The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20160737 Ver 1_Redwood Bend Road permit application_20160729i'Ffll i 5�J 07'tQ tt'afl july Z9, 2416 Mr. jahn TY�a�rnas US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Dr. Suite 1Q5 Wake Fc�rest, NC 27615 SUBJECT. Natianwide Permit #3 RepEace pipe carrying UT ta Go�f Creek (Class C) WBS pxoject �to.: 9.2(38511 Stokes County, NC Dear Mr. T�ioma�, PAT McCRORY Gavernor N[C1-[OLAS J, "f�NNYSC?N Secretary We are reques�ing a Nationwide 3 permit for replacement afa pipe carrying an UT ta Goff CreQk (Class WSI1� on l�edwood Bend Road (no 5R number) in Stokes County. � have attached a pre-constructian notification applicatian, a topagraphy map with the project area circted, project plans, and 'No Survey Required' farms from NC�QT` Cultural Resources for Historic Architecture and Areheology. '�he project will permanently i�npact 64 linear �eet {24'-energy dissipater, 15'-bank stak�ilization} and ternpararily impact 25 Iinear feet (dewatering) af the UT tt� t�e GflFf Creek. '�he existing pipe is 4$" pipe that is perched approximately 5' above the strear� bed. Exist�ng di�ches are concrete and have undermined. The new p�pe will be a 60" pipe aF1;he same length. The t�evv pipe wil9 remain perched and will not be buried, and an energy dissipater pad wil2 b� i�stalled at the pope outlet tfl cantral vel�acity. If �h�:e pipe was buried and the perch e�iminaied, the s�ope of the ch.anne] would %e 7.3°fo, whieh wauld result in instream instability. Ditch lines will be regraded and lined with rip rap. The culvert s�te will b� dewaterer] during construction in accardance with NCDOT's Best �ianagement Praetices, The LiSFVIfS lists Schweinitz's sunflower [Heii�rnthusschweinitzfi) and Small-anthered bittercress [Cardamine micran�hera) as endangered and Northern Lang-Eared bat [NLEB- Myotis sepCentrianafis] a� threa�ened for 5tokes County. There is no habitat fbr the I�orthern Pang-ear�d �at ar �chweinitz's sunflower in the �praject area. The pi-oject is in the Yadkin River basin whic� mear�s there°s na need to survey for Small-antherec� bittercress. Therefore, it was determEned that Chere will �e 'no effect' on ScYtcveinitz's 5unfiower, the Srnall-anthered �aittercress, ar the Northern lang-eared bat. �I�fath�ing Compares�,� Stafe oSNorih Carulina � bcpartmenl of TransporsaCion j Division 9— CQNSTRUCTION 37S Silas CreeR Parkwsy � Wirsstnn-Salem, NC 27127 (3361747-7800 T � (336}703-6643 F By copy af this let��e, we request Marla Chambers, NC Wildlife Resources Comrnission, ta corrzment directly to the Corps concerning the pet�mi# requesi. Na vwritten perrnit is requested From NC Divisian af Water Resaurc�s. However, condition number requires notiiication iFthe pipe is cannat be buried due to topographic constraints. Please accegt this letter as the na�fication. If yc�u have any questians, comrnents or need additional infarma�ian after reviewing this mafierial please contact Amy Euliss at (33b) i47-78{}0. Thankyou fnr ynur c�aperation in this matter. 5in erely, Amy uliss �ivisian Envirflnmental0f�cer, NCDOT Division 9 Attachments: Applicatir�n Package and plans CC: Dave Wanucha, I�CDEQ-DWR, Environmental Specialist- e-copy Phil Suggs, Division 9 I�oadside Environmental Engineer- e-capy Chuck White, Division 9 Bridge Maintenartce Engineer- e-copy Daniel Harne, Division 9 5tokes County Maintenance Engin�er-e-copy Marla Chamber�, WRC- e-cQpy �F V � ATicp '� -, ;_1 , Q� OG �f�1C0 I1S@ �fl�Y: �''i�j,-;� i,' � � Corps adion 1D no. �� I�,I Q �''` DWQ project no. `- ==--_.� Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN} Form A. Applicant Information 9. Processing 'I a. Type(s) of appro�al saught from the Corps: 1 b. Specify Natianwide Permit (NWP) number� N�N 3 1c. Mas the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? X[� Section 4Q4 Permit or General Permit {GP) number. 0 Section 10 Pe�mit ❑ Yes [� No 1 d. Type(s) of appro�al sought from the DWQ (clieck afl that applyj: � 441 Water {�uaGty Cerkification -- ReguEar ❑ Non-40� Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notificafian so�ely for the record For the record only for DWQ because wrilien approval is not required? 401 Gertification: ❑X Yes ❑ No 1f. Is payment into a miiigatian bank ar in-lieu fee program praposed for mitigation of impacts? Cf so, attach fhe acceptance le#ter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is #he project located in any of NCs finrenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h befow. ih. Is the project located w�thin a NC QCM Area of Environmental Concem (A�G)? 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: PipEr replacement on Redwood Bend Road 2b. County: Siokes 2c. �[earest municipality 1 town: King 2d. 5ubdi�ision name: NA 2e. NCDQT anly, T.I.P. ar state project na 9.208511 3. Owner InfomtatEon 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCODT Di�ision 9 3b. �eed 6oak and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC i# 3d. Street address: 375 Silas Creek Parkway 3e. City, state, zip: Winston Safem, NC 27127 3f. Telephone no.: 336-747-7800 3g. Fax no.: 336-7Q3-8fi93 3h. Email address: pivey@ncdot.go� For the reoord only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes ❑X Na Page � af 10 PClV Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Informafion (if di#ferent fram owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ,X(] Other, specify: �F� 4b. N�me_ Amy Euliss 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. 5treet address: 375 Sifas Creek Parkway 4e. City, state, zip: Winston Salern, N� 27'l27 4f. 7elephone no.: 336-747-78a2 4g. Fax no.: 336-703-6693 4h. Email address: aeuliss@neda#_gov 5. AgentlCvnsultant tnforntat�an (if applicab[e) 5a. hfame: 5b. Business name (if applicabEe): 5c. Street address: Sd. Gity, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fau no.: �g, Email address: Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 1 b. Site eoardinates (in decirnal degrees): Latitude: ��30762 �,Qng�u��: -8Q.337993 1 c. Properfy size: "� acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Goff Creek 2b. Water Quality Classificafion of nearest receiving water: WSIV 2c. River basin: Yadkin Pae D�e 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of ihe project a� the time of this application: Existing site is a pa�ed secondary road in a residential setting. 3b. List the total estimated acreage af all existing wetlands an the property: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet af afl existing streams ('rntermittent and perennial} on the propertyr: 80 3d. Expiain the purpose af the proposed praject: Replace extsting 48" pipe with a 60" of the same length, Install an ene�y dfssipater to cantral velocity ansi repair eroded ditchlines 3e. Qescribe the overall project in dekail, including the typa of equipment to be used: standard construction equipment will be used. 4. Jurisdictianal Determinatiores 4a. Mave jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the � y�� 0 Mo ❑ Unknown Corps or Sfate been requesied or obtained for this property / ro'ect ineludin all rior hases in #he ast? Comments: 4b. ff the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, wha# #ype � preliminary ❑�inal of determination was made? �4c. If yes, who cEefineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): �ther: 4d. If yes, list the dates Qf the Corps jurisdictional determinations ar State de#erminations and at�ach documantatian. 5. Project History 5a. Ha�e permits or certificafions bee� requested or ob#ainec! for �yes � No ❑ Unknown this proje�t (inc}uding aIl pri4r phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detaif accordfng to "help file" instructians. 6. Future Project Plar�s 6a. Is this a phased pro�ect? ❑ Yes 0 R!o fib. If yes, explain. page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts lnventory 1. Impacks Summary 1 a. 1Mhich sections were compieted below for your project (check ali that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams --tributariss ❑ Buffsrs ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pand Canstruction 2. Wetland Impac#s If there are wetland impacts proposed an the site, then complete this question for each wetiand area impactecl. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of impact Type af wetland Farested Type of jurisdict+an Area of number Corps (404,10} or impact Permanent (P) or DW4 {4�1, other) (acres} Tem ora W1 - Choase one Chaose ane YeslNo - 1/V2 - Choase one Choose one YeslNo - �3 - Choose o�e Choose one YeslNa - W4 - Choose or�e Chaose one YesMo - WS - Choose one Choose ane YeslNo - � - Choase one Choose one Yes/!da - 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 2F�. Commertts: 3. Stream Impacts lf khere are perer�nial or intermittent siceam impacts (inc�uding temporary ir�pacts) praposed an the site, then complete this question for al[ stream sites impacted. 3a. 36. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream irrEpact Type csf impact 5tream name Perennial (PER) or Type of A�erage Impact number intermittent (IN�? jurisdiction str�:am length Permanent (P} ar width (linear Temporary ('n (fest) feet) S� P Fill Ul" to Goff Creek P�R Corps 412 • 24 S2 P 5tabil�zaiion U7 ta Goff Creek PER Corps 4i2` 15 S3 T Fill UT to Goff Creek PER Corps M2' 25 S4 - Choase one - - S5 - Choase one - - S6 - Choase nne - - 3h_ Total stream and tribuEary impacts 64 3i. Comments: Stneam is approximately 4' wide at inlet and approximately 12 wide at outlet. Stream is overwidened at outlet due to perch and unstable ditches. With pipe rep[acement and energy dissipater insfallation, sEahility at outlet witl imprave. Since perehed pige is an ee�cisting aquatic passage bartier, pipe qurial is nat proposed. If inlet was buried and laid af grade, the pipe slape waufd be 7.3 %, and would resulk in instability upstream of khe pipe. Page 4 of 1 Q PGN Form — Version 1.4 .lanuary 2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic �cean, ar any other apen water ofi ihe U_S_ then individuall list all o n water im acts befflw. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open wa#er Name o# waterbndy impact num6er (if ap�licable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or type Tem ora 01 - Choose one Choase 02 - Choose ane Choose Q3 - Chaase one Ghoose 04 - Choase one Choose 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pand ar Lake Gonstruction lf ond or lake constructEon ro sed, then cam lete the chart below. 5a_ 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Pond ID num6er Praposed use ar Wetland Impacfs (acres) Stream lmpacts (feet) Upland purpose of pnnd (acres) Flooded Filled Exca�ated Flooded Filled Exca�ated P1 Chaose one p2 Choose one 5f. Total: 5g. Camments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard pertnit rec�uired? � Yes � No If yes, permit ID na: 5i. Expected po�d surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pand watershed (acres): Sk. Method of construction_ 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If praject will impact a protected riparian buffer, then corrrplete the chart below. If yes, then indi�idualiy list all bufFer impacts 6elow. If an im acts re uire miti ation, ihen ou MUST fiil out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse � Tar-Pamlica [] Catawba � Randleman ❑ Other: 6b. 6c. &d. 6e. B�F. Bg. Buffer Impact Reason far impact 5tream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2 number— mitigation impact impacf Permanent (P) or requirecf? (square (square Tem ora feet feet B1 - Yes/No B2 - YeslNo B3 - YeslNa 84 - Yesl�Jo B5 - YeslNa B6 - YesliVo 6h. Total Buifer Impacts: 6i. Camrnents: Page 5 of 10 D. lmpact Justi�catian and Mitigation 1. Arrai�ance and Minimization 1 a. Specificaliy describe measures taicen ta avoid ar minimize the praposed impac#s ir� designing project. Exlsting site conditions are unstabie. Avoidance and minimizaGan measures involve designir�g an energy d9ssipater to control outlet �eloaties and designing ditch lines ta control erosion. 1 b. SpecificalEy describe measures #aken #o avoid or minimize the propased impacts thraugh construction techniques. NCODT BMPs form 5ediment and Erosion Contral will be utilized. 2. Gom ensato Miii ation for Im act�s to Waters of ihe U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Daes the project require Compensatary Mitigafion far � Yes � No impacts to Waters af #he U.S. or Waters of ihe Stafe? 2b. ]f yes, mitigation is required by (checfc all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mifigation aption wilf be used for this ❑ payment to in-lieu fee program project'? ❑ Permittee Responsi6le Mitigation 3. Com lete if Usin a Miti ation Bank 3a. Name of Miiigation Bank: �ype; Choose orte Quantity: 3b. Credits Purr.hased (attach receipt and letterj Type: C�oose one quantity: Type: Choose one Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Gom lete if Makin a Pa ment ta In-lieu Fee Pra ram 4a. Approval Ietter from in-lieu fee program is atiached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using streatn r-nifigation, stream temperature: C�aase ane 4d. Buf€er mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigatian requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittea Responsible Mi�igation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, prauide a descxiption of the praposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Fom1— Version 'i.4 January 2008 6. Buffer Mitigation (5tate Regulated Ripanan Bu#fer Rulesj — required 6y DWQ 6a. Will the project resuf# in an impact within a protected riparian bra#fer that requires bufFer mitigaiion? �] Yes ❑ No 6b. If yes, then identify the sGuare feet of impact ta each zone o# the riparian bufFer that requires mitigation. Calculate the artraunt af mitigatian required. 8c_ 8d. 6e. Z��e Reason fot impact Total impa�# Mu�tiplier Required mitigation {square feet) {square feet) Zone 1 3{2 for Catawba} Zone 2 1.� 6f. Tota! buffer mitigation required: Bg. If buffer mit�gation is required, discuss what type of mitigatian is proptis�d (�.g., payment to pri�a#e mitigation hank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment info an apprQved in-fieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 1 U E. Starmwater Management anc! Diffuse Ffaw PEan (required by DWQ) 1. Qiffuse Flow Plan 1 a. �oes the project indude or is it adjacent to protected �iparian buffers identified � Yes XD No within one of the NC Ri a�ian Buffer Protection Ru{es? 1 b. If yes, then is a cfiffi�se flow plan includecf? If no, explain wMy. � Yes � No 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overaN percent imper�iousness af ihis projeci�? o�, 2b. boes this ro'eet re uire a Stormwater Mana ement Pfan? ❑ Yes � No 2c. 1f this project DOES NOT require a Stormwa#er Management Plan, expEain why: There vuill be no new impervious surFac� as a res�lt of the project. 2d. If this project [3�ES require a Stormwater Management Pian, then provide a brief, narrative descripkion af the plan: 2e. Who will be responsible for the r�view of the Siormwater Management Pian? NA 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local avernmenYs 'urisdicEian is this ra'ect? ❑ f'hase 11 3b. Which of the following lacally-implemr�ntecf stormwater management programs � N�W apply (check afl that applyj: ❑ USMP � Water Supply Wa#ershed '] Other: 3c. Fias the appro�r�ed 5tarrnwater Managemen# Plan with proof of approva} been ❑Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ S#ormwater Pro ram Re�iew �Coastal caunties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the follawing state-implementecf stormwater management programs appiy �pRW (check a[I #hat apply): ❑Session Law 2{}06-24fi ❑ Qther: 4b. Has #he approved Stacmwater Management Plan with proof of appraval been � y� ��a attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit 5tormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Managemeni Plan meet th� appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ Na 5b, Have all af the 4f}i tJnit submit�al requirements been met? � Yes � No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Uersion 1.4 January 2Q09 F, Supplementary Information 1. En�iranmental Documentation (DWQ Requirementj 1 a. Does ihe project in�olve an expenditure �f pubiic (federallstate/local} funds or the ��o use af pubEic (federallstate) land? 0 Yes 1 h. If you answered �yes" t� the above, does the project require preparatian af an en�iroRmental document pursuani to the requirements of fhe National or State ❑ Yes []X No (North Caralina) Environmentai Policy Act (tVEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered °yes" to khe above, has the document re�iew been finalized by the State Clearing Hause? (If so, attach a copy �f �he IVEPA ar SEPA finai appro�al letter.) Minimum Criteria Checkl�st was developed fnr the praject. MCC is not requir�d ta be � Y� ❑ NCl Comments: �viewed by the St�te Clearinghouse. Z. Violations ([3WQ Requirement} 2a. Is the site in vioEation ai DL'VQ WetEand Rules (15A NCAC 2H .05Q�), fsqlated Wetland Rules {15A NCAC 2H .130D), DWQ Sur�ace Water or Weiland 5tar�dards, ❑Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (95A NCAC 2B .020Q)? 2b. Is this an a$er the-fact permit app�ication? ❑ Yes X[] No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one c�r both of the above questians, prov"rde an explanafion of the violation(s}: 3. Cumala6ve Impacts (DWQ Requiremen#) 3a. Wiil this project (based on past and reasonably antic�pated future impacts) resuft in � Yes � No additional de�eiopmen#, which could impa� nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yesA to the abave, su6mit a qualitative or quantitative cumulati�e impact analysis in accordanc:� with the mosk recent �WQ policy_ Ef you answered "na," pro�ide a short narrative descr�ptian. Indirect and cx�muiativs impact analysis is expected for pipe replacement. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement] 4a. Clearly detaif the ultitnate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge ar discharge) of wastewater generated from N� the proposed project, or a�ailable capacity of ihe subject faci{ity. Page 9 of 10 PCiV Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habita# (Carps Requirement) 5a. Wiil this project or,cur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes 0 No habitat? 5b. Flave you checked with the USFWS concerning �ndangered Species Act � y�s �X No impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the IJSFWS Fie6d �ffice you hav� aontacted. - 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered 5pecies or Designated Critical Habitat? NG Natural Heritage data 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement} 6a. Will fhis project occur in or near an area designatetf as essential fish hahitat? ❑ Yes j�]X No fib. What data sources did you use to determine wMether yaur site would impact E�sential Fish Habitat? 7. Historic or Pr�histaric Cultural R�sources {Cor�s Requirerttent) 7a. Wrfl this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal ar tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes ��lo status (e.g., National Histarie Trust designatio� or properties signfficant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site woulci impact historie or archeolagical resources? NCDQT Human Environrnent Unit reviewed the project for effects. lt was determined that the�e would be 'na e6fect' on Archeology or Historic Architeckuce_ Reviews are ar+ailable upon request. 8. �laad Zone Designation (Corps Requirementj Sa. Will this pra�ect nccur in a FEMA-designaied '100-year floodpiain? ❑ Yes 0 No $b. ff yes, explain haw proj�ct meets FEMA requirements: NA Sc_ What source(s} did you use to maice the floodpiain determinatian? IVC Ftoodplain mappirrg � Amy Euliss, DE� Divisian 9 �!�� 1 ApplicantlAgent's Printed Name lica er��'s Si9nature Date (A nYs signature is valid mnly if an authorizatian letter fi om the a licant is ro�ided. Page 14 of 1 fl i i ♦ . � � / / ' ,' FLOW /� roNS PRQlECT REFERENCE N0. SH��T Nfl. R,�DW�DD BEI�D PIPE 4 R�W SHEET N0. � R�AbWAY b�51GN HYI3RAlll.ICS ENGINEER �NGIN��R �NCUMPLE�`E PLA►.N5 ❑D 1�IDT USE F�R � W ACQUISITIDN DQGUMENT NQT CDNSIDERED F1NAL UNLESS ALL SICsL�LATURES COMPLETED D ETAI L B RIP—RAPP�D �N�RGY DISSIPATOR POOL [LJLVERT C�II��I�:�I�:T�, � 10' POOL fJ:z�7�1�� ' BE'�M CLASS II RIP RAP � � r SiREAM 8E❑ / .L_. �CCAVATI QN � DWNE�4F AME PIN * PD� �4�4Ea ow a o rn�a y� RQNNIE J, GALLt�1aRE 69�3�5385�8 585 SQ. F r, BYLD�IA1 1NC. 69�3a4536465 2551 SQ. FT. Prepared Jn tl� Dffic�e of: ��PAR T'MENT �F TRA�SP�R TA TI �� 37S SIiAS CREEK P#WY, WINST�,N SALEM, ,NC .27.1.27 2�1,2 STANDA.R.I3 SPEC.IFICATIUNS REDwO�❑ gEN❑ R❑ P�PE APP. BY DI57: ENG. �ATE PR�fECT' .11lAME AAP. BY DI� TR4FFIC ENG. DATE W.D.KU11�iBER 7�oa��6 NTs�[ SR 1254 R�DW�OI7 B�NI] ROAD ��ED CHECRED BY 5R # IRQAD NAME 6/I6/I6 �xW� ST4KE5 �'QU'�'T'''�7' DAT'E DRAWN DRAWN BY SCA.�E 1 " � 20' � Switch Basemap Add Resources _ • tr� ti= o��` � �� I __-- =_1,�vi1�Fa I - � __-- - r' � _CresCw�c.v Dr — — — — � _ - � — — � � � - e'�c?�rqr,�r� , ! h ='> `�r, � � �..,R..,,q,,. 7 . �_.rr,T�. II �4I 3 � v 'g c� � m - �>, � � p O x f - - -- 01� _ � , a , -- , � ' pipe loeation � � , ,, � - � � � , , 5tate of Nort Project Tracking No.: 16-07-0019 oa�� NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM �� ,,�.,__:� .� ��.�;:.: . This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not ,��: , �� ;��► �.. . -- � o�� valid for Histaric Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the ;� e ¢: �;�.:.:.....� ��`�C�-. '� Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. .� � Q. . PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: na WBS No F.A. No. 9.208511 na Pederal Permit Required? County: Document: Stokes MCC Funding: � State ❑ Federal � Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NR'P 3 Project Description: NCDOT Division 9 intends to replace a pipe under SR 1254, Redwood Bend Road, for an unnamed tributary of Goff Creek, south of Mount Olive. The pipe failure that had been discovered during a routine paving contract will require the installation of a wider pipe and a new energy dissipater. These changes will require the acquisition of permanent drainage easements along the unnamed tributary. For the purposes of the archaeological review, an area of potential effects (APE) was created based on the extent of the project illustrated in the preliminary designs submitted with the Request for Cultural Resources Review form. This APE is estimated to encompass almost .78 acre (nearly 32 hectare). f.Yi1u 1►� /\:7'LI]�1[�11�i1:7\ If:7 x.Y�ll�3N �.Y'7 �►�/11�.�/ Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: A review of the site maps and files archived at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology was conducted on July 19, 2016. No previously identified archaeological sites are recorded within the proposed APE, nor are any archaeological sites recorded within .5 mile of the proposed APE. An examination of the data presented on the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service reveals that two recorded historic properties are located within the same radius, including: the James William Moser House (SK0371) and the James William Moser II House (SK0372). Additionally, the Timmons Cemetery is depicted on topographic mapping of the area. It should be noted, however, that no historic properties are recorded in the vicinity of the APE. An examination of soils in Stokes County presented on the National Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey indicates that two soil types are represented within the APE: Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded (CeB2); Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded (FpC2). No further archaeological investigations are required for the project within the boundaries established for the current APE. Should the project change to include a larger footprint than covered by the current APE, further consultation will be necessary. In the unlikely event that archaeological remains are encountered during the bridge replacement, work should cease in that area and the NCDOT Archaeology Group should be notified immediately. "No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 1 of 3 Project Tracking No.: 16-07-0019 Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that theYe are no unidentifzed historic properties in the APE: Most of the proposed project falls within the existing disturbed right-of-way (ROW) for SR 1254. Those areas that include temporary and permanent easements for the project appear to fall within areas that would be considered to have a low-potential far significant archaeological resources: areas with relatively steep slopes or eroded and deflated soil profiles. These small areas are very unlikely to contain archaeological resources of significance. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: � Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence � Other: http://websoilsurvev.nres.usda.�o, v/a�p/WebSoilSurvey.aspx; preliminary design FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST NO ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED L • - NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST July 27, 2016 Date "No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 2 of 3 Project Tracking No.: 16-�%-0019 Q ��] 1��1 240 Feet-x . a, , , � �= a'�'� . � 4 � +( �,'� r � � ' -.R1� � ..v �-,t��."��1 � . ,..James :�:+illiarn falcserHause`II ' j �`^ 'tB � .ij r'R, . � -O.. j� �� 4r/ � � � 4 ,� ' .Y" 2` �- �,�+ ° . ' ,'_ ��''.� '.� '� s� , ( .� �y`5 . � . `,��r .. q'' . J � � ,..{�'. �G �,=� �w � ..�,'i�. - . .,�' �,� :r� ;A/ >�r� l�y�`,. k . �"' ❑ r �" �' �'��1� : , � "�� a �'� r�_ i„ � , �� t , �� ` � �F� �r,� , �j�,r _ �'�i�,. � ,� � . u :-� ,� � _ r �� s g I �� , -�_ ,�� ,� � '�.� �' � � �� ;.�" � ' ,�, � - ,, � . �, '� 4' �; ��, .. C" I �' e�T' #� ;; ,a � : ��'"�-_ _ - - � '�: � ` � .. - , �e-,' � �+ �?i;�, � y' � ^ ,�' .:�� , ..: � � � � i�,+� . t�' � . �, .�r , �,r f , :� �:;� � - � _ . . — ��,r �+� f ; ,�_ � ,�.� � � � � . . +� � � �, `,� �,, � � � � �� ,. . , , � ��. ., � . _ _ p � . � M �. ��: ��, �" ` �;, � '•�� '� _ � - `. ,�� y � �� ,��' � � "� � �, � ��^ ] R , .i .y I� ?i� y � ' .. : � �r I ' 'I'" � 1 •�.A �1 �� _ a� �. � ��', �" � � t � .� � ' f �� " 1 f� �r �`�...0 � �f'� y�W��'` }ldr a ��+ 'y � � �j • M ��` p` ,F 4 ��'Y� ��F� � '� � �I��E�S''�+ �� 5 } 1� , � � ' ;+ � �� . � ��v ��!"` A. � °` . - - � '; - '�e`�F � . ' ' � ' ,� . -s � f' �,Y� S 6 M � �'1�• . �: - • �' . § � �. f r - ' � . 4� N� ��' ��. S '� z,� ��. � ��'j � w � ' '� Ir �... r i t cY� �%''� � 4 � �t+. �:: � ` , � + �:, }, i � M �q� � IG � .:-e * � . � �t� "ie. �Lf. � l�F�FM. �° M��{j �a , 't J� '�� I' �, °� �� i�� ` '� • i � /� � a" � � y�' + . A a+ i� j ;w :�,"y� � ��iY�t'k� 1� , �"r� � aFY �' 1 �� =---I, � tl.�� d gp� � f r � � 1 f ' �, . l ` * TlR�' �•�. � �, .,,�'��i �% v !'�.i +�'Y�'' � � ` w "`� �, f � r ��7�'ri'' � _ �,1 a` i .�� _ �.5 � � .; t � ' � '�r }'' � r� I � , �°,f �� ` ::.� t P,r�." ��r "'�" , • + r �" � + � � � � f � � ' � � l' '7�` �4`j� � � � 1 � . .� �` � � ' I�� r�� + ��} � J i�p� r f �,{t ! `` � .� ,� � F� ' �]+a �:� � x �, +r'+ s ,�� . � : , i � � ,,� � . � , . i � ,-r �r �,� � � r P 'ri r��.:4 Jj � ! 1. db _ �r +'t t+a.f ..i y�r+ �}. �yF' �'�`��'�� . �� . '�. .�, ...1"�J • `� + f� - � _ 1� y �, 1� � � t,��r t+ -�1 �1 ,� ' } r ��,_�[�` - }��' � 'i . �z . � '.,, � e'+;. P� �� I Iy + ��,' �� . _ i �,1+ ., 5ir ' �„ - . - I '�.., '.. � . , ' . _' �W� . A . . 9. - f � r �'y� �-t r ' '� f - ' . � � � . ''�A� .. � . ' `�'' r t : �: t % • y �aT ' '�!`�, `$��'�., �". ,� � ' -• . . � ,1� .;;�"� �a '1��. y� __` .�•t� t�.•'� .' °. i {...., i � r Y.'�� _ f � ' . . � �ir y5�0.a�F � . �ti `-0� . k -. f, , , ' � . � . ' t.°' . � �' � y i� 1G , � � �� F r ""`' a l� F,� _ � �n � ~y �'!` � �§e1rµ 3 �, �-w��," � ,�F . ' :- _ �� . � . � - ' ' \ .. � � ,~ � �� , . « Y' ��.___��//��}}} . `�� . � r, '_J� M��' . "�'F 9 � � - �� `� � �� "� , . , . , ,� - ` . . _ �; � �� ! ✓ r �� 4`a . .' � : y . - r � ' � ��'�� s .. �+' . - T � .. . _ . . . . - - � _ - - �,...� � t, � �.� Y �'iaM'J„ Y' �3, .a _ - _ � f . F ''�t�� a�5r � �- = . _ _ ,�, ' Aerial photograph with 2-foot and 4-foot contours illustraring the location of the proposed pipe replacement at the unnamed tributary under SR l 254. No ARCfIAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED" form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualifted in dhe 2015 Pr�ogrammatic Agreenien[. 3 of 3 3 Soil Map—Stokes County, North Carolina � o (Pipe Replacement on SR 1254) o N N 559390 559400 559410 559420 559430 559440 559450 559460 559470 559480 0 36° 18' 30" N � i , �, I� �;. . I I - I a .,, I _ I— -, T. . I —� 36° 18' 30" N � � I i � , �: ` . .�i �, a �_ N ' n+ 1 � o . _ . , , � y '� � r �e.+� o W w M 1 �� vt Y y � � , . .� � d.� �i . � � � ° r i ' � � �� ,� � � �� I , i` - , I � , 1,. ; � — � '� / � ' I' „Y. � � X• � n�� r�i � � �•y `—w _ V � W o a � � - �� r. •' • ,� T s � � _� a � � � A � o II j" r. o � _ r � � _ m ry'�� 'I' i � � 7"_` �, � o - ' r � ' i � � - ni � � � o �� . u I�.�, 9 _ .�„ � " N � y i� — W � �. '�..�� . X II ' ��.� I. . �� y � A . �� O � �` � � w— � ,�`'; .�J � 1 r� .� � � m .e o � � r'� — °� V 2, `' � � � � T� _ i' . � � �� . � �I � " ' o . . � .;.y � � ��. .'r,. ._ O O OJ — I 2� �i �M � ,� .- :� : — � F�� V �� ..�f �+il . - ' V , -r �• �. L � � � ' 0 � � � . , � �- � � � O �� f ' ' � , � ' , `i — W 0 i � W �y, I ; V +� + y c r � � • l" �� 4 «. ( I� �F � � ��i Y. 1 r " ! !� - .. i .y �. R Y � . � �� y� �� r � I � . W ' � :� -�pr �- O .r � �, � � ; ��i' N } �A . _ � o � ,.�, � . � � e � �� 7 � !g.y � N • M �- � � � � - V � - 1 � ' � �� • ' . . ��+ � . � ?' . � � � I� �..� ��' 4� iu i �� 4 '��'.:� , n °� — � " � � i i� . � r � � � '� �l �` `� �_'� � . � , �— � o ,� � ! ` � .� . # � �, �. ' 4" �. � �� t. �� " � ��M' � � � ' � �... s � I f .- �, � � A � ' �: "�' „ � � J+ t e _ tl. o � h . ti ..� �,.,� ' - ' � � . - - . . � . o o— �� ,�� ' y � � � � � �� F,. Y� � -� � — � a �"� � � I • � , � � �� , � y �-M' ,�I � , � . t ��i , r 1` �! � � y. /��w � � - � .,� .N: , ; � Y �f�l� �. �6 M� 4� � �#, M . ` � � � � o N � y � r . d� ti k.� '� :� - � y in i i � �I � � — M , � �... � � + I V `� � �� ' � ,� ��`� � � dd d� � �r;M � �.'ti y+w''�� ti � � �,� , �. , �' � � ,�; • � � � �-� ��, � v � �J� �� 9 r�,� �, �'�� k �,i ' � " ` i' ' ' � N � � �. co ,A��L• �[ � �� '� ,t ��'�' � � � 1 ' �r a• 1�� _� w "�'' . � `� '�', ri p;, �� 1'e � �;� 'w 3 � C � �q '�. a ! � � p �+er t � �?� "�,' ,� � ' -� 'f�' ��1� ''�� ' {I � �; � w � �� _ ; � �� ,�"� . '" _ �� # i � '�� y, ' �e k - � � - ` � ,�,� �� , � � � � � s' � � � � _� � � � �' � ��, � r� � 1A �' ''r ¢ � " �: � 1� � ' � �� ,�+ p. � ' �'� o * ' '� 4f . � a 0 Y �J .. � `My � ,. . s � , F . ,r � �'I � � �� `� �� .,f - + N�.��. 7�.�� _ � _ � 1 �F. � x��_ �14 a_1�� i 36° 18' 25" N I '� �' I I '� I • I ' � 36° 18' 25" N 559390 559400 559410 559420 559430 559440 559450 559460 559470 559480 3 3 6� v o Map Scale: 1:668 if printed on A port�ait (8.5" x 11") sheet. o Meters � N 0 5 10 20 30 � � � 0 30 60 120 180 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 uSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/27/2016 � Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons � � Soil Map Unit Lines 0 Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features �} Blowout �i Borrow Pit � Clay Spot Closed Depression �! Gravel Pit k, Gravelly Spot �t Landfill �� Lava Flow �, Marsh or swamp +� Mine or Quarry � Miscellaneous Water �� Perennial Water _ Rock Outcrop � Saline Spot , Sandy Spot � Severely Eroded Spot ' Sinkhole Slide or Slip yoo� Sodic Spot Soil Map—Stokes County, North Carolina (Pipe Replacement on SR 1254) Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot , Other •� Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation t++ Rails � Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background � Aerial Photography MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Stokes County, North Carolina Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 16, 2015 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 11, 2011—Mar 3, 2011 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. USDa Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/27/2016 � Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map—Stokes County, North Carolina Map Unit Legend Pipe Replacement on SR 1254 Stokes County, North Carolina (NC169) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Ce62 Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 0.4 45.8% percent slopes, moderately eroded FpC2 Fairview-Poplar Forest 0.4 54.2% complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded Totals for Area of Interest 0.8 100.0% U��a Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/27/2016 � Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Projecf Tr•ackiMg No. {InEerucrE Use� i �-o�-ao i 9 HISTUI�IC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES Na SURVEY I�EQUIRED FURM This form c�nly pertains to Historic Archite�ture and Landscapes for this project. It is not r�alid for Archaealogical Resources. You must cansult separately with the Archaeology Group. PRf),IECT INFC}RMATION Project Na: Couraay: Stokes WBS Nn.: 9.2�$S 11 Document MCC T e: Ferl. Aid lYo: 1'dIA Funding: State Federal Fede�al Yes 1'do Permit NWP3 Permit s : � �(�s � Froiect Descr�iption: Replace pipe with new pie on SR 1254(Redwoad Bend Rvad} SUMMARY OF HISTURIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW Description of review t�ctivities, resul�s, and conclusi�v�s: Re�iew flf HP() quad maps, HP� GIS infarmation, historic designatians roster, and indexes was undertaken on January 8, 2016. Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS praperties in the Area of Potential Effects, which is lOQ' from the pipe ea�h way and 50' from the cen#erline each way. A survey site, the James William Moser House, falls flutside of the APE and will not be affected. Two mid-20t�' century houses, one brick and one wood frame, sit in the northernmo�t portion of the APE. The ranch hames are unremarkable and not eligible for National Listing. There are nv National Register listed or eligible properties and no sur�vey is re uired. If desi n lans chan e, additional r�view will be � uired. N'hv t{ie auailahle information p�ovides a r�elitrhle basis fo� reasvr�a6lv nredr'ctinp that there are no unidenti�erl siPni�ca�t Itistoric archatecturrrd or l�n�lscape resaurces in the proiect area: HPQ quad maps and GIS infarmatian recarding NR, SL, LD, DE, and SS praperties for the Stokes County sur�ey, StQkes County GISITax information, and Google 1Vlaps are considered rralid for th� purposes of determining the likelihaod Df historic resources being present. There are na National Register listed or eligible properties within the APE and nv sur�ey is re�quired. SUPPURT DOCUMENTATION Map{s) ❑Pret�ious Sutvey Info. ❑Photos �Correspandence ❑Design Plans FINDIN� BY NCDUT ARCHITECTURAL H�ST�RIAN and Land�capes -- N(} SURVEY REQUIRED NCDOT Architectural Historian Date Hisloric Arclaileclure and Lorutscapes NC) SURYI3Y I�L•'�]UIlUs'D farni jor Minor 1 ransporraiion Yrojects ns �Jualifrec! rn ti�e 10�7 Progmmmntrc Rgreeir�enl. Page 1 af 4 F4�,`t�� ane IieNily, LLC � v J� v ti ?• _°x U Z Q ti I�inoak �r � G��n��s �fl '�[i � o� 0 a ? d � ,� ;� Ridger,rest fir L � 0 � Tiatfac f � � Il:f�� Melisse L �,S�rhech � � AflaclnsurenceAgent ! s� � '�' �4 �yJ 4��? ro � � 7 c3. Q` ,�y\�'t� � / �t ��4 R��'a�d I3end Projeci Locatian. I.aure� G�,SrRa otie�G��s��,b �a (� �ld Yu��{ �arrp fict d Uakley's Con+renience 2 li Redwoad fiencl a n w s� z � 66. � u.5 I lib�ck�i '++ l��aaci�. Lian � h�aque9�nque t1 aa� hSexicFn Gsill Q,eti C7a gIB Nf.S70YlC Al'L'Ii1lL'Cl71YC [771fII.t1ilFI.4('(7�J�.ti NC�.StliiYi:YHI.�+�f�ff�ISJJJ?Ylli fOYA��(3107' I�PA7i.S]1a7'PRifUtf f�7'OfG'Ct.F R.S �)P/{�%jff8fl17l1lii' If�Ii% }'rp�,rr�ri�i�rrrric ARr�eerrsenl. Page 2 of 4 0 , n �. + , � , ; �. � �� r � �+p`'1�' ��,�� t F"� F — , _ .. -- �r, . � r a ", . y�+�. i,n�,_� �. �� , li', .� " � . �';,{'F^Z,.. i n �._d.., .t _- , �i . ' � � _ _ ..�. �� . t ��.f: ,� r; $. �, �,I � , �� , �, +�„ .a tk �t ��' � � r,�ft" t f � �1 4. � � i $ • �� b r �+' � ,p � � i r illi�N• ;�. w t. ``. iS.`,�i i �__ �,.�It �, t• �� R . �1�� 4; � ��t '�� ,� #._ r!� � R ! � � r y� �.,,; �1� �� j{,.�. - � � �'i+ P�., t I '��! I �� i r` p i '1 � t `r� u� S r Y` �4� k"�S i p � 1i �, Y� �K 1 � A� � ' ,¢yai ./ � � � , � + ' r-.. s '' �, �.. (.�„ � � �% ,��.� I � �� F ' � � ; ,g ,� J�y .f F� � Jr J`, �; r � �`' " ' ;- V� �;� ' � � �, �, r ' ..� � � f � F � ` �`,` . A'' � � N , ,, �`•''' ,�` , ., i . � y ��i Y-+J � at , - ��'� 1��i�: i � � 'I � �� '`' � ��l -.' �Yi _ ,�' � .., li , � .i�� r,1,;4 1°.-} _..,K�'I�t '.�,,� ,: ��.�� . . F ; �.' ,, yc � �q 1. � . .- � , � "5`. y�':�� F. . � '�r �t �� ; ,�'les� �� 4�}��, � >.! 3��.� 4 �F � q �f � '� e� "` �'` � � ` �`'�' �, - y: _ . , ``a. a � � �,,` t,'• �'� �f s ��'�y� �r � � �� , i� .*��. `j � b,'F " '� � � � ��g�}�,�,� +� ' .� _ � v�;.'� `� ai': � "� � ,1. ti�i. � . � �i[?i) t�TS, Hislaric Arehifee(rrtr mxl f,aird.rcnpes h'C) S(1!{V13Y Rfs{7UlRlsl) jnrrra jo�• Mi��c�r 'i'rrrns�orlulra�r !'rvjc ef.r rrs �7ur�lrfrrri in fl�e 2(IQ7 Prog+nn+rranfrc rlgr•eet��rv+1. Pa�e 3 of 4 Google Stteet View looking nortH. Two Houses not aligible fat NIR listing. Hralanic Arahiu anu•e mid,6andsaapus NO SU/IVLIY REQUIIU�IDJarni JorMina� i Traiis�� italran Fb•n c cts a.i Qimlified in IhEi 20(la Fb�<grauronalrc AF�rnemenl. Pagei 4 af 4