Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19980049 Ver 1_Emails_19980217John_D From: James Ronald (Ron) Linville [RON_LINVILLE@WSRO.ENR.State.NC.US] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 1998 5:59 AM To: John Dorney Subject: (Fwd) River Landing @ Sandy Ridge DWQ #980049 (Guilford) Talked to Kevin this AM and he has indicated that they will resubmit and not impact wetland and "perennial" stream with instream retention pond. They will still impact several linear feet of stream (non perennial, in my opinion) so no mitigation. They are to send new notification to you and me. Later, Ron ------- Forwarded Message Follows ------- From: Self <NROAR04/N1EW331> To: John Dorney <john@dem.ehnr.state.nc.us> Subject: River Landing @ Sandy Ridge DWQ #980049 (Guilford) Reply-to: Ron-Linville@WSRO.ENR.STATE.NC.US Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 16:06:41 +0000 Please place on hold. Waiting for a determination on actual size requirements for proposed wet retention pond stream impacts plus a determination as to whether or not wetland impacts can be avoided. This was a wild one from the perennial picture as it appears that the waters between ponds will dry up during the dry season. This would not have been the case prior to golf course ponds being constructed, in my opinion. High Point only requires a 20' buffer on their WQ ponds. They were also proposing to divert water from last pond. Both Kevin and I urged them not to do this. Kevin is getting tough to deal with in the field. Keeps us on our toes though. To a person uninstructed in natural history, a country stroll is a walk through a gallery filled with wonderful works of art, nine-tenths of which have their faces turned to the wall. -Thomas Huxley Eric -G From: RON_LINVILLE@WSRO.ENR.State.NC.US Sent: Tuesday, February 24,1998 12:26 PM To: eric@dem.ehnr.state.nc.us Subject: (Fwd) River Landing 0 Sandy Ridge DWQ #980049 (Guilford) Forwarded message: From: Self <NROAR04/N1EW331> To: John Dorney <john@dem.ehnr.state.nc.us> Subject: River Landing @ Sandy Ridge DWQ #980049 (Guilford) Reply-to: Ron-Linville@WSRO.ENR.STATE.NC.US Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 16:06:41 +0000 Please place on hold. Waiting for a determination on actual size requirements for proposed wet retention pond stream impacts plus a determination as to whether or not wetland impacts can be avoided. This was a wild one from the perennial picture as it appears that the waters between ponds will dry up during the dry season. This would not have been the case prior to golf course ponds being constructed, in my opinion. High Point only requires a 20' buffer on their WO ponds. They were also proposing to divert water from last pond. Both Kevin and I urged them not to do this. Kevin is getting tough to deal with in the field. Keeps us on our toes though. Ron Linville @ WSRO 910/771-4608 x 265 "The things that will destroy America are prosperity at any price, peace at any price, safety first instead of duty first, the love of soft living and the-get-rich-quick theory of life. This country will not be a permanently good place for us to live unless it's a good place for all of us to live." Theodore Roosevelt Division of Water Quality February 23, 1998 MEMO To: Ron Linville -IYA Prom: Eric Galamb I have gone throughi,.our files !and we have not received following projects below, ifyou have sent in your comments r review these projects ASAP and send, in your comments by Mat decision:by that date, the central office will make a decision on t review. DWQ No. Applicants Name County 980049 River Landing at Sandy Midge Guilford s recommendations on the . fitly, FAX them tome. Please 4. If you do not make a n. Thank you for the quick Permit Type NW26/14 V? r f.?