20080358 Ver 1_Application_20080226

--- Transmittal Letter
~.~.
~.~.
~_
~_
~_
K C I ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
ASSOCIATES OF NC
LANDMARK CENTER n, SUITE 220 ~ 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD ~ RALEIGH, NC 27609 • 919-783-9214 1 (FAX) 919-783-9266
Date: February 26, 2008
Company: North Carolina DENR
Division of Water Quality
Contact: Eric Kulz
o ~~~~a~ p
FFB 2 6 2008
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Project: Cane Creek Tributary Site
Stream Restoration
Subject: 401 Permit
1 401 Application Fee (Check for $570)
1 Approval Letter from the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
5 PCN
5 Restoration Plan with 60°Io Plans
^ In accordance with your request
® For your review
^ For processing
^ Plans reviewed and accepted
^ Plans reviewed and accepted as noted
^ For revision by you
^ For your use/files
^ Please call when ready
^ Please return to this office
^ Approval requested
^ Conference requested
at your convenience
Comments: Enclosed are the permit materials for the Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream
Restoration, afull-delivery stream mitigation project developed for the EEP. Please feel
free to contact me with any questions. Thanks, Kristin
cc: File
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NC, P.A.
istin Knight- eng
Environmental Scientist
www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988

~~_
OS St~lzl.
-}
January 2, 2008 ~'ROGRAM
Gary Mryncza
Project Manager
KCI Technologies, Inc.
4601 Six Forks Road, Suite 220
Raleigh, NC 27609
Subject: Restoration Plan for Cane Creek Stream Restoration Project
Roanoke River Basin - CU# 03010104
'~ Person County, North Carolina
Contract No. D06002
Dear Mr. Mryncza;
On December 7, 2007, KCI Technologies (KCI) submitted the Cane Creek Stream Restoration
Plan to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) for review and comment. The plan
proposes to restore and enhance 17,738 existing linear feet (lf) of unnamed tributaries to Cane
Creek. The streams will be restored or enhanced using a combination of C and/or B Rosgen
stream types. Natural channel design approach will be employed using reference reach and
regional curve data for developing design parameters.
The EEP has completed its review of the restoration plan and has no additional comments at this
time. Please proceed with acquiring all necessary permits and/or certifications and complete the
implementation of the earthwork portion of the mitigation project (Task 4). A copy of this letter
should be included with your 401 /404 permit applications.
For the purpose of obtaining approval of the erosion and sedimentation control plan for this
project, I have also attached a memorandum confirming that KCI is the Owner and Financially
Responsible Party, and has full operational control for all matters pertaining to construction of
this project. Please sign and attach this memorandum to the Financial Responsibility/Ownership
form of the erosion and sedimentation control plan application. Failure to do so may delay
approval of the plan.
Sincerely,
Guy arce
EEP Full Delivery Program Supervisor
cc: file
~~, ~~`~.
~~~~~orth Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 16~~ C°iail Service (~nte~~, ~ea~eigh, ~~~1E ~7a,'S'-IvS~ / ~I~`-715-047G l '~~i~~,~w.ncee~.m~t

Off Ce Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
fir any pantcutar item is not applicable to tats project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I.
II.
Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Inforniation
~~~~~~ p
FFB ~ ~ 2008
Name: _ KCI Associates of North Carolina P A
8€NR 1YA1F.~LlI ial 1TY
Mailing Address: 4601 Six Forks Rd, Suite 220 1RETLANDS AN1~ STORMNlATER BRAN(
Ralei>?ll NC 27609
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:~919) 783-9266
E-mail Address: kkni~htna,kci.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Updated 1 I /1/2005
Page 5 of 13

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 9060-00-02-7485 and 9060-00-32-4307
4. Location
County: Person Nearest Town: Semora
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): To reach the site from
Raleich, proceed west on US-70 until it merges with I-85/LTS-15 south. Continue on I-85 for
approximately 1.5 miles and then take exit 176B for Duke St/US-501 Bypass Take a right off of the
exit and travel on US-501 for 27.5 miles. Within the town of Roxboro turn left onto Court St/US-158
west. Follow US-158 west 0.4 mile and turn right onto NC-57 continuing northwest for another 12 3
miles. Once within the small community of Semora, turn right onto NC-119 and drive north 0 5 mile
Turn right onto Cunningham Road and continue east for 0.85 mile. The CCTS is accessible through a
metal gate on the right.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.5035 °N -79.1309 °W
6. Property size (acres): 52.7 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Cane Creek
8. River Basin: Roanoke (03010104)
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 13

9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: This site is characterized by a series of headwater tributaries
that run throu>?h active pasture. The property had been converted from forest to pasture over
the last thirty years. Narrow and/or sparse riparian buffers remain in certain areas. As a result
of these changes in land use, the project streams have become highly incised with eroding
banks. The cattle still have access to the project streams. The surrounding; land use is
characterized by pasture and forest with patches of agriculture and rural homes.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: This proiect
will entail stream restoration and enhancement activities. In restoration areas the channel
will be relocated in areas where it is appropriate. In other restoration sections the existing
channel will have its bed and banks improved. Enhancement reaches will have the bed and/or
banks reshaped. Grade control and habitat structures will be installed to provide additional
stability and variability to the streams. This type of work involves equipment such as
bulldozers, track hoes, track trucks, and dump trucks. Timber mats and tracked equipment
will be used in the wetland area.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: This project is afull-delivery project FDP)
performed for the Ecosystem Enhancement Pro~(EEP~. The stream restoration and
enhancement activities are desi ed to provide stream mitigation credits for impacts in the
Roanoke Subbasin 03010104.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 13

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
This project proposes to restore and enhance 17 465 linear feet stream that have been impacted
by logging and grating This type of work involves rehabilitatin existing streams so that they
have the appropriate pattern profile and dimension Specifically this project will incorporate
the following actions: relocating certain sections of channel; working within existing channels to
reform the banks and/or bed; installing grade control and habitat structures such as step Wools
and cross vanes: stabilizing incoming seeps and drainages- installing livestock exclusion fencing-
and replanting riparian buffers.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flnndin~_
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 Fill Ditch Forested No 0 0.004

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.004
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.688 acre
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 13

plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number

(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width

Before Im act Impact
Length

(linear feet) Area of
Impact

acres)
1 Tributary 1 Enh./Restoration Perennial 11.5 2,775 0.734
2 Tributary 2 Enh./Restoration Perennial 5.1 843 0.099
3 Tributary 3 Enh./Restoration Perennial 6.0 1,564 0.214
4 Tributary 4 Restoration Perennial 5.3 1,979 0.239
5 Tributary 5 Enh./Restoration Perennial 3.3 362 0.027
6A Tributary 6A Enhancement Perennial 3.0 89 0.006
6B Tributary 6B Enhancement Perennial 3.0 103 0.007
6AB Tributary 6AB Restoration Perennial 3.0 30 0.002
6C Tributary 6C Restoration Perennial 3.0 180 0.012
6 Tributary 6 Restoration Perennial 4.4 1,275 0.129
7A Tributary 7A Enhancement Perennial 3.0 136 0.009
7 Tributary 7 Enh./Restoration Perennial 7.6 5,619 0.975
8A Tributary 8A Enhancement Perennial 3.0 110 0.008
8 Tributary 8 Enhancement Perennial 4.0 449 0.041
9 Tributary 9 Enhancement Perennial 3.8 369 0.032
10 Tributary 10 Enhancement Perennial 12.9 1,582 0.469
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 17,465 3.005
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of

Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 3.005
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.004
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 3.009
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 17,465
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Updated 11!1/2005
Page 9 of 13

Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
This project will provide stream mitigation credits for impacts elsewhere within this 8-digit
HUC. The site offers an ideal opportunity to improve a series of headwater tributaries. In the
wetland, construction will be completed using timber mats and tracked equipment to minimize
impacts.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 13

but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Please see the attached Cane Creek Tributary Site Stream Restoration Plan.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://www.nceep.net/pages/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/statellocal) funds or the use of
public (federaUstate) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 13

Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* I ,..,.~pacte«~ Multiplier I Required
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendiculaz from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 13

XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

` Applicant/Agent's~Signature O Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 13

VIRGINIA
~__~
PPrcnn rnun4v Nnr4h f_arnlina
_~~
Z_ h
,~ _ _ _
~-_,\ ~-, PERSON
~~ ~ COUNTY
_,
_~ ~
--
Cape Creek ~ ~~~
-_ -_ ~~~/~V A
~ ~ ~~
.__ - ,
~~ ~ r
~ ~-
~a.
~_~ ~ '
VIRGINIA ~~ ~. ,
~ , ~
~_
/J
~_. e
CASWELL PERSON ~ /
i
--~//
_,
r
i ~-
~ ~. a ~
~,
ALAMANCE ORANGE DURHAM //~ ~ ~ m
GRANVILLE I~ ~~ ~~ ~ W'" ~~
~ ~~~
Cane Creek Tributary Site -Vicinity Map
~~
~~
~~
Project Site Location K C I
~ Major Roads "
~5.5[~( IATEti (7F N~
Other Roads "' e
~`i Major Streams and Rivers s
1:63,360 ~
- Major Lakes and Reservoirs I inch equals 1 miles
TECHNOLOGIES ~ County Boundaries l os o i ~~,,,,~,,,,,~,,,~TK~„a~,E~
Miles

~
/
`
'
, 4 '
ry'
L..r
~ -_ ~"_- . ~
. _ - .,
\
. \ 11 -, / ~
1. ` ? > ~ r;/ 1

r
` F
t
~~
~
`,
`
``
r
`
~ _
~
q
h
til~~~ - j~~i
~I
+
~`
'~
l. 1
L..,,1~,~ l ~-- t~.
.,
/` ly
~`•
~
' + iL
1 '~~ -
v s
r ~? _ \~ I (
~ 5:'l - t
+ ~ ~ ~r ~ r i ;~ - '!'' i
1~„ (l
+ ~
`rJ
•~~
r ~
Y
~
'
,/
~ r
r
.
{
,
~_y
.~~- ~`.
ti
(l
;
:?~ '~~t~j ,e ~ ' 1 ~~Jir 1,
1 1 ->'_ ' r ' Abp ;
{/
~
`, fi4
~
~~
/
'
l/ J
r
` f~-w, i
'; \~t~
~t
~`
~
-
1) /
_
9
~
`'~ ~T
~r \ ~~
~
~~
(-~
2
J
~
\
/~
J
r
•
,
.\
''i'Y" Z
1
I r 1 ~ 1 / .~
_
2
) t }
It.r-

~
~ ~
~
~
~ \
I J /:~; ~ i\\
1 ~i, \ `.
'. II ~ ~I .a t.j
/~~
:~
~
/
a ~ ~ ~~
' ~ ~
1 it -~-,
r -' r 1' t~ ~. \~--, is 5 ~~,~,/ ~ ,.
q t\ j ~- (\
1 X ~,r'~ --: ~ ~ ~ ,
'f / ~ r 1
1
,
•..
.
,.
!
-~
fo
~
t
~
~ ~
-~ ~ tOla r .
°"
:~
,
~`
.
-~~F~•
lr~.
+j..
I ~,,,r
,al
.. ~.. j,r,j `\. ~ r_ ~~S\, 7, I'~. ',\ f.N
't ~I) ~ t \ r (`~~c~l/{'d ~~t.:,}sf.
'
~
~/
~
~
~
~ ~;-s~-- ti ~ _- ~
,~;;~
1.. '~~~~_t c ~r ~, 6. ~I. •:~~ '
'
-
~
}
~
_
J \ ! 4 J r ~.II !i
\[t + . -~C C
., r
~
~~'~
4
"/
l `__.,r
~ (rr r.l #~ fiC l l f \~ I I t ~ ; \ + L fL., ~ l .'` {
,~
~~
~
"' I
'Y~~
'~.~ ~q i i
? /.
r : ~ >~~5.;
I
.~ ~
t
•I •~ / ~., ~ ~f .( \I ~l ~. ~ t,t ~ :\ i l~,
~i-.
\
t `
`
~
t ~f
' ;_
~~,
'
`
-
I }
{\
1 . /` T
`~`!
1.
- ~
~
"C333yyy
...
~
.•
~T; .,` ~ ~ i ;}~ Iti'~a .
`s~~l~
'~_-~.'S'~~ '~+~' ~~
•{lk ~
~ r ...''t ~ r` `~,J
`
,6!)~r r
I
`
al
[' -
r
'
~1
' \ • \~ l
58~"
( ~'
,• e ~ ^.
~} ~ r \ /.~
~~ ~
-
fi -
A r
~
~
(
v.l I
~~. ~~~ %r ~\ 'S r / ~ ~ _ /. { ;
r
J
L
~4 ``1 /`~ ~11f. ~ 1 t jam, ~+.r-,

~
~
~~t ~
t /'
\
:d
'Y(if f
f[ V'~ {
i• 1
`
lil
.
\
~ _
t
r ~
r
~
;
!`3'
/~
T: ) 'j
T^+ ~ ~/~~ J
f c"~/-~r-
III ~ ~
~: {
z .
a
` ~g• _/H "
•+t
, 1
{1 ~
~
~
C
} ;
:
,
r
v,Y
/ r~
`•y
~ '
t1
Jr~'
"47 l,
~
t
n
ti
~~~.
PM
~
2.; ` }.
i,
~
~
, I ~
~
~
...
.>,
jP.
~
f
ZQQ
.~ :J'
,1 /1 }t' ~ ~t i ~ r;t 1``\ '_. .:d•! r ~,, 6 ~jl 1
~ . I_
'`+
Y: L1.,~ /•yI C~' .. ~r~_~15 ;a ..
L .' _~ S ! I '~ :_1(' +~ Jr !~ \
7 *
J ~~~i~'~1 {ICI ~~,y / I - ~.. ~~~Y-.p' frif, i~
.
~ + _
1 I ~ 1 : - ~ / ,. t ; rr I ~ ~ ~. 1 ~r•1 ` I~r ~~ .~ lilt/ ~ r~-~ ''n "-'~ i \
r ~
. ( ~JC`-.!~J v : ; 1 r r ,_ i ` , ~~~ .
4 _ . ¢ l ; \~i c y ~C. , t } 17
, -
_
F •~: I- r11 I f.Fs '!'p ~ 4i\ r 1
~
,
"
'
"
9~ ~ +
/ '~ ~~ ~' l /
J ~
~ _ I \• ~ Q , ~'• I
~V! i
I~.rl
j
~ `- rr?..,^
T
~ /~\ +
1~~
l+t
fi
~. C
y ~ ~`
I-
_
\
~ 1 _
~~
-5_
~' X_ • ' - t r . 0 ~ \s 'I f r +
~
a
~. ~
-
r
~
~ ~
~"
t ~~
/
~ J
",~~
,Vi
7F
~ I
f
' f~ -'?~7! ~ tt/ ~\ 11) ~ / WI) ti ~ Ihplr / ) r~
~ +
~.., r
r- f~%
~
't svr~' I
~~
~
~
_
,
l ,
.. ,,
/
,_
L
, ~X _~
te} f- -~ A r ~._ y ^v ~
:' S
I I_III F
: ~ ~ ~
.,
.
,
~
x, /
;
~ ,3, - _ -_ 1 , t,i \ ~', !!!'~'___
r
~
t
r
4r
T A
~Jl - ~
/
f~i
~
~
-
~••
~ r
\
~'~ -
t V '
1
~
~
1 ~
R.Yi-~~kli I !S4
r
r
9~ ~7;
~
~
~
s
L'ea§ r ~
-; }
"~-rte
F
~ -~~~ V
.
-~
oF:_ ,~ ~
f
~_
(•:;_
t~1
li
~~
~
'~-~--
i
>'
i
l
it
/ T
. ec p
- 1 ~:
~,, 3 s
f n7.J
~
C
~
~ ~
,
~ ~ `
l
a
~) ,
~~ :
J ~ `
r
Y ~
~~~ ;
{
~ ..,r ~ /1
V ' r i ~
.
1~'~,.r L
~
~
1 ~~
p - `'~
f
r
~
r ""1•C J ~
.. - - i' ~6'~ ~~~ y
~
• ~
/.--
° ,'` A P.1, ~_,
y L {~``
~:_J ~ /
~'~ ~
~'O 1
.
,
~.. /
F
la
~ ~~,-Iffv"S`% 1, rLr ~ tiI ~1 /(rl ~g ~~1 ~~.\~r
1~'
J
~ [~1 ,
-- .P ~ ?
~
'~
1~-+~(t ti
7
^'~i
. ~
`\ 3
.
a ,
57d- ~
S
. ,.°' .~d~r \, yY (f - - •1`. J` ~
`~ r-~, ~ ~)~ n,. ~~ ~ - ~~~~.~~~
r
I
~
~
~ ~
e
,.
,
~
.
'
~ t
_ r ~•. ,L ~t~ ~Jl /ZK, ` / (` I{ ~' C -S r }11
``,~'~~E. llVV~~/r' C)~~k r~ ~~- ~. ) r\ iV Jl~ 4`~.+ ' 1
( 1
~~
I
!^
I
+
ll
~
~
~ ~-~'~
s~j -' ~~r ~~"I' `' .~ If ~ ~
I ~, '1 ~
'
~
' i~
~ !
\
,~~r 4 '`
~;~3 /~~
~ ;
`{~rr~~'i~~~la~ii~~~~
.
'
~ ~ .n 13 ~ y 1
1 ~ ~,f'" ~ r So 'v ~Y,t(
! `, i4 2~-, riy --, .
r ~/~ 1/
.~~~'
'"@
$
~ ~~ 1"! t
" ~
~
~' "
..:,(~r~+~ r r~ +l 11, 7t/ ~ ~
y. ~ ~ ~ /
.
! c
P I ^ ~ ~i r \ ~ l ~~t
'~{ ' l`~
'~
`
~
f /
h3
5
~\ `
:
~ 5
,
,p'q ~.i"~ ~ _a
- ~.! T ,1 t. >>, ! i•°~ i
~ <-y \~ ..
,
S.
,,
1', ~~+r~.-- ~ _ I~y. B t. '\c
~ ~4 J~j~.. /~.,
D'~',
~
~ ~ ~ r .-w ! ~. ~v~, a r ,} 4 t.l ,1. 3 ~r..l
~ ~ U r~ ~ ~ ~~' tir'. r ~ ~ ~'. _~ ~ 5
`
r
r
~
` ~
J ~ d ^, ~ ll` -'}' ~ '~ i `{ , ~ 7/`
i ; ~ `y -r"~~'p ; '~ ~l ~ ~s ~ ` `I f '`~~t~ ~\ / `, pF1
~
•
`! . - ! P c... -.~~
~
R
,~~t r
hFr}.~ .-h .~.,..,~ ~;
"« 'I n. ~`• a!>
~ :~ ~ f

Cane Creek Tributary Site -Topographic Map r~rrrav irlra

~~

~ Extent of Project Parcels ~~

~~
E
s

124,000 ~
~
~~``uT~7 7 ~~--``T
T ~+I.HNOLOVIES sourzr-: uses rop~h,-rph;r-~r,~,dr~~,„t/~., I inch equals 2.000 feet
.41tonll9(~8/,[easbt,rg 11968/, :1 /illr"rr 11 GS?,. ~,QI)Q I•QQQ () ~(J(I(I ~
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOC-.IES
<n,d Oli,x~!/ilI !196N1 I.e ,l N•1D ~.ONSTRUCTION. INC.

rrw~~ ~ a
Vr I
i I ~ "iN' f II a ~ u 91 ....'~ ~ s $ 4 ~ '~ fir- r' 4A[ e~K w.i _, ~ nln:~"'~~p i ~~^.
r ~ ~ ra _ r I
r
~~ Y ~ ~~ + _ ~ { ri
% hl'~~~ dr~l ~~ ~ ~ - ~~~~ ~„~~ISr~~+P r'~"'~ 1~ ~ ~~ fl Yir ,: ~ ; ~ A ~ ~ ~'I~~~d~~~ .~ ~II~ ~II ~ II ~I~I~ I I I
' ,..... I
I j I tl r
" d ~ "'~~Ir '. d '--
~ffP ad Ipl Idyll ~ Yl~~~~p I I
r I,-
I
~ t~ III ~ }
- - u ~~ _ - _ I~..
F - I ~~
I ~ ~ I II~ ~ - I;I,
h"~I,,~ " ~ ~ a 5 III 1~1 I w III di .+-..^ J~,"+""",{ " V I u ~I rt~r, 'rt
~~ .M ,I V e~ ri *. ~ I II - ~ r ~ ~ C`~ `~ ~ ~^ a~li's h 'rrr ~,~
rd I I ~' ~ ~ .W ` d s i ~ H ~/'s W I`~~ M~ ~ 5
I IFlpl +a`ll ~,I ~a ,x. I ~ M ~'-" _~rl r" r 1 ~ ~~r, ~`` f" .t _ '"W~., x I ~ I ~I r L"A~ ~'?
Illh y VI I ^'~rlh dual npV~ w, r 'k r^~~ 4 ~ ~ „ A ~ ~. 1
~l d ~I r 9 Eldl ,7f~
I yl I Ihylf~ 9 III ~ a Ipl rdll ~. 4~f ~h II ~ ~~~ ~~~~ r d. ~~ ~ JI~m~ U d~y , x d
V~ III Ih.s II ~ S Y 171 ~.~ ~ r ~, ~ x _ ` m~j~' r=. ~ =,~wdN.r'-~''p }u ~ I n, ~~~
Y ~~' ~d I~ u~ ~ "hl~ I i~.. 'hur V o(i' r I ~. ~- I ~ O - P ~ ~.
~I p~l III I I ~I
~ ~ ° ~ ~ Ia ly ~ H r~ ~VI"I
~ti~glI I r~ y I I I d Ip ulll~~~~" II„ L,w ~~ ;u ,., {3~f3 -` ' I Ir I ~ ~rz '~ rlw,;
19 n I I f,W r u ~ I I. ^~ ,ul ~
~,hl iNla :.. U ~"'~~~...a ~'ilpliil `~ ~A ~a ~~ ~ I w%~~ IIVI F .' "T ~ 1'' '' ~-- ,',
ytA~
~I~Ip dl dTT "ll~rb r" I ~ - ~ ~ t
~ q' 11
W- ~ _
+ d Illlir _ I~ I ~ t~ II ~,y ~ - ~ a 9W r 6 ~~ ~ III I~" ~_~ rll I u - I
..,
ft" ~ ~~yld w g III a y IrnMe.. ~ ~ ~. ~ 4~~ II ~ ~_. w I~V1
iln I ~ ~~, I Ir r8~ ~ V
I II~ I I~. ; S1. ?:.~.. ~ 'rl°; ~. ~vl Id r hl tile: % h ^,
µ-~ N4
Cane Creek Tributary Site -NRCS Soil Survey ~~~
~~
~~
~~
Extent of Project Parcels K C I
N
W A ASSOGATES OF NC
~~l"p E
s
:24,000 ~~~
~` ~'^ 1 inch equals 2,000 feet
TECHNOLOGIES 2,000 1,000 O 2,000 ENVIRONMEN7Al1EGHNOLOGIES
Source: Soil Swve~~ of Person Counh°. NRCS 1995 Feet •,N~ CONSTRUCTION. INC.

R
j5 3~r ~ ~ F /~
~~•• I `~fa' Project Entrance
~ ~ y '~ ~ ~ ~' at Metal Gatd ' ~W ~ ~,-
Cu haRf Rd t ~~ ~ ~"~' ~ ~~
~' _ y . ~ ~~~ ~ hibutary 7 ~ 'butary 7a t F 1 ~ ~=r
t} ~ ry
~ bola 3 `'~_ ~°'~ hibutary 8 ~ - '`~
~ P hibutary 4 ,,
I ~ ~
t t ~ . , , , ,,,.
~~
~ hibuta
r ~~ +as_
etland - ~ ~ hibutary 66 x •l r .. • ' +
' IwFn' x x
~ ~ hibut a ~' ~
' r;=_ ~ ~ry ~ hibutary '/
~° _,~`~ ~ ` ,
r~~~ ,*,,~ ~ rte' ~ ,,~e+`'"- ~ ~t '~ ~
~ I
s
~- -
^~~~.r ~ r ~ 7~~ - I r , ~ is I:
7Y~butary 2 ' . ~`Nti w rr ,..+','+'~`'« '." , > ~Sr ~ y r
~' k ~ M 7 • -
,:j - •r. Y~ . ~ i/ ~• a ~, !y ~ r~: ~ ~7.1
ry Lr-f ~
r ~ v
~ , Y't y1 « [ ~~ ~"
' ~ r + n8 Gr ~' ~ ~ ~ d ,t~.w
~ ~ 'M r~r„ d ~ ;~ a/t ~ i~' t"F ~ ~ ~'M_,' i '+~41 ~"A m'.
x z-
Cane Creek Tributary Site -Site Map
~~
~~
Extent of Project Parcels ~~
Project Easement N K C I
W ~ E a~~c~a;arES c,F tir
~~/ Project Streams
s
~i Other Streams 1:9,600
1 inch equals 800 fcct
S00 400 0 R00 -~
TECHNOLOGIES ~~~` E""R°""'~"'"` r~`""°`°~'~s
PND CONSTRUCTION. INC.
lulu e Source: Person Counm G/S. Or~huirnu ei~r _'004