20041075 Ver 1_Staff Report_20060515

? Co
Staff Report Project Num: 20041075
Name: NCDOT - Sr 1396
County: Swain
Location: Alarka Creek Lauada
Latitude: +35°23'10"
SW Plan Location:
Owner: NC DOT Division 14 - Bryson City
Contact Person: Tippett, Lyndo
Inspection Date: 05/15/2006
Reason for Inspection: Routine
On-Site Representative(s):
Primary Inspector: Michael R Parker
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone: [phone]
Question Areas:
Site Visit
Inspection Summary:
DOT is proposing to grade, widen and pave NCSR 1396 in Swain County. One existig culvert will be extended by 32 linear feet in an
unnamed tributary to Alarka Creek. It is recommended that WQ Certification Nos. 3404 and 3366 be issued.
The 401 Certification was issued on May 17, 2006.
Version: 2 Status: Issued
Project Type: Pave road
Region: Asheville
Longitude: -83°31'19"
Title:
Phone:
Entry Time: 11:00 PM Exit Time: 11:15 PM
Inspection Type: Staff Report
Page: 1
Project Num: 20041075 Owner: NC DOT Division 14 - Bryson City
Inspection Date: 05/15/2006 Inspection Type: Staff Report Reason for Visit: Routine
Site Visit Yes No NA NE
Do impacts described in the application differ those seen in the field? 00 0 0
If yes, please describe differences:
Are the Intermittent/Perennial calls different in the application? Cl ¦ n n
If yes, please describe differences, and how mitigation ratios are affected:
Are there additional impacts not described in the application? n ¦ n n
If yes, please describe and quantify:
Were the impacts in place prior to the application for the 401 Certification? n ¦ n n
Additional conditions recommended for the Certification:
Recommended project modifications:
Is this a modification request to an existing Certification? 0000
Are there additional stromwater conditions that should be required due to the following classifications: n ¦ n n
# 303(d)list, Class WS, NSW, ORW, HQW
Describe:
Is this a subdivision or otherwise part of a larger project? E) n ¦ n
# If yes, what phase is this?
Are there prior impacts from prior phases? n n ¦ n
If yes, what are the cumulative imacts for this project?
Possible secondary impacts noted:
Comment:
Page: 2