20160642 Ver 1_Application_20160628

PAID
pPalustnne Group
June 27, 2016
Ms. Tasha Alexander
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
2°16064
2
Re: 404/401 Permit (Nationwide 13) Application
Carolina Lake Bank Stabilization Project
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
Dear Ms. Alexander and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of our client, 221 South Rogers, LLC, Palustrine Group is submitting the enclosed joint
Section 404/401 Pre -Construction Notification Application for the above referenced project for your
review pursuant to Nationwide Permits 13 and General 401 Water Quality Certification number 3890.
This application is to conduct a stream stabilization as required by the City of Raleigh as a condition
for the building permit for the same property. The Certificate of Occupation is conditioned on
approval and implementation of the stream stabilization at the breach in the dam of the preexisting
Carolina Lake. The proposed stabilization is to construct a new channel to bypass the tight meander
bend which is contributing to the instability of the existing channel. The new channel provides a
more stable plan form than the existing channel as seen in the photo pages. The stream flows into
Crabtree Creek just upstream of the confluence with the Neuse River. It is located at approximately
35.769708°N, -78.551333°W. The following information is included as part of this application
submittal:
• Project Summary Sheet
• Pre -Construction Notification Form
• Project Site Figures
o Figure 1— Vicinity
o Figure 2 — USGS Topo (Raleigh East Quadrangle, 1987)
o Figure 3 — JD Features and Proposed Impacts (2015 Aerial Photograph)
• Construction Drawings for Channel Stabilization
• Project Site Photo Pages
• Jurisdictional Map with Topography
• NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter Package

The project is located at 221 South Rogers Lane in the City of Raleigh, Wake County, North
Carolina. Existing land use in the vicinity of the project commercial development.
The 404/401 (NWP 13) application presents site conditions evaluated by Palustrine Group staff
(Norton Webster) on May 6, 2016.
The proposed project seeks to stabilize the existing dam breach by constructing a new channel that
will provide a more stable bed form than the existing conditions. The property has been assessed for
the potential of developing a stream mitigation site. The Corps (Mr. Todd Tugwell) and NCDWR
(James Graham) reviewed the site. Plans are being developed to move forward with a more
expansive mitigation plan but the City of Raleigh requires stabilization of the dam breach as part of
the building permit process. .
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions, or if additional
information is necessary.
Sincerely,
Palustrine Group, LLC
Norton Webster
Environmental Scientist
Attachments
Cc: Lindsay Sewell
Brookwood Capital Partners
400 W. North Street # 112
Raleigh, NC 27603

0F O�WA LIZ.?
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification C Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 or General Permit (GP) number: 3885
1 c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Carolina Lake Bank Stabilization
2b. County:
Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
221 Rogers LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
016003/00638
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Lindsay Sewell
3d. Street address:
400 W. North Street #112
3e City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27603
3f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g. Fax no.:
n/a
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
1c. Property size:
4d. Street address:
2. Surface Waters
4e. City, state, zip:
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
4f. Telephone no.:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
4g. Fax no.:
2c. River basin:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Norton Webster
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Palustrine Group
5c. Street address:
35 Thompson St, Suite 205
5d. City, state, zip:
Pittsboro, NC 27312
5e. Telephone no.:
919-548-0949
5f. Fax no.:
n/a
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
PIN 1733256345
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.769708 Longitude: -78.551333
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
36.59 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
UT to Crabtree Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Neuse (HUC 03020201)
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area is located at 221 South Rogers Lane in the City of Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina. Existing land
use in the vicinity of the project includes mostly commercial properties. The existing property is being developed into
warehouse space.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
3.7
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
4,000 of existing perennial stream
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to stabilize the dam breach as required by the City of Raleigh for the project's certification of
occupation
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will require the use of an excavator to lay back the existing slopes which will be seeded and matted. Constructed
riffles with three log J -hooks with boulders will be constructed to deflect the thalwag along with a double drop cross -vane to
hold qrade at the connection of the existing channel.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes F-1 No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Delineation verified but not signed.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Please see attached.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The site is being developed as a stream mitigation site. The IRT and NCDWR have reviewed the site. The project will
move forward with development once a mitigation user is identified.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact number —
Type of
Permanent (P) or
Type of impact
Type of
Forested
jurisdiction
Area of
Temporary m
wetland
(Corps - 404,
impact
(if known)
10
(acres)
DWQ — non -
404, other
W1 ❑ P [:IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact number -
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of
Average
Impact
Permanent (P) or
(PER) or
jurisdiction
stream
length
Temporary m
intermittent
(Corps -
width
(linear
(INT)?
404,10
(feet)
feet)
DWQ—
non-404,
other)
S1 - Impact 1
Stabilization of existing
UT to Crabtree
® PER
® Corps
❑ P ® T
channel
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
8
415
S1 - Impact 2
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑P❑T
[:1 INT
❑DWQ
S1 — Impact 3
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑P❑T
[I INT
[3 DWQ
S1 - Impact 4
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑P❑T
El INT
El DWQ
S - Impact 5
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑P❑T
❑INT
[:1 DWQ
S - Impact 6
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑P❑T
❑INT
[:1 DWQ
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 415
3i. Comments: The proposed project will result channel stability and improved aquatic habitat.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑P❑T
4E Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
R Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other.
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
131 ❑ PIE T
access am
UT to Crabtree Creek
® Nos
B2 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Channel will be stabilized thus protecting the existing herbaceous riparian buffer.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Avoidance and Minimization are not practical because the project purpose is improving stream function.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All measures will be taken to minimize the impacts to the existing channel as well as the amount of sedimentation during
construction of the instream structures.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete If Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)-
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
6. Complete If Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
�
❑Yes No
Comments: Diffuse flow already exists on site and will not be altered.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The existing construction project has
one.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Raleigh
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will actually provide an improvement in water quality by reducing sedimentation into the stream.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Pedestrian survey performed by Palustrine Group staff on May 5, 2016.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?❑
Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service accessed 5/5/2016
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Project will not result in an increase in flood elevation.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Map Number 3700956800J (Effective Date
October 2, 2008)
Norton Webster
06/27/2016
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Date
is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 221 S. Rogers Lane, Raleigh, North Carolina
PARCEL ID: PIN 1733256345
STREET ADDRESS: Same as Above
Property Owner: 221 Rogers LLC
800 E. 9611 St. Ste. 175
Indianapolis, IN
The undersigned, registered property owner of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Norton Webster of the Palustrine Group, LLC
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
applying for a Nationwide 27 permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions
attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of
our knowledge
Authorized Signature: r.
Date: April 19, 2016

Ur
FigureI
Location
ocat a
Raleigh Knightdalt-
rV
=Figu=rel fZ,,, Ile I
Clayton
Figure 1 Notes:
Carolina Lake Legend
Wake County, North Carolina
Carolina Lake Parcel
0 1,300 2,600 Feet
Palustrin Group
I i i I I W�
r. I I

IW oft 4fftErM
2err

CAROLINA LAKE BANK STABILIZATION
221 S. RODGERS LANE, RALEIGH, NC 27610
PROJECT DESIGN CONTACTS
PROJECT OWNER
221 RODGERS LANE LLC
PROJECT MANAGER
NORTON WEBSTER
TITLE SHEET
PALUSTRINE GROUP
EXISTING CONDITIONS
919-546-0949
PROPOSED PLAN
[e-mail]
ENGINEER OF RECORD
GREG JENNINGS, PE, PHD
TYPICAL SECTIONS
JENNINGS ENVIRONMENTAL
0.67 SM (430 AC)
[phone]
1733256345
[e-mail]
CONSTRUCTION
JOSEPH WRIGHT
NA
WRIGHT CONTRACTING
VACANT
[phone]
)[e-mail]
INDEX
SHEET#
SHEET DESCRIPTION
1
TITLE SHEET
2
EXISTING CONDITIONS
3
PROPOSED PLAN
4
PROPOSED CHANNEL PROFILE
5
TYPICAL SECTIONS
VICINITY MAP
SITE DATA TABULATION
PROPERTY OWNER
221 RODGERS LLC
LOCATION
N 35° 46'09.4"
W 78° 33'03.8"
PHYSICALADDRESS
221 S. RODGERS LANE
RALEIGH, NC 27610
COUNTY
WAKE
RIVER BASIN
NUESE
STREAM
UT TO CRABTREE CR
DRAINAGE AREA
0.67 SM (430 AC)
PARCEL NUMBER
1733256345
PARCEL AREA
36.57 AC
TYPE AND USE
NA
LAND CLASS
VACANT
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TBD
Z
O pN
iU
0 V% n1 Z -.
U
z OXY
m�lu¢
wN�3 €y
gN �J
U �

_ _ sena. oEsicN nNo coNsmucnau. F7221
E BANK STABILIZATION
S. RODGERS LANE
�~WRIGHT�\ALEIGH, NC 27610
PRO ECTf
"' ' `' o CONTRACTING ( ) JENNINGS WAKE COUNTY
PH45E b _.—
EXISTING 2 O, 5

i
A
9
p A
x m
y
% x
y
x D
9 9
T
,
-1 n
v
v
m 0
H
y
O
O O
N m
�
Z
m
F
D
z
A
I � 1
1
BS
<Dm
G)
u o -
+
o
mom n
,21m cz
n
OD-U)ic i u)
n mmme =m
m>n n� n�
zmm Z* 0-0 \
cn �
i,r2 ym �O \ �S
---__� m A �T. \
0 X
^g O
.p
ca
m
,5� o
v
a
p+z o+oo Z
0+60
\\\\ D Z °o
+00 1+80 1+6 1+4 moo\ o Z
8a � m
\ �2x\ D X
N z
m G)
im
05 (D
c X 5 z!m O
�� . O
00
2� zL) M,0
1 O m 0 \ xl O �o D
=m 00 V c0»m �z
ZZ m� mm =m
mG) O�� D Ol
r _ D = z AR
m2 m0�2
X0 mar v
u D 00
n3 r /
o m
U)
r �
ADO
u u -u
SAO
0
0
N m
I O
�1
O
y m
D
I
0 6
F
C_ LAKE BANK STABILIZATION
E -E!
221 S. RODGERS LANE
El—�
WRIGHT RALEIGH, NC 27610
j)JENNINGS
�E�*• V� CONTHAGTING �---�----- WAKE COUNTY
PROPOSED PLAN I ;C75

(13) NOUVA313
j
00—���&0�� Oc y�a�
a', a,
Q>Q>O,�O, O>W W�JV .IV�VJVV WWWW� WWWW�cO� U'a(�
NWA �, O)J W,O�N WA WPI CU (pQ�NWA NW
-._._.._
��VW(O
.-
OA
CD �I y
GDS
OOT
CD
+ w °
o v
I
C)
II
CD'
+,
0
CD I
(13) NOUVAAl3
Ii
CD' I I
0 . GP�EaPE�Ps d
+�AC.71-V CpW��. m.yANm_�Q�N���
'+'
oot
o
I
CD
X
C)
o
II
CD j I
Im
Ao_
o i/ I
n
I
O /,.
'�
0
+
CD �I
w V
+
of _
+'
o. I (n
m
� I
} �y
z
N�D+ n '
> C=l
D
zi
I
z /IZ
z j' I
m
N r` / z
X
N. / M
�\ I
P�EaPE �" r°"
+ I
Z
J/
{' /
A I
o I
D
\ // rl
�
���
­21 mm
carnE/
O > I
�
00 I
z
D
m I
J
i
+'
o I
c
D
,
+
\ I
N I •�
G
+ o
I�
I
o'
CD
II
I
�
o
I
I
+ I
WN Acn O�N�AU,
O
O
W GP�BREuc sf='d�2435 '.
ELEVATION (FT)
o
G ➢ PaEu S =
W
m;
I
} iW N
+
CD
O o I <u
A caroEea = w i // � A
C
+ cawE eaEwa srw.'swaas
D
O
j l
ePEiac sr ..aom I.
Jm� mOo �'m Oom� COQ A(fl
O (T O CT O CT1 O U1
!
ELEVATION (FT)
_
_
'
sEu:
oesicri�rro carvsmicnav�
WRIGHT //�\��
( )�JENNINGS
CONTRACTING --.--
C. LAKE BANK STABILIZATION
221 S. RODGERS LANE
RALEIGH, NC 27610
WAKECOUNTY
PROP. PROFILES 5 OF 6

sEn� DESIGN uao coNsnxucnoN:
C. LAKE BANK STABILIZATION
AK S. RODGERS LANE
WRIGHT RALEIG 1 NC 27610
(--CTI I e CONTRACTING ( �) JENNINGS WAKE COUNTY
PKq I _a
TYP. SECTIONS 5 OF 5

ap
4s aR 1521
r
�s2
�Ag.......
Jill
an ,
(ro
g4^ti3p:E^
id
^�
yR
{�E V =gs1
eai3dR '^j
a? as
9
gy;F�s
F
I
R�`
7n _�
ay39�gt=FE�{1=94
�tl9'�z�
�8
FFHM4� Gg-
66iR
9
9�1P
�J
r
N
$
r
BOUNDARY AND
!
TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY
73 -,SM WS DB K15394 AG
I qN 1/7325546] DEED BOOK 15781 PARE 24ee
9 gN1171251�40DEE.—K7—,—aE2184
qN 113325-019 DEED BOOK 1579, PAGE 2460
WILLIAM F HAMLIN 1118
KATHERINE ANNE HAMLIN
221 S. ROGERS LANE
RALEIGH�NC2781U
2
^�
ECL S
...����'�` `
......c vsso

AL'i"AwA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
April 7, 2015
BCP Rogers, LLC
Lindsay Sewell
5400 ETTE Burke Court Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27606-1696
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Subject: Buffer Determination
NBRRO# 15-089
Wake County
Determination Type:
Buffer Call
Isolated or EIP Call
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
Start@
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
❑ Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Determination
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267)
❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
Project Name: Carolina Lake
Location/Directions: Property is located at 221 S. Rogers Lane, Raleigh, NC
Subject Stream: Crabtree Creek
Determination Date: March 27, 2014 Staff: James Graham
Feature
Not
Subject
E/1/P*
Start@
Stop@
Soil
USGS
/Flag
Subject
To
Survey
Topo
To
Buffers
Buffers
B**
X
P
X
X
C**
X
p
X
D**
X
P
X
X
E
X
P
X
X
Carolina
X
Not present
X
X
Lake
*F/1/P _ 1 nhPmorl/i..ta
.:*+o tin
1
**Features B, C, D are subject through the old lake bed, B and C connect with Feature D which exits at the breach
in the north Side of the dam into Feature E.
y�`
N�ohCarolina
ova mra!!b
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1628 Mad Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone]
Internet. www ncwaterguality org Location- 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Carolina Lake
Wake County
April 7, 2015
Page 2 of 2
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service c/o Karen Higgins DWR — 401 &
Buffer Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx,
etc.) Karen Higgins DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit 512 N. Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 2760.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Resources (Central Office) at (919)-807-6300, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact James Graham at (919) 7914256.
Respectfull ,
Danny Smith, S erviso
Water Quality Section
Raleigh Regional Office
cc: RRO/SWP File Copy
Jay Keller
Keller Environmental
7921 Haymarket Lane
Raleigh, NC 27615

CY)
00
Ln
r -I
V)
C',
r1i m
ai
ry')
0
U
I
Q)
r
u c
4i
Q)= Qj
fD
(n
Q)
L.
V) CL
o
0
z0
z
'w—'.
o
CY)
00
Ln
r -I
V)
C',
r1i m
ai
ry')
0
U
I

`• k .1 c'
O
M U c rn a s•
OQO
fo O.7Y: y,
r O N N j'.
0
° m O p Ln
U Z Z O ti V)
4` N
f, rN
- N
M ,..
la-
z CU
ro
Q: � ;y. � � ... � .fit•: •' i.
U- l/i
a
�f
C L
C 41'
O '
T
U.
cli
k .-
CL
v
Q N LL..N 1
m O +�'r
mV,
U- in
ro �.
w�.
Li V)
11