The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBridge 11 on SR 1164Transportation August 9, 2016 Brian Wrenn NC DWR 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 919-733-1290 fax PAT McCRORY Govnrnor NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON Secretary Enclosed is a package of information outlining a proposed bridge replacement over Garr Creek on SR 1164 in Montgomery County. The project is located within the backwater of Badin Lake, which is operated by the Yadkin Division of Alcoa Power Generating Inc. as part of the Yadkin Hydropower Project (FERC No. 2197). Yadkin requires the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) consult witli federal and state resource agencies regarding the proposed project. Enclosed is some basic information about the proposed project. Please provide to me any written comments on this proposal within thirty (30) days. Agency comments will be forwarded to Yadkin as part of our application for approval of the proposed project. Yadkin will consider ageney comments in evaluating and approving the proposal. Thank you for your review. �,�� Sincerely, Art King Division Environmental Officer NCDOT Highway Division 8 D L� C� C ��I C� D ��G 1 9 �016 DENR - WATEH RESOUZCfS TRANSPORTATION PERMITTING UNIT �Nothing Compares'%.�_ State of North Carolina I Department of Transportation I Division of Highways 902 North Sandhills Boulevazd I Aberdeen, NC 28315 910-944-2344 C.C. Mr. Andrew Williams- US Army Corp of Engineers Mr. John Thomas- US Army Corp of Engineers Ms. Christy Wicker- US Army Corp of Engineers Mr. Steve Kichefski- US Army Corp of Engineers Mr. Brian Wrenn-NC DWR Mr. Rob Ridings- NC DENR Mr. Dave Wanucha- NC DENR Mr. Travis Wilson- NC Wildlife Resources Mr. Michael Sandy- Stanly County Planning and Zoning Depart. Mr. Phil Henley- Inspection and planning Depart. Montgomery County. Mr. Guy Cornman- Davidson County Planning and Zoning. Mr. Ed Muire- Rowan County Planning Manager Mr. Brian Cole- US Fish and Wildlife Service (Davidson, Davie, Rowan, & Stanley Counties) Mr. Pete Benjamin- US Fish and Wildlife Service (Montgomery County) Ms. Shari Bryant- NC Wildlife and Resource Commission (Davidson, Montgomery, & Stanley) _ _ _ Ms. Deborah Walker- US forest Service Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley- NC Department of Cultural Resources Ms. Lyn Hardison- NC Depart. Of Environmental and Natural Resources. Mr. Charles Waklid- NC Depart. Of Environmental and Natural Resources (Water Quality) Mr. Tom Reeder- NC Depart. Of Environmental and Natural Resources (Water Resources) Mr. Lewis Ledford- NC Depart. Of Environmental and Natural Resources (Parks and Rec) Ms. Crystal Best- NC State Environmental Review Clearinghouse Ms. Karen Baldwin- APGI Yadkin Division Proiect Summarv for Bridae No. 11 over Garr Creek on SR 1164 • The project is located over Garr Creek in the Yadkin River basin. • No riparian buffers apply. • The design drainage area is 2.82 Sq. Mi. (Terrain Navigator). • Garr Creek is a 303d stream; therefore, "Design Standards for Sensitive Watersheds" apply. • Water classification is listed as "WS-IV; CA". • The project is located in a Hazardous Spill Basin (WSW 0276); however, hazardous spill basins are not anticipated. • The project is within FEMA Limited Detailed Study; therefore, MOA is required. • Based on FIRM, the existing roadway is not overtopped by the 100-Yr water surface; therefore, roadway grade may be raised, if required, to accommodate proposed replacement structure. • The project is within the backwater of Badin Lake. • No impacts to endangered species are expected as a result of this project. • No Impacts to cultural resources are expected as a result of this project. • Permanent stream impacts (bank stabilization) are expected to be 4 feet; temporary stream impacts are expected to be 8 feet; no wetland impacts are expected. f-i1f,TF1WaV North Garolina Departrnent of Transportation ' ` +� ��°'� �St�Fiiakvc�It r�: . - � �-�—; _ , Highway Stortnwater Program - • � . 3 = �- �. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN , y'"6• �r _ �:, -. � � ' . . � ' � . , . , . � �. >. �. ;;. .,r,. . (Version 2.06; Released June 20�6) ' ' ` - " FOR NCDOT PROJECTS � ` • � . . WBS Element: 17BP.8.R.105 TIP No.: SF-61D011 Coun ies : MONTGOMERY Pa e 1 of 1 � General Pro'ect InforrimaGon � - ' � WBS Element: 178P.S.R.105 TIP Number: SF-610011 Pro'ectT e: Brid e Re lacement Date: 7/22/2016 NCDOTContact: CHRISTOPHERR.LEWIS Contractor/Desi ner: Address: �020 BIRCH RIDGE DR. Address: RALEIGH, NC 27610 Phone: 919 707-6714 Phone: Email: CRLEWIS2 NCDOT.GOV Email: Ci /Town: NEW LONDON Coun ies : MONTGOMERY River Basin s: - Yadkin-Pee Dee CAMA Coun ? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Pro'ect Descri ion Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 0.11 Surroundin Land Use: UWHARRIE NATIONAL FOREST Pro osed Pro'ect Exlstin Slte Pro"ect Built-Upon Area ac. 0.2 ac. 0.2 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 2@10' TRAVEL LANES WITH 3' SHOULDERS OR 6' WITH GUARDRAIL 2@10' TRAVEL LANES WITH NO SHOULDER Annual Avg Daily Tra�c (veh/hdday): Desi n/Future: 300 Year: 2025 Existing: 150 Year: 2000 General Project Plarrative: THIS PROJECT IS THE REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE #11 OVER GARR CREEK ON SR 1164 (TUCKERTOWN ROAD). THE EXISTING STRUCTURE ON SR 1164 IS A (Description of Minimization of Water TVVO-SPAN STRUCTURE CONSISTING OF I-BEAMS AND TIMBER DECKING ON TIMBER CAPS AND PILES. THE SPANS ARE 1@18'-5" AND 1@17'-2". THE Quality Impacts) REPLACEMENT STRUCTURE WILL BE A SINGLE SPAN 1@60' 24" CORED SLAB STRUCTURE WITH 4' CAPS. DECK DRAINS ARE NOT REQUIRED ON THE STRUCTURE. THE EXISTING MUDSILLS WILL BE RETAINED FROM THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND SPILL-THRU ABUTMENTS WILL TIE IN BEHIND THE EXISTING MUDSILL WITH CLASS II RIP RAP. SURFACE WATER FROM THE PROPOSED BRIDGE WILL BE COLLECTED IN A 2GI AND DISCHARGED ON A RIP RAP PAD TO PROMOTE OVERLAND FLOW. BANK STABILIZATION WAS ADDED NORTH OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE TO PROTECT THE BANKS FROM DITCHES THAT WERE REALIGNED AS A RESULT OF A NEW "ABC" DRIVE. _ . _. , Waterbod infortnaUon SurFace Water Bod 1: GARR CREEK NCDWR Stream Index No.: 12-131- 2 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Prima Classification: Water Su I IV WS-IV Su lemental Classification: Other Stream Classification: Im airments• A uatic T8E Species? Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: Pro'ect Includes Brid e S annin Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? No Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Dischar e Over Water Bod ? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) ,� � vrctxl� � �°]CA"]["]E �1F N�R'1['�]][ ��]E8�1LgNA Il��N �1F ]H[��lH[W.��Y� M011tTGOMERY COU11lTY LOCATI011L• BRIDGE Il OVER GARR CREEK ON SR 1164 TYPE OF WORK.• GRADI11iG, PAVIl�'G, DRAINAGE A11iD STRUCTURE ��'��R� �: Af�9D : $�9��.C� VN�e��R @6�Pe��"S ��E�f1Al� P�TP 7 ' TO 11WMAR0.IE POItJ� PARKYIAY NOTES: I CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED �•. TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY MEfHOD _. U GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTN q� �d «+ �., W.,. NOM�„��, �� ICA s„ m � ADT 2000 v 750 ✓ u�rarm �� =•m, so ss o eo ioo ( 1 mrmm�md, '-""' ADT (2025)= 300 PLANS K % ma sr.wwxn seacrriunoxs � LENGTH ROADWAY TTP PROJECT I7BP.8.RJ05 = OJO9 M7LES D= Yo DENA C. SNEAD. PE 50 25 0 io lOD T= 6 Ya ' LENGTH STRUCTURS T!P PROJ6CT I7BP.8.R.I05 = 0.0/0 MILES R1CHT OF WAY DA7E: PQO�s�'' ENO�'�" � V= 55 MPH JI1NE 27. 2076 pLFJ(ANDER D. SNIDER. PE PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) TOTAL LENGTN TJP PROJECT I7BP.8.R.705 = 0.099 MILES , O • TTST = DUAL rno�<cr o�rw+ mwrNrsR l0 5 0 lo sa FUNC CLASS = LOCAL LGTTING DA7E: nM WELCH. PE U SUB-REGIONAL TIER DECEMBER 20. 2016 �W�v neve.v - rxo�eer r,veixeex PROFILE NERTICALI 17BP.8. R.105 PERAAIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 6 JIN�Mm�EoE P�LA�xNS oocuz�wr wor cows�mEq�o �uvrLL UkLESS /fll S16WqTYRES COMPLEiED NYDRAULICS ENGlNLGR oF xoarq � ti �o .i % �- m ROADIVAY DESffiN � ENGIN88R � `e oe� r OC T0.�NSp � Oc� � v1 y n C asm c nmau n� oa :ov �c ax 1' wom. xtlm r� ec MP PAP nTl Wo�TiFu.EM w4�� / DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER �� 4�lNBi�9G ��9�� 2 O� b a � w FOR -l- PROFILE, SEE SHEET 5 FOR -0R- P0.0FILE, SEE SNEEf 5 � a � °��E�, �.w. "''"�,-"� � � �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER �DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER a.� ��ao� ��a,wa�� 3 �� a S b FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEEf 5 FOR -�R- PROFILE, SEE SHEEf 5 TEMPORARY SURFACE - WATER IMPACT'S WOODS SURFACE W R IMPACTS . � / / C / S , / � � �� , .� j � > y- � � �-- �� / i ' , , �� , , - � F , � - �- I�1LA\N S ITE U . � DENOTES IMPACTS IN � SURFACE WATER � � DENOTES TEMPORARY � IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER F 2 5' 0' 2 5' „ _- I"=25' WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMiNARY A R A Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fill ln Fili ln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (FromfTo) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 STA. 13+10 -L- LT. BANK STABILIZATION < 0.01 < 0.01 4 8 TOTALS': < 0.01 < 0.01 4 8 0 'Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: � Project Tracking No.: 15-11-0037 NO NATIONAI, IaEGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES ,�`o��- ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES �'`�� .� �¢ � PRESENT FORM i; :�"'�_ . ;,`��° ;�'::��,`�.�� .�;_� ; :.�: ?aQ';� cj''.:•'�� This form onl ertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this ro ect. It is not r. ��:��,.��7 :,a: .._. .:.�- Y P P J "�.�`:� valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the �� a� Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. PROJECT INFO�IATION Project No: WBS No: F.A. No: Bridge 11 17BP.8.Id.105 na Federal PeYmit Required? Counry.• 1VIontgomery Document: Attachment G Funding: � State ❑ Federal � Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP# 3 Project Description: The project calls for the replacement of Bridge No. I1 on SR 1164 (Tuckertown Road) over the Garr Creek in Montgomery County. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the project is defined as a 600 foot (182.88 m) long corridor running 300 feet (91.44 m) east and 300 feet south along Tuckertown Road ff-om the center of BYidge No. 11. The corYidor is approximately 120 feet (36.58 m) wide extending 60 feet (18.29 m) on either side of the road fi�om its present center. SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Arc{zaeology Group reviewed the subject project and determined: � There are no National Register listed or eligible ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES present within the project's area of potential effects. (Attach any notes or documents as needed) ❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations were required for this project. � Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources. � Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources considered eligible for the National Register. ❑ All identifed archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project. "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIG/BLE OR LLSTED ARCHAGOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projecrs as Oualrfied in rhe 2007 Programmatic Agreemenr. 1 of 9 Project Tracking No.: 15-11-0037 Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: Bridge No. 11 is located just north of Badin Lake in the southwestern corner of Montgomery County, North Carolina. The project area is plotted in the northeast portion of the New London USGS 7.5' topographic quadrangle (Figure 1). A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on December 3, 2015. No previously recorded archaeological sites are identified within the APE, but nine sites (31MG492, 31MG849, 31MG1952, 31MG1968, and 31MG1769-31MG1773) are reported within a mile radius of the bridge. According to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office online data base (HPOWEB 2015), there are no known historic architectural resources within the APE that may yield intact archaeological deposits. Topographic maps, USDA soil survey maps, aerial photographs (NC One Map), and historic maps (North Carolina maps website) were examined for information on environmental and cultural variables that may have contributed to prehistoric or historic settlement within the project limits and to assess the level of ground disturbance. An archaeological field investigation was carried out on December 9, 2015, to evaluate the project area. Tuckertown Road runs north-south on the westside of Garr Creek. After crossing the creek at Bridge No. 11, the road bends roughly 90 degrees to run east-west. Garr Creek flows south into Badin Lake, a damned portion of the Yadkin River. The APE consists mostly of side slopes, but a small floodplain is adjacent to the creek, northwest of the bridge (Figures 2-5). The landform southwest of the bridge is graveled over for a boat landing and parking lot (Figure 6). Property southeast of the bridge has been cut and graded, most likely for road construction (Figure 7). The former road trace is still present along the southern edge of the slope in this section. Other disturbances include recently dug ditches and the dumping of fill to elevate the road above the floodplain. According to the USDA soil survey map, three soil series composed the APE (see Figure 2). Oakboro silt loam (OkA) is found in the floodplain. This is a well drained soil with slope of less than two percent. Early settlement activities are possible on this series due to it being dry and fairly level. On either side of the floodplain is side slopes made up of the Badin-Tarrus complex (BdD) to the west and the Goldston- Badin (GoE) complex to the east. Although both series are also well drained, slope is steep at 15 to 45 percent. Typically, landforms with slope of 15 percent or more are not tested since they are unlikely to yield significant cultural resources. A review of the site files shows few investigations within the vicinity with nearly all being conducted to the south and east. These investigations have identified a high density of archaeological sites in the region. A total of nine previous sites (31MG492, 31MG849, 31MG1952, 31MG1968, and 31MG1769— 31MG1773) are reported within the general area with more further to the south and east. Most are prehistoric, but three (31MG492, 31MG1772, and 31MG1773) have historic resources present as well. All known sites are ineligible for the National Register except for 31MG1772 and 31MG1773, which have yet to be assessed. Due to the high density of sites, it is very possible that unknown sites could be present in areas that have not yet been investigated. Lastly prior to fieldwork, a historic map review was conducted. Most maps before the 20th century provide only general details concerning the region illustrating just major roads and settlements. The circa 1910 U.S. Post Office map and the 1910 Map of Eldorado Township are two of the first in which an accurate location can be identifed (Figures 8 and 9). These two maps show a road with a similar alignment as Tuckertown Road cross Garr Creek near or at the current bridge site. No structures are identified adjacent to the crossing. The later 1930 Soil Map for Montgomery depicts the same picture as the earlier maps (Figure 10). From this review, it seems unlikely for any significant deposits associated with former structures to be impacted by the proposed bridge replacement project. "NO NATIONAL REGISTER BLIGlBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOG/CAL SITES PRESENT" form jor !he Amended Minor Transportalion Projects as Oualifred rn rhe 2007 Pragrammatrc Agreement. 2 of 9 Project TrackingNo.: 15-11-0037 The archaeological field investigation at Bridge No. 11 consisted of two shovel_ test placements (STPs) 30-m (ca. 98-ft) apart in the floodplain, northwest of the bridge (see Figure 2 and 3). These STPs were excavated to 40 cm (ca. 16 in) below the surface. The soil stratigraphy consists of three layers. The upper layer is a dark yellowish brown (lOYR 4/4) loam that is 10 cm (ca. 4 in) thick. This is followed by a yellowish brown (lOYR 5/6) silt loam that is 15 cm (ca. 6 in) thick. The third layer appears to be subsoil and is a light yellowish brown (lOYR 6/4) silty clay loam. Slopes in excess of 15 percent and the gravel lot prevented the placement of additional STPs. Also, no STPs were placed on the cut and graded landform to the southeast, but this area was surface inspected. No cultural material was identified either from the subsurface or the surface. The archaeological investigations for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 11 show that no archaeological sites are within the APE. As a result, no further archaeological work is required for replacement of Bridge No. 11 in Montgomery County. However, additional work might be required should design plans change to encompass property outside of the currently defined APE. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: � Map(s) Signed: � ❑ Previous Survey Info C. Damon Jones NCDOT ARCHAEO�,OGIST � Photos ❑Correspondence 12/11/15 Date "NO NATIONAL RLGISTER ELlGIBLE OR LLSTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL S/TES PRESENT" form far !he Amended Minor Transportatron Projects as Quafified in (he 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 3 of 9 Pr�oJect Tr acking No.: IS-11-0037 Figure 1. Topographic Setting of the Project Area, New London (1993), NC, USGS 7.5' Topographic Quadrangle. "NO NAZ70NA/. RIiGISTL'R EL/GlBL@Oli L/S%ll) A2CffAFOLOGlCAL SITES PRES/iA9"' Jorrn for the Amended Minor lYnnrpnrmriuv Projears as OualiJ�ed iv �he _>OOl Nr�oRrammatic.4Rreernent. 4 oF9 Projec� TrUcking No.: l5-11-0037 Figure 2. Aerial photograph of the APE showing development, landforms, soils, and STPs within and near the project area. 'V UA 11[O:b:J/ [U 0/S[ti/t 671(3/HL8 OR l.LSTFD AR['HAGOl.O(3/C'Al. S%IILti PRI �l ;A,1.. funn7 d-,lmmndddll� �7'mepunm falf'�nn.c(� lf.dmrhz_'0o.lr.�r�mmnr I�a�.m.nu. Jo�9 / J � � �_ f � ,� / . Pro�,� r /f,e� nir�g \„ IS-l1-0037 r� � � ,� , , , -� , 1 ,i = ; {.` , , r �� n ' i P � .i � I �� c.� �h �t� , i/ �� 5 Ai� ;� � .�! �' �'� t r! � n.,y iC i-Y rF., '; � ' r 1 t . � �� - I �-� � � � � � � i - i .`�� v 1 � � a 1 � . . � x .7� / r �3 ` }�. � � � � `� . di� >>'-' , `�i 1� � �, � . -� r �'% .r,� ,.-d -{f, S � 1 � ,� .: " '�"' ;r a'y �: � v�� ' � s � °�y ��" � �, , E �+ ��y k,;� ��" :, j s� ��blRc .y"�g� �a4, �� i. � � ��I� � . .� �#' � F� d� '^� ^ � � � � �.. � �' ��, ' �i � � � ` �_�" �"� � �� +�t,n� 4' ` ;. +dr��t;�� ,�.i .� b� �� I,� � " �� tr .a��: ;� �,. ; ,. . ' Ty ' ��,�' . . ��..> �..`—s ,�—', �:�-- _ t�:�y ,1� �,�: :y �.� �4.._ f � M��`N jj y'�� ` �'`` ,�� ^ , '�� '�•_- S �s�� ..�_ �_ �' . . �' t L....]-�,- f [ ~ . - �� [ '...!r� ��' "nt i. iF. . . F -~' �i•. r ti, �^.a l :� tt'�.,"v�.. i�.. a �� i . � {� -+ - .. � f�d�,a:. ' i-yr,��.� .iF ��,.,''i�'� �� ' c. 1�'{ �,� � x.�•. _ _• '� a. _ ..'1 .� � ;� .. �y , �.-.:F•' y" -�'�%i. y .L . G �� y ��`y�. -i+_� vii � 1 ,r—� ��r�'"i �'� .i ��:YS.Ci�'3s� R )�� `x��. "iN � t I i, �,r: :�. ( �� , A , , . , .�. ,-.;�laiin in the north�� ..� .... .,,-. .. ... �Vu �:Iflrq�:ILII ,I�llJllfl.Ldlt/Fiil,'l/i/Il :IR 1/. S � rc,![ I 5/lG<i'fii �l �! /�„nl;rrl-. n....Jt(r l.� , e _..,..n.n� i t�r, �le _i � i,�_ ...n..�,_ o� ` Prajec�7}acAing Vo.: �5-11-��% a i . ��3'!u r ,�a �e. ; �.��'��'"��'a��,. t -��; - - . . ' . • _ . �/ � .. • •�y . s Y . . � • �: .. .. � A_ � l � � .,. � � .� � � °�i �.� _ i � . .. ,M t .r M> i ' +1 ,,,�►*c � � r � � d�$" '` �4� �� ti. _ . �_r. . ,. ,SF , a' ' . x r �' i- � ' � `w „ .+4r •�y �ija jK �i • yp '�� 4 '..Q � .rr i$ . 4 � G� . - N i � ..,i�..i . i. y, . . ] .50� y��iir`y •.r� .�� ,' j'. , j. .I.��.: - .j{�. �Zi•t '^•� � . . �:e• � ... .. 9. ��, r ...:'G" .��>. 2� . - ' Pigure �. General View of side slo�e in the naithe:�st quadrant looking ��cst. I i _ Ck_ � _ � '. , _� lo� in the southi . _.��_�ir ,. . i�urth. �� tio e.��ron,�r. ai msisii er.ieie� �� on �.cn en a�i� Hauni.00ic.i� sin�s rar tierv,r� lo,�,r�Irdr�,l,nu,d.dn1� T� ,rnrmr loie<�r.,a�rh��/cAmnc�2n0:1 � nv»en�q. emerz� 7nf9 Project Tracking:tio.: 15-I1-0037 Pit�un: -. t�u .�.0 � , ., _ __., . _..,.. . � i�:. �,: . _�... - � �.. .,_, . _ .. ._ '� Project Area . . � ,. . I N �� . •, _ �. , �t, ;. ry . ' � �� r��_ l. ! �-dr/,. ��`.<. ,� . .. ! ' � y_.i s � + �i?`� J . . . 7 tigure 8. I�he circa I y lU U.J. Nost Uliice map sho��ing the location of the project area. ..�UC.Vlr11aLIJo/�1/fRL/li;lHIFORl1�li�1.Ik('H.alnlnG!( V.?'[ll:_CP,R/V�_A.1.. lnrrr,lurtGeJn�enAed4uv,sliorr.permn,u�Yr�a,�,a��hmldrz�LriiA.-_'Orr F�oy.,,rmm�n,ae+��+�znr S ol 9 Prnject 7 racking A'o.: 15-11-0037 Project Area � -i�u�e 9_ The 1910 iilnn nf X/i/nrnrin Tnu�ivcl�in hv N M Thavrr chn�uinn �h� Inrntinn nf t6�� nrnlP�t ar.�� . � �_ ('hriniii�•r (irr,��,• .•• ' Project Area `-'"'r�-'' • , _. -; , . � , � - . � ,_ r'... r , . n , •� . , . . • J` 1 ` � ��. ! � • :, . r igure i u. i ne i ySu �oat map Jor monr�nmery Coamty sno«ang the locahon ot the pro�ect area. r �,:iu��,�:u.� ,�viui�no�aic-nxi�etri..�.�r�u�.,,rr� � ,.rrsrtu�t.cr� .,, , .d�, ��,., �.... , ,. , ,.. ,:�,.� �� i��,i�;_� � ..��,.�,,.,�, , �„�.,, �y o(v � :� . � Project Trackirig No. (IwEe�7+a1 Usej 15-11-0037 HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the Archaeology Group. PROJECT INFORMATION Project 1Yo: County: Montgomery WBS No.: 17BP.8.R.105 Document T e: Fed. Aid No: Fundi�g: State ❑ Federal Federal Yes No Permit NWP 3 Permit s: Ty e s) : Proiect Descrintion: Replace Bridge No. 11 over Garr Creek on SR 1164 (Tucker Town Rd.) � SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES RF,VIF,W Description of review activities, results, and conclusions: Review of HPO quad maps, relevant background reports, historic designations roster, and indexes was undertaken on December 4, 2015. Based on this review there are no NR, DE, LL, SL, or SS in the Area of Potential Effects (APE). There are no structures in thE vicinity of this bridge replacement project other than the bridge itself. Montgomery County Bridge No. 11 was built in 1961. The structure does not exemplify any distinctive engineering or aesthetic type and is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. No survey is required. Whv the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonablv are�licting that there are no urziclentified siQnificant historic arcl:itectural or landscape resources in tlee proiect area: Using HPO GIS website and Montgomery County GIS website provides reliable information regarding the structures in the APE. These combined utilities are considered valid for the purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION �Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. �Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans FINDING BY NCDOT ARCH�ITECTURAL HISTORIAN Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED �� NCDOT Architectural Historian Date ��s Hisroric ArcHiteclnre and Lmidscapes NO SURVLY RGQUIRED jorm jor Mitror Traispormlia� Projects as Qualifred in llie 1007 Programmn(ic Agreement. Page 1 of 2 N w�r $ Bridge 11 - Montgomery County yr b , ... �4 . M4 �� s� :" � �.�.,jNG�N6 p161 MCi�e� 1 �8 Z� _ N�'y3� ` - . \ N LFOR ST t i � i i��n.,��n � N�:/bncl i Fnmal '`\ r .. NTN �O EST ��=u'�ro C_J JD I� wiq-.nu � .y,m��om�iv Z� NT LFOR ST � � \ '�,�.�i��. NTNL r�. � �� Sources: Esd. HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, in� Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hon�� (Thailand), TomTom, Mapmylndia, OO OpenStreetMaF conhibutors, and Ihe GIS User Communiry , � „i