20160767 Ver 1_PA 15-10-0017 Scotland (NSR)_20160808

Project Tracking No.:
IS-1�-��1%
o���1��� NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM :�''y�
:�., �" q ,i :.7;1,:. _.. �"' .
;,,� � This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not t�=;` �
°���: .; ���:,
G' ��.: o�o;: , valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the t, �� ",�
�a_ . . : .��, ��.::�:....�
'����C;�. � Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. .,,,.� 4�
I � :i1a1 D[�r 1►��17�►I /:11 Y [�]�I
Project No
li� : _7/�7a
F.A. No:
B-5741
45697.1.1
Federal Permit Required?
County:
Document
Scotland
MCDC
Funding: � State ❑ Federal
� Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP3
Project Description: Replace Bridge #30 over Juniper Creek on SR1425 (Blakely Rd) in Scottand County,
North Carolina. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) measures 600ft in length (300ft from each
bridge end-point) and subsumes the 60ft wide existing right-of-way.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
First, permitting and funding information was reviewed for determining the level of archaeological input required
by state and federal laws. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act will apply because a United States
Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) permit acquisition will be necessary. Next, construction design and other data was
examined (when applicable) to define the character and extent of potential impacts to the ground surfaces
embracing the improvement work.
Once an APE was defined, a map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology
(OSA) on Friday, October 23, 2015. No previously documented archaeological sites are located within the APE.
Examination of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), State Study Listed (SL), Locally Designated (LD),
Determined Eligible (DE), and Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing resources available on the NCSHPO website
is crucial in establishing the location of noteworthy historic occupations related to a perspective construction
impact area. A cross-check of these mapped resources concluded that no meaningful historic properties with
possible contributing archaeological elements were located inward of the archaeological APE margins. In addition,
historic maps of Scotland County and the project area were appraised for evidence of former structure locations,
land use patterns, or other confirmation of historic occupation at this locale and archaeological/historical
reference materials were inspected as well.
Further, the APE was referenced on topographic, geologic and NRCS soil survey maps (PcA, AeC) for the evaluation
of environmental, geomorphological, hydrological, and other correlatives that may have resulted in past
occupation in the project corridor. Finally, aerial photographs (NCDOT Spatial Data Viewer & other on-line sources)
were examined and the Google Street View map application was utilized (when amenable) for gaining a virtual,
first-hand perspective of the overall study area and for assessing disturbances, both natural and human induced,
which compromise the integrity of archaeological sites/deposits.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicti�g
that [here are no u�eidentified historic properties in the APE:
The project APE is absent of NRHP listed historic properties, previously documented archaeological sites, and
cemeteries. The proposed improvement work is unlikely to affect areas outside the margins of the largely
impacted existing right-of-way. In addition, almost the entire APE is distinguished by very poorly drained soils
"No ARCHALOLOGY SURVEY REQU/RED"form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projecls as Qualrfted in lhe 20/5 Programmalic Agreemen(.
1 of 2

Project Tracking No.:
15-10-0017
which hold little potential for the presence of archaeological resources. No further archaeological input or work
will be necessary for this state-funded NCDOT project. A finding of "no archaeological survey required" is
considered appropriate.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ❑ Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
OARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYRE UIRED
�
❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
Other:
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEY RL•QUlRED" jorm for the Amended Minor Transpartation Projecrs as Qualified in the 2015 Programma(ic Agreement.
2 of 2

Bridge 30 - Scotland County
-_..�. z� /- � .� ,,�, C `/
���l�•nv����� � ��� o-�+a~$ �F�a �.'. ��, �;��rr� Y` �\ / ��r�j \ 1` �''`��� ��/Dv
�'�. �F 1' � a` t� - `( �,., `<- �� � . { ,`. .
,. :�F ` �.3^��v�! ^c- . � lt y � + ` , . i^ 7` c.� � , _ _ 'ti� .� �./� � . ` y
`., Y �� /' ' .
t t � �
.
� � .. , ^��` _
' J �d¢n -`� �.�.. `��`' '�
, o _ :,. � � __ �_ 4 �` .,�-• , , y �, . �, : " 1 �' Y ' ..
�`v=�`"�t•...,.,. .-„, .. ._ _. . s�� (R� � _ -�=____ �\� '- ,�`
_1 ���" �..� • � � � ' � -o_ • { i :� �. / � ___ � i
` ,� -.i' ''� � ' i j
�
-
., . , ._ � _
� '.4 � ' ,,.Y�' ... • � "y.� \ � � • I"
.. .. �''. . � ° � ". ��s .��./,+-' .�.''rrG ; �„" t �� r..�J� .,\� � ,`�� \ ' ��
t ' / h""+. � "�t � . � �, ��~�` �� t i�ti =
o �.� � ' .: � �e-•� i. _ .. , t l. �. :�r� � ' � �',V�',- � � � - .� :? •--/
` '�` _ \ "'W°- .. �� �` `�
..� br�ry .,`�� �' "` ". \ Y �t `.%�I?0-�_ �� % � ; s �� �� � � +. ,
�
� �.. ). ' '�.. � ...� �. � � �..+' T ��.
� __ � r. ,,,� , �... ,. �� 7 { ti � " .�� , '�,. , ' 1. \
. '�4 / .• `e :yr 2 •� ... }w .. � 1 . 1 /��\ i � Y • II�Tl�� � � �
� �, • t �.•� 'x� �^� ^� ...,, � i t � . r . �+ M1,'�.
`\ \
��., � ... 'J aai 6 ��� _ � ` �. ` f �'' ' . � `} A
, , '� � � ~�t ti��ViuOn . • _ 1`auriMrurp � , � " � ,�.� � lauANw�p � ��
�
` : " � ... �_,�g,� �\ . +G.-�' �
""`�. / � \ ♦, �,ti • ,i` <� ,' . _" l"' .- ... +, �..�, , � �,� ��.,\ •` r � i �
~' . ' 00 +�,�' . ���} ^ ` ^ _ ��`� ���� L.�`i � �.�`�+� / � . lJ
y� ,,' � , �, 1. _ ,` �."� .• Torrer � � .�, ..J '
■ ' 4
A� �• � �� A y�' !� � � "'.�� ,.. � �. � ' /� :�i� i
� � � t .. � ' ' f
�'1. • ' �`- � � i _ - ? , —' � l Y: � . /�
� �\ _,--� — ', � '' - + ' � I
:1 _ � �"\_ � • � t s,ry/ � � � . r� , � '. ` � �_ �� ..� � f /, � � � � 4�
� .,�.� �� i � / �! � 'u / _� � ` � V r'� �'`�' r-' � •
�1'. n �/�'� 1 i �� � �+. ��
�
� � , � -� `... �r'1� iJ 7( l ' .. � ... � I,' �� �� f
+�s � �.i � �\ . 7 __ „. !� . ��• �%+
. j t.i'1 � � ._ � i • �"
' �.. . _ . r---�`�, C.� - � . -. r�y • _ ' ._... : • -`�,
! � .,� � ♦ ,i :i3i t � .n \ �YM . }„ 1 +
✓' , -- ... � •'�:� � . . I .
' , �
,
, � ,:
,�
.
'` ,, t' � � "'�+- ' -�. �
jF �' ' �. � a� � w,�'a� � . d .. , • � .. "1 /:�� � �+�,_' ��,
�; 1 ' � `�;y �` ; � . _ ...,,,,,�� _. / A .- � y! � ._ vr .. �'�.� j •
`� ` �..If y .. �� � .� ~'`` f . •i;� ." �. � ..y_ �t•r - ._ . , K.� . =. `'
r .�� a / � `'-,\\� � .. �1 w �. . , . � _ ( ..--., .:
� ( '�� � � r��'' � �'�.�p� .r ; � '�4 �� �
� :. , y� - , _ C'�. . ' � � ; '
-. - �� � `•� , � e �
� �s � .__"�"'/ i �' ,� i `tir„�-.� �. . ^� +1
� �, s� : t�� � ' ` � f .� _ � � e��. - ' " ;Y-` i.
} - ,� � � ( � ,. ; � - _ 3- + ' � a
' � * ' � ",�,, - � e2�6 'C '� � - �-v�„ _ � 'wr' .. . _ � �'`, ` � M -'\
� .
�� �`�;`� „' �, e 1 � ^ �. `� � 2
�".� ,y �'\��t� =�. /�'....�� ` � � � • � ` ._ . � a - ;.� .. e � � ��t � �/,^�`�
�� ,� � � ` �� ''�../� ��a `\ � . -+-� ,\j �, .. , � .� w++ � \ ..� : ` !� • _ ' ' l '�
' 0� '\ ,. � ��' . « .». � � ± � � � �- \ � � ... . � ..a. _ � i �,�,` a� /
, i' y
�.,.y 1 � '� _ . -} � ��
`,, �A ' ` L�A p S� - �LaunnEurq . � e'� . "`� \, nnburq � w,
� ������ `.•5* \� gy.��'.•i-, 1/ � \ .w.. ��.� . _ 4 .
'�,p _ .'l � � r� �� ",�. ♦ { � ,-� � �,. � `^ � � i�_ � �i �� _ �.
.. ' a ` �; r" `. _, � � ;,�-- . � •
�_. � . .+a ' _
� .- o � .. -�-'-��`�•,. r % . g 1 �'�, - ' � �t`-�. ,, 'i' •.,,��-�� - �•.� "' = ��f �
'', � � 6 r 'Z�,%� ^ �- �`�. - �'�`,. `,'
} � .�\� \_i 'C. ��� _ r . i � � ; . ' �
� � � 13t3 � � f � ' ;1 a ' ..� '� . � t�
. , ;. . . �, � .,,b.. ` /� ;.
�+ _ �:;o�;�� s .,..::7w� • _ •� ^"; — �=}�7' o;a, �''�^
._
. . .
. . , � '�b.,,,� 8 , a� / , , �w� u,,f:,n»,� i..�5o: ' � t
,. . ��,
S y t � ,
.
y �� l \ � ,. ..
.
� �� = `• ' .
:�. ' ij i� • j �_ y, i `;, CJ�.M7i �7�i �Uwtl¢i =.. .. ��v1 ' _ .. .� "` . . ` � �ti i �
. _ �.. .. . � / \ . ' _ '. .._ . . " _ __ `.�

PcA—Pamlico and Johnston soils, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
• National map unitsymbol: 1jh0y
• Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
• Frost free period: 210 to 265 days
• Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
• Pamlico, undrained, and similarsoils: 60 percent
• Johnston, undrained, and similarsoils: 30 percent
• Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pamlico, Undrained
Setting
• Landform: Flood plains
• Landform position (two-dimensionalJ: Toeslope
• Down-slope shape: Concave
• Across-slope shape: Linear
• Parent material: Organic material over sandy alluvium

Typical profile
• Oa - 0 to 30 inches: muck
• Cg - 30 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 1 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Natural drainage c/ass: Very poorly drained
• Runoff class: Negligible
• Capacity of the most limiting /ayer to transmit water (KsatJ: Moderately high to high (0.57 to 5.95 in/hr)
• Depth to water table: About 0 inches
• Frequency of flooding: Frequent
• Frequency of ponding: Frequent
• Available waterstorage in profile: Very high (about 14.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
• Land capability classification (irrigatedJ: None specified
• Land capability classification (nonirrigatedJ: 7w
• Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Description of Johnston, Undrained
Setting
• Landform: Flood plains
• Down-slope shape: Concave
• Across-slope shape: Linear
• Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
• A- 0 to 30 inches: mucky loam
• Cgl - 30 to 34 inches: loamy fine sand
• Cg2 - 34 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 1 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Natural drainage class: Very poorly drained
• Runoff class: Negligible
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (KsatJ: High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
• Depth to water table: About 0 inches
• Frequency of flooding: Frequent
• Frequency of ponding: Frequent
• Available waterstorage in profile: High (about 9.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
• Land capability classification (irrigatedJ: None specified
• Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
• Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
AeC—Ailey loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
• National map unitsymbol: 1j8s1
• Elevation: 80 to 750 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
• Frost free period: 210 to 265 days
• Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
• Ailey and similarsoils: 85 percent
• Minorcomponents: 7 percent
• Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Ailey
Setting
• Landform: Low hills
• Landform position (two-dimensionalJ: Shoulder
• Landform position (three-dimensionalJ: Crest
• Down-slope shape: Convex
• Across-slope shape: Convex
• Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
• A- 0 to 4 inches: loamy sand
• E- 4 to 37 inches: loa my sand
• Bt - 37 to 53 inches: sandy clay loam
• Cd - 53 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 8 to 15 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 80 inches to densic material
• Natural drainage class: Well drained
• Runoff class: Medium
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (KsatJ: Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
• Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
• Frequency of flooding: None
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available waterstorage in profile: Low (about 3.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
• Land capability classification (irrigatedJ: None specified
• Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
• Hydrologic Soil Group: B
• Ecological site: Loamy Backslope Woodland - PROVISIONAL (F137XY006GA)
Minor Components
Candor
• Percent of map unit: 4 percent
• Landform: Low hills
• Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
• Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
• Down-slope shape: Convex
• Across-slope shape: Convex
Bibb, undrained
• Percent of map unit: 2 percent
• Landform: Flood plains
• Landform position (two-dimensionalJ: Toeslope
• Down-slope shape: Concave
• Across-slope shape: Linear
Johnston, undrained
• Percent of map unit: 1 percent
• Landform: Flood plains
• Down-slope shape: Concave
• Across-slope shape: Linear

r'i` --
��
'il�l.
\
. t�t`�i . �`�.. ..
���� - Jy
��% ,�. ` .. _
�i ir��
?
$� �`�clJe C�r
`>!fy M�Nair F'.•�
- Q-a
: ��
. -
-�. . �_"-:,a f ,. ` � .
_ '� ��
.._ ,. _ .�.i:i�
� , _ _
Op"` -
J�'
SCfl262 Dar.iel C. Stewsrt Floase
� r� ^
�`��
.,�_ � •. � ��` .
�
SCOTLA ND
�, �1i�1 z"�
S�. �':�
���
��
M1
�i �
Fr_ l: � .. . ..
H�f���-
�rx
CC
X
.."'y.
r �"
S 3<�
l_ ec � r.
PIE Lr
���'`��� t�d
��(;�
^r
�
rn
a
�
�
- - ��
. .. �� C��yE]G
_ � ... ��G:��tt��
r� ri
;:,iv ��'•O'� v
� @�
. � f�!`J �
�
s
J:
.�
�
�
NCSHPO website map illustrating the location of the APE. No historic structures are located within or adjacent to the project area.

REQUEST FOR CULTURAL
RESOURCES REVIEW FORM
Projecl Trncki��g No. (h��ernnl UseJ
;/s /O--4o/%
: _ _.
MEMORANDUM TO: Drew Joyner, Human Environment Section
1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1 �C�. �
Send Electronic Submittals to: PAtracker@nc . aED ��1�1�
ATTENTION: Matt Wilkerson, Archaeology Supervisor
Mary Pope Furr, Histocic Architecture & Landscap � ��.1...t
�; � . �.
FROM: REX BADCETT
ENVIRONMENTAL SPECtAWST II—DIVISION 8 QC� O
DATE: 10/1/15 +� i �� 1 �O �� �
1 !� �i-c�-r�:«.....___
•r«
PRO.IECT INFORMATION
Project No: B-5741 County: Scotland
WBSNo**: 45697.1.1 Document Attachment G
Type:
Fe�l Aid No: Funding: � State ❑ Federal
USGS Quad Laurinburg Project ASAP
Name: Sc/iedule:
Proiect Description:
REPLACE BRIDGE #3O OVER JUNIPER CREEK ON SR 1425 IN SCOTLAND COUNTY.
j$/� Ke ly �o�
�
xX Work cannot begin until a charge number is proviclecl tnat can be uiuea to ny starr u� nie numan
Environment Section.
DESIGN INFORMATION
Project Lei�gt/i: Delour
Route:
Existi�zg ROW: Proposed 60'
ROW.�
Existing X- Propose�l X-
section: section:
Structure to be Bridge Structure 1951
Replaced: Bui/d DaPe:
A�tditional DesiQn Information:
Bridge will be replaced on existing alignment.
n

USACE Pernzit
Easements
USFS Property:
PERMIT & �ASEMENT INFORMATION
Yes ❑ No Type of NW 3
Permit:
Yes ❑ No Temporary or Temporary
Perma�ient:
Yes � No TVA Permit ❑ Yes �
Adclitionnl Permit& Easernent Information:
ATTACHMENTS
REQUIRED
� Vicinity Map Showing Project Location � USGS Quad Map
Showing Project Location
OPTIONAL—but providing this information will expeclite project review
❑ Design Plans ❑ Photos
❑ Agency Input Letters
No
❑ NCDOT Input Letters ❑ Scoping Meeting
M inutes
❑ Aerial with Study Area, Project Termini, and Y-Lines indicated
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
SUBMIT THIS FORMAND ATTACHMENTS ELECTRONICALLY TO:
PAtracker�a zcdot.gov