Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20060616 Ver 1_Site Plan_20060606 (2)� 'TI 0.2\\• m f EXISTING LOGGING c ROAD CROSSING% TEMP. UTILITY CHAPEL RI IMPACT/ PEDESTRIAN CROSSING #1 PUD TEMP. UTILITY " IMPACT/ PEDESTRIAN CROSSING #2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING E PEDESTRIAN NOIMPACT BRIDGE CROSSING ; ROAD CROSSING PERMITTED BY CHAPEL RIDGE EXISTING LOGGIA ROAD CROSSING IMPACTTOTALS jl°ro n NOTE: BUFFERS PER CHATHAM COUNTY WATERSHEDPROTECTIONORDINANCE �pJ�J�JJJ/J�,, �/////� yOWNTEERBUFFERSPERPLANNED UNIT C��! /!/!/(/111 PERMANENT IMPACTS TOTAL RIP -RAP S.F. 499 WETLAND L.F. 108 STREAM . TOTAL ROAD FILL S.F. 796 WETLAND L. F. 142 STREAM COMBINED TOTAL S.F. L.F. 1 295 250 WETLAND STREAM TE-- MP AARRY IMPACTS To,AL T —T Aa -OOF TOTAL UTILITY. 1249 WETLAND L F. 239 STREAM TEMP. UTILITY IMPACT /PEDE CROSSING #3 EXISTING LOGGING jl°ro n * NOTE: SEE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE SECTION F �hyN o DESTRIAN �o I} A BRIDGE CR StNPr - -� MAXIMUM POTENTIAL IMPERVIOUS CALCULATION NOIMPACT Iv ROAD CROSSING #11 PEDESTRIAN a, CROSSING PEDESTRIAN NOIMPACT'1'I BRIDGE CROSSING o ROAD CROSSING #21 NOIMPACT TENO UTILITY IMPACT .� BRIDGE CROSSING #1/ TEMP. UTILTY IMPACT I to --� — 6- To,AL T —T Aa _ IMPACT/ PEDE MP��o°saE «—TAAE m�A EXISTING LOGGING jl°ro n ROAD CROSSING TEMP. UTILITY IMPACTS �hyN o DESTRIAN �o I} A BRIDGE CR StNPr - -� i9 NOIMPACT Iv ROAD CROSSING #11 PEDESTRIAN E P. UTILITY IMPACT �BRIDGIE CROSSING PEDESTRIAN NOIMPACT'1'I BRIDGE CROSSING o ROAD CROSSING #21 NOIMPACT TENO UTILITY IMPACT .� BRIDGE CROSSING #1/ TEMP. UTILTY IMPACT I to --� — 6- tI — TEMP. UTILITY _ IMPACT/ PEDE CROSSING #4 � o `� 0 J, 7_ n I W � II X11 o \\ a \ o� �J * NOTE: SEE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE SECTION EXISTING ROAD CROSSING PERMITTED BY CHAPEL RIDGE EXISTING LOGGIA ROAD CROSSING IMPACT TOTALS NOTE: BUFFERS PER CHATHAM COUNTY - ERSNEDPROTECTIDNORDINANCE VOLUNTEER BUFFERS PER PLANNED UNIT PERMANENT IMPACTS 'OTAL RIP -RAP S.F. =e % L.F. 108 STREAM _ 'OTAL ROAD FILL 10, \ 796 L L.F. 142 STREAM i S.F. L.F. I EXISTING LOGGING TEMPORARY IMPACTS 'OTAL UTILITY S.F. 1248_ WETLAND L.F. 24 STREAM ROAD CROSSING TEMP. UTILITY IMPACT/ PEDESTRIAN CHAPEL ROGE { , CROSSING #1 P U p TEMP. UTILITY " IMPACT/ PEDESTRIAN i CROSSING #2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING _ �r PEDESTRIAN NOIMPACT.' w - BRIDGE CROSSING r K", EXISTING ROAD CROSSING PERMITTED BY CHAPEL RIDGE EXISTING LOGGIA ROAD CROSSING IMPACT TOTALS NOTE: BUFFERS PER CHATHAM COUNTY - ERSNEDPROTECTIDNORDINANCE VOLUNTEER BUFFERS PER PLANNED UNIT PERMANENT IMPACTS 'OTAL RIP -RAP S.F. 499 WETLAND L.F. 108 STREAM _ 'OTAL ROAD FILL S.F. 796 WETLAND L.F. 142 STREAM :OMBINED TOTAL S.F. L.F. 1 295 __ 250 WETLAND STREAM TEMPORARY IMPACTS 'OTAL UTILITY S.F. 1248_ WETLAND L.F. 24 STREAM TEMP. UTILITY IMPACT/ PEDESTRIAN CROSSING #3 -EXISTING LOGGING ROAD CROSSING G#2/— TEMP. UTILITY IMPACTS DESTRIAN BRIDGE CR NOIMPACT I- PEDESTRIAN NO BRIDGE CROSSING NO IMPACT BRIDGE CROSSING #1/ TEMP. UTILTY IMPACT E EC MAXIMUM POTENTIAL IMPERVIOUS CALCULATION SING CROSSING #2/ UTILITY IMPACT TEMP. UTILITY IMPACT /PEDE CROSSING #4 w