20010830 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20080103

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: I :??, I .2rl-F-, Evaluator's Name(s): -1 1
Date of Report: i 21 2 _ ,1 Report for Monitoring Year; Z Cc'
Date of Field Review: ??2?,? .f © Evaluator's Name(s).--
5 ?1 . ,kUA 6
Other Individuals/Agencies Present: K 1qr? 1 0 ( tlYl r?? l??_? UYI_
Weather Conditions (today & recent): t?'CL r N Nlk , \ (-C 1 oL?c9?e .
Directions to Site:
1. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20010830
Project Name: Lee Street Mitigation Site
County(ies): Brunswick
Basin & subbasin:
Nearest Stream:
?L
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream:
Mitigator Type: Private
DOT Status:
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 6.76 acres
Stream:
Buffer:
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes
Monitoring reports available?
.4- 1
(es

No
Problem areas identified in reports? tees` No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Project History
Event Event Date
Report Review - Wetlands 1/24/2007
Site Visit - Wetlands 5/31/2007
Mitigation required on site: *Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known):(1C4 _Ctx? c received, construction, planting, repairs, etc. j
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate ea component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Mitigation Component
Monitoring Success Success
Year (report) (field) Resolved
20010830-2 2.8 acres Wetland (Coastal) Enhancement
20010830-3 2.55 acres Wetland (Coastal) Preservation
20010830-1 1.41 acres Wetland (Coastal) Restoration
6 LI_c
6 <
- 6_(D he _ k?-
rnv
y1b
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS: _
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful pa all success I nsuccessf 11 List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional pomments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
we YA Lk.S
t ? ? a
f ?. i ? t: ?'.>_?%? ,?. `•_?l ?' _ ? ?1_G ??s ??ls?_C 1 L, ?- ? ?_?,'li. ??;??L{?'.?1??`- 1 ? !t ?`??i G?"t_ `? VCt
-LC:?I
J J
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 2.8 acres Wetland (Coastal) Enhancement Component ID: 20010830-2
Description: Spartina marsh
Location within project:
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: W etland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in upper 12 inches
Monitoring report indicates success Yes No Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? Yes No j Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to add ress (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):

SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: T }
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes o
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (. . er io pland areas, etc.):
l i
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/'/ cover
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Y?ls o
based on TPA and/or % cover? Y?s
Vegetation planted on site? Yes N
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? )Y s No
3-
A-D0
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 6
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques
NCWAM Type on Site:
Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? ' Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this r L Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful pa ially success full unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.): ?r• 01)?
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 6
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 2.55 acres Wetland (Coastal) Preservation Component ID: 20010830-3
Description: Spartina marsh
Location within project: C A-0- C
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: p? LI Vietland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in upper 12 inches
Monitoring report indicates success Y s No Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? Y No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? a Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? e o Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues Woad? re4s (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
SOILS - Approved Success Criteria:
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric?
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to addres
Yok No
e g.lerbsion, upland areas, etc.):
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria:
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):
Observational field data agrees? No
based on community compo itio Y Rs No
based on TPA and/or % cov Y No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/'% cover
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)
Page 3 of 6
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? I" Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to thi?'? e r
_ p, Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to addre?s ?(e.d. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: 4cessful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
' , t t ?Z?
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 4 of 6
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality

Component: 1.41 acres Wetland (Coastal) Restoration
Description: Spartina marsh
Location within project: Cj(1 L "?
III. Success Criteria Evaluation: it C.?_ ;
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: 1
*ADD from mit plan* ;??L,?(? Wetland Hydrolog Indicators:
V----'Inundated 1 ayl

1
C
T I
1

{,
C I u
t
,L (C
f C
l
L 1C
Saturated in upper re
inches
?
c
•1.
q1 ? ?? t-C
n?t?n g m port i ica es suc ss
o Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? No
ge Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? No Water mar U , Vl
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining it ` s, d xcessive water, etc.): 0?
,
?
' . C
)
t
cictt LC C6 C V _C.! - u
i I,Q. C'.A }C t <f
r?
?_l? r ? ?t?,)Ce, ?•?'_{ ?' _ ? Cc41 i?_I-,. ° (j `+ L c? tiCLl -('
L
--
L "
SOILS - Approved`Succe Criteria: ria
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to add ss;( g. r sion, upland areas, etc.):

VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
*ADD % cover details from mit plan* Species Story TPA/'% cover
CCU Lc'-"C U"rl-?_
4onitormg deport indicates success? Yes CNo

Average TPA for entire site (per report): I {- `
? ? & Yrf Ar i
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
"" i>C?t,k Lei c?
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No F
Vegetation planted on site? Yeses ??--?LC° ???? ?•<< c f '=:- --?;t?, ?_tor? t-?
Date of last planting: <-'; Ac
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No -c. -,
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
i <
'.\r d
tFlo
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):

List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, conce ns, etc.):
?l
ec
G ?e
(? C bC?.?Q
?
? YZ[??J
. ,
?? ?r? Cnrtr.vtie
LUG So C-.?- - CZA-k-C D -4- v116? L ^t . \VY ?_
-\ 1 11
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) ?p uJd 6'u GyA "kR.- V -4 6XD-Q vvL- bAA.
67
Component ID: 20010830-1 L
ICJ ?' a
A-ps?u- .
C -E- jo("
vc
1
tt. Via-1

Page 5 of 67
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
na Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? es No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this r Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to addr ss (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 6 of 6