20160763 Ver 1_Stormwater Approval_20160812

Strickland, Bev
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
SW Approval for carringdon
16-0783
Needs Add to file/laserfishce
Johnson, Alan
Friday, August 12, 2016 9:17 AM
Larsen, Cory
FW: Carringdon Archaeology
SW3160702 Cover Letter.pdf, SW3160702 High Density Permit.pdf
From: Gregg Antemann [mai lto:gregg@cws-inc. net]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 6:43 PM
To: Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Cc: Kelly Thames <[e-mail]>
Subject: Fwd: Carringdon Archaeology
Alan,
Looks like they already have approval. See High Density SW plan approval attached.
Thanks,
Gregg
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Sr. Vice President
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
,,,, 1'Gcr�cvace�' O�eavcvace G'oo,a-H. ficw,1m
550 E. Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Phone: [phone] xl
Cell: 704-408-1683
Fax: [phone]
www.cxvs-inc.net
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ColeJenest & Stone - Joel C. Causey <jcauseygcolejeneststone.com>
Date: Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 4:36 PM
Subject: RE: Carringdon Archaeology
To: Gregg Antemann <gre cws-inc.net>
Cc: Kelly Thames <kellygcws-inc.net>, "ColeJenest & Stone - David S. McAuley"
<dmcauleygcolejeneststone.com>, Aliisa Harjuniemi <aliisagcws-inc.net>
Gregg,
Already obtained. Verify this is what you are talking about. We submitted the package and were approved.
Joel
1

From: Gregg Antemann [mai lto:gregg@cws-inc. net]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 4:15 PM
To: ColeJenest & Stone - Joel C. Causey <[e-mail]>
Cc: Kelly Thames <[e-mail]>; ColeJenest & Stone - David S. McAuley <[e-mail]>; Aliisa
Harjuniemi <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Carringdon Archaeology
Joel,
Since Weddington is not a delegated authority to review Stormwater plans for NCDEQ we will need to submit the SW Plan
to NCDEQ for review. Are you familiar with this process? This assumes >24% and/or piped conveyances.
I can help you find the appropriate worksheets, and mail in so the information is coming from the same person that
submitted the permit. Just let me know if I can pick up?
Thanks,
Gregg
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Sr. Vice President
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
.... wlalwd K6ovr2ce �iovo-wfii+,1i
550 E. Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Phone: [phone] x1
Cell: 704-408-1683
Fax: [phone]
www.cws-inc.net
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:13 PM, ColeJenest & Stone - Joel C. Causey <Icausev .coleieneststone.com> wrote:
Kelly,
We don't know that we completely understand why a potential historical site within the project limits is tied to the
wetlands. Seems like if there is potential that a historical site exists on the site, then there is potential we would
disturb it with our construction and should therefore verify whether or not one exists. MI Homes almost always errs on
the side of caution if a little extra due diligence will minimize their risk so we're pretty sure if given these options, they
will want to go with option #1. Give me a call and let's discuss when you get a chance. I'm back in the office this week.
Thanks

Joel
From: Kelly Thames [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 9:54 PM
To: ColeJenest & Stone - Joel C. Causey <[e-mail]>; ColeJenest & Stone - David S. McAuley
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Gregg Antemann <[e-mail]>; Aliisa Harjuniemi <[e-mail]>
Subject: Carringdon Archaeology
Joel,
We got some hits from the State Historical Preservation Office regarding the Carringdon site.
There are records dating to the 1970s that the UNCC Archaeology Dept. logged back then that occur within the project
limits. The SHPO wants a survey to confirm/deny those sites as well as the rest of the site. If these sites are considered
for listing in the national register, then formal consultation may be required.
There are 2 options:
1. Go ahead and tee up a certified archaeologist survey;
or
2. Still submit the permit and let the USACE determine the "area of effect" which is usually the area of the aquatic
resource impact and their immediate adjacent uplands. This area of effect would allow the Corps to determine whether
or not SHPO needs to be consulted.
The outcome of #2 has chance for the Corps to require nothing, which by law would eliminate the need for SHPO
consultation and subsequent survey. Or he may decide that SHPO consultation is required and a survey would be
needed. I've already inquired about his thoughts on what he may do, and his response is that he can't say anything until
he sees a permit.
I think #2 is the best option, however, if a survey is required, the timeline for getting the permit is pushed back while
waiting on results. If #1 is chosen, that could potentially be in the works prior to submitting the permit.

I've just received the 1 st permit draft to review FYI. Also, we can help with teeing up archaeology, regardless.
Please feel free to call to discuss.
Thanks,
Kelly
Kelly Thames, PWS
Sr. Project Manager
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
Direct: 704-996-9986
Office: 704-527-1177
www.cws-inc.net
Joel C. Causey, PE, LEED Green Associate
Project Manager
COLEJENEST & STONE, P.A.
D 704-971-4519 C 704-607-8381
www.colemeneststone.com
Land Planning + Landscape Architecture + Civil Engineering + Urban Design
This email is for the recipient only. It may contain confidential information. Unauthorized use is prohibited.

Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Joel C. Causey, PE, LEED Green Associate
Project Manager
COLEJENEST & STONE, P.A.
D 704-971-4519 C 704-607-8381
www.colemeneststone.com
Land Planning + Landscape Architecture + Civil Engineering + Urban Design
This email is for the recipient only. It may contain confidential information. Unauthorized use is prohibited.