20160670 Ver 1_401 Application_20160716

■■ Wikh+ersRaven+el
NoOur People. Your Success.
July 1, 2016
US Army Corps of Engineers
NC -Division of Water Resources
Regulatory Field Office
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Ms. Tasha Alexander
Ms. Karen Higgins
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
1617 Mail Service Center
Suite 105
Raleigh, NC 27699
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Poole FamilyYMCA - Garner, Wake County- NWP 29 PCN Submittal
WR Project #02130063.00
Dear Ms. Alexander and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of YMCA of the Triangle, Inc., we are requesting authorization from the USACE to utilize
NWP 39 for 115 If of permanent stream impacts and 0.065 acres of temporary wetland impacts for
construction of the proposed YMCA facility. We are also requesting a 401 WQC from NCDWR for
the above referenced impacts, as well as a Buffer Authorization for 6,561 sf of permanent impacts
to Neuse River Riparian Buffers.
The project is ±13.92 acres in size and is located east of the intersection of Aversboro Road and Old
Scarborough Road in Garner, Wake County (Latitude: 35.681901°N; Longitude: -78.622342°W).
The project is located in the Neuse River basin (HUC: 03020201) and onsite waters drain to Swift
Creek (Lake Benson). The Water Quality Classification for Swift Creek (Lake Benson) is WS-
III;NSW,CA and the Stream Index Number is: 27-43-(5.5).
Proposed Project
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a YMCA facility to meet the recreational needs
of Garner, as such a facility does not currently exist within this area. The proposed project consists
of the construction of a YMCA facility and associated infrastructure including parking, utilities,
stormwater management and greenway trail.
In 1974, The Bell and Holding families donated the subject property to the YMCA. In 1998, the
YMCA established a program center in Garner that today serves more than 1,100 children at 10
sites. The YMCA of the Triangle relies on local schools and community centers for space to offer
after-school, day camp, sports, teen leadership programs, and year-round tracking -out programs.
This permanent facility allows the YMCA to expand and enhance programming for fitness, wellness,
family programming, and health initiatives for all ages within the Garner community.
As a part of the YMCA of the Triangle, the Poole Family YMCA will have the features of a full service
branch within the Association including gymnasium, fitness studios, locker rooms, children's center,
wellness floor, indoor track, and an outdoor aquatics center. The community requested the outdoor
aquatics center, indoor track and group exercise studios as necessary amenities, as these are
currently deficient in this community. This facility will likewise offer diverse programming meeting
the needs of the community: swimming lessons, group fitness classes, family activities, wellness
education and training, quality childcare, teen programs and youth sports. While the site is narrow,
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403
t: 910.256.9277 1 f: 910.256.2584 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

Poole Family YMCA- Garner, Wake County %0WithersRavenel
NWP 39 PCN No
o F People v s:ccess.
it is able to accommodate a compact building footprint, the outdoor swimming pool, a small
recreation area, and parking.
The building orientation along with adjacent parking and other features have been carefully located
to avoid impacts on the natural features of the site where feasible. The outdoor aquatics center has
been located close to the building and parking is provided around the building and pools for the
convenience of those using the facility. In addition to considering site impacts, YMCA of the
Triangle parking requirements are based on actual conditions at the 15 other facilities in six
Triangle region counties. While the number of parking spaces exceeds the minimum requirement
of the Town of Garner, parking demand is considered at the typical AM/PM peak times and the need
to provide adequate on-site parking to keep vehicles off local streets. Also considered are the
convenience of proximate parking to the primary entrances of the facility and the pool coupled with
accessibility requirements.
Please refer to the attached letter from YMCA of the Triangle, Inc. for a more in depth discussion of
the proposed Poole Family YMCA project.
Project History
Wetlands within the YMCA property (PIN: 1710138336) were delineated by WithersRavenel in
July 2015 and a Preliminary JD Request was submitted to David Shaeffer with the Corps of
Engineers on 07/28/15 via email. In an email dated 09/23/15, David Shaeffer preliminarily
approved the delineation (AID: SAW -2015-01777), but the approved Jurisdictional Determination
has not been received as of the date of this application. A copy of Mr. Shaeffer's email has been
provided as an Appendix.
Since the original submittal of the JD Request, the project design has changed to include an offsite
greenway trail connector to the greenway within White Deer Park to the west. As a result, WR has
delineated the wetlands and streams within the greenway corridor. A revised Preliminary JD
Request has been provided as an Appendix which includes both the YMCA property and offsite
greenway corridor. We are requesting issuance of the Preliminary JD in conjunction with issuance
of the NWP 39.
NCDWR issued a Buffer Determination for the YMCA property (PIN: 1710138336) on 08/03/15
(NBRRO #15-323), which has been provided as an Appendix. The only depicted stream within the
offsite greenway alignment is the downstream portion of Feature A, which was determined to be
subject to buffers under the Buffer Determination for the YMCA property. Therefore, a Buffer
Determination for the offsite greenway alignment is not necessary.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of 115 If of permanent intermittent stream impacts, 0.065 acres of
temporary wetland impacts and 6,561 sf of permanent riparian buffer impacts.
Wetland & Stream Impacts
Impact 3 will result in 115 If of permanent stream impacts for construction of outdoor aquatics
facility and parking lot. Impact 3 will impact the uppermost reach of Stream 3, which is a small
Page 2 of 6

Poole Family YMCA- Garner, Wake County %0 WithersRavenel
NWP 39 PCN lip
intermittent stream. Retaining walls have been utilized to stabilize fill for the aquatics center and
parking lot in order to minimize stream impacts.
Impact 7 will result in 0.023 acres of temporary wetland impacts for connection of the onsite sewer
system to an existing manhole.
The 0.023 acres of wetland impacts at Impact 7 are considered "permanent conversion" impacts by
the Corps of Engineers, as the entire 20 If sewer easement within the wetlands will be
maintained/mowed in perpetuity, thereby permanently converting forested wetlands to
herbaceous wetlands.
Impact 8 will result in 0.042 acres of temporary wetland impacts during construction of the
elevated pedestrian bridge over the wetlands for the greenway trail. The temporary impacts will
consist of clearing of the alignment of the elevated pedestrian bridge, as well as disturbance from
equipment during construction of the bridge. The pedestrian bridge will be constructed on pilings,
and no permanent wetland impacts will occur.
Neuse River Buffer Impacts
Impact 1 (Z1: N/A; Z2: 1,703 sf) & Impact 6 (Z1: 1,273 sf; Z2: 1,009 sf) will result in permanent
riparian buffer impacts for construction of the greenway trail which will connect to the existing
greenway trail within White Deer Park to the west.
Impact 2 will result in 598 sf of permanent Zone 1 impacts and 293 sf of permanent Zone 2 impacts
for construction of the outfalls for SCM #3 (Wet Pond).
Impact 4 will result in 487 sf of permanent Zone 1 impacts and 668 sf of permanent Zone 2 impacts
for construction of the outfall for SCM #1 (Bio- Retention).
Impact 5 will result in 530 sf of permanent Zone 2 impacts for connection of the onsite sewer to an
existing manhole. The entire 20 If sewer easement will be mowed/maintained in perpetuity, and
therefore the entire 20 If easement has been assessed as a permanent buffer impact.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
The linear configuration of the project site, along with the topography, wetlands, streams and
riparian buffers resulted in constraints on the site design. As a result of the buffered stream and
wetlands along the southern property boundary, all development had to be concentrated in the
northern portion of the property.
The proposed site design has gone through numerous revisions in an effort to minimize impacts to
onsite wetlands, streams and riparian buffers. The original site plan from August 2015 and
currently proposed site plan have been provided as Appendices to document the avoidance and
minimization of impacts through site design revisions. The August 2015 site design would have
resulted in impacts to the majority of Stream 3, as well as significant wetland impacts from
construction of the outdoor aquatics center, a BMP and the parking lot, and impacts would have
Page 3 of 6

Poole Family YMCA- Garner, Wake County %0 WithersRavenel
NWP 39 PCN
exceeded the impact thresholds for a NWP, resulting in a need for an Individual Permit. The
revisions to the site plan to minimize impacts include:
• Revisions to the outdoor aquatics center through swapping the locations of the lap pool and
kid pool, as well as the reduction in size of the kid pool.
• Shifting of the outdoor aquatics center east, closer to the main YMCA Building, which
resulted in a loss of the outdoor exercise area between the main YMCA Building and
outdoor aquatics center.
• Elimination of the Drop Off/Entry Plaza to allow the outdoor aquatics center to be shifted
further east.
Designing retaining walls along the outdoor aquatics center and parking lot to stabilize fill
rather than traditional backslopes which would have resulted in greater wetland and stream
impacts.
Relocation of the greenway trail and chapel from along the southern stream/buffers to
allow for redesign of the BMP (SCM 2) to eliminate wetland and stream impacts for the
BMP.
The site plan has been revised to greatly reduce proposed impacts, minimizing impacts to below
NWP impact thresholds, resulting in the project being eligible for authorization under a NWP 39.
Proposed permanent stream impacts will occur to the northern unbuffered intermittent stream
(Stream 3) for construction of the outdoor aquatics center and parking lot. The outdoor aquatics
center is critical to the success of the proposed YMCA center, as this is typically the most
immediately utilized component of any YMCA center and will fill a deficiency in the community, as
there are no such facilities available to the public in this area. Additionally, the outdoor aquatics
center typically generates most of the income for the facility over the first two years after opening,
which is critical to the financial feasibility of the project.
The parking lot has been designed to provide parking based on the parking demand at typical
AM/PM peak times for the other 15 YMCA facilities in the six Triangle region counties. Providing
adequate on-site parking is critical to preventing guests from parking their vehicles on adjacent
local streets, which would create both traffic and pedestrian safety hazards. The parking lot layout
has gone through several design alternatives to identify the best parking layout for the parking
spaces needed for this facility. The wooded area in the northwest portion of the site, north of the
multi -use play field, is not a feasible option for providing additional parking. Specifically, the
distance from the YMCA facility is problematic for accessibility. But more importantly, this area
receives significant runoff from the adjacent subdivision. If this area was designed for parking, the
impervious area to be treated, along with having to capture the offsite runoff in the stormwater
management system would have resulted in a drastic increase in the size of the BMP (SCM 3). Even
with the elimination of the multiuse play field, the increased size of the BMP (SCM 3) would take up
so much area that the actual number of parking spaces provided would not have resulted in any
significant changes to the main parking area that could have reduced impacts.
Wetland impacts have been minimized to only temporary impacts needed for connection of the
onsite sewer system to an existing sewer manhole and temporary impacts necessary for
construction of the elevated pedestrian bridge for the greenway. Temporarily impacted wetlands
will be restored to natural grade and seeded with a wetland seed mix to provide stabilization until
natural recruitment permanently stabilizes these areas.
Page 4 of 6

Poole Family YMCA- Garner, Wake County %0WithefSRav nel
NWP 39 PCN o,F People , success.
Riparian buffer impacts have been minimized to only those necessary for construction of the
greenway trail connector to White Deer Park, connection of the onsite sewer to an existing sewer
line and outfalls for the BMPs, which are "Allowable".
The currently proposed impacts represent the maximum avoidance and minimization of impacts to
wetlands, streams and buffers while maintaining a feasible project.
Mitigation
Stream Mitigation
The proposed permanent stream impacts will occur to an intermittent stream and are less than 150
If, and therefore stream mitigation is not proposed.
Wetland Mitigation
All proposed wetland impacts are temporary, and "permanent conversion" impacts are less than
0.10 acres, and therefore wetland mitigation is not proposed.
Buffer Mitigation
All proposed riparian buffer impacts are classified as "Allowable" in the Neuse River Riparian Buffer
Rules Table of Uses, and therefore buffer mitigation is not required.
Stormwater Management Plan
The proposed Stormwater Management system consists of a combination of Bio -retention (SCM
#1), a constructed wetland (SCM #2) and a wet detention pond (SCM #3). The bio -retention and
constructed wetland provide sufficient TN and TSS removal and discharge at non-erosive velocities
and diffuse flow is not required. The wet detention pond will provide sufficient TN and TSS removal
to eliminate the need for diffuse flow, and will discharge directly into the stream through the bypass
outfall. The Stormwater Management Plan will be reviewed and approved by the Town of Garner.
The current request is for 115 If of permanent stream impacts, 0.065 acres of temporary wetland
impacts and 6,561 sf of permanent impacts to Neuse River Riparian Buffers (see the attached
maps and PCN for details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely
WithersRavenel
T� S
Troy Beasley
Senior Environmental Scientist
Page 5of6

Poole Family YMCA- Garner, Wake County %0WithefSRav nel
NWP 39 PCN Our Peopte )'our Success.
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• Project Purpose Letter from YMCA of the Triangle, Inc.
• Wetland/Buffer Delineation Exhibit
• USGS Quad
• Wake County Soil Survey
• NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter (YMCA Property)
• Corps Email Approving Delineation for YMCA Property
• Preliminary JD Request (Revised to include offsite greenway alignment)
• NCNHPT&E Project Review Letter
• Original Site Plan from August 2015
• Currently Proposed Site Plan
• Impact Exhibits
Page 6 of 6

rq�0F W A Tom,, q
0 Niii� -c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Poole Family YMCA - Garner
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Garner
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
YMCA of Raleigh, Inc
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Book: 002215; Page: 00019
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Tim Carr — SVP Property & Facilities
3d.
Street address:
801 Corporate Center Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27607
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-719-9628
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Troy Beasley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Withers and Ravenel
5c.
Street address:
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
5d.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e. Telephone no.:
910-256-9277
5f.
Fax no.:
910-256-2584
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
PIN: 1710138336 —YMCA Site
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
PIN: 1710035130 — Greenway Connection to White Deer
Park
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.681901'N Longitude: - 78.622342°W
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
±13.92 acres — YMCA Property
±0.56 acres — Offsite Greenway Connector
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Swift Creek — Stream Index: 27-43-(5.5)
proposed project:
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -III; NSW; CA
2c.
River basin:
Neuse - 03020201
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site currently consists of undeveloped woodlands. The general land use in the vicinity consists of residential
developments and recreation, with White Deer park to the west and Lake Benson Park to the south.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
±0.97 acres within YMCA Property
±0.12 acres within Offsite Greenway Alignment
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
±1,507 If within YMCA Property
±104 If within Offsite Greenway Alignment
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a YMCA facility to meet the recreational needs of Garner, as such a
facility does not currently exist within this area. The proposed project consists of the construction of a YMCA facility and
associated infrastructure including parking, utilities, stormwater management and greenway trail.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of the construction of a full service YMCA facility, including an outdoor aquatics center,
multiuse play field and greenway, as well as associated infrastructure (i.e. roads, parking, utilities and stormwater
management). Retaining walls will be utilized to stabilize site fill for the outdoor aquatics center and parking lot to
minimize impacts. Standard commercial construction equipment and techniques will be used to construct the proposed
project.
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: WithersRavenel
Name (if known): Troy Beasley
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
David Shaeffer with the Corps of Engineers preliminarily approved the delineation specific to the YMCA property on
09/23/15 (AID: SAW -2015-01777), as documented in the attached email from David Shaeffer. We have provided a
revised Preliminary JD Request which includes both the YMCA property and the offsite greenway alignment, and are
requesting issuance of the Preliminary JD in conjunction with issuance of the NWP 39.
NCDWR issued a Buffer Determination for the YMCA property on 08/03/15 (NBRRO#15-323), which has been provided
as an Appendix. The only depicted feature within the offsite greenway alignment is the downstream portion of Feature A,
which was determined to be subject to buffers under the Buffer Determination for the YMCA property. Therefore, a Buffer
Determination for the offsite greenway alignment is not necessary.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
[6b, If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
Impact 7
® Yes
®Corps
❑ P ® T
Sewer Construction
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.023 acres
Wetland B
Impact 8
Temporary
® Yes
®Corps
❑ P ® T
Construction
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.042 acres
Wetland B
Access
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.065 acres
2h. Comments: Wetland impacts will be temporary from construction of the sewer connection to an existing manhole and
construction of the elevated pedestrian bridge over the wetlands.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Impact #3
Fill for construction
❑ PER
® Corps
® P ❑ T
of pool house and
UT to Swift Creek
® INT
® DWQ
4'
115 If
Stream 3
parking lot
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
115 If
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number—
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 6 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number-
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
Impact 1
®P❑T
Greenway
UT to Swift Creek (Stream 2)
❑ Yes
®No
N/A
1,703 sf
Impact
BMP High
® P [-]T
Flow
UT to Swift Creek (Stream 2)
®s
No
598 sf
293 sf
Bypass
Im act 4
p
Bio -Retention
El Yes
®P El T
UT to Swift Creek (Stream 2)
®No
487 sf
668 sf
Outfall
Impact 5
®P❑T
Sewer
UT to Swift Creek (Stream 2)
❑ Yes
®No
N/A
530 sf
Impact 6
®P❑T
Greenway
UT to Swift Creek (Stream 2)
❑ Yes
®No
1,273 sf
1,009 sf
6h. Total buffer impacts
2,358 sf
4,203 sf
6i. Comments:
All proposed buffer impacts are "Allowable".
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands
and "waters" could be minimized.
The linear configuration of the project site, along with the topography, wetlands, streams and riparian buffers resulted in
constraints on the site design. As a result of the buffered stream and wetlands along the southern property boundary, all
development had to be concentrated in the northern portion of the property.
The proposed site design has gone through numerous revisions in an effort to minimize impacts to onsite wetlands, streams
and riparian buffers. The original site plan from August 2015 and currently proposed site plan have been provided as
Appendices to document the avoidance and minimization of impacts through site design revisions. The August 2015 site
design would have resulted in impacts to the majority of Stream 3, as well as significant wetland impacts from construction of
the outdoor aquatics center, a BMP and the parking lot, and impacts would have exceeded the impact thresholds for a NWP,
resulting in a need for an Individual Permit. The revisions to the site plan to minimize impacts include:
• Revisions to the outdoor aquatics center through swapping the locations of the lap pool and kid pool, as well as the
reduction in size of the kid pool.
• Shifting of the outdoor aquatics center east, closer to the main YMCA Building, which resulted in a loss of the outdoor
exercise area between the main YMCA Building and outdoor aquatics center.
• Elimination of the Drop Off/Entry Plaza to allow the outdoor aquatics center to be shifted further east.
• Designing retaining walls along the outdoor aquatics center and parking lot to stabilize fill rather than traditional
backslopes which would have resulted in greater wetland and stream impacts.
• Relocation of the greenway trail and chapel from along the southern stream/buffers to allow for redesign of the BMP
(SCM 2) to eliminate wetland and stream impacts for the BMP.
The site plan has been revised to greatly reduce proposed impacts, minimizing impacts to below NWP impact thresholds,
resulting in the project being eligible for authorization under a NWP 39.
Proposed permanent stream impacts will occur to the northern unbuffered intermittent stream (Stream 3) for construction of
the outdoor aquatics center and parking lot. The outdoor aquatics center is critical to the success of the proposed YMCA
center, as this is typically the most immediately utilized component of any YMCA center and will fill a deficiency in the
community, as there are no such facilities available to the public in this area. Additionally, the outdoor aquatics center typically
generates most of the income for the facility over the first two years after opening, which is critical to the financial feasibility of
the project.
The parking lot has been designed to provide parking based on the parking demand at typical AM/PM peak times for the other
15 YMCA facilities in the six Triangle region counties. Providing adequate on-site parking is critical to preventing guests from
parking their vehicles on adjacent local streets, which would create both traffic and pedestrian safety hazards. The parking lot
layout has gone through several design alternatives to identify the best parking layout for the parking spaces needed for this
facility. The wooded area in the northwest portion of the site, north of the multi -use play field, is not a feasible option for
providing additional parking. Specifically, the distance from the YMCA facility is problematic for accessibility. But more
importantly, this area receives significant runoff from the adjacent subdivision. If this area was designed for parking, the
impervious area to be treated, along with having to capture the offsite runoff in the stormwater management system would
have resulted in a drastic increase in the size of the BMP (SCM 3). Even with the elimination of the multiuse play field, the
increased size of the BMP (SCM 3) would take up so much area that the actual number of parking spaces provided would not
have resulted in any significant changes to the main parking area that could have reduced impacts.
Wetland impacts have been minimized to only temporary impacts needed for connection of the onsite sewer system to an
existing sewer manhole and temporary impacts necessary for construction of the elevated pedestrian bridge for the greenway.
Temporarily impacted wetlands will be restored to natural grade and seeded with a wetland seed mix to provide stabilization
until natural recruitment permanently stabilizes these areas.
Riparian buffer impacts have been minimized to only those necessary for construction of the greenway trail connector to White
Deer Park, connection of the onsite sewer to an existing sewer line and outfalls for the BMPs, which are "Allowable".
The currently proposed impacts represent the maximum avoidance and minimization of impacts to wetlands, streams and
buffers while maintaining a feasible project.
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 8of13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Retaining walls will be utilized to stabilize site fill. Access during construction will occur through uplands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 8of13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The proposed Stormwater Management system consist of a
combination of Bio -retention (SCM #1), a constructed wetland (SCM #2) and a wet
detention pond (SCM #3). The bio -retention and constructed wetland provide
sufficient TN and TSS removal and discharge at non-erosive velocities and diffuse
® Yes ❑ No
flow is not required. The wet detention pond will provide TN and TSS removal
sufficient that diffuse flow is not required and will discharge directly into the stream
via the bypass oufall. Diffuse flow requirements will be reviewed and approved by
the Town of Garner during the review and approval of the stormwater management
plan.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
30.36%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The proposed Stormwater Management system consist of a combination of Bio -retention (SCM #1), a constructed
wetland (SCM #2) and a wet detention pond (SCM #3). The Town of Garner will review and approve the Stormwater
Management Plan as the certified local government entity.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Garner
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project consists of the construction of a YMCA facility, which is not anticipated to
be a catalyst for future
development.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
City of Raleigh Sanitary Sewer
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/home to identify if
there were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of the NHP data
did not identify any occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species or critical habitat on the subject
property or within 1.0 miles of the project, see attached NCNHP project review letter. Site reviews did not identify any
potential habitat for any federally protected species known to occur in Wake County, except for the Northern Long Eared
Bat.
Potential habitat for the northern Long-eared bat (NLEB) is listed as mature forest with trees over 3" dbh, which is used
for roosting during the day. Since the entire project area consists of mature forest over 3" DBH, there is potential northern
long eared bat habitat present. The USFWS Final 4(d) rule for the Northern Long -Eared bat specifies that tree removal
within the White Nose Syndrome (WNS) Zone is not prohibited as long as it occurs more than 0.25 miles from known
hibernacula and does not result in destroying known occupied maternity roost trees, or any other trees within a 150 ft -
radius from the maternity tree, during the pup season (June 1 — July 31). The proposed project is not located within 0.25
miles of any known hibernacula, nor is there any known maternity roost trees present on the project. Therefore, WR
concludes that the project "may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" the northern long-eared bat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters classified as EFH in Wake County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
WR reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/, to
determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The
database review did not identify any known resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com & site topo survey
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Troy Beasley — WithersRavenel 07/01/16
Authorized Agent
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1/ WithersRavenel
1/ Our People. Your Success.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION

WITHERS &,-RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Owner YMCA of the Triangle Area, Inc. (Client) does hereby appoint
Withers & Ravenel, Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate
local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC
Division of Water Resources, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for:
a) review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands,
surface waters, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate
environmental permit applications/requests for the ±13.92 acre tract located west of
intersection of Aversboro Rd and Old Scarborough Rd; Wake Co PIN# 1710-13-8336 .
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts on
behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required supplemental
materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of environmental
review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or termination by
the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
Withers & Ravenel Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Tel. [phone]
Date: 17 AIL 141 -
Signature of Client:
Tim Carr, SVP Property & Facilities
ame Print) (Title)
e�
(Sig ature)
801 Corporate Center Drive
Mailing Address
Raleigh, NC 27607
City State Zip
Phone: [phone]
Email: tim.carr at7ymcatriangle.org
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 275111 tel.: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
7011 Albert Pick Road I Suite G I Greensboro, NC 27409 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
PROJECT PURPOSE LETTER FROM
YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE, INC.
Page 2 of 11

-,M
the FOR YOUTH DEVELOPMENT
�P FOR HEALTHY LIVING
�`r FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
To Whom It May Concern:
RE: YMCA of the Triangle Area, Inc.
Poole Family YMCA in Garner
Environmental Impact Justifications - Summary
The YMCA of the Triangle Area will build a new full-service facility at 21 10 Aversboro Road in Garner
scheduled to open in late 2017 or early 2018. Our Civil Engineer/Land Planning firm, WithersRavenel
Inc., has created various site plan options that were developed during the early design phases of the
project. While each of these design iterations lessened the environmental impact, the site plan
submittal to the Town of Garner includes some impacts on the existing jurisdictional features and
stream buffers identified on the site. Some of the early design impacts were minimized by relocation
of the greenway trail extension to White Deer Park. This and two outfalls from the BMP's are
allowable impacts. We understand the current design impacts approximately 115 LF of un -buffered
stream.
Several points are offered below relative to the property and the required improvements to sustain a
facility that supports the community through programs meeting our principles of youth development,
healthy living, and social responsibility. These can be considered as justification that the project
team has vetted all practical alternatives to limit impacts.
In 1974, The Bell and Holding families donated to the YMCA nearly 14 acres of land located on
Aversboro Road in Garner. In 1998, the YMCA established a program center in Garner that today
serves more than 1,100 children at 10 sites. The YMCA of the Triangle relies on local schools and
community centers for space to offer after-school, day camp, sports, teen leadership programs, and
year-round tracking -out programs. This permanent facility allows the YMCA to expand and enhance
programming for fitness, wellness, family programming, and health initiatives for all ages within the
Garner community.
As a part of the YMCA of the Triangle, the Poole Family YMCA will have the features of a full service
branch within the Association including gymnasium, fitness studios, locker rooms, children's center,
wellness floor, indoor track, and an outdoor aquatics center. The community requested the outdoor
aquatics center, indoor track and group exercise studios as necessary amenities, as these are
currently deficient in this community. This facility will likewise offer diverse programming meeting
the needs of the community: swimming lessons, group fitness classes, family activities, wellness
education and training, quality childcare, teen programs and youth sports. While the site is narrow,
it is able to accommodate a compact building footprint, the outdoor swimming pool, a small
recreation area, and parking.
YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE
Association Resource Center, 801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 200, Raleigh, NC 27607
P 919-719-9622 • www.YMCATriangle.org
OUR MISSION: To put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

YMCA of the Triangle Area, Inc.
Poole Family YMCA in Garner
Environmental Impact Justifications - Summary
The building orientation along with adjacent parking and other features have been carefully located
to avoid impacts on the natural features of the site where feasible. The outdoor aquatics center has
been located close to the building and parking is provided around the building and pools for the
convenience of those using the facility. In addition to considering site impacts, YMCA of the Triangle
parking requirements are based on actual conditions at our 15 other facilities in six Triangle region
counties. While the number of parking spaces exceeds the minimum requirement of the Town of
Garner, we consider parking demand at the typical AM/PM peak times and the need to provide
adequate on-site parking to keep vehicles off local streets. We also consider the convenience of
proximate parking to the primary entrances of the facility and the pool coupled with accessibility
requirements.
The site master plan includes a future facility addition in an area designated as "Phase 1 —
Amphitheater". This will essentially be a grassy area adjacent to the building that is graded for
appropriate drainage that can be programmed for after-school and day camp activities — more of a
gathering space for organized play than a structured 'amphitheater' with stage, seating, and audio
capabilities.
We have and will continue to work closely with community representatives from the neighborhoods
adjoining our property particularly related to programming of activities on the property. This will
include the planning for the outdoor pool and green spaces. The master plan also limits development
of permanent constructed facilities in the upper northwest corner of the site. This area is directly
adjacent to several properties that have been established since the early 1980's. A small open field
will be created at the end of the parking lot, while leaving most of the natural forest in place.
Activities will support our summer camp and after-school tracking out providing for common play
areas mostly within the current natural environment.
We know from community surveys taken prior to commencing design that the YMCA's local
programming in Garner is appreciated by community leaders and those in the community who are
aware of its impact. Providing a facility that houses these programs for children, youth, and families
in addition to the current off-site locations, will enhance and grow mutually beneficial activities for
Garner families.
Respectfully Submitted,
Tim Carr, CFM, LEED AP O+M
Senior Vice President
Property, Facilities, and Risk Management
YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE
Association Resource Center, 801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 200, Raleigh, NC 27607
P 919-719-9622 • www.YMCATriangle.org
OUR MISSION: To put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
WETLAND/BUFFER
DELINEATION EXHIBIT
Page 3 of 11

r
I
'ST
S7
'`NOTI
NOT B' ,
ST
INT'••
(BUFFERED)
a'
STREAM 4
Z NNI L O
COQ
1) DELINEATION FOR YMCA SITE APPROVED BY DAVID SHAEFFER WITH CORPS OF ENGINEERS ✓
ON 09/23/15 (AID: SAW -2015-01777). x.
2) BUFFER DETERMINATION FOR YMCA SITE ISSUED BY NCDWR ON 08/03/15 (NBRRO#15-323) �r
POOLE FAMILY YMCA WETLAND LOCATION EXHIBIT 10 WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
GARNER WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USGS QUAD &
WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY
Page 4 of 11

RANCH FARM -RD
PINE AI
ewood
MAPLE LN
'
a POPLAR DF
p�
ho Heights
R7
kTk The-
Imml
Lake
Woodridge unset
Acres F' GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1000 2000
R'^�+✓IEW TRL
a,
v s _
DR n 1 4t�l Ar,�a c 1 inch = 2000 ft.
o
[1AA?�NI�U 1 ll�w 4_ f�"� - _ W
Hills
`� � FOREST OR
D R 70
se°Heathen`
ST sMlr ge V
l" H D
Hills IGARNER A _�
HOL.MAN DR
z
�p� RpOKOR ('KENTUCKY DR
o FOLEYDR KELAND DR
300 �p� ,.�.� Qper 'wA Pin
HEATHEN \
0
sOUTHERBY OR I
JSO>
Heatheridge�y'A� .Z
(� CLAYMORE DR —> p
A - ` Malibu Valley
TIMBER DR
300ATCNISON"ST
� s0a Com:. F
�MeER sT Van Story Hills
a �
FOXBURYDR
v _
41 Bagwett C"
Airport �c
e�`FALO� .l t u �� K� 1
UnloTi ��jl CerT
Carbide Pond v' q�
l%
Dunhaven by
the Lake \
I�EyIATER:OR 1 j Qke R0 Rand
Cem
8R OK R = t :-
pQ' ' f� OREGON'TRL
� "':
Rolling
-
H111S5i CRAVE N'DR /`� A Z RAND RD =
YS� O v / div Oe
POOLE FAMILY YMCA USGS QUAD (2013) WithersRavenet
LAKE WHEELER & GARNER Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
GARNER WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400
1 inch = 400 ft.
a�
a�
0
0
POOLE FAMILY YMCA USGS QUAD (2013) WithersRavenet
LAKE WHEELER & GARNER ,� Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
GARNER WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

1 GRAPHIC SCALE
w♦ . C 0 200 400
r.
A Ce B ?- 1 inch = 400 ft.
tiEtiC- _ A B2
_ApC
LoB CeC2
r
ApB
A�
A p B
—� CeB2
j
ALM-
CeC2
Cn
CeB2
Ce B�
CIC3
eC2 Ap82 ., " CeB2
CeB2
Me
Z CeC2 .
CeB2
�CeB4_
GARNER
POOLE FAMILY YMCA WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY - SHEET 78 6WithersRavenet
WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
NCDWR BUFFER DETERMINATION
LETTER FOR YMCA PROPERTY
Page 5 of 11

NACU R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
YMCA of Raleigh, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Dr. Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27607-5243
Determination Type.
Ri iffer Call
August 3, 2015
Isolated or EIP Call
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Subject: Buffer Determination
NBRRO#15-323
Wake County
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 26 .0259) ❑ Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Determination
❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 213 .0267)
Project Name: Garner YMCA
Location/Directions: Property is located at the west side of Aversboro Rd at the intersection of Old
Scarborough Rd.
Subject Stream
Swift Creek t Lake Benson I
Determination
Date: June
29, 2015
Staff:
James Graham
Feature Not
Subject
E/UP*
Start@
Stop@ Soil USGS
/Flag Subject
To
Survey Topo
To
Buffers
Buffers
A
X
I
Approximate
throughout
X
location shown on
map
S2
B
X
I
S1
Confluence
with A
C
X
E
D
X
I
S4
chic
, Carolina
,� �rturrrll�
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.org Location: 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Garner YMCA
Wake County
August 3, 2015
Page 2 of 2
E X I Approximate Approximate
location shown on location shown
map on map
S5 S5 -A
*E/I/P - Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service c/o Karen Higgins DWR — 401 &
Buffer Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx,
etc.) Karen Higgins DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit 512 N. Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 2760.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Resources (Central Office) at (919)-807-6300, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact James Graham at [phone].
'rsIte pe ttully,
Danny Smith Supervisor
Water Dual ity Regional Operation Section
Raleigh Regional Office
cc: RRO/SWP File Copy
Martin Richmond
Withers and Ravenel
115 MacKenan Dr.
Cary, NC 27511

►try ak r ,.'T i �� � _ _ � ��[ -
!Y'��
v
FRO
zz .�.
L :� � . Grp'- 4•-r Jnr eyr . ��� f + a.pr /"�_fY� 4 - .
K ,�� rte. �' i- - _ tl�; _ �.� _ � i � - i - �• � _ �
t
fn
„ m ua rn 4
�r`� � `' ,�t,.� ..� +i. ` 'jam, a _ � ••
• � r � �RI,�I�t�'����-��T'� � ,� *`� :moi. �! � �A - �� t �' �'.
�..�. "'�' ��r j E •: K ''s; , `� � 'ray -
ISP � �•. w{ y . ,

lole
vi
0

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
CORPS EMAIL APPROVING
DELINEATION FOR YMCA PROPERTY
Page 6 of 11

Richmond, Martin
From: Shaeffer, David L SAW <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 7:58 AM
To: Richmond, Martin
Cc: Beasley, Troy
Subject: SAW -2015-01777 Garner YMCA, YMCA of Raleigh, Inc. (JD Report Received)
(UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Hi Martin,
I have received your request for an approved jurisdictional determination for the Garner YMCA site. I have assigned this
project the file number SAW -2015-01777. Please reference this file number in the subject line of ALL future
correspondence regarding this project.
I have reviewed your delineation report and it looks good. I do not need to conduct a field review of this site and will
concur with the delineation as -is.
I do recommend that you request a preliminary determination in -lieu of the approved determination. I suspect that it
will be a while before we figure out the new regulations for issuing approved JDs.
You should note that I have a substantial backlog of jurisdictional determinations. It will likely be some time before I will
issue any paperwork for this site. Accordingly, if you intend to submit an application to impact waters of the U.S. on this
site, feel free to submit the application at your convenience.
Sincerely,
David L. Shaeffer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone] ext. 31 Fax: [phone]
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
1

• ' • • ' •
hit
2 � d �, • t rY �'�y§�J� a f �. � "�
J5 '�,•��. st�e�'s •� � _T� r .. �. `a � i�- ` �
44
.. �`.. • t�? �.'7" ` it,_t,Lr?T \_,� '�!. - �y� t y .t � 4 � �! iC� r 4 .
L7�S-5A E-1
STOP STREAM TT STREAM w' S-5
START STREAM t 'tZ
E-11
TT STREAM
D-1 F_1 TT STREAM
'
TT STREAM p-g TT STREAM A-1 S-1 �. - '•;
J
TT STREAM TT STREAM START STREAM -
S-4
START STREAM—/ C-1
° y i1»IIIhT I����i�� �� t
r + TT STREAM START TREAM iQS... .
r TRE M
t ,,,jj. ,1: �� F •r ��

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
PRELIMINARY JD REQUEST
FOR YMCA PROPERTY & OFFSITE
GREENWAY ALIGNMENT
Page 7 of 11

-4■ WithersRavenel
0 � Our People. Your Success.
Poole Family YMCA - Garner
Corps Al D # SAW -2015-01777
WR Project No. 02150390.00
Jurisdictional Determination Request Information
Applicant - YMCA of Raleigh, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27607
Property Owner - Same as Applicant
Physical Address - Project is located on west side of Aversboro Rd, at intersection of
Aversboro Rd and Old Scarborough Rd
Written Authorization: See attached Agent Authorization form
Nearest Municipality- Town of Garner, NC
County - Wake County
PIN - PIN: 1710-13-8336 -YMCA Site
PIN: 1710035130 - Greenway Connection to White Deer Park
Drainage Basin - Neuse River Basin
HUC Code: 03020201
Receiving Waters - Swift Creek (Lake Benson)
Stream Index: 27-43-(5.5)
Classification: Class WS -111; NSW, CA
Decidegrees - 35.681901°N; -78.622342°W
USGS Quad Map - Garner Quadrangle
Soils Map - Wake County Soil Survey - Sheet 78
Total Area - ±14.48 acres Total
±13.92 acres - YMCA Property
±0.56 acres - Offsite Greenway Corridor
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403
t: 910.256.9277 1 f: 910.256.2584 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

Richmond, Martin
From: Shaeffer, David L SAW <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 7:58 AM
To: Richmond, Martin
Cc: Beasley, Troy
Subject: SAW -2015-01777 Garner YMCA, YMCA of Raleigh, Inc. (JD Report Received)
(UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Hi Martin,
I have received your request for an approved jurisdictional determination for the Garner YMCA site. I have assigned this
project the file number SAW -2015-01777. Please reference this file number in the subject line of ALL future
correspondence regarding this project.
I have reviewed your delineation report and it looks good. I do not need to conduct a field review of this site and will
concur with the delineation as -is.
I do recommend that you request a preliminary determination in -lieu of the approved determination. I suspect that it
will be a while before we figure out the new regulations for issuing approved JDs.
You should note that I have a substantial backlog of jurisdictional determinations. It will likely be some time before I will
issue any paperwork for this site. Accordingly, if you intend to submit an application to impact waters of the U.S. on this
site, feel free to submit the application at your convenience.
Sincerely,
David L. Shaeffer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone] ext. 31 Fax: [phone]
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
1

• ' • • ' •
hit
2 � d �, • t rY �'�y§�J� a f �. � "�
J5 '�,•��. st�e�'s •� � _T� r .. �. `a � i�- ` �
44
.. �`.. • t�? �.'7" ` it,_t,Lr?T \_,� '�!. - �y� t y .t � 4 � �! iC� r 4 .
L7�S-5A E-1
STOP STREAM TT STREAM w' S-5
START STREAM t 'tZ
E-11
TT STREAM
D-1 F_1 TT STREAM
'
TT STREAM p-g TT STREAM A-1 S-1 �. - '•;
J
TT STREAM TT STREAM START STREAM -
S-4
START STREAM—/ C-1
° y i1»IIIhT I����i�� �� t
r + TT STREAM START TREAM iQS... .
r TRE M
t ,,,jj. ,1: �� F •r ��

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
YMCA of Raleigh, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 200; Raleigh, NC 27607
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Project is located at intersection of Aversboro Rd and Old Scarborough Rd in Garner. Wake Cc PIN#1710-13-8336
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC
County/parish/borough: Wake county
City: Garner
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.681901 °N; Long. -78.622342
oW
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Swift Creek (Lake Benson) 27-43-(5.5)
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
± 1,554 linear feet: varies width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardln Class: Riparian
Stream Flow: Intermittent
Wetlands: ± 1.09 acres.
Cowardln Class: Riparian
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: N/A
Non -Tidal: N/A
1

E
REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 9/23/2015
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
0 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: Martin Richmond - WithersRavenel
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
0 U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1.24,000 Garner Quad
0 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Wake County Soil Survey, 1970 Sheet 78
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
0 Photographs: 0 Aerial (Name & Date): NConeMap - 2013
❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2
or

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later 'urisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
4
Zv�`�e�s�a vere_�
Signat re and date of
person requesting preliminary JD 06/10/16
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Poole Family YMCA
Preliminary JD Inventory Table (Updated 06/10/16)
Estimated Amount of
Class of Aquatic
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin Class
Aquatic Resource in
the Review Area
Source
Wetland A
35.68187
-78.6243
Riparian
±0.97 acres
Non -section 10
YMCA Site
wetland
Wetland B
Non -section 10
Offsite Greenway
35.68184
-78.6253
Riparian
±0.12 acres
wetland
Alignment
Stream 1
35.68154
-78.6224
Riparian -Int
±20 If
Non -section 10
YMCA Site
Non -wetland
Stream 2
35.68147
-78.6224
Riparian -Int
±988 If
Non -section 10
YMCA Site
Non -wetland
Stream 2
Non -section 10
Offsite Greenway
35.68171
-78.6255
Riparian - Int
±47 If
Non -wetland
Alignment
Stream 3
35.68203
-78.6228
Riparian -Int
±398 If
Non -section 10
YMCA Site
Non -wetland
Stream 4
35.68157
-78.6248
Riparian -Int
±44 If
Non -section 10
YMCA Site
Non -wetland
Stream 5
Non -section 10
Within Offsite Greenway
35.68186
-78.6257
Riparian - Int
±57 If
Non -wetland
Alignment

GRAPHIC SCALE���
0 loo 200
1 inch = 200 ft. {
WHIT ORN�QR
f r !3
� O
}
��7L.
SUMMERS WALK CIR
11
Z NNI L O
.,,IL
�0 . h
IL
�
r
POOLE FAMILY YMCA AERIAL - 2012 1O WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
GARNER WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

_ Ak;
FA
EWA`11
t,
STREAM 3'
INT.
S-5
1 TART STREA
w.
t
li
r
I
w4w)
STREAM1,INT
F
`F
6 TREAM BEGINS AT FLAG S
STREAM •• D � TT STREAM
TT S
�� � •.�•� TT STREAM A-1
TTS TREAM
OF
1r
GREENENWAY `=+�
i •• c ;/ F:. _ . Y. a BYRE
IIII �I��I�
ALIGNMENT
1
r
i`
4
STREAM 4
i l rT M TB 5 •
s
■
9 E
INT -
+r
�.
a BE
AT FLAG
10
14
,y 1
r 1 1
� � � � • • � ..• � • � � � � � •' • �. SII
• 1•jjr
FAME
1 1
r
POOLE FAMILY YMCA DELINEATION
■
EXHIBIT
WAKE COUNTY
�.

RANCH FARM -RD
PINE AI
ewood
MAPLE LN
'
a POPLAR DF
p�
ho Heights
R7
kTk The-
Imml
Lake
Woodridge unset
Acres F' GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1000 2000
R'^�+✓IEW TRL
a,
v s _
DR n 1 4t�l Ar,�a c 1 inch = 2000 ft.
o
[1AA?�NI�U 1 ll�w 4_ f�"� - _ W
Hills
`� � FOREST OR
D R 70
se°Heathen`
ST sMlr ge V
l" H D
Hills IGARNER A _�
HOL.MAN DR
z
�p� RpOKOR ('KENTUCKY DR
o FOLEYDR KELAND DR
300 �p� ,.�.� Qper 'wA Pin
HEATHEN \
0
sOUTHERBY OR I
JSO>
Heatheridge�y'A� .Z
(� CLAYMORE DR —> p
A - ` Malibu Valley
TIMBER DR
300ATCNISON"ST
� s0a Com:. F
�MeER sT Van Story Hills
a �
FOXBURYDR
v _
41 Bagwell C"
Airport �c
e�`FALO� .l t u �� K� 1
UnloTi ��jl CerT
Carbide Pond v' q�
l%
Dunhaven by
the Lake \
I�EyIATER:OR 1 j Qke R0 Rand
Cem
8R OK R = t :-
pQ' ' f� OREGON'TRL
Rollin
g -:
HillsCRAVEN'DR /`� A Z RAND RD =
i ?
POOLE FAMILY YMCA USGS QUAD (2013) WithersRavenet
LAKE WHEELER & GARNER Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
GARNER WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400
1 inch = 400 ft.
a�
a�
0
0
POOLE FAMILY YMCA USGS QUAD (2013) WithersRavenet
LAKE WHEELER & GARNER ,� Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
GARNER WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

1 GRAPHIC SCALE
w♦ . C 0 200 400
r.
A Ce B ?- 1 inch = 400 ft.
tiEtiC- _ A B2
_ApC
LoB CeC2
r
ApB
A�
A p B
—� CeB2
j
ALM-
CeC2
Cn
CeB2
Ce B�
CIC3
eC2 Ap82 ., " CeB2
CeB2
Me
Z CeC2 .
CeB2
�CeB4_
GARNER
POOLE FAMILY YMCA WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY - SHEET 78 6WithersRavenet
WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

Print Form
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Garner YMCA City/County: Town of Garner Sampling Date: 7/22/2015
Applicant/Owner: YMCA of Raleigh, Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: DP -1
Investigator(s): T Beasley & M Richmond - W&R Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): < 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.68187 N Long: -78.6243 W Datum: NAD84
Soil Map Unit Name: Cn - Colfax sandy loam NWI classification: Headwater Forest
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x❑ No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑x No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 1E No ❑
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 ® No within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑x No ❑
Remarks
This data point was collected within Wetland A, near flag D-4 at the Lat/Long Isited above. This sampling point also
applies to Wetland B within the offsite greenway alignment because conditions were similar as Wetland A and Wetland B
are part of the same wetland complex.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Qn Surface Water (Al)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
L.I High Water Table (A2)
® True Aquatic Plants (B14)❑I
Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
1J Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
® Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
® Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
® Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (B7)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
® Microtopographic Relief (D4)
0 FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes No ___0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes No Depth (inches): 12"
Saturation Present?
Yes No __0 Depth (inches): 0"
Wetland Hydrology Present? YesNo rl
(includes capillary fringe)
_Q
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was present at this sampling point based on Primary and Secondary Indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP -1
(Plot size: 20' x 40'
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
7
Tree Stratum )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
= Total Cover
x FACW
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
— 3 - Prevalence Index is <_'3.0
— 4 - Morphological Adapations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
1. Carpinus caroliniana
50%
x❑ FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
4
(A)
2. Lirodendron tulipifera
15%
x❑ FACU
®
❑
® Total Cover
=
x❑ FACW
6
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
10%
❑ FAC
Total Number of Dominant
5
2.
®
❑
®
®
®
®
®
❑
®
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
4.
5.
❑
6
7.
5
8
Percent of Dominant Species
o
80 /o
10.
11.
O
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
6.
= Total Cover
1•Smilax rotundifolia
20%x❑
FAC
7.
®
Prevalence Index worksheet:
❑
3.
75%
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 20'X 30' )
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
5•
OBL species
x 1 =
1 None
❑
FACW species
FAC species
x 2 =
x 3 =
2. ❑
3.
❑
FACU species
x 4 =
4.
❑
UPL species
x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals:
(A)
(B)
6.
❑
7
❑
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Shrub StratumPlot size: 20' X 30'
( )
1 Vaccinium corymbosum
0%
25%
= Total Cover
x FACW
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
— 3 - Prevalence Index is <_'3.0
— 4 - Morphological Adapations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
❑
®
®
3
4
5.
®
❑
® Total Cover
=
x❑ FACW
6
7.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree –Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum Plot size:5' Radius
( )
1 Arisaema triphyllum
o
25/o
10%
2.
®
❑
®
®
®
®
®
❑
®
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
3
4
5.
6
7.
8
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20' x 40'
10%
)
= Total Cover
1•Smilax rotundifolia
20%x❑
FAC
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
®
®
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
5•
20% = Total Cover Present? Yes ❑ No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation was presnt at this sampling point based on the Dominance Test.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3" 10YR 3/1 100%
Loam Sandy Loam, Wet
Y-8" 10YR 4/2 85%
7.5YR 4/6 15% C M Loam Silty loam, Saturated
8" - 14" 10YR 4/1 80%
7.5YR 4/6 20% C M Loam Silty loam, Saturated
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) f] 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 0 Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑-H dro en Sulfide (A4)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
-❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) ® Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_� Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
—❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No ❑
Remarks:
Hydric soils were present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

Print Form
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Garner YMCA City/County: Town of Garner Sampling Date: 7/22/2015
Applicant/Owner: YMCA of Raleigh, Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: DP -2
Investigator(s): T Beasley & M Richmond - W&R Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): >2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.68187 N Long: -78.6243 W Datum: NAD84
Soil Map Unit Name: Cn - Colfax sandy loam NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x❑ No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑x No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 1E No ❑
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 1:1® No x within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No El
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks
This data point was collected within uplands adjacent to Wetland A, near flag D-4.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Qn Surface Water (Al)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
L.I High Water Table (A2)
® True Aquatic Plants (B14)❑I
Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
1J Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
® Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
® Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
® Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (B7)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
® Microtopographic Relief (D4)
® FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes No ___0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes No Depth (inches): >18"
Saturation Present?
Yes No __0 Depth (inches): >18"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_❑ No rxJ
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was not present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP -2
(Plot size: 30' Radius
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
7
Tree Stratum )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
— 3 - Prevalence Index is <_'3.0
— 4 - Morphological Adapations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
1. Carpinus caroliniana
20%
x❑
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
5
(A)
2. Quercus phellos
20%
x❑
FAC
7.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
3. Ilex opaca
10%
E]
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
7
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
3
4
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
4.
®
❑
❑
®
❑
®
❑
8
9.
5
10.
11.
Percent of Dominant Species
o
71 /o
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius
0%
)
O
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
6.
2.
❑
3.
7.
❑
®
4.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
®
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
5•
50%
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
OBL species
x 1 =
1 Carpinus caroliniana
20%
x❑
FAC
FACW species
FAC species
x 2 =
x 3 =
2. Ilex opaca 10% E] FACU
3. Diospyros virginiana
10%
❑
FAC
FACU species
x 4 =
4.
❑
UPL species
x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals:
(A)
(B)
6.
❑
7
®
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Shrub StratumPlot size: Radius
( )
1 Acer rubrum
40%
10%
= Total Cover
x❑ FAC
❑
❑
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
— 3 - Prevalence Index is <_'3.0
— 4 - Morphological Adapations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
3
4
❑
5.
®
❑
®
6
7.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:5' Radius )
1 None
10/o o
= Total Cover
❑
2.
®
❑
®
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
3
4
5.
6
®
❑
❑
®
❑
®
7.
8
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius
0%
)
= Total Cover
1•None
❑
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
®
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
5•
®
00/6 = Total Cover Present? Yes ❑ No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this sampling point based on the Dominance Test; however, vegetation at this site
fails the FAC -Neutral test and no FACW or OBL vegetation was present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3" 10YR 4/4 100%
Loam Clayey loam, dry
3" - 14+" 10YR 3/4 100%
Loam Clayey loam, dry
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) f] 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 0 Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑-H dro en Sulfide (A4)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
-❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) ® Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_� Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
—❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
Remarks:
Hydric soils were not present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

Print Form
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Poole Family YMCA - Offsite Greenway City/County: Wake Forest - Wake Co. Sampling Date: 2016-04-22
Applicant/Owner: YMCA of Raleigh, Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: DP -Up
Investigator(s): Martin Richmond - WithersRavenel Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): HIII Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): >2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.68187°N Long: -78.6252°W Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: CeD - Cecil Sandy Loam - 10-15% Slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes El No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No El
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 1:1® No x within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No El
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑x No ❑
Remarks
This sampling point was taken within uplands in the offsite greenway alignment, adjacent to Wetland B at the Lat/Long
listed above, near flag A-2.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Qn Surface Water (Al)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
L.I High Water Table (A2)
® True Aquatic Plants (B14)❑I
Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
1J Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
® Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
® Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
® Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (B7)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
® Microtopographic Relief (D4)
® FAC -Neutral Text (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes No ___0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes No Depth (inches): 16"
Saturation Present?
Yes No __0 Depth (inches): 4"
Wetland Hydrology Present? YesNo rl
(includes capillary fringe)
_Q
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size0' Radius )
1. Fagus grandifolia randifolia
Absolute
% Cover
50%
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
❑ x FACU
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 2
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
15%
® FAC
3
4.
®
❑
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5
6.
O
Percent of Dominant Species
o That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33 /o (A/B)
7.
®
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
65%
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
1 Fagus grandifolia
60%
E] FACU
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
2. Carpinus caroliniana 10% E] FAC
3.
❑
FACU species x 4 =
4.
❑
UPL species x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
❑
7
❑
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
— 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
70% = Total Cover
Shrub StratumPlot size: 15' Radius
( )
1 Fagus grandifolia 10% FACU
2
3
4
5.
6
7.
Herb Stratum Plot size:5' radius
( )
o
10/o
❑
❑
®
®
®
® Total Cover
=
— 3 - Prevalence Index is <_'3.0
— 4 - Morphological Adapations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree –Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1 Polystichum acrostichoides
5%
x❑ FACU
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
2.
3
4
5.
6
7.
8
9.
10.
11.
12.
®
❑
®
®
®
®
®
❑
®
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius
5%
)
= Total Cover
1•Lonicerajaponica
5%x❑
FAC
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
5•
5%
®
❑
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ❑ No E]
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation was not present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 3/3 100%
Loam
6-8 10YR 4/3 60%
7.5YR 4/6 40% C M Loam
8-14+ 7.5YR 5/8 60%
7.5YR 4/6 40% C M Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) f] 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 0 Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑-H dro en Sulfide (A4)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
-❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) ® Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_� Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
—❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
Remarks:
Hydric soils were not present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
NCNHP ME PROJECT
REVIEW LETTER
Page 8 of 11

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
Pat McCrory Bryan Gossage Susan Kluttz
Governor Executive Director Secretary
Clean Water Management Trost Fund
June 6, 2016
Troy Beasley
Withers & Ravenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
[e-mail]
RE: Poole Family YMCA; 02150390.00
Dear Troy Beasley:
NCNHDE-1709
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources from our database that have been compiled for the project referenced
above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary submitted
with your request for information. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences'
table and map.
Also attached is a table summarizing rare species and natural communities that have been documented
within a one -mile radius of the project boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural
heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is included for
reference. In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that
we may update our records. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile
radius, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning,
project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory
decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written
notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications.
Maps of NC Natural Heritage Program data may not be redistributed without permission from the NCNHP.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence
if a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), or an occurrence of a Federally -
listed species is documented within or near the project area.
Thank you for your inquiry. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need
additional assistance, please contact Suzanne Mason at [e-mail] or 919.707.8637.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Page 1 of 5

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Poole Family YMCA
Project No. 02150390.00
June 6, 2016
NCNHDE-1709
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the NCNHP database
does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The
use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare
species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our database.
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Wake County Open Space Wake County: multiple local government Local Government
Wake County Open Space Wake County: multiple local government Local Government
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Natural
Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on June 6, 2016; source: NCNHP, Q4 October 2015. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 5

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Poole Family YMCA
Project No. 02150390.00
June 6, 2016
NCNHDE-1709
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name ■ Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Status
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004 -PRE
Damselfly
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
Owner J11IMM'"'
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County:
multiple local government
Wake County Open Space Easement
Wake County:
multiple local government
Page 3 of 5
Historical 5 -Very
Low
Owner Type
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
--- Significantly G5 S2?
Rare

Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on June 6, 2016; source: NCNHP, Q4 October 2015. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 4 of 5

NCNHDE-1709: Poole Family YMCA
June 6, 2016
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 5 of 5
1.21,973
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
Sources: Ew HERE, OeLonne.. Yntermap. increment P Corp. GESCO.
USGS, FAD. NPS. NRCAN, Ge S6 e. IGN. Kadaster NL. Ordnance Survey,

:1 WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
AUGUST 2015 SITE PLAN
Page 9 of 11

/
-- —____---___--------_—___—_—__
`----- --------------
----------------- —' ___ __
—_—_—_�\_---_.— — /��___—__—_—
_ `L
--�---_—
_�
35'QUFFER�
11
�// --
_
�---
i B rEN1inFOIwA�nONOBt,N ErNOMWO%ELCL GiBgi—W —N OF NNIGNNALE BTANDMO S 1111O1TIONBOnODEfALB.
a,EDBESUPPO NI1RME1ER NNDLBARSAREPPPRONaL41EBA ONGPBLM oN
1. OxEBL NELNE
M_B0.9MoN—ECO—e6DAiAGPBBNTFNNDTOPOCaM rKrER`EEiAIpN. BINfAMB
BTREMIL �i ON mPNIO—E GINGN
6 ROW NPR OtENEW —ANE FOP GR4FxN.KP„PPOOES ONLYPIOWILL BE FN—D BASED ON -0 BNOYANNYSB.
ANDWw ENDMENBDNSS�PREV Amo ScrEPrwc ESsxa.BEREPDRIEDTDTNEEN.NEEN1.ON
TO III— AN EANI
AFFEcrEo Br THE o scRE�nNc'v6
10
D� N_E[sw akorcuP TTOL enGtoFWffi MTC N OFF CiDlww LR PPR PPm Lli UNL� mNiR�vwE
11 uL nsvw4 1DOOvatETEWxrc5ewA 1NrERB IONOTOH tEBNwOm Pnnl. NoRw.ErE U UerF.9 RE
uLP sEL auOE sxuL�B xncwROAncE wBTn*I uEaicnNs wlxwSAM<mFs ncrnccEssmumciio¢InEs1oDAA01-
Wx A TmGAR,GIMARMNGSENALBETRRMe—C.W -ON OFPAMNNGSTALL mPEBWN xNBVBE--
I
WHITHORNER
IVE
'MULTI 'Y
PLAY FIELD
63,0005E
-- --- — —\
`C —\� \�"`
35'HIZFFER
NO
3Tx 6Bsl�Tex
35 � FEW
v I
SMP
( HHA�E I AMPHfFIIEAI
POOLAOLJ _ \ \ v uTUR6 Nara RwMt/
DROP OkF
v I CONNECTION TO WHITE �.- :—I. /�.v .: — i --vi ( v II m� I I ,l,�N�v I J i / ( I / I RIGHT INIRIGHT OUT
DEER PARK TRAIL I — — LI lea I _ / —,TSx PLAZq. v x I (iJ / 1 �1 I I / / ij ACCESS/
�\`\\ r / \ (�<4�
- — __ -54bbv OG./Y \ �",
sr� !Mv APPR6xIMATESEWER tery '&���\ _ a — III/I /— — / l sEdorvonRY q,vmv
A I cNAP _ I I /
MANHOLE LOCATION _ �� — / LDDD F / 11,000 I/ri 1 / r I
\�•• / / IIAIII
m {� _ _ s� � , � 11,000 SF / KID POpL / I IMAIN(YMCk �UILDIN�
1
i A �' I � � / / /� ,/ � +P�25,44S3F
_, $\ // v—` /I .� 4 \�•: v• I ���— � v ���/ /I �"'_c�_�� v �v v v �/ \ � (, I � ��� // ISI /r � i
WETLANDS�TYP.) i S BUFFER4TYP.)INC ti. = r v i 1 ( \ (—i ' / 1 F•� / i i i
—I"—� �+�...—.•.. �, ,,_ ,-.�<— ,_ ((\ \ / '� � �( \ \ ..�Bv� / 1 I\ � �� / J
i4,�MPI
100 SF I �ERB I I / i I/ 1 1 // FULL SERVICE ACCES� � I
I v A Jam_ 35'BVFER—�
BUFfER—�
�VJHITE DEER PARK—
i
—
�I SUMMERS WALK d[RCLE I /
% — --
-------1 i � --_• PR�y T ZINNIA LANE
--' z9/YF
Poole Family
YMCA
Aversboro Rd
Garner, NC 27529
Owner
YMCA of the Triangle Area, INC.
801CorporBte Center Drive, Suite200
Raleigh, NO 27607
(919)7139622
Architect
RATIO Architects, Inc.
135 E. Martin Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
919-821-0805
Structural Engineer
Stroud Pence
4906 Pr %svonal Court, Sud, 200
Raleigh, NO 27609
[phone]
Mechanical / Electncal Engineer
Engineered Designs Inc.
1151 SE Cary Parkway, Sud. 200
Cary, NO 27518
[phone]
Civil Engineer
WithersRavenel
115 MaOK.nan Dr.
Cary, NO 27511
(919)4633340
•
0 25 so 00
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REISSUE
CHECKED BY
APPROVED BY
PROJECT NO.
15041.000
CONFIDEMOB SHAIL BE USED ONLY
IFNITIANIHITEC11 III 11101"I
SHEET TITLE
SCHEMATIC SITE
PLAN
SHEET NUMBER
L1.0
_�
35'QUFFER�
11
i B rEN1inFOIwA�nONOBt,N ErNOMWO%ELCL GiBgi—W —N OF NNIGNNALE BTANDMO S 1111O1TIONBOnODEfALB.
a,EDBESUPPO NI1RME1ER NNDLBARSAREPPPRONaL41EBA ONGPBLM oN
1. OxEBL NELNE
M_B0.9MoN—ECO—e6DAiAGPBBNTFNNDTOPOCaM rKrER`EEiAIpN. BINfAMB
BTREMIL �i ON mPNIO—E GINGN
6 ROW NPR OtENEW —ANE FOP GR4FxN.KP„PPOOES ONLYPIOWILL BE FN—D BASED ON -0 BNOYANNYSB.
ANDWw ENDMENBDNSS�PREV Amo ScrEPrwc ESsxa.BEREPDRIEDTDTNEEN.NEEN1.ON
TO III— AN EANI
AFFEcrEo Br THE o scRE�nNc'v6
10
D� N_E[sw akorcuP TTOL enGtoFWffi MTC N OFF CiDlww LR PPR PPm Lli UNL� mNiR�vwE
11 uL nsvw4 1DOOvatETEWxrc5ewA 1NrERB IONOTOH tEBNwOm Pnnl. NoRw.ErE U UerF.9 RE
uLP sEL auOE sxuL�B xncwROAncE wBTn*I uEaicnNs wlxwSAM<mFs ncrnccEssmumciio¢InEs1oDAA01-
Wx A TmGAR,GIMARMNGSENALBETRRMe—C.W -ON OFPAMNNGSTALL mPEBWN xNBVBE--
I
WHITHORNER
IVE
'MULTI 'Y
PLAY FIELD
63,0005E
-- --- — —\
`C —\� \�"`
35'HIZFFER
NO
3Tx 6Bsl�Tex
35 � FEW
v I
SMP
( HHA�E I AMPHfFIIEAI
POOLAOLJ _ \ \ v uTUR6 Nara RwMt/
DROP OkF
v I CONNECTION TO WHITE �.- :—I. /�.v .: — i --vi ( v II m� I I ,l,�N�v I J i / ( I / I RIGHT INIRIGHT OUT
DEER PARK TRAIL I — — LI lea I _ / —,TSx PLAZq. v x I (iJ / 1 �1 I I / / ij ACCESS/
�\`\\ r / \ (�<4�
- — __ -54bbv OG./Y \ �",
sr� !Mv APPR6xIMATESEWER tery '&���\ _ a — III/I /— — / l sEdorvonRY q,vmv
A I cNAP _ I I /
MANHOLE LOCATION _ �� — / LDDD F / 11,000 I/ri 1 / r I
\�•• / / IIAIII
m {� _ _ s� � , � 11,000 SF / KID POpL / I IMAIN(YMCk �UILDIN�
1
i A �' I � � / / /� ,/ � +P�25,44S3F
_, $\ // v—` /I .� 4 \�•: v• I ���— � v ���/ /I �"'_c�_�� v �v v v �/ \ � (, I � ��� // ISI /r � i
WETLANDS�TYP.) i S BUFFER4TYP.)INC ti. = r v i 1 ( \ (—i ' / 1 F•� / i i i
—I"—� �+�...—.•.. �, ,,_ ,-.�<— ,_ ((\ \ / '� � �( \ \ ..�Bv� / 1 I\ � �� / J
i4,�MPI
100 SF I �ERB I I / i I/ 1 1 // FULL SERVICE ACCES� � I
I v A Jam_ 35'BVFER—�
BUFfER—�
�VJHITE DEER PARK—
i
—
�I SUMMERS WALK d[RCLE I /
% — --
-------1 i � --_• PR�y T ZINNIA LANE
--' z9/YF
Poole Family
YMCA
Aversboro Rd
Garner, NC 27529
Owner
YMCA of the Triangle Area, INC.
801CorporBte Center Drive, Suite200
Raleigh, NO 27607
(919)7139622
Architect
RATIO Architects, Inc.
135 E. Martin Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
919-821-0805
Structural Engineer
Stroud Pence
4906 Pr %svonal Court, Sud, 200
Raleigh, NO 27609
[phone]
Mechanical / Electncal Engineer
Engineered Designs Inc.
1151 SE Cary Parkway, Sud. 200
Cary, NO 27518
[phone]
Civil Engineer
WithersRavenel
115 MaOK.nan Dr.
Cary, NO 27511
(919)4633340
•
0 25 so 00
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REISSUE
CHECKED BY
APPROVED BY
PROJECT NO.
15041.000
CONFIDEMOB SHAIL BE USED ONLY
IFNITIANIHITEC11 III 11101"I
SHEET TITLE
SCHEMATIC SITE
PLAN
SHEET NUMBER
L1.0

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
CURRENTLY PROPOSED
SITE PLAN
Page 10 of 11

�i \ j
� --
//,
+ II eee I
HEATHER RIDGE ON
Itl i I \ ZONING: R-12 R-12
/
\ \\ / / ; / T^ _ — ?' _E✓H—IiHORNE DRIVE \ f
I / I
CHAPEL-, \ RETAININGWALLWITH4'BLACKVINYL / I j
CHAIN LINK FENCEMOUNTED ON TOP 1
ER
/ / HEATHRIDGE SUBDIVISION
ZONING: R-12
PRNAtERESIDENCE
20NWG:RdO _ O -�
l
SHELTER -- --
I I MULTI -USE PLAY FIELD
I 20.800 BE
( I 1 PROPDBED
1 PARKING NYR)
30'PROPW SEWER /
__ T_EASEMENT
I I 1 SCM 9-WETPOND H59I w i _ _ _ —
I 5
1
w, ......Ty -
I PROPGBED
PROPOSED 30 SEWER EASEMENT �����'' -•:.. .: .- 1' I
1
✓ 1 ..�'=MXSe s P1A2AY i i.
I'\ �'_— ✓�,—'��/ EX. WET105
I
---
'_--_— _'—_--- - -
i--------------
j!I � L fI II If II ' ` � f I SUMMERS WNI(BDI IK)N f � 1 7,RTAILG WALLWI �BILAK
5v STREAM BUFFLRVimcNVNLINKFENCEMOONT/
ED
ZONINGR2
I I f ONTOPOW)SEEMIAILONC6A
SUMMERS MALI( CIRCLE
ZINNIA LANE
I y 1i
t f /
r
SITE DATA
PROPERTY OWNER:
YMCAOFMETRIANGLE
801 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 2D0
`l 1
"\ IHEATHER
RALEIGH, NC 27607
STRBETADOREM,.
OAVERSBORGROAD
REAL ESTATE ID:
OOOS6T!
WAKE COUNTY PIN:
1710DR336
CURRENTZONING:
MIRA(CCMMUNITY SERVICEIOMER SPECIAL USE)
EXISTING USE:
VACANT
PROPOSED USE
YMCA FACILITY& OUTDOOR AQUATICS CENTER
TRACT AREA:
1392ACRES(M5,402SF)
DISTURBED AREA:
827 ACRES (360,131 BF)
IMPERVIOUS:
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA:
0.00 SF
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA:
MAIN STRUCTURE = 35,1045E
POOL HOUSE2,1 SEE
SHE =i6TA SF
PARKING & DRIVES =111,106SF
SIDEWALKS =n 168F
TOTAL =182,559 BE (M.2%)
PARKING:
BUILDINGS
I SPACE I MID SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA
35,104 SF (WIN STRUCTURE) - 2,129 (POOL HOUSE) =37,233 BE
37 233 SF 120D SF =186 SPACES REWIRED
NOTE PARMNGFORFUMREEXPANSIONMLLBEACC MOFOt ATTHETIMEOFTHATPROJECTOEVELOPMMT
OUTDOOR FACILITIES:
1 SPACE 12505E OF DEVELOPED(PARK) AREA
13,504 BF (POOL AREAL -1,800 BE (SHELTER) =15,1 % BE
15,104 SF 1250 SF = M SPACES REOUIRED
NOTE: ME%AYFIELDWIUWUSEDSOLELYFORYMCADAYCAMPANDAFTFRSCHY1 Nf I MEPATRONBUSINGDIEFI€LB
WILLSEDROPPFDOFFOXVMDNOADD1710NALPARpNG
KJUW NEEDED.
TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED:
246 SPACES (7 SHALL BE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE)
TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED:
272 SPACES (1 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SPACES PROPOSED)
TREE COVERAGE:
PROPOSED TREE CANOPY COVER:
257,609 SF OR 591 AC. (42%L
• NODIMENSION IS LESS THAN 15 FEET AND OR LOCO SQUARE FEET.
• REQUIRED PRESERVED TREE COVER AREA FOR NON RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT =12%
1 PARKING NYR)
30'PROPW SEWER /
__ T_EASEMENT
I I 1 SCM 9-WETPOND H59I w i _ _ _ —
I 5
1
w, ......Ty -
I PROPGBED
PROPOSED 30 SEWER EASEMENT �����'' -•:.. .: .- 1' I
1
✓ 1 ..�'=MXSe s P1A2AY i i.
I'\ �'_— ✓�,—'��/ EX. WET105
I
---
'_--_— _'—_--- - -
i--------------
j!I � L fI II If II ' ` � f I SUMMERS WNI(BDI IK)N f � 1 7,RTAILG WALLWI �BILAK
5v STREAM BUFFLRVimcNVNLINKFENCEMOONT/
ED
ZONINGR2
I I f ONTOPOW)SEEMIAILONC6A
SUMMERS MALI( CIRCLE
ZINNIA LANE
I y 1i
t f /
r
GENERAL NOTES:
1. FIELD SURVEY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS COMPLETED BY WITHERSRAVENEL.
2 WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION PROVIDED BY WYTHERSRAVENEL
3. NO FEMA iW YEAR FLOOD PLAIN IS LOCATED" MIN THIS PARCEL.
C ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TOWN OF GARNER
STANOME, SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS.
5. ALL WORK MUST COMPLY WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BUILDING CODE AND Ml
ACCESSI60.1TY CODE IN EFFECT AT ME TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILRIES PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON PLANE IS BASED ON
BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS
APPROXIMATE.
7. PRIOR TO START GF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE
PRECONSTRUCTION MEETINGS WITH THE TOWN OF GARNER AND WAKE COUNTY
ENWRONMENTALSERVICES.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONTROL AND TO INITIATE CLEAN-UP OF
THE LITTER AND REFUSE GENERATED FROM THIS DEVELOPMENT, BOTH ONSITE AND
OFFSITE, DURING THE IHSTALIATION OF SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
UNTIL SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION — ALL CONSTRUCTION THE CLEANUP _ LITTER AND
REFUSE SHALL BE DONE ON A REGULAR BASIS. THIS SHALL INCLUDE INITIATING ACTION
ANDASSUMING ANY COSTS IN REMEDYING ME SITUATION
9. ALL WRITTEN INFORMATION AND WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL PREVAIL ANY
DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO ATTEMPTING ANY
WORK INTHE AREAAFFECTED BY THE DISCREPANCY.
1D. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM BACK OP CURB TO BACK OF CURB OR TO FACE OF BUILDING
WALL OR TO PROPERTY LINE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
II ONLY GENERAL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS REFER TO
ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS
12 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AND DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATIONS SHOWN ARE FOR
GRAPHICAL PURPOSES ONLY AND WILL BE FINALIZED WED ON TRAFFIC STUDY
ANALYSIS.
13. All PAVEMENT TRAFFIC) MARKINGS SHALL BE THERMOPLASTIC, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF
PARKING STALL STRIPES WHICH MAY BE PAINTED WHITE.
14. ALL SIGN AND STRIPING PLACEiENT& MATERIALS TO CONFORM TO THE LATEST BOTTOM
OFTHEAMITCD.
15. AT STREET INTERSECTIONS NOTHING SHALL BE ERECTED, PLACED, PI -ANTED OR
ALLOWED TO GROW IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO IMPEDE THE SIGHT VISION AT THE
INTERSECTION AND THAT THE TOWN'S MINIMUM SIGHT TRIANGLE REQUIREMENT,
MEASURED FROM THE INTERSECTING RIGMOF-WAY, TEN FOOT (10) ALONG THE
APPROACH STREET AND SEVENTY FEET (70) ALONG ME INTERSECTING STREET.
18.ACCESSR E ROUTES ILL EXCEED 1:20 LONGITUDINAL OR 1:48 TRANSVERSE SLOPE
PER ADA.
17. WHEELCHAIR RAMP LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE OMIY. WHEELCHAIR RAMPS SHOULD
BE LOCATED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TOWN OF GARNER AND
MMT STAMMOS AFTER THE LOCATIONS OF THE PROPOSED STOP BARS ANDPoR
PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS HAVE BEEN STAKED OUT,
18. ALL ACCESSIBLE
TH
SIGNAGE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH E AMERICANS WITH
DISABILITIES ACT ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES (ADAAGL.
19. ALL CURB AND GUTTER ON-SITE SHALL SE 24', ALL CURS AND GUTTER WTTHIN PUBLIC
RIGHT OF WAV SHALLBE30'. ALLMEDIAN CURBAND GUTTER SHALL E IV,
20. ALL ASPHALT AND CONCRETE WALKS & WALK INTERSECTIONS TO HAVE SMOOM RADII.
NORAGGED EDGES OR IRREGULAR C IRVFB ATL BE ACCEPTED,
21. EXPANSION JOINTS IN THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK SHALL BE PLACED EVERY 25' ON CENTER
U. FOL -MING SITE PIAN APPROVAL. APPROVAL OF THE SOIL EROSION AND SEDINENTATION
PIAN BY WAKE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION IS REQUIRED. APPROVAL OF
THE PLAN BY WAKE COUNTY IS CONTINGENT ON A LETTER FROM THE TOWN STATING
THAT ME REQUIRED TREE PROTECTION FENCING HAS BEEN INSTALLED BY THE
CONTRACTOR, AND INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. A
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FROM WAKE COUNTY FOR THIS PROJECT IS REQUIRED BY
METOWN OF GARNER PRIOR TO RECEIVING A WILDING PERMIT.
, ME ADDRESS SHALL BE DISPLAYED ON THE HIGHEST, OUTMOST SURFACE OF ME
BUILDING OR ON A SIGN, NUMERALS TO BE AT LEAST 12 INCHES IN SIZE, IN A COLOR
CONTRASTING WITH ITS BACKGROU1m, AND VISIBLE FRCMTHE ROAD.
2d. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROTECT ALL SCIS INSTALLED ON -WE MUST BE CERTIFIED
BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND THE TOWN OF GARNER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
MUST RECEIVE ALL AS -BUILT DRAWINGS PRIOR TO RECEIVING ME CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY
25. FENCING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO SURROUND STORMWATER SCM 3 AND SMALL BE BLACK
VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK AV IN EIGHT,
26. PERMANENTAMTEMPORARYSIGNAGEREQUIRM NAPPROVEDSIGNPERMITPRIORTO
INSTALLJOI N. SIGNAGE IS A SEPARATE WBMTTAL, REVIEW AND APPROVALPRICESS BY
ME PLANNING DEPARTMENT. SIGNAGE FOR THIS SITE MOST COMPLY WITH THE TOWN OF
GARNER SIGN ORDNANCE..
27. CONTACT JUSTIN MASSENDLL AT (919)]]54458 ORjmassWgill®garnernegpv TO SCHEDULE
A PRECONSTRUCDON MEETING PRIOR TO OBTAINING BUILDING PERMITS FOR THIS PLAN.
\%
WithersRavenel
OurP-p'ne Y.Un SVccess
GRAPHIC SCALE
60 30 60
Lo
.O
ro
L
O
z
ai
C
L
eo
a
3
O
15-0390
_
W
N E FO
RT AI�IPF�\f
12-07-15 3 d Comment Re Wises I
C2.0
f
/ WIDEWATERS GROUP
`l 1
"\ IHEATHER
ZONING: 081
WOODS SUBDIVISION
OPENSPACE
\ZONING: R-15
GENERAL NOTES:
1. FIELD SURVEY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS COMPLETED BY WITHERSRAVENEL.
2 WETLAND AND STREAM INFORMATION PROVIDED BY WYTHERSRAVENEL
3. NO FEMA iW YEAR FLOOD PLAIN IS LOCATED" MIN THIS PARCEL.
C ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TOWN OF GARNER
STANOME, SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS.
5. ALL WORK MUST COMPLY WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BUILDING CODE AND Ml
ACCESSI60.1TY CODE IN EFFECT AT ME TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILRIES PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON PLANE IS BASED ON
BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS
APPROXIMATE.
7. PRIOR TO START GF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE
PRECONSTRUCTION MEETINGS WITH THE TOWN OF GARNER AND WAKE COUNTY
ENWRONMENTALSERVICES.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONTROL AND TO INITIATE CLEAN-UP OF
THE LITTER AND REFUSE GENERATED FROM THIS DEVELOPMENT, BOTH ONSITE AND
OFFSITE, DURING THE IHSTALIATION OF SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
UNTIL SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION — ALL CONSTRUCTION THE CLEANUP _ LITTER AND
REFUSE SHALL BE DONE ON A REGULAR BASIS. THIS SHALL INCLUDE INITIATING ACTION
ANDASSUMING ANY COSTS IN REMEDYING ME SITUATION
9. ALL WRITTEN INFORMATION AND WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL PREVAIL ANY
DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO ATTEMPTING ANY
WORK INTHE AREAAFFECTED BY THE DISCREPANCY.
1D. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM BACK OP CURB TO BACK OF CURB OR TO FACE OF BUILDING
WALL OR TO PROPERTY LINE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
II ONLY GENERAL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS REFER TO
ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS
12 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AND DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATIONS SHOWN ARE FOR
GRAPHICAL PURPOSES ONLY AND WILL BE FINALIZED WED ON TRAFFIC STUDY
ANALYSIS.
13. All PAVEMENT TRAFFIC) MARKINGS SHALL BE THERMOPLASTIC, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF
PARKING STALL STRIPES WHICH MAY BE PAINTED WHITE.
14. ALL SIGN AND STRIPING PLACEiENT& MATERIALS TO CONFORM TO THE LATEST BOTTOM
OFTHEAMITCD.
15. AT STREET INTERSECTIONS NOTHING SHALL BE ERECTED, PLACED, PI -ANTED OR
ALLOWED TO GROW IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO IMPEDE THE SIGHT VISION AT THE
INTERSECTION AND THAT THE TOWN'S MINIMUM SIGHT TRIANGLE REQUIREMENT,
MEASURED FROM THE INTERSECTING RIGMOF-WAY, TEN FOOT (10) ALONG THE
APPROACH STREET AND SEVENTY FEET (70) ALONG ME INTERSECTING STREET.
18.ACCESSR E ROUTES ILL EXCEED 1:20 LONGITUDINAL OR 1:48 TRANSVERSE SLOPE
PER ADA.
17. WHEELCHAIR RAMP LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE OMIY. WHEELCHAIR RAMPS SHOULD
BE LOCATED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TOWN OF GARNER AND
MMT STAMMOS AFTER THE LOCATIONS OF THE PROPOSED STOP BARS ANDPoR
PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS HAVE BEEN STAKED OUT,
18. ALL ACCESSIBLE
TH
SIGNAGE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH E AMERICANS WITH
DISABILITIES ACT ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES (ADAAGL.
19. ALL CURB AND GUTTER ON-SITE SHALL SE 24', ALL CURS AND GUTTER WTTHIN PUBLIC
RIGHT OF WAV SHALLBE30'. ALLMEDIAN CURBAND GUTTER SHALL E IV,
20. ALL ASPHALT AND CONCRETE WALKS & WALK INTERSECTIONS TO HAVE SMOOM RADII.
NORAGGED EDGES OR IRREGULAR C IRVFB ATL BE ACCEPTED,
21. EXPANSION JOINTS IN THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK SHALL BE PLACED EVERY 25' ON CENTER
U. FOL -MING SITE PIAN APPROVAL. APPROVAL OF THE SOIL EROSION AND SEDINENTATION
PIAN BY WAKE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION IS REQUIRED. APPROVAL OF
THE PLAN BY WAKE COUNTY IS CONTINGENT ON A LETTER FROM THE TOWN STATING
THAT ME REQUIRED TREE PROTECTION FENCING HAS BEEN INSTALLED BY THE
CONTRACTOR, AND INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. A
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FROM WAKE COUNTY FOR THIS PROJECT IS REQUIRED BY
METOWN OF GARNER PRIOR TO RECEIVING A WILDING PERMIT.
, ME ADDRESS SHALL BE DISPLAYED ON THE HIGHEST, OUTMOST SURFACE OF ME
BUILDING OR ON A SIGN, NUMERALS TO BE AT LEAST 12 INCHES IN SIZE, IN A COLOR
CONTRASTING WITH ITS BACKGROU1m, AND VISIBLE FRCMTHE ROAD.
2d. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROTECT ALL SCIS INSTALLED ON -WE MUST BE CERTIFIED
BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND THE TOWN OF GARNER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
MUST RECEIVE ALL AS -BUILT DRAWINGS PRIOR TO RECEIVING ME CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY
25. FENCING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO SURROUND STORMWATER SCM 3 AND SMALL BE BLACK
VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK AV IN EIGHT,
26. PERMANENTAMTEMPORARYSIGNAGEREQUIRM NAPPROVEDSIGNPERMITPRIORTO
INSTALLJOI N. SIGNAGE IS A SEPARATE WBMTTAL, REVIEW AND APPROVALPRICESS BY
ME PLANNING DEPARTMENT. SIGNAGE FOR THIS SITE MOST COMPLY WITH THE TOWN OF
GARNER SIGN ORDNANCE..
27. CONTACT JUSTIN MASSENDLL AT (919)]]54458 ORjmassWgill®garnernegpv TO SCHEDULE
A PRECONSTRUCDON MEETING PRIOR TO OBTAINING BUILDING PERMITS FOR THIS PLAN.
\%
WithersRavenel
OurP-p'ne Y.Un SVccess
GRAPHIC SCALE
60 30 60
Lo
.O
ro
L
O
z
ai
C
L
eo
a
3
O
15-0390
_
W
N E FO
RT AI�IPF�\f
12-07-15 3 d Comment Re Wises I
C2.0

:1 WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
IMPACT EXHIBITS
Page 11 of 11

i II
I
I
I
� I
� II
II' LOCATION OF
BUFFER IMPACT 5 AND 6 AND I I
WETLAND IMPACT 7 AND 8 1
LOCATION OF BUFFER
STREAM
IMPACT 1 AND 2 i l
Illl
SCM #3
WETPOND
271—
WAR! @�-
uv`• `// ��` J'
INTERMITTENT
-__-
NOT BUFFERED
®
265-265.
I
;F L ! � _::- �_ --_ / -"/ � '• Vii..' `
• A
. . . . . . . . . . __ ►� o
STREAM 3
. . . . . . . . - INTERMITTENT
NOT BUFFERED
�5� -Q- � �� � • ��� - - - � - �. - - - - - - � 265 SCM #2 � ' • i i j 11 11
a
�����. - WETLAND
co
�� t♦.'. .254 STREAM 4 STREAM 1
_____ INTERMITTENT �. 2 �� INTERMITTENT al<
25y h �\ `♦ rs' -- I- NOT BUFFERED �' �'f_ NOT BUFFERED "
LOCATION OF BUFFER
IMPACT 4
1 �26p ^ . ...
260
STREAM 2 _
INTERMITTENT SCM #1 5
' ♦ �' -� �"' �. —. ��^�' / I� BIO -RETENTION
BUFFERED �' _ �POND �
♦
0, L - - - - -- ` . .� .� . . .`- 28, }
♦ \� - - - �� - -� " - - _ - -r /' -\ STREAM 2
♦ - - - INTERMITTENT
f65 ♦, ` I ` j ---- �`BUF _ --- - - -- ---
2 WHITE DEER -
PARK J �I
IMPACT TABLE
IMPACT
BUFFER IMPACT
STREAMIMPACT
WETLAND IMPACT
MAP
ZONE
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
NUMBER
2
1
ZONE 1
0 SF
0 AC.
0 LF
0 SF
0 AC.
ZONE 2
1,703.08 SF
0.039 AC.
0 LF
0 SF
0 AC.
2
2
ZONE 1
597.79 SF
0.014 AC.
0 LF
0 SF
0 AC.
ZONE 2
293.00 SF
0.007 AC.
0 LF
0 SF
0 AC.
3
3
-
0 SF
0 AC.
115 LF
0 SF
0 AC.
ZONE 1
486.93 SF
0.011 AC.
0 LF
0 SF
0 AC.
4
4
ZONE 2
668.28 SF
0.015 AC.
0 LF
0 SF
0 AC.
ZONE 1
0 SF
0 AC.
0 LF
0 SF
0 AC.
5
5
ZONE 2
530.06 SF
0.012 AC.
0 LF
0 SF
0 AC.
ZONE 1
1,273.00 SF
0.029 AC.
0 LF
0 SF
0 AC.
5
6
ZONE 2
1,009.45 SF
0.023 AC.
0 LF
0 SF
0 AC.
6
7
-
0 SF
0 AC.
0 LF
1,005.77 SF
0.023 AC.
6
8
-
0 SF
0 AC.
0 LF
1840.40 SF
0 .042 AC.
TOTALS
6,561.59 SF
0.150 AC.
115 LF
2,846.17 SF 1707.7065
AC.
LEGEND
r PROPOSED IMPACT AREAS
L - J
PROJECT INFORMATION:
TOTAL ACREAGE: 13.92 AC.
REAL ESTATE I.D.:0005627
PIN REFERENCE: 1710138336
EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY WITHERSRAVENEL.
GRAPHIC SCALE
8o 0 40 80 X60
1 inch = 80 ft.
E
0-
Q
L.Ijm
ul) X
o W
Z
Q U
U
Ix Q
W a.
u-
m

PERMANENT 1 \/
ZONE 1: 597.79 SF o cil
ZONE 2: 293.00 SF m
I I STREAM 2
� INTERMITTENT \
I i i li li BUFFERED
LEGEND
® ZONE1
® ZONE 2
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 10 20 40
1 inch = 20 Ft. ID
,N I
E
2t=
am
W T
X
N W
� N
Z 06
a
W u
LLa
La
Z C
m _
as
z
u�
c
a
V
t—
c
O
Z
J_
u—
w
W z
J
a�

HC M
°•
- - _ A
SSS .ez_
SS o
SS - HC �:e1 v
Q ° _ _ "
SS ° d ° d �._ H _ C wNr
SS v �_��� v > n3
-°1ro i2u
SS
IMPACT 3 / _ v "
Iq PERMANENT �, a v a N
INTERMITTENT STREAM ' — — _ _ _ / N — �� _ ss s v
115 LF — — _ N SS
A u . . .
46
4.
La< 'A .: 0. . -- s . . e - G
< ... a . d v .
.�`� d e v
° O ° e .e °.
OL HOSE .. a.... y m
�za
Ln X �/
/° ea ° Q w
a
�M
d' e c Q
a °
dJIIJS
�� D a e ■ ° W
J ° ..v � .v v �. 5
4 LL
v d
/ / d
STREAM 3 ° . s a a . ..z /. d 1 a +, _i e U O
d a
INTERMITTENT �r, a i°e i °
" NOT BUFFERED d e - -
c
A. -- n J
A v ' C
d v.e
-d d° e e LL c
a. KID POOL
v'
/f c
4 z
� 0 z
a ° o
AP a
A. d.
A4 d
1 1 v II 1
LEGEND
STREAM IMPACT
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 10 20 ao
1 inch = 20 ft.

1.
A. na
a a.
y`n 11 o
c
----Cz
is
diAS —� d I > Z 3
\ Olc - -- - - --- .- -- - --- --- -- --- - -- -- - I .m v
m�
° °O `` rn
II STREAM 1 ° s w AF
— INTERMITTENT ` °a ° —w
–� NOT BUFFERED w
zo wm
/ �—
% 285 l/1 w
M I •/ C
o _ \ Z d
BIO -RETENTION ON POND x U
LLJ a
\\ ��• w
SCM #1 - 280 Co
OUTFALL
N /
N O / z
N z
u�
u
dl/dS
STREAM 2 IMPACT 4 i i — �— �S ---:.� dw d.uJS >- c
S PERMANENT / _ >- z
INTERMITTENT � J
BUFFERED ZONE 1: 486.93 SF
ZONE 2: 668.28 SF Q
w
w
— —
W—
z
— ^ / ——————————--——————---——————
o
_ z
FE11
LEGEND
ZONE 1
® ZONE 2
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 10 20 40
1 inch = 20 Ft. ID

`Sg
a a �.a a a ♦i. a
-
STREAM EX.
INTERMITTENT a WETLANDS
NOT BUFFERED
a a a IMPACT
PERMANENT �� s ♦♦_ _ I
- ZONE 1: 0.00 SF ♦ ♦ — C
\ ZONE 2: 530.06 SF \ N / Cn
ELEVATED a ♦ _
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE77T,♦♦
i-
EX.
• . r a ♦ r
WETLANDS'
.\ ♦ ss ♦ Mo I, I
C�y ♦ \ ♦ N
+ + a a ♦i r i ♦ r i a .a a r I r I r
IMPACT 6 .. r r\ r ♦ a r 254 I a r Ir Ir
PERMANENT
ZONE 1:1,273.00 SF ♦♦ r -�-
ZONE 2: 1,009.45 SF
- -- .. I
255
\ ,�/ ,� ♦ STREAM 2 1
�� ♦♦ INTERMITTENT
dll�s \ass _ + ♦ I
�- BUFFERED I
xON
aL ♦ ♦ ss ♦ L_ STREAM 4 I
-:17♦♦ — — — — INTERMITTENT I
N s ♦ ♦ - NOT BUFFERED moi— 1
♦♦ ss ♦♦ I
50' STRERAM ♦♦ ;s I
BUFFER ♦♦
LEGEND
® GRAPHIC SCALE
ZONE 1 zo 0 10 zo ao
® ZONE 2 1 inch = 20 Ft. ID
E
wm
� X_
N w
D
p\
Q �+ 1
Ix Q
La
m�

\ IMPACT 7
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
1,005.77 SF r
\
r r r\\\ r 1r r sr
• A r r r r r r 1
-- ---- STREAM 5
- -
r r + INTERMITTENT r
NOT BUFFERED ,
2Sp A y,
ELEVATED PEDESTRIAN---,
BRIDGE
1
� d.UAs
Ix
ON
MM 'Adlaill
11
IMPACT 8TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESSWETLAND ►`,��� IMPACT
1,840.40 SF
254
♦ ♦ STREAM 2 ♦ ♦
♦ INTERMITTENT
BUFFERED ♦♦
♦♦ ss ♦♦
♦ s
LEGEND
OWETLAND IMPACT
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 10 20 40
1 inch = 20 Ft.
E*
E
E
H
Q F—
d Co
p X
Z w
Q00
J 06
W
C