20120107 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report Ph IV_2015_20160620

FIRST ANNUAL (2015) REPORT FOR THE
P AND U LANDS RESTORATION SITE PHASE 4
RICHLAND TOWNSHIP
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Prepared by:
CZR Incorporated
June 2016

FIRST ANNUAL (2015) REPORT FOR THE
P AND U LANDS RESTORATION SITE PHASE 4
RICHLAND TOWNSHIP
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Prepared by:
CZR Incorporated
June 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
PROJECT OVERVIEW ......................
1.1
History ................................................
1.2
Location ..............................................
1.3
Goals and Performance Criteria.........
2.0
REQUIREMENTS ..............................
2.1
Normal Rainfall and Growing Season
2.2
Hydrology ...........................................
2.3
Vegetation ..........................................
2.4
Photographic Documentation .............
3.0
2015 RESULTS .................................
3.1
Rainfall ...............................................
3.2
Hydrology ...........................................
3.3
Vegetation ..........................................
4.0
SUMMARY ........................................
LITERATURE CITED
Cover Photo: Aerial photo looking south over Phase 4 and sections of Phase 3. 17 March 2015.
LIST OF TABLES
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
Table 1 P and U Lands Phase 4 performance criteria, methods summary, and current
status.......................................................................................................................... T-1
Table 2 Hydroperiods of eight non -riparian monitoring wells at P and U Lands Phase 4
restoration site and three Rodman control wells during all rainfall conditions in
2015............................................................................................................................ T-2
Table 3 Hydroperiods of eight non -riparian monitoring wells at P and U Lands Phase 4
restoration site and three Rodman control wells during WETS normal and below
normal rainfall in 2015................................................................................................ T-4
Table 4 First annual survival of trees and shrubs planted in eight 0.3 -acre plots at P and
ULands Phase 4........................................................................................................ T-6
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 Monitoring Locations
Figure 3 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 Soils
Figure 4 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 Monitoring Locations on As Built LiDAR
Figure 5 2015 Bay City and WETS -Aurora Rainfall
Figure 6 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 2015 Longest Hydroperiods and
Estimated Hydrologic Zones during All Rainfall Conditions
Figure 7 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 2015 Hydroperiods and Estimated
Hydrologic Zones during WETS Normal and Below Normal Rainfall
APPENDICES
Appendix A Stem Counts at Individual Plots at P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4
Appendix B Selected First Annual Restoration Photograph
NOTE: Copy of entire report and hydrology data included on accompanying CD.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 iii PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report June 2016

1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
1.1 History. The approximately 3,667 -acre P and U Lands restoration site is part of
the PCS Phosphate Company Inc.'s (PCS) compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable
impacts to wetlands and waters authorized under United States Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Action ID: 200110096 and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Water
Quality Certification (WQC) #2008-0868 version 2.0. The P and U designation have no special
meaning other than that was the historic label given to PCS and Weyerhaeuser properties with
similar ownership agreements.
The P and U Lands site is a key component linking PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.'s
(PCS) Parker Farm Mitigation Site, Bay City Farm Mitigation Site, Gum Run Mitigation Site, and
the South Creek Corridor into a large and varied collection of restored wetland and preserved
natural areas (South Creek Corridor Complex). Unlike most other PCS mitigation sites, the P and
U Lands are not prior -converted agricultural fields. Other than the existing roads, most of the
acreage in which earthwork occurred was in some stage of silviculture, usually various -aged pine
stands, and contained regularly spaced ditches (deeper than the agricultural ditches on other
restoration sites that were filled in as part of restoration work) and the bedding common to pine
plantations. The removal of all standing timber and stumps and post-harvest debris presented
particular challenges as the organic soils precluded safe burning of the timber slash on site.
Consequently, some of the debris was piled into somewhat evenly shaped and sized mounds
throughout the site which provide additional wildlife habitat.
As described in the mitigation plan prepared for the pre -construction notification (PCN) to
the USACE (CZR 2012), the site was planned to be constructed in three phases as shown on
Figure 1. These three phases were completed during the following three years: Phase 1
construction was completed in 2011 and planted in February 2012, Phase 2 construction began
in 2012 and was planted in 2013; however, construction at the lower elevations took additional
time due to excessive wetness. This delay prevented the restoration of approximately 268 acres
of the original Phase 2 which included Gum Swamp Run. During the third year, these 268 acres
and Gum Swamp Run were restored and included with the Phase 3 work completed in 2013
(planted in February of 2014). Because Phase 3 was the largest of the three phases, some of the
Phase 3 work, approximately 138.43 acres, was not completed until later in 2014 and was not
planted until spring of 2015. This report includes results of first annual hydrology and vegetation
monitoring for the 138.43 acres of P and U Lands Phase 4 conducted by CZR Incorporated
(CZR) of Wilmington, NC.
The design team consisted of Jonathan T. Ricketts, Inc. of Palm Beach Gardens, FL, the
restoration design engineer, PCS, and CZR. Earthwork was performed by Sawyer's Land
Developing, Inc. out of Belhaven, NC and supervised by the design team. Phase 1 and 2
restoration activities occurred September 2011 -March 2013. Phase 3 construction began in Gum
Swamp Run on 9 May 2012 and on 22 June 2012 on the larger Phase 3 area. Phase 3 was
constructed with a total of 14 NC Division of Land Resources Erosion and Sediment Control
(DLR) permits for land clearing which were subsequently modified to all for the construction of the
interior ditch plugs and perimeter berms and ditches. Phase 4 activities were included in three of
the Phase 3 DLR permits (#s 22, 23, and 24). Planting of Phase 4 occurred in mid-February
2015. Further details of construction are included in the As Built Report for P and U Lands Phase
4 (CZR 2016).
1.2 Location. The P and U Lands site is located east and west of Bay City Road
(SR1002), approximately 4.5 miles southeast of Aurora, Richland Township, North Carolina. Bay
City Road runs through the P Lands portion of the site, which is bounded on the east by SR 1918
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report June 2016

(Peele Road is the unpaved extension of SR 1918) and on the south by "County Line Road" (a
gated gravel road along the Beaufort/Pamlico County border). The U Lands portion of the site
lies west and southwest of Bay City Farm (the western portion of the P Lands site referred to as
the "panhandle" separates Bay City Farm from the U Lands). South Creek and the South Creek
Canal form the northern and northwestern boundaries, Bonner/Rodman Road forms the western
boundary, and the Pamlico/Beaufort County line forms the southern boundary of the U Lands
(County Line Road itself is the southern boundary of only the eastern half of the U Lands as the
western limit of County Line Road terminates at the midpoint of the south property line). The
entire site is accessed via multiple gated roads along Bay City Road, Peele Road, County Line
Road, and/or Jaime/Executive Road. The site is located within the Pamlico Hydrologic Unit
03020104 of the Tar -Pamlico River basin within the South Creek subbasin at latitude 35.233831
and longitude 76.775742. Portions of the site can be found on the USGS Aurora, Bayboro, South
Creek, and Vandemere quadrangles (Figure 1).
1.3 Goals and Performance Criteria. The primary goal of the entire project is to re-
establish a self-sustaining functional wetland complex to allow surface flow to move through
vegetated wetlands before reaching any stream. Mitigation yields are estimated and performance
criteria are described for the project in detail in the Compensatory Mitigation Plan for P and U
Lands Restoration Site (CZR 2012). Performance criteria for Phase 4 are summarized in Table 1.
Over time the 138.43 -acre Phase 4 portion of the site is expected to successfully re-establish
approximately:
17.8 wetland acres of headwater forest and
116.5 wetland acres of non-riverine swamp forest
2.0 REQUIREMENTS
2.1 Normal Rainfall and Growing Season. A continuous electronic rain gauge on the
adjacent Bay City Mitigation Site is downloaded once a month and its data are used in
conjunction with data from nearby automated weather stations (e.g., NRCS WETS data from
NOAA's site at Aurora and rain gauges at other nearby monitoring sites) to determine normal
rainfall during the monitoring period. Bay City data were compared to the WETS range of normal
precipitation to determine if Bay City rainfall was within the normal range. The range of normal
precipitation for this report refers to the 30th and 70th percentile thresholds of the probability of
having onsite rainfall amounts less than or higher than those thresholds. The range of normal
and the 30 -day rolling total data lines begin on the last day of each month and the WETS -Aurora
monthly precipitation total is plotted on the last day of each month.
Under the 2010 regional guidance from the Corps of Engineers for wetland hydroperiods,
the normal growing season for Beaufort County is 28 February to 6 December or 282 days
(WETS table for Beaufort County first/last freeze date 28 degrees F 50 percent probability) (US
Army Corps of Engineers 2010). At the suggestion of the Corps' Washington regulatory field
office, data collected between 1 February and 27 February provide important information related
to analyses of site hydrology during the early growing season, but are not part of the hydroperiod
calculation for success.
2.2 Hydrology. Figure 2 depicts the locations of hydrology monitoring equipment,
Figure 3 shows these locations on Beaufort County soil polygons, and Figure 4 shows all
monitoring locations on the as -built LiDAR. To document surface storage and hydroperiods of all
wetland types on the site, eight semi -continuous electronic Level Troll water level monitoring
wells (manufactured by InSitu) are deployed at a density of approximately 1 well/15 acres across
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report June 2016

all planted areas of Phase 4. Exclosures constructed of barbed wire wrapped around metal fence
posts were built around each well to reduce likelihood of disturbance or equipment loss by black
bears.
To serve as additional hydrology controls for the entire P and U Lands site, three Level
Trolls were installed in the Rodman Tract in 2013 in an area mapped as Ponzer soil at elevations
similar to portions of Phase 4 (7 to 9 feet) and four Level Trolls were installed at previous well
locations within the adjacent Bay City Farm in late 2015. According to the soils map and LiDAR
data, these four locations also are underlain by Ponzer soils but two are at slightly higher
elevations than the three Rodman wells (9 to 11 feet) and two are slightly lower (4 to 6 feet).
Level Trolls collect data every 1.5 hours, are downloaded once a month, and the data
evaluated to document wetland hydroperiods. Wetland hydroperiods are calculated by counting
consecutive days with water level no deeper than 12 inches below the soil surface during the
growing season under normal or below normal rainfall conditions and then for all rainfall
conditions.
2.3 Vegetation. The first annual survey of the eight 0.3 -acre planted vegetation
monitoring plots occurred August -October 2015. The plots represent --2 percent of the
restoration area (Figure 2).
2.4 Photographic Documentation. Due to the small size and similarity to the
surrounding areas of Phase 3, no photo stations were established specifically for Phase 4. The
view for Phase 3 photo station PLPS 21 faces into Phase 4, so this station is included in
Appendix B. The first annual photo was taken December 2015.
3.0 2015 RESULTS
3.1 Rainfall. Total rainfall in 2015 at Bay City was 56.4 inches, 2.4 inches more than
last year. The 30 -day rolling total of 2015 Bay City rainfall was considered above normal WETS
rainfall June 3 -July 5, October 2 -November 1, and November 18 -December 19 (Figure 5).
Wetland hydroperiods were calculated for the entire year regardless of rainfall and also calculated
with above normal rainfall periods excluded.
The US Drought Monitor (http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu) provides a synthesis of multiple
indices and reflects the consensus of federal and academic scientists on regional conditions on a
weekly basis (updated each Thursday). In 2015, all 41 weeks of the growing season were
considered normal with no drought status in the vicinity of the P and U Lands project area.
3.2 Hydrology. During all rainfall conditions, all of the eight wells recorded a wetland
hydroperiod (Table 2, Figure 6). Most wells recorded wetland hydroperiods frequently during the
year; seven wells (87.5 percent) recorded a wetland hydroperiod of >12.5 to 25 percent, and one
well recorded a wetland hydroperiod of <25 to 75 percent of the growing season (Table 2).
After exclusion of abnormally high rainfall periods, one well (190) did not record a wetland
hydroperiod (Table 3, Figure 7). Most wells still recorded wetland hydroperiods frequently during
the year. Seven wells (87.5 percent) recorded a wetland hydroperiod >12.5 to 25 percent.
The three Rodman control wells recorded water levels similar to Phase 3 wells (Table 2,
Table 3). Tables depicting 2015 daily well readings and rainfall are included on a companion CD
with this report. The data for the four Bay City reference wells is not included in this report
because the wells were installed in November 2015 and the data were incomplete. The Bay City
reference well data will be included in future reports.
3.3 Vegetation. Planting zones of Phase 4 were divided into two community types:
headwater forest (Z2) and non- riverine swamp forest (Z3). Using only the number of planted
stems that were unquestionably alive in the monitoring plots, the most conservative estimate of
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report June 2016

survival is presented. Some stems may appear dead or questionable, but based on prior
monitoring experience, a stem needs to appear dead (or not be found) for two consecutive fall
survey events before it can be confidently counted as dead. At the year one 2015 survey, percent
survival in the two zones was nearly 100 percent with 18 identified species (12 trees and six
shrubs). Appendix A contains the number of stems that were alive in each plot for the fall 2015
survey.
Overall survival of trees that were unquestionably alive in the eight plots from the time of
planting to the first annual fall survey was 99.9 percent, with a corresponding density of 358 trees
per acre (Table 4). There was only one identified stem with uncertain survival among the tree
species.
Overall survival of shrubs that were unquestionably alive from the time of planting to the
first annual fall survey was 100 percent with a corresponding density of 14 shrubs per acre
scattered among the eight species planted (Table 4).
When the trees, shrubs and unknown species that were definitely alive are combined,
density increases to 386 stems per acre and if stems with uncertain survival are added, the
density increases to 400 stems per acre.
4.0 SUMMARY
Total rainfall in 2015 at Bay City was 56.4 inches, 2.4 inches more than last year. The
30 -day rolling total of 2015 Bay City rainfall was considered above normal WETS rainfall June 3 -
July 5, October 2 -November 1, and November 18 -December 19. During all rainfall conditions, all
of the eight wells recorded a wetland hydroperiod. Most wells recorded wetland hydroperiods
frequently during the year; seven wells (87.5 percent) recorded a wetland hydroperiod of >12.5 to
25 percent, and one well recorded a wetland hydroperiod of <25 to 75 percent of the growing
season. After exclusion of abnormally high rainfall periods, one well did not record a wetland
hydroperiod. Most wells still recorded wetland hydroperiods frequently during the year. Seven
wells (87.5 percent) recorded a wetland hydroperiod >12.5 to 25 percent.
Overall survival of trees that were unquestionably alive in the eight plots from the time of
planting to the first annual fall survey was 99.9 percent, with a corresponding density of 358 trees
per acre. There was only one identified stem with uncertain survival among the tree species.
Overall survival of shrubs that were unquestionably alive from the time of planting to the first
annual fall survey was 100 percent with a corresponding density of 14 shrubs per acre scattered
among the eight species planted. When the trees, shrubs and unknown species that were
definitely alive are combined, density increases to 386 stems per acre and if stems with uncertain
survival are added, the density increases to 400 stems per acre.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report June 2016

LITERATURE CITED
CZR Incorporated. 2012. Compensatory Mitigation Plan for P and U Lands Restoration Site.
CZR Incorporated. 2016. As -Built Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4.
Kirby, Robert M. 1995. The soil survey of Beaufort County, North Carolina. Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2002. Regulatory guidance letter (RGL) 02-02. Guidance on
Compensatory mitigation projects for aquatic resource impacts under the Corps
regulatory program pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2005. Technical Standard for Water -Table Monitoring of Potential
Wetland Sites. WRAP Technical Notes Collection (ERDC TN -WRAP -05-2). U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008. Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 08-03. Minimum
monitoring requirements for compensatory mitigation projects involving the restoration,
establishment, and/or enhancement of aquatic resources.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional supplement to the Corps of Engineers wetland
delineation manual: Atlantic and Gulf coastal plain region. Version 2.0. J.S. Wakeley,
R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble, eds. ERCD/EL TR -08-30, Vicksburg, MS.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report June 2016

Til
0
2
0
U
06
0
\
m
E
0
�
0
k
E
0
/
E
U
0
a
k
w
U
E
k
a
r-
0
#
:
0
�
>
R
%
= \ /
)
k
•)
¢
A
7 2
) >
5 f\.
o
a/ a f •
e a.g e
e
E e® .g )
/ 5 »
/
§
o \ k
_/
\ / kƒ
/ 7 f 2 \
3 5
f
e 7 E
2§ p
G
e=\ m
o 5
L .0 = /
.E
._ 2 &
7_
y
3= n
0
= 0
I
E a
0° 3
e
9
\
© R
9
LQL) J /
00 \ / /
0 @ 0-
0 ƒ0
/k/)
c .. m
\ � /
C
E .g
§ 2
0
E To
� c o
)//
0
\
U) *
$
A
o E v m
/ / � 2 / 2 E
/_ ± 2.2 f ° / E
» = o > E / 0 \ /
\
*.a 3\/ a) a) 5 J
n/ E E
> W / f = I ° @ Wu)
'E c \* E 0 c
J I 0 a k� R
/ # U)
D E\/
a =
/
0
0
E
/
)
El
2
/fk
�§ƒ
N LO/ E
//�k
/ § k
= o I
CO E a
Paw u Lands Restoration sb Phase sl PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report 2e 2016
)
k
,
2
o
= m
3°022/
* /
3 5
f
e 7 E
n
R 0
.ƒ \
e
/ \ o
y
k
/
0
0
E
/
)
El
2
/fk
�§ƒ
N LO/ E
//�k
/ § k
= o I
CO E a
Paw u Lands Restoration sb Phase sl PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report 2e 2016

First Annual Report
X
LO
O
N
-'t O r
N 1 '
N L N
N N T
T
M LO LO
N M
O
Cl)
r
0
N
L6
r
N N CSO
0 N
d T
1 � 1
CON N N
N O T
N r T
X
T
NOtW
o
N
N
_
(0
LO
d
CO
d�
CO
C
LO
n
O')
LO
T
Cl)
0)
L
C
LO
(0
LO
x
N
�
�
(0
❑
CO
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
A
June 2016
c
N
U
LO
N
O
LO
x
X
X
O
N
+J
O
O
_0
r
n
=
\
o
O
LO
E
N
AI
N
N
V
C
O
O C') C >
U
O 3 U
i 00
u7
M
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
0
U �
L
0
NU
N
N N
N
O
LO r
N
❑
r
N I
N CO
T
1
N
r
N 1
N N
N I
N N
M
N N
M
ON
T
N r
T
N O
T
d
U)
U N N
N
a
J
O j U
7
"0
j 0 ❑
N ON
It N
N
It M LO
M N
U L 1
CO fl-
CO
CO N M
CO CO
N
0-0
U L N LL
O L
c
0
> (DO
ct
M
+� (0 O
T?
c0
T
O
LO
T
d
T
O
E
c a)
7 O N LL
O
CO
E N `i N
U U N
L
Q
C
(6 O N
LL
CN
T
N
'
t`
LO
r-
r--
0
O
to r
N
N
N
N
tq
O
0 0
_N
U O
N
LO
aT
M
❑
O
O
L N
=
C
0)
O
0)
O
O
j
00
O)
O)
N
f
O
P and U Lands
Restoration
Site Phase
4
T-2
First Annual Report
X
LO
O
N
-'t O r
N 1 '
N L N
N N T
T
M LO LO
N M
O
Cl)
r
0
N
L6
r
N N CSO
0 N
d T
1 � 1
CON N N
N O T
N r T
X
T
NOtW
N
N
It
M
d
CO
d�
CO
LO
O')
LO
T
Cl)
0)
N
N
M
M
0)
C
LO
D
O
O
N
N
(0
❑
CO
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
June 2016

N
C
O
N
U_
0)
O
O
L
70
2
0
Ln
ti
A
0
Ln
~
X
x
Ln
N
A
0
LO
N
Lf )
N
n
O
U?
N
T
�I
CD
v
O T
O (0
(9
07
O -0
O N
CO
M
00
rl-
O
CD
00
—
CD
U)
N
—
N
N
N
N
_
L1
(0L(1
T
fB
0
co
N
(\
r-
N
0
N
LO
N
N
O
07
N
O
CO N 00
� � N
O
M
M
U O Q
N LL
T
O 1--
C)
U 3: cn
a�
0
0 D
Q) m M
Ln
o 0
m
m
D O N LL
00
`� N
C)
L
W L
C6 O N
- LL
N
ti
T
L cn T
N
N
O N
O
04
>O
0�
0-1
O)
CO
00 T
N N N
L?
i Cfl i
Oo LO
N N
N O
O O M
CD T
0
0
N
N
CO
U
ry
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 T-3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report June 2016

0
LO
ti
U)
n
N
Lr)
T
CA
LO
T
I-
ILLI
I--
ti
s
L[)
N
T
0)
C
T
~
LO
T
�
A
�
T
�
r
Vr
!n
N
o
'w
..
U
LO
O
LO
x
N
O N
O
04
N
L
n
N
O _ T
1LO
\
NT
: C
N
T
N
T
CU
C
T
N
r
-O a)
O 0
T
r
w
CO
AI
CO
MM
L
CO
x
t�c
C
v
�
0(1)
_
O O
O 0) C >1
O Z
,T) 00
C .0 O CCS
a) 3:O
I�
CV
T
C- "O
U O C N
L U)
N
6
O CE
a) CO
N
C
C
O
a) EN
T
T
>
O
f r
T
O
U) Z
N
Cb
N N
N
C6
N T
T
LL L
U)-0-
_ O
C U
U a) 00
>' — N
C6
J O
co
-O > U
N
O L O a>
C CO
C
(0
C L
U 3 O
C.O r
T
dO
�
N - L
N LL
C
+�
C O
N
O L `i
N
U 3 w
M
�'a)
fn
a)
>' Z > U
0
O C
U
a)N C
> L CD
O
O
C O )
a
C)
E Ln
N IL
C r
O i CO
U N
'�N
CU
C:
L
CCU
O a)
O C
=
Co
04 r -
a r N
0 CO
T T
N
N
UO E
-O
a) a)
ON
O C
>' M _0
CO C
C1 O
O
>' -O
2 C
(6
—
N
M
O
M
>
Cb
CA
CU
E
T
H C
P and U Lands
Restoration
Site Phase
4
First Annual Report
x I x I x I x I x I x
Ln
M
rl–
N
61
d'>
T
Cl?
N
N
T T
LO T
CNO CV
N T
r
CO C9
Q0 T
C9
00
I -
C\1
Uf
CO
T
CA
LO
T
N
Lr)
T
CA
LO
T
I-
I--
ti
ti
T
N
T
r
T
N
T
�
T
�
T
�
r
Vr
'0
'w
Cb
b
N
N
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
NT
N
T
N
T
N
T
r
r
r
r
w
CO
CO
MM
C0
CO
�
�
M
rl
ti
N
M CD
N N
T-4
N
M
O
N
M
rl-
N
CO
N
CO
CD
0)
C
U)
CD CD E
N N M
(0
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
June 2016

0
LO
rin
0
LO
L(7
N
O n
I_-
0 O
N o
U LD
� N
O Ln
O N
O n
L
0
Ln
N
CO
AI
L4
v
O C
C O M
N -0
O N N
N N 00
N
U
N
C6
0
00
O
> U
N O N
CO
U O Q
C N LLL
O r
U O
> p U
7 _
N N O
> L
O N
D O N LL
Ei
O i 00
VN N
L
L -Q
c� O O
_ LL
N r -
N
O '
O r
O N
x
m
rl- I --
C'4
Ln
00 N
N
N �
G) C9
00
r
I --
N
x
r�
X
w
CO
LO
ti
N
N
U
r
N
M
U
ry
T-5
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
June 2016
O Q O
w
U)
O
U
L
C
�
o
U
N
>
E
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4
First Annual Report
x
r�
X
w
CO
LO
ti
N
N
U
r
N
M
U
ry
T-5
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
June 2016

\
CO
0E\
\ \
/
»
g
/
o
c
2
0
\
a
\
,
o
o
o
» ,
/
¥32
132
CO
M"
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0,
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0
—
0,
0
\
¥
m
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ƒ
2
'
2 '
a
\
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2
=
/
%
_
/
/
Cl)
#
CO
/
2
®
\
\
^
2
2
n
#
7 2
%
k \
/
(�
/§
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0—
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0/
R
$
_
m
/
2=
3
g
CO//
n#
2
//*%
2
a
2
2
r#
7 2/
% CO
\
a
a
m
m
-1 n
a
k
*
Co
#
r
CO
o
o
r
#
=
//
w
V.
CO
m
a
a
s
r
#
7 7
%
o 0
q
$
_
\
_
/
\
%
2 #
/
%
/ �
E
/
4
/ 6
M �
_
R
=
m
2
0 0
E
(
\
/
\
\
\
&
Q)
_
/
\
2
»
%
%
$
$
\
CO
§
\
$
3
a
m
\
E
E//
CO
E
E
%
0)/
7£
2
%/
0°
5#
°
7
/_
/
\
®
°
n
-
>1
�
2
&
o
c-
=
2
=
E
4
E
=
o
\
E
E
®
°
I
I
E
/
-
_
CO
°
c
=
/
/
\
\
/
e
±
`
7
/
i
o=$
m<
S
3
o
m%
I
m
e
m
a
m
s±
I
E
_
�W
\
}
$
2
@
\
[
/
CO
)
f
\
\
®to
=
u
&
-
n
/
\
/
[
\
n
°
E
%
U
E$\%
5
5
E
2
z
CO
=
3®
E
R\\
E`
2
m
m
U
2
m
m
2
o
=
®—
@
=
—
a
E
»
—
=
2=,
n
2
2
C.)
=@
4M -
2
-
®»
a
—
2=%
5]®
m
c
=
E
o
2
0
2
E
k
p
a®`
E
E\\/_
£
/
J
/
/
2 /
Z
2
#
/
d
d
d
d
J
v
/
$
/
/
a
Pak u Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 ae PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report 2m 2016

a. IyI Olt)
di y
SOUTH CREEK
CORRIDOR
,
,
-
j-
P LANDS
SOUTH CREEK ,fig
CORRIDOR
— Ix Q. V .�a — - -- - — ----"
-- - -- -'-- - -- - ao.o PHASE 2
! PHASE 1 - ..
PHASE 2LANDS "'"',^^�`-
HOLLOWELL TRACT PHASE 3 P
\
-
m PHASE 3
ear clrrhFXRM < PHASE 1
E
PARKER FARM
PNA$E 4
U LANDS - P LANDS SECTIONS A -J
35'14'15.04"-
-
RODMAN
.., LONG: 76'46'19.20"
/ `
CONTROL
SITE
P LANDS
-�--
CASEY TRACT
U LANDS
U LANDS
-- o
= i
LEGEND
P and U LANDS BOUNDARY
P and U LANDS PHASE 4
0 6,000 12,000
SOUTH CREEK CORRIDOR AND
PARKER FARM BOUNDARY
SCALE IN FEET
VICINITY MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
P AND U LANDS PHASE 4 AND RODMAN
SITE LOCATION
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
P and U LANDS
SOURCE:
SCALE: AS SHOWN
APPROVED BY:
DRAWN BY: TLJ
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
DATE: 05/17/16
FILE: PLANDS_VIC_PH4_
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
2015
NAD 1983EFEETRT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
CP#1745.59.32.4
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGES, NC STATEPLANE,
EIV2
�^ ^ 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
lV_ K
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
INCORPORATED TEL [phone]
FIGURE 1
NAD83, FEET, 1:24000 -SCALE, WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]

LEGEND
NOTE:
P AND U LANDS (3,666.92 ACRES)
(TOTAL ACREAGE INCLUDES 12.52 ACRES OF
RIGHT—OF—WAY ALONG STATE ROADS NOT
PLANTED.)
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW. CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
EXECUTIVE ROAD
JAIME ROAD
s
o �4�
C)
SOUTH CREEK CANAL J
PULPS 21
0
C
3
190 �n189
0
�uw
00
�1711 U LANDS
Z 70 PHASE 3
7070
00
KUUMAIN
CONTROL
SITE
204 — —
i.I
VA -_ -
MONITORING LOCATIONS
P AND U LANDS PHASE 4 AND RODMAN
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE: 06/09/16 FILE: P_U_LANDS_PLANT_N WELL a
2015
0 900 1,800 CP# 1745.59.32.4
o�� 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
ZR SUITE 2
SCALE IN FEET o WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
IRCORPORATED TEL [phone] FIGURE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]
PHASE 4 PLANTING AREA
OPENWATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH
—
ROADS
®
BERMS AND PARKING AREAS
0
FORESTED WETLAND
TREE SAMPLING PLOT
•
WELL LOCATION AND TREE MONITORING PLOT
(LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE)
�•
PHOTO STATION NUMBER AND LOCATION
PULPS 21
CONTROL WELL
AREAS PLANTED IN PHASE 4
ZONE 2 HEADWATER FOREST
ZONE 3 NON—RIVERINE SWAMP FOREST
NOTE:
P AND U LANDS (3,666.92 ACRES)
(TOTAL ACREAGE INCLUDES 12.52 ACRES OF
RIGHT—OF—WAY ALONG STATE ROADS NOT
PLANTED.)
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW. CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
EXECUTIVE ROAD
JAIME ROAD
s
o �4�
C)
SOUTH CREEK CANAL J
PULPS 21
0
C
3
190 �n189
0
�uw
00
�1711 U LANDS
Z 70 PHASE 3
7070
00
KUUMAIN
CONTROL
SITE
204 — —
i.I
VA -_ -
MONITORING LOCATIONS
P AND U LANDS PHASE 4 AND RODMAN
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE: 06/09/16 FILE: P_U_LANDS_PLANT_N WELL a
2015
0 900 1,800 CP# 1745.59.32.4
o�� 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
ZR SUITE 2
SCALE IN FEET o WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
IRCORPORATED TEL [phone] FIGURE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]

?
LEGEND
O <v4q�
P AND U LANDS BOUNDARY
V
WELL LOCATION AND TREE MONITORING PLOT
SOUTH CREEK CANAL
(WELLS TO MONITOR LATERAL DRAINAGE EFFECT
EXECUTIVE ROAD
MAY NOT HAVE A TREE PLOT.
LOCATIONS ARE
JAIME ROAD
P�
APPROXIMATE.)
189
CONTROL WELLS
190 Po
SOILS
� Da
SYMBOL SOIL NAME
U
LANDS
Da DARE (ORGANIC)
PHASE 3
A
Po PONZER (ORGANIC)
0
Pt PORTSMOUTH (MINERAL)
D
0 0
-
0 HYDRIC SOILS
�?,
U LANDS
NOTE:
Z
-
PHASE 3
ONLY HYDRIC SOILS ARE DESIGNATED
70
.
MINERAL OR ORGANIC.
D
RC -1
0 0
199
200
RC -2
RC -3
202
203 Da
Po
205
RODMAN
204
CONTROL
SITE
SOILS
P AND
U LANDS PHASE 4 AND RODMAN
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
SCALE: AS SHOWN
JAPPROVED BY:
DRAWN BY: TLJ
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
DATE: 05/17/16
P_LANDS_SOILS_PH4_
FILE:
WWW. CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
Q1
CP#1745.59.32.4
NAD 1983 FEET. 0 900 1 '800
2012 AERIALS DOWNLOAD FROM FROM NC ONE MAP'
WEBSITE: http://datc.,co,,mop
I
1
ZR
4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
SUITE 2
FIGURE 3
SOIL SURVEY OF BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, US DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONVERSATION SERVICE, SCALE IN FEET
INCORPORATED
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
TEL [phone]
ISSUED: SEPTEMBER 1995
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
FAX [phone]

LEGEND
PHASE 4 PLANTING AREA
OPEN WATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH
- ROADS
® PERIMETER BERM AND PARKING AREAS
0 FORESTED WETLAND
WELL LOCATION
s CONTROL WELL
Legend
Elevation in Feet
Value
00-2
0 2-4 1
=4-5
= 5-6
=6-7
=7-8
o S-9
_9-10
10-11
IIIII■ 11 - 12
_ 12-13
_ 13-14
_ 14-15
_ 15-16
Q 16-21
021-48
SOUTH CREEK CANAL �E
EXECUTIVE ROAD/
JAIME ROAD
U LANDS
PHASE 3
O
�I
I �
199 200
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB $2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
HAD 1983 FEET.
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM, BEAUFORT AND PAMLICO COUNTIES,
LIDAR, NC STATEPLANE, NAD 1983, FEET, WWW.NCFLOODMAPS.COM
HUUMAIN
CONTROL
SITE
•
204
Z"��
0 900 1,800
SCALE IN FEET
203
202
F
U LAJW�4
PH �
MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS ON LIDAR
P AND U LANDS PHASE 4 AND RODMAN
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE: 05/17/16 FILE: PLAN DS—WELL—Ll DAR_
PH4_2016
�E
� CP#1745.59.32.4
4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
TE 2
INCORPORATED WILMINGTON, NOR TEL 91R0/392-9253 CAOLINA
FIGURE 4
4ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]

16
NOTE: Rainfall source from 2-6 June 2015 and 20 June 2015 comes from the PA2 rain gauge due the Bay City rain gauge being clogged.
Rainfall source from 10 Aug 2015 to 8 Oct 2015 from the PA2 rain gauge due to an animal attack on the Bay City rain gauge.
14 "Range of Normal" and "Aurora Monthly Rainfall Total" plotted on last day of each month.
"Range of Normal" refers to the 30th and 70th percentile thresholds of the probability of onsite rainfall amounts outside of the normal range
(based on historical averages from 1971-2000). WETS Data subject to periodic revision. Data shown are latest available from
http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/climate/navigate_wets.htm.
12 11Aurora Monthly Rainfall Total" refers to monthly totals from the PCS -Aurora 6 N NOAA Station.
Periods of above normal rainfall include 3 June -5 July, 2 October -1 November, and 18 November -6 December 2015.
c
4-
10
4-
2-
>- 8
L
C
O
et
6
c�
T •
4 -
•
2
0
ti� ti� ti� tih tih tih ti� ti� ti� tih tih
eQotia 0
Q) 0ti tiP tis y� �O
0 0 0 0 0 0
2015 Bay City Daily Rainfall — Bay City 30 -day Rolling Total • 2015 Aurora Monthly Rainfall Total
30% Less Chance 30% More Chance 2015 Bay City Monthly Rainfall
Figure 5. 2015 BAY CITY and WETS -AURORA RAINFALL

LEGEND
-;a 00
POSSIBLY BE SHORTER THAN WHAT
PHASE 4 PLANTING AREA
CTUALLY OCCURRED
OPENWATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH
®
ROADS
BERMS AND PARKING AREAS
0
FORESTED WETLAND
O
WELL LOCATION
+I
CONTROL WELL
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE PH4 (117.83 ACRES)
WELL MALFUNCTION RESULTED IN AN
---'
ESTIMATION OF EXACT HYDROPERIOD
EXECUTIVE ROAD//
JAIME ROAD `
LENGTH; REPORTED HYDROPERIOD COULD
-;a 00
POSSIBLY BE SHORTER THAN WHAT
00
CTUALLY OCCURRED
Z
Dm
Z
HYDROLOGIC WETLAND HYDROPERIODS
ZONES
O O
0 0 = >12.5 — 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
00
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE PH4 (117.83 ACRES)
0 Q = >25 — 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE PH4 (15.79 ACRES)
RODMAN CONTROL SITE (23.49 ACRES)
RODMAN
CONTROL
SITE
NOTE:
HYDROLOGIC ZONES ARE A VISUAL APPROXIMATION OF TOTAL ACRES
REPRESENTED BY WELL HYDROPERIOD CATEGORIES BASED ON ONE
WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR
CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIOD
BOUNDARIES.
0 900 1,800
SCALE IN FEET
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
s
J 4,j
SOUTH CREEK CANAL
U LANDS
PHASE 3
199 200©
0203.
0204
(�
190
G)
c
0
D
U LANDS
PHASE 3
O
202 -_-
205
O
I P AND U LANDS PHASE 4 AND RODMAN I
2015 LONGEST HYDROPERIODS AND ESTIMATED HYDROLOGIC ZONES
DURING ALL RAINFALL CONDITIONS
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE: 05/17/16 FILE: PLANDS-PH4-MON-
RAIN -2015
kOw"!
,CP#1745.59.32.4
4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVETE 2
CZ R NCORPORATED WILMINGTON, NOR EL 910/329253 FIGURE 66ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]

LEGEND
0
0
HYDROLOGIC
ZONES
D
PHASE 4 PLANTING AREA
OPENWATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH
ROADS
BERMS AND PARKING AREAS
FORESTED WETLAND
WELL LOCATION
CONTROL WELL
WELL MALFUNCTION RESULTED IN AN ESTIMATION OF EXACT
HYDROPERIOD LENGTH; REPORTED HYDROPERIOD COULD
POSSIBLY BE SHORTER THAN WHAT ACTUALLY OCCURRED
WETLAND HYDROPERIODS
-1)
SOUTH CREEK CANAL
EXECUTIVE ROAD/
JAIME ROAD
190
U LANDS c
PHASE 3
_— — O
• = <6 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
OO I
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE PH4 (17.41 ACRES)
3 Z
0 _ >12.5 — 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
m
Z ;u
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE PH4 (117.21 ACRES)
;0,;o
O = >25 — 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
O
D 0
P AND U LANDS MITIGATION SITE PH4 (0 ACRES)
RODMAN CONTROL SITE (23.49 ACRES)
0
199 200
203.'
,O
RODMAN
CONTROL 205
SITE or 0204 0
NOTE:
HYDROLOGIC ZONES ARE A VISUAL APPROXIMATION OF TOTAL ACRES
REPRESENTED BY WELL HYDROPERIOD CATEGORIES BASED ON ONE
WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR
CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIOD
BOUNDARIES.
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
HAD 1983 FEET.
0 900 1,800
SCALE IN FEET
U LANDS
PHASE 3
0
202
on
P AND U LANDS PHASE 4
LONGEST 2015 HYDROPERIODS AND ESTIMATED HYDROLOGIC ZONES
DURING WETS NORMAL AND BELOW NORMAL RAINFALL
(EXCLUDES JUNE 3RD — JULY 5TH,
OCTOBER 2ND — NOVEMBER 1ST AND NOVEMBER 18TH — DECEMBER 6TH)
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE: 05/23/16 FILE: PLANDS-PH4-MON-
WET -2015
��� CP#1745.59.32.4
��CI&
7 4708 COLLEGE ACRESUT E 2
L R WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
FIGURE 7 INCORPORATED TEL
ON ENTALL CONSULTANTS FAX 910%392-9139

APPENDIX A
Stem Counts at Individual Plots at
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4

Appendix A. Individual tree/shrub plot counts from P and U Lands Phase 4 first annual (2015) fall monitoring. Numbers in each column indicate trees unquestionably alive at sampling. Plot size is 0.3 acre.
Zone 3
189 199 200 202 1 203 204 205 Total
Zone 2
115 1 Total
7
Common name
Scientific name
1st
Unknown
?
1
1
Serviceberry
Red chokeberry
Paw paw
Amelanchier canadensis
Aronia arbutifolia
IAsima triloba
River birch
Betula nigra
2
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
2
4
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
1
2
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
1
3
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
10
16
Buttonbush*
Cephalanthus occidentalis
5
4
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
1
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
1
1
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
2
2
Swamp dogwood
Cornus foemina
Titi
Cyrilla racemiflora
2
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
1
1
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
2
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Deciduous holly
Ilex decidua
24
20
Inkberry
1. glabra
22
20
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
1
24
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
2
2
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
2
2
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
1
1
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
Mulberry
Morus rubra
7
8
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
18
5
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
52
52
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
10
10
Red bay
Persea borbonia
2
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
1
Oak
Quercus spp.
1
White oak
Q. alba
27
15
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
35
58
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
3
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
Water oak
Q. nigra
1
Willow oak
Q. phellos
Cherrybark oak
Quercus pagodaefolia
107
119
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
115
126
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
59
59
American elm
Ulmus americana
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
Dusty zenobia
Zenobia pulverulenta
TOTAL
127
127
Zone 3
189 199 200 202 1 203 204 205 Total
1 st
2
7
9
4
1
2
2
9
2
1
3
2
4
12
1
2
3
4
1
3
1
15
10
16
6
10
5
4
16
67
1
1
5
1
1
1
10
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
7
2
4
6
24
20
22
29
22
20
15
152
1
24
23
8
6
11
12
85
2
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
8
18
10
18
5
10
76
25
15
15
16
23
17
19
130
2
1
3
1
2
1
4
27
15
16
18
35
58
29
198
3
3
1
1
2
4
107
119
112
113
115
126
108
800
P and U Lands Phase 4 First Annual Report A-1

APPENDIX B
Selected First Annual (2015) P and U Lands Phase 4 Restoration
Photograph

NOTE: A 10 -foot pole marked in one -foot increments held by a biologist about 25 feet from the
camera is visible in all photos. The photo is identified with the station number (see Figure 2) and
direction of view. Photo was taken 10 December 2015.
PLPS 21: southeast, 10 December 2015.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 B-1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
First Annual Report June 2016