HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160679 Ver 1_Public Notice|_20160802tV�� � �
i���i
US Army Corps
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
PUBLIC NOTICE
Issue Date July 28, 2016
Comment Deadlme• August 26, 2016
Corps Action ID Number• SAW-2010-00032
TIP No. U-3633
The Wilmmgton District, Corps of Engmeers (Corps) has received an application from the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) seekmg Department of the Army authonzation
to permanently impact 1,119 linear feet of stream and temporarily impact 186 lmear feet of
stream along 1 3 miles of NC 273 (South Main Street) to widen the road to a multi-lane facility
in Gaston County, North Carolma (TIP No U-3633).
Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached plans
This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site
at http //www saw usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatorvPermitPro�ram/PublicNotices aspx
Appl�cant: North Carolma Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Mr Philip S. Harris III, P E, C P M
Natural Environment Section Head
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
Authority
The Corps evaluates this application and decides whether to issue, condrtionally issue, or deny
the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of the followmg Statutory Authorrties
� Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U S C 1344)
❑ Section 10 of the Rrvers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U S C 403)
❑ Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33
U.S.C. 1413)
Location
The pro�ect is located along NC 273 (South Main Street) from Tuckaseege Road (at
Beatty Drive) to Highland Street (at A&E Drive) in Mount Holly, Gaston County, North
Carolina
p ����d�
D
� 'i1G-2� �016
L'�
JENR Ve'ATER RESOURCES
7RANSPORTATION PERMiTT�NG UNI?
Pro�ect Area. 1.3 miles
Nearest Town. Mount Holly
Nearest Waterways Frtes Creek
River Basm. Catawba River Basm (HUC 03050101)
Latrtude and Longrtude 35.285005 N, 81 023284 W
Existing Site Conditions
The pro�ect study area is located m the Piedmont physiographic region of North Carolma.
Topography m the pro�ect vicmity is comprised of gently rolling hills wrth narrow, level
floodplams along streams The elevations m the study area range from 600 to 700 feet above
mean sea level. Land use m the pro�ect vicmrty consists primarily of residential and urban
development interspersed wrth forestland along stream corridors
The Gaston County Soil Survey identifies six soil types wrthm the pro�ect study area mcluding•
1) Cecil urban land complex (CfB), Well Drained, Non-Hydric, 2) Chewacla loam (ChA),
Somewhat Poorly Dramed, Hydric, 3) Lloyd sandy clay loam (LdB2), Well Dramed, Non-
Hydric, 4) Lloyd sandy clay loam (LdD2), Well Drained, Non-Hydric, 5) Wilkes loam (WkF),
Well Dramed, Non-Hydric, 6) Winnsboro loam (WnB), Well Dramed, Non-Hydric
Two terrestrial communrties were identified wrthin the pro�ect study area.
mamtamed/disturbed and mixed hardwood forest. Mamtamed/disturbed areas are scattered
throughout the study area m places where the vegetation is periodically mowed, such as roadside
shoulders and residential lawns The mixed hardwood forest community exists m the middle of
the project study area.
Waters wrthin the pro�ect area are located m the Catawba River Basin (H[JC 03050101) There
are no Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Qualrty Waters (HQW), or Water Supply
Waters (WS-I or WS-II) wrthm 1 0 mile downstream of the pro�ect area. Streams that are
impacted by this pro�ect mclude Frtes Creek (Index #ll-121-(1), Classification WS-IV) and
three of rts unnamed tributaries. Stream determmations wrthm U-3633 were conducted usmg the
field determination method outlined m the 2010 NCDWR Stream ID Manual. Personnel wrth the
U S Army Corps of Engmeers (USACE) and the North Carolma Division of Water Resources
(NCDWR) verified the water resources on September 28, 2009 An approved Jurisdictional
Determination (JD) was issued by the USACE on May 4, 2010 (Action ID 2010-00032) An
addrtional intermittent stream (SE) was identified in the field m October 20 T3
The Catawba River (located <1 Om downstream) is currently listed on the 2014 Final and 2016
Draft 303(d) list of impaired waters for PCB Fish Tissue Advisory
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The purpose of this pro�ect is to mcrease system capacrty and improve efficiency along NC 273
(South Mam Street) for local and regional traffic, thereby improvmg mobility
2
NC 273 is the primary north-south facility for local commuters servmg the City of Mount Holly
from Interstate 85 in east central Gaston County Traffic volumes are expected to almost double
by the design year of 2035 on this segment of NC 273 2011 traffic volumes along the pro�ect
ranged from 18,215 to 24,485 vehicles per day (vpd) In the design year 2035, traffic volumes
are expected to range from 31,600 to 42,300 vpd. If this segment of NC 273 m Gaston County is
not widened, it is expected that traffic volumes on the pro�ect will exceed the current capacrty of
the existing facilrty by at least 100%.
Project Description
The NCDOT proposes a four-lane median-divided facilrty along NC 273 (South Mam Street)
wrth curb and gutter, sidewalks, and a wide outside lane to accommodate bicycles Proposed
improvements will mcrease the right of way width to 120 feet. A raised median is proposed for
the entire length of the proposed project. Median openmgs wrth bulb outs will be constructed to
provide U-turns for trucks between the West Catawba Drive/East Catawba Drive mtersection and
the Carey Street/Cloisters Apartment Entrance intersection. No driveway control of access is
proposed for the project.
All intersections will remain at-grade intersections A raised median is proposed along the entire
length of the proposed project and will limrt the existmg full movement condrtions at the
numerous private dnveways and the followmg two-lane side streets that mtersect NC 273 (South
Main Street), Lowe Street, Sunset Drive, Stoneridge Drive, and Nutall Drive Bulb outs to
accommodate U-turns are located between East Catawba Drive/West Catawba Drive and the
Carey Street/ Cloisters Entrance intersections with NC 273 (South Main Street) The sections
below describe the proposed improvements to the following mtersections
• The intersection of NC 273 (South Mam Street) and South Main StreetBelmont - Mt.
Holly Road will be converted from a right m/right out wrth a left out to a right in/right out
intersection. A concrete median will limit turnmg movements and prevent left turns from
South Main StreetBelmont - Mt. Holly Road.
� The intersection of�NC 273 (South Main Street) and Forest Hills Drive will be converted
from a stop signed controlled full movement mtersection to a right-in/right-out
intersection. A concrete median will restrict traffic to right-in/right-out turn movements.
• The intersection of NC 273 .(South Main Street) and East Catawba Drive/West Catawba
Drive will be converted from a full movement mtersection to a left-over type mtersection.
A raised concrete median will limit movements to left turn mto those streets from either
direction.
e The mtersection of NC 273 (South Main Street) and Carey Street/Cloisters Apartment
Entrance will be no longer be a right-in right out with a left-out intersection. The
proposed improvements include a raised concrete median that will restrict traffic to right-
m/right-out turn movements
The proposed pro�ect will result m 1,096 lmear feet of permanent stream impacts, 23 linear feet
of stream bank stabilization, and 0 03 acre (186 linear feet) of temporary stream impacts. There
are no wetlands within the pro�ect footprmt and there will be no impacts associated with utility
relocations for this pro�ect. Below is a summary of each of the seven permrt site locations
Permit Site 1 Water from stream SE will be routed into a 36" and then 42" remforced
concrete pipe (RCP) to converge wrth the pipe carrying SB under YS As a result of the
reroutmg at the inlet end of the 36" pipe, there will be 15 lmear feet (lfl of permanent stream
impacts and <0 O1 ac (141� of temporary stream impacts to SE.
Permit Site 2 As a result of the reroutmg of SE into a 36" and then 42" RCP, the portion of
the channel east of the existmg road will no longer be carrymg the flow from SE. This
permanent dewatermg will result in 145 lf of permanent stream impacts to SE (these impacts
include 43 lf of SE that currently flows through a concrete-lined channel)
Permit Site 3 The 42" RCP currently carrymg stream SB under YS will be replaced and
realigned with a 54" RCP This pipe replacement and channel shift will result m 68 lf of
permanent stream impacts and 0 O1 ac (26 l� of temporary stream impacts to SB
Permit Site 4 The 42" pipe currently carrymg stream SB under Y6 will be replaced wrth a
54" RCP with a headwall. This pipe replacement will result m 7 lf of permanent stream
impacts, 10 lf of stream bank stabilization, and <0 O1 ac (21 l� of temporary stream impacts
to SB
Permit Site 5 A new 60" corrugated steel pipe (CSP) will be installed to carry stream SB
under the new fill slopes resulting from the road widening m this location. This 60" CSP will
result m 484 lf of permanent stream impacts, 13 lf of stream bank stabilization and <0 O 1 ac
(42 1 fl of temporary stream impacts to SB
Permit Site 6 The existmg triple-barrel remforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) will be
extended on both ends to accommodate the widening of NC 273 This culvert extension will
result m 228 lf of permanent stream impacts (94 lf on tlae inlet side and 134 lf on the outlet
side) and 0 02 ac (68 l� of temporary stream impacts.
Permit Site 7 To accommodate the new roadway slopes resultmg from widening NC 273,
steam SD will be relocated to the west. This relocation will result m 149 lf of permanent
stream impacts and <0 Ol ac (15 lfl of temporary stream impacts to SD
Avoidance and Minimization
Accordmg to the applicant, they have avoided and reduced impacts to streams to the greatest
extent practicable Specific examples of avoidance and mmimization measures mclude
To avoid impacts to existmg outfalls, drainage from the proposed roadway is separated
from the existmg srte drainage.
Hazardous Spill Basins will be utilized for stormwater discharge entering Fites
Creek smce rt is wrthm 0.5 miles of a Crrtical Area (CA) and the Catawba River
which is a primary water resource
The extension of the RCBC carrying Frtes Creek will be supplemented with a 66"
pipe to assist wrth floodplam conveyance and accommodate the new roadway
typical section.
Sills and low flow benches will be utilized m the RCBC extension to maintain a
low flow channel passmg through the center barrel of the culvert.
Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be utilized durmg construction to
attempt to reduce the starmwater impacts to receiving streams due to erosion and
runoff.
Compensatory li'Iitigation
The proposed pro�ect will result in 1,096 linear feet of permanent stream impacts, 23 lmear feet
of stream bank stabilization, and 0 03 acre (186 linear feet) of temporary stream impacts. There
are no wetlands wrthm the pro�ect footprmt. The USACE is not requirmg mitigation for the 23
linear feet of stream bank stabilization.
The applicant proposes to purchase credits from the NC Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS) as compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable functional losses to the aquatic
environment resulting from 1,096 lf of permanent impact to streams NCDOT proposes to
mrtigate for the permanent stream impacts at a 2 1 ratio
Essential Fish Habitat
Pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, this Public
Notice imtiates the Essential Fish Habrtat (EFH) consultation requirements The Corps' initial
determmation is that the proposed pro�ect would not affect EFH or associated fisheries managed
by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marme
Fisheries Service
Cultural Resources
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the lead federal agency for this pro�ect and
approved a Categorical Exclusion (CE) on August 27, 2012
The State Histaric Preservation Office (SHPO) noted there was one district of historical or
archrtectural importance withm the general area of the pro�ect and recommended further
evaluation of this district. A field survey of the Area of Potential Effects (APE) was conducted
for the proposed project by an architectural historian pursuant to Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act. All properties withm the APE were evaluated for National Register
eligibilrty The architectural historian concluded that no properties within the pro�ect's APE were
considered eligible for the National Register of Historic Places There are no National Register-
listed or Study Listed properties withm the pro�ect's APE. On September 15, 2009, the SHI'O
concurred that compliance wrth Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act has been
completed for this pro�ect.
The Historic Preservation Office (HPO) noted that there are no known archaeological srtes
withm the proposed project area (correspondence dated June 17, 2006) and recommended no
addrtional archaeological mvestigations Therefore compliance with Section 106 of the National
Preservation Act m regards to archaeological resources is complete and no further action is
necessary
Endangered Species
Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Corps reviewed the pro�ect area, examined
all information provided by the applicant and consulted the latest North Carolma Natural
Herrtage Database Based on available mformation
❑ The Corps determmes that the proposed pro�ect would not affect federally listed
endangered or threatened species or their formally designated crrtical habitat.
❑ The Corps determines that the proposed pro�ect may affect, not likely to adversely affect
federally listed endangered or threatened species or their formally designated critical
habitat. The Corps mitiates consultation under Section 7 of the ESA and will not
make a permit decision until the consultation process is complete
� The Corps is not aware of the presence of species listed as threatened or endangered or
their crrtical habrtat formally designated pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(ESA) wrthm the project area. The Corps will make a final determmation on the effects of
the proposed pro�ect upon additional review of the pro�ect and completion of any
necessary biological assessment and/or consultation with the U S Fish and Wildlife
Service and/or National Marme Fisheries Servtce
Other Required Authorizations
The Corps forwards this notice and all applicable application materials to the appropriate State
agencies for review
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). The Corps will generally not make a
final permrt decision until the NCDWR issues, denies, or waives the state Certification as
required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500) The receipt of the application and
this public notice, combmed with the appropriate application fee, at the NCDWR Central Office
m Raleigh constitutes mrtial receipt of an application for a 401 Certification. A waiver will be
deemed to occur if the NCD�VR fails to act on this request for certification wrthm sixty days of
receipt of a complete application. Additional mformation regardmg the 401 Certification may be
reviewed at the NCDWR Central Office, Transportation Permittmg Unrt, 512 North Salisbury
Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260 All persons desirmg to make comments regardmg
the application for a 401 Certification should do so, m wrrtmg, by August 26, 2016 to
NCDWR Central Office
Attention. Ms. Amy Chapman, Transportation Permittmg Umt
(CTSPS mailmg address) 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
0
r�
(physical� address) 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
North Carolina Division of Coastal Mana�ement (NCDC1Vn.
Based upon all available information, the Corps has determmed that this application for a
Department of Army (DA) permit does not involve an activity which would affect the coastal
zone, which is defined by the Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Act (16 U S C§ 1453)
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts
mcluding cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will
reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit
which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced agamst rts
reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be
considered mcluding the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics,
aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife
values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use,
navigation, shorelme erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water
quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral �needs, considerations of
property ownership, and, m general, the needs and welfare of the people For activrties mvolving
the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the
impact of the activity on the public interest will mclude application of the Environmental
Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines
Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public, Federal, State and local agencies
and officials, includmg any consolidated State Viewpomt or written posrtion of the Governor;
Indian Tribes and other interested parties m order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this
proposed activity Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engmeers to
determme whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permrt for this proposal. To make this
decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water
qualrty, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above.
Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to NEPA. Comments are also used to determme
the need for a public hearmg and to determine the overall public mterest of the proposed activity
Any person may request, in writmg, w'ithm the comment period specified in this notice, that a
public hearmg be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearmgs shall state, wrth
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearmg. Requests for a public hearmg shall be
7
granted, unless the District Engmeer determines that the issues raised are msubstantial or there is
otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearmg.
The Corps of Engmeers, Wilmmgton District will receive written comments pertment to the
proposed work, as outlmed above, until Spm, August 26, 2016 Comments should be submitted
to Steve Kichefski, Regulatory Pro�ect Manager, Asheville Regulatory Field Office, 151 Patton
Avenue, Room 208, Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006, at (828) 271-7980 extensiom 234
Comments can also be emailed to steven.l.kichefski(c�usace.army.mil
:
���"a`:a i i �i�i�4'���1
![i►nr����/f� i��v/�
r�1�lI�11 �* l.r� ���+���
r,d,,
- �,
� /�
i.
a � !f
J �
�.,, , � z' .. I�I
k�G�1D pG30OdC�C�4 _ � �.,�� -. - - �---�� ..w _ ---_� �,
- �;' ��;f f -- /.
\�1� �8����+ K'GL�n'q,tE �73 + � j� �
�.�('� �`9ilr, Aj� �i `�-J
Rtounl H
� `'`' '`!!1! �
' 9G�,
r -
-,
��Gt
'���� �
Q,�, �
. ��� �
� � t
�v'�°' �
�' �Z �l�u
Co3C�C�0�1 pG30OdC�C��
,�
m
sT
r
�ao,-ta -�_
I3etu3r�iit PtEtna��i
`�M�T:=;HOL�L-�Y
�g��,;�,,,t
oF �� �4q
,i� � 9 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
" • OF TRANSPORTATION
z DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
� � PROJECTDEVELOPMENTAND
9��eNTOFrRp�54oQ~P ENVIRONMENTALANALYSIS UNIT
By: J.TORTORELLA
.�,
�,
c
�N
��
`E - 1 , `--
ss ;s � �
; r ,r �_
i %
� ,
y'
� o ��
o � �
I
, o %'1
�j�Tlt•
d f 1
i
� �
tJf /
1` �
� �!
�
� �q
r ;y
� �
� �.
�. �,�� �
''��' l
�
i�
i'
i
� ! 0 1,000 2,000 4,000
3 i
i �
�
, Feet
�
VINICITY MAP County GASTON
WIDENING OF NC 273 Figure
(SOUTH MAIN STREET) FROM o��• iz TIP# U-3633
TUCKASEEGE ROAD TO �
HIGHLAND STREET AT A& E DRIVE Wes 37649 1 1
MOUNT HOLLY GASTOM COUNTY Date. SEPT 2011
TIP PROJECT U-3633
M
M
�O
M
�
U
W
O
�
�
�
See Sheet 1-A For Index af Slsels
See Sleel 1� Fo� �omenl�na, S�mbal�
Sae Sl,eef 1 or urve� on �o sr.�a
� � \� � � ��) � ��� ��� � � � � � � � �„ �, (�� I � � � ��
I
0
0
0
�
—
—
�
�
�
r� � ���,
:r:;if M
1r' �,��j�
I�h:+j
��
—L— J LH. llf t 6J.UU
� �
U GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA
V, So 35 Q So �ap ADT 2014 = 26,800
' ADT 2035 = 42,300
�� PLANS ' K = 1D %
� D = 55 %
� so a�s o 5o t4o T q
V = 50 MPH
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) TTST =2 DUAL 2
Ol0 5 Q l0 2o FUNC CLA55 =
URBAN COLIECTOR
U PROFILE NERTICALI REGIONAL TIER
THIS IS NOT A CONTROL Of ACCESS PROJECT -L- STA. 91 + 00.00
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MT. HOLLY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
ARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
PROJECT LENGTH rnvorec r ns anw ar, N7'DRAU/JCS ENG7NEER
LENGTN ROADWAY i.I.P PROJECT U-3633 = 1.365 MI DIVISIONdeOF HIGHWAYS
AO SPEfJfIGRONS
LENGTH STRUCTURE T.I.P PROJECT U�633 = 0.005 MI
RIGHT OF WAY DAT&: JAMES A. SPEER. PE
TOTAL LENGTH OF T.I.P PROJECT U-3633 = 1.370 MI rn �acrcNcrnucx ROADWAY DESIGN
NOVEMBER 25.2014 ENGlNF'FR
LETTING DATE; NYA BOAYUE PE
JANl1ARY 77.2077 P"""���fGNPN01N�"
�
PRELIMINARY PLANS
`0 M011 M
C�
i
i
'�1 4~`
�r �o
• �
CITC lt1
100' �' �OD' 200' S00' JI I L ]TY
� DENOTES IMPACTS IN PERMIT DRAWING
SURFACE WATER GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET 2 OF 11
Scale: 1" =100'
� ��'� :���::,. .:.
��i����
_..,.�:�,.��. _---�-�=���-�a�.:::s
- ■��r��
�'—['i���
'�'i����
��r�r
1 �'� �� �
:1� -i:• isrl
��'�S�l�'/J,►i�..�l�
- ���/�����
�\�I . ����r`+i�AixX�cA&'B
/ t �,I • � ����
�C:r F - ,_Ir �
�
�'
�I
,00 -Y4- A
IST. R/W W
� 4
/ ly
;oNj��I
�I
z
N
N
O
PL COR:�` �''
EXISf.R/W ,
_ i =�
DETAIL 4
STANDARD BASE DITCH
�Nollo Scole�
Noiu�al util
/ SITE #1 `��°° D M1` `"°°� SITE #2
d
Ge enila B Min 0=1,5 F.
Ma� d=2.5 F.
B- 5 FI.
T e of liner= Class 1 Ri -Ra
I E E E RFM FXICT !'R —
F- 052
�G 36
- -�-= -_ - -�-�------ --- ------
��- �-
��n�e�s= - - '
� �
-���� �� � .�..
�`ii��� _`��;.
��
�■�?-��:, � -�,� .�
—��� i--+"� ���--.
�._c! Lf�LJ?uti t'G�"—C4��''.:
1� J�_J.__�� �—\� ��
, � �� r_��'��� �
��'U�..�:..,� � � � S:i[•Jl�:ty:"J1� L
��^�a�1/ . .. .. . . .. :..,.. , � �`•�s��-
i ����lI7������ w��1•��{I'�� � �
ln�-,�� s. ��r \i���
. 60' "
y� PUE �
�i,J:�Q
�..,, -----_---- v - +IO `L y p +40 -L-
2 E F _�- �__ CONC PAVED DITCA\ Q' � '� �� CB �5" RC V d 60, '
� ' q8 E� F 2 CB �� _
q JB H m � E
� � c F 6 I�° s
+90 _�_ REM. PAVED DITCH 36' R � ' EM. X�S D\�
6a —Y5— P� Sto. 17+8l.67 I� D E .4� .�.II o �F ��
n U p e
0' vi Z R I J S wn � • TL-2 � p �/�I �€}�
a O x II FP Qv �- 1'pQf} x�
2V RETAI PAVED DITCH // � �U I qz� RCp ��\�� ��
� // .� 5' ase D tc
ee Det il4)
x 48' CHL x ' // � EMOV �� �'
B' PVC g. p +8/.67 —Y — �O %/ � I � �--
�� EXIST. R/W � ii w tF� ''� m, '� p�F Q �
SS� .-. i/ / I� / I T /]� A I 11 TI �
�DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
�DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
��� `� ���� SITE #3
ENLARGEMENT �wa�
� �
so• o• So• oo• �o• PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 4 OF 11
GR4PNi[ SCPLE
Scale 1"=50'
'' I' _F E-� � ' ��PUE F / � ,
�} � +52 +20 -L- ' /
100' � ��
105'&l00' a'
� +22 +30 -Y6- y .• � F S
isFo �g 60'&95' EXIST.R/W 6 ��
Z � t32 . . . . . . . o0
+81.67 - 5- D 95' !OS' � �
B57' �
'�, EXIST.R/W OECM — — Stq �� 'rJO ECM ll , I l
se �h}�h END NT�� �/`"� /� '
Detail4) � � �� ' /
ll� I �� .
z x o �� � o ��j ,
� , I" ' �i
� ~
H CI�� � � I ' F
py� �
� �_ _ �� Q I .\
s
S \ _vc _ or P OP TEMP P �i' • �-1 � m , � ,
"�,//y�� V� E
�� � 0 -L-
60'
xi �
�o
Q +80 -Y6-
EXIST. R/W o
0
00 00
60• N
+
-Y6- PC �G�`� o
sta. ��+�958 QB�Tq�e�
o yf
>}Q. � `'`' o.
i ae F� �9,-
TEMP
Y
SEE DETAIL 16
STANDARD BASE DITCH
W/CL I RIP—RAP
�L "" `"' �
750' UNIFORM TRANSI
(U—T�J�1 LN.)
io W
��
� �J:
�
-L- POT Sta. 44f45.42
-Y7- POT Sta.17+88.38
DETAIL 16
STANDARD BASE DITCH
� Na� �o s«ie)
Nnlural Nalural
� Ground �.� �y� Ground
d �
�Replace Exisfing 42' Pipe � `_ �� _ �G�a=, - - - _ _ _ � �eoee.r�l� g Min. D= 2 Ft.
p�I� Max.d= 4 Ft.
with 54' Pipe w/Headwal y`� x---_, ___ when e ts > 6.0' B= 5 Ft.
�I. 1 � . � Std. No. 876.01
—Y6— P�T �,' I1 , �1 '- . Type of Liner= CLASS I Rip-Rap
Sta. 14t30.65 {� j 1 � o
–Yb–Sta.14+15.0 � I II� y —�--______
END PAVEMEN �
� I I ��� a°�
SITE #4 ���� ° �� °° o�
ENLARGEMENT ;��■�
�DENOTES TEMPORARY Na
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER so• o• so• ioo� iso•
CNAPNiC SCALE
�DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER Scale: 1" = rj0�
—Yb— STA.13+68 RT
AT PIPE OUTLET
SE
TC
Wi
18
40
-DRI-
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 5 OF 11
=L
SITE #6
�
CITC 1L7
�:
_�.
�DENOTES TEMPORARY ,.�
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 6 OF 11
ioo• o• ioo� zao• �oo•
�DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER GqdPHIC SCdLE
Scale. 1"=100'
���������������������������o
■■■■����������������■■■■■■ .. ', . '�
• �� � - �� � �� � � ■■■■ � .
■■�■�iiiilii�illiiiii�iriliii�iriiliirii�li`ii■
■���■�� �� ���i��� �� �����■��■■
■��■��■�■■�■r������■���������■
■■��■■■■■�;�����:i■��r.■����,._ .�.■
■�■�■�■■�����������■��■����■■,�■■■
;� ..:..., ,....:,
� �;� :s;�..�::�—
■■� . � �■■■.�������\�■■■■.I■■ . .. ... ,— .
��■.. .� .., ����������������������■����■
■��������� �=;��;��=� ��■�■������■���
■■��.,�����: �: �"����� ..�. .������■■����■■■
��■�r��������■��������■■��=����■
■■�■�■��.����������■�■■�������■■
■�■��■■�■���■■��■�■■�■�■■■■��■
■��■�����■����■�■■��■�������■■
■�. . ,������ .�������■����■■■������■
��■���iiii�.������►��� .::r-.��■�■�■■��■■■��■■
� � ,►:; ��
•;1:::. �:''
■�� • ����yIIIB::;:����l�►�,::�111�::; ��■■�■���������
■����.ii`�►�I�l�li� �'��'���`` ■■■■�■�■■■■■��■�■
- ■■ =�I�ii��������<�': �',��������■■■■��
: �■■��I�����i�ii��i��l■■�■■�■�■■�■■�■
J 1 1 L 'f/" J -�- s�a. so+az er.
¶� j� �� � j� j[a }�p AT PIPE OUTLET
1C'" 11� 1L1Le �Y\�
�DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
�DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
ENLARGEMENT
� � � � � ---1
Scale: 1"= 50'
�9y �o�
�jP
� � PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 9 OF 11
�/�l �, �
'"'„'GJ CONC B.F� I
�
�` 9�C �-�.
�--��
E F—
FROM STA.54+40 LT TO STA.54+55 LT
FROM STA. 55+48 LT TO STA.55+63 LT
�DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
�DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
SITE #6
`4' BASE TAIL DITCH
SEE DETAIL 13
�- PDE �
.. r., . \\— � ic I I I Y�
JL 1LA � i V V � IL.J V V
So. DENLARGEMENT ,00• Iso.
snavwc scaie
Scale: 1" = 50'
0
� r" �E E�
��PUE` ' � p� �
FROM STA.53+56 RT TO STA.53+76 RT
FROM STA.54+06 RT TO STA.54+31 RT
on � PERMIT DRAWING
�,,9 SHEET 10 OF 11
/DO
S
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fiilln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (FromfTo) Size/Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands inWetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 31+77/31+92 LT-L- 36' Inlet Stub Out <0.01 <0.01 15 14
2 34+69/36+12 RT -L- 36"Pi e/42"Pi e 0.02 145
3 18+34/18+75 -Y5- 54" Pi e IN/OUT <0.01 0.01 68 26
4 13+63 -Y6- 54" Pi e IN/OUT <0.01 <0.01 7 21
4 13+63 -Y6- Bank Stabilization 10
5 45+94/50+65 RT -L- 60" CSP Pi e 0.06 <0.01 484 42
5 50+80/50+93 RT -L- Bank Stabilization 13
6 53+80/54+29 RT -L- Culvert E�ension 0.04 0.02 134 53
6 54+08/54+36 LT -L- Culvert E�ension 0.03 <0.01 94 15
7 54+54/55+37 LT-L- Stream Relocation 0.01 <0.01 149 15
TOTALS: 015 0.03 1119 166
NOTE: 43' of Site 2 is paved ditch.
Rehsed 3f31lOS