0 ��` oyP �`S otia �, tiP tis y� ti 0NO
0 0 0 0 0
2014 Bay City Daily Rainfall - Bay City 30 -day Rolling Total • 2014 WETS -Aurora Monthly Rainfall Total
30% Less Chance 30% More Chance 2014 Bay City Monthly Rainfall
Figure 5. 2014 BAY CITY and WETS -AURORA RAINFALL

IAJ
J
0 BAY CITY FARM
PHASE 4
SOUTH CREEK CANAL U LANDS
EXECUTIVE ROAD/
JAIME ROAD
RODMAN
CONTROL
Rc-1 SITE
RC -2
RC -3,
PHASE 4
U LANDS
W c o
Z o
Z D
m v
U LANDS
v
0
0
D
Z
O
D
v
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
ro
zo
mc:
Z�
o
1
0
0
D
v
N
O
O
N
ROYAL ROAD
SMALL ROAD
037 BAY C4j4 044
0
42
35 039 0
0
043
040
340 038 028
36 0 7
030 29 25
032 0 26
033 03 a
No2
Q•
BAY C 22 23
19 LA. N D S
0
20 0 011
SMALL RI
056
s0 0 0
87 55
PHASE 1
01 0
50 47
P DS 46 40
53 49' 48
® 051 0 /
LEGEND
12
PHASE 1 PLANTING AREA
OPEN WATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH
a
ROADS
0
PERIMETER BERM AND PARKING AREAS
0
WELL LOCATION
0
CONTROL WELL
HYDROLOGIC
ZONES
08
12
WETLAND HYDROPERIODS
'
14
os o
010
0 • _ <6% OF THE GROWING SEASON (21.77 ACRES)
BAY IN 2
015 013-
.
0 O = 26 - 12.5 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (11.46 ACRES)
. 017
BAY 7 C3TYoo-
09
0 _ >12.5 - 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (62.02 ACRES)
0
O_
>25 - 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (318.12 ACRES)
10P
6
8
® 0
LANDS
4
_ >75 - 100 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (482.87 ACRES)
5
NOTE:
LINE ROAD=
HYDROLOGIC OF TONAL AS
EHYDRIOPERIOD
COUNTY s
REPREESEEN ED BYEWELL CATEGORISUAL ES BEDN ONE
vmDm
WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR
w '
CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIOD
BOUNDARIES.
P AND U LANDS PHASE 1 AND RODMAN
2014 LONGEST HYDROPERIODS AND ESTIMATED HYDROLOGIC ZONES
DURING ALL RAINFALL CONDITIONS
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE: 08/03/15 FILE: PLANDS—PHI—MON—
RAIN
1,800
-2014
3,600 -2014
CP# 1745.59.32.1
4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
SUITE 2
SCALE IN FEETZR
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 C
INCORPORATED TEL 910 V
/392-9253 FIGURE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]

SOUTH CREEK CANAL
EXECUTIVE ROAD/
JAIME ROAD
RODMAN
CONTROL
RC -1 SITE
RC -2\RC -3,
PHASE 4
U LANDS c)
W �
0 A
z 0
Z >
fTl 0
A
0
U LANDS
0
>
z
0
>
O
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB 02009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
BENFEWELL ROAD
ROYAL ROAD
SMALL ROAD PHASE 1
ED
d56 52p OF`
059
>
: 500 47 F
�4 0' �F
�
SMALL ROAD
4
o 58 46 0 �'O
P LADS
PHASE2 {
p
60��, 0 ` 7 55j 53 S1'; 49'1 48' V6
PHASE 3�
I o O 0 {'�
0
>
A LEGEND
PHASE 1 PLANTING AREA
'
PHASE3
PHASE 1 OPEN WATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH
0
o
N
ROADS
CITY NO.
044
0 PERIMETER BERM AND PARKING AREAS
PHASE3
o37 BAY 410 42
Q WELL LOCATION
J
PHASE1
_�.
® 39 0
BAY CITY FARM
o35
[� CONTROL WELL
p43
040
PHASE 4
038
34
028
HYDROLOGIC
U LANDS
p
ZONES
36
07
WETLAND HYDROPERIODS
030 29
25
D • = <6% OF THE GROWING SEASON (21.77 ACRES)
032
0
26
033
31
o24
O 0 = 2!6 — 12.5 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (11.46 ACRES)
BAY CITY V40 22 3 23
0 0 = >12.5 — 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (62.02 ACRES)
19
P L A N D '
0 0
= >25 - 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON (800.99 ACRES)
20 021
p11
rc�
zo
012
rn
p
1
NOTE:
Z
14
0
010
016
HYDROLOGIC ZONES ARE A VISUAL APPROXIMATION OF TOTAL ACRES
N
CITY NO. 2
015 013
REPRESENTED BY WELL HYDROPERIOD CATEGORIES BASED ON ONE
BA Y
017
p9
WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR
NO 1
CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIOD
BAY CTY
BOUNDARIES.
7
0
10
p
o
P AND U LANDS PHASE 1 AND RODMAN
P LANDS
2 4 6
°
6
LONGEST 2014 HYDROPERIODS AND ESTIMATED HYDROLOGIC ZONES
DURING WETS NORMAL AND BELOW NORMAL RAINFALL
5
(EXCLUDES JUNE 19TH — JULY 20TH AND
LINE ROAD
AUGUST 3RD — AUGUST 30TH)
COUNTY
=
N yN
w m
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
0 1,800
DATE: 08/03/15 FILE: PLANDS—PHI—MON-
3,600 WET -2014
CP# 1745.59.32.1
SCALE IN FEET
0 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
_ 7 ^ N swrF

APPENDIX A
Stem Counts at Individual Plots at
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1

Appendix A. Individual tree/shrub plot counts from P and U Lands Phase 1 first (2012) and third annual (2014) fall monitoring. Numbers in each column indicate trees unquestionably alive at sampling. Plot size is 0.3 acre.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 Third Annual Report A-1
Zone 3
37
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
48
49
50
51
52
Common name Scientific name
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
Unknown ?
7
3
1
12
9
6
7
1
9
1
2
15
Serviceberry Amelanchier canadensis
Red chokeberry Aronia arbutifolia
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
3
Paw paw Asima triloba
River birch Betula nigra
4
3
6
3
5
2
2
1
11
6
21
9
10
9
4
4
12
7
3
2
5
4
6
4
American beautyberry Callicarpa americana
Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana
3
4
1
3
2
Water hickory Carya aquatica
Sugarberry Celtis laevigata
Buttonbush* Cephalanthus occidentalis
Atlantic white cedar Chamaecyparis thyoides
2
1
6
6
1
Sweet pepperbush Clethra alnifolia
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
3
1
1
Silky dogwood Cornus amomum
Swamp dogwood Cornus foemina
Titi Cyrilla racemiflora
Persimmon Diospora virginiana
Strawberry bush Euonymous americana
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3
1
19
10
Deciduous holly Ilex decidua
Inkberry Ilex glabra
1
1
2
2
9
9
8
2
1
1
Winterberry Ilex verticillata
1
1
Virginia sweetspire Itea virginica
1
5
7
4
2
2
3
3
2
Swamp doghobble Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
1
1
Spicebush Lindera benzoin
Fetterbush Lyonia lucida
Sweetbay Magnolia virginiana
Mulberry Morus rubra
Nyssa spp.
Water tupelo N. aquatica
19
19
1
2
8
10
13
15
9
10
19
20
12
12
22
22
2
2
19
18
8
8
6
7
19
19
Swamp tupelo Nyssa biflora
12
12
8
7
35
34
3
2
2
2
10
8
4
4
13
14
9
8
17
14
25
25
30
29
11
11
Red bay Persea borbonia
4
5
6
6
1
1
1
Pond pine Pinus serotina
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
Oak Quercus spp.
2
5
1
3
12
1
2
1
3
White oak Q. alba
Laurel oak Q. laurifolia
3
1
23
13
19
10
3
15
9
54
23
22
10
6
3
4
2
2
2
4
4
15
6
5
1
Overcup oak Q. lyrata
16
14
9
11
19
20
12
8
22
12
22
20
15
19
11
12
12
10
23
15
20
19
13
18
7
6
Swamp chestnut oak Q. michauxii
4
4
8
4
18
19
12
6
9
8
37
28
42
25
32
8
26
21
30
13
22
5
Water oak Q. nigra
Willow oak Q. phellos
44
39
22
18
29
26
3
1
20
11
21
17
32
14
17
10
9
5
9
3
15
11
17
13
12
9
Cherrybark oak Quercus pagodaefolia
Dwarf azalea Rhododendron atlanticum
1
2
2
Swamp azalea Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose Rosa palustris
Bald cypress Taxodium distichum
5
5
10
10
19
19
6
7
10
9
10
10
7
6
43
41
28
28
18
18
42
42
5
6
29
29
American elm Ulmus americana
High bush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum
1
Possumhaw Viburnum nudum
6
9
2
2
1
1
1
Dusty zenobia Zenobia pulverulenta
1
1
TOTAL
123
106
98
68
161
147
83
53
113
61
187
139
137
82
164
142
113
86
145
89
143
132
130
100
148
94
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 Third Annual Report A-1

Appendix A (continued)
Zone 4
Zone 3
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
Total
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
Common name Scientific name
Unknown ?
5
4
8
1
2
1
2
54
4
76
93
2
Serviceberry Amelanchier canadensis
2
17
2
7
Red chokeberry Aronia arbutifolia
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
11
13
Paw paw Asima triloba
4
5
20
20
24
24
4
4
5
5
15
15
5
River birch Betula nigra
15
6
20
6
13
10
8
7
15
7
1
1
161
91
American beautyberry Callicarpa americana
15
18
27
4
1
1
14
2
19
Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana
22
15
21
5
2
14
8
93
89
9
10
10
3
Water hickory Carya aquatica
11
2
2
185
167
135
90
146
133
146
Sugarberry Celtis laevigata
Buttonbush* Cephalanthus occidentalis
Atlantic white cedar Chamaecyparis thyoides
14
13
71
70
32
30
37
26
163
146
Sweet pepperbush Clethra alnifolia
3
3
1
1
15
10
Silky dogwood Cornus amomum
Swamp dogwood Cornus foemina
4
1
5
Titi Cyrilla racemiflora
Persimmon Diospora virginiana
Strawberry bush Euonymous americana
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
22
11
Deciduous holly Ilex decidua
1
1
Inkberry Ilex glabra
1
1
2
1
2
1
3
2
29
20
Winterberry Ilex verticillata
1
1
Virginia sweetspire Itea virginica
8
7
3
5
5
29
28
Swamp doghobble Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
1
1
Spicebush Lindera benzoin
2
1
2
1
Fetterbush Lyonia lucida
Sweetbay Magnolia virginiana
2
2
2
2
Mulberry Morus rubra
Nyssa spp.
Water tupelo N. aquatica
18
20
18
18
17
17
16
15
10
10
12
12
248
256
Swamp tupelo Nyssa biflora
18
15
26
26
6
6
4
4
20
20
8
7
7
6
268
254
Red bay Persea borbonia
12
12
Pond pine Pinus serotina
1
1
1
1
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
Oak Quercus spp.
2
1
1
33
1
White oak Q. alba
1
1
1
1
Laurel oak Q. laurifolia
2
2
5
2
4
2
7
4
13
5
17
1
16
3
239
103
Overcup oak Q. lyrata
24
20
22
7
12
8
5
5
24
21
10
7
9
8
307
260
Swamp chestnut oak Q. michauxii
28
21
18
2
16
7
43
33
8
4
14
1
2
2
369
211
Water oak Q. nigra
Willow oak Q. phellos
23
22
8
1
9
2
5
4
24
13
29
9
23
10
371
238
Cherrybark oak Quercus pagodaefolia
Dwarf azalea Rhododendron atlanticum
3
2
Swamp azalea Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose Rosa palustris
Bald cypress Taxodium distichum
28
28
15
15
39
38
38
37
31
31
10
10
2
2
395
391
American elm Ulmus americana
High bush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum
1
Possumhaw Viburnum nudum
1
10
13
Dusty zenobia Zenobia pulverulenta
2
TOTAL
166
139
159
93
174
150
152
123
144
115
157
90
108
63
2,805
2,072
Zone 4
10
11
12
14
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
6
6
7
12
6
3
8
4
2
1
55
54
75
76
2
17
2
7
5
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
14
14
4
5
20
20
24
24
4
4
5
5
15
15
5
4
7
7
17
17
3
2
7
5
5
3
15
28
13
10
7
15
18
27
4
1
1
14
2
19
10
22
15
21
5
2
14
8
93
89
9
10
8
6
11
11
2
2
185
167
135
90
146
133
146
122
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 Third Annual Report A-2

Appendix A (continued)
Zone 4A
Zone 4
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Total
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
Common name Scientific name
Unknown ?
58
54
4
3
1
4
10
6
1
1
7
18
66
1
Serviceberry Amelanchier canadensis
17
21
12
16
1
1
10
19
3
1
11
19
15
28
29
48
4
2
Red chokeberry Aronia arbutifolia
1
188
105
209
90
192
112
Paw paw Asima triloba
River birch Betula nigra
American beautyberry Callicarpa americana
Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana
6
3
Water hickory Carya aquatica
10
4
Sugarberry Celtis laevigata
Buttonbush* Cephalanthus occidentalis
Atlantic white cedar Chamaecyparis thyoides
64
62
42
42
13
9
249
244
Sweet pepperbush Clethra alnifolia
Silky dogwood Cornus amomum
2
Swamp dogwood Cornus foemina
Titi Cyrilla racemiflora
1
1
1
23
20
1
1
26
22
Persimmon Diospora virginiana
Strawberry bush Euonymous americana
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
17
2
Deciduous holly Ilex decidua
2
10
5
Inkberry Ilex glabra
Winterberry Ilex verticillata
Virginia sweetspire Itea virginica
1
5
4
Swamp doghobble Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
Spicebush Lindera benzoin
Fetterbush Lyonia lucida
Sweetbay Magnolia virginiana
5
5
4
4
9
9
1
2
5
4
2
2
11
12
5
4
80
81
Mulberry Morus rubra
Nyssa spp.
1
1
Water tupelo N. aquatica
7
1
2
2
10
9
3
3
18
15
1
5
5
1
1
95
84
Swamp tupelo Nyssa biflora
12
18
25
24
20
20
50
48
46
46
39
38
9
8
26
26
256
256
Red bay Persea borbonia
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
7
1
29
16
Pond pine Pinus serotina
17
18
7
2
11
46
13
22
1
16
27
27
18
22
5
2
152
235
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
Oak Quercus spp.
5
3
2
1
3
1
19
1
White oak Q. alba
Laurel oak Q. laurifolia
14
7
6
24
12
10
1
5
2
9
4
7
2
12
4
143
59
Overcup oak Q. lyrata
2
2
Swamp chestnut oak Q. michauxii
4
2
4
2
Water oak Q. nigra
Willow oak Q. phellos
27
20
28
28
19
18
7
27
26
21
12
5
2
32
3
226
99
Cherrybark oak Quercus pagodaefolia
1
1
Dwarf azalea Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose Rosa palustris
Bald cypress Taxodium distichum
14
14
5
5
16
16
6
6
34
35
13
12
14
14
7
7
230
225
American elm Ulmus americana
High bush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum
1
2
4
3
Possumhaw Viburnum nudum
Dusty zenobia Zenobia pulverulenta
TOTAL
101
83
84
37
128
138
111
89
153
148
191
160
137
127
116
58
1,633
1,352
Zone 4A
2
3
4
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
9
16
1
18
25
34
9
1
4
37
37
58
54
27
20
1
17
10
6
1
20
18
24
15
20
17
21
12
16
15
19
10
19
9
49
11
19
15
28
29
48
48
14
14
1
188
105
209
90
192
112
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 Third Annual Report A-3

Appendix A (continued)
Zone 5
Zone 4A
6
7
8
9
13
15
Total
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
Common name Scientific name
Unknown ?
7
1
8
21
2
6
3
5
4
3
9
76
1
Serviceberry Amelanchier canadensis
2
Red chokeberry Aronia arbutifolia
1
2
2
Paw paw Asima triloba
1
1
1
River birch Betula nigra
4
4
1
1
10
10
7
7
American beautyberry Callicarpa americana
5
3
3
3
4
14
14
34
34
48
46
41
43
18
Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana
4
1
1
1
11
4
1
1
22
5
13
25
128
5
Water hickory Carya aquatica
3
4
1
21
4
28
7
11
1
9
1
90
13
Sugarberry Celtis laevigata
2
1
20
5
18
13
10
6
3
1
1
22
16
Buttonbush* Cephalanthus occidentalis
55
21
19
9
10
7
3
22
19
32
25
11
Atlantic white cedar Chamaecyparis thyoides
63
64
54
55
23
18
65
55
81
82
20
18
358
347
Sweet pepperbush Clethra alnifolia
14
15
15
27
26
2
Silky dogwood Cornus amomum
78
84
160
109
194
176
145
122
96
77
Swamp dogwood Cornus foemina
Titi Cyrilla racemiflora
Persimmon Diospora virginiana
Strawberry bush Euonymous americana
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
23
7
2
1
1
26
8
Deciduous holly Ilex decidua
6
5
1
12
7
1
6
96
7
Inkberry Ilex glabra
Winterberry Ilex verticillata
1
1
Virginia sweetspire Itea virginica
4
2
10
9
3
19
8
8
6
10
7
70
33
Swamp doghobble Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
Spicebush Lindera benzoin
Fetterbush Lyonia lucida
2
1
2
1
Sweetbay Magnolia virginiana
9
8
24
24
25
22
12
5
16
15
36
35
186
159
Mulberry Morus rubra
Nyssa spp.
Water tupelo N. aquatica
15
13
19
14
39
31
14
9
10
8
24
19
177
131
Swamp tupelo Nyssa biflora
Red bay Persea borbonia
Pond pine Pinus serotina
8
29
13
21
29
16
5
8
22
25
22
31
186
165
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
Oak Quercus spp.
White oak Q. alba
Laurel oak Q. laurifolia
Overcup oak Q. lyrata
1
1
Swamp chestnut oak Q. michauxii
Water oak Q. nigra
Willow oak Q. phellos
Cherrybark oak Quercus pagodaefolia
Dwarf azalea Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose Rosa palustris
Bald cypress Taxodium distichum
13
13
27
26
30
29
15
14
28
28
38
37
241
238
American elm Ulmus americana
High bush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum
1
Possumhaw Viburnum nudum
Dusty zenobia Zenobia pulverulenta
TOTAL
155
142
162
150
180
102
177
107
211
171
163
131
1,637
1,110
Zone 5
25
27
28
29
30
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
2
1
4
3
3
3
2
8
3
8
4
8
9
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
1
1
10
10
7
7
3
5
3
3
3
4
14
14
34
34
48
46
41
43
18
17
3
1
1
1
5
4
1
1
1
1
7
25
1
2
2
1
5
2
1
20
5
18
13
10
6
3
1
1
22
16
56
55
21
19
9
10
7
3
22
19
32
25
11
8
9
2
31
13
23
18
7
6
3
3
20
18
28
27
13
14
15
15
27
26
2
78
84
160
109
194
176
145
122
96
77
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 Third Annual Report A-4

Appendix A (continued)
Zone 6
Zone 5
31
32
33
34
36
38
46
47
60
Total
2
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
Common name Scientific name
Unknown ?
1
1
2
1
12
49
4
49
7
21
25
21
1
1
10
7
47
7
Serviceberry Amelanchier canadensis
4
3
4
1
1
35
27
35
27
14
14
14
14
25
16
25
16
6
Red chokeberry Aronia arbutifolia
6
3
232
184
232
184
Paw paw Asima triloba
River birch Betula nigra
American beautyberry Callicarpa americana
Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana
3
5
1
2
1
4
1
4
6
1
15
6
61
19
Water hickory Carya aquatica
Sugarberry Celtis laevigata
Buttonbush* Cephalanthus occidentalis
Atlantic white cedar Chamaecyparis thyoides
1
9
9
Sweet pepperbush Clethra alnifolia
1
1
1
1
4
4
Silky dogwood Cornus amomum
1
Swamp dogwood Cornus foemina
Titi Cyrilla racemiflora
Persimmon Diospora virginiana
Strawberry bush Euonymous americana
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Deciduous holly Ilex decidua
Inkberry Ilex glabra
1
1
1
4
4
Winterberry Ilex verticillata
6
4
6
4
Virginia sweetspire Itea virginica
Swamp doghobble Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
1
1
Spicebush Lindera benzoin
Fetterbush Lyonia lucida
Sweetbay Magnolia virginiana
1
1
6
6
Mulberry Morus rubra
Nyssa spp.
3
3
Water tupelo N. aquatica
21
20
19
17
5
5
21
19
1
1
24
23
33
30
34
35
7
7
191
186
Swamp tupelo Nyssa biflora
11
11
24
26
37
37
32
33
9
8
12
12
37
38
47
46
19
20
383
385
Red bay Persea borbonia
13
13
4
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
36
31
Pond pine Pinus serotina
8
25
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
Oak Quercus spp.
4
6
1
5
1
1
1
4
1
32
2
White oak Q. alba
Laurel oak Q. laurifolia
4
1
5
1
4
2
11
21
7
4
3
1
4
3
8
4
115
47
Overcup oak Q. lyrata
28
16
34
19
44
28
17
9
15
17
18
16
28
32
15
13
12
4
320
254
Swamp chestnut oak Q. michauxii
2
18
5
9
5
14
3
23
14
15
16
34
34
19
15
206
147
Water oak Q. nigra
Willow oak Q. phellos
19
6
10
6
55
29
18
7
9
6
4
4
2
190
100
Cherrybark oak Quercus pagodaefolia
Dwarf azalea Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose Rosa palustris
Bald cypress Taxodium distichum
16
16
19
18
23
23
7
7
34
34
15
15
24
25
24
24
53
56
318
318
American elm Ulmus americana
High bush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum
2
1
2
1
4
3
10
5
Possumhaw Viburnum nudum
Dusty zenobia Zenobia pulverulenta
TOTAL
111
71
160
110
201
134
132
82
131
93
107
97
162
159
146
136
128
97
1,951
1,547
Zone 6
35
Total
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
8
8
2
2
2
2
14
9
14
9
3
3
3
3
26
24
26
24
1
1
3
4
3
4
1
1
1
1
57
49
57
49
25
21
25
21
1
1
7
7
7
7
3
4
3
4
1
1
35
27
35
27
14
14
14
14
25
16
25
16
6
3
6
3
232
184
232
184
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 Third Annual Report A-5

Appendix A (concluded)
*Planted but in such a low density, did not show up in plots
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 Third Annual Report A-6
Zone 7
1
17
Total
Common name
Scientific name
1 st
3rd
1st
3rd
1 st
3rd
Unknown
?
11
19
30
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
Paw paw
Asima triloba
River birch
Betula nigra
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
Buttonbush*
Cephalanthus occidentalis
8
4
1
1
9
5
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
Titi
Cyrilla racemiflora
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
23
4
29
52
4
Deciduous holly
Ilex decidua
Inkberry
Ilex glabra
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
Mulberry
Morus rubra
Nyssa spp.
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
32
31
22
15
54
46
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
Red bay
Persea borbonia
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
Oak
Quercus spp.
White oak
Q. alba
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
Water oak
Q. nigra
Willow oak
Q. phellos
Cherrybark oak
Quercus pagodaefolia
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
2
2
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
58
58
34
33
92
91
American elm
Ulmus americana
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
Dusty zenobia
Zenobia pulverulenta
TOTALI
132
1 97
1 107
1 49
1 239
1 146
*Planted but in such a low density, did not show up in plots
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 Third Annual Report A-6

/_1„a1►1QPAN :3
Selected Third Annual (2014) Restoration Photographs

NOTE: A 10 -foot pole marked in one -foot increments held by a biologist about 25 feet from
the camera is visible in all photos. The photos are identified with the station number (see
Figure 2), direction of view, and date taken.
PLPS-1: northeast, top photo 23 October 2014, bottom photo 30 October 2012.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 B-1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

PLPS-2: northwest, top photo 23 October 2014, bottom photo 30 October 2012 -white
poles of staked tree plot is in distant background in bottom photo.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 B-2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

`�!
..r-
, -
.v � -� .
�� .
� ;_
�,� �. , . .
��",� �'
R _ �
�_�%r �� a/' v
..n=f i�RlTT4 �S�
l
3, Y•�T.}�.. ;qt'g �,
`l� CT - s w�` >
� � ��# �
��ggK ( f
'�,i _

PLPS 4: southeast, top photo 23 October 2014, bottom photo 30 October; white poles
mark trees in plots.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 B-4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

PLPS-6: east southeast, top photo 23 October 2014, bottom photo 23 October 2012.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 B-6 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015

PLPS-7: north northwest, top photo 23 October 2014, bottom photo 23 Oct 2012.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 1 B-7 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report September 2015