The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20080358 Ver 1_Restoration Plan_20080226• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan Person County, North Carolina State Contract No. D06002 Prepared for: North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program ,.- ;0 St{gym WROCsKAM DECEMBER 2007 o ~ .~'' D F~.a '~- ~ 2~(lR GN uENk - NiAiEit WATER BRAN , N"EYLp,NDS AND StORM Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan Person County, North Carolina SCO Contract No. D06002 KCI Project No. 1205472501 Prepared for: NCDENR-EEP 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 ~~ I~cos~stem i H~~i.kAM Prepared by: KCI Technologies, Inc. 4601 Six Forks Road, Suite 220 Raleigh, NC 27609 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~_ ~~ ~~ KCI TECHNOLOGIES Gary M. Mryncza, Project Manager gmryncza@kci.com 919-783-9214 December 2007 Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - The Cane Creek Tributary Site (CCTS) is afull-delivery stream mitigation project located in northwestern Person County, North Carolina. The project site is situated within the upper portion of the Roanoke Basin in the 03010104 8-digit hydrologic unit code and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality Subbasin - 03-02-05. The project watershed is located in a rural setting within the Northern Inner Piedmont ecoregion of the Piedmont physiographic province. - The CCTS is made up of 17,375 existing linear feet of tributaries. On the western side of the site, there . are 9,110 existing linear feet of stream with Tributary 1 forming the main drainage into which five smaller tributaries flow. There are 8,265 existing linear feet on the eastern side of the CCTS where Tributary 7 receives flow from three additional tributaries. The project streams all drain into Cane Creek, - which then flows into Hyco Lake. The project watershed includes 0.70 square mile (448 acres) on the western portion of the site and 0.62 square mile (397 acres) on the eastern side. i Historic aerial photographs are available for the site starting in 1955. From 1955 to 1976, the CCTS was . forested. Between 1976 and 1998, the property was cleared and converted into pasture except for patches of riparian vegetation that remain along the streams. The entire property is currently used as pasture for i cattle. All of the project streams have been impacted by livestock and land clearing. These impacts have resulted in bank erosion on all of the tributaries and severe incision on selected tributaries. There are also spoil piles remaining from land clearing, which disrupt overland flowpaths. Bank erosion within the project . streams is producing excess sediment into the streams. The riparian zones remain at least partially vegetated, which has helped to minimize the degradation of certain reaches, but overall the CCTS - contains a series of tributaries in varying degrees of instability. The CCTS offers the opportunity to restore a significant headwater system. By developing a healthy, interconnected riparian corridor, the site will also help to reduce nutrient and excess sediment inputs. The - proposed project reaches were designed as restoration or enhancement based on the level of departure from a stable stream system. The streams at the CCTS will be restored to Bc and B channels, although C channels will exist in isolated areas where there is a floodplain. Riparian vegetation at the CCTS site will i be restored using Piedmont Alluvial Forest species in floodplain areas and Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest • species in the stream valleys and slopes leading away from floodplains. The project goals are to: S Improve water quality with reduced nutrient and sediment levels. ^ Create high-quality aquatic and terrestrial habitat. • In order to meet these goals, the following objectives must be accomplished: • Plant a functional Piedmont Alluvial Forest floodplain community along with a Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest to create an effective riparian buffer. ^ Arrest bed elevation lowering and stabilize seep outlets. ^ Stop bank erosion by developing the appropriate channel dimension and stabilizing with vegetation. ^ Remove relic spoil piles that disrupt overland flowpaths. ^ Exclude livestock from the riparian areas with fencing. Project success will be assessed by utilizing measurements of stream dimension, pattern, and profile; site photographs, and vegetation sampling. The monitoring report format will be similar to that set out in the most recent EEP monitoring protocol. Monitoring shall be conducted annually for a total period of five - years or until the project meets its success criteria. i Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan Miti ation Summar Reach Existing Stationing Proposed Stationing Mitigation Type Priority Approach Existing Linear Footage Designed Linear Footage Tl-1 10+00-17+26 10+00-17+59* EnhancementI - 726 759 T1-2 17+26-21+50 17+59-21+50 Enhancementl - 361 328 T1-3 21+50-24+63 21+50-24+74 Restoration P3 313 324 T1-4 24+63-35+19 24+74-34+94 Restoration P3 1,056 1,020 T1-5 35+19-38+38 34+94-37+64 Restoration P3 319 270 T2-1 50+00-53+OS 50+00-53+OS Enhancement II - 305 305 T2-2 53+OS-55+32 53+OS-54+91 Restoration I'2 227 186 T2-3 55+32-56+92 54+91-56+51 Enhancementl - 160 160 T2-4 56+92-58+63 56+51-58+51 Restoration P3 151 180 T3-1 60+00-61+07 60+00-61+OS* EnhancementI - 107 105 T3-2 61+07-75+83 61+OS-76+79 Restoration P3 1,457 1,554 T4-1 80+00-81+90 80+00-82+66 Restoration P3 190 266 T4-2 81+90-99+99 82+66-102+53 Restoration P3 1,789 1,967 TS-1 110+00-112+64 110+00-112+64 EnhancementII - 244 244 TS-2 ] ]2+64-113+82 112+64-113+85 Restoration P3 118 121 T6A 240+00-240+89 240+00-240+89 Enhancement II - 89 89 T6B 250+00-251+03 250+00-251+03 Enhancement II - 103 103 T6AB 240+89-241+19 240+89-241+29 Restoration P3 30 40 T6C 120+00-121+80 120+00-121+88 Restoration P3 180 188 T6 121+80-134+75 121+88-134+38 Restoration P3 1,275 1,230 T7A 260+00-261+36 260+00-261+36 Enhancement II - 136 136 T7-1 140+00-144+69 140+00-144+69 Enhancement II - 469 469 T7-2 144+69-148+00 144+69-148+00 EnhancementI - 331 331 T7-3 148+00-168+43 148+00-169+08 Restoration P2/3 2,023 2,088 T7-4 168+43-180+89 169+08-181+54 EnhancementI - 1,246 1,246 T7-5 ]80+89-182+74 181+54-183+08 Restoration P3 185 154 T7-6 182+74-190+49 183+08-190+83 EnhancementI - 755 755 T7-7 190+49-196+59 190+83-196+93 EnhancementI - 610 610 T8A 270+00-271+10 270+00-271+10 Enhancement II - I10 110 T8 200+00-204+49 200+00-204+49 EnhancementI - 449 449 T9 210+00-213+69 210+00-213+69 EnhancementI - 369 369 T10-1 220+00-233+00 220+00-233+00 Enhancement II - 1,300 1,300 T10-2 233+00-235+82 233+00-235+82 EnhancementI - 282 282 Total 17,465 17,738 Total Pro osed Stream Enhancement I 5,394 Total Pro osed Stream Enhancement II 2,756 Total Pro osed Stream Restoration 9,588 ii i Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 2.0 PROJECT SITE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION ............................................................. ..1 2.1 Directions to Project Site ........................................................................................................... .. l 2.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWQ River Basin Designations .................................... .. l 3.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION ..................................................................................... ..1 3.1 Project Drainage Area ............................................................................................................... ..1 3.2 Water Surface Classification/Water Quality ............................................................................. ..1 3.3 Geology and Soils ...................................................................................................................... ..2 3.4 Historical Land Use and Development Trends .......................................................................... .. 2 3.4.1 Historical Resources .............................................................................................................. ..2 3.4.2 Land Use and Development Potential ................................................................................... .. 3 3.5 Endangered/Threatened Species ................................................................................................ ..3 3.6 Cultural Resources ..................................................................................................................... .. 3 3.7 Potential Constraints .................................................................................................................. .. 3 3.7.1 Property Ownership and Boundary ....................................................................................... .. 3 3.7.2 Site Access ............................................................................................................................ .. 3 3.7.3 Utilities .................................................................................................................................. .. 4 3.7.4 FEMA/Hydrologic Trespass .................................................................................................. ..4 4.0 PROJECT SITE STREAMS (EXISTING CONDITIONS) .......................................................... .. 4 4.1 General Site Description ............................................................................................................ ..4 4.2 Channel Stability Assessment ................................................................................................... .. 6 4.3 Bankfull Verification ................................................................................................................. ..8 4.4 Vegetation .................................................................................................................................. ..9 5.0 REFERENCE STREAMS ............................................................................................................. .. 9 5.1 UT to Fisher River Reference Site ............................................................................................ 10 5.2 Reference Vegetative Communities .......................................................................................... 10 6.0 PROJECT SITE RESTORATION PLAN ..................................................................................... 10 6.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives ................................................................................. 10 6.1.1 Design Approach ................................................................................................................... l l 6.1.2 Designed Channel Classification .......................................................................................... 11 6.1.3 Targeted Buffer Communities ............................................................................................... 14 6.2 Sediment Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 14 6.3 Natural Plant Community Restoration ...................................................................................... 17 7.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ...................................................................................................... 17 7.1 Stream Stability ......................................................................................................................... 18 7.2 Vegetation .................................................................................................................................. 19 7.3 Schedule/Reporting ................................................................................................................... 19 8.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 21 iii Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan TABLES Table 1. Project Restoration Structure and Objectives Table 2. Project Watershed Land Use Table 3. Project Drainage Areas Table 4a. Morphological Criteria for T 1 Table 4b. Morphological Criteria for T2 Table 4c. Morphological Criteria for T3 and T4 Table 4d. Morphological Criteria for TS and T6 Table 4e. Morphological Criteria for T7-2, T7-3, and T7-4 Table 4f. Morphological Criteria for T7-5, T7-6, and T7-7 Table 4g. Morphological Criteria for T8, T9, and T10-2 FIGURES Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. North Carolina Ecoregions Figure 3. Project Watershed Figure 4. Project Site NRCS Soil Survey Map Figure 5. Project Watershed Land Use Figure 6. Existing Conditions Figure 7. Reference Site Vicinity Map (UT to Fisher River) Figure 8. Reference Site Watershed Map (UT to Fisher River) Figure 9. Proposed Site Plan STREAM PLAN SHEETS Plan Sheet 1 Plan Sheet 1 A Plan Sheets 2-2A Plan Sheets 2B-2E Plan Sheets 3-21 Plan Sheets 37-52 Title Sheet General Notes and Project Legend Details: Stream Restoration Details: Typical Cross-Sections Plan and Profile Planting Plan APPENDICES Appendix A. Historic Aerial Photographs Appendix B. Correspondence Appendix C. Conservation Easement Appendix D. Project Site Photographs Appendix E. Existing Conditions Data - Appendix F. NCDWQ Stream Identification Forms Appendix G. Stream Gauge Summary Appendix H. Reference Reach Data . i • • iv i Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Cane Creek Tributary Site (CCTS) is afull-delivery stream mitigation project being developed for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). This restoration plan presents detailed information about the existing site and watershed conditions, the morphological design criteria, and the project design parameters based upon natural channel restoration methodologies. 2.0 PROJECT SITE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION 2.1 Directions to Project Site The CCTS is located northwest of Hyco Lake in northwestern Person County and its location is shown in Figure 1. The center of the site is situated at approximately 36.5038 degrees north and -79.1310 degrees west (WGS 1984). The project area is located at the center of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Quadrangles Alton, Leasburg, Milton, and Olive Hill. - To reach the site from Raleigh, proceed west on US-70 until it merges with I-85/LTS-15 south. Continue on I-85 for approximately 1.5 miles and then take exit 176B for Duke St/US-501 Bypass. Take a right off of the exit and travel on US-501 for 27.5 miles. Within the town of Roxboro, turn left onto Court St/US- . 158 west. Follow US-158 west 0.4 mile and turn right onto NC-57, continuing northwest for another 12.3 • miles. Once within the small community of Semora, turn right onto NC-119 and drive north 0.5 mile. Turn right onto Cunningham Road and continue east for 0.85 mile. The CCTS is accessible through a metal gate on the right. 2.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWQ River Basin Designations The project site is situated within the upper portion of the Roanoke Basin in the 03010104 8-digit • hydrologic unit code (HUC) and the 03010104061040 14-digit HUC. This 14-digit HUC is not a Targeted • Local Watershed as identified by the EEP. The site is found within the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Subbasin 03-02-05. i • 3.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION The project watershed is located in a rural setting within the Northern Inner Piedmont ecoregion of the Piedmont physiographic province (Figure 2). The topography within the project watershed is . characterized by rugged hills and has more mountain outliers than other areas in the Piedmont region. Streams also tend to have higher gradients in this ecoregion when compared to outer parts of the Piedmont (Griffith et al. 2002). Elevations within the project watershed range from 600 feet above mean - sea level (AMSL) at the top of the drainage to 447 feet AMSL at the confluence with Cane Creek. 3.1 Project Drainage Area The project streams all drain into Cane Creek, which then ultimately flows into Hyco Lake (Figure 3). The western portion of the site has a 0.70 square mile (448 acres) drainage area, which flows into Tributary 1 before reaching Cane Creek approximately 2,500 feet below the project boundary. This portion of the CCTS watershed is bounded by NC 119 to the west, Cunningham Road to the north, and ridgelines to the south and east. The remainder of the site on the eastern side has a drainage area of 0.62 square mile (397 acres) and has tributaries that drain directly into Cane Creek. This drainage area is formed partially by Cunningham Road to the north and site topography in the remaining areas. Together, the two project drainage areas form a total of 1.32 square miles. 3.2 Water Surface Classification/Water Quality The DWQ assigns surface water classifications in order to help protect, maintain, and preserve water quality. The project tributaries do not have classifications, but Cane Creek has a designation of Class C. • Class C Waters in North Carolina are protected for secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish and aquatic life propagation and survival, agriculture and other uses suitable for Class C. Secondary Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses involving human body contact with water where such activities take place in an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental manner. There are no restrictions on watershed development or types of discharges (NCDENR, DWQ 2007). None of the project streams or streams downstream of the site are currently designated as impaired under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act (NCDENR, DWQ 2006). 3.3 Geology and Soils The underlying rocks at the site include biotite gneiss and schist, which is described as a metamorphic rock from the Inner Piedmont, Chauga Belt, Smith River Allochthon and Sauratown Mountains Anticlinorium. There is also felsic mica gneiss, a metamorphic rock from the Charlotte and Milton belts (NCDENR, NCGS 1985). The Soil Survey of Person County indicates that the primary soils at the project site are Chewacla and Wehadkee loam, Helena sandy loam, Wedowee sandy loam, and Wilkes loam as shown in Figure 4 (USDA, NRCS 1995). The Chewacla and Wehadkee loam series is typically found along floodplains and consists of a somewhat poorly drained to poorly drained brown loam. The Helena series has very deep, moderately well drained, slowly permeable soils that are found on broad ridges and toe slopes of the Piedmont uplands. The Wedowee series consists of very deep, well-drained, moderately permeable soils on narrow ridges and the side slopes of uplands. The Wilkes series consists of shallow, well-drained soils with moderately slow to slow permeability. Wilkes soils are found on gently sloping narrow ridges and sloping to steep sides of ridges between intermittent and permanent streams in the southern Piedmont. 3.4 Historical Land Use and Development Trends 3.4.1 Historical Resources Historical aerial photographs were obtained from the Person County Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) office in order to assess the existing and historic site conditions. A review of the site history helps to understand the chronology of land disturbance and aid in the development of an appropriate restoration strategy. Aerial photographs of the site were obtained from 1955, 1966, 1976, 1993, 1998, and 2004 (Appendix A). The earliest aerial photograph available is from 1955. At this point, the western parcel is approximately 60% wooded with the northeast corner of the parcel in agriculture. The eastern parcel contains a narrow strip of agricultural fields through its center, which coincides with a ridge running through the property. Farm buildings are visible in the center of the eastern parcel as well. Distinct stream patterns are not distinguishable in the photograph, but the project streams are all wooded at this point in time. The surrounding area has a similar distribution of agriculture, rangeland, and forest as the project area. In 1966, the site has not experienced any substantial changes in land use. There are a couple of additional farm buildings within the original cluster of buildings. The riparian zones surrounding the project streams are still forested. A pond has been constructed just north of the project easement on the eastern parcel. By 1976, there is still little change in the land use on the site and the riparian zones along the project streams remain forested. There is a new house on the north end of the western parcel. Between 1976 and 1993, the property experienced significant changes. The two parcels have been cleared and converted into pasture except for narrow strips of riparian vegetation along the streams and intact forest in the southern portion of the western parcel. The two northwestern tributaries in particular have lost the majority of their riparian buffers. There have also been several ponds constructed by 1993: a pond 2 i Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan - just off the subject property in the southwestern corner of the site; a small pond on the eastern side of the • western parcel; and a larger pond along the northeastern corner of the eastern parcel. The site did not experience as much change between 1993 and 1998. By this time, the remaining forest in - the southern portion of the eastern parcel has been cleared, thus converting the entire two parcels into pasture. The riparian areas remain sparsely vegetated, but there are still no distinct stream patterns visible. No additional ponds have been constructed. • No noticeable changes occurred to the project area or the surrounding areas between 1998 and 2002. 3.4.2 Land Use and Development Potential The CCTS is situated on two properties: a western parcel and an eastern parcel. The entire property is currently used as pasture for cattle. Various portions of the site have been logged between 1976 and 1998. However, there are small wooded areas remaining along some of the tributaries. Using an Anderson Level - I classification, the predominate land uses in the project watershed consist of 49% agriculture, 35% forest, 12% pasture, 3% wetland, 1% water, and less than 1% urban or built-up land (See Table 2 and Figure 5) (McKerrow 2003). The surrounding area is rural with low development pressure. • 3.5 Endangered/Threatened Species A formal review by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) was requested in November 2005 to identify the presence of rare species, critical habitats, and priority natural areas on the project site i and to determine the potential impact of the proposed project on these resources. In their letter dated December 7, 2005, the NHP indicated "no record of rare species, significant natural communities, or priority natural areas at the site nor within 2 miles of the project area" (See Appendix B). In addition, no - threatened or endangered species were identified in the project area during the existing conditions site - assessment. 3.6 Cultural Resources - To evaluate the presence of significant cultural resources on the subject property and the potential to impact these properties, KCI requested a formal review by the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). The formal SHPO review identified "no historic . resources which would be affected by the project." The formal review by the State Archeology Office • identified no potential archeology sites on or around the subject property (See Appendix B). 3.7 Potential Constraints - The site was evaluated for any site constraints that have the potential to hinder a successful mitigation project. Below is a description of any potential issues that may affect the project's success. • 3.7.1 Property Ownership and Boundary The proposed restoration project is located on two adjacent parcels (Person County P1Ns 9060-00-02- 7485 and 9060-00-32-4307) owned by Sidney and Angela Thompson. KCI has facilitated the purchase of • a conservation easement on the site, which has been transferred to the State of North Carolina (see . Appendix C). The conservation easement will protect the project streams in perpetuity. 3.7.2 Site Access - The site is reached from Cunningham Road as shown in Figure 1. Once on Cunningham Road, the site entrance is approximately 0.85 mile further east and is accessible through a metal gate on the southern side. Once onto the property, there is a 0.25-mile dirt road that travels to the center of the property, where parking is available. • 3 Cane Creek Tributarv Site Stream Restoration Plan 3.7.3 Utilities There are no utilities mapped on the project site. 3.7.4 FEMA/Hydrologic Trespass No portion of the site is located in a significant flood hazard area as recognized by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The far western portion of the site is found on FEMA Map 3711904000) (Caswell County Flood Insurance Study, Effective September 27, 2007) and is shown as Zone X. The remainder of the site is not mapped by FEMA. The proposed restoration is not anticipated to produce hydrologic trespass conditions on the existing property or on any neighboring properties. 4.0 PROJECT SITE STREAMS (EXISTING CONDITIONS) The CCTS is made up of 17,375 existing linear feet of tributaries that all ultimately drain into Cane Creek. On the western side of the site, there are 9,110 existing linear feet of stream with Tributary 1 (T 1) forming the main drainage into which five smaller tributaries flow. There are 8,265 existing linear feet on the eastern side of the COTS where Tributary 7 (T7) is the primary drainage feature that receives flow from three additional tributaries before reaching Cane Creek at the southeastern corner of the site. The existing site conditions and site assessment locations for cross-sections and longitudinal profiles are shown in Figure 6. The project site photographs (Appendix D) show the current conditions at the CCTS and the existing conditions data (Appendix E) summarize the site assessment. All the project streams receive perennial flow and the DWQ stream identification forms are included in Appendix F. 4.1 General Site Description All of the project streams have been impacted by livestock and land clearing. These impacts have resulted in bank erosion in all of the tributaries and an increase in the sediment supply. Severe incision has also occurred on selected tributaries. During the land clearing, numerous linear spoil piles were also placed parallel to some of the smaller tributaries. These spoil piles block overland drainage from entering the tributaries and funnel this drainage into side drains. Riparian zones remain at least partially vegetated, which has helped to minimize the degradation of certain reaches, but overall the CCTS contains a series of tributaries in varying degrees of instability. T1 is a third-order hydrologic feature that flows northwest to southeast for approximately 2,775 linear feet within the project site boundaries. T1 extends from the western property boundary at Station 10+00 until the southern property boundary at Station 38+38 before continuing into Cane Creek, which is approximately 2,500 linear feet below the property line. As it comes onto the CCTS, T1 has moderate riparian coverage, but this begins to decrease around Station 21+00. Five tributaries drain into T1: Tributary 2 (T2) at Station 12+27, Tributary 3 (T3) at Station 17+26, Tributary 4 (T4) at Station 21+50, Tributary 5 (TS) at Station 24+63, and Tributary 6 (T6) at Station 35+19. T2 begins as a first-order hydrologic feature and then quickly turns into asecond-order stream when a small tributary from the southeast enters. T2 starts at the southwest corner of the western parcel boundary at Station 50+00 and then flows northeast for approximately 843 linear feet before its confluence with T 1 at Station 58+63. Along the eastern side of the stream, there is a linear spoil pile that parallels the stream. At Station 53+05, the stream runs along the edge of the valley wall with a floodplain on the right bank. The stream then goes back into a confined valley. There is a cattle crossing at Station 56+92, after which the stream has been straightened for 150 feet before it joins T1. T2 is forested throughout the length of the reach with mature trees in the overstory, but with little understory vegetation due to cattle grazing. 4 • Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan • T3 is a first-order hydrologic feature that flows north to south for approximately 1,5641inear feet before it joins T1. T3 starts at a wetland seep at Station 60+00 and ends at Station 75+83 at the confluence with T1. The first 107 feet of T3 consist of a meandering, low gradient channel that runs through a forested - wetland. At Station 61+07, there is a 3-foot headcut and the stream becomes deeply incised. Cattle have free range of the stream and many banks have exposed soil. Linear spoil piles run parallel to the stream. There is an existing cattle crossing at Station 67+20. Aside from the forested seep area at the beginning of - the reach, the vegetation consists of less desirable riparian species such as red maple (Ater rubrum) and • sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). - Running parallel to T3 is T4, which is a stream that flows north to south for approximately 1,979 linear • feet from Station 80+00 to Station 99+99. T4 is similar to T3 in that the tributary has a low gradient headwater reach followed by a large drop in elevation. For T4, this headcut occurs at Station 81+90 and after this point the stream can be characterized as a gully. T4 also has linear spoil piles that parallel the - stream at varying locations. At Station 86+25, there is a crossing used by livestock. At the beginning of T4, there is overstory vegetation, but it is largely composed of less desirable species. Once the bed elevation drops, the riparian vegetation is characterized by Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), eastern red • cedar (Juniperus virginiana), red maple, and sweetgum. The next hydrologic feature that drains into T1 is T5, which is a first-order stream that flows south to north for approximately 362 linear feet. The beginning of T5 at Station 110+00 flows through a section • with established riparian vegetation. After 2441inear feet, the stream reaches a crossing where cattle have impacted the channel. Downstream of the crossing, there is no riparian vegetation and the channel is not well defined. The last 20 feet of the stream goes underground before TS ties into T 1 at Station 113+82. T6 is another tributary that runs roughly parallel to T3 and T4 and flows from north to south before flowing into T1. T6 has a steep drainage area with its drainage features cut deeply into the landscape; the drainage area flattens as it nears the confluence with T 1. It starts as three small, seep-driven tributaries - (T6A, T6B, and T6C) that come together to form a larger channel of 1,275 existing linear feet from Stations 121+80 to 134+75. T6A and T6B join into a short reach called T6AB and this reach then meets T6C to form T6. The headwater reaches are well forested, but the downstream portion of T6 has only . moderate riparian vegetation coverage. T7 is the primary drainage feature on the eastern side of the CCTS and has approximately 5,619 existing - linear feet of stream. It begins at Station 140+00 as a small, first-order drainage and becomes athird-order - stream before it reaches Cane Creek at the southeastern property corner at Station 196+59. T7 begins at a groundwater seep below a farm pond. Tributary 7A (T7A) is another small, seep-driven stream that joins T7. Both of these headwater reaches have a meandering channel pattern, but have been subject to bank . erosion. The riparian area is forested with an established overstory surrounding the top portion of T7 and all of T7A. • Approximately 275 linear feet after the confluence of T7 and T7A at Station 144+69, T7 flows into a - more confined valley and experiences more bank erosion as it meets the valley wall. At Station 148+00, the stream becomes even more impacted from cattle with little riparian vegetation protecting the banks. This impacted reach continues for approximately 2,000 linear feet until Station 168+43 where T7 enters - into a more confined valley. Bedrock outcrops and clusters of boulders become dominant features in the stream channel. T7 continues to have large sections of bedrock controlling the bed elevation all the way until the confluence with Cane Creek. The riparian vegetation along this lower portion of T7 consists of a - mixture of hardwood species such as red maple, tulip poplar, beech (Fagus grandifolia), northern red oak - (Quercus rubs), black willow (Salix nigra), and tag alder (Alms serrulata). - 5 Cane Creek Tributarv Site Stream Restoration Plan Three additional tributaries drain into T7: Tributary 8 (T8) at Station 148+00, Tributary 9 (T9) at Station 150+88, and Tributary 10 (T10) at Station 190+49. T8 begins as a first-order stream and turns into asecond-order feature that flows northeast to southwest for approximately 449 linear feet from Stations 200+00 to 204+49 before flowing into T7. Tributary 8A (T8A) is a small seep-fed tributary that extends from Stations 270+00 to 271+10 and joins T8 145 linear feet downstream of its start. T8 has moderate vegetative coverage in its riparian zone. The next tributary to enter T7 is T9, which is a first-order stream that flows west to east for approximately 369 linear feet from Stations 210+00 to 213+69. The tributary is fed by a groundwater seep and is downstream of a farm pond at the upper portion of its drainage area. A linear spoil pile parallels the stream on its southern side. The final project stream is T10, which is a first-order hydrologic feature that flows north to south for approximately 1,582 linear feet from Stations 220+00 to 235+82. T10 enters the CCTS at the eastern property boundary and the channel is shaped by large sections of bedrock and confining valley walls. A cattle crossing is located before T10 enters T7. 4.2 Channel Stability Assessment A qualitative stability assessment was performed to estimate the level of departure for a stable stream system and determine the likely causes of any channel disturbance. This assessment facilitates the decision-making process with respect to restoration alternatives and establishing goals for successful restoration. At the start of T1, the stream is not yet incising, but it is experiencing bank erosion in combination with a loss of bed feature diversity. Cattle have caused overwidening and exposed soil in the banks. Riffles and pools are still evident features along this reach, but sedimentation from bank erosion and incoming tributaries is filling in pools. Riparian vegetation has also been reduced, which has eliminated rooting strength to maintain bank integrity. Bank height ratios from Stations 10+00 to 21+50 range from 2.3 to 3.6. Upstream of the confluence with T4, T1 begins to have fewer defined bed features except for in those areas where bedrock has maintained the bed structure. The bank height ratios from Stations 21+50 to 38+38 range from 1.9 to 2.3. Immediately downstream of the confluence with T4, there are large deposits of sand. Existing trees have helped maintain the channel dimensions in some areas, but areas without rooting protection are raw and eroding. Along T2, cattle seek refuge in the shaded areas and have regular access to the stream. For the first 300 linear feet, the stream has a meandering pattern, but cattle have created overwidened sections and induced bank erosion. In this section, the stream has a bank height ratio of 1. At Station 53+05, the stream runs adjacent to the valley wall and receives large amounts of sediment from an unstable slope. Once T2 comes away from the valley wall, it continues down the slope and starts to become incised. The lower 150 feet of T2 just before it enters T1 have been straightened and lack bed diversity. Linear spoil piles keep overland drainage from entering the stream except at isolated locations. From Station 53+OS to the end of T2, the bank height ratios range from 1 to 2.5. T3 begins at a wetland seep where the stream is moving up the valley as a 2-foot headcut is migrating into the seep area. Below this initial headcut, the stream pattern and profile is stable for approximately 100 feet, although the banks are experiencing erosion and are vertical in places. At Station 61+75, the channel experiences another headcut and the stream loses 4 feet over 13 feet of channel. After this headcut, the channel becomes deeply incised with an unstable bed and banks. The bank height ratios range from 1.9 to - Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan - 3.2. This lower reach of T3 has experienced extensive degradation as a result of livestock impacts and - other human disturbances. The channel has downcut to weathered bedrock in many areas and the exposed banks show erodible sandy soil in the upper portion of the bank continuing down to a gravel layer where the current bed elevation is. Numerous cattle paths cross the stream channel. There are also linear spoil - piles that run along the stream channel and alter the flowpath of overland drainage. Any drainage features flowing into T3 have also cut down to the incised bed elevation. At the bottom of T3, the channel has accumulated sediment from upstream erosion and has a more gradual slope than the upstream reaches. - T4 is experiencing a similar channel evolution as T3. It also has experienced extensive degradation as a result of livestock impacts and human disturbances. At the beginning of T4, there is a small channel . running through a seep area with overstory vegetation, but there is no herbaceous understory vegetation • due to cattle impacts. The channel continues for approximately 190 linear feet before it reaches a severe headcut at Station 82+00 that is migrating up the valley. Downstream of the headcut, the channel is deeply incised with vertical banks and has developed into a small ravine. Bank height ratios range from • 3.1 to 4.2. Sections of bank are falling into the stream and bringing down rooted vegetation. Spoil piles • paralleling the stream also affect the overland drainage paths. Before the confluence with T1, T4 has a gentler slope and large accumulations of sand from upstream bank erosion have been deposited in the . channel. The beginning of TS from Station 110+00 to 112+64 exhibits characteristics of stable channel morphology and is well shaded by riparian vegetation. This upper reach has experienced bank erosion due - to grazing impacts. After the cattle crossing at Station 112+64, the stream becomes unstable with bank height ratios around 2.7. From this point on until the confluence with T1, TS has eroding banks, sparse riparian vegetation, and a series of headcuts. The base elevation of the stream has been lowered and the . last 20 feet of channel go underground before reaching T 1. T6A and T6B are seep-fed, forested reaches that have stable beds and planform. The banks, however, have been impacted by grazing cattle. T6C is a steeper, more incised reach and has a series of headcuts . and blockages until it reaches the confluence with T6AB. It has severe bank erosion and lacks bed diversity. Once T6 begins at Station 121+80, the channel continues to lose bed elevation as the stream headcuts up the valley. Bank height ratios range from 3.0 to 6.8. There also is a lack of understory • riparian vegetation to provide rooting strength in the banks, which combined with cattle grazing has led to - bank erosion and a loss of bed features. - Both of the headwater reaches of T7 and T7A have meandering patterns, but have been subject to bank • erosion. The riparian zones along these two reaches have established overstory and understory vegetation, which helps prevent further degradation on these tributaries. Approximately 275 linear feet after the confluence of T7 and T7A, a large debris blockage marks the transition into a more heavily degraded - section. The stream has areas of bank erosion against the valley wall and the bed features are less defined. - The instability of the T7 worsens after the confluence with T8 where the stream has a lower slope and more erodible soils. This heavily impacted reach continues for approximately 2,000 linear feet until • Station 168+43. In this section, bank height ratios range from 2.8 to 4.5. After Station 168+43, T7 enters a more confined valley. Bedrock has helped to prevent further incision, allowing the channel to maintain defined riffles and pools. These bed features, however, are being filled - in by sediment from upstream bank erosion. At Station 180+89, T7 flows along a steep valley wall, which is unstable and experiencing bank erosion. After another 20 feet downstream, T7 has a large elevation drop and then returns to its bedrock-controlled profile. From the confluence with T10 at Station 190+49 - until it reaches Cane Creek, T7 has a stable planform, but the banks are still eroding from cattle impacts • and the bed diversity is being impacted from upstream sediment. Bank height ratios are around 4 in this section. • 7 Cane Creek Tributarv Site Stream Restoration Plan T8 begins at a groundwater seep, but the stream is headcutting up to its source. The stream has several unstable elevation drops and eroding banks from cattle impacts. The bank height ratio in this tributary is 1.7. T8A has a stable pattern, but is incised within its banks and has few defined bed features. T9 starts at a groundwater seep and the channel is headcutting up to this location. After flow begins, there is a short meandering reach that exhibits stable channel morphology. However, a sizeable knickpoint exists at Station 210+88 and there are three other substantial headcuts at Stations 211+62, 212+60, and 213+38. The stream does not have connected riffle-pool sequences and the banks are not stabilized. T10 is defined by large sections of bedrock and confining valley walls. Overall, the stream is stable with a mature riparian zone, but erosion has resulted where the channel cuts into the valley walls or where cattle have impacted the banks. Once T10 nears the confluence with T7, bank erosion and poor grazing management have degraded the overall condition of this reach and differentiate it from the more stable area immediately upstream. A cattle crossing at this location has caused the channel to become overwidened. 4.3 Bankfull Verification The standard methodology used in natural channel design is based on the ability to select the appropriate bankfull discharge and generate the corresponding bankfull hydraulic geometry from a stable reference system. The determination of bankfull stage is the most critical component of the natural channel design process. Bankfull can be defined as "the stage at which channel maintenance is most effective, that is, the discharge at which moving sediment, forming or removing bars, forming or changing bends and meanders, and generally doing work that results in the average morphologic characteristics of the channels" (Dunne and Leopold 1978). Several characteristics that commonly indicate the bankfull stage include breaks in slope, changes in vegetation, highest depositional features (i.e. point bars), and highest scour line. The identification of bankfull stage, especially in a degraded system, can be difficult. Therefore, verification measures were undertaken to facilitate the correct identification of the bankfull stage on the CCTS. The two methods used to verify bankfull stage at CCTS were pressure transducer gauges and regional hydraulic geometry relationships (regional curves). Stream stage data were collected from pressure transducer gauges at six locations on the CCTS: Gauge 1 on T3 at Station 71+70; Gauge 2 on T4 at Station 96+68; Gauge 3 on T6 at Station 130+84; Gauge 4 on T1 at Station 37+05; Gauge 5 on T7 at Station 183+44 upstream of the confluence with T10; and Gauge 6 on T7 at Station 192+85 approximately 400 feet upstream of the confluence with Cane Creek. An on-site rain gauge was also installed. Data were collected for 9 months (January through September 2007) and are summarized in Appendix G. Water levels were correlated to an estimated discharge using a rating curve generated for each gauged section. An approximate bankfull event occurred on March 2, 2007 with an additional 0.7 inch falling on top of several rain events during the preceding week. The storm caused approximate discharges of 53 cfs on T1, 17 cfs on T3, 30 cfs on T4, 29 cfs on T6, 71 cfs on T7 upstream on the confluence with T10, and 64 cfs on T7 after the confluence with T10. Regional curves are typically utilized in ungauged areas to approximate bankfull discharge, area, width, and depth as a function of drainage area based on interrelated variables from other similar streams in the same hydrophysiographic province. The regional curve for the rural Piedmont of North Carolina and its corresponding equations were used to verify the bankfull discharges in the project reaches (Harman et al. 1999). Based on the regional curve, the following bankfull discharges were calculated for the project tributaries: 90 cfs for T1, 26 cfs for T2, 26 cfs for T3, 33 cfs for T4, 15 cfs for T5, 29 cfs for T6, 73 cfs for T7, 5 cfs for T8, 11 cfs for T9, and 53 cfs for T10. However, the calculations for the tributaries with • Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan • small drainage areas (T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T8, and T9) should be used with caution, because the smallest - drainage area used in the regional geometry regression to relate drainage area and discharge was 0.2 square mile. • 4.4 Vegetation The uplands surrounding the project streams have all been cleared of trees and mature woody vegetation only remains along riparian corridors in varying age classes and densities. Because of previous impacts to - the existing forest stands, no distinct vegetative communities exist on the site. Below is a description of • the distribution of common plant species across the CCTS. - Along T1, the upper portion of the stream (Existing Stations 10+00 to 21+50) contains red maple, tulip - poplar, sweetgum, northern red oak, sycamore (Plantanus occidentalis), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), black walnut (Juglans nigra), southern red oak (Quercus falcata), flowering dogwood (Corpus Florida), willow oak (Quercus phellos), white oak (Quercus alba), possumhaw (Viburnum • nudum), and American elm (Ulmus americana). From Station 21+50 on, the mature trees are less dense, reducing available rooting strength along the banks; the trees along this section also include American beech. T2 has similar species along its banks as those described above. Along T3 and T4, there is a - similar composition of species, but early successional species such as red cedar, sweetgum, tulip poplar, - and red maple are most common and the stands are younger and less dense. T4 also had a large population of Chinese privet along the upper portion of the tributary. The top of TS has the same species as T1, but the lower reach of TS has only sparse vegetation with a few young trees. T6 has mature trees at - its headwaters, but the trees vary in age and composition along the lower portion of the stream. There is only sparse understory vegetation along T6. - The eastern portion of the CCTS contains similar species to the western side of the site. Common species - in this area include black walnut, eastern red cedar, sycamore, green ash, sugarberry (Celtis laevigata), American beech, southern red oak, northern red oak, willow oak, white oak, sugar maple (Ater saccharum), red maple, persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), American elm, winged elm (Ulmus alata), - flowering dogwood, and shagbark hickory (Carya ovata). From Stations 148+00 to 168+43 on T7, there are also several individuals of tag alder, mature black willow, and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana). At the bottom of T7 after the confluence with T10, there is a stand of common pawpaw (Asimina triloba). • T8, T9, and T 10 all have forested riparian zones that consist of the species listed above. Spicebush (Lindera benzoin) is a prominent understory species across the CCTS, but it is limited to areas where the cattle have not impacted the site as heavily. Other understory species found at the CCTS • include muscadine grape (Vitis spp.), greenbriar (Smilax spp.), and blackberry (Rubus spp.). During construction, the number of mature trees removed from the existing riparian areas will be • minimized as much as possible. Any valuable trees that may provide immediate shade to the restored . channel will be left in place if feasible. In the enhancement areas, certain trees may be able to remain on one bank if the opposite bank can be reshaped to accommodate the appropriate dimension for the stream. - Chinese privet is the one dominant invasive species at the CCTS. In particular, it exists in thickets at the upper portion of T4. These individuals will be removed during the construction phase of the project and any remaining plants will be treated with a glyphosate herbicide. - 5.0 REFERENCE STREAMS A reference reach is a channel with a stable dimension, pattern, and profile within a particular valley • morphology. The reference reach is used to develop dimensionless morphological ratios (based on - bankfull stage) that can be extrapolated to disturbed/unstable streams to restore a stream of the same type and disposition as the reference stream (Rosgen 1998). For this project, only one suitable reference reach 9 Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan was found that was appropriate to design the proposed restoration reaches: an unnamed tributary to Fisher River in Surry County, North Carolina (see Appendix H for detailed reference reach data). 5.1 UT to Fisher River Reference Site An unnamed tributary to Fisher River (UTFR), a first order rural stream in Surry County, was selected as a reference reach for the restoration of the project streams (Figure 7). The reference reach is located on Fisher Valley Road off of Exit 93 from Interstate 77. UTFR is approximately 95 miles to the west of the CCTS. The valley slope is approximately 1.6%. The sediment distribution and transport closely match the project streams. The local topography is characterized by rolling hills. Approximately 300 linear feet of UTFR was surveyed and was classified as a B4c channel. UTFR flows northeast into Fisher River and drains approximately 0.38 square mile of predominantly forested land with a small section of rangeland (Figure 8). The reference reach watershed is within the Northern Inner Piedmont ecoregion in the Piedmont physiographic province. The site is in the 14-digit hydrologic unit 03040101090010 in the Yadkin Basin and is in the DWQ Subbasin 03-07-02. The reference reach watershed elevations range from 1,420 feet AMSL at the headwaters of the site to 1,210 at the bottom of the reference reach. 5.2 Reference Vegetative Communities There are two communities described by Schafale systems appropriate for the CCTS site (1990). and Weakley that are representative of reference The natural community identified as representative of the floodplain areas was the Piedmont Alluvial Forest. This community type is described as existing along river and stream floodplains in more isolated patches when compared to broader floodplain forests. The canopy species that are typically found within a Piedmont Alluvial Forest include river birch (Betula nigra), green ash, sycamore, sweetgum, sugarberry, black walnut, shagbark hickory, American elm, and tulip poplar. Species that dominate the understory are ironwood, common pawpaw, American holly (Ilex opaca), spicebush, and painted buckeye (Aesculus sylvatica) (Schafale and Weakley 1990). Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest was identified as the community type appropriate for stream valleys and slopes leading away from small stream floodplains. Typical species found in the Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest canopy include American beech, northern red oak, tulip poplar, red maple, and sugar maple. The understory layer commonly has flowering dogwood, hop hornbeam (Ostrya virginiana), and American holly along with shrub species such as deerberry (Vaccinium stamineum), downy anowwood (Viburnum rafinesquianum), and strawberry bush (Euonymus americana) (Schafale and Weakley 1990). 6.0 PROJECT SITE RESTORATION PLAN 6.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives The CCTS has experienced degradation along all of its tributaries from livestock and the removal of upland and riparian vegetation. These impacts have left the streams with large amounts of excess sediment, unstable banks, and incised streambeds. There is considerable potential to improve and protect these headwater tributaries and provide an interconnected assemblage of aquatic and terrestrial habitat upstream of Hyco Lake. Based on these site-specific conditions, the restoration goals for the CCTS are as follows: ^ Improve water quality with reduced nutrient and sediment levels. ^ Create high-quality aquatic and terrestrial habitat. 10 Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan - In order to meet these goals, the following objectives must be accomplished: • Plant a functional Piedmont Alluvial Forest floodplain community along with a Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest to create an effective riparian buffer. ^ Arrest bed elevation lowering and stabilize seep outlets. • Stop bank erosion by developing the appropriate channel dimension and stabilizing with vegetation. ^ Remove relic spoil piles that disrupt overland flowpaths. ^ Exclude livestock from the riparian areas with fencing. - 6.1.1 Design Approach When approaching the design for the CCTS, the project objectives were balanced against the existing site - constraints. Below is a description of the site-specific approach used for the design for the CCTS. One of the major site constraints is the amount of incision that has taken place on the COTS. In particular, T3, T4, and T6 have become deeply incised and formed gullies. Many of the smaller tributaries (T8 and - T9) also have steep headcuts that are making these channels unstable. KCI decided to approach these streams by leaving them at the existing bed elevations and tying them into their respective downstream tributaries. The streams have incised too much to be brought back up to their original bed elevations • (Priority 1) and many are entrenched within a confined valley. However, in order to stabilize the reaches • with large drops in elevation, a number of grade control and step pool structures will be required. The proposed step pool channels are the natural stable channel types given the valley type, valley slope, and sediment regime of the existing conditions. In addition to vertical instability at the CCTS, another challenge was determining bankfull elevations on the range of rural tributaries. It was difficult to set a bankfull elevation in these channels given that many - are incised. Bankfull elevations were field estimated during the site assessment, but required verification by other measures (see Section 4.3). The pressure tranducer gauges at the CCTS provided useful data, but the frequency of a bankfull flow events was limited to less than a year of data and 2007 saw extreme - drought conditions in Person County. Several storm events did indicate of the type of response and - magnitude of flow events that can occur at the site. The discharges from these storm events were verified with regional curve data, although these data were used cautiously in the smaller tributaries. A number of the project streams have perennial flow despite having unusually small drainage areas. All of these factors • were balanced against each other to identify the appropriate bankfull discharge for each project reach. There was also a lack of appropriate reference reaches for the CCTS. In the Piedmont region of North • Carolina, stable B4 streams with slopes ranging from 2-3% are scarce. KCI has conducted numerous - reference reach searches throughout North Carolina and has not been able to find a stable B4 channel with this slope. The UT to Fisher River is a stable B4c channel and is an adequate reference reach fora B4- type channel. This reference was used to develop the geometry of the proposed cross-sectional areas. The - proposed pattern data were developed using a combination of criteria from the UT to Fisher River site and from on-site streams with stable planform. For example, radius of curvature, meander length, and meander width ratios were taken from the more stable sections of T2 to develop design criteria for the - lower sections of this tributary. 6.1.2 Designed Channel Classification The streams at the CCTS will be restored to Bc and B channels. In isolated areas where the streams are not entrenched in a valley, they will be able to access a floodplain and function as C channels. The tributaries are divided into reaches based on the drainage areas entering the streams and the restoration or enhancement approach needed to design the proposed channels (Table 1). The morphological design • criteria for each of the reaches are found in Tables 4a through 4e. The project reaches are identified in • Figure 9. • 11 Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan All of T1 will be designed as a B4c channel with small sections of C channel in those areas with no valley walls. T1 has been divided into five different reaches in order to develop the appropriate design as the drainage area increases or if a different type of action is required. T1-1 runs from Station 10+00 to 17+59 and stops at the confluence with T3. A second reach, T 1-2, goes from this confluence with T3 at Station 17+59 until Station 21+50, where the stream starts to experience more instability. Both T1-1 and T1-2 will be improved as Enhancement I, which involves adjusting the stream to have the appropriate profile and dimension (USAGE et. al 2003). For this section of T1 specifically, this will involve grading back the banks to the appropriate dimension. Existing bedrock provides stable grade control, but pools that have filled in will require excavation. One grade control structure will be installed at Station 19+85 downstream of a 60-foot easement exception. Beginning at Station 21+50 until it ends at the property boundary, T1 will be restored. There are three separate reaches in this section that are distinguished by drainage area: T1-3 from Stations 21+50 to 24+74 where T4 enters; Tl-4 from Stations 24+74 to 34+94 where T6 flows into T1, and T1-5 from Stations 34+94 to 37+64. These three lower reaches of T1 will be restored using a Priority 3 approach, which takes an F or G channel type and converts it to a B or Bc stream (Rosgen 1997). This type of restoration develops the appropriate stream dimension, pattern, and profile at the existing bed elevation. Along this section of T1, the restoration will reestablish riffle and pool features within the streambed while also utilizing existing bedrock as grade control. The pattern will be moved away from the existing stream channel from Stations 25+50 to 28+00 and Stations 31+50 to 34+00. T2 has been divided into four separate reaches and the majority of the tributary will be a B4 stream. T2-1 begins at Station 50+00 and ends at Station 53+05. This reach will be improved as Enhancement II and actions will include sloping back and stabilizing banks that are eroding and planting vegetation to help establish an understory riparian community. Beginning at Station 53+OS and ending at Station 54+91, T2- 2 will be restored using a Priority 3 approach. In this section, the stream has run against a steep, eroding valley wall. The proposed pattern will be realigned into an open floodplain to avoid this hillside and reconnect with the existing stream at Station 54+91. T2-2 will be a small E/C4 reach in between a B channel up and downstream. It will have two separate double step pool structures to stabilize the bed elevation. The next reach, T2-3, will be improved as Enhancement I and modifications will include grading back the vertical banks to an appropriate dimension and developing pool features. At Station 56+51, T2-4 begins and it will be restored using a Priority 3 approach. This bottom section of T2 has been straightened and the new pattern will incorporate a meander bend before tying into T1. The next tributary to join Tl, T3 has been divided into two different reaches and will be designed as a B4 stream type. T3-1 is a short headwater reach that runs from Stations 60+00 to 61+OS and it will be an Enhancement I section. At its beginning, T3-1 will be stabilized with a seep development structure to protect from further headcutting up the valley. The remainder of T3-1 will receive bank shaping and stabilization. At the end of T3-1, there will be a step pool structure to lower the bed elevation down to T3- 2 where there is currently a 3-foot headcut. Once T3-2 begins, the stream will be restored using a Priority 3 approach. Because T3-2 is so heavily incised and downcut, a number of step pools and other grade control structures will be utilized to bring the bed elevation down to the confluence with T1 in a stable manner. These structures are concentrated from Stations 61+OS to 64+00 where the large headcut exists and from Stations 67+50 to 70+00 below an existing crossing that has caused bed lowering. T4 has also been separated into two reaches and the entire length will be restored as a B4 channel. T4-1 runs from Station 80+00 to Station 82+66 and will be restored using a Priority 3 approach. The new planform for T4-1 will include more sinuosity than currently exists in this section along with five double step pool structures in an effort to lower the bed elevation in stable increments. T4-2 continues from Station 82+66 until the confluence with T1 and will also be restored using a Priority 3 approach. Step 12 - Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan - pool and cross vane structures are necessary along T4-2 to ensure that the bed elevation remains stable - and to meet the elevation at Tl. TS has two reaches for the proposed conditions and both will be designed as B4 channels. TS-1 runs from - Stations 110+00 to 112+64 and has a stable bed and pattern, but minor bank impacts. Under Enhancement II, the stream banks will be sloped back where necessary and planted with vegetation to stabilize any erosion. TS-2, which goes from Station 112+64 to Station 113+85 at the confluence with T1, will be - restored using a Priority 3 approach. The new pattern will meander to the left of the existing channel and - avoid the existing confluence with T1. Five double step pools are necessary to bring down the elevation from this short, steep reach to the confluence with T1. • T6 and its headwater tributaries will consist of B4 channels. The two headwater reaches, T6A and T6B, will receive bank stabilization under Enhancement II. Both reaches will have seep development structures installed to protect them from additional headcuts. Once these two reaches come together to form T6AB - from Stations 240+89 to 241+29, the existing stream begins to headcut and the proposed design will - restore the reach using a Priority 3 approach. T6C, currently a steep, incised channel, will also be restored using a Priority 3 approach. The proposed T6C channel will avoid the tortuous bends in the existing - channel by taking the pattern offline in these locations. Several step pools will lower T6C to the - confluence with T6AB at Station 121+88. T6 will be restored using a Priority 3 approach and avoids sections of the existing incised channel by coming offline from Station 124+50 to 127+00. After this point, the channel will then come back onto the existing streambed until the confluence with T1. On the eastern side of the property, T7 has been divided into seven different reaches for the proposed stream design. T7-1 begins at Station 140+00 and continues until Station 144+69. It will be a B4/C4 - stream that will receive seephead protection, bank stabilization, and revegetation under Enhancement II. - T7A is similar to T7-1 and will also be improved as a B4/C4 channel with Enhancement II actions. T7-2 is more degraded than T7-1 and will receive adjustments to the bank dimensions and pattern as a B4 ~ channel under Enhancement I. Vertical or incised banks will be graded back to create the appropriate - cross-section and step pool structures will be installed to stabilize the drops in bed elevation T7-3 begins at Station 148+00 where T7-2 and T8 join together. From this location forward, the existing - stream has extensive bank erosion and bed impairments. T7-3 will be restored as a B4c channel with a • Priority 3 approach. Several step pool structures will be used at the beginning of this reach to bring the elevation down to the confluence with T9 and to meet an existing crossing shortly thereafter. The proposed pattern for T7-3 meanders away from and then back along the existing stream, avoiding - overwidened or otherwise unstable areas when possible. At Station 168+08, T7-4 begins where the stream enters a more confined valley with numerous bedrock features. The proposed B4/1 channel will be improved as Enhancement I. The banks will be sloped back to accommodate the appropriate channel - dimension and to stabilize eroding banks. Removing accumulated excess sediment will enhance existing - pool features. Because bedrock is so prominent throughout this reach, no additional grade control structures are necessary. T7-5 is a short B4 reach of restoration that will flow from Station 181+54 to 183+08. The design proposes to meander the stream away from a steep valley wall and a subsequent headcut using a Priority 3 approach. To compensate for the elevation lost to the headcut, a step pool will be installed to bring down the bed elevation. From Station 183+08 to Station 190+49, T7-6 has frequent bedrock in the streambed, but the banks are experiencing erosion from cattle impacts. The proposed B4/1 reach will have the banks sloped back and stabilized. As part of the Enhancement I process, T7-6 will also have several pools enhanced by removing accumulated material. T7-7 begins at the confluence with T10 and continues until the stream enters Cane Creek at Station 196+93. This final reach along T7 will also be modified as Enhancement I with adjustments to the banks and profile. The existing vertical and eroding banks in 13 Cane Creek Tributarv Site Stream Restoration Plan many sections will be graded back to the appropriate dimension. Bedrock provides stable grade control along the length of T7-7, but several pools along the reach will be enhanced. The headwater reaches of T8 and T8A are proposed for Enhancement I and Enhancement II actions, respectively. Both reaches will also be a B4 stream type. T8 begins as a groundwater seep and this outlet will be stabilized with a seep development structure. As T8 continues down toward its confluence with T7, the profile will be modified with step pool structures to bring the stream down to the necessary bed elevation. The banks will be graded back to create the necessary cross-sectional dimension. T8A forms from seep drainage at the head of its watershed. The banks along T8A will be enhanced by grading them back and stabilizing them with vegetation. T9 is a similar headwater reach to T8 and will receive Enhancement I. The seep at the top of T9 will receive a seep development structure. A series of step pool structures will bring down the bed elevation of T9 instead of allowing the stream to headcut as it is currently. The banks will also be shaped to the appropriate dimension. T10 has been divided into two separate reaches for the proposed actions. T10-1 forms the majority of the tributary and goes from Stations 220+00 to 233+00. It is a gravel stream underlain by extensive bedrock features that shape the profile. T10-1 is proposed as a B4/1 channel with improvements under Enhancement II. The pattern and profile are stable, but the banks are experiencing erosion from cattle impacts or from running against steep valley walls. These sections will be sloped back and stabilized. T10-2 begins at 233+00 and continues a short distance until the confluence with T7 at Station 235+82. The design for this reach calls for Enhancement I of a B4/1 channel. The enhancement actions would include deepening several existing pools and grading back the eroding and unstable banks. 6.1.3 Targeted Buffer Communities Once all of the work on the project tributaries has been completed, livestock exclusion fencing will be installed around the easement area to eliminate the impacts by cattle on the CCTS. The project will restore a Piedmont Alluvial Forest community along the floodplains of T1 and T7 as well as in other floodplain communities as appropriate. Piedmont Alluvial Forests are typical of the small floodplain areas that will be restored at the CCTS. This community will fit into the natural topography and setting created by the newly restored channels. The buffer areas along the headwater tributaries will be planted as Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest. This community typically exists along lower slopes, north-facing slopes, ravines, and occasionally on well- drained small stream bottoms (Schafale and Weakley 1990). 6.2 Sediment Analysis The sediment competency of the CCTS was studied in detail and the assessment data are available in Appendix E. Pebble counts, bulk samples from 0-0.2 feet and 0.2-0.4 feet below the riffle bed, and bar samples were taken from most of the project reaches. Based on this analysis, the majority of the project reaches are dominated by gravel material, although T1, T7, and T10 all have portions that are underlain with bedrock. As T1 comes onto the project site, it has primarily a gravel bed with small amounts of sand. A pebble count at Station 11+68 (Existing) found the channel to be 92% gravel with a D84 of 27 mm. Further downstream near Station 13+10 (Existing), a bulk sample provided a measured D84 of 24.5 mm and 72% gravel in the upper 0.2 feet. The lower 0.2 feet had a D84 of 14.2 mm, which is similar to the D84 of 17.3 mm that was taken from a bar sample in the same area. T1 continues to have gravel in the range of 83- 90% of the sampled pebble counts until the sample taken around Station 29+14 (Existing). At this point, the confluences with T2, T3, and T4 are all upstream. Although gravel is still the dominant material, the bed becomes more heterogeneous with larger percentages of both sand and cobble. Bulk sampling at 14 • Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan • Station 32+90 indicated 77% gravel and 23% sand with a D84 of 51.9 mm within the upper 0.2 feet. - However, the lower 0.2 feet had 100% gravel material with a D84 of 50.2 mm. This indicates that sand is accumulating in the bed at this location. Near the end of T1 at Station 37+05, a pebble count shows that the stream is still agravel-dominated bed with 52% gravel, 32% cobble and 15% sand with a D84 of 110 ~. T2 begins as a gravel stream; a pebble count near the beginning of the tributary had a D84 of 31 mm and - 66% gravel. At the bottom of the stream before it joins T1, T2 has accumulated more sand in the bed. A pebble count at a location approximately 130 feet upstream of the confluence with T1 had 54% sand and 42% gravel with a D84 of 16 mm. At this location, T2 is receiving excessive sediment from the • surrounding unstable banks as well as from occasional backwater events from T 1. The sediment competency in T3 has been affected by the severity of bank erosion and bed incision along the length of this tributary. A pebble count was performed downstream of the large headcut at the top of T3 and this sample had 64% sand, most of which likely came from surrounding bank erosion. Another pebble count was completed further downstream at Station 64+40 and at this location there was 70% sand along with 30% gravel. This trend toward a sand bed continues throughout T3. However, there is a gravel bed that is under the large depositions of sand. A bulk sample at approximately 200 feet above the confluence with T1 showed 87% gravel and a D84 of 54 mm from 0-0.2 feet and 77% gravel and a D84 of 40.7 mm from 0.2-0.4 feet. • T4 is also receiving large amounts of sediment from its impacted banks and bed. Near the top of the stream at Station 83+60 (Existing), a pebble count revealed 83% gravel and 14% sand with a D84 of 38 mm. As T4 progresses down the valley, a pebble count shows that the streambed is comprised of greater - amounts of sand (28% at Station 88+83) than at the point measured upstream. Bulk sampling was - performed at Station 91+45 (Existing) and the results show that gravel is dominant at 78% and that this riffle section has a D84 of 50 mm within the first 0.2 feet of the bulk sample. From 0.2-0.4 feet below the riffle bed, there was 56% gravel and 44% sand along with a D84 of 27.5. ~ T6 is also experiencing elevated sediment inputs from bank erosion and bed incision. A pebble count was completed on T6 at Station 121+87 (Existing) right after the confluence of T6AB and T6C. This sample showed that the stream has 56% sand and 44% gravel with a D84 of 9.5 mm. Further downstream, - another pebble count at Station 130+84 found 49% sand and 47% gravel in the bed with a D84 of 13 mm, indicating that the tributary receives large amounts of sand along its length. However, a bulk sample - performed at Station 128+50 (Existing) had 79% gravel and 21% sand with a D84 of 41 mm within the - first 0.2 feet and 71% gravel and 29% sand with a D84 of 34.6 mm from 0.2-0.4 feet below the bed. The results from the bulk sample signify the presence of a gravel bed under sand material. - T7 is a gravel stream with frequent inclusions of bedrock along its length. A pebble count was conducted just downstream of where T8 enters T7 and the stream had 90% gravel material with a D84 of 39 mm. Near this same location at Station 149+73 (Existing), the bulk sampling indicated a D84 of 32.9 mm • along with 77% gravel and 23% sand in the upper 0.2 feet. From 0.2 to 0.4 feet, the bed had 56% gravel • and 44% sand. Another pebble count was completed on T7 at Station 152+55. Because the stream is starting to experience greater amounts of erosion from cattle impacts at this point, the percentage of sand rises to 22% and the gravel drops to 76% with a D84 of 23 mm. The slope of the channel also decreases along this section of stream. Further downstream at Station 169+25 (Existing), T7 enters a section controlled by - bedrock and a bulk sample showed 89% gravel and 11 % sand with a D84 of 53 mm in upper 0.2 feet and . 74% gravel and 26% sand with a D84 of 33.4 mm from 0.2-0.4 feet. At Station 183+44, a pebble count - 15 Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan showed 55% gravel with D84 of 55 mm. A bulk sample in the same location had 79% gravel and D84 of 49.4 mm in the upper 0.2 feet and 72% gravel and a D84 of 48.5 mm in the lower 0.2 feet. After the confluence with T 10, T7 continues to be dominated by gravel material. A bulk sample was taken at Station 193+35 (Existing) with 77% gravel and 23% sand with a D84 of 32 mm in the upper 0.2 feet and 66% gravel and 34% sand with a D84 of 36.5 mm in the lower 0.2 feet. A pebble count conducted at Station 195+08 (Existing) had a D84 of 42.0 mm and a predominantly gravel bed with 78% gravel and 16% sand. Shortly after this point, T7 joins Cane Creek and the lower portion of T7 indicates sediment deposits from backwater events. T10, despite being a predominantly gravel stream, is controlled by bedrock and larger cobble. A pebble count on T 10 at Station 222+92 (Existing) shows that the stream has a heterogeneous bed mixture with 31% gravel, 30% cobble, 29% sand, and 4% bedrock. Further downstream, a pebble count conducted at Station 233+53 found that the bed remains mixed with 38% cobble, 35% gravel, 22% sand, and 1% bedrock and a D84 of 160 mm. After analyzing the existing sediment conditions, the site was studied with respect to sediment transport in the proposed reaches. T1 and T7 are active bed channels and have been designed as such. In active bed systems, there is a threshold level of bedload movement. At low flow levels, only the smallest particles will move, with the larger particles resisting the flow of the stream; this is the condition of partial sediment transport. As the stream flow increases, eventually every particle on the streambed will show threshold movement. This is the condition of full sediment transport. If the largest particle that moves during a bankfull event can be identified, then the flow conditions that produced this movement can be determined and this flow condition (channel competency) can be used in the design of the restored stream. Determinations of the design shear stresses were made based on the sediment distribution from the surface and subsurface sampling. These shear stresses were validated for the design riffle cross-sections and channel gradient using the equation: i = yRs Where: i =shear stress (lbs/ftz) y =specific gravity of water (62.41bs/ft3) R =hydraulic radius (ft) s =average water slope (ft/ft) The shear stress values for the designed reaches were calculated and related to the movement of a particular grain size using Shield's threshold of motion curve (Shields et al. 1936). On T1-1, T1-3, and T1-5, the proposed channel has critical shear stress values of 0.56 lbs/ftz, 0.81 lbs/ftz, and 0.64 lbs/ftz, which correspond to mobilized particle sizes of 43, 62, and 49 mm, respectively. These values are higher than the sampled D84 particles on these existing reaches, which should help to keep the bed from aggrading like it is currently under the existing conditions. For T7-2, T7-3, T7-4, T7-5/6, and T7-7, the shear stress values range from 0.58 lbs/ftz, 0.56 lbs/ftz, 1.18 lbs/ftz, 1.15 lbs/ftz, and 0.68 lbs/ftz, and these values would move particles of 44, 42, 93, 90, and 53 mm, respectively. The predicted particle sizes for T7-4, T7-5/6, and T7-7 are larger than the existing conditions data show for these reaches, but this length of T7 is also controlled by bedrock, so there is little risk of bed degradation. The remaining tributaries - T2, T3, T4, T5, T6 and its headwater tributaries, T7A, T8, T8A, T9, and T10 - are threshold channels, which are defined as streams where the bed material inflow is negligible and the channel boundary is immobile even at high flows (Shields et al. 2003). At the CCTS, these tributaries are threshold channels due either to the lack of incoming bed material from the small surrounding watersheds or the hardening of the bed from bedrock or cobble. As opposed to an active bed system, a threshold 16 Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan channel never achieves full sediment transport; the system only achieves partial sediment transport. Therefore, the threshold mobility evaluation provided for Tl and T7 is not appropriate for the other tributaries at the CCTS. Based on this analysis, the designed channels provide sufficient competency for the type of streams proposed and are capable of transporting sediment during bankfull events. 6.3 Natural Plant Community Restoration Riparian plantings shall consist of native woody species. To achieve a mature survivability of 320 stems per acre, 436 stems per acre (10 feet by 10 feet spacing) will be planted. Plant placement and groupings will be randomized during installation in order to develop a more naturalized appearance. Woody vegetation planting will take place during dormancy. Species to be planted in the floodplain area as Piedmont Alluvial Forest will consist of at least five of the following: Tag Alder Alnus serrulata Sycamore Platanus occidentalis River Birch Betula nigra Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii Persimmon Diospyros virginiana Willow Oak Quercus phellos Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Coralberry Symphoricarpos orbiculatas Winterbeny Ilex verticillata Possumhaw Viburnum nudum Spicebush Lindera benzoin Yellowroot Xanthorhiza simplicissima Tulip Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera The slopes leading from the floodplain will be planted as Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest and may consist of the following species: Sweetshrub Shagbark hickory Persimmon Witchhazel Black Walnut Spicebush Calycanthus,lorida Carya ovata Diospyros virginiana Hamamelis virginiana Juglans nigra Lindera benzoin Tulip Poplar Southern Red Oak Willow Oak Coralberry Possumhaw Liriodendron tulipifera Quercus falcata Quercus phellos Symphoricarpos orbiculatas Viburnum nudum On the restored stream banks, live stakes will be used to provide natural stabilization. Appropriate species identified for live staking include: Silky Dogwood Corpus amomum Silky Willow Salix sericea Black Willow Salix nigra Elderberry Sambucus canadensis A herbaceous seed mix composed of appropriate native species will also be developed and used to further stabilize and restore the riparian and bank zones following construction. In addition to planting the proposed community types, vegetative restoration will also include eliminating invasive species that have taken over portions of the site. The targeted species (Chinese privet and Japanese honeysuckle) will be treated with a glyphosate herbicide as needed to control populations. 7.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA Monitoring shall consist of the collection and analysis of stream stability and riparian/stream bank vegetation survivability data to support the evaluation of the project in meeting established restoration objectives. Specifically, project success will be assessed utilizing measurements of stream dimension, pattern, and profile; site photographs, and vegetation sampling. 17 Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan 7.1 Stream Stability The purpose of monitoring is to evaluate the stability of the restored stream. Following the procedures established in the USDA Forest Service Manual, Stream Channel Reference Sites (Harrelson et al. 1994) and the methodologies utilized in the Rosgen stream assessment and classification system (1994 and 1996), data collected will consist of detailed dimension and pattern measurements, longitudinal profiles, and bed materials sampling. Dimension -Permanent cross-sections will be established at 14 riffle and 6 pool locations along the restored project reaches. The following cross-sections will be used to evaluate stream dimension: ^ 2 riffles and 1 pool on T 1-3, T 1-4, or T 1-5 ^ 1 riffle on T2-2 ^ 2 riffles and 1 pool on T3-2 ^ 3 riffles and 1 pool on T4-1 or T4-2 ^ 1 riffle on TS-2 ^ 2 riffles and 1 pool on T6 ^ 2 riffles and 1 pool on T7-3 ^ 1 riffle on T7-5 Permanent monuments will be established by conventional survey. The cross-section surveys shall provide a detailed measurement of the stream and banks and will include points on the adjacent floodplain or valley, at the top of bank, bankfull, at all breaks in slope, the edge of water, and thalweg. Width/depth and entrenchment ratios will be calculated for each cross-section based on the survey data. Cross-section measurements should show little or no change from the as-built cross-sections. If changes do occur, they will be evaluated to determine whether they are minor adjustments associated with settling and increased stability or whether they indicate movement toward an unstable condition. Profile -Longitudinal profiles will be conducted on approximately 3,000 linear feet of the project reaches as described below: ^ SOO linear feet along T 1-3, T 1-4 or T 1-5 ^ 500 linear feet along T3-2 ^ 7501inear feet along T4-2 ^ 500 linear feet along T6 or its headwater tributaries ^ 750 linear feet along T7-3 Measurements will include slopes (average, pool, and riffle) as well as calculations of pool-to-pool spacing. Annual measurements should indicate that bedform features are stable with little change from the as-built survey. The pools should maintain their depth with lower water surface slopes, while the riffles should remain shallower and steeper than the average values for the stream. Pattern -Measurements associated with the restored channel pattern shall be taken on the section of the stream included in the longitudinal profiles. These data will include belt width, meander length, and radius of curvature. Subsequently, sinuosity, meander width ratios, radius of curvature, and meander length/bankfull width ratios will be calculated. Bed Materials -Pebble counts will be conducted at each monitored cross-section for the purpose of repeated classification and to evaluate sediment transport. Verification of Bankfull Events -During the monitoring period, a minimum of two bankfull events must be recorded within the five-year monitoring period. These two bankfull events must occur in separate monitoring years. A bankfull event will be verified using pressure transducer gauges. 18 - Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan - Photograph Reference Points -Fifty photograph reference points (PRP) will be established to assist in • characterizing the site and to allow qualitative evaluation of the site conditions. The location and bearing/orientation of each photo point will be documented to allow for repeated use. Cross-section Photograph Reference Points -Each cross-section will be photographed to show the form of the channel with the tape measure stretched over the channel for reference in each photograph. An effort will be made to consistently show the same area in each photograph. i 7.2 Vegetation The success of the riparian buffer plantings will be evaluated using 20 ten by ten meter vegetative sampling plots and will use the stream vegetation monitoring protocol set out by the EEP. The corners of • each monitoring plot will be permanently marked in the field. The coordinates of the plot corners will be recorded using conventional survey. The monitoring will consist of the following data inventory: composition and number of surviving species, total number of stems per acre, diameter at decimeter - height, diameter at breast height for trees greater than 5 feet in height, and vigor. Additionally, a . photograph will be taken of each plot that will be replicated each monitoring year. Riparian vegetation must meet a minimum survival success rate of 320 stems/acre after five years. If monitoring indicates that - the specified survival rate is not being met, appropriate corrective actions will take place, which may - include invasive species control, the removal of dead/dying plants and replanting. 7.3 Schedule/Reporting • The first scheduled monitoring will be conducted during the first full growing season following project completion. Monitoring shall subsequently be conducted annually for a total period of five years or until the project meets its success criteria. • Annual monitoring reports will be prepared and submitted after all monitoring tasks for each year are completed. The report will document the monitored components of the restoration plan and include all collected data, analyses, and photographs. Each report will provide the new monitoring data and compare - the most recent results against previous findings. The monitoring report format will be similar to that set out in the most recent EEP monitoring protocol. Variations from the designed project reaches can be anticipated due to unknown site conditions, inputs . from outside the restoration site, regional climatic variations, or acts of God, etc. Regular management activities will be implemented as necessary to ensure that the goals and objectives of the project are met. - These activities will be conducted throughout the year and may include invasive species control or other management activities. If the monitoring identifies failures in the project site, a remedial action plan will be developed to investigate the causes of the failure and propose actions to rectify the problem. - 19 •••••••iw••••••••~~••~••t~•••••••~••••~••••• 0 N Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan 8.0 REFERENCES Dunne, T. and L.B. Leopold. 1978. Water in Environmental Planning. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F. MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelburne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina, (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs). Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,500,000). Harman, W.A., G.D. Jennings, J.M. Patterson, D.R. Clinton, L.O. Slate, A.G. Jessup, J. R. Everhart, and R.E. Smith, 1999. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams. Wildland Hydrology. AWRA Symposium Proceedings. Edited by D.S. Olsen and J.P. Potyondy. American Water Resources Association. June 30 -July 2, 1999. Bozeman, MT. Harrelson, C.C., C.L. Rawlins, and J.P. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: an Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. McKerrow, A. 2003. North Carolina GAP Land Cover. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Gap Analysis Project Office. NCDENR, Division of Water Quality. 2006. North Carolina Water Quality Assessment and Impaired Waters List (2006 Integrated 305(b) and 303(d) Report). Raleigh, NC. Accessible at: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tmdUGeneral_303d.htm NCDENR, Division of Water Quality. 2007. Surface Water Classification. Accessible at: http://h2o.enr. state.nc.us/csu/swc.html NCDENR, North Carolina Geological Survey. 1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina. Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A Classification of Natural Rivers. Catena 22: 169-199. Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books. Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. In: Wang, S.S.Y., E.J. Langendoen, and F.D. Shields, Jr. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. pp. 12-22. Rosgen, D.L. 1998. The Reference Reach - a Blueprint for Natural Channel Design. Presented at ASCE Conference, Denver, CO -June, 1998. Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, 3`d Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, NCDEHNR, Division of Parks and Recreation. Raleigh, NC. Shields, F.D., Jr. R.R. Copeland, P.C. Klingeman, M.W. Doyle, and A. Simon. 2003. Design for Stream Restoration. Journal of Hyraulic Engineering, 129 (8): 575-584. Shields, Ing. A., W. P. Ott, and J. C. Van Uchelen. 1936. Application of Similarity Principles and 21 Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan • Turbulence Research to Bed-load Movement. Pasadena, CA: Soil Conservation Service, - California Institute of Technology. - US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, US Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, and NCDENR, Division of Water Quality. 2003. . Stream Mitigation Guidelines. Wilmington, NC. USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1995. Soil Survey of Person County, North Carolina. - r s • • • 22 • •~•••••••i••••~••••••••••••~••!••••••••••••• y Table 1. Project Restoration Structure and Objectives Reach Existlog Stationing Proposed Stationing Mitigation Type Priority Approach Existing Linesr Footage Designed Linear Footage Comments TI-I 10100-17+26 It110(1-17159* Enhnnccmcntl - 72fi 7i9 TI-2 17+26-21+50 17159 - 21 150* Gnhancement I - 361 328 Excludes 60-ft crossing TI-3 21+50-24+63 21+50-24+74 Rcstoration P3 313 324 T]-4 24+-63-3.5-[19 24+74-34+94 Rcstoration P3 1,056 1,020 T]-5 35+19-38+3g 34+94-37+64 Rcstoration P3 319 270 T2-1 50+00 - 53+OS 50+00 - 53+OS Enhancemcnt I I - 305 305 T2-2 53+05 - 55+32 53+05 - 54+91 Rcstoration P2 227 186 T2-3 55+32 - 56+92 54+91 - 56+51 Enhancemcnt 1 - 160 160 T2-4 56+92 - SR+63 56+51 - 58+51 Rcstoration P3 I51 180 Excludes 20-ft crossing T3-1 60+00 - 61+07 60+00 - 61+OS* Enhanccmentl - 107 105 T3-2 61+07 - 75+g3 61+OS - 76+79 Rcstoration P3 1,457 1,554 Excludes 20-ft crossing T4-1 80+00 - 81+90 80+00 - 82+66 Rcstoration P3 190 266 T4-2 81+90-99+99 82+66-102+53 Rcstoration P3 1,789 1,967 Excludcs20-ft crossing TS-1 110+00 - 112+64 l 10+00 - 112+64 Enhancement II - 244 244 Excludes 20-ft crossing TS-2 112+64 - 113+g2 112+64 - 113+g5 Rcstoration P3 118 121 T6A 240+-00 - 240+g9 240+00 - 240+g9 Enhancemcnt II - 89 89 T6B 250+00 - 251+03 250+00 - 251+03 Enhancement II - I03 103 T6AB 240+89 - 241+] 9 240+g9 - 241+29 Rcstoration P3 30 40 T6C 120+00- 121+80 12O+00- 121+g8 Rcstoration P3 180 188 T6 121+g0- 134+75 121+gg - 134+38 Rcstoration P3 1,275 1,230 Excludes 20-ft crossing T7A 260+{)0-261+36 260+00-261+36 Enhancemcnt l] - 136 136 T7-I 140+00-144+69 140+00-144+69 Enhanccmcntll - 469 469 T7-2 144+69-148+00 144+69-148+00 Enhancemcm I - 331 331 T7-3 148+00 - 168+43 14R+00 - 169+08 Rcstoration P2/3 2,023 2,088 F.xcludcs 20-fr crossing T7-4 16R+43 - I80+g9 169+08 - 181+54 Enhancemcnt I - 1,246 1,246 T7-5 180+89 - 182+74 181+54 - 183+08 Rcstoration P3 185 154 T7-6 182+74 - 190+49 183+08 - 190+83 Enhancemcnt I - 755 755 Excludes 20-fr crossing T7-7 190+49-196+59 190+g3-196+93 Enhanccmentl - 610 610 T8A 270+00-271+10 270+00-271+10 Enhanccmcntll - 110 I10 T8 20n+00-204+49 200+00-204+49 Enhanccmentl - 449 449 T9 210+00-213+69 210+-00 213+69 Enhanccmentl - 369 369 T10-I 220+00-233+00 220+00-233+00 Enhanccmcntll - 1,300 1,300 T10-2 233+00-Z35+83 233+00 235+82 Enhanccount I 282 282 -Ibtal I Z4G5 17.738 Total Proposed Stream Enhancemcnt I (If) 5,394 Total Proposed Stream Enhancement Ii (If) 2,756 Total Proposed Stream Restoration (If) 9,588 *Thc length of selected enhancement reaches changed if the confluence with a restoration reach was ahcred. 'I'ahlr 1 Prnivrt WafrrchPd I and I Ica Land Use Acreage Percentage of Watershed Agriculture 414.1 49°~~ Forcer land 2953 35% Rangeland 100.3 12 Wetland 22.0 3%. W atcr k 7 1 °/ Urban or built-up 2 2 <1% Table 3. Project Drainage Areas Reacb Drainage Area (Acres) Drainge Area (Square Miles) TI-1 249,9 0.39 ll-2 304.4 0.48 I'I-3 310.5 0.49 "r 1-4 400.0 0.62 Tl-5 447.8 0.70 T2-1 66.1 0.10 T2-2 67.8 0.11 T2-3 70.3 O.ll I'2-4 71.1 O.l l T3-l L5.5 0.02 T3-2 48.2 0.08 T4-1 36.4 0.06 T4-2 61.4 O.10 TS-1 13.1 0.02 TS-2 13.8 0.02 T6A 2.6 0.00 T6B 2.5 0.00 T6AB 52 0.01 T6C 8 2 0.01 T6 42.6 0.07 T7A 5.8 0.01 T7-l 31.6 0.05 T7-2 34.2 0.05 T7-3 113.2 0.18 T7-4 154.9 024 T7-5 156.5 024 T7-6 166.9 026 T7-7 397.1 0.62 TSA OS 0.00 T8 13.7 0.02 T9 2z.8 o.oa TIO-1 21 R.7 0.34 T I O 2 220.6 0.34 • Table 4a. Moroholoeical Criteria for T1. Existin Existin Existin Existin Existin Ref. Pro osed Pro osed Pro osed Pro osed Pro osed Variables Tl-1 Tl-2 Tl-3 Tl-4 Tl-5 Reach UTFR Tl-l Tl-Z Tl-3 T1-4 T]-5 W sgicn Stream l)pc (i (. II Bi(PP G 13Jc C'[34 C"B4 CR4 C'B4 (~.'f34 M iligation type Enh. I Enh. I Restoration Rovtora0on 12caoration N/A Enh. I Enh. I Rcstoralion Reskxation 12cstoralion Drainage Area (mi) 0390 O.SR7 Q_596 0.736 O.RII 0.38 0.390 0.587 0.596 0.736 O.R11 Bankfull Width(Whr~)(li) R.6-8.R 8.4 10.2 10.5-17.0 13.9 9.0-10.0 12.8 13.( 13.6 IS IS Bankfull Mcan Depth (d,xd (fU I.I-L2 L0 1.3 1.2-I.5 1.2 I.I-L2 L2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 Bankfull Cross-Sectional area (f~k1) (R-) 9.8-10.9 8.2 12.9 15.3-20.1 I6.R 10.4-10.7 14.5 16.4 16.4 20 20 Wid1h/depth Ratio (Wnr~dnrr) 7.1-Z6 8.5 R.I 7.2-17.2 11.5 8.0-10.0 10.7 11 II 12 12 Maximum Depth (d„nxd (f9 1.4-LS 1.2 1.9 1.2-2.3 L7 1.3-1.5 1.8 1.9 1.9 2 2 \4idth of Bood prone aroa(W4,~)(fp II-13 12.2 25.4 IS-35 19.4 13.]-20.5 2R 30 30 33 33 Entrenchment Ratio (ER) 1.3-1.4 L5 2.5 1.2-3.3 1.4 1.3-2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 Sinuosity (stream length/vallcy Icngth) (K) I.l ].I LI 1.2 I 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 I Pool Depth (Il) 1.8 2.0 1.3 1.3-1.8 1.7 1.2-1.4 LS 1.5 I.5 1.6 L6 Ri171c Depth ql) LI-1.2 1.0 L3 L2-L5 1.2 LI-1.2 L2 L2 1.2 1.3 1.3 Max Pool Dcplh (Ill L9-2.2 2.7 2.5 2.2-3.0 3.0 2.1-2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.6 Pool WidOt (fp 9.3-10.0 9.I 12.3 7.R-17.7 17.3 R.4-11.6 16.6 IR 1R 20 20 Rilllc Width (ft) R.6-8.8 R.4 10.2 10.5-17.0 13.9 9.0-9.9 12.8 13b 13.6 15 IS ~ Pool XS Arca (sl) I6.R-17.6 18.1 16.6 14.2-23.1 28.9 I L6-13.4 24.7 26.4 26.4 32.5 32.5 0 ` Ri01c XS Ama Isl) 9.R-10.9 8.4 129 15.3-20.1 16.8 IQ4-10.7 14.5 16.4 16.4 20 20 E O Pool depth mean nBlc depth L5-1.6 2.0 L0 0.9-L5 1.4 I.0-1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Pool widtl>/rifllc width I.I-L2 LI LZ 0.5_1.7 1.2 O.R-1.3 1.3 1.3 19 1.3 1.3 Pool arca/riflle area L5-1.8 2:? 1.3 0.7-1.5 1.7 L1-1.3 1.7 L6 L6 1.7 1.7 Max pool depth/dirt I.6-2.0 2.7 1.9 1.5-2.5 2.5 1.9-2.0 2 2 2 2 2 Bank Height Ratio (BHR) 2.3-3.0 3.6 1.9 1.4-2.1 2.3 I I 1 I I I Mcan Bankfull Velocity (V) (fps) 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.0-5.2 4.9 4.1-4.5 4.I 4.4 4.4 3.9 4.2 Bankfull Discharge (Q) (efs) 42-07 36 60 66-101 R3 42-46 59 73 73 R4 90 Meander length (I,,,)(fq 121-146 112-120 90-117 106-230 188 93-136 121-146 112-120 160-170 140-240 IIS-180 Radius of curvature (R~) (Cq 19-36 17-26 7-19 12-54 30fi4 13-42 19-36 17-26 30A0 30-50 30-40 Bch width (Whi,) (Il) 27-33 34 21 25-49 5I 45 27-33 34 40-70 40-60 25-40 C Mcandcr width ralio(Ws„/W~,r,l 3.0-3.R 4.0 2.0 IS-4.7 3.7 4.5-5.0 2.1-2.G 2.5 3.0-5.0 2.7-4.0 1.7-2.7 Radius of curvahtrc/bankfull width 2.2-4.2 2.0-3.0 0.7-1.9 0.7-5.1 2.2-4.6 1.3-4.4 LS-2.R 1.3-1.9 2.2-3.0 2A-3.3 2-2.7 Mcandcr lcngth/bankfull width 13.8-17.0 13.3-14.3 R.R-11.4 6.2-21.9 13.5 9.0-15.0 9.4-11.4 8.2-8.R 11.9-12.6 9.3-16 7.7-12 Valley slope 0.0102 O.OIIR 0.0115 0.0077 0.0120 0.016 0.0102 0.0118 0.0115 0.0077 0.0120 Average water surface slope 0.0083 Q_0134 0.0077 0.0072 0.0090 0.013 0.0083 O.OI34 O.OOR9 0.0079 0.0080 Ritpe slope OA090- 0.0230 0.0290- 0.0299 O.OI3R- 0.0427 0.0110- 0.0407 0.0211- 0.0289 1!013-0.028 0.0090- 0.0230 0.0290- 0.0299 0.010-0.1114 0.006-0.013 (1.005-0.010 Pool slope 11-0.0012 0.0004- 0.0014 O~~t)I1f18 O.OU 12- 0.0038 0-0.0003 0.000-0.001 0-0.0012 0.0004- 00014 0.002 0.001-0.002 0.002 Pool to pool spacing 44-56 RO-107 21-49 29-34 RR 30-_59 40-60 60-100 75-100 60-150 50-70 C Poal length 16-24 14-SR 13-38 II-29 16-30 3-25 IS-25 15-25 10-20 IO-30 10-IS RifOcslope/avgwata~surfaccslope L10-2.80 2.16-2.23 1.79-5.55 1.53-5.(i5 234-3.21 IAO-2.20 L10-2.80 2.16-2.23 1.12-I.S7 0.7S-L65 0.63-1.25 Pool slope/avg water surface slope l1-0.14 (1.03-0.10 0-11.111 0.17-0.52 11-11.113 11.0 0-0.14 0.03-U. I U 022 0.13-0.25 0?5 Pool lcngth/bankfull width 1.8-2.8 1.7-6.9 1.2-3.7 0.6-2.ft 1.2-2.2 0.3-2.5 1.2-20 LI-L8 Q.7-I.5 0.7-2.0 0.7-L0 Pool m pool spacing/bankfull width 5.0-6.5 9,5-12.7 2.1-4.R 1.7-32 63 3.3-6.0 3.1-4.7 4.4-73 5.5-7.4 4.U-10.0 33-4J T., 4.lo A1. AA.....I„~I....:..~I f'.:ro.:~ {~... T7 Existin Existin Existin Ref. Pro osed Pro osed Pro osed Variables T2_2« T2-3~ T2-4** Reach UTFR T2-2 T2-3 T2-4 12u=ecn Sircam Type I-1 L4 G3 144 ~~ C I J B4 131 Miugution ~fype Restoration Enh. l Restoration NrA Restoration Enh. l Kestora[ion Drainage Arca (mi') 4106 0.110 0.1 I I 038 0.106 0.110 O.I I I Bankfull Width (Wskr)(ft) - - 62 40-140 74 7.4 7A Bankfull Mean Uepth Idsprl (ftl - - 0.9 I.I-11 0.8 OR 48 Bankfull Cross-Sectional area (At,;~r) (ff) - - 5.7 10.4-10.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 WidtFJdepth Ratio (W nkrdnkrl - - 6.7 8.0-10.0 9.3 9.3 9.3 Maximum Ucpth (d~,nkr) (ft) - - 13 1.1-LS 13 13 13 Width of flood prone area (Wro,) (f11 - - I I 13.1 ?0.5 19 14.8 14.8 Entrenchment Ratio (ERl - - L8 1,3-2.3 ' S ? Sinuosity (stream Icngthivallcy length) fK) U L'_ LI 12 1.4 1.2 13 Pool Uepth (fl l - - L I 1.2-1.4 L? I ~ 1.2 Riffle Depth lftl - - 0.9 I.I-1.2 48 OB 0.8 Max Pool Depth Ifl) - - ? 0 2.1-2.4 2 Pool Width lfll - - 9.4 8.4-I L6 8_' 8.2 8.2 Riffle Width lfl) - - 62 9.0-9.9 7.4 7A 7.4 Pool kS Aren (sf) - - 9.9 I L6-13.4 9.6 9.6 9.6 Riffle XS Area 1st) - - 5.7 10.3-10.7 S] 5.7 S.7 Pool dep[kmean riffle depth - - 12 I.0-1.3 LS LS LS ~• Pool svidthri tTle width - - LS 0.8-1.3 LI LI 1.1 Pool arca;'ri fflc area - - 1.7 L1-1.3 1.7 1.7 1.7 Max pool deptkdskr - - 1.9-2.0 ? 5 ? 5 ? s Bank Ilcight Ratio (BIIRI - - ?.~ I L0 I.0 L0 Mean Bankfull Velocity lV)Ifpsl - - 39 4.1-4.5 5'_ 4.4 4.5 Bank hell Discharge (Q1 (cfs) - - 21 12-46 30 25 26 Meander length (L~1(RI 39-61 2952 - 93-136 40-53 29-5^_ 50-90 Radius of curvantre fR,l fft) ~-18 5-19 - 13-42 7-111 5-19 IS-20 Belt widlhlN~siJ lftl II-19 16-25 - 45 14-23 16-25 26-44 y Meander width ratio (Whi~,'Ws~rl 2.5-3.3 3.6-5.7 - 4.5-5.0 1.9-3.1 _.2-3.4 3.5-5 9 Radius of curvamr-bankfull width I.I-4.1 I_I-49 - 17-4A I-1.4 0.7 ?.6 ?0-2.7 Meander Ienbnh,'bank(ull width N.9-13.9 6.6-I L8 - 411-15.0 5.4-Z2 3.9-7.0 6.8-122 Valley slope O.U 160 0.0131 40159 0.016 0.0174 40131 40159 Average water surface .elope 0.0179 0.0164 0.0137 O.f113 O.U231 0.0164 0.017 Rifflcslopc - - 11.0224- 0.0304 0.1113-0.028 OOIR-11.02: - 4017 Pool slope ~ - 0-0.0005 ODOfI-O.OfI I (1.11(12 0.(102 400'_ _ Pool to pool spacing - - 39 30-59 23-411 24-67 35-60 -~ Pool length - - 10-211 3-25 8-16 S-6 5_25 Riffle slope ucg water surface slope - - I b4-"' LO-?.'_ U.78-11.9 - I Pool slope-avg water surface slope - - 0-0.114 09 0.09 0.12 0.12 Pcwl Icngthbankfull width - - L6-3 ' f1.3-2.5 1.1 -'_.? 0.8-119 11.7-3.4 Pool to pool spucinghankfull width - - 63 33-6.11 3'-5.4 3.6-IU. _' 4.7-8.1 'T2-Z shares the same dimensional character as T2-I. The existing conditions panern data i.r specific to the T2-2, but profile data were not collected for T2-2. T2-3 shares the same dimensional character as T?-4. The existing conditions pattern data arc specif ic• to T2-2. but profile data were not collected for T2-2. Tahle 4r. Mnmhnlnoinal ('riteria tier TZ anri Td Existin Existin Ref. Pro osed Pro osed Existin Ref. Pro sad Pro sad Variables T3-1*** T3-2 Reach UTFR T3-1 T3-2 T4 Reach UTFR T42 T4-1 Rusgcn .titrcum Typ< C'4;S G4 134c l'li H3 Ci4 B4c 134 B4 Mitigation Typc Enh. 1 Restoration N!A h:nh- I Reslordion RcatoraGun N;A Restoration Restoration Ureinagc Arca (mi") 0.024 0.075 038 0.024 0.075 0.096 0.38 0.096 0.057 Bankfidl Width lwnkil (fd 2.3-3.4 4.2-5.8 9.0-10.0 4.4 Z8 45-6.7 9.0-10.0 9.2 6.2 Bank full Mcan Depth ldnkd (fU 0.8-I.l 0.6-OA LI-12 0.6 0.7 LI-1.4 LI-1.2 O.R 0.5 Bankfull Qoss-Sectional area (Py,kr) (f[-) 2A-29 2.5-4.8 10.4-10.7 2.5 5.6 5.4-Z2 10.4-10.7 7.1 3 Width/depth Ratio (wnki/dekd 2.1 -4.3 5.4-8.0 8.0-10.0 7.3 10.9 33-62 8.0-10.0 I I.5 12.4 Maximum Depth (d~,n~J 1(9 I2-1.3 L0-13 1.3-L5 O.R I.I 1.4-1.7 1.3-I.5 1.2 0.8 Width of Flood prone area (W fi,~) (ft) G-56 6-9 13.1-20.5 I I Ib 7-10 13.1-20.5 I8.4 1 ~ 4 Gntrcnchment Ratio (ER) 2.5-163 LI-1.7 1.3-2.3 2.4 2.1 L5-1.6 1.3-2.3 2 2 Sinuosity (stream length/valley length)(K) LI LI L2 I.1 12 LI L? L2 I.5 Pool Depth (ft) - 0.9 1.2-1.4 0.8 1.2 1.3-LS t2-1.4 1.2 0.8 Riffle Depth (ft) 0.8-I.I 0.6-0.9 LI-1.2 0.6 0.7 LI-1.4 LI-12 48 0.5 Max Puol Depth (ft) - 1.3 2.I-2.4 1.4 2 L5-2.1 2.1-2.4 2 1.4 Pool Width (ft) - 43 8.4-I Lb 5.8 10 3.3-4.5 8.4-I LG 12 8 Riffle Width (ft) 2.3-3.4 42-5.8 9.0-9.9 4.4 7.8 4.Sfi.7 40-9.9 91 6.2 ~ Pool XS Area (sfl - 3.7 I L6-13.4 4.8 I L5 5.0-6.8 1 L6-13.4 14 6.4 ' RifFlc XS Arca (st) 2.4-2.7 2.5-4.8 10.4-10.7 2.5 S.ti 5.4-71 10.4-10.7 7.1 3 c Puol depth/mean rifFlc depth - L0-I.5 L0-13 1.3 1.7 0.9-L4 I.0-1.3 L5 L6 O Pool width/n fflc width - 0.7-L0 O.R-1.3 1.3 1.3 0.5-L0 0.8-] 3 1.3 1.3 Pool area/rifFlc arcs - 0.8-LS LId.3 1.9 2.1 0.7-1.3 I.I-1.3 1.9 2.1 Max pool depth/dnti - 1.4-22 1.9-2.0 2.3 2.9 LI-19 1.9-2.0 2 ?.% Hank Ilcight Ratio (BBR) LI-L6 1.9-3.2 I I I 3.1-4.2 I I I Mcan Bankfull Velocity (VI(fps) 4.2-6.7 4.7-6.3 4.1-4.5 3.8 4.7 5.0-7.5 4.1-4.5 49 4.4 Bankfull Uischargc (Q)(cfsl II-16 12-30 4?-46 9 26 25-SI 42-46 33 13 Meander length (L,,,I fftl - 80-420 93-136 - 48-130 35-290 93-136 50-130 77-95 Radius of curvature (R~~I fCQ - 8-30 13-42 - 10-30 7--?6 13-42 10-30 IS-20 Belt width(WmJ (ftl - 20.25 45 - 40-45 IS-58 45 25-60 39-50 Mcandcr width ratio (Wne/wnxr) - 6.0-3.4 4.5-5.0 - 5.1-5.8 22-12.9 4.5-5.0 2.7-6.5 6.3-8J Radius of curvature-bank full width - 1.4-7.1 1.3-4.4 - 1.3-3.8 LO-5.8 1.3-4.4 I.I-3.3 2.4-3.2 Meander lcngth/hankfull width - 13.8-100.0 9A-I5.0 - 6.1-16.7 5.2-64.4 9.0-15.0 5.4-14.1 12.4-15.3 Valley slope 0.0439 0.022( 0.016 0.0439 0.0226 0.0211 0.016 0.021(1 0.043 Average water surtscc slope 40195 0.0202 4013 0.0195 0.0215 0.0224 0.013 0.0181 0.0296 RifFlc slope 0.0129- 0.0350 0.0102- 0.0640 0.013-0.028 (!0129- (1.0350 0.014-0.045 0.0134- 0.0381 0.013-0 028 4009-0.030 0.022 Pn<dslope 4(1001- 40089 0.0014- 0.00(,3 noon-o.onl 40001- 0.0089 0.002 0.0008- 0.0032 o.ono-o.ool 4002 0.00^_ a Pool to pool spacing 105 II-68 30-59 14-17 25-90 20-SU 30-59 30-85 60-70 Pool length 5-6 6-23 3-25 S-h (-20 10-35 3-25 5-q0 18.30 Riffle slope/avg water surface slope 0.6(x199 (1.45-2.83 I.0-2.2 0.66-1.79 0.7 ?.I 0.(0-190 LO-2.2 05(1-I.66 0.07-0.74 Pool slope/avg water surface slope 0-0.46 096-0.28 OA 0-0.46 41 0.04-0.14 0.0 0.1 I 0.(17 Pool lcngthlbankfidl width L5-2.4 I.I-5.7 0.3-2.5 I.I-1.4 0.8-2b I.5-7.8 0.3-2 5 0.54-4.3 2.9-4.8 Pool to pool spacing bank full width 30.9-45.7 1.9-16.2 3.3fi.0 32-3.9 3.2-I LS 3.0-17.8 33-6.0 3.3-9.2 9.7-I 1.3 --- t nere an no aennea nca tea[ures on i s-i; existing condrttons data an !tom representative cross-sections that arc neither defined rifflu~ or pools. Tahle 4d Mnmhnlnoiral Criteria fnr Ti anri TA Existin Ref. Pro osed Existin Ref. Pro osed Pro osed Variables 1,5-2*** Reach UTFR T~2 T6 Reach UTFR T6C T6 Roscrn tilream lypr l.4 Rdr B4 (. 84~~ B4 144 S1itig:nion Type Restoration NA Restoration Kestoratinn 1.A Kes[ornion Rcstornuon Drainage Arca Imi") 0.0?? 0.38 0.022 0.067 0.38 0.013 0.067 Bankfull Width lWssi)lfQ 3.3 9.0-10.0 5 3.4-53 9.0-10.0 6 8 Bankfull Mcon Ucpth (dnad lftl 0.7 1.1-1.2 0.5 0.4-0.8 I.I-L2 26 0.7 Bankfull Cross-Sectional area lA~,rtl (ft') 2.3 10.4-10.7 25 1.3-4.0 10.4-10.7 34 5.7 Width.'dcpth Ratio (wn~rdnxrl 4.7 8.0-10.0 10 7.0-8.7 R.0-10.0 10.6 11.4 Maximum Depth (d~;nxi)Ifll 0.9 1.3-I.5 0.8 0.5-I.0 1.3-LS 0.9 LI Width of flood prone area (R'ic,i (ft) 4.3 13.1-20.5 10 4-8 131-20.5 12 16 Entrenchment Ratio (ERl 1.3 I3-?.? 2 I.I-1.5 13-'_.3 Sinuosity (stream lengthkallcy length) (K) I.I I.2 L2 1.. 12 I.I 1.2 Pool Depth (ftl - 12-1.4 0.9 0.[-I-I 1.2-1.4 l I_I Riffle Depth lftl 0.7 LI-I.2 0.5 0.4-O.R I_I-I-? 0.6 0.7 Max Pool Depth (fll - 2.1-2.4 LS 0.8-'_.3 '-I-24 1.7 L9 Ptwl Width Utl - 8.4-11.6 6.5 4.Sfi.4 84-II 6 7.8 1(1.4 Riffle Width (ft) 3.3 9.0-9.9 5 3.4-5.3 9 0-9.9 6 8 Pool XS Area Isil - 11.6-13.4 5.8 2.7-ZI 11.6-13.4 7.9 I LX Riffle XS Arca Isf) 23 10.4-127 2.5 1.3-4.0 t0.4-10.7 3.4 5.7 Pool depttv'mcan ri ifle depth - L0-I 3 1.7 (IX-1.9 IA-I 3 1 7 1.6 Pool widtkri fflc width - 0.8-1.3 1.3 0.8-1.9 0.8-I i 1.3 1.3 Pool arc:r riffle area - LI-I-3 2.3 0.7-5.5 LI-1.3 2.1 1.9 Msx pool depikd„Lt - 1.9-2.11 2.9 1<3.5 IA-2..(1 2.9 2.7 Bank I Icight Ratio (BHR) 2.7 I L0 3.(I-6.8 I LO I.0 Mean Bankfull Velocity lV)(fpsl 4.4 4.1-4.5 6 3.0-5.7 4.1-4.5 5.7 S.I Bankfull Discharge (Q) Icfs) 34 42-46 IS 3.8-33.9 42-46 29 Mnandar length lLml (ftl - 93-136 453 14-116 93-136 54-90 7?-12U Radius of curvanrtc (RBI lftl - 13-42 IS 3-16 13-42 7.8-'_6.4 10.4-35.2 Belt width(Ws~;l lft) - 45 IS-3l1 16-36 45 27-3(1 36-40 Mcandcr width ratio (wnc-wnxl - 4.5-59 3.0-6.0 2.6-34.1 45-5.11 4.5-5.0 45-5.11 Radius of cunaturcbankfull width - 13-4.4 30 (1.6-4.7 1.3-4.4 1.3-4.4 1.3-4.4 Mcandcr lzngth'bankfull width 9.0-15.0 99-13.11 2.GJ4_I 9.U-15.0 9.0-15.0 9.0-ISO Vsllcy slope 2(1190 0.016 0.064 0.0274 2(116 09396 2029 Average water surface slope 0.0590 0.013 O.U55 11.0245 2013 20361 0.024 RifFlc slope - 0.013-(1.(128 0.02 0.11119(1- 0.(1295 11.013-I1.U2fl 0.02 (1.1113-0-025 Pool slope - 0.000-0.(1(11 0.00? 0.(1005- 0.(IO45 0.OOU-U.(101 0.00? 0.002 Pool to pool spacing - 30-59 20-50 26-48 30-59 16-40 25-70 Pool length - 3-25 10-IS 9-13 3-25 6-IS 6-IS Riffle slopcavg water surface slope - L0-2.2 0.36 U39-I__7 L0-'_.? 0.55 (1.54-L(1 POOI slope: ava water surface slope - 20 0.04 0.0'_-0.19 (19 096 0.08 Pool length Bankfull width - 03-2.5 2.0-3.11 IJ-3.8 03-'_.5 I-0-15 0.8-L9 Pool to pool spacingbankfull width - 39-6.0 4.0-10.11 49-14.1 3.3-6.11 17-h7 3.1-8.8 «««There arc nn defined bed feauazs on TS-2; existing conditions data arc from representative cross-sections that arc neither definzd ri(Flzs or pools Existing conditions survey data wen nal collected on TS-I; a visual inspeelion was conducted. Tahlr dr Mnrnhnlnoiral ('~itr.;-~ 4:.: T'7_~ T7_Z ana T7 d Existin Existi~ Existin Ref. Pro osed Pro osed Pro sed Variables T7-2 T7-3 T~_q~ Reach UTFR T7-2 T7-3 T7-4 Rosl,cu si rc:un ryl>t, a4 cap r:4.1 Isar 144 Ba~~ 134, I Mitigatiun'fypc tnh. I 12cstora0un linh. I - ~nh_ I Itcstorution 6nh. I Drainage Area Qni') 0.053 0.177 0.242 0.38 0.053 0.177 0.242 BanAfull Width(Wssl)(fl) 49 6.0-6.9 - 9.0-10.0 5.8 8.2 9.6 Bankfull Moan Depth (tlhtt) (ft) 0.7 0.9-I.0 - LI-12 0.5 0.7 0.9 Bankfidl Cross-Sectional area (Aykll (ft') 2.8 5.6-6.0 - 10.4-10.7 2.8 6.0 8.2 Widtl>/dcpth Ratio (W nxr~dnxr) 5.7 6.0-7.9 - 8.0-10.0 11.8 l L2 I L3 Maximum Depth (do,nkr)(fi) 0.8 LI-1.3 - 1.3-I.5 0.7 LI 1.2 Width offlood prone area (WG,,,)(ft) 5.2 7.6-8.7 - 13.1-20.5 II-6 16.4 192 Pntrcnchment Ratio (ER) 1.3 1.2-1.4 - L3-2.3 2 2 2 Sinuosity (stream length/valley length)(K) IJ LI LI L2 LI I.I L1 Pool Ucpth (fil 0.8 0.8-1.3 - 1.2-1.4 0.6 I.0 LI Riffle Ucpth (ft) OJ 0.9-L0 - LI-1.2 QS 0.7 0.9 Max Pool Depth (fl) L0 1.3-L6 - 2.1-2.4 L2 L8 2.0 Pool Width (fi) 4.0 4.8-7.2 - 8.4-11.6 6.4 9 11.2 Riffle Width (fi) 4.0 6.0-6.9 - AO-9.9 5.R R.2 9.6 ' Pool XS Arca (s~ 3.4 6.1-62 - I L6-13.4 3.8 8.7 11.8 c Rif71e XS Arca (st) 2.8 5.6-6.0 - 10.4-10.7 2.8 6.0 8.2 E Pwl depth/mean riffle depth LI 0.8-1.4 - L0-1.3 1.2 1.4 1.2 ~ Pool widthinfflc width L0 0.7-1.2 - 0.8-1.3 LI 1.1 L2 Pool area/riffle area LI 1.0-1.1 - I.1-1.3 1.4 LS 1.4 Max pool depth/dnkr 1.4 1.3-LR - 1.9-2.0 2.4 2.6 2.2 Bank Ilcight Ratio (HEIR) 2.6 2.R-4.5 - L0 L0 1.0 L0 Mean Bankfull Vclucity (V)(fps) 4.7 4.5-4.9 - 4.1-4.5 3.6 4.5 5.4 Bankfidl Discharge (Ql (efs) 13 25-29 - 42-46 10 27 44 Meander length (L,,,t (}tl 52-fit 52-IIS 52-138 93-136 52-62 55-106 52-138 Radius of curvmurc (R~) (ft) 17-29 22-58 29-77 13-42 17-29 15-35 29-77 Belt width (Ws~~l(R) 13-I6 24-02 28-45 45 13-16 29-47 28-45 y Mcandcr width r:rtio (WnniWnkr) 33-4.0 3.5-7.U - 4.5-5.0 22 ?.8 3.5-9.7 2.9-4.7 Radius o(curvamrc/bankfull width 43-73 32-9.7 - 13-4.4 2.9-5.0 LR-4.3 3.0-R.0 Mcandcr lcngth/bankfull width 13.0-19.5 7.5-19.2 - 9.U-15.0 9.0-10.7 6.7-12.9 5.4-14.4 Volley slope 0.0263 0.0144 0.0229 0,016 0.0263 0.0263 (1.0229 Average water surface slope 0.0200 0.0132 0.0216 0913 0.0200 Q0128 0.0216 wffle shrne 0.0220- o_oa61 0.0070- 0.0119 - 0.013-o.ozs 0.0220- o.oa61 o.ozoo- 0.0300 Poal slope 0.0032- 00068 0-0.0090 - 0.000-0.001 0.0032- 0.0068 0.001 - Pool to ptml spacing 16-26 17-42 - 30-59 Ih-26 32-86 - Poollength 5-13 6-12 - 3-25 5-13 7d0 - Rifileslop/avg water surf ace slope L10-2.31 0.53-0.90 - L0-2.2 L10-2.31 1.5(.2.34 - Pool slope/avg water surface slope 0.16-0.34 0-038 - U.0 0.16-094 0.078 - Poollength/bankfull width 1.3-3.3 0.7-2.0 - 0.3-2.5 0.9-2.2 0.9-3.7 - I'uol to pool spacinNbankfidl width 40-6.5 2.5-7.0 - 7.3-6.U 2.8-4.5 3.9-I l15 lUlllpll'Ie exlslmg elln Oln Onh ,Vllf\'Cy (lala Wl'R rlul cUlleeletl on I /-4. Takla 4f Mnrnhnlnairal ('riteria fnr T7-S T7-F anri T7-7 Existin Existin Existin Ref. Pro osed Pro osed Pro osed Variables a T7-5 T7-6 T7-7 Reach UTFR T7-5 T7-6 T7-7 Rosecn Strcmn Typc I.J t46 I P4 I Ific 64c C -0 64 I 13~4c I M1titigation Typc Kestoruion Enh.l Enh.l !~A Rcsturalion Enhl Cnh.l Drainage Area pni'I 0.245 0.261 0.620 0.38 2245 0261 0.620 Bankfull WidthlWssd (FlI - 9.2 15.0-17.0 9.0-10.0 10.4 10.4 lip Bankfull Mcan Depth (dhp~) (ftl - 0.9 09-I.0 I.I-1.2 0.9 0.9 L0 Bank full Crass-Sectional area (~sd fft-1 - 81 15.1-15.2 IOA-109 9.0 9.0 15.6 Widtlv'dcpth Ratio(Wn.rdnsfl - 102 14.8-19.1 8.0-10.0 I? 12 14.4 Maximum Depth (d,,,yxd Ift) - 12 I.I-I 4 1.3-I.5 L2 1.2 1.4 Width of flood prone area 1 Wrr.J I fU - 23.6 20.0-22-6 13.1-20.5 20.8 20.8 30.0 Entrenchment Ratio (ERI - 2.6 1.2-LS 1.3-23 2 2 Sinuosity (stream lengthivallcy Icngthl lKl I ' I.I I.0 1.2 LO 1.1 1.0 Pool Depth (ft) - 0.9 L2 12-1.4 LU 1.0 L? Riffle Depth (ftl - 0.9 0.9-I 0 1.1-L2 0.9 0.9 1.0 Max Pool Depth Ifll - 1.3 U 2.1-2.4 2.0 2.0 2.4 Pwl Width (fll - 9.1 13.1 8.4-11.6 12.2 L2 IZO Riffle Wid[h [ftl - 92 15.0-17 0 9.0-9.9 IQ4 10.4 15.0 Pool XS Areo (sf) - 83 15.8 I I.6-13.4 126 12.6 20.8 Riffle XS Area IsO - 82 15.1-15.2 10.4-10.7 40 90 15.6 - Pool dcpttrmcan ri Ffle depth - LO 1.3 LO-1.3 L I I.I 1.2 -. Pool width,'rifflc width - LO 0.8 Q8-1.3 I.'_ 1 2 LI Pool arcaln Rlc area - L0 LI I.I-1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 Max pool dcpth'd nor - 1.4 19 1.9-2.0 ' ? 22 2.4 Bank I Icight Ratio (BIIRI - 26 4.0 I.0 I.U L0 LO Mean Bankfull Velocity (Vl (fps) - 6J 4R-5.1 4.1-4.5 S.h 5.6 49 Bankfull Dischargr IQI (cfs) - 56 73-77 4'_-46 SU 50 73 Meander length IL.,.) (ft) 62 112-205 245-289 43-136 64-6N I I?-205 _45-289 Radius u(cun~uturc (R~1 ffq I? ;5-67 64-140 13-42 2U-25 35-67 64-140 - Bclt widthfWm~.I1fU 2R 27-33 60-63 45 21-'_4 27-33 60-63 y Mcandcnvidth ratio lµ'm~-'Wckd - 2.9-3.6 35-02 4.5-5.0 2.0-23 2.6-3.2 4.0-4 _' Radius of cun~artuc.fianktiill width - 3.8-73 38-9.3 1.3-4.4 1.9-2.4 3.4-6A 4.3-93 Meander length: baokfull width - 122-22.3 14.4-19.3 9.0-15.0 6.2-6.5 IUB-19J Ih3-193 Valley slope 0-0'_84 0.0191 O.OI 10 0.016 0.0284 0.0191 0-0110 Average water surface slope U.0145 0.0229 0.0122 0.013 (1.0193 0.0229 O.UI'_2 Rifflcsh,pe - o.olxx onlso- U.U218 anl3-u.o2x ao2ao. 0 0250 u.olxa aolsn- 11.021 N Ponl,lttpe o.on2z a0.0042 o.oon-o_ool o.ool o.ooz o-0.0042 Pool m pool syncing - 9 66-I I8 30-59 31-38 9 66-I 18 Pool length - II 16-25 3-25 414 II 16-25 Rifllc slope,avu water sur(acc slope - 0.82 L47-IJ9 L(1-2.2 I'4-1.30 0.82 1.47-IJ9 Pool slope.aeg venter surt~tcc slope - 0.10 0-0.34 0.0 0.052 0.10 0-034 Pool length b;mFlidl oidth - I_' 0.9-IJ 03-2.5 Q413 I.I LI-I] Pool to pool spacing h:ml.ti~ll wuith - 10 3.9-7.9 3.3-6.0 3.0-3.7 U.9 4A-7.9 Complete existing condrtwns survey data were nut collected on f /-S. ~rn .._a ~rin ~ Existin Existin Ref. Pro osed Pro osed Existin Ref. Pro osed Variables T8 T9 Reach UTFR T8 T9 T10-2 Reach UTFR TIO-2 Rosgen Stre:uu Type 134 G4 64r 64 (i4 64; I 64c 134; I Mitigation lypc Enh.l tnh.l NfA Enh.l Enh.l Enh.l N(A Enh.I Drainage Arca lmi') 0.021 0.036 0.38 0.021 0.345 0.38 0.345 Bankfidl Width (Wykt~)(ft) 4.0 3.8 9.0-10.0 4.0 S.U 16J 9.0-10.0 12.6 Bankfidl Mcan Depth (dskr)(ft) 0.3 0.6 LI-1.2 0.4 0.4 0.6 I.I-1.2 0.9 Bankfidl Cross-Sectional area (Py,~) (fY) 1.3 2.2 10 4-10.7 LS 2.2 10.6 10.410.7 10.9 Width/depth Ratio(Wsk~/dsk~) 12.3 6.6 8.0-10.0 ILI 11.6 263 8.0-10.0 12.6 Maximum Depth (d,sk,) (CI) 0.5 0.8 1.3-LS 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.3-I.5 1.2 Width of flood prone area (Wry,) (fi) 7.5 6.5 13.1-20.5 8.0 8.0 24.8 13.1-20.5 25.2 Entrcnchmeot Ratio (ER) 1.9 1.7 1.3-2.3 2 LS 1.3-23 2 Sinuosity (stream length/valley length) (K) I .I I .I 1.2 L I L I I.0 1.2 L0 Pool Depth (ft) 0.6 O.R 1.2-1.4 0.5 0.5 0.9 12-1.4 LO Riffle Depth (ft) 0.3 0.6 LI-I? 0.4 0.4 Q6 L1-1.2 0.9 Max Pool Depth (ft) 0.8 L0 2.1-2.4 L0 LI 1.6 2.1-2.4 2.0 Pool Width (ft) 2.7 3.0 8.4-11.6 5.0 5.7 12.5 R.4-11.6 14.0 Rifde Width (ft) 4.0 3.8 9.0-9.9 4.0 5 16.7 9.0-9.9 12.6 Pool XS Area (sf) 1.5 2.4 11.6-13.4 2.3 3 11.8 11.6-13.4 14.1 ' Riffle XS Arca (st) 1.3 2.2 10.4-10.7 L5 2 2 10.6 10.4-10.7 10.9 E Pool depth/mean riffle depth 2.0 1.3 L0-1.3 l3 1.3 LS L0-1.3 I.1 O Pool width/riffle width 0.7 0.8 0.8-I.3 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.8-1.3 LI Pool arca/riffle area 1.2 LI L1-1.3 LS 1.4 LI LI-1.3 1.3 Max pool depth/dbkt 2.7 1.7 1.9-2.0 2 5 2.8 2.7 1.9-2.0 2.2 Bank I leight Ratio (BI IR) 1.7 2.0 I LO L0 4.7 I 1.0 Mean Bankfidl Velocity (V) (fps) 3.8 4.8 4.1-4.5 3.6 3.9 4 4.1-4.5 4.9 Bankfidl Discharge (Q) (cfs) 5 I I 42-46 5.0 8 42fi3 42-46 53 Meander length (L,,,)(ft) 17-72 23-49 93-136 17-72 23-49 168 93-136 168 Radius' of curvature (R~) (ft) 7-22 6-29 13-42 7-22 6-29 116-137 13-42 116-137 Belt width (Wsi~(ft) 13-14 9-II 45 13-14 9-II 33-34 45 33-34 y Meander width ratio (WWII/Wnkr) 3 3-35 2.4-2.9 4.5-5.0 3.3-3.5 1.8-2.2 2.0 A.5-5.0 2.6-2.7 Radius of curvatureibankfull width L8-5.5 1.6-7.6 1.3-4.4 l.R-5.5 1.2-5.8 6.9-8.2 1.3-4.4 92-10.9 Meander length/bankfull width 4.3-18.0 6.1-12.9 9.0-15.0 4.3-18.0 4.6-9.8 10.0 9.0-15.0 13.3 Valley slope 0.0390 0.0360 0.016 0.0390 0.0360 O.OL15 0.016 QOllS Average water surface slope 0.0300 0.0276 0.013 0.0300 0.0276 0.0170 0.013 0.0170 Riffle slope 0.0169-0.0219 09125-09301 0.013-0.028 0.0169-0.0219 0.0125-0.0301 0.0254 0.01.1-0.028 0.0254 Pool slope 0.0105 0-0.0042 0.000-0.001 0.0105 0-0.0042 0.0008 0.000-0.001 O.000R ~~ S Pool to pool spacing 24-37 43-45 30-59 12-42 29-52 7 30-59 7 Pool length 5-6 5-7 3-25 6-10 5-ll 7-50 3-25 7-50 Riffle slope/avg water surface slope 0.5(r0.73 0.45-1.09 L0-2.2 0.5G-0.73 0.45-199 L49 I.0-2.2 1.49 Pool slopc(avg water surface slope 0-0.04 0-0.15 Q(1 0-0.04 0-0.15 0.05 0.0 0.05 Pool Icngth/bankfidl width 1.3-I.5 1.3-1.8 0.3-2.5 I.5-2.5 L0-22 0.4-30 03-2.5 0.4-3.0 Pool to pool spacing'bankfidl width 6.0-9.3 11.3-7 1.8 3.3-6.0 3.0-10.5 58-10.4 0.4 3.3-6.0 0.4 • • • • • ••••~••••••••••••••••••••s•••••••••••••••••• ~. VIRGINIA i Pnrcnn (~n~~n4u Nnr1h ('arnlina ~\ Y __ _. v 119 c 0 a e m m ~ ~ ~~. ~ _ ~ - CASWELL _ ~-- PERSON COUNTY ~,;~~~~~ ~~. ~ COUNTY - __ _~ G~ ninghaR`Ra I{ / ~ - ~~ ~ i~ I Semora ~ ~ --~_,~~ _~1~ ~ ~ { Cana Creek ~ 1 __ ~ L _ i~ _~ ~ ~~ ,~~\9°r a CreeK ~_-~ l ~__-~ ~ i _, J- ; _ 57 ~ ~~ ~~ V '3`~ ~~~' ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~r -- 1 ~~ ;_ 1 ,~ - - ~~ ~- ~ I ~~ ~~ VIRGINIA ~ ~ ~ , ~`~ ~ I -~ i 1 i -- CASWELL PERSON i q~ _ ~ 1 r I -~ -~ -sue-, ~ ~ c i. n x \ c~ ALAMANCE ~ ~ ORANGE DURHAM ; ~ GRANVILLE ~~ ~ ~ _ ~~~ Figure 1. Vicinity Map ~~ ~~ Project Site Location ~_ Major Roads N K C I A55(~CI,aTES (1F NC Other Roads "' e ~~ Major Streams and Rivers 5 L63,360 - Major Lakes and Reservoirs I inch equals I mites TFC~t~N(l1 (~C~IFS ~ i o., o i ~,~„~-~~~a~~E, ~~ ('ounly Roundanes ,wocar~nwc~roa w<~ Miles PERSON ~~ / RANVILLE __ - / GUILFORD ALAMANCE ORANGE DURi11CM i ~ i 1 _- -- -- ., x lI WAKE I I RANDOLPH CHATHAM ~ -- ,, ~ ~,~ '~ ~ ., r LEE ~ ~ ~f'I MOORE Figure 2. North Carolina Ecoregions -- ~~ Carolina Slate Belt ~ Counry Boundaries u~~ Northern Inner Piedmont ~ Project Site Location 1 t ~~~iX:IATLS llF `Vt Northern Outer Piedmont N Rolling Coastal Plain w~ E L633,600 Southern Outer Piedmont I inch cL{uals 10 miles s _~ E NVIRONMEMAL TECHNOLOGIES TECHNOLOGIES to ~ o to Til'1SSIl: B3Smti 'VII~CS nnin CON5i1R1CT10N. INC. t �� . ��G�� '-fou ��._-.��.. �.. ��• ' 1� `_� �,` �. `' 1 � t � �.:y�. ✓sem- - �� / \/� .:�� , �N"� / ,�.� >�l`,.. •ryy�,'� Yom,•, R•' �._i��.i/��f�'�1�. 'Jc.Z;� ..f '� _ Ilk r�`' ,J�^..J,N� r • \ 1. �' � ,•� /p ��.� ;;��' ~ ! `�• 1 ) 1 13 `\ � C^ a-- � . j 5sµ �� ,,IE�Q..�`'��,/\J• /`�j� l M• e�X10 Ssp� ^��•�...�^" 550/' �I ''4 ' :'`� .ai*1•-, � ( . x It HUC 03 • / /. /i� _ - t ! AIOC 030 ler 9. �• ••� � � 1 ( 1' �e, .—. !..` i ( i' s'°� ,✓ /` ! .} ;. _I I NLe 0 , JV Figure 3. Project Watershed s^� Project Streams USGS Quadrangle Boundaries Other Streams K C I Project Watershed (1.32 sq. miles) w�E K C 14-digit HUC Boundaries 5 1:24,000 1 inch equals 2,000 feet —� Source: USGS Topographic Quadrangles I ECHNOLOGIES Alton (1968), Leashurg(1968• Aron 1983, 2,Ot)0 1,00 0 (100 AND ONMEMAT)CIN INCOLOGIES ( ) Iwo CoNSTaucnoN, I and Olive Hill 1968 PCC( ~1r~ r 'r ~-j;a WeE ', r ,. ~.~ WeD Pa B2 ~., PaC2 ~~ a ~ ~ ~ ~' Pa B2 s HeC U ~s., -_ ~ 4>> ~ ~~-- .i, HeC i ~ t>+; i ;, i « - ' r ~.. r ", S WeD r~= i , ~R A , d ~ ~ y~_ .~.~~° w a, ~ t~ ' , ~, sIt• .. , ~'" ~ L ~ ra ~ ; a ,,V r ~ WeE rt ~ t.~ _~- 'w'+E ~• WeD ! Web A-~ ~? ~ r:~ ~~ i ~~ ~~ ~~: ~,~ = ~ ~`~ ~ ~ ~ PaC2 ~ - ''4 ~tk rh ~ x - ~ t_ c ~ m HeC ~~ ~ yy ` WeC ~ ~ n - r !r WeD ~ ' fi ~ s' ~ i ' h ~ WeD~ r . y - ~ ...' - a = r'~ ~ ~ P i' ~ ~ F i. VaC 4 ~ ,T y - ~ V ~ s - e ,y . P qt 1 r6~~A ' _ r wee .. • r ~ r ~'! ti. ~ ~ ~ a .' VaB ~ a - a r,;y .,s ~ W PaC2 ~, ' ,'y - WeB ~ a , t ,34 Pa62. ° r ~ ~ ! PaC2 ~ s ~ ~ " r~ 's ~~ - r . /~ ~ ; `~ I~,i' '~. k ~ ' f ~ 4 IPaCr - s 22 ~ i ~ ,~':~ WeD WeB ,~ Vvtx ' wee i~ ~~~ ~~ I r, y WeD 1\ ,F Va8 / ~i HeB ~,{ `t ~ i' HeC t i ' Pa~82 , ~ ,l - - ~ . ~ ~ y,. vas ``\\ ~wee rt .:+. ~ ~; Hec ~ , _ ' ..~.4.\ .~ HeB ~i ~ ~ ~ ~~. i~q~ '' Va6 I sti I . ~• -Va6 ~ - y a: , y WeD HeB ~ i tl ,-° 4'A `~ ~ I , ~ - He I j ~ • r~ r ~• dpr ~ p ~ L~ _ ,. -.,."r ,WeE ~ ~~~ ~ . - c etli~ ~ T~ ,~ G r ~! E~~ say` ~. _ 't~/tI ~ r~,_ ern"" VaBa ~} ~ ~t~l. ~ ~ lt~'I .r ~ :~... Y ~' t VaC- En6 mod, / ~ v VaC ,~ l ~'.,r~ ~ HeC ~ ~~ s xr I a~ ',~. ~ - _ WeE~`~ ,.~~ . ` ~~~ OIrB ~, 2 i, ~ fL - WkF ~E _ He8 ', r ~~~~-~ ~,'~, o EnC ~ fc n -~ ~`, °` ~_ ~ - °, `w sa ~ HeC .r''~ - -~ ~ ~ Pr,d~,,,,h.,,,t rr„i,,t S,ii' ~~ ~ ` ~ ~WkB " '~ - + Cwt" •- i :: C , C hc„ a 1e And A1ehadkec Loams. Erequcnil, F log dut ~ = r HeB Helena Sandy Loam, 2 To 6 Percent Slope. ~ VaC W~Ie P.a c ~ - -_ "~` p ~ = ~ ~ ' ~ WkD 5 ~ ~ - ~ . HeC -Helena Sandy Loam.6 To 10 Pcrccnt Slope. ' / ,~ ~ ~+' ~. -'f ~ 1' 'f ~ ~ ~ V' {p PaB2 -Pacolct Clay Loam, 2 To 6 Percent Slope.. Eroded n -~~'~~ # l ~, '~ ~- `~!"~---/ <.- ~. ~. - ~ ..'. ~~ f r ~i PaC2 -Pacolct Clay Loam, 6 To I O Pcrccnt Slopes. Eroded ~~ z• ~ ,yt~~ - ' ` - _ `i ~~iP ~ t WkF VaC -Vance Sandy Loam, h To 10 Pcrccnt Slopes t s - 'i f ~ EnB WkD ~ ~. 3- +~ I t WcU -Wedowee Sandy Loam, 10 To I S Percent Slopes ~ rr• ~ >a ~£ a . _- ~ ,y, •', ~ - - WeE: -Wedowee Sandv Loam. 15 To ?5 percent Slopes `• 'r - r ~`~ -~ ,e ~ ~ • ~ +~u~ - ~ i , , ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ HeC HeC -Wedowee Sandy Loam, 6 To 10 Pcrccnt Slopes ~ ` a - wr _ ~~ MeC ~ WkF -Wilkes Loam. 15 To AS Percent Slopes ~4,~ #!j ~ r., ., ~ ° k.'-_ HeG tEnB ,;~yyk p~ He8 . Y11kD ,1 ; W'kD - Wilkn Loam. x To IS Pcrccnt Slopes •.t F+r ~^ " ~" ~~~ ~ -prB ~ OrB ~~ ~~ Figure 4. Project Site NRCS Soil Survey Map ~~ ~~ Project Easement K~~ Extent of Project Parcels ~ 1 ` v ~SC(lC1ATFS OF ivC w~ c ~~ Project Streams s ~~i Other Streams ~' ~ 2'000 L~]]T~7 ((""~~ I inch equals 1,000 feet --r~ T~C{ 11 V IILO ~]IES ll,lil L'~',S~,+n'~'e~ _'!I(19 Pc'I-.cUl7 Cntlnll' ~ilS~ ~•()00 S~~n ~ ~,~~~ ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. .Soil D,u,r Soi/ Sut-t~ec o% Peraun County. ,VXC'S' / 99? Feel ~j ar c ~ , ~` ~ ~; ~ / ~~ ~-~ 119 ~ ~~ I -d~ . .,. ~., ~ ~ ,.~ ~ ~ ~ _~ ~~ ~~~ ~,~ ~ ~< S= to ~~ i ^ ,°' Semora ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ -: . 57 ~ `~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ll Gaye cr~K ~~ ~ ~_~ ~-~ -- ~ i~ ~ i ~ ~~~~ Figure 5. Project Watershed Land Use ~~ Urban or built-up land (<I %~) ~ Project Watershed ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Agriculture (49°/) Major Roads Rangeland (12%,) Other Roads ASSCX7ATES C1F NC Forest land (35%) ~~ Project Streams N Water (I %) ~~ Other Streams I :18,000 a ~~ ®Wedand (3%) I inch equals 1,500 feet T~~11i `OLO~-++~v Suirrcr:.NC~(i.9Pl.~iil<(Cot~c~i'Uc~l~.rc~l, /'41hli.~l~i~c(?(7113 ~•Sll~ 750 n 1,500 t'Cl`t ENVIRONMF.NTAI iECHNOLOCIES AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. Cl~~a:rified Using .Anderson 1 i ~ . , °. a ~` y' ~ .~ 4 ~~ ~ + +~y ,'. ~;, A ~ I, ~ r ~~ ,`~ ~ ti• ''I ~ ~ ~'~"E. ••, _•#,,,*~ ,~~ProjectEntriihce ~`. ~"~~~ ~~~`~:! ' r~K 1~ ~, • ~' at Metal Gatti`' _;'~' _ ~+ c= Cun i~ ham Rd t~ ` j ~"~'. ~~' °;lj ti:° - ~'+~ d • ~ Tributary T 'r! butary 7a ^ a i' .. buta~ 3 7Y%butary 8 ,~ `,,,~e ~ ~ 4 - PRO a3/a4 + r"~ l~A PRO 1 ~~ ~ PR0 41142 ~'~~~ rXS 43 ~^ I Y~'- « ~"` xs 1?~+f ~ 7Ylbuta~Y 4 A xs 41 , ' 6 ' xs 44 ' ~' XS 2t~Y I~ _ PRO 213 '+ XS 42 .f '~ l X545 XS 3 PRO 45.46 ~ XS 46 PR04 ~ PR022123i ~.~ - +';`~ -PR049/50 r XS r, XS 22 (°,+: ..~ A ~ ~ X5 48 „d ~_ XS 49 PRO 5 XS 23 ~ '~ +~ ' • TYlbuta €'xs 47 ~ x`s so w~+ ~~~XS 5 _ ~A 1' ~ PRO 51/52 ~ ~ ~ `Y a PRO 6 __ il~ibutary 6b pR0 47148 . . ...~YXS6 .1 'PR024 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~7 ~ - XS 51 ` ~ : ~' ~ ~ .I~^' ~M1 I XS 24'- XS 7 ~ PRO 7/8 k PRO 25~6~ ~. ~ ~~~AAM--.yyy XS 52 .., ~^~ 'ty'l a '/ t XS 25 , PRO 39140 ~ XS 40 "-.._ err' ~ ~ PRO 53 ~ t ~ ~ ~ ry s e ~ ~ ~ ~ xs 39 utary~c ~butary 7 ~ ~' . ~ PRO 9110 +-- _ ., f ~~. 7Y%byta,~ ti XS s3' ~ 71r%butary 1~ _ , ° PR016117 ~~ •r~~ PRO;26127 ~ d .~PR060 XS 10 ~,~ XS 26~ ~ .;ice 1. "' ~ ~ XS 60 + PRO 61 XS 75 XS 16 ~ XS 1T XS 18~ :XS`2R '~If PR037I38 ~'_ ~~~AAA "~ PRO 18/19 • XS 21 1'~7 ~._ XS 38 • ~ T~~~ ~ ~ XS 61 XS 13 1XS 19 7 y~ ~.~~y - - ix ,~c Ypt PRO 13115^ XS`20 - , X X5930 PRO 33134 % XS 37 ~' "4~,^y~ r t. ._~ 1 * G N _ ~~,: ~ ~ I +a PRO 29/30 "~ y " dd,~ -- XS 12 PRO 20121 .,4J1~ ~ y. ~ +- t i `+ , , ~.. ~ 'XS 17'7, ~ X528 _ ~ _ '- I ~~' - XS 33 '~, '~+~ a PRO 11112 PRO 28 '~XS 31 XS 32 XS 34 L XS 35 : /' ~ { + ~ _ ~ ~.~i ~ +~ • XS 36 ` : ~-_ eryZ +PRO 31132 "PRO 35/36 ~ ~ 14 •'' + ie~P' `~ 7Nbuta ~~ , a ~ ~_ ~ "` 1 PRO 58,'59 ' ; ' g ~ ~~~ ~ xss4.- ~ xs~9 .°` u. - e ~~, t,~ t,. ~` , i• . r xS 55 ~1 ' XS 58 ~~ +Q~.?, dpi e . ~{ ~~~'~ .-~ _ ~ PRO 54(55 '~ PRO 56A/57 ~ X557 ~ • ? ~u h7y w1' ~ :, 1:-y 1 XS 56A 4„ ' 1 p(~~ "~ { t~s + # . I~ i 'dr'y - '~4+~ ~*'", w..- ~' j `3 PRO 56 XS 56 n k`, , j ~ ,. !y[ rF °-. _ _ _ ` . ~.. Ys,3 ! ~. ~ _,: , ~~' ... ~ ~ + ,berry' ~ I 1 + ~ .ice . 4c. T ~. ? + •'. r~ f I . - ~ dfF,t! a r'k ~ t + _ ~ ( t 7 R ~' M Figure 6. Existing Conditions ~~ ~~ Project Easement Rain Gauge/Barologger ~~ ~`~ Project Streams Stream Gauge K C I ~i Other Streams " AStic)CIATFS (lF NC ~°° Surveyed Longitudinal Profiles w~c a Surveyed Cross-Sections ~ :9,600 (' /~ ~` 7 I inch equals 800 feet ~~ TECHNOLOGIES PTO~eCt ParCCI BOUOdarleti 8OO 4OO U $OO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES Feel AND CONSTRUCTION INC. /mane Suurre~ Nrrcon Cuunh~ GIS. U(7huinn(~'rrr _'O(l4 _ ,~~L ~. s w --~~~~~ STOKES ROCKINGHAM CASWELL PERT YADKIN FORSYTH GUILFORD ALAMANCE ORANGE DAVIE DAVIDSON RANDOLPH ROWAN CHATHAM Figure 7. Reference Site Vicinity Map (UT to Fisher River) ~~ ~~ Project Site ~-~ Reference Site ('UT to Fisher River) K ~~.~ Major Streams w~~ 155(~~JATF~(7FNC Major Roads 1:6q ,360 Other Roads I inch e uals I miles TECHNOLOGIES ~ IL' ° ~ ~'"~~""~ ^"~' ~ ^°"~"s County BounLl~u I~~, Surry County, North Carolina LI '---N. T� A I. X t� 61, ZZ ? 0; ti -7X N -'7tx-- U.- t N\ ik\ V, e I w S �'J' 1�1 I j -1 Z I , 41Q! 1� IL `0 r) > F fl, % 6 1, Z 'Z -j �NNNN IYO 0� < 0- _ >1 —4 L — A J) 45� kC7 Figure 8. Reference Site Watershed (UT to Fisher River) Reference Reach Watershed (0.38 sq. mile) MMMMMO�� 14 -digit HUC boundaries N KCI 0'**.o Reference Reach (UT to Fisher River) ASSOCIATES OF NC KOther Streams 1:24,000 C I I inch equals 2,000 feet 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 EwRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGMS TECHNOLOGIES Feet AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. Source., USGS Topographic Qua,*mg1e Bottom (1971) Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan Stream Plan Sheets •••••••••••••••••!•••••••••••••••i••••••••!• N n h O N 0 U vICINITY JNAP NOT TO SCALE N O 0 ~o 0 A h U O U Dr~cTTOxs To r . TO REACH THE SITE FROM RALEIGH, PROCBED WEST ON US-70 UNTIL IT MERGES WIIH I~SUS-IS SOUTH: CONTIIdUB ON !~5 FOR APPROXLNATELY L5 MILES AND 7HEN TARN EXR IJAB FOR DUKE STiUS-SOl BYPASS.TARE A RIGRT OFF OF TBB EXIT AND TRAVEL ON US-501 FOR 11.5 MASS. WI717A' THE TOWN OF ROXBORO, TURN LEFT ON70 COUR7 STiUS-158 WESZFOLLOA' US-158 (PEST 0.1 MILE AND TURN RIGHT ONTO NC-57,CONTINUING NORTNWEST POR ANOTfd+R l2,T MIIFS.ONCB WI7TIA' TAE SMALL COMMUNITY OF SEMORA,TURN RIGHT ONTO NC-ll9 AND DRIVE NORTH A.5 MILE. TURN RIGHT ONTO CUMIINGAAM ROAD AND CONTINUE EAST FOR 0.85 MILE. TAB SITE WILL BE ACCESSIBLE BY A METAL GATE ON THE RIGHT. ADEX OF C ! 77726 SH68T `L1 PROJBC7 L6GBlm • 2 fARU 2A DETAD:S: STABDITA770N `28 17DlU 2E DETARS: TYPICAL CROSSSECTTONS 3 7ARU L PLAN ANG7 PROFDE Tl 77DtU 30 STREAM GEOMETRY `3777IRU 52 PLANTING PLAN 53 77DPU 6S SRDAfENTAI70N b EROSION CONTROL PLAN ' INCLUDE!) IN RESTUR,f170N PLAN GRAPHIC SCALES -40 -20 0 40 80 PLANS -40 -20 0 40 80 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL -4 -2 0 4 8 PROFILE (VERTICAL) PERSON COUNTY LOCATION: CANE CREEK TRIBUTARY SITE UNNAMED TRIBUTARIES TO CANE SENORA, NORTH CAROLINA TYPE OF WORK STREAM RESTORATION AND PROJECT DATA STREAM RESTORATION LENGTH = 9,588 FEET STREAM ENHANCEMENT LENGTH = 8,150 FEET A~eO !n IM dlias d, ~~~~ ~~ TECSwoLOGRw ENGIME&ERA PLANNERS• ECOLOGISTS SUTE 220 LANDYAAX CENTER A 46q 9X FOPo(S IiO, RALEIGH, NC GARY M. MRYNCZA, PE PROJECT p/y(.gucnn ADAM SPIELER /KRISTIN IOJIGHT-MENG NATURAL CHAMO?I, D6SfIN CREEEK ENHANCEMENT PROJECT ENGINEER ~,.R ~..o .C. D06002 1 ~5 A EUBMRTEDWrtH NESTOFUMIN PIAX OEC7W7 ~~ wt~oreo lar o.- F~osyste PROGRAM GUYPEARCE pg CONTRACT ADMIHIS77RA7UA PROJECT LEGEND z 0 ~ W ~ ~ 0 m .fi STREAM RESTORATION Proposed Thalweg -8 8- w/Approximate Bankfull Limits Proposed Offset Rock Cross Vane °~ Proposed Modified Rock Cross Vane Proposed Log Step or Step Pool Proposed Channel Block Proposed Riffle Grade Control Proposed Constructed Riffle with Constrictor Proposed Stone Toe Stabilization ~ Proposed Rock Ford Crossing Seep Dev elopment Structure Existing Bedrock TOPOGRAPHY Minor Contour Line Major Contour Line ---~--- SEDIMENT ~ EROSION CONTROL Stabilized Construction Entrance SCE Silt Fence _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ Limits of Disturbance ~~ Temporary Stream Crossing _ ~ Silt Fence Rock Outlet Rock Silt Screen (Std. Drawing 1636.01) ~; ~P ~a _~ ~~ = o~ U ~ Oi CJ ~Z N '(YWy}' O ~ ~Q W pu Z LLS ~~~ w a w Z U ~ W ~ ~ U a ~ w o °z U~ z w o 'o Z ~.. U U~ N g W Q a W ~ O ~ w N PROJECT LEGEND UNCOMPACTEO BACKFILL ~ MIN COMPACTED rF N SP .PnO a E BACKFlLL -.... r ^F: p.l . coMPACrEO ~ ~5'~ FLOW I BACI(FILL 9 CHANNEL ._. MIN. 1.tt THICK 'S P~_...I INVERT EDIMENT CONTOI 7 E Il.. ~~ CLAS3I STONE ' CHANNEL BLOCK SCALE: NTS -A PLAN VIEW 1IJ OF PROPOSED Il! OF PROPOSED 1R OF PROPOSED GUNNEL WDTH GUNNEL N101H CIUNNELYADTX A' FLON ~ FILTER FABRIC ~ ~ (INSTALL ON UPSTREAM SIDE) ~ \ sa° ~ P L ~/ ( A B' PLAN VIEW S r BASEFLOW 9' PROPOSED J ~'L~ ' ~ - ~,. -~ -FLOW-~ _ STREAMBED ELEV. _I POOL ~," BACKFILL WITH ~i ~,- - MU(TUREOFi57 FILTER HEADER= FOOTER ROCKS STONE, CLASSAORB FABRIC ROCKS (STONE, BOULDER) RIPRAP, ANDIOR NATURAL STREAMBEO MATERIALS. SECTION 8-B' (PROFILE VIEW) 113 OF PROPOSED 117 OF PROPOSED 10 OF PROPOSED CHANNEL WIDTH CHANNEL'MDTH CHANNEL WIDTH TOP OF CENTER 1D ROCNSSET ATPROPOSEO STRE4JBED BANIffULL ELEVATION ........ ........ p EJ.F/ATION, . I= , ``/ / ,\ NO GAPS BETWEEN STREAMBED ROCKS ELEVATION I _- FILTER FABRIC FOOTER ROCKS UPSTRLEAM SIDE) DOWNSTREAM VIEW PROPOSED GRADE A BANNFULL ~~ ELEVATION i_-,.,,. __.__ - ~ ~-1. t:: ~~ ~ I S TO 7~ SLOPE _ \~~, A' STREAM BED ELEVATION FOOTER ROCKS FILTER FABRIC (INSTALL ON uPSrREAM slOE) SECTION A-A' OFFSET ROCK CROSS VANE SCALE: NTS NOTE: (1)PLL ROCKS OR STONES IN THE VANE STRUCTUREARE STONE SOULDERS (2) SHOAT CROSS VANE ARM TO BE HALF THE SLOPE OF THE FULL MM SLOPE. FILTER ~UHAOE CONTROL STONE FABRIC (CLASS q PROFILE - SECTION C-C PROPOSED -THALWEG~ A STONE TOE - STABILIZATION 4' MIN. GRADE CONTROL STONE (CLASS I) yA SECTION A-A r EXISTING STREAM STONETOE~ I STABILIZATION I ~ SUBSTRATE rINVERT SET AT 1 PROFILE GRADE f M RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL SCALE: NTS S ONE (CLASS A~ \ GRADE CONTROL STONE (CLASS I) SECTION B-B a Z O VI ~ ~ tl S~ S k s m N ~ ~. ,E C' t r m '" o z `~ orv '^ oz ~J O ~ ~p Z ou ~~ N = LLI w a U ¢ w Q 2 U ~ W ~ ~ ~ 0 v a ~ YZ O W O }Z Q 4- U~ ~ WO O U (aj W o ~ W Q a W O f/1 W N N.T.S. DETAILS: STABILIZATION SEE PROFILE SHEETBFOR- STATIONSAND ELEVATIONS STAPLE FILTER FABRIC TO HEADER LOG PROPOSED 1Z' MIN. DAMETER STREAMBED ELEV FLOW HEADER LOG STAPLE FILTER FABRIC FROM SECOND STEP __ STRUCTURE AND THEN BASEFLOWp STAPLE FILTER FABRIC FROM BACKFILL IMTH ~ TI ~ ~~ FIRST STEP STRUCTURE ON HEMER MIXTURE OF #57 ~ , ~~ ' -- - I -~ LOG STONE,CUSSA _ - -L- . ,{ ~^ ' ~ ^~ OR B RIPRAP, ANDIOR NATURAL Y1 i ~ r (~ S - "t ~ ~ ~-;' STREAMBED - ^ ~ MATERIALS ~ Z FILTER FILTER 1 ~ FABRIC FABRIC ~UNDISTURBEO 1Z" MIN. DIAMETER GROUND FOOTER LOGS TONE FOR EROSION SECTION A-A'fPROFILE VIEWA CONTROL, CIASSA DOUBLE LOG STEP DETAIL SCALE: NTS NOTES: -DETAIL SHOWN IS FOR A DOUBLE LOG STEP. ADJUSTACCOROINGLY FOR SINGLE ANO TRIPLE LOG STEPS. (SEE PROFILE SHEET TO DETERMINE AMOUNT OF STEPS) FILTER- FABRIC (KEY IN UNDER STFIEAM BED) PROPOSEDI STREAMBEDI ELEV INSTALL FILTER FABRIC ON UPSTREAM SIDEAND STAPLE TO HEADER LOG A I B' MIN. BANKFULL WIDTH 5' MIN. _ _ _ _ ~ __ __ _ ... -T-- _ __ .=d SECUREALL THREE ', TEND LOGS TM~ INTO BANK o~w WITH CABLE < a ZLL ~~K m a =n INSTALL FILTER FABRIC ~ w WATER FLOW ON UPSTREAM SIDE AND ~pLL STAPLE TO HEADER LOG -~_-_- op~ ~w0 TONE FOR EROSION a CONTR04 CLASS 1 Z~y ~o~` -A BANKFULI `MOTH BANKFULL VdDTH BANKFULL IDTH FILTER FABRIC SILL AND FOOTER ROCKS (INSTALL ON STONE, BOULDERS UPSTREAM SIDE) o~~ ~ ~ROCKTIED INTO ~ Y ~^ STREAM BANK Ja m Hof f ~ ~ Z a ~ ~ WATER FLOW D NO GAPS BETWEEN m ~ " FILTER FABRIC y ~ ROCKS (INSTALL ON UPSTREAM SIDE) SILL AND FOOTER ROCKS STONE, BOULDERS O~~ ~ W 0 STONE FOR EROSION J a CONTR04 CLASS 1 y~f 0 a m~LL 0 I -A PLAN VIEW LAY FILTER FABRIC OVER UPSTREAM TOP EDGE OF SILL ROCK(S); BEHIND FILTER FABRIC, STABILIZE WITH #57 SEE PROFILE SHEETS FOR STONE, CLASS A OR B STATIONSAND ELEVATIONS RIP RAP AND10R NATURAL STREAM MATERIALS. LAY FILTER FABRIC FROM THE SECOND STEP OVER PROPOSED UPSTREAM TOP EDGE OF PROFILE SILL ROCK(S) AND REPEAT FLOW -~ I TI`- ~- I I I ~: ~~ I I I'iF - - I N7TH FILTER FABRIC FROM END OF FIRST STEP BASEFLOW p G"i ~_~ ~= ~NI L-~ ` l~ III I it VIII ~._ I1L=i L STONE, - ~ i l ~. ,I, ~l" Y 111 ~~~' 1 I I I I-j _ ~ _ _ _ - = I I ~ '3.L1_i III IL _ Il 111 ~~Jl STONE FOR EROSION ^I ` 1 Ill llL=l FILTER BOULDERS CONTROL, CLASSA FABRIC (KEY IN UNDER SECTION A-A' (PROFILE VIEW) srREAM BED) DOUBLE STEP POOL SCALE: NTS NOTES: -ALL SILL OR FOOTER ROCKS ARE STONE, BOULDERS -DETAIL SHOWN IS FOR A DOUBLE STEP POOL, ADJUST ACCORDINGLY FOR SINGLE AND TRIPLE STEP POOLS. (SEE PROFILE SHEET TO DETERMINE AMOUNT OF STEPS) ~~ B N w rc FLOW FILTER -i`~ ltiX L/CS7. fABRIC__-__-___________- TOP OFBANK PLAN VIEW RIFFLE USE EXISTING BED =1LE MATERIAL TO ACHIEVE lBSLOPE FINISHED THALWEG GRADE A80VE RGC. BOTTOM OF RIFFLE . , . ~-__ _ AJSJ1~ CHANNEL BOTfOM~ ____ _ NAOTH BOTTOM OF BANK ~i B USE IXISTING BED MATERIAL TOACHIEVE FINISHED THALVNEG r GRAOEABOVE RGC. !/ ` ~ q-' $ GRADE CONTROL STONE (CLASSA) J-' - ^/i v v ~o~-w° r 1 ~v,L, ~~~_ri \/ \/ /) L I A i \ PLAN VIEW 1D OF PROPOSED IO OF PROPOSED 1I! OF PROPOSED PAOPOSFD GRApE CHANNEIVADTN GANNELNIOTH CHANNEL wDTH FINER FABRIC TOP OF CEMER (INSTAII ON 1t9 ROCKS SET UPSTREAM SIDE) A AT PROPOSED STREAMBED BPNIffULI ~~ BANKNLL ELEVATION 0 ELEVATION _\ ELEVAnox ~ ~ ....... . ... . ... .. . .. . . . ..... iC-'.I _ -1 -, ~ _ J .'; ~ s7p jp'A StoPE ~....._- ~ J .. FRIER FABRIC ~ _. \ - _ .. UPSTRFAN BIDE) STREAM BED `_r,~ -~ BETWEEN FOOTER ROCKS ELEVATION STREAMBED _ } h i+ I ~ ~B ~y _ ELEVATON "` yJyJ] FILTER FABRIC 5t~1'' P~-Tt~'-T-1r~r (INSTALL ON FILTER FABRIC FOOTER ROCKS UPSTREPN SIDFl ~~ (WSTALL ON SECTION A-A' ugsTREAM SIDE) DOWNSTREAM VIEW ~ f ~fV B(P q, STABNZEO SPILLWAY ~j TREATMENT TO STREAM, CLASSB °fOL/ AREA STABILIZED ROCK OIIRET FROM DRAINAGE FEATURE q pIAN NEW STABIDZED SPILLWAY L-, DETENRON AREA ~ S MAX DEPTHAPPRO%.05' ~ _ SECTION A~A' fPROFIIE VIEI M WATER QUALITY TREATM ENT AREA scALE: Nrs MODIFIED ROCK CROSS VANE SCALE: NTS NOTE: ALL ROCKS OR STONES IN THE VANE STRUCTURE ARE STONE, BOULDERS SQUARE CUT - BANIffULL_ Q _ _ I BUDS (FACING UPWARD) 0 I~ LIVE CUTTING ~ (1"T02"DIAMETER) y w ANGLE CUT 3046° BASE FLOW 9 PROPOSED GROUND UVE STAKE NOTES. DVE STAKESTO BE INSTALLED LIVE STAKES pASCT g SCALE: NT$ SPECIAL PRO SIONS N DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. B PROPOSED ~y ~ BASEFLpV -_-------. B' sTgEPAtBEO ELEV ~- ti APPROX O.S' Ftow --- _. , ~ POOL r FILTER ~ ~~P. POOL FABRIC ~.,'~ I. ~ ~~.?-- ~7 MXNRE OFIEI ~ ~ ~ _ L ~'~E7-~M1~'Zk~ STONE CUSSAORB RIPAAP, ANDIOR NAIIIgAL ROCKS ROCKSR STREAMBED MATEMALS. SECTION B-B' (PROFILE VIEVJI COIR FIBER MATTING - CONTINUE 12' DOIMISLOPE OF STONE TOE AT UPSTREAM ENO OF BOTH WINGS, ICY BANKFULL VMNGIN TO BANKA MINIMUM OF /'AT HEADER ROCK TYP. SET HEADER ROCK BACK AN ELEVARON OF 7S A80VE BED AMINIMUM OF 10 ~ 'MOTH OF FOOTER ROCK ~, +s r <,5 r 1s F ~ ABOVE I , > ~ I , . ~ I BACIffILL, 8ED r:,~'G`:~:~? , TYP. _ ",• ' ~. ~ •~ I - j I C57 STONE BED HEADER A FOOTER ROCK, TYP. ROOK 7 BACIffILL F DOTER 1 ROCKS IN DEFLECTOR ARM SHOULD MINIMUM NOT BE GAPPED OR . HAVE ANY ~ ROCK _ / _ SIGNIFICANT SPACES N57 STONE FLOW EXCAVATED TRENCH FOR \ I DOUBLE VMNG DEFLECTOR CI LL ~ A CONSTRUCTION ~ FILTERfABRIC, TYP. ~ / c ~ SECTION B-B ~7 STONE FlLTER I FABRIC ° HEADER BANIffULL ROCKS B __ C B BURY BOULDERS Y'BELOW BED = 0 HEAD OF RIFFLE RIFFLE MATERIAL: 6'NOM. THICKNESS WELL A BE GRADED MIX OF 50% CIASSA75%/57 STONE, RIFFLE MATERML BED AND 25%MED. SAND 8' NOM. THICKNESS YrFLL GRADED MIX OF 50% FOOTER ROCKS, T~P~ GUS RIFF ~ CUSSA25%Mi75TONE, ~ BOTTOM OF AND25%MED. SANG ROCKS IN DEFLECTOR ARM SHOULD RIFFLE AT DOWNSTREAM END SECTIONS C-C&D-D E P ~A~ OF STRUCTURE, CONTINUE yGN F CANT SPACES 7~ FlLTER RIFFLE SEALINTO BANKA MINIMUM FABRIC MINIMUM OF 4 FEET PLAN VIEW sores: - I 11. CLASS'A"STONE CAN BE USED TO REDUCE VOIDS SECTION A-A - I BETWEEN HEADERS ANDFOOTERS. ' 2.COMPACT BACKFILLTO EXTENT POSSIBLE OR ATTHE i DIRECRON OF THE DESIGNER. CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE WITH CONSTRICTOR SCALE: NTS ~ EXISTINGI / • PROPOSED w / STONE TOE PROTECTION GROUND rc / OF CLASS 1 STONE j (PLACE 1(3 OF SPECIFIED ~ STONE BELOW THE EXISTING GRADE AT THE TOE OF SLOPE, ~ STONE SURFACE TO BEAT FINAL DESIGNED GRADE) STONE TOE STABILIZATION SCALE: NTS A^ CLASS"A" RIP RAP 2'1 SLOPE TO ROCKTIED INTO EXISTING GRADE STREAM BANK BURIED ROCK SILL IMMEDIATELY S~F DOWNSTREAM q,NBgNK OF CROSSING FLOW__. S~ STONE TOE ~M EAM ~NK OF FORD AJ CLASS ^A' PLAN RIP RAP 11 - 1 CROSS SECTION A-A FILTER FABRIC FOR DRAINAGE 1. A STABILIZED PAD OF CLASS "A" RIP RAP, i81NCHES THICK, LINED W1TH FILTER FABRIC SHALL 8E LOCATED WHERE FARM EQUIPMENT AND LIVESTOCK WILL BE CROSSING THE RESTORED STREAM CHANNEL. 2. EXCWSION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL APPROACHES TO AND ADJACENT TO THE CROSSING. 3. THE CROSSING SHALL BE BUILT TO THE DIMENSIONS SPECIFlED ON THE PLANS. 4. THE ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE AN APPROPRIATE RAMP ANGLE FOR THE STREAM CROSSING ACCORDING TO THE CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY. 5. THE CROSSING LOCATIONS ARE DEPICTED IN THE PLANS. ROCK FORD CROSSING SCALE: NTS a 5 a Z 0 0 N 2 0 prt.,...~'~ ~... N P 0 i `r LJ;~ : ~N ~1 tsGa [) N O= tt- 0 ~ ~p Y w Ou z ~ Z > ~~~ ¢ o~ w Q z ~ cD w Z U ~ W ~ ~~ ~ U a ~ w0 z U~ W O O Z I' V V W N W Q a W 0 F-- ~ W N xuN N.T.S. DETAILS: STABILIZATION TRIBUTARY 1-1 STATION 10+00 TO STATION 17+59 "C4/B4c" STREAM TYPE ENHANCEMENTI nE BACKTO EXISTNG GRADE AT 2:I SLOPE (TYPICAL) 4,8' 3' 4' 2.4' 2.4' 4' 3' y.g _.-_~___ ~ -__-___ --_- WbIA__ _ m - _ - J 0.2'I-_._ ___.._ TIE BACK TO EXISTING TYPICAL RIFFLE GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE (TYPICAL) 4.B' 3' 8' 2' 2' 4.8' 3' 4.6' _ ~ _---,__ ~__.__--___-~~.-__~-_r __-__ i m------ I Nbkf I '. C I (V nEBACKTOEXISnN'c TYPICAL POOL-RIGHT MEANDER GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE (TYPICAL) 4.8' 3' 4.8' 2' 2' 8' 3' 4.8' I ~i _. __.__~ ___I__. _ m -__. ___.. '...___-_-~~ -_.___.._. V N TYPICAL P 0 LEFT MEANDER p = TRUV4:c LocAnaN TRIBUTARY 1-5 STATION 34+94 TO STATION 37+64 "C4164c"STREAM TYPE RESTORATION 7.3' 3' 4.9' 38' 3.B' 4.B' 3' 7 TRIBUTARY 1-2 AND 1-3 STATION 17+59 TO STATION 24+74 "C4/64c"STREAM TYPE ENHANCEMENT I AND RESTORATION nE BACK TO EXISTING GRADEAT 2:I SLOPE (rYPICaL~ 5.T 3' 1.2' 2.6' 2.8' 4.2' 3' S2' __ _.__. I I ~i _-._-._.._ _Y~_I_ _ __-_~.__ WDkf __- -_ _ -0.2'x.--I _ _-___-_ TIE BACKTO EXISTING TYPICAL RIFFLE GRADEAT 2:I SLOPE (TYPICAL) ~ 5.7 3' B' 2' 7 5 3' S.2' ' ~ ---- N _____ ____ _ nE BACK TO EXISTING TYPICAL POOL-RIGHT MEANDER GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE (TYPICAL} TRIBUTARY 1-4 STATION 24+74 TO STATION 34+94 "C4164c" STREAM TYPE RESTORATION nE BACK TO EXISTING GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE (TYPICAL) 8' 3' 4.2' 3.3' 3.3' 4.2' 3' 8' ~ ~, i ', ~ i ~ ~ __ __-_._-._-_-_-__~I_-_ __.-_ _-~__y_._. --t- i __ _._-._ . ___ 12~^_- _ L ' 0.2{ ____. ____.__. n~~~a ~~rrl r TIE BACK TO EXISTNG GRADE AT 2:I SLOPE (TYPICAL) 4' 2.5 9 4' 2 5' 2 5' S 6 2 5' 4' - -- i I - ~ ' -_ - - ~--~r-~ TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER TIE BACK TO EXISTING GRADE AT 2:15lOPE (TYPICAL) ~ 51' 3 5' 4' Y' 4' 2.5' S 8' 2 5' 2 5' B 4' 2 5' 4' - -L_ __ 9 3 5.7 __ _..__.___ B __. _I ____. +-_.-_____.___.___- _.____-___. -___ __. __ -.._ N __._- -___Vvb(f-I NRM I _.._-~ I-__t.. N TYPICAL P00 -- LL EFT MEANDER N I w __.__- __. I ____-.1__.. _ Wbkf_ I__-- -- --o ~---- -------- 8' 3' B.4' 2 5' 2.5' S.8' 3' ~ __ I TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER 8' 7 5.6' 2.5' 2.5' 9.4' 3' ~ ~ N - _ _ --- -- io N - ~- -NM1 r--- - ---- TRIBUTARY 2-1 STATION 50+00 TO STATION 53+05 "E4" STREAM TYPE ENHANCEMENT II > 2.6' > 2.0' VARIES VARIES TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION Q =TNALYJEG LOCATION TRIBUTARY 2-2 STATION 53+05 TO STATION 54+91 "C41E4" STREAM TYPE RESTORATION 2.8' 3' 2.T 1' 1' 2.T 3' 28' ~ i ~ i ____ -~_LI_y~1_ I L TYPICAL RIFFLE 2.8' 2.6' 3.6' .7 .7 3.2' 2.fi' 2.8' ~~ i ~ I -- "~- ~ - ' -- _ _ _li ~1 - N ____ TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER 2.8' 2,6' I 3.2' .T .7 3.6' 2.6' 2.8' " "w ' -- ' ---- - TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER 0 = TMALWEG LOCATION TYPICAL P00 LEFT MEANDER 0 =TNALYIEG LOCATION TRIBUTARY 2-3 AND 2-4 STATION 54+91 TO STATION 58+51 "B4" STREAM TYPE ENHANCEMENT I AND RESTORATION 2.3' 1.5' 2T 1' 1' 2.T 1.5' 2.3' ~ ~ I ~, I i - ~ ~ - - _ I_L~I Wbkf _~__ - -_ 0.1'~ -1 _ TV ^Il~AI ~Irrl r 2.3' 1.1' 3.6 7 .7 3.7 1.1' 2.3' ,,,~ , N -- --L - -~~__ ~- - _ __ TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER 2.3' 1.1' 3.2' .7 .7 S6 1.1' 23' ~ wr,a - -- L- _ _ wthL __ TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER 0 = THALYrEG LOCATION 2 O N s r~ 1 ~ ~X f ~i ~ t: ~' ii ~ ' N ~ ~ N ~ r= z ~ ICI ~ w o"' U V ~ oz ~- ~ No ~ ~ ~` ~ Z LL~ w a z ¢ z w ~ Z U ~ W 0 ~ ~ ~ U a ~ w 0_ }Oz F U~ z W 0 0 U (Qj W o ~ ~ ~ w Q a W ~ o N w N -~~ -4 -2 0 4 g DETAILS: TYPICAL XS TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER GRAPHIC SCALE O =THgLWEG LOCATION ET 2B BF E TRIBUTARY 3-1 STATION 60+00 TO STATION 61+05 "C41E4" STREAM TYPE ENHANCEMENTI TIE BACK TO EXISTING 1.3' 1.5' 1.3'090.9'.1.3' 1.5' 1.3' GRADE AT 2:I SLOPE it i i l ' (ttPICAL) ~ ~ I ~ _-~_ -_-_ +~+-1 NPIf:GI RIFFI F TIE BACKTO EXISTING 1.1' 1' 31' .5'.5' 1.T 1' 1.1' GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE ~--T--^----- (TYPICAL) • I '~ ~~~-~, ~ i m-~~-- ~el~--'-~ d wbk}y P -- TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER TIE BACK TO EXISTING 1.T 1' 11' S'S' 3.P P 11' GRADEAT 2.I SLOPE ~ G (TYPICAL) • i '~. I I 'I ~ i _ v _ I TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER Q =THALWEG LOCATION TRIBUTARY 3-2 STATION 61+05 TO STATION 76+79 "B4" STREAM TYPE RESTORATION TIE BACKTD EXISTING 1.6' 2.5' 2.4' 1.5' 1.T 2.2' 2.5' 1.6' GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE _~-T-L.YNPi'._-_ ~ _- -rt- !Whkf '__ IO.Y 4_ TYPICAL RIFFLE TIE BACK TO EXISTING GRADE AT 2a SLOPE (TYPICAL) • 18' 1.4' 5.5' .P .T 3' 14 1.6' ~ i _ _,_ -_-~8 ~1.L._- 1, .. __ Vvbkf - L.-'- N --. --. _ TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER TIE BACK TO EXISTING GRADEAT 2'.1 SLOPE (TYPICAL) • 1.6' 1.4' 3' .T .T 5.5' 1.4' 1.6' ~i _ I I I VJlpa I I Iwnkr TRIBUTARY 4-1 STATION 80+00 TO STATION 82+66 "B4" STREAM TYPE RESTORATION TIE BACKTG EXISTING 1.4' L5' 2.1' 1' i' 2.1' 1.5' 1.4' GRADEAT 2:I SLOPE ~ ~ ~' ~ I I ' (TYPICAL) • ~ I ~ m _ _- _..-_-V4TP?-_.- _ _ _YJDkf I r 10.1' -- ro TYPICAL RIFFLE TIE BACK TO EXISTING GRADE AT 2:I SLOPE ~ 15 1.5' 45 8'~8 23 1.5' 1.5' (TYPICAL) • ~ -- -- VRPa ' I --~ I ~ wtkf _ _ ~~ - - -- TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER TIE BACK TO EXISTING GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE ~ 1.5 1.5' 2.3' .6'.6' 4.5' 1.5' 1.5' (TYPICAL) • ~ ~ i ~ I~ i ~ -i -- _ --- _ -r- _ I NMA TRIBUTARY 4-2 a STATION 82+66 TO STATION 102+53 W a "B4" STREAM TYPE ° RESTORATION TIE BACKTO EXISTING GRADE AT 2:I SLOPE 1 24' i 2 29' 17 i 1T 2.9' I 7 i 2.4' (TYPICAL) • 1 i • l Niel ~ __. - . __ .. ___ ~ _- _-_IWOkfI__ I i ] G N ___ ' a ~ W X0.1' ~ ~ C TYPICAL RIFFLE F ~ n TIEBACK TO EXISTING ° GRACE AT 2:1 SLOPE ~ (TYPICAL) • 2' T 8.5' 1' 1' 3.5 1' 2' ~ w ~ I wTPs ~.. i ~ ~ _ _ _-Nbkfl I _-_ o N wwF F _ f m 7 N TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER TIE BACKTO EXISTING ~ DE L' 2:1 SLOPE ~ 2' 1' 3 5' 1' P 8 5' 1' 2' P ~ . ~ . ~ I i - --- -- I'VYbIA - - i i - mlG m-. ~~~ ~~ TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER p=TxALw>cLOCAnoN ~ ~„~-'?' a~ TYPICAL POOL-LEFT MEANDER Q =THALwEG LOCATION TRIBUTARY 5-1 STATION 110+00 TO STATION 112+64 "C4IB4" STREAM TYPE ENHANCEMENT II >2.P >aa VARIES VARIES TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION TRIBUTARY 6A AND 6B STATION 240+00 TO STATION 240+89 AND STATION 250+00 TO STATION 251+03 "C4/64" STREAM TYPE ENHANCEMENT II TRIBUTARY 5-2 AND 6AB STATION 112+64 TO STATION 113+85 AND STATION 240+89 TO STATION 241+29 "64"STREAM TYPE RESTORATION TIE BACKTO EXISTING ~ 1.5' 1 18 0,9'0.9' i.fi' 1' 1.5' GRADE AT 2:I SLOPE I (TYPICAL) • 'I ~ I ~I i m !J_Iwhkfl i n lo.i'- _ TYPICAL RIFFLE TIE BACK TO EXISTING 12' 1' 3.4' 6'.fi' 1,9' 1' 1.2' GRADE AT 2I SLOPE ~ ! ....~. (TYPICAL) • ~ Wbkf _ I_. - TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER TIE BACK TO EXISTING 12' 1' 1.9 .6'.6' 3.4' 1' 12' GRAOEAT 2:I SLOPE (rYPlcw I I ~--~ . ~ - - _r '. vmkf i - -- - TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER X20' >2.a VARIES VARIES TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION Q • THALNEG LOCaT10N TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER 0 =THALwEG LOCATION TRIBUTARY 6C STATION 120+00 TO STATION 121+88 "64"STREAM TYPE RESTORATION TIE BACK TO EXISTING 2' 1' 1 9 1.1' 1.1' 1.9' 1' 2' GRADEAT 2:I SLOPE ! I I (TYPICAL) ~ I ~ c __._~ I ~~wbkf~'~ I I- o m ~.1~ _ _ TYPICAL RIFFLE TIE BACK TO EXISTING GRABEAT 2:15LOPE iS' 0.8' 4 .8'.fi' 2.3' 0.6 1.6' (TYPICAL) • ~ ~~.-II-I---i - ~ cl - - _- wtikf r _-_-_-_ TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER TIE BACK TO EXISTING GRACE AT 2I SLOPE 1.8' 0.8' 23' .B .S' 4' 0.6' 1.8' fie- I i o~ ~'- _ ! _ twin I-~ TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER p • n1ALw,:c Locanox N N ~ Z u y W y U O ~D ON O 7 N OZ 7 pJ o ~ ' N~ TRIBUTARY6 ~j~ = a~ STATION 121+88 TO STATION 134+38 a No "B4" STREAM TYPE ~!!~ RESTORATION W II w QW TIE BACK TO EXISTING 2.5' 1.5' 2.5' 1.5' 1.5' 2.5' 1.5' 2.5' _ a GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE (TYPICAL) ~ w • ~ ~ i ~ ~ w4kfl l ~.t' H 2 TYPICAL RIFFLE w o TIE BACKTO EXSTING 7 ~ ~PDCAI) 2:1 SLOPE ~ 4.3' 1' S.T 1' 1' 3.2 1' 2.3' 0 U ~ --- ---tea ~ -'--- ~ ~ a ~ Nbkf I - -I ~ I I-- I I Y Z O i I I w O Z i __ ~ ~ U Z TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER w O o PE BACK TO EXISTING GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE ' ' ' ' ' Z ~ U (TYPICAL) ~ 1 3.2 • 2.3 1 1 S.2' 1' 2.3' ~ V W O - - _ ' _ r ~ ~ ~ ~ _-. _ -_ Nbkf_-_ cC C w d III Q w ~ -- ~ o TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER N N 0 • THALNEG LOCATION -4 -2 0 4 g DETAILS: TYPICAL XS GRAPHIC SCALE -___- - __ - TRIBUTARY 7A AND 7-1 STATION 260+00 TO STATION 261+36 AND STATION 140+00 TO STATION 144+69 "C4/E4" STREAM TYPE ENHANCEMENT II > 2.0' > 2.0' ' VARIES VARIES TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION TRIBUTARY 7-2 STATION 144+69 TO STATION 148+00 "B4"STREAM TYPE ENHANCEMENTI TIE BACK TO EXISTING GRADEAT2,I SLOPE 2.9' 1' 1.9' 1.9 1' ~ 2.8' (T'PICAq • ~ ',, I I I ~ f, - --~- ~Wfpa I _ ~ - _V.bkf_ _ 0.2' TYPICAL RIFFLE 0.5' TIE BACKTO EXISTING _ 2.fi' 28' 0.9' ~ 2.4' 2.6' GRADE AT 2:I SLOPE 1 I (TYPICAL) ~ • I I i _ 7--_ i~~r i .-_ -_ 0.T 7 _- as I TYPICALPOOL -R GHT MEANDER as TIE BACK TO EXISTING _ 2,8' 2.4' 10.8'1 2.8' 28' GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE ~ I (TYPICAL] • ~ i ~ ~ I _'MPa-. _. ~ VvLkf__I I ~ ---- '~ - OT 0.5' TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER 0 =THALWEG LOCATON TRIBUTARY 7-5 AND 7-6 STATION 181+54 TO STATION 190+83 "B4" STREAM TYPE RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT I TIE BACK TO EXISTING GRADEAT 2:I SLOPE TRIBUTARY 7-7 STATION 190+83 TO STATION 196+g3 "B4" STREAM TYPE ENHANCEMENTI TRIBUTARY 7-3 STATION 148+00 TO STATION 169+08 "64" STREAM TYPE RESTORATION TRIBUTARY 7-4 STATION 169+08 TO STATION 181+54 "B4" STREAM TYPE ENHANCEMENTI TIE BACKTO EXISTING 4.1' 1.8' 2.5' 25' 1.6' 4.1' TIE BACK TO EXISTING GRADEAT2I SLOPE 4.T 2' 2.8' rt 2.8' 2' 4.T (TYPICAL) • ! ~ I I GRAOEAT 2:I SLOPE ~ (TYPICAL) • _- - -T - .VApa ~ ~ i I ~ a I I ~i - _ _ _ - -_ 0.8'__._0.3 ---.-~ -L I ~ - TYPICAL RIFFLE ~2, TYPIf:AI RIFFI F TIE BACK TO EXISTING TIE BACK TO EXISTING GRADE AT 2a SLOPE 3.T 2.8' 1' 1'.T.T 2.8' 3T GRADEAT 2:I SLOPE (TYPICAL) • ~ lM~e- ~ (TYPICAL) ~ 3.9' 3.4' 1.3 1.3'.8'.6' 3.T 3.9' ~ I- `I- ~6__~x-I- N m`I I -7 i i~-. ~ -1- Wakf o - - ~ - L fD, ~ ~ o;o 0.8' -- .-~ ---- TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER TYPICAL POOL- RIGHT MEANDER TIE BACK TO EXISTING GRADEAT 2'.1 SLOPE 3.T 2.6' T.T 1' 1' 2.B' 3.T (TYPICAL) • I ~, ~i -----r- I - ~ ~.I 4\bkf m o1-- _ D.1'~ II0.8' TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER Q = TNALVJEG LOCATION 5.2' 2' 3.2' 3.2' 2' 5.2' (TYPICAL) • I I 7.5' 2.8' 4.T 4.T 2 8' 7 5' -_ -j-~8- _.-._- - I -. . . _ _- yHps ~~ ;~ - i I @ _ i - ~ __-- --- - ~, --__ ._ _-_________ Nbkf ~ __ __ --I ~L I ,, -_ ~ - Nhkl -- -- -ry - - -L - -- '- TYPICAL RIFFLE 1 Dz TIE BACKTO EXISTING TYPICAL RIFFLE GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE • 4.3' 4.1' 1.5' 1.5' .B' 8' 3 6' d 3' (rYPIDALI ~ • ~ 6'S 5.8' 2' 2' 1' 1' 5 2' ' • rv . . - _ - YYY ~~~ttt 'r . 6.5 _-_ _ I --_ ~ i - T_-- __ NNkf _ - --- ' I ~I I - - 1 -- i W4kf --- - ----- L I __-1-I-__-._ N _ 0.1' ~ N~ ~ 'L-_ -_ _ O _.- 01 ~L_-__.-_--_ __-_--N TYPICAL POOL-RIGHT MEANDER TIEBAGKTDExISnNG GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE (TYPICAL) • • 4.3' 3.6' B'..8'. 1.5' 1.5' 1.1' 4.3' ~~ • ~ - Wtkf _ ' ! I _ ' I ~~ _. -. - - o -. 0.1' 1 __ TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER 0 • THALIM1EG LocATroN TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER B.5' S.2' 1' 1' 2' 2' S.8' 6.5' ' i -- --- - ~-I. ----------- - i W6kf I I I i --_irt- __.-__- -__ rvI + 'l _ I - -{. rr o. 1 1 1 ! ~ 1 TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER p • TNUwt:c LocanoN TRIBUTARY 8A STATION 270+00 TO STATION 271+10 "B4" STREAM TYPE ENHANCEMENT II 1 3' VARIES VARIES TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION TIE BACKTO EXISTING GRADE AT 2:I SLOPE z a z 0 0 m rc >r (TYPICAL) • 1 39' 3.T .8',.8' 1.3' 1.3' 3,4' 3.9' ~ i r - ~ "- K4M I ~ ~ I i i ~ 'L r - ~ -- - - E ..., a - --- __o G.i, --- .+ TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER Q •7NALWEG LOCATION N H P N ~ ~ ~ z u W W pN TRIBUTARY 8 V ~ ~ ~o STATION 200+00 TO STATION 204+49 , ~j ~ Z o "B4" STREAM TYPE a ~° ENHANCEMENTI oz ~~~ U1 PU ~ Y 0 T 1.3' 13' 0.T 2' w w TIE BACK TO EXISTING ~~~~ GRADEAT 2:15LOPE ~ ~ I '~ I ~ ~ w (TYPICAL) • ~ I~ 1 - r1 _ NAIA} _ _ TYPICAL RIFFLE ~ Z U ~ W U 1.5' 2 4 6.5 1.5' 1.5' TIE BACK TO EXISTING `-"T-~^+---T-~, GRADE AT 2 I SLOPE I 7 ~ 0 U ~ . I I (TYPICAL) • i I I I ~ ~ _ N~~ - w 0 Z - a,5' ~/ (y LL Q r z TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER Z 0 0 15' 1 5 .5.6' 2./' 1.5' TIEBACK TO EXISTING ~t--~----j Q ~ Z U LLI O GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE ~ ~ ' ~ ~ (TYPICAL) • I I I i i. ~ '_ ~N ~ a '-~_ o s~ ~ 0 . -os ~ w TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER Q =THAINEG LOCATION -4 -2 0 4 g DETAILS: TYPICAL XS GRAPHIC SCALE -_ 5 a z F 0 F N W K 2 SH Y rW t f CI 7 N TRIBUTARY 9 STATION 210+DO TO STATION 213+69 "B4" STREAM TYPE ENHANCEMENTI TIEBACK TO EXISTING 2.5' 1 1 5' 1.6 1' 2.5' GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE (TYPICAL) ~ I j I ` ~ 1~ ~ 0.8'~ 0.5 - ~= I-~15b6f[.~ -_ 10,6' II O.Y 1 TVPI(AI RIFFI F TIE BACKTO EXISTING 3' 3' GRMEAT 2:I SLOPE ~ 2.1' 2.6' .T~~ 1~.9' 2.1' (TYPICAL) _ III 0.6' _ _ _- ~Nbkl B.5 0,5 TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER TIEBACK TO EXISTING ~ B I GRADEAT 2:I SLOPE 2.1' 1.9' f.T 1.6' 2.1' (TYPICAL) ~. Va4kf ~ _ _ _ 0.6' - 0,6 0.5' TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER 0 =TIULw,;c LocAnoN TRIBUTARY 10-1 STATION 220+00 TO STATION 233+00 "B4/1"STREAM TYPE ENHANCEMENT II TIE BACKTO EXISTING GRADE AT 7I SLOPE TIE BACK TO EXISTING GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE 6.2' 2.5' 3.8' 3.8' 2.5' 8.7 (TYPICAL) ~ -1 .__.___-__ -____.-_ 1 4 I ape /' . ~1_-.__ __ I I Nbkl I VARIES - - _ _ ~~ ,0.2' VARIES TYPICAL RIFFLE TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION (TYPICAL) ~ 1 55 57 1,4 14 09'0.9' 42 5.5' ~ Y / a - _ __ N i ) _. ~' _ _ LV&kf I ~ I _-1_- - - _ ~I ~0.1 ~ 1 nE BACK TO EXISTING GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE TRIBUTARY 10-2 STATION 233+00 TO STATION 235+82 "B4" STREAM TYPE ENHANCEMENTI TYPICAL POOL -RIGHT MEANDER ICAU ~ 5.5 42 0.9'0.9' 14 14' S.2 6.5' ~ T __ Nbkf _ -__ __~ _- _I. _~ al-_ __ _ iQ 0.1'I TYPICAL POOL -LEFT MEANDER Q =TNUw>:cLOCAnoN -4 -2 0 4 8 GRAPHIC SCALE d K tl r)jr 7 ~ ~ r ~ z u ~ W ~N U '^ of 1 Jz ~J I./ lT! ~ NQ w ~u z o Z LLI ~~~~~ ~W i a o ~ w U W 0 a YZ w0 ~~ U~ WO z~ Q~ UW Q W H DETAILS: TYPICAL XS w Y ww •• Y ~~ '' V~ ^^ ,, V• ^^ ,, V• ^^ ~ cn cr V• cn tr cr / ~' /~ / O ~ ~ I ~ / / Aw Y / W O V/ O IV ~ Q W T A O T ry ~ W ~ I ~ I I ~ / ; / 1 T I / / / ~ ~ + Q ~ ~ ~ ~ / / ' , I / ~ / ~ 0 ~ __'.__ -;- - ~. -,. - VPi STA. 12+0 37 O -',. ' - ,_. -.,.-'. - - .. - ~, _ ~ I ~ l : / l l l / T~ I ~ ~ / ', _ ', _ ~, VPI STA 12+ 8.34 - ~- _ I STA 12k4 _ _, '~ ~~ ~~ '. I J _. _ / ,, ~ i ~ / , J ~/ l / /' Q ~ ~ ' E EVATI N 8.48 LEVATION 50 .OB ~ i A ~ / _ " ~ " x~ I ~ ' VPI STA Y2+ ELEVATION 5.31 .-48 - - ~ PfSTA~ 12+60. 1 ~ - - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ - - : , O ~ ~/ , / m n ~ // / / / / ~ i / ~ ~ 1'~ / I I Q ~ r I ~ ~ ~ --, ~- _ -~- LEVA7IDN 91 ~- -, - ~- ~ / 3~ //~~// /~ ~ ~ I I I i ~ ' ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ - ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ISTA. 13 1. + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~- ~ ~- ~ ' / / ~ i ~ ' , A ~~ ~ I ~ + O ~ O ~ ' ~ / /' ~~ ~ / I 'O~ A ~ I I ~ C~ _ ~ ELEVATION 5t .06 - _ V - ISTA 13+'G0 0 O ~ - ~ ~ - - ~ - _ - ~~I f/~~/ \ ~ d ~ ~ I I - - VPI STA. 13+1 .66' . . ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~I STA 11+ 0 78 ~ I / ~ ~ I ELEVATION 50 E .05 EVATION 508. ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ - - ~ . ELEVATION . 9.52 ~ ~ I ~ / ~ ~ \ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 - - ' - - ISTA: 13+44. ~ ISTA. 13+38.6 - ~ - - - ` - -', VPI STA..11+ - 1.82 - - - VPI STA. 11+ - - - .82 ~ ~ l ~'.I 1 ' - -' ~ LEWAYION 507 ~ E 77 EVATICIN SQB. ~ ~ ~ ELEVATION 78 ~ - E4EVAT10N .38 ~ - \ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - ` TA,13+ 1. ~ E ' ATION 508 3 ', ', VPI STA: 11 8.82 + ELEVATION 28 9 ~ V \ ~ ~ If I : ~, - EVATION 507. --~. '_- 7 - - _~- . ~ - _ ~ _ NATION ELE ~ ~ ~B; 76 - ~ - ~ . ~ - \\ ~ l ` ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~ VP 3+82.98 STA 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I STA 11+8 .81 I , li I ~ I , - - ' EL NATION 508.2 ~ -' ~ VPI STA 11+ .21 - - - ELEVATION .11 ~ m i- l \. -- I 1 ~ ~ _ A - - - ~, ~~ ~~ : N ~ - ELEVATIONS 8.58 -, - - VPI STA. 1 H9 53-~ ~ y - / ~~ I ~ A ~ + ~ ~ ELEVATION 50 .95' ~ m __ - / / ~ I \ . ~ ~ Q VPI STA 11+84.21 ~ ~ ~ -. I \ Q ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ O ELEVATION 508.58 T ;I ~ 2+00 II I I I' ~, ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~ _ ~~VPI STA 14+43.85 ~ (r)~ ~ \ J . F \ ' ' ' 'EL ATION 508.15 ~i -' ~ ~ 1 \ , ', ', V ISTA. 14+62. 5 VPI TA.'14+57.$0 ~ i IT - - ~ E EVAYION 507. - - -ELE AT10N 507.91 - ~ l l ~ \ ., ',_ _' - '_ ISTA.-14+69. ~ VPI TA. ~14+75.88. A ~ ' ~ Ai I ~ ni A ' - - - E EVATION 507 ALE ATIpN 607.]6 A ~~ 3 +r I ~ \ , , . - . \ ' ' I Z f/ p ~ A ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ A \ O ~ ~ ~ ~ l V A ~ F ~ 9 ~'F I O \ C Z \ -, VPl ST . 15+30.81 'VP-I'ST - . 15+25'.74 - \ p \ ( - - - ~ ELENA - ION 508.53 ~ ~ELEVA ON 507.12. ~,\ , D \ , ' ' \ ~ . 1 '~ 1 ~ _~ ~ .VPI ST .1b+37.61' YPIST .16+44 06 1 I \ ~, { ' 'ELENA ION 505.5 ' ION 507.08 ~ I I i ~ ~~ 1 ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I I ~ 1 ~ ~ J ~ ~ - - I ~ \ ~I ~ ~ I 1 1 , , _ , ~~ A VPLSTA. S+9g_69 VPI STA 1 98.85 '- Q ~ ~ V ~ ~I Q ~ \ ~ ~, E4EVATI N505.7) ~, ELE,VATIO 506.02 ~ ~ I 1 ~ 1 1~x~ l V 1 ', VPI $T 18+05.89 ~ ~ _ ', 1 I I ' I ~' ~ ll 11' ~ ~ A p ELENA ON 505.77' VPI STA: 16 12.36 O o , ~~ V / - - - _, -ELEVATIO 508.34 ~- - ~ ~ 47 '~, 1 \ \ m O I , \ 1 \ m 1 \ ~ \ I, 1 I ~ ~ ~ I I \ I . _ ~ ~ ''--. - - - VPY SYA. 15+ .16. ~ ~ ~' I i \ I I . , EL~VATION6 5.89 A ~ I 1 \ ~ Q~ \ 1 V _ _ ~ ~ \ ~ A 1~ ~~ ' , k 1~ I A \ oz ^ y ~ + OO - -ELEVATIO 604.81'- ~ LEYATION50 .4t', .- I 0 I 1 \ / \ ~ \ - i D VPbSTA. 1 1370 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ \ N ' - --~L~VATIO 504 81' hSTA: 17+20 73- . ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ \ O . L AYIO 50 4t ~ ~ ' ~ ~m ~~ ~~ . ~ ~ A \ X L,ATION,50 35~ ~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ A \ 1 v ~ \ ~ , - . , , , . . , - - m ~ \ 1 A \ - a ~ 1 ~ A ~ ~ \ c ; 1 I / \ ~ m {. 0 ~ ~ ~ 1 r - 1 \ ~ A 1 A I V ~ ~ - i 0 , m ~ ~ - I I ~ A _ ~~ - ~ V ai ~ ' ~ I I I I - ' '- , _ , i I ! I ~ 2~ ° ce i _ z / / /~ / / ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ r ~ w ~~ - ~ \ + ~ t/ ' ~ ~ ~ / ~ i I' r ~ ~ /~ ~r i ~ I ~ / I t , / I k I l I ~ ~ O / ' _ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ / / / / p / / ~ 'VPI STA. 19+64.78 ~ ' ~ i / / I - - Et ATION50045 - ~~ - _~ - ~ -_ ~ "- .. / / ~ l f_STA. 19+8 94 ~ _. _ ~ ~ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i _ , 7 N ELEVATION4 78 ~ VPI TA. 19k8495 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / /! ~ ~ I / / / O '. EL ATION 500.36 , , . , - . _ _ - ~ / ~ O ~ ' ~ ' k ~ ~ p + ~ VPI TA 20+3.83 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ / 0 ; ~ ~ O> O ELEVATIO N 4 7B N A I ' ~ ~ O z O . ~L Y O .50tl.33 , - - , - - - ~- - , - _ _ __ I ~ -• .VPI TA.~20+24.36 ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ -. _ _ ~ ) / ~O ~, _ ELE ATION 50033 _ ~, _, ~~ _ __ i ~ / / I z A -VPI S ~ - 20+6 3~~ ~ - - - ..~' ~ / - _ EL~V ION 4 99.88 - ~, _. - _.. / \ i 0 _. RLSTA- 84:71 - ~ ~Q N ELEVATI 498.94 ~ iI~ ' ' ' ' ' O , VPI 5 . 21+8. 48 , - - !. d p ELEV ION 499.85 i ~~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ / ~ I ST ~ . 21+30.27 ~ _ _ _ ~ ~ pi~ p , ,ELENA ION 499.77 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O~N ,~ I =~Z O 4 ~ II m z ~ ~ m Gm G A STA 2~1+9.18 VPI ST 21+ 80 ', O ~ C D~ ,/ ~ ,~ m~ IJ E ATION 499. ELENA ON .53 - _ ~ < ,. ~' / ~~ ~ O- vi O N ~ ~ ~, z w ~.~ i / ~ ~ N O + ~ ; ~ ~ _ ~ _ V STA. 2`F+98. 8 9 ~. ~ -.. ~ _ - -' - - , ~~ 'Y aO '~ n ~ `-~ E NATION 49 . ~ - ~ ~, - - _ _ _ ~, _ fi r N NCO B3 ~ , ~~ A ' ~, D r o VPI A. 22+77.18 ~ ~ ~ ~ m ELE TION 49820 - `VPI' STA. 2 +83. 5' -, - -', - ~ ~ELEVATIO 4 .73 VPI S .22+84.16 ~- ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ~ r ELEV ION 498.11I_ _ _, ', -, _ - - ~ O N .. -'~ _,WI',STA.2 9.16.'._ ~. -~. '~ -. '- W ELEVATIO 4 .6T O O ~, ~ ` A SUBMITTED IMTH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 - o CANE CREEK ~ KC I - - O ~ w o z ~ ~ s STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT R ~SC ENTISTS PLANNER ~ Z ENGINEE jf ` ~ m NORTH CAROLINA PERSON COUNTY SEMORA F RK ROAD ~~ ao*~ wTE '0P"0'~" , , 4601 S IX O S s.w oEK ~ T1-1, T1-2, 713: STATION 10+00 TO STATION 22+56 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 REVISIONS ••••!•••••••••••••~•~•••••••••••••••••S••••• V 00 00 c~ co cp W OD N 01 O ~ 00 O : O .- - - ~~ ~ ~>. _ ' -~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' STA. 31+79.91 _ ~Vpl'-ST ..31+71'5 '. ~ , . ~ ~ , ', EL ~ ~ - - ATION 491.0 ~ELEVA ION 491. (q _ .V ISTA. 31+BA.0 'VPI'ST . 31+88'. 3 ' - N ' E ATION 491.0 ELENA ION 491 5. O O 4133HS 33S' 3NIlHOlVW - / ( 1 1 ~ ~ / ~ ~ VPI STA 32a .42 ~ ~ ~ I 1 ' ~ - ~ VPI S A. 32+64.88 ELEVATI ` _ N 91.27 ~ ~_ _ ~ _ v i O ~~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ELEV TION 490.84 ~ 41 m ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I ' ~ ~-VPI S A. 32+71.78 ' VPI S`fA ~ 2 78.90 ~ ° ~ G7 ~ ~ I ~ ~ 1 ~ '1 -ELEV TION 490.63 ELEVATI N 491 27 ~ o ~ m 1 3 { ~ 1 W o m ~, ` \ ~ .} ~ ~ i / 1 ' ~ ~ ~ II Il~ 1, 1 ,,' i 1 1', 1 '. ~ li„ , ' I 1 1 ' ~TA. +525$ ~ 1 q, I ~ ! ~ ! 1 ~' ' 1' `, \ ~ Ili ~ I ~ I , 1 I -~ ~ ' .' ELEVAT ' 890,16 ~ ~ I STAB ' +63.95 ~~ ~np ~ " 1A 1 I I i ~ ~ ~~. \ ... I l I ~ II ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ` . , , VPI STA 33+61.1 - LEVATIO d 490.74- iy ~ ., ~ I I ..., / ~ I ~ ' 1 ELEVAT DN 490.15 ~ ~ ~ ~ 01 _~ 1 1 V ~` III~III, 'II 1 'I ' II I A ~ \ \ A - 1 1- - '~ ~m ! I ~ i I I I ~ I ~ I ~~ / ~ + ~ / / i I~ 1 11 I' ~ '~Cj~l ~ A ~ / ~ I l l ~ O -~ ~. - - ~ - - ~ T l i ~ l , /. / ! A ~ / - ~ m ~' ~ m ' ~ LEVATION .33 ~ + ~ / ~ ~ ~ '~ V STA 34+68. N - - ~ LEVATION,48 .56' / - 'I! a ~ V \ ~ .E NATION 488.3 - V STA 34+70.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ / ,,~/ / / Ijl I~ V ~ ~ ',VPI ST 54+72'.8t - F~ EVATION 489. 8 ' / ~ / I ') / ~ A ~ W 'ELENA 0~48~.85', / / __,,. _ .. ', / ~ / ~ ~ / ~ ~~l ,3~+ 001 O UI STA. 34+79.31 `V STR. 34+94.81 / - / i .~ ~ ~ A + ~ N487.8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ / i ,~/ / ~ l A O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / -,/ / ~ / ~ ~I 1 \~~ c _ _ _ _ _ .. .l1 ~ / / - ~ - / N ~ ~ A ~ . ~ Z in ~ / ~ ~~ / ~ i I I I I _ ~ ~ j . / i / ~ i ~ ~ ~.. I ~ - - ', / / - I - - _ ~ - - - - - - - - / / ~ ' ~~ ~ ~,VP ' STA. 35+88]4 V~ ST 5 78.60 ', ' / ~ ~ / ~ ! - _ ~. - -- ~ p_ W ,EL - - ~ ATION 48.35 ' EL - VAYION 87.9 - - - - i / ' /~E ~ ~ ~ - / ~ / _ - ~ V STA. 38+93. . 'VP ' - STA 35 9 8 ~ - - - ~ / , i i ~ ~ i ~ + . 8. 7 / i v / ~" % / X~ ~ I ~ / O ~ ~ ~ ~ - . ~/ -~ ~ i / ~ _ 1 O~ l _ / , ~ ~ ~ ~ /o , ~ / ~ ' ~ A'/ ~ ~ ! / - _ ~,, ~ ~ , _VPI T 36*47.23 - - ~ i ~ 36 ~ VRI S 38+55.51, ~ EL A ON~487.45 / ~ X0© / '~ ELEV TIQN 488.88 ~ ~ ~/ i ~ vPi s sa 7e ~ ' ' VPI S A 3fi+99.84 EL V ON 497 4Q ' _ ' ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ELEV TION 486-83 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ I ~ ~a W ~ ~ ~ - ~ W / \ ~ / I ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ / ~ VPI ST . 38+99.81' ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ y + ~ ELEV ION 487.22 ~ ~ / if "' O~ ~ -'-ELEV TaON 488.61 ~ ~~ ~_ _~- ~ ~ ' ( ~ _~ _ VPI S A. 37+09.24 _ _VPI ST _ 37+11.9 ~ _ ~1 ~ ELEV TION 486.fii ELENA ON 487.21 ~ ~ / 4~' ~,a~ , ~ ~ .i - x ~ ~ ./ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ / - ~ ~ - ~ ~ VPI STA.3 +84.45 ~ - - - ~ - "_ - ~ ~ / ', ~, ', ELEVATIO 986.fi7- - -,- - , / / ~ ~ / W , O O O N O O 2 n N n A D c r m O '-~ NC GNID NAD '83 ° A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 j o ~' CANE CREEK ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ g STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT O ~ I N o z ~ s ENOINEER~PLANNERS ~SCIENTISTS ~ vZ ~ m PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA SEMORA - ~ ~ ' ~ , , 46DISlx FORKS Roao ~ ~ ' •~ s,w oEx~.,~ a.I ...moo ~ T1-4, T1-5: STATION 31+28 TO STATION 37+gq RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 REVISIONS ••••••••••!••••i•••••••••••••••••••••••••i• ~ O O N t O O Q N O O W t A O O IJI O O 01 O O V 0 OJ O O to tD O O O ~ ~ N O) O ~ 00 N z z . y m c m a _ - - - { ~O . ~ , ~ ~~ I ~. D - . _ - - - pi m m J ' / . / Np / ~ l ~ / °o / / / ' ~ / ~ ~ l / / / / / ~ VPI ST 53+31.89 ~ ~ 8. / / / _ __ / '- -` -EL,A I 0,51,49, ~, I~,STA.S 18.91 m ~ / /%/ VPI STA.5 +38.38' EYATIO 518.21 ~ m / / / , c ~ _ ELEVATIO d 517_.48 _ _ VPI STA 3+44.87 O y ' / ' / ,. / ~ / ', ', ', VPI STA 58+5 .20' ~ ELEVATIO 518.16 ~ p " / .' / / / ~ ' - - - ELEVATION 5 6.67- - -' pl'STA. S +53.98 O no / / / / VWI S 5 58.70 517.97 Z N / ~ / ~ ~ / 'ELEV ION 516.87 53+6 VPI STA 03' I ST . 53 81.76 / / - / / ~ ~ / - - . . _ - EVATIO 517.47 ~ \ / ~ " / ' VPI STA. 53+6553 ELEVATIOM 51 - .51 - ~ ~ - '- VPI / ~ ~ ~ / STA. 53+87.86 / ~ e eLEVATI . - - - N 518.51 - VPI S-TA. 53+ .1 S - ~ 1 STA 53+.78. lf ELEVATION 518.95 / 7 / I ~ / i ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ' -VPI ST-A. 3+91.69- ELEVATIO 5 8.0 _ L ATION 516. Rs. 53+96.23 3 / I I ~ I ~ i i i 'k ~ I ~ ~ a ~ ~ ELEVATI N 696.00 ~ ~ ~ ~ / I ~ / ~ / \ / ~ - Q ~ ~ I I ' / / - VPI - TA. 54+21:66 ~ ~ - I ~ ~ STA. 54+15:71 , / ~/ ' / i r -d ~ \ ~ ( i l l l ~ ~ EL ~ ATION 515 00 El 10 516.30 / ~ 1 ~ ~` \~ / ~ VPI TA.54+19A4 ~ S ~ 71' - - / ~ 'l'~ ~~ I ~ V / ~ EL ATION 515 00 +2 . / ~ , ~ ~ ~ i ~ VPI STA 54 27.46 .- , . ~ - ~ ELE - N 515.80 - ~ I ~V A , V / ./1j / I / LEVA ON 514.64 'ST . 54+33'.52 ~ ~ / ~ /~ A I ~ -VPI A. 54+Q9.98- - ~ELEVA ION 518.23 - / / ,~ A ~ / ' ' ELE TION 514.54 T + ~ ~ J - V I / / / - - / ~ / ; - ' VPI S . 54+55.11 ~ ~ ELE7~.T10 514.90 ~ I / / ~ / / ' C / / ~\ ~ ~ - ~ -~- - ~~ELEV ION51A.19 VPIS A. 1+59.81,- ~, - / // J ' / ~ / / ;Z ~ WI STA. 591 .48 _ ~ EL TIO 514.88 ~ / ' i / / i ~ / / _ _ ~/ ~'~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ELEV,TION5 4.18 ~ ~~ ~ ~ '~ -- / ~ - / / ~ / i ~ / ~ ' VPI STA. 54 79.55-~- VPI~ST ' .34*73.21 ~ ' ~ / ~ ~ ~ / _ _ _. ~ ~ / ~ ~ ' ' - ELENA ION 614.61 / / - / ~ ~ ~ 1 , , ELEVAT,10 513, 66 m ~ / / ~ / ~ ~ i / , ~ -_ -~ ~ / / z z / ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ i i: ~, / ; ~ / I i y l~ i I~( ', ELEVATI N 5)3.6 ELEVATIO 614.28', - i l , ~ / / ~ ~ / 1 V1 ~ -~~~ ~ i 1 / / ~ / ~~ ~~ VPI STA 65 38.98 ~~ 'VPI 5TA. +40.79 O ~ a / , i ,p/ ,. ~ / / -' ~ ~ ,I I / , ~ i ~~ I / / ~ ~ / / ~ / , / ~ ~ _' - ` - ELEVATI 513 .65' - _~ PLEVAT7 514.OZ z ~ / / i J i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ' , 'VPI STA. +48.28 ~ , / ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ / I ~ / ~ VPI STA 55 ELEVATION 41:96-'- 513.85 ~ EL VATIO 5 4.0 I I ~ ~ ~ r , / ' / ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ -" ) I ,~ ~ ~O ~ / / ~ ~ / i / / ~ l / ' ~ ~ ~ i i I / ~ / ', ~ + VPI STA.~.55 .84 _, i ~ ' ~ ~ , ~ / ~ / / / l ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' _ eLEVATION 13.44 _ ~. VPI STq. 5 ~ELEVAT'10 ri7;20 ~ 519 82' / - / i / l ~ ~ l ~ ~ ' I I ~ ~ / ' / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ I ~ ~ VPI S7A.~55+ 1.84 ~/PI STA 5 . N3 58 / / ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ / ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ / y / -~ - L ATION _ 13.44 ~ . ELEVATIO . _ 513.80 / / ~ ~ ~ i ~' ~ I I I/~ ~ / ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ / / - I I I ~ " l I I I~ I' ~ ~~I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , I I ' ~ ~ I 1 ~ ' A ' 1 I / ' ~ VP1 s A. ss+3a.5o . I , / ~ ELEV --- TION 541.80 - - -- I ~ S 8 ~ I I i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ' I ~ ~ VPt TA. 56+37.50 ,EL ~,. ATION 512 45 - ~~ ~, - -' - - . pCC ~ ~ ~ ! I i / / SV+~b! ~ I ~~ V A / ~ I ~ ~ ~~ EL ATION~511.80 Vpl ~ STA 58+39:02 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~~I ~ I~~, ~ 1 ~ \ ~ - -~, E NATION 511.4 ~- jlPl TA *54.A4 ~~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ / ~ I~ ~ I I~ ~ ~ / I i ~ l l ~ A ~ I I ~ I ~ I I ~ ~ / ~ ~~ I - EL A'9101 '512.25 _ O V ~ ~ I ~ I I V ~ - / ~ / - ~ i ! VPI TAi 56+62.71 ~ I I / , , D ~ ~ - - ~ -ELE AT90N 611:43 ~~ VPI STA. 5 +66.47 _, _ - ~ { / / / ~ I ~ I I I ~~ A V ~ ~ / E T N 572.24 O v / , / / ' : ~ ~ ~ ~ \ '; ~ vpi ~$T - ', 57+10.68 - - -- -- -- - ~ ~ z y /, I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~, ~ J ~ ' ' VPI S ~ . 57 00.48 ~ ~ ~ / ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ELEV TIO 11.72 / / I ~ ~ ~ \ VRI S A. 57+15.78 - - ~ . - - , ~ ~ L \ , ~ A ,.. _ ~, E4EV TIQN 5',1.0.79 ~, VVI S A. +2089 ~~ _ ~. \ V A \ \ \ ~ ~~ ~ \ .~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ 7 - VPI STA. ~ 7+42.89 ~ - ' - - - ~- - - - - ~ ~ / ~ / (~' ~ 1 \ zy~ ~ ~ ELEVATI N510.07 VPI ST 7+39.84 ~ i .- A ~y~ / ~ / > V ~ I I 1 V '~ A ~ ' VPI 3TA. 57W7.39 ~~ ELENA I N, 511.37' _ ~' ~~ - - ~ ~ zNi / ~ V ~ / ELEVATI N 510.D7 ~ + ~ ~ ~ v OO-'1 / / ~ 1 \ ~ ~ " / \ ~ ~ ~ " - VPI 5TA' 57 82.88 - ' - -ELENA ON 510.87 ~- -~ ~- A S~k . - ~ - / ~ ~ \ ~ ELEVATION ' .59 - ~ ~ ~ VPI T ~ - ~ ~ _ ~ 7337 ~, - ~ ~ - -~ - ~ o mm / / / \ \~ - ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ VPI STA. +57.76 ATION 10:35 ~ . - y / , / \ / ~ 9 5 ~ - - - ~ / ,. \ '~... G7 0 oz - ~ VP S - VPI STA. 57 .95- - ~ - ~ O '~ ~ ~ ~ / / ~ ~ \ \ E AT ON 508 80 , EL EVATIQ 5 0.0 ~ p -- - - / ~ ~ ~ / / ~ ' VPI ~TA, 58 04.52 ~~ VPI SYA +0 5 78, ~ ~ , ~ 1 iL m _ ~ ~ I ~~ I ~ \ ~ l ~ EY ~ L AT ON 08'80 ', ' T1 LEVA~ 9.59 ' ' _ _ ~i ., - ~ \ - ~ - ~ ~ , - , / ~ _ VPI S7A. 58+ .39 ~~- - ~, VPI'STA 36-. - ~ - .. _ - ~ - - ;- _ `_f - -.: ~ _ ~., ~ ~~ ~ EL TION 6 - 4 5 ELEVATI _ _ q ~ _ _, ~ ~_-_ _ _-, - - ~ _ .~, ~ m I ST A. 58+ .41 8 ~S~A'55+48 2 ~~ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ ~ m - - - ~ ~ ELEVATION 50 .18, ', LFVATIOH .07', ', ', ', ', _ Z ? I J," ~Gt_ - ~ k - ~ I STA.- 56+51 2 -' - , m i ' i _. ~ EASEMENT B(7CINDARY - A O N ~ O o~' O a 2 n (~ A ~ ~ r m 0 I SOX~O ~f i . nC^ ~ (~/~ ~ / ' / ' / / / ~ / / ~/ '/, /; ~ / / / ~'~,~ / / / / / / / / i ~ ~/ ~~ ~! / ii \ \ \ \ ~ \ ~ - ~\ ' ~ ~ V ~ ~ _ _ \ , ~ .. \V~ \ I~V~ - ~ ~ I _ `\ I ~. ~\\ V~ ~ - ~ \ ~ ~. ~ ~~ \ , X~ ~o- PLAN F C I o CANE CREEK ~ K ~:,:..~ ~ a ~ g N STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ~-'~°'°'iOt~OG~ r ''~ ''`' ~ Z ~ $ ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS '° • ~ ~ Z IT ~ SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD ~' d; ~ ~qa ~ - ° sr~a o[unnrgx wtE .nreor[o ~ T2-1, T2-2, T2-3, T2-4: STATION 50+00 TO STATION 58+63 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 REVISIONS a Q U C C U O Os V O O VPI SL ELENA Q] O O 4~D O O U' v_' v' v, v, cr cn cn cn cn p~ 00 N Q~ O ~ 00 N O~ O O ~ 1 A ~, ~ ~ VPI ~ TA60.80.20 - ISTP,. 80+%7 ~ m . ' - ~ - ~ , , - EL A710N538.90 ~ - ,/ L ATIQN 9 7 _ ~, .. Z , VPI I STA 80+84.48 ~ ~ VPI STA'.8 0 9.08_ _ ~ - - - VPI - TA: 80+72.85 ' 'ELEVATIO N 38.$9 ' ' ' EL - ATION 539.38 ~ ' - ', - - ~ - - ~ ~ VPI S A. 80+77.08: - 1 STA.$0+78.71 - - ~ - - ~ _ , _ _ . ~,VPI'$TA, 91.L35 -', ELEV TION 538.59 - ~ - _ ~. .. ~ E - - ~. EVA710N 539.4 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EVATIO 'EL N 38.04 VPI S 80+93 90 ' - - - - -' I STA: 60+88. 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ELEV . . TION 536.04; S ~ - LEVATfON X39. + ~ ~ VPI STA 81 + .11 EL ATO 538.58 ~ - . , ELEVATION 7.88 VPI ST . 6i+2.38 ~ ' ~ ' - ' ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ELENA 537:69 ~ - - ~ - -, LEVATOM 538. 1 m .. .. , - , ', ' _ -', 'VPI STA. 81 ~ 28.18 VP A 81+2 74 ' ~ ~ ~ y . EL A N 538, ELEV 0 53 .88 ~- - . . - _'- .. ' - ~ - ~ - - ~, - V ST 81+ .95' , - - ~ I'ST 61+36.74 - - - - - - ~ - - V I N 8, LEVA ON 532,18 ~. ~ ' VPI STA. 6'I+ .43 ~ - - - ~ ~ ~ - : - - ~ Z VPI~ST 81+47. 9 _ VPI STA. 87+ 43 ~ L I N 536 1 ' _ ~ ~ VPI S A 81+70 85 ~~ -ELEVATION 53~ .30' - - - VPI +88.24 - - ~ - ~ - _ - ~ ~ ELE . . V TION 535 28 _ L .3Y ' . I STA.~81+73. ~ VPI ST . 81+7 .24 ~ - ' ~ ~ ' - ~ ' -VPI STA 1+81.93' - - LEVATION 535. L A ~N, .81 ' _ _ ~ - - ~ ~ n ~ ~ - ELEVAT I N534.93 .81+89.24 ~ ~ ~ ~ J ', ISTA.-81+84.93 L 5 .%. - -.. - - - - F ~ - - - - ~ELEVATIO 533 94 ~ ELEVATI 534.98 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . VPI S R. 82+9.75 , VPI STA 82+1 .18'. ' ~ ' VPI STA. 82+1 ' ELE 95 ~ V TION 533_.94' - 'VPTS fA 2+2 ,39' ELEVATIOM 5 _ _ ~ .a5 ~, _ , , ', ELEVATION 5 3 .SB', WI STA +18 20 ELEVA I N 5 3.99 , ' ELEVATI . 533 - _'VPI ST 62«34.10 _~. - . -, - - ~ ~ - I STA. b2+41. .58 - - - - , - , I~,S4A~82:52. I STA 82+46. ' ~ -' LEVATION 532. - - - I STA 82+58.36 _ _ ~, ~ ~ . ~ - ~. ~.., ~ __, ~, -Vpl Sl•A.82_ .56., ~ LEVATI ' ~N 532.96 , ~ , ' ~ ~ ELEVATION 5 VP .04. STA. 62 . 7. 3 - -,- .. ~ -'. - - ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ - ~ I STA. 82+,73. 1 - EL ATIO - 32.92 ~ ~ ~ ' - ~ ~ ~ LEVATION 532 .3 ~ V I STA.62r 3.00 ~ ~ N ' _ LEVATION 32.82 ~ ~ -~ ~- VP I TA. 83+01.82 ~ ~, VPI ST . 8 + 93 I A. 3+i .2 EVATIO 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ELEVATIO 531.89 ~ - - N 5325 _,. _ _, - - - _ - ' ISTA~63+2fl3 _ ~83+25.02 ~ ~ VPI STA. 3+30.58 ~ LEVATION $31. EL AT ON 532.21 , - - - ~ , - - ,- - - ' ~ - L VA I N 31:1 ~ - - I S A. 83*37.05 'VPI STA. 83 ' ELEVATIO 34.02 531:71 ~ - -, ~- .VPI STA. + .80 -.. I -..VPI S ELEV T . A I . 42.23 _', ~.. - _,- .. _ 531:25 VA N+ ~ - ELEYATION530 ,VPI ST 83+59.75 ~, 'VPI'ST ~ 63+82.18 ' - - - 'ELEVA ION 529 .99 ~ - ~ -,ELEVA - ON 530.88 - - - - ' VPi STA. 83+82. VPI STA' ' ' ' ~ EL VA ION,529 1 - - VPI TA. 63 - - - ,19 83 ELEVATION + .83 _ 54 ~ , - - , , _ _ _ - ~ ', ' ~ _ -~ LEVA ION 29.51 ~ ~ - - 1 STA. 83+88,83 - - - _ ' I STA 83+91. E EV TIO 53p.04 I , LEVATI,ON 529. 7 I ~ ~ - - ~ VPI STA 3+93.86 _ _ ELEVATI 1 29_.83 - ' ELEVATI N 529.17 VPI.STA-54 8. 5 ~, ~, -' - ' - - ' _ ' ~ ~ VPI STA 64+ 7.83 ELEVATION 529 .6-,. _ ~_ _ _,_ - -, LEVA ON ~ - ~_ _ ' - . VPI STA 84+38 .1 ~ ~ ~ ' ' VPI STA 84+ :07 - - - ELEVATION 52 21-~ - ~ ~ ~ - - ELEVATION 8.32 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ', ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I STA. .20 ~ VPI STA. 84+B .74-~ - EVATION 52.8 ~_ _ ,. _ _ _ _ ~, _ - ELEVATION 52 .83. , ~- - ~ - Vpl STA. 64+7 .01 ~. STA 84+ .28 _ - ELEVATION 5 .92 ~ ~ E . ATIO 28.80 ~~.__. ~, - - '- ' - ~ ~ ~ -. - I STA 65+22.1 - 'EL +, VA OIj528.33 -, - '- ~ E EVATION 527. 0 -, -~,~ . ', -', - 1 STA. 85+29.2 - ~ - - - ~ - - ~ - - - E NATION 527.3 VP S4A. 65+36.44 ' - I L NATION 528.27 - ~~_ ~, __ - ~(~/ 16T B5a73.52 ~_ _ ~, . _ VPI - TA'65+83.22 E A ON 527 53 ' ' ~ ~ ~ ELE ATION 528.67 . , - -VPI S A. 85+88.08 - ~ ST 65+92.91 ' - ',- ~- - -' - - - -~' VP TA. i+13.81 - - ~ - ','VPI S +2 .30 - ELE TI N 527.07 ', - ,ELEV T ION 526.15 - ~ - - VPI ST - 66+35.84 VP STA , +42 98 yOO~T ELENA ON~528.13~ ~ . _ m~~mP Z -~ - - - ~ v j~x rm ~ - ~ ~ VPI$ A. 86 8 8.'18 ~ ~ ~ =_ ~ ~ ' ' ~ VPI STA. +78.89 - ELEVA ON 5 28,51 ~ ?Z =OOo -~ - ,. - ' ELE ATI VPI STA N 525. 9. , 66+81 24 VPI ST '. 86 8 5:60 - - - ' - oAmc~i - ~ ~ ELEVA O . Nb25.59 - ELEV TI 5 26;48 - ~~~_ m0 ' my m , :- ', o ' ' - I STA. 67+51.7 -' ' - - - ' - - E E - - I VATION 524, STA. 67a53. _ ~, _ V ~' PI STA 87+4 .4 0' - ~ ~ ' E E VATION 524. E NATION 5 5. 1 _ I ST.A. 67+60.1 VPI STA +57.40 ~ ~ ~ ', ', ',- E NATION 523,7 - - - ' -E~EVATIC 524.6y - ', I rn O y4 ' ~ 7a~ 19TA'87--+80. P T A.~ 67.61 - - ~ ~ - ~ O , N 522 83 , E ,ATION 23. A TION ;524;15 ' ' ' ~ rn , 'VP S TA. 87+92.Od `- 'VPI STAB + 88.56', - ' c1 - ~- El N ATION-522.6 ~ ~ - - V - - ~ELEVATIO 52365 - ~ p / D PI ST +00.54 m ' I T 8 803. 0 ELEV I N 523.15 ~ I^ ~ ELEVA O N 522.28 ~ - ~ - - ~ ~ - VPI ST 8 8+07 80- ' 'VPI ST . 6 + 19.28 ELENA O , N 522.28 ' .ELEV 10 15 22.67 ', ' VPI STA. 8 +40,29 ~ ~ I : 68 34 .9 - ' - ', EIEVATI N 521.$3 EL~1lATION 2 2:36 ~ - VPISTA. 4 4:79 ~ I STA. BB+ .7 T ~ ' 'ELEVATIO 5 21.33' L ATION 5 1. ~ 85 ' ~ ' VPI S-TA:68 5 1.56 ,- - ~ ~. - ~, ~, _ ELEVATIO V Ph STA. 88+613 9 VPI STA. ~ - - E LEVATION 52 .4 2' - - -ELEVATION 5 20.99 ~ - - ', - - ', ', - VPI3TA-69+ 27- '~ - I STA. _+95. - - - J . ELEVATI N 9 .68 E ATI 20.1 ~, ' ' A O N O ~ ~ o D O 2 n Vf r n A ~= ~ 6 a ° ~ o r m ' O p y p w D H N i ~;~/~~ ~ ~ , ~ ; - „/ i ~ ~ i I ~ i i ~ i ~ i I ii I I ~ ~, I I I ~ I 1 , I ~ ~ i ~ ! ' ~ I ~ I ~liIli i / ~ ' ~ I ~ ' I I I I I I r ~ I ~ ~ , ~ ~ I ~, i ~ I I~ ' I ' ~ I I ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ i i~ ~ ,~~ ~ ,~, jR~ ~ ; ~ ~ 1, /; i ~ ~ / Q ~ Z / / ~ ~' /, ~ / ~ ~1i. ~ I~ ~ l i I i ~ i l ~ l~ I - m c ~ 7+ SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 CANE CREEK ~ K C I o ~_ ~ a ~ ~ ° STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ~Tec9°vucoc~s " `'F=s -"' O ~ g Z ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS ~ m SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA > ~` 1'f ~?z ~~~'='1 ~ 4601 slx FORKS ROAD RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 srrx u[scxv.ow °•'E u~nrovEo T3-1, T3-2: STATION 60+00 TO STATION 66+10 REVISIONS ~ ~ ~ N N O O ~ ~ W N ~ O ~ 00 N ~ O ~ t O O '... - '.. ~, '~ VPI FA. +13.81 ~- ~ - - -~ - _ ~- _ _ -~ - - ~_ _ _ - -~ _ ~. VPI S 2 .30- - _ ~ EL. - TI N 527.07 ELEV TION 528.15 _ -;- ~, ~,. - ~,. ', -.- _ ~. -. - -', -', _ _VPI ST 68+35.64 ' VR STA +42 98 ELEVA ON~528.13~ . E' ATI . N527.02 ~, ~, _~,-. ~, ~,__, _,-_~, _-~, _, --~,- -~.- ~ - VPIS A. 88 88.18 - - ~- - ~ - - ' - ' ~ - -' - ' ~ - ~ ~ - - ~ - VPI STA. 66+78.89 - ~- - ELEVA ON 526.51 ' ~~ ' ' - - - .- -.. ELEVATI V N 25. ~9. - _ VPI ST ' 88 85.80 ~ V - - ;- - ' - ' _ _ - - ;- - -' - -'- - ` ~, ~~ ~~ LEVA ON 525.59 ELEVA 528.48 µgTCHLINE -SEE SHEET 7 O ~ ~ - ~ ~ I ~`~ ~ V ~ _ _ ~ ti ~ ,. ~ 'Q ~ v ~ I sra e1+57.7 ~ ~ I / ~ v \ ~ , E EVATION 524. ~~ \ ~ I ~ A - ~~ _ - - - - ~ ' ~_ ~ ~ ~ V 1 STA 87+53, _ _ _ _ VPI 6TA 52±4 -_ i ~ V ~ .40 I \ ~O ~ ' , E EVATION 24. 8 ~ E VgTlO 5 1 } 5.11 - . ,. V" ~~ \ 1 V ' I S A 67+60.1 ~ I TA. 87+67.4 ~ , ~ _ ~ ` - ~ ~ - _. ~ _,__ _.- ~~ _~__ . E ~ ~ ATION 6237 _', -` N5245 . A -. ~ -. ~ \ - - - ~ V ISTA. 67+80.1 TA.~ 87+85.6L ~ \ ~ - ~ ~ ' ' ~ ', E EV, TI N 523. ATION;524, 15 ~ ~ ' ' ' ' 'VPI $ ~ A. 67+92.04 VPI'S . 67+88 56 ' -- \ IA _ ,- , -- , ,. ELEV TION 522.63 L V 3.86- - ~ h ~ - ~ V ISTA 67+ ~ ~ ~ + \ \ .._ _. '. ~ ~ ~ ~ EV ~ L VA I N 523 15 \ ~ O ST _ -VPI +03.30 68 ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ , ~ LEA 522.28 ON ~VPI~STM. 8 + ~ 19 8 _ O0 ° V ~ \ ~ V 6 ST _ I I _ I 26 ' ~ ~ I ~ __ = EL 2 T10 22 q , ~m I OZ ~ I ~ _ _. VPI STA +40 29 _ 1 - Z ~ O ~ ~z-izP 0 - - - - . ' -ELEVATI ~ . N 521:3,3 ELEV TION .~ 2236 - - tnr x Om 1 1 I ~~ OmODq I I \ ~ - ~' m ~ VPLSTA. 44,79 ~ VP + cp ~ ~ i ' 5 5 ' ~~~~~ I ~ \ J. 1 /, ~ • - ~ ~ ~ VPt STA68 51:56 - - - - VPtSTA 68+61 . - 39 '~ ~ycy I ~ I I ~ Q i n '_ ELEVATION _ _,- . O ~ ~ - I _ mz~ i ~ I ~ Y ° G ~ ' ~ ~ ~ VPI STA' BB ELEVATI N 52 .42 3 ~ ~~~ ~ I I 1 . ,. ) ~_ i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L A.10 520.99. _"-, ~ z Otim ~~ GJ ( / I ~' I ' I /~ ~~ ° ti~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - VPI sid. ss+oo.z7 _. ISTA +95. __ r ~ m z~ I ~ I I / ~ ~ _ "' ' ' ' EL ATION 519.68 ~ E ATI 620. 1 _ ~ o~ / ~ ~ / / ,L O ~ i C ( ~ O + V I TA 89 +03.27 WI A. 89 7.81 ~ ( ~~c ~ / 1 i ~ . ~ % 2 / ~ ~ - - - EL - ATION 518.68 E E ~ TIO $20. 2>- / T w ~ VPI A_69+11.55 ~ VPIS A. 6 +18 81 ~ " / I / t / ~ 1 ~ ~ ' - ElE TI N 19.3 ELEV TI~ 6,19.7,5 I I / O I I I ~ ~ -~ VPIS A.-69+1 4:55 , ~ lJ/, °z Oz 1 / / _ _ _ _ ', _',_ ELEV TION$19. 3 _ VPI 3TA. 6 +38.99 ~ ~ ~ ) / / ~y ~ ~ I~ ( EL~V T 519.28 ~ . ~~ ~ oD - ~ / ~ ~ - / ' / / ~ / 1 _ ~~ / ' I ~~ / v -.~-ELEV ION 518.33. --.~ -.-. -- - ~ ~ ~~ / I~ I / I NPI ST .69+6298 ~ VPI STA. G9+70.62 i ~~ ~ ~ _ I ', - ELEVA ION, 518.31 ', _ _ ', ELEVATI N 519.20 ~, ~~ t OrN 1 ~ I I I I~ i I I I ~~ ~ I ~ I I I/ O I I I I I V O VPI S A 0+00.83 vPI srA, +s6 9s : - p ~ I I 1 I ~ ~ ~ m 1 ~, 11 ' ' ELEVATI N S9Z89 ~ ~ ELEVATIO 518.68 , m ~ ~ ( ~ I ~. o~mz~z ~ I I O VPI STA. 0+03.83 ~VPI'STA. 7 - +04.82 m I I 1 I ~ ~' I I I I ( I I ~~mO~D I ' O , ELEVATI NS}7.69 ~ELEVATIO 518.58 I 1 i ~ _ / / i ~ I ~I I I m~~~3r ~ -- - _ - - - I I ' v/~, I / / ~~0° ~> ~ ~ p I I i l l I (~' ~ O~DAp ~ , ~ ~ -, - ~ I I I I I I ~ l ( I ` ~ m~~~~ > 1 ' ° I / ~m- i I I I ~ / ° ° t / ~ \ 1 I ~ / l m I i ~ / ~ i i' ~ ~ /~ (, I / ' II _ . -_ _ - . __ _ - _ / z ~ I ~ ~ / I I / I . ~ C ~ ~ I ~ 17 ~O~N / / / / 1 J i I ( I ~ i ( I ~ V - - VPI STA 0+94.79 ~ VPt A. ELEVA 70+90.20 N 51474 ' / i ~ / / ~ O ~mm~n l ;' l i l l ~ v OmZc / ( ~ / "_ ~ / / / - - ELEVATI - N 13 83 I ~ O~~ ~ / / ~ / / / ~ - I/ ~ I / ~ ~ + . VPI'STA.7 + .38', , ~ / / / r ~ / / ~ ~ / ~ / I I ~ ' I ~ ' ~ VPI STA 0+97.09 ~ELEVAV~AO 514.72 ~ p ~ om0 / / , ~ ~ ~ / ~ / / // ~ ~ ~ ~ G7Z ~ ~ +~00~ I ~ ~ ELEVATI N 513:83_ - _~ - _~ _ ~ - ~ ~> ~ ~ l i l I ( / 1 / / ~ I( ~ ~ I I I I I D I y I $ ' ~ ~ / ' 'VPI'STA 7 +50 59'_. ~ / ~lVLST/471 47-32 ~ / I / I I I I I I ~ / / / , / / ~ ~ ~ ~ A~ . ~ELEVATIO . 1 T ELEVATIO 51q.Ofi ~ / ~ I I I I ! ~ , I I ~ y ~ / ~VPLSTA.7 ' 53,59 ~ + ELEV TI N ~ 3. Z _', ~ / I I , , ~ m o / ,' ~ I I 1 `, I I / / I I ` ~- ,ELEVAflO 513.07. ~ , ~_, ~ ~ ~ ~ ) I I I i r /// ~// I ~ II I I , I( 1/ J ~ . ~ ~_ _ ~'f ~, l I / / I ~i~ / m ~ / i l l ~ ' __ '_-_ _ ~ ~ / / \ I ~'~ / / / / / `. ~ ~~I~ - VRI ST fi2+ 54 _~_ - TA 79+9 VP .46~ - I //,~~~ i i ~ 1 I ~. ~~ ATIO 5 3.34 '~ I I ( 1 I ( ) ~~ I I I O ~ ~ ~ ~ - VPI STA. 72 ELEVATLON 5 .54 2 36 ~ - - ~ EVATION 51 ~ .25~--~- ~ I 1 I ~ 1 I 1 ~ ~ / ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ / I Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ( f ~ I 1 I i / ~ ~ / ~~ / ~ / / ~ ~ / ( ~ ~ / - ./ ,~ / ~ I I ~ / ~ ~ ~ I ! / ~ ~ / I ~' 1 ', - - ISTA: 2+70.5 - '- V E I STAJ2t87.5 EVATI N 12 _ 3 ' ~ / ~ I / / I / ~ ~ I i E EVATION 511. 4 ~ ~ . , - / / ( ~ ~ ~ 72+73 5 ISTA I TA: 72<75. ~ ~ , / / / i ~ , l l ~ l ' . - - -ELE ATION 512.33 . --~--~ l i i l li ~ l ( E EVATION 911. 4 , / / / ~l ~ _ - ___ - ___ / ~ ~ / , ~ ~ / ( / (/ I ~ lA I I + ~ ~~ - - ~ '~ '~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~. - ~ ~ ~~ ~ / / ~ ~ / / / / / - ~ n((. 1 I I i ~ ~ ~ ~ + 'VP 73+23' 64 ' I i / (/ r i / ~~ ~ I S L A. 3 5.7 51 4 LEVA . . ION 511 38 _ ~ ~ I ~ / / / ~ / . L4Pr3fi} . 73>33.~2 / / ~ i 1 I ~_ ~ / i / VPI S ~. EL,EV A 73+28.78 TI N 670.48 ,. ELEV ' N 611 38 ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 i / / ~ i / / / ~. ~ ? / ~ , ~ ~ ~ //~ i // , C 'I / I I 1 I / / ~ 1 I ', VPI ST .73170.89-', VPI,STA.7 +6 .84~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ / i / _ ~ ~ it ( '~ ELEVA ~ ON~ 509.80 ~- ~ 'ELfVA710 I 0:72',- -,- -. , / / ~-- / / , / ~ / r1 ~ ~` I I n7 ~ VPI STA 73+73.69 ~ ~ VPI ST ~ ~ 3+76 3f ~ ~ - ~ ~ ; L ~ ~ / / / ~ I / ( ~ V LEVA -' _ ON 609,80 ', _ - ', ELEV I . N 10.X0 ;_ -',- '. I 1 l\1 I ~ / / ~ / ~ ~ ~,, m ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ % ~ I I ' I O _VPJ 9TA'74 783 ~_ 1 VPI STA. 74* 5.78 _ _ / , ~ ~4 ~ Y , ~ / ~ ELEVATION 8.62 ELEVY~ ION 08.91 ; / / I~ ~I( ) f ~~ ~ "V Vpl 67A. 74+ 0.83 -~- - - +2 VPt STA 26 " ' / / -~ h I ~ I ~ ~ I ' ' I ~ i -ELEVATION 08 82 ; - - - - . ELEVATIO d 5 .39~ ~~ _ _ _ ~~ - ~~ ~ ~ ~ / ~,' ~ / ~// ~ m~ i ~ / Z~ ti I I 4+69 4 _ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ / `(/ ,~ /~ m O LEVATION 50 85 - ~ ~ ~ - - / ~ , ~ / ~ / . . ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f i i ~ ~ ~ ~ / / ~ IJ LSTA 74+65 ~ Vp 18 ~ STA, 7A+70 87 _ _ _ - ~ m / ~ / / ~ I ~ ~ / ~ O NATION 50 L~ .94 TION 08.8 ' ~ ~ ~ / / i ~ ~ i i ~ - ~ ~ ---- ~ , ~ ~ , / \ /i / / / ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ / ~ / / / I I I I STA. ~75+12. 1 ~ ~ VPI ..75+06.50 / I ~S ~ ~ ~ -ATION 1 -~E T TION 508.12 75+20 24 - - / X(~., \ I STA 7 E . . ION 507 70 -' / / - T ~ V \ y ~~~ I N 508. ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ . V ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ A vPlsr ~ 75755.72 + - m / ~ \ o ELEVA ~sos.ls N ~ uP 7s so. 6 , ~ ~ ~ I ~ \ ( __ _ _ ~ _ ` \ VPI ST ELEVA + 19 VPI STA. ~ 6+5 ~ 9.98 __ ~ - ' ~ _ - _ / - / ~ / . I - - -. ~ - _- ~ / ~' VPI STA 7 85,69 ~ 8 N 507.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ - ~ ~ ~ . 00 '' Op EV TIO b0564 _ _ - -, ~ ~ , 16X m - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ TA -_ ~ _ -~ - _ --_ - I I~ -- ELEVATIO 505.84 E O 506?87 ~ ~ Z _-- ~ . - _ _ , m _ - - - "r W \ 01 ~ 75+ 1~ ~, - - - -1 ~ ELEVATI ~~ 6 ~ ~ ~ i \ , - - X __ + , y +1 . VPI ST 55, __ -- . - ~ - VPISTA~75 .9g ~,_ ELEVATI N50 ~ .75 - - - ~ - - -,- -', 0 z °`- ---' \ i - - ~- ~ __ 'i ~ ELEVATION 5,28 ', _ ', _ _ _ _ - - - - ~ r ~ `~ ~ ~ ~_-_~ ~ ~ \ ' O VPI STA. 76 148 '. LEVATION ~ 7 ' ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ELEVATION 5,29. '~ ~~ ~, ~. '~ ~~ '~ ~ ~ ~- /I ~ / ~ I . ~ ~ \ ~O ._. STA.~78 7 ~ ~ ., '~" ~ ~ ~ p~ VPI STA. 78 3.4 2 -' - ATION O6 LEV 2 ~ ~ ~ _' _ - ' - _~ _ _' _ ~ ~ _ _ ~ ELEVATION 44 . - , , , -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - -- - ~ ' VPI STA. 78 98 VP STA 76+78 1 + ~~ ~ ELEVAT N V _ 43 EL N504. VAT10 _ - _ ~_ - __ - S ~.. _- - _ _ - __ - ~ \ 1 _ m~ + - - \ _ _ -- _ -_ , \ I \ ~ L A21VlflSlil1210j 9-E S133HS 33S R A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 '" ; o CANE CREEK -~ KC I ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ - ~;_~_ , 0 s STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT L RS ~S E ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ P ANN I NTI5T5 ENGINEER E C +~ ~ ~ TY N RTH CAROLINA e ~ ' ~ m , SEMORA, PERSON COUN O 4601 slx FORKS ROAD v t ~~~ ~ ~`' s.~ ~x~.,~, a.E .o.~o ~ T3-2: STATION 66+10 TO STATION 76+79 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 REVISIONS (II CT (Jt (Jt (Jt U1 CT (J1 w 0 ~ 00 N O O ~P 00 t ~ +. p ', ~, ~, -, ~, ~, ELEVATIO 530.80- ~ ElE ATION 63 :15 VPI S A. 3+ 3.7 ~ VP STA '1+17 14 VPI STA 8 +19.81 ELEV TION 530.80 ~ ~ ~ ~ EL . . ~VATI N 531. ' ~ ~ E A'TI O 5 33 ' ' VPI STA. 3+24. ~ - ' ~' ~ ~ VPI S . 83+22.16 ~ ECEVATI N 531 OB ', EL V 10 5 0.3 ' ~~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~, ~ ~, VPI STA. 83 H1,5 ~, VPI STA 83+71.34 ELEVATIO 53015 ' ' ELEVATION5 9.00 ' s ~ ~ ~ ~ VPI ST 3 VRI STA. 83+7 1 i ~, ~ ~ ' ~ , , ', ~, A. 8 +8 .34. ELEVATION 5 9.00 ELEVATION ~ 9S7 - 'p + ~ ~ ~ ~ I STA. 84+13.8 - ' O ~ ~ E EVATION 527. ' V I SYA. E4+1 .8 ' O ~ NP I STA. 84+10.37 - ~ E NATION 528. I -, ~, ~ EL A ION 52 .84 VPI TA 84116.00 - , VPI S - T . 84+25.14 EL E ATION'528',45 ~ ~ ' ' ~ ELEN A ION 527.17 ~ ~ STA 84+29.84 '- VPI S A 84+41.88 ' ~ E L NATION 527.1 ELEV TION 528.01 / VPI ST A 84+70.7 ~. -', ', ',- ELEVAT ~ N529.'11 ~ 7 - , - VP S ',ELENA 8'4+7 .7 ION 527 4T, ELEN A OM 526.11 ~ STA. +77,83 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, VDI STA. 84+ _ ', ELF~VATI 1.3'2 _ N 528.91 ~ , _ , , ELEVATION - 5.85 V STA +87.78-' - ~ ~ ~ - - + I STA. + .32 ~ ' O ~ ECEVATI N 525.65 O ~ ~~ , ~ VPI STA 85+5 .4 VPI STA. 85+ .28 ELEVATION 5 33 ' ELEVATION 5 4.52 ~' VPI STA. 85x 5 .88' VPI STA 86+5 OB') ', L A I N 5 4. ELEVATION 5 .32~ - / OD I 01 O ~ ', ', V ISTA. 88+24.9 ' VP STA. 88 18.27 O ', ; E EVATION 523. ~ EL VATIO 524.4 ', V ST .88+2 .24 TA. 88+3 .58 EL NATION 523. ELEVATION 52 \ .45 ' ~ ~ VP S TA. 86+45:28 ' STA. 88+58. L ATIO 524.20 ~~ VPi 6TA . 86+82.26 VPI TA.'86+87.93 ', ', ECEVAT I N 523:36 ~ ~ ELE ATION 524:15 ' ~ ~ VPI S .88+88.29 ~ ~ V STA. 88+84.18 ~, ~. ; ~, EL, TION 5?2.4$ VPTIO 5 3.7 ~ V ~ ~ ~ ' VPI S ~ ~ +91.29' VPI STA 88+95.85 ' + 522.4 5 3. O ~ VPI,STA 99'54 VPI STA 7+06 54, O ', 'ELEVA710 52199- . ELEV 279 ' ~- .VPI ST 87+02 54. ~ - ', ',ELEV ION_521.99 p~,4' B.Ig_- _ VPI 5TA. 87 F44r97 ~ ELEVATION 22,31 ~ ~, LE ATIO 521.07 ', ' '. - ' '- VPI-STA 87 52.47 ~ VPI' STA 87+5' .90 ', _ - - ELEVATION 521.07 _ ELEVATION 521 ~ ~ ~ I' TA. 87+ 08 ' W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ELENA .92 QO ; ELEVATION 5 0.10 ', ~, ~ p0 I~,STA. 88+15 47 ', - '. V I STA. 88+21.9 ~ p LEVATION 52 .08 ~ E 20.8 ~ ~ ~ G1 w LI O ' ~ 'VPI STA. 88+49.44 ~ ~n P V ISTA. 88+54.3 EL NATION 52 .2 ~ m 6 ' E EVATION 5,19 ~I ~ ~ ~ TA 88+59 99 m ~, I,STA. 88+56 75 ', LE ATION,520,25 ' ' ' IEVATION 51 / .45 - , . , VPI S7 . 88+gg,Og ~ VRI S A. 88+96.54 ~, ~ ELEV ON 517.97 ELEV TION 519.32 ' ' + VPI ST 89+02.19 , , O ELENA ON51Z.97 ~ VPI STA. 8 +05.52 O ,VPI STA. 8 +0%.28 ~, ELEVq 10 5 8.7 ', ', ', ECEVATI 521.03 'VPI STA 9+08 51 VPI STA 8B +1x.87 ', . ECEVATI . N 521.03 ELEVATIO 518.23 .. -. VPF STA. 89+7 . 57 - ~ I STA. 89+80 8 ~ EL VA IOM 51 _ _ _ 71' ' . , t0 I STA 89+83 8 ' ~ VI STA. 89+85. O LEVA ON 51 67, EVATION 5,18. - - ~ / O ~ ~ VPI A~90 2340 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / / / VP STA. 90+31.43 EL TION 15.83 ', ', - - - ', - / ~ ' EL ATION 574.8 -'- '- -- - _ _ / / , STA. 90+36.44 I ~ST . 90+39.46 ~ ~ ~ EL VA'~ION 514.81 _ ELENA I ON 515.80 - _ _ / / , / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / VPI STA. +95.14 / / ELE V AT1 N 513.72 STA. ECEV +81.39' ~ ~ ' ~/ ~ ~ ~/ ~ 4 ~ , ATI 14.55 ~ ~ ~ ~ // ,// / / O ~, VPISTA. 91 08.8 ~, ~, ~, ~ / / i / ,/ " , O ~ EL~ 14.50 ~ ~ ~ / / ~ / ~/ /PI 3TA + 02.02 , / ' ~ ?LEVATIO 513.7t ~ / / i / / / - VPI STA. 01+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i / / / / / ~ ~ VPI STA. W7.94~ ELEVATION 3-9!4 ~ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' l ~ l l i ECEVATI 513.1 ~ / / / VPI STA. +5385. VPI STA. 91a 9 .37 ~ ', ~ / i / / / ECEVATI 51311 V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / / / / / ~ / l l / ~ i l ~ ~ / N LEVATIOIV~61 . 18' , , i l l l l Ill y ////////~///. O O ~ \ ~ ~ N W ~ \ W W ~ ~ v ~ I ~ ~ 43 O ~ 00 N \ 03 I I ~ ~ + \ ~ ~ ~ VPI STA. 82 0 0 O 1 c I ~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 A ~ \\ - 1 \ I i i - ~ I ~~ ~ ~ V / f \ i , I ~ I~~/\ ~pp~ I\ N~ O. I I ~ I ~ ~ 1 ~ Q 0/ A ~ / ( ~~ / I I I ~~~ ~~ I ~ I, 1 ~ I ~ \ ~ ~ _ I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I \ I ' `~ ~ \ \/ I I I I I I ~ ) ~ / I ~ / ~ I / Y ~ ~ I ~n I I I I ; I ~ ! I ~ 1 I ~NO I / /I I I 1 1 ~ I ~-o ~ ~' l I 3+.Od I I i I I M I ~ ~~o I ~~~ / ~~ I ~ I'I I I I ^~ I I I 2 ~ I ~ m ~ o~ g A l ~/~~ I I / 7 i ~ I i I I ~ ~ a° i i ~~! ~ ~ ~~~/ I I ~~ I ~ ~ I I I ~ I D ~ ~m ~~ ~ ~ I I N I I I I I ~ / / I i, I I g~4+00 / / i / / / / / ~ ~ i / / ' 1 / / , / / ~ ~ ~ I / / / ~ / ~ / . . ' / / / ~ I / / ~ ~ / / / i i / / / / / / 8S / ~ ~ / / ~ i / ~ } / ~ 1 ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~~ ~ ~ I ~ I I ~ 1 1 z Np m~ ~ // / ~ / ~dll li. ~ i i t I ~ I , I J I I ~ ~ / ~ I / / ~ / ~ I ~ ./ I ~ ' / / I I ~ , / I i / / ~ I ~ I ~ ~ - - ~ _ / - '/ / ~ I I I I, ~ I I I ~ / ~ V I I I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , I I , ~ ~ ~ / , . - ~ 1 ~ r / I / I ~ i I ~ /~ ~ \ // I / l \ ~ ~ / i I / I / ~ ~ i / ~ \ ~ ~ / / i ~ / I / / / ~ / / / / ~ I I I I ~ / ~ C / / , //, ~ ~ ~ / I 'a/ / ~ / / / I I / ~ / ~ I I I I I / l A I / / / I I I I I l i/ i / i t i I ~ it / G' ' , Q aSlkO I I i l I I / / i / /;; / / ~ I ~ I / , 1' / / / I / / / ~ / / / I / / ~ ~I~, 1 ~ i I ~ / I ~ / ~ / / i / / ~ I / ~ I / _ I / / I '~ I I i, ~ ~ i I / / ,~ / / / , // i/ ~ I l , ; l/ I i I /~ ~ / / / / / % %/ i / ~ l ~l /I \ I I ~/. / o~T / ~ I I / ~ / / I ., ~ ~ ~ imF s_r / ~ / ~ I ~ J I // / i / ~O~ ! ~] ~~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ,in ~ ~~ / i / / ll /i , ~~ ' / ~ / / / _ '/. Y - / ,/ / I ~ / / / /. / ~ O i/// O ~~ c / ~ / / - ' / / ~ ~ ~~ / ' / ~ 2 ~ / / I I ~ / . / , ~F ~ /~~/ ~i ~ II~~ / I l / 'I I ~/ I II II ~ ~o l/~ ~II II (,.J( ~/ i'~~ l l I I I ~ I I I I I ~1~ / 'll/ ,/,ll / / ~ ~ ~ I,IIII ~ °za / / / ~ / I ~ I / ~ I I I A O // ~ ~ ~ I I I I ~ I' I I I I I I I I I ~ I I ~ I ~ / i ~ I I l l i /~ ~,, /~ I / ~ I i I~I' ~i I I! llllll~l, I I I ~ I I( ~~{ I•71~ ~' 0~ ~ I I I I i 1 I l i i l 1~ l l I ) i l I I I I I l l j i I ~ I ~, I I I r 1 ~ /1/ 7/u ,i I I I 1 1 I I I I ~ \ , I I I I I I I 1/ ~ \ 1 ~ ~~ I I ,A ~~ ~ , N O Y IMF- O 2 fl (~ A D o m O `~ CANE CREEK ~ ~~ 0 0 ~ 4 s STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT m Z SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA I I ~ T4-1, T4-2: STATION 80+00 TO STATION 91+38 ~KC I TECIWOLOGIFS ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS 460131X FORKS ROAD RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 ~ ~ ~ ~ EL ATION 535.93 ~ ~ ~ VPI STA ~ ~+24 10 .V STA. 80+11.20 . . 54 .75 ECEVATI N 535.83 yp 7A ~, gpiyq.93 VPI A. ~80+28.82 4 ELE TI N 539.0 ~ VP ~ T . 8 +39.85 ' ', ', ; VPI STA. +31.92 ~ E A ION 539.72 VPI STA. 80+81.03 ~ ~, ~, ~, ' ' eLEVATI N53791 ~ , , Vpl TA. 0+69.53 ', VPI S A. 80+ ~ 5 5 ECE TI N 539.OY ' ~- ELEVATION 5 7 91 ~ ~ , 11 ~ ~ :VPI STA 8 +32 30 ~ WI T ' 89.1 ' F . EL VATIO . 541.99 ELEVAT N ~ ~~ 538; 51 ~ - ~ I STA.'80+ 2. ~ ' EVATION 537. 9 ~ ~ ~ VPI 3TA. B1+ .O4 NATION 5 01 ', ~, ~, ~. VPI STA. 81+4 .79 ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ELEVATION 84 VPI TA. 81+ 84', ' VPI S A. 81+45.79 ELE TION 5 44 ; ' ; I STA. 81+5Z E ATI 5 , - _ EVATI N 535. , 3 - ', -' - ' - VPI TA. 81+81:58 - VPI TA: 8 +73 24 - - EL A ION 53 .53 ~ ELE . AT I N536.41 D _ ',VPIST . Bx*10',25 _ - - ~_ ) J - _ - _ _ ~ J ELENA ION 531.67 ~ ~, VPI STA 82+ 3.25 ~, ELENA I ~ 536.79 ~ E EV TI N .fj7 - - VPI TA 82+21 50-' VPI STA -ECEVATI 82 17.91 ELEVAT ON 534 21 538.28 ... ~.. ~ YPI.STA. 8 +31.34.. ~, ~ VPI,BT .82 24 50 ELEVATIO 534 83 . ', ELENA ION 534.21' . V * VPfST .~ 69 A 2 LEVATION 27 ~, ~ VPI SFA 82+ .81 ~ ~ ~ V I E PLSTA. 82+8 2 6. LE AT QN 5 2.81 ELEVATION 53 . VPI STA.~82 0.34 1 STA 82 . 27 ~ ~~ ~ ~~ '1 ELEVATION 53 .38 ~ ~ ~ ~, ~, +8 Q ~+ ~ ~, ~. ~_ _~ y. ~~ ° ,~ ~.r ~'~~''s j~ o ~ ^ `<: ~~~ ~.s ~srr I ascw.ux I wi[ I urnov[n I ~ o o _ W ~ 00 N Q> p ;i O O ~ ~ ~ VPI TA, 93+35.85 ~ ;- VFI S A. 93.94.37 ELE ATION;510;7 6 ELE V TION 5 11 ~I ' VPI ST .B3+41:58' , ~ I~ ', ', ', ~ ELE NA ION 510.75 ~ VPI S T . 93+47. ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P. ~ ~, '.ELEV A ION 5 .54 ~. ~, ', ', ',ELE VA ION 510.14' VPLSI A. {.71 ~~ ; 'VPI ST A 9 *73.11' ~ ELEVA TI N 11.35 ~~ ', ', ELEVA TIO 1 510.14 ~ VPI S T . 93+78.58 l0 ' ', ~, ~ ', ~ VPI S - TA. +08.93 ~ EL ION 510.80 p ~ ~ ~ ~ ', ELEV ATI N 009.51 ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ LSTA. 02,62. OO ~. ELEVATIQ N 5 l.50 EL~TIO 510.32' VPI STA. 9439:35' ST ELEVA 94+15.24 ON,510',30; - ELEVATI O 508.Bfi VPI STA. 94 + 0.43 ~ ~ ~ VPI STA. 94 +4 .87 ELEVATION 09.99 '; ', ELEVATION 5 .08 I'STA. 94+4 OB ' ' PI STA94+6 5. ELEVATIONS .55~ VPI ST A. +67.33 LEVATION 5 07.4 13TA '94+61 6 ELEV, TI N 507.24 - - . LEVATION 609 . - - ~~ - ' ~ - ' VP STA. 94+73. EL NATION 507. 53 2 ~ ' VPI STA: 94 ~ ' - ' - ~ ~ - V PI STA.-94+75:7 8 _ VPI S ( A 94+79.99 - ELEVATION - ~ ~ - - E L A 10 507. 27 -~ ELEV TION 508.05- - ' ' ' + VPI STA 9 5 07.09 ~ ~ ~ , O ELEVATIO N 06,17 O ~ ~ ~ -VPI,S T .95+9.$4 -ELEVA ON'50T. ' ELEN A ON 508.17 ~ VPI STA. 95 2046 VPI STA, 9 5 15.55 ; ~ ~~ ELEVATION / SOB N ELEVATIO N 5;70-' - - ~- - - ~ ~ - . VPI STA 5+17.80- ~ VPI 74,86+ 7 'ELEVAT I N 505.7D 'EkGVAAON VPI STA.' 8 5 54.49 i VPI ST0. 95+ .80 ' ELEVATIO N {5.24 ~ ~ ~ ~ ELEVATION 5 ~~ ' -' VPI STA. 9+80.14 - ~ ', ; ELEVATI O 1505.23 ; ~ -~ ' ~ CO ', ; ', ', ~ ~, VPI STA. 95+ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ELEVATION 5 5. ', ; + O PI STA.,98 +{ .Z5 O ~ ~ ELEVATION 04.61 PI STA. +1 0, ~ ' ~ ELEVATION SC VPI STA. 98 + 2,83 ' ; ELEVATION 04.80 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ST7C'76+4 . 89; ~~ ~~ ~~ ~. ~, LEVATION 50 .11. VPI STA 96+ i .64: ' ', ', ELEVATION 5 .27 VPI STA 98+7 3 51 ' A + Q ELEVATION .26' N TION 5053 O ~ '~ ~ ' VP ST0. 9 + 1 ' ' ' O ~ ~ ~ - EL ATi N 504. , , I STA. 97+38.3 ', ' E EVATION 503. - ~ .V ISTA. 97+54,1 ~ ~ z ~~_ E EVATION 503. 2 ,'VPI STA. 9~+89 ~ v ; : 'EL . NATION .6 -~ ~ - ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ Vf~rS A. 98+ 1.11 m 0 VPI S A. 98+16.88 OAL50.4.07 m 0 ;ELEV TIO'N 502.96 ~ ' : ~ - VPI S A. 98+22.68 'VPI ST . 98+30 0' ELEV TION 502.99 ~ E~ 1 .89 VPI STA. 8+63.19 ELEVATI N $03.23 ', ', ', ' ', VPI STA. 9 +7x.89', - ' ' ELEVATIOI 501.47 ~ Pf STA. 9 +69.80' ', LEVATI011 502.75 ~ ; !O .VPI STA. 9 +7.18: ~fVST ~98+ 0 41 {p ELEVATIO 501.47 . LE TIQN . 02.30 ' + , O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VPI STA. 7 .98 ~ VPI STA.' 99 2 6.90 ELEVATIQN 0 1.5 ' ' ELEVATION 01:11 ~ ~ ~ : ~ ', ', VPI S A. + ELEVATION 5 1 .10 VPI STA. 99+4 . 3 - EL VATIO 1 ' VPI STA. 96+8 .0 9, V E PI STA 99+ 8 0.T 0 ' ', ~ ~~ ELEVATION 5 O. M N 50 .2 6 ~ ~ - O VPI STA. 99+8 .7 4~ V PI'STA. 99+8 3 8' - '- ~- O ELEVATION 5 . 44 E ON 50 .2 3~ + O VPI STA. 100+ 7. 81- - ~ - VP S TA 10D+15~ - ' - - ' EL VA 10 4 8 9 - _ L A~ ON 50Q , ~. -. _ - ._ _ VPl STA. 100+ 3. 79 ' VP S ~ TA. 100+3 .9 ~ - _- ~ - ~- ELEVATION 4 9. EL N 98 ATION 5 .7 ', ', '. V I STA. 100+94.9 VPF3 0+79 OB ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ' r E NATION 499.1 ELEV TI ON 499:98 O - 1 O ~ ~ VPI S A 101 0.70 ~~ ~ ~ ~~ O VPI S . ~ 101+02.80 ,ELEV TI ~ ~ ON 409.92 J ELEV I ON 499.14 ~ ~, ~, VPI ST0. 0 1 54 15 VPhST 1+44.96 ~ ~ ~, ELEVATI N 4 ELENA ON 4 24 VPI ST . 101+80.85 VP STA. 1 5.88 ', ', '. ELEVA O N 498.04 EYATIO a 98.71 O N O _ ; ~ ~ V PI S A. 0 5 ' O E LEVATION 9 1 STA 10 +1 4.10 - VATIO 9 6.99 ~ _ VP I STA. 10 2 3 5 I STA. 1 + 18.23 EL VA 10 8 7 ', ~ ~, EVATIO 4 98.93 ~~ ~ ~ - ; ; - ~. -,, - - I vPl srA.loz+ 10 A o - - EL VA IOM 4 OB ', -, ~- - ~ -~ ~ I N O ~ oo ~ W D O t v O = o n o D m O 0o c_o rn O 1 + t0 N + O O t0 W O O O ~ 00 N ~ VPI STA. 1+02.02 ~VPh STA 9 +08 8 - ' E4EVATI N 613.7 1 ' . . ' , , ~ pH01 14.50 ; .~ VPLSYA. 1+4,7.94 VPI STA 91+ _ ~ ~, ~. ' ELEVATI 513.12 ELEVATION 3.941; ' VPI STA. ; ELEVATI 1+53.85 5 VPI STA. 91+ 9.37 ' 3.11 ~ VPI STA. 9'2+ .15 ~ - - ELEVATI .18. ; ~~ ', PI STA 92+{ 18' VPI;ST 22, ELEVATION 51 .39 ELEVATION 51 .13~ PI~'STA. 92+45 58' PLS~2~+ 98. ', LEVATION 51 .72~ ~ - ELEVATIO 51 .68', A LEVATION 51 .84- - ~ ^~ ION 512. ~ - ~ ~ ~~ , PlSTA 92+7-7 34.~..~ Cpl 2+78b4 LEVATION 51 .22 _ _ EL ATION 512.0 ~ _ ~ ~ ' PI 'STA. 92+79 58 _' VPI ~ TA. 92+81:83 ~ ~ ~~ LEVATION 51 . 21 . EL ATION 512. _ ~ ~ ~ ; ~, pz~^ NN yjm =Fm 04~ °m T~ oz ~ pZ T f/1 ~D Or 7 ~~ O O 4 gg+~0 my 0 ~n ~ n O~ m n w ~,~ O' ~ /~i \ i i II/ ~~~ / ~~/ ,~ " ~ ~ ~! I I i V I I I -~V 1 I ~ ~ I I! ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~I ~ ~ I ~ ~~ I ' I i i 1 ~ ~ / ... I . I ~ l ~ l l I i ~ ~ ~ I \ A\ 1\: I. 1 / ~; I ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ i V i l' X92+ pp, V \ \ \ V I \ \ \ 1 \ I v v: v v v ',~ v ~ ~ ~ I I , ~ \ ~ ~~` A `' A ~'~ ~ \ 1 `,. 1 / ~ ~ ~ I /~~ ~ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ , I I \ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~, 1 V ''~, , ~ ~ l k ~ \ \ 1 1 1 I i I \ ~ 1~ I I \ \ \ 1 ~ ~~ 1 \ 1 / , \ \ ~ ~ \ -` 1 I ~ 3~ ~. A A\ 11 I ~+00 \ \ 1 I .' Pit \ ` \ \ ~ ~ ~ I, I ~ . ~ ~ A I I \ A I I I A' ~ ~ , A 1 \ I I I ~ ; ,\ m \I',I\\, ~ ~ I ~ m \,' \ -1 \ \ \ ~ ~ }y, 4 ~ ~ ~~ I `., \ ,,. v~ ~~~I xj~r, O ~~ v v v , \ \ Z 1 , \ i,~i ~ v , I I ~ ~ ~ I zz~ OOD ~ /~ I I ~ yam i' l zmni ~Om m / \ ~A zZ ~ O<7 yti ~ A~ om ~~~, _ ) J / , _- ~ i~ ~ ~~ ~ `II I I I ~ dll,l,rr~l\ ~ V, ~~ I ~ , `1 i0~ \ i \~,\ , ~ \ , ~ ~ ~~R~1b \ \ ~ I ~~ ~~~~ X00 p V llll ~ ~~ /~i~~ ~ I ~ ~ G~ 2 Q 9 ~ \ ,, , \ 'Q{- _ , \, \ m `~Iql \ ~ ~i . ~~~~~'Fb V rn m ~ i ~ l m y \ ~ ~. .A~` ~ 1 i ',A ~ N ~ . I ~'LC , 1 \ - ~II \ ~ -J .. W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~.l- . I ~ ~ ~ 0.,Q0 - -- _ - ~ i ~OZ ~ ~ ~_, LV ~ ' ~~ ~o i \ ' ~. ~ ~ \ x~ ^, ~ ~ I ~ ~ rlh ~ \ ~ - -~ , ~ I \`,~ ~ ~~~, ~ ANdlO91i11 LIOj 9-E S133HS 335 ~ ~ A SUBMITTED MATH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 CANE CREEK ~ K C I o z ~ g s STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT -~-'~~~~~ .,,~ p ~ ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS m SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 4 ~' ~~~~~~~{'X~~ T4 2 STATION 1 6olslx FORKS RoA~ RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 _ 5Y14 °EK"°T1pN w*c umorEo - : 9 +38 TO STATION 102+52 - REVISIONS ~ coo 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 00 N ~ O ~ 0 F + ~ ~ O O _- I',-- ''', N I ', / O , Q ~ ~, ~ ~ I . vPrsTa. n +72.6e ' y ', VPI siA.1 2NSS.oa - ' ELEVATION 500.27 ~ ', ELEVATIO 501.79 ~, VP A. + '.18 'VPI ST '. 11 +89,24 ' EL ATION, 500.27 - ~ ~ELEVATI 501.57 - - ~ ~ ~ - VPI STA 142+ 0.93 -ELEVATION .17, VPI STA.,112 78.24 - . . - ~ - . VPI A 112+63A3 - ~ ELEVATION 1.07 ' ~ EL TION 500.17 I TA.'112+BB. 3 ' W VPI STA. 1 13+22:51 LEVATION 500. ~ - : ~ - - O I STA. 113+27.1 I ELEVATION 500 OB ~ ~ O E ATION 499. - - . - - , , - , - . VPI STA 113+5 .75' _ ELEVATION 4 .33. ' VPI S i13+54.25 yPl 1 3+4 .31 - ' ' ELE TIO 46,8.33 ' EL ION 49483 ~ ~ - - VPI Sr ELEVA t1a+s7.oo . '.VPI T'na+55 e1 VPI ST0. 13+59 50 ~ 'EL AT10N 49905 ELEVA . N497.88 - -VPt STA ELEV 70 3+81.28'- 4 .87', VPI ST i13+fi881 1 STA. 113+ LEV jTION 4 105 - - 4 - VPI STA. 13 ~ - ELEVA 4 11 ION'498.48 ELEVA7 N 4 .90 - 157A / 3+78.06 ', - ' - - VPI STA 113+ .85' ELEVATI ~ ~ N 497.51 ~ ~ - ELEVATION 4 .92 Q VPI STA. t13 .OB Q ELEVATION 4 .44 ~ ' STA. 113+ ~ - ~ - ~ ', EVATION 4 48 - - - - ISTA. 113+ .31 _ - - LEVATION4 .02. ~ ~, ', r ~ ~m r ~ m m -~ n 1rr~~ 1 _ m 0m m ~ _ y D r `i D » ti ~ -1 D' ~r~ K '- ,~ o ~z .. o ~z ~ , o o z,-z ~ - - - ~ ~N ~ wgw ~ + O O m -1 z a m c ~ a i < m v, ~i ~ y~ i i , _~ ~ / ~ m ~ -_ ~ i ~ ~ :: ~ , ~ ~, / / ~~ Z P ~ ~ - ~ ~ / ~ / ~ / / ~ ~ - - .~ .. _ ~ .. i _- ~ ~i ~ I / i O _~ i k ~~ X ~ ~~ i / , ~ ~ ~~~ '~ .. J ~~ ~ ~ i ~ _~, _ ~ ___ - dr ~~~- i -- - ~/~ . ~ - ~~ ~ ~. I I / 'I'II / , x \ \ I ~ ~ 00 I ~, ~ ' I I ~ I I II I~ I I I I I ~ I~ I~ r~ I ~ ! I jl i l ~ ~ 6 ~z~" ~ I ~,~ i ~Q °a~ l ~ i I' // / =NZ ~ ~ / / , ~4~ / / I' o~+ --- rv ~/ ~ / zo / ! oz ~ ~ ~ I ?, / ~ ~/, ~ k / ,1/ d ~ / I i i I ~m I~~~ - 28+p~ . __ ~~~~' ~ I ~ ~ - y / ~O C ~ O ~ a r ~ ~ I - '~ ~~~ ~ II! / ~ ? ' lil! /i, 9,~~ j it ~ i~ ~ ~~ I I~ ~ I //I ~ III r il, I I ! II I I QO it ~' I I I 11 ~0,~, I I / ,' I ~ ~~ I i ~ I I SEE SHEETS 35 FOR TRIBUTARY 1 m m x m 1 vi w T A a'' p ~, D ~ / < ?3x;~~ 1 / 1 ~i ~ ~I li / ~ I S~4~H-Dh ; ~~ r / N ~ ~ ' ~~ J I I y /I ~~ ~ m N i ~ I ~ ~ _ - m N ~ ~ O D N - ~ k / , ~ ~, i ~ O O $ a ~ / ~ < ' ~ ' ~ 1 I I A O N O 1.1- O 2 n N n A D c r m O NC GflID NAD '83 1C 1~1 F : A SUBMITTED MATH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 ~ o CANE CREEK ~ KC I -~ - ~ ~ ~ N STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ~-~°°"°~~ _. _ . °~ ~ y a f ~ v ~ S ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS : '~"?' ~ m ~ SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ , , a6olslx EORKS ROAD ~~ ~~ °~ ~ '~~ ~ s,w ~~~r~, a.E ...~ ~ T5-1, T5-2: STATION 110+00 TO STATION 113+85 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 REVISIONS tD O O ~ ~ ~ N N W CO N rn O ~• Oo N rn O VPI STA 120+02 81 O V PI STA 120+05.08 ELEVATION 524.20 V PI STA. 720+00.0 0 + E LEVATI N 525. 50 Q ~ ~ 0 T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - -- ELEV ION 523.74 ~ + ~ LEVATION 524 ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~, VP ST . 1 *1 50 ~ ' STA. 120+15.30 ~- ~ ~ ~ -~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~-ELENA 10!482324 'VPI ~ TA'. 120+18.99 ~ E A710N624.31- VPI STA ~-E 20+24.56- A70N 23.4 -ypl TA i2M28.23 ' - ~ - ~- ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ELEVATI ~ N 522.76 _VPI A. 120+28.24 \ EL _ ~ T10N 523.41 ' = ~ ~ W I STA 1 0+39]5 ELE TION 522.78 API 12038.44 , ' ~ ' ~ 'VPI ST ' .120+42.75' VPI S A. 120+14.65 -. ' ~ - _ ~ ~ ~ ~.. ~ ~ -. ~ - ~ ~ ,-EL A - -~ 52226- ~ -ELEVi TION 523.08 - - - - - , - - YPI STA -' 0±77.50 - -' VPl S 0+84.82' , ELEVATIO 521.83. ELEVATI 1522.88, VPI S - . - _ ~.. ~. ~_ _,. _,- -.. ~- -VPI 6TA'120 .83.80-. - .. -~ _ _ - . _ ELEV ' 'ELEVATION 21.82 'VPI ST 1 0+90.09 N ~ ~- ~ ~~ ~~ YST `121b13 - - -' E 522.61', - ~ ELEVATION 620. 9 +' ~ ~ ' VPI SYA 21+ 6.09 I ' ~ ' ~ ~ -'- VPI S 121+23.28 ELEVATIONS 0.88 - -',E TION VPIS 221 . ', - ', _ 121+20 59 ~. - ~. ~- ~- ~ ~. ELEV ION.520.43. VPI 6TA 129+2 .2B- - - - ' EL . . TION 521.70' - - - - - - - - ELF,VATIOH, 520 43 ' _ _ I STA 21*28. 3 _ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ V ISTA. 121+48.23 ~ ELEVATI 1621. 8 ~ ~ - _ '_ E VAT10N 519.52 _ _ ~.! ' I TA.- 121N5. ' WPI S . 12H50.73~ ELEVATI N 520.62 VPI TA 121 58.47 E O 518.52 VPI TA. 1 i+53.7 - - ~- - -ELEVATION 18.05 ypl STA 121'x58 87 - .EL ATIO 20.32. ~ . ELEVAT . N 518 05 STA. 1 1+80.45 ~ - - VPI STA. 121+f .53' - - . - ELEVATIOI 519 75 ' ~ - ELEVATION 51 - - - - - ~ .74 ~ _VPL STA. 1 1+88.53' - VPI - - - TA..121187.57 - _ ~ ~, ELENA OI 51 .74 EL ATION 518.25 p N - - ~- PI STA. h21+88. ~ - ~ - - VPI ST .121+88.25 ; ~ N LEVATION 517.9 "ELENA ION 516'.77 ~ ~ ~ o c + ~ ~ ~ + ~VPIS 121+81.78 0 - - 'ELENA ON 5tt.93. _ - -'ELE A ON 518.72- ', -, - - - O ~ ~ ~ . - ~ ~ ~ - - VPI STA. 122124.51 V S A. 22+17.80 - ~ - - - ~ - Z ,- -.~,- - - _ ~ ELEVATI N517.39 _ EVATI N518.21, ~ ' - - ~ - VPI STA 1 2+27.87 ' A - - -' ELEVATIO 617.39 - ~ ,VPI ST . 12 'ELEVATION +31 22 - 18A8 - VP16TA 12 53.80 ~ ~ ' ELEVATION 17.21 ' ~ ' '_ 'ELEVATION 18.03-' - - - - ~ VP STA. 122+5 .54 ' ' - ~- ~ - ~ EIEVAT70N 51 20-~ - - VPI TA. 122 3.78 , -, - , , - - - ISTA. 722188,' 7 ~EVATI N 1 ~ ~ ~ LEVATION 518.8 ~ - ~ ~ - - N - ' - VPI TA..122+ .09 - W , V STA. 122+92.25 EL I 51 .66 . + VPI A123+32.33 VPI 6T 12h9630 ' O - - - '- - \ 515. - ELENA 1N 51703 -' -' '- VPJ 5 .123+35.00' ELEV ON 51$.53 ISTA. 123+28.1 ' ' ' - VPI STA. 23W0.57 ~ - ~ IO,N 5 .8 - . - ~ - - ~ - ~ - - ELEVATI N 575.06 - - VPI STA.' 123 37.88 ~ ' - ' 'VPI STA 1 +43.07 ' VPI ST L A 10 .123+4 .80 6. ', ' ELEV ION 515.82 - '- - -VPI STA: 123 85.88 '- - PI-STA.'123962. 1 - ELEVATION 14.05 LEVATION 515. - VATI N 514.0 -VPI STA. 723+ 4.16 - - VP1 ST 1 3+71.41 - ' - ' - - ', - ELEVATION 5 3.5Y - ' _ 4- VA O I 14. _ ~ ~ ~ - ' VPI STA 123+7 .85' I STA. 123N8. I N E~EVA ION 51 .57 EVATION 514.3 1 A VPI STA 124+01 Al ~ ISTA 123 98.53 + ELEVATION 512 7 ELENA 3.92 I ' - ' - - T 1 ' + 41 - - - - 0 101 51 .6 ~ ~ VPI .124+06.96' ~ ~ ~ - '- - I STA: 124+12 ~,- ION 513,46 . - _ - , ' LEVATION 512 0 ~ ISTA. 4+77. - ~ ~ - ~~ V ISTA 124+158 - ~ =10N 512.9 -, - - - -, -- _ ' _ E EVATION 512.20 , VP STA. 124 .18 ~ ~ - ' ' VP STA 124+47.53 ' EL ATION 5 2:49 ' EL ATION511.67 , -VPI STA 24+52.22 EIEVATI N 511.6¢ ', VPI TA. 124+ .90 - ~- - - ~- VPI A 124+84.56 LE ATION 12. ', ELE TION 51].30 - - - V ' STA 12,4+73.83 ~n N - - - ~, -VPI S7 .124+9003 ~. EL AT ON 512.12 4 ?~ p rn O 117 (~ ELEV ~ ON 511.28 ~ VPI S A 1 4 15.49 ~ Z O b + ~ . ~ c1 m R VPI STA 125* 4 01 ELEVATI N 510.43 '- VPI S L 12 06.07'- 1 O ~ LEVATF ~N 5 0.4 ELEV IOM 11.74 ~, G7 ~ - ~ ~ VPI STAI +19.76 ~- ~ VPIS7A 25+'1 .07 ~ ' ELEVATIO 509; 88 ' LE ATI N 5 .24_ _ ; m Z m ~ VPI STA, 125 22.26 ~ V ' ' ~ - ELEVATION OB.88 ',- PI 7A ', - L 1 +24.79 , O 510.0 : O VPI STA. 125 4.52 ~ ~ ~ / ~ VPI A. 125+85.02 ELEVATION .54 VPI STA 125+5 O6. ~ ~ Z EL T10N SOB.SM - - - t'I STA 125+70 - 5 ~, ELEVATION 90 63' -'- ~ 0 D VPI S .-125+73.25'- - ELEVATION 508. 7 ~ ~ ~ VP A. 125+68.0@ ~ ELEV ION 508.07 ~ - - - V STA 125+75. -~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ISTA 126+00.7 EL VA OI 50 . ~ ' N ~- - EVATION 508.9 - - - - ~ Vp T 125+97.31 ~ ~ VPI 6TA 126+03'.26 A N' ~} EL ATION 508.98 VPI S A. 126+p6 1 ~ - - '- - '- ELEV TiON 507. 8~ - '- '- ~ ~ VPI A 128+08.01 I A. 1 6+ 3.19 ' VPI STA 128 .Ot ELE TI N 508.50 ~ ~ - ELE ATI 507.24- ELEVATION :50 -VPI STA.-1 8+32.02 - ~ - VPI STA 28+28.4,9 ~~ ELEVATIO 505.83 LEVATt N 506.90 VPI S _ 128 34 52 - ' VPI TA 1 +37.56 ' ELEV ~ ~ E VATIO 506.44 ~ ~ VPI STA,128 0 'VPI~STA t2 474 ELEWATION .35 ~ - ELEVATION 5, - - - - VPI ST 28+42 58 - VPI $TA 12 87 2 ' ELEVAT . ~ N 905.35 E=EVATIT_N , ~~ VPI STA 128+ 3.41' VPI STA. 127 .90 ~ ~ - ~ ~ N -ELEVATION .85' - ~ -~EVATION .85', - - - - - VPI 57A. 128+9 .91 / + E A ION 50 * ~pN ~ V SYA 1'47+0 .88 LEVATION 504. 2 ', ~- ', ',- ', Z~j ~E ATION 503.36 _ ~ I ~ TA..127i43.22 ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ Oar 02r VPI A;727*66:1~8 ELE AT10N 503.72 ~ ~ ~ ;i~ ELE TION 503.38 Z~~ VPI STA 12 39 87 'VPI 57A. 127+3822 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ODm . ELEVA . L N'S03.22 ~ Npp ~ ~I S 127+42.17 'VPI ST 127+4995 ~ ~ ~ v c ELEV VPI STA 1 ION 502.42 ~ 1 - 45 ~ ~VPLSTA 12 .ELE A +80.27. ~- ON 502.78 - ~ - - - ~ ~ Oar ~~- . ELEVATIO + .4 501 95 'ELEVATION f2.53 m . VPI STA 1 7+87.29 - y VPI STA 127 7.91 ELEVATIO 502.52, ', m A - ~ VPIS ~ 127+! 86 - - _ E' ATION 50 1B / N 'VPI'ST'12 +9288.'- _. ~- / ~ / T VPI STA. 127.98.07 0 ELEVATION 500.43 VPI STA. 127+95.57 ELEVATION 500.43 VPI STA 127+65. ELEVA710N 501.72 VPI STA. 127+90.08 ELEVATION 500 89 VPI STA 127+63.78 . VPI STA. 127+87.32 ELEVATION 501.73 ELEVATION 500.09 NO o ~ O ~ 00 O N N N O O m s 7 fA. 120+21.17 9TION 523.68 \ p~~ I OrD tiOr / / _ N J\ Aim m / / ' V~ / ~ / \ ~ ~ _ /~~ ~~ Y~ / / ~ ~~ _ ~~ ~ \ ~ ~. ~-9 I / ~ / r ~'~, ~„ ~ i I I I / // ~ ~~ _ _ _ ~/ '~ ~ I I I ~ I 'I ~ I ~ i ~ I / / ~ ~i~~~~_ _ / II ~ I ~ I I i' _ _ •~ i ~ ~ I / i '~ / // _ ,l _ _ ~~~ I I . I \ - ~ S `~SQ~oo / ~ / / , i i ~ / ~ l ~. ___ ~ ~ I ~ I / ©/ ~ ~ I ~ ~ / i ~+, I 1Q1+00 , i ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ) I ~ : J J ~ _ / ,X ~(- / i ~ I l ,` _ I ~ ~ I ,WTI ~ I / - / ~ / ~ V 1 I I ~ - - / ~ l I i ~ ~ r ( l i~ // i;~ ~22~ I I ~ i / vmop~> ~iZm ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ / a00 ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~i I I I ~ ~ i ~ ~ I ~ m mpm~ ~ / ~ / / i ~ ~ i l l ~ / ` ~ ~ p~m yy~m / / - / ~ I l / ~ ~ ~ I ~1 ~'~~1 / ~ / ~/ ~~ I c~~Q icmzi ~ ~ ~ ~ / / l ~ ( ' / / i , / , / L ,~ /4/~ J /i I i ~ ~ / mvo0 / / ~ ! Y ~ l ~~ ~ tl I~ I ~ / ~ /~ / ~ ~ I l i l i l! I I i~ ~ ~ ' I~ i` i~ ~ i// ~ t~ I I I I I~ I I I I I I~~ j l ~~>~> I I I l l I~ ~ I I I I I I p~m I - ~/ ~ r I~~~I1 ~~i I ~ I I I i IIIII~!II II mmm ~ I / ~ ~ ,Illllllllill 'II ~~~ ~ I ~~ - ~ / ~. 1 _, I I I i 1 1 ~ I I I I' ~°_~, ~ II ~ ~pll i'~Ilr II~'~I z° '~ ^~ / ~ ~ 1 _ ,~'~Ihf I ~~Il,l'II IY ~~o O > ~ ~ ~ i np~ ~ ~ ;A - ~ : I ~ , i I I~ ~ r~~~'!~ li ~ I ~ I ~~ I (III ~~III Q '1II ~~lil~~~~~~II m ~ l I ~ !I ~ ~ ~ Ili i I ~! ~ ~ i t ~ I i I I ~~~ I I ~ / / ~'~~ ~ ~ ~ I~I,I I i ~~ I ~I II I I! I f ~~ ~~I i / ' ~~ ~ / ~ / I I I I I I I I ~I I I I ~ I I~ i~ '~ ~I I ' ~' / ~ / i ~ I I ~'. I. i, 1 1 1 V I I I t / / .~ i I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I / ~ ~/ I I I / lil''I'~,11'1111~~11 ~ ~ I _ I ~ I I ~ I I I I / 2', ~ ~ Q I I ~ , \ ~ A ~ I~ I ' i ~ ~ ~ / \. I \ 1 1 \ } . / /~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ I 'I I I - / / ~~ ~~ 1~ '~~b~ / ~ ~~ I I I ~~ ~ I I ~ ~ , . I . ' - ~ li ~ I ' ~~ I I ~ III, . i ~ I ~ v ` I ~ i I ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ,I ~I ~~ it ~'~ I ~ ~ \ \ ~~ ~ ~ ~II~P ~ ~ A 12~'1'd~~ ~ ~ '~. I I ~~~~ ~~ ) /~~ V A. ~ ~ - . A ~ N N ~ _ N ~ MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET I3 m ~~ ISTA. ?AO+B1.0 ~ ~ ~ ' E ATION 519. / ' ~- VPI TA:240+93.52 ~ ~ ~ ' ; ~, .. .. E ATION 51908 - ~, ', ISTA 240+88.5 ' 'VPI'ST 240+98:27 E ATIONS20.38 - ~, - - ~,ELEVA ON 518.62 40+95.0 p ELE ON 519.80 m ELEVATIC 516.62 ~ T 241+OO.b2 ~ O ~~ ~ ~ ~ VPI STA 24 +02.97 ~ L AT ON 18.1 - ' - ' - ' '- - ELEVATIO 516'.tt ' - ' - VPI STA 41+b8A7 ~ - - VPI 9tA.-Z41a 5.47 - ~ ~ ~ EIEVATI N 518.83- ~. Z -ELEVATION5 8.12- '- - ' LEVATYON 518. 9 ~ ' A P p a O N O n 2 N ~c " D c ~ m O g ~ ~ - -- A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 '" ; o CANE CREEK ~ KC I ~ ~ '~""°` OG~ , ,~ -- ~ ` ~ D ~ ~' ~ ~ N STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ~ IENTISTS R ~ ; ~r ` `"` ~` Z ~ p Z $ SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ENGINEERS PLANNE S SC , ~ z - ~, Q' 171 T6: STA 240+00 TO 241+19 TEA 766 T6AB T6C 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD 1 ''~"' ° ` ~~~ srk oczcnv.nw W1C •rmov[o °' , , , , , STA 250+00 TO 251+03, AND STA 120+00 TO 127+18 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 REVISIONS ••••••••i•••••••••i!••••••••••••••••••••••• I N ~ O ~ 00 NO O) O V I !(! I nDOfn ~ 2~~m mm~N / ~~mm ~ / / m /; ~~~ ~ / , ~~_ / m~ Ny m o , LEVATION 491. ~ PI ~ TA~ 1132+51 8 ~, ~, ', ', / ~ i I I) I t ~ I ~~ STA t32M9.1 LEVATI(IN 492 ~ // 9 ~ ~ / / ; I ~^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ \ ~F EVATI N4919 ~ E PI ST132.75. LE ON A92 0 4 ~ ~ ~ II ) ~ J ~ ~ , ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ z w . , / ~ ~ ~ )~ I ~ A \ \ ~ (N I STA. 133.09.9 I ~ I ~, f \ ~ \ '` O n Q 4 ~ ~ ELE TI N 492.13. ~~ ~, ~, , { - \ \ t i ~ \ / ) N ~ \ Zp ~ I STA. 133112. ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ \ O EVA710N 491.3 VPI ' TA 13 494.09 , , / / ~ I r , / ~ ~ .. ~ ' ' , ~, '~ ~ ~ I \\ I ~ ~ ~ I VPI S A . 133 8438 - ~~ , ~ ~ , _ , ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I I , ) 1 ELE / ~ ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ ~ VPI S7 33+90.24 _ ~, ~, ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ I i ELEVA7 VPI STA N 490.1,1 34+12.{3 VPI SYA. ELEVA710 •7 .80' 4 .94 ~, '. ', ' - ' ~, ~, I / ` 1 / / I ~ ~~~Q ~ ~ V Oyti N EL SAT N489.13 - - ' - ~ ~ . ~ I ~ yam VPI STAI . .12' ~ / ~ ) ~ ~ 1 ~Q + / ) ~ O - - _, - ', _E4kl!AT10 90.42'.. _ - - - ~ - ~~ ~ i / / ~ ~ ~ \ mm O VPI ST 134N ~ ~ i / _ ~ ~\ m~ •14.89 - - ELENA 9 92 - - - - - / \ / ~ ~ z0 ELEVATI 4@9,13. _ - Vq~ ~A. 134+ 9 63- _ ~ - ' / ~ ~ ~~ ~ \ oz VPI STA +20.38 ELEVATION 4 9 48 ~ ' ~ / b .. \ ELEVATI 488.97 S . TA.-134+38.84 -, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ko \ ~ ~ ~ VPI STA. ~ ~ ~ ~ - - \ ELEVATI 488.87 - ~ ~ ~ ~ rn _ - ~ ~ ~0\ _ ~_ _ - N ~/ \~ x ~ W 1n ~~' .~I ~ + O ~/' ~ I Az mm ~ I ~~+~ ~~' ~~ < ~ - - ~ ~l ~~ 00 p~. x0 ~ oy ~ h ~`1 ~ ` ~ ~ Om 33 ~ ~ 1 ~ v . ~ ~ ~ ~ A\~V 1 V'~ A ~ VV~AA A. _ -- -_ ~~. ` ~ ~. '. _. \\ 1 V ~ \ ~ ~+. ~ ->~ I - ~ ~ 0 \ N ~ `~, ~ ~ v ` ~~ d ~ ~~ ~ ° ~ ~~ ~.~ ~ ,,_ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~w ~ ~ ~~ ~ ,tip ~ ~, ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ;~` v n ~~ ~ D c ~~ ~_~ ___\ \ \. avo ~ ~~ --_ ~ ~ m O ~ A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 ~ o CANE CREEK ~ K C I Y. w D ~ ~ N STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT TF.c~mococ~s O ~ ~ ~ g ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS ~ m SEMORA PERSON CO NT 7 , U Y, NORTH CAROLINA ° `1 4'')'~~+'~tt`il! ~ a6olslx FORKS ROAD RALEIGH NORTH CARO INA 7 srr oEUxn.w w+E •ornovao T6: STATION 127+18 TO STATION 134+38 , L 2 609 „~...,......,. N N W W W ~ ~ W W ~A ~ (r A N O O ~ P O D N 0~ 00 N 01 O w + + 0 O O - Z m r ~ ~ Fq s~ moo= M Fti Te SOD o NO ~ ~ R mmm ~ )' ' . I ' ~~ - ~ ' ' -,- ~. - ' A A ~-',-- ,- - ----, - ---- - -- , --- A / O O i ~ ~ ~' ' ~ ~ - vl~ 40+00 / ~ ~ ~ / / ' / v - ~ - -~ -. ~ / 1// \ ~°my ' ~ \ pam ~ / _ ~ ~ mmm ~ . ~ w - ~- -- ~ ~ A CP 99; < N / '+ N O - ~ ~ ~ - ~ O O - - / ~ 141 +00 i ~ I - ~ 7 .- '~. '~ '~. - - -' -~ ~ i - / / ' ~ ~ - % i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ l I ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ! / / ,r1s I / I A C1 1+ W _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~~ I + + ~ A ~ ~b ~~ _ ~ . . ~ O / O 1 I i t ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 i ~>> v ps (!\ _ „ ~ \ I ~ ~ ( 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ \ - \ \ V ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ V ~ +~~ ~ v ~ ,~7~3 v I ~ ~ I ~ I ~ I A \ \ , I I I \ v i I I \ i + ~, I ~ n~ S.l7 -i m m r~ i \ , s I I , ~ ~ \ y r \ ~ zzm=0 ~ I I \ O < \ i \ 1 ~N ~1 ~ ~ ` ~ 0 OmO~ ~ i i ~ I I \ y ~ 1 \ 1 \ .L f ~lf lly ~ I ' - \ ~ i oao~ ~ ~ A ~ \ ~ 1 ~ V \ ~ k ~ I I I I ~ ~ , A ! / ~ ~ \ ~ A ~ o~ ~ ~ 1 ~ A ~ ~~ I I I I ~ ~ ~ \ I ~\ ~ \ \ I + O n I I i -~ ~ 1 I ~QA ~ V A ~ i i ~ \ ~ ~~ A ' ~ ~ O ~ m I ~ 1 ~ A ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ I I 1 \ \ - ~ V ~ I ~ VP I I I .. I, VPI i ~~„ ~ ~ I I ~~ 11 A A ~ A I ~ \ ~ EL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V I I I ~i A ti ~ . I V ~ ~ ~ VPI S ~ i ~ I I / ~ \ \ \ ~ ~ I ELEV I ', 1 i ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ E~ 1 i ~ ~ A A I II V ~. 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ \ - ~~ t0 I i t v' V ~ 1 1 1 1 I I~~ + i ~111!II~~~I~III A~ ~ \ O I' I I I ~ A - i l l ~ l m III i \ ~ m VPI ELE i~~ I' ~ ~~ v 146+00~, v - x I l ~ VPI S , i A A - - - . ~ I ELEV ~ ~ i ~ ~ vPlsr ~ I ' ~ i l l l ~\ _- --~r_ I I ` ~ o ELEVA - I II ~ ` I \ - I ~ ~ z y ]I VPI STA _ ~ III i - -- - -- `- ~ ~ I I ~ m EL ~A ~ . _. I I ~ I ~ I I ~ - - - - ~~ ~ - ~ II ~ V I I I I I ~ ) i i I m O I - ~ I ~: / ~ + O ~ ~ III III I ~ I / ~ _ / I a ~ i t I I I I i 1 ~ / ~ / ~ ~ 147+00 ' I I a o vPls . I _ ___- I I I I I I I I ~' ~ ELEVATI VPI STA I I ~ I I i i i I '~, I I ~' I I ~ I ~ I I I I I I ~ ~, ~ - - - IJ I , ELEVATI f I I ~~ \ I I \ ~ ~ i W / vPl srA 1 7 ~ I I ~ ~ A ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r{' ~ I I I ' ~ I I ' ', ~ / ' p/ , ELEVATIO I I ~ , ,. / / ~ ,~ i ? I ~ i VPI STA 15 ~ 1 O 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 1 / ' ELEVATIrON I ~~ I I ~ ~ ~ ( I ~ I I ;' i o I I~ i l l ~ ~ i l l ~ ~ ; ~ k10'4xOp I I I i p ~ + O O pp D ~ ~ ~ !IIII I I I ~ a~ l ~ I l l I I I I O III I I ~1 / ~ 2 D I I ~ I ~ ~ ii I ~~ ; \ 1 1 I I ~ l l l' ~ I ~ '~ I ~ ~~ ~ I \ I I I ~ ~~ ~ ,; A ~/ ' ~ ~ ~ °~°~ I I -d ~ I O \ ~ ~ I ~ ~ r m I O L°;a ~ i o OI I X ~ .. ~ \ ~ ~ I I vi ~ ~ ~ V` \ . ~~ UI ~ m / ~ I ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~\ ~ O ~ A A + ~ ~ / I ! : A ~ O ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ O / II 11' 1 ` ~ i ~ I ~~~~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' \ ~~ I I ! ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ I ~ \ I I ~ I ~ ~ ~/ ~~ i / ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ O~ ~ / ~ / ,I~/ I yyOa¢ --- A _ i \ ~ / / 1 x , , _ - - i ~ ~ /~ ~, ~, _ ~ ~ i _ - - ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ m i ~ ~ I ~ x _ ~ ~ - / ~, i ~4 ~ - ~ ~ ~ _ - \ o = - ppX ~ % ~ - _ ~ 1 v k - ~ ~ _ - ~ ~ _ 1 ~ ~~ m '` ~ - - ~ _ ~ __ ~ ; o ~ \ \ l A f i _ - \ I - 1 ~ __ i I ~ / 1 1 ~ { ~ . ~ I 1 ~ ~ 1 N1~H01~ ~ ~ ~ HS 33S . 3 V A ~ I , ~ - - - - -- 81 13g _ - - ~~ ~ _ ~ - ~ ~ ~ A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 F o CANE CREEK -'--- K C I ~ ~ _ 1EQ°"°' °°~ ~- ~ ~ ~ z; ~ ~ ~ ~ N STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ~ . ~ Z ~ $ ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS ~ p Z SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA -+ ' ~ ~ ITI 460151X FORKS ROAD '~ ~ ''~' I ~'~h' oEUx-rux w.e ...aovEn T7-3: STA 260+00 TO 261+36 AND T7A T7-1 T7-2 _ srK ~ , , , STA 140+00 TO 151+22 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 REVISIONS ~. / ~ ' , , - - / -. - ~ - VPI ST 144+g6.99~ I VPI A l4 +90. ~ - - -ELEYA ION 534.01' I ELEV TION534.99- VPI STA. 44+9499 111 VPIST .145+98.98 ~- - - ELEVATI N 534.01 -'ELENA ION 53649' - ELEVATIO 533.51 LEVATION534 - - VPt §TA. 14 +8.99 '~ I STA. + .99 - ' - ELEVATION 533~.51 ~ E L VATI 533.99 ' VPI S7A. '145 _ _ 19.45 _ I STA 145414. - ELEVATION 32.97 ~ -~ ~ - . E EVATI ~ .533. ' VPI S7A. 145+ 1.45 ', I',STA. 1 5+23.4 _ ' ELEVATION 5 2 97 ~ELEVATIO 533.47 LEVATION,53 10 ELEVgT10 3.4 ' VPI STA. 145+ 3.47 ~ ~ ELEVATION 5 .09 + VPI TA 146+07.31 E NATION 532.2 - ~ - EL AT10N'S32`28 ' - ' - -VPI T .146+2 . VPI ~ TA14C»2197 - ' EL ATION 532.21 r ELE ATION 532 2 _ _VPI ST . 148+66.3L r VPI STA 148+62.01 ', ELENA ION 53Q.74', ', ELEVAT ~N 531.23 VPI STA 148+74,09 ~ VPI STA 146+7842 ELENA ON 530.74 ~ / ELE\/AT ON~531 22 ' ', - VPI STA 14 03 33 ~ Vpl S7A 89 18 ELEVATION 2941 'ELEVATI N53041 ', VPI STA: 947 ..-33-'- - - ~VPL ST .-147+09.72 E qTl N 28 1 - 'ELENA ON 529.91 - ', - - ', ', ', VPI'STA.1 7+18.98 ' ELEVATIOI 529.74 VPI STA. 1474 .Od ~ VPF STA. 147+ .00 ~, ~, ~, ~, I STA. 147+ ,00 I STA. 147+ 00 ', ', - ', - LEVATION' S2 13 ~ I ELEVATION 52 53 . ~ - ~ ~ V I $TA 148+00 - ~ - ~ ~ '~ - . I TA 148+15. 3 A 527. I TA, 148+10.09 - - - - - STA.148+20. ELE ATION;528; 39 ', NATION 527..-4 - Fl S .148+24.24 A., 14d+28.99 ,.ELEV TIOJJ 527.8. -,. -, - . - TION 526.89 'VPI ST . 1d8+36.6 ', ' ' A 148133.99- ELEV ION 527.40 _ .148+76,10 VPI 149+53.74 ', ', ', '~ - TION 526.34 ELEVATI 527.06- ' - - - . ~48r87.27- - ~,- .,- ~,. ~, ~,. - ~,- - - ,, - TiQN 576.33 - ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~- ~-- VPI STA. 1 +98.45 '~ - ~ ~ ~ ~- ~- ' ELEVATI 527.02 ~ ' _ S~7A +2122 - - A. 149+gO,47 ELE ATIO 656 ~ ' now 52s. .1A9+5o 09 ION 5258 149+8850 VPI STA 14 5971 ON 525.47' ELEVATIO _ 2652 ~ ' 16994''38 ' - -Vpl S7A. 1 78.76 - ~ - ~ N,525,46-' - ELEVATI N 2616 ~ ~ ~- ~ ~,- ~ VPI STA 150 0023 ~- - ~ -~ ~ ~- ', ', ELEV]1TIQN ~ 6.~6 ', ', ', +,`16.19 - ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~. ~ - - - , 524.49 PI $T ' 1 .40 '~ +41.89 - LEVATION~ 50 -, -, _ - - 524.49 ~ I STA. 15 56. +95.43 E EVATION 25. - - 23' 31 ' 0043 - - - ~/ r ` 2331 ~- -. - / t TA. 150',+91.32 ELE ATION 524.31 ' VP ST . 1 1+21.0 ', ', ', ~ - , - ELEV ION 523.81, - , ~, - ~,. ~, - ~, EV O ~ N O N O O V O O 0) O O (JI t0 O O O O Of O N O C1 W O CT A O O ~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ N N W QT O ~ CO N ~ ~ ~ OD N OT O VPI STA 15 16.53 _ ~ VPI S A ~1¢¢+32 63 -ELEVAT ON 19 34 ' ' ' ELEV TIQN 518 fj3 ~ , , . - ', - ', - - '. ', VPI S A. 155+40 88 _ ' ELEV TIQN 518.62 VPI STA. 159 48:73 ' - - _ - ~ ELEVATI N 19.31 ~, ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ VPI STA.1 5 880 - ~ - ~ ~ ELEVATIO -518.86 VPI 57A 56+12.U4 - - _ _ - ELEVATI N 518:13 ', ', ~, -' ',_ - ~ ~, VPI STA. 158+28,88 Vpl STA +45 28 ~' - ELEVATI N 518:11 LEVATI . 518 79 VPI SSA 22 ` - 156+83 VPI-STA 15 72'.30 - - - . -ELEVATI . N $17:62 ELEVATIO 18.33 - - - ~ VPI STA 58+88,68 - VPI 3TA.~1 94.14 - ' V T 1 ~ ', ', ', - ', -Vpl STA. '157 32.42 -', - + VPI STA. 1 ~ 3.06 _ ', ', ELEVATION 17.02 -', ELEVATIO 51 .73 - -VPI STA. 157 36.49 - - VP4 STA. 7+ .97 ' ELEVATIO 51 .72 - - ~ - - - - ~ VPI ST 157+ 1.28 ' VPI STA. 157 77.50 ELEVATI N 51 11 ELEVATION - 16.40 ~ ~ P . ' ' ' - ~ PI'STAJ157+ .72 , , VI'I S7A. 157 80.$1 ELENA ION 51 .10 ', ~ ', ', ELEVATION 18.40 ', VP STA. + 7.3 1 '. - STA. ,158+19 !)~ - ' EL VATI 518.6 EVATION 515. 1 ' - , ~ V STA. 1 8+30.8 I STA. ,158+24 EL VA7101 516. LEVATION 515. i ' - - , - -, , VPI A. +45.21 - -' EL NATION 516. ~ , Vpl STA 158+66.6 -',-VP STA. 1$8+61,2 ~EL VA ON-518.28 ' EL NATION 515 5 ' - VPI S A. 158+92.54 VPI A 159+0595 ~ ELEV TON 515.90 ' ELE TIbN $15 18 ~, ~ ~, VPI A 159+12.66 ~ VPI S A. 159+19.36 Ti N 515.18 EL TIQN 515.87 VPI S 169+53.01 - VPI57 ~59+4 77 ~, ~, ELEV 10 514. ~ELEVA . . I N 515.26 ~, ~, ~. VP,I S 1$9+$4,63 - VPI STA. 19+56.25 ELEV ION 514.56 ~ E ~ATI N 515. B ' ~ VPI $TA 1 ~ +01.02 ' ELEVATTO 14:36 ' ' - ~, ELEVATI 5136$-: --,. - ~,--. ' ~ 'VPI STA. +20.08 - ~ -' VPI ST . 1 ~+28.43 ~, - .ELEVATI N 513 64 - ~ E6EYA 10 1514.34- ' UPI sTA.1 Sosa ~, -ELE ATION 12.50 ', ELEVAT 513.84., ~, -'- -VPI STA'180 M7.'21 ' - VP4 STA. 1i + -.82- -~~- ~~ -ELEVATION 12.77 ELEVq 10 J 51 .3S - - I S7A 161119. • E EVATION 5 2. EVATION 511 I STA 161+25 8 2 ',VP STA, i67•32.6 ' ~ - E EVATION.511 7 ~ EL VATIO) 514.- - - VII S A 16 88 71- ~ - - ' - - EkfV ~ ~ IQN 511.94- - - ~- ~ - ', '. ~ - _ VPI STA. 161+g0. 1 ~ ~ _ _ ' 'EL ATION 511.00 - -', VPI STA. 162+01. ', VPFST . 18 12.81 - - - ~~- ; - EL ATION 510.88 ', ELENA ION 5 1.48 - -',- ', +tl -~ ~ _VPI STA - ~ '- - 162+74.05 ~, ~' ELEVA,TIO ~ - - 51 .59 - ~ -' - ' - - ', FLEYAT ON 509'87 ' ~ , ~ ~ ' VPI $TA i6z 83.04, -- ' - - ' -. ' ELEVAT N 509 86 - SiA-1 +92.03 ~ - - - . ; , EL~VP~TIO 510.55 ', ' 1 STA. 16 41.18 VPI STA. 163+ .77 ' - ~ - - ~', ', ELEVATION - - - . - 8.71 ~ - ELEVATION - _ .44 - - - ~ ~ VPI STA. 183+ .58 ~ ~ ~ ' ELENA, 10 .4tl ', ', ~ ', -ELEVATION 871 ~ ~ ~ -- .- ~ ~ ~ -- ~ - ~ - - - - ~ - ~ - I STA. 183+88. 5 ~ - E EVATION 508. ~ -' ' O O U1 N O O W O O ~I1 A O O (J1 O ' ' V STA. 151+00. ' _ ~~ ~ - ~~- E NATION 523.3 ~ - - ~ ~ - - - - - - - ~ VPL ST . 15]±21.05 - ' ', ', ELEV ION 5Z3.8~ VPI STA. 151+72.15 ~ £LEYAT ON 522 80 ' QLEyAT ON 522;19 ' . - - - ~ - - I STA. 151+77.81 - : VPI STA 51+74 $6 ',. -ELEVATI 522.88. ~. ' ELEVATI N 522 19 ' - -~,- - ~,- - - VPI $T ': +94.25 ELEVATI N 52-1.$4 - , ', _. VPI STA 52115.44 - ~,- VPI STA, 15 +22.50- - ~~ ', ELEVP,TI N 521.83 SLEVATIO 522.52_',_ ' ' ', Vpl S7A. 15 38 30 ', - - ~ - , - ~ ELEVATI 22 21 -' VPI STA 52+57.96 ', ELEVATI N 521.49 - ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ - - VPI STA.15 +67.78 - - VISTA 152 77 1 ', - ELEVATION 21.48 E3l~770N 11 22 17 - ~~ ~~ - ~~ - ~~ - ~~ - PI STA 1 53 1 .28 ~~ - - VPI STA. 153+ 0:64 ~ LEVATION;S 41 ', - -, ', ELEVATION 5 0.70 ~ - ~~ ~- - - - ~- VPI STA 153+ 31 PI~,STA. 153 99 ELEVATION 5 .69 ~ ELEVATION 2 38 ' ~ ~ -' - 153a I ~STA 18 ~ 53+ VPI STA. 82 , . ELEVATIOM 5 . a6 ELEVATI N 5 88 - PI STA 153+8 .BB~ - STA 15 +91. - EL NATION 20.8 VPI TA' 154 ~54 -~- I $TA 154a2 .34 -ELE AYIONS 045 LEVATION 51 .74 - _ I $TA 154+3 .24 VPI TA 1 38 14 , - - - LEVATION 51 .73 ELE ATION, 20;43 , I STA. 154x77. 1 ~ VPI S .154 .35 ~ - - EVATION 519. 6 ELEV TON 9.97 ', ', ~I S 1~ -55.87 - ~- 1 STA. X54+,81. 9 ELEV TIQN 518 88 EVATION 9,19. 6 . O N ~ O ~' o 2 N g n A 6 02 ~ O ~mao rn o~ 0 SEE SHEET 14 ~ MATGNLINE- t I I ~I 1 I i ~ ~ 1 --I I I I I ~ A ~~ ~~ A ~ I~ -- ~ ~ I , 1 ' v I 1 I 111 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~ -- xq ~ v I i 1 1 A~ 1 I I~~~ /1111111 A 1 ~ I ~ ~II III _ ` ~ A ~ 1 1 l \ 1 I 1 I I X1 ~ \~ ~ ~ \ I 1 1 1 ( ~1 ~~~ / ~ V A~ A ~ 1 I J \ V A I 1 1 ~ i oz~" p~tn m I ~ ~ ~ A A ~ A~ a~i~S I 1 1 ` ~ ~ ~lO ~ 1 W ~4-ZI i I I I ~ 1 ~x ~\ \~ I h i ~~t ° m I I I ~ .r I 1 ' I I ~ ~ ~ m O~ I I I 1 l ~ 'I oz I 1 ~ I ~I 1 1 ~ , ~ \ 1 1 ' ~ 11 ~ 1 \ ~ , ~ 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 i I I 1 1n1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1~~ ~ 1 \ ~ ~ ~1(. ~~ 1~~X ~~~ I ~, 1 °~i, V A 1,1 ~/ l,) 1~ \ 1 ~ 1 ' \ ~ ~\~, II / /( \ ~ ,~; I /L 1 p ~ \ 1 ,, ~ 111 /~ \\ r ~ ~ \ ~ \'~\ .-\ 91 Ili ~ ~ ~ ~. I I I I I III ~ ~ h{ 161 C1 ~ gy p, I I I f1 I~I~MII l' --- l ll~y ~Ovz ~ rlll l ~ x I 1 1 1 1 ~~ h p ~ 1~ V y I 1 I I I ~~ 1 ;p ~ I ~ 1 1 1 \~ ~ ~G ' I 1 , ,. I III ~ ~ 1 I J I I I I// ` \\ \ 1 I 1 ~ _ -' f I ~- - ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ 1 I ~ I I. i V \ 1 ~ ~ I ~I ~ I 1 \ 1 ~ I ~ I I 1 1 i \ ~ 1 '1 11 II I, I r I~~~ ~ 1 ~ 156+p ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I ~ O ~ I 1 1 ~ \ \ ~ 1 1 1 ~ i ~ , i ` I I I 1 1 1 ',, I I 1 I I i . I I i ~... I I I 1 \ ~, I ~ 1 1 1 ~ i I I ~ 1~ I I i i A 1 I I , 1 ~ I ~ 1 1 I 1 I~- } I I, 1 I ~ ~ I I ~ '/li 1157+ ' 1 1 ~~ ~ ` 1 I 1 I IIII ~ 1 \ \ I ~ ~ ~ I I I 1 1 I 1 ~ ~ li 1 I f / 1 I~ 1 ~ 1 I I/ ~ d~ ~~- ~ 1 1 ~1 l 1 I II / I I I 1 1, V, ~iI I 1 I I 1 ~ l~lfl I I I i ~ I~~~l~~ I l I I I l ~ ~ 111' ~ ', I 1 1 1 1 1 I I' ' I I 1 ~ A ~~ 1 I, i \ 1 V 1 \ II \ \ \ ~ I I 1 I I, I I I I 1 ~g+00 ~\ ~\ I ~ i I 1 I I~ 1 ~ I I Ill ~~ 1 1 \ 1, 1 1 \ 1 I I "~ 1 I I I I I I ',/ ~ 1 A 1, I j ~ 1~ I 1~ ~-. i A - i I ~ A ~ A i I ~ A , A ~ I \ \ ~ ~ A ` I ~ V ~ ~~ ~ \ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ I ~ v I 1 I , ~ \ 1159+p v ` ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ A \ 1 ~ ' 1 ~'~ ~ ~, A ~ ~ / ~ ~ A V ~~ ~ \ 1 \ \ ~~ 1 ~~ A ~, ~ \ ~ ~~ CAA! ` . A 1 ~ ~ A IIIIA 1 A \ \ ~ ~ \ ~ 1 ~~' a A V 1 1 1 \ ~~ ~A 1 A\ V~ \ ~ A ~ A ~~ 1 \ v ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 1A 1 ,~6ox v ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 1 . ~ 11 ~ 1 ~ ~~. ~ v ~ I 1 1 ~. ` ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 I r 11 I { ~~ il ~ ~ I I V ~ \ ~ ~~ 1 ~ 1 ~ I I ~ I ~ , ~ A I 1 I I I I , V 1 ~ I I ~ I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 ~, ~ ~ ~ Q \ A ~~ ~ ~ Q ~ \ 1 1 1 1 '' 1 I I 1 1 I l V\ ll~ ~ ~X ~ \ ~ 1 ' ~ 1 1 ~ l ~ \ ~ 11 I I I ~ 1~, ~~1~ ~ ~~ I ~ 1 ~ 1\ I ~ '~~ I , 1~1 1 1 I~ 1 1 I ~ 1 I~ I ~~ 1 1 1 I t ~ 1 I ~ ~' I ~ 1 1 1 I~1 I 11 ~ 1 I I I I I ~ I 1 I ~ III I ~ I ~ 1 \ ~~ A I D~ I ((~/ V I I I '~ I f1'I ~ 1 \ I (__ I I ~ ~ \\ liillll~ll I 1 1 1~ ~ \\ ~ III11 ~z I I I 1 1 I 11,E 4~ 1 1~\ ~` 6~' " 1 1! 1 1 1 +I I I I I l i 1 1 1 1 1 I IIIIII1j~ V I ' ' I I I I 1 1 1 ~~111 I ,i I ~ I i , I I I I I I'~ 1 1 i 1 1 ~, 1 I / /~p 1 I I ',I illl11 l 1 1 1 1 1 11 I~', I I I l ~ ~ ~ 1 '~, , I ~1 ~ ~ 1 1 ' I I 11 11~ I V I I I '~ I I I I I I I I ~~ I 1 1 'i la1 ~~.~ I I'~ I I I 1 ~ ~ 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 /; ~~ ~~ , I v ~ l I ~~ ; ~~ I I 1 1 I ~ ,1631 I 1 11 ~ I I ~~ .. I i l ~ l I i~ __ JIIII pq~. A~0~1 I I II 1 II' io l f l l l l l l l ~I IIV . 1 ~ 1. 1 1 ~ T IIII 1 III °m I I ; ' I i ~ 1 IIII 111j I 1 I ~1 G4 1 I' \ ~ 1 ~_~ \ 11 1 9L 133HS 33S - 3NIlNOly{ry - F $ . A SUBMITTED VNTH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 o CANE CREEK _ KC I ~ - o ~ ° ~TF~`°'1OLOG~ . I ~~ ~ «;> ~, ~ ~ ~ Z STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT 8 ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS T O ~ ~ ~ gg ~ ' IT'I SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD ~ ~ :. 4 t_ srr n¢scir*ax ar[ .wmv~o ~ T7-3: STATION 151+22 TO STATION 163+7g RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 REVi710NS ~ ~ ~ ' CO cD c0 co 0 o U Os~ O ~ OD N pi O v O - O ' - - ` - - ~ - - ~, ~ - ~. -VP I A. -167+20.69 - - - I STA. 187+26 .0 ATION 504.01 ~ . ~ E EVATION 503 . - -' - - ~ f STA 467128 . 1 ~ ~ -VPI TA' 187+31'.51 - ~- -~~ - E EVATI N 03 .0 ELE TION 504.00 - VPI - S .167+89.89 VPI ST A 187+64.17' ~ - ELE _ V ION 502.5f1 LEVA T <1N503.29 r - ~ ~ ~ ~ VRI S .167+72.75 WPI ST A 167179.61 '- - _ ~~ - ', ', ', ;ELE V TION 502b8 - - - -ELEVA T N.50328 ~- - ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ VPI ST A 168+24.46 - ELEVATI 502 39- - - O ELEVA Tt N 501.89 . . ' ~ - ~- _~ -~. - - ~ - - -VPIS 168+28.92.. - VpI ST A 68128.69 ~~ _ ~LE,A ON, SOZ.3 8 ', ELEVA TI N 501.88 . _ - - - VPb ST _. 1 8+47,38 ~ ~ ,ELEV 10 502.01 ' ' -' '- ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ -ELEVATI O 501.30 - -~ ' ~ ~, _ ~ _ _ ',VPI',STA. 1 B+BB.18 VPI S A 1 -~ELE(~4T10 8+75.12 ' 501 99~ ~ - -'ELEVATO OI 50129 / ' VPI'STA. 188 q6 +c V 'VP STA.1 8+9028 -' ~ ~ !D ~ - ' ~ ~ ELEVATION . 50 .97 E AFIO ~V 501 68 - - ', 0 ELP,VATION 5i .9T ELEVATION 167- 0 -, - - YPI STA' 1 , 8 +D8' 30 Z s ELEVATIO . N 01.68 VP6 STA 169+ 88 ~ ~, ~ c - --' - VISTA 169+39 .1 ~ - . ELEVATION 50 .33 ', -', O D ~K , E EVATI N5 .5 z y . E EVATION 500. PISTA. 169+ .43 - - _ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ELENA 0 50 .16 ', ; STA 1 9+72 . - ~. . ~ ~ EL NATION 500. _ 3 ~ ~ - - O ~ ' _ ~ 1T ~ w 0 0 "' U' U' N O~ O ~ CO ~, ' ~ ~ VPI S'TA. 1& 3 41.18 VPI STA 183+ 77 ~ ~, ~ E ATI N 08 1 ELEVATION .42- ', VP ST . 1 3+ 2.58 ' EL A I i - ELEVAP, ON 08.71 - - _ - - - ' PI-STA: 164+0 18 I STA 183+88. 5 - - ~ - - LEVAT ON,507 - 73, ~ E EVATION 508. , ~ - - _ ~ I STA. 164+10. ~ E EVATION 507. I ' V STA. 184117. - ; '- - ~, ~ EL VA71 0N 508 1 ~ - ~- - . - VPI ~I ~ STA. 186138 8 ~- - _ S ' A. 184+47.78 EL VATI 50777 - ELEV TION 507.06 , - ' VP S T . 1 + 2.3 ~ VPI S A. 6 +56.93 ,ELEV ION 507.05 -ELEV TIO 507.75 ' -, - ~, ' J - ~ - VPPST .185+04.96 ~PI'ST .165+01.06 - ; ~EL VA I _ ~ ELENA ION 508.87 VPl STA. 65+06.94 '- - ' VPI S . 185+08.90 - ELEVATI N 505.99 ~ ~ ~.FLEV ION 506.63 ~ ' VPI STA 165 ~ ~ - - ~ELEVATIO 505.20- - ~ - - ' VI?I STA 165 ii 1 ~. - ' - VPI $TA: 1i +61.04'- ELEVATION ] .89 ~ ~ - ~ ~ - . -ELEVATION 0520.- ~ - VPI STA 185+ 5.64 VPfSTA.-188 1 . 9.41 -'.- ~ ' -' . ELEVATION s .58 - , VPI STA 168+ 1 .29. _ - - - ~ ELEVATION 50 .57 ~ ~ ~ - ' ~ - - ~ - ~_ VP4 STA. 166+ ,17- ~. ~ - - EL VAt I N 5 . 26' ' - - ' VP / STA 168+82. ~- ~ ~ - ~ VPI STA 166+ g ,93 ~ EL ATI M 504. ~, ' _ _ ' ELEVATION . 77 - - - - - - ~ , ' ~ ~ VP STA 166+ 3 88 '-V STA 168+97. ~ - ~ . EL A N 5¢6.4 ' O O ' d C C O7 O Of 6r O O 67s v O O STA . 75+59.25 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ', EVAT I N 489.89 - ' - - ' -' ISTA . 75+72,59 ~ - VPI STA '17 81184-'- ~ - - EVAT I Nd89 9 . ELEVATION 9 020; _ - - -- Of o 0 ~ o N O 0 v n V ~ O g + o m O O 1 l OD O O O ' ~ `~ ~ CANE CREEK ~ KC I ~ o a ' ~ ~ STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ~-'~'°'1O1~0G~ r r g ~1 ~ D Z ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS m SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA , , 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD T7-3, T7-4: STATION 163+7g TO STATION 176+51 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 °i°~ v~ / ~~11 A~`~ \~1~A~ ~ C ~ .AA ,\ ~ 1 ~ A~ mm ~ X \ ~ 1 \ ~ ~ ~~ _. \ ~ ~ _ amp ~ \~ / 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~VA ~ ~ AVA m CIA ,.~A ~ L L 133HS 33S - 3NIlHOlVW ~N~~NOy~W A~OO 5~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ v ~ ~ ~, V \ \ ~1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ A ~~ ~ ~ \ 1~~~ ~ V ~ 1 1 VA~~ A`. IIII ~ ~ A '. 1 11 1 I A VAV~~ A\~,, 111 ~~ \ 111 V ~~ 1x1 A 'I 1 1 1 '~. ~~ A A\ ~~ ~~ '~~ I A ~ A .. A l ~. '~ A A A\ -V ~. 1~ 1 1 \~~AAA~ ~_ --A~ 111 \ ~ ~ ,~. ~ \ \ ~ ~~ V A ~ ~ 111A ~ ~ lAV1 \~AA A AA V I' ~'l~A ~ 1 I AA ,~.~~ V A V I A \ A ~~ ~. A Al 11 ~A~` ` A ~ ~ ~ I A yL `-. V~ ~ '1 \ 1 A, ~ ~ A ~~tQ A 111 1111 \~ ~A I ~' ~ ~ V\11~~11 '~1 `\ ~ ~~VV ~ _ ~ 11 V1~ ~A `,A , ~ A, ~1V A ,h 1A1V~ ~ ~A A11 \ ~ A \ 11 ~ ~ ~ U11~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 , V I / I, 11111\l1\VAA1 1V1 I A •. ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ I ~ I ~ \ ~ A ' ~ A V 1 \\~ ~ l l ' i t ~~I> 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~,A1 (A, 1'I I 1 ~. A ~ \ ~ i/l ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ p NI I i ~ 1 ~ 1 \\~, ~ 111 1 / i~ l 1~ I l~ en ~ ~~ A l 111 /; i +~ ~ 1 ~~ k~ ~ I~ v~ 1 I I / ~ Wpp ~ ~ 1 ~ y 1 1 \ ~ ~ 1 I11~~1 I %/ ~~C~ . 1 1 A X1,1 IIII / / / /Z ~ I 1 i 1 I I ~, 111 III11 / i / D / 1 1 ) 11 III I ~ i / i l~/ ;p I ~ 1 1 i,, 11111 I / ~ 1 -< ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 ill~l ~ ~/ ~ I' 1 i 11 11 1~ 11,1 I ~/- ~ 1 1 ~ A I VI ~ 1 1 1 1 ~' 1 I i // !~ I 1 1 1~~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 // I 1 .11111 I III~~I11',11 A I ~ ~ I I" / I I I,' I ~ 1 1 ' A V~ ~ 1~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 1111111 v v v v1~~1~ ~6p+OV 1 l 1,111111 11111'11- \ 1 \\ 11i1;1~11~ i1 I~ ~ \ i 111;1 \ I ~1~11~11 1V~ ~ 1 II 1'jI~ 1 I I I \~ ~ ~ 1 11A ~ 11 ~~ 1 1 1 1 ~ I I 1 1 I 1 1 ;11 ~ 1111, ~ 111 1 iL 1; 1'I f 1 1 .I I, 1 II. 1 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 A i~ 11 ~ 111,1 ;1~~111~ I i i 1 11 1 1 1 1 I ,11 1 q 1 1j11 1~j1111~ I ~ 1 1 1 1 '~ I I~ ~~\ l i. A 111111 1111111 ~ ~ 1 1 1 I i 1 1 ~\ ~\ 1'Ililllli 111 1~ 1 1 1 : 1 1 11 A. \ ~111111~1 I ir1111 i 1 1 1 1' 1 1 ~ 1111`11, V'11111 111! 111;11 1 1 1 i~ 1 1 1' 1j1 l~l /!111111 111'11 I 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 ~ l 1 1i ~_ /~~~ 111~1'~11111~ 11 1 I 1 1 1 (~ /~ 111 ''!11111 1 1 1 1/ 1 1 1 I l A~ ~~ ~~A~ I I ~ IIII, ~ i 1 1/ 1/ (~ I l /~ 1~ \1111~1111111~1111j11 ~ ~ / I ! 1 / / / I 1j1~11111i' ~I1 111 ~ / ,' I / / I 1 '11111111 1 X11 11, ~~ I IIII I 1i11 /; / ~ I 11 II 1 / / - ~ / 1 / I 'Ili ~ Ij11~,11 / ' ! ~ ' /~ ~~ / l1'Il~~/IIII 1, II ~//~ ~ ~ , ,, / ~ ~~ ~I~III;II//1/111 11~1~~1/1 ~~ ~/ ~ ~ / ~ ~ 1 '1111 11 iI~1i11 / / I ~ ~ I I 11 ~ 1 / ~ / ~ // / ~ ~ 1!11 111'~111i 1 ~ I I II / ~~ ~~ l l 1/ l!I X 1 1 ~ 1~1;'lll /; l ~~ ~ ~/ I ;~~ 1 I. / ~ l ~ ~ ~~ / ~ I / l ~ M~ I I I' 1~~1~~1 1 i III / / ; l 1'1 I i„ ail ~ ~ / ~ ,I~I I li IIII ~~ ' // 1 ~; ~ / ,~ / ~ ~/ 'LLl j l i ~ 1, I l l i~ i,r~,~1~ /,I '1// l - I l 1% 1 i'~'ll 1,,11 I~ 11 ///~ I 1 11 1 ~ ~/l I ~ ,ill JI~~~II l~l~l(~~Ilj r ~ 1 I ,~ I I I ~; l ~;% 1 >',~111 1 1 ~ 1 11 ~/ l ~ II // / I I, 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 I I/,'/f / ~~ i1 ~1 / /11~j11~1 111111 1i ~ ~_ ~b i ~ X111 I III 1 'lil' ~~~ 1 / ~ l l ~'i/ _ x:!1111 111~;1~111111 ~ ~ I // / .r ' 1'!1111'11 1~1~ 111 ~ ~~ /~ ~~/~~~~ r ii 111 , 11'111111 ~ /~ r l111~ ~ ~ ~~! 1 111Ir1 1 1 1 11 /~ ~ //I Ili /1 'llij,l III 1;~1 /, ' I / /// 11 1 ~ / ~~ Ii111j~11~'1111 . 1 1 l~l I /I I ~ / I!I 1~1 11 1 1~~y,11111 1 ',11111 ~~ l l II ~l 1 ~ I i~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I, ~ / I I I ~~ 1 I I~1kp~ 1' 1 1' 1 1 1' 1 1 ~_ ~~ ~/ , I I I 11, 1~~1 ' ~ I~ i ~ 1 1! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~~/ A l ~ V 1 1 1 1 1 1'~ 1 I ~ i. ~ 1 \ j I 1 I' 11 j 1'x'1 111,,1 I I ~ ' II ~ ~~ ~ ~IIiI111111111 111 1 ~~ I I ~ ~, A 1 11;111 ~,j11 1 'I II' l11~IIII IIII,,II11 I 1 ' I ` 1' I I I 1 1 i I i/ ~ 1 1111 I I I I I i , ', 1 1 I i l ~% I~I~1~,'11 I II 11'111 1'' 1 X 1 1/ // 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~j 1 1 1 1 1 1~~ I 1 1~ I/ I 11 ~I~ 1 ~Ji I~ 1 1 1 1~ I m 1 1~ '~~ / I ~~ 11 X11 ~1/.. ~ 1 111 1 ~4~d 1 II 11 1 /~ ~ 1' ~ 1 1111j1i~ / 11\1,111'0 \11111\11`. ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 1 1 I I ~ !/ 11 I I,, 1 A\ '. 1 A 1\\ 1 pt1`rA 1 V! 1 1 I II,~I11111 I, V11 111CI1,~1~1!''~ 1 1 1111; ~ 1 I / \~~ 1\p 111 11,11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1~ 1 1~ 1 ~ VA 11 ~ A111 1 1 1 1 11'11 111 1~1~ ~ 11A111 11 11`V11 1 I 1 I I, 1' ! \ ~ 11jj ~,11~\ 111 1~ 1 1 ` v x'75+001.1 ~~ 111' 11 1 1 ` v 1 1, 1 1 ~ I 11 ~ 1 1 ~1 ,~ ~ I ~ 111 1, I', 1, ~ %IIII ~ / 1 '111 1 1 j1'1i1~~~1.\\1 ~~ A ~1~ , / \ ~~.\ / ~ ~ A ~~ ~~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ / A I ~ VA~.A ~V~1~ 1A ~ ~ ~ A SUBMITTED N6TH RESTORATION PLAN ,,.. .:~. .. ~~ . :s ~' ~g1'~~~=°1I srk o[xnvrgx REVISIONS • . ~ ~ . . / , • / . / • / ~ ~ / , / ~ . , , , , / . , / , , , , . . , / , , i ~~ -"~. ,; . i i , ~~ i ~ " or ~ ~ ~ ~z Dp ~ / N / m mp ' i n i m - - _ ~ x - - - _ _ - _ - - ~ ,~ i ~ m m -- - .. - __ _- - - - _ - _, ~ - ~~ ~ .` i ~ m rn ~- ~ ~~ --- , ,~,. , ~. W ~ ~ , ~ , ~> ~_ ~ V _ ~O - _~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~, _ i - ~j '1 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ I ~ _ ~~~ ~ ~ 1 O~/ O i ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ 091N3W3S~13 ~ 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~2i`d4N(1 81 +0 / ~ 1 i I! 1 i 1 ~ ! 1 1 A / ~ ` i i 1 ~ , ) i ~ 1 ,~ ~ 1 ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ I l I I l ~ ~ ~ ~ / I I ~ i l i I ~ \ ~\ ~ ` II ~ \ \~\ ' ' \ ~ \ ~ \ \\, %~1 / i ~ ~ V A 82+~ ~1 \~ A,' I ~ \ I, ~I ~ ~,~I ii~l I~~I I \ i~~ll ~I~~i~ I ~ \ ~i~III~ AV~~rl ~ G1~ r ~ \ \1 'V~ ~V A ~ ~O ~ 1 1 © 1 \ a~k ~ ~ ~ 1 \ \ ~ 1 I V o0 ~ ~ \ \ ~ " II~ ~ ~ \ O; ~ \ \rm _ V ~ ~ \ A A~ AAA Q JAVA A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ C ' . te ~ A t A l. ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ \ V ~~, \ ~ ~ '~I ~ I \ ~ ~ ~, ~ I AI~ ~ ~ ~ , \I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ 1 I \ ~~~ ~ 11 1 r ~ ',l ~~ Illiiif I i 1 ~, ~ ~ lillll ~I ~ I. 1 ~ t ' ~ 1 ~ i i ~!iiii ~ t85+QO` yr ii 1 ~ ~ I~ Ili,~~i~,,l, it 1 1 I , ~1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~1 1',~ 'l ii ~i ~ 1 ,1 ~ far i ~ I i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1. z 1 q F I ' p ~ I 1~ 1 1 zno ~~ 1 I I I ~ ~11,~ ~1 11 ~~ ~~ om~ ~ I 1 ~ ~ / ~ 6~~~~ ,A1 ~ ~ I A ~8 ~\ 1 mmm i ~~ ~ A ~AV~ \~\\~\I / l ~ 1 \1 ' '6 N I / 1 ~ i p ..{x ~ i / ~ ~1\ 1~~~ ~ / / ~\ ~ I i / ~ ~ i ~ I~ / 1~1 I ~ ~ ~ % ~ ~ I ;.. I 'I I ii 11 I 1 I ' ~ ~/ ~ ~ I ~~~I~ I I~~, II ~ 1 / / / 1 ~ I~' II ~ ~ ~ ~1 / li ' I ~ i 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ I i ' ~ ~ ~~ !I l /~ /~,~' / %; i ~ . ~ ~ ~/ _ " r i J ~I ~~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ , . 1 , ~ ~ -- ~/ %i, ~i~k~ J~. J i,~ ~ ~, ~ i ~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ i 1 ~ ~ / I ~ ~ ~I~ 'k9TCy~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~R, ~ ! f ~ SFFS~~~~~8 V ~. 1 ~ A O N '~ mmy py4+ m //~~ V • O NADN'B3 yZm z~z G1 O ~ ~y m ° ~ = A C1 '~o (~ A °~Z v D ~ m OD O A SUBMITTED MATH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 ~ ~ CANE CREEK K C I ~ p ~ _ O ,- ,, ti o ~ s STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT RS ~S ~E z ~ NTISTS ENGINEERS • PLANNE C ` ~ z F ,~ ~ :f~ ~ ~ m SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA a6olslx FORKS RoAO '~° r ~ 5.~ ~x~*»»~ a*F ~~o ~ T7-4, T7-5, T7-6: STATION 176+51 TO STATION 189+38 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 REVISIONS N ~O ~ 00 rn O ~ W O O /, I ` 1+54.51 -'._ -~_ ~ ~--~..~-. ~.-'.~__ ~.-~ _ -_~ ~. ELEYATI 474.8's - - ~ . - -~ ~ . ~ - -:. ~ - ~ - -:- - A. 1 ~ t+91 .. -VPl $ ]8 +88.89 ~ ' ~ ~ ~ELEVA TIO 478.27 ELENA ON 474.07 ~ ~ --~~ ~ ~ '~ -------- ~ ~ ~ -- --~ '~ ~ VPIS ~ - TA..181 93.11- ',- -- ~ VPIS7A ',18t 94.59 N 74.06 o O ' - ', -, - -, - - -, _ ',- ', ', ', _ I STA. 182+3 .98' VPI:ST.A. 1A2+ .10 LEVATION 47 2 38 ~ ELEV ION 47 .43 - - -, - - _ L STA. 182±37 . 3 -' - VPI:6 A. 182+ .87 E EVATION 472. 5 ELEV TION 47 .93 - - ', ', : ', I - TA'182+6 .03 _ VPI T 1 +5 87 _ ~ ~ ~ E AT 471,69 ELE /ATION 472.50 : ~ _ VPI TA. 18~+72.11 VI'I TA'. 18 78.19 ' -' -' -' -'- ELE ATION'471.`69 ~ - LE /A Ot/ 472,48 : -. . : - -~ ~~ ~~ -~~- VPIS A.182+98 79 -' ~+90. 1 w , . LEV TION 472.13 + VPI S A. 183+07 78 0 O : ' -, ~ ~ ~ - - -, I ~ ELE A. '183+93.49 TION 471.32 - ELEV . TION 472.1T , -, _ -, _ - _ - _ - D m z ~ I 3 -AG m ~ ~ ' ~ ~ _' _' VPI'STA.1 +79.24' ' ' VPI STA. 183+88:05 ' ELEVATIO 470.58' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ELEVATI N 489.78 ~ - ~ - - , , , , , + ~ ~ - -~ ~- ~ - -~ - ~- ~ - ~- -~ VPI STA. 184+9.25 YPI STA, 184 11.30 - - , O : ~ ', ELEVATI ON 469.78 ~ LEVATIQN 4 9.99 ' f ~, o 0 - VPIST .185+40.20 ELENA ON 461.62: _ - '~ : _', ', ' - _', - ELEV TION 4',66 82 _ :~ ~ ~ '~ '~ ~ - - - ~ ~- - ~ ~ - ~ -'~- VPI S A. 1 85+75.11 ~ - ~ ~ . -, : - - ',_ -'.-E, LEV QN A'68.62 TI - - VPI ST .185+85.1 ' ~ - ~ - W _ E A ION 46 ~.54 01 O / _ OD v O ,. o ~ ' : ' : ~ ~ . ~- - - _ VPI'ST .187+41.00 -' - - . - - ~ELEVA ION 463.BZ ' VPI ST . 187+g2.2T ' ELENA ION 462..-87 - - :VPIST 787+73.39 I - - .. -. '- - - -ELENA ION 462.87' - - - - ~- - ~- - - - . ~ VPIST .187+88.87 ~ - - - - - - - ~ELEVA ION 483 81 ~ . O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ O : ` ~' OD ' _ t0 O O -- ' J ', O ~, O O m _n ~ ~ o $ z ~ t z ~, ~ ~ OD 00 O O ~ O> t O O /'r : '~ : '~ : ', l', : : ', ', y _' ' - ~ ~- ~'VP15T .178+42.52 ~~ - - -VPIST .178+48.37 - -~ELEVA ION 482.87. : ELENA IOM 482.07 ~ ~ ~ ' - -~ VPI-ST .-fl8+54.24 - - ~VPPST -178+58.94 - ~ - ~ - ', ELENA ION 482.07 EL VA 10- 482.87, - -', - - - VPI-STAr17 +93.75: -VPI S7A.'-17 86:76 '- ', ELEVATION '72 ELEVATION 81.62 V v O O V O O v t0 O WPI STA: 17 08.75 - LEVATION 80.72 - ' - - ', -: - - ', - - -~',-/,- VPI-STA: 17 +29.56 ~'- - -..' ~,': LEVA710N 81,64. - , 0 0 0 ~_ O A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 ~ CANE CREEK K C I ~ ,~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ° _ ~~_ '~`°1O1~0G~ ~ s a O r g STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS ~ _: ~°^°" ~ v Z Y ORTH CAROLINA j7 # I j , N SEMORA, PERSON COUNT 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD ~ !'' ~`` ~ ~ € sna o[unotox wrE .sonovcn g T7~, T7-5, T7-6: STATION 176+51 TO STATION 189+38 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 REVISIONS ••••••••••••••••••i••••••••••••••••••••••••_ SEE SHEETS 20 AND 21 FOR TRIBUTARY 10 ~ ~ ~ ~ i < , ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~I i i ,~ i ~ I I ~ I ~ l ~ N ~ ~ (J1 (II (II ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I i I I I I I ~ ~~ !~ X 1 1 ~~ I it I ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ I ~ i w ~ I I~ IIIIII ! J I ~ II~I ~ I I I ~ II II~ I III~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~~~I ~ I ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ i ~II I~i, I I ~~ ~ , I I ~ I ~tl~~,~~,~I ~I~ i1 I I i ~~ I~ ~ ~ v I l~llll~~;~i~llll ~ II~,I III ! I ~ I 'I I~ I Ilillll~~l~l l 1 I I I I I ~ I ~~ ~ III1~ ~IIi Ii ~3r~ ~ ~ I~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ' ~~~ v , , v,,,; ,,, ,, ~ , I , ,oo~~~~,;! I I ~ ~ ~ ~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~' 1 I~ I I I II~,~~'I~11~11'll it ~~ I I ~ I III II\11 l I~I ~I ~ ~ ' _ m- ~ I I ~~ I 11 I I tl II~~~~I~~I I~III ~~~~` ~~1~~ ~ IUI~~~~~fl~lll~ll~~l~ IIII~~~~ IIII~ ~/~~I ~~II~~III~I~~~I~1'~V~ ~~~ t0 , Z~ ~ ~ Ii~l ~~I ~/ \~I ~i% I ~ ~ I I l~l 111\ ..~ \ 111\\ ~ ~ ~~ A ~ ~ ~~~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II~i VIl ~ ~~ \ ~~ II ~/ ,~~If~ ~ ~ ~ ._ ~~, ~ ~ i ~ - i I~~I~I ~~~I~~~Ii ~' II II~~A 1 ti ~ ~ I l~l \~,V\~ ~ .A~~A\\~VA I ~ 11 ~ B~a~ ~b~v I' ~ ` v v , ~ ~ 1 , ,I ~ ~ ~v~v~~v ~~I ~~ ~ I ~ ~ I~ I ~ ~ ~ ~I ~II~I~ ~ I\ v ~ ,Avg \~I; II III'll~l II ~ 1 v 1' ' 1 'l V ~ Vv lil, , . ~~I , l 1, It ~ ~1 ~ l 1~ 1 I N ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~~I ~ 1 1 I\~ ~' 1, ~ ~ IIIIII 1 I 1 1 il~llllll~ll'I ~I~ I~II~ ~ ~ ~ v 1 111 II ~, O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . , I 'i~ ~'l~' ~ / ~~~ I~ 1 v ~1'~~~'llll~llll!~~~III~I ~ , li lul l 1 I ~ ~ N ~- _ ~ ~ \I ~ ~ , II 11 l 11~~11, 1 I ~.'~1 1 I ~~~~ ~i ~~ r I ~~ 111 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~l ~ m ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ,v 11 ~~ ~ ,i1 ~ i ll i l ~ I~ i ~ ' 1 ' _~ - ~ ~ ~ , l ~ ~ ~ d , ~1 i~33~00 llilill ~1~ ~, ~~, i v~ ~ ~~'''~ ~I 1 1'I i11 ~ 1 ~ ~ o ~ l 11 I ~~ i~ „ I, i ~ i ~ 1 ~ i I~ \ ,~~ ~l I I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l I ~I II ~ I~.All ~~ I l ~\ , ~i ~ '~ }' 1 l ll ,~ '1 1111 /~ I~ V`,v, ~' 1'~\1 \ ~ tp ~ ~~ ~~ ~ / ~ 1 I~ I 11 ~VI ~,V 1 I '111,111111,.~~ ~~J I i~ Il ~ 1 I I i ~~, ''~1j + ~ ~ 1 ~ I p ~ ~ - ~ ~~ ~ II I lil / I~ ~ ,%I ~ i ~ ~ ill ~~ i I ~- ~I I~i~il~~l ~ ~ l ~ ~+ 4 _ _',WI STA. 193+19.7 L ATI,ON 452,37 ', ', ~ ~ - - ~ - ~ ~ ii iiii ~ i 234+p ' / ~ ~ ~ 1 I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EL ATION 451.37 ~ ~ ~ _ i ~, ~ ~' i - 1 __ _ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~~VPI STA. 193+57 0 } ~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ J I ~ ~ ~ __ ~ ~ EL ATION 451 37 ` - - - - ' ti .-- _ ~y ~ ~ ~ ID + ~WI'-ST .193+93A8 ~ ~ ~ELEVA ION 461.71, ~ ~ ~ C "- ~ ~ 2 -. A A ! ~ _ I T . -1 A l d ~ p O , ~ . ~ i V i ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' L n, ., ~ ~ ~. 1 1 ~ ~~ ~ m~ ~ ,11 2~5 i ~ 1 O ~Op I O" ' i 1 ~ , I t ~ ~ ~ 1 \ ~ -~1 y i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ,. i ~ ~ I '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --~ - -' ,, ~ ~ ~'v ~ . ~vv ~ 1 ~ ~ , ~~ ~~ ~ 19 ~ ~~ ~ o ~ v ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v v, ,~ v v~ ~~ l STA. 195 04 YPLS7A. 195 1.82 ~, ~ ~ ~~ ~ ON 8.78 ~ ~~ ~ V~~~ ~~ _'_ ~ ~ V II. ~ A . ~_~ LEVATION 44 .?8 _ , 1 ~, - - ~ Ayv l P ~ - - - \ ~~ ~ ~ ~A ~ v ~ \ ' \ I \ , I~,~ + PSTA 195 04 O ELEVA ON 44 28 - O ~ ~ ~ VP6 STA 1961 27_ _ ~ ~ ELEVATIO . A ~ AA ~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ ~ \ ~1 ~~ i I 19rZ x,00 A ~ ' 1 N 5T ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ ,~~~ ~ i 1'1 II~~~~~ V ~~ A ~ _ ~ _ - - _~ . ~ V1~1 ~ ~~ ~ ~-0~~ v ~ ~ ~ x \ - _ ~ ~ . , - -, - ~ I l,l ~~ ~i ~ ~~~~ V `. ~~111 II ~ A A I A A ~ ~'. + ~ ~ ~ ~ 11111 ~11~1~1 II ~\ i A.. V ~ ~ ~~ \ ~ I ~ I I 1 1 A _ ~ _ _~ ~_ _ . I ~ __ . \ O -- _ ~ ~ ~ zm V ~~~~ ~ `~ 1 ` ~~ -- ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~. I I ~ I ~ I ~ 1 i ~ I l ~~ ~ ~ ~ y~ I I I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ti~~ 1 ~ ~~ ~\~ I ~ ~ ~~ ~ 111 ' ~ r / AA \\ ~ v v~I ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 49a+90 v ~ ~ , v ~ ~ ~ ~~~1 i ~~. `` ~,~~ ~ 1 I _ - , ~ 1 1 ~ ~~ , ~ ~ lily s '~~ ~ ~ ' _ , , ~ v , , 1 ,, -. ~~, \ p0 v~ ~ ~ ~ , ' ('P ~ ` v r. V 1~ v ~' ~ ~ ~ ~-~ . i ~ , , ~ v ~ ~ \ `` , ~~ ~ 1 1 1 \ ~~ ~ - I O ` 11 ~ ~~ 1~~ 1 / 111\ ~ / ~ 1 i ~ N ~ ~ V'1~~~' AA~A ~ ~ ~ I.. A 1 y ~I~ ~~ ~ , n ~ i . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ -. ~ 2 \' ~ ~_~ ~ A ~ \ ~` ~~ A A rl~i/~ i ~~ ~ ~ ~~ \~ \ ~~A`--~., ~ A~ ~ A A~ \ ~I I ~ i A ~ ;~i Vf ~ V V V` V AAA ~ V A ~V AI / \ ~ A ' r^ o~ V1A ` ~~~A ~i ~, O m0 z'^ A 1A~',. ~ ~~AA ~ \ ~A1A V~AA 0 ' m0 ~ ` ~~ Z m `~ ` ` A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PL4N DEC 2007 ~ ~ o m CANE CREEK - K C I - ~ ~ m o D ~ ~ N STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ---'-'~'°"O1~OG~ `: g ?1 Q Z ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS ~ 3 m SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ' ' " a 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD SY4 DESCDPTgM O1 °' RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 WTF •YVMDYFD T7-6, T7-7: STATION 189+38 TO STATION 196+g3 _ REVISIONS _•••••••••••~•i••••••••••s•••••~•••••••••••• NN N W W W ~ ~ O N Q~ O ~ OD N ~ 0 + O ~~ ~ ~ -' ' - TA, VPI $ - - 200+00.00 z O - ~ - - - - - - - - - - I STA. 200+27. I I ,ELEVATIO 9 540:88 , ~ ~ ELEV ATI _ N 542.04 z -:,-_~._ -- -' -_~,_ `E -' - EVATIONS40. ~ ~ ~ 8------- VPI STA20 --- --- 31'.19' ---VPI$ TA. ~ 200+22.34 m - - - -- - - -- - --- ~ - ELEVATION 0.38- ~ ~ - ~- ELEVATI N 541.88 m ~ ~ VPI TA. 200+33.19 ~ 200+28 I S7A - . - _, - _ ,. - , - _.- _ EL A JO 54 .38 _ VPI TA'200 - _ _ _ '02 ' E . . EV TI N 541. ? 8 - ELEVATION 39.98 ' _ ~ -'- _'_ _ _ : _' VPIS 200±71.06_ ..~_ _'_ _ - .. _ _'_ _'_ VP S7A. 200+34: - , - _, - ELEV - - - --- - - ION 539.98 - -- - --- ~ , I$TA;201+D . E_L 27--', NATION 54 ~ ~ - ~ - - 200+62 ' I STA - ...~ - - ~_ - - ~.. -VPl STA 201+0527 ~. - LEVATION,S 71-', _'. - - _, - _ . - .. E . . . EVATION 540.4 N ~LEVAT ON 538.71 . I • - fA. 200+74.26 O - - ~ ELE TION 540.21 ~ VP STA. 201+78. ~ VP STA. 201+00.41 + ', ', VPI SYA. 01+,18.64 ',EL NATION 538.02 ypl ST 201+06,41 ~~ EL ATION 539.71 OO - ~ -' - - " ~ECEVATI N 538.02 VPI ~ - - ~- - ~ - 201+28.74 A ~ ELENA ON,539,21 VPI TA 201+13.78 - ~ - -~' - - ~'- - -VPI STA.' 20 +31'.59' ELE . TIQN 537.93 VPI~,STA. 2 ~ 10 ' _ 1+19.78 LE 83 5 - ' - - ATION 539.02 - -~ ~ - ~- - -ELEVATION 37'93 ~ - - - - VPI ST - - - - - - ~ 201+52.76 ELEVA7 - - 8. 2 , .VPI ST .201+24.71 _ VPI STA 201 _ 58.76 ELENA ON', 537; 50 VPI STA. 201 _ 36.55 ~,ELEVA ION 538.43 ELEVATION 7.50 ~ ELEVATION .22 WPI STA 201+49.70 --'- -~----'~~ --'-VPI STA. 01+8t28~ `- ----- -- ----ELE AT ON 538.01 ELEVATI N 538.56 ~_ VPl SYA. 201+ .8;4 - _ - - - - LSTA: 201+ .28 - ~ - ELEVATION 5 7.90 Vpl SYA 01+78 43 _ _, _ _ _ ELEVATION 5 .56' - - - - - VPI STA 20 - - - - +04 03 ~ ISTA.-201+84- . 3 ELEVATI . N 537.57 N O ~ ~ ~ ~ , ELEVATI , ~ 535',7Z EVATION 537. 7 ' 1J ' VPIS .2f12+Q6.03 STA. 202 VPI .18 + ~ ~ ELEV ~ ON 535.72 _ I STA. 202+12. 3 ~ _ VP S A'102f07_ .,18 ELEVATION 5 .73 O O ' -VPI STA. 02+10.03 ' EVATION 535. 2 TfON 5 .23 I $TA. 202+13. 8 ' -ELEVATI N 53522 bpl TA 202+26`.49 I STA 202+21:54' ~ EVATION 535.- 3 - " VP ST 2 + 4.4 - EL ATION53449 - LEVA N- 5,50 TA.',202+2T,54- . ~ ELEVATIO 53449- VII S A. 202+45.24- - ~ I-STA.- 2+42.54 - ~LE ATION 535,00- VPI STA 2 49 24 EL ATIO 534. ELEVATION 3411 VPI STA 202+63.99 ~ ~~ ~~ VPI S A 202x51.02 VPI STA 202 799 ELENA ON'533 85 VPI STA. 2 2+6`1 3A ELE TION 534.82 E EV, TI N 5 3.85 - VPI STA. 202+g4 82 ~ - ELEVATIO 534 38- - 'VPI ST - 202+89.68 PI',STA 202+ .B2' ELEVATI N 533 5T - - - - S ; - - ~ ELEV ON 534.33 N O LEVATION-53 ~ ~ .5T VPISTA.- ~ 3+00.69 - ~ 20 VPI TA -ELEVATION +81 10 - - ~ - - 34: 08' ~ - - ~- - ~ - - ' (il 13TA.'203+04 69 ~ ELEVATI 533.29 , WPI STA 202+90,84 + EVATION 533. , 9 ~ ~ STA..20 ' _ +26.23 ~ VPI STA 202 7.1'1 ELEVAT - ~ - ON 833.89 - - ~ - - - - - O _ _ _ _ I STA. 203#33. _ 5 P,LE VATION 2 17 ELEVATION 5 - 3.8 - b f A ~ f - - - E EVAYION 532 1 - _ _ _ - ~ ~- - ~ P . 2 ~ ,ST .04: O t . ~- - VPI STA.-203 9.44 - I,STA. 2d3+2 .29ELEYATIO 533.59', - ', - - VPI TA 203+51.41 ELEVATION 5 1.68 - EVATION 53 98 - -' - ' - - EL ATION 531 88 VPI'STA 2 3+ VPI STA. $03 34.81 '. ELEVATION 53 . ELEVATION 268 ' VPI S .203+71.04 _ _ 203+47. I STA - - . _ '- _ - - - r ~ - - ELEV ION 530.90 VP STA. 203+~5. ~ E . NATION 532.4 - _ - _ - - - - ~ /PI ST 20$+77.04 ~, E NATION 530. - - - ~ - " - '- 1 STA. 203+52. ' ` ' ?LEVA ON530.40 '- . - - - - ~ - - '- - - - .. - - ~_ - ' E TION 5321 - - ' ., - - IJ _VPI STA. 2 3+8 ~~ V91 $ A 203±86.20 - - - _ _ O ~ TIO ELENA', 529 .65 ', ECEV TIQN 5,31.9,1 ' O ;ELEVATIO ~ 629.68' - - ---~- ELEV TION 531..-41- - - - - O VPI STA 20 97: ~ ~ VPI STA 03+7820 - - ~- - - - - ~- - ELEVATION 29.15 ~ ~ ~ ,ELEVATI N 530.91 ~ - - - - _ - VPf STA 203 99.514 ~ - - _ 20 VPI STA +88 20 ELEVATION 9.~5 _._ - _~ ~ ~ . ELEVATI . N$30.66_ ` - - __ _, _ - - ' ' - - '- - - - -' - '- - ELEYATION 30.18 -'- - '- - - -' - - '- - ` - - _' - - _ - , - 'VPI ' ~ ~ -~ ~ -____ _- EVAT10 112988~ _ ~ _ .. _ --_. . VPP STA 204+ 8.49- . - - - - .' -'_ _ ' N _ '' ~, ION '28 EL A 57, . O - - - - _ -'_ _ - -_ - - - - O O I ~ N N W W W Oo N rn O ~ Oo + m -~ z ~ O m ~ c n - - - - ' - - - - - - -VPI STA. 21 ~_ SZ:26- - ' + PI SiA 210 m 19 ~ ~ 7 ' VPI ;26 TA.' ~57 ~, . ~ ~ 210;+80 STA ' 98 EL - - - 53277 ATION - - - - - - ' ~ - - - _ - ' I . , LEVATION 533 - - ~ - . STA 310+ 88 . 0 ' LEVATION 531. 9 + I STA. 21 22 N _ ~~ WIST .210+90.88 - - - - - LEVATION 537 - -ELENA ION 531-79' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ VPI STA 210+92 ~ VPI ~ TA 210+94,15 ~ ~ ELEVATION 532 + ' ' ELE ATION 531:29 I A. 210+97.37 O - ~ VPPSTA- 0+9615 - ~ - - ~ '- -' - - ~- EL TNJN531.79 - O ELEVATIO ¢~1 29 V ISTA. 211+19.BE VPPST .211+22.53 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E EVATION 531.45 - ~ ' - ;ELENA ON 53840'.- - - -VPI STA 211+25'.80 - - - 1 S A. 11 24.3 ELENA N 630:90 ELEVATION .40 -~- - ~ - _ ~ - -~- - - - - - -VPP TA 211+47.20 ' 'VPI STA. 2 1+49.39 ATION 530.47 I STA. 211+51. 9 ~ ELEVATIO 529.47 VPI TA, 1 +5 .39 , EVATION- 9. T - - - - - ~_ - 1 TA' 21 - - - _ ~_ + ,g4' ELEVAT 29,9?'_ - - - VPI S A. 211+57.78 - t - -~~ - - ~~- - - ELEVATfON , 28.9T ~- - ~ - - -~ - - ~- - ~ - - -~ - - ~- ELEV TIQN 529.47 _ ' _ - _ - YPI_STA:.21 +58.64'. - _ PI'STA. 211+7 ,10' - - - _ - - ~ N r ~, ~. ~ -.- -- ELEVATION -'- _ -- 28.97 ~ LEVATION 52 ~ .12 N + ' '- '- + '- - - I srA z1z+1 LEVATI ON 28 n d_' - - - - ~ O O V , - I S7A-212+28. ~ A I 2 2 ~, - T- - - ~ - .24' - - ~ - - , -I $TA; 212+2 , 12 ~ - E ATION 528 . LEVATION;528 54-, _ - - - , - - _ _ -- ELEVATION 52 .24' - -'~ - - - 212+5 ISTA. 68~ ~--~~-~-- STA Z12a 66 E ~ I STA X12+82 ~ ' VP 8 STA. 212+59 6 ~ ~' - , - - - , ' EL . 7 ATION 526. / EL ( NATION 52 74 _ ~ ; ' VPI UC 21'2+84-.26 _ VPI TA.'212'+65:25 - - - EL AT10N'S2S,74 ~ - - '-.ELE ATIQN 527.24 PI STA, 212+7 11 _ ---~WI 213+05.3 S ,, ,, , _ ,,,,,,, ,', 52 LEVATI,ON, ~ ~ AT,ION 52¢.53 , , ,, , + p E_VAT_ IQN 525. ', _ ~ _ELEVATI N 528.53 - 0 ~ VPI STA 13+11.30 ~ VPI TA. 213+08.66 -E EVATI N 25.3 ~_ - - - - - _,- - EL ATON~526:03- VPI A. 213+13.30 ~ VPI STA 213+ 14 29 ~_ ~ _ _ ~ _ ~ _ _ EL TIQN 625.!)3 _ _ ~ / ELEVATION 5 5 54 ', ', ~~ ~~ ~, VPI SFA 213 - 4665-~- - - - - - - - -~ - - VPI S A. 213+43.18- - ELEVATIQN 23.$3 ~ ELEV TIQN 524.83 VPI STA. 13+48.85 ' E - + EVATlON 924 ~, 3 -' - - - - - - ~. - - - - - - - - ELEVATI N 523.83 - ~- - STA213±52 - - - VP . I STA. 21 3+~ , . , , _ EL . NATION 523. - EL - - -~~ ~ ' 52`3.83 ATION ', ~, ~, PI STA. 3+64.50 - ~. _.~ - ~~ .~ - ~~ ~ - ~~ LEV A TI 52333_ - - . _ _ - -, - -, -, - 4 J , , A O O i6 29 D i A b /i J / ~ ~ ~ _ ~~A~`~'., ~AV I ~ ~~ ~~ ~ V A ~ ~ V ~ I ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~~~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~I `~~ ~ t II ~I ~ ~ i i 1 A A I ~I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I ~I ~I I I I I II I I ~ I I I I I / 1 / / ~~j~ / I / Cj I l l r ~~~ / l/ ~ 1 ~~ / / ~ / i /~ ,' / ~ /~ ~ / / - I / / /~ / ~ i i ~ ~ / ~ i /~ U~+jLI~7ii i~~ ~ ~ ~~ i~/~ ~ ~. i i - -~ --- iil ~ 'i '-~ ~ ~ ~ - - ii_- ____ -_- _- - ~_- _ ~ Y i - - -- - - - ~ _ _ - - i - - . i - wvZ ~ i m D car __ --- --~ rn _ mmm . -' zv . - O N O ~o D O 'O n V1 m C ~' O A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN Utt; 2W ~ ~I -~ KC I '^ ~ ~ o CANE CREEK ~ ,,~- , ~D v ~ N STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT '~`°101~~ r r O p D NORTH CAROLINA 8 SENORA PERSON COUNTY ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS r ~ ~ Q ~ , , °~`1 ~~€ ~~~ otsciwTUx w*c ~oonono + m T8A, T8, T9: STA 270+00 TO 271+10, 460151X FORKS ROAD RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 srw REVISIONS ~ STA 200+00 TO 204+49, AND STA 210+00 TO 213+69 r z I I I/ ~ I I I ~'"~~ lI i l l I I ~, i l/ I~ \ ~~~ +0~ L kl 1 1 1 1 ~~ mmm // I/ l l i i l l f ~ y~ t~l I I I A ~~ 1 ~ I I I I I I I I i I ~ ~ I ,I I I i I I I I I II I I I , I ~~%~ I I I I ~ ~ I I ~ ~ I I ~ I I / I I /, /I II I I I` ~ li II I I\ i ~ I I L I I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~` 9 I A \ ~ ~ \ I \ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~\ ~ \ ~, ~ ,.. V ~ V ~ \ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~_ \\ ~ ~ \ ,\ ~ \ ~ ~ \ ~~~ ~~ \\ ~,I ~ ~, - ~~ ••+t••ii•!•i•i•i••i••••!•ii••!i!•i•••i••••ii . ~ ~ ~ .~ . ~ N o N ~ O ~ 00 Q~ O o Z ~ O ~ ~ I ~ a ~ m < N / / + O O I ~~ ~~ I I '~ ~ ~ ~ ._ ~ ~` ~ ~ I I ~ I I ~, 220 r ~ ~ I 1 +0 0 i l 1 1 I I' 0 N I' 1 j 1 1 I i ~, I I ~ I i I I ~, i l'I N ~I o J ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II I ~I~I ~i ~ ~'~l o ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ' I I I I i I i I I~/ I ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ 1 ~ III/" ~~ \ ~ l7 IIII 1 11 ~ 1 1 % '~ l~ I I I 1 I ~ / ~ 1 n I % ~ ~ ~~ 1 I ~ D I 1 ~ 1 0 1 r ._ ._ ._. 1 ~ III x ' 1 ~ I N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 1 1 ~ I III l i d I I' I ~~ I I I I ~~ p I N + ~ ~ ~ ~ I II 1 II I 1A~~ ~\, I I ~'^ I ' I I ~ ~ ~ I I I I \ I 1 ~ ~ ' O ,_ ~_ ~_ ~ ~ ~ I I i I I ~ I I ~ I l l ~~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~ // ~' I '' ~ ~ , 1 i I I ~ / ~ ~ I 1 1 '; 1 I I I I I 222 00 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ IIII ~ ~ 1 1 I 1 ~ I ~ l u, ' ~ ~ ~ / ~ , ' 1 ~ l ~ I l _ '~ I ~' ,/ 1, 1 ~ ~~11~~~ i/ ~` v ~ 1 ~ 'I / IIi II ~ ` ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I / 1 ,I II o : I I I 1 II ~' I ~ 1 I I \1,~~3' 00 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~J'~~,11;1/ I I ~ ~~ 1 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ r 1 ~ I I 1I'I II"'/ r ~il,/ ' '~ I I ~' ~ 1 ~ il ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ , , ~ ~ I~hl 1vI, ~ ~ ' 1 ' l ~ ' l I' I ~ 7 I ~ , ~ i ~ ~, ! ~I / 1 I I l .~ ~ ~ ~ III Il l~ X1; / J 1 1 . 1 S -- -~ - -- `~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ll~ I ~ II III / ~ ~ I 1 , ~;/ ~ ,11 I 1 ~\ 1 I ~1 ~ ' ~ 1 --~,- --,- ~ ~ -- ~ ~ -,-- ~ ~ ---~ ~ II i ~ 1 i; I / , ~~I III 1 ,~'/~~ ~ ~/, i ~ i ~~l / ~ / - ~a~~'~ ~ / , l 4i I /;'~ / ~~ ; ~ ~ / '.l ,11111 1 111' ~ ~ ~ ~ / / 1 ~ / ~,~/ ~ l/ dill ' 1 l ~ , i ;' / / ill/ l ~' i 1~l/ IIII / / %~ ~/1 ill / I I I I ~'~ ~ ~ i ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , I / 11 i ~ / / i/, i / .ill, / i // ~1~ ~ ~; I I ~ I / ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ % / / ~ II i/ / i; i ~ ,.I rlil~ /l ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~' / ~'/. I I I 1,'~ Ir i, i ~~;/ /~~ I 1~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~; l l /' I ~~ ~ ~/ ~ 1 1 1 i I I I ~ I I / / ~ ~°4 1 ~ ~ ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ / I ' ~ / ~ / ~ i l / l I; / ~ I I' i~l I 1 I I I ' I ; I ! ~ / ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ / l i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ - : ~ - ~ - - ~~ ~ i l ~ ; 1 1; ~ 1 / I ~ l; ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~,' ~ ~' 1; 1 ! ~, ,' ~ I ! 1 1 11 1 '° 1 b' ~ ' 1; ' ~ ; I ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 11 , ,, I I ~ 12~~+q I ~ 1 + ~ ~ ~ ~ 11 i1 , i I ~ I;1,!I , p ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ,1 1 IIIIIIIIIII~ ~ ~~~ 'I 1~\ VA~11AAIII~III'I~ 1 I' ~/ ~ 1 \11' ' 1 11 1 1 , , 1 1 11 l 111 ~ I ,I I~ 1 11 11 1 I ~ II ~ ~ h ~ I ' ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ r 1 , 1~ t II I,I I~ I I ~ ~ i III~,,II 'III ~~ IIII I I 1 ~ ~ \ 1111' II I I, 1, i li! 1 lli11~1 11 mil ~ 1 )I \ I,.'i I ' 1 l 1 1 1 1 I i ~ I~ I i i i 1~ I I I ~ 1 11, 1 i X l ~ , 11 1A ~I,II~i ll ~ I ~ 11 I i~ i11,~11 I~111'i ~ ) ,~ Y ~ ~1~, i 1 Illi,!II ~ I \~~ ,`\ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 V~ d 1~ /~ t I / 1 1 I, 1 1 ' ~v ' 2~ + O ~ v„ v ~ i, 1 ` A, ~ 1` ~\\ 1 111 1 I 7~0p 1 1 1~ 1 ~ 1 I O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ A ~ \\ V (il, \ ~ \ 1 11 i ~ ~~ 1 1 1 '~. I 1 1, 1 1 - ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V \ A. ~~1A11 V~ Illi 1 1 1 ', 1 1 11' 1 1 1 1 1 \ ~1 III 1 1 ~ \ 1 ~ 1 I ~ \ ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r ~ r I I ~ , li~~'1 I 1 11 I 11 I \ \ 1 , IIII ~ 1' 11 1 11 11 III I~II, ~1, 111 ~ \ 1, 1 1 . 11 1 111,11 1 11~~~/ I ~ ~~~~ ~ j1 1 I I V ~1\V ~ , 1 i I1i~~ 111 1~~ 11 ~'1 'l~ 1 ~yy ~~x~, ~ \ 1 11' 1 , ~,1V~`~ ' N ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ 111 ~~~ V1, 11i~I11 1~, 'A \ \ ~~ `-K ~~1 1 1 A A ' ~ ~ ~ ` 1 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , V ~ 1 11 ~ ~ ~ , ~ ' 1!I1 1 1 1 1I!II I 1~ ~ A ~ l \ + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 V 11 1 ~ A` \ ~ ~ ,x, ~ 1 IIiI 1 11 11'I ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~, 1 , , _. ~V,1 \ ~'~~ ~V'~ ~ 1 111 1 1~111 ~1 i' p V V1 1 1i 1 ~~, ~~1 I 1111 ~, I II II II\ 1111 A, \\~~~ A~ ~~\ ~ ~A I 1 /- ~ V ; 1~ , II 1111I~1 A l ~ . ~ ~ \ ~ A ~~ ' \ \ 11 I1 1 ~ I 1 ~~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~' ~ ~- - ~ 1 ~1 ~\ ~ , I ~~ ~ ~ ~ A~ ~ , i 1 ~ ' 11 ~~ Iil IIII 1 1 1 1 11 A' ~ ; ~ 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ~ 1 , , ~ ~ 1 ' ~ A 11 ,- ~ ~-~' --~ -~ '~ - ~- ~ ~ ~ „AV • ~ ~ i III~II I I I I 1 1 I ;'~ 1 ~1 I 11' ~ ~ I I `~ `` ` ~ 1 I 1 . V~~ v III I ~ - I 1 .1,1 1 1 1' 11 ~ I l l ~ N ~ , ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~` 1 1 1 1 1 I I I ~ l i 1 \, 1 ~ X29+00 ~~~ ~ I I I I ~~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '~~ 1 ,r1 ~ ~~- w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ II~11I~I11I ,AI1',1V ~_ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ .' _' ~ I ~ I O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V 1 t 111 I~ V 1 1 I I I I ~ ~ ~` ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . _ - ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ _ - I 1 I 1 I 1 `, A \ A 1 \ ; I I i, ~ I ~ I ~ 1 1111 1 1 1 \ 1 \ l l l ! 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ _ - I \ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ \ 1 1 ~ 1 1 I I I I~ h I ~ 1~ - _- \ I ~ ~ - I'~7 I i I'~'~\11 1 ~ - 1 1 1 1 \ `, A 1 1 I~ i~ I I I ~- 1 ~ ~ I \ l ~ 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 11~~1 \ \ \ \ a ~ ~ ~ ~ I II il 1~ __ ' _ ~ I I I I II II LI1111 \ V 1 \ \ 1 ~ i I I I I I I I I , 1, 1\ 1\~ ~ b ~~30+00 ~ ~ l l l l l ~ l l j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l 111 I III 1111' 1'\ \ 1 ~ ~ ~. ~ 'ill~~~ I' I S ' ~ 1 I 11 1 1 1 11 1~\ 1 1 i I ~_ I - I V ~ ~ III ,IIII ' 1 1 11 1 W ( ~ ~ - ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ 1 1 1 ~ , ~ ~ I \ ~ ~ , , tZ 133HS 33S' 3NIlHO1VW O O ~ _ A SUBMITTED MATH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 -• ~ '~ CANE CREEK ° -'- K C I r.- ~ ~ ~ m N STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ~'~`Q"O1-OG~ ,_ „~ - ~' ~ r a r ~ ~ D g ENGINEERS PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS Z ~ ~ m SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ~~ ~~ £ ~~ , , 4601SI% FORKS ROAD `~~ sru rcscnvru. an .onrono ~n T10: STATION 220+00 TO STATION 230+29 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 -- REVISIONS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (N.IO ~ OD N Q1 p t'~ c n v C C G 4 t C c N W A O N ~!1 O O N W O~ O MATCHLINE -SEE SHEET 20 I I I ~~~ 1 1 1 1 1 / i e,. -1 ~ ~~ I V I I I ~ 1 i ~ l I I 1 / ~ V i ~ ~~\ 1j111111'~il l 1 I ~~ ~/ /~'~~ ~ I~ I I~~~I'1~111111 11Ii111~1j11~1~, li ~ 1 - la I' 1 1 i i iili~~li1;1j1 l II,II~'I 11 1 i "~, lip 111 1 1 Il~Ilii'~~I;II;~I 1 11,111 ~'I r l l I I 1 1 Ii~i1~~11111111,1 i ~~ I' I' l ll ll l ll l l~ I I I ~` ~31'I I I i i i I l llillll~l~' I I I ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1~' I 1 11~ ~I i~~ 1 '~Opl 1 1 1 1 ll Ill h i l l ililll I~ I / 1 I ~ !Ill/ 111jI~ I, 111111 i1 I 1 ' Irl I I I llilllili~~~ I~ nl~ ~~l~lll~ i i i Ir~11~1~~1'IIli~1l~~il 11 i i I 1~ 1 111 IIIi i I,. I 111 111 I I I I ~~ I ~ 1 /III 1 1 ~, I IJIIIlillil ~~~ `:~~,~ 1 11111 11 ~ X11 iI~ III ~1 ~~~~. ~~ 1111111 11111 ,~ 1~ ,i.1 I I ~ II i i1111,1,1`~~~~.~,~ ~IIIII I , 1~1~~1 ~11~~1i 1 ~ ~I ~`i,l 111 i ~ ll"; '~~,;~,`~~h~11~, I j111i i~1111i ~ ~ I, 'hl I I~ ~ 1~~~,~~~1~~ I;;~', I i, ~l l l 1 1 1! 1 1 1 I 1 ~ 1 ~2~~', ~~Q ' 1~ ~~ I~~ l ~ l l ll~ll~lr 111~~1 ~IIII~, ' 1 ~ 1~~~ ~~,~~'~~~~~~1~~111111'.i~~~ I'~I`~ 11~1''~~I I 1i '1 ~~ ~~ ~'~~~`~ `,Illllill'il I III~1 1, i1;~ 1 r,~ rl `, ~,~~~ ~,,IIII 11~1~!1 / III ,1111 l l 'l i ~II'11 ~, ',~~11111 ~I~~LII~I ~ ~~ ~, r~~ ~'~ '1A~ 1~ ~ ''1 \~V 1 ~ A~ 1~1 1 ~I ~ li I I I II l l I I 1 I 111 ~! ~i'li 1111 I ~ 1 ~ ,11 ~~I'~~I!Ilil 111 'I ~~Il~llli~i,~l 111 `,li 11 I ',1~''i'~~11111111111~11'illl ~~ Ilr" I ! i I ~,I1 I~',i,lii ~ 11111 ~~~,'~ 'Iril l~ l I I.1 ~~,.~~ 1 ~,1j1 ~11~111 I ~I111111 ~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~/ , I J ~ 2i3'3~FOO1 1111,1 1 11 111' ,111 11 j 1 ~'l 11111 1 1 ~1 liilrli it ~ 1 ~, ~ 11111 I, Ilil~lllllll'.II,I / 1~ // ~ ' ~~ l I~ ', \ I I I I II , 1'I II111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ',1 / ~ ~~I ~ \ \ ,111 ~Illli,l ~I 'i I '~/ r r / ~ I'ii ~ ~ '11' 1 '~ III 1111111 i',1 ~11~I'l III Ati~ll,, ~'11.1'~11'1illill~l,l',1 ~ ~/ I 1 1 \ 1 11 ~ 11, ~ 1.,. ~ / I ICI 11 I 1 it ; i /~ /)II r' I I Ilil ~I1,III ~ / ~ 1 I ~11 I Il~i~ ~ ,;~~'i ~~ 'l ;I 234+~1 ~llii ~i~ '/ d ~ 1 nQi m'Zg ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~! ~ 1 a ~ III U \ ~ ~I I I I' ~ _. __ _. /. ~ ~' III / ' ~~ ~ I I I Y __ - l ~ 1 ' A •- - ~ , ~ I ~ ~ A i 111 ~ i ~ ~ ~~/ ~ 1 ~ m i ~ ~ ~ 1 i 1 xO~j 11 23s ~ ~ I i I, 1 ~~ I ~ 11 'FQO I ~o o `~ ,A~ 1!I ~.il ~ mor iy ~. _ _.'I I ~ mar ~~ ~ ~ . ~ - ~ oz ~ A~ ./ ym->i zc \~ ~ A~.AI, }~~ l ~°ai zm A ~ ~ III Ir ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ my~ ~z ~\ 1 ~,\ ~ \ D~C Ar r~i m ~ \ \ 1 A V V jl \ z0 ~ zQ ~ A' A ~.~ ~ ~ ~x~ \ ~ A" ~ I /I 4 -~ ~ ~ ~. ~A A ~~ V`I~' !~ 1 \ ~ ~ ~~ V 1„A1~, 'i I I I V 'I A ~ A V~ ~.A ~ ` \\\~ ~ \,. ,~AV',,~ ~~,I, ~ A ~,A\\ ~ ~ ~~~ r ~~1 ~~~ ``~~ ~ 1111 ,~~ , 19200 ~ . ~, I: 11 1 II \~~~ ,~ CAI 1 1 i I ~ v ~ 1 I 111 1,11 1 ,I I 11~1~, ili'~II il~?1 I~' ~~, ~ I1~11', II A ~ I ~ V 1 ~ 1 ~11 / / i 1 J~`q, i ~ ~, ~ ~~. 'I i / ~ \ x ~'\ II, ~, ~~, ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ 1 \I \ I Il I lli l l ~ ~ ~ __ ~ ~~~ II ~ 11~1~1;, 111( ~~ 1~ 1 ~ ~~ ~~~. . X 1 1 1 ii 11 i ~ A ~ ~~ A I l ~'l l l'I V I I I i I ~~ 1 r ~~~ ~. A 'I I 1~''I~II~I'Illlr 11 ~ ~ ~ - O ~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 vI'~ .1`I 1,1 ~, 11, 1l' 111 i 1 _ I ~ J 9. ~ ~ ~ V ~~ 1 1111111.111111~~1 ~~~~ ~- --'a~i ~~ ~ ~ ~~ \ 1 ~L 1 A -_ ~ ~ __~ ~ _ ~ ~`~ I ~ ~~ ~ 1 ,111 ~ ~ A ~ A`~ 1I~ 1 ~ 1 A 1 ~, -~ _ -~ `. 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 ~ A~~ ~~~ ~~ 1 I i i 1 ~ ~ ~~ ,~- ~~ ~ I I 1I 1 i ;- , , I / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ l 1 V A ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ \ 1 i ~ ~~ _~ ~~~~~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ } X11 VIII r \\ r ~~~ .V ~ .~ ~ I1 I i I r.o Ili, 1 I ~~`\1 ~,~ ~ ~~~ 1 ~ 11. 1~ I r V 1\ / ~.~~ ~~ ~j1, 1,11'.1 '~ 1 11 ~~795+90 1 ~~' ~1 ~ 1 111 1 1 1 q l 1 ~. ~ ~. ~~ ~ ~II v1 '~ ~ 1; I'll, ~~'~ ,~`.~ ~ ~,~ ~, '~1 1 r ~ ~~ `~ ,~' ~ - ~,~ ~- ~; ,~ ~ ,~~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ - -- I ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Op, ~,~,I ~ ~> bx ~ ~ ~_ ,~' ~ 1, ~ ~ I ~1 ~,~~ ~ _11 ~ ~ . o A Gy I ~ 4 ~. ~ ,' ~i I ~1 I Q 1. I ~ ~~ ~ . ,, `~1 N v v -9,p ~ v ~__ .'..- p o 11 1„ A 1 1 I ~ ~/ y y ~1~ 1 ~A ~ ~~ ~ i i 11111 11 1A~~~ 1 / 1 ~ ~ ~r"= ~" 11 x,11' ~ A 1 ~ cn Ili I''' \ ~ \ li ~ 1 ~ ~ 1~ 1\ 1 ~ A '~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ / ~ - / ~ 1 ~ ..,A 11 ~ ~.~=i V VA \~~ 1 1~~ 1 ~~~~ j i ll,r~ 1~~ \1\` 11 ~ 1` \\ \~'' m o ~ A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 ~ ~ m CANE CREEK ~_ K C I ~,. .,_. o a ~ ~ ° STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT _ '~'°1O1-OG~ ~'' "'= ?~ ~ ~ 8 ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS ~ m ~ SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ~ ~'~~' ~~~~ ?~ a ~ a6olslx FORKS Rono RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27609 ~ ~ s"~ rcscxv*oe wre ~vswveo T10-1, T10-2: STATION 230+2g TO STATION 235+82 "'- - REVISIONS SEE SHEETS /1<2 FOR TRIBLRARY 3 0 J 0 8 N o ~xc~ o w a '~ o ~Ox o 0 ~i o i ' ~ ~ o x9 ~ N O = ~ W v _ ~ QQ O 0 ~ C tiV ~ 15 .~ ~ ,. .- ., v Q r ~~ % ~ _ ~ I 0 L 0 ~ d n ~ n P ~ d~ m ,~g y O N } i • ~i n ~ ~, ,, r. • OQx~ ~ X • •J s • ~.• ~ ~ } $~j c _ _ ~'~ ',' _ 0 ~, ' l+~ SEE SHEET 46 FORTRIBUTARY2 ~ 0 • N ' n • • • N ~ f N op Z ~ ~ • • • • CDO " ~ J w oN U N OZ PUNTING PUN AND SPECIES COMPOSITION • ~ y Ug~ ¢o ZONE A ° ~ ~ w ~~ STREAM ZONE=3.91 ACRES (176,124 SO.FT.) • F z ~~ a x LIVE STARS: i.5'T02'LENGTHS, 1f2'T07 DIAMETER ~~ -~ a mo 3'CENfER SPACING, RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT 9E~5~~~~ ~II~ W eW COMMON NAME __ SCIENTIFIC NAME ~O~\,\~~ BLACNIMLLOW SALIX NIGRA ~ _ w SILKY IMLLOW SALIX SERICE0. SILKY DOGWOOD CORNUS AMOMUM ELDERBERRY SAMBUCUS CANADENSIS n NOTE: NO SINGLE LIVE STAKING SPECIES SHALL COMPOSE MORE THAN 40%OF THE21,778 TOTAL NUMBER OF LIVE ~ J N STAKES TO BE INSTALLED W Q ~ ~ V F Q EXISTING d F ~ ZONE B ZONE C TREES X Z ~ ~ • PIEDMONTALLUVIAL FOREST PLANTING AREA=3.26 ACRES n ~ ~1 MESIC MIXED HARDWOOD FORESTPUNTING AREA=25.28 ACRES W O Z O ' 17-iB'BARE ROOT MATERIAL 12"-18"BARE ROOT MATERIAL W ~ ~ X36 STEMSIACRE(i6'XID SPAGNG), RANDOM SPECIESPUCEMENT '~~ G C 038 STEMSlACRE (10'X10'SPACING), RANDOM SPECIES PUCEMEITT O . U Z a W 0 0 0 COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME %OFTOTAL_ MOFPUNTS ~ ~ ~ COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME %OF TOTAL MOF PLANTS Z ~ U ~ CORALBERRY SYMPNORICARPOS ORBICUUTAS p gy CORALBFRRY SYMPHORICARPOS ORBICUUTAS 5 876 Q ~ Z F SPICEBUSH LINDERA BENZOIN 5 BS SPICEBUSH LINDERA BENZOIN 10 1,362 V ~ N N 1MNTERBERRY ILEX VERTICILUTA ip ipp POSSUMHAW VIBURNUM NUDUM 5 876 ~ (rj POSSUMFiAW VIBURNUM NUDUM 10 170 PERSIMMON DIOSPYROS VIRGINIANA 10 1,352 °m9 ~ a GREEN ASH FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA 10 170 BUCK WALNUT JUGUNS NIGRA 10 1,352 `?3 Q F SYCAMORE PUTANUS OCGDENTALIS ip 17p SHAGBARK HICKORY CARYA OVATA 15 2,028 W ~ N RIVER BIRCH BETUU NIGRA 1p 170 S. RED OAK QUERCUS FALCATA 15 2,028 ~ ~ F SWAMP CHESTNUT OAK QUERCUS MICHAUXII 10 170 N7TCHHAZEL HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANA 15 2,028 ~ W ~ WLLOW OAK QUERCUS PHELLOS 10 170 TULIP POPUR URIODENDRON TULIPIFERA 15 2,028 N PERSIMMON DIOSPYROSVIRGINIANA 10 17p -40 -20 ~ 40 8Q F- TAG ALDER ALNUS SERRUUTA 10 17p 106 13,520 'UNDISTURBED FORESTED AREA55MTHIN PUNTING ZONE GRAPHIC SCALE naB, DEC ZOa7 100 1700 WILL NOT BE PUNTED scut. 1"-40' ' UNDISTURBED FORESTEDAREAS VATHIN PUNTING ZONE VdLL NOT BE PUNTED PLANTING PLAN E1 37 a 6a i . / / / . , / , , / , , / , / / / , / , / , , , . . / / , . , , • I, r~ o o .o 0 ~ ~j ~ z z z m m m '~ O O n aD D ~ N m m p z O o y 2 N m 0 D = y ~ C y D = ~ A .n ~ m O ~ A ~ y 2 ~ ~ s ~, p Z ~ D mA D C) y9JC~ • • ~~(. ~~ • F my gym,, w, ~~ . x~ ~. o o o c~ ~ I~ o 0 0 o ~ ~ o o • 2~t 00 o ~ O O n :~ O i~ •~ X~ O ~ o O ~ c~ E~ O O ~> o i) t'i ~ - ~ 7 ~_~ ~_ O C) U O I m m z - U m ~ o t~ - ~~ C) Crl o U O o (~ cis ~j ~°w+ v v ~_ ~.~ v .. O iJ ~J X t) ilk Ji (? O .+i~ O C) ~ S oa oo _ o A o m . ; • • A • • • • ?C • V ~O • • • • ~ ~7 ~~ • •~, o • • O • • • OO ~) L) • • • ~ U (~ ~ ~ ~0 ~ O O ~ O ~ ~ ~ E Ci U • ~ o U ~S pp o 0 ~~ ~> ,~ o ;> ~~ ~~ 3 ~ U O C~ c; cl C O C7 ~ r n ~ o O O O O <~ 1 ~~ O A MATCHLINE -SEE SHEET 39 ~ N O O 2 _ n NC DflID'~ N NAD '33 D c r m O k ~ A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 ~ e o CANE CREEK -~ KC I =.~.. ~- ~ ~ ~ ° STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ~~©°'1O1~OG~ ~ Z 8 ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS '"~~~' z ~ SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ~ G7 Tl-3,T1~,T1-5: STA 22+567031+28 AND 4601S1x FORKS ROAD ~ ~~~~~``~~~~~~ ' srti oesmw.oN w.c +wuovEo RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 ~ STA 110+00 TO 113+82 REVISIONS , , , , ~ / / , , , . , , , . • , i , , . , , , , , , , / , / , • •••i•••i••••••••••••••••••••••••i••••••••••• o o O O O A c~ O C> m m m ~ 7 C1 C7 C7 W D N O ~~oo ~~ ~n ~ v_ y D O g n s ~ Z ~ n R ~ N p ~ Z N m umi ~ 5 v D O ~ ~ ~ m o °~ czi ~ m o ~ ~, pp v ~ i O v ~ S z z ~ ~ DA z ~ J _~ so O ~ O X~~ ~~x. ~. ~~ r~ r • G O O C J Fi G r c ~ sa .xo• o o ~. o c ~, ~, ~ ~ ;~ ~, c •+ o o c~ v • o c~ ~> o o _ -. . o ~ o ~ ~ o - ~, o ~ o - • ~ r c~ _. ~yx ,, (, ~ 6+00 n 0 c ~ v > ~ o ~, S7+pp_ ~-, ~_~ _~ c; o _, o _ ~; v o _ o S .x~0 • N • • • m ~, r m <++ } • -} m, N d O m ~ ~ U o ~' A "O , G PA CJ ° A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 ~ e o CANE CREEK ~ KC I ~~. ~- ~[''' ~ ~ ° STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ~'~'°"°'~°G~ ~ ~ `~ $ D ~ S ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS .; ~ Z Z SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA . ; ~& ~~"11 . ,n 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD ~. "~~~~~~-~^` '°` ` srr rcscnvru~ wr[ uveov[o RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 °' T2-1, T2-2, T2-3, T2-4: STATION 50+00 TO STATION 58+63 REVISIONS ~~ O O N N N Z ~ ~ ~ Z Z `~ =~ ~ m m m c) <~ O n ~ W D ~ ; ~ ~ ti y m ~ ~ ~ z ; O D O y Z m r m N ~ yy VV S F O A t1 ° m z ~ m ~ ~ z ~ ~ z G7 ~ A Z D mA D J (~ n (~ r ~O X Ci o ~~ Op 62+0 ~3x 0 ,J ~~ c; ~:~ ~ ~~ ~ x o O ~ ~ o ~. ~sSXOO 0 c o 0 0 o ~, r, o c, c o I MATCHLINE -SEE SHEET 42 O !J ~o~ O y O 2 l1 n +~ ~~ D o m-S m ~'o O K A SUBMITTED MATH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 ~ ; o CANE CREEK ~ KC I ~ ~.- ~ 5 ~ N STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT '~`°101~°~~ ~~' =~~= ~ 8 ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS ~ ~ ~ ~ SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ~,t,`i~i ~ 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD ~{-\f ~~ zrK o[xavrn~ a*e ~vvnov[n m T3-1, T3-2: STATION 60+00 TO STATION 66+10 RALEIGH. NORTH cAROUNA zT6oe REvi5~ON5 `7 U ~~ N N N O O O ~"~ FU C 7 2 z Z m ~ m m ~) J C. A m D m m i O o s Z N ~ ~ m ~^ c v 41 D m 2 O ~ ~ O TO y ~ LY133HS 33S•3NIlHOlVW p ~ ~ x~ ~~ ~ c a ~ ~ o s ~ ~~ `_ ,> ~~ ~•~, r~ ~ ~ ~; ~; ,~ 0 ~ak~ ~~ ~~ ~; ~~ r; 6g+p0 ,~ n <~ n ~~ O _ > ~~x ~ n ,~ n O O o O r~ ~~ O 71 +00~~ CU O O ~ '~ O G '~ ~~ O n C~ Cj O ,~ ~~ !~ ~> '~ O <~ ~ J ~ ~2+QO o ~ ~: , o ~ c .~~ I~ r~ ~ ~ o c 0 0 n ~> ~ `'3'~QQ o ~ o o -~ 0 -, o o ~~ ,~ ~ ~' , ~ ~ 4'~~0 ~- c ~~ ~~ n , n ~> c~ ~S ' o o x o o ~O v I ~ ~~ N ~,~ ~ O O ~ I~ ;:~ O o ~~6k00 n o '~o~~ - `~ ~" ~- y o ~o o ~ ~ m O X~ ~ O O m m ~~ ~~~ O ~ O O~ IJ O ~ r~ G O O ~ O ~ ~ Q O o ~~ ~ z ~~ ~ r ~ ~ (~ J a ~ r. i ~~ n ~ ~' ; 0~ ~~ O n < ~~ ~ C) n O L AiIVllI9R11 ilOj 66-C£ S133HS 33S ~ ~ ~ K C I A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 v ; o CANE CREEK -'-- ~- N ~ z ~ ° STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT 'E©°"°L°~~ ~ $ ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS --~ Qi ~ ~ SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 4601 S1x FORKS RDAD ~-` l,~Vl~(zj~~ s+ti cewx~rn~ o~rc umo.[o ~ T3-2: STATION 66+10 TO STATION 76+79 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 REVISIONS ,, ~~ o .o 0 ,~> n ~ z z z m m m Cl O O n W D G~ t) Si m m m ~ n ~ ~ F~8~~0 ~ ~ x i ~ O O m =~= D Z ~' N p 5 V l) ,J ~.~ i.. ~ ~ Z o T ~ Q 0 A Q ~ ~ ~ 8~ O 0 N 7D1 D ~ ~ - (~ ~ ~ rJ ~ C7 Z ) Z ~ Z Am ~~ m~ D i D ~ C C~ G l~ p ^ ^ ~J (~ r (` d4 O fC.~~ (~ i ~~ U ~. C' i_ V 8 +oo ~J ~~ `i i ` (') CJ ~~ ~J O V S r (1 G fl Ci !;. ~~ ~ ~GQ, O O O k O ~? ~C:~ ~: r~ n ~j $$,F00 O ~~ O r~ n :? ~i C C; rJ ~; ~ i~ .; ~; n ~~'~© ~, '~ ~) O n O r_~ G ~j C <~ G n /~~ ~Qy,CY E) ~ ~i =; O ~: G i~ t S~1+p~ o n c c o ~, o 0 0 94133HS 33S - 3NIlHOltlW A O N ~o~ O y O 2 n y b~ n A ° a m aD O ~ '~ ~ ~_ K C I ~ A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 CANE CREEK ~ ~ ~ N STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT '~'°''°'-OG~ `.=emu ' ~ ~ 1 8 ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS ~ ~, ', ~ ~ ~ SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA „~{~;~~{~•,+b~~Frz~~~ - 4601 SI% FORKS ROAD srw o¢sero*nx w.e .vowveo m ~ T4-1, T4-2: STATION 80+00 TO STATION 91+38 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 REVISIONS ~, I~ ~, o . o z ~~ r~ C~ z ~ rn m m ~) C) n n Oo D z O O ; ~ ~ N ti X ~ O m y m ~ ~ m N ~ V O T O '~ y~y N m7mJ ~ ~ D y 5 ~ Z ~ ~ s Z Z MATCHLINE -SEE SHEET 43 G ~ z ` Q ~. c~ C~ ~~+0`~ 0 c, n ~; ~- u ~ O U ~~ O G C~ , ~ ~ `> c', O ~ ~ o g~~ (~ 0~ ~7 C~ i~ ", n ~:> i> ~ O C? O ~? ~5+44 ~ c; c r; n ~:> r> 0 0 ~,6+00 o ~ ,~ x n r?, O~j O r ~ -, - 0 o n n G r ~~ ~ r~ O ~_ n ~~ r> ; ~ x ~, o ~> ~~ ~-, = ~ ~; - ~O ~ O ~~ .~ C; O ~> ~> n ~~x p~ r; r, ~ u '~0 ~~ _ m ~ C? ~ '~ '-101 ~. 0 m _ - ~ O - n O y ~ ~ n ~ ~: J O G ~ o .~~. Q A U (~ 7 • ' ^ O D . . . . 1YJ I!~~~xoo ; O ~ ~ n _ O ~ '~ o Dr ° ~ 0 0 ° _ 'L`~ m G ~ o C7 O ~ O o O L Ai1V1f181N1 iJ03 BE-LE S133HS 33S ~ ~ A SUBMITTED VNTH RESTORATION PIAN DEC 2007 CANE CREEK ~ KC I ~ .:,~- _ ~ ~ ~ ~ STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT Z $ ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS ~ Z ~ SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD ~ ' ~°'I'' ~ ~~~ s+k max""*~ °`Te 'PPROVFD RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27609 ~ T4-2: STATION 91+38 TO STATION 102+52 REVISIONS •••••••••••••••••s•••••••••••~•••••••••~~~•• <, o o . N O O O ~~ ~~ CI ~ z z ^' m m l F) (l n W D ~ S y y y m Z ~ ~ ~ ; O z ^x' ~ o m o > z m ~ ~ m N ~ 5 ~ O A ~ 0 A ~ m ~ s Z ~ D Z ~~mn mD D D 2 ~© l J ~ N\ ~~ 0 }00 1 ~1 +(f0 +o 2 ~° ~~ • X ~ G • ~~ ~- ~ _ O • ~, Ci G ~; ~; ~~ ` ~2~x~o ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ O O ~~~ ~~ C7 C~ " - 12390 ~% ~, o ~~ ~~ ~ ,_ ,, o ~~ 0 0 ~ ~2R~~0 ~~ ~, O n ~ X~~ (") r 6k~ o ~ 0 ~' n 12 +00 c, ,~ o ~, 9V 133HS 33S - 3NIlHD1tlW A O N ~c~ O D O _2 !7 =b D ~ ~ m~+o r m w 0 m e ~ ~~ K C I ` A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 ~ , m CANE CREEK _ ~. ~ ~ z ~ ° STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT -'-'~°1iOt~OG~ r. "' ~ $ SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ENGINEERS PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS ~" ~ T6A, T66, T6AB, T6C, T6: STA 240+00 TO 241+19 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD ~ s,µ ~~,,,,~, a,E „„,,,~, ~ RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27609 AND STA 120+00 TO 127+18 REVISIONS ~li••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••!••••••i••! ~~ol, .. N N N O • • • O O ~ ~ ,~ z z z m m m C <~ O n ~ D ~ ; ~ m m ~ N O n ~ 3 N A ~ D Z 4mi ~ ~ [y~~ ~ Z T = O A ~ ° m O y m ~ ti ~ ti 2 9 ~ 5 Z Z 'n ~ D Z A D mA D MATCh~~Nf_ SFF ~ ShF ~4S ~'t~kQ tigx ~, o c ~> ~~ < <~ ~> c. ~3 0 c~ C ~- ~'~~ k ~ n' 0 0 r, ,~ -, o ~ ~ ~ '132+00 ~; o C ~~ ~. ~~ ~ o C m ~~ h~ 7 O m m x i-i m A N ~ O O ~ N ro ,~ ~ ~ C~ O ~ O O ~ p ~~ z O Cat ~ c ~ 2 { " '> °134+0 n ~_ ~ o r ~o O ~~ m ~~ O ~ O ~~ ~O X C. ~~> ~,~ r ~> , 0 ~~ - <~ C ~~ ok0~, ,. ~ ~1 ~ 0 0 o c; o~ ~ ~~ ~_~ 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 # ~ A SUBMITTED MATH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 ~ ; o CANE CREEK ~ KC I ~. ~-- ~ ~ z ~ N STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ~TECNN°LOC~s A" ~ $ ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS ~. ~ Z Z SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ' ' } ? ~ 460151X FORKS ROAD ~ `~~~'~' ~°' ~~ sru o[sc~rnx wi¢ .rr•ov~o RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27609 ~ T6: STATION 127+18 TO STATION 134+38 REVISIONS F ~ CANE CREEK _ ~ ~~~ ~w, ~ e ° STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT KC I ~'~ .°" 9 ~ i ~ ° SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ~-'E©°~101'OG~ "` ~~~ z 8 ~ ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS ~; ~ z T7A, T7-1, T7-2, T7-3, T8A, T8, T9: STA 260+00 TO 261+36, , E , r ' ~~ ~ STA 140+00 TO 151+22, STA 270+00 TO 271+10, 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD NORTH CAROLINA 27609 RALEIGH ° ' srr n[zcnv,nx a*c .vwov[u $ STA 200+p0 TO 204+49 AND STA 210+00 TO 213+gg , REVISIONS O o o • ~ z z O O O m • m m ~~ O n m D 3N1'1HOLyW Ld ~3NS 33S . ~ ~ fA ~ (7 ~ Z ~ 47 ; _ ; A m -i ~ m ~ m O ~k~ y c ~ ~~ a i O 1 o z O v m ~ iV .~ ~ m ~ y ti 2 O s y o n (~ O x~ ~ •~y ` O O O O O O k ~ ,~At V O O n ~_~ ~ ~~ ~ X 1 • • .~s'~'~Q • . • • ~ ~5~ O O O 158+ ~ O O _ c r_ C. (~5g+0~~l ,~ i~ c` O O O ~ O [~~X ~=T C O O I N O l Q ~ x0 = o ~~ n ~ $ ~~ O m ~otia~ 7 O • • k0~ ~~ .'s3 • 00 MgTCHLINE -SEE SHEET 49 K ;: ~ ~ ~ K C I _ A SUBMITTED MATH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 ~ ~ ~ CANE CREEK -~ ~ „~ ~ ~ z ~ N STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT TES°'-°°~ •» , ;' Z Z S ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS i H SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ~~t ~ r~tr<~ I j~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ RALEIGH, NIORTN ~ AROLRINA 027609 °° T7-3: STATION 151+22 TO STATION 163+7g REVISIONS O l~ O N . N N QO O O O X ~~ ~~ ~ m m m aN~~~~~yvl 0 1 n ,~ O n W ~ s~~s ~y Y~~~ G' O r: nl ~ ~ N N ~ L7 ~ V7 ; Z ; A Q D Z ~ ~i m ~ m N ~ ~ ~ 00 o ~ c o `~h o m D ~ C) (, A ~ D 9 `" ~ O O C 1 v z z Q ~ ~ ~ O O O ~ i ~ ,\<o ~ , 0 r~, c~ .~ ~6 x~ -~>1 +oo 00 ~x ~. _ , 0 o° x 1 r:~ O ~ ~ J= r f ~0 O it c rn is U ~~ > G k O~ ~_; ~., 00 ~~ x _, n -, t r_, „ ~ O o r~ _ o ~ o ~Ax O _ o 0 ~ o ., O o _ , 175+ 0 I N ~ O > i ~~O D O '9 r} (~ 2 n N ~ C) ~~ c~ 7g d0 m r~ c~ ~. ~ O O 7 O O ~ 09133NS 33S-3NIlHOlVW R ° A SUBMITTED MATH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 ~ ; o CANE CREEK ~ KC I ~. ~ ~ z ~ ° STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ~-'~~`°1O1~OG~ ~' "~'=: g ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS Z - ~._. ~ ~ SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA a6ol slx FORKS ROAD ~~~ "`> ~'`t'~ ~ ~ ~~ s,k ~~,,,,~, ,.,E ,.~, ~+ RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 T7-3, 77-4: STATION 163+79 TO STATION 176+51 REVISIONS 0 o c~ o . o 0 c~ ~~ o z z z m ~ ~ ~ m m ~l ~) C7 n ~ D m m ~ ~? O (~ ~ N m ° D m m ~ ~ v y $A 55 T _ U a O O ~ y~y O ~ A C) _ m v ~ m z r~ i m ~ y Z Z G1 m i ~ ) O G s ~ ~n m m mA ,~, A D ... ~O ~_ ~~. 1. ~ OO ~ O O O 18 +00 O c> > . 1 {o ;~$ x D n O~ bX ' ~' ~> 7 c~ 1 5+00 i> > ~8 xDD . , ~~ C ~! 0 0 O O 00 o + O O ~~ o - ~ r~y~y f Se fSyffTSl A O N O ~~ /^~ NC GRID V' NAD '83 Y n N D C r m aD 0 ~ ~ ~ K C I A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 CANE CREEK -~- ~ ~ z g m STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ~ '~`°101-°°~ a.z ~ $ ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS ~ ~ ~ SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA a6ol slx FORKS Roao ~ ~ = t ~~~ ~~ `~~ s.K ~x~*~ a=I RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 ~ 77-4, T7-5, 77-6: STATION 176+51 TO STATION 189+38 REVISIONS ••s••~••••••s•••••••s••••••••••••••••••••••• Z5133HS 33S - 3NIlHOltlW O O O N ~ ~ _ O O O O O O O z z z m . 1^ m O O O n m D O O > 023 +~0 ~ $ ; N m O r Z O m xb ~ m N °O ~ Z O G a ~ o A ~ O m y ~1 y A O ti ~ 2 ~ s ~ 232 00 ~- Z p A O 233 00 O O O 23a+ 0 O O O O O O O ~ O O O O ^" m= O O O a r m i~ O O O ~ O ~~' Xpp 235+ d' O O yOJ~ O O O ~ G O O G O O O O O O C ~~ O O ~ O 1 a' ~ `> O O ~ 19 O C O C O C ~ +00 ~~ ~ X 1~ d O + O O~ O O O O O O ~ O O 1 195 00 IJ ~ O O O O 2 n O H D o m g o o ,cab Op ~ O c 0 o O kpO 0 o O ~ c ~_ K C I A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 ~ ~ o CANE CREEK ~,.. ~ z ~ N STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT '~'°1O1~OG~ `' ~ ~ ~ . „< g ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS r' ,p ~ ~ SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 1~{'$?'~:~ ~~t %~ ~ 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD srk o[srnsrgx a*¢ .rvwv[n m RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 T10-1, T10-2: STATION 230+29 TO STATION 235+g2 REVISIONS - _ J CU O Z z z O U O m m m ~ CJ O o w D ~ ~ f/1 ~ N O .>7 Z ~ ; ~ ; O ~ A m ~ O m o D z y ~ c ~ ~ z ~ A G7 o m A ~ D m y S r~ Z D ~ 2 ~ ~ D 2 m D D A /~ ' 22p~~0 l < r G ~? _ O O O G C 22 ~~ J O CZZ G` ///" ~~ yir~~4xoa ~~ ~~ o, 0 27+ a o, ~~x ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ N ° G1 o ~ < ~ D O ~ S ~ n 2~9+ > n A g° o m 7 v C7 O ~ O C ~ 2~ 00 O LS 133HS 33S - 3NIlHD1tlW ~ ~ ~ -`_ A SUBMITTED MATH RESTORATION PLAN DEC 2007 CANE CREEK K C I ~ ~ ~ ro z ~ ~ STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ~ '~~~~~ " ~ 1 Z S ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS ° ~ Z ~ SEMORA, PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 4601 SI F °' 710: STATION 220+00 TO S X ORKS ROAD RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 zra ~urornx wrF ...~~ TATION 230+29 REVISIONS Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan Appendix A Historic Aerial Photographs • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i~ ~~~ Historic Aerials 1998-2004 ~~~' ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ KCI Extent of Project Parcels ""~ ~ ~assoc~ns of nc Project Easement 1:18 000 1 inch equals 1,500 feet ~.sa~ Aso o i.~~~ ~~~ T~!'LTT~T~T ~/~T~C Sua~ne~LSGS Orfhoyu~dnin~lre, l99R; ENVIRONMEMAL TECHNOLOGIES l..l 11 V L U l J Person Cnunn~ GIS. Ordmroiagen~?0(14 F~~t AND CONSiRUC110N, INC. i • • • • • • Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan Appendix B Correspondence '••••••••••••••••••••••i••••••••i•••••••••••• I~ C I 'CECHNOLCfGIL"S _ .~Er,; Sc'tr:rarl;r4. ~t~_. __ .A~l:~~•..~t.LS 'G I2J L L E.> ~}L:\. ~ "~TRPC I It~;d LSr:n+cer.~: Ceti~ex 11, 5cnre 220 • -Fbl}1 5~~ Poor.; Ro:to • R;Lne~t, I`C 27609 • 919-783-921.-t • (P:ts) 919-783-9266 November 29, 2005 Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley Environmental Review Coordinator - SHPO 4617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-4617 Attn: Juliana Hoekstra Subject: Cultural Resources Review Cane Creek Stream Restoration Project Dear Ms. I-Ioekstra: Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Cane Creek Stream Restoration Project, which is located approximately 9.6 miles northwest of Roxboro approximately two mites east of the intersection of Cunningham Road with State Route 119 in Person County, as a submittal for cultural resources review by the State Historic Freservation Office. A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. The vegetation at this site is primarily Natural Herbaceous with portions of Piedmont Forest according to the 2003 NC GAP land cover dataset. The planned restoration work typically involves modifying stream channels to a natural stable form through minor grading, use of in-stream rock features, and establishment of vegetated riparian buffers. In addition, grazing management {fencing/watering devices/access control) will be incorporated in this particular project. Following an informal review by John Mintz on November 9, 2005, it is anticipated that there will not be an impact to archeological resources on the subject property. Itts also anticipated that there will not be structural impacts an the subject property. Following the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination regarding any potential impacts to cultural resources associated with this project. Please feel free to contact me at {919) 783-9214, ext. 141, should you have any questions or require any further information to process this request. Thank you in advance for your assistance and attention. Sincerely, ~{ ,~ Michael B. Schlegel Project Manager l~(~1 Tla lltit3Lt7ClFti, 1P;t.. [anldar~r-ll~rnid tiinu 195N U' 1V 1V . 1: C i . t: to ~1 O'~ ~~4 +~' d ~~~ ~.~~~. North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office 1'ctcr B. SandUcck, Administrator 1lieltael 3~.13asle}•, Got•emor Office of Archiccc and !-listorl+ [,isUcth (:. Etanc, 5ccrt:ttry t)itisian of 1 Iiatorictl RcsotuYCs jcffrt:y J. Croty, Dcpun' Secrctnn~ Dated Httxrk, Director January 4, 2006 Michael Schlegel, Project Manager ICI Technologies Landmark Center II, Suite 220 4601 Six Forks Road Rs~lleigh, NC 27609 Re: Cultural Resources Review, Cane Creek Stream Restoration, Person County, ER 05-2785 Dear 11~Ir. Schlegel: Thank you for your letter of November 29, 2005, concerning the above project. We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources that would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no ,comment an the project as proposed. The above comments are trade pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations far Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above catnment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking number, Sincerely, /~ ~~~~,} , /t lj Peter Sandbeck '~vC.. Location ADMINISTRATION SQ7 N. Blount Strccq Ralrigh NC AFS7'at2ATTON Sly N. Blount 5trcet, Raleigh NC SURVEY do PLANNING 515 N. Blount 5trect, Ralegh, NC 5--0Ai)I 5•-0&)1 4617 Atari 5en•ice Center, Itnicigh NC 27499-4(117 4617 Alatl Service Crntcr, Rakiglt NC 2769')-4617 4617 Alad Service Crntcr, Ralcigft NC 27!,99-.t(i17 SCI TFCI l NOl_OC~ I [5 C G F ^. L[ t; ti~ I A v}:` L F~ S t I ['ti T I ti T ti C i~ [V S I R P t: i Ill iv ~!'~ 1 ti :1 ti L' R S _. _. _ . L.,.n+taeF: CL-'JTL'li fl, Surtt_ 770 • X601 Sn Ftvu•;s Rn:w • ILuI lta+, NC 27609 • 919-iB3-9211 • (ray) 9I9-i83-92b5 November 29, ?005 Mr. Sidney and Mrs. Angela T`liompson P.O. BoY 35 Semora, NC ?7343 Subject: Notification of Uniform Act Provisions Dear Mr. and Mrs. Thompson: As part of the environmental documentation process in preparation for stream restoration on your property, this letter is to inform you of important provisions in the Federal Highway Administration Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, referred to as the Uniform Act. The Unifor-n Act was developed to provide for uniform and equitable treatment of persons displaced from their names, businesses, non-profit associations, or farms by federal and federally-assisted programs, and establishes uniform and equitable land acquisition policies. The Act assures that such persons are treated fairly, consistently, and equitably, and so that they will not suffer disproportionate injuries. This act applies to any project which utilizes federal funds for the purchase of any interest in real property, including conservation easements. A portion of the funding for this project is ultimately provided by the US Department of Transportation, through the NC Department of Transportation far in- kind mitigation to offset impacts from transportation projects in the area, and therefore we are required to infann you of the following provisions. The provisions of this act require that we inform you in writing that this conservation easement transaction is voluntary and that the project is being developed by KCI for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP}, and as a result, KCI or NCEEP does not have the authority to acquire the property by eminent domain in the event negotiations fail to reach an amicable agreement. In addition, the Act requires that we indicate the agreed purchase price of $15,000 per acre. This letter is for your information, and no response is necessary. Please feel free to contact me at (919) 783-9214, est. 141, should you have any questions or require any further information. Sincerely, Michael B. Schlegel Project Manager ce: Steven Stokes, Sr. )<nvironmental Scientist KCl -l 1'C:I I`JI~hUGIE:>, l`Ft':. Gmphwii -ttisi~rd tiin~ r 19~SN KCI r1;cl-Inol_oclrs _ _ _ _ r'. (.; i `: C L i i~ P L:\' v 'v L R> S C I I ti 1 I ti T~ C C 1 :' d h T 1 i U C l 1 O F, 1~ a i v. l C i l P. La;:n~.t.~lls Ceo-:rek I1, 5i:lre 220 • -IhOI Slx I•~ntk; Roan • R•~~lial, NC 27fi09 • 41.9-783-921# • (I::~~? 919-783-9266 November 29, 2005 Mr. Gary Jordan US Fish and Wildlife Service Raleigh Field OfFce P.O. Box 33726 Raleigh, NC 27636 Subject: Endangered Species Act, Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site Dear Mr. Jordan: Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Cane Creek Stream Restoration Project, which is located approximately 9.6 miles northwest of Roxboro approximately rivo miles east of the intersection of Cunningham Road with State Route 119 in Person County, as a submittal far review of the Endangered Species Act, Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, and Migratory Bird Treaty Act by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. The funding for this project Domes from the USDOT Federal Highway Administration through NCDOT. The vegetation at this site is primarily Natzual Herbaceous with portions of Piedmont Forest according to the 2003 NC GAP land cover dataset. The planned restoration work typically involves modifying stream channels to a natural stable form through minor grading, use of in-stream rock features, and establishment of vegetated riparian buffers. In addition, grazing management (fencinglwatering devices/access control) will be incorporated in this particular project. As part of the environmental documentation process (Categorical Exclusion), coordination with the USFWS is requested for compliance with the Endangered Species Act, Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, and Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Fallowing the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination of the potential effects to endangered species, wildlife, or migratory birds associated with this project. Please feel free to contact me at (919} 783-9214, ext. 141, should you Dave any questions or require any further information to process this request. Thank you in advance for your assistance and attention. Sincerely, Michael B. Schlegel Project Manager _ _ }~Cl TI t,I1P!i>I_C)GiPti, (`lC. Lui~~d,~rn•(hwtr,l tiin,r P!hh \\' \\' \1 . }: i~ i . (: t 14 I~ ~ I _ _ _ _ _ __ dc~l ~;r.r-lci ~'L:1:~:1~f Rj r (_.}f?:TIti Iti Ct'ljv j l liL'C I It7iv \•1 :1 h. :1(.F1.5 TL•CiiNOLOGtT:S L~txme~er C~r;rrr, [l, St!tre 220 • -Iti01. 5t~ Ceai;s R,~:tn • R:t~etc;n, vC ?7609 • 919-783-921-} • (1=n~} 919-743-9?66 November 29, 2443 Linda Pearsall, Program Head North Carolina Natural Heritage Program 1601 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27529 Subject: Natural Heritage Review Cane Creek Stream Restoration Project Dear Ms. Pearsall: Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Cane Creek Stream Restoration Project, which is located approximately 9.6 miles northwest of Roxboro approximately rivo miles east of the intersection of Cunningham Road with State Route '119 in Person County, as a submittal for natural area and rare species review by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. A portion of this property {refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. The vegetation afi this site is primarily Natural Herbaceous with portions of Piedmont Forest according to the 2443 NC GAP land cover dataset and the current land use is livestock pasture. The planned restoration work typically involves modifying stream channels #o a natural stable form through minor grading, use of in-stream rock features, and establishment of vegetated riparian buffers. In addition, grazing management (fencinghvatering devices/access contra!) will be incorporated in this particular project. It is anticipated that there will not be structural impacts on the subject property. Fallowing the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination regarding any potential impacts to rare species or natural areas associated with this project. Please feel free to contact me at (919) 783-9214, ext. 111, should you Iyave any questions or require any further information to process this request. Thank you in advance for your assistance and attention. Sincerely, Michael B. Schlegel Project Manager I\Cl Tfit }I•.~:UI(.k;1Lti, ~?C:. JanpGmi'r-t.hrurd tilruc 1')tit; _ _ _ _ INCDENR North Carolina Department of Environmenfi and Natural Resources Michael F. Easley, Governor December 7, 2005 Mr. Michael B. Schlegel KCI Technologies Landmark Center II, Suite 220 4601 Six Forks Road Raleigh, NC 27609 Subject: Cane Creek Stream Restoration Project; Person County Dear Mr. Scl~iegel: Vviiliarn G. Ross Jr., Secretary The Natural Heritage Program has no record of rare species, significant natural communities, or priority natural areas at the site nor within 2 miles of the project area. Although our maps do not show records of such natural heritage elements in the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present. It may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species, significant natural communiries, or priority natural areas. You may wish to check the Natural Heritage Program database website at <www.ncsparks.net/nhp/search.html> for a listing of rare plants and animals and significant natural communities in the county and on the topographic quad map. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 919-715-8697 if you have questions or need further information. Sincerely, Harry E. LeGrand, 3r., Zoologist Natural Heritage Program HEL/hel 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, Narih Carolina 27699-1601 No~rthCaroli/na Phone: 9i9-733984' FAX: 919-715-3Q6O' Iniemet www.enr.state.nc.us ~~jtl~r~~ll~ An l:quai Opportunity' Aiflrrnative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled' 10 % Post Consumer Paper • • • KCI TLCI INCILOG I[_S ~.~~~r~,:r.rr;~ Sctl:vir,rs t~nr~.it;ut~iror: I~I:~t::aULeti _ __ __. _ _ La~aoaL~nt; CctiTru Ii, Sutre 220 • 9601 Sts rot?hs Roan • I'WLLtGI+, 1VC 37609 • 919-783-92}-} • leas? 919-783-92fib November 29, 2005 Mr. Jim Huey, District Conservationist USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service Person County Office Building, Rm. 126 304 South Morgan Street Roxboro, NC 27573 Subject: Farmland Conversion Impact Rating Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site Dear Mr. Huey: Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Cane Creek Stream Restoration Project, which is located approximately 9.6 miles northwest of Roxboro approximately two miles east of the intersection of Cunningham Road with State Route 119 in Person County, as a submittal for farmland conversion impact rating by the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service. A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. The funding for this project comes from the USDOT Federal Highway Administration through NCDOT. The vegetation at this site is primarily Natural Herbaceous with portions of Piedmont Forest according to the 2003 NC GAP land cover dataset. The planned restoration work typically involves modifying stream channels to a natural stable farm through minor grading, use of in-stream rock features, and establishment of vegetated riparian buffers. In addition, grazing management (fencinglwatering devices/access control) will be incorporated in this particular project. Fallowing the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination regarding any potential impacts from farmland conversion associated with this project. Included is the Farmland Conversion Impact Rating Form (AD-1006); please complete Parts Il, IV and V. Please feet free to contact me at {919) 783-9214, ext. 141, should you have any questions or require any further information to process this request. Thank you in advance far your assistance and attention. Sincerely, '7 c- ~' Michael B. Schlegel Project Manager ~~~a ~ 1: 1_ai'it]Llkil!'ti, 1P7t:, l3ntr~listrr•Chanid titttrt N:}.4N lt' \4' l~' , ti (: I . t.: l? 1( United States Department of Agriculture o MRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service 530 Westlnnes Street Salisbury, NC 28144 alan.walters@ nc.usda.gov 704-637-2400 704-637-8077 FAX 704-798-8044 CELL 500-6T7-6913..mailbox 3900 December 9, 2005 Michael Schlegel KCI Technologies 4601 Six Forks Road suite 220 Raleigh, NC 27609 Dear Mr. Schlegel Enclosed is the AD1006 Farmland Conversion Impact Rating form for the Cane Creek restoration project in Person County. When section VII of the form is completed please send me a copy for the bean counters. Thanks /4~~ A an Walters The Natural fesources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment. An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer ll ~ 1 rcct tr:ot.or~u.s P,~c,i.,t~r,~ P-:~...vrrs Scie,~:r-~~; Ce~t~:~-a-;~ ri;~t~ i~l,~;v.~r,er.~ __ _ _ ___. L~~au»;~x-: CCti~rtc li, 5urre 22Ct •-}6111 St11;ox~:s Roan • I:a-_~icii, NC 276t?9 • 919-783-92>li • (F'as) 914-7133-9?66 December lb, 2005 Mr. Alan Walters, Resource Soil Scientist USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service 530 West Inner Street Salisbury, NC 2$144 Subject: Farmland Conversion Impact Rating Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site Project Number 12054725 Dear Mr. Walters: Attached you will find the completed Farmland Conversion Impact Rating Form (AD-1006} pertaining to the proposed Cane Creek Stream Restoration Project, which is located approximately 9.6 miles northwest of Roxboro approximately two miles east of the intersection of Cunningham Raad with State Route l l9 in Person County. This project will restore impacted streams and riparian buffers and is compatible with surrounding agricultural operations. Thank you for your help in completing a farmland conversion impact rating far this site. PIease feel free to contact me at (919} 783-9214, ext. 141, should you have any further questions. I appreciate your prompt attention throughout this process. Sincerely, ' '.~~~ ~_ Michael B. Schlegel Project Manager KLl lit: l'~ii:11_i)Gl[ti, I:~k_ L'i~ip6g'i~'-t)~~~iiial Ji~~.~• N)flti v1' ~1~ l~V . h L; I . C l;1 y! KCI Tccfl~of_oclrs ~ .v t~ I iJ f f R ti P L.1 v ~. Ii F~ S{ 1 f:1: T I ti T S C l~ I~ S T t; l' t 1 i i~ ti i~~~ :1 M1: :\ t, E R 4 Ll^IDUrtFF= Crv~r~a I1, Sunr 220 • -F601 Sn ~rn~~; Ri~:w • R~~f~uai, NC 2?609 • 919-i83-921# • (C~z) 919-7~3-9266 November 29, 2005 Ms. Shannon Deatan Habitat Conservation Program Manager NC Wildlife Resources Commission Division of Inland Fisheries 1721 Maii Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1721 Subject: Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site Dear Ms. Deaton: Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Cane Creek Stream Restoration Project, which is located approximately 9.6 miles northwest of Roxboro approximately two miles east of the intersection of Cunningham Road with State Route 119 in Person County, as a submittal for the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act review by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission. A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. The funding for this project comes from the USDOT Federal Highway Administration through NCDOT. The vegetation at this site is primarily Natural Herbaceous with portions of Piedmont Forest according to the 2003 NC GAP land cover dataset. The planned restoration work typically involves modifying stream channels to a natural stable form through minor grading, use of in-stream rock features, and establishment of vegetated riparian buffers. In addition, grazing management (fencing(watering deviceslaccess control} will be incorporated in this particular project. As part of the environmental documentation process (Categorical Exclusion}, coordination with the NCWRC and the USPWS is requested far compliance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act. Following the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination of the potential effects to wildlife associated with this project. Please feel free to contact me at (919) 783-9214, ext. 141, should you have any questions ar require any further information to process this request. Thank you in advance for your assistance and attention. Sincerely, -~, Michael B. Schlegel Project Manager __ Et(1 ~l`CaC~;{)t.l1f~lP~, l~!{ ['ntpl,n',t'-thrni's1 Sinai' N1ti4 \1' ~\ t\` . !i is 1 C {l Si r • North Carolina Wildlife Resources Con~.mission Richazd B. Hamilton, Executive Director 12 December 2005 Mr. Michael Schlegel, Project Manager KCI Associates ofNorth Carolina Landmark Center iI, Suite 220 4601 Six Forks Road Raleigh, NC 27609 Subject: Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site, Person County, North Carolina. Dear Mr. Schlegel: Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject - document. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d), and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.}. ~ The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program is currently investigating a stream restoration site along several tributaries to Cane Creek, a tributary to Hyco Reservoir in the Roanoke • River basin. There are no records for federal or state listed species in Cane Creek. Hyco Reservoir supports a diverse fishery including sunfish (Lepomis spp.}, crappie (Pomoxis spp.), largemouth bass . (Micropterus salmvic~es) and cash (Ictalurus spp.). The project would involve minor grading to form • natural, stable stream channels, use of instream rock features and establishment of vegetated riparian buffers. Also, grazing management (fencinglwatering devices/access control) will be used. - The proposed restoration project should improve water quality and aquatic habitat. Additionally, ~ establishing a forested riparian buffer should improve terrestrial habitat and provide a travel corridor for - wildlife species. We do not anticipate signifcant adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources from the - proposed project. - Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. If you require further assistance, please contact our ace at (336) 449-7625. • Sincerely, , - Shari L. Bryant Piedmont Region Coordinator - Habitat Conservation Program ec: Brian McRae, WRC Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries ~ 1721 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1721 Telephone: (919) 707-0220 Faac: {919) 707-0028 •••••••••••••••t••t••••••••••~•••••••t••!••! i w • • • • • • • • s • s • • • • • i • • • • • • • w • • • • • i • • Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan Appendix C Conservation Easement '•i•i•••••••!•i•i•••••i••••••••••••••••••i•i• i ~cw .r I ...~ .d.. N E S ~ ~A ~ai ro NOTES: w nm..s ~ w.r.wn we ..n.. i..w . w.c. 1~``M~~~~/~111~~y~~~^~II{~w~Y_~,yt/~~1~~1 ~M1~Mf ~rM`~AIIM MM IMF It ~MIF I IwMr ~ 1A0~~ R~9 MtlOtO OM 0 w111~Iw i 1flN rc~~a~';i~~iw~i ~ .arias ~ ~~_ e~w w w ~ n7i'ii'Ai w we w. ..y~f'Q ~ S..Iti ~~urtJ ,~ ~- s..~ i ~ NIIAX p,~ 5y'+..~COWIr j, ~~c ~'~ ~~w'~ia~~ ~~~w ~/~~~~ ry~w 1Mlai.a~M `nT sw~ n ~$o .. ~rrlri',I; MiIQ`,.~ C"' ~zl~tK allQ19M E9~ ~U@~ICi 4_~+ •yo~,,uCOUN'TyN `S as a~rr -.~ aar rnw arw+- ncrr acwrt +c3r~r ~ ~ w~ ~ras~c~Y~~ we~i~ u ~w-:i'_ euw~ ~. /a bra iNlt x wia wr r~u ~w~M ~w.w.~-a~w~ mw ro nya~-~ ww-w~s~~wrw~ t*aw ass M~w-rn -.--"-- ,~r~~.. err /P/At ask ~~ Py~ l fkp :. fin., ~«~'. NG Tly a~, iooc ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~s E 6 e ~~ y}r k5 r }6~€~ r i n ~~ ~ ~ ~ i~~ ~<~x ~ ~ f ~.~~;~..~ ~~~ ~,~~ ~~ ~~ _. l~~~ ~B ~ art ~~~i ~~ I E fa r:: f' !a 4g ({ E E ~ ~ ~~ ~` ~ RRRe i6 I~ ~ RRRR ~6 I~ ~` ~ RRRR j6 ~~ ~r. RRRR 36 ~~ ~r. cfRR ~6 il~G~t 3 a ~pE@ r a 3~~ ~~~~ a ~~~E e a ~ [iC~~ r : ~ E~~~ III E "~ [rx ~ a~9~ ii ~ ~x ~ {3~> ~ ~~~~ F~~~ 1~ R~ ~~ aka 1~ a~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ 11 t ` i~~ g ` aC~ `i~`f = 1 I ~1 cdE R s i [~ ~ i~~ Rg g ~ ~ ~ ~~~ yg 4~~~~1~9~~ie~~3~4ii-=f s~9~iGe~~3197~'s~i~ v ~~ ~~ i~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~t~~~~tt~~~~~~~~~[~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ d RRRRRR RR RRRRRR`"R`RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR`R"R`R`RRRRRRRR`RRRRRR`RRRRRRR 1 n € R _ ....... RRR R . R RR R R ... R R .. ~ r ~ < RRRR "~ ~~~CE~~~E@E~pp@@FF~E~@p@~~~~~~E~~~~FE~~E~~EC~~~~~~~~~E~F@~iEE~E~~~E~~C+C€~~[C+@~CE~~ ~ ~f ~~ [i~Cl~ aRSf R ! alas ;aR C iR a < i11t i ^R 1 ~ ~ F' asa f fRRQiR~a R ~f- ~ i s ~7E = Ra ~= ~ ~~ ~~a~Fi9~~i~~~~~~~~s~ye~~=~~x~~~e~~~~f~Fz~:i~~~~:gF~/9~~•!at~=a~E~Frl~~a~l~1~~~~?iF ~a .~ ~r ~~.~ ~ ~~ ~ ~i~~~~~~~ Y ' ~ ~ ~ Ll ~_ - _ ri R RR R s f s i s s 3~ g~ ~ ~~ f R r< ~~ f~ ~~ f f I~ ~r¢¢~ ` Ig 1 r ~~1 9 ~ ~..~ i ~~ F ~ ' ~G 1 F ~ uw pYNt 1 a.,. a x inl's ~ .IMiI ~ F + ~~ ~ 1 ~} F 1 FF 4 ~ ~~ • x ~. ~ . ~~~ I ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ 8~ ~~ ~4 a 1 `^or K,K 1 66 ".KiKis+i _~~ ~ ..~. ~ I O ~ ./ ' F ~~ ~. ~ .. {. ~ KffRl'F TOi ~' 'I .~ ~ ~ F} M[K e ' ~~ tt ~• ~ am ~ ~ ~ ~ +„'f £k ~ "~Ne ~ ~~ +' s¢ -- -- --i K-,~... --- -- Ri w~i 1 I ( •.. 111 ..~~ ',~/ "\ 1" d\ ~! ` C 1 + lg r ~~ ~~ f `fig ~ ~„~;: -~ S~tiii G r ~~ ~,~ ~: a :~~ 1 ~. f 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~ ~~ ~E ;~ ~ ye~ft ~ X00 ~ I I I~~= W M 2 ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ 0. ~~ ~, ;~ ~ ~ QQ ~ • ~y ~l~~ "1 ~ ~~~~+E ~e ~~ t4 ~ ~~ ~~~ ~, ;~ ~ 1 ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ pRpRptRRt ~~ I ~,. ~ , p ~~ RF XE~, Y'. '. ~.: ~s ~~ -`' ~ 1 ~c S. .~.. 1 b``•, ~ t( `: ~~ j ~ !'} *ay ROy~4 ~, t ~ R ,063 P~Q,t9 ~' E _ _ ~ :~ ~~_ ~ , ~ *~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~R ,~ !1 ° ~ , f~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ j~, ~ i~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ i~~ ~~~x f~~ ~y LyRpRGtRpGCR6pRpRpRpRRpRppRpR ~~ r~ ~RF RGRRpR ~ ~~ ~x+b}/^ cRRRRt i! ~ ~~~acusr ~~~ ~ i C[CL'![~tR~t'!~ . t! ;~~67 t~l~}C} !t t!'!2 1cIFRCe tbC 4~ R ~E~~~~~~ 9 ~ ~s~ ~ ~ 1~ ~~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~i ~ ~~~ ~~ !1 ~ k U z ~„ a o~ w a ON d~ W ~~ ~~x Y, 5~~ Y = ~~< ~~~~ ~~~ r .' ~ ~~ ~~ r .. j•••••••~•••••••••••S•••••••••••••••••••••••• Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan Appendix D Project Site Photographs • • • • • • • • • ~,., ~, ~ ~ / ~ ~, /,,,., i,., / / • / ~ /,, / ~,. ~,,, ~,,. PROJECT SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Tributary 1 A view of T 1-3 in between the confluences with T3 and T4. T1-4 just upstream of confluence with T6; aggradation is seen in the channel. T1-1 shortly after it comes onto the site (upstream of the confluence with T2). T1-4 after the confluence with T4. Sand deposition is evident in the channel and on the banks. An overwidened riffle on T 1-4 is shown in the foreground with the confluence with T6 in the far left corner. The end of T 1-5 before it leaves the site. PROJECT SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Tributary 2 ~ ,~ ` i ~' T ~ ~_ L ~ ~~ ~ t f~~i _f~ ~.~ . '« . r .. i4 . ~ - ~' ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ..mo~tt ~ ~~ ,' YC X C .. `LpL 7~+ ~~~~ x•9 s~4 f ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ •~ ~„~ ¢ -~~, a ,y Top of T2-1 where the channel has the appropriate pattern, but is experiencing bank erosion from cattle. T2-2 as it comes away from the valley wall . ~~ r ~. _ ~r A ~ ~ ~, - ~ " ~~ ~ ~; ~ ~_~- . ~ :~ R ~ `: f s r ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ti ~~°` i r a -~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~> _-__ ~ :, ``~ ,~ ; A section of incised channel on T2-4 shortly before it joins T1. Looking upstream along T2-2 where the channel runs against a steep valley wall. PROJECT SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Tributary 3 ` ~ • ~ ~ +r. ~ ~~ .~ ~ - y@ ,. ~2 1i 4 ~. i' ~. :, ~~ ~. A w 4 . kflb '!' ~ I R ~. .{: fk n e ' '."Y F Y.i:. M1` ~ ~u a a~ ~ ym"# f ' ~ a ~ - Looking upstream at a headcut where T3-1 begins; the stream is migrating up into the seep area. ~ 4 ~~1 ~ ~. ~ ~a ~R ~ ~ ~~~ ~ y s,~ ~ .° 1 ' ~ . ~ 5 ~ ~'~. ~A m t } ~ ~ fl sS _ {" +~ ` - fir" d:.,. ' L ~> Looking downstream on T3-1 as the stream goes through a wetland area. A section of T3-2 approximately 3/4 downstream from the top of the stream (Cross-Section 8). T3-2 after the large headcut where it has become deeply incised (Cross-Section 3). Large headcut on T3-2 approximately 100 feet downstream of the beginning of the tributary. PROJECT SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Tributary 4 -- F ti .S ~,~ t ,tM ~- .t:la 4 ~~ "- 1 y a ` a « 3 te ~~°- ~ ~ ~ ,, . , 4 3 ~ ~ ~~ ` ' View within the gully on T4-2. Looking down at the gully that T4-2 has formed. s+ Another view of T4-2 approximately midway down the tributary. "`~ `-~ 4!~~ - ~ .. ~~ Z ,~, ~., ~ "-, ~t; ~~~ ~'y ~ i ti~ V n. ~~ t, s. w~ ^ ~._ .~ e~~ T4-2 at Cross-Section 27/Gauge 2 location, which shows the severe bank erosion the channel is experiencing. Headcut near the beginning of T4-1. A downstream view of T4-2 approximately 1 /3 down from beginning of T4. PROJECT SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Tributaries 5, 6A, 6B, 6C, and 6 :~ ?r~ :.Say '` K~°., -_ ,~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~<< ~~ ~: ', Ix w _ ~ -~ ~ ;_, r' n r. 9 y~. ~ 'P"" ~-~ .. ti's Y4,.d ~ ~~ -i ~ + 3 ~ 7 S _,~ a * ., ~ ~ ~ e~ ~ ~r IaE y A ~ ., kL..° TM' 3 ~~ { - rv hI T6B-headwater reach of T6. ~' ~ ~~ .. ru,. ..Jar .i4: ~ry ~ ~ ~ 9 '~; ~ `a,s r # .' ~ ~ , `~ ~ ~ 'q.. ~ _ $ ~` - -~"-` _ - T6A-headwater reach of T6. a ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ < d~4 `~ ~ P,~~ ~` ~ ~ r ~, '~', ~~w ry ~, ~ F ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~yyy~.:' r a ~~ ~ 5 ~,i s ca -~ rfr ~ s S a `- ~' ~ k ~.• ~ ~ , .. x -, .~ . , ~,, _ ~ ~ . Looking downstream on T6C approximately T6 at Cross-Section 37 as the tributary nears 100 feet below its start. the confluence with T1. A view of TS-2 looking downstream just below the existing cattle crossing. Beginning of T6C at a groundwater seep, where a headcut has also formed. PROJECT SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Tributaries 7A and 7 T7-1 after the confluence with T7A. A vertical bank on T7-2 just downstream of Cross-Section 41. 4 ~ ~ _ ~ ~~ i ~' -~ ~'~ .~ - ~ .~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . s., „, ~. i ~~ - ~~ ~_~ An upstream view of the beginning of T7-1. ~, ~ ~. w -r gEC„~ -~ ~ ~ ~_~ ~_ ~ y ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; :,k~. a~ ., n., Bank erosion along T7-2 around Cross- Section 41. ~ ~ ~ ` ,. ~ r ~ ,'{ r '+ ~~ [ ~' ~, ~ ~ d1 ~ ` r a :~ry`.. •~ ~~r~ ~.x ~ ~~ l a xz 3 L T . T7-3 at Cross-Section 47 and downstream of T8. Looking upstream along T7A. PROJECT SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Tributary 7, cont. ~1 gal ~ ,n . -C . ' rf,~k _ * ~ ~ ~ '.M'lY 'p" 4 . ~ ~ ~ e _ ~ ~ is V Y .~ : r : a ~,f, T7-3 along Cross-Section 53. . °°'"~ p' ' j ~ ~ ~ ~.~,. .;~ <t ~~ ; ,~~. ~~ #~ _ ~,~ ° ~ , Looking upstream on T7-4 as it enters a section with bedrock. «, 1 ~ ,~ i~ ~~ ~ n _; ~~~~~~ ~ ~ 1 ~~' ~ `i~~ `~ { ~ ~ ~~_ .~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ::~ " ll i M1„ _ ,~ ~~ ~~ -~ r y k -, :, ~ y r . A downstream view of T7-3 at Cross-Section 50 showing eroding banks. T7-3 shortly after the confluence with T8, but upstream of the confluence with T9. Eroding banks as the channel meets the valley wall on T7-3. Another series of bedrock on T7-4. PROJECT SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Tributary 7, cont. F ,~.~. k"-~~ Bedrock on T7-4 Overwidened section of channel along T7-6. y • X ~ '+ ~ z' ~ .r i r+ x"$f ~.. i ,~ny`yes ~. n . .e,.._ - .p y ~- ~~'.W ~ ' ~ ~ '. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ' ~~ ~ J ~ -r , r - - ~ \1 ' 3 c L °# ~ t 4 ~ ~ . _ ~,, y ~E ~"~. '3 s~. ~4 _ F~~~~ '~ ~ E 4 ~ ~` ~ 7 ~ ~g J t ~ A~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ^y yy Overwidened section on T7-7 (downstream of confluence with T10). tiedroclc series along 1 "/- / approximately 3UU feet upstream of the confluence with Cane Creek. Bedrock crossing on T7-6 just upstream of the confluence with T10. PROJECT SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Tributaries 8A, 8, and 9 T8A. A downstream view of T8. - , ~a y~ ~, ~, ~.. e ~ ~` &~~ ~ ~ ~ Ir il ~ a u ~ ~ x 1 ~ .~ f ` ~ V ~ a S J ~ fl ~d^ V ~ ~~,. £ i ~~ ~ ~ S 1 ~ ' ~~ ~'~ I 1Ye ~s JAM` m ~ ~V ~ ~ r~ ~ a r~ a ~Y~ ~yN" H ., ~ q~~r' ~~~ <' `~ ~ ~ ~' .~ } ~ . ,art ~. ~ ~i I~~ Y d: ~ ~ , ~ i Looking downstream at the start of T9. a ., rr,~ ~ µ ~TT #R, 4~ x $~"~ 4~~ ~ ^~ _ 't ~, ~~ s u R ' W 4M b ~ B ~5 ~ ~. ~~, ~ _ l ~ _ m b ' 'tl A°i~` a~ '~, a ,'a. , y~''~A, , 3 ~ s e .~ ~ ^ Beginning of T8 at a seep where a headcut has formed. Eroding banks on T8. Another downstream view of T9. PROJECT SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Tributary 10 Looking upstream on T 10-1. ~° ~ °° w, `, ~ ~,, }; .~~ .~~. ~:, ~'~' =r- ~~' :,a Looking downstream from a bedrock drop along T 10-1. Overwidened and aggrading section of T 10-2 as it nears the confluence with T7. A downstream view of the beginning of T 10-1 with cobble and bedrock material evident. Craze Creek Tributary Sate Stream Restoration Paart Appendix E Existing Conditions Data ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••:•••00 River Basin: Up er Roanoke Watershed: Trib I XS ID XS 9, Riffle Draina a Area s mi : 0.269 Date: .lanuar 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0.00 51421 5.33 513.96 8.50 514.15 12.20 514.17 15.71 514.36 19.1 I 514.46 22.01 514.24 24.04 513.10 25.12 511.95 26.36 511.10 26.71 509.79 27.34 509.61 30.64 509.79 31.90 509.88 32.88 509.84 33.86 509.96 34.44 509.78 35.48 511.82 37.05 513.36 38.11 514.02 40.60 514.25 44.60 514.15 47.22 514.65 50.65 515.24 55.08 515.56 66.36 516.12 70.54 516.51 76.97 516.95 SUMMARY D,AT:1 Bankfull Elevation: 511.1 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 10.9 Bankfull Width: 8.8 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 512.6 Flood Prone Width: 11.7 Max De th at Bankfull: t .5 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.2 W / D Ratio: 7.1 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.3 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 3.0 Slope (ft/ft): 0.008 Discharge (cfs) 45 ,° ,~x s;~, Stream Ty e: G4c Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 1, XS 9, Riffle 518 516 y 514 c 512 W 0 ]0 20 30 40 50 Station (feet) Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area 510 508 60 70 80 Material Size Range (mm) Count Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 1 XS 9 silUclay 0 - 0.062 cu mulative % - - -- # of part icles veryfine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 1 100% silUclay sand gravel cobble boulder coarse sand 0.5 - 1 5 25 ve coarse sand 1 - 2 1 90% very fine gravel 2 -4 1 ° 80 /° ----- --- -------- ------ - fine gravel 4 - 6 1 ~ ~ I 20 fine gravel 6 - 8 15 ~ 70% ~ ~ medium gravel 8 - 11 14 ~ o 60 /o I medium gravel 11 - 16 22 w I 15 coarse gravel 16 -22 18 ~ 50% ----- --- -------- ---- I o coarse gravel 22 - 32 16 ~ 40% I ! ~ very coarse gravel 32 - 45 4 °- I I 10 ~ very coarse gravel 45 - 64 5 30% ~ I m small cobble 64 - 90 1 20% I I 5 medium cobble 90 - 128 I I large cobble 128 - 180 10% ~ I ve lar e cobble 180 - 256 0% I 0 small boulder 256 - 362 0 01 0 1 small boulder 362 - 512 . . 1 10 100 1000 10000 medium boulder 512 - 1024 particle size (mm) large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: bedrock --------------------- clay hardpan --------------------- detritus/wood --------------------- artificial --------------------- Size (mm) D16 6.9 D35 11 D50 14 D65 18 Size Distribution mean 13.6 dispersion 2.0 skewness -0.01 silUclay sand gravel cobble Type 0% 7% 92% 1 tots count: Note: XS 9 D84 27 D95 48 boulder 0% I', , . , / . , / / / , ~ , . / , , , / . , , . ~ / / . , / i , . . , . ,. t 9 ~ . a ~ I"~ ~1 E ~ ik; f \ I ~ ~ ' a' b. I ~ "~ f ~ ~ $ i• II~ ~' ~~'~ ,~ ` ~ N~ 1 V ~ e0.: t ~ ~. ~ . x ~ ,, ~}, r ~# ~ ~~ ti ~ ~ K ~ ~ ~Y ~ a ~" ~~ - - * ~~ ~,.. , x r - ~ r~ ~ ~ , m . ,.~. • ~ ~ :~~. .,, >- ~, + ~~~.. . ~ ~ . Stream Type: - Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 1, XS 10, Pool 516 514 ^~ ~ 0 512 ~ Q W 510 I 508 0 10 20~ 30 40 50 60 Station (feet) ~- - - Bankfull - - Flood Prone Area River Basin: U per Roanoke Watershed: Trib 1 XS ID XS 10, Pool Drama a Area (s mi : 0.269 Date: .ianua 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0.00 ~ 13.97 2.80 513.78 5.86 513.81 9.26 513.81 12.05 513.92 14.85 513.95 15.94 513.60 16.77 512.83 17.68 511.49 18.48 5 ] 0.98 18.64 509.74 18.73 509.46 19.76 509.34 20.63 509.15 22.44 509.24 23.46 509.27 24.73 509.54 25.23 509.75 25.30 509.83 25.58 511.01 27.17 511.80 28.74 512.52 30.09 512.89 31.70 513.48 33.76 514.09 36.80 514.17 39.58 514.18 45.89 514.02 50.13 514.03 55.68 514.05 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 51 I.0 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 16.8 Bankfull Width: 9.3 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 1.9 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.8 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio• - Discharge (cfs) - I I I I I I I i 1 i l l l l I I I I I I I I V I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 i, 1 I I I I I I T I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I h i l l I I I I I I I 1 I I I I i l I I I I I I I 1 ~ a I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I. I I I I 1 I I I I I I ~ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i t l l l 1 I ~ I I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I ...1.__1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I ~~ I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I H i l l 1 I I 1 ~. •. I I I I I I I I LLL I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Watershed: Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis - 0 to 0.2 ft Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 100 % ~, I I I I i l I i l l l I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 90 ~ ~ ~. I I I I I i. i V I I I I I V I I I I I ~. i l I I li 1 1 i l I l l -rn-r,- - - 80 % ~ r 7 I l l l l m I I I I I I ' I I I I 1~ I ~ I ( I I I I I I I I i I I i I i ~ 70 I I ~ I 1 1 1 ~ i ~ I~ i l~ I ~ 'i V I I I I I i I i l l l~ I I I I I I ~ 60 I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l i l~ I I V I I I 50 % I i i I I ' I i I V I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I l l l i i I I I I I ~ ~ 40 I I I i V I I I ~. I I I I I i l l l' l I i V J I I I I I I V I I I V I 30 % --~ I ' l l l i ~ i I l i l l I V I I I I I I I I I i I I I I l l l i y 20% ' i I i i l l l I I i I I 1 I I i I l l i l I I I I I I i I I I I I I I, ~ I I I ~ i I I I I I I I I I I I I I 10% I I I I I I _ '. I I I I I I I I i t I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1~ 0% ___--1 I__I I I_.I__!_ ~ '- I '__I I I _I _._I._ I _I I ~ I~ I I I I__i I I I I I_.i. I I I I 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) f Cumulative Percent • Percent Item D16 I D35 Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 40 33.3% 33.3% Location: 2.0 16.5 13.8% 47.1 % Note: 4.0 13.5 11.3% 58.3% 8.0 15.0 12.5% 70.8% Bulk Sam le Sieve Anal sis 0 2 0 4 ft 16.0 19.0 15.8% 86.7% p y . - . 31.5 6.5 5.4% 92.1 % 100 % Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 9.5 7.9% 100.0% 90°/ ~ I I 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I 128.0 0.0 O.O% 1 00.0% ° I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I l i I I I I I I I I I , 256.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% ~ 80 ~ I I I I I I I I. '~ I I I ~~ I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Total: 120.0 100% ~ 70°/ I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I; I I I I l i ~ ii 60°/ 50°/ I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ~ I l l l i N 4O % I I I I I I I I I I I I i i I ~ i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 ~ °~ 30 % ~ I I I I I I I - I ~ I I I I I ~-i- I I I I I ~- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I a 20 % I I I ~ I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I i-. I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 % I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O~ I I I I I I I I 0.1 1 i I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) _ -Cumulative Percent • Percent Item l Size ercent less tha n mm Percent b substrate e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt/cla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 1.1 1.1 2.4 14.2 40.9 0% 47% 53% 0% --- --- I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ••••••••••s••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 4 Y ~ `~ I ~. ~ ~, .i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~„ t ~ ~.S ~ l r ~ t P y ~Y yu1S _ ~ • ,~ ~ ~ . h ~..~ ... - ~_ ~~. 5 - ~, ~;- ~ . ~ - i ~~ ~ ~ rtl`R - Y .~ : - ;~ ~ Stream Type: Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 1, XS 16, Pool i 516 514 - 512 - r 0 > 510 - - _ _ 508 - 506 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Station (feet) I - Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area i_ River Basin: U cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 1 XS ID XS 16, Pool Draina a Area (s mi): 0 39 Date: ~ uniarv 2007 Field Crew: ~ ~:. Ruhcr~a Station Elevation 0.00 ? 11.40 3.85 510.97 6.91 5 11.08 9.79 511.07 12.68 511.20 15.92 511.78 18.81 512.07 21.84 512.28 22.75 512.36 23.79 512.22 24.80 511.64 25.35 510.26 26.75 509.60 27.85 508.18 28.83 508.07 29.82 508.00 30.77 507.66 31.74 507.4R 32.80 507.41 33.42 507.41 33.90 507.47 34.71 507.65 35.77 507.64 36.66 507.66 36.95 510.63 37.70 511.16 38.88 511.62 39.75 511.98 40.79 512.18 41.76 512.27 42.67 512.36 43.78 512.47 46.73 512.51 49.64 512.90 54.14 513.29 55.67 513.28 60.72 513.61 7L(,7 514.19 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 509.6 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 17.6 Bankfull Width: 10.0 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 2.2 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.8 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Slope (ft/ft): - Discharge (cfs) - River Basin: U icr Roanoke Watershed: Trio 1 XS ID XS 17, Riffle Draina a Area (s mi : (1.39 Date: Janua 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0.0(1 5 11.96 3.09 511.72 5.98 510.67 8.44 510.61 10.53 510.77 12.70 510.49 17.11 511.33 25.61 511.55 27.61 511.79 32.53 512.01 34.80 51 L78 35.45 511.55 35.93 511.13 36.22 509.71 36.62 509.17 37.12 508.77 38.04 508.03 38.11 507.86 38.31 507.72 39.03 507.80 39.72 507.79 40.43 507.78 41.49 507.85 41.98 507.81 43.54 507.80 43.89 507.79 44.35 507.89 44.69 508.55 44.96 508.93 45.51 509.36 45.77 509.82 46.42 510.48 47.16 510.98 49.04 5 11.41 54.71 512.34 56.64 512.34 59.13 512.65 77.89 514.24 tiUi17MARl' DATA Bankfull Elevation: 509.2 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 9.8 Bankfull Width: 8.6 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 510.6 Flood Prone Width: 12.0 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.4 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.1 W / D Ratio• 7.5 Entrenchment Ratio: I.4 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 2.3 Slope (ft/ft): 0.008 Discharge (cfs) 41 516 514 v 512 0 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 1, XS 17, Riffle ~ 510 W 508 506 ! + ~ ~ i I 0 10 20 30 40 50 Station (feel) Bankfull - ~ - Flood Prone Area 60 70 80 ~ / , , , , , . , / / , , / , ~ / , , / / . / / . , . , ~I~ , , . , , , / , , , , , , , , , , , , , / , , , , , , / , , , , , , Material Size Range (mm) Count Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 1 XS 17 silt/clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 1 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 2 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 6 very coarse sand 1 - 2 6 very fine gravel 2 - 4 10 fine gravel 4 - 6 6 fine gravel 6 - 8 17 medium gravel 8 - 11 30 medium gravel 11 - 16 12 coarse gravel 16 - 22 8 coarse gravel 22 - 32 2 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 1 ve coarse ravel 45 - 64 small cobble 64 - 90 medium cobble 90 - 128 large cobble 128 - 180 ve lar a cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 small boulder 362 - 512 medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: 101 bedrock ------------- 2 clay hardpan ------------- detritus/wood ------------- Note: XS 17 total count: 103 100% 90% 80% c ~ 70% c 60% w ~ 50% U ~- 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -~- cumulative % # of particles silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder ---- --------- --- I I I I I ---- --------- --- Y i I I I I I I I I I 0.01 0.1 Size (mm) D16 2.2 D35 6.5 D50 8.2 D65 9.6 D84 14 D95 20 1 10 100 particle size (mm) Size Distribution _ mean 5.5 dispersion 2.7 skewness -0.19 35 30 25 7 C 3 20 m 0 -o 15 ~ ~~ m 10 ~ 5 0 1000 10000 silt/clay 0% sand 15% gravel 83% cobble 0% boulder 0% bedrock 2% ,;. ~.~; ~ ~ ~ ~. , ~ a i i ~~` t ~ * o- ~ir~ ~~I ~ ~wr- o- .` u~ ,.- ,. ~ ~. ~.aaN -* s,~ ~~ ~ v 4 ~ ,~ . ~ Y j ••••~ ~ . ~ -~, „ ,,. > ~, _ ~ Stream Type: F4 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 1, XS 18, Riffle 510 508 ~ ~ 506 S ~ ~ 504 r.U _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I 502 _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ - - - - - _ - - - _ - _ _ - - - - - _ 500 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Station (feet) Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area River Basin: U ~ cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib I XS ID XS 18, Riffle Draina a Area (s mi): 0 587 Date: I ~ hi u~ir~ '00? 1~ icld Cr~e«~: ~ t v1 ~ , Station Elevation 0.00 504.67 6.58 504.39 11.08 504.58 14.91 504.44 18.20 504.89 20.77 504.75 23.60 505.03 24.91 505.01 27.46 505.31 30.33 505.31 33.26 505.37 34.45 505.14 35.23 504.15 36.35 503.40 37.53 502.90 38.35 502.38 39.52 501.84 40.58 501.35 41.45 500.63 42.85 500.56 43.96 500.62 45.39 500.62 46.34 500.62 47.01 500.70 47.86 501.37 48.12 502.33 49.43 503.06 50.34 503.25 51.42 503.49 53.21 503.90 56.04 505.15 60.36 505.14 63.38 504.90 72.31 504.50 78.15 504.60 83.39 504.62 88.20 505.04 96.38 505.22 SU~1~1AR1~ DA"FA Bankfull Elevation: 501.8 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 8.2 Bankfull Width: 8.4 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 503.1 Flood Prone Width: 12.2 Max De th at Bankfull: L3 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.0 W / D Ratio• 8.6 Entrenchment Ratio: I.5 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 3.6 Slope (ft/ft): 0.013 Discharge (cfs) 36 I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••s••••••••••••••~ Material Size Range (mm) Count Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 1 XS 18 -we % -# of particles silt/clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 l bbl ld b 25 - 0 5 di d 0 6 silt/clay sand grave co e ou er 30 . me um san . 100% coarse sand 0.5 - 1 3 ve coarse sand 1 - 2 1 90% 25 very fine gravel 2 - 4 2 80% - - - - - fine gravel 4- 6 2 m I ~ fine gravel 6 - 8 14 w 70% I 20 ~ medium gravel 8 - 11 22 c 60% I m medium gravel 11 - 16 27 `~ ~ o coarse gravel 16 - 22 15 ~ ~, 50% ---- -- ------- ---- 15 ~ coarse gravel 22 - 32 8 n 40% ~ very coarse gravel 32 - 45 5 10 ~ very coarse gravel 45 - 64 1 30% I ~ small cobble 64 - 90 1 20% medium cobble 90 - 128 5 large cobble 128 - 180 10% ve lar a cobble 180 - 256 p% 0 small boulder 256 - 362 1 01 0 0 1 10 100 1000 10000 small boulder 362 - 512 . . medium boulder 512 - 1024 particle size (mm) large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: bedrock --------------------- clay hardpan --------------------- detritus/wood --------------------- artificial --------------------- Size (mm) D16 6.4 D35 9.2 D50 12 D65 14 Size Distribution mean 11.6 dispersion 1.8 skewness -0.02 silt/clay sand gravel cobble Type p% 9% 90% 1 tots count: Note: XS 18 7 D84 21 D95 36 boulder 0% a ~ y << ' " . ~-- ~. _ ~ .~ R : t i + ~= ~ ~Y ' ~k~ r ~.- 1~ ' ~. y . ~ - . ~ , ~ i, ;~~ < N h l ~~'~~ ~ ` r~.. r . . ~`1j'*w ~~ y~ . . . ~ 9r„ ;s+.'~' z `~" ~ ,,.fit - - r ,~ N f -~,~1 ~ ~" ~ ,i~ "` ~ "~ Stream T e: - Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 1, XS 19, Pool 508 506 ti ~ ~ 504 r 0 ° 502 = - _ - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - ~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ ~v 500 -- 498 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Station (feet) ~I ~ Bankfull - - -Flood Prone Area River Basin: U cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 1 XS ID XS 19, Pool Draina a Area (s mi): 0 587 Date: I ~ hi u;~rv '007 Field Crew: ( ~ .li,»c~. hi -h~. U ~-.IZ,~hrrF. Station Elevation 0.00 5U4?S 6.46 504.64 10.96 504.95 15.46 504.91 21.26 504.73 24.43 504.60 25.52 504.48 28.50 503.55 31.50 502.86 33.14 502.25 34.77 502.09 35.88 501.93 36.61 501.52 36.89 500.56 37.22 500.48 37.89 500.00 39.20 499.63 40.80 499.35 42.68 499.15 43.73 499.61 44.57 500.74 45.09 502.26 46.29 503.29 47.53 504.12 50.31 504.52 55.18 504.42 62.27 504.21 74.66 504.00 84.99 504.27 100.72 505.00 SU~1.11AIZF DA"I~A Bankfull Elevation: 501.9 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 18. I Bankfull Width: 9.1 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 2.7 Mean De th at Bankfull: 2.0 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: Slope (ft/ft): - Discharge (cfs) - •••••••••••••••••••••••••i•••••••••••••i••i• Watershed: Bar Sample Sieve Analysis 100° Sands ~ Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock i 90 i ~ ~ i ~ i ~ i i i ~ i ~ i i i ~ i i ~ i i i iii i 80 i i i i ~~~ i i i iii, i i i i iii i i i i i ~i i i i iii ~ m 70 % i i i i ~ ~ i -+-r~-. ~ i ~ i i i ~ - -r--r i i i i i i ~ i i i ~ i i i i ~ iii i ~ ~ 60 i i i i i ~ ~ i i ~ i i i ~ i ~ ~ i i i i i i i ~ ~ i i ~ ~ iii i 50 ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~ i ~ i i i ~ ~ ~ i ~ i i i i ~, i i ~~ i i~ i i ~ iii i ~ i i i i i i ~ i i ~ i i ~~ i ~ i ~ i i i_ i i ~ i i i ~ iii i ~ 40 ~ v i i i i ii~~ v i i i iii i ~, ~ ~ i iii i i i ~~~~, i i i i iii ~ 30 % ~+ ~ ~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~~I - - ~ ~ i i i~ i ~, ~ i i ii i i i i ~~ ail ~ i ~ i iii 20 i i i i i ~ ~ ~ i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ~ i i ~ ~ i i i ~ iii i 10% i i i i i iii i• ~. i ili i i i iii i i i i iii i i i i iii 0. 1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) (-Cumulative Percent • Percent Item Smallest Sieve Passed mm Weight oz % Item Percent Finer Than Stream: Watershed: 1.0 36 24.7% 24.7% Location: 2.0 8.5 5.8% 30.5% Note: 4.0 5.5 3.8% 34.2% ~ 8.0 13.0 8.9% 43.2% Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis - 0 to 0.2 ft 16.0 29.0 19.9% 63.0% 31.5 30.5 20.9% 83.9% 100 % Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 23.5 16.1 % 100.0% 90 % ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 128.0 0.0 O.0% 100.0% 80 % i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ~ iii i 256.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% ~ i i i i i iii i i i iii i v i i i iii i i i i i iii i i i i iii Total: 146.0 100% m F 70% ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ so% 50% ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i~il ~ ~ ~~~: ~ 40 i i ~~ i i i i ~ ~ i i i i i i i ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ iii ~ v 30/ ~ i ~ i ~ iii ~ i iii i i i i i iii i i i i i iii i i i ii: a 20 i i i iii ~ ~ i iii i i i i ~~i i i i ~ ~ iii i~ i ~ ii: 10% i ~ ~ i i i ~ i i i iii 0% ___ I_--_I. _!. I I I. ~._I_ 0.1 1 ` ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~i i i i i iii i i i i~~ 7 1 1 ~ i i I I I ~, ~ ~ !_.. ~. I. _~ ~_) is I ~ I I I I~ 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) #-Cumulative Percent • Percent Item i Size ercent less than mm Percent b substrate e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt/cla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 4.2 4.2 10.2 31.6 51.4 0% 30% 70% 0% --- --- •~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 40 35.7% 35.7% Location: 2.0 8.5 7.6% 43.3% Note: 4.0 5.5 4.9% 48.2% 8.0 13.0 11.6% 59.8% Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis 0.2-0.4 ft 16.0 19.0 17.0% 76.8% 31.5 16.5 14.7% 91.5% 100°/ Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 9.5 8.5% 100.0% ' ' "" ' ' "' ~! ' ' "" ' ' ' ' "' ' ' "" 128.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% 90% T ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ i " ' i ' ' ' " " ' ' " "' 256.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% ~ 80% ~~ i i~ i i i i i ~i i i ~ i~ l i ~ i i i i i i i i i i i~` I i i i i i i ~ l Total: 112.0 100% m ~ 70 ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~;'; ~ ~ ~ ~~~, 60 50 °o' 40% ~ i -, iii, i ~ ii i i ~ i i i iii i i i ~ ~ ~~ i i i iii a 30% i i i iii ~-~ i~ ii i i ~ ~ i iii i i ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ~ i i ~~~ i i i i i • ~ i i i! i ~ ~ ~ i ~ i i i ~ i ~ i l i i ~ iii ~ ooh i.. i i i i i ~_ i i i i i '~ i i i i i ~~. i i ~) i i i ~. i; 1_ i _~ i i I i 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) f Cumulative Percent • Percent Item I Size ercent less tha n mm Percent b sub strate e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt/cla sand rave l cobble boulder bedrock 4.5 4.5 4.5 22.3 42.1 0% 43% 57% 0% --- --- River Basin: U ~pcr Roanoke Watershed: Trio I XS ID XS 20, Riffle Drama a Area (s mi): U.>96 Date: I~rhruarv ~00~ Field Crew: ~ -r.i~;,~, ~ i,,.:. ~.~ _~r~- Station Elevation 0.00 503.3-1 5.29 503.56 9.08 503.26 13.30 502.95 18.24 502.51 21.94 502.52 23.87 502.44 25.24 502.27 26.67 501.32 27.34 500.98 27.91 500.47 28.45 500.21 28.77 499.84 29.02 499.69 29.36 499.33 30.27 499.20 31.04 498.96 32.85 498.89 32.94 498.78 34.01 498.71 34.57 498.69 35.30 498.66 35.86 498.75 36.04 499.50 36.50 499.72 37.50 500.46 38.04 500.57 40.71 501.35 43.02 501.74 46.23 502.15 48.71 503.10 54.40 503.06 59.30 502.80 61.71 502.43 65.28 502.63 68.64 502.51 75.63 502.70 tiU~ti1MARY' DA"1'A Bankfull Elevation: 500.6 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 12.9 Bankfull Width: 10.2 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 502.5 Flood Prone Width: 25.4 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.9 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.3 W / D Ratio: 8.1 Entrenchment Ratio: 2.5 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 1.8 Slope (ft/ft): 0.008 Discharge (cfs) 60 508 506 a, `. 504 r 0 502 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Statron (feel) [- - - Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area 80 ~~ Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 1, XS 20, Riffle ••••••••••i•••••••••••!•••••••••••i••••~••i• Material Size Range (mm) Count Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 1 XS 20 silt/clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 f~ d 0 125 0 25 1 me san - medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 6 100% coarse sand 0.5 - 1 6 very coarse sand 1 - 2 90% very fine gravel 2 - 4 2 80% fine gravel 4 - 6 1 ~ fine gravel 6 - 8 11 w 70% medium gravel 8 - 11 23 ~ ° medium gravel 11 - 16 18 ,~ ° coarse gravel 16 - 22 21 ~ 50% coarse gravel 22 - 32 8 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 3 0- 40% ve coarse ravel 45 - 64 1 small cobble 64 - 90 30% medium cobble 90 - 128 large cobble 128 - 180 20% ve lar a cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 10% small boulder 362 - 512 0% -+-cumulative % # of particles snvciay sans cwoie medium boulder 512 - 1024 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 particle size (mm) total particle count: 101 Size (mm) Size Distribution bedrock ------------- D16 6 mean 11.2 clay hardpan ------------- D35 9 dispersion 1.9 detritus/wood ------------- D50 11 skewness 0.01 total count: 101 Note: XS 20 D65 15 D84 21 D95 30 25 20 c 15 ~ m 0 -o 10 m m 5 0 1000 10000 Tvae silt/clay 0% sand 13% gravel 87% cobble 0% boulder 0% ~, ,. ~~r .. D rY W e ` 1 YI y~ ' ; A .-i!' ~ ~ . ' q ~, ~ ~ i ' ~ ~ . f , ~ ~I ~ . i ~.. "M a.1C ~ • •. Stream T e: - - - - - - - Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 1, XS 21, Pool 508 506 y 504 0 502 I W 500 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 498 - j 496 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Station (feet) ' Bankful] ' Flood Prone Area i River Basin: U ~ icr Roanoke Watershed: Trib I XS ID XS 21, Pool Drama a Area (s mi): 0.596 Date: Fcbruar 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0-00 503.:;6 x.32 503.43 10.02 503.5(1 15.51 503.55 20.93 503.47 23.62 503.50 27.83 503.42 29.99 503.43 31.36 503.06 32.80 502.20 33.96 501.35 35.60 500.50 37.30 499.82 39.94 499.39 42.11 498.88 42.69 498.43 43.82 498.02 45.1 1 497.(,1 46.32 497.38 47.47 497.34 48.42 497.39 48.53 497.44 49.74 499.81 52.55 501.29 54.58 502.60 59.32 502.61 65.59 502.38 75.38 502.36 79.66 502.28 94.93 502.26 100.65 501.72 SUJ~L11AR1 UA'I'A Bankfull Elevation: 499.8 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 16.6 Bankfull Width: 12.3 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 2.5 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.3 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Slope (ft/ft): - Discharge (cfs) - ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••i••••••••••• L •~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~ a. ~„ Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: r Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 40 14.4% 14.4% Location: 2.0 34.5 12.4% 26.8% Note: 4.0 13.5 4.9% 31.7% 8.0 43.0 15.5% 47.1% Bar Sample Sieve Analysis 16.0 48.0 17.3% 64.4% 31 5 46 5 16 7% 1% 81 ° Sands ~ Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock . 64.0 . 52.5 . 18.9% . 1 00.0% 100 I I I I I I I I I V I I I 1 I ~ I l l l f I I I 1 1 1 1 1 '~ - ~ I I ~ I I I I' 128 0 0 0 O.O% 100.0% 90% I -rr-r,- ~-r I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I i l l l I I V I I I ~ 1 ~I 1 1 1 I I I i I I 1 1 1 1 ~t . 256.0 . 0.0 O.O% 100.0% C 0 ° I 1 I V I I I 1 I I~ I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I i i I I I I I Total: 278.0 100% m ~ 70 % --~ I ~ I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I i l I ~ I I I I I I I I V I I I I 1 I I I I I ~ ~ 60 I I I I I I I ~ I ( I I I I I I I I 1 1 I + I 1 1 1 1 II 1 I I I I I I '. C 50 I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 - I l l l l I I I I I I I I~ I I I I I I I y L 40 % I I I h i l l I I I I I I I ~ I V I I I f I I I I t l ~ I I I I I d 30% I I I I I i I I t i I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 ~ I i l l l 20% ° 1 '~ I I I~ i l I L ~~ ~ I I I I I.I , i I • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 10°° I 0 / - 0.1 ._ I ~ '~ I I I I I I ~. I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I ~ -~~- I I I i _ I _ 1 y~~ I ~. _I. I LIJ_ I. I. 1T I i I 1 10 100 1000 Particle Size (mm) III-Cumulative Percent t i I I I I I C- I ~. J-L ~. 10000 • Percent Item I Size er cent less than mm Percent b substrate pe D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt/cla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 1.1 4.6 9.0 35.1 53.0 0% 27% 73% 0% --- --- Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: .' Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 26 18.2% 18.2% Location: 2.0 14.5 10.1 % 28.3% Note: 4.0 9.5 6.6% 35.0% 8.0 15.0 10.5% 45.5% Bulk Sample Sieve Anal sis - 0 to 0 2 ft 16.0 28.0 19.6% 65.0% y . 31.5 30.5 21.3% 86.4% 100 % Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 19.5 13.6% 100.0% ~~°~ I I I ~~~~ I I ~I ~I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I t l l~ l I I I I I I 128.0 0.0 O.O% 100.0% I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I~~~ 256.0 0.0 O.O% 100.0% ~ so ~ I I 1 1 1 1 I I ~ I I 1 1 I I I I I I I r I I I I* I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total: 143.0 1 00% ~ L ~ ~o% I I I I I I I ,. i , 1 1 1 1 I ~ I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 ~ i l l l 'I ~ ii so % 50 I I I I I I ~~ I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4t)°~ i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l i l l l I I I I I I I N L 30°~ I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 V I I I a 20 °/ I I I I I I I ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I ~ I 1 1 1 100 I I I I I I I ~ I i 1 I I 1 I I I j 1 I 1 __ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0% I I ~ I I I_ I I 0.1 1 I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I _._ I ~ ~ _I I I I I I I I I ~ ~ J. I I I I I I I.I 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) _ Imo-Cumulative Percent • Percent Item ~ Size ercent less tha n mm Percent b substra te e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt/cla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 4.0 4.0 9.4 29.2 49.4 0% 28% 72% 0% --- --- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~ Watershed: Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis 0.2-0.4 ft 100% Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock i i i i i i i i i ~ i ~ i i i i i i ~ i i i i i i i i~ i, i i i iii i 90 80 % - -, r-~- ~ ~ ~ i i i ~ ~ ~ i ~ i i i ~ T i i ~ ~ i ~ i i i i ~ ~ ~ i i iii i m 70°/ r ~ i iii i i ~ i i i ~ i i ~ i ~ i i i ~ i i, i i~ i i ~ i ~ 60 i i i iii i i i i i i iil i i i i~ i ii @ i i i iii 50 ~ 40 v ~~ i i i iii i ~ i ~ ii~l i v i i i iii i i ~ i i i ~i i i i iii d 30% ~~ i i i i iii i i i i i iii i ~ ~ i i iii i i i i i i i ~ i i ~, i iii 20 % '~-' 10°/ ~ ~ i ~ i i i i i i ~ i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ~ i i ~ i i~ i ~ u i ~ i i i iii i ~ i i i i ~ i i i i iii i i i i iii i i i ~ i iiI i ~~ i i i iii i i i i ~, ii ._! _i ~ i iii 0% 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) ~-Cumulative Percent • Percent Item River Basin: Up ~cr Roanoke Watershed: Trih I XS ID XS 29, Pool Draina a Area (s mi): 0.736 Date: Fchruarc ?007 Field Crew: ~ ~ ; - ~ Station Elevation 0.00 >01.79 G.55 501.35 I L52 501.34 21.55 501.33 27.84 501.42 32.19 501.02 35.55 501.23 45.22 501.35 46.50 501.38 47.71 SOI.08 48.85 500.62 49.85 499.45 SQ29 499.16 50.89 498.62 51.28 49269 51.63 495.33 52.51 495.43 54.01 495.82 54.72 495.97 55.33 495.93 56.37 496.78 56.83 497.47 57.61 497.75 58.86 498.34 60.28 498.85 62.36 499.89 66.39 500.10 70.13 499.91 74.16 500.04 76.27 501.19 77.48 SOI.37 78.99 501.26 81.40 501.35 85.74 500.97 90.30 500.74 93.21 500.45 96.92 501.46 100.84 500.53 SUMMARI' DATA Bankfull Elevation: 498.3 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 14.2 Bankfull Width: 7.8 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 3.0 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.8 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Discharge (cfs) 505 _503 v 501 r 0 > 499 W 497 495 ~ ~;. Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 1, XS 29, Pool f._._..... --j-. f.... 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Station (feet) ~- - Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area 80 90 100 '••••••i•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••is River Basin: U>>er Roanoke Watershed: I rib 1 XS ID KS 30, Riffle Drama a Area s mi : 0.736 Date: f ehrua 2007 Field Crew: Gurdner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Eleva tion 0.00 501. 29 4.98 501. 18 9.92 501.09 14.96 501. 00 16.02 500. 61 17.96 501.04 23.09 500. 89 26.41 501.23 28.85 501. 16 31.63 500.99 34.68 500. 39 35.51 500.04 36.69 499.04 3268 498.13 38.46 497. 36 39.22 496. 86 40.18 496. 35 40.23 496. 03 40.88 496. 03 41.65 496. 10 42.70 496. 11 43.06 496. 12 43.74 496. 29 44.32 496. 50 44.98 497. 05 46.24 497.64 47.95 498. 36 49.03 498. 96 50.03 499. 40 52.00 499. 54 56.06 499. 19 57.48 499.11 67.16 499. 84 64.08 499. 69 65.76 500. 16 67.35 500.82 69.52 501. 11 73.92 500. 95 77.11 500. 77 79.82 500. 53 81.67 500. 67 SUMMARY D.4"FA Bankfull Elevation: 498.4 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 15.3 Bankfull Width: 10.5 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 500.7 Flood Prooe Width: 35.0 Max De th at Bankfull: 2.3 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.5 W / D Ratio: 7.2 Entrenchment Ratio: 3.3 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 1.4 Slope (ft/ft): 0.007 Dischar a (cfs) 75 Station (feet) - Bankfull ~ ~ ~ Flood Prone Area Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 1, XS 30, Riffle Material Size Range (mm) Count Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 1 XS 30 Imo-cumulative % -# of particles silUclay 0 - 0.062 2 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 5 100% silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder 30 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 4 ver coarse sand 1 - 2 90% very fine gravel 2 - 4 1 80% ---- -- ------- ------- 25 fine gravel 4 - 6 1 ~ I fine gravel 6- 8 1 ~ 70% d 20 ~ medium gravel 8 - 11 6 ~ 60% I ~ medium gravel 11 - 16 7 `~ `D coarse gravel 16 -22 15 ~ 50% ---- -- ------- ------ 15 ° coarse gravel 22 - 32 28 ~ 40% ~ very coarse gravel 32 - 45 17 °- 10 "- very coarse gravel 45 - 64 8 30% ~ small cobble 64 - 90 2 o 20 /° I medium cobble 90 - 128 3 I 5 large cobble 128 - 180 10% ve lar e cobble 180 - 256 0% I 0 small boulder 256 - 362 0 01 0 1 1 10 100 small boulder 362 - 512 . . 1000 10000 medium boulder 512 - 1024 particle size (mm) large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar e boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: Size (mm) Size Distribution Type bedrock --------------------- D16 8.9 mean 19.3 silUclay 2% clay hardpan --------------------- D35 19 dispersion 2.2 sand 9% detritus/wood --------------------- D50 24 skewness -0.11 gravel 84% artificial --------------------- D65 30 cobble 5% tots count: Note: XS 30 D84 42 D95 64 boulder 0% River Basin: U ~ xr Roanoke Watershed: UTCC-Trib 1 XS ID XS 31, Riffle Drama a Area (s mi): 0.736 Date: I c'~nrin~''00" Field Crew: ~. ,ieh~. ~~lillcr. 1Zobcrts Station Elevation 0.00 499.52 5.02 499.69 20.51 498.81 25.93 499.05 31.96 498.91 38.37 499.43 42.97 499.39 45.00 499.23 47.07 498.75 49.36 498.05 50.23 497.44 51.64 496.85 52.12 495.91 54.65 495.46 55.91 494.94 56.75 494.53 57.75 494.55 58.47 494.46 59.50 494.33 60.76 494.36 61.38 494.43 62.82 494.54 64.39 494.77 65.77 495.42 66.85 495.71 67.06 496.26 68.33 496.73 69.32 497.30 69.87 497.50 70.49 498.10 71.39 498.29 73.00 498.43 75.39 498.50 87.37 498.57 91.80 498.69 98.20 499.06 104.93 499.09 11 1.45 499.58 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 496.3 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 20.1 Bankfull Width: 15.1 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 498.2 Flood Prone Width: 19.0 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.9 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.3 W / D Ratio: 1 1.3 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.3 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 2. I Slope (ft/ft): 0.007 Discharge (efs) 101 502 500 v 498 r 0 496 W 494 492 ~ a ~ ~: a~ CIF ter ~. . , ~ , .~ .-_ ~ . wi ., .,F e "'r m ~ R. ~' ..Y. °~ ~! ^ ~ - ,- ;~ - ,; ~~ . - =~._~r .,~. - .~ ~ _ t~ ~` ~ ~~ I ~. _ , ~ `. .r, .~ . .x # -- .~ ~ ~ Upper Roanoke River Basin, UTCC-Trib 1, XS 31, Riffle 0 ]0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Station (feet) - - Bankfull - - ~ Flood Prone Area Material Size Range (mm) Count silt/clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 2 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 7 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 1 very coarse sand 1 - 2 5 very fine gravel 2 - 4 4 fine gravel 4 - 6 3 fine gravel 6 - 8 10 medium gravel 8 - 11 10 medium gravel 11 - 16 10 coarse gravel 16 - 22 7 coarse gravel 22 - 32 6 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 13 ve coarse ravel 45 - 64 6 small cobble 64 - 90 9 medium cobble 90 - 128 5 large cobble 128 - 180 1 ve lar e cobble 180 - 256 1 small boulder 256 - 362 small boulder 362 - 512 medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 ver lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: 100 bedrock clay hardpan detritus/wood total count: 100 Note: D16 2.4 D35 8.8 D50 15 D65 32 D84 64 D95 100 1 10 particle size (mm) Size Distribution mean 12.4 dispersion 5.3 skewness -0.07 14 12 10 8 m 0 6 v m 4 N 2 0 100 1000 10000 Tvoe silt/clay 0% sand 15% gravel 69% cobble 16% boulder 0% Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 1 XS 31 100% 90% 80% c L 70% c 60% w a~i 50% U ~- 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% --°~°° cumulative "~:, ~ of p~rtiCle~ silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder ---- --------- ------- ---- ----- --- --- 0.01 0.1 Size (mm River Basin: U er Roanoke Watershed: Trib 1 XS ID XS 32, Pool Drains a Area s mi : 0.736 Date: Febnia 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0.00 499.52 13.01 499.32 18.70 499.20 21.62 498.83 26.48 498.49 30.83 498.83 33.43 498.85 37.40 499.05 40.37 499.21 44.37 499.14 48.12 498.74 49.51 498.27 53.58 497.84 X5.36 497.50 55.94 496.99 56.46 496.52 57.23 495.73 58.80 495.42 59.17 494.98 59.78 494.32 59.87 493.78 6L67 493.54 63.42 493.48 64.19 493.50 65.62 493.99 66.78 494.32 68.88 493.75 69.71 493.97 70.60 494.31 71. ] 0 494.54 72.02 495.50 73.16 496.73 73.79 497.55 75.10 497.8] 78.28 497.59 82.90 498.18 87.11 498.33 96.87 498.35 100.43 498.52 104.77 499.26 SUM~L4RY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 495.7 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 23.1 Bankfull Width: 15.0 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 2.2 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.5 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Slope (ft/ft): - I)lCCll'31'~?:f (CIS) - Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 1, XS 32, Pool 502 500 y 498 > 496 494 492 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Station (feet) - - - Bankfull 70 80 90 100 Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed. ,~ :_ 1.0 104 56.4% 56.4% Location: 2.0 44.5 24.1 % 80.5% Note: 4.0 13.5 7.3% 87.8% 8.0 11.0 6.0% 93.8% Bar Sam le Sieve An l i p a ys s 16.0 7.0 3.8% 97.6% 31.5 4.5 2.4% 100.0% o Sands 100 E Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% ~~°~ I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 128.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% o I I 1 V I I I V I I I I I I I i l l l I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I V I I I 256.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% C gp ~ i I I I I' I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I V I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I Total: 184.5 100% L ~ 700 -.._-_~r.. I I I I i ~I ~ ~. _ ~~ I I V I I I 1 ~ i I I I I I I I V I I I' I 1 I I I I I ~ 60% ii 50°/ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~, V I I I I I I I I I I I V I I I 1 I I I I~ I I I 1 I ~ I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1' ~ 40°/ . I I I I ~! I I I I' l l 1 1 ~ I I I I I I I I I ~ I l l i 1 ~ ~ I I I I I 1 I a 30° , I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 I I I I ~. 1 1 1 I I i l l l l I ~~ I V I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I i V I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I V I I I I I I V I I I I 10% I V I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I.I I I I ( I I I I 1 1 I V I I I I 1 V I I I 00~ _.. _I. 11_I__I_.I~_._ _J L_..L_L1~L.. •~t_.I 11.1 ~J.._.I.. 1. 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) If-Cumulative Percent • Percent Item Size ercent less than mm Percent b substrate t pe D16 D35 D50 D8 4 D95 silt/cla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 10.0 0% 80% 20% 0% --- --- ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••!••••••••••i Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 23 15.1 % 15.1 % Location: 2.0 12.5 8.2% 23.4% Note: 4.0 21.5 14.1% 37.5% 8.0 5.0 3.3% 40.8% Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis - 0 to 0 2 ft 16.0 5.0 3.3% 44.1% . 31.5 2.5 1.6% 45.7% 100% Sands E Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 82.5 54.3% 100.0% 90Q/ I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ~ i 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I~ I I I I l i 128.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% I 1 I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I ~~ 256.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% SO% ~ I I I I I I I ~ V I I I I I I I I I I ~ 1 I I I III 1 t ! I I I Total: 152.0 100°/U ~ 7o r I I - I I I I I , I I I I I ~ V I I I I 1 I I I I I I, I I I I I I C soar 50% I I I I I I ~ '. I I I I I '~ I I I 1 ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I '. '. ~ ~ 40 I I '. I I I! I '~ V I I I I ~ 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I! I I I I I 1 ' I I I I ~I N U 30/ I I 1 '. I I I I I ! I I I I I I I V I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I d 20% ~ I I ( I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I V I I I 1 1 V I I I, 100 I 1 ! I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 i ~ I i 1 I I V I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I Op~ ___ I_ _ I 0.1 I I I I I I I I I I! 1 ! I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I ! '_ I~I. _.._ • I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I' 10 100 1000 Particle Size (mm) --f-Cumulative Percent I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I ( I I I I 10000 • Pere Size ercen t less tha n mm Percent b sub strate e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silUcla sand rave l cobble boulder bedrock 1.1 3.5 33.3 51.9 60.0 0% 23% 77% 0% --- --- Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 0 0.0% 0.0% Location: ~~' 2.0 0.0 0.0% 0.0% Note: 4.0 0.0 0.0% 0.0% 8.0 3.0 7.0% 7.0% Bulk Sample Sieve Anal sis 0 2-0 4 ft 16.0 0.0 0.0% 7.0% y . . 31.5 20.0 46.5% 53.5% ~ 00 % Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 20.0 46.5% 1 00.0% ~ I I I I I 1 1 '. ~ I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I 1 28.0 0.0 O.O% 1 00.0°/U 80°j II i ~. I I I I _~_ _ I I I I I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I V I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' 256.0 0.0 O.O% 100.0% I II I I I I I I I V I I I I I I I i l I I ( I I I I I I I ( I I ~ 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 11 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total: 43.0 100% ~ so i I I I I I I I I I I I i l l l I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 L F,. ° I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '~ I I I I I I I ~ V I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I ~ 40 I t ! I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I i I I I I I I C I I V I I I I I I I i l I ! 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 V I I I ~ I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I V I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I 1 1 ~ 20°/ I I I I I I i 1 I 1 I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I n t l d I I V I I I i I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I i I V I I Q% I I I V I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I I I V I I I 1 I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i l l I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~t I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 11A 1 I I I I I I o I I I I I I I 1~ I I I I 0 I I I I I 110 I I 00 -20 I 1 I I I Particle Size (mm) Cumulative Percent • Percent Item Size erce nt less tha n mm Percent b subs trate e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt/cla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 18.2 24.1 29.9 50.2 59.3 0% 0% 100% 0% --- --- •~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~ •!•••i•••••i••is•••••!••••••••••••••~•••••••~i, River Basin: U per Roanoke Watershed: Trib 1 XS ID XS 33, Pool Drama a Area (s mi): 0.736 Date: Fcbrua 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0.00 495.37 6.73 495.39 14.43 495.27 21.56 495.26 28.66 495.26 35.59 495.09 41.36 494.7] 46.24 494.04 48.37 493.70 52.45 493.25 54.22 492.90 55.23 492.59 55.52 492.04 55.70 491.38 56.76 490.35 57.66 490.16 59.08 490.26 60.94 490.50 61.70 491.03 63.09 491.24 65.18 491.32 65.90 491.52 67.01 492.09 68.35 492.38 72.60 492.72 75.61 493.38 77.77 494.19 78.37 494.64 82.20 495.00 88.52 494.37 90.90 494.75 96.75 495.39 104.21 495.76 112.15 495.78 117.06 495.79 5UM~11RY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 492.7 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 22.4 Bankfull Width: 17.7 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 2.6 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.3 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Discharge (cfs) - 498 496 v 0 494 .~ W 492 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 1, XS 33, Pool 490 ~ 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Station (feet) Bankfull 70 80 90 100 110 120 River Basin: U cr Roanokc Watershed: Trib I XS ID XS 34, Riftlc Draina a Area (s mi): 0.736 Datc: Frhruarv ?110? FicldCrew: ~ .<<in~,~ 1t,~ 4,i .n. Al ~~ It. ,~,~n, Station Elevation 0.0O 494.(, I 3.72 494.67 11.46 494.74 14.62 494.92 18.65 494.75 22.55 494.27 24.8 I 493.93 26.80 493.41 29.06 493.05 33.53 492.76 35.57 492.49 38.18 492.51 38.98 492.40 39.86 491.43 40.48 491.32 40.78 490.94 41.26 490.10 42.53 490.17 45.12 490.24 47.07 490.12 48.38 490.24 50.44 490.32 53.60 490.32 55.71 490.41 56.63 490.63 57.19 491.05 57.78 491.58 58.82 491.96 59.51 492.50 60.58 493.83 61.98 494.69 71.02 494.98 73.47 495.14 76.07 495.31 78.76 495.(,9 81.31 496.03 84.05 496.39 86.43 498.02 tit~~1hL1Rl~ DA"I~A Bankfull Elevation: 191.3 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: I (i.8 Bankfull Width: 17.0 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 492.5 Flood Prone Width: 21.0 Max De th at Bankfull: L2 Mean De th at Bankfull: I.0 W / D Ratio: 17.2 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.2 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 2.0 Slope (ft/ft): 0.007 Discharge (cfs) 66 500 498 v 496 0 494 .~ W 492 490 488 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 1, XS 34, Rift7e 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Station (feet) Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area 70 80 90 •~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~s~s~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~ •~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i Material Size Range (mm) Count Riffle Surface Pebble Count, silt/clay Tributary 1 XS 34 sand gravel cumulative % - cobble boulder # of particles' silt/clay 0 - 0.062 100% 14 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 1 90% medium sand 0.25 -0.5 12 _____ ____ __ _ 12 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 8 80% I ve coarse sand 1 - 2 8 I very fine gravel 2 - 4 8 c70% I 10 fine gravel 4- 6 1 w I c fine gravel 6- 8 4 ° ° 60 / I c medium gravel 8 - 11 2 c ° ~ ~ medium gravel 11 - 16 5 c coarse gravel 16 -22 5 ~0% ----- ---- -- - - - ---- ~ -a coarse gravel 22 - 32 12 n I I ~' very coarse gravel 32 - 45 8 40% ~ 1 2 very coarse gravel 45 - 64 6 I I m small cobble 64 - 90 9 30% I ~ 4 medium cobble 90 - 128 6 I I large cobble 128 - 180 5 20% I ve lar a cobble 180 - 256 2 ~ I 2 small boulder 256 - 362 10% I I small boulder 362 - 512 1 I I I medium boulder 512 - 1024 0 large boulder 1024 - 2048 0% ve lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 0.01 0.1 1 10 article size (mm) 100 1000 10000 total particle count: Size (mm) p Size Distribution Type bedrock -- ---------- 2 D16 0.68 mean 7.5 silt/clay p% bedrock 2% clay hardpan --------------------- D35 3.7 dispersion 16.1 sand 28% detritus/wood --------------------- D50 19 skewness -0.28 gravel 49% artificial --------------------- D65 33 cobble 21 tots count: Note: XS 34 D84 D95 82 160 boulder 1% '~ b...= „ i ~ /S,} ~ / ~ } ,ll ~ , _ : ~~ N - I . a ' ' - c. ~~,s .:~ ~ - ,:~! ~ 4 t..' '^1 ... ~ ; ~ Stream Type: - ~ ' Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 1, XS 35, Pool 'I 499 497 - 495 - I 493 c a 491 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - `~ 489 i 487 485 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Station (feet) - - -Bankfull River Basin: U >>cr Roanoke Watershed: Trih I XS ID XS 35, Pool Drama a Area (s mi): O S I I Date: I ~ hi uurc '007 FieldCrcw: t I~.n, h ~I~ ~ i<< Station Elevation 0.00 493.70 12.74 492.45 20.85 492.43 29.23 492.24 33.22 492.32 35.77 492.09 37.(16 491.84 39.52 492.22 45. I I 492.34 48.57 491.78 52.77 49L03 54.82 490.18 56.72 489.77 58.17 489.33 59.27 488.78 60.64 488.68 62.85 488.68 64.77 487.84 65.66 487.49 66.63 487.44 67.74 487.15 68.88 487.28 70.08 487.68 71.58 489.28 72.56 490.95 73.39 493.77 74.70 494.16 76.62 494.54 80.89 495.13 82.45 495.61 84.65 496.34 88.35 496.33 91.89 495.91 94.42 495.38 96.35 495.62 99.94 496.07 107.47 496.75 112.74 497.74 SUIIM1IARI" DA"TA Bankfull Elevation: 490.2 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 28.9 Bankfull Width: 17.3 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 3.0 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.7 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Discharge (cfs) - •••••e.e.ee~••••~••••s•••~•~••••••••~•~•i•••~ •~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ River Basin: U >>cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib I XS ID XS 36, Riffle Drains a Area (s mi): 0.81 I Date: Frhruar v 2007 Field Crew: _ (~arucc~.I':a~~~,. h_ni~h;. Atil?~r. IZuhcr> Station Elevation 0,00 492.55 4.12 492.22 10.80 491.93 14.64 491.84 17.78 491.98 21.91 491.81 29.05 492.00 32.11 491.83 35.94 491.67 38.52 491.23 40.16 490.43 41.25 490.07 42.62 489.45 43.88 488.80 45.38 488.37 47.54 488.06 50.26 488.00 51.98 488.14 53.85 488.28 55.14 489.23 56.01 489.68 58.91 491.07 60.85 491.64 64.05 492.08 67.13 492.22 71.02 492.30 75.26 492.00 77.16 492.32 80.07 492.22 90.56 492.04 90.56 492.05 93.04 492.01 95.20 492.45 97.23 493.17 101.30 494.04 103.24 494.36 104.40 494.86 106.15 494.92 SUMMARY DA"FA Bankfull Elevation: 489.7 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 16.8 Bankfull Width: 13.9 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 491.4 Flood Prone Width: 19.4 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.7 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.2 W / D Ratio: I I.5 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.4 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 2.3 Slope (ft/ft): 0.009 Discharge (cfs) 83 496 494 ~"~ 492 r 0 490 W 488 486 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 1, XS 36, Riffle 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Station (feet) Bankfull - - ~ Flood Prone Area Material Size Range (mm) Count Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 1 XS 36 silt/clay 0 - 0.062 -cumulative % -# of particles very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 8 100% 14 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 4 very coarse sand 1 - 2 3 90% ---- --------- ----- -- - 12 very fine gravel 2 - 4 80% fine gravel 4- 6 1 ~ I f6 70% I 10 fine gravel 6 - 8 5 ~ I ~ medium gravel 8 - 11 3 ~ I ~ medium gravel 11 - 16 g w 60% I 8 m coarse gravel 16 - 22 12 c ° - - - - I ---- ----- --- I o coarse gravel 22 - 32 9 ~ ° ~ very coarse gravel 32 - 45 9 a 40% f ~ 6 ~ ve coarse ravel 45 - 64 4 I I m small cobble 64 - 90 11 30% I I 4 `~ medium cobble 90 - 128 13 I I large cobble 128 - 180 6 20% 1 1 ve lar a cobble 180 - 256 2 I I 2 small boulder 256 - 362 1 10% I I small boulder 362 - 512 0% I I 0 medium boulder 512 - 1024 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 particle size (mm) total particle count: 100 Size (mm) Size Distribution Type bedrock ---- D16 6 mean 25.7 silt/clay 0% clay hardpan ------------- D35 17 dispersion 4.3 sand 15% detritus/wood ------------- D50 27 skewness -0.02 gravel 52% artificial ------------- D65 54 cobble 32% total count: 100 D84 110 boulder 1% D95 160 Note: XS 36 ••••••••••••••••••••••i••••i•••••••••••••••• River Basin: U er Roanoke ;~ w 1 ~ ;;. , ~ ~ .x-- Watershed: Trib 2 ~'S". ,~ "~ ~ , p 1.~ ~ XS ID XS 11, Pool ~ ~ ~, ~ i , ~, } ~,.' ~ , E ~ ' Drama a Area s mi): 0.103 . _ - ~~ +,t,~,. Date: Janua 2007 ~ .~ ~+~:~ ~ ". . fi ' Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts ,, r ;- ~ «~ Station E levation SUMMARY DAT:~ ~ ~ ~ 'r,~ ~''"~, ~ 0.00 525.95 Bankfull Elevation: 520.4 ~ `"", ,~~~ w ?"'` ~: ~ ,, 5.51 525.06 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 3.5 ' *~ p". w~i~ ~'r~l ~~`" 12.02 524.26 Bankfull Width: 4.8 ~ ~ ~ ~~ +<, w 16.25 523.79 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - ;,-~ ~ ~ " ~ 17.77 523.52 Flood Prone Width: - ~ ~ ~ _ , " _• , ~ - 22.87 522.96 Max De th at Bankfull• 1.1 , ~ - 4 ~ ~ ^. ,~ a , ~," ., r - p ' ` ~` 27.08 522.45 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.7 ~.~ ° r ~r ~r¢ ~ ~, ; er ~ , 30.30 522.19 W / D Ratio: - °t~~ < x~ ~ ~ ,~ yi , ~„ ~ 33.93 521.78 Entrenchment Ratio: - , ~ ~ ti s ~* ~ ~` ~ ~ 1 £ " 36.94 521.55 BankHei ht Ratio: - ,r ~ ,;'~ ,~ `"f ~~ ~ ~ ~~;. •~= 39 27 521 55 Sl e (ft/ft): - . . op 41.69 521.45 Discharge (cfs) - Stream T e: - 44.10 521.21 --_ _ _ ___ _ _ __ 45.34 520.93 46.65 520.80 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 2, XS 11, Pool 47.57 520.78 526 48.20 520.62 48.36 519.39 49.13 519.39 524 - - -- - - - - 49.51 519.33 N 49.98 519.38 50.63 519.34 0 522 - - - - _-- - 50.68 5 ] 9.60 51.09 519.83 51.65 519.92 ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 52.39 520.01 I 520 53.06 520.41 53.50 521.33 54.91 521.76 518 56.30 522.12 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 58.28 522.46 Station (feet) 59.74 523.34 61.26 524.41 - -Bankfull • - -Flood Prone Area .. "~ ,,,~ s . Y. ~ r. w ~- . ,. ~ ; '` '"~,~ ' r ~ : _r ~ . •' r: ray A h i ~ '~~ _ ,e, t "K I' ~'y,y- y. 4} ~, r are ~ ~ r ~ ~ .... Stream T e: t:4 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 2, XS 12, Riffle 524 y 522 - - - s I °- - - - - - _ - ~ _ - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ _ - - _ ~ _ - - - _ ~ _ - _ ~ _ - - - - _ 520 i 518 0 10 20 30 40 50 ~ Station (~ee1) - Bankfull ' - - Flood Prone Area River Basin: U ~pcr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 2 XS ID XS 12, Rifflc Draina a Area s mi : Q 10 ~ Date: .Ianua~ 2007 Field Crew: Gardner. Il:rvc~- I~nieh~. 'dill ~ ~~ Station Elevation 0.00 52'_'.88 3.15 521.95 5.26 521.25 8.09 520.87 10.65 520.54 13.47 520.27 15.52 519.95 17.30 519.85 18.52 519.62 18.98 518.67 18.94 518.73 19.40 518.77 20.19 518.73 20.73 518.61 21.96 518.60 22.27 518.63 22.32 518.66 22.82 519.05 23.02 5]9.50 24.49 519.62 26.82 519.81 28.80 519.97 31.72 520.11 36.22 520.00 40.29 520.01 43.86 520.00 47.98 519.88 51.09 519.87 SUJ9ti1:1RY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 519.5 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 3.3 Bankfull Width: 4.4 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 520.4 Flood Prone Width: >40 Max De th at Bankfull: 0.9 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.8 W / D Ratio: 5.9 Entrenchment Ratio: >l0 Bank Hei ht Ratio: I.0 Slope (ft/ft): 0.013 Discharge (cfs) 13 •••i••••••••••••••••••i••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••iii••••••••••••ii••i•••••••••••••••••• Material Size Range (mm) Count silt/clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 1 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 3 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 12 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 10 very coarse sand 1 - 2 7 very fine gravel 2 - 4 6 fine gravel 4 - 6 2 fine gravel 6 - 8 6 medium gravel 8 - 11 8 medium gravel 11 - 16 4 coarse gravel 16 - 22 11 coarse gravel 22 - 32 15 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 9 very coarse ravel 45 - 64 5 small cobble 64 - 90 1 medium cobble 90 - 128 large cobble 128 - 180 ver lar a cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 small boulder 362 - 512 medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: 100 bedrock clay hardpan detritus/wood total count: 100 Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 2 XS 12 -cumulative % -# of part leci s 100% 90% 80% C ~ 70% c 60% ~ 50% U fl. 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder ---- -------- ------- I I I I i I I I 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 particle size (mm) Size (mm D16 0.5 D35 2.5 D50 9 D65 19 D84 31 D95 48 Size Distribution mean 3.9 dispersion 10.7 skewness -0.27 16 14 12 10 6 m 8 a 6 ~~ m m 4 2 0 1000 10000 Tvoe silt/clay 0% sand 33% gravel 66% cobble 1 boulder 0% P y ,; O ~ ' t w ~ ~ w ~. ar ; t~ r. w" , ~ a ~ i . _ ~ ~ , w y , , ~ ~,,. ~ ~ Y~ ~ ~I ~ 4 u~~ ~ .°s ~ "` / ~ ~ •T . " ,~ , ~~_ ~~ iY d y t. ~_ Stream T e: - ~'~ Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 2, XS 13, Pool ~ 518 516 - y m i 0 514 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ c m ~ 512 - 510 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 i Station (feet) i I - Bankfull - - Flood Prone Area River Basin: U > >cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 2 XS ID Xti 13, Pool Drama a Area s mi : 0. I l l Date: Januar 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation O.UO 51792 5.95 516.85 9.08 516.30 1 L04 516.21 14.08 515.99 10.98 515.90 20.06 516.00 22.95 515.98 24.67 516.17 26.79 516.16 28.99 515.88 29.96 515.67 32.26 514.31 32.47 514.29 32.98 512.21 33.84 512.00 34.85 512.14 34.89 512.19 35.87 512.66 36.81 512.74 37.65 513.02 38.62 513.12 38.75 513.00 40.00 513.52 4L96 SI3.97 42.70 514.25 43.75 514.34 44.14 515.59 45.73 515.79 47.89 515.90 51.90 516.15 55.49 516.24 61.75 516.70 68.94 517.19 SLi~137ARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 514.0 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 9.9 Bankfull Width: 9.4 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 2.0 Mean De th at Bankfull: I. I W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Dischar a (cfs) - •~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ River Basin: U ier Roanoke Watershed: Trib 2 XS ID XS 15, Riffle Draina a Area s mi): 0.1 I 1 Date: JamMnn~ 2007 _ Field Crew: _ ~- ~ ~~iilcr. Robcns Station Elevation 0.00 51726 4.02 516.81 5.89 516.52 15.60 515.22 19.06 515.26 24.45 515.40 27.93 515.61 33.95 515.73 35.39 515.57 36.39 515.33 36.90 514.81 38.01 514.40 38.57 514.05 40.43 513.35 41.03 512.99 41.36 512.64 41.73 512.22 42.04 512.13 42.39 512.04 42.93 512.05 43.46 512.05 44.51 512.10 44.89 512.13 45.69 512.45 46.12 513.05 46.64 513.33 47.10 513.72 47.64 514.43 51.54 515.68 54.99 516.00 58.28 516.19 61.24 516.35 68.46 516.53 74.38 517.56 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 5 13.3 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.7 Bankfull Width: 6.2 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 514.6 Flood Prone Width: 11.1 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.3 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.9 W / D Ratio: 6.7 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.8 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 2.5 Slope (ft/ft): 0.014 Discharge (cfs) 21 Station (feet) ~ankfull - - - Flood Prone Area Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 2, XS 15, Riffle Stream Type: G4c Material Size Range (rr silt/clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 very coarse sand 1 - 2 very fine gravel 2 - 4 fine gravel 4 - 6 fine gravel 6 - 8 medium gravel 8 - 11 medium gravel 11 - 16 coarse gravel 16 - 22 coarse gravel 22 - 32 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 very coarse gravel 45 - 64 small cobble 64 - 90 medium cobble 90 - 128 large cobble 128 - 180 very large cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 small boulder 362 - 512 medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 very large boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle coy bedrock ----- ---- clay hardpan -------------------- detritus/wood -------------------- total cou Note: XS 15 D16 0.33 D35 0.54 D50 1.5 D65 6.7 D84 16 D95 45 1 10 100 particle size (mm) Size Distribution mean 2.3 dispersion 7.6 skewness 0.14 1000 10000 Type silt/clay 0% sand 54% gravel 42% cobble 4% boulder 0% Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 2 XS 15 Count 4 30 100% 10 10 90% 5 80% 3 ~ 8 ~ 70% ~ c 60% 7 g ~ 50% 5 a 40% 1 1 30% 4 20% 10% 0% cumulative % -# of particles snvciay sana grave e boulder 35 30 25 ~ 3 20 0 15 10 v 5 0 0.01 0.1 Size (mm) ••••••••••••••••••••••r•~~i•••••••!••••••i•• ~t ;;~ x ~ ~ ~~ r~x :` 1V~, ~F.~ ~+ r ~ ~ ~ . ~ r P,;yr a ~~ ~~ x .~~ ~, ~ ''"'' ..' ~,. ~~ ~?`"- .~ ~k ~ "`~ ti ~n ~„ ~+ -a ,. Stream Type: E Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 3, XS 1, Riffle 550 548 - - - ~~ ti 546 I r 0 544 w - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i i II 542 - - - - - - " - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - 540 I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Station (feet) Bankfull ' Flood Prone Area * Slope influenced by large headcuts in reach profile River Basin: upper Roanoke Watershed: Trib 3 XS ID XS I,RifFle Drama a Area s mi): 0 024 Date: Iinaai}~?00~ Field Crew: t r ~ >> A n; t.; Station Elevation 0 547.25 4.27 546.51 8.70 546.16 12.43 545.95 19.16 545.82 22.60 545.64 24.61 545.38 27.08 544.70 28.15 544.20 29.16 543.67 30.32 543.37 31.13 542.97 31.52 542.89 31.93 542.22 31.86 541.08 32.2 541.06 32.4 540.99 32.7 540.96 33.1 541.05 33.8 541.14 34.4 543.13 35.6 543.54 36.9 543.83 38.6 544.53 42.1 544.79 49.8 544.93 56.0 545.28 61.2 545.42 SU~1~1.~RY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 542.2 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.4 Bankfull Width: 2.3 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 543.4 Flood Prone Width: 5.6 Max De th at BanWull: 1.2 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.1 W / D Ratio: 2.1 Entrenchment Ratio: 2.5 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 1.6 Slope (ft/ft): 0.056* Discharge (cfs) 15 1 ~~ Z. R ~ ~ ~t ~ r~ ~y, ti. ' '" ~ 7r jl'~~ :r a 1 a+`°` r . F" it r„"~' ~,~ ?r', rl~9+r fit, a,~ ~ w 5 .... .. ~~. .. ,~, ~: - •-, ors ~+'~. '~'+,p3P 7a *M"~"au' a 1.. .It w, '~ ~;. -sy~y'- ''", :y '4 y'""i ~ t: .:• .` ,' t~ k ~ ', ,bra' ,~: „~ a WW ~+'~ a Stream T e: E Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 3, XS 2, Riffle III 544 I y 542 - - - r 0 w 540 - 538 0 IO 20 30 40 50 60 70 ~I Station (feet) I i 'i - - Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area * Slope influenced by large headcuts in reach profile River Basin: Up ~cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 3 XS iD XS 2, Riffle Drama a Area s mi : 0.024 Date: I uuuuy ~I)0? Field Crew: (..iclnrr Ila~r: Ian ~ ~1i ~, Station Elevation 0.00 542.5p 2.55 542.33 5.91 541.78 7.49 541.25 10.16 540.98 13.13 540.99 16.00 540.64 18.77 540.59 21.32 540.55 23.98 540.42 26.46 540.30 28.89 540.28 31.16 540.23 32.94 540.18 33.62 540.23 34.29 540.02 34.84 539.61 35.06 538.98 35.12 538.87 35.80 538.84 36.45 538.83 36.38 539.00 36.99 539.46 37.47 540.12 38.07 540.59 38.62 540.91 40.27 540.77 43.60 540.57 46.28 540.43 48.72 540.55 52.23 540.47 54.60 540.67 57.13 540.75 59.93 541.08 63.04 541.20 65.69 541.29 69.38 541.50 71.95 ~-11.(,-l S111911ARti' DA"FA Bankfull Elevation: 540.1 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.7 Bankfull Width: 3.4 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 141.4 Flood Prone Width: 55.6 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.3 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.8 W / D Ratio: 4.3 Entrenchment Ratio: 16.3 Bank Hei ht Ratio: l .l Slope (ft/ft): 0.05(,* Discharge (cfs) 21 I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ •~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~ River Basin: Upper Roanoke Watershed: Trib 3 X5 ID XS 3, Riffle Draina a Area s mi): 0.075 Date: Janua 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0.00 537.93 4.60 537.61 9.91 536.76 17.24 536.31 24.79 536.23 29.34 536.00 32.87 535.53 33.75 535.15 35.00 534.18 35.53 533.57 36.43 531.90 35.86 531.99 37.72 531.83 38.60 531.89 38.58 531.90 39.56 532.04 40.49 532.35 41.50 532.80 42.37 534.91 46.77 535.29 51.71 536.11 55.98 536.74 60.85 537.45 66.72 537.91 73.08 538.60 90.71 541.37 SFMVIARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 532.8 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 4.2 Bankfull Width: 5.8 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 533.8 Flood Prone Width: 6.5 Max De th at Bankfull: i .0 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.7 W / D Ratio: 8.0 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.1 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 3.2 Slope (ft/ft): 0.020 Discharge (cfs) 22 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 3, XS 3, Riffle 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Station (feet) Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area 542 540 538 0 536 w 534 532 530 80 90 Material Size Range (mm) Count silt clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 5 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 13 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 26 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 17 very coarse sand 1 - 2 6 very fine gravel 2 - 4 5 fine gravel 4 - 6 1 fine gravel 6 - 8 4 medium gravel 8 - 11 4 medium gravel 11 - 16 3 coarse gravel 16 - 22 4 coarse gravel 22 - 32 4 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 4 ve coarse ravel 45 - 64 2 small cobble 64 - 90 5 medium cobble 90 - 128 large cobble 128 - 180 ve lar e cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 1 small boulder 362 - 512 medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar e boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: bedrock -- clay hardpan ---- detritus/wood ------------- 104 total count: 104 3 Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 3 XS 3 100% 90% 80% C r 70% c 60% w a~i 50% U °- 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -~^-riimulative °io # of particles silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder ---- ----- --- ----- I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I 0.01 0.1 Size (mm D16 0.23 D35 0.41 D50 0.69 D65 2.2 D84 21 D95 68 1 10 particle size (mm) Size Distribution mean 2.2 dispersion 16.7 skewness 0.36 30 25 20 ~ 3 Q m 15 ° 'D N ~' 10 m 5 0 100 1000 10000 Type silt/clay 0% sand 64% gravel 30% cobble 5% boulder 1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~• •~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~ River Basin: Lpper Roanoke Watershed: Trib 3 XS ID XS 4, Riffle Draina a Area (s mi): 0.075 Date: Januar 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes. Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0.00 534.91 2.94 534.02 4.97 533.68 9.41 533.44 14.37 533.24 18.45 533.33 21.91 533.07 24.40 532.74 27.19 532.53 28.97 532.30 30.63 531.79 31.08 531.59 32.01 530.31 32.13 530.11 32.70 529.11 32.94 528.98 33.26 528.90 34.00 528.96 34.74 528.99 35.31 528.92 35.47 528.98 36.05 529.10 36.59 529.31 37.35 530.25 38.55 531.36 39.46 531.59 41.57 531.81 44.44 532.11 49.76 532.53 54.40 533.18 61.36 533.73 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 530.1 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 4.8 Bankfull Width: S.l Flood Prone Area Elevation: 531.3 Flood Prone Width: 7.2 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.2 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.9 W / D Ratio: 5.4 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.4 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 2.0 Slope (ft/ft): 0.020 Discharge (cfs) 28 536 534 i 0 532 W 530 528 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 3, XS 4, Riffle - -- - - - -- - - - - r--- -F 0 10 20 30 40 Station (feet) `Bankfull ` - Flood Prone Area 50 60 Material Size Range (mm) Count silt/clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 4 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 6 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 15 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 26 ve coarse sand 1 - 2 19 very fine gravel 2 - 4 2 fine gravel 4 - 6 6 fine gravel 6 - 8 9 medium gravel 8 - 11 2 medium gravel 11 - 16 5 coarse gravel 16 - 22 3 coarse gravel 22 - 32 3 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 very coarse gravel 45 - 64 small cobble 64 - 90 medium cobble 90 - 128 large cobble 128 - 180 ve lar a cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 small boulder 362 - 512 medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: bedrock clay hardpan detritus/wood Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 3 XS 4 100% 90% c 80% m 70% c 60% 50% U n 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% ~-cumulative % -# of particles silt clay sand gravel cobble boulder ------------- ------ I Y I P i I I 30 25 20 ~ Q 15 ° a m 10 5 0 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 particle size (mm) Size (mm) Size Distribution Type D16 0.33 mean 1.6 silt/clay p% D35 0.65 dispersion 5.2 sand 70% D50 0.97 skewness 0.18 gravel 30% D65 1.7 cobble 0% D84 7.3 boulder 0% D95 18 •~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~ River Basin: U _ er Roanoke Watershed: Trib 3 XS ID XS 5. Riffle Drains a Area s mi): 0.075 Date: February 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Haves, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0.00 528.91 1.05 529.48 2.70 529.69 4.69 529.57 6.71 529.58 10.68 529.20 14.83 528.96 15.67 528.79 17.60 528.82 18.65 528.73 19.25 528.55 19.91 527.98 20.68 528.05 21.72 527.88 22.05 527.74 22.47 527.53 23.75 527.76 24.14 527.87 24.67 527.96 25.76 528.10 26.68 528.13 28.72 528.47 30,68 528.56 33.31 528.41 39.13 527.95 52.88 528.12 55.24 528.05 58.46 528.24 64.70 528.19 67.65 528.88 70.71 529.13 73.74 529.28 76.73 529.38 79.44 529.29 ~~'.i~7 529.43 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 528.5 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.1 Bankfull Width: 10.9 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 529.5 Flood Prone Width: 78.1 Max De th at Bankfull: l .0 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.5 W / D Ratio: 23.3 Entrenchment Ratio: 7.2 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 1.0 Slope (ftlft): 0.020 Discharge (cfs) 18 530 529 r c w 528 527 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 3, XS 5, Riffle 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Station (feet) Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area 70 80 Material Size Range (mm) Count silUclay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 6 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 12 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 47 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 17 very coarse sand 1 - 2 4 very fine gravel 2 - 4 2 fine gravel 4 - 6 4 fine gravel 6 - 8 7 medium gravel 8 - 11 1 medium gravel 11 - 16 coarse gravel 16 - 22 coarse gravel 22 - 32 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 ve coarse ravel 45 - 64 small cobble 64 - 90 medium cobble 90 - 128 large cobble 128 - 180 ve lar e cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 small boulder 362 - 512 medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: 100 bedrock --- clay hardpan detritus/wood ------------- total count: 100 Note: XS 5 Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 3 XS 5 100% 90% 80% c r 70% c 60% w a~i 50% U N °- 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% tcumulative % -# of particles sang cobble 0.01 0.1 Size (mm) D16 0.22 D35 0.32 D50 0.4 D65 0.5 D84 1.4 D95 6.8 50 45 40 35 ~ 30 6 m 25 ° N 20 m 15 ~' 10 5 0 1 10 10G 1000 10000 particle size (mm) Size Distribution Type mean 0.6 silUclay 0% dispersion 2.7 sand 86% skewness 0.16 gravel 14% cobble 0% boulder 0% •~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a Stream: Watershed Location: Note: Bar Sample Sieve Analysis Sands ~ Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 100 I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - 90 % I I 1 I I I I I! I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 '. I I I I 80 ~ ~ C I I I I I I t l I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I i l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I -- m L 70 % -- ~ I I I I I I ~ I t I I I I I I ~ I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 60 % ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i t I I I I I I I I 50 % I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I ~ I I I I I I I] I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I~ I ~ U ~ 40 % I I ~ I I I I I I I I I ~ 1 1 1 1 I I ~. I I I I I I " I I I I I I I I I I I I I d 30 % _- - I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I ° 20 / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I ~~ 1( 1 1 ~ - 10% I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ 1 I I II • I I I I I + i I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I ~ IJ1 ~ 'J~~L~ i J I J I J LTI ! 00~ . . _ _ ~. _ -___i --- _ . . _ . - _ ._ . _ ____.. __- ___ 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) f Cumulative Percent • Percent Item ~ ,:~. ~ - Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: . Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: ' . 1.0 48 48.0% 48.0% Location: ' ~' 2.0 24.5 24.5% 72.5% Note: + 4.0 13.5 13.5% 86.0% 8.0 11.0 11.0% 97.0% Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis - 0 to 0 2 ft 16.0 3.0 3.0% 100.0% . 31.5 O.t) 0.0% 100.0% 100°/ Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 0.0 O.O% 100.0% I I 1 I I I I I ~ 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I V I I I ' 90°/ 1 28.0 0.0 O.O% 100.0% I I I V I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I i I I I I 256.0 0.0 O.O% 100.0% ~ 80 % ° I I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 --- I I I 1 1 1 1 1 -1- I I I 11 1 I Total: 100 0 100% ~ 70 / ' ~ . ~ . 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I ! I I I I I ~ ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ so % ~ so% I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ; ' ~ 40°/ I I I V I I I . V I I I 1 I I V I I I I i I I I I I I I I ~. I I I I U I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I V I I I I I V I I I ~ d 30 % - ~_.L « I I I I I I I I I i l l l I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 20 % 1 ~ u 10 % I I I I I I I I I j; l l l l ' I I V I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I V I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 V I I I ~% _ I i ~_ t.l _I..I_. _-_. __ I. I '. _I.'.I I __._~ I I I t I _1. 1 I I 11_I.I I I I 1 1 _I...1 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) Cumulative Percent • Percent Item Size er cent less tha n mm Percent b sub strate e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt/cla sand rave l cobble boulder bedrock 1.1 1.1 1.1 3.6 7.1 0% 73% 28% 0% --- --- ••••••••••••••i••••••••••••••i•••••••••••••• Watershed: Location: Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis 0.2-0.4 ft Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 100 % i I 1 V I I I I '. ! I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i I I I I 90 % - ~ I 1 V I I I I I I I i I V I I I I I I I I i l l I I I I I I 80 I I I - I I l f l l 1 I ( I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 ~ I' 1 1 I I I I C s 70~/ I I : I l ~ I I '~ I I I I i V I I I I ~ I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 11~ I I I I I I I I 60 ' C I I I ( I I I I I ~ i I I I I I '. I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 '~ ~~ I I I I I I I ly 5Q / I V I I I I V I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I~ ~, ''! I I I I I I I I I " , i ; ~ ` 40 % I I I I I I I ~ ry I I I I I I I 1 I 11 I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L d 3(] % I I I I I I I-I- I I I I I I I i I 11 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I 20% I I i I I I I -- ~ • i I I I I I ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I V I I I 100 i I 1 i I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I . I ~ V I I I i I I I V I I I I I I I I I 0~ I___ I _I _l I I I ,,_. I. I._ I__! I I I I I I I I i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 0. 1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) ~-Cumulative Percent • Percent Item River Basin: U > >er Roanoke Watershed: Trib 3 XS ID XS 6, RifFle Draina a Area s mi): 0.075 Date: Fcbruar ~ 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, I laves. Knight Miller. Kohrri, Station Elevation 0.00 526.07 3.14 525.38 8.82 524.61 15.04 524.21 18.94 523.91 24.28 523.53 27.60 523.27 30.57 523.12 32.47 523.18 33.25 521.59 33.87 521.22 34.39 519.78 34.78 519.38 34.82 518.91 35.88 518.86 36.92 518.80 37.82 5 18.43 38.65 518.81 39.41 520.21 42.62 521.75 46.87 522.58 55.75 522.85 55.72 522.82 68.05 523.23 93.28 524.30 SUYI~9ARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 519.4 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.5 Bankfull Width: 4.2 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 520.3 Flood Prone Width: 5.5 Max De th at Bankfull: I.0 Mean De th at Bankfull• 0.6 W / D Ratio: 7.1 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.3 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 1.9 Slope (ft/ft): 0.020 Discharge (cfs) 1 1 526 524 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 3, XS 6, Riffle 0 522 0 520 518 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Station (feet) Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area 70 80 90 •~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ••••••••~••••!•••••i•••••••••••••••••••••••• River Basin: Upper Roanoke Watershed: Trib 3 XS ID XS 7, Riffle Drama a Area (s mi): 0.075 Date: F<:bruar~ ~ 200? Field Crew: _ ~ s;r-. ~ ~~.~, I~~~. R~~bcrts Station Elevation 0.110 5 19.95 2.39 519.46 4.96 519.36 8.11 519.14 11.38 518.75 13.89 518.57 16.00 518.29 18.82 517.86 21.]8 517.42 23.33 517.18 24.20 516.72 26.25 516.12 27.01 515.46 27.62 514.69 28.73 513.98 29.24 513.59 29.62 S 13.21 29.88 513.19 30.15 513.11 30.92 513.23 31.43 513.54 32.16 513.79 33.25 514.43 34.84 515.20 36.50 516.83 38.80 517.82 42.88 518.47 48.17 519.17 53.89 519.94 64.78 520.53 78.86 522.10 SUNIVIARI" DATA Bankfull Elevation: ~ 14.4 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 4.0 Bankfull Width: 5.2 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 515.7 Flood Prone Width: 8.7 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.3 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.8 W 1 D Ratio: 6.8 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.7 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 2.3 Slope (ft/ft): 0.020 Discharge (cfs) 17 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 3, XS 7, Riffle 521 519 fi c 517 W 515 E:_:_::::::::\::f_:~ ::::::..:::::.:.:::: 513 ~ 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Station (feet) Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area 70 80 Material Size Range (mm) Count Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 3 XS 7 +cumulative % ~ -# of articles silt/clay 0 - 0.062 p very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 2 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 2 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 14 100% silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder coarse sand 0.5 - 1 30 35 ver coarse sand 1 - 2 21 90% very fine gravel 2 - 4 3 80% ---- -- ----- - ----- 30 fine gravel 4 - 6 ~ I fine gravel 6- 8 3 w 70% ~ 25 ~ medium gravel 8 - 11 7 ~ 60% I a' medium gravel 11 - 16 4 `~ I 20 m coarse gravel 16 - 22 8 ~ 50% - - - - - - - - - - I ° coarse gravel 22 - 32 6 ~ ° 40 / I I 15 m very coarse gravel 32 - 45 2 a ° I I very coarse gravel 45 - 64 30% ~ ~ 10 N small cobble 64 - 90 2p% I I medium cobble 90 - 128 I I 5 large cobble 128 - 180 10% I ver lar e cobble 180 - 256 0% 0 small boulder 256 - 362 0 01 0 small boulder 362 - 512 . .1 1 10 100 1000 10000 medium boulder 512 - 1024 particle size (mm) large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: Size (mm) Size Distribution Type bedrock --------------------- D16 0.46 mean 2.7 silt clay 0% clay hardpan ------------ D35 0.75 dispersion 8.5 sand 68% detritus/wood --------------------- D50 1.1 skewness 0.32 gravel 32% artificial --------------------- D65 1.8 cobble 0% tota count: Note: XS 7 D84 16 D95 26 boulder 0% . ¢, - ~~ ~. >- Y ~. i f* ~ , ® , , ~ ,~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ d,~i~a , ; _ t ' "` ~~ ~ . ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ f-, ~ _ SUV1i~lARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 514.1 ; ~ . --~ s K~ .~ ,'bra"> , i~x~y ~ ~. ~ ' `' ~, ~ ;~ ~ _ .~ Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 3.7 ,~ J t - ~ . '~. -~ Bankfull Width: 4.3 , s ,~ ~ °;~~ ~~,a Flood Prone Area Elevation: - ,~ -~~ ~~'~ , ~ ` ~~ ~~~" Flood Prone Width: - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ". ' ~ 1. Max De th at Bankfull: t .3 ` ti~ ,"~ ":`~ . ~ " ,~:f~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ y ` ~~N ,~ Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.9 ~+ * ~ ~ $~-_ }~ "~' W / D Ratio: - ~ ~ ' ~,; ~ Entrenchment Ratio: - ,~ ~~'~~ ': ~ - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - , Slope (ft/ft): - ~ .: Discharge (cfs) - Stream T e: - I~ Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 3, XS 8, Pool 520 I ~ 518 - -- - - -- - I fi C .¢ 516 I W 514 - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- --.-'--' '--- _ _ _ - - - - - - - - -- 512 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 i Station (feet) Bankfull - Flood Prone Area - River Basin: Ur er Roanoke Watershed: Trib 3 XS ID XS 8, Pool Draina a Area s mi): 0 075 Date: ~~' r u ~r~ '00~ Field Crew: t ~:; i,:~ ., !~ ~ ~. 1<uhcn. Station Elevation 0.00 520.06 L56 519.59 4.96 519.43 8.28 518.87 13.93 518.69 16.94 518.37 19.43 517.99 20.78 517.36 22.26 516.48 23.93 5 ] 5.79 25.98 514.72 26.26 514.]3 27.28 513.66 27.59 512.98 27.59 513.05 28.14 512.90 28.58 S 12.89 29.29 512.89 29.97 512.85 29.97 513.06 30.90 514.83 31.84 515.72 32.65 516.43 33.68 517.03 35.95 517.07 39.34 517.39 46.40 518.13 52.55 518.50 59.53 518.90 66.58 519.78 75.62 520.88 ~ R Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 944 92.1 % 92.1 % Location: 2.0 44.5 4.3% 96.5% Note: 4.0 23.5 2.3% 98.8% 8.0 7.0 0.7% 99.5% Bar Sample Sieve Analysis 16.0 5.0 0.5% 100.0% 31.5 0.5 0.0% 100.0% Sands 100 E Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% 90 % ~ i ~ ~ ~'~ i ~ i ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i~ ~ i ~ i iii ~ i ~ i iii 128.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% , i i i i i i!i i i i i iii i i~ i i i ii i i i i i iii i i i i iii 256.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% c 80 / i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ~ i iii i Total: 1024.5 100% ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ so % so% ; ao% 30% ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~,~~i ~ ~ ~~~~ d 20% ~ i i ~ ~ i ~ i i ~ ~ i i i i i i ~ i i i i i ~ ~ i ~ ~ i i i i ~ iii ~ 10% i i i i ~ i ~ i i i ~ i i i i i i ~ ~ i i i i i ~ i i i ~ i i i i i iii ~ i i i i i i ~ i ~ 0/ {--- 0.1 1 i ~ i i i i i ~ i ~ i i i i i ~ i i i ~ i i i i i iii i 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) _ _ Cumulative Percent • Percent Size ercent less than mm Percent b substrate e D16 D35 D50 D8 4 D95 silt/cla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 0% 96% 4% 0% --- --- ••s~•so•••••••s••••••••s~••s••s•••s•:s•s•••• Watershed: Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis - 0 to 0.2 ft 100 % Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I '. I I I I I i 1 1 1 1 1 I I I l i i l 1 I i l l l l 90 '" I I 1111 .1111 I I I 1111 1 1 1 4 ill! I I 1111 80 % I-~- ' I I I I I I '~ i. I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 11 1~ 1 I, 1 I I I I I L 7~% F ~ I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I it I l I I I I I I I I 1 l I I I I I I ~ 6~% C I I I I I I I - I i I I I 1~ I i l l l l i l l I I I l l l i I ! I I I I LL JO% ' 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 + I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ 4~ % I U ! 1 I ( I I I I I V I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I a 30% 1 I I I I I I 1 I i I LL l I I I l 1 1 1 1 1 I I i I I I I ll I I 1 1 1 1 20°/ ~ i I 1 1 1 1 1 I l 1 1 1 1 1 I I i 1 1 1 1 1 I i I I I I I 100 i I I I I I I i I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I i I : 1 I I I I I I I I l l l l . I I. i V I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I l l _ I_ 1_I I 0% _._ 1__.~ I I I_I-I_ J ~_I I I•I_ I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) f Cumulative Percent • Percent Item li, ~ F Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 10 18.5% 18.5% Location: 2.0 2.5 4.6% 23.1 % Note: 4.0 3.5 6.5% 29.6% 8.0 3.0 5.6% 35.2% Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis 0 2-0 4 ft 16.0 7.0 13.0% 48.1% . . 31.5 14.5 26.9% 75.0% 100 % Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64 .0 13.5 25.0% 1 00.0% g0 ~ I 1 i l i l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I 1 1 1 p 128.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% I I I i l l i l I I I I I 1 1 I V I I I I I I~-? ~ 1 I I I I I 256.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% ~ 80 % ° i I I I I I I I ~, 1 1 1 1 I I V - I I I I rte--" Y- -r . I I 1 I I I I F I I i I I I I Total: 54.0 100% ~ 7o i ~ I I I I I I ~, ~. t i l l I i i V I I I I I 1 ( I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ;~ so % so % i I I i I l l i i i i I I I I ~. ~.. V I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ao% 30 / i I I I I I I I I 1 i V I I I ~ i ~ ( I I I I , i l l I ~ V I I I ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ~. I I I I 1 I i I I I I d 20 I I ( I I I I ~ I I I I I • I I I I I I I I l l l i I I 1 1 1 1 1 10 % I I I I I I I I I! l i l l ~ ~ I ~, i V i I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 11 I I I I i l l l l I I ! I I I I 0/ ' I. I_ ( I I I I 0.1 1 ~ • ~ I I•I I i i V I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 V I I I I F I J I 1 i I I I I I 1_ _I I i I I I __. I ~ V I I I 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) _ f-Cumulative Percent • Percent I[em Size ercent less tha n mm Percent b substrate e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silUcla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 7.8 7.8 16.8 40.7 55.5 0% 23% 77% 0% --- --- ••ii••i•iii•iiiiiiiiiiiii•i•••••••••••••••••~ •••••!•~•••!•••••!•~•••!•~•••it~••~••!•••!•• River Basin: Upper Roanoke Watershed: Trib 4 XS ID XS 22, Pool Drama a Area (s mi): 0.096 Date: Pchrusirv ?00? FieldCre~a: t 'a !~ Station Elevation 0.00 X37.24 2.88 536.83 7.13 536.34 11.65 536.04 16.60 535.93 25.37 536.12 28.83 536.79 30.63 537.24 34.18 537.65 38.79 537.45 41.00 537.16 43.83 535.19 46.45 534.92 49.95 534.71 51.02 534.46 52.01 533.74 52.69 530.60 53.19 530.07 53.63 529.11 54.01 528.01 54.55 527.51 55.05 527.43 55.46 527.32 56.17 527.27 56.86 527.28 56.80 527.30 57.44 534.60 58.59 535.02 62.52 534.51 64.59 534.53 68.20 534.37 70.65 534.23 76.55 534.02 82.76 534.04 90.77 533.8 ] 102.32 534.53 103.96 535.83 SUMMARY DA"I'A Bankt5rll Elevation: 529.1 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.0 Bankfull Width: 3.3 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 1.8 Mean De th at Bankfull: I.5 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Slope (ft/ft): - Discharge (cfs) - 540 538 536 v 534 s 0 532 ~ 530 528 526 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 4, XS 22, Pool 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Station (feet) -Bankfull - - -Flood Prone Area 80 90 100 River Basin: U »cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 4 XS ID XS 23, Riffle Drama a Area (s mi): 0.096 Date: Fchni.u~v ?007 Field Crcw: ~i -. Station Elevation 0.00 536.78 5.52 536.29 11.10 535.77 20.18 535.43 27.26 536.38 3 L60 537.25 36.55 537.46 40.57 537.21 43.00 536.68 45.68 534.86 47.07 534.64 48.74 534.52 5 L62 534.49 52.54 534.19 52.99 53 L69 53.80 530.61 55.20 529.38 55.62 528.78 56.24 527.19 56.76 527.16 57.51 527.13 59.10 527.1(, 59.40 527.35 60.90 530.35 61.66 531.64 62.68 532.93 63.46 534.06 64.57 534.37 66.68 534.34 73.13 534.04 75.64 533.89 78.18 534.08 85.77 533.84 102.68 534.08 107.1 I 534.61 SU.4IMARY DA"FA Bankfull Elevation: 528.8 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: (i.l Bankfull Width: 4.5 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 530.5 Flood Prone Width: 6.9 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.7 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.4 W / D Ratio: 3.3 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.5 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 4.1 Slope (ft/ft): 0.022 Discharge (cfs) 44 540 538 536 534 0 a 532 v w 530 528 526 ~~. :" "'~,~ Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 4, XS 23, Riffle 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Station (feet) Bankfull ~ - - Flood Prone Area •i•••i•••••!•••••••~••••••••••i•~i~iiii~i~~~' I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i Material Size Range (n silt/clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 very coarse sand 1 - 2 very fine gravel 2 - 4 fine gravel 4 - 6 fine gravel 6 - 8 medium gravel 8 - 11 medium gravel 11 - 16 coarse gravel 16 - 22 coarse gravel 22 - 32 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 very coarse gravel 45 - 64 small cobble 64 - 90 medium cobble 90 - 128 large cobble 128 - 180 very large cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 small boulder 362 - 512 medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 bedrock clay hardpan detritus/wood Note: XS 23 Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 4 XS 23 Count 3 1 1 7 12 15 18 12 8 9 3 D16 6 D35 11 D50 16 D65 21 D84 38 D95 59 Size (mm) 1 10 particle size (mm) Size Distribution mean 15.1 dispersion 2.5 skewness -0.03 100 1000 10000 Type silt/clay 0% sand 14% gravel 83% cobble 3% boulder 0% cumulative % -# of particles silvclay sand gravel ---- --------------- - I I I I boulder 20 18 16 14 ' c 3 12 ~ 10 ° 8 6 N 4 2 0 0.01 0.1 100% 90% 80% c ~ 70% w c 60% 50% `` o. 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% River Basin: U ~ cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 4 XS ID XS 24, Riffle Drama a Area (s mi): 0.096 Date: Fchrunrv 3007 Field Cre~c: ~ I h~ . n', ~1 Rn~ Station Elevation 0.00 537.56 5.01 526.83 9.95 526.41 14.93 526.08 19.94 525.66 27.59 524.88 29.58 523.68 34.87 523.12 40.70 522.79 45.00 522.46 46.77 521.57 47.76 521.88 48.45 521.14 48.75 520.91 48.85 519.37 50.33 518.36 51.92 517.32 52.40 516.41 53.58 516.09 54.72 516.08 55.51 515.96 56.05 515.87 56.34 516.04 56.42 516.62 56.88 517.11 58.20 SI8.97 58.81 519.41 60.34 521.49 61.59 522.73 63.44 522.87 69.03 522.68 72.12 522.76 76.OR 523.25 80.75 523.90 103.68 524.78 SUMMAIZI` DATA Bankfull Elevation: 517.3 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.4 Bankfull Width: 5.1 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 518.7 Flood Prone Width: 8.3 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.4 Mean De th at Bankfull: I .l W / D Ratio: 4.8 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.6 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 4.2 Slope (ft/ft): 0.022 Discharge (cfs) 32 528 526 524 v 522 fi C a 520 v `U 518 516 514 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 4, XS 24, Riffle 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Station (feet) C - Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area 80 90 100 I •~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Material Size Range (mm) Count Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 4 XS 24 silt/clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 1 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 8 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 11 100% very coarse sand 1 - 2 8 90% very fine gravel 2 - 4 1 fine gravel 4 - 6 1 80% fine gravel 6 - 8 3 ~ 70% medium gravel 8 - 11 2 medium gravel 11 - 16 3 c 60% coarse gravel 16 - 22 5 coarse gravel 22 - 32 12 ~ 50% very coarse gravel 32 - 45 13 a 40% ve coarse ravel 45 - 64 12 small cobble 64 - 90 8 30% medium cobble 90 - 128 7 large cobble 128 - 180 1 20% ve lar a cobble 180 - 256 1 10% small boulder 256 - 362 62 512 0% small boulder 3 - medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: 97 bedrock ------------- 3 clay hardpan ------------- detritus/wood ------------- Note: total count: 100 -cumulative % -# of particles V .. H ....... H .. ~ ... . I I I I 1 coouie uuuiuCi 14 12 10 ~ c 8 m 0 v 6 ~ m 4 `~ 2 0 0.01 0.1 Size (mm) D16 0.75 D35 9.3 D50 26 D65 40 D84 68 D95 110 1 10 100 1000 particle size (mm) Size Distribution Type mean 7.1 dispersion 18.6 skewness -0.40 10000 silt/clay 0% bedrock sand 28% gravel 52% cobble 17% boulder 0% wf ~ ~ p 'reP a ~~' ~~~ ,x~ ~`~ ~ is ~, ~ ~Fi'dy ~ b~ .tuM ~ !~! ~~4e pr~..c''' ~p~,~ I` ~ R ~ Y '~ '~ ~` ~ " ~' " ~ ~^?~^" '+ 11"6 . ~. ,. - . '~~, a ~ ~wu„ . , r', ~ ~' ~+ ~` Stream Type: - -- Upper Roa noke River Basin, Trib 4, XS 25, Pool 524 522 520 ~~ i o 518 o w 516 - - - - 514 - 512 i 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Station (feet) - ~ - Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area River Basin: U cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 4 XS ID XS 25, Pool Drama a Area (s mi : 0 096 Date: Fcbrua 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, ~~lillci. ~<~~?~tl~ Station Elevation 0.00 5 19.61) 5.10 519.7(1 10.02 519.75 15.15 520.06 20.23 519.90 23.76 519.40 27.34 519.06 29.11 518.66 36.17 S I R.58 39.32 519.17 40.81 518.99 41.33 518.41 42.26 517.54 42.51 517.13 43.23 516.75 43.79 515.95 44.17 515.69 45.20 515.27 45.40 515.10 46.10 513.33 47.10 512.95 47.84 5 13.04 48.57 513.45 49.34 514.03 49.80 SI5.10 50.90 515.73 53.13 515.95 56.12 516.27 59.43 517.59 64.26 517.76 65.74 518.65 67.17 519.18 69.12 519.48 73.73 519.69 77.24 520.15 87.90 520.95 95.49 522.12 101.73 522.83 SU11M:V21 DA"I'A Bankfull Elevation: 515.1 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 6.8 Bankfull Width: 4.4 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 2.1 Mean De th at Bankfull: I.5 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Discharge (cfs) - Stream• *~ _ ~ . Watershed Location: ;~; Bar Sample Sieve Analysis Sands ~ Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 100% V I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I B i l l I I I I 1 1 90 l l l I I I l i I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I V I I I I i V I I I 80 I i I I i I l i I I I I I i I V I I I 1 I I V I I I I '~ I i I I L 70% r ~ I f ~ ~ I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i i l l l~ I _ I I I t l l l I i V I I I ~ 60°/ I I I l i i l l I I I I I I I I i V I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I 50 I I I I I I I I I I i i i l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I ° I I I I I ~ U 40 / I I I I i l l I I I I I I I I I I I' I I i I I I i l l I I I I I I L 30°/ I I I I I '.. I i I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I '~ I I I I I ( I I I I. o 1 20 / I I I I '~. l i It _ _ I I i I I I I _ I '~ I I I I I I I I i l l I I I i l l l 0 1 III 0~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I y ~ I I I I I I i I I V I I I ° __.I I I. I I I I I '. I I_I. I I I= _ ~'._ .:.I I. ~ 1 .... I I i l l l l _I.._ I. _i_1J J 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) f Cumulative Percent • Percent Item Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 16 15.0% 15.0% Location: 2.0 7.5 7.0% 22.0% Note: 4.0 5.5 5.1% 27.1% 8.0 5.0 4.7% 31.8% Bulk Sample Sieve Anal sis - 0 to 0 2 ft 16.0 9.0 8.4% 40.2% y . 31.5 16.5 15.4% 55.6% 100 % Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 47.5 44.4% 100.0% 90% I I I I I I I I ~i I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I 11 1 I 128.0 0.0 O.0% 100.0% ~ I 1 V I I I 'I i I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I I I I I 256.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% 80% I 11 1 1 1 I I V I I I I I 1 V I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I X 1 1 1 1 Total: 107 0 100% m 70 % ' ~ . ~ . t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I f V I I I I I I I I I I , , so % C 50 I I I I I I , I 11 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ii ~. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 ~ ~ 40 1 1 I I I I I I ` ~ 30 % , I 1 V I I I I I I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 ~ d I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 20 % iil_ . 10 % I I I ( I I I I I 1 .y. ._ I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I . I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I~ I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 00/ I ~ I. I_ I I I i I I I__ I_ I I I_ ~ J_I,.1 I _I _ .I L _J_ I I I _ I i I I L!..I 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) -~ Cumulative Percent • Percent Item Size erce nt less tha n mm Percent b sub strate e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 siltlcla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 1.1 10.4 24.6 49.6 59.1 0% 22% 78% 0% --- --- I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~. - Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 36 33.0% 33.0% Location: 2.0 12.5 11.5% 44.5% Note: 4.0 9.5 8.7% 53.2% 8.0 11.0 10.1% 63.3% Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis 0.2-0.4 ft 16.0 11.0 10.1% 73.4% 31.5 14.5 13.3% 86.7% 100 % Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 14.5 13.3°/U 100.0% ° 1 1 ': I I I I I I ~ I 1 1 '~ 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I ~ 1 I I I I ~~ 1 1 1 128.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% 90 1 1 1, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I l i l l l l j 256.0 0.0 O.O% 1 00.0% 80 / 0 ~ I I I I I , 1 1 1 1 I i I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I 1 ~ ~ I I I I~ I~~'~. Total: 109 0 100% _ 70 ~ I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I ir; I Ih~ 4,1 ~ I l ~ l l l j . ~ i' w ~ 60 % I 1 1 1 1 ' I I I I l I I' I ' I I I ~ I ~~ ~~ I I I l l s ~ I I I I I . rr ; . 50% I I I I I I I I l i l l I ' ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '. I I I I iv ~ 40 % I I I I I I I r 11 I 1 I( I i i V I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ 30% i. I I V I I I ! 11 I I I j I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I i I I I I '~. 20% 1 ~-1 1 i l l l 1 ~ i V I I I i. V I I I I I I i i l l l i 1 V I I I 100 1 i I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I '. ' I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i t 1 1 I I I I Op/ _ I I i I I I '. I I I I I I ', I I, I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) __ _ __ -~-Cumulative Percent • Percent Item Size percen t less tha n mm Percent b sub strate e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt/cla sand rave l cobble boulder bedrock 1.1 1.1 3.1 27.5 49.0 0% 44% 56% 0% --- --- River Basin: U , cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 4 XS ID XS 26, Pool Drama a Area (s mi): 0.096 Date: Fchnww ?007 Field Crew: ~ ~ ' `~~~' Station Elevation 0.00 5IU?7 5.49 510.01 20.24 509.64 24.78 509.40 33.01 509.39 37.69 509.26 42.43 509.03 43.19 508.97 44.57 508.50 45.27 507.36 46.07 506.75 46.64 506.26 47.65 505.21 47.74 504.28 47.88 504.02 48.62 503.80 49.61 503.63 50.44 503.74 50.78 503.70 51.61 503.91 52.23 505.35 54.40 507.19 55.42 508.01 56.34 SOR.70 56.83 508.92 58.00 509.13 6 L69 509.17 65.95 508.91 73.33 508.94 80.59 508.71 89.26 508.64 100.58 509.04 SUJ9J7ARl' DATA Bankfull Elevation: 505.2 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.9 Bankfull Width: 4.5 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 1.6 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.3 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Slope (ft/ft): - Discharge (cfs) - 512 510 508 0 ° 506 504 502 ,. J ~. ~ ., `.. Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 4, XS 26, Pool 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Station (fee!) ' Bankfull ' Flood Prone Area 80 90 100 ••••••••••i•••••••••~•••••t•••••!••~•••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• River Basin: U ~ cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 4 XS ID XS 27, Riffle Draina a Area (s mi): 0.096 Date: Fcbrua 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation o.o0 514.41 5.19 512.94 11.03 512.69 17.10 512.57 21.80 512.03 26.15 511.13 27.78 510.86 28.70 510.39 30.23 508.50 31.00 506.71 31.74 505.38 33.05 503.77 33.61 503.42 34.13 503.38 35.92 503.30 37.25 503.17 37.97 503.97 38.92 504.66 40.34 505.92 42.20 506.58 44.83 507.44 46.69 507.75 51.60 508.03 56.56 508.12 62.64 507.89 72.86 507.53 79.11 507.87 87.63 507.47 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 504.7 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 7.2 Bankfull Width: 6.7 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 506.1 Flood Prone Width: 9.9 Max De th at Bankfull: I.5 Mean De th at Bankfull: l .l W / D Ratio 6.2 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.5 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 3.1 Slope (ft/ft): 0.022 Discharge (cfs) 48 .~ Stream T e: G4c Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 4, XS 27, Riffle 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Station (feet) Bankfull ' - 'Flood Prone Area 514 512 510 508 W 506 504 502 70 80 90 Material Size Range (m silt/clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 very coarse sand 1 - 2 very fine gravel 2 - 4 fine gravel 4 - 6 fine gravel 6 - 8 medium gravel 8 - 11 medium gravel 11 - 16 coarse gravel 16 - 22 coarse gravel 22 - 32 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 very coarse gravel 45 - 64 small cobble 64 - 90 medium cobble 90 - 128 large cobble 128 - 180 very large cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 small boulder 362 - 512 medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 very large boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle cou bedrock clay hardpan detritus/wood XS 27 III Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 4 XS 27 Count 4 100% 5 5 90% 4 80% 1 ~ 7 w 70% 11 c 60% 15 18 ~ 50% 17 40% 8 n 4 30% 1 20% 1 10% 0% -cumulative % # of particles silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder ---- --------------- 20 18 16 14 ~ 12 ~ 10 ° 8 6 `~° 4 2 0 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 particle size (mm) Size (mm) Size Distribution Type D16 2.9 3.4 mean 9.5 silt/clay 0% D35 10 12 dispersion 3.6 sand 14% D50 15 17 skewness -0.20 gravel 84% D65 20 20 cobble 2% D84 31 29 boulder 0% D95 49 39 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••i••••••••••••••r ••••••••••••••••••••••••••~•••••••••••••••••il --~- a~ s~~t ~ I ~~ Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 82 91.1 % 91.1 % Location: 2.0 4.5 5.0% 96.1 % Note: 4.0 1.5 1.7% 97.8% 8.0 2.0 2.2% 100.0% Bar Sample Sieve Analysis 16.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% 31.5 0.0 0.0% 100.0% o 10 Sands ~ Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% 0 ° 9 I I I I '' I i I I 1 1 1 1 I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 128.0 0.0 O.O% 100.0% 0 / T- T I I I I I I I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I I I IIII I I V I I I 256.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% ~ 80~ 1 I I ~ I IIII I ~~~ IIII I I I IIII I I I I I I I I I I~r~l Total: 90.0 1 OO% m ~ 70% ! I I I I V I I I .--r~-- i~ I I I I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I I t l f l I I ( I I I I '. ~ so % I I I I I ~~ ~ I I '. I I I I I '. ~. I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I ~I ~ 50 ° I ' I I ( I I I I I I I I I I I ~. I ( I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I ° i U Il 40 ~ 30°/ 2 ° I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '. ( I I I I i ~ I I I I I I I I I V I I I I I V I I I I I '. I I I I I I V I I I 0 / I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I V I I I I I V I I I 10% I I 00~ I I 0.1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I V I I I I I V I I I I I_!..1J_~ ~. - L_ ~ I_J_ I~I -~. I_..~_i _I_ ~ I I I ~~_I~ 1_J I. LI 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) f Cumulative Percent • Percent Item Size erce nt less than mm Percent b substrate e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt/cla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 0% 96% 4% 0% --- --- ~J{ riNr ", Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 34 29.4% 29.4% Location: 2.0 20.5 17.7% 47.2% Note: 4.0 20.5 17.7% 64.9% 8.0 19.0 16.5% 81.4% Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis - 0 to 0 2 ft 16.0 13.0 11.3% 92.6% . 31.5 8.5 7.4% 100.0% 100% Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% 90% ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ i ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~i i i ~ ~ iii i ~ ~ ~ iii 128.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% o i i i ~~ i i i i i i i i i i i i i i -T , i i i i ~ i ~ i i i ~ i i i i' 256.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% ~ _ 80~ i ' i ~ iiii _ iii i ~ i i i iii __ i ~~ i ~i,~ i i ~ iii Total: 115.5 100% F ~o % ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ so% 50 ~ o ~ 40 30 % i i i ~ iii ~ ~ i ~ i i i i i i i ~ i i i i i i iii i i iii' ' ~ ' ~ 20 ~ i i ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~ i ~ ~ i i i i i i i i i ~ i ~ ~ --- -- - ~ i~ iii i i ~, i i i ~ 0.1 1 ~ ~ i ~ i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ~ ~ ~ i ~ iii ; 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) _ -f-Cumulative Percent • Percent Item ' Size erce ntlesstha n mm Percentb substrate e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silUcla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 1.2 1.2 2.2 9.4 19.9 0% 47% 53% 0% --- --- •~~~~~~f~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••!!l~~~!•~i~! Watershed +~""" : t ~"'" Location *~•, Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis 0.2-0.4 ft Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 100 % I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I V I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 90 ~ I I I I I I I I ! I I I 1 1 1 I ~ V I I I I I t 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 80 % r~~ -~ --rte C i I I I I I ~ I I I I I l l f l I I I I 11 1 1 ~ I I I i l l l = ~ 70% I i I V I I I i V I I I I I V I I I I I 1 I ( I I I I I I ! I I I I C 60 I 1 I I I I I I V I I I I I V I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 50 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I i l l l l 1. I V I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I ° p ao i I 1 I i I I I I I h i l l I I ~ I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 '. I I I I 30% - _ I I I I 1 I I I I ~. V I I I I I I V I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ~~ I I I I 20% I i I 1 1 1 1 1 ,. • I I I I 1 ~ V I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 0 I I 11 1~ I I I I I I I I I I I 10 I I I I I I I ( I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 0% - I 1 I t l l l l I I V I I I I I I I I I I 1 I i I I I I 1_ I ~ I I I I 0, 1 1 10 100 loo0 loooo Particle Size (mm) f Cumulative Percent • Percent Item ~ _.1: ~. ~ Y (+.• ~~'.1 ~s • ` ~' . ~~ ~ Wit. ,i '.`_ A > '~, 74 ~_ •~. W Gny} ITY~., ~y ~ F ~.~. - ^4 a; ,p~ ~vy,,"~ ~$~i3^.. Cllr' ~':: us > ^4 * a ^~ ` b ra.. ,, fi! w A~~ ~V~it •~ ar rrra , i~ ~«~~ J' ~; Stream Type: G Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 5, XS 28, Riffle 504 - - -- - i 502 I y `~ 500 498 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Station (fee!) Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area River Basin: U ~ cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 5 XS ID XS 28, Riffle Drama a Area (s mi): 0 022 Date: I ~hru,ir~ ?007 Field Crew: < uin~r. li:n~~, hn ;~n;. 17 ~~ ~ ~:~,n_;i~. Station Elevation 0.00 501.62; 8.77 501.78 16.92 501.87 27.29 501.94 35.50 500.92 39.22 500.61 41.28 499.92 41.67 499.59 41.89 499.10 42A9 498.40 42.50 498.31 43.09 498.34 43.79 498.22 44.30 498.49 45.16 498.61 45.48 500.75 46.01 501.35 47.04 501.53 49.74 501.65 55.96 501.67 62.64 501.18 73.49 501.43 83.10 501.53 tiU~ti1MARl' DATA Bankfull Elevation: 499.1 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.3 Bankfull Width: 3.3 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 500.0 Flood Prone Width: 4.3 Max De th at Bankfull: 0.9 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.7 W / D Ratio: 4.7 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.3 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 2.7 Slope (ft/ft): 0.031 Discharge (cfs) 34 •~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ •~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ R~ ~~ i „ . T ~~ ~ _ ~. s°' a: ," ,R, :, ~- ,~.., _ -~ .; = . , _ s ~~ r . '•` +~ ~ fir: f ~ ~ ' -.- . .~. t ~ .. ~~~- ~ Mr • ,. r _ r ~, . ,-.-- ,.. L Stream Type: - - ~ ~I '~ 527 ~ 525 I ~ I i ', ~ 523 0 ,'~, 521 W 519 517 0 Station (feet) -Bankfull River Basin: Upper Roanoke Watershed: Trib 6 X5 ID XS 39, Pool Drama a Area (s mi): Q067 Date: fcbruar 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0.00 525.99 4.96 525.42 10.02 524.99 15.01 524.36 19.97 523.92 24.90 523.67 29.99 523.30 31.96 523.22 37.56 522.41 39.49 522.00 40.27 521.84 40.80 521.52 41.25 521.12 41.65 519.40 42.21 518.74 43.14 519.03 43.71 518.90 44.67 518.33 46.46 517.68 47.85 517.91 48.00 519.47 48.30 519.87 48.63 520.29 49.77 520.67 52.33 521.43 54.54 521.80 59.54 522.05 61.44 522.13 66.81 522.41 74.10 522.44 79.06 522.68 86.R6 523.61 96.99 524.67 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 519.5 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 7. I Bankfull Width: (i.4 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 1.8 Mean De th at Bankfull: I . l W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio• - Slope (ftlft): - Discharge (cfs) - Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 6, XS 39, Pool 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10 d ~, ~ . ~ ~. S.~ ,S Y~V, ~ ~ ~~- ~ e'r ~ ,~ A ~ . ~ _ ' .T l r" 74'. ~.~~ n." ~ ~ Stream Type: GS -- '~~ Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 6, XS 40, Riffle i 528 526 - v 524 - - ~, r o 522 - W 520 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 518 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Station (feet) - - - Bankfull - - -Flood Prone Area River Basin: U cr Roanoke Watershed: Trill 6 XS ID XS 4Q Riftlc Draina a Area (s mi): 0 067 Date: I '~iu.irv'007 Field Crc~+: < .r f ~ .~~. _ i~ ~~ \1` i. - Station Elevation 0.00 524.95 3.59 524?6 5.43 524.71 8.21 524.10 12.09 523.61 14.80 523.42 19.93 523.49 22.69 523.06 23.55 522.80 24.80 522.29 25.57 521.89 26.18 521.50 26.31 521.09 26.78 520.11 26.95 519.44 27.70 519.53 28.44 519.50 29.24 519.34 29.80 519.30 30.17 519.22 30.21 519.75 30.57 521.21 31.02 521.56 31.67 522.03 32.12 522.20 33.19 522.41 35.18 522.73 37.64 522.85 40.91 522.76 44.94 522.64 47.33 522.56 51.38 522.91 55.46 523.20 58.72 523.62 62.43 524.04 SU~1~1A121' DATA Bankfull Elevation: 519.8 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 1.3 Bankfull Width: 3.4 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 520.3 Flood Prone Width: 3.7 Max De th at Bankfull: 0.5 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.4 W / D Ratio: 8.7 Entrenchment Ratio: I .I Bank Hei ht Ratio: 6.8 Slope (ft/ft): 0.023 Discharge (cfs) 4 •~••••~••~•~••••••••••i••~~•~~i•~•~••~••!••• Material Size Range (m silt/clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 very coarse sand 1 - 2 very fine gravel 2 - 4 fine gravel 4 - 6 fine gravel 6 - 8 medium gravel 8 - 11 medium gravel 11 - 16 coarse gravel 16 - 22 coarse gravel 22 - 32 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 very coarse gravel 45 - 64 small cobble 64 - 90 medium cobble 90 - 128 large cobble 128 - 180 very large cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 small boulder 362 - 512 medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 very large boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle cou bedrock -------------------- clay hardpan -------------------- detritus/wood -------------------- Note: XS 40 cou Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 6 XS 40 Count 21 19 16 10 5 7 11 7 4 Size (mm) D16 0.42 D35 0.83 D50 1.5 D65 3.7 D84 9.5 D95 15 0.1 1 10 100 particle size (mm) Size Distribution mean 2.0 dispersion 5.0 skewness 0.11 silt/clay 0% sand 56% gravel 44% cobble 0% boulder 0% coooie uvuiuei snvciay sans gr. I I I I 0.01 100% 90% 80% c 70% c 60% w 50% U a 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% }cumulative % # of particles 25 20 c 3 15 ~ 0 10 ~ ~~ m 5 0 1000 10000 Type River Basin: lJ »cr Roanoke Watershed: l'nb 6 XS ID kS 37, Rittlc Drama a Area (s mi): 0 067 Date: ~ "'007 I rhiu;~r Field Crew: _ ~ ~, ~,.~: ~ ~ _. Station Elevation 0.00 501.63 3.82 501 ?0 7.50 501.02 8.42 500.93 13.76 500.81 2 L51 500.63 30.04 500.52 35.46 500.29 37.58 499.97 38.99 499.41 40.04 498.93 40.58 498.68 41.11 497.38 41.91 497.22 43.63 497.18 44.83 497.45 45.49 497.97 46.13 498.22 47.16 499.25 48.14 500.52 48.93 501.19 50.96 501.65 54.43 502.25 60.09 503.05 65.64 503.62 94.24 509.97 SUh111AR1' DATA Bankfull Elevation: 498.2 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 4.0 Bankfull Width: 5.3 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 499.3 Flood Prone Width: 7.9 Max De th at Bankfull: I.0 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.8 W / D Ratio: 7.0 Entrenchment Ratio: I.5 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 3.0 Slope (ft/ft): 0.023 Discharge (cfs) 23 a ~ . w, , n ~ ~i :" ~' u, ., ` , ,..r uiti ." ~,~ .~ ~ ~., a __.r,~ p...,i 4 ~~ ~~~ .~-,. ~ i ~ _: ~.. -~, .~r+s sxr ~ { ^+~~ "ti's „:'`~iw ^' ~~ ~ ~ ~" -. .. m - ~ ~ ,~ - u .- "~- ~~ ~ _ T rty" L Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 6, XS 37, Riffle 0 ]0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Station (feet) ~- ~ ~ Bankfull - - - Plood Prone Area 510 508 506 `~' 504 r 0 ~ 502 w 500 498 496 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••i••i•••••••i••• •~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I Material Size Range (mn Count silt/clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand ).062 - 0.125 fine sand ).125 - 0.25 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 10 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 25 very coarse sand 1 - 2 14 very fine gravel 2 - 4 8 fine gravel 4 - 6 3 fine gravel 6 - 8 11 medium gravel 8 - 11 6 medium gravel 11 - 16 10 coarse gravel 16 - 22 4 coarse gravel 22 - 32 2 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 2 ve coarse ravel 45 - 64 1 small cobble 64 - 90 medium cobble 90 - 128 1 large cobble 128 - 180 ver lar a cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 small boulder 362 - 512 1 medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar e boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: bedrock ------------- clay hardpan ------------- detritus/wood ------------- 98 2 -----_- total count: 100 D16 0.59 D35 0.98 D50 2 D65 6.6 D84 13 D95 33 1 10 100 particle size (mm) Size Distribution mean 2.8 dispersion 4.9 skewness 0.12 30 25 20 c m 15 ° m 10 m 5 0 1000 10000 T ype silt/clay 0% bedrock 2% sand 49% gravel 47% cobble 1% boulder 1% Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 6 XS 37 100% 90% 80% c ~ 70% c 60% ~ 50% i Q 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% ~-cumulative % # of particles I silUclay sand gravel cobble boulder ---- ------ - ---- I I Y I I I ---- ------ - I y i s I I I I I I 0.01 0.1 Size (mm mer} " ° i a s ~ rr 3 $j ~ Sy ..'i' `~ i ~ ~'~i '~' ' Y R R~I. 1~' ~ ~ ~~~FFF ~ UF~ ~ ~~ d ~` i ^- i .w -~~am u ~ ~ I~ i ,~~ ~ „;''~ red i ~ ~ • a ~,~ ,. ,..~ ^ _. .~ u ti "' ~ " ` " ' ` ~ w "~ ~ ~aR.> • ~± ~ X ~, FM 'k 15 Yi w`. , Stream Type: - i Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 6, XS 38, Pool i 507 i 505 - - - - I m 503 - r 0 501 ` w i 499 497 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Station (feet) ~' Bankfull River Basin: U cr Roanokc Watershed: Trib 6 XS ID XS 38, Pool Drama a Area (s mi): 0 Ohl Date: I ~ hi u,ir~ '007 Field Crew: ~ i ~~ "~F ~ i~:.~ ~.,;-- Station Elevation 0.00 504.36 9.97 503.25 21.50 502.02 31.02 501.47 34.33 501.57 40.75 501.06 41.70 500.54 42.87 500.01 43.83 499.70 44.85 498.09 45.55 497.78 46.40 497.88 47.79 497.67 48.84 497.97 49.1 1 498.47 49.50 499.14 50.90 499.87 52.91 501.03 57.31 501.77 63.12 502.32 73.61 503.18 79.13 504.13 83.93 504.86 SUJL~1.1R1' D,1"1'A Bankfull Elevation: 498.5 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.7 Bankfull Width: 4.5 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull• 0.8 Mean De th at Bankfull• 0.6 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Slope (ft/ft): - Discharge (cfs) - ••••••••••••••i•••••••!••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••i••••••!•• Stream: Watershed: Bar Sample Sieve Analysis 1oo~io soar ao~r ~o~r soar 50 40% 30% 20 10% 0°/ 0.1 r C LL C N U N a Particle Size (mm) f Cumulative Percent • Percent Item 1 10 100 1000 10000 ~ Vl;r ~,~ c I~." .~~~. _ Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 18 14.5% 14.5% Location: 2.0 8.5 6.9% 21.4% Note: 4.0 7.5 6.0% 27.4% 8.0 9.0 7.3% 34.7% Bulk Sample Sieve Anal sis - 0 to 0 2 ft 16.0 17.0 13.7% 48.4% y . 31.5 32.5 26.2% 74.6% 100% Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 31.5 25.4% 100.0% 90°/ I I I '. I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I III I 128.0 0.0 O.O% 100.0% ° I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I ( I I I I I 1 I I I i l 256.0 0.0 O.O% 100.0% C 80 / I I I ( I I I I i I I I 1 1 I I V I I I I I I V I I I _ i I I I I I Total: 124.0 100% m ~ 70 ~ I I I I I I ; I I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I I ; I I I I C so so % I I ; I I I I I I V I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I, I I I t l l ;~ ao°i '. I 1 1 1 1 ~ I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1; I i V I I I ` 30°/ I I ~ I I I ~ I I ~ i i l l l l I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 d 20°/ I I I V I I I I I I 1 1 I • I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I H i l l 10 % I I I ( I I I I ; I 1 1 1 1 1 r I I I . i I i I I _ I i I I I I l i l l l I I 1 1 1 1 1 I Q~ I ° -_ 0.1 I I ! I I I I I___.I _-~_ 11.1 I 1 ~. I I I I I i ! I I I 1 1 I I I ( I I I I I I ( I I I I I I~ I I I I I i I I_ I I I I I I I I I I I_I I I_ 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) __ --~-Cumulative Percent • Percent Item Size er cent less tha n mm Percent b substra te e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt/cla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 1.2 8.1 16.7 41.0 55.7 0% 21 % 79% 0% --- --- •~••••••••••••••~•~•••~•~•••••••••••s•t••••• Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis 0.2-0.4 ft 100% Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 90% ~ % + 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 -,- ~ ri ,- l ? m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~~ ~ 70 I ~ i i ~ i i i i ~ i ~ i i i i i~ i ~ i ~ i i ~ ~ ~: ~ i i i ~ ~ 60% ° i / 50 i i i i i i i ~ i i t i i ~ i i i i i ~ i i i i i i ~~ i I i ~ i i i ~ 4 ~ 0 i i i i i i i i ~ i i i i i ~ i i i ~ i i i i i ~ i ~ i i ~ iii i a 30/ i ~ i~iiii ~ i~i~ii i i~ i;i i i ii~~~~ i i~iiii 20 i ~ ~ i i i i i i i i i i i i 10% i ~ i i i i i i i i i i i i i ~ i ~ ~ i i iii i i i i iii i 0% --_- i__i. !. i.. i.i _.~.`---- '_i- i i i ~ , i i _~-~-'--•--i i i ~ •: iii ,~ i i i .i_).i. ~ 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) ~~-Cumulative Percent • Percent Item D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silUcla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 3.1 3.1 8.4 34.6 52.8 0% 29% 71 % 0% River Basin: Upper Roanoke Watershed: Trib 7 XS ID XS 41, Pool Drama a Area (s mi): 0.053 Date: Janua 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Robots Station Elevation 0.00 537.13 5.90 536.84 18.32 535.08 23.82 534.88 25.29 535.03 26.29 535.03 27.1 I 534.87 28.03 534.51 28.60 534.19 29.07 533.97 29.16 533.80 29.59 533.64 30.14 533.08 30.39 532.88 30.54 532.33 31.02 532.26 31.51 532.31 31.53 532.46 31.96 532.46 32.25 532.41 32.73 532.38 33.09 532.33 33.60 532.27 33.81 532.21 34.04 533.23 34.52 533.91 36.32 535.45 37.61 535.90 39.81 536.45 43.27 536.61 51.37 537.2.5 58.43 538.15 tit!17~L1R1 D:1"1 ;1 Bankfull Elevation: 533.2 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 3.2 Bankfull Width: 4.0 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull• I.0 Mean De th at Bankfull• 0.8 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Slope (ft/ft): - Discharge (cfs) - 540 538 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 7, XS 4l, Pool v 0 536 W 534 532 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Station (feet) - -Bankfull I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~• ~~•••i•~••••••••••••••••••••••••!••t•••••1•••• River Basin: U cr Roanoke ~ ~ "~ ~ ~ ~ ~n ~ ~ 3 Watershed: Trib 7 .~ g XS ID XS 42, Riffle ' ;' ~ ~ ~ , ~ .~ _~ ^ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, . ~. ~~'? "Y ~ °" Drama a Area (s mi): 0.053 ~ a ~ y m ; ~, ,~ " Date: Janua 2007 '~ ~ ~1°~"~ ~,,;, - •" ~ ~~ ~ Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts - ~~ ~ ~'~ ;~ ? ~* ~~ ~' - ~1 i ~ *~- t , µ ' ~'^ ~ ~ i ;~ r~- Station E levation SUMMARY DATA r °: ~ ~~ ~ W _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ _ 0.00 537.31 Bankfull Elevation: 532.8 ~ , ' , " ' ~ ~ ~' ~' ~{' ~ ~ ~x 5.83 536.81 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.8 ~ = -, a ~ _ ~ "` ' 19.00 534.95 Bankfull Width: 4.0 w_ ~° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,` ~ -c •• 22.37 535.18 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 533.6 ~,;' ~ ~ ~ .a - ~ 25.40 534.91 Flood Prone Width: 5.2 ' '_ ' ~ ~ ` ; : ~ "` ~~ 27.46 534.68 Max De th at Bankfull: 0.8 ~ ~ ,~ ... _ " '~~,v "~~~'~'~~s 28.69 534.40 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.7 , ~~`'~' -~ ~~ 29.54 534.27 W / D Ratio: 5.7 r ~ ~ ~w , ~ •~ ,~+£ .- ~ ~- .•,,I 30.15 534.06 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.3 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~, ;'°.~ "'f~ s 30.86 533.67 Bank Hei ht Ratlo: 2.6 ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ 31.33 533.30 Slope (ft/ft): 0.020 ~ _ `- 3 ] .70 533. I 1 Discharge (cfs) 13 Stream Type: G4 31.98 532.07 32.38 532.10 33.08 532.01 i Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 7, XS 42, Riffle 33.70 532.13 t i 540 34.21 532.01 34.71 532.04 ', 538 34.79 532.04 35.53 532.13 35.96 533.29 ~ 536 - - - - --- 36.25 533.69 fi 36.62 534.18 ° 36.78 535.36 ~ 534 - - - --- - _- - _ - - - 37.36 535.68 w - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - 37.96 535.77 ~ 532 38.25 535.82 41.38 536.09 46.17 536.39 530 54.01 536.75 ~ 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 57.18 537.01 ~ ~ Staliorr (feet) 62.50 537.83 I 66.82 538.54 - -Bankfull - - -Flood Prone Area I River Basin: lJ »cr Roanoke Watershed: Tril, 7 XS ID XS 45, Riffle Drama a Area (s mi): (1.177 Date: Ichruarv ?007 Field Crc,e~: Station Elevation 0.00 532.tii; 5.59 532?6 10.78 531.98 22.96 531.30 28.60 530.85 31.64 530.64 35.28 530,62 36.70 530.42 37.19 530.19 38.92 529.67 39.27 528.95 40.09 528.45 40.72 528.17 40.80 527.91 41.40 52264 41.75 527.37 41.88 526.16 42.30 526.13 43.48 526.25 44.38 526.18 45.28 526.26 46.02 526.11 46.00 526.21 46.82 526.05 47.60 526.15 48.03 527.00 48.33 527.56 48.41 528.90 50.03 529.77 51.55 530.08 53.82 530.21 58.90 529.99 65.77 530.35 72.08 530.69 78.54 530.79 84.76 531.51 91.04 531.72 96.59 532.23 SUM V1ARF DATA Bankfull Elevation: 527. I Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.6 Bankfull Width: 6.3 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 528.3 Flood Prone Width: 7.6 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.1 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.9 W / D Ratio: 7.1 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.2 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 4S Slope (ftlft): 0.013 Discharge (cfs) 25 535 533 y j 531 e 529 527 525 Upper Roanoke River Basin, UTCGTrib 7, XS 45, Riffle 0 10 20 30 40 50 Station (feet) -Bankfull ~~ 60 70 80 90 100 Material Size Range silUclay 0 - 0.06 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.12 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 very coarse sand 1 - 2 very fine gravel 2 - 4 fine gravel 4 - 6 fine gravel 6 - 8 medium gravel 8 - 11 medium gravel 11 - 16 coarse gravel 16 - 22 coarse gravel 22 - 32 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 very coarse gravel 45 - 64 small cobble 64 - 90 medium cobble 90 - 128 large cobble 128 - 180 very large cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 small boulder 362 - 512 medium boulder 512 - 102 large boulder 1024 - 204£ very large boulder 2048 - 409E total particle cc bedrock ---- clay hardpan ------------------ detritus/wood ----- Note: XS 45 D16 6.7 D35 13 D50 18 D65 23 D84 39 D95 60 1 10 particle size (mm) Size Distribution mean 16.2 dispersion 2.4 skewness -0.05 25 20 c 3 15 ~ 0 10 m N 5 0 100 1000 10000 Type silUclay 0% sand 6% gravel 90% cobble 4% boulder 0% III Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 7 XS 45 Count 1 100% 1 5 90% 3 80% 4 ~ g w 70% ~ c 60% 16 23 ~ 50% 16 40% 12 n 9 30% 2 20% 2 10% 0% -cumulative % # of particles silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder ---- --------------- - I F I I ---- -------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.01 0.1 Size (mm) -!' } i r ~~~ ~~„~ ~ ; ~~ e 4 l ~ wG ,VN'~' ~ yry ~, 4y~ A ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~'y 7 T"g 'r^ ~ ~` T - "r ~ '~ ~~ ;, ., p Stream T e• - i Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 7, XS 46, Pool 536 I 534 I I 532 ~ , 0 530 W 528 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 526 I 524 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 '~~ ~ Station (feet) I Bankfull River Basin: U ~ cr Roanoke Watershed: crib 7 XS ID XS 46, Pool Draina a Area (s mi): 0.177 Date: I cbrua 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0.00 533.83 1.15 533.75 3.59 535.00 7.12 533.72 9.35 533.20 15.56 532.27 18.92 531.75 36J6 530.56 42.29 530.48 44.02 530.07 47.22 529.91 49.01 529.50 49.70 529.13 49.86 528.35 50.22 527.35 50.54 526.21 51.09 525.34 51.86 525.31 52.68 525.22 54.00 525.19 54.83 525.60 56.13 525.85 56.62 526.33 57.2(, 526.79 58.95 527.20 61.02 527.55 62.73 528.39 64.80 529.21 67.49 529.53 71.06 529.64 74.45 529.60 81.98 529.89 94.31 530.75 98.73 531?4 SU11~ti1ARl~ DA"fA Bankfull Elevation: 526.5 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 6.2 Bankfull Width: 6.4 Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 1.3 Mean De th at Bankfull• I.0 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Discharge (cfs) - •~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s Watershed: Bar Sample Sieve Analysis Sands 100 ~ Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock I 90 I I I ~ I ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 80% I I I f i l l I I I I I I ~ I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ~ I 1 1 ~ I ( I I I I I I I I I I C r 70 % -r----,---+-- , I 60 % I I I I~ i t I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I 1 1 1 1 1 j I I I I '. I I I I I I I I I I 1 ! 1 1 ~ I I I I I I I I I I I 50 ~ i l I I I I I I V I I I I I ~ I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I ~ , 40 ~ . U I I I I I~ I I '. I I I I I ~~ ~ I I I I ~ I I I i i ~ I I I I C I! ~ 3p~~ a . d I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 ~ ~~ ~ 1 1 1 1 1 ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I 1 1 1 20 I I ~ I , I I I I I I I I I i ~. V I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I I 1 1 1 1O% I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 11 ~ I I V I I I ~ I V I I I 0% _ I I I I...I_'__I _ -_ __ __J- I - I J_I_I_ _ I_ ~, :. i LL ~ i I I I I I I I I 1 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) f Cumulative Percent • Percent Item 161r51~~~ _ lV~ ~ II ~~,iIS~:.. Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 26 14.1 % 14.1 % Location: 2.0 16.5 8.9% 23.0% Note: 4.0 10.5 5.7% 28.6% 8.0 17.0 9.2% 37.8% Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis - 0 to 0 2 ft 16.0 37.0 20.0% 57.8% . 31.5 46.5 25.1 % 83.0% 100 % Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 31.5 17.0% 100.0% 90 I I I ' 1 1 1 1 I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I' 128.0 0.0 O.O% 100.0% ° I I I ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 256.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% ~ 80 ~ I I ( I I I I i I V I I I I I V I I I I I I I I 111 +-rrr I I ( I I I I Total: 185.0 100°/U F 70/ ~~ I I ( I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ C 60 % 50 I I I I I I ~. I I V I I I I I V I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I ~ U d 40°/ 30°~ I I I i l l l l 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I V I ~ I ( I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I X 1 1 1 20 % I I I I I I V I I I ~ I ~ I V I I I I I I I I I I I I I ( I I I I 10% I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I V I I I I I 0/ __ I I 0.1 I V I I I _ ~.. V I I I 1 I ~ I I! I I I I i l l l l I 1 i V I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I_ I I V I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I _I I I I 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) II-Cumulative Percent • Percent Item ' Size perce nt less tha n mm Percent b substrate e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silUcla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 1.2 6.5 12.2 32.9 52.0 0% 23% 77% 0% --- --- I I I I I I I I I I I I V I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ I I 1 1 1 1 1 DTI-1-t I 1 i I I I I '. I I I I I I I i I V I I ~T I t~ I I I~ I! i - I ~ I I 1 1 1 1 '. 1 '. I I I I I I I I I I I I I~ I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I' I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I 1 ',I I I I I! I I I I I I I I ~. I I 1 1 I I I I I I ~ ~ I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I '. I I t l l l I ~ I l i l I 11 1 1 1 ~ I I 1 I I I I 1 I ', 11 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 '. '. : I I I I I I I ~ V I I I I I I I i l l 1 I I I I I I I I i I I I '. I I I I I I I ~ ~ V I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I i ~ I I I I I I I I I • I ~ V I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I i I I I I I I I I! I I I I l l f I I I I l i l I I. I I I I I ~ ~ I I 1 1 1 I_ I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 1 I, I I ~ I 1 1 1 River Basin: U>>cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 7 XS ID XS 49, Riffle rama a Area s m~ . 0 177 Date: 1107 ~ nuE.i Station Elevation 0.00 526.63 5.25 526.25 9.32 526.23 14.13 526.62 19.04 526.27 24.14 526.08 29.29 526,1 34.17 525.83 41.68 525.45 46.09 525.27 49.13 525.10 54.42 524.99 56.58 524.36 57.59 523.73 58.36 522.35 58.88 521.03 59.99 520.75 61.38 520.83 62.56 520.83 63.66 520.76 64.33 520.75 66.07 523.08 67.52 523.85 71.06 524.72 74.20 525.11 79.15 525.48 85.38 525.45 100.96 526.41 Sl'~111,1R1" U-1"1"-1 Bankfull Elevation: 521.8 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.9 Bankfull Width: 6.5 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 522.9 Flood Prone Width: 7.8 Max De th at Bankfull: I.1 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.9 W / D Ratio: 7.2 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.2 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 3.8 Slope (ft/ft): 0.013 Discharge (cfs) 28 tk a ~~ ** 5 If P 0 ~, ~,}y' ~ I b~ . ~ t R, ~~ .k/ ` ! y} e t ~~ . ~ ~ d~ ~y d4. x^ . ~. ~ l ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ r~~ v f ~^ ~ ~ 4' ~~ ~ ~ ~ s / !~' t I ~ ~ i ~ s i d.5 ry~ II ~ ~ 3 . is " ~ J~fp ~ ~ • t ~ ,~ n ^~ M +1~ / ~ ~ z ~. ., .. _ ~, ~ *~+ A dam' "~" m ~ ~ ~~~ S i a" ~ ti ~''.. - - a~~ ~ arv ^,. ,~ 'i~ ,~~~„ ~ ", - ~ , . . _ ~ i d~ ._ _ ' al w .~ Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 7, XS 49, Riffle 530 528 526 r c ° 524 y 522 520 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Station (feet) f - - - Bankfull - - -Flood Prone Area 80 90 100 , , . , , , , , , . , / , , , . , . , ~ • , • , i . , , . , • •••••••••••••••••••i••••••••a••••••••••••••• Material Size Range (mm) Count silUclay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 4 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 8 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 7 very coarse sand 1 - 2 3 very fine gravel 2 - 4 6 fine gravel 4 - 6 4 fine gravel 6 - 8 6 medium gravel 8 - 11 11 medium gravel 11 - 16 19 coarse gravel 16 - 22 15 coarse gravel 22 - 32 10 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 3 ver coarse ravel 45 - 64 2 small cobble 64 - 90 medium cobble 90 - 128 1 large cobble 128 - 180 1 ve lar a cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 small boulder 362 - 512 medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: 100 bedrock clay hardpan detritus/wood artificial total count: 100 Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 7 XS 49 100% 90% 80% c r 70% c 60% a~i 50% U °~ 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% ~-cumulative % -# of particles silUclay sand gravel cobble boulder ---- --------- ----- I ---- --------- ---- 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 particle size (mm) Size (mm D16 0.74 D35 6.9 D50 11 D65 15 D84 23 D95 40 Size Distribution mean 4.1 dispersion 8.5 skewness -0.35 20 18 16 14 ~ 12 6 m 10 ° v 8 ~: m 6 `~ 4 2 0 1000 10000 Tvoe silUclay 0% sand 22% gravel 76% cobble 2% boulder 0% 49 ~ ~ ' * € ~ ,~ ~` ,.. ~. ~ ~. ~ fIA ' " F k ~~,,,, ~, ~ r ~ T~ ~ ~~ - ~ - C ~ } ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~rr1' h~ u ' ~ ~ ' k I ~, y ~ 1~ ~T _ J 4 ~ is ~w „~ r A A ~ ~ ~t~~-. ,~- . ,R ... , . `~ ` ~ ,~~ ,r, ., +~F•~"" ~ !1 ~ ~ , :. r '~~ 1' fi*. ~s ~ o ~ ~" ' ~ ,.f. 31 ~~y "" ~ Stream Ty e: - - _ - - - -! Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 7, XS 50, Pool I 530 i ! 528 - - - - -- - d I 526 --- - z o ! 524 -- 522 r ! I 520 i 0 ]0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Station (feet) -Bankfull ! River Basin: Up ~cr Roanoke Watershed: T'nb 7 XS iD XS 50, Pool Draina a Area (s mi): 0.177 Date: I uu~~nv'_f)0~ Field Crew: < << !~ Station Elevation O.OU 526_ I _' 5.12 525.gi 9.90 525.83 15.02 525.51 19.93 525.51 24.99 525.26 27.04 525.03 29.03 524.81 30.98 524.64 32.83 524.44 33.89 524.24 34.78 524.02 35.54 523.15 36.58 520.65 37.16 520.50 37.80 520.44 38.63 520.32 39.79 520.47 40.47 520.70 40.93 522.33 42.05 522.79 46.87 523.82 48.34 524.08 50.12 524.36 52.37 524.88 54.79 525.14 57.14 525.10 79.97 526.28 85.30 526.85 90.60 527.32 95.60 527.85 SUJ'1~1A121' DA'1',~ Bankfull Elevation: 521.9 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: G.I Bankfull Width: 4.8 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: L6 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.3 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Slope (ft/ft): - Discharge (cfs) - •••••••••••••••••••••••••i•••••••i•••••••••• ••••••••i••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ,, ='.w a 'a ~ h~-, fir; - E ~ za ~ 1111 .~F4 ,, .. ~~ 1 ~;~. ~ ea ~ ~ z, i r~ TT „~„~' ~~~ " ~ '~ ;~`" .~~' ~ .ter ,.- ~~~ 'a a ww-~~, ! _ ,,,~ ~ «y ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~.. a ~,. `x<__m '9f ~,Fyk ~..... ~F. u ~l~F~ ~ Stream Type: G4c Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 7, XS 51, Riffle 523 `~ 521 I fi I ° W 519 _ ___ --_ - --.--- 517 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 I Station (feet) -Bankfull - - -Flood Prone Area River Basin: U pcr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 7 XS ID XS 51, Riffle Draina a Area (s mi): 0 177 Date: I nmarv ?00~ FieldCreH: ~ ~,[~ ~~:rt> Station Elevation 0.00 52 L58 6.00 521.32 10.62 521.23 15.30 520.82 21.46 520.99 26.65 521.32 31.99 521.37 38.78 52].44 44.46 521.59 48.80 521.34 50.30 520.84 52.64 518.49 53.14 517.83 54.93 517.86 57.05 517.68 57.78 517.58 58.41 519.26 60.03 520.85 61.58 521.54 65.40 521.69 73.50 521.01 78.84 521.46 85.02 522.28 91.06 522.86 100.42 523.50 SUMMARY DA"I~A Bankfull Elevation: 518.9 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 6.0 Bankfull Width: 6.0 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 520.2 Flood Prone Width: 8.5 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.3 Mean De th at Bankfull: I.0 W / D Ratio: 6.0 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.4 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 2.8 Slope (ftJft): 0.013 Discharge (cfs} 29 Material Size Range (mm) Count Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 7 XS 51 cumulative % -# of articles silt/clay 0 - 0.062 p very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 10 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 32 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 27 100% silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder 35 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 2 ve coarse sand 1 - 2 1 90% 30 ve fine ravel 2 -4 rY 9 8 ° 80 /° --"' -- -- ------ -- fine gravel 4 - 6 11 ~ fine gravel 6 - 8 6 ~ 70% , 25 c medium gravel 8 - 11 3 c 60% ~ medium gravel 11 - 16 1 `~ " 20 ~ coarse gravel 16 -22 ~ 50% ----- -- -- ~ ° coarse gravel 22 - 32 a 40% j ' 15 ~ very coarse gravel 32 - 45 ~ very coarse gravel 45 - 64 30% r ~ 10 m small cobble 64 - 90 2p% ~ i medium cobble 90 - 128 e I 5 large cobble 128 - 180 10% 6 j ve lar a cobble 180 - 256 0% ° small boulder 256 - 362 0 01 0 1 1 10 0 small boulder 362 - 512 . . 100 1000 10000 medium boulder 512 - 1024 particle size (mm) large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: Size (mm) Size Distribution Type bedrock --------------------- D16 0.14 mean 0.8 silt/clay 0% clay hardpan --------------------- D35 0.22 dispersion 8.8 sand 71% detritus/wood --------------------- D50 0.31 skewness 0.34 gravel 29% artificial --------------------- D65 0.46 cobble 0% tots count: Note: XS 51 D84 4.8 D95 7.6 boulder 0% '••ir•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••I i•••••••••••••••••••!••••••••••••••••••••••• River Basin: Upper Roanoke Watershed: Trib 7 XS ID XS 52, Pool Drains a Area (s mi): 0.177 Date: Janua 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0.00 520.67 5.45 520.54 11.31 520.52 14.39 520.54 15.90 520.37 22.16 520.75 26.31 520.47 30.99 520.80 35.72 520.86 39.55 520.73 40.72 519.23 42.42 517.93 43.34 517.34 45.30 517.07 46.27 516.98 48.57 517.99 50.82 519.31 53.48 520.29 56.73 520.63 63.46 520.66 67.56 520.51 73.44 520.26 77.93 520.46 81.78 520.59 87.14 521.17 93.96 521.63 100.76 522.30 SU'~1MARl' DATA Bankfull Elevation: 518.1 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 6.1 Bankfull Width: 7.2 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 1.3 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.8 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Slope (ft/ft): - Discharge (cfs) - Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 7, XS 52, Pool 524 522 s c ~~ 520 w 518 ~- s `~; ~ . ~ e " ~. s - ' 516 + 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Station (feet) Bankfull 70 80 90 100 i n. itovl ~'~ +~ rt u, Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 72 81.8% 81.8% Location: 2.0 8.5 9.7% 91.5% Note: 4.0 3.5 4.0% 95.5% 8.0 3.0 3.4% 98.9% Bar Sample Sieve Analysis 16.0 1.0 1.1% 100.0% 31.5 0.0 0.0% 100.0% 100 Sands E Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 0.0 O.O% 100.0% 90 1 I 1 I I I I I ( I I I I I i i l l l l I ! I I I I I I 1 I I I I I p 120.0 0.0 O.O% 100.0% I I 1 I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I i l l i l I I I l i l l I I I I I I I I 256.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% ~ 80 % I I I I I l i l . Iii I I I I I 1 I 11 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I Total: 88.0 100% ~ 70 / I Y I I I~ I I I~ I I i. I I I I I I I V I I I I I I V I I I I I ! I l l i ~ ~ so % so % I I I I ~. I I I I ( I I I I I ~ 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I i I I I I ; ao % I I I I I I ~ I I ( I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I U ~ 30°~ I I I I I I I I I I i l l l l ~- 1 ( I I I I I ~ I V I I I I I I I I I I d 20 % I 1 I I ! I I I I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I 1! 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 10% 1 1 I ( I I I I I I ( I I I I 1 I I V I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 0% ___. _.L.. 0.1 1111111 I I L.I I I.I ,. 1 11~IIll 11 111111 1 1111111 1111111 _. I__ I.I 1 1.. _.~ 1 ~ I._I_ 1.. 1. 1. 11_1_1. -_.__ I. I~IJ_L~., 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) ~-Cumulative Percent • Percent Item ~i Size er cent less than mm Percent b substrate e D16 D35 D50 D8 4 D95 silt/cla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 3.7 0% 91 % 9% 0% --- --- •••••••••••••••~•••••s•••••~•••••••••••••••~ River Basin: Up ~cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 7 XS ID XS 53, Riffle Draina a Area (s mi): 0.177 Date: Janua 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0.00 514.97 2.49 514.68 5.82 514.58 12.84 514.27 18.09 513.91 21.87 513.50 23.37 513.91 26.06 513.91 30.74 513.59 33.33 S 13.67 36.23 S 13.43 37.13 513.25 37.91 513.08 38.03 S 12.73 38.59 S 12.57 39.07 512.12 39.88 511.19 40.48 510.33 41.22 509.75 41.51 509.41 41.95 509.21 42.49 509.28 42.88 509.28 43.83 509.29 44.21 509.23 44.64 509.44 45.44 509.91 46.49 510.13 47.75 510.90 48.27 512.98 49.08 513.44 51.55 513.43 55.63 513.42 58.87 513.41 62.48 513.29 67.14 513.28 71.80 512.98 85.42 S 12.98 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 510.6 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 6.0 Bankfull Width: 6.9 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 51 1.9 Flood Prone Width: 8.7 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.3 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.9 W / D Ratio: 7.9 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.3 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 3.2 Slope (ft/ft): 0.013 Discharge (cfs) 29 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 7, XS 53, Riffle ~ltS 516 y 514 s c > 512 W 510 508 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Station (feet) Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area 70 80 90 Material Size Range (r silt/clay 0 - 0.06: very fine sand 0.062 - 0.12E fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 very coarse sand 1 - 2 very fine gravel 2 - 4 fine gravel 4 - 6 fine gravel 6 - 8 medium gravel 8 - 11 medium gravel 11 - 16 coarse gravel 16 - 22 coarse gravel 22 - 32 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 very coarse gravel 45 - 64 small cobble 64 - 90 medium cobble 90 - 128 large cobble 128 - 180 very large cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 small boulder 362 - 512 medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 very laroe boulder 2048 - 4096 Size (mm) 1 10 particle size (mm) Size Distribution bedrock --------------------- D16 1.7 mean 4.9 clay hardpan --------------------- D35 6.1 dispersion 3.2 detritus/wood --------------------- D50 7.9 skewness -0.22 artificial --------------------- D65 9.6 tota count: D84 14 D95 19 Note: XS 53 30 25 20 ~ m 15 ° _~ 10 m 5 0 100 1000 10000 Type silUclay Oq0 sand 18% gravel 81 cobble 1 boulder 0% Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 7 XS 53 Count 1 4 100% 5 8 90% 7 80% 9 C 17 Y 70% 25 c 60% 16 7 ~ 50% U a 40% 1 30% 20% 1 10% 0% ~-cumulative % -# of particles silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder ---- ------------- I I I I ---- ------------ I I I I I I 1 1 0.01 0.1 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••ii••••••' ~~~ II ~e Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 28 66.2% 66.2% Location: 2.0 4.5 10.6% 76.8% Note: 4.0 3.5 8.3% 85.1% 8.0 3.0 7.1 % 92.2% Bar Sample Sieve Analysis 16.0 3.0 7.1 % 99.3% 31.5 0.0 0.0% 99.3% o Sands E 1 Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 0.3 0.7% 100.0% 00 ~ I I 1 I I I 1 1~ I I i I I 1 I I V I I I I l i I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 128.0 0.0 O.O% 100.0% ~~ ~ 0 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I V I I I I I V I I I 256.0 0.0 O.O% 100.0% ~ 80 - I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I V I I I I I I I I i l I I ! 1 1 1 1 Total. 42 3 100% ~ 70 ~ I I I ' I I I I i I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 m ~ I I i 1 I I i l l l l . I I I I I I I 60 ~ ~ I I I I i i I I ', I I I I I I i I l l l l i I ~ 1 I I I! 1 I i~ I I V I I I 50 I I I I I I I f I ~ i I I I I Ij i I I I! f ~I I I V I I I ~ I I I I I ~ I ~ U 40 I I l i l l l I I i l l( l 1 I ( I I I I i 1 1 1 1 1 I' I I I I I I d I I 1 I I I I I I i I I I I I I ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I 20 % I I I I i l l I I i l l l l I I I! i l l i 1 I I V I I I I I i l l l l 100/ I I I I l l l I I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 0% I. I I._I ' I I _ ,,__ _..I I ~~ I i I I _ __i. ~ I I I l_.I _; I..i.. __.. a. __1--1 I i I I 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) f Cumulative Percent • Percent Item Size percent less than mm Percent b substrate e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt/cla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 10.5 0% 77% 23% 0% --- --- Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 16 7.9% 7.9% Location: 2.0 6.5 3.2% 11.1 % Note: 4.0 5.5 2.7% 13.9% 8.0 7.0 3.5% 17.3% Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis - 0 to 0 2 ft 16.0 15.0 7.4% 24.8% . 31.5 30.5 15.1 % 39.9% 100°/ Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 121.5 60.1 % 100.0% 90°~ i i i ~ i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ~ i i i i i i i i i ~ iii i 128.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% i iii i i i iii i i i i iii i i i i i iii v i i i iii 256.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% ~ 800 I ~ i i i i I ~ I V I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 V I I I I I I I I t l Total: 202.0 100% m ~ 70 ° ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ / 60 50°/ i i ~ i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ i i ~ i ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ i i ~ iii ~ ~ 40 i i i iii ~ i i i i i i l i i i i i i i i i ~ i i i i i i i i ~ i i i i ` 30% ~ i i i i i - i~ i i i i i i i ~ i i i i i ~ i ~ ~ i i ~ iii ~ a 20 ~ ~ i~ iii , ~ ~ i ~ i i ~ i i i i i i i i i ~ i ~ ~ i i ~ iii ~ 10 % ~ ~- ~ i i ~ i i ~ i i 0.1 i 1 ~ i ~ i i ~ ~ i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i iii ~ 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) f-Cumulative Percent • Percent Item Size ercen t less tha n mm Percent b substrate e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt/cla sand ravel cobble boulder bedrock 6.1 25.3 35.5 53.0 60.3 0% 11 % 89% 0% --- --- I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~• Watershed: Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis 0.2-0.4 ft 1 oo°r° so°r so°r ~o°i 60°~ 50°~ 4~ ~° 30°/ 20°/ 10% 0°/ 0.1 L N C_ LL C OJ U N a Particle Size (mm) f Cumulative Percent • Percent Item 1 10 100 1000 10000 River Basin: U>>cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 7 XS ID XS 54, Pool Draina a Area (s mi): 0 X61 Date: I uni.u~ 'Ofh Field Crew: Station Elevation U.U(I 478.42 x.80 477.47 12.45 476.57 I C.57 476.17 21.33 475.33 27.39 475.07 32.3C> 474.73 37.33 474.15 38.29 473.33 38.92 472.74 39.64 472.13 39.86 471.94 41.92 471.80 43.42 471.55 44.90 471.69 46.48 471.73 46.77 471.94 47.86 47266 49.90 474.47 54.38 474.94 63.95 474.83 71.28 475.12 77.09 474.94 80.46 474.10 82.23 473.99 84.77 474.20 87.77 474.81 89.57 476.08 SU!ti1~1,1Rti' DATA Bankfull Elevation: 472.8 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 8.3 Bankfull Width: 9.1 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull• 1.3 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.9 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Discharge (cfs) - ,y .3,': ~r t r 6: L ~ ~ l { yr ~ i •.1 t ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~'i, ~ ` ~ 1' ,w ~ ~~ ~ k s t~ ~ " 1, ~ ~ gyp. ~, , ~ ~ .,, , IG E. ~ ~ A t z~~~ ti E~ ~.~; ~ ~ ~l ~~ I~ f t~~~ ~~~ '~~, y} ~fff ~ ~. _ o ~ D^•=..., • ..,,~ , .s ~ Yy.G: . ~ -AID. ~~. ~: h `~ ., ._ u.~ ~. ~- ` '! ~ ~ ~__. ~" ~r ~ 4 ~h• ,.... - a~ •.. i M ~, s d' ~ ., u. ~~ ~ t R Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 7, XS 54, Pool 479 477 ~, 0 475 c y w 473 0 10 20 30 40 50 Station (feet) ' 'Bankfull 471 60 70 80 90 i ••••••••••i•••••••••rt•~••••••~••i•••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••s••••••••••••••••••• f~ a~ r ~ i s y , .~.. l ~ ~ ~ " . ~'~ x c.r~,.~ 3 -Say _ ~r _-"~.v } . '1"-. Il~L ~^ `~ ~~ ~L ~~ 3 y ~ ` ,~ ,~- ~ s =` ter, w` w `;_~s..;~G '{" „~ ~'" ..4 ~~ '.'~" - K:- 1 y~ 4 ~'T .. Stream Type: E4 - , i Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 7, XS 55, Riffle 480 ~ 478 - 476 r 0 > 474 472 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - - - _ _ - - - _ - _ - _ ___ . 470 0 ]0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Station (feet) Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area River Basin: Upper Roanoke Watershed: Trib 7 XS ID _ XS 55, Riffle Drama a Area (s mi): 0._'61 Date: I^n.iar~ ~00~ Field Crew: t i ~ . is ~ ~ i I, ~~ ILuherts Station Elevation 0.00 478.?2 5.52 477.34 9.25 476.64 15.93 476.14 23.29 474.89 25.87 474.54 28.71 474.31 30.70 473.51 33.30 472.88 34.12 472.66 34.75 472.42 35.79 471.30 36.63 471.21 39.32 471.27 40.37 471.21 40.51 471.28 42.89 471.75 43.83 472.07 44.10 472.93 44.10 473.28 46.12 474.29 48.29 474.43 54.42 474.02 57.31 473.77 58.63 473.50 64.40 473.26 70.64 473.92 75.79 475.94 ~U.07 476.47 SU:~I~IARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 472.4 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 8.2 Bankfull Width: 9.2 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 473.6 Flood Prone Width: 23.6 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.2 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.9 W / D Ratio: 10.2 Entrenchment Ratio: 2.6 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 2.6 Slope (ft/ft): 0.023 Discharge (cfs) 55 Material Size Range (n silUclay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 very coarse sand 1 - 2 very fine gravel 2 - 4 fine gravel 4 - 6 fine gravel 6 - 8 medium gravel 8 - 11 medium gravel 11 - 16 coarse gravel 16 - 22 coarse gravel 22 - 32 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 very coarse gravel 45 - 64 small cobble 64 - 90 medium cobble 90 - 128 large cobble 128 - 180 very large cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 small boulder 362 - 512 medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 vary larne hnul~iar ~ndR - dn9R bedrock clay hardpan detritus/wood coun XS 53 Size (mm) 0.1 D16 1.7 D35 6.1 D50 7.9 D65 9.6 D84 14 D95 19 1 10 100 particle size (mm) Size Distribution mean 4.9 dispersion 3.2 skewness -0.22 30 25 20 ~ m 15 ° v 10 5 0 1000 10000 Type silUclay p% sand 18% gravel 81 cobble 1% boulder 0% III Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 7 XS 55 Count 4 100% 5 $ 90% 7 80% 9 c 17 70% 25 c 60% 16 7 ~ 50% U n 40% 1 . 30% 20% 1 10% 0% -~-cumulative % -# of particles silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder ---- ------------- I I I I ---- ------------ i I I 1 I I I I ~~~ 0.01 •~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Watershed: Location: Bar Sample Sieve Analysis Sands ~ Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 100 I I i I, I I I 1 i t I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I 90% ~~ ° I I I I I I, I i I l i! I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 80 / I I I ~ I I m ° I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I 1 I I I I , I I 70 / L I I I I ~ ° 1 I I i ~ i l I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I i I 60 / ~ I I I I I '. I i I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I i I I l i I 1 I i jl 50 % ~ i I I I I 1 I I I I I I i l l I I I I ~~ I I I I I i I I I I . I I I I ~ 40 % I I I I ~ l l l i I I ~ I I I I I I I I~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I d I I 1 I I I 1 I i l l l I I i I I I I I~ I I I I i l l I~ I I 1 1 1 ° 20 / I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 i I I 1 1 1 1 I I I ( I I I I I I t l l I I ~ I I I I I I I I I t I I I I 1 I V I I I I I I V I I I 0% ___--- I_ J_..I. I __-~ ll I I i I L1_... I. 1 I _~ I I L ~--. _._ .. 1~:_ I I 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) f Cumulative Percent • Percent Item 4 Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: LO 28 15.4% 15.4% Location ~~ r °~ 2.0 10.5 5.8% 21.2% Note: ~ ~ 'k_;^ ~ "" 4.0 13.5 7.4% 28.6% 8.0 9.0 4.9% 33.5% Bulk Sample Sieve Anal sis - 0 to 0 2 ft 16.0 15.0 8.2% 41.8% y . 31.5 26.5 14.6% 56.3% 100 % Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 79.5 43.7% 100.0% 90% ~ I I i iii , i I I I i I I I i I I I I I i I I i I ~ I i I I I ii i 128.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% ~ I I ~ 'III ~ ~ ~ I, I I I i~ I I I I I I I IIIII i I~ i„ 256.0 0.0 0.0% 100.0% C 80% ~- I I I I I I i I I 1 1 ~ I I I I I I I I ~ ~ I I I ~ i l ~~ I I i I I I I ii Total: 182.0 100% = ~ 70 % i I I i I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I l l i l I I ~ I i l l ~~ ~ LL 60 50 i I I ~ I I I I i h i l l ~ ~ I I I I I I I ~ I i l i I I ~ I l l i ~ 40 I I i I I I I - i i I I I I I I I [ I I ~ ~ I I I I I I ~ i I l i i ~ m 300 ~ I I ~ I I I I 1J._l I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ I I I 1 1 1 ~ ~ 1 1 1 1 1 ' d 20 I I ~ ~ i l l l i I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I 1 1 1 1 ~ I I I I I I 10% I I ~ I I I I I ~ i I I I I I I ~ ~ I I I ~~ I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00~ 1. ~ ~ I I I I 0.1 1 I I I I~I ~ ~ ~ I I I I I ~ ~ ~ I I 1 1 1 I ~ I I 1 1 1 I I I. I I ~. i ~ I I I I I ~ ~ I I I I I I ~ I-. I I I I I 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) ~i-~ Cumulative Percent • Percent Item ' Size ercent less tha n mm Percent b sub strate t pe D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt/cla sand rave l cobble boulder bedrock 1.1 9.1 23.5 49.4 59.0 0% 21 % 79% 0% --- --- I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~• Stream °'t'" Watershed ~ sl a~.~: Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis 0.2-0.4 ft 100% Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 90 % I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I V I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 80 % I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 V I I I I 1 I I 11 1 1 I I . 1 1 1 1 - 7 % I I ~, I I I I ~ V I I I I I I t l l l I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I L 0 '' F 60 I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I V I I I ,I I I I I l i I r , 1 I ( I I I I ~ I 1 I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ V I I I I ~ 1 I I I I I I 11 'I I I I I I I i 50 % ` ~ i I ( I I I I V I I I I - V I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I ! I I I I ~ 40 U I I 1 ( I I I I I I I I h i l l I I I I l l l i I I V I I I 30 % _ _ 1 ~ I ( I I I I ~ ~ I I I I 1 I I V I I I I I I I I~~ i I V I I I 20 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 V I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I l l l i 10 % I I I I I I I I I I I I I i 1 1 1 1 1 . I I•I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 00~ I I 1_ I I I I _ _ I I_I_ I_ _- ~ __ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I ( I I I I I ~ _ I I I 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) -~-Cumulative Percent • Percent Item ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' r ,~ n ~ ~, u "~ ~ and ~ ~ '~~,,. - ~`+ a` ~ ~ ~ _ h~y µ r ~ . ~ W ~^ ~ 6~y ~ 'TW ~ ~~ I ~ . `M ~~ff I r ~"~~ ~ .~~ 1 4 ~! ' ~ s ~ R . ~" ~` ~ w t E~ r+4'~ i° -+ r'+3. '1 j~ yN~' "~'~f ~,1~6 ry,,~ 1 ~'~.,u h ~ ~ ' ' .""M4 ~ °, ~- ~ ,~ wt~ ,,.-. ~~ ~ ~~'~~~ ~ .. M~r ~,, ~~x 9 4 ~_ - ~ a ~r+. ~ @ti ~ ~ ~ e d.. + ~ -fir * .,_ k ~ _ ••~ ~r~PSa. ~aM a ~ .~^ ilr _ .. ~ _ ~ u ybr~a .. - n' _, +,; .fir .. "~` ... .m,.. - n~ .,.. t -~ Stream Type: F4 ~ Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 7, XS 56, Ri ffle ~, 462 i 460 458 456 -- I c 454 --- - --- v `'~ 452 450 448 i 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Station (feet) - Bankfull - - - Plood Prone Area - River Basin: U i per Roanoke Watershed: Tnb 7 XS ID XS 56, Riffle Draina a Area s mi : 0.62 Date: 4nniary 2007 Field Crew: G~ir~incr_ I Li~c>. hniaht_ ~tilillcr, Ruhcrn Station Elevation (1.00 459.66 6.83 458.15 12.31 457.10 21.33 455.69 29.97 455.13 35.44 454.91 37.95 454.81 39.69 453.81 41.11 451.90 41.79 451.11 42.40 449.22 45.63 449.68 49.00 449.49 51.59 449.65 54.57 449.87 54.27 449.90 57.84 449.77 59.93 451.38 62.97 453.06 65.52 455.51 67.36 455.87 74.07 456.12 81.65 456.69 95.34 459.05 103.34 460.77 SUAIAIAR>' D x'1'.1 Bankfull Elevation: 450.6 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 15.1 Bankfull Width: 17.0 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 452.0 Flood Prone Width: 20.0 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.4 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.9 W / D Ratio: 19. i Entrenchment Ratio: 1.2 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 4.0 Slope (ft/ft): O.Ol2 Discharge (cfs) 73 •••i•ii•••i••••••i••••i•••••i•••••i••••i••i•' ••i~•!••i•••••••••!•••••!••••!••~••••i••••••• Material Size Range (mm) Count silt clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 1 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 7 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 6 very coarse sand 1 - 2 2 very fine gravel 2 - 4 fine gravel 4 - 6 fine gravel 6 - 8 4 medium gravel 8 - 11 6 medium gravel 11 - 16 11 coarse gravel 16 - 22 15 coarse gravel 22 - 32 21 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 14 ve coarse ravel 45 - 64 7 small cobble 64 - 90 6 medium cobble 90 - 128 large cobble 128 - 180 ve lar a cobble 180 - 256 small boulder 256 - 362 small boulder 362 - 512 medium boulder 512 - 1024 large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: bedrock ------------- clay hardpan ------------- detritus/wood ------------- 100 Note: total count: 100 D16 6 D35 15 D50 21 D65 28 D84 42 D95 68 1 10 particle size (mm) Size Distribution mean 15.9 dispersion 2.8 skewness -0.13 20 c 15 Q m 0 100 1000 10 m 5 ---~ 0 10000 Tvoe silt/clay 0% sand 16% gravel 78% cobble 6% boulder 0% Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 7 XS 56 100% 90% 80% c m 70% c 60% w a~i 50% U 4) ~- 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% sans ----- ---------- -------- I I f I I 0.01 0.1 Size (mm) -cumulative % -# of particles boulder T 25 River Basin: LJ ier Roanoke Watershed: Tnb 7 XS ID XS 56a, RifFle Drama a Area s mi : 0 62 Date: Januar 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes. Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0.00 458.75 8.99 4i8?9 21.49 457.71 35.78 457.55 38.43 457.75 47.32 458.02 51.63 457.53 54.53 456.76 56.70 455.96 58.02 455.31 58.46 454.86 59.14 454.44 60.00 454.05 60.37 453.03 60.64 452.88 61.92 452.87 64.08 452.83 66.41 452.88 69.05 452.85 71.69 453.01 75.41 453.26 76.06 454.23 77.48 454.74 78.18 455.01 81.09 455.17 86.04 455.40 95.76 455.55 103.05 457.27 107.36 458.13 114.80 458.90 122.94 460.34 SU~1~9AR1~ DATA Bankfull Elevation: 453.9 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 15.2 Bankfull Width: 15.0 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 455.0 Flood Prone Width: 22.6 Max De th at Bankfull: I .l Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.0 W / D Ratio: 14.8 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.5 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 2.0 Slope (ft/ft): 0.012 Discharge (cfs) 77 ~" v ~~ ~ t; ti ~ ~ " , 5~~ ~ 1 ~ ,t ~ r ~ , ~,~ 4 t ~ I I~,~ '~. i „ Jr F y 7Rr I 4 y y ;+ I ~ # ~ , W ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~i4 ~ y NI ~ 'll'F a ,~ ~~,r ~ 3 ¢ W a ~, "~ .~+ ~r;~ , ~ "~j ~. y yy K ~ ~, 8, ~~ ~ ~ t E ~ u.~l, ~ ~~ :pr ^ ~` ~"'~ s ~,~+' .. `~ ~n"r ~ r _-..)~yy;, ~~~ ~` ~ E t. ~: ti «A s .. ~: 'Y J tir~ Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 7, XS 56a, Riffle 462 460 y 458 r 0 - 456 v 454 452 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Station (feet) Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Areal 90 100 110 120 •~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~s~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Stream: Watershed: 100 90 ~ I ~ I I I I l 80 % l I I I I i r-r-~-m-} C m C 70 I I I I i ~ ~ l l ' ~ ~ 60 I I I I I ~. I I I I I i i ~ ~ 50 I I I I i l l ~ U 40 % ~ I I ~ I I I I~ d 30% I I ~ I I 20 % --'~~`~-`r 10% I I ~ I l l i ' I I ~ l i 1 1 0.1 1 Bar Sample Sieve Analysis Gravels _ E~ I I i l l l l I I ( I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ I I rr--r-rr ~r-r-t I ~ I I I I I I ~ 1 V I I I I I V I I I ~ ~ I I I ~, I ~ i I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I V I I I ~ I I I I I I ~. I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I I I I I I Q ~ I I I I I ~ i i l l I i I I I I I I I I I I ~ I ~ I I I I I I I I I ~~ I I I I I ~ I I I I I! 1 ~ ICI I I u I ~ V I I I I I I i l l l l ~ 11 1! I I I I I I I _i I I i I I I I I I I I I I I~ ~ 1 ~ l i l l l ~ I i I I I III J •~ I I I I I ~ i. D i l l ~ I ~ 1 1 1 1 1 I I ~ 1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) f Cumulative Percent • Percent Item 7 - _ Smallest Sieve Weight Percent Stream: Passed mm oz % Item Finer Than Watershed: 1.0 28 21.2% 21.2% Location: 2.0 2.5 1.9% 23.1 % Note: 4.0 9.5 7.2% 30.3% 8.0 15.0 11.4% 41.7% Bulk Sample Sieve Analysis - 0 to 0 2 ft 16.0 23.0 17.4% 59.1 . 31.5 32.5 24.6% 83.7% 100% Sands Gravels Cobbles Boulders Bedrock 64.0 21.5 16.3% 100.0% 90 % ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~~i - -- - - ~ ~ i ~ ~~i ~ ~ i ~~~ i i i i i iii i i i i iii 128.0 0.0 O.l)% 100.0% ~ r r ~ i i i i~~ i i~~ iiii i i i i iii -r i i i i i iii i i i iii 256.0 0.0 0.l)% 100.0% ~ 80% ° i i i i iii I i i iii - i i i i iii -__r__ i r i i i i iii -t-rn-r r i i i iii Total: 132.0 100% ~ 7o i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ 60 50 ~ ~ v i i i ~ ~ ~ i i i i i i ~ ~ i i i i i i i ~ ~ i i ~ iii ~ 40 v 30% ~ i i i i iii i i ~i i i i i i iii i i i i i iii i i i iii a 20% ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ r ~ i ~ ~~i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~i ~ i ~ ~ ~~~ 10 % ~ i _~_ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ i i ~ 0.1 1 ~ ~ i i i i i i i ~ i i i i i i ~ i i ~ i i ~ iii ~ 10 100 1000 10000 Particle Size (mm) ~-Cumulative Percent • Percent I[em Size ercent less tha n mm Percent b sub strate e D16 D35 D50 D84 D95 silt/cla sand rave l cobble boulder bedrock 5.3 5.3 11.1 31.9 51.5 0% 23% 77% 0% --- --- ~ittt~•t~~~i~~~~~ii!•ti~tt~t~ltr~~~•t~~~t•t• ~~~~i~~~~~~~e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~• I I I I I I I - I I l l l j I I I I 1 ~ I I I I I I I I I I t l l l l ~ f ~T~TT I I B i l l Y---1~_....-1-?t-t I V I I I I I l l l l ~ - I j I I I I I I I i I 1 1 1 11 rt~~-t'1- I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I ti I I I I I - ~ I I~! I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I i I l f l I I I I I. i V I I I I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I! ' i I i I I I I I I ~. V I I ~ I I I V I I I I I 1 I I I I I I t 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ': I I V I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 -__ 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I] I t ( I I I I L ', 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I U I I I I I I I I I ~ I . 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ I I I 11 I I 1 I I I I I I I I : I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I I __,. I I I _ I i I 1 I I I I I I X 1 1 111 I I I I 11 I I ~ I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 _I__.., I I I: I I I i V I I I I_~ River Basin: U>>cr Roanoke Watershed: Trih 7 XS ID XS 57, Pool Draina a Area s mi : 0.62 Date: Janua 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0.00 461 .92 13.08 460.9? 20.88 460.33 26.80 459.87 29.93 459.60 36.46 459.31 42.73 458.92 48.86 458.63 54.29 458.72 58.62 458.91 64.40 459.06 68.46 459.05 70.65 458.97 73.70 458.73 75.02 457.97 76.47 456.57 78.24 456.11 82.33 454.90 83.66 454.53 83.82 454.40 85.89 453.93 87.82 453.42 88.94 453.69 90.40 453.38 92.75 453.61 94.64 453.82 94.83 455.93 95.66 457.4] 97.88 458.55 102.87 458.92 106.68 459.47 1 1 1.68 460.36 1 16.00 460.95 122.06 461.61 127.66 462.52 131.76 463.38 13 5.15 464.24 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 Station (feet) - - - Bankfull SUM~1ARl' DATA Bankfull Elevation: 455.1 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 15.8 Bankfull Width: 13.1 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 1.7 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.2 W ! D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Slope (ft/ft): - Dischar a (cfs) - Q t,~ r ~ ' ~e Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 7, XS 57, Pool 464 462 460 r '~ 458 :~ 456 454 452 i._......._ --.....t. c -.......... i 0 ••••••••••••••••i•••••••i•••••••••••!••••••• •••••••••••••••••~~••••~••••••a•~••••~~s~••• ~.,~ ~ ~a~ r e ~s; ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Wp, '"~ „ ., ~'~-° ~~ ~, . -. ~ ~ , e!% w~ t ~ Stream Type: - i Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 8, XS 43, Pool 546 544 ti 542 r 0 ~ ° 540 -- - - W 538 - -.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 536 0 ]0 20 30 40 50 60 70 Station (feet) i - ~ ~ Bankfull River Basin: Up ~cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 8 XS ID XS 43, Pool Drama a Area (s mi): 0.021 Date: Janua 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Robots Station Elevation 0.00 54260 4.42 541.17 12.42 540.54 18.46 539.93 24.88 540.43 28.50 540.24 29.69 539.95 30.44 539.45 31.43 539.07 32.00 538.32 32.44 538.06 32.37 538.04 32.91 537.63 33.54 537.58 34.16 537.53 34.58 537.57 34.77 539.13 35.47 539.78 36.46 541.08 37.90 542.09 38.90 542.40 42.32 542.62 45.11 542.97 48.16 542.92 55.27 543.34 66.05 544.30 71.62 544.72 SUMYIARY UA'fA Bankfull Elevation: 538.3 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: I.5 Bankfull Width: 2.7 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 0.8 Mean De th at Bankfull• 0.6 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Slope (ft/ft): - Discharge (cfs) - q. h~ ~al~ ~ c: ,e ~ z t'~ 6 ~,w ~ h ~iI~V 4 aryl .reiP d ~~ I rail ~ ~ ~ ~`'a' I r~. a u~.,y.~+ g ~~ "m, ~ 'sue "` .YF ~.~.~` q,- ~ ,~ ':,r . i ~ ,. .. - ~1 ,~GG, xr~ ~~s~,~a . ~ ~ ~ ~ gar . Mks ~~'C'°"'" • ~ r °`k"'. 9~r~ ,~¢,k, ' `,"S,. ;~.." w . Stream Ty e: B4 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 8, XS 44, Riffle ~~ 544 i 542 y 0 540 a 538 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 536 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 ~ Station (feet) - - Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area River Basin: U ~ ~cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 8 XS ID XS 44, Riffle Drama a Area (s mi): (I 021 Date: .lama 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 0.00 542.49 9.41 54L62 11.99 540.80 15.60 540.47 18.06 539.61 21.53 538.89 25.55 538.57 30.47 538.82 34.09 538.36 34.95 537.80 36.1 I 537.58 36.82 537.60 37.27 537.39 38.16 537.46 38.71 537.91 39.93 538.27 40.84 538.42 41.34 538.86 42.16 539.40 43.36 540.10 44.64 540.44 47.37 540.64 49.88 541.06 52.00 541.24 55.24 541.27 59.94 541.24 65.88 541.63 SUJ1~IARY D.1'1'A Bankfull Elevation: 537.9 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 1.3 Bankfull Width: 4.0 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 538.4 Flood Prone Width: 7.5 Max De th at Bankfull: 0.5 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.3 W / D Ratio: 12.3 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.9 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 1.7 Slope (ft/ft): 0.030 Discharge (cfs) 5 •••••••••••••••••i•••••••••••••••••••••••••• ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~• f~ r . -~ ~~1~ ~ ~ ~ k Vic; ,. k f 9 yc ~,ma~ _ 4 ' I ~' a ~r~ s~+~ - ~ ~v _-r-•~. ~~"' ~~ , .: ~, ~ ,. d~ ~ -. r- ..~, ~ a!. ~~' , .- b F""n~s ). ~ ,- ~ ~'~.rF - it '~ ^?,~~ -Y `-"~'' , rs f ear ~a „ '~`^ +~ ~, ~ ~ ~''~`iT~? . ~~-: ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~~ . mm +'~~ ~*~' ~ ~ "„per .- +'~ iti;. '~'~ ,.-~ ~- ~ ~ ..rte Stream Type: - i~ Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 9, XS 47, Pool 536 - - - ti 534 -- s 0 ~' `~ 532 530 0 ]0 20 30 40 50 60 70 ~ Station (feet) -Bankfull River Basin: Up ~cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 9 XS ID XS 47, Pool Drains a Area (s mi): 0 036 Date: l uni uv '007 Field Crew: r f I,:~ti> r ~ ~ht ~1~ t<uhrri~ Station Elevation 0.00 536.46 4.57 536.17 9.99 535.25 12.23 535.23 16.80 534.73 19.99 534.15 23.08 534.15 25.77 533.96 29.93 533.70 34.19 533.41 37.28 533.35 39.R 1 533.47 42.34 533.27 43.61 532.89 45.37 532.35 46.18 531.85 46.90 531.52 47.55 530.77 48.37 530.56 49.14 530.55 49.52 530.60 49.69 531.56 50.56 532.49 5 L92 533.38 55.10 533.56 57.74 533.73 60.46 533.96 63.55 534.28 66.19 534.78 67.04 535.92 SLiM:V1ARl' DATA Bankfull Elevation: 53 ] .6 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.4 Bankfull Width: 3.0 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: I.0 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.8 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Slope (ft/ft): - Discharge (cfs) - ~ ~ t + t ~ ~ r r' f . ~ (f , '~' e.~ ~ .Y: ~ ~ .,~ I. ~~ '~'.. 1~ ^ M ~ j ~~ ir~r ~ ~ ` , ,,~ *~,~ ?~~,,, .,w '4W J• 9. / '°w.. . w - ~ ~ ,.~ ~. ~ ~ W ;_, ~ ~' ' t- ~ ~ ~ ~ r •` ~ ~ - e ~~ ~.. i ~ ~ J . ,9 a~an o Stream T e: G4 ~, Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 9, XS 48, Riffle I~ 540 538 - - --- - - I w 536 - r , o 534 - W 532 I 530 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Station (feet) - Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area - - -- River Basin: U ~cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 9 XS ID XS 48, Riffle Drama a Area (s mi : 0 036 Date: .lama 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayas, Knight, Miller, Roberts Station Elevation 11.00 537.78 ~9 135.53 4.96 534.74 8.02 534.68 1 1.00 534.30 12.88 533.90 14.98 533.57 17.02 532.98 17.78 532.16 18.14 531.13 19.07 531.18 20.12 531.23 20.91 531.36 21.47 531.73 22.74 532.69 24.34 533.01 26.42 533.44 28.73 533.69 31.93 534.2] 35.00 534.35 38.06 534.69 40.97 535.09 43.92 535.45 46.03 535.94 48.96 535.70 51.95 536.08 55.01 536.37 60.50 537.08 63.97 537.52 66.93 537.96 70.05 538.47 76.09 539.38 SUMMARY D1"I'A Bankfull Elevation: 531.9 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.2 Bankfull Width: 3.8 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 532.7 Flood Prone Width: 6.5 Maz De th at Bankfull: 0.8 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.6 W / D Ratio: 6.6 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.7 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 2.0 Slope (ft/ft): 0.028 Discharge (cfs) I I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~• ~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~• } ~ S; ' ~ ~ ~§ f 5 ~ ~{ y ~ "`@@@ X ~ ~~ £ S R.: f ° LT ~ ~..: z ~ ~W~. ~ ~. .,~~~~- r k' ~. ~ v ~_ '• + _ .. ' ~ ~. ~ ~ :..rte •, ,_~ . , .~ ~ a. '~ i, 's . _. .tom" ,~ ~• ;. ..,_ "'. .yam„ J~.. '~ ~, ,.'°.3 e .ri-~ ~ .~ - Stream Type: - Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 10, XS 60, Pool 496 494 - - - - - _ - - m 492 - -- :'°.. o 490 - ~, ~ 488 486 484 I II 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Station (feet) -Bankfull River Basin: U>>cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 10 XS ID XS 60, Pool Drains a Area (s mi): 0 ,~~ Date: I uw u'v 2007 Field Crew: < uii~.c.. fin ~ ~ h' tii:i ~ ~-~h;~,~~ Station Elevation 0.00 491.13 4.18 490.81 7.39 489.94 15.02 489.28 23.41 488.92 30. ] R 488.25 35.68 487.95 38.59 487.14 41.45 486.73 42.58 486.12 43.70 485.42 45.05 485.07 47.31 484.44 49.34 484.51 50.09 485.02 51.21 488.01 52.60 489.46 54.94 489.91 61.90 490.45 71.56 491.21 79.28 492.04 88.03 493.66 93.54 494.59 SUMMARY l)A"fA Bankfull Elevation: 486.3 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 10.7 Bankfull Width: 8.3 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 1.9 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.3 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio• - Discharge (cfs) - River Basin: U ,cr Roanoke Watershed: Trib 10 XS ID XS 61, Riffle Draina a Area s mi : 0.342 Date: Junu:,r.~ '_007 Field Crew: ~,.ndn~r- I',,-. .. Ian<~ht. ~~~1illcr, Robcrls Station Elevation 0.00 490.90 6.27 488.12 10.43 486.40 14.08 485.14 16.07 484.44 17.10 483.61 17.65 483.52 18.07 481.75 18.80 481.82 24.30 481.65 25.87 481.62 27.81 48L65 28.60 4RL63 28.84 481.85 29.50 482.19 30.41 482.92 32.33 484.99 33.61 485.61 35.85 486.03 38.86 486.22 45.59 486.67 53.81 487.07 62.37 487.47 75.55 488.47 91.71 489.64 102.72 490.28 112.92 491.43 122.55 493.25 SUYIb1Al2l' DATA Bankfull Elevation: 482.6 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 10.3 Bankfull Width: 12.1 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 483.6 Flood Prone Width: 13.7 Max De th at Bankfull: I.0 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.9 W / D Ratio: 14.2 Entrenchment Ratio: l .l Bank Hei ht Ratio: 2.8 Slope (ft/ft): 0.022 Discharge (cfs) 63 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 10, XS 61, Riffle 0 494 492 y 490 0 488 486 y w 484 482 480 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 ll 0 120 Station (feet) Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area Material Size Range (mm) Count silt/clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 2 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 6 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 9 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 7 very coarse sand 1 - 2 5 very fine gravel 2 - 4 6 fine gravel 4 - 6 2 fine gravel 6 - 8 4 medium gravel 8 - 11 2 medium gravel 11 - 16 3 coarse gravel 16 - 22 4 coarse gravel 22 - 32 4 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 2 ve coarse ravel 45 - 64 4 small cobble 64 - 90 7 medium cobble 90 - 128 13 large cobble 128 - 180 5 ve lar a cobble 180 - 256 5 small boulder 256 - 362 2 small boulder 362 - 512 3 medium boulder 512 - 1024 1 large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar a boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: 96 bedrock ------------- 4 clay hardpan ------------- detritus/wood ------------- Note: total count: 100 D 16 0.44 D35 3.4 D50 19 D65 72 D84 130 D95 320 1 10 particle size (mm) Size Distribution mean 7.6 dispersion 25.0 skewness -0.25 14 12 10 c 3 8 m 0 -o 6 °' n m 4 2 0 100 1000 10000 silt/clay 0% sand 29% gravel 31 cobble 30% boulder 6% bedrock 4% Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 10 XS 61 100% 90% 80% c ~ 70% c 60% w aci 50% U N °- 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% ~--cumulative % -# of particles silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder ---- --------- -------- - ---- ----- - - ----- I I I f I I I I 0.01 0.1 Size (mm ,~.. 1~.~ a ~ ~ ~'; ,~ a '{ ;` ~"". ~, ~ '~'~ ~ i ~ }e it ~ i ~ V ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ '~ ~° ° 1 - ~ ~~~~ ~ Station Elevation ~ +.s:n a~u : ~ , ~~.~ ~ ~°;C; ~z. ,~. t'-~ tj'v-" ",. ~-~ 0 00 4(i4 90 ~k~ Y.."~ Y ' ,~ '. .,'r 3.40 464.43 w. ,~ a _ " ,ti 6.49 464.08 ~"- '" °` ~~:.-µ~~~R"~-,rr ,} ~.,r ,. . 10.51 463.65 ~"1w t ~~ ~'~'~ 1 -rrF~,,, .~~ ~ ,.v"~c.,,,. ~ .,.., ~.~ .- -„ 15.70 463.37 r~r ^~ I' r.r~r-'~",~'r` -- _ _ 18.04 463.10 ~ '" ,_ °' ~ 22.74 462.66 a ~ - .~• a„ 26.17 462.34 ~; ~ ~ ~,,.w .- 28.71 462.22 r'~~r„mow+° _ .,~~: 31.42 462.25 x s". 34.05 462.27 ~ ~~~~ ~ 38.22 462?4 Stream T e: - 45.34 462.15 47.57 462?7 ~ -- - '~ 50.45 46z.o8 Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 10, XS 58, Pool 52.15 461.54 ~~, 467 I 53.89 460.87 I 56.02 460.10 58.94 457.56 465 60.93 457.40 61.94 457.37 ~' 463 62.96 457.69 ~ 64.64 458.05 66.38 458.38 ~~ > 461 - 68.32 458.72 I ~ 69.52 458.90 ! 459 - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ ~ _ - - - - - - -_ _ _ - _ ~ - - ~ - - - - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - - 75.37 461.58 I 77.91 462.11 ~ 457 ~ 80.20 462.04 83.24 461.92 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 87.64 461.90 ~ Station (Jeet) 89.51 461.80 91.83 461.76 - - - Bankfull 94.97 461.72 __ - 98.25 461.73 - - -- 104.61 462.30 108.85 463.00 113.57 463.24 116.59 463.72 127.57 464.69 River Basin: U ~ er Roanoke Watershed: Trib 10 XS ID XS 58, Pool Draina a Area s mi : 0.345 Date: Januar 2007 Field Crew: Gardner, Hayes, Knight, Miller, Roberts SOMA1ARt' DATA Bankfull Elevation: 459.0 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 11.8 Bankfull Width: 12.5 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - Flood Prone Width: - Max De th at Bankfull: 1.6 Mean De th at Bankfull• 0.9 W / D Ratio: - Entrenchment Ratio: - Bank Hei ht Ratio: - Slope (ft/ft): - Discharge (cfs) - •~t~t~t~~~~t~~~~~~~t~~~~~t~~t~~t~~i~tt~~~~~• .~ -~ _ ~ ~ , ~ 4 r i h " ~ ~ -~ ° i ~ ~ 1 I F' ~ 1h ~ ~~ ~ I. ~~~ I. , ~ r'J~ ; ~h F #' k ~ - e ~ e; t .- r ~ ~. _ ~ ~~ ~ ~ , d ~ P . -~ ~.. . w .. n ~~" 4M ~ ~'^ ~ ~~ >~. ~ c •.. ~ t w cw, ° f .; ~ ~ .~ ~.'~ - ; _ . . car _ < _ • - ~, , ~- :., ~ Y . ~ ~ } ' ~ ~' r!~ € .a~ , , Stream Type: B4/1 ~ - - - - --- Upper Roanoke River Basin, Trib 10, XS 59, Riffle ~ 468 , i ~ I 466 - - - - - - y y 464 r 0 ° 462 ~I 460 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' ~ - -~ _- - - _ ~ - - -_ , , _ - - _~-- ' - - 458 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Station (feet) i - -Bankfull - - -Flood Prone Area River Basin: Upper Roanoke Watershed: Tnb 10 XS ID XS 59, Riffle Draina a Area (s mi): 0 345 Date: January 2007 Field Crew: Gardner. Haves, kmahi. ~1~1!.:~_ 1Zonc,~t~ Station Elevation 0.00 466.55 2.78 465.86 5.74 465.26 10.54 464.69 15.00 463.85 19.30 463.43 23.41 463.18 27.37 463.33 31.28 463.10 33.88 4(3.10 35.01 462.31 35.97 460.94 36.94 460.64 40.45 460.38 43.69 460.12 44.61 459.74 44.85 459.22 44.86 459.10 47.78 459.14 51.02 459.43 53.10 459.44 54.76 459.33 56.57 459.44 58.75 459.27 60.30 459.33 60.49 459.48 61.32 460.90 62.68 462.79 64.63 463.21 68.37 463.04 73.20 462.94 78.21 462.73 84.10 462.64 89.05 462.71 92.58 462.91 95.92 463.27 100.66 463.94 104.21 464.22 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 460.0 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 10.6 Bankfull Width: 16.7 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 460.8 Flood Prone Width: 24.8 Max De th at Bankfull: 0.8 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.6 W / D Ratio: 26.3 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.5 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 4.7 Slope (ft/ft); 0.017 Discharge (cfs) 42 Material Size Range (mm) Count silt/clay 0 - 0.062 very fine sand 0.062 - 0.125 fine sand 0.125 - 0.25 1 medium sand 0.25 - 0.5 7 coarse sand 0.5 - 1 3 very coarse sand 1 - 2 11 very fine gravel 2 - 4 7 fine gravel 4 - 6 1 fine gravel 6 - 8 5 medium gravel 8 - 11 5 medium gravel 11 - 16 4 coarse gravel 16 - 22 3 coarse gravel 22 - 32 3 very coarse gravel 32 - 45 2 ve coarse ravel 45 - 64 5 small cobble 64 - 90 6 medium cobble 90 - 128 9 large cobble 128 - 180 17 ve lar e cobble 180 - 256 6 small boulder 256 - 362 2 small boulder 362 - 512 1 medium boulder 512 - 1024 1 large boulder 1024 - 2048 ve lar e boulder 2048 - 4096 total particle count: bedrock ------------- clay hardpan detritus/wood ------------- 99 1 total count: 100 D16 1.4 D35 7.8 D50 30 D65 95 D84 160 D95 240 1 10 100 1000 particle size (mm) 18 16 14 12 ~ 10 0 8 v ~. 6 4 2 0 10000 Size Distribution Ty pe mean 15.0 silt/clay 0% bedrock 1% dispersion 13.4 sand 22% skewness -0.21 gravel 35% cobble 38% boulder 4% Riffle Surface Pebble Count, Tributary 10 XS 59 100% 90% 80% c t 70% c 60% a~i 50% U N °- 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -cumulative % -# of particles silUclay sand gravel cobble boulder ---- --------- ----------- I I I I I I ---- --------- ------ I i I t I t I t I t I 1 I I I I 0.01 0.1 Size (mm) I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~• i • Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan Appendix F NCDWQ Stream Identification Forms North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: (Q ~ } ~ - Q ~ Project: ~ IQ C,r t?~tr Tr~b S Latitude: ~ fv , 4 ~ ~' 15 ~' Evaluator: Kai ~} _ t>rl(~j;lc Site: ly i~t,(,tLLY~ ~ Longitude: _ ~,~, f 3 ~ ~ 0~' Total Points: •1 Other Stream is at least intermittent `~ County: `>a { Sfa'1 if z 79 or erennial if z 30 J ~ e.g. Quad Name: m I k1~ Y1 ~(~d~ A. G eomarphology (Subtotal = ! } - Absent Weak --_ ~ Moderate Stron g _ _ 1 a Continuous bed and bank = __ 0 1 _ ___ 2 3 ~ r- -- ;-----_ 2. Sinuos_tty 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 0 a 1 _ 2 3 2 3 . -- - - 4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting - - .~ __.._ ~ 0 _ 1 - ~ 2 3 - ~--- -- 5. Activelrelic floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches - ! 0 ~ - --t--- 2 3 7. Braided channel _-- _ _._. 8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 j 1 ! 2 3 ! 0 1 2 3 i 9 a Natural levees _ _ _ ! O ~ 1 2 r 3 10. Headcuts _ 11. Grade controls ~ ~~~ __ 0 ~- i ~ 0 ~ 0~5 ~~ 1 ~ 1 5 ~ ~ _ _ 12. Natural valley or drainageway -_ t 0 0 5 1 1 5 . - I _ . ~ 13. Second or greater order channel on existing ± ; ~ USGS or NRCS map or other documented ~ No = 0 Yes = 3 evidence. "Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hvdrologv fSubtotaf = 14. Groundwaterflow/discharge 15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Water in channel -- d or rowtn season _ ~ _ ~_ ~_~-. - -- 16 L flitt j _ 0 1 ~ 2 ~,~-~_ _~ ~ 0 1 2 O I I - --}--- --- -~--- ---~ ea . er ~ 17. Sediment on plants or debris -------- -- -------- 1.5 ~ 1 _ 0.5 1, _ 0 -- 0 0.5 --r- 1 1 5 - -~---- - --- 118. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines} ! --- --1 19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features} present? ------ ~~_--_ --- --1 - _ 0 0.5 1 ~ 1.5 -- -~. -~ - --- - N~a = 00 + ! Yes = t5 - _- i-__-?_ -C. Biology (Subtotal °_____~_)_ - -- ---r-- -r-- -- - -T- _ -- ~r 20~ Fibrous roots In channel ~ - 3 2 ; __ 1 _ 0 ; ._- ~_ - -- - - - i ~. Rooted plants m channel ~ 3 2 ~' 1 p 22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 _ ~- --- - - ~ -- : 23. Bivalves _-- -` - __ 0 ~ 1 '~ 24. Fish --- - -- - -- ----- ~- -- - - ~--~ ~ 3 0 5 1 ~_ 1.5 - - -- - - - -- -- -- --t - - - -- - 25. Amphibians 0 0 5 1 1.5 26. Macrobenthos (note droersity and abundance) 0 f 0 5 1 i 1.5 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 ~ 3 28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. 0 ~ 0.5 1 1.5 29 °. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 ; Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. ~~ ~ Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) . 1~ ~ Z ivt G;l~tCS ~ '~I'+~ Sit2 Ott U ~~yiCekirlQ. "i~~ie S~etL~1~---Y~}rrS_I~ib-~i cyL i__S- ~'y_t.,nc Shccxi-,,, `` -~= = v~ --~ -- - -7GS (Lv]G CXrri/~rL~ rCh(,illrlfl czf ~~tfS ~7~tn{ , T}'lt S7'742Yti -u~+G~, TI~t,J ~,~ ~~uS(- t)C~vb~r ~C~L~~ Gi,u,~i'n~ St+C 'v~ Si~S. ~(}Ii S }irn~ ~t'rior~ hr~~ Gt(t e xirarvte d~~ u~~+: t~ y~G Sketch: E~~,+r+'~5 ~~xtS'r ~ / ~ ~, h 2 ,.~~,b. y~:>r iienctc~.~ 1 ( 1 1 ~C' North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: ~~_ ~~ , U -~ Project:~C (,rFe~ ~rilot.~tw ~l~Latitude: 3(0 . 505 ~ 5O Evaluator: Kht ~~'r~''t'ti< Site:'~rtb~.~y ,3 Long+tude.."~C,,13"~BCZ Total Points: Other Stream is at feast intermi2fent '1,~7 County: P~ r~ ~, n 11A ~ tin ~~ ~~ i(Z 19 or erennia! i(z 30 / °~ e.g. Quad 1~Iame: t Y(t 1 A. Geomorpho_ io9Y (Subtotal = l~ _) Absent Weak Moderate i Strong 1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 - 1 i - 2 i 3 _ ~ i 2. Srnuosity ~ 0 1 I 3 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence ____ 0 1 _ 3 4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 5. Active/relic floodplain _ ~ 0 0 1 __ 2 2 __ 3 j 3 - I 6. Depositional bars or benches _ __ 0 1 2 1 __ ` 3 ~ 7. Braided channel ~ - 1 ~ _ _ 2 _ _ ~ 8. Recent a~luv ial deposits ` ~ 1 --- 2 t---- 3 a 9 Natural levees a --- 0 ~ 1 _ ~ -} ~ 2 i - -- 3 -i j 10. H10. li dcuts 0 1 2 ~ 3 _ _ 11. Grade controls ~ ~ ' -_ i - ; _ - ~ 0 - --- - 0.5 1 - - 1.5 12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 ~ __ `.L_--------1 0.5 , ---- 1 ~ 1.5 13. Second or greater order channel on exi, sting ``..~ J USGS or NRCS map or other documented ~ No - 0 _ evidence. Yes = 3 Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hvdroloav tSuhtntal . ~ l~ 14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 _ 1 15 W t i h - ~~ 2 i ` 3_ _ I a er . n c annel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Water in channel -- dr or rowin season 0 ~ 2 j ~--' I 16, Leatlitter _ 1. 1 0.5 t 0 I __ ____ _ `~ 17. Sediment on plants or debris ~ 0 ~ 0.5 i __ 1 ~ ~ t 1 1.5 ~ 18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines} 0 0.5 _ _ __ ~ 1 - ~ 1.5 i - - - 19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 -- ------ Yes _ 1.5~ C. Biology (Subtotal = _ __ -{- 20 . Fibrous roots in channel ---- _P _ 21~ Rooted lants in channel - - 22. Crayfish _----- - --- -- - - T - it _ 3 _ _ -1- ~ 3 ~ 0 i - -- - 2 _ _~ 1 2 _ 1 0.5 ~i 1 -~------- _ ' _ 0 _ 0 1.5 - 23. Bivalves ~_~----- -- _ 24 Fi h -- - 0 r - ~ - ~ ~ --, --~ .~.~ - ~ 2 -(- -- v _ _. _ _ _ 3_ ~ . s _.-_ - } 0 -- T-- - 0.5 1 ---- - -- _ 1.5 -~- - 25. Amphibians _ 0 _ - _0.5 -~ ! 1.5_ { - - i Y ~ 26. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance - - -- 27 Filamentous al ae e i h t t ~ - -i_- -- - ~ 0.5 i 1 ` --,-- ~-- 2--J i 1.5 ___. - = - . g ; p r p on y 28 I on oxidizin bacterialf n 0 _ 1 --- -~ 3 r . g u gus. _ ~ i~ ° _ _ 0 ~ 0.5 1 ~ -- t.5 _ 29 . Wetland plants in streambed ~ FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 ~Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. tJotes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch: -Q,~'~1 QtLVY~ !?' ~yi Y~ ' ~^ __i~_ S O vi~ r ~ ~t ~~_ Ct~ E'~' jLt c~he+re_~ v e ~ -s crtsc~ ~ __I~sl'~~~ .c,,#- . T t~iir~ e ~yr~ - ~.L~.;_~ ~ ~ Cline t d ui_r~~i v~s i ~ S_~~~~; -'=- Oc~ a 0C)~ c.~~te~t1. `~~ -j=~!~- ~ a s .~ ~~_n ct_~~ ~ ~ ~EY e r,-~2 ~irc u5h+ ~ l~(,1~iar~ T-15~,, s fl ~~'~~ ~ two herc~a.~ ~' ~ U m I ti't` 1_ ~- rl North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: j(j - ~ $- ~~ Project: ~a,vl2 L rpe(C I n-a,~kri+1, S'~~.Lafitude: 3 (~. cj C j ~ (~f Evaluator: kKt ~tt! -) - ~L'k~G' Site:"~t ; bui-av~ ~ Longitude: -'~c1, 1 J~ y 0 `-~ `'( Total Points: (} ether Stream is at least intermittent 3) Gounty: f ~ Q f SC,+.i e. g. Quad Name: ~1lii ~~Cn Q u~ il'z ?9 or erennial if>_ 30 L\ (3omm~rnhnlr~nv /G~h+~.+~1 - ~ ~ ~ ~Qbsent I Weak tVtotlerat@ .SI trgnq lI ~1 a. Continuous bed and bank 12. Sinuosity _ `i _, ~ 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence i 0 0 0 { 1 1 2 __ 2 _~ _ 2 --~~3~_ _ _---~ _ 3 3 ~ Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 4 0 1 2 3 . __~ 5. Active/relic floodplain ~6. Depositional bars or benches -_~ 7. Braided channel ____ - ~_ 8. Recent alluvial deposits _~ ~ 0 0 i ~ 0 '~ 1 ~ 11'~ -----~- 2_ 2 -- 2 _ 3 ~ 3 ~ 3 _~ ~ 3 ' 9 a Natural levees _ -- ~ 0 } ! 1 2 ' _ 3 10. Headcuts 0 I 1 2 ~ 3 ~_ `-_ 11. Grade controls ~ 12. Natural vaAey or drainageway - d h l i i _ __ 0 _ ~ 0 0.5 ~ 0.5 - ~ 1 ` 1 1.5 ~~ 1.5 er c anne an ex st n 13. Second or greater or j USGS or NRCS map or other documented No = 0 Yes = 3 I evidence. Man-made ditches are not rated; se~e-7discussions in manual R Hvrimhnu fSuhtntal = 7 1 ' 14. Groundwater flowldischarge ~ 0 _ 1 _ 2 _ 3 ~~ 1~5. Water in channel and > A8 hrs since rain, or ~ 0 I (~ 3 ~/ ~ 2 Water in channel -- dr /for growing season 116 Leaflitter _ ~ ~ ~ ~ - 1.5 ~ _ ~ 1 ~ 0.5 0 _~ ~ i 17. Sediment on plants or debris _ 0_ 1.5 _ 0.5 _ 1 r ~ 18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines} ~~ 0 __ ` 0.5 1 ,, 1.5 ~ ~_.~ 19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features} present? No = 0 I Yes = 1.5 1 C Rinlnav fS+ihtntal = ~t- 1 20b. Fibrous roots in channel ~__ 1b ~---~-~~ 2 2 1 1 0 ' 0 . Rooted plants in channel 2 22. Gra tsh -~-- --_- -- -- -- ---- - ~ Bivalves ( 2 3 V 0.5 ~ 1 - - ~ 1 2 1.5 J - 3 . _ . , _` t. __ - ,~--24. Fish ---- -------- ---- -- -~.. I - --- 0.5 ~ ---- -I - - 1 ---- - _- 1.5 I -__ --------------~._.- - ~25. Amphibians 0 26. Macro benthos (note diversity and abundance} 0.5 1 0.5 ~ --~,1-~- I 1 I - 1 5 1.5 ~ _ ~ i _ ,__ ' _ 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ~ - 1 _ 2 ~ ~ _ 3 ~ 28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. _ T ._ r ----- - - 29 W aetl nd plants in streambed _ ~ FAC - 0.5; FA 0.5 CW = 0.75; OB L--1 _ L = 1.5 SAV = 2 _ 1.5 ', -! .0; Other = 0 " {terns 20 and 21 locus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wet~ano p~arns5b {-~ Sketch: Notes: (use back side of this (orm for additional notes.) ' ~(}t t'__~ (b\;?G~ i ~1v~_ G ~ ~~t~ C-~1A.Y tYi ~~~~ qqS~ l~ I~ S ~ v{r~~ c C`~ t~_ (~ ilJti'! l~ . ~ `1.G-- r ~~~ GL ~ ~ t'~- 't-v~k i 2 i .$ ~'l _ YtY ~P~Gt ~i=t.~ Mlle c4,d-arty?! t~r~-;+t~.~s v~ -5G_.~~._.~_~~ `~r~___~S ~ r~r?t~~ vl.rt, ~~.~ Ct?rGCr`i-ic~ S c~.i-~ ih~ .Si4e vi Si~}-a ~~ ,V , ~ A r ~ ~- ~ North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: ~~ - (~ - ©~ Project:(~• t~ ~r e~ek. ~ rt ~ }~ Latitude: '~ ~ y L? ~ ~ ~ ~ Evaluator:~ytj~~_ ~,~,?~ Site: 7j-ibU,~-a ,j Longitude: _ ~q• (3 rjC>~ Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent 3 ; , 5 County: ~/ S~ Other i41 t } {Z'rt r`>tu~ f NtC' { it z 19 or erennial it 2 30 e.g. Ouad Name: ~ e~+ 5~ ~ Qt+-mac" S . `~" A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = i 5 -`~ } Absent Weak Moderate Strong ' 18 Continuous bed and bank _ 0 ~ ~ 1 2 _ j 3 , _ __ __ ~ 2. Sinuosity ! p , ~ j ~ 2 3 t- - - -, L 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence _ ----- - 0 1 _ - 2 3 ~ 4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ~ - __ _ i 0 - ------ 1 }- __ 2 u 3 ~ 5. Active/relic floodplain 6. Depositional bars or benches 7 0 0 1 1 -- 2 ~ 3 2 3 ~ _ i 7. Braided channel ~ - _ 0 ! A 1 _ 2 3 ---i .- 8. Recent alluvial deposits ~ 0 1 2 ! 3 98 Natural levees 10. Headcuts _ 0 0 1 1 _2 2 _ 3 _~_ 3 11. Grade controls . 0 0 5 _ 1 ; 1 5 12. Natural valley or drainageway ~ ____ . --"t 0 0.5 . r~ 1 1 5 13. Second or greater order channel on existin _ . _ _1 USGS or NRCS map or other documented i No = 0 ! 1 Yes = 3 ~, evidence. ! ____ ~ ~ i ° Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = ~! . ~J 1 14. Groundwater flowJdischarge __ 0 1 _ ~~ ___ ~ ' ~ 2 3 ~-- - 15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Water in channel -- d~ or growing season _ 6 _ _- _ 1 Q ~ 1 16. Leaflitter _I__ ----- - 17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 ! 0.5 t __ 0.5_ i 0 1 !' 1.5 __ 18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack fines} ~~ 0 0.5 19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features} present? t No = OJ 1 ~ 1.5 Yes = 1.5 C. Biology (Subtotal = ~ ..5 ) 20 .Fibrous roots in channel ~ 3 ! 2 ___ ~ 1 0 ~21 . Rooted plants in channel --- ---- 22. Crayfish 3 2 Y- _ ~ 0.5 ~_ _- 1 -- - r - 1 I 1.5 23, Bivalves - --- - ----- ~24, Fish 0 ~ 1 - ---- ~-- - -- ~ f i 2 3 ----- - ---- I 25. Amphibians ~ 'r-- -------_. _----- -- ------ 26 M b h 0 0.5 --- - 1 I 1.5 ! - -- - - -- . acro ent os {note diversity and abundance} - --- _ _ 0 0.5 1 1.5 - i 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton , ~ 0 ~ 1 2 I 3 28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. j 0 I 0.5 1 i 1.5 29 °. Wetland plants in streambed v _ ~ FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 ~ i[ems 1U antl 11 Locus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. Notes: {use back side of this form for additional notes.) 111 f~~Wu~~ has ~occ~ =~tnt~t.~S tZ;t4ern__~~ ItS -~.,k~. 1 -~--- -L~--~- --- - Cyyc YJ~~ \ ~ n~t~ C~c~•i~-c~ ~ `,` .L_trri L ~1 ~,y~ -- ~~~~, ~~~_ _ Ake ~-SI.Ei'~-7 Jh~ ~t'~ YZ~~ c'~C t.; ~S , ~-UXt7Y1'-• _r\~.4Sd.__-~_l~l.~._I V~ ~~r~_..~ y'.~..~revr° C~,vt?U~1~.~- Lurk{ 1-tCti'~S Sketch: m !~_ ~S rv I ! ,.^ 2 ~; ~ 4 • i • • • North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: (~-~ ~-~ ~ Projeck~t~ CYQCic ~Yt1xt,~.t St~ Latitude: '~, J Q ~,~~ cj Evaluator: I(Vlr ?~4 - /~-~~fG~ Site: `}.~ ~t~,rf, (pA Longitude: ~- ~~ . ~ 3r~-~3 Total Points: Other r~t~, jJ Stream is at feast intermittent ~a County: l~r54n e.g. Quad Name: irlf ~~n QC(Qd' if z 19 or erennial if 2 30 R. Geomorphology (Subtotal = f~ ~} _ 1a. Continuous bed and bank ; 2. St' 2. St osity - `_ 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence _ ; 4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ~ Absent Weak 0 1 ~ 0 1 _ 0 _ 1 _ 0 1 Moderate ~ __ 2 --~} 2 I 2 ~ _ 2 ~ Strong i ---- 3 ~ ~.-} 3 3 ' _ 3 i~ ; 5. Active/relic floodplain Depositional bars or benches ~ ~~~ 0 1 ` 0 1 2 _ _ _ 2 ~ _ _ 3 ~~ 7. Braided channel 8. Recent alluvial deposits ~ 0 1 ~ _ 1 2 2 3 r ~ 3 ~ ~ 9 a Natural levees ;_ 10. Headcuts ~~ 0 1 0 1 ~ 3 2 _ ~ _ 22 ~~_ 3- t~~ 11. Grade controls r _ 0 _ 0.5 ~ ! _ 1 1.5 _- _ ~ 12. Natural valley or drainageway 0.5 0 1 t5 } I ~ 13. Second or greater order channel on existin ~ USGS or NRCS map or other documented I No = 0 Yes = 3 ~ evidence. "Man-made ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = ~J' } 14.Groundwaterflow/discharge - 15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain or ~- Q - 1 ~--1 __-{ ~ 2 j ~3~ _ --- - --- , W in ch n l d t i 0 I ~ 2 ' -- r~or~w a er a ne ng season ~r 16. Leaflitter I- 1.5 _ ~ 1 1 .~ _ 0.5 0 1 __ - - 17. Sediment on plants or debris _ ~~ O 0 ~ 0.5 _ _ ___ 1 ~ _ 1.5_ I - 1 18. tr nn cog debris lines or piles (Wrack lines} 19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features} present? C ------- - - - _ 0 No ~ - 0.5 ' 0 ____ ---~ 1~~~ 1V5 _ ~ Yes = 1.5 _----- - ---- G. Bioloav (Subtotal = ~ 5 } 20° Fibrous roofs in channel ~. b.-` _.__ .W~.~--_-.- 2~ 1 . Rooted plants in channel ~ _ 22. Crayfish ~ 3 __ - ~- i 3 _ _~~ _ , „ 2 2 _0.5 ~ __ ; ~ _ ~. ~ 1 1 __1 }~ ~ I 0 _s._-... - - 0 _ i 1.5~ 23. Bivalves 24. Fish 0~ 0 1 0.5 i; ~ _2 1 3 i - -- ----I 1_5 , _ 25.~Amphibians _ __ _ ~.____.__ _ F 26. Macrobenthos (note diversify and abundance} ~- 7 -- , --_-. 0 0.5 --Y L- ~- 0.5 __ - 1 1 _ ~ ~ __ 1.5 ' ~ - --~ 1.5 ~ ,~ .- - - -- - - _ ~ - - -- - -- _ 27. Filamentous at ae; en h ton ~ ~ I ~ 28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungusv ~ ~ _ ~_ _ 0 ~ ~ 015 _ -~ w-- -1 _ --1 5 ~{, ,__ 29 . Wetland plants in streambed __ _ FAC = 0.5, FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 _ - _ SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 ~ "Items 2p and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 28 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. ~,p~e{ Sketch: ~, ~yp~`o ayv-r Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) j --- ---_ --- -- --- ------_ - _- - ---- -_.-_ r ~~~~..:_~he.~~;ct~s_s_~~~_ 'vt_ i~u~t,tSd--- r~G t;~ku~-~z±~t~e~(} 2t7c7~ _ ~i}e y iStt~r_~E~~2~_~_~r ._ ~~ t~_k LiLj2'F'1~~`c~__~#-D ~-~-:_Cl1GiL~tST ~~PS_ GGY~I:a Cra.~.~ui/'S t,v~ere -C~ i~i~~. ~ ., ~}i,~ S4-=~ ct;yn . j~~;~ciccv{. North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: ~-~.~_Q7. Project:C~tth~~B~F:,`~yibtd,~.Sj'~Latitude: ~,,JrC?,~``~~J(O Evaluator: Ktlt ~~ . M~vtG` Site:'-("Y i ~3U,~tL-G bI~ Longitude: --~ ~j, 1 ~ 1 tO~ Total Points: Other Stream is at leas( intermittent 2 ~ County: ~Q Y `jp 1'l t_ J i/ z 79 or erennial if 2 30 J e.g. Quad Name: m f fa`cn QU l~(~ A . Geomorphology (Subtotal = ~ ! Absent Weak Moderate Str ng ~i, _ 1a~Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity 0 1 i 2 I 3 i 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence__ 0 1 ~- ~EJ ----3- - d Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ~ 0 1 ~ 3 5 Active_/relic floodplain _ _ 6 Depositional bars or benches _ _ 7. Braided channel __ 8. Recent alluvial deposits ~_ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ _ 1 ' 1 1 1 - ~ __ 2 ; 2 2 3 ___ ____ 3 3 3 j 9a Naturallevees_ ____ ~ ~ __ - 0 j 1 2 _ 3 10. Headcuts __ __ 0 1 2 3 ': 11. Grade controls _ 0 0.5 ! 1 ~~ 1.5 12. Natural valley or drainageway J _ 0 0.5 _ ___ l 1 1.5 13. Second or greater order channel on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. No = 0 __ _ ~ i Yes = 3 i man-mane oacnes are not ratetl; serpe discussions in manual R Hvrtrnlnnv /Suhtntal. t_.~ 1 14. Groundwater flowldischarge _ 15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Water in channel -- dry or growing season 0 0 _1 2 „~ _ i 1 /'''1 I 3 16. Leaflttter _ _ 1.5 1 0.5 __ _ 0 _ __ T~- 17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 ' 18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) - 0 0.5 1 ;' 1.5 ----- - 19~Hydric soils (redoximorphic features} present? No --------- =~ Yes = 1.5 G. Biology (Subtotal = -f ~ J 20". Fibrous roots in channel 3~ ! 2 I 1 I 0 -__ __--- - - - 1 -t--- --I--- - --- 216. Rooted plants in channel 3 ~ _2_ 1 ~ 0 ~ -- ---- --- ----- -1----- 22. Crayfish - 0.5 - fi_ 1 - ~ 1 5 23. Bivalves _ 0 1 ~__~- 2 3 - ~~ 24. Fish ~-- --- -- 0 ,- --0.5 1 1.5 _-~_ __ 25 Amphibians _ 0 0.5 1 , 1.5 26 Macrobenthos (note dwersity and abundance} 0 ~ _ 0.5 ~ 1 1.5 ~ _ _ - - --_ 27, Filamentous algae; periphyton ~ 0 i 1 2 3 28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 I 1 1.5 29 Wetland plants in streambed FAC - 0.5; FACW - 0.75; OBL - 1.5 SAV - 2.0; Other = 0 ~' Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. Notes' (use back side of this form for additional notes-) 11~ s c~tt.nnel ~ t m ' -- --- --~~ _~ h„S 1G~ t} LL;,~ OI Vl~ l.c nC~. tai c~.~' ~ ~ f~~,: ~ ` (Y~ 'S! (.L. tai{ SF~~/(G•~ _~I~~ti',~~, . ~`11~ f~,~,~ _~`,7 Ca__T1UC;(~.~f~.~..~'~ Yt..lirl (l~- ~,, fjy~..L~ `-i_"`~.- -~~~~=-~- bttt~-ic t,~ ~ ~ rn s t.uere~ ~n cl ~FI~.-rc ~~h ~ cty~ `fide c-G~ {; t.-tom t 6'tGi pl ~- { ~w z U c' +-, d~,~iv~~ e>ttrP:wZ c~ pc~G.~- ~;v,d,t~+C)n S t~~ .~-u ~ a S~- t~vu~ Se ~ f e ~ bx, ~Dt~ ~ . Sketch; ~~ ~ ~ lip.. t`~. .~- North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 9- (~j- ©~ Project:~h~C,YP~~C ~ib+~tr J~~-atitude: ~(~, Je?~j~~ Evaluator: ~IG~~E _ ~~~r? G'~ Site: ~r, ~~~(-~,r t,~ ~j C Longitude: - ~ ~, j 3p ~ c{ c-{ Total Points: Other rte .l:~." /!~ Stream is at least intermittent ~ J County: pc(,S ~ ~ e.y, Quad Name: + rt 1 ~ tv+7 CXt,L(j (~ it a ? 9 or perennial iI Z 30 A. Geomor polo Subtotal = -5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong 18. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 ; 2. Sinuosity _ 0 1 2 3 ___ 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 ' 2 ~ 3 ~ 4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3 ' 5. Active/relic 8oodplain 0 1 t 2 3 _ 6. Depositional bars or benches - __ 0 ! 1 2 ' 3 7. Braided channel 0 ` 1 2 ; 3 _ 8. Recent alluvial deposits ~ 0 ~-_._- 2~ -_ y_~^ ~ 3 Natural levees-~ _ 0 _ ~ 1 2 ~ 3 ' 10. Headcuts _ 11. Grade controls ~ 0 i 1 ~ 0 0.5 2 _ _-~-- 3 _ 1.5 12. Natural valley or drainageway ~ 0 0.5 1 ~` ~ 1. 13. Second or greater order channel on existin USGS or NRCS map ar other documented I No = 0 evidence. Yes = 3 a Man-made ditches are not rated; se`e~]d'iscussions in manual Q LJvrlrnlnnv /Co~htntol - 'T 14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 -_T ~ 3~ 15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or i Water in channel -- dry or growing season ! 16. Leaflitler 0 1 _ ~ ~_- _._ 1.5 1 + - 2 ;, 3 _-~ -__i 0.5 i 0 - - 17. Sediment on plants or debris - - _ 0.5 ~ 1 1.5 _ 18. Organic debris lines or piles {Wrack lines} ! 0 0.5 1 1.5 19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present- ? ~ - No = 0 _ _~ _ Yes = 1.5 r Rinlnnv tSnhtntal = ~t- 1 -- - 20 . Fibrous roots in channel 21°. Rooted plants in channel 22. Crayfish - r- --_~r__~------ - 2 1 -~ 0 _ 3 2 1 0 -1 0 0.5 1 1.5 23 Bivalves 0 1 2 3 24. Fish µ 0 0.5 ; 1 1.5 y _____.---_-_ _ 1 --- 1.5 ---- 25. Amphibians 0 0.5 i`~ - - --- --- 1 1.5 26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ~ _ _. - } 1 2 3 ' -- -- -----1---- - - ------ 1 1 5 M 21 8. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. . , 0 ~ 0.5 .____~_~ , i__ . ~.~ __-- 29 °. Wetland plants in streambed _ _ _ _ ---------_-___- - _ FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBt_ = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. -~~"'~ Sketch' ~ y_y - - - [L'~t~,G.l7 Notes: (use back side of this form for additionaE notes.) - `~} ~ ._S`hrZCcm _ s S ArG'u.nC~ UXJI,t 2r t-P ~_--OUnG'~-_-_ <' t`fh{ S' ( f;~.ll'ri LL J~~ 2.~ ~11 t~i_~~'1~-t C~ (~.i ~ trVk~~r l(!t_ l~t~-~,~. t1.~(` - ~ ~ ~~` Lt1k~ _~1 Gt S ,,~E'.yt ~'t PA~1i i ~.4t X ~T ~ -~L~ ~--LII q,S ~ I W to P ~ ~CIl (- ~- 1-1n(h ~2~~i ~~~ (,1k1~ ~ ~ 4e mL..~ Y ~ j}U~- S ikC ~1~.,5 t~M y `rt_e,;}},~ 1 ~ Z e r.'1-T ~.irr~ t~.t' D LCt1 ~lv~ ~~ ~i (+ v /i ~'. /, . North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: R - J ~~ G ~~ Project:~Q t~ ~'r~~ l~ Tt<;t~ S ~ 2Latitude: ?j(p. 50 ~ 6C ~.- Evaluator. I~yu `l~-(v(PViC Site: ~rt~iu-'ht+~ T/~ Longitude:-~~• (Zg (y~ Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent County: D Other i(2 19 or erennial i/ a 30 t ~ r S e ~ e.g. Quad Name: ~ i ~~r7 ~ L(C2 l?~ A. Geomorpholo9Y {Subtotal = 1 f ~ ~ } 18. Continuous bed and bank ~ - _ Absent 0 Weak , 1 Moderate _Strong "~ 2 3 2. Sinuosity - ' 3 nl -channel structure: riffle ool s - 0 - 1 -~ 0 -- 2 __ 3 _p equence 1 3 ~! 4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 5. Active/relic floodplain ~ 0 _~ 1 p j ~ 2 3 2 -t---~~~ Depositional bars or benches - 7. Braided channel 0 1 - -- 0 1 -~ _3 - 2 ~ ~ 3 r 8 R t ll i l , _ . ecen a uv a deposits i r - a ----- ---. - --._ 9 Natural levees _ 10 H d __1 __ 0 1 ~ ~ 2 ' _ _ 3 ' _ -- . 2~ __ 3 . ea cuts _ 11. Grade controts__ _ ~ - ~ ` 12 0 1 ^ _ 0.5 2 3 1 1.5 ~ -~ r . Natural valley or drainageway _ 0 0.5 ---- - 1 1. -~ 13. Second or greater order channel on existing - ~ USGS or NRCS map or other documented No = 0 Yes = 3 evidence. ~ -- ' nnan-mane oi~cnes are not ratetl; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ~ - 5 ) __ 1A.Groundwaterflow/discharge 0 T-1 ~__ 2 ~-~ -- 0 -t------ i 2 3 15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or rt _J~J ~- Water in channel -- dry or rowi- ng season 16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 ~ _ 0.5 ~ 0 17. Sediment on plants or debris ~ 0.5 ~- 1 1.5 18. Organic debris lines or piles {Wrack lines) 0.5 1 1.5 - - -- -- - ~------- -"-1--- 19. Hydric soils {redoximorphic features} present? i No = 0 ,i_ ` Yes = 1.5 C. Biology {Subtotal = ~ ) ' 20y. Fibrous roots m channel 3 • 2 1 ~_ 00 21 .Rooted plants m channel I 3 ~ 2 j 1 - ---- -- ~-- -C - ---~- -- - ... _T__- ~ 22. Crayfish 0 i 0.5 1 ~ 1.5 I 23. Bivalves 0 ~ 1 2 ~- "-" 3 ~24. Fish ~~ -~ 0.5 1 1.5 ! ( 25. Amphibians ~ 0 ~ 0.5 -~ -t~~_ 1.5 --- - r 26. Macrobenthos (Hole drversity and abundance} 0 ~- 0.5 ` I _ 1 r 1.5 (27_Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 ~ 3 ------ -- - -- - ------- - ~- -- -- _, -- -- " 1 28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 j_ 0.5 j 1 1.5 ~ 29 b. Wetland plants in stream_bed _ FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 3items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Ctt,ti~. ~~hcir~ "~-~_ 1~~~ ~4_l~r~~ 4~__~41~ -r'~ct,ert~t~ ~ f 1~' th ~~~--~----f--LS rl~~;_2S~-ct~E~.1---F~ ~:~~__ Sketch: ~~ ~ Sfr,rf S r~ / '~ fz`J"t'~ ~~ i i North Garolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 _ - _ Date: ~ - j,3-- C ~~ Project:(~lt~ (?~~.,~, T7afiuk S;re Latitude: 3~, SC~~~3 Evaluator: Krf; `f•~ -/t~e„ site: Tr;bi,vlar~ ~ Longitude: ~ ~~~1. ! Z 8~~ ~l Total Points: Other f Stream is at least intarmrttent 3 ~ County: (~.rSOh e.g. Quad Name: ~~ >'tbn ~~t~`' it a t9 or erenniat if a 30 A. Geomorphology ~Subtotai = ) --- ---- Absent Weak ---_ Moderate Strong ~ ~ 1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 _ 2 3 I 2. Sinuosity ~ 0 1 3 j 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence ~~ 0 1 1 2 3 ~ - i 4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 ___t --_ 2 - _ 3 ~ _ _ ----- - -_ _.._ _ ~_. _ __ -- 5. Activelrelic floodplain - 0 _ 1 2 3 _ 6. Depositional bars or benches ___ 0 ___ 1 ~~~ ////TT'22 ' 3 7. Braided channel 0 1 ~ 2 3 ___ __ 8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 9 ~ Natural levees 0 ~ __ ~_ 1 2 _ 3 ~ _ _ ~ 10, Headcuts 0 1 2' 3 11 Grade controls ~- 0 0.5 _ 1 ' 1.5 rainageway 12. Natural valley or d 0 0.5 1 i- ~ 1.5 _ 13. Second or greater order channel on existing USGS or NRGS map or other documented evidence. No = 0 i I Yes = 3 Man-made ditches are not rated; s-e-e7discussions in manual R Hvrlrnlnnv tS~ihtnfal = -f ..~ 1 14. Groundwater flowJdischarge j 0 1 ~ 2 ~,,~ I : - __- _ 15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Q i l i W h t 1 ' - 2 ~~ . --for grow ng season er n c anne a -.. - - - _ _ _ _ + _ _ --i__._ 16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 __ X17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 1 1.5 - 18. Organic debris lines or piles {Wrack lines) _' 0 0.5 1 1.5 ' ~ 19. Hydric soils {redoximorphic features) present? ~_ __ No = 0 - ~ Yes = 1.5 C Riolonv iSuhtntal = 7` 1 20 . F bri o su roots in channe! ___ _ . ~ ____ ~ 3 ~ ~ 2 ~ 1 _ 0 .~ . 21 . Rooted plants in channel ~~_-_-_- _-- 3 .-- ~ 2 _._ 1 _- _ 0 -W__.__W 22. Crayfish -____,__--~ _-'~---- _ 0 0.5 1 1.5 -- ! l 23. Bivalves ----- 24. Fish _ -~~~~ 1 lJ 1 --- 0.5 2 --_ _4 1 3 ~ _ ~ -_,; 1.5 25. Amphibians 0.5 1.5 126. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance). - ~__ - -- 0 0.5 I 1 1.5 -_ _. - I _-- __ _.-_ _ 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton Ir idizin bacteria/fun us 28 1 2 ! 3 5 1 1 5 t 0 g g . on ox . . ~ 129 .. W d plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = L5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 Items 2() and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. r Sketch: ~ y ~~M~,vc~~Y Noses: (use tack side of this form for additional notes.} a ~~ b~ ~ ('`'~ ~- - -t COY-- - - - -- ~` --. r h ~~'CL'tVP S t~S ~ ~O~.ti ~rn __~=,--__ _ '~~ .i 5~~~~,- ~ i;~xszt,' a~.er ~~2 7~1Q.~~r~.ATt.t'1¢~t ~'ICtS ~'iILC~ - ~O' "~~,~- __ ~~ ~l.vld_ rnOvt? S i n ~`O Gt ~ UJL `'~W`~'~`'ti. r~xeR _ \`-ie North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: j~} • j ~ - ~-} Projeck(~}~ Cr~~k. ~~rt btt~.t~tq ~r-kLatitude: 3(a . "J 0 ~ 55~ Evaluator: Kt-tfc~){ _ rn~r~~ Site: ~YIIUL.T~y~~ g~ Longitude: _ ~~ j 2 "~©5G Total Points: Other .1n (~ { Stream is at least intermittent ~ County: pQ(S(lr'} e.g. Quad Name: ~l I ~ t un U( ~.(Ct L~ if z 19 or erenniat it a 30 _A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = I~ )~ Absent 11a. Continuous bed and bank _ 0 ---~--- - ~ - Weak _ 1- r--- Moderate 2 ~ Strong ^__ ~ 2. Si nuosity -}-_ __0 -~ ----1 -- 2' - ~ ~_ 3 3. in-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence _ ! 0 ~ ,~ 4 Soil texture or stream substrate s rtin 0 I 1 1 2 3 _ _ . o g _ _ _ - ! - -_--~ ~ -_ ~ 3 __ 5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 I 2 3 fi. Depositional bars or benches ~7 0-~ 7. Braided channel U _ __ 2 2 _ ~ 3 3 ! 8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 9 a Natural levees 0 1 1 Z ~ 2 3 I 3 ~ 10. Headcuts 0 - 1 ~ - 2 3 11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 -{i 12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 ~J 0.5 1 1.5 I 13. Second or greater order channe! on existing ~ ~ -'' USGS or NRCS map or other documented I No = 0 Yes = 3 evidence. 51~E aF T~ ~ "Man-made ditches are not rated; se~e7discussions in manual B. Hydralogv (Subtotal = 7' 1 14. Groundwater flow/discharge i 15 Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain _ 0 ~ ~ 1 ' _ 2 -r ~~ ~ -~ ~-~-i . , or Water in channel --dry or growin~c. season 16 i ~ 0 1 2 ~ ~ -~- ---~ -~ 3 ---~ . Leafiitter _- -__ i _ 1.5 1 0.5 - 0 I 17. Sediment on plants or debris I ~ -t 0 ~ ' 0.5 ~+_ 1 ~ 1.5 18.Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines} 1 0 -- 1 1.5 1 ~0.5-`---' --- - 1 19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? --~ ; __ _ Na = G I I -- Ye 1 6---- C. Biology (Subtotal = _ ~_ ____) 20 .Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 ~ 0 ~ j 21 . Rooted plants in channel - Crayfish ---- 22 ~ --- 3 }--- --_ ~-- 2 _- i --~--- 1 ~ - _ 0 , r_ - . _~----- -------- ~ 23. Bivalves 0 - - t-~-- b ~ 0.5 --- 1 --~- - ( 1 - ---- 2 ~~-^ 1.5 3 -_-,; y -- ------ 'i 24. Fish ~ ft 25 `Amphibians __--- ---- ' -- ~ ~_ 0 _ ~` 0.5 = 0 5 ~ -- -~---- -~ - 1--~- - ~ _ --- 1.5 __ 1.5 26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance} 0 0.5 - - -- II _ 1.5 -~ 2G 7. Filamentous algae; periphyton - -- 28 Iron oxidizin bacteria/fun us - ~ p ~ -- ~ 0 ~- 1 2 - ~~ 3 -- -- -' . g g . _ _._ - - --1 - - 0.5 --- ~ 1 ~ I 1.5 29 . Wetland plants in streambed i1 FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; _ - OBL = 1. ., ~__ 5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 hems ~u and 11 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.} "~u5 g1~~?avvt r~cetyPs r~uN~wu~ler nl t.t,~~ ~,~ S~CwtS us~~i'~n i* h ~~t' ~.cw~ . ~ ~~ to tw ,i f - G~Ew~,l o~~?~.~tr~ ~ r ~ f ~rr1-_~e ~,ltt:t,vl.hZf-- hud ~'1J~-~ _r %~vt~~t,cS-F ~.(~ ~~ 4rt,(~~~~n - i-t` w G S ~~~a..~it~ i ., 0-C~U ko2 r ~~ ~ ~}u;~ ~ n t } `~-1r~; 5 'T „ten 2 q.J2 T ~`o c'~ , `fir V~G + E. I.,c)~ S ~' ti~ ~ ~h-er~r.e. ca~;~ ~5~~ . Sketch: o ~'~' `~~~ 't Q,itG(G~ (t~: -~ ~ North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date:'-I~f_ ~~ Project:~ylQ ex2~c:.~n(~u1u.~ , S~}Qlatitude: ~3(p.r,(`,~ ~j ~~ Evacuator: KNi Q ~l~ - ~~ Site: '~y i buta.r ~ p Longitude:,, `~ ~ e I z jo~ 3 jF, Total Points: Other Stream is at least intermittent r13 County: ~1 r S ~Yl e.g. Quad Name: ~1(~` -"1 Q U G1 it z 19 or erenniat if z 30 A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = f ~' _) ~ Absent Weak ~ Moderate _ Strong -_ 1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 __- 2 ~ 2. Sinuosity - 0 1 _ ~- ~ 2-' ~ 3 - r -•-- ~ `- -- - 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 4. Soi( texture or stream substrate sorting 0 ~ 0 _. ~ __.~.:..~ 1 2 2 3 3 ' S. A~- ctivejrelic floodplain r 6. Depositional bars or benches ~ 0 _ I 0 ~ 1 1 j 2 _ 2 - 3 3 ~ _ _ _ 7. Braided channel ~ _ 1 ~ 2 ~ ~ 3~ _ _ 8. Recent alluvial deposits Y 0 1 2 3 _~__ r 9 a Natural levees i--- - ' 0 _ _ 1 f 2 _ _ 3 10. Headcuts ~ 0 ~ _ 1 ~ 2 3 v _ 11. Grade controls X12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 ~ 0 ~ 0.5_ ~ 0.5 1 1 1.5 1.5 13. Second or greater order channel on xistin USGS or NRCS map or other documented ~ No = 0 Y8s = 3 evidence. ° Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 - -~ 2 3 Y 15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Water in channel --dry or growing season ~ 0 1 _ - u~ 2 ~ 3 ~ __ ~_ 1 &_Leaflitter .5 1 0.5 j 0 _ _ __~_ i__ 17. Sediment on plants or debris_ ~ ~ _ _ - 0 ~ 0.5 ~ __ _ 1 1.5 ~ - ~ 18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) i 0 0 ____ 1 j 1.5 ~ ~ 19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0~ ~_ ~ ~ Yes = 1.5_ J C 8iolnav 1Subtntal = 20°. Fibrous roots in channel - A ! _ 21 °. Rooted plants in channel ._____._________... Y 22. Crayfish -- ---~ 3 _ 2 _~, 1 3 2 1 ____ -,___~_ 0.5 ~ _ 1 ~ ~ 0 , 0 _ 0 1.5 23. Bivalves _ ~ ~ _~_ _ _ _ _ _ ~ __ yv 0 _ ~_ _ 1 _' 2_ _ _ _ ~ ~ _ 3 _ --- I ~ i 24. Fish -__ - _ ---_--__- - 1 0 0.5 --- ---- ~ --- 1.5 _ I ' 25. Amphibians ____ __~-_~~___~___ 2& M2cr bentho t di it d d b 1 0 _ i _ 0.5 `, i~- -- Q ~ ~ 0 5 ~ 1 _ 1.5 _-.-----I L5 . o s (no e vers ance} y an a un -_ -_ -- --~ __ _ , . - --- - - ; - - 27. Fi{am entous algae; periphyton 2 1 - 3 ~ j __ _ __ 28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. ~ _-~ _ __ _ ----- __- -- - 0 ~_ v~, 0.5 1 ~~~ 1:5 29T'. Wetland plants in streambed ~AC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item Z9 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. S Q,l Sketch. ~ ~~ Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) ~,'~`~ ~~~ S~t'~G.v_H ~EG~;~S c~._'~ __~_i'DLL~x~c.~;Ct;f~'r- ~ e~~,~_7~~_ -- 9~+1.~~+' S .b~,~r L)1~t1Y13,~i"-'t.-_'y~J _t~.~ taw h~ ~u.ri~ . _--- `~~z,r e__~_S_~1~~5~? etZ1~--~~et r2,_~ ~_~_. i.~,t._~..~~ ~~IcS_ C:k:+r1C~ ~?~_.~'~Ur ~_-~.?~_.~ 1t~~eo~`~c,.>i- t,SC,(:c~ --low i ~ `-~'~12 G1nlAVtY~¢.,~ (~urtr.P~ ~uG~1,t5~' _ •` ~L`R~'r\\k~ ~?C.~o~ptr St-4( ViS1~S ~~~~rOWt~ C~.r~~' CE'4'~=c'4-idnS~ \ G~"'c. ttea~ p (:L r ~ ~ i North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: ~~ - ~ g - Q -~ Project:lLltilL~ G Pr?k Try hu,~. ~ st ~ Latitude: 3~ . 5p ~ S~ Evaluator: KYII h ~ - ~~f 1 Site: j r r'~,~~ G Cj Longitude: _ ~~ j •~ ~ ~ y '~ Total Points: Other Stream is at least intermittent 3 ~ County: Pef• ~©{~ /! if >_ 19 or erenniat if z 30 e.g. Quad Name: ~~ t ~ ~C rl Qtt G C'( A. G_ eomorphology (Subtotal = {`~• •~ ) [ 1Continuous bed and bank - -~ -~-~- ~ Absent 0 ~-~- Weak ~ 1 Moderate 2 ~--' Strong ~ 3 -1 ~ 2. Sinuosity 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 j ~ 0 ~ 1 1 2 2 3 4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ~-- 15. Activelrelic floodplain V _ - 1 i _ ~-~'1 ~ ~ 3 -' _ 2 _ 3 ~ 6. Depositional bars or benches _ raided channel 0 ! _~ _-t-_ --r--_ - ~ 0 ; 1 2 3 r_ -1 g 2 ~ ~ 8. Recent alluvial deposits ~ 0 ~- 1 ~ _ _~ - 2 " 3 { 9 a Natural levees 10. Headcuts _ 0 ~ 1 0 1 _ 2 3 ~ 2 ~ 3~ ~ ~ 1 Grade controls _ -~' 0 0.5 ~ _ ~~ 1.5 ~I X12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 ~ 0.5 ~ 1 ~ 1.5 13. Second or greater order channel on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented ( No = 0 ( ' Yes = 3 evidence. mdn-rnaoe a[ccnes are not ra[ea; see aiscuss[ons m manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ~ • .5_ - _) _ 14. Groundwater Flow/discharge 0 1 2 3 15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 4 Water in channel -- dry or growing season ~ 0 ~ ~ ~- O _ -~ 3 i 16. Leaflitter _ ~ ~ 1.5 _ 1 ~ j 0.5 _ ~ 0 ~17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 _ 18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) _ H 19 i _ _ 0 _ ~~ _ 0.5 ~ 1 _ _ ~ _ _1.5 . ydr c soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5 C. Biology (Subtotal = __ ~ _____ ) 20 . Fibrous roots in channel --- 2 - - ---- 1-_-_ 1 - - __ __ ~ 1 0 - ----- -- - ' 21 . Rooted plants in channel ~ 3 2 1 - 0 22 C f h _ - - T ~ ~ __ -- __ . ray is --- ----- 0 0.5 ~ + - ~ 1 1.5 1 J 23. Bivalves 24 Fish - - - 0 -- --- - 1 -- ' ~ 0 ~ 0 5 ~ - - -2 - --t•--3 _-, 1 ~ ~ . 25. Amphibians _ . ~- 0 ~ 0.5 + 1 1 _ __ 1.5 r 1.5 ' ~2fi. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 _ 1.5 1 127. Filamentous algae; periphyton ~~ I _ Y~ 0 ~ 1 ~_- . 2 ~ _3 28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. 0 0.5 ~ 1 1.5 29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other - 0 [ems cu ano zi rocus on me presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. Sketch: ~ 1~f~'Cw Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.} !Gus Srr2anl iS~i~o~,u-~;cq~,~~T~~~~=6foc~cfu;a~tr>r~{,~,x.:y,~~ Y!~1 FS.~~~lvt 1~1~ih~~ r~. ~sl~cE~. rea GEc~,vts ~t v~~.t'K' ~ `~,~_c, :.wt< Q atn ,r rt~ (i, uG X D, __~ ~~~f~ k~b:t`~?~~~2~ ~_ G~.1L4tQ~ ~•w~'~~US'~t'n'+Q ~+`~~. ~~ ~ja,wstS ~~~5 }~"~ ~yv~ `F11A,b"(! ~z t:v~ 1 +'y>rrA.e~ C~ b, Cc>~.Q CLt~Gf `-~,-e. Ci r2 . 3tt 1v~G~w ~Gkrdw[,,fe, Jte(~ ~pc}k Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan Appendix G Stream Gauge Summary Date Fcb 14 Fcb 25 Mar 2 Mar 16 Mar 28 Apr 12 Apr 15 Jul 10 Jul 17 Sep 14 Rainfall (in) 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.4 2.0 1.0 No data available Q Stage Arca Q Stage Area Q Stage Arca Q Stage Area Q Stage Arca Q Stage Arca Q Stage Area Q Stage Area Q Stage Arca Q Stage Area Gauge 1 15.7 1.2 3.4 ] 7.3 1.2 3.4 10.3 1.0 2.5 26.3 1.4 4.4 7.7 0.9 2.1 21.0 1.3 3.9 Tributa 3 Gauge 2 25.5 1.1 4.5 30.0 1.2 5.1 18.1 0.9 3.4 8.8 0.5 1.5 2.4 0.3 0.6 38.4 1.3 5.7 7.2 0.6 1.9 20.0 1.0 4.0 Tributa 4 Gauge 3 26 2 1.1 4.5 2R.8 1.2 5.0 15.5 O.R 29 9.8 0.4 1.2 33.0 ].3 5.6 11.0 0.6 2.1 17.7 0.8 2.9 Tributa 6 Gauge 4 67.3 1.5 14.4 6.2 0.4 2.2 52.9 1.3 11.8 44.8 1.2 10.6 19.1 0.7 5.0 5.7 0.4 2.2 120.2 2.0 21.5 20.9 0.8 6.1 4.1 0.4 2.2 46.9 1.2 10.6 Tributa I Gauge 5 66.0 L4 9.7 2.2 0.3 0.9 7I.2 1.4 9.7 32.1 0.9 5.3 2L8 0.6 2.9 1.9 0.3 0.9 69.3 1.4 9.7 10.0 0.5 2.2 13.9 0.6 2.9 Tributa Gauge 6 g3.0 1.1 15.2 20.3 0.5 5.9 83.1 1.2 16.7 64.2 1.0 13.6 45.6 0.8 10.5 19.5 0.5 5.9 105.7 1.3 18.3 35.2 0.7 8.9 7.8 0.3 2.9 40.3 0.8 10.5 Tributa Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan Appendix H Reference Reach Data ~;. - k w ' -• J >`. t `t . n S+' ' ' ' ~ g t ~ t , t ~.. "„ ,~ .~ , .. _~. ~ , "'r ~~ ~lµ L~ '~. ~` . Stream T B4c Yadkin River Basin, UT to Fisher River, XS#1 Riffle 110 105 0100 -------- ----------------- _ - - W 95 - - Bankfull ~! ~- - - Flood Prone Area 90 0 10 20 30 Station (feet) River Basin: Yadkin Watershed: UT to Fisher River XS ID XS~I Riffle Draina a Area s mi : 0.38 Date: 6/9/2005 Field Crew: G. M ncza, A. S filler Station Rod Ht. Elevation 0.0 2.22 100.00 3.0 2.15 100.07 5.0 2.50 99.72 7.0 2.98 99.24 8.0 3.49 98.73 8.8 4.00 98.22 9.0 4.96 97.26 12.0 5.03 97.19 ]4.0 5.25 96.97 16.0 5.16 97.06 17.0 5.20 97.02 18.0 5.06 97.16 18.7 4.00 9822 19.5 2.65 99.57 20.0 1.66 100.56 Bankfull Elevation: 98.22 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 10.40 Bankfull Width: 10.00 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 99.47 Flood Prone Width: 13.10 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.25 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.04 W / D Ratio: 9.6 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.30 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 2.08 Slo a ft/ft): 0.013 Dischar a (cfs) 42 Pebble Count Material Size Ran a (mm) Count UT to Fsher River silt/clay 0 0.062 0 Surry County, NC very fine san 0.062 0.13 0 Riffle #1 (Sta. 01+00) fine sand 0.13 0.25 0 Note: medium san 0.25 0.5 0 coarse sand 0.5 1 5 ve coarse san 1 2 g 100% 25 very fine grave 2 4 21 90% - -- - ----__-_ _ :_. _. -~ -- _-,--~-___ fine gravel 4 6 9 fine gravel 6 8 8 80% 20 medium grave 8 11 11 ~ _ _ medium grave 11 16 6 70% r _-._ ', - - --- ~ coarse gravel 16 22 7 ~ 6p% 15 a, coarse gravel 22 32 2 `r ='+ very coarse grave 32 45 9 50% _- r-- - -- --_ ----- ---- -.___ ve coarse ave 45 64 6 a 40% 10 ~~ small cobble 64 90 5 ~ ~ N bbl di 90 128 2 --- ~ . ~-- me um co 30% -~ _ -~ --" -- large cobble 128 180 1 ~ ~~ ve lar e cobbl 180 256 0 20% ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 small boulde 256 362 0 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - _ - small boulde 362 512 0 10% 0 medium boulde 512 1024 0 0% large boulde 1024 2048 0 0.01 0.1 1 l0 100 1000 10000 ve lar e boulde 2048 4096 0 particle size (mm) total part icle count: 100 -~ cumulative % # of particles bedroc ased on size percent less than (mm) particle size distribution clay hardpa sediment D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95 gradation geo mean std dev detritus/woo particles only 2.208 4.18 7.7 13 42 79 4.5 9.6 4.3 artificial based on percent by substrate type total count: 100 total count silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial 0% 13% 79% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% i•••••••••••r•••••••••••~••••••~•••••••••••• River Basin: Yadkin .~ ;fir ~~:~~'~"° i Watershed: UT to Fisher River ~ ~_~ -'dir.. ~ `' ' °`~ x w, XS ID XS#3 Pool ;~ "ub ~ ~.. .,E_ ° ~`- " " ~"" ~'" ,F Draina a Area sq mi : 0.38 ~~~ ~~ ~` "t ~" Date: 6/9/2005 ~ -.,..„ Field Crew: G. M ncza, A. S filler .;~ _ '.~ Station Rod Ht. Elevation SU~1MARY DATA y _ 'I }~ Yk 0.0 1.33 100.00 Bankfull Elevation: 97.78 f = ~ ~ ~r '° ' °~ 3.0 1.78 99.55 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 1 1.60 ~,,~ _. F es-' f .. 5.0 2.35 98.98 Bankfull Width: 8.35 *~' 5.5 2.82 98.51 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 100.05 - - "~ - ~ 5.7 3.81 97.52 Flood Prone Width: ~~ ~ ,,,. ~' . 6.0 4.52 96.81 Max De th at Bankfull: 2.27 ,};~ f v,,, "`"",-~.~, ', 6.5 5.79 95.54 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.39 ~ ~ ~~ ,"''~."~,,", 8.0 5.82 95.51 W / D Ratio: 6.0 ~ " #~- `"' ` ~ ~ 9.0 5.50 95.83 Entrenchment Ratio: ~, _ . xy ~ b- ' '"` `~~~'~ 10.0 5.02 96.31 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 0.85 ~ ' „,„~ ._ °'a , ~' 11.5 4.80 96.53 Slo a ft/ft : 0.001 ~" ° 13.0 3.90 97.43 Dischar a cfs 52 S tream T e: B4c 14 0 3 55 97J8 . 16.0 . 3.03 98.30 __ _ __ _ 20.0 2.66 98.67 Yadkin River Ba sin, UT to Fisher River, XS#3 Pool 110 105 m 0 _ ~ _ - _ - - _ - - - _ ' - f~ __ ..~~ - - - - - - - 100 _ - _ - - _ _ _ - ~_ - - - IL 95 - - - Bankfull - - Flood Prone Area 90 0 10 20 30 Station (feet) • ~ ~ .!~ ~ } ,.. "~`7r ~ y y,r t' ^i '~ x~ ~ r.~ r ~ y ~. r _. t:. ~.~ ~ ~' '' ~` y . ~ .~ s v K WWf ~ ~~R.p ~M L. ~, x 'v. _ r' ~ ~~~ Irv-~i~`ip Stream T e• B4c Yadkin River B asin, UT to Fisher River, XS#2 Pool 11o 105 _ - -- - a: 0 100 - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . W 95 - - Bankfull - - - Flood Prone Area 90 0 10 20 Station (feet) 30 River Basin: Yadkin Watershed: UT to Fisher River XS ID XS;#2 Pool Draina a Area s mi : 0.38 Date: 6/9/2005 Field Crew: G. M ncza, A. S filler Station Rod Ht. Elevation 0.0 2.6x IOU.00 3.11 2.94 99J4 5.0 3.61 99.07 6.0 4.10 98.Sx 6.x a.56 9x.12 7.0 4.70 97.98 9.0 4.94 97.74 I I A 5.21 97.47 12.0 5.64 97.04 13.0 6.00 96.6R 15.0 6.59 96.09 17.0 6.42 9626 1x.0 6.50 96.18 18.2 4.93 97.75 19.0 3.56 99.12 20.0 2.xo 99.sx SUV1~lARl' DATA Bankfull Elevation: 98.12 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 13.40 Bankfull Width: 11.62 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 100.15 Flood Prone Width: Max De th at Bankfull: 2.03 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.15 W / D Ratio: 10. I Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Hei ht Ratio: 0.81 Slo a ft/ft : 0.001 Dischar a cfs 56 • , • , i ~ / / . , i . ~ / / , ~ . , , , / . , . / , , . , / , / . River Basin: Yadkin .~; } ~ Watershed: UT to Fisher River XS ID XS#4 Riffle J E .+ Drama a Area sq mi : 0.38 , j ` . ~ Date: 6/9/2005 - ~ ~ ' ~ Field Crew: A. Spitler G. M ncza `°~ -~~~ ~' ~~'~' , ~ : a K ~ ~ Station Rod Ht. Elevation StiMMARYDATA . ~,~~ "'``" ~`"„~~.,,~,^~.. '~ _ " ~:" :. ~ ~ 0.0 4.62 100.00 Bankfull Elevation: 98 28 M _ : ~ ~ r,~ik..- ,~ 3.0 5.54 99.08 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 10.70 '~;° ~~'~ ~ ,: *.~~ °"' 7.0 6.01 98.61 Bankfull Width: 9.00 ^ ~' ,, ~ ~- .;.° ~~et x 8.5 6.34 98.28 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 99.73 - „+ ~ . 9.0 7.04 97.58 Flood Prone Width: 20.50 ~ R` ~'~- ~• "~r" ;- 9.5 7.66 96.96 Max De th at Bankfull: 1.45 ~ ' ~ - e - ~ `T 11.0 7.67 9695 Mean De th at Bankfull: 1.19 • "+_ ~ ~ . - - 12.0 7.79 96.83 W / D Ratio: 7.6 " * 14.0 7S8 97.04 Entrenchment Ratio: 2.30 ~~ ~"'` ry ~ 'f 16.0 7.57 97.05 Bank Hei ht Ratio: 1.00 ,,,~u.!i ~ w ~,.-: r - - 17.0 7.51 97.11 Slo a ft/ft : 0.013 y 17.5 6.34 98.28 Dischar a cfs 46 Stream T e: B4c ] 9.0 5.90 98.72 21.0 5.06 99.56 25.0 4.37 10025 Yadkin River Basin, UT to Fisher River, XS#4 Riffle 110 105 - 0100 -- -- - - _---- -- -_ -- --- to 95 i - - Bankfull - - Flood Prone Area 90 0 10 20 30 Station (feet) Pebble Count Material Size Ran a (mm) Count UT to Fsher River silt/clay 0 0.062 1 Surry County, NC very fine san 0.062 0.13 0 Riffle #2 (Sta. 02+55) fine sand 0.13 0.25 0 Note: medium san 0.25 0.5 0 coarse sand 0.5 1 S ve coarse san 1 2 10 100% 18 very fine grave 2 4 16 90% _ _ ~ fine gravel 4 6 16 _ . _-___ _-__-_ _ ., -__- --,_._._~__ .. ____ _. 16 fine gravel 6 8 10 80% 14 medium grave 8 11 12 medium grave 11 16 12 a 70% .~ - _ _ - ___ 12 ~ coarse grave 16 22 7 v 60% ~~ ~~ ~ ~ coarse grave 22 32 4 `~ ~ ~ 10 very coarse grave 32 45 3 ve coarse ave 45 64 0 a ~ ~~ ~~ 8 ~ small cobble 64 90 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ medium cobbl 90 128 0 30% ___.-: ~ - - - ---- - ~ - --- 6 large cobble 128 180 0 ~~ ~~ ~~ 4 ve lar e cobbl 180 256 0 20% I I I small boulde 256 362 0 l0% -- --- ' ~ ' ' ~ ~ 2 small boulde 362 512 0 - --- di ld b 512 1024 0 0% me um ou e 0 large boulde 1024 2048 0 0.01 0.1 1 t0 100 1000 10000 ve lar e boulde 2048 4096 0 particle size (mm) total part icle count: 100 f cumulative % # of particles bedroc based on size percent less than (mm) particle size distribution clay hardpa sediment D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95 gradation geo mean std dev detritus/woo particles only 1.625 4.00 5.8 9 16 29 3.1 5.0 3.1 artificial based on percent by substrate type total count: 100 total count silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial 1% 18% 80% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% •••••~••••~••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••i •!•••••••••••••~••••••••••••••i•~!••!•~•••i• Pebble Count Material Size Ran a (mm) Count UT to Fsher River silt/clay 0 0.062 0 Surry County, NC very fine san 0.062 0.13 0 fine sand 0.13 0.25 0 Note: Reach Pebble Count medium san 0.25 0.5 2 coarse sand 0.5 1 7 ve coarse san 1 2 15 100% 16 very fine grave 2 4 13 90% - _ __ --- _ _- ------- ------ --------- -- fine gravel 4 6 9 14 fine gravel 6 8 10 80% medium grave 8 11 9 12 medium grave 11 16 5 ~ 70% ~ --- -- __ - - - ___ __ coarse gravel 16 22 7 v 60% ~ 10 ~ coarse grave 22 32 6 `~ very coarse grave 32 45 7 ~ 50% ~ ~ g °, ve coarse ave 45 64 6 ~ ,y i i i ~ small cobbl 64 90 4 40% ~ ~ 6 ~~ medium cobbl 90 128 0 30% ~ ~ ~'' ; ; large cobble 128 180 0 4 l 20% - - - - ve ar e cobbl 180 256 0 -- -- small boulde 256 362 0 ', ', ', ', ', 2 small boulde 362 512 0 ~ 0% ', ', ', medium boulde 512 1024 0 0% 0 large boulde 1024 2048 0 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 100 00 ve lar e boulde 2048 4096 0 article size (mm) total parti cle Count: 100 p -}cumulative % # ofparticles bedroc based on size percent less than (mm) particle size distribution clay hardpa sediment D16 D35 D50 D65 D84 D95 gradation geo mean std dev detritus/woo articles only 1.382 3.60 6.7 11 34 60 4.9 6.8 4.9 artificial based on percent by substrate type total count: 100 total count silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock hardpan wood/det artificial 0% 24% 72% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% UT to Fisher Rrver Profile i ~ 1 __. _ I -I _..__. 1 I I I I - I. I. I ~ T-- _1__._.r 1.... 1.. I I 1 I. 1 r. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 96 I I I I ' I ' I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I . 95 z --~.=Fr,--'~ "'` I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I _ > I ~ I I ~ ~ I "~i .._-'r`--'+~. I I I I I I I I I - w I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 93 I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 fY I I I 92 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I 91 a so :o0 1ep zoo 2so sao s6o cnar,,,el o'ISlao~a InI '^~ betl wafer sd O LF RB -~ BKF -W$ -Linear lBKF)', Elav atbn BM: BS HI FS FS depth FS FS FS FS I AZ ELEV ELEV ELEV ELEV ELEV ELEV nine. distance station 10n TP bed water LB RB BKF Huth , Dad water sA LF RB Blff WS _ ~. e(t _ - _ ~ 455.5 95.86 ~ . t _ _ ._._... _ - __.__ _ '. il6 96.23 95 46 ... _. . _... 6 .. ~. :. n6 95 35 3 I I:15 1p ~ 1.:.66 98.16 95.35 8 1 ~ ''~ 02 4 ~ ,a 64 95.35 3 ...._ - - _ _ __ ~.: ]3 95.34 _ _. 6 ...... ... 1:: I9 96.2A 9 _ 95.34 5 - I.t.99 95.15 12 ~ '!.62 94.96 2 1.11 5 ~ :.12 95.73 94.96 3 ~ - '~: fi3 94.87 6 _ 4 38 11 - . 14.04 94.41 _... 4 -~ - .. _ _. ___ _.___. _ _. _. . ~ _ ..._ ,.1.91 __ - I 13 - - ' ,:1.88 94.98 94.22 19 ~ ~ _ _ _ 94.A3 -16 __ _ ____. _. _ _ rf.92 B _ If57 93.94 5 ~ _ _ _ . ___ ,1.31 93.86 2 _ . 11.01 94.83 5 1.76 2 ~1.A8 93.86 _ 6 --- _ .. _.. 13.53 - - - - - 93.86 _ _ .. 7 .. . i37 _. _ 93.74 6 I,' 43 94.67 93.74 3 li 11.69 ~ 13.34 - 93.74 8 ':i 24 93.68 e _. _ _ _ _. _ ,- 38 __ - - _. __ 93.52 9 - ~ '.94 93.16 4 '1 46 93.16 3 3 ~ 11 45 _ ~J 26 2 U3 3 __ 1.66 - _- 94.32 g ~ ,2.69 q ~ ~ ~1.G1 93.D8 5 ~ '1.54 92.97 10 ~ X1.56 92.94 13 ~ '~1.5fi 93.99 92.94 _ _.. 4 _ „1.11 4 ~, '1:.64 92.7 6 __.. _ . _ _.._ - 1 __ _ ._ _. _ - _. ___ -____. .. .. - ,1.59 92.7 ~ _ 7 ..., 12.45 92.7 I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~•