20160551 Ver 1_More Info Received_20160629

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 2761-5 • Phone: {919) 846-5900 • Pax: [phone]
sandec.com
June 29, 2016
S&EC Project #12175.W19
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: James Lastinger
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Ste. 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Deer Creek & Offsite Gravity Sewer -Incomplete Application Notification Response
AID# SAW -2013-02263
Apex, Wake County, NC
Mr. Lastinger:
Per your Incomplete Notification dated June 2, 2016, we are providing you with the requested additional
information in order for you to continue your review of the Pre -Construction Notification application for the
Deer Creek & Offsite Gravity Sewer project.
® Your application did not include a statement explaining how avoidance and minimization for
losses of waters of the U.S. were achieved on the project site (see remarks).
Remarks:
1. The present layout of roadway infrastructure for the proposed project does not depict logical
termini leading to the potential for further/future jurisdictional impacts associated with
roadway impacts on adjacent parcels, therefore the Corps is unable to determine whether the
activity authorized under the nationwide permit will result in more than minimal individual or
cumulative adverse environmental effects. Please provide further information on the potential
for adverse cumulative effects due to stub roads to adjacent properties.
On June 9, 2016, we had a meeting to discuss the potential cumulative impacts related to adjacent
properties. To the north and east, it was determined to be not an issue. There are no features
present on the USGS to indicate future cumulative impacts. To the south, Ed Tang the project
engineer explained that Meritage Homes (Meritage) had contemplated purchasing the southern
parcel and that Meritage had paid to have a wetland & stream delineation completed on this property,
in addition to a preliminary development plan. The plan was designed such that the stub to the south
would enter the property in the uplands and stream impacts were avoided. Brian Ketcham, the
applicant and Meritage Homes & Director of Entitlement, indicated that there was not enough viable
land to get the required lot yield, in addition to the Town of Apex requirement that 30% be set aside
for commercial development. With these issues, Meritage walked away from the parcel of land.
2. Your avoidance and minimization justification is insufficient. Please provide a more robust
justification for the current location of the stream and wetland crossings, and if/why other
crossing options that could have less impacts to jurisdictional waters were not utilized.
Specifically why/why not road crossing 2A, 513 cannot be moved to avoid wetland impacts at

those locations. As well as a detailed explanation for not utilizing bore and jack methods to
avoid wetland and stream impacts associated with sewer line installation.
In the June 910 meeting, it was discussed that the Town of Apex would require Cast In Place (CIP)
retaining walls at the wetland crossing locations 2A and 5B and that a comparison of the cost of the
CIP walls and the reduction in compensatory mitigation vs. the existing proposed impacts and current
mitigation should be completed to determine the cost difference in each scenario. To complete this
exercise, Ed Tang sketched new impact areas with a reduction in the wetland impacts that would be
reasonably expected with the use of CIP retaining walls (see attached exhibits). Brian Ketcham
contacted Oak City Contracting, LLC and requested a bid price on the CIP retaining walls for the two
crossings (see attached Bid), and I re -calculated the wetland mitigation fees with the wetland impact
reductions. The wetland impact reduction totaled 0.099 acres. In reviewing the decrease and the cost
associated with the CIP walls, there would be an estimated increase of $193,900.00 for the CIP walls
and no reduction in compensatory mitigation because we had to utilize the NCDMS for mitigation and
NCDMS only accepts mitigation in 0.25 increments (i.e. 0.72 vs. 0.52).
Bore and Jack methods were not utilized at sewer line crossings because preliminary boring studies
indicated bedrock along the streams for the project.
3. Furthermore, the Corps believes that the greenway trail at impact areas 3 and 4A can be
avoided by relocating the greenway away from jurisdictional features, or the utilization of foot
bridges that require no impacts to jurisdictional waters. Please revise the greenway trail to
minimize impacts or provide a detailed explanation of why this plan cannot be practically
accomplished, reduced or reconfigured to better minimize impacts to jurisdictional features.
Impacts 3 and 4A have now been modified to include pedestrian bridge crossings to avoid permanent
stream impacts in these locations. However, there was proposed gravity sewer at these crossing
locations so now we are proposing only temporary stream impacts at impact locations 3 & 4A. This
addition of pedestrian bridges has reduced the Permanent and the Permanent, No Permanent Loss
stream impacts by 143 linear feet. Please see attached updated Exhibits 3, 4, 12 & 13, and the
"typical Ped Bridge for Greenway".
Please see updated Impact Summary below:
If you have any further questions or any additional information is needed, please don't hesitate to call me
at 9 19-846-5900.
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONS LTANTS, PA
PeborSa%Ee
. Shirley
Environmental Specialist
Cc: NCDENR DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit -Archdale Building, 9" floor, 512 Salisbury Street,
Raleigh
Brian Ketchem-Meritage Homes (electronic)
-2-
Previously Requested
Updated Request
Stream Im act (acres):
0.046
0.045
Wetland Impact (acres):
0.453 (total permanent loss=
0.345)
0.453 (total permanent loss=
0.345
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. acres
0.499
0.498
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
468 (total Permanent Loss =
186)
395 (total Permanent Loss =
90
If you have any further questions or any additional information is needed, please don't hesitate to call me
at 9 19-846-5900.
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONS LTANTS, PA
PeborSa%Ee
. Shirley
Environmental Specialist
Cc: NCDENR DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit -Archdale Building, 9" floor, 512 Salisbury Street,
Raleigh
Brian Ketchem-Meritage Homes (electronic)
-2-

Attachments:
1) USACE Incomplete Application Notification
2) Impact sketch drawings for Impacts 2A and 5B \
3) Oak City Contracting, LLC Bid
4) Updated PCN sheet 5-9
5) Updated Overall Site Plan
6) Updated Impact Exhibits for 3 & 4A
7) Updated profiles for 3 & 4A
—3—

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2013-02263 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -NEW HILL
INCOMPLETE APPLICATION
Property Owner: Meritaee Homes of the Carolinas Aeent: Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA
Brian Kelchem Deborah Shirley
Address: 3005 Carrington Mill Blvd. Address: 8412 Falls of Neuse Road
suite 100 Suite 104
Morrisville , NC, 27560 Raleigh, NC, 27615
Location/Description of Proposed Activity: The project site known as the proposed Deer Creek residential
Type of Permit Applied For (check one): IP ❑ NWP ® GP ❑
Applicable law: Section 404 of the Clean Water Act®; Section 10, Rivers and Harbor Act ❑
YOUR APPLICATION IS INCOMPLETE AND CANNOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING
INFORMATION IS RECEIVED (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Your application form has not been completed and/or signed (see remarks)
❑ Under the conditions of the Nationwide Permit, mitigation is required for your project. The mitigation
proposal submitted with your application is insufficient. (see remarks.)
® Your application did not include a statement explaining how avoidance and minimization for losses of
waters of the U.S. were achieved on the project site. (see remarks)
❑ Your submitted project plans or maps were insufficient, too large, or not legible (see remarks).
❑ Your application did not include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands, vegetated
shallows, and riffle and pool complexes as required.
❑ You must submit a copy of your application to the NC Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) since your
proposed work is in a designated trout water county (see remarks section below for the address of your WRC
representative)
® Other (see remarks below).
REMARKS:
1. The present layout of roadway infrastructure for the proposed project does not
depict logical termini leading to the potential for further/future jurisdictional
impacts associated with roadway impacts on adjacent parcels, therefore the Corps is
unable to determine whether the activity authorized under the nationwide permit
will result in more than minimal individual or cumulative adverse environmental
effects. Please provide further information on the potential for adverse cumulative
effects due to stub roads to adjacent properties.
2. Your avoidance and minimization justification is insufficient. Please provide a more
robust justification for the current location of the stream and wetland crossings, and
if/why other crossing options that could have less impacts to jurisdictional waters
Page 1 of 2

were not utilized. Specifically why/why not road crossing 2A, 5B cannot be moved to
avoid wetland impacts at those locations. As well as a detailed explanation for not
utilizing bore and jack methods to avoid wetland and stream impacts associated with
sewer line installation.
3. Furthermore, the Corps believes that the greenway trail at impact areas 3, and 4A
can be avoided by relocating the greenway away from jurisdictional features, or the
utilization of foot bridges that require no impacts to jurisdictional waters. Please
revise the greenway trail to minimize impacts or provide a detailed explanation of
why this plan cannot be practically accomplished, reduced or reconfigured to better
minimize impacts to jurisdictional features.
Please submit the above information within 30 days of receipt of this Notification or we will
consider your application withdrawn and close the file. Please call or email
(✓[e-mail] me ifyou have any questions.
Digitally signed by
INGERJAMS.C.1 362
LASTINGER.JAME DN: c=US, o=USEGovernment,
Date: June 2. 2016 S.C.1363642400 cn=LASTINGERJAME5.1C1363642400
Date: 2016.06.02 07:53:41 -04'00'
Corps Regulatory Official: James Lastinger Telephone No: 919-5544884 x32
Corps Regulatory Field Office Address: 3331 Heritage Trade Dr., suite 105, Wake Forest. NC 27587
2

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
wetland
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
if known
W1 (#1) ® P ❑ T
Bypass Drainage &
Headwater
® Yes
® Corps
0.013
Greenway
Forest
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2(#2A) ®P ❑ T
Road Crossin
Headwater
® Yes
® Corps
0.123
Culvert 8 Fill
Forest
ElNo
ElDWQ
W3(#2A) ❑ P ®T
Road Crossing-
Headwater
® Yes
® Corps
Construction Corridor
Forest
El No
[-IDWQ0.017
W4(#2B) ❑ P ® T
Sanitary Sewer-
Headwater
® Yes
® Corps
0.005
Construction Corridor
Forest
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5(#5A) ® P ❑ T
Sanitary
Sewer(Permanent/
Bottomland
Hardwood
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.010
No Perm Loss)
W6(#SA) ❑ P ®T
Sanitary Sewer-
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.019
Construction Corridor
Hardwood
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W7(#58) ® P ❑ T
Road Crossing-
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.209
Culvert & Fill
Hardwood
❑ No
❑ DWQ
WS(#58) ❑ ®T
P
Road Crossing-
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.020
Construction Corridor
Hardwood
El No
❑ DWQ
W9(#5C) ® P El
Sanitary
Sewer(Permanent/
Bottomland
Hardwood
®Yes
El No
®Corps
❑ DWQ
0.019
No Perm Loss)
W10(#5C)❑P ®T
Sanitary Sewer-
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.018
Construction Corridor
Hardwood
F1 No
El DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.453
2h. Comments: Total proposed permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands= 0.345 acres; total proposed temporary impacts
to jurisdictional wetlands = 0.079 acres; total proposed permanent, no permanent loss impacts to wetlands= 0.029 acres.
Temporary impacts will be brought back to original contours and re -vegetated with wetland seed mix. Bold "Area of Impacts"
requires compensatory mitigation.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 (#3) ❑ P ® T
Greenway Crossing-
UT to Beaver
❑ PER
® Corps
1.5
Avoided
Construction Corridor
Creek
® INT
❑ DWQ
S2 (#3) ® P ❑ T
Greenway Crossing-
Culvert
UT to Beaver
❑ PER
® Corps
1.5
Avoided
Creek
® INT
❑ DWQ
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 6 of 13
Greenway Crossing -
S3 (#3) ® P ❑ T
Dissipater
(Permanent/No Perm
UT to Beaver
Creek
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
1.5
Avoided
Loss)
S3 (#3) ❑ P ® T
Sanitary Sewer -Open
UT to Beaver
❑ PER
® Corps
1.5
49
Cut
Creek
® INT
❑ DWQ
S4 (#4A) ❑ P ® T
Greenway Crossing-
UT to Beaver
® PER
® Corps
1.5
Avoided
Construction Corridor
Creek
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5(#4A) ®P El T
Greenway Crossing-
UT to Beaver
® PER
® Corps
1.5
Avoided
Culvert
Creek
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Greenway Crossing-
S6(#4A ® P ❑ T
Dissipater
(PermanenUNo Perm
UT to Beaver
Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
1.5
Avoided
Loss)
S6(#4A ❑ P ® T
Sanitary Sewer -Open
UT to Beaver
® PER
® Corps
1.5
41
Cut
Creek
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S7 (#4B) ® P El
Sanitary Sewer-
Open Cut w/keyed
UT to Beaver
Creek
® PER
El INT
® Corps
El DWQ
2
33
in Riprap
S8 (#5B) ❑ P ® T
Road Crossing-
UT to Beaver
® PER
® Corps
2
19
Construction Corridor
Creek
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S9 (#58) ®P El T
Road Crossing-
UT to Beaver
® PER
® Corps
2
90
Culvert
Creek
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Road Crossing-
S10(#5B) ®P ❑ T
Dissipater
UT to Beaver
® PER
® Corps
2
69
(PermanenUNo
Creek
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Perm Loss)
S11(#6) ®P El
Sanitary Sewer-
Open Cut w/keyed
UT to Beaver
Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
El DWQ
14
41
in Riprap
S12(#7) ®P El
Sanitary Sewer-
Open Cut w/keyed
UT to Beaver
Creek
® PER
❑INT
® Corps
❑DWQ
15
53
in Riprap
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
395
3i. Comments: Total proposed permanent loss = 90 linear feet of important, perennial stream; total proposed permanent, no
permanent loss = 196 linear feet of important, perennial stream; total proposed temporary = 60 linear feet of important,
perennial stream; total proposed impacts to intermittent stream = 49 linear feet. Temporary stream impacts will be brought
back to pre -construction elevations and banks stabilized. Bold "Impact Length" requires compensatory mitigation through
Corps and/or DWR
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individ ally list all open water im acts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water impact
Name of waterbody
number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent(P)or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
Page 6 of 13

5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Floo
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
dlo
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico ®Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d,
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for impact
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
required?
❑Yes
B1 ❑P❑T
❑ No
El Yes
B2❑P❑T
❑ No
❑Yes
B3 ❑P❑T
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: A no practical Alternatives request and review will be completed by the Town of Apex
Page 7 of 13

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
la.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant contracted with S&EC to complete a wetland and Jordan Watershed Buffer evaluation for the entire property and
the offsite areas in order to identify the natural resources so that the project designers could design a site plan that would
minimize impacts to wetlands & streams to the maximum extent practicable. The proposed project includes eleven (11) impact
areas that include impacts to jurisdictional wetlands, streams and associated riparian buffers. Impact 1 includes a wetland
impact necessary for a greenway, and bypass drainage piping & pad from existing stormwater directed from New Hill Olive
Chapel road. This proposed impact will result in 0.013 acres of permanent wetland impacts. This impact has been minimized
by moving the greenway to the northwest to minimize wetland impacts. Impact 2A includes a wetland road crossing necessary
to provide access to the northern portion of the property. This proposed impact will result in 0.123 acres of permanent and
0.017 acres of temporary wetland impacts. This impact has been minimized by crossing the wetland at a near perpendicular
angle. Impact 2B includes a wetland impact associated with onsite gravity sewer. This proposed impact will result in 0.005
acres of temporary wetland impacts. Impact 3 includes a stream crossing necessary for onsite gravity sewer. This proposed
impact will result in 49 linear feet of temporary intermittent stream impacts. Impact 4A includes a stream crossing necessary for
onsite gravity sewer. This proposed impact will result in 41 linear feet of temporary perennial stream impacts. Impact 48
includes a stream impact associated with onsite gravity sewer. This proposed impact will result in 33 linear feet of permanent,
no permanent loss (i.e. keyed in riprap) stream impacts. Impact 5A includes a wetland impact associated with onsite gravity
sewer. This proposed impact will result in 0.010 acres permanent, no permanent loss and 0.019 acres of temporary wetland
impacts. This impact has been minimized by utilizing a narrower permanent maintenance corridor (i.e. permanent conversion).
Impact 5B includes stream and wetland impacts for a road crossing necessary to provide access to the eastern portion of the
property. The proposed wetland impacts will result in 0.209 acres of permanent and 0.020 acres of temporary impacts. The
proposed stream impacts will result in 19 linear feet of temporary, 90 linear feet of permanent, and 69 linear feet of permanent,
no permanent (i.e. dissipater) perennial stream impacts. This impact has been minimized by utilizing head walls and retaining
walls at the stream crossing, and crossing the wetland and stream at a near perpendicular angle. Impact 5C includes a wetland
impact associated with onsite gravity sewer. This proposed impact will result in 0.019 acres permanent, no permanent loss and
0.018 acres of temporary wetland impacts. This impact has been minimized by utilizing a narrower permanent maintenance
corridor (i.e. permanent conversion). Impact 6 includes a stream impact associated with offsite gravity sewer. This proposed
impact will result in 41 linear feet of permanent, no permanent loss (i.e. keyed in riprap) stream impacts. Impact 7 includes a
stream impact associated with offsite gravity sewer. This proposed impact will result in 53 linear feet of permanent, no
permanent loss (i.e. keyed in riprap) stream impacts.
Post construction, all temporary stream impacts will be brought back to pre -construction elevations and the stream banks will be
stabilized, additionally all temporary wetland impact areas will be brought back to original contours and will allowed to re -
vegetate with the natural seed source.
The applicant is aware of the regional conditions associated with the Nationwide Permits 29 & 12. With respect to residential
development conditions (NWP 29 -Regional Conditions section 4.0) the applicant does not anticipate any impacts to streams or
wetlands associated with stormwater facilities, there are no impact associated with single-family recreation facilities, there are no
permanent wetland or stream rills proposed within the floodwayRloodplain and the stream classification for this project is WS -IV,
NSW (i.e. not Outstanding Resource Waters, High Quality Waters, Coastal Wetlands or wetland adjacent to these waters). With
respect to utility line activities (NWP 12 -Regional Conditions section 4.0) the applicant does not propose to utilize directional
drilling,boring methods to install the sanitary sewer because considering the size of the site and the number of utility crossing
being required by the Town, it is cost prohibitive. Furthermore, the applicant recognizes that the proposed temporary impacts for
the sanitary sewer crossings will be for the minimum period of time required to complete the activity and that the wetlands and
stream must be returned to its pre -construction elevations and contours, that the proposed sanitary sewer crossings construction
corridor and easements will not exceed 40 feet in width, that the proposed sanitary sewer crossings should not cross federally
maintained channel and interfere with navigation, that this proposed sanitary sewer crossing is not a communication line or an
electrical line and therefore should comply with 4.5 & 4.6. And finally, the applicant is proposing that all temporary impact to
wetlands will be restored to pre -construction contours and will be re -vegetated, and a mitigation plan is included within Section
D.2. a, which includes compensatory mitigation In -Lieu payment for the conversion of forested wetlands to a herbaceous
permanently maintained corridor. Rip -rap will be avoided to the maximum extent practical.
1b.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Per
the project engineer., Contractor shall use pump arounds and temporary bypass channels to construct stream crossings
and work in the dry periods. Silt fence and tree protection fence will minimize the footprint of impacts where contractors
shall not encroach outside the work area. Sediment traps basins will be constructed in the areas upland of wetlands and
streams to minimize turbidity impacts to receiving waters. Standard residential construction equipment and techniques
will be utilized.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ® Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Quantity:
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
2861near feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.72 acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments: Compensatory wetland mitigation at 2:1 ratio for 0.345 acres of riparian wetlands (Impacts 1, 2A 8
5B); and 1:1 ratio for 0.029 acres of riparian wetlands (impacts 5A 8 5C -permanent conversion); Compensatory
Stream mitigation at 1:1 ratio for 286 linear feet of perennial, important stream (NCDWR-impacts 4B, 5B, 6 6 7)).
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) —required by DWQ
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Page 9 of 13

..x.-..�
?-
�
{}
�
..x.-..�

C>A^k K I Y NIF �
CONTRACTING, LL C
To: Medtage Homes
Address: 5400 Trinity Rd, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27607
Contact:
Phone:
Fax:
Brian Ketchem
919.926.2600
919.926.2601
Project Name: Deer Creek CIP Walls
Project Location:
Bid Number:
Bid Date:
Overexcavation/Backfill Retaining Walls
6020
Dressout Shoulders
7010
Item # Item Description
Estimated Quantity Unit
1010
General Conditions
5010
Temporary Seeding
6010
Overexcavation/Backfill Retaining Walls
6020
Dressout Shoulders
7010
Retaining Walls - Pour In Place
Notes:
• Budget based on Preliminary Design sketches.
Exclusions:
Undercut of unsuitable soils beneath footings
Permits/Fees
Rock Excavation
1.00 LS
1.00 LS
1.00 LS
1.00 LS
1.00 LS
Total Bid Price: $193,900.00
ACCEPTED: CONFIRMED:
The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and Oak City Contracting
are hereby accepted.
Buyer:
Signature:
Date of Acceptance:
Authorized Signature:
Estimator:
Page 1 of 1

sp♦l �v / � �"� � � ti \ ll�lll ! 1 vDt
i
1 �li♦1 �
STA�MANN YhT DIMPACTWI ND
/ </
/ !ERlwfM vh�VM WUR ,I.PIVN.ICYI
rtwnwrx2nuowK� !n2
5 n. ® uroonK
Hca � \ �\b elHw.�rPr smuuwncn. `�'' wM, n,ss
ba \\ \\
(. \ STREAM &1FFER IMPACTS IFCEND
II`l�lO 'a� Idf,lOKR 6TI6FPA, K1
bVa n �. \ \ zaE 2lPlcis ®,rmfv N.0 rc
to rbd
lD \ \ IpEIMiICI! b.WI VIOmCI
Aye'- -� ♦ 0\0 ♦♦ s\ ' v ♦IN,
XAV
♦
—� _ Rasaem Muimr¢wm � �� I��� v_♦ � __ � _� A
\\ x ` � . `rg�Fg :M1°v i� 1 0�� ' �♦ 7 � g e '-�, \�<♦ � � xcnuos
R v Date Dfff�—'..'m
DEER CREEK OVERALL SITE PLAN WithersRavenel
1�
❑
n,smles i w,Mrs I wn•.ya� '�
A x Wake County Noah Carolina uI-..-w..,...,.en

J I
\A'\ \`
UNIMPORTANT S.
STREAM
/ I // \ \ EX. TOP OF BANK
/ ; IS &
1EMPORARY \
49 LFJ 58 SF
�1 1 A\\1iV `\\\1V vac
5 r 1 \I \ l PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER
T I I 1 40' EASEMENT \
GREENWAY
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
� 1
11\
;
LEGEND
WETLANDS -
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS -
- 0 SF (0.0 AC)
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS -
® - 0 SF (0.0 AC)
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS (UNIMPORTANT) -
- 0 LF (0 SF)
GRAPHIC SCALE STREAM IMPACTS (UNIMPORTANT) -
ddddMMU - 0 LF (0 SF)
50 0 25 50 100
PERMANENTMO PERMANENT LOSS
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS -
- 49 LF (56 SF)
(UNIMPORTANT)
DEER CREEK
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS
110 WithersRavenel
1/ Engineersma Planners Surveyors
.--. ...n.. rv........ m...n. r,...c...
EXHIBIT 3
"SMxKcn'n0r—1 ","C 27511
191946933GOIkicemN: G06331vm'w.wllMrsravmeLcpn

/ /. /
/ IMPORTANTSTREAM c
PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER � w�
7_L_JJJ/ 1
PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER
/-30'UTILITY
EASEMENT
r�iOq of 87,NR J
TOP OF RIP RAP
TO MATCH
PRE -CONSTRUCTION
STREAM CONTOUR
RIPRAP DETAIL
N15
\ / I
EX. TOP OF BANK
�I j /
ISTREAMIMPACT4A
(TEMPORARY
41 LF.199SF
/ J 40'IEASEMENTi
/ /If
PEDESTRIAN /
1 BRIDGE I
X11 � 1
a
/ \'\\\, \ 1, i�� NOTE
STREAM IMPACT Q
I PERMANENTINO PERMANENT LOSS
33LF.I60SF
4/
THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE
/ RIP -RAP SHALL NOT EXCEED THE
ELEVATION OF THE ORIGINAL STREAM BED.
THE FLOW LINE OF THE STREAM SHALL BE
THE SAME AS IT WAS BEFORE
INSTALLATION.
LEGEND
WETLANDS -
RIP RAP
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS -
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS-
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS(IMPORTANT)-
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
STREAM IMPACTS(IMPORTANT)- & AJrdd
PERMANENTINO PERMANENT LOSS
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS -
(IMPORTANT)
- 0 SF (0 AC)
- 0 SF (0 AC)
- 0 LF (0 SF)
- 33 LF (60 SF)
- 41 LF (99 SF)
II I STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS I 1110 WithersRavenel _ I
DEER CREEK do Engineers I Ptanners I Surveyors
EXHIBIT 4 11 nrxK—, 0,-i C, NC 27511

13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50
GRAPHIC SCALE
I I I ❑ ers5 , V2f121
EXHIBIT 12 1/ neerI ftm l5arveyms
MKKenan hive Cary. NC$7511
DEER CREEK eo8.:— --- 11
—

16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 loo
STREAM CROSSING 4A - PROFILE�� Wlthersll ,ven
tts el
DEER CREEK III1 EnglneI Planners Surveyors
EXHIBIT 13 5..Km.. bm l Cary. NC 27511
...... w�._�_. _.,. ...a,,..a. t.919A69.33% I Ike a a: 0321—withers—enel mm

}(
)
�
\
±
-
)
§
\
�
o
•
/
_
�
m
�
\
\
�
\
§XM
z
(
)
r
2
f
`
/
�X
IE
\
m
-
\j
\
;
I
K
L
;R
0-
,
/
m
]
!
/