20070191 Ver 1_Public Notice_20160812

1 I
PUBLIC NOTICE
US Army Corps
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: August 12, 2016
Comment Deadline: September 12, 2016
Corps Action ID Number: SAW -2015-01762
The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) received an application from Development
Solutions BRY, LLC seeking Department of the Army authorization to impact 0.2076 -acre of
riparian wetlands and 1,3450 linear feet of stream, associated with development of a
transportation oriented mixed-use development in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached plans.
This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site
athttp://www.saw.usace.arfny.mil/Missions/Re ug latooPermitPro_rg am.aspx
Applicant:
AGENT (if applicable):
Authority
Development Solutions BRY, LLC
Attn: Kim Gualtieri
516 North West Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Environmental Services, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Jeff Benton
1905 Ebenezer Road
Rock Hill, South Carolina 29732
The Corps evaluates this application and decides whether to issue, conditionally issue, or deny
the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of the following Statutory Authorities:
® Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344)
❑ Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403)
❑ Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33
U.S.C. 1413)
Location
Directions to Site: The site is located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Hambright
Road and NC -116 (Old Statesville Road) in the town of Huntersville, Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina. PINS: 01911108, 01911117, 01911118, 01911137, 01911139, 01911140,
01913151, 01913152, and 01913177.

Project Area (acres): ±217 -acres Nearest Town:Huntersville
Nearest Waterway: Cane Creek River Basin: Yadkin -Pee Dee 03040105
Latitude and Longitude: 35.38453 N, -80.82165 W
Existing Site Conditions
The project area is comprised of existing residential development (apartments), land recently
cleared for new development, and existing timberland. Upland forested communities are
dominated by a canopy of sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple (Acer rubrum),
loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), and American beech (Fagus
grandifolia). The shrub layer is primarily saplings of the canopy species, but also includes
ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), and red cedar (Juniperus
virginiana). The groundcover consists of vines such as Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera
japonica) and wild grape (Vitis rotundifolia) with herbaceous individuals such as Christmas fern
(Polystichum acrostichoides), and blackberry (Rubus argutus) also being present. Topography in
the area is generally moderately sloped, but there are some areas severely sloped. The total
length of jurisdictional streams located on the property is ±10,513 linear feet. The total area of
jurisdictional wetlands located on site is 6.796 -acres.
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The applicant's stated purpose is to provide a public transportation linked, residential
development in northern Mecklenburg County.
Project Description
Previous developers began master planning the Bryton development prior to the economic
recession that began in early 2008 (see Figure 5 — Concept Plan). The original development
concept included residential development within the current project area and commercial
development to the south of Hambright Road. A Nationwide Permit 39 verification was issued
on November 5, 2007 (and reissued on October 19, 2009) to place fill material in 3,815 linear
feet of intermittent stream and 0.172 acre of wetlands to facilitate the construction of the
commercial portions of the Bryton development. A Nationwide Permit 14 verification was issued
on October 15, 2008 to place fill material in 290 linear feet of stream to extend Hambright Road
to Everett Keith Road and to provide access to the original Bryton development. While site
grading for the commercial development was completed in 2010, the commercial development
as proposed was never built. Since 2012, a Walmart and McDonalds have been built on portions
of the property and other businesses are beginning to develop parcels within the commercial
portion of the original Bryton development. This commercial portion of the original Bryton
development is currently under different ownership than the residential development described in
this notice.
The current project area includes a ±217 -acre assemblage of parcels located north of Hambright
Road. The proposed Bryton residential development is a high-end walking community with a
planned transportation hub nearby (LYNX Red Line station). The proposed development would
-2-

contain single family residential, multi -family residential, light commercial, and park -like green
space. The proposed development is part of an effort to bring a multi -faceted, pedestrian oriented
community to the Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
A Nationwide Permit 29 permit verification authorizing the placement of fill material in 0.09
acre of wetlands and 104 linear feet was issued on August 28, 2015 for the first phase of the
proposed Bryton residential development. Apartments are currently being constructed on
Hambright Road at the south central portion of the project area. The current proposal seeks to
authorize impacts necessary to complete site grading for the entire Bryton residential
development.
Avoidance and Minimization
The applicant provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or minimize
impacts to the aquatic environment:
Wetland and stream impacts on the preferred alternative have been avoided and/or minimized to
the greatest extent practicable. The project will impact approximately 1,335 linear feet (12.7% of
the streams located on site). Total impacts to wetlands on site are approximately 0.2076 -acre (3%
of the total wetland area located on site). The vast majority of jurisdictional areas are avoided by
the development of the property. The reason that the vast majority of jurisdictional areas are
avoided is that the developer's engineer took care to try and avoid the largest system present on
site (Cane Creek drainage). This drainage is also affected by beavers and has extensive wetlands
associated with it. The designers were able to avoid all but one road crossing to this system,
which is needed to access the northeastern comer of the project site. All other impacts are to
either, unnamed tributaries (and their associated wetlands) of Cane Creek or to even smaller
tributaries further in the headwaters located on site (Engineering Drawings: Figures 0-11).
The designers tried several configurations, especially in high impacts areas (Impact Nos. 7 and
8), but with the topography of the area and the fact that the tributaries here bisect the property
through the middle portions of the area, it was impossible to configure the development
(apartment buildings, parking, storm water control, sewer, etc.) in such a manner to avoid the
impacts in this area. The same can be said for Impact Numbers 1 through 6. Impact 1 could not
be avoided due to the significant loss of area for development. The tributary and its associated
wetland bisect the development area in such a manner as to limit the ability to develop the area
without impact. Impact 2 is needed for access and has been minimized as much as possible, and
are generally due to the topography in the area and the need to create a safe crossing. Impact 3
was minimized because there will be no permanent impact associated with this sewer line
crossing. Impact 4 is a road crossing that minimized impacts by only proposing the road crossing
over the stream. The designer eliminated three lots in this area in order to avoid and minimize the
impact in this area. Impact 5 is another area where impacts are unavoidable due to challenging
topography in the area. However, the impacts were limited to the headwaters (and associated
wetlands) of these two small headwater streams. Impact 6 (much the same as Impact 2) is needed
for access and impacts are minimized as much as possible. It should be noted here that additional
minimization measures such as the use of bottomless culverts for the stream crossings were
reviewed. However, they were eliminated due to the challenging topography in the area of each
-3-

road crossing and the significant cost associated with designing and constructing a "bottomless"
culvert. When feasible, the current site design also integrated sewer lines and roads and/or road
crossings within the same easement to further reduce impacts (this was not practicable in the 10
instance of the one sewer crossing). Further, the proposed site plan establishes "green -space"
corridors that bisect the site and encompasses a large portion of streams and wetlands on-site. In
order to demonstrate that avoidance and minimization has been achieved to the greatest extent
practicable while still maintaining the overall purpose and need of the project, we compared a
concept plan that was developed by the initial developers of the Bryton property (Figure 5 —
Concept Plan). The impacts proposed initially in the concept plan, when compared with what is
currently proposed, show very little difference in overall proposed impacts. However, it should
be noted that the concept plan does not include stormwater facilities, which are generally located
at lower topographic locations on the site (low drainage points). This would lead to additional
impacts not depicted on the map and would certainly surpass the impacts currently proposed. In
summary, the developer and his engineer has designed a site that meets the stated purpose and
need of the project while avoiding and minimizing impacts to jurisdictional areas to the greatest
extent practicable.
Compensatory Mitigation
The applicant offered the following compensatory mitigation plan to offset unavoidable
functional loss to the aquatic environment:
The applicant proposes to compensate for wetland and stream impacts through the purchase of
both stream and wetland mitigation from the NC Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS).
Application has been made to the NCDMS since there are no wetland or stream mitigation banks
in the project service area. The applicant proposes to compensate for unavoidable impacts to
waters of the United States at a 2:1 (2 mitigation units for every 1 unit of impact) ratio for
perennial streams, a 1:1 mitigation ratio for impacts to intermittent streams, and a 1:1 ratio for
wetlands.
Essential Fish Habitat
Pursuant to the Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, this Public
Notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements. The Corps' initial
determination is that the proposed project would not affect EFH or associated fisheries managed
by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine
Fisheries Service.
Cultural Resources
Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Appendix C of 33
CFR Part 325, and the 2005 Revised Interim Guidance for Implementing Appendix C, the
District Engineer consulted district files and records and the latest published version of the
National Register of Historic Places and initially determines that:

® No historic properties, nor properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are
present within the Corps' permit area; therefore, there will be no historic properties
affected. The Corps subsequently requests concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).
The District Engineer's final eligibility and effect determination will be based upon coordination
with the SHPO and/or THPO, as appropriate and required, and with full consideration given to
the proposed undertaking's potential direct and indirect effects on historic properties within the
Corps-indentified permit area.
Endangered Species
Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Corps reviewed the project area, examined
all information provided by the applicant and consulted the latest North Carolina Natural
Heritage Database. Based on available information:
® The Corps determines that the proposed project would not affect federally listed
endangered or threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat.
Other Required Authorizations
The Corps forwards this notice and all applicable application materials to the appropriate State
agencies for review.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR): The Corps will generally not make a
final permit decision until the NCDWR issues, denies, or waives the state Certification as
required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The receipt of the application and
this public notice, combined with the appropriate application fee, at the NCDWR Central Office
in Raleigh constitutes initial receipt of an application for a 401 Certification. A waiver will be
deemed to occur if the NCDWR fails to act on this request for certification within sixty days of
receipt of a complete application. Additional information regarding the 401 Certification may be
reviewed at the NCDWR Central Office, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit, 512 North Salisbury
Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding
the application for a 401 Certification should do so, in writing, by September 12, 2016 to:
NCDWR Central Office
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
(USPS mailing address): 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Or,
(physical address): 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
-5-

North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM):
® Based upon all available information, the Corps determines that this application for a
Department of Army (DA) permit does not involve an activity which would affect the coastal
zone, which is defined by the Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Act (16 U.S.C. § 1453).
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts
including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will
reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit
which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its
reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be
considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics,
aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife
values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use,
navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water
quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of
property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving
the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the
impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental
Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies
and officials, including any consolidated State Viewpoint or written position of the Governor;
Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this
proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to
determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this
decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water
quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above.
Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the
overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a
public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing shall be
granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is
otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
KIM

The Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District will receive written comments pertinent to the
proposed work, as outlined above, until 5pm, September 12, 2016. Comments should be
submitted to David L Shaeffer, Asheville Regulatory Field Office, 151 Patton Avenue, Room
208, Asheville, North Carolina 28801, at [phone].
-7-

Project Location
(t 217 acres)
r
ti
Project Location
Not To Scale
Source: andvoyage-com,
USES Cornelius (NC] Quadrangle. 2000.
disclaimer The irk—ten d{p,. d an thle fig rase W
�nfpmral,pnai porppeag on!y and was not prepared for, end is
not awlebia for ragsL or Bngir min; pL"n.
L�JI
ar•,�' K: is
�wx�►•�' J ,fir,
ENVIRONMENTAL
Project: ER13671.02
SERVICES, INC,
General Project Location
L�p�ate: Feld 2016
9401-C Soutlxm Flan Boulevard
d
Chad", North Carding 28273
BrytVn Development
VO4)U3-7225Mecklenburg
DnvalChkd: J'MBISPP
1704p 523-722e Fax
ww`w mrrwnrarswvlcas we
County, North Carolina
Figure: 1

}
i _J
/
��.• !� t,` _ i Protect Loeat(pn r i t��d
a` .ems 1
217 acres]
01
t ion
All" "Til
v5-
Ailexander -1
` 946
��\ 4 S�'a!'i��■
i BM•
t t 4igh Sc \� -�i'`� 1,t 41 . ation r
Protect` Location os 1I5 -`r + .,Jo.lt}i
. } •;�
0 660 1,320 Iir�! ,~
N
1 inch equals 1,320 feet
Baume: Lando yagaxorn,
USGS Cornelius (NC) Ouadrangle, 2000. o _ r
DsCarnar TMa mkxmatan dap�ciad nn tfrrs fpure ii fix ' `1
nfor l al purposes only ar�d waa nd pwipigd iw, orad.>j
t sw IMN. fa,!eget a inpinpanrg puwpaiia.
kPIR
ENVIRONMENTAL Project: ER13071.02
SERVICES, INC. Project Location Date: Feb 2©1fi
9401 -C .PkWh PiniBa20273 Bryton Development
minae.. Nowa, carcina xgzra
(71)4) 623,7225 Drwn/Chk& JMBISPP
(7U4)523-7229 Fe: Mecklenburg County North Carolina
.,.w ie zona a rar,a ram a n Figure: 2

IMPACT #2
PROPOSED ROAD
CROSSING (STREAM &
WETLAND) ±162LF;
{' ►- 11•.1•
J
1 1 1
ire
Big-1.1.0110
ow tu
GRAPHIC SCALE
—70D 0 3S0 700
1 inch = 700 M
IM PACT #7
PROPOSED LOT FILL
(STREAM) ±171 LF
IMPACT #3
PROPOSED SEWER
CROSSING (STREAM) ±15LF
(TEMPORARY)
Desc.
Reason
Aw
Impact#3
Utility
f - •
�WW1.n
i6Lf.
s
000W Ac
lmpact 61
Road Fill
r
1. 1 f •
Desc.
Reason
Typo LerVArea
Impact#3
Utility
Stream 45 Lt.
Total Stream
i6Lf.
Total wetlands
000W Ac
IMPACT #6
PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
(STREAM & WETLAND) ±99LF;
±0.0297AC
I LILATIVE PERMANENT IMPACTS
Dosc.
Reason
Type
LordArea
Impact Al
Road Fill
Stream
179 Lt
lmpact 61
Road Fill
wetland
0 0950 AC
lmpact i2
Road Fig
Stream
162 Lf
Impact 92
Road Fill
wettand
00480 Ac
Impact #4
Road Fln
Stream
62 Lf
Impact 05
Lol Fill
Stream
266 Lf
Impact #5
Lolfill
Wetland
0 034 9 A,.
Impact 06
Road Fill
S'tr9am
99 Lf.
lmpact #6
Road Fill
Wetland
0 0297 Ac
Impact 97
Lot Fill
Stream
471 Lf
Impact#8
Lot Fill
Stream
45$ Lr
Total Stream
1.334 L f
Tata[ Wetlands
0.2076 Ac
0

:Jll��®
IMPACT #1
PLAN VIEW - PROPOSED LOT FILL & ROAD CROSSING
Bryton R. Joe Harris & Associates, Inc.
Town of Huntersville, North Carolina RJ
Engineering •Planning •Management
9 Date: 02--08-201 R w
u1 bm C1ec,' d.:�c 5�4�c 1�1, [ix�Mie, S.0 YVfiB {ou'f18D3.1'A9 Fet i8m). ao:lRL..
M Scale., AS SHOWN I Fl ure: 1

PROPOSED MECKLENSURG
COUNTY GREENWAY TRAIL
5 WINI 13UPFF-R (TYP.)
•
IMPACT #1
PROPOSED ROAD
CROSSING
(WETLAND)
±O.04
80AC
LINE CHANNEL WITH
RIPRokP ARMOR FOR
201-F UPSTREAM &
DOWNSTREAM OF
CULVERT {SEE FIG,101:
"0. .......
I IMPACT #1 .
PROPOSED ROAD
CROSSING (STREAM)
t162LF
GRAPHIC SCALE
I M PACT #2
PLAN VIEW - PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
Bryton R. Joe Harris & Associates, Inc.
Town of Huntersville, North Carolina Engineering -Planning -Management
Drawn 8 DBG Date: 02-08-201d R,, 177 Mery Corex Dri- S— Mr, I-- W1, S.C. N�. qMlj WZA�. 1a-81131
EnQineer.- - PLM Seale: AS SHOWN I fioure: 2A M= �

........ ..
Ik
-------- - - - - -------
710-
7— Hd-R SCALE: T
60 0 30 60
6. Stream Bouorn
IF 701.51
700-_.. _.............................. ...F.roposed 12'x I 1'ReinforceOl 1 inch = 60ft.
Concrete Box Culvert
IE 699.33t VER. SCALE:
0 3 6
L
I inch = Mt.
19-00 20+00 21+00 22-00
6-
I M PACT #2
PROFILE VIEW - CENTERLINE OF ROAD CROSSING
Bryton
Town of Huntersville, North Carolina
RG I Bate: 02-08-201d R,,
rM IScale., ASSHOWNIFim,
R. Joe Harris & Associates, Inc.
RJH Engineering - Planning - Management
(I
Q7 P— Catty I)— Sui;, [01, 1 -MA, S.C. NMA J�11 1— (R ?W2i ,

RA ............
GA
-. itC-,--5CAL
0
........ . . .....
..........
....... . ..
I in -4 . ..............
........................
.........
. .
..........
-PROPERTY-LiN
...............
....... .....
......
....... COONTY G131tE4WAY.TRA{ �
..........
...
......
..........
I R A M A ^-r Al"I
PLAN VIEW- PROPOSED SEWER CROSSING
Bryton P, Joe Harris & Associates, Inc.
Tawe of Hmmm&, North Carolina
Drawn 8g. DBG. Late: 02-08-201JRev.- RJH En�mcering - Planning - Management
Engineer. PLY I Scale. AS SHOW I Fi,7,,,: JA W ftm Cb"Mw � W1, Fat W'. "I OPA 000) W2-1� FW (mac} N2�

730
HOR. SCALE:
60 0 30 60
1 inch = 60ft.
go
VER. SCALE:
off'
mti
6 - 0 3 6
�E
7213
_
Oa
.1 .. -inch ..4 _;...6ft.. _
i
{
1
7117
go _
i
............ _. - - - ._ .
.........`-
xN2
4%
Lu
6
_ ...
----
-..._ r
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION
. LIVE STAKE {SEE DETAIL 9} -
700
.........._.
jl
I
I
... .__
I +
I
j
1.33'
{
1
i60-09 LF 8" OF 58 0 3 60%
c
ti
W �
u c
I I
690
5II
C�_
7
— —
0+00
1+00
2+00 3+00
I M PACT #3
PROFILE VIEW - OPEN CUT SEWER LINE CROSSING STREAM
Bryton R. Joe Harris & Associates, Inc.
Town of Huntersville, North Carolina _-
Engineering •Planning • Management
(@ Drawn B . DRG Date: 02-08-201Rev.
127tkn r•�[a6��m [uG. c..,t. Mill. s.('. ?9�v [ru:�ii &12-1 1W Fu: MLI) &)2+—
Engineer.-
ti)7+—Fn ineer.- PLM I Scale: AS SHOWN I Fi ure: 38

I M PACT #4
PLAN VIEW - PROPOSED LOT FILL & ROAD CROSSING
Bryton R. Joe Harris & Associates, Inc.
Town of Huntersville, ?North Carolina
RJH
Engineering • Planning • Management
BG Me: 02-08-207dRew
— iixe.nc..,y rh:,<s:x gar, w.. esu. sc xava i�no an•t:vu s.,: fem}amares
M Scale: AS SHOWN I Fr ure,' 4
i
—GRAPHIC. -..-SCALE:
r rNY
\
. }
r 1 inch —
50
l
X
}
:. '.•
` ....
\\ "
}
X•
1i: •'
:..:
'MPA CT
M ACT
.`
OPOSE ROA
RETAINING
CROSSING[`1�t ) ''
--_-
---
VVALLJYP,).
#62L
'D.
_
yp,D
.. ........
1 '•. 1
F f
'•.1``.
r
..................
':t
t
+
� 3
I M PACT #4
PLAN VIEW - PROPOSED LOT FILL & ROAD CROSSING
Bryton R. Joe Harris & Associates, Inc.
Town of Huntersville, ?North Carolina
RJH
Engineering • Planning • Management
BG Me: 02-08-207dRew
— iixe.nc..,y rh:,<s:x gar, w.. esu. sc xava i�no an•t:vu s.,: fem}amares
M Scale: AS SHOWN I Fr ure,' 4

IMPACT #5
PLAN VIEW - PROPOSED LOT FILL
Bryton R. Joe Harris & Associates, Inc.
Town of Huntersville, North Carolina
Engineering • Planning •Management
9G Dote: D2-08-201iRev.
i'_' Ilrn Cbe) Ihne 3oise lal, Fon x�a, SC. ]9'AB yemysaa•1'F» f¢ (8o3J la2�B96
M Scale: AS SHOKIV Fi ure: 5

GRAPHIC SCAL8
1120 w e, 80,
WA
IMPACT #6
PLAN VIEW - PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
Bryton R. Joe Harris & Associates, Inc.
Town of Huntersville, North Carolina
Engineering • Planning • Management
9G I Dote: 02-08-201d R,,
IScale. AS SHOWN I Roure: 6A

o
770
760
10+00
IE 761.64±
11+00
Ex. Stream Bottom
IE 762.64±
HOR. SCALE:
60 0 30 60
S inch = 60ft.
VER. SCALE:
6 0 3 6
I
1 inch -= 6ft.
12+00
IMPACT #6
PROFILE VIEW - CENTERLINE OF ROAD CROSSING
Bryton R. Joe Harris & Associates, Inc.
Town of Huntersville, North Carolina T
J Engineering •Planning •Management
BG I ❑ate.- 02-08-201Rev.•
— I"Ikn ('ae, �ki.4s ��fu l.. E+ro Mill.CC. ^I'L'A Iggll Rle�1:N Fm I�I:+E A02s.19P6
f A! I Srnla• A S V40 I Fn;;ra • RR

I M PACT #7
PLAN VIEW - PROPOSED LOT FILL
Bryton R. Joe Harris & Associates, Inc.
'town of Huntersville, North Carolina
Engineering • Planning •Management
4G Date: 02-08-201Rev.
'_M I Scale: AS SHOI+N I Fiaure: 7

I l I M A e% -r -U^
PLAN VIEW - PROPOSED LOT FILL
Bryton R. Joe Harris &Associates, Inc.
Town of Huntersville, North Carolina JH
Engineering • Planning • Management
9G Date: 02-08-201dRev
_ I77 Bm C) y Dh S'iw ]01, F e1?4U, S.C. IM (&j W24 M F. (M) BO'I1
� M Scale: AS SHOWFr' ure: 8

NOTES FOR STREAM BANK STABILIZATION:
1, LIVE STAKES SHALL BE APPROXIMATELY 24` IN LENGTH
F 2, LIVE STAKES SHALL BE 0.5"- 1.5" IN DIAMETER AT TIME
1, UPON COMPLETION OF STREAM CROSSING WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL BACKFILL
OF PLANTING
AND MECHANICALLY TAMP (NO SPECIFIC DENSITY) SOILS INTO PLACE AND DRESS
3.
LIVE STAKES SHALL BE BLACK WILLOW OR SPECIES
DISTURBED SURFACES.
SPECIFIED BY COEA)HEC OR CONSULTANT
2. BEGINNING AT A POINT 2' ABOVE WATER SURFACE ELEVATION. GRASS DISTURBED
4-
SPECIES SHALL BE DORMANT AT TIME OF ACQUISITION
AREAS (SEED, FERTILIZER & STRAW MULCH) STREAM BANK. TOP OF BANK AND
Ij
AND PLANTING AND LOCALLY GROWNIHARVESTED
DISTURBED AREAS UPLAND OF STREAM.
3- INSTALL COIR FIBER NETIMAT STARTING MINIMUM 12` BELOW WATER SURFACE
5.
LIVE STAKES SHALL BE SPACED T O.C.
ELEVATION AND EXTENDING A MINIMUM 5' BEYOND TOP OF BANK. MINIMIM
6.
LIVE STAKES SHALL BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 18' IN
SPECIFICATIONS FOR COIR FIBER NETIMAT AS FOLLOWS:
DEPTH WITH NO MORE THAN 4"-6' OF STAKE EXPOSED
- MIN. THICKNESS OF 0.30 INCHES
- 100% COCONUT FIBER AND WOVEN INTO TWINE
- AVG. WEIGHTOF 20OUNCESISO.YD.
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
4. COIR FIBER NETIMAT SHALL BE SECURELY HELD IN PLACE WITH USE OF WOODEN
STAKES AND WIRE STAPLES (AS NEEDED).
5- INSTALL LIVE STAKES BEGINNING AT WATER SURFACE ELEVATION AND EXTENDING
2 VERTICAL FEET UP THE STREAM BANK. SEE LIVE STAKE DETAIL FOR ADDITIONAL
REQUIREMENTS.
6- INSTALL SILT FENCE WI WIRE REINFORCEMENT ALONG TOP OF BANK (ADJACENT TO
END OF COIR FIBER NETIMAT) FOR WIDTH OF DISTURBED SOILS,
COIR FIBER NETIMAT
GRASS (SEED. MULCH & FERTILIZE)
REMAINING DISTURBED STREAM BANK
AREAS INCLUDING TOPS OF BANK
(UNDER COIR NETIMAT
LIVE STAKE (WILLOWS OR
SPECIES APPROVED BY
COEIDHEC) FOR FIRST 24"
ABOVE NORMAL WATER
SURFACE ELEVATION
WATER SURFACE ELEVATION
12"' I#
wn
—
f�llllll,
EXTEND COIR FIBER NETWAT
12' BELOW WATER SURFACE
ELEVATION
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION - LIVE STAKE
TYPICAL. DETAIL - N.T.S.
Blyton
Huntersville, North Carolina
9
(RJH
INSTALL SILT FENCE
REINFORCED WITH HOG
WIRE AT TOP OF BANK
(EDGE OF COIR FIBER
NETIMAT)
lVC RV4n1anV � eJn lm re.lnl]
Y BE USED TO REFORM
1EAM BANK (STACKED). 18- OF
IL SHALL COVER STREAM
E FACE OF ROCK STACK.
E OF ROCK TO ANCHOR BANK
)PTIONAL)
R. Joe Harris & Associates, Inc,
Engineering • Planning a Management
137 Bea Caner Tkw9uim 191. iixC M�9.YC 3q'>G5 (B9SIE07.1'✓'>&€aM l&:O}s92

NOTES FOR STREAM BANK STABILIZATION:
1. UPON COMPLETION OF STREAM CROSSING WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL BACKFILL
AND MECHANICALLY TAMP (NO SPECIFIC D€NSMY) SOILS INTO PLACE AND DRESS
DISTURBED SURFACES.
2. BEGINNING AT A POINT 16' ABOVE CHANNEL BOTTOM ELEVATION, CUT BANK
BACK AT A 1:1 MINIMUM SLOPE TO JUST ABOVE THE TOP OF CULVERT.
3. RIPRAP WILL NEED TO BE RECESSED 12" INTO THE CHANNEL BANK, SO THE BANK
WILL NEED TO BE CUT DOWN 12'& GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PLACED INTO THE CUTOUT.
4. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE SECURELY HELD IN PLACE WITH USE OF WOODEN
STAKES AND WIRE STAPLES (AS NEEDED).
S. RIPRAP WILL BE PLACE ON THE CHANNEL BANKS AT A DEPTH OF 12". FINAL RIPRAP LAYER SHOULD
LAYER SHOULD BE FLUSH WITH THE REST OF THE CHANNEL SLOPE.
6, ALL BANK STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED ABOVE HIGH WATER MARK
CHANNEL BOTTOM ELEVATION
STAPLE FABRIC AT TOP OF -,
EXISTING TOP OF BANK SLOPE TO PREVENT SHIFTING
EXISTING CHANNEL SLOPE
CUT EXISTING SLOPE BACK TO
1 A SLOPE MINIMUM ,1
r
1
PROPOSED CHANNEL SLOPE
WATER
ELEVATION
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION
- RIPRAP ARMOR
TYPICAL DETAIL- N.T.S.
Bryton
Huntersville, North Carolina
R. Joe Harris & Associates, Inc.
Engineering • Planning - Management
127 Hem Cnryl'hi vSSdx l6l. FwI MIR SC. 21r108 (W3)80&IAA Fu: 1807) 9g2 -0w

NOTES FOR TEMPORARY COFFERDAM:
1. INSTALL CLASS I RIP4W DAM WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC UNDERLAYMENT TO DIMENSIONS AND HEIGHT REQUIRED,
2. INSTALL W IAYER OF WASHED 157 STONE ON UPSTREAM FACE OF ROCK. DAM.
3. TRENCH (TOE) PLASTIC LINER INTO STREAM BED AND OVERLAP LINER AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE WATERTIGHT SEAL MAY NEED TO USE GRANULAR BENTONITE, MASTIC OR OTHER
ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE SEALANT).
4, LINER SHALL BE DURABLE ENOUGH TO WITHSTAND WATER PRESSURES EXERTED ON THE MATERIAL ONCE IT FACES THE TEMPORARY COFFERDAM AND BLOCKS WATERFLOW. GEOMEMBRANE S
ANDIOR OTHER MATERIALS MAY BE USED.
5. WHILE LINER IS BEING TRENCHED INTO STREAM BED, POSITION BYPASS PUMPS AND HOSES TO INTERCEPT AND PUMP WATER. ONCE LINER HAS BEEN TRENCHED ACROSS ENTIRE WIDTH OF
STREAM, ROLL LINER ONTO UPSTREAM FACE OF COFFER DAM AND BEGIN BYPASS PUMPING OF WORK SITE.
C INSTALL SANITARY SEWER (TRENCH ACROSS "DRY' STREAM BED) AND COMPLETE WORK AS DILIGENTLY AS POSSIBLE, RESTORE WORK AREA TO PRE•OONSTRUCTION CONTOURS.
7. ONCE SEWER WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED. REMOVE COFFER DAM IL RESTORE STREAM BED TO PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONTOURS. REMOVE AS MUCH STONE. AS PRACTICAL FROM STREAM BED.
& LIVE STAKE AND COIR MAT STREAM BANKS (SEE OETAILj-
0, STREAM FLOW (WATER SOURCE TO DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL) SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES VIA FREEFLOW THROUGH CHANNEL OR BYPASS PUMPING (AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL).
10. BYPASS PUMPS SHALL BE OF SIZE AND QUANITY NECESSARY TO PREVENT WATER FROM OVERTOPPING THE COFFER DAM AND ENTERING INTO THE WORK SPACE.
11. CONTRACTOR MAY STAGE COFFER DAM TO COMPLETE ONE HALF THE SEWER CROSSING AT A TIME. POSSIBLY ELIMINATING NEED FOR TEMPORARY BYPASS PUMPING,
12. ALL SEWER EXCAVATION AND TRENCHING SHALL BE 9N -THE -DRY' AND TRENCHING THROUGH FLOWING WATER IS NOT PERMITTED.
13, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS OF FILTER MOM SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR FOR APPROVAL AND USE. DISCHARGE FROM FILTER
MEDIA SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE PROVISIONS OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT.
14. ENSURE THAT PULP PRESSURE DOES NOT EXCEED FILTER MEDIA PRESSURE RATING.
15. FILTER MEDIA MAY BE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SAND MEDIA FILTRATION DEVICES, RATED FILTER FABRIC BAGS OR POLYMER BASED DEWATERING PRACTICES.
10. PUMP STRAINER SHALL NOT BE IN CONTACT HATH BOTTOM OF POND
Lid
0
TEMPORARY BYPASS
PUMP(S) WITH INTAKE
AND DISCHARGE HOSES
TDP OF BANK
r 20' MIN. r
FLaw
WIDTH OF CREEK
y _ VARIES
DISCHARGE INTO FILTER F
BAG (SEE NOTE 13) — FLOW
SANITARY SEWER OR�L �t
BURIED CULVERT
410' MIN.
TOP OF BANK
y
CLASS I RIPRAP
yyy//LE
UNoEERLTAAYMEENTF�R 2` MIM.
DUTY
THE DRY" SANITARY
SEWER OR ROADWAY
,�._ HEAVY DY PLASTIC LINER,
CULVERT INSTALLATION �S�i' GEOUEMBRANE OR OTHER MATERIAL
1.5 WITHIN LIVE STREAMS ATER L �
—��
SURFACEFELTR � FLOW
EVAIONVARIES
c
5' IN, OF #57 —
WASHED STONE
'EXCAVATED AND TOED
INTO EXISTING STREAM
BED/SANDS AT A DEPTH
TEMPORARY COFFER DAM DETAIL SUFFICIENT TO ANCHOR
TYPICAL DETAIL - N.T.S.
Bryton
Huntersville, North Carolina
giB
R. Joe Harris & Associates, Inc.
Engineering • Planning • Management
i? line f'wM Urrc S�ivc 101, Iv,rr Nrl1, S.C'. _u'.t�y IIRlll BQ?-1aN 1-u. SWLiI NSIiYY!r.'�

�r�
TYPCAL SWEET SECIKM
=-;-VVIAET Z'CaAD0 1140" !,T2PE-
I. At,
T -T p
i INAAIQT QCjA0/(DFF1C F STREET
mow.,
A
Laea
SECOND"Y r,,!)ADQeSCe4T1AL, STREET
j
all %
NOTE: THE ILLUSTRATIVE
BUILDING SECTOM ARE
SCHEMATia IN MATURE AND is
ARE INTEL IIDTODEN ICT
THM C IVERALL PEDESTRIAN
ENVIRONMENT
TYPK'.AL
NVI NMENT
TYPC& BUU)NGA.OT TYPES,
-VEFO TC) *AqncLE , ' RADM APO 107 r# -I-- 04 7F1! TOM OF W MRSVUZZU" OPDKWYD-- FM
ADOMON44 VrOWMATM
"amy cowko?m
4 'Z,
NCMS
MALW tAyw No
9isi5cr M awise Eu smi
10 74 0.1"4 ElIVLJCOREL"
Z FWL Mo LOCATKM To IM
M95wml Dj*a na sismam sinal
PLM REVIEW
15C 4 tw w
HOR PUBLIC HEARING
PETITION NO. R 05-10
VICNITY MAP NCII 110 SCALE
Ain
Figure 5 - Ccncepi Plan