20160511 Ver 1_More Info Received_20160628

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name: Hendersonville Publix
2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: Halvorsen Development Corporation
3. Name of Consultant/Agent: Kiml!Z -Horn & Associates, Inc.
*Agent authorization needs to be attached
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): N/A
5. Site Address: 701 Greenville Highway, Hendersonville, NC 28792
7. City: Hendersonville
8. County: Henderson
9. Lat: 35.304473 Long: -82.458797 (Decimal Degrees Please)
10. Quadrangle Name: Hendersonville
11. Waterway: Johnson Drainage Ditch (Tributary to Mud Creek)
12. Watershed: HUC: 06010105/French Broad
13. Requested Action:
X Nationwide Permit # 14
General Permit #
X Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre -Application Request (Mitigation Proposal)
The following information will be completed by the Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:

Kimley»>Horn
June 3, 2016
Mr. David Brown
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Mr. Andrew W. Moore
Asheville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
2090 U.S. Hwy. 70
Swannanoa, N.C. 28778
Re: 404/401 Permit (Nationwide 14) Application
Hendersonville Publix
Hendersonville, Henderson County, NC
Dear Mr. Brown and Mr. Moore:
On behalf of our client, Halvorsen Holdings, LLC, Kimley-Horn is submitting the enclosed joint
Section 404/401 Preconstruction Notification Application for the above referenced project for your
review pursuant to Nationwide Permit 14 and General 401 Water Quality Certification number 3886.
This application is to conduct a culvert extension for the purpose of bank stabilization in Johnson
Drainage Ditch located at approximately 35.304473°N, -82.458797°W. The following information is
included as part of this application submittal:
• Project Summary Sheet
• Agent Authorization Form
• Pre -Construction Notification Form
• Project Site Figures
o Figure 1 — Vicinity
o Figure 2 — USGS Topo (Hendersonville Quadrangle, 2003)
o Figure 3 — SSURGO Soils (2015 Aerial Photograph)
o Figure 4 — JD Features and Proposed Impacts (2015 Aerial Photograph)
o Figure 5 — FEMA Map
• Site Construction Plans for South Market Village
• Project Site Data forms
o USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
o NCDWQ Stream Identification Form
• Project Site Photo Pages
• Agency Correspondence

Kim ey>))Horn Paget
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
The 404/401 (NWP 14) application presents site conditions evaluated by Kimley-Horn staff (Chris
Tinklenberg, PWS) on September 30, 2015. The stream delineation was performed by utilizing
survey prepared by a licensed surveyor (verified by Kimley-Horn).
The project is located on the southwest quadrant of White Street and Greenville Highway (Hwy 25)
in the City of Hendersonville, Henderson County, North Carolina. Existing land use in the vicinity of
the project commercial development. The proposed project seeks to construct a f 50,000 SF Publix
Grocery anchor with two 9,600 SF of additional retail adjacent to Greenville Highway. The site plan
will also include a new parking lot and two outparcels to be developed in the future. Offsite roadway
improvements are necessary in order to service the new shopping center including widening for
additional turn lanes, driveways and sidewalks.
In order for a driveway to be constructed for the development at the corner of NC 225 (Greenville
Hwy) and White Street, a left turn lane is required by NCDOT (see attached correspondence letter) to
be installed on Greenville Hwy at the proposed entrance to the development. The addition of this
required left turn lane necessitates an extension of the existing 6 -foot by 8 -foot box culvert
underneath the Greenville Hwy. Additionally, sidewalk is required by the City of Hendersonville
along the road frontage, including the area above the proposed culvert extension. In order to place the
sidewalk along the roadway, NCDOT is requiring an addition of 30" curb & gutter for the safety of
the pedestrians and the addition of guardrail to protect vehicles from the unrecoverable slope and
water hazard within the clear recovery zone of the roadway and the headwall of the culvert.
The proposed project seeks to extend the existing concrete box culvert by 35 linear feet in order to
facilitate roadway widening for the required left turn lane and associated sidewalk, guardrail and curb
and gutter. The culvert extension will require 20 linear feet of temporary construction impacts
necessary to install impervious dikes, stone rings, and a pumped bypass to allow work in dry
conditions. The project will result in permanent impact to 35 linear feet of stream and 20 linear feet
of temporary stream impacts from the culvert extension. The proposed project will result in a net loss
of 35 linear feet of waters of the US.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions, or if additional
information is necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist

Kimley>>> Horn
Project Summary Sheet
Project Name: Hendersonville Publix
Applicant Name and Address: Mr. Thomas Vincent
Halvorsen Development Corporation
1877 S. Federal Highway, Suite 200
Boca Raton, FL 33432
Telephone Number: [phone]
Type of Request: ® Nationwide PCN (NWP # L4) ❑ Individual Permit Application
® Jurisdictional Determination ❑ Other:
Included Attachments: ® Project Plans ® USGS Map ® NRCS Soil Survey
® Agent Authorization ® Delineation Sketch ❑ Delineation Survey
❑ Data Forms (Up & Wet) ® NCDWR Stream Forms ® USACE Stream Forms
❑ NCEEP Confirmation ® Aerial Photo ® Site Photos
® Agency Correspondence ❑ Other: ❑ Other:
Check if applicable: ❑ CAMA County ® Trout County ❑ Isolated Waters
❑ Section 7, ESA ❑ Section 106, NHPA ❑ EFH
❑ Mitigation Proposed (❑ NC EEP ❑ On -Site ❑ Off -Site ❑ Other)
County: Henderson Nearest City/Town: Hendersonville
Waterway: Johnson Drainage Ditch
H.U.C.:06010105
Property Size (acres): 6.86
Site Coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.304473 °N
River Basin: French Broad
USGS Quad Name: Hendersonville
Approx. Size of Jurisdiction on Site (acres): 0.27
-82.458797 °W
Project Location: The project area is located at southwest quadrant of White Street and Greenville Highway (Hwy 25) in
the City of Hendersonville, Henderson County, North Carolina.
Site Description: Existing land use in the vicinity of the project is commercial properties.
Impact Summary (if applicable): The project will result in 35 linear feet of permanent stream impacts and 20 linear feet
of temporary stream impacts from the extension of a 6'x8' box culvert. The proposed project will result in a net loss of 35
linear feet of waters of the US.
NWP
#
Open Water
(acres)
Wetland Stream Channel
(acres) Intermittent and/or Unimportant Perennial and/or Important
Aquatic Function Aquatic Function
Temp.
Perm.
Temp. Perm. Temp. Perm.
Temp. Perm. if ac if ac if ac if Ac
14
20 0.004 35 0.006
Total
20 0.004 35 0.006
Total Permanent Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.006
Kimley-Horn Contact: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS Direct Number: [phone]
Email: chris.tinklenberg(a kimley-horn.com

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: Publix North Carolina, LP c/o Jeffrey Chamberlain
Address: _3300 Publix Corporate Parkway, Lakeland, Florida 33811
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/Description: South Market Village
Date: .lune 23. 2
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attention: David Brown
Field Office: Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
Publix North Carolina, LP hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to act in
my/our behalf as my/our agent solely for the purpose of processing Jurisdictional Determinations,
Section 404 permits/Section 401 Water Quality Certifications applications, and to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. fiom this day forward until successful
completion of the permitting process or revocation by the owner.
In addition, I, the undersigned, Owner of the properties identified herein, do authorize representatives of
the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated
with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this theday of ,
Publix North Carolina, LP c/o Jeffrey Chamberlain-
._._..
Print Property Owner's NaW operTyT w rer's Signature
Ce: Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: Halvorsen Development Corporation c/o Thomas Vincent
Address: 851 South Federal Highway Suite 201, Boca Raton, FL 33432
Phone: [phone]
ProjectNarne/Description: South Market Village
Date: May 9, 2016
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attention: David Brown
Field Office: Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
The Halvorsen Development Corporation hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. to act in my/our behalf as my/our agent solely for the purpose of processing
Jurisdictional Determinations, Section 404 permits/Section 401 Water Quality Certifications
applications, and to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from
this day forward until• successful completion of the permitting process or revocation by the owner.
In addition, I, the undersigned, a duly authorized optionee of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter
upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this the 9 day of May 2016
Print Property Owner's Name Property Oer'&Silgnature
Cc: Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650

o�0 W ATF9QG
' Em
I I >
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page l of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
N No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401
Certification:
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
N No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
N No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
N No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Hendersonville Publix
2b.
County:
Henderson
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Hendersonville
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
See attached Preliminary JD Request
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page l of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
Thomas Vincent
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Halvorsen Development Corporation
4d.
Street address:
851 South Federal Highway Suite 201
4e.
City, state, zip:
Boca Raton, FL 33432
4f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g.
Fax no.:
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
4h.
Email address:
River basin:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
5e.
Telephone no.:
704-409-1802
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
See attached Preliminary JD Request
1b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.304473 Longitude: -82.458797
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
6.86 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Johnson Drainage Ditch (Tributary to Mud Creek)
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c.
River basin:
French Broad (HUC 06010105)
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area is located at the intersection of White Street and Greenville Highway (Hwy 25) in the southwest quadrant
in the City of Hendersonville, Henderson County, North Carolina. Existing land use in the vicinity of the project includes
mostly commercial properties.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
—520 If of Mud Creek and 380 If of Johnson Drainage Ditch
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a commercial shopping center with associated parking lots and offsite roadway
improvements necessary to service the facility.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project seeks to construct a ± 50,000 SF Publix Grocery anchor with two 9,600 SF of additional retail adjacent
to Greenville Highway. The site plan will also include a new parking lot and two outparcels to be developed in the future.
Offsite roadway improvements are necessary in order to service the new shopping center including widening for additional
turn lanes, driveways and sidewalks.
In order for a driveway to be constructed for the development at the corner of NC 225 (Greenville Hwy) and White Street, a
left turn lane will be required to be installed on Greenville Hwy at the proposed entrance to the development. The addition of
this required left turn lane necessitates an extension of the existing 6 -foot by 8 -foot box culvert underneath the Greenville
Hwy. Additionally, sidewalk is required by the City of Hendersonville along the road frontage, including the area above the
proposed culvert extension. In order to place the sidewalk along the roadway, NCDOT is requiring an addition of 30" curb &
gutter for the safety of the pedestrians and the addition of guardrail to protect vehicles from the unrecoverable slope and
water hazard within the clear recovery zone of the roadway and the headwall of the culvert.
The proposed project seeks to extend the existing concrete box culvert by 35 linear feet in order to facilitate roadway widening
for the required left turn lane and associated sidewalk, guardrail and curb and gutter. The culvert extension will require 20
linear feet of temporary construction impacts necessary to install impervious dikes, stone rings, and a pumped bypass to allow
work in dry conditions. The project will result in permanent impact to 35 linear feet of stream and 20 linear feet of temporary
stream impacts from the culvert extension. The proposed project will result in a net loss of 35 linear feet of waters of the US.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes ®No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact number —
Type of
Permanent (P) or
Type of impact
Type of
Forested
jurisdiction
Area of
Temporary (T)
wetland
(Corps - 404,
impact
(if known)
10
(acres)
DWQ — non -
404, other)
W 1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact number -
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of
Average
Impact
Permanent (P) or
(PER) or
jurisdiction
stream
length
Temporary (T)
intermittent
(Corps -
width
(linear
(INT)?
404, 10
(feet)
feet)
DWQ —
non -404,
other)
S1 - Impact 1
Culvert Extension
Johnson
® PER
® Corps
8
35
® P E] T
Drainage Ditch
❑ INT
® DWQ
S1 — Impact 2
Construction activities
Johnson
E] PER
® Corps
8
20
E]P ® T
Drainage Ditch
❑ INT
® DWQ
S1 - Impact 4
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑P❑T
E] INT
❑DWQ
S - Impact 5
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑P❑T
❑INT
E] DWQ
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 55
3i. Comments: The proposed project will result in a net loss of 35 linear feet of waters of the US.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary (T)
impact
required?
131 ❑P❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
F1 Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The project will utilize particular care to culvert orientation and skew to minimize potential impacts to the stream bed. The
project will construct a custom built headwall and install handrails in order to maximize slope and minimize additional stream
impacts. The sidewalk was designed to the minimum width required to minimize impacts to the stream channel during and
post -construction.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The side -slopes are at a maximum of 2:1 to minimize stream impacts. Handrails and a headwall will be constructed to
maximize side -slopes. Temporary construction impacts will be limited to the installation of stone rings, impervious dike and
pumped diversion and all disturbed areas will be restored and/or stabilized when construction is complete.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
ElPayment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
68.1%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Water quality treatment for the South Market Village development by means of permanent Best Management Practices
(BMP's) will be provided using two proposed underground detention and water quality systems. The underground detention
systems are designed to treat the 1 -year, 1 -hour storm event runoff or the difference between the pre- and post -condition
runoff from the 1 -year, 24-hour storm event per the Hendersonville City Code and will draw down over a period of two to five
days. The under detention systems have been designed to provide a minimum 85% average annual removal of Total
Suspended Solids (TSS) requirements.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Hendersonville
® Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached? The Stormwater Management Plan is currently under review. The
approval will be provided to the NCDWR project manager once received from the
City.
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes
❑ No
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The culvert extension is to address channel side slope stability and will not cause any additional impacts.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewage disposal will be handled by existing infrastructure
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5.
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a.
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b.
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts? A copy of this application will be provided to USFWS-Asheville
F-1 Raleigh
5c.
If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program; Pedestrian survey performed by Kimley Horn staff on September 12, 2014.
6.
Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a.
Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
7.
Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.
Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service accessed 5/5/2016
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a.
Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b.
If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Project will not result in an increase in flood elevation.
8c.
What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Map Number 3700956800J (Effective Date
October 2, 2008)
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS-
06/28/2016
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Date
is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

r
r7
carwedl S.
s
rnrn s Hil l Dr
-
2 5'�
�
LA
yJ
sA
e
Whit, SJ
1
if i�,
Hebran Ry
phi#eSJ
r
.a r awit
palkJlblrr�
jl ._..
i' 0 11
taF
3a
I
Cy
P@JlJly s
C.dW,
'i 47
/ 0,y_
t%
4i
q �I�N' Iti
�tl
f
Ota wo
ala t i�P
- i
-a vo
� r
a
fi, ?
s
u
.J
4p
12511
�r *
JON
L,lurel
Park
H�nd�rs�n}tal�
�
�•
coo
-
Figure 1
g Flat
E �+ = t F I o t
R"
*
rj
_
0
�F
G
711-i-nnia*•'ifl"
11
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Legend:
�[ rY1I f1 r1
0 500
1,000
Project Boundary
Ki1 1 f ley )}) Hoo 1
Feet
I

4,
qp
s ,d►
R'v .-
�r � � • �+ •_ mss;
i
� • — r;fin
w
r
Fi V L) qpt
s
43
ib
• i
• * # '� of
46 t / a
lk
,r !
i • # Copyright:© 20ti103 tion+aIII eographic,Society, ii -.cubed
Figure 2: USGS Topo (Hendersonville Quad, Rev 2003) Legend:
rY1
I �� ry 0 500 1,000 � Project Boundary
i mley ))) Horri Feet I

se
pMiff`'
)i
'a .(=�' r' . 't -
4
t ,
,,. ,/ .►°
� , 1 V+ �,V

1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 11 1 12 1 13 1 14 1 15
20' DISTURBANCE SAM E RIDDLE AND WIFE, SAM E. RIDDLE AND I
ALLOWED RBANC LINDA S. RIDDLE WIFE, LINDA S RIDDLE SAM E. RIDDLE AND WIFE, CITY OF OR FORMERLY)
STREAM E DB 770, PG 849 LINDA S. RIDDLE (NOW OR FORMERLYI
M BUFFER �2ARCEL 0116726 DB 771, PG 007 DB 1470, PG 426 LARRY BAKER AND WIFE
30' UNDISTU �# PARCEL #9944647 PARCEL #1014267 ANNETTE BAKER j
RBEp SIRE \ PART OF DB 1402, PG 223
AM BUFFER e _ PART OF TAX PARCEL 1017854
CITY OF HENDERSONVILE
1 \ AREA MARK D. THOMPSON
3,247 S0. FT OR AND WIFE,
TOP OF 0.075 ACRE LEAH H. THOMPSON
RIP -RAP APRON \ DB 1169, PG 270 J&D BURNS INVESTMENTS, LLC
BANK _ 1029, PC 749
CLASS 1 \ \ ` \ PARCEL #1014204 PARCEL 10111719
- _� APRON WIDTH (START) = 6' \ \
7,,��- _ V YED
-`
-777R-E­
J 1 K AM � � � � APRON WIDTH (END) = 12' SURVEYED �
CE_RLINE I - T TOB -
HENDERSON MLLE � i LENGTH = 8' BOB TO BOB \ � � � _
CITY LIMITS / 9= DEPTH = 18" - v v
� GR=2091.37
\ IN -2087.57
OUT -2087.07
CREEK - -
MUD � � � 12"RCP
TOP OF BANK--� ,. � � 24 "MA
30' UNDIS O o 9 N �. - - - = \'� = o "_ _ 12'R
TURBED ST 60 HW 10" WYE 1W Cf s - �� - _ I �
STREAM =
M BUFFER L _
- 2085 ST -03 -CB '� �_� ���208 w
20
DISTURBANC --• 90. `�
ALL OWE D STREAM B FFER 2088. \\- - - ®� _ =_?ap - ELEV 2083'
I �, /< 2092.83. ST -01 -MH
ST -61 -MH 12"X12 4" WYE \
2069.91 -- - - - - _ _ \
2090.61 2089.5 - - - -- - ' = = -Ir
CV
j SIt
T -CB -10 i 9 10. 0 - - - -\5
9ti - � - - 1
- 13094.00
� 2092.78 ~ � � 2087- � -•_�-� � _ � _
090.92 LP: 2091.63 2091.84 09 2094.00 2Og220g1 0090-
2090.00 I 2093.00
HENDITYOFERSON ILLE / IST -29 -CB
CITY OF 2091.82 2091.50 4" DS 12" WYE /W CO 2092.5- `D
DB 1107, PG 172 IE: 2087.0_ 12'12 X10 WYE 2091.04
rn 2092.81 12"X10"X4" WYE 10" DS A 20� 2092.42 i - -?!n,
PARCEL #9904276\ Nl 10" DS IE: 2087.3± ® n,
PARCEL 1
11IE: 2087.0±
/2093.98 10" WYE 1W CO 2092.42-1 (�
l 2093156 IE:, 084.6± 12"X1 0'10" WYE 2092.36 • " DS 2092.33 2 0 ° 2091• 090.85 3
4 DS 10 DS - 4092.09
1I E: 2084.2± I E: 2086.8± 093.95 2090.66 x
llj N 12" PVC 1.0% 12" PVC @ 1.0%
� MIN (TYP.) MIN (TYP.) �� 2092.70 `Og3 2092.11 20f.1 -
TIN. 2091.29 2 2.94 2091.19
2092.82 ST- -CB
BW: 2090.96 I / 2092.91 2093.25 'I /
i
2092.65 o P U B L IX GROCERY 0 2092.802092.76
2092.47 12092.36 I 2089.58
N N
l \ \ I3
092.36-12093.04 49'4 • 2092.71 I 209 3--,\ I
■
■
CONTRACTOR SHALL
CONVERT EXISTING
STRUCTURE TO MH
FRAME AND COVER.
CB
GR=2090.01
FULL
\ I49,0981 209.21 a el/ W GR=2089.02
2092.62 6" PVC @ 1.0% 2092.10 TW: 3.19 CB
MIN (TYP.) FIFE: 2094,00 2092.17 B 092.86 0> 7p FULL
/ / / - 0 89
92.73 20 2.77 /�% �, �,
2093.33 - - _ u ° CLEANOUT 2092.88 2092.69 2092.22 _ - ' 30" RETAINING WALL
TW: 2092.00 _ 6" DS
BIN: 2088.00 - - 6" DS 1.0± 2093. 4 -_ - - / 2092.0(, 2091.86 I ABUTTING BACK OF CURB
I DII2092.59 / sT-27-cg - _- I �' (SEE DETAIL BELOW)
ST -62 -MH I ', ` 2092 25�
TW: 2092.00 I' 2 2.80
BW: 2089.00 I[ 2093.23 _ - - -- r - \i
2092. - - I 2092.16 2092.14- N-
8`' /
TW: 2092.33 _ 2093.24 2093.32 , 2092.38 I
209 2093.00 - 2093.98 8" DS 8" DS 92.7 2092.86 2092.20---,,,,,.,1 2092.11 BW: 2090.81 r ' I \ CB
BW: 2092.00I GR=2085.92
Jll' �` 2093.21 2093.16 FIE. 2090.0± IE: 2090.0± N 2092.54 2092.07. 2091.72 _I (FULL)
136'MH _ _
- _ r 2092.23, 3
TREES TO REMAIN I l I i� 2092.65 I •:.#;. 2093.30 2 • 20
I 2093.68 2093.69 2092.59 o�ol I / X
2092.13 P: 2092.72 6 _ m m -�. 2 ' G -
UNDISTURBED (TYP.) f p - - - - - - - - - - i�2093.00\�21 N
tiST-26-CB w
�.ICITY of 2092.85 - 2093.22 _ 2093.38 I .2093.49 3.54, HP: 2093.69 2093.53 2 3.35 2093.16 2093.09 2092.76 2092.07- - �
- / \ HENDERSONVILLE 30 MAI / III I 2092.92 8 2093.31
DB 1107, PG 172 2091.98 2092.93 209 16 293.28
-€EL9904276 _ _ - 09
BW: 2092.00 27 •
_
------ ---- - _ _ - - 28 0 4 2093
- - -_-_ - -7-- 2092.78 20 22 93. 2093.082 9 2� 2
---- g _ _ _
_ - 270 -
J - - 2
- I � 092 90 I � I
2093.00 - - 2093.37
_ 2091.8 ST -52 -CB - _ 2093.1 2.;8? 99 \ 20 11
\ I - - - \ 2093.23
.!� _ A6
BW 2087.00 -_ I ? \ ti r
TW: 2094.00 2093.50 - - - -i \ C, 2091.62 2088-
v \ _
� I rq
/ ew. 2063.00 I 2 �� �� o 4-
\\ \N 4 r CO
4 -2093.40 j 209224 - �� - = L
1\ qK I Iq 8" PVC 1.0%
IN0 30"M\ 2093.27209Z38 , 209 2092.68 MI 2092.36
2093.61 i V
TW: 2093.00 2093.39 8" C
�I 2092.54 - 2092.07 2092.01
BW: 2084.00 �_ , - 2092.00 2092.15
_ 2092.17 ST -21 -CB
2092.61 2092.16 ST -71 -CB
TW: 2092.45 TW: 2092.33 ap 2092.56 2092.60
TREES TO REMAIN t�� \ BW. 2084.00 BW- 2092.00 1� /ZOg� is 2091.82 ST 54 -MH 2092.41 .� 2092.26
1
UNDISTURBED TYP. ��� 2085
1 (TYP.) � � - � ST -50 -CB
/ \ - tY rvin ♦ 2092.23 20
TW: 2092.33 2092.
20�v v \ v ° G�2092.23
2os4.e2 ��' 2085.42 BW: 2092.00 - ` 2091.972091.90 i 25 2093
�\ \\
TW. 2092-2 0.50. - 20 �_2uHP:2093.3:
8W. 2091.40
20
TRESS _ �o� v ��/� -� o'
S�UTH MARKET L C 2- H
_ TW- 2091.53
OB\129 , PG 076 V� UNDISTUROE_ ) v 2092.0.
\ E 0116725 V v v v �� \ 1 TIN: 2093.24 _ BIN. 2089.94
i
# / /, iii \ . \ '� \ \ 2092.06
BW' 2090.72
0�l NG PCD � - iii � _" - `- ���vv V A _ � � •
V - =08'
-41-CBS2092.58 7.22
i
�, TW: 2092.68
2092.41 -
ST -30 -FES BW: 2090.17 _ - -
\\\ DO NOT DISTURB��
VERTICAL LIMITS TW: 2086.10 9.28 •2088.56
c\ 2082.25
I 24" �b �� BW: 2082.3/0 � � GR HIGHWAY OF�WAY
�{P-RAP APRON 1 ! i ,, U•S� \`
AA CLASS 3 TW: 2087.02 / , -�I (PUBLIC RI x Row
EDWARD BAYNARD BW:2080.47 60 - E
DB 726, PG 723 ON T (START) = 6'
PARCEL 10117092 SWI H,NGTH = 13' _ ROW ASPHALT CURB
\ _ TW: 2089.57 - ' Ex-
CO�C NGTH - 10' 208 • _
�\ 1 ASPHALT D PTH = 1,3" 8W. 2089.44
089.60 _ - �� EOP Ex_ROW ASPHALT CURB
G�
ASPHALT CURB
�133 o
ro & wooD �o� 22 n0 & SIDEWALK DESIGN
FOOT BRIDGE 'L SEE OFF-SITE ROADWAY PLANS
(UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT)
h � �
ZONE A OP
® SEE OFF-SITE ROADWAY PLANS
FOR CULVERT DESIGN. 60 LF OF
STREAM IMPACT.
SEE OFF-SITE ROADWAY PLANS
Fp�l�
\q�'
2092.98 2Ful
092 90 15 i
'-2092.06
� X093.39 � y
ST -24 -CB 2092.72 I \
2092 9 2092.63- O \
8" PVC @ 1.0,0 209 .08 I I I
MIN (TYP.)
ST -23 -CB 20 2.43• 2093.01 2092.67 full
92_.28_ 209 \� \
2092.59
ST -22 -CB N 2093,34 BW: 2090.67
'092.69 \
1.48 HP: 2093.38 i
LP: 2092.73.. 208!
? TW: 2091.62 CB V=208
BW: 2090.53 j GR=2085.67
Op CB
GR=2085.60
o (FULL)
2 p \ ROADWAY DESIGN
W�30" RETAINING WALL SEE OFF-SITE ROADWAY PLANS
ABUTTING BACK OF CURB (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT)
Ex,Ro (SEE DETAIL BELOW) per\ G
CB
GR=2085.53
FULL
GR=2085.40
IN A=2083.80
IN B=2083 70
IN C=2084.05
OUT=2083.45
B
C1 P
GR --2086.08
IN=2083.43
OUT=2083.18
»G&G
\ �� 18'RCP
% C
1
's, GR=2085.87
IN A=2083.67
�`�
8&G IN B=2083.22
IN C=2083.12
OUT=2083.07
GR=2085.63
(FULL)
f4' HIGH HANDRAIL MOUNTED INTO RETAINING WALL.
HANDRAILS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND A 200LB CONCENTRATED
LOAD APPLIED IN ANY DIRECTION AND AT ANY POINT ON THE TOP RAIL.
WHEEL STOP SEE SITE 5.0' SIDEWALK
PLAN 1.5' SEE OFF-SITE 2.5'
C&G VARIES ROADWAY PLANS C&G
SEE TYPICAL SECTION 1'
FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT
4.0' \_ 30" RETAINING WALL ABUTTING
MAX BACK OF CURB
RETAINING WALL 1
// -DESIGN BY OTHERS
4' RETAINING WALL DETAIL
NTS
ROADWAY DESIGN
SEE OFF-SITE ROADWAY PLANS
(UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT)
17 1 18 1 19
ST -25 -MH
J
1
Q
=
2093.13
*2093.36
2092.36
TW_ 2092.95
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
20.
0
2093.36
2092.98
2
.�
2092.44
2092.23
BW: 2090.02
w
�
4P09J4
9A2092.
• :.. 2091.94
-
II�
100.000
0100.00
y
2093.00
TW:2091.31
PROPOSED GRADING ARROW
01 -FES
14 -DI
2089.00
BYII.2090 07
C0
2092.98 2Ful
092 90 15 i
'-2092.06
� X093.39 � y
ST -24 -CB 2092.72 I \
2092 9 2092.63- O \
8" PVC @ 1.0,0 209 .08 I I I
MIN (TYP.)
ST -23 -CB 20 2.43• 2093.01 2092.67 full
92_.28_ 209 \� \
2092.59
ST -22 -CB N 2093,34 BW: 2090.67
'092.69 \
1.48 HP: 2093.38 i
LP: 2092.73.. 208!
? TW: 2091.62 CB V=208
BW: 2090.53 j GR=2085.67
Op CB
GR=2085.60
o (FULL)
2 p \ ROADWAY DESIGN
W�30" RETAINING WALL SEE OFF-SITE ROADWAY PLANS
ABUTTING BACK OF CURB (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT)
Ex,Ro (SEE DETAIL BELOW) per\ G
CB
GR=2085.53
FULL
GR=2085.40
IN A=2083.80
IN B=2083 70
IN C=2084.05
OUT=2083.45
B
C1 P
GR --2086.08
IN=2083.43
OUT=2083.18
»G&G
\ �� 18'RCP
% C
1
's, GR=2085.87
IN A=2083.67
�`�
8&G IN B=2083.22
IN C=2083.12
OUT=2083.07
GR=2085.63
(FULL)
f4' HIGH HANDRAIL MOUNTED INTO RETAINING WALL.
HANDRAILS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND A 200LB CONCENTRATED
LOAD APPLIED IN ANY DIRECTION AND AT ANY POINT ON THE TOP RAIL.
WHEEL STOP SEE SITE 5.0' SIDEWALK
PLAN 1.5' SEE OFF-SITE 2.5'
C&G VARIES ROADWAY PLANS C&G
SEE TYPICAL SECTION 1'
FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT
4.0' \_ 30" RETAINING WALL ABUTTING
MAX BACK OF CURB
RETAINING WALL 1
// -DESIGN BY OTHERS
4' RETAINING WALL DETAIL
NTS
ROADWAY DESIGN
SEE OFF-SITE ROADWAY PLANS
(UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT)
17 1 18 1 19
ABBREVIATIONS
CB NCDOT STANDARD CATCH BASIN
JB NCDOT STANDARD JUNCTION BOX
CS NCDOT STANDARD OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE
FES FLARED END SECTION
DI DROP INLET
EX EXISTING CATCH BASIN TO REMAIN
HW NCDOT STANDARD HEADWALL DETAIL 838.80
GRADING NOTES
1. SEE GENERAL NOTES SHEET FOR OVERALL PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE
NOTES.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW, UNDERSTAND AND IMPLEMENT ALL REQUIRED
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO ANY
DISTURBANCE.
3. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG PAVEMENT REPRESENT FINISHED GRADE
ELEVATION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
4. ALL PROPOSED STORM PIPE TO BE CLASS III RCP UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
5. ALL STRUCTURES SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH
FINAL PAVEMENT.
6. INLET PROTECTION - CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CATCH BASIN INLET
PROTECTION ON ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED INLETS UNTIL CONTRIBUTING
DRAINAGE AREAS ARE STABILIZED.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SMOOTH TRANSITION BETWEEN PROPOSED
PAVEMENT AND EXISTING PAVEMENT AND STORM STRUCTURES
8. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH (4) SIDED BEARING
HEAVY DUTY H-20 RATED TRAFFIC RIMS AND GRATES
9. ALL CLEANOUT COVERS SHOULD BE RATED FOR HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE PAVING IMPROVEMENTS TO AVOID TIRE
MARKS FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. FINAL PAVING SHALL BE AS SMOOTH
AS POSSIBLE AND FREE FROM ANY CRACKS, SCRAPES, GOUGES, TIRE MARKS,
ETC. CAUSED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
11. DURING CONSTRUCTION AND AFTER FINAL GRADING, NO SURFACE WATER
RUNOFF MAY BE DIRECTED TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, AND ALL SURFACE
WATER RUNOFF MUST BE ROUTED TO APPROVED DRAINAGE FACILITIES OR BE
RETAINED ON SITE. ALL RUNOFF FROM THE SITE, BOTH DURING AND AFTER
CONSTRUCTION, MUST BE FREE OF POLLUTANTS, INCLUDING SEDIMENT, PRIOR
TO DISCHARGE.
12. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE IN BOTH AUTOCAD AND SIGNED/SEALED PDF AN
AS -BUILT SURVEY OF FINAL BUILDING PAD PRIOR TO VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION
AND AS -BUILT SURVEY OF ALL FINISHED WORK PRIOR TO PAVING ALONG
WITH AN AS -BUILT OF THE STORM DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM FOR OWNER
AND ENGINEER APPROVAL PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH FUTURE PHASES OF
CONSTRUCTION.
THE PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BMP HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO CONTROL
AND TREAT RUNOFF FROM THE FIRST ONE -INCH OF RAIN OVER THE TOTAL
DRAINAGE AREA. THE DESIGN AND PLANS ARE SUFFICIENT TO COMPLY WITH
APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND POLICIES FOUND IN THE NCDENR STORMWATER BMP
DESIGN MANUAL AND CITY'S PHASE II STORMWATER ORDINANCE.
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
[HIS DOCUMEN I, IUGEIHER WI IH ]HE CUNCEP IS AND DESIGNS PRESEN IED HEREIN, A5 AN INSIRUMEN I OF SERVICE, 15 IN IENDED UNLY FUR [HE SPECIFIC F'URF'U5E AND CLIEN I FUR WHICH 11 WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE UN ]HIS DOCUMEN I WI IHOU I WRI I IEN AU IHOHIZA [ION AND ADAF' IAIIUN BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSUCIAIES, INC. SHALL HE WI IHOU I LIABILI IY IU KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIAIES, INC.
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
Kimley*Horn
NC License #F-0102
200 SOUTH TRYON ST.
SUITE 200 JA
CHARLOTTE,
NORTH CAROLINA 28202
PHONE: [phone]
© 2016
L,\N CARpj
/4, '
�°��FESS/pN919 B
° SEAL g
034426 $
C H AMP
J
PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
Q
=
wz
J
Z
135
V
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
134
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
-/\
w
�
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
CW
G
-
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
100.000
0100.00
PROPOSED SPOT GRADE
1.00
3:1
PROPOSED GRADING ARROW
01 -FES
14 -DI
PROPOSED STORM SYMBOL
0
-
C0
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
Cf)
w
-
H
L
PROPOSED RIP RAP
>• •
>• •
DIVERSION DITCH
24' RCP
EXISTING STORM SEWER
ABBREVIATIONS
CB NCDOT STANDARD CATCH BASIN
JB NCDOT STANDARD JUNCTION BOX
CS NCDOT STANDARD OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE
FES FLARED END SECTION
DI DROP INLET
EX EXISTING CATCH BASIN TO REMAIN
HW NCDOT STANDARD HEADWALL DETAIL 838.80
GRADING NOTES
1. SEE GENERAL NOTES SHEET FOR OVERALL PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE
NOTES.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW, UNDERSTAND AND IMPLEMENT ALL REQUIRED
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO ANY
DISTURBANCE.
3. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG PAVEMENT REPRESENT FINISHED GRADE
ELEVATION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
4. ALL PROPOSED STORM PIPE TO BE CLASS III RCP UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
5. ALL STRUCTURES SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH
FINAL PAVEMENT.
6. INLET PROTECTION - CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CATCH BASIN INLET
PROTECTION ON ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED INLETS UNTIL CONTRIBUTING
DRAINAGE AREAS ARE STABILIZED.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SMOOTH TRANSITION BETWEEN PROPOSED
PAVEMENT AND EXISTING PAVEMENT AND STORM STRUCTURES
8. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH (4) SIDED BEARING
HEAVY DUTY H-20 RATED TRAFFIC RIMS AND GRATES
9. ALL CLEANOUT COVERS SHOULD BE RATED FOR HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE PAVING IMPROVEMENTS TO AVOID TIRE
MARKS FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. FINAL PAVING SHALL BE AS SMOOTH
AS POSSIBLE AND FREE FROM ANY CRACKS, SCRAPES, GOUGES, TIRE MARKS,
ETC. CAUSED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
11. DURING CONSTRUCTION AND AFTER FINAL GRADING, NO SURFACE WATER
RUNOFF MAY BE DIRECTED TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, AND ALL SURFACE
WATER RUNOFF MUST BE ROUTED TO APPROVED DRAINAGE FACILITIES OR BE
RETAINED ON SITE. ALL RUNOFF FROM THE SITE, BOTH DURING AND AFTER
CONSTRUCTION, MUST BE FREE OF POLLUTANTS, INCLUDING SEDIMENT, PRIOR
TO DISCHARGE.
12. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE IN BOTH AUTOCAD AND SIGNED/SEALED PDF AN
AS -BUILT SURVEY OF FINAL BUILDING PAD PRIOR TO VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION
AND AS -BUILT SURVEY OF ALL FINISHED WORK PRIOR TO PAVING ALONG
WITH AN AS -BUILT OF THE STORM DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM FOR OWNER
AND ENGINEER APPROVAL PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH FUTURE PHASES OF
CONSTRUCTION.
THE PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BMP HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO CONTROL
AND TREAT RUNOFF FROM THE FIRST ONE -INCH OF RAIN OVER THE TOTAL
DRAINAGE AREA. THE DESIGN AND PLANS ARE SUFFICIENT TO COMPLY WITH
APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND POLICIES FOUND IN THE NCDENR STORMWATER BMP
DESIGN MANUAL AND CITY'S PHASE II STORMWATER ORDINANCE.
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
[HIS DOCUMEN I, IUGEIHER WI IH ]HE CUNCEP IS AND DESIGNS PRESEN IED HEREIN, A5 AN INSIRUMEN I OF SERVICE, 15 IN IENDED UNLY FUR [HE SPECIFIC F'URF'U5E AND CLIEN I FUR WHICH 11 WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE UN ]HIS DOCUMEN I WI IHOU I WRI I IEN AU IHOHIZA [ION AND ADAF' IAIIUN BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSUCIAIES, INC. SHALL HE WI IHOU I LIABILI IY IU KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIAIES, INC.
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
Kimley*Horn
NC License #F-0102
200 SOUTH TRYON ST.
SUITE 200 JA
CHARLOTTE,
NORTH CAROLINA 28202
PHONE: [phone]
© 2016
L,\N CARpj
/4, '
�°��FESS/pN919 B
° SEAL g
034426 $
C H AMP
C
U
E
F
It
W
J
W
Q
=
wz
J
Z
Q
z
V
z
a�
�a
=
C
J
-J
>
w
�
cn
z
CW
G
U
z
H
O
z
}
Q
N
w
O
O
O
M
M
J
TEB
0
-
C0
CHECKED BY:
Cf)
w
-
H
L
o
W
w
0
L,
I-
LU
LL
0
U
�
LU
U
w
F
z
�
Q
O
O
I--
V) V
o
U)
O
z
Q
O
V
OO
U
0
0
r
m
>
0
U
v
�a
0:�11�
w
w
0
LJ
Ln
0
w
v)
w
0'
w
o-
LU
N
N
Q
C)
Lo
Ln
�\
Zo
C
U
E
F
It
W
J
W
Q
=
wz
J
Z
Q
z
V
z
a�
�a
=
C
J
-J
>
W
J
J
>
LU w
z°0
�Z<
U)
w
p
w
=
CW
G
U
z
H
O
z
}
Q
N
w
O
Z
=
M
M
J
TEB
0
-
Q
CHECKED BY:
W
-
H
L
o
W
_j
��O
LU
LL
LU
U
w
F
z
5
O
W
19
U)
O
O
V
OO
U
m
>
0
�a
0
C
U
E
F
It
W
Z
J
W
Q
=
wz
J
Q
z
V
z
a�
�a
=
C
J
-J
>
W
J
J
>
LU w
z°0
�Z<
U)
w
p
w
=
O
i
W
o
w
U
z
H
O
z
J
w
J
DESIGNED BY:
TEB
DRAWN BY:
DMH
CHECKED BY:
ECH
DATE: 01-25-2016
PROJECT#: 018667009
C3-0
0
LU
a
Z
J
V
z
w
J
DESIGNED BY:
TEB
DRAWN BY:
DMH
CHECKED BY:
ECH
DATE: 01-25-2016
PROJECT#: 018667009
C3-0
M
L
a

Y
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
i I Uv
I I
O v
CONNECT PROPOSED
----- I j cc SITE HEADWALL
TO CULVERT
HEADWALL
PROPOSED SITE
-- OUTFALL FROM \
I
BMP DEVICE - ---- -
1ul
- ° - - 11+
o a -o -
+ -
10 00 _ - ---- - ---- -
— — — _20B4- — —
— —
- - -- - - - - - - 40
2085-
10
r
PROPOSED HANDRAIL
PROPOSED GUARDRAIL
+ 8 X6' CONC
__-- — --- –20B7-
_-- 8'X6'
— PROPOSED PROPOSED
-- ---- HEADWALL BOX CULVERT
— — — — EXTENSION
- -- - -2088- — —
')089-
12092
12076
10+00
PROPOSED HEADWALL
tn
co
O
N
13
5
6
EXISTING 8'X6' I i�� A�v��
->0BOX CULVERT �1I���
1 <
I �\
U �
RETAIN EXISTING BOX CULVERT,
EXISTING HEADWALL AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
_ >:�/
of
co
I y~
I
PROPOSED HANDRAIL
5'
S/w
rn "'
co
O O
00
OO
N N
11+00
REMOVE EXISTING HEADWALL AND CONNECT
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT EXTENSION TO THE
EXISTING BOX CULVERT
EXISTING 8'X6'
BOX CULVERT
REMOVE" EXISTING HEADWALL AND CONNECT
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT EXTENSION TO TH
EXISTING BOX CULVERT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
RETAIN ' EXISTING BOX CULVERT,
EXISTING HEADWALL AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
17
Imo'
�Tti
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 5 10 20
20921
20801
20761
Kimley>>> Horn
NC License #F-0102
200 SOUTH TRYON ST.
SUITE 200 A
CHARLOTTE,
NORTH CAROLINA 28202
PHONE: [phone]
© 2016
CARS'.
SEAL
034549
E
F
W
A/
W
G
w
J
J
�
Q
z
U)
w
U-11
Z
a
J
>
=
w
J
U-1
z°0
0
w=
o
z
LLJ
0
W
J
y
0
N
_
a
O
�co
= M
ALM
DRAWN BY:
ALM
CHECKED BY:
TRB
DATE: 03/15/2016
PROJECT#: 018667009
W
L�
r
a
J fY
�CNo
W
G
0
�Lc")
~ z
H
Z
a
wu 0
W
Q
y0
o
a
Q
Ov
- 0
>
0 m
za
z
111111■
w
J
U
I
E
F
L
IN
W
A/
W
G
w
J
J
�
Q
z
U)
w
U-11
Z
a
J
>
=
w
J
U-1
z°0
0
w=
o
z
LLJ
0
W
J
y
0
N
_
a
O
�co
= M
ALM
DRAWN BY:
ALM
CHECKED BY:
TRB
DATE: 03/15/2016
PROJECT#: 018667009
W
L�
r
a
J fY
�CNo
W
G
0
�Lc")
~ z
H
Z
a
wu 0
W
Q
y0
o
a
Q
Ov
- 0
>
0 m
za
z
w
J
U
I
L
IN
W
A/
W
Q
=
w
J
J
}
�
z
�
Q
z
U)
w
U-11
Lai
g
=
>
a
J
>
=
w
J
U-1
z°0
0
w=
o
z
LLJ
0
Q
U
0
J
y
0
_
U
ALM
DRAWN BY:
ALM
CHECKED BY:
TRB
DATE: 03/15/2016
PROJECT#: 018667009
R2-05
0
a
L
IN
W
W
U)
w
U-11
J_
J
Ov
a_
w
J
DESIGNED BY:
ALM
DRAWN BY:
ALM
CHECKED BY:
TRB
DATE: 03/15/2016
PROJECT#: 018667009
R2-05
L
IN

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Halvorsen Development Corporation 2. Evaluator's name: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
3. Date of evaluation: 9/30/2015 4. Time of evaluation: 9:00 am
5. Name of stream: Johnson Drainage Ditch- Stream 1 6. River basin: French Broad
7. Approximate drainage area: 200 acres 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100 ft. 10. County: Henderson
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.304718
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex. -77.556611): -82.458206
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GI Othe Survey/GIS
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): The reach
under evaluation located near the intersection of Greenville Hwv and Conner Pennv Street.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Culvert Extension
15. Recent weather conditions: Trace precipitation within 72 hours
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Partlycy, 75-85 degrees
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known:
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters
_Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 50 % Residential 35 % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
15 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other ()
22. Bankfull width: 81 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 51
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream
may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score
assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 41 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 9/30/2015
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering
the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score
resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or
requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
Characteristics
Eco -region Point Range
Score
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
4
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
1
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
04
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0 - 4
0 - 4
3
U5
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 - 4
0 - 2
2
no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
1
P.
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints)
S
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
0
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
2
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 - 4
0 - 5
2
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
3
>+
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0 - 5
3
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
14
Root depth and density on banks
0 - 3
0-4
0 - 5
3
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu hout = max oints)
(A
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 - 5
0-4
0 - 5
2
substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
2
E
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
Q
1
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 - 6
0-6
3
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
1 S
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 5
0-5
1
no shadingvegetation = 0; continuous canopy= maxpoints)0-5
-
r"
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0 - 5
0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
u'
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
a
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
�
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types =max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
41
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Halvorsen Development Corporation 2. Evaluator's name: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
3. Date of evaluation: 9/30/2015 4. Time of evaluation: 9:00 am
5. Name of stream: Mud Creek- Stream 2 6. River basin: French Broad
7. Approximate drainage area: 20 sqmi 8. Stream order: 4
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100 ft. 10. County: Henderson
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.305782
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex. -77.556611): -82.460046
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GI Othe Survey/GIS
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): The reach
under evaluation is located southwest of the ProSource Plumbing SUDD]v store
14. Proposed channel work (if any): None
15. Recent weather conditions: Trace precipitation within 72 hours
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Partlycy, 75-85 degrees
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known:
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters
_Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 30 % Residential 10 % Commercial % Industrial _15 % Agricultural
45 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other ()
22. Bankfull width: 15ft. 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 81
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream
may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score
assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 45 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 9/30/2015
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering
the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score
resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or
requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
Characteristics
Eco -region Point Range
Score
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
4
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
04
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0 - 4
0 - 4
3
U5
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 - 4
0 - 2
4
no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
2
P.
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints)
S
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
0
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
1
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-47
0 - 5
1
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
>+
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0 - 5
2
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
14
Root depth and density on banks
0 - 3
0-4
0 - 5
2
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu hout = max oints)
(A
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 - 5
0-4
0 - 5
2
substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
1
E
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
Q
1
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 - 6
0-6
2
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
1 S
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 5
0-5
4
no shadingvegetation = 0; continuous canopy= maxpoints)0-5
-
r"
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0 - 5
0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
u'
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
a
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
�
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types =max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
10
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
45
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 9/30/2015
Project/Site: Hendersonville Publix/S1-
Johson Drainage Ditch
Latitude: 35.304718
Evaluator: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -82.458206
Total Points: 37.5
Stream Determination
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Hendersonville
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
0
1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 19
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes
= 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 11
12.
Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
1
14.
Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0.5
Yes = 3
1.5
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 7.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW
= 0.75; OBL
= 1.5; Other
= 0
1.5
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 9/30/2015
Project/Site: Hendersonville Publix/S2-
Mud Creek
Latitude: 35.305782
Evaluator: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -82.460046
Total Points: 41.5
Stream Determination
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Hendersonville
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
0
1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 23
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes
= 3
3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 11.5
12.
Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
1
14.
Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0.5
Yes = 3
1.5
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 7
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW
= 0.75; OBL
= 1.5; Other
= 0
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes

Photo Page ]
,z
a -
Johnson's Drainage Ditch looking upstream towards proposed culvert extension
Johnson's Drainage Ditch looking downstream
Title Photo Pages
Prepared For Hendersonville Publix Prepared By
Project
Halvorsen Hendersonville, Henderson County, North Carolina
Development Date Project Number Klmley»)Horn
Corporation 6/28/16 1 018667009

Photo Pale 2
I
.> �.• � k do ✓�
1�s _
Johnson's Drainage Ditch looking upstream towards the existing culvert outlet
�� _ �� ,�, � :✓,"YAG.
F► JZ Kms^ - _ �i� `$
d r
?u f FIr' iy• I _
ik
A �f
Johnson's Drainage Ditch looking downstream towards the existing culvert inlet
Title
Photo Pages
Prepared For
Project
Hendersonville Publix
Hendersonville, Henderson County, North Carolina
Prepared By
Halvorsen
Development
Date
Project Number
Kimley»>Horn
Corporation
6/28/16
1 018667009

rnoto rage s
Title
Prepared For
Halvorsen
Development
Corporation
Mud Creek
Photo Pages
Project Hendersonville Publix
Hendersonville, Henderson County, North Carolina
Date Project Number
6/28/16 018667009
Prepared By
Kimley»>Horn

Transportation
June 1, 2016
Mr. Tim Brumfield, PE
Kimley-Horn
802 Gervais St., Ste. 201
Columbia, SC 29201
RE: Publix on NC 225
Dear Mr. Brumfield:
PAT McCRORY
Governor
NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON
Secretary
In order for a driveway to be constructed for the development at the corner of NC 225
(Greenville Hwy) and White Street in Hendersonville, a left turn lane will be required to be
installed on Greenville Hwy at the proposed entrance to the development. This requirement
was outlined in the traffic study dated 12/7/2015.
The addition of this required left turn lane necessitates an extension of the existing box
culvert underneath the Greenville Hwy which impacts the jurisdictional stream, Johnson's
drainage ditch. To the best of my knowledge sidewalk is required by the City of Hendersonville
along the road frontage, including the area above the proposed culvert extension. In order to
place the sidewalk along the roadway, NCDOT is requiring an addition of 30" curb & gutter for
the safety of the pedestrians and the addition of guardrail to protect vehicles from the
unrecoverable slope and water hazard within the clear recovery zone of the roadway and the
headwall of the culvert.
Should you have questions or comments concerning the above information, please do
not hesitate to contact me at 828-891-7911.
SLC/co
Sincerel
EDocuSignedb
7y:y1WG G~V*VID L
OFECB6ABFE95408...
Steve L. Cannon, PE
District Engineer
Nothing Compares!�
State of North Carolina I Department of Transportation I Division 14 — District 1 : Henderson, Polk & Transylvania County
4142 Haywood Road I Mills River, NC 28759
Phone [phone] I Fax [phone]

aP�SM�NT }OF�,yFi
�! p
—.au yv
4�CH 3 1�
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, forth Carolina 28801
March 24, 2015
Mr. Chris Tinklenberg
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
2000 South Boulevard, Suite 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
Dear Mr. Tinklenberg:
Subject: Proposed Retail Development at the Intersection of Greenville Highway and White
Street, Hendersonville, Henderson County, North Carolina
We have reviewed your letter dated February 24, 2015 (received February 27, 2015), concerning
the subject project. The following comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of
the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.§ 4321 et seq.); the Migratory Bird Treaty Act,
as amended (16 U.S.C. 703); and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Streams and Wetlands. Because Mud Creek and one of its unnamed tributaries border the
property, we want to emphasize stringent measures to control sediment and erosion should be
implemented prior to any ground disturbance and should be maintained throughout project
construction. Any stream impacts will require a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
One of the most important and effective measures that can be taken to protect stream health is the
preservation of riparian buffers. Wide, contiguous riparian buffers have greater and more
flexible potential than other options to maintain biological integrity' and can ameliorate many
ecological issues related to land use and environmental quality.' Riparian buffers accomplish the
following:
1. catch and filter runoff, thereby preventing nonpoint-source pollutants from
reaching streams;
'R. Horner, C. May, E. Livingston, and J. Maxted. 1999. Impervious Cover, Aquatic Community Health, and Storm
Water BMPs: Is There a Relationship? In: Proceedings of the Sixth Biennial Storm Water Research and Watershed
Management Conference. Southwest Florida Water Management District, Tampa, FL.
'R. J. Naiman, H. DeCamps, and M. Pollock. 1993. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional
biodiversity. Ecol. Appl. 3:209-212.

2. enhance the in -stream processing of both point- and nonpoint-source
pollutants;
3. act as "sponges" by absorbing runoff (which reduces the severity of floods)
and, by allowing runoff to infiltrate and recharge groundwater levels, maintain
stream flows during dry periods;
4. catch and help prevent excess woody debris from entering the stream and
creating logjams;
5. stabilize stream banks and maintain natural channel morphology;
6. provide coarse woody debris for habitat structure and most of the dissolved
organic carbon and other nutrients necessary for the aquatic food web; and
7. maintain air and water temperatures around the stream.
For most projects, we recommend the maintenance or establishment of minimum 100 -foot native
forested buffers along each side of perennial streams and 50 -foot native forested buffers along
each side of intermittent streams and wetlands throughout the project area.3 We additionally
encourage the implementation of buffers on ephemeral streams due to the important functions
they provide as headwater streams. 4, S We realize that the project area is already highly impacted
and that there is only a very narrow riparian area along Mud Creek and its tributary (slightly
larger on the tributary). If your proposed development could allow for the expansion of these
buffers, it could greatly increase the protection of these streams.
Impervious Surfaces/Low Impact Development (LID). The proposed development will
contribute to the quantity and quality of storm water entering project area waterways. Recent
studies6 have shown that areas of 10- to 20 -percent impervious surface (such as roofs, roads, and
parking lots) double the amount of storm -water runoff compared to natural cover and decrease
deep infiltration (groundwater recharge) by 16 percent. At 35- to 50 -percent impervious surface,
runoff triples, and deep infiltration is decreased by 40 percent. Above 75 -percent impervious
surface, runoff is 5.5 times higher than natural cover, and deep infiltration is decreased by
80 percent. The adequate treatment of storm water in development areas is essential for the
protection of water quality and aquatic habitat in developing landscapes. Impervious surfaces
collect pathogens, metals, sediment, and chemical pollutants and quickly transmit them (via
storm -water runoff) to receiving waters. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, this
nonpoint-source pollution is one of the major threats to water quality in the United States, posing
one of the greatest threats to aquatic life, and is linked to chronic and acute illnesses in human
3 For projects that potentially could affect waterways that contain federally listed species, the above -recommended
buffer widths should be doubled (100 feet for intermittent streams and 200 feet for perennial streams).
4R. B. Alexander, R. A. Smith, and G. E. Schwarz. 2000. Effect of Stream Channel Size on the Delivery of
Nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico. Nature 403:758-761.
5B. J. Peterson, W. M. Wolheim, P. J. Mulholland, J. R. Webster, J. L. Meyer, J. L. Tank, E. Marti, W. B. Bowden,
H. M. Valett, A. E. Hershey, W. H. McDowell, W. K. Dodds, S. K. Hamilton, S. Gregory, and D. D. Morrall. 2001.
Control of Nitrogen Export from Watersheds by Headwater Streams. Science 292:86-90.
6Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (15 federal agencies of the United States Government).
October 1998. Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices. GPO Item No. 0120-A; SuDocs
No. A 57.6/2:EN 3/PT.653. ISBN -0-934213-59-3.
2

populations from exposure through drinking water and contact recreation. Increased storm -water
runoff also directly damages aquatic and riparian habitat, causing stream -bank and
stream -channel scouring. In addition, because impervious surfaces reduce groundwater recharge,
they result in even lower than expected stream flows during drought periods, which can induce
potentially catastrophic effects for fish, mussels, and other aquatic life. Accordingly, we
recommend that all new developments, regardless of the percentage of impervious surface area
they will create, implement storm -water -retention and -treatment measures designed to replicate
and maintain the hydrograph at the preconstruction condition in order to avoid any additional
impacts to habitat quality within the watershed.
Further, we recommend the use of low -impact -development techniques,7 such as reduced road
widths, grassed swales in place of curb and gutter, rain gardens, and wetland retention areas, for
retaining and treating storm -water runoff rather than the more traditional measures, such as large
retention ponds, etc. These designs often cost less to install and significantly reduce
environmental impacts from residential development.
Where detention ponds are used, storm -water outlets should drain through a vegetated area prior
to reaching any natural stream or wetland area. Detention structures should be designed to allow
for the slow discharge of storm water, attenuating the potential adverse effects of storm -water
surges; thermal spikes; and sediment, nutrient, and chemical discharges. Also, because the
purpose of storm -water -control measures is to protect streams and wetlands, no
storm -water -control measures or best management practices should be installed within any
stream (perennial or intermittent) or wetland.
Utility Crossing/Directional Drilling. Your letter does not describe or state if there will be a
need for utilities to cross the stream on the property. We strongly recommend that open -cut
trenching be avoided. From our experiences with similar projects, we believe this technique
increases the likelihood of future lateral movement of the stream (which could undercut or erode
around the utility line), and the correction of these problems could result in additional future
maintenance and impacts to the stream. Therefore, we recommend the use of directional boring
under the stream in order to prevent stream impacts. All utility crossings should be kept to a
minimum, and all utility infrastructures should be kept out of riparian buffer areas. Directional
boring under streams significantly minimizes impacts to aquatic resources and riparian buffers.
If this method cannot be used and trenching is determined to be the only viable method, the
crossing should be made perpendicular to the stream flow, and we recommend the development
of a stream -bank monitoring and maintenance program that would allow for the prompt
stabilization of stream banks near the utility crossing (should any stream -bank erosion or
destabilization occur) throughout the life of this project.
7 W recommend visiting the Environmental Protection Agency's Web site (http://Www.epa.govlowowlnpsllidl)for
additional information and fact sheets regarding the implementation of low -impact -development techniques.
3

Sewer lines associated with crossing areas should be maintained and operated at all times to
prevent discharges to land or surface waters. In circumstances where minimum setbacks cannot
be attained, sewer lines shall be constructed of ductile iron or a substance of equal durability.
Stream Crossings. Use bridges for all permanent roadway crossings of streams and associated
wetlands. All stream crossings should be made perpendicular to the stream. We recommend
bridges that span the entire floodplain because it is important for streams to have
access/connectivity to the floodplain. Bridges that span the stream and floodplain are the best
option because they minimize impacts to aquatic resources, allow for the movement of aquatic
organisms, and eliminate the need to place fill in streams and floodplains. Bridges should be
designed and constructed so that no piers or bents are placed in the stream, and approaches and
abutments should not constrict the stream channel. Bridges should also be designed to allow for
safe terrestrial wildlife passage. To provide for terrestrial wildlife passage, the new bridge design
should span beyond the waterway so that unsubmerged land is also bridged. If bank stabilization
is necessary, we recommend that the use of riprap be minimized and that a riprap-free buffer
zone be maintained under the bridge to allow for wildlife movement. Longer bridge spans also
cost far less than a separate wildlife crossing under an existing roadway. Also, floodplain
culverts must be installed if fill is placed in the floodplain for bridge construction.
If bridges are not possible and culverts are the only option, we suggest using bottomless culverts.
Bottomless culverts do not need to be buried, thereby preserving the natural creek substrate and
not disturbing the streambed. Culverts should be sufficiently sized to mimic natural stream
functions and habitats located at the crossing site; allow for water depth, volume (flow), and
velocity levels that will permit aquatic organism passage; and accommodate the movement of
debris and bed material during bank -full events. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
Consideration should be given to minimum water depth during low-flow/dry periods when
designing culvert placement. Sufficient water depth should be maintained during low flows to
accommodate both the upstream and downstream movement of aquatic species. Water depth
inside the culvert must be adequate for fish to be completely immersed and not scraping the
bottom of the stream. The culvert should be designed and installed at the same slope as the
stream grade to maintain an acceptable water velocity for fish passage, and the stream substrate
characteristics should be retained within the culvert. Where feasible, we recommend the use of
multiple barrels (other than the base -flow barrel), placed on or near stream bank -full or
floodplain bench elevation, in order to accommodate floodwaters within the stream corridor.
These should be reconnected to floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by
using sills on the upstream end to restrict or divert flow to the base -flow barrel(s). If the culvert
is longer than 40 linear feet, alternating or notched baffles should be installed in a manner that
mimics the existing stream pattern. This should enhance the passage of aquatic life by:
(1) depositing sediment in the barrel, (2) maintaining channel depth and flow regimes, and
(3) providing resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms.
Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground -disturbing
activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing vegetation should be
M

retained (if possible) to maintain shoreline cover for fish and wildlife. Disturbed areas should be
revegetated with native grass and tree species as soon as the project is completed.
The proper planning, design, and installation of stream crossings provide year-round aquatic
organism passage and preserve healthy streams. We recommend the following Web site for
additional information regarding stream crossing activities:
http://www.stream.fs.fed.uslflshxinglpointers.htm1
Federal Endangered and Threatened Species. According to our records and a review of the
information you provided, no federally listed species or their habitats occur on the site.
Therefore, we believe the requirements under section 7 of the Act are fulfilled. However,
obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals
impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not
previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not
considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may
be affected by the identified action.
Thank you for allowing us to comment on this project. If you have any questions, please contact
Mr. Allen Ratzlaff of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 229. In any future correspondence
concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-15-196.
E -Copy: Andrea Leslie, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission,
[e-mail]
5

AP15%
VLOt"A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Land and Water Stewardship
Pat McCrory Bryan Gossage Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Director Secretary
March 23, 2015
Mr. Chris Tinklenberg
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
2000 South Boulevard, Suite 440
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
[e-mail]
RE: Hendersonville Retail Site (REVISED)
Greenville Highway and White Street, Hendersonville, Henderson County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Tinklenberg:
Thank you for the opportunity to provide information from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) database for the proposed project referenced above. As noted in your request for information
dated February 24, 2015, and received by our office on March 2, 2015, we previously provided
information on natural heritage resources for this project on September 12, 2014. Upon review of the
REVISED project area, the NCNHP database does not show any records for rare species, important
natural communities, natural areas, or conservation managed areas within the project area as depicted
in the maps submitted with your request for information.
Also based on a review with the revised project area, the NCNHP database shows element occurrence
records for the following rare species within one mile of the proposed project area:
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME
ELEMENT
OCCURRENCE
STATUS*
ACCURACY
STATE
STATUS*
FEDERAL
STATUS*
Acontium reclinatum
Trailing Wolfsbane
Current
Low
SR -T
---
Asplenium pinnotifidum
Lobed Spleenwort
Current
Medium
SR -P
---
Colopteryx amata
Superb Jewelwing
Historical
Very Low
SR
I ---
Crotalus horridus
Timber Rattlesnake
Historical
Low
SC
---
Dendrolycopodium dendroideum
Prickly Ground -pine
Historical
Very Low
SR -P
---
Glyceria laxa
Lax Mannagrass
Current
High
SR -P
---
Hexastylis rhombiformis
French Broad Heartleaf
Current
Medium
(4 records)
SR -L
FSC
Sagittaria fasciculata
Bunched Arrowhead
Current
High
E
E
Sarracenia jonesii
Mountain Sweet Pitcher Plant
Historical
Low
(2 records)
E
E
Senecio suaveolens
Sweet Indian -plantain
Historical
Low
SC -H
---
Spilogale putorius
Eastern Spotted Skunk
Historical
Very Low
SR -G
---
Stachys eplingii
Epling's Hedge -nettle
Historical
Low
SR -T
---
Current
High
Tholictrum macrostylum
Small -leaved Meadowrue
Current
High
SR -T
FSC
Thermopsis mollis
Appalachian Golden -banner
Current
Low
SC -V
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] \ Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

Hendersonville Retail Site (REVISED)
Greenville Highway and White Street, Hendersonville, Henderson County, North Carolina
March 23, 2015
Page 2
*For status and accuracy definitions, please see the Rare Species Status Definitions and Element Occurrences documents at
https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help.
The occurrence of Trailing Wolfsbane is from the vicinity of Hendersonville, and the occurrence of Lobed
Spleenwort is from the Canteloup Estate, south of Hendersonville in the vicinity of US -21 to Highland
Avenue. The occurrence records for Superb Jewelwing, Prickly Ground -pine, and Eastern Spotted Skunk
all have very low accuracy because the records lack site-specific locational information, but these three
species have been documented in Henderson County. The occurrences of Timber Rattlesnake and
Appalachian Golden -banner have also been documented in the vicinity Hendersonville.
Occurrences of Lax Mannagrass, Epling's Hedge -nettle, Small -leaved Meadowrue, French Broad
Heartleaf, Mountain Sweet Pitcher Plant, and Bunched Arrowhead are all documented at the Ochlawaha
Bog natural area, located south of the proposed project; the NCNHP database also shows a record for a
high-quality Swamp Forest -Bog Complex (Typic Subtype) in this natural area. The Ochlawaha Bog
natural area is owned and managed by the North Carolina Department of Agriculture, Plant
Conservation Program (PCP), as a plant conservation preserve, and a portion of the natural area is a
Dedicated Nature Preserve. An occurrence of Mountain Sweet Pitcher Plant is also located in the Bat
Fork Bog natural area, located northeast of the project area; a portion of this natural area is also owned
and managed by the PCP and is a Dedicated Nature Preserve.
Additional occurrences of French Broad Heartleaf are known to occur at Osceola Lake, Tom Hill, and in
remnant wetlands in the vicinity of Fitzsimons Street in Hendersonville, and occurrences of Sweet
Indian -plantain and an additional population of Epling's Hedge -nettle have been documented in the
vicinity of Flat Rock.
In addition, the NCNHP database shows that a parcel adjacent to the southern portion of the proposed
project area is considered to be City of Hendersonville Open Space. Other conservation/managed areas
near the proposed project area include those at Ochlawaha Bog and Bat Fork Bog (mentioned above), as
well as various parcels considered to be Henderson County open space, the Jackson Park Wetland
Registered Heritage Area northeast of the project area, and conservation easements in the vicinity of
Ochlawaha Bog that are held by the Carolina Mountain Land Conservancy and the Natural Resources
Conservation Service.
The locations of natural areas and conservation/managed areas nearby the project area, including those
referenced above, may be viewed by accessing the Natural Heritage Data Explorer online map viewer, or
by downloading and using Geographic Information System (GIS) data; both options are available from
the NCNHP Data Services webpage (see www.ncnhp.org).
Please note that although the NCNHP database may not show records for rare species within the
proposed project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. Occurrences of rare species documented within one mile of the
proposed project area increase the likelihood that these species may be present within the project area
if suitable habitat exists. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual
field surveys if needed, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare
species are found during field surveys, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that
we may update our database.

Hendersonville Retail Site (REVISED)
Greenville Highway and White Street, Hendersonville, Henderson County, North Carolina
March 23, 2015
Page 3
Thank you for your interest in information available from the NCNHP database. Please feel free to
contact me at 919-707-8629 or [e-mail] if you have questions or need additional
information.
Sincerely,
Allison Schwarz Weakley, Conservation Planner
NC Natural Heritage Program

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
March 24, 2015
Chris Tinklenberg
2000 South Boulevard, Suite 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
SUBJECT: Hendersonville Site, revised
Halvorsen Development Corporation
Henderson County
Dear Mr. Tinklenberg:
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) received your
February 24, 2015 letter about the proposed retail development project. You requested
comments on any potential issues that might emerge with respect to fish and wildlife. Comments
from the Commission are provided under provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
(48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and the National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332 (2)(c).
Our staff is not aware of any particularly important fish and wildlife habitats in or near the
project area.
However, according to the NC Flood Risk Information System
(htlp:Hfris.nc.gov/fris/Home.aspx?ST=NC), the site is situated in the floodway of the Mud Creek
floodplain, which stores and treats floodwater. The NCWRC does not support commercial or
residential development within the 100 -year floodplain. The filling of floodplains increases the
potential for flooding and degrades in -stream habitats for fish and other aquatic organisms.
We do have the following recommendations for the project:
1. The site is adjacent to Mud Creek, which is on the 2014 303(d) list and suffers from urban
impacts such as stormwater flows and pollutants. We recommend that the applicant treat and
retain stormwater on-site, using stormwater control measures to mimic the hydrograph
consistent with an impervious coverage of less than 10%.
2. NCWRC recommends a minimum 100 -foot undisturbed, native, forested buffer along Mud
Creek and any other perennial streams, and a minimum 50 -foot buffer along intermittent
streams and wetlands. We understand that the site is already impacted and that a narrow
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Hendersonville Site Halvorsen Development Page 2 March 24, 2015
Mud Creek, Henderson County
buffer exists along Mud Creek; however, we recommend that the applicant widen this
forested buffer as much as feasible. Maintaining undisturbed, forested buffers will minimize
impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources, water quality, and aquatic habitat both
within and downstream of the project area. Wide riparian buffers are helpful in maintaining
stability of stream banks and for treatment of pollutants associated with urban stormwater. In
addition, these buffers will provide an adequate travel corridor for wildlife species.
3. Use non-invasive native species and Low Impact Development (LID) technology in
landscaping. Using native species instead of ornamentals should reduce the need for water,
fertilizers and pesticides. Using LID technology in landscaping will not only help maintain
the predevelopment hydrologic regime, but also enhance the aesthetic and habitat value of
the site.
4. Sediment and erosion control measures should be installed prior to any land clearing or
construction. These measures should be routinely inspected and properly maintained.
Excessive silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on aquatic resources
including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills of
aquatic species.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Please contact me at
[phone] if there are any questions about these comments.
Sincerely,
Andrea Leslie
Mountain Region Coordinator, Habitat Conservation Program
ec: Allen Ratzlaff

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
March 17, 2015
Chris Tinklenberg
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
2000 South Boulevard, Suite 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Amendment to Construct Retail Building & Parkling Lot, Intersection of Greenville Highway & White
Street, Hendersonville, Henderson County, ER 14-2073
Dear Mr. Tinklenberg:
Thank you for your letter of February 24, 2015, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.reviewkncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
(1� aL�L-��.
60VRamona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

Jurisdictional Determination Request
U5 Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (7D) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram.aspx , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
RPcrmirr-Pc Cnncam7atinn CPm71!`P nrinr to ctartincr Az7n1-lr
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 701 Greenville Highway
City, State: Hendersonville, NC
County: Henderson
DirectioiiS: From Hendersonville head south on Greenville Highway, site is located
to the west.
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 9568739994, 9568840380, 9568842052, 9568831970,
9568833809,9568841291,9568832720,9568842176
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Mailing Address: 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: 704-409-1802
Electronic Mail Addressi: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Halvorsen Development Corporation
Mailing Address: 851 South Federal Highway, Suite 201
Boca Raton, FL 33432
Telephone Number: 561-367-9200
Electronic Mail Address i:
❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
Z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION'
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
See attached agent authorization
Property Owner (please print) Date
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
W1I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WOUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
❑ I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

12
❑✓
Jurisdictional Determination Request
ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
❑✓ Size of Property or Project Area 6.86
W/1
G.
acres
I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
Project Coordinates: 35.304473
Latitude -82.458797
Maps (no larger than l lxl7) with Project Boundary Overlay:
Longitude
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑✓ USGS Topographic Map
W] Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑✓ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ✓❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑✓ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than llxl7) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/reg supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
httD://www.saw.usace.armv.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/Dublicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.Ddf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets9
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11"x17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
n1nfe and rpfnrn therm -.ria p -mail fn flip rpnnpefnr
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
❑ Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
❑ Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
❑ Must be legible
❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
❑ Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
❑ Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
❑ Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
❑ When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
❑ all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
❑ Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
❑ Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved 7D must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
❑ Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WrAT Tc
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (S) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
❑✓ be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
❑✓ include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): May 5, 2016
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Wilmington District - Asheville Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
701 Greenville Highway, Hendersonville, NC 28792
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC
County/parish/borough: Henderson
City: Hendersonville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.304473 °N; Long. -82.458797
0W
Universal Transverse Mercator: 1983
Name of nearest waterbody: Johnson Drainage Ditch
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
900 linear feet: 8 width (ft) and/or 0.17 acres.
Cowardin Class:
Stream Flow: Perennial
Wetlands: 0 acres.
Cowardin Class:
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: N/A
Non -Tidal: None

E
REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑✓ Field Determination. Date(s): 09/30/15
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑✓ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: vicinity map, topo map, SSURGO soil map, Waters of the U.S. map, FEMA Map, overall design plans
❑✓ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Hendersonville
❑✓ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Henderson County SSURGO Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps: Map Number 3700956800)
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: ❑✓ Aerial (Name & Date): 2015 Aerial Imagery
Other (Name & Date): 2015 Field photos
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2
or

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
3

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Pi
Digitally signed by
--- [e-mail]
-- c--- '�
ON. —chris.bnklenberg@kimley-horn, cam
Oat,: 2016 05,13 10:49:06 -04'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)