20061944 Ver 2_Triage Comments_20080218

Use this form instead of writing inside the folder
Triage Comment Sheet
DWQ# 1 GI Lkgv Q
Triaged By:
Reviewer 1
Reviewer 2 l Pi-
Reviewer 3
Date: 0 ` a 3 'G?
Date: to
Date:
Issue Project (Reviewer 1) Issue Project (Reviewer 2)
? Issue with conditions (Reviewer 1)
? Issue with conditions (Reviewer 2)
? More Information (Reviewer 1) ? More Information (Reviewer 2)
? Return Application (Reviewer 1) ? Return Application (Reviewer 2)
? Send to Regions (Reviewer 1)
Send to Regions (Reviewer 2)
S:1Triage FormsWriage Issue Sheet.doc
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY
Lonesome Valley (06-1944)
Subject: Lonesome Valley (06-1944)
From: Eric Kulz <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:08:24 -0500
To: Kevin Barnett <[e-mail]>
Kevin:
We issued a 401 for this site, and it included on-site restoration of 570 LF of stream. The 401 was
issued on July 16. In October we got a request for a permit modification involving the mitigation
plan. According to the letter when Baker completed the design, it was only going to result in 440 LF
of stream restoration. So they got a letter from EEP to cover the 130 LF of credit.
So now we have a February 7, 2008 letter from Clement saying that they want to withdraw the request
for modification, and they are back to 570 LF. I compared the plan sheets and the plans are pretty
much identical to the plans submitted in October.
I would say we need to ask for an explanation.
Eric
Eric W. Kulz
Environmental Specialist
401 Oversight and Express Permitting Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
1 of 1 2/22/2008 12:43 PM