20051881 Ver 1_401 Application_20051010

ocT ~ o zoos
't,~1U+tap9%~trosTO~'~~'4~T~R~'~1*1 October 6, 2005
S&EC #5-1325w1
Environmental Consultants, PA
Suite C Concord, North Caroli~$~?,5,.;~c~: [phone] Fax: [phone]
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Todd Tugwell
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Dear Mr. Tugwell and Ms. Karoly:
NC Division of Water Quality
401 OversighdExpress Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27604
Our client, Faith Properties of the Carolinas, requests the use of Nationwide Permits 12 and 39 for
the proposed "Piedmont Crossing" project in High Point, NC. Specifically, this notification
requests impacts associated with development for Tracts B-E of the proposed project. Tracts F-I
have no final designs at this time and wetland/stream impacts are not anticipated for those
parcels. The subject property (including all tracts) is approximately 197-acres in size and located
west of Barrow Road. A signed agent authorization accompanies the enclosed preconstruction
notification. As proposed, Piedmont Crossing will result in the construction of single and
multifamily units as well as a section of Piedmont Parkway to be funded and constructed by the
developer. No other segment of the proposed Piedmont Parkway to be constructed for this
project. The approximate property boundaries are shown on the attached USGS Topo Quad
vicinity map. Surface waters on the property are unnamed tributaries that flow to Oak Hollow
Lake in the Randleman Lake watershed/Cape Fear river basin (WSIV;CA/ WCA.Tier 4). S&EC
has met with regulatory personnel from the USACE and NC DWQ regarding approval of our
wetland delineation and Randleman buffer origin points, respectively.
As proposed construction of Piedmont Crossing will result in impacts to perennial streams,
wetlands, and isolated wetlands. Permanent impacts to perennial streams involve 149 linear feet
for 2 road crossings. A road crossing over the largest perennial stream will involve an arch span
to avoid impacts. Two temporary stream impacts totaling 301f are proposed for sanitary sewer
construction. Proposed wetland impacts associated with lot fill and road crossings tota1.09 acres.
Impact W 1 on the attached sheet involving approximately 0.016 acres of wetlands (included in
the .09ac total) has occurred. That impact total fell below USACE and NC DWQ notification
thresholds. Proposed impacts to isolated wetlands tota10.082 acres. The isolated wetland
impacts are below notification thresholds for the NC DWQ.
Proposed impacts to Randleman Lake riparian buffers (50') tota124,510sf for Zoned and
18,170sf for Zone 2, respectively. Buffer impacts are associated with proposed road and sewer
crossings. The crossings occur at perpendicular angles and are exempt under the Randleman
Lake watershed buffer rules. Enclosed with the completed PCN are impervious calculations and
stormwater management plans from the project engineer. Proposed stormwater management
facilities include construction of (4) wet ponds followed by level spreaders and (2) bio-retention
cells. Stormwater management facilities have been approved by the watershed review committee
and follow City of High Point guidelines as well as NC DWQ general certification #3402.
Greensboro Office: Ralei;h Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Greensboro, NC 27455 Raleigh, NC 27614
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

. t
Attached please fmd: 1) A completed Pre-construction Notification 2) signed Agent
Authorization Form, 3) USGS topo quad vicinity map, 4) Guilford County Soil Survey map, 5)
Construction plans, 6) Cross-sectional view of arch span, 7) 3 copies of impervious
calculations/stormwater plans, 8) Wetland data forms, and 9) 401 processing fee of $475. Please
call if more copies of the stormwater plans/calculations are needed.
Sincerely,
G~~~~~~
Wendell Overby
NC Licensed Soil Scientist

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12, 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
S. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Faith Properties (Ken Lindholm)
Mailing Address: 10410-SOOG Park Road
Charlotte, NC 28210
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Wendell Overby
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 236 LePhillip Court
Suite C
Concord, NC 28025 _ _
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: woverby(a~sandec.com
Page 5 of 13

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Piedmont Crossing
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 180005500000100004, 18000500000100001,
18000550000010000501
4. Location
County: Guilford Nearest Town: High Point
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Piedmont Crossing
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):I-40 exit 210 (Hwy 68). Go
South 2 5 miles to Willard Dairy Road Turn right ~0 1 3 miles to Barrow Road. Property is
across Barrow Road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 350525°N 79.9912°W
6. Property size (acres): 197
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT Oak Hollow Lake (WSIV CA)
8. River Basin: Cape Fear (03030003)
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Formerly farming operation with open pastures and woodland.
Two homes occurred on the property. General land use in vicinity is predominantly
residential. A high school and fire station located in very close proximity.
Page 6 of 13

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Tract B-64 single family homes C 1 Phase 1 &2 181 single & multi family units, C Ph 2,3
24 multi family units D Ph 1 & 2 106 single family units E 304 multi family units. Use of
heav~quipment including_pans backhoes and trenches required for site preparation.
1 1. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Construction of Piedmont Crossing project and
a portion of Piedmont Parkway Thoroughfare
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.No prior determinations or permits known. S&EC's delineation approved
by Andrea Wade (USACE). Site meetings between S&EC USACE and NC DWQ have been
held to review wetlands/streams and Randleman buffers.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Future phases predicted but no impacts estimated at this time. Design of future phases have not
been finalized to date (Tracts F-I). No future impacts anticipated for those tracts.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:Two perennial stream impacts totaling
149 if proposed for road crossings. Wetland impacts totaling .09 acres requested. Impacts to
isolated wetlands total .083 acres. Temporary stream impacts of 301f proposed for sewer xin~s.
Page 7 of 13

Buffer impacts zone 1 (20 210sfl zone 2 (14 658) Impacts exempt forproposed road xings.
Impacts for temporar~xings- zone 1 (4 300sfl zone 2 (3 512sfl. Exempt for sewer xin~s.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grrading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Located within Distance to Area of
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland 100-year Nearest Impact
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, Floodplain Stream (acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) ( es/no) (linear feet)
W 1 Fill Linear headwater No 0 .016
W2 Fill Linear headwater No 0 .006
W3 FilUPipe Linear headwater No 0 .008
W4 Fill Headwater No 0 .OS
WS Fill Headwater No 0 .01
Total Wetland Impact (acres) .09
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 3.45 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Perennial Average
Stream Impact Stream Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact °r
Intermittent Width Length Impact
(indicate on map) Before (linear feet) (acres)
' Im act
S 1 UT Oak Hollow L Pipe Perennial 4' 74 .007
S2 UT Oak Hollow L Pipe Perennial 3' 75 .005
T1 UT Oak Hollow L Temp Perennial 4' 15 .005
T2 UT Oak Hollow L Temp Perennial 4' 15 .005
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 149 .012
179(+temp) ,022+tcmp
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
Page 8 of 13

6. List the cumulative im act to all Waters of the U.S. resultin from the ro'ect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.012
Wetland Impact (acres): .09
O en Water Im act (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) .102
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 149
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ®Yes ^ No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Three isolated wetlands approved by USACE on property totaling 0.2 acres. Proposed
impacts of 083 acres to isolated wetlands for the development.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ®uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): excavation with installation of riser
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): stormwater
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: Agriculture or forested.
Size of watershed draining to pond(s): 1-19.3ac, 2-16ac, 3-14.8ac, 4-13ac
Expected pond(s) surface area: 1-.23ac 2-.38ac 3-1.3ac. 4-.25ac
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.Since our involvement with
nroiect chances in road layout made to avoid additional stream/wetland impacts. Proposed arch
span proposed to avoid impacts to perennial stream Project designed to avoid buffer impacts
except for exempt road/sewer crossings atperpendicular ankles. Small % of wetland and stream
impact amounts compared to total wetland/stream acreages on site and size of project.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 9 of 13

freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmuide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Planning of subdivision to avoid and minimize impacts will serve as mitigation.
Development will utilize stormwater ponds combined with level spreaders as well as
bioretention areas for waterguality. Impacts to perennial (miti~able) streams at the
minimum necessary and less than 1501f Impacts to large perennial stream avoided at cost of
bottomless span Road alignments have changed to reduce~roposed impacts Proposed
wetland impacts less than .1 acres. Proposed isolated wetlands impact less than .1 acres.
Proiect subject to Randleman and water supply buffers. Proposed buffer impacts exempt
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Page 10 of 13

Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate/local) funds or the use of
public (federaUstate) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify)? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(s uare feet) Miti ation
1 24,510 3 (2 for Catawba) 0
2 18,170 1.5 0
Total 42,680 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zonc 1.
*Buffer impacts for proposed road and sewer crossings are exempt.
Page 11 of 13

3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Buffer impacts for exempt activities
requiring no mitigation
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Calculations for four water qualityponds
attached Delineation maps of watersheds and construction plans of four wet ponds and 2
bioretention areas attached Estimated impervious percents to be treated b~nond 1 (28.4%), pond
2 (53 8%) pond 3 (38 9%) pond 4 (38.2%) bioretention 1 (50%) bioretention 2 (48%).
Stormwater facilities approved by watershed review committee.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Construction of sanitary sewer lines are proposed for the development.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:In our
opinion project is residential subdivision/amenities that will not result in violation of downstream
water quality standards. Project mandated to conform to water supply rules and Randleman
buffers. On site stormwater controls to be constructed that meet state and local rules.
Page 12 of 13

XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
..1.~.
ic~(~ X05
Applicant/Agent'
(Agent's signature is valid
ignature
Date
if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13

_,
=~`~ ~~``-S-oil & Environmental- Consultants; ~ P.A
~s
f ~ ~ 236 LePhilGp Court Su;u C Cooc«~ North CuoGm 28Q25 Ptwoe: p0a) 72Q940d Fu: Q04) 720-9406
wwwsandF.C.cotn
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM _
- - All Blanks To Be Filled In B The Current Landowner
Name: !y-~~ .-~~~ J~7- L- • t., d ~/ ~ ..:~''~~ ~: -
I l ..,
Address: ~ d Cl/ d ~O tI C- f ~ r ~ ~ri ~ ~ ~i 4 G /~a ~/ t, , /~~~-:. ~ Z ~'Z l G .
~•
Phone:
Project Name/Description: -_PlEC7Monl•'T CRb55)NCC ~ ~~ ~ . ~~ .
-_.. _. .,
Date: ~ - ~3' O y -
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 284x2 /
Attu - _ ~ ~~ i-e~ ~RC1~
Field Office: •RaIei~h
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current ro owner, hereby. designate. and authorize Sod & Environmental Consultants, PA to
actin my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit. applications, to furnish upon inquest ~ ~ -
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The ~P 3 -f-day of
.. -
This notification supersedes any previous, correspondence concerning the agent for this project•:.~. . .
- <ri-;
~-.mot:-`W ..
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability anti prgfessional courtesyreasons, is valid only,:for ~ . ;
;a.
government officials to enter the pivperty when accompanied by S&EC staff. You shonld'call S&EC
,.; ::
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site. • ~ .
,.
r ,, .. . -
Print Property Owners Name Property Owners Signature -_
.. ...
;.
. _ _ . _ .._ .:~__T__ __ _ _.. _.
~ Mr. John Dorney - cc Mr. Wendell Overby -" ~ - - - .
NCDENR - DWQ Soil dz Environmental Consultants; PA
_F.~.
2321 Crabtree Boulevard -~";-: r- ;~-~
Raleigh, NC 27604 blank a~tt anth fo~doc
Gransboro Oflicc: lickorv Arta Office:. Ralei h Officc:
3817-E Lawndalc Drivc 710 Boston Road L 101U Ftavcu Ridge Road
Greetuboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681 Raleigh, NC 27614
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]

~PY~~ ~~ 1997. Nt3pcech, Inc.

Guilford County Soil Survey

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil 8~ Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Barrow Road Date: 10/21/03
Applicant/Owner. Faith Properties County: Guilford
Investigator: W. Overby, A. Rollans State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Mix-Pine-Hardwood
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Upland
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEG ETATI O N
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Pinus yiriginana Tree FACU 9. Pinus echinata Tree FACU
2. Liriodendron tulipifera Tree FAC+ 10.
3. Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC 11.
4. Juniperus virginiana Tree FACU- 12.
5. Rubus argutus Herb FACU 13.
6. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 14.
7. Lonicera japonica Herb FAC- 15.
8. Quen;us alba Tree FACU 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 40
Remarks: Much of upland in pasture (fescue) or cultivated field.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: WA (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: WA (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: WA (in.)
Remarks:

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
Project/Site: Barrow Road Plot ID: Upla~+d
enn c
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well
(Series and Phase): Enon Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ultic Hapludalf Confirm Mapped Type? x Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 Ap 10YR 4/2 Sand Loam
4-12 Bt1 2.5Y 5/4 Sand cla loam
12+ Bt2 10YR 5I8 Cla
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WFTI ANnS 1)FTERMINATION
X
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No Yes x No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes x No
Remarks:

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil 8 Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Barrow Road Date: 10/21/03
Applicant/Owner. Faith Properties County: Guilford
Investigator: W Overby A. Rollans State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Headwater
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Wetland
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
ir~rTw Tt~u

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Juncus effusus Herb FACW 9.
2. Sambucus Canadensis Herb FACW 10.
3. Salix nigra Tree OBL 11.
4. Carex sp. Shrub FACW 12.
5. Rubus argutus Herb FACU 13.
6. Cyperus strigosis Herb FACW 14.
7. Ludwigia sp. Herb OBL 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 85
Remarks:
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
x Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
x O~odized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0-2 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0-12+ (in.) x FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0-12+ (in.)
Remarks:

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
ProjecUSite: Barrow Road Plot ID: wetland
JVILJ
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorly
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic endoaquept Confirm Mapped Type? x Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color
Mottle Color Mottle
Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 Ap 10YR 5/2 Loam
4-12 Bg 10 YR 6/2 7.5YR 5/8 Few/Distinct Sand cla loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime x Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
x Reducing Conditions x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
urerr rune nereotit~unTtnt~!
X
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? x Yes No x Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes _ No
Remarks:

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
(70d) 720-9405
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Barrow Road Date: 10/21/03
Applicant/Owner. Faith Properties County: Guilford
Investigator. W. Overby, A. Rollans State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Riparian wetlands
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: wetland
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEG ETAT10 N
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ligustrvm sinense Tree FAC 9.
2. Liriodendron tulipifera Tree FAC+ 10.
3. Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC 11.
4. Microstegium vimenium Herb FAC 12.
5. Smilax rotundifofia Vine FAC 13.
6. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 14.
7. Woodwardia areolata Herb OBL 15.
8. Salix nigra Tree OBL 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100

HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
x Obdized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
x Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0-12 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0-12+ (in.)
Remarks:

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
Project/Site: Barrow Road Plot ID: wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorl
(Series and Phase): Worsham Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Endoaquult Confirm Mapped Type? x Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-5 A 10YR 5/1 Sand Loam
4-15 Bg 10YR 6/1 10YR 5/2 Common/Distinct Cla loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
x Aquic Moisture Regime x Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
x Reducing Conditions x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
x
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? x Yes No x Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes No
Remarks:

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjecUSite: Barrow Road Date: 10/21!03
Applicant/Ovvner. Faith Properties County: Guilford
Investigator: W. Overby, A. Rollans State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Mix-Pine-Hardwood
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Upland
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEG ETATI O N
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Pinus vinginana Tree FACU 9. Pinus echinata Tree FACU
2. Liriodendron tulipifera Tree FAC+ 10.
3. Liquidambar styraciRua Tres FAC 11.
4. Juniperus virginiana Tres FACU- 12.
5. Rubus argutus Herb FACU 13.
6. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 14.
7. Lonicera japonica Herb FAC- 15.
8. Quen;us alba Tree FACU 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 40
Remarks: Much of upland in pasture (fescue) or cultivated field.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: WA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: N!A (in.)
Remarks:

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil 8~ Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
Project/Site: Barrow Road Plot ID: Upland
C(ltl C
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well
(Series and Phase): Enon Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ultic Hapludalf Confirm Mapped Type? x Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 Ap 10YR 4/2 Sand Loam
4-12 Bt1 2.5Y 5/4 Sand cla loam
12+ Bt2 10YR 5/8 Cla
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WFTI ANI'lS r]FTFRMINATInN
X
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No Yes x No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes x No
Remarks:

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjecUSite: Barrow Road Date: 10/21/03
ApplicanUOwner. Faith Properties County: Guilford
Investigator: W Overby A. Rollans State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Headwater
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Wetland
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
\IC /~GTA TPI\I
YLVLIf11IV 1\
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Juncus ef(usus Herb FACW 9.
2. Sambucus Canadensis Herb FACW 10.
3. Salix nigra Tree OBL 11.
4. Carex sp. Shrub FACW 12.
5. Rubus argutus Herb FACU 13.
6. Cyperus stri_gosis Herb FACW 14.
7. Ludwigia sp. Herb OBL 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 85
Remarks:
~vnonl nr_v
111 ulwwv 1
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
x Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
x O~odized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0-2 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0-12+ (in.) x FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0-12+ (in.)
Remarks:

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil 8~ Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
Project/Site: Barrow Road Plot ID: wetland
SOILS

Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorl
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic endoaquept Confirm Mapped Type? x Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 Ap 10YR 5/2 Loam
4-12 Bg 10 YR 6/2 7.5YR 5/8 Few/Distinct Sand cla loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
x Aquic Moisture Regime x Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
x Reducing Conditions x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
w~i nunc nFTGR~ulue'r1~1N
x
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? x Yes No x Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes No
Remarks:

i
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil 8~ Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Barrow Road Date: 10/21/03
Applicant/Owner. Faith Properties County: Guilford
Investigator. W. Overby, A. Rollans State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Riparian wetlands
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: wetland
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEG ETATI O N
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ligustrum sinense Tree FAC 9.
2. Liriodendron tulipifera Tree FAC+ 10.
3. Liquidambar styracinua Tree FAC 11.
4. Microstegium vimenium Herb FAC 12.
5. Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 13.
6. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 14.
7. Woodwarriia areolata Herb OBL 15.
8. Salrx nigra Tree OBL 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100

HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
x O~adized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
x Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0-12 (in.) _ FAGNeutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0-12+ (in.)
Remarks:

,. r
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
ProjecUSite: Barrow Road Plot ID: wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorl
(Series and Phase): Worsham Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Endoaquult Confirm Mapped Type? x Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) AbundancelContrast Structure, etc.
0-5 A 10YR 5/1 Sand Loam
4-15 Bg 10YR 6/1 10YR 5/2 Common/Distinct Cla loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
x Aquic Moisture Regime x Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
x Reducing Conditions x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
x
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? x Yes No x Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes No
Remarks: