20080111 Ver 1_More Info Received_20080312

fl8-- o~~ t
Sou~~err~ ~r~v~ronmenta~ ~rou ne.
~'
53 15 South Co~~e~e Road, Suite ~ Wi~min~ton, North Carolina 2841 2
~ 10.452.2) 1 1 ~ax: ~ 10.452.2899 o{-~ice@se~i.us
www.se~Lus
March 11, 2008 p ~~~~~~ D~
Hand Delivery
MAR 1 ~ 2.OU8
Ms. Kimberly Garvey
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
RE: Response to Request for Additional Information
Lot 2 and 13 Towne Lake Drive at West Gate
AID: SAW-2008-386
Dear Ms. Garvey:
C1ENk -WATER idUALJI'~
Wt~TI_ANDS AND ST(~tMWATEk BRANCk
~SEGi Project #: 07-050.01 ~
This letter is in response to the Notice of Incomplete Application and Request for Additional
Information for Lot 2 and 13 Towne Lake Drive at West Gate. This letter was issued by your office
on 6 February 2008. Within and attached to this correspondence, SEGi will provide responses and
documentation that will address the Corps' concerns and requests for additional information listed in
the aforementioned correspondence:
1. It does not appear that Attachment 2 was included with your package. Please submit and
include specific information pertaining to the road widths around the proposed
structures.
Attachment 2 -Overall Impact Map has been included with this document. The overall site
plan depicts road widths around the proposed structure and those impacts to 404 wetlands
associated with incorporation of the required fire lane. Justification for the width of the fire
lane can be found within the previously submitted Attachment 9 -email from John Grimes,
Chief of Fire and Emergency Services -Leland Volunteer Fire/Rescue Department, Inc..
2. Attachment 1 D -Preliminary Site Plan -Pre-Fire Lane appears to impact wetlands in the
same areas as the existing proposal. Please clarify.
The area in question was proposed to be covered by an elevated, slatted deck and boardwalk.
Pre-fire lane, the first floor on the back side of the building would have been higher in
elevation than the front due to the existing topography of the site, which would have allowed
the deck and boardwalk to be elevated at least 3' above the substrate. Thus, no wetland
impacts would have occurred with this plan. For clarification purposes, hatching on
Attachment 10 was altered so that it would be easily recognized as slatted decking.

SEG
3. Please provide current elevation survey for the areas proposed for temporary impacts.
See Attachment 12 -Topographic Survey, provided by Hanover Design Services, which
depicts existing elevations in areas where temporary impact, are proposed.
4. Based on your application, it does not appear that you looked at avoidance and
minimization after the Town of Leland Fire Department informed you of existing
codes for fire lanes.
a) Please provide information pertaining to any site modification (alternatives) you
looked at after this information was presented to you.
Once the applicant was aware a fire lane would be required for the development, the
design team attempted to incorporate a hammerhead cul-de-sac in lieu of a thruway.
This option would have required greater impacts to wetlands then what is currently
proposed. In addition, it would have required that fire trucks back out of the area,
which is difficult to do. The next thought was to rotate the hotel footprint. However,
due to the layout of the parcels, this option would have had the structure encroaching
into the setbacks. This would also have required the Applicant to have all engineered
plans redrawn, as well as applying for modifications to all existing permits. All the
aforementioned engineering issues, factored in with the amount of time that it would
take to obtain all necessary permit mods and engineered drawings does not make this
a viable option.
b) In the cover letter accompanying your Pre-Construction Notification, you indicated
that l37 parking spaces are required by the architect. Please provide information
pertaining to this requirement and where it comes from.
Please see addendum entitled Attachment 14 -Michael R. McLeod Architect, P.A.
Letter, justifying the number of parking spaces proposed for the development.
c) Although you stated 137 parking spaces are required, the plan calls for 150.
Therefore, it appears that you may still have opportunities to avoid and minimize
impacts to wetlands.
Based on the correspondence received from Michael R. McLeod Architect, P.A., there
are no further opportunities available to avoid or minimize impacts to wetlands.
5. Mitigation will be required for impacts to riparian wetlands abutting Jackey's Creek to
ensure that the activity results in minimal adverse effects to the aquatic environment.
Since on-site, in kind compensatory mitigation is preferred as per Regulatory
Guidance Letter 02-02, please evaluate all on-site mitigation opportunities, including
restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation.
Unfortunately, the site does not exhibit conditions that would allow on-site mitigation,
such as creation, enhancement or restoration, to take place. Therefore, as you requested,
the Applicant is proposing to utilize the NC EEP In-Lieu Fee Program. Payment will be
made to the NCEEP in the amount of $7,337.75 (Seven Thousand Three Hundred Thirty
Three Dollars and Seventy Five Cents), which provides a 2:1 impact to mitigation ratio.

SF-G~
Please refer to revised page 6 of the PCN and addendum Attachment 13 - NC EEP
Acceptance Letter.
6. This office is also concerned about untreated stormwater flowing over the bulkhead
and into Jackey's Creek. Please provide this office with a copy of your approved
stormwater Management Plan.
Hanover Design Services, P.A. is in the process of applying for the stormwater permit for
the project. At this time, we are unsure as to how long this process will take. Therefore,
SEGi requests that the USACE condition the permit to state that no wetland impacts are
to take place until a copy of the approved Stormwater Management Plan has been
submitted to their office.
7. Your cover letter indicated that a portion of the requested fill is in the 100 year
floodplain, but the PCN indicated otherwise. Please clarify and provide 100 year
floodplain map of the subject parcels.
Approximately 138 square feet of wetland impacts are located within the 100-year
floodplain and has been accurately depicted on the addendum entitled Attachment 13 -
"100 Year Flood Impacts". Page 4 of the PCN has been revised to reflect this
information.
It is SEGi's hope that the information provided in this correspondence and the attached
documentation will satisfy the USACE's request for additional information. Should the USACE
need further information or clarification, please do not hesitate to contact our office at
910.452.2711 or email me directly at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
~~~
Dana Lutheran
Project Manager
cc: Michael R. McLeod, Architect, PA (electronic mail)
Chad Coburn -DWQ Wilmington (electronic mail)
Ian McMillan -DWQ Raleigh
Enclosures (11)

State stormwater permit SW8# 990807 was assigned to Tract 2.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no future project plans, nor any future federal permits, anticipated for this
rp o~ect.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream .channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
_Two_areas, totaling 0.08 acre, of permanent wetland impact are proposed, and are
.necessarv for the incorporation of a fire lane for theproposed hotel. 0.04 ac. of
temporarypacts are proposed, and are associated with the installation of
necessarv retaining wall, which aids in minimizing impacts to wetlands.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For
dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact

(indicate on map)
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain (yes/ Stream (acres)
no) (linear feet)
A Fill PEM-1 Yes 500 0.07
B Fill PEM-1 No ~-400 0.01
1 Temporary PEM-1 Yes 500 0.02
2 Temporary PEM-1 Yes 400 0.02
Total Permanent Wetland Impact (Acres) 0.08
Total Temporary Wetland Impact (Acres) 0.04
Page4of10 C~~/~

If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^D uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Excavation
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Local stormwater requirement
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The original site elan did not call for any impacts to jurisdictional features. It was onlx
until comments were received from the Town of Leland fire department, requesting the
Applicant incorporate a fire lane into their design plan, that the impacts were determined
to be necessary.
The fire lane must be incorporated in this location, as the hotel will be required to have at
least a single parking spot per hotel room. In the original siteplan, the Applicant took
ever precaution to avoid im acting wetlands for the purpose of parking. Thus, the
majority of buildable uplands were already allocated to adhere to other Town
requirements. The only feasible location for the fire lane is to the east of the proposed
structure.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/
Page 6 of 10 C~Q~V ,

OT S
THIS PROPERTY HAS BEEN EVALUATED
BY HEATHER COATS WITH THE NC DIVISION
OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT AND WILL NOT
REQUIRE A CAMA PERMIT,
88,808 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS
155,587 SF TOTAL SITE
63,5% IMPERVIOUS
~ ~
/~/,
/ /
i
•'.".RETAINIAIG.'8,w' S"' .v
- =~~~ l
1;.........
~.'.` .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.~i
...',,
KEY PLAN ...LL .............+.,.,."
scram r =,od~
,,.,,,
0 5~I 10 200
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 " = 100'
Z
~
w
F-

W

I-
m ~
o J
H ~~
w~ H
~Z =
~
~ z~
~~ Z

h-~1
0 M
r_,
w ~ v
a
ro
O ~ /~
W N ~
Um

~

N
U
u
`
1
~

~ Z
0O
N
~ F ~
1/
-j'1
1 U °a~

~/
~
G W
` x
LaLL
~ w ~
.,
I ~gn
m

W ~"'~
x E ~ n
~Qa

~ ~ U W~

'~ /~-~//I
W d c
~ L
a

r 1
V d
a
r
H

Y
01-1o-os I 1

-~_
/ J5• ,
/ . ~~.
~ . __ - e•
_~_- ~\
,.,
e
,.
1bRUR.re, I
wuR , r
1T7 I
Mexr I
,, I
,, ,
,, ,
,.
" ~
..~,
'' I ~,
,~ ,
11 ,
II ,
,. ,,
..
II ~,
J
P o g
z
W i.L
~-
/ WE GAT j' ~\\ `~,~y\ .'N '~. cn
RACT1,2813 ~' ~ ~ 11 ~
/ ~ \ II ~~
~~~ II ~.
\II ~
0l1 \ `. I
~ `_ ___ W
J ~
' m W
~ \\ ~ 1s„ ~
'' c,~A; III W ~ 0
\~ ~
/'/ // \ TRACT1 ~// i\\\~~~~'I~ ~~~\ ~ (~w
/ ~ \ 1D0 LDm // / la ~ a ~~ ~ ~ Y ~ >> `l
`^~ S~ n ~ / / CT \ ~ i ~ /. I I \~ ~ / ~ ~~ W 3 g W
v ~~.. ya ~ moxnaU ~ 6 3~ ~ z
•~m, / / / ~ ~ \ \r ~/ k~ /Cp ~ I /I \ \ \ ~II/I 833% \~ ~~/~
~ ~td~ / ~~~ OCHER p~,y~ 1 // / / I ~ I ~ a~ ~ C
/ b / / I \ A tai OA !
/~ / / ~ ~b \ /// / / / I I I" \ " ~/~F (cy~
~~eg' / / /POOL 1 STORY LOBBT \ ~ ~ /// / / N+~. ~ ~€I „ \ ` \ \ ~` ~
~ / ~ ~iPORTION OF ~ \ i / ~ I~I ~« ~ ~ ~ \ n `~
// ~BU]LDING o ~ \ \ i// /~ .~ IMI _d w/ 'y~ FPM
_~Aa
~ / ~ / ~`
Aa La ~ < / </ L eerWa Ror2 `~ b \ \ i~/ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I! O ~ ~
As y ~ ~ h7 wer 1[AVI0116 V ~ b \ ~ i ~ / ~ • ~
\N y1 ~_ - ~ ~ ~ DlOOIRB ~/ ~ I ~ w d3
tD R[AA elpLp reACK h eT \ I V
4 \ Ar ~ b / /~ I /~ n On
~ ~ r U QN
\ / + / I tr~ ~
~qn ` J ~ ~.~ _ w erx•'u' I - \\AU 100 ROOM b ~\ ~ -// A I ~ -...-- - ~ " u ~-
a
"\ oy~~ \ HOTEL ! \ p sy _ - ~ ~ ;<
`A' ~'~ \ I ~ W~~~
~/ ~ 1 \ e ~ ~.~ 1 ix Anrcr ~ L~ ~ n
s 0 ~ gE51AURANT d ~ I I 1 CH-' g d
_.--_ ~ \ x \ u I /PARKING ~ I li ^ S ~ c~
- - ` \ ~ ~ 5 STORY I N 1 .~.er aADee to ~ 1 ~ W x ~ < o'
_ r- - -~ * i 1 5 ` ~~ TOWER a I ~ [ ~ 1 F m
.~
rowR uum w Leuxo A[x ~\ 155 HEIGHTI i, I~ I ael I ~ ~ ~~/ a c
Yi. t \ ~ ~g Ip + II I~RI x W ~a
~ R RemmoR ram I
~\ 1 ~ ~ o1A1RaRe eAleMeur at
1 ~` ~ t~ ~I4 I roRn Ia rc U
S1 IT aIM APRI ~~//
n,/1' ,{fir /~ j~-~ ~ r-1
V~1 ~l (Wl.~ ~ ~' ~'N~ i ~~ : ~~` `\ t, I~ft ICI ~ RESTAURANT III' ~ T'
n Y.~ ~v~', L~.(~aI 6~ 3 ~~v~ ~~ ~ •~ ~ I ~~I q et'~ : I ~ 1 a•
~lJ~ ` ~]Y~ \ G\~ i ~ \ PARK]NG ~ II ~ I~
na;LUOee a c. \ ISED LTIA ~ ly
\ '~ An \ \
RD TRACT ~
\ 1 ~ \ ~ ef~7 (~,
x I ', I ~
\ La. \
\ ~ II I I //
Mores \ tr \ $r
xoreL: 1 eeaA reR eutenwou MIN ~ 4,~ \ tl ~u1~ip °K ~ PROPOSED A9 I I
1. ARM COMAURD D7 CODRDIWT! MlrH00 100 A00111 •100 MACH R[OIAA[D \ h
n emcee nmvmeD ~ ~~ e1x eueoDra ie,DAm L a wcrLARO RETENTION 1 I
t. ALL DfeTANCl6 AR! MMRDMAL a0a ^ I ~
ReeTADRAMr:1 wAC[ Ree roo era .~ _ , hh <,, POND 1 13
t. roR RereeeMtt see M.c re ro. t+a eRDee L[AtAeL[ AA[A ION r~ADLy! ~
.. euev[reD : wr q tool eAe+er 11ea m wAae ReouR[D ~'\ xx emLO a ~•.ra• I "~- - ~ \ '~+ J I ~ I xl+"a
el IRAte6 IROVID[D ~ _` ~- _ ~~ ' ~, ~ \ I 1 ~,+ Z
0. +.07 ACRlS TDTAI ARlA ~ ~~~ Lf~ W q\ y7 I I /R
e [X16TING M GRID MONUM[M D WITMN t000'Or AN \ Ato LtR ul \r~\~ y / .rl/ I ~
- ~ , SITE PLAN '~ b~~~ ~~;~ ', ~ ~ w
SDI scuF:rsa~r ~~~ A"[~ ~ /~ , ~
1 4?. ~ ..•~' I ~ fA
1 /IaWN LMRI M LIIAMD \ ,Lf ~I ' I 1
V ,p 1 ~•
~ is°~ I tis
1 ~ ~ Z ':~ NOV. 26
~ 1 200)
1 10 - ~.

TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 'RAINACE, ~
(kUTY /
WEST GATE '~~ ' LOCATION MAP
s EAJpEMENTI m
NOT TO SCAIf
~a ~° I' / a
TRACT 2 & 13 :>~~ i /
s 'P. ~ >a
JQ ~ ~^ .K. NAft 3R ~ U.S MWr. 7h76 'wl,,~
TOWN CREEK TOWNSHIP BRUNSWICK COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ; ~ , ~ \\ m
TOWN OF LELAND ''~ - r o '
DEVELOPED BY.• ARBORGATE PROPERTIES LLC ; ~ ycN AND c^ ~. ~ \ ~ u5 N,~. n ~
P.O. BOX 3167 ,~' unuTr ~ \ ~ \ " Law ~
WILMINGTON, N.C. 28406 ~ 59 EASEMENT ~'~ ' N \\ ~ ~ aw ~~ ~~+ z
/ PHONE ,y(9f0)791-1196 /~~ ~~~~-\ ,p os ~a \
/ DATE: AUGUST 13, 2007 \ \ ~ ~ \ \ ''~
/ ~ 1 ~ \ i `\ SI ~•qF
`~ ~~ 1 ~
/ / ``Q~O~p~~ /~ / 11 P.K. Na `~~--,~// ~~ ppOpo
~I .,~, ~/ INV 16.14 >,
L ~ I macr I y/P ~ m
~ ,,~
/ (I\ 1\\\ ~ 6 J ~ -_''' ~ /// Q' /~p~/ I~ \\\ .K. NAIL / \\\ PHASE 1 sfcnoN 2
i V -~\~ ~e'"/ .'/ / '~• /~ ~~'~ ~,~ ~ /~/ I l \\~ Sss•~~\ /(Llavma) \ M.C. 34 PG 519
/ / t^ // , ^~ / // / I ~h '~+ f P.K. NAft \
1 _ \\\ , TRACT 2 s. /' / / // f II ~ I I 1 ~ ~`
c -,
/ / \ \ \ ~----~\~\\~~~_ ,~~~__`~ 72951 so. Fr. /i/ // 1 I l~ / ~ 1 j II/' ~ \~~
Al / ~ \ - \\\\ t.~i- . i~ ~~~`~ 1.67 ACRES / // 1 / I r I I ~ ~
/ `. .~ -----~\~~=-~ %~_; :`" awDUlr / / // ' I ICI Id WI 1llf l~r
s ~ 1 ~ \ ~ ~ ._ . ~ - _ ~\~ y~-.Dt=~i6~,~~ ~\\~1\1 ssMN fo.a' / / ti ! r ~ IIII ry ~
qtr t3, \ `~~ _~~---- -~ ~._ >•}~11 / ° / ~/ I ~ / ~I WESrcArE
A3.\ .~ - ~ L7 --~i-~~1\ II 111 1~~~1~7 ~ y./ / / /ll/~ o/~I ( PNASEiSECncwi ~~O
\3 \~ ~~-~~~--- ~~~ ~ ~IIIII / >~ ~ / //~ I ~ /~~ M.B. 2a PG 342 R/ ~
' `*~--.'A6-~ ----_W5ICANDS \ ' IIII 111 -~,5a°' ''~ ;' "~i l l I ~n I~ I RETENTION POND TRACT V~
\ Iro !r-_---^ -----' -~, \ //l 111 1 Upuzy ~/ /~ ~ l r I I ;-~, r e ~t
~ ! a ~ - - ~ ~ a' ki ~'41I l ~l I I I EASEMENT / ~/'! '/ G5 I 1 III I Z' ~
,~~~ _.. -~. 6 --~ / ~1~1t \11 ~ r ~ a / 1,,~ I $ I I I III c I oRAarAaESUr.
I a• As _ ~ ~. ,~ - ~ 5s l w \I\\\ \ \ \~\11 / / RY ~ ~ / / ~~ I I I I I ~ L~~ I zs1 Aarfs wErLANO uNE
~ k'` 5j75fi \\ ~ \\ \\\\ 11\/ / G1 W `,~ I I I IIII I I ~--------~ LRIE BEARING OLSraNCF
I \ \\KI \\111\ / ~// / ~'' i I 1 I I /\ ~~~~ L1 5583615E 4A6s
/ \'w \ \\ 1\\ 11 - / ~ }/>il I I I I I ~ I 1 11 1 L2 s 722 s f 230.5
- \\ ( / ~0~0\1 ~ i/ I I I 1 1 1 ~ II °(~ L3 S 7287 f 4507
\~O. \~\\ 1111 - l 1 ./ i ~ l I I 1\ /
_ , _ ~ . . - ~ -~ \,~ ~ \ \\111111 \\I /I ~ M1e~~° ,0~/ ~ / ~ I I I I III 1 11 1 1 j II ~ / ~ 1 ~ ~ u S 42ros 32 f 4823
` LS N 581458 E 56,17
TOWN UWTS OF LELAND ~ ,~1~11111I11 ~ ~~ vt B. 111 CQYDUIi/ I i I I I I I i ~ / / / ~~ ~ Ls N 5a3043 E 29.33
\ w ~ 1111\-i~0 ;w //~ I / I~ // I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 ~ 1\\\~ L8 N 6D~ 8 f zz.42
~ ~`&. ,)11= 1 j 1\1\1\y I I I ~\ \.,/ // I I I I- I I ~ I I~ \ \\\~ L9 N 7t~94s E zz1
N07ES
1. AREA COMPUTED BY COORDMAIE METHOD
2. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL
3. FOR REFERENCE SEE M.C. 26 PG. 342
4. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY IN AUGUST OF ?007.
5. 357 ACRES TOTAL AREA
6. THIS PROPERTY IS NOi LOCATED WITHIN 2000' Of AN
EXISTING N.C. GRID MONUMENT
LEGEND
ELP. = EXISTING IRON P1PE
E.1. EXISTING IRON
E.C.M. = EXIS7ING CONCRf1E MONUMENT
R\W = RIGHT OF WAY
C.P. = COMPUTED POINT
• WETLAND FUC
® SANITARY SEWER
WM• WA7ER METER
CO• CLEAN OUT
• CONDUIT
L/PA LIGHT POLE
WV w WRIER VALVE
P FIRE HYDRANT
,~ I I
~ ~r \\ t\ \ `\ \\ `\~\ \\\pNi I fh I l ~ l ~ l j"~j \ Z l
s'OR~f ~ Afa \\\\ \\ ~~ ` `` ~ \ \\__~R~C~'I~-I% / !~ I i I I I \ \1
~iy~ ~ ,~ a ~~~~ \\ ~\\ \\ ~\ \\ ~ -zr-~a3a'S~~t'r./ ~/~ ~ I i I I I I \\ '1111
~4 ~\~ \\~~ ~ ` -,- ~ i_,__-GR~° 1 1 11 1 I ~ ~ 11 IIII
~~\~~ ~ ~__~ = --'/'~--- --\ 1 111 111 1 I
n ~ ~ ~~ _--~ ,Atr-
11I~ I I
1
1 1
o ~ ~ _. T \ 1
CAMERON mACr w ~s ~ AT9~ S 85'4~9`N'~;~ `~ - ~~`,~\4\`~, j I\~~ I
M.B. 17 PC. 167 ~°J• -- _ - i
\ ,~ '-~ ~8• ~~-B--~Y\` ~ \`~,-/Alf I LINE BEARING DISTANCE
~~\ r~~~0~r ~A2~ ~~/III ~ LJ3 S 301146 E 25.00
,/ TOWN UMI1S OF LELAND
1
.1
~, '~ ~~' I
G~ A26 ~ ~ I
5?~6ti I
I
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
~~
50' 25' 0 ~ 50'
~~
scaE Ir FEET
/ '• ` 5-1~
TIE
nE
CURVE
Ct RADIUS
310.00 ARC L
10.7 CHORD 1.
10.79 CHORD BEARING
S 60'02 06 W
C2 285.OD 123.27 12232 N 46'3447 E
C3 335. 145.63 144.46 S 46'36 31 W
C4 425.00 121.94 121.52 N 387456 W
CS 375.00 124.78 124.21 N 39'43 43 W
C6 375.00 110.49 110.09 5 57'4207 E
C7 310.00 134.45 133.40 S 46'36 4B W
CB 425.00 24.26 24.27 N 55'03 02 W
HANOVER DESIGN SERVICES, P.A.
UND SURVEYORS ENgNEERS LAND PUNNERS
1123 FLORAL PARKWAY
WILMINGTON, N.C. 28403
PHONE (91°) 343-8002
FAX: [phone] L/
r• 1AU1,uUcAOONCI sao9 NEnANn 2007 Lots s-um~o.oWG
N
~~
~~
R~

,~
$~$te_ m
PROGRAM
March 5, 2008
Mr. Miley Evans
Sankey Properties, LLC
P.O. Box 847
Clarkton, NC 28433
Project: West Gate Best Western
08•0~>>
Expiration of Acceptance: September 5, 2008
County: Brunswick
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. if we have not received a copy of
the issued 40d PermitJ401 CertificationlCAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance wilt expire. It is the
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must. be made prior to conducting the authorized
work. The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
followin table.
Cape Fear
03030005 Stream (feet) Wetlands {acres) Buffer I

(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II

{Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Ri arian Non-Ri arian Coastal Marsh
Impacts 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0 0
Credits 0 0 0 0.16 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
Ifyou have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Kim Garvey, USACE-Wilmington
Chad Coburn, NCDWQ-Wilmington
Dana Lutheran, agent
File
Sincerely,
~~
Willie .Gilmore, PE
Director
~:Pfi~DYGK~... ~ ~ ~ Ou,Y ~i
... Prolb~c~
1~+fa.chrner~+ t3
(aaacw-~~,~~

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 /919-715-0476lwww.nceep.net

~-
O
February 11, 2045
Kimberly Garvey
US Army Gorps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Re: Request for Additional Information for Sankey Properties, LLC
Tract off 1 l7 Hwy South, Westgate Drive,lwestgate Shopping Plaza
Brunswick County, Leland, North Carolina
Dear Kimberly:
This letter is in response to your questions regarding the allocated parking for this
project.
The required 137 parking spaces were determined in this manner:
Minimum required parking spaces for the Town of Leland is one space for guest room for
hotels. Therefore 100 rooms times one space per room. equals 100 minimum required
spaces for the hotel. Minimum required spaces far the restaurant is one space per 150 51=
of gross leasable area. Therefore 5,524 SF divided by 1 SO SF equals 37 minimum
required spices. 37 plus 100 yields the 137 minimum required parking spaces per
ordinance.
Please see attached excerpts from the Town of Leland Forking Ordinance with these
figures shown.
The 150 parking spaces shown on the plan is a compromise figure, which is much Mess
than the number of spaces recommended for proper operation of the hotel. by Best
Western and of the restaurant by IHOP. The reconunended number of parking spaces by
Best Western Hotel is one space per room; one parking space for four seats in the public
areas, and parking spaces for employee parking and delivery vehicles. Therefore 100
spaces for :100 rooms is recommended, 72 seals in public areas divided by four equals 1 S
spaces, 20 employees equal 20 spaces. This totals tol3$ spaces recommended by Best
Western Hotel for the hotel only.
IHOP restaurants recommend 50 to $0 spaces for proper operation of their restaurant. If
we figure the rninimwn at 50 spaces, then ad+d it to the 138 spaces for the hotel, that
equals a total of 188 spaces minimum that are recommended by the franchises to operate
these facilities. We have therefore reduced the recommended minimum by 38 parking
spaces in an effort to avoid and minimize impact to wetlands...
v
-~...
t
13A HAMPSTEAD VILLAGE • HAMPSTEAD, NORTH CAROLINA 28443 • {410) 270-9778 • FAX [phone]A61
www.mcleodtarchitect.com • www.southerncottages.com • mrmcleod~belisouth.net
A R C H I T E C T P. A.

~-1-
O
We trust tl~ai this information will adequately demonstrate our reductions from our N
needed number of parking; spaces to minimize wetland impact.
Please adti7se if'you gave any other questions regarding; this letter or if you need
additional info- ic~i~ from. us,
Sincc;rely
Michael R. McLeod
ee: Miley Evans
Enclosures

~TICI_,E VIII. PARKII,'G, LOAI~INCi, DRIVEV-jAY AI\D SIDEWALK REQUIREi11I... I'a~e 2 of
feet
Next 15,DD0 square fee#, one per 340 square
Commercial wholesale, general feet
distribution, lumberyards, building Next 30,000 square feet, one per 400 square
materials and supply yards feet
Thereafter, one per 600 square feet of grass
leasable area
Dwellings, residential Two per unit
__
Hospitals and care facilities, excluding One per '12 patients, clients andlor recipients,
animal hospitals plus one per three employees
t_ibraries, museums, studios, clubs and One per 804 square feet of gross leasable
lodges area
Restaurants
bars and nightclubs One per 150 square fee# of gross leasable
, area a
Warehouses, manufacturing and all other fine per 2,75 employees ont he largest shift.,
nanretail uses plus one per eight managerial and office
employees on the day shift
~~
(b) The classification of uses shall be deemed to includ$ and apply to all uses; however, if the
classification of any use fcr the purpose of determining the quantity of parking spaces required
is not readily determinable under this section, then the classification of use shall be fixed by the
code enforcement officer.
(c) All parking spaces shall be paved with an asphalt andlor concrete paving material designed
and installed to withstand the anticipated forces of the proposed use, except single-family
residential driveways exempted from the paving requirements by section 30-276.
(d) All required off-street. parking facilities shall be permanent and not used far any purpase
other than the parking andlor storage of vehicles.
{e) All off-street parking faalities in existence at the time the ortiinanc+e ftom which this chapter
is derived becomes effective, up to the minimum required in this article, shall be counted toward
the existing uses thereby served and shall not be allocated toward new development.
(f) No portion of any street right-of-way shall be considered as fulfilling, or partially fulfilling, the
requirements of this section.
(g) .Each parking space shall be a minimum of nine feet in width and 18 feet in length,
exclusive of access drives, maneuvering area, ramps and other appurtenances.
(h) Off-street parking spaces shall not occupy any portion of the required minimum front yard in
residential use developments.
(i) Any nonresidential and multifamily dwelling use parking facilities shall be constructed and
maintained to conform with the following requirements:
(1) All parking facilitiies shall be graded for drainage of stormwater;
(2) All parking facilities shall be paved to withstand traffic;
(3) Each perimeter parking space shall have a wheel stag or guard to prevent
extension of the vehicle beyond the parking space andlor over sidewalks;
(4} Permeable surface areas shall be landscaped;
(5) Requirements of sections 30-274 and 30-275 mus# be satisfied, where applicable;
(6) Lighting and equipment shall not interfere with street traffic andlor residential uses;
(7) Entrances and exits shall be located so as to minimize traffic congestion on

http:Jllibr-aryl.munict~de.comlrncclDocView/133D2J1/l ]0!120 glgJ2pp'7

<Tit'I,ly VIII. PARKING, LOAf~IN~, L~RIVEV-~AY AND ~1DE~%ALK REQLI1REIvIE.,. f~age 2 Qf 5
feet
Next 15,OD0 square feet, one per 340 square
Commercial wholesale, general feet
distribution, lumberyards, building Next 30,OD0 square feet, one per 440 square
materials and supply yards feet
Thereafter, one per 600 square feet of gross
leasable area.
©wellings, residential Two per unit
Hospitals and care facilities, excluding One per 12 patients,. clients and/vr recipients,
animal hospitals plus one per three employees
Libraries, museums, studios, clubs and One per S00 square feet of gross leasable
lodges area
Restaurants
bars and nightclubs One per 150 square feet of gross leasable
, urea. ~
Warehouses, manufacturing and all other One per 2.75 employees ont he largest shift.,
nonretail uses plus one per eight managerial and office
employees on the day shift
~7
(b) The classification of uses shall be deemed to include and apply to all uses; however, if the
classification of any use for the purpose of determining the quantity of parking spaces required
is not readily determinable under this section, then the dassification of use shall be fixed by the
code enforcement officer.
(c) All parking spaces shall be paved with an asphalt and/or concrete paving material designed
and installed to withstand the anticipated forces of the proposed use, except single-family
residential driveways exempted from the paving requirements by section 30-276.
(d} All .required off-street parking facilities shall be permanent and not used for any purpose
other than the parking and/or storage of vehicles,
(e) All off-street parkfig facilities. in existence at the time the ordinance from which this chapter
is derived becomes effective, up to the minimum required in this article, shall be counted toward
the existing uses thereby served and shall not be allocated toward new development.
(f) No portion of any strut right-of-way shall be considered as fulfilling, or partially fulflling, the
requirements of this section.
(g) each parking space shall be a minimum of nine feet in width and 18 feet in length,
exclusive of access drives, maneuvering area, ramps and other appurtenances.
(h) Off-street parking spaces shall not occupy any portion of the required minimum front yard in
residential use developments.
(i} Any nonresidential and multifamily dwelling use parking facil#ies shall be constructed and
maintained to conform with the following requirements:
(1) All parking facilities shall be graded for drainage of stvrmwater;
(2) All parking facilities shall be payed to withstand traffic,
(3) Each perimeter parking space shall have a wheel stop or guard to prevent
extension of the vehicle beyond the parking space and/or over sidewalks;
(4) Permeable surface areas shall be landscaped;
(5} Requirements of sections 30-274 and 30-275 must be satisfied, where applicable;
(6) Lighting and equipment shall not interfere with street traffic and/or residential uses;
(7) Entrances and exits shall be located so as to minimize traffic congestion on

http:/llibrary2.municode.con~lrnccfDocView/I 330211 /l 10!120 gIgl2007

~'12T1C'1.11 VII1. 1'ARI:iNG, LOADINC-, DRI~~E1~~'/1Y AND SIDE1~'ALK RE(~t)11Z~ME__. page 1 nF~
7~d l~~ OF LC-Z.~},.~
ARTICLE Vtlt. PARKING, LOADING, DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS` J'
`Cross references: Parking, § 24-31 et seq.
State taw references: Authority to regulate parking, G.S. 160A-301 et seq.
Sec. 30-271. Applicability.
The requirements for vehicle parking, loading, driveway and sidewalk facilities shall apply to all
primary zoning districts unless otherwise noted in this article.
{Ord_ No. 02-21, ~ 1{art. IX {intro. ¶)), 6-24-2002)
Sec. 3~-272. Parking requirements.
All development shall provide parking facilities as specifically set forth in section 30-273. All
provisions for parking and/or storing of vehides shall be made entirely upon the lot and/or parcel being
developed, except in certain circumstances where parking may be combined due to the nature of -and
use, subject to the provisions of section 30-2?6.
{Ord. No. 42-21, § 1 {19.141 j, 8-20-20{12)
Sec. 3U-273. ©ff-street parkiing requirements.
{a) The number of off-street parking spaces, by land use category, is specified in the following
table:
TABLE INSET:
Use Category
Auditoriums, theaters, churches, funeral
homes and places of assembly One per three seats
Boardinghouses, hotels. roominghouses,
motels and tourist homes
One r uestroom ~`/ ~.aC J c1 d = /
business and/or professional offices One per 275 square feet of gross leasable
area
Firsi 15,000 square feet, one per 250 square
feet
Next 15,044 square feet, one per 34D square
Commercial retail, other general feet
businesses and personal service Next 30,040 square feet, one per 400 square
feet
Thereafter, one per 600 square feet of gross
leasable area
First 15,000 square feet, one per 250 square
http:!llibrary2.mu~~icode.com/mcc/DocView/13302J1 /11 81120
/~Jl~vin~vwr r~~v1 ,~~Y-r,~l+~r~ sus i,,,~,q„~r~,;
Number of Spas Required = 13
~p
8/81200?

!! {()P
!'age 1 of 1
~,kt
~~ (~~ t
~ -igrrry Into 5qc Ma
..
~ print i
SITE REQUIREMENTS
Crcneril ells trrtormati0n
1HOP Franchl!:e l)evebper6 Can devei0p new re;fauranffi in 6eVera!
ctanfipurationt
• Standard treestandinp INOP buridtnp6 of 4,970square feet antl seats
approximataty tt;4 people The;e are Iocated in chapping centers and
hiptnvay orrenled tocabon;
. Budd-out of txomrlaM and cap apace in a shopping osnlm
. Gonveraipn o1 existing improvements to an IHOP Restaurant
Damotlsh existing i+nprovements and build an IHDP prototype.
SNe Requfremerals
• Populcibn: 25,000 ro 50,OD0: 3 mile popuation 180,000 tp t 30.000 b
mile population
. TriMk CotMt4: Greater man 4e.D00 averape daffy uarrK
• Fras~way Traifle: Greater man 80.000 averape wly traffic
• tTeiaiUOffiat: DertstlY of releq, 0if+ce and hospitaic Ot approxlmatey 10,000 people wNhin t 10 4 rtalea. in additbn to the population base
PBrpckal RequfrsaterRs (tteestandinp uMC)
. 1.04 SFze: Approximatery 40.OD0.50,DOD square test for 6tand aitlr-e or 10,OD0-20,000 square feet M pad !; part of a shopping center
. Frontage: 130 Feet minimum
Daptlf: 2t30 Teal •!-
• Parking: 50 t0 BO spacac
tnili<y;3rrvtca - ~zoyu~7'~~~"~'' ~IK 1 i~ t.+wt ~~G
• Gsc: 2,000,000 BTUH
• Water ?" and 333 miMmum ticw pressure fee service d required by focal codes
• Elsctrk: 1.000 Amps i 401208 ;3 phase 4 wire
Sawsr: 0' tins minimum lateral
AcquicMbn Yehkls
The acqu~iiiam v~ehicie that an IHOP f ranChl9e Oevelapar wilt typically use, is to purchase or tease the property, npwever they may also 6ulld-out
urrfrnished erw t:ep space and convert existing improvear+enls
lease Terms
1HOP Franche!le Oavebpers typically enter info a fr-ple-ne! tease. with or willrout a wntribution hom tt-e Wndbrd. that has a base term of 40 years
and options extending W a total of 30 years
Prig d ImprovemeMc
The oosi of oDrl;irt6Ctlon for a atantlard INOP restaurant varies From market ro market, but is approx+matety 5700,000 t0 S1.OD0,000. which does not
include equipment or 6ipnaga
Hone I ItiOD I.otator I Menu ! Company 1rd0 17o0s~IHOP! 1 t°rarxhice 1M4 I Irlvester Info
Contact Info i Gtft Car6f i 1rlsldetHOP 1 t,acal SIDe t.ogin I vrtvscy Poscy 151tr Map
1Hpp Cpp, asp N aranC &vo Crrre++os~ Cn si~d.r.116 Tee 8!&2+t0~6pS6 F'ar etB~WJ.3131 a MDt~ Corp
http:/h;•ti-~~~~.ihop.com/index.php:~option =com_content&task=vie~-+~&id=1 l &Itemid=7 2I8J2008