20080440 Ver 1_401 Application_20080308

CIL15. H. SELLS, I N(:.
February 26, 2008
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Eric Alsmeyer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
RE: PCN Application for Section 404 NWP-29
Proposed Bhangoo Property Residential Subdivision
Guess Road, Lebanon Township
Durham, NC
Chas. H. Sells Project # 08-4019
Dear Mr. Alsmeyer:
PRINCIPALS
STEVEN W. SMITH, P.E.
SUSAN K. FASNACHT, P.E.
MOSE D. BUONOCORE, P.E.
THOMAS NOVELLINO, C.P., P.P S.
SENIORASSOCIATES
C. ROSS MASSEY, P.E.
DAVID K. BRUBAKER, P.L.S.
DAN E. BREWER, P.E.
0 8 0 4 4 0

On behalf of Bhangoo Development LLC ("the Applicant"), Chas. H. Sells, Inc. ("Sells") is filing
a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application requesting permission for a Section 404
Nationwide Permit 29 (NWP-29) to conduct jurisdictional activities within "Waters of the U.S."
at the referenced site. We are also delivering five (5) complete copies of this application to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), 401 Water Quality Certification Unit
Office in Raleigh.
If you have questions or need more information, please contact either me or my co-worker Tom
Rouse at 919-678-0035.
Respectfully submitted,
Ch s. H. Sells, Inc.
Budd Titlow, a ral Systems Group Leader
Professional Wetland Scientist (SWS #754)
Enclosures: PCN Application forNWP-29 (1 copy) p ~~~~~~ D
Copies: North Carolina Division of Water Quality (5) MAR 1 0 2008
Mr. Chuck Hill, Coulter Jewell Thames (2)
DENR -WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
15401 Weston Parkway • Suite 100 • Cary, NC 27513 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone] • www.chashsells.com
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOY"ER, M/F

CHAS. H. SELLS, INC. TRANSMITTAL
15401 Weston Pkwy, Suite 100, Cary, NC 27513
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
To: Eric Alsmeyer Date: March 7, 2008
Company: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Project:: Bhangoo Property
Address: Hand-Delivered CHS Project #: 08-4019
Re: PCN Application
FOR YOUR:
D Approval ^ Use ^ Information ^ Review & Comment ^ Record ^ Distribution
WE TRANSMIT THE FOLLOWING:
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
1 2/26/08 PCN Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit
5 2/26/08 Delivered to NC DWQ for parallel review
uENU - ~var~~ e~u~urr
REMARKS:

Cc:

Office Use Only: ~ a Fo ®e~ion4lvl~ch 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing ~ ~ T
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: -------
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP-29
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Bhangoo Development Company LLC
Mailing Address: 115 Pond View Court
Apex, NC 27523
Telephone Number: 919-303-7152 Fax Number:
E-mail Address: Bhangoo_Jharmal_S(a,cat.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Budd Titlow, Professional Wetland Scientist/Tom Rouse, Environmental Scientist
Company Affiliation: Chas. H. Sells, Inc.
Mailing Address: 15401 Weston Parkway
Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
(See Attachment Tab A.~
Telephone Number: 919-678-0035 Fax Number: 919-678-0206
E-mail Address: ftitlowna,chashsells.com, trouse(cr~,chashsells.com
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 13

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USAGE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of prof ect: Bhan og_ o Property
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 186783, 186785, 185142
4. Location
County: Durham Nearest Town: Durham
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Bhan og o Property
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.055760 °N - 78.554313
6. Property size (acres): 24.4 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Crooked Creek (off-site)
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The property is currently all vegetated by mid-successional
eastern deciduous (oak-hickory) forest. The property is bounded by residential to the south
(St. Albans Court, Lakeview Road, east (Lakeview Road), and north (Canterbury Estates).
sheet that
°W
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 13

Residential development and a church (Cornerstone Bible Church) occupy the western side
of the property (see attachment Tab B).
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed development will consist of 51 residential lots on '/4 acre lots (approximate acreage)
including appurtenant access roadways, driveways, and utilities. The proposed plans also
specify 5.19 acres of designated "Tree Save Areas" and 1.36 acres of "Open Space" (see
attached Site Plan Sheet #SD-2.0).
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The proposed development will provide 51 new
single family home (SFH) residential units in northern Durham County.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
* Neuse Buffer Rule Determination Letter, June 8, 2004 (Stream "A" and Stream "B" -see
attached Tab C & "Existing Conditions Plan" -Sheet Number SD-0.1).
* July 24, 2004 Memo, USACE Determination, Streams #1, #2, & #3 = "Intermittent -
Unimportant (see attached Tab C and "Existing Conditions Plan" -Sheet Number SD-0.1 ~
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
NO
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 13

wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed construction of
51 residential units will result in the loss of 3801inear feet (LF) (0.044 acres) of Intermittent-
Unimportant stream channels that are all above the headwaters of all drainages in the Neuse
River Basin. During an October 28 2007 site visit (following ~ 4.5 inches of rain during the
previous 72 hours) a Chas. H. Sells, Inc. Professional Wetland Scientist (SWS #754)
observed the following conditions in all of the proposed impact stream channels: (1) no flow,
(2) no evidence of scour and (3) no hydric or saturated soils. Because of this, the Applicant
requests waiver of the 300 LF impact threshold under NWP-29.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
Stream #2 Permanent Fill forested no Bord. Str #2 0.035

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.035
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.12 acre
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
Stream "A" /#1 unnamed Permanent Fill Int-Unimp. 3 125 0.009
Stream "C"/#2 unnamed Permanent Fill Int-Unimp. 5 240 0.028
Stream "D"/#3 unnamed Permanent Fill Int-Unimp. 6 50 0.007

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 415 0.043
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 13

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.043
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.035
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.078
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 415
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 13

were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. As shown on the enclosed "Site
Plans" the proposed development was designed to avoid impacts to wetlands and buffer areas
(state and countx). The proposed Site Plan (Sheet Number SD 2.0) also minimizes impacts to
the stream channels on the property by confining impacts to the upper reaches of these
Intermittent- Unimportant channels which bisect the center of the property and avoiding impacts
to the lower reaches of these channels that are near the southern property line. Specifically
housing layout was designed to avoid impacts to: (1) approximately 260 LF (0.018 acres) of
Stream "A"/#1 including 8,000 square feet (SF) (0.18 acres) of Neuse River Buffer Area, (2)
approximately 100 LF (0.011 acres) of Stream "C"/#2, including 4,350 SF (0.080 acres) of
wetland and (3~approximately 115 LF (0.012 acres) of Stream "D"/#3. The proposed impacts
to 415 LF (0.043 acres) of "Intermittent-Unimportant" stream channels are Unavoidable due to
the fact that these channels bisect the middle of the Project Area. Because of this, the Applicant
requests waiver of the 300 LF impact threshold under NWP-29.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 13

of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Based on both written (July 23 2004 Memo prepared by Carter & Associates -attached
Tab C) and verbal (October 30 2007 telephone conversation) communication with the
USACE Stream Channels #1 #2 & #3 are all designated as Intermittent-Unimportant and
do not reckuire mitigation for impacts. Since these channels are all Intermittent, and not
Perennial the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NC DWQ) also does not require
mitigation for impacts.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://www.nceep.net/pages/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 13

map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multi Tier Required
i..,.,..,..e ~ e«~ p r,r;.;,,.,.;,,,,
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The property is 24.4 acres in size. In its Existing
Condition, the propertv has no (0 acresl of impervious surface. Followin>? the proposed
construction, the property will have 5.82 acres of impervious surface, which is 0.238% of the
total surface area of the site (5.82 acres/24.4 acres = 0.238%). Since the proposed impervious
area exceeds 20%, the calculations for total proposed impervious surface are attached to this
application -see Tab E. As shown on the enclosed Site Plans -Sheet Number SD-4.0, Stream
Channels #1, #2, & #3 plus the Wetland adjacent to Stream Channel #2 and associated Buffer
Areas will be protected b_y Erosion & Sediment Controls. After construction, all Stormwater
runoff will be directed into a 39,200 SF L.90 acre) "Stormwater Dry Detention Pond" (see
enclosed Site Plans -Sheet Numbers SD 3.0 & SD 3.11.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 13

XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
As shown on the attached Site Plans -Sheet Number SD 5.0, wastewater generated by this
project (51 residential units) will be treated by existing municipal sewage facilities. The Cit~of
Durham has documented that there is available capacity for treatment of wastewater generated
by this residential development (see Site Plan Sheet Number SD 0.0).
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
s~Ta6 ~ a ~ zG ~~8
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 13

Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application
Bhangoo Property
Durham, North Carolina
February 26, 2008
List of Attachments
Tab A Signed Agent Authorization Letter
Tab B Vicinity Maps: USGS Topo Quad, NRCS Soil Survey, NWI Mapping,
Aerial Photo
Tab C Agency (USAGE, NCDWQ) Correspondence
Tab D Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets and Classification Forms
Tab E Stormwater Impervious Calculations (Typical Lot)

February 22, 2008
US Army Corps of Engineers
A anti n: Mr. Erie Alsmeyer
Raleigh Regulatory Fieki Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Fores#, North Carolina 27587
Reference: Authorize#ion to Sign/Submit PCN Application Form
Bhangoo Property
Durham, North Carolina
To Whom l# May Concern:
As applicant for the referenced project, I hereby authorise Chas. H. SeNs, inc. to act in
my behalf as my agent in the processing of permi# applications and, upon request.
famishing supplemental information in support of permit applications far the referenced
prope-tylproject named Bhangoo Property and loca#ed on Guess Road, #_ebanon
Township in Durham, North Carolina (Parcel ID #'s 186783, 18®785, 8 185142).
This not cation supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the permitting
agent far this project. Ptease con#act me if you need additional information.
Sincerely,
~(" 7
Bhangoo Development Company, LLC
115 Pond Vew Court
Apex, NC 27523
PH: 919-303-7152

2005 Aerial Photograph c:fras. ~~. ~;,;.~,,,~ ~~,..
Bhangoo Property, Durham, NC
Project # 08-4019
36.055760° N -78.554313° W
Legend: Figure 1
Scale:
N Not to Scale

USGS Topographic Map, Northwest Durham uad
Q
c rr ~s. ai. s~;~.~.~. r~{:.
Bhangoo Property, Durham, NC
36.055760° N -78.554313° W Project # 08-4019
Legend: Figure 2
Scale:
N Not to scale

Durham County Soil Survey
~ ~ ~~,~~. ~~. ~;l1,1,~ Iti~:.
Bhangoo Property, Durham, NC
35.055760° N -78.554313° W Project # 08-4019
Legend: GeB - Georgeville silt loam, Well-drained Figure 3
HrB - Herndon silt loam, Well-drained
HrC - Herndon silt loam, Well-drained Scale:
LgB - Lignum silt loam. Moderately well drained N Not to Scale

National Wetland Invento
Y'3'
~ t;n~~.ii.~t~,~,is.rof:.
Bhangoo Property, Durham, NC
36.055760° N -78.554313° W Project # 08-4019
Legend: Figure 4
Scale:
N Not to Scale

JUL-27-2004 18 87 ~ P.02%03
D_ R. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCYATES, INC.
l~nvironmental Consultants
P.O. Box $9l • Southern Pines, N.C. 2$388
[phone] . >~ax (9I0) 695-3317
j camain@pin~hurst.net
M~MORAN~DUM
Date: 27 July 2004
To: Dan Jewell-Coulter Jewell Thames, PA
Hrom: Tracy .lZush •- Dr. J.1 T. Carter III & Associates, Inc.
Subject: Bhangoo Streams
i sent all of my Bhangoo stream data to the U.S. Arn~y Corps of Engineezs to see if they thought any of
t1~e streams were jurisdictional. They havc decided that Streams #I, #2 and #3 shown on the attached
snap are jurisdictional (permits required) but they will not require mitigation for impacts tv them.
Stream #2 has a small area of jurisdictio~~al wetland near the property line but they will not require
mitigation for that either. We flagged these areas when we were up there and thesc points will need to
be surveyed so we can send the Corps a map for verification:
Stream #1.: Line A = 24 flags
Line B = 24 flags
Connect A-24 and kJ- 24 to property line
StrcamlWetland #2: Line L = 19 flags
Line D = 19 flags
Connect C-19 and D-19 to property lane
Stream #3: sine F = 7 flags
Litre G = 8 flags
Connect >~-7 and G-8 to property line
Please )et me know if you have any questions.

" ~ Michael F. Easley, Governor
,, ~~ F W A TF
~ 9 William G. Ross Jc, Secretary
`OCR QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Cq ~ Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
~ Colleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
~ ~ Division of Water Quality
June 8, 2004
NBRRO # 04-0183
Durham County
Page 1 of 2
Coulter Jewell Thames, PA
Steven P. Bailey, PE
111 West Main St.
Durham, NC 27701
Subject Property: Bhangoo S/D off of Guess Rd. in Northern Durham Co.
UT to Crooked Creek(030401, 27-2-18, WS IV NSW)
On-Site Determination for Subjectivity to the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A
NCAC 28.0233)
Dear Mr. Bailey:
On 6/3/Q4, at your request, I conducted an on-site determination to review-two stream features located on
the subject property for applicability to the-Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233). The features in
question are labeled as "A & B" on the attached map initialed by me on 6/8/04.
Steven P. Bailey met with me at the subject property stated above to determine the subjectivity of two
possible stream features. During the- site review stream feature labeled as "A" on the attached map was
flagged approximately 180 linear feet behind parcel # (PIN)(0825-03-04-6289) at headcut. The stream
feature labeled as "B" is located just North of the intersection of Guess Rd. & St. Albans Ct.. Feature "B"
becomes subject from culvert downstream. Stream feature is not located on property but the buffer of
feature "B" extends approximately 35 ft. on to property according to the map (scale being 1"=100') given
to me by the applicant.
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the stream feature labeled as "A
~ B" on the attached map is Subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule. The feature listed above and its
associated buffers should be identified on any future plans for this property. The owner (or future owners)
should notify the DWQ (and otRer relevant agencies) of this decision in any future correspondences
concerning this property. This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a
surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request
for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o John Dorney, DWQ Wetlands/401
Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or
Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an ad judicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day
statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is
notified of this decision. DWQ recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that
third party appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60
days.
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
i<~1~D phone [phone] Customer Service
facsimile [phone] 1-877-623-6748

~ , Coulter Jewell Thames
Steven P. Bailey, PE
6/8/2004
-Page 2 of 2
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the buffers.
Nor does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. If you have any
additional questions or require additional information please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Michael Horan,
Environmental Specialist
DWQ, Raleigh Regional Office
cc: DWQ 401 Wetlands Unit, RRO Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Land Quality
NBRRO # 04-183
6/8/04
NorthCarolina

10/29/2007 HQN 12:43 FAg 910 695 3317 J.H. CARTER & ASSOCIATES X0041016
JSACF., AIll# ~~ .,,~ DW() # r .itc il~,,,,_ (indicate on athched map)
;,,.; STREAM QUALT`~X ASSESSMENT '1)V'OR.KSHFE'~'
57 ~2F /~~F1 ~ ~ . .
Provide the following iaformatioa for the stream reach under assessment:
_....-.
1. Applicant's ttame:~_C,VIq aD z. Evaluator's r-ame:~y _ ~U5 H _
3. Date of evaluation: ~ '~„-,,,,~ ~~ 4, Time of evalusttiLLO'n: (~ '~ b b ~ m
5. Name of stroattx;l}nn~.~n 20 "'~~ ~ ~ "~7, C-YODL~,P~.~~(. River basia:_,,,N_~t15~
7. Approximate drainage area: ~- l 0 A L12~ S $. Strom order:
9. L,cttgth of reach evahtatcd:.-____ ~ bQ ~ Pg,.~ YA. County: 1 2.
1 t. Site coordinates (if known): preefer in decimal )EZ. Subdivision name (if any};
Latitude (cx. 34.$72312): ~ ~' ~ 4R D $ ~.J~ tr ~ N „~W Lpniitudc (ex, -77.55G61 I ): ~ V . `~ 2q b~, ~ (, ° ~,1
Mcihod location determined (eirolc): GPS '3` S onlto (Acriaq Phocolt;is Other CIS Utha
Y3, Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams} iocation):~
14,1'roposcd chatmcl work (if any): r•a t~,~f I't0 ~ Si na de,r,~e.~o, dd i_"'}'p 5'~ r ~~ m
15. Recent weather conditions:- ~y~N~ ~'~ D'1' x''11 IM ~ u)1 T}i t} ~ Dln tZ5? b„t~m $ ,~,~
16. Site conditions at tithe of visit;. -. ~ u+~ Ny + ~ U7 ~ ~ U t_ M f~ ~ b °
Y7. ldcntify any special wattxway classifications known: ~„ Section 10 Tidat Waters ,-_~1RgCf~tial F1ShCt'IC.C 1'Ia~lttAt
T,Trout Waters _Out~tanding Rosotttne Waters _, Nutrient Sansilivc Waters -„Water Supply Watershed (1~1V)
18. lc there a pond or lake icxnttad upstt+eam of thn ervaluation point`? YF.9 NQ if yes, estimate the water surface area:
X9. Docq channel appear ott US<iS quad map? YES NO Z0. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ~°/a Residential '~ ~ % Commercial ~ 1 % ]ndustrial ~ Z % Agricultural
~% ltorested „~% Cleared / l.oggcd % Othar ( _._._ )
22. Bankfull width:-.-._ ~ ~ ~. ~ C? ~~ Z3. Bank height {from bed io top of ban&): 0 ~ ~ ` ~ ~~_
2a, Channel slope down tattler of stream: _,rlat (0 to 2°!0) ,~,,,,,Gcntle (2 to 4%) _)4loderatc (4 to ] 0%) -Steep (>l0%)
2$. Channel sinuosity: Straight ~C` Occasicmal bends ,_„_,.,Frequent meander -Very sinuous _Draidcd channel
lastructions for cpmpktion of wgrlcsheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the mast appropriate eaorcgion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, tie. lrvcry characteristic must be scored using the same eeorogion. Assign points
to tech characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregian. l'agc 3 pravides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics iduntified in the worksheetr Scorns should rcilcct an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a
charaotoriatic cannot be evnluntexi duo to site yr weather condttions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide as explanaiigt, in the
comment section. Where there arc obvious changes in the character of a stream under review {c.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used in cvaluaic Caeh
reach. The iota] score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 anti 100, with a sccx~e of ]00 rcprescnting a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): _~~ Comments:
l~valaator's Sigaatare ..., ~ ~~,~~ llatc ~ ' ~ ' Q~
This chanaei evaluation form is late ed to be ased Daly as a gttlde to assist landowaettic snd cnviraamental prgfeesionals itt
gathcriafi the data repaired by the Uaitrd Stater Army Carps of Rngiaeers is ankc a prelimiasry aasessmcat of stream
quality. The total score resulting firom the cgropletion of this form I.a subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
partieutar atltifiation ratio ow rcqu%rcntent. Form subject to change -version OGl43. 'T'o Comment, please call 919-87G-8441 x 2G.

10/29/2007 RON 12:44 FAQ 914 695 3317 J,g. CARTER & ASSOCIATES X005/016
c.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESS1VfENT WORKSHEET ,
...~.
.
.

..
:.
..
..
.

.
:..

.: ,..
.;

. ,
'
'

.
. .. ....:
..::.
.,
....: 7C

t
i
l Presence of flow ~ persistent polls fin stream 0 - 3 0 .. 4 0 - 3
na flow or saturation ~ 0• stron flow = max Dints
2 Evidence of past bgm>sn alteration 0 _ ~ 0 -- S 0 - 5
extensive alteration = p• no alteration = max iitts

3 lZipsrirn xane
•
0 _ 6
0 - 4
0 - 5 , t
".
no buffer ~ 0' can
uous widebuffer = max rots ~
~ Evidegee of nutrient er chemical discharges
~ o - 5 D - a 0 - a y
extensive di es ffi 0• no m max
rots
a
~ S Groundwater dlsthargc 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4
+0 na discha e = 0• s rin s se wetland etc. = max Dints
v- ~ Presence of adj scent lloodplaiq 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2
no flood lain = t)• oxtensiva flao lain = max rots
~~
7 Egtrenchment ! ttoodplain access
0 - S
0 •- 4
0 - 2
~+ 1 ctttraacl~cd = 0• uent floodi = max rots
S Presence oi' adjacent tivetlands
• p_ 6 0 -- 4 4- 2
ent wetlands =max. rots
no wctlaitds = 0' la ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0 -~ 5 0-~ p- 3
extensive chamielizatian = 0• natural meander = max ants
10 Sediment faput 0- S 0- 4 0- 4
extet~ive sition= 0' little or no sediment = nsax rots
l l Sizo & diversity of channel bea'snbsiiate
• ~A*~:::"~'` 0 - 4 0 -- S
nts
~i h ~ 0• la divcxse sites = max
l2 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 -~ 5
~ 1 incised ~ 0• stable bed dt banks ~ max Dints

13 Presence of major bask failures
0 - S
0 _ S
0 - 5 t_l

~: severe erasion ~ 0• no erosion stable banks ~ max rots 1
i ~ Boat depth and Be~nsity on banks 0 - 3 0 -. 4 0 - 5
no visible mats s 0• dc~e mots thro hoot = max rots
~!
t s Impact by agricuitar~ livestock, or timber production
•
0 - S
0 -- 4
0 - 5 t,
_
=0• no evidence = max rots
sabstantiel 1
t ~ l'rescncc of riffle-pooi/rippie-pool ~mplcxes 0 _ ~ 0 - S 0 - 6
~ no rifflcslri lcs ar oafs = 0• wolf-deve ed = tnax rots
et,'
l7 ~labitat complexity
.
0 ~- b
0 - 6
0 - 6
~~~ tilt ar no habitat = Q• f variod habitats = ntax .rots
_

18
Campy covcragt over streambed
no shadin 'an ~ 0• eot-tinuous ca s nix ints

0 - S

0 - 5

0 -- S
3 9 Substrate embeddedness . ,~'., '. ~. ` 0 - 4 0 - 4
dec l embedded ~ 0• loose structwre W max
.•.~
.
2U Presence of str~cam invertebrates {seepage 4) 0 _ ~ 0 _ 5 0 - •5
~,, {na evidence = of commo ttttttierous s = trtax. rots
~~ ~ 21 Presence of amphibians 0 - 4 0 _ ~{ 0 - 4
~1J no evidence ~.0• comimon msmemnns s = max ittts
'~
f7
22 Prescncc of fish
0-a
0--4
0--4
.~ no cvidcz-ce = 4• numaraus t s 'max rots ,Y,_,

23 Evidence o! wlkllife use
0 - l~
0 - 5
0 - S
no evidence _ 0• abundant evidence ~ ~x ou:tc
Total Points Po~ibte~ ~ ~ i0p '...: ; ]00 100 '
Td7`A~: ~~~~'"'t~~5t3'~CYltCT':~~~iIS'~~$gC~.;..... ~~
{ -t-tf:CSe CftaraCieriSllC3 arC net a1SSeSSCd ITI Coastal StYCan13.

10/29f2~07 RON 12:42 FAg 914 695 3317 J.g. CARTER & ASSQCIATES
IYC~WQ ~tr~eam~,~Classif cation Torn
Projoct Name: g ~ A N Cr Dd River Basin: ~ E USA

~oo2fo16
Coituty: l,~~t?HAn~ 7Evaluatar: ~~Y ~USH
DWQ P%~cct 1Vurnbcr: Ncar~~st Natnied Strom: Latitude: 3b. p9$$ Z5G.°t~ Signature: ~
(~12i>Q~C~D C._~Eir~ ~8,°lx9la~3tnaW I~.u~O-~.
Aare: ~ - q - Qy USGS QUAD: N W ~ ~ ~p~ q m longitude: location/Aireetions:
*PI,.TASI'< NOTE: Xf eralaator and landowner agree chat the fcatnric is a ma~wx~ade ditch, !lien unr of this farm is nat ~ E•~ RT 7 AC l-I t
necessags Also, if in the best profa~lonal Judgement of the evaluator, the feature, is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural
strcmn.-,rlris rating syatP-m shoald not be uscd*
~l£'lln~l"y ~i~ld ~ndxcators: (ClrclaD,~cNxmbcrPcrLlne)
I Gcanwr hot Ab cnt Weak Moderate Stt-on
I~ Is Them A Riftlc-Pool Scottencc? 0 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Strcambed ,,.,~ '~
51 Is There An Active !Or Relic)
~~rnr~~r c~a~oR.~,~:rozocx~vorc~ra~ ForNxs:
II. H dr. al Absent Weak ocle a Stron
1) Is There A Grountiwatcr
.~.
1"RI11iARYI~XDR'O.LOGYINbl'CATOR
t"N07Z: lfQed & Bank C.,mrscd Rv tlf4~blG8 4lti~..~'~HOUT Siuunsiry Thcn~O'I ,,,,,
10) Is A z"~ order or Groater channel (As Indicated _ f-....,.~
PRlMAKYBIULUGYINlIICATUR POINTS:,_,~,,,_

10/29/200? SON 12:43 FAg 910 695 3317 J,g. CARTER & ASSOCIATES ~J003/016
:,
d) Is Water In Channel And ~$ Mrs, Since
~ t r own ai 7 or • e ~, r
5) Is'I'herc Water In Chennei A~rin~ Dry
SECD1YD~tRYI~tYbRDI,.DGY1'NbtCATDR
~~T'~ ~'arNTS Prin:ar + Seconda ~{,If t;rcatcr Than Or L~qual To ~ Fo?ntx Tlec Stream I.c At l:Qasr
Lucrmittent)

St'CO d81' Field Indicator ~ (CirClaOnP.NumhcrPerlineJ
C8 flt~jl~e WAY? p .S f j~ 1 1,~5
.SFCDNDARY GED,r1~DR,T'H'OLDC.YINDICA~'DR POINTS.;~_,_„ .uu
II. troto Abs Weak oderate q
1) is'I'leis Xear's (Or Las!'x) I.caflittcr ~,
.+~ ...~ n vuauu r wnis Aii ou~;xmoc;o: SAY Mofi BL Mostly FAt::VV Mostly FAC Mostly FA(:U Mostly tJPJ.
{*lVOTIi:ljTatatAbx»cr.t7fA!lPfanralrtSWnambcd z ! .75 ,5 0 ~
As~!{~cdAbavcS,l~' N C AY
SL~CON;UARYBIO,LDGYINDICAI"DR PD.irN7S: ~""

10/29/2Q07 NON 1;45 FAg 91Q 695 3317 J.R, CARTER & ASSOCIATES X00$/016
.. . .
USAGE AIDiF _ _::: ,„ AWQ # ----...__ ~~ ce ~ (indieatC on attached trap)
;,~,; STREA.M (~Yl'ALITY A,SSESSN~ENT WQRKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream roach under assessment: ~~~~
i. Applicant's name: ~}~ I`~ {~(•s{1(} 2. Evaluator's namc:~,,,,,~~ ' ~1 _,..~~„SI'r
3. Date of evaluation: ~' ~' ~ - a!••~ t " 4. Time of evaluaticn: { 2 : ~ ~ (~ i'+lt
5. Name of stream: unvl~am~d ~~ r ;.~~ '~ C.lr' p (~I.Pt~ ~r iti. G. It.ivcr basin:^ ~ ~ U S E
7. Approximate drainage area: ~ ~ i7 l4 G S. Stream order: {
9. l.cngth of reach evaluated: ~ ~ -~ Q~ } 10. Courny:~,,,~ U~~ 19 I'Yl
11. Site coordinates (if known): prcf°r in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
P 6
Latitude (ex. 34.Rn3 t 2): .~ ~ . 4 q 9 ~ W a5 N Lnngitrtdc tom. ~rt.ssss! !): ~$ . 9 ~ `~ Q ~ 2 W
Method location deterntincd (circle): GPS Shec Ortlto (Aerial) I'hoto/CrIS Outer Gl9 Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note~y reads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
SEA AT~~t+~~ ARP
14. Proposed channel work (if any)• 0 f'1O { •t 1
15. l~cccnt weather
16. Site canditions at time of visit:~~~t!# 4.1`~ '~ U 7 ,
17. Identify any special waterway clarifications known; „-Section IO -Tidal Waters .____F.ssential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters Mttstandittg Resource watecrs ~, Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. TS there a pond or lake iercatcd upstream of the evaluation poiniR YES NO If yea, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does cltanncl appear on USCrS quad map? YES T!U 20. Does ohannel appoar on USDA Soil Survey? YES ND
21. Estimated watershed land use: ~ ~ % Residential ~ ~- % Commercial ~ E °~ Indttstriai ~ ~ % Agricultural
~,C~.°~ ~or~st~a f ~ ~ cleared ~ i_.oggal „~,,,,.~ other ( i
22. i3ankfull width: i - ~ '~'2.2.~' ,,,~, 23. Bank height (from bed to top of hank}: ~ ~~ ,,,,,,,,,,
24. Channel slope down cxrncr of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) ~,Cicntlc (2 to a%) Moderate (a to ! 0%) ,-Sleep (>! 0°J°)
25. Channel sinuosity: StraightOccasional bends Ftegnent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by detetrrtining the most apprapriaie exoregion bastxl on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classiFcation, etc. Every characteristic must be scotcd using the same ecorogion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the eeoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
charactcristies idtmtiiwcd in tlto worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under cvaluaticn. if a
eharactcristic cannot be avaIuated due to site or weather conditions, cater 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
cannzrrertt section. Where there are obvious changes in the chararacr of a stream under review (e.g., We stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate cacti
reach. T'he total score assigned to a stream roach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of I00 repn:scnting a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Scorn (from reverse): ~ Comments
!~ ~ ~~ ~/~
Evainator's Signatnro -~.-~ "'t Date ~ - ~ ;.Q.,,,~T
This channel evaluation form is int otl to be used only as a gelds to assist landowners and s~viro>f~srttal professionals in
gathering the data required by the rritcd States Army Carps of >~,nglnccrs to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this forru is subject to USACE apprevat and dog not imply a
particular mitigation ratio ar rcqufremeut. Form subject to change -version pGlt)3, To C,ommcttt, piGase cai1914-87G-8441 x 2G.

10/29/2007 SON 12; 45 FAg 910 695 3317 J.1{. CAI~I'ER & ASSOCIATES
SxREAM QUALYT'u' ASSESSMENT WpI~SH~UT
1
2
3
a
s
b
7
9
]a
11
12
13
~.
14
15
16
N
17
~.
18
19
20
~• 2i
o:
a:
22
23
Prescnce of itaw ! perafat~ent poufs ~iit gtreaaa
na PMw ~• saturation = 0• flow g max rots
Evidence of past homes ahcration
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration -max rots
1<tiparian Bane
no buffer = 0• cattti wide bttftet• ~ matt rots
l;videncc of nutricat or chemical discharges
extensive disciaa = 0• no diAGha ~ max rots
Groundwater tiischatge
t-o disch c = 0• , well etc. = max rots
Presence of adjatcAt lloaiiiiiain
rta flood lain = 0• extensive floo lain = tnax Dints
Entrenchmcat / flaodphtin acCr'ss
dee ! entrcnchcd = 0• t floodin ~ max rots
Presence of adjacent Wcflttnds
no wetlands = 0• ]ar a ad'accm wetlands = tnax rota
trhangcf sinuosity
extensive ehanneli?.atiota ~ 0• natural meander=max itrts
Sediment input
extensive 'tiatt~ 0- little ~ na sediment - mac •nts
S;ze dt diversity ofchatanei bed substrate
flu ho moats = 0• diverse sizes =mate ' is
Evidence of channel ftacislon or widening
d I incised = 0• stable bed & bantcs = takttt rots
i'reRenca of major hank Paffures .
severe erosion = 0• no erasion stable banks W max rots
Root depth and denxfty on banks
na visible roots w 0• dense roots thron ~ tt~c ~~
Impact by agriculture, livestaek, or tfrnber ptroduttton
substantial im =0• act cvldcncc ~ max rots
Presence of rfftle•.poal/ripplo•pooX catuplexet
ao t•ifl'Iesiri lea or to = 0• welwdcvet cxl = ntax Dints
Habitat complexity
ttlc or no habitat ~ (?• f vatiead habitats =mate rots
Canopy coverage aver strcatubcd
~o sh v tion ~ 0• continuous cacao = max • is
,1~~ Subshate cmlfeddedness •s..
u4'k% 1 embedded = 0. 1aOSe $tNetUre ~ a2kUC
Presence of stream iavortebrates (seepage 4}
0-~s
0-ti
0-d
o-s
0-3
0-4
0-S
0-b
0-S
a•-s
0-5
0_5
0~3
0-5
0-•3
0-d
0-5
`t,'ATA`~Mi''.. .. .
tto evtdettcc ~ 0• common numerous -max. rots 0 - 4
Presence of amphibians
'
no evvidence - 0• common numerous ~ max iota 0 ` °i
IPrmeuce offish
no ovidcnce = 0• comtno numerous es $ max ~ 0 - 4
Evidence of wildlife use
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence w max hats 0 -• 6
xatai Poiyts'Posstble ~ ~ ~ ,i.~.;;• ,
~'UTAY: SCURE :'(,also ~ezY~er nn ~~ii~t~page~} ...
0-4
0-5
o --a
0-4
a-a
0-4
0•~4
0-•4
o-a
o-~
0-4
0-4
-.•.~..-
0-S
0--4
0-4
0 S
0-b
~O1 ~ s
V "- 4
a--s
0-4
0--4
0-5
' •I00
" Tlt~sc cltatactetishes arc not assessed in Coastal streams.
4-5
0~5
a.-s
0-4
o.~a
0-2
0 2
a.~2
0--3
0-4
0 -• S
O~S
0-5
0-5
0-S
o~~
0-G
0 -» 5
0-•4
0-s
0~4
0-4
0-5
9.00
~ao9~ols
-.,-_.._
.~
S
i
sg
2

10/29/2007 RON 12:44 FAg 910 695 3317 J.g. CARTER & ASSOCIATES (~406I016
N'CD~VQ Stxeam C~assz~ca~.on Torm ~~p ~-~rv1 ~ x
Prajcet 1Vame: g H ~ tJ G f7U River Basin: N ~ OS ~ County: '~ U tzN +q• m >avahtator: ~ ~.A Cy {~ U SH
D'WQ 1'rojcct Number: Nee st Named Stream: Latitude: ~~ pgq~q p 5 M Signature: ~ ~ ~~
~.~oa~r;o C.r~trEK ~S.gz9o~xx w ~.•~^~~1
Date: ~ " ~ "Qw USCrS QLlAA: N y,~ i~ul~ ~ ~~ I.engitude: Location/i]ircctiotss:
PLEASE NOTE: Jf estaluatnr and landowner agree tAat the feature is a even-Made d&eit, t&cn use of tA~s form is xot ~ ~ E R 1' T/i C.~-i t
necessary, Also, if to the k~1 ptofaasioxa! judgcnrest of the avatuaror, rhr. feature !s a Wren-nrRde ditch and nal a noodifiad natiuat
stream-this rating systertt should nor 1-e agedA'
Pl'imaY`r~' T+'feld Yndfc~t4rs: (CirrleOrrcNnarherArrJ,iaeJ
2) is The USDA Texture In Streambed
5) is Ttsere Aa Active (Or Kclic)
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Hank 1'resent7 0 (,i',1 2 3
~(f~lr,~Gf 4i Baxk Ceuted ltv Ditchine And iVJrl'tbY1T ~£7y~,sib' Then Score=O~Z. ,,,,_
16) is A 2 Order Or Gc+eater Channel (As indieatcd ~,,~,.~
PRIMARY GEO~rroRpxo~octrrnrDrcAZ~oR rorlvTS:
~.~, Abscnt 'Weak Madarate trop
i) is Thane A t"aroimdwater ~
rRr~ARY~rYDRO~co~Y~avnrc~~o~ Pol~rs:
PRIMAR X 13IOZOGY 11VDICATpIt

1ai29/20x7 HON 12:45 FAg 914 695 3317 J.H. CARTER & ASSOCIATES

~BCOndalrv k`X@X~_X~~XCdtOY'5: (CSrcleUncNainGcr•l'p•LlNC)
~oo7io16
a) Is Water In Channel Aar! ~t8 kits. Sinoc 0 l'_J ~vd~ e,& i ~ 1 I.S
Last Xrt wn ai ? N • • 1 r i ThG. +rrl f15 ow+' C'YQ't 5.
5) Is 'I'itcre Water In Channel During Dry 0 I i,S
s E c o~ vn a n Y, r~ xn R o z o c Y rNn rc~ x~ o n
roT~t,T,~ .t'DI.NTS Printer + Seconder ~(,Tf Greater Their Or Equal ra .i9 Points Tlie S'trcanr ,ls AI Least
rstcrntitranr)

,.~ .rvwa ~ v~rv~~a~i~y auu.vaw n
Natural Drain@gc W_y? 0 ,S 1.5
SECOND~iRY GEDMORPHDI.UGYINDICifTOR POINTS: 2.. ~~ ..~
ft dt'oto A t WCAk ndcrate Stron
1) Is This Year's (Or bast's) beaflitter
rt) n,rc wcttanrt Plants in 5trcatnbed? SAV MasiJy,QBL M.nstly FACW Mostly FAC Mosgy FACU t-~oslly Ul'L
(+ Nt)T,6~ Ij7brar Aluenec OjAU Plants In Strcavrrbcd ?. (~ .7S , $ ~ Q
~.t Nolan dhnHeSkiy Thin Sven CI~„!'L,,¢SSSd 4Prerrnt')
SECON.I)ARYI3XOLOGYINAICATOR POXN'7'S. I •~

10/29/2007 HON 12:47 FAg 910 695 3317 J,H. CARTER & ASSOCIATES ~j012/016
DACE AIDir.
.t
_ DWQ # ,~. .te '1/ (indicate on attached rnap)
;,~,; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
`?1~~f1~1 ~?~
Frnvide the following information for the stream reach under assessgtcttt:
1. Applicant's name: __ _ ~ H ~' ~~0 ~ __ 2. Evaluator s name: ~~,~ C`I ~.uci t"(
3. Date of evaluation: ~• `~ ~ " ~ `~' 4. Tithe of evaluation: I P m
5. Name of stream: VY1 '~V ~~~ ~~r ~b. River basin: N E U5 ~ ,,
7. Appmxintatc drainage area: L ~ ~ f1- f< 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated:- _ ~t~ ~ T 10. (:ounty: ~ V !? M ~ m
11. Site coordinates {if known): prefix in declimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): Q r~ '7 ^~ p ~ t
Latitud° (ox. 34.872312): ~ ~,Q ~ ~ ~ Z. tD '-t o ~ Longitude (cx. -77.SS6G I t ): ~T7 . "I 2 'T ~ ,~„ 1 "} a W
Metttad location determine! (oirele): GPS ~o Shec Ortho (Aerial) Photo/01S Other G1S Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and atiacb trap identifying stream(s) location):
14. Prop«sed cltanncl work (if
-Trout Waters ~„tatttstanding Resource Waters _,,,_, Nutrient Sensitrve Waters -Water Supply Watershed ~1-1V)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ~ lfyes, estimate the water snrfaec atra:
l9. Does cltannci appear an USGS qu.'ul tnap? YES ~~ 20. Does channel appear ou USDA Soil Survcy7 YES [N~4
21. Estimated watershed land u.RC: ~~% Residential ~ ~ % Cotnmcreial ~ ~ % Industrial C ~ °!° Agricultural
~,,,~% 1~orc.4tcd ~ ~ % Cleared /Logged T% Ot11Cr ( ~^ „}
22. Bankfull width: ~ •` ~ 23. Bau#c height (from bed to top of hank}: ~Q " f ;~ 1 rl .~L.Q
24. Channel slope down confer of strcatn: ,-Plat (0 to 2%) „`(ientlc (2 to 4%) „„Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>1Q%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ~ Occasional bends „_Fret}uent meander ,,,,,,Very sinuous _13raidcd channel
Fnstructious for tompktion ofi worksheet (located an page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecarcgion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, strcaim classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ccarcgion. Fage 3 providcc a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the warlisheet. Scores should re$ect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather cot-dltiona, enter t? in the scoring box and Prgvidc an explanation in the
connment section. Whcrc there arc obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (c.g., the stream flows fmm a pasture
into a forest), the strcain they be divided into smelter reaches ti:at display more continuity, and a separate forth used to cv:tiuatc cacti
reach. '1'hc total score assigned to a stream reach mutt range bctwecst d and 1t70, with a score of lt9(I represc„nting a stream of the
highest quality.
Tota# Score (from revetyte): ~ ~' Comments:
Evaluator's Sifinafirc ~ T3ate ~ - q ' ~ ~ ,
7'hls channc# cvalnntion fornt is int d to be need only ss a guide to assist landowners and environmental prnfessionals in
gathering the data regnircd by the nited States Army Corps of Eng'tncers to make $ prel#rrtlnary assessment of atrcarrt
quality. The fatal score restelting frotrt the completion of thin form is subjeef to USACE approval and doex not imply a
partictt#ar mitigation ratio or requirement. l~orm subject to change -version DG/43. To Comment, please call 919-87G-8441 x 2b.
17. Identify any sptxial waterway classifica6ans known: ,_Scction 1Q ~,Tidai Waters ^l:.gsential Pisheri~s l;abitat

14/29/2047 SON 12:47 FAg 910 695 3317 J.H, CARTER & ASSOCIATES X413/016
t,-
~'~ .r
S~.'~tEA11~ QU'ALIT'Y ASSESSMENT WORKSHEE'T'
~y

fY
... .
~y~ /'...... .. •... ~..
.:
~
4.[1'A~'41~~iJ 1~1~~~

'.•~1iilJ

~~:

;~~~31].....'

.,~C¢y '~~1
: y.~~~
~~. y~~{~~

~•

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
5
no flow or Saturation = 0• stron #ioa+ ~-max rots 0 - 0 - 4 0 - S
2 F,videncc of past human alteration 0_ fi 0- 5 0 ... 5
extensive alteration W 0• no alteration = max rots

3 Riparian mnc
'
0 T 6
0 - a
0 -- 5
na buffer ~ 0• con
ous wide buffer w max rots
4 Evidence of autrimt or ehemicai discharges 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 4
extensive = a• no disch = max rots

5 Groundwater discht-rgc
0 W 3
0 - 4
0 - 4
tno discharge ~ 0; springx, Sccps, wetlands, etc. = max.twints)
V
~
b Presence oFadjRCCtit tioodpisia
0 - 4
0 "" 4
0 - 2 O
no 0 lain = d• extensive flood lain = max ants

p''
7 fnbre~aeitment / fioodplsta aectss
'
0 -- S
0- 4
0- 2
da l entrenched W 0• t flood
W max

S Presence of adjhtxnt wetlannds
•
0 - G
0 - 4
0 - 2
no wetlands = 0• la a ad
accni wMiands = meat inia

9 Channel sinuosity
0 - S
0 - 4
0 - 3 , 1 ~~
""
catensivc chamtclization ~ 0' natural trarattdcr = max oints ~
' ] 0 Seditttcat iAput
• 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4
..~
extensive sitioa~ 0• ]]ttlc or no sediment W max
nt,4 J

l t Sias & diversity of chaagei bed substrate
~ ~(A* " : ~•
0 - d
0 -- 5 r
fin home errs ~ 0• is a divease sizes ~ malt rots i

12 )Gvidcacc of ehaunel inCisioa or widenltt>w
0 - 5
0 -• 4
0 - 5
~'! d I incised = 0• stable bed & banks = rttax oinis
1 ~ lyreseetee of major beak failures 0 _ ,~ 0 - 5 0 - 5 L~
~ severe erasion = 0• no erosion stabte banks W max iNs
14 Root del~-th and density on banks
no visible roots = 0• dense roots hoot ~ max rots 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 - S y
~
1 S Itppact $y a~rieuiturc, livestock, ar timber prodnetion
0 - S
0 - 4
0 - 5
L}
substantial im act ~' no avidence = max rots
16 Freseaca of rifoolhfppfa~pooi coutpIaxcs 0 - 3 0 -• S 0 - 6
E;,~
~; tto riftieslxi ics or ]s = 0• wcll•devei = max rots
Habitat camplexity „~,,,

;~ 17
little or
t = 0• f v
oh
bit
bit
t
i
d h
~
r 0- G 0- 6 0 -• b

] s n
a
a
a
ar
e
a
s
max
ots
Canopy coverage ever strcambed
na shadin v anon = 0• continuous = ntax 'nts

0 - s

0 - S

0 -- s
19 Substrate embeddedacss '
:~~*'
0 - 4
0 •- 4
1 embcxidcd = 0• loose atntcture = max .:.
:
. , .
20 Presence of stream ]nvertebrates (sec page 4) ~ _
~} 0 - S 0 - S
~,, na evideuec ~ 0• common numeraus t = max rots
21 Pregettce of amphib~~
' 0- 4 0 -~ 4 0 -- 4
'a no evidcitcc = 0• common numerous W max
22 Presence of Hsb 0 •• 4 0 - 4 0 - 4 (~
~ no evidence = 0• Gammon, numerous types ~ tttax points)

23 )~vidertcc of wildlife use
0 - 6
0 -- S
0 -- 5
no evidence ~ 0• abundant evidence = ntax rots
Total P6ints•Possible.. ~ :1'Q~~ :. 300 l00

' Tbese cltaracicristics arc not assessed in coast.•tl streams.

10/29/2007 RON 12:46 FAg 910 695 3317 J.H, CARTER & ASSOCIATES
.~~~i

l~C~'VV~ Stream Classi~cat~ion Fo~ranx
~..
vT~EnY~I ~~~
f~ 010/016
ProjectNamc: Z~ ~~~aD Riv~rBasin: N~US~ County: ~U~~~m f3valuatar."r~CY ~.U$~„+
llWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: ,~(~. 69 9g2.1o4'W Signature: ~ ~~ r,
G~..pA-LEp ~12.~E;+C ~$.92~l9R4'~I ` Y.~~
Date: ~ _q - Q~ tJSG5 QUAD: ~~ ~1)~ ~ ~ Longitude: LocatiottlUirocfions: UV
*PLEASE MUTE: if evaluator and landowner agree that fhcJJta[ure Fs a -aan-x+ade ditch, tAen u~o of this form is not ~ ~ ~ +'gT71~ (.}~
necessary ~flM, !f !x -he hrAl prafeasionallud~cn+e+u of the evaluator, tha fctrtt+rn fs a xean-made ditch, uud nal a modifiref ntttnral
strca+x-this rating rysJetn should xo1 he nscd*
Primary Fief ~ndicatars: (Circlc(h-eNnmberPrrLine}
I. Gcomor ltoa Absent W k 1Vi'odcrntc Stron
1) Is There A Tti#~tc-Pool ,,~,,uencc't 0 1 3 ,~„
~~ ro •ri.~ r icne T.,..,,.,~.. i., c,,,~o...t,,.a
~) is "t here An Active ([h Helic)
9) Is A ConGttuaus hod & k3ank Present'1 0 1 ~ 3
`' ffQ~,(3a~,Cawffit,BvALL 'n n~IIOUTSinuruirv77i47JrS,~Qrc.~-'I
i0) Is A 2 tardcr ()r Greater Cb2mnel {As Indicated _,.,~
l~RtM~1RY c~01V~fORPHOZOCYINDICArOR
T.~. drot bsent Wcalt Moderate t n
1) Is'!'hcrc A Grounc)water ,~
PRT,AI,~~RYBYIJROZOGY INbI'CATUR
PRIM.4RY,BIOLUGYINDICATOR

10/29/007 RON 12:46 FAg 910 695 3317 J.g. CARTER & ASSQCIATES
aCOndar .~+ieIcl Zndfeators: (CiraleC)neNuMGerPerLixe)
~j 011/016
3} Vacs To - •"•, v .5
pogra~hy Ittdicatc A
NRtura in ge WaY?
SECOND•9RY GEDMORp,2y01,OCY1'1Y,prCATOR POIN7".S.•~`
XL Ii dr 1 Absent Weak
1) Is This Y'ear's (Or bast's} I.eaflitter
4) Is Water In Channel ~nd>48 I;Trs. Since p
S tt 'n~ N R..• I l tl dicar
5) Is There Water In Channel During bry 0
d'ti Growl o
6} Arc I~ydr4c SoiI~P.~,)~id s df Chat l„L~
S,+l"'CONbrIRYHYOR(IIOGYINDICA7'O,R PO111
2..5
I I.S
Are F' ll Tres t? ent Weak oderate Strntt
A hibia Rent? • 5 I „ 1.5
3 ua 'cTu ies i? 'S 1 5
I.S
~ e than P t? ~ 'S I 1.S `-w--~""----
~~ Izott Oxidi,~g g~c~'~~~~us I'rescnt? 'S "-^~- I t 5
Is Filam ntau ae P,~cscnt? ~- 'S ~ .S
$) Arc Wetland I'Iants In Straambcd? .. SAV Moa~~L Most! ~ACW l I. Y ' Y-~-
(' N07'ts: If Tolal Rbsence OfRll FImNs to SteapiLcr! ,~ ! -, } Y hY0.ctil' NAC MAStIy FACU 14~astty UI'1,
SECONDA.ttY,~ftOLOG~'IND,lC,g7'pR pfJ,T1y~. .
~Q~'~~ ,~~I~~'S Arimar +Sec'ondur =~~Iflre~aar T/rart Or E ua1 To 19 Poin .
Irrterntrttant) 9 .. is 7"l+e S'tr¢ad! Is Ott Lertst
• i
7

10/29/2007 SON 12.48 FAg 910 fi95 3317 d.g. CARTER & ASSOCIATES
~~JSACE AII~#_
0014/Olfi
.... .
bWQ # ( t¢ if (indicate on attached map)
S'C'REAM QUA~:,~TY ,ASSESSMEN'~ WU~SHEEx
5T ~ ~~!'rNt # ~k
Provide rite fotaowang iaformadon for the stream reach grader assessanent:
1. Applicant's natnc:_~I-~~~ 6 2. Evaluator's name: ~~-~~ y ~ (~~,~,-
3. bate of evaluation: ~ ` ~ "' Q ~ 4, Tizrle of evahtation:~,,,,~, ~ ~'1
S. Name of stream: U hh~rClt' ~ ~ri b -~ Croo ~~rl Grk ~. ltivor basin: .~~: t)~ ~
7. Approximate drainage area: ~ ~ ~ ,~G _ 8. Strcarn order: 4 _ _...._..__.
9. I.cngth of reach evaluated: .r~ d ~ 10, County: ~-~1 ~ m
1X. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrccc. I2. Subdivision name (if any): ` '
1„aiitt-dc (cx. 34_R72312): ~~ • ~~ ~ ~ O ~ Longitude (ex. -77.S5661 L):~ . ~ e~ ~ t~~.,a'~l~ p W
Methai iocatirn- determined (circle): GPS Topo Shod Ortlm (Aerial)1'latolGiS Other GiS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation ( roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
SEE . ~4TTI4~NED m la ~ -,~.-
i$.1'roposed chatmcl work (if
15. Itcccttt wcaUter conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit:„~,,,~) ~~I ~f" l DT . ~ U M I ~ ~ ~ a
17. Identify any special waterway classiticatiotts known: -Section 10 -Tidal Wafers ,_,Easen8al Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters „,~Qutstanding Resaouree Waters ~ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed Y..____ .(1-IV}
18. Is there a pond ar lake located upstreartt of the avaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface ar~a;~
19. Does channel appear on llSGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel apptaar on USDA Soil Survey? YI:S NO
Sa. };stimated watershed land use: ~afe Residcntiai ~ ~ % Commercial ~ ~ % Industrial L Z °Jo Agricultural
~~% Forosted Q% Clcarcd I Logged ,_°/a Other ( )
22. Iiankfull width: I -ern n ~- 23. Bank height (from bed to tap of bank}: ~ ' S ~• ~'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ,,,,Flat (0 to 29/0) _Gerttic (2 to 4%) Moderate {4 to 10°/a) ~Stccp (yid°r6}
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ,-Occasional bends _Fret;ttent meander -Very sinuous ~,flraidcd channel
Instructions for compaction of worksheet (locates on page 2): Begin by determining the most agpropriatc ecoregian based on
bcation, terrain, vegetarian, stream classit`tcatian, etc. Every characteristic must be scared using the same ecorcgion. Assign paints
to each characteristic within the range shown for the eearegion. page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identifcd in the worksheet. Soaves should reflect an overall asscssmctti of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be cvaluatcd due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
Cpmment sccti4n, whcra there ar^8 obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display motae continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stn;arrr reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 represcming a stream of the
highest quality,
Total Score (from reverse): Commeat.~:
a!:valut:tor's Signature ~ ~ ~ 1)atc ~. - ~ ~ ~ ~ _~.~.
This channel evaluation form is i»tend to Itc used ortly as a guide to assist laudowncrs and ettvironmentaa profevsio»als in
gathering the data required by the U 'tcd States Army Carps of l~gpfaeers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from tits completion of this farm is sabjeet M US,A,S:F: approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or regniremettt. Dorm subject to change ~~ version 4Gl03, To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 2ti.

10/29/2Q07 SON 12:49 FAg 91Q 695 3317 J.g. CARTER & ASSOCIATES X015/016
STREAM QUAL~TX ASSESSIV~ENT WORKSHEET

..... ,
~..
1 Presence of fiow / persistent pools in stream

no flow or satuxatioa = 0• s flow ~ max rots 0 .. g 0 - 4 0 - S
~ Evidence df past human alteration
exioasive ahcration ~ 0• no alteration ~ max Dints 0 - 6 0 -• 5 0 - S ?j
3 R~par<an zone

tto buffer ~ Q• ou wide bufifer = max rots 0- 6 0- 4 0- S
4 Evidence of ~autrie»t or chetrtital discharges

extensive disch ~ 0' no discha = anax rots 0 - S 0 - 4 0 - 4
$ Grauudwatcr discharge
no discha c ~ 0• •n wetlands etc. = mux Dints 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 ~ 4
G Presence of ad jacent thiadplain

~ flood fain = 0• extptsive lain -max. 'rots 0_ 4 0- 4 0- 2
7 Entrenchment 1 lXoadpittht access

`~
d I entraichcd = 0' t flopdi = max i~rts
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 -- 2 a
8 Presence ~~' adjacent wetlaads
no wetlands = Q• 1 adjacent wetlands Q max Dints 0 " ~ 0 - 4 0 - 2 Q
9 Chanuel stauosity

cattcnsivc cltelization ~ 0• natural meander = max Dints 0- 5 0 ~- 4 0 -- 3
10 Sedimettt~lnpat
extensive itiott~ 0• little ar no sedimem W max rots p_ S 0- 4 0- 4 !.~

1 i Size & diversity of channel bell substrate

•
.~.;..; ..
~ ;;,. ' 0 - 4 0 -- 5
fin homo us = 0• I diverse mazes = tax
is
12 ]vvide,tce of channel incision or widening

d incised = 0• stable bad dt battlrc ~ max rots 0 - S 0 - 4 0 - 5
''"' 13 Presence of major bank failuwes

~.
ficvero crasiort = 0• rm crosi atablc bank ~ mac Dints 0 - S 0 - 5 0 - 5
„~
14 Root depot and density o» banks
na visible roots = 0• daasc toots throe t = max nb 0 - 3 0 - d 0 - 5
! 5 Yntpact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production

. substantial im ct =0• no evidence ~ max Dints 0 - 5 0 , 4 0 - S Li
16 Presence o! riflk-pooi/ri~le-pool complexes
. no rifllcs/ti 1os or ols = 0• well-dcwelo ~ max leis 0 - 3 0 - S 0 - G a
17 Habitat complexity

;~' ~
littiC or no habitat = 0; eat varied habitats ~ max rots 0- 6 0- 5 0- 6
l$ Canopy rnvcrage over streambed

no shadin v ctatioa ~ 0• cmntinuous = max rots p_ 5 0- 5 0- S
19 $ubetratc ewbeddedness ;
NA*
~
` : ~

d i embedded = 0• ktosc stracture = max 'A
.:
;
~::,;.~::;
,. ; , 0 -- 4 0 - 4
ZO Presence of stream invertebwates (seepage 4)
~;,, . no evidences = 0• c~tnmon namerous = tnax rots 0 - 4 0 •- 5 0 - S (~
21 Presence of amphibians

~.,
no evidence ~ 0• commo numerous t = max rots 0 - 4 0 - 4 0 - 4 (~
O: Z2 Pa esenec of t~h
~ , no evideacx = 0' common numert~us -max rots 4- 4 0 - 4 0 - 4
23 Evidcecc of wildlife asc 0 •- 6 0 - 5 0 - 5
no evidence W 0• abundant evidence = rnax Dints
Total Poirtts~PoRei111e'; ~ ~ :1fl0".. i00' 1:00
..:.
TUTAL:~CURE '{~Iso tziiiitet:~~~~=stp:{,ge
')
-an:sc wuuacecnsuca are no[ assesses m COaslal sttCaln.S.

PROPOSED
CURB ANO
GUTTER
TYPICAL L4T
LAYOUT
PROPOSED /MPERI/1'OUS AREA:
HOUSE.• 1,535fS.F.
CONC OR/VE, WALK, PATlO, & PADS: 762fS.F.
TOTAL: 2,297fS F.
TOTAL ALLOCATED PER LOT 3,050 S F.
30 0 30 60 90
Scale 1" = 30'