20070997 Ver 2_401 Application_20080208

07-0177 4-

Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
5315 South College Road, Suite E
Wilmington, North Carolina 28412
910.452.2711 (office) • 910.452.2899 (fax)
Date: 20 February 2008
Transmittal Letter
To: Mr. Ian McMillan
Of: 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Attached you will find:*
? Proposal ? Sketch(es)
? JD Package ? Report(s)
,v r-?k,,T
r;<
SEGi Project #: 05-149.01
Client Name: K. Eason / Legend Builders
LISACOE Action ID#: 2006-32879-071
(r-z' R OW r=
FEB 2 1 2008
DENR - dVMER QUAUIY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
® Permit App. ? Signed Wetland Map ? Photo(s)
? Plans ? Information Request ? Other
Copies Dated Description
5 02/14/2008 PCN 29 Application for Hoover Road Subdivision
If noted items are NOT attached, please contact our office.
These are being delivered:
® For your Review/Comment ? For your Records ? Returned for Correction(s)
? Corrected and Returned ? For your Signature ? As Requested
? Other:
By: ? Hand Delivery ? Fed-Ex ? UPS © Regular Mail ? Other
Notes:
Ian:
Attached are five copies of a NWP 29 application for a proposed subdivision, Hoover Road Subdivision, located off Hoover Road in Pender
County. Also included is the $240 filing fee. Please review the attached documentation and let us know if you will need anything further in
order to process the application. Thank you in advance for your time.
Signature and (Typed) Name: C-?
AAmandoaL. Kolb
Date: 02/20/2008

5outkern Environmental 6roup, Inc.
55 15 South Collcgc Road, juitc r Wilmington North Carolina 28412
9 J O.-152.271 1- Fax: 9 10A-52.2899 • ofF1'cc05eg1.us
www.scgi.us
February 14, 2008
Hand Delivery
Mr. Ronnie Smith
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
FEB 2 1 2008
DENRiAEfClu,+u r
"STIANDS AND STORMWA ER BRANCH
RE: Proposed Hoover Road Subdivision
Hoover Road
Hampstead, Pender County
AID#: 2006-32879-071
Dear Mr. Smith:
[SEGi Project #: 05-149.01]
Southern Environmental Group, Inc. (SEGi) has been retained by Legend Builders, Inc., to
pursue Department of the Army approval to impact 0.49 acre (21,344.0 square feet) of
jurisdictional wetlands. All of the requested fill is necessary to construct access roadways within
the proposed Hoover Road subdivision. The project is located off Hoover Road, just beyond
Renee Drive in Hampstead, Pender County, North Carolina.
The subject parcel is comprised of 76.72 acres (3,341,923.2 square feet), 39.31 acres of which
are considered jurisdictional wetlands, according to the parameters set forth in the 1987 Army
Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. The adjacent parcel is 44.85 acres in size, and
is owned by Mr. Kenny Eason et al. Previous submittals of the Pre-Construction Notification
application associated with this project requested a driveway crossing, which would allow Mr.
Eason access to his personal property, adjacent to the subdivision. Construction of the proposed
driveway crossing and personal residence were not anticipated to require wetland impacts. As
the permitting process has taken longer than anticipated, and cost more than originally thought,
the Applicant is unable to construct his personal residence at this time. Economic hardships have
limited the Applicant to only constructing the subdivision. Further down the line, when the
Applicant is in a better economic position to construct his personal residence, he will treat any
required wetland impacts associated with the driveway as cumulative with the subdivision (as the
driveway permit would have been contingent upon the subdivision roads being constructed).

SEGO
The Applicant is proposing a low density 10-lot subdivision on the subject parcel, which would
require 0.49 acre ( 21,344.0 square feet) of impact. These impacts are associated with the
construction of an access road. Utilities will be installed within the roadway, so the fill request
has accounted for all impacts. No impacts will result due to lot fill. The requested impacts are
unavoidable, and have been minimized as much as is practicable. The table below outlines the
fill request:
This particular project has a history with the Wilmington District. Two environmental firms
were hired to do the preliminary work on the project. The Clark Group, out of Wilmington, was
responsible for the wetland delineation. Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc., were responsible
for the engineering of the project, as well as the original submittal of the Pre-Construction
Notification. The original permit application was withdrawn by the Applicant's new agent,
SEGi, on (or around) 19 November 2007. Prior to the withdraw of the application, SEGi
addressed comments received from the Army Corps of Engineers, contained within a "Request
for Additional Information." In that request, the Corps inquired why the entrance road could not
be relocated further south, to reduce wetland impacts. Using CAD technologies, SEGi relocated
the roadway and calculated the impact acreage of the relocated road. While the impacts were
reduced in the relocation, subsequent research indicated that the road relocation would not be
economically feasible. The impact would be reduced by approximately 0.20 acre, but would also
eliminate the use of Lot 10 as a viable piece of real estate. With the original impact totaling 0.49
acre, and the property selling for $50,000/acre, the loss of an almost five acre lot would result in
the loss of nearly $250,000 in potential income. In addition, the Applicant would be required to
have all his engineered drawings re-designed, in order to show the roadway in the new location.
Also, the Applicant would have to apply for modifications to all his existing permits, as well as
take the project through the Technical Review Committee again. All of these factors, including
the loss of $250,000, the amount of time it would take to obtain the necessary modifications and
engineered drawings, versus an approximately 0.20 acre wetland impact reduction, make the
relocation of the proposed roadway not a practicable alternative.
5L6i
In accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition 20 (c), compensatory mitigation is
proposed for the impacts associated with this project. The Applicant is offering a combination of
mitigation mechanisms to off-set unavoidable wetland impacts. First, minimization of impacts to
wetlands was carried out by incorporating a retaining wall on each side of the entrance road,
where the bulk of the impacts are proposed. By utilizing the retaining wall, impacts were
reduced by 0.09 ac. (4050.5 square feet). Second, the Applicant is offering to place a 25 foot
buffer off the centerline of Brick Run Branch. The Applicant is aware that the Corps feels an
effective water quality buffer should be at least 50 feet in width, but suggests that the 25 foot
buffer would be sufficient, since the area adjacent to the buffer would be yard and would assist in
sediment removal. The third component of the Applicant's mitigation proposal is to provide all
lot purchasers with a copy of the wetland boundary survey, as well as a separate document, which
will inform potential buyers that any impacts to wetlands will more than likely be reviewed
under the Individual Permit process and will have to be mitigated for. This will assist in making
future lot owners aware that impacts to wetlands will not be permissible without appropriate
regulatory approval. Fourth, the Applicant is offering the preservation of approximately 8.85
acres of wetlandsJound adjacent to the Hoover Road subdivision entrance (up to the property
lines of Lots 1 & 10). These wetlands will be protected in perpetuity by the restrictive covenants
associated with the subdivision. In addition to placing these wetlands into preservation, the
Applicant will provide deed notifications on all lots with remaining unpreserved wetlands. The
Applicant's final component of mitigation is to make payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (NC EEP) at 2:1 ratio, for non-riparian wetland impacts.
As stated previously within this cover letter, The Clark Group was responsible for the wetland
delineation, and subsequent submittal of environmental documentation. Thus, SEGi is not in
receipt of the tear sheet or signed wetland boundary survey, though both of these items should be
on file at the Corps' office.
For clarification and verification of the statements made above, please refer to the following
documentation attached to this correspondence:
Attachment 1.
Attachment 2.
Attachment 3.
Attachment 4.
Attachment 5.
Attachment 6.
Attachment 7.
Pre-Construction Notification
Overall Impact Map
Profile and Plan View - Impact Area 1
Plan View - Impact Area 2
Profile Drawings of Impact Area 2 (a, b, c)
Draft Copy of Restrictions
Exhibit A - Wetland Preservation Map

SEGO
Attachment 8. Draft Copy of Deed Notifications
Attachment 9. Acceptance Letter from NC EEP
Attachment 10. Jurisdictional Information Sheet (signed 20 March 2007 by Mr.
Brad Shaver)
Attachment 11. Approximate Wetland Boundary Survey (not signed, not to scale)
Attachment 12. Property Deeds (a, b)
Attachment 13. Stormwater Permit No. SW8 070533
Attachment 14. Alternative Road Location Drawing
Attachment 15. Aerial Photograph
Attachment 16. Vicinity Maps (2 scales)
Attachment 17. Letter of Agency
Attachment 18. Documentation from Engineer re Culvert at Crossing 1
Please review the attached Pre-Construction Notification and accompanying documentation
requesting authorization to utilized NWP 29. Should you have any questions, concerns, or
comments, feel free to contact me at 910.452.2711. Thank you in advance for your assistance
with this project.
Sincerely, ll? ,,
?L?/ 0_? "
Amanda L. Kolb
Environmental Consultant
cc: Mr. Chad Coburn (DWQ)
Mr. Ian McMillan (401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit)
Legend Builders, Inc. (Client)
Enclosures: (18)
1?' P' ?4 r- n i T
FA r
Office Use Only:
USAGE Action ID No.
DWQ No.
Revised Version December 106
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
II.
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
?x Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
0 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 29
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?X
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4),
and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information:
Name: Legend Builders
Attn: Mr. Kenny Eason ??L51J `J
Mailing Address: 400 Carl Street
Suite 202 FEB 2 1 ?"8
Telephone Number: 910.264.3479 Fax Number: N/A
E-mail Address: N/A ?n ?r,
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Ms. Amanda Kolb
Company Affiliation: Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
Mailing Address: 5315 S. College Rd. Suite E
Wilmington, North Carolina 28412
Telephone Number: 910.452.2711 Fax Number: 910.452.2899
E-mail Address: amandaksegi.us
Page 1 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction drawings
rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are reduced to a
small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the project
has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Hoover Road Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 3283-71-6618-0000
4. Location
County: Pender (# 71) Nearest Town: Hampstead
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Follow US-17 N out of
Wilmington, into Hampstead past NC-210 W). Take a left onto Hoover Road The site
is on the left, just after Renee Drive.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 34.3797 °N 77.7145 °W
6. Property size (acres): 76.72 acres (3,341,923.2 square feet)
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Brick Run Branch
8. River Basin: Northeast Cape Fear River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 2 of 12
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at
the time of this application:
The subject parcel is comprised of 76.72 acres. It was determined that of the 76.72 acres
approximately 40.6 acres would be considered jurisdictional wetlands according to the
parameters set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual
and a site visit, held on 13 June 2006, by Ms. Elizabeth Hair. As is evident on the
"Jurisdictional Information Sheet," Mr. Brad Shaver concurred with Ms Hair's
findings, stating that the proposed jurisdictional boundaries that were provided to his
office were accurate.
Vegetation associated with the project site includes: Ilex coriacea (Large allberry), Ilex
vomitoria (Yaupon holly), Liquidambar stvraciflua (Sweetgum), Magnolia virginiana
(Sweetbay magnolia), Mvrica cerifera (Wax myrtle), Persea boronia (Red bay), Quercus
nigra (Water oak), Smilax rotundiflora (Catbriar), Pinus taeda (Loblolly pine) and Pinus
serotina (Pond pine), among others. The forested wetlands on-site are vegetated with a
mixed canopy of Magnolia virginiana (Sweetbay magnolia), Pinus taeda (Loblolly pine),
Pinus serotina (Pond pine) and Liguidambar stvraciflua (Sweetgum). a shrub laver of flex
coriacea (Gallberry), Ilex vomitoria (Yaupon holly), Mvrica cerifera (Wax myrtle) and
Persea borbonia (Red bay), and an understory of Smilax rotundiflora Catbriar).
The subject parcel is vacant of any structures and is heavily vegetated Many trees on
the property are larger than 6-8 inches in diameter. The property identification number
(PIN) is 3283-71-6618-0000, and the Action ID number associated with the project is
2006-32879-071. The surrounding land use in the vicini of the project is a mixture of
residential, used for schools or remains undeveloped
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The_project is a low density 10 lot residential subdivision located off Hoover Road in
Hampstead, Pender County North Carolina The proposed development plans will
conform to low density residential zoning designations for the subject parcel and will be
consistent with the Pender County Subdivision Ordinances Utility corridors sewer
areas, fire hydrants, and roadways will be put into service to meet the needs of future
residents. Utility lines will be laid beneath the roadway. Heavy equipment will be used
in this project, such as an excavator, hack hoe and bull dozer. The machinery will be
used to clear the land, stabilize the soil and establish 2rade
There are a total of two (2 areas of proposed wetland impacts throughout the planned
subdivision, which are associated with the construction of a main collector roadway. The
proposed wetland impacts total 0.49 acre (21,344.0 square feet), and are necessary for the
completion of the proposed roadway. The roadway will grant access to lots while
meeting minimum DOT standards. The impacts are unavoidable and have been
minimized as much as is practicable. The Applicant is proposing a retaining wall to
stabilize the fill material associated with the proposed road crossings
Page 3 of 12
The parcel adjacent to the subject site is owned by Kenny Eason etal and should be
considered independent of the subject parcel Previous submittals of the Pre-
Construction Notification application associated with this project requested a driveway
crossing, which would allow Mr. Eason access to his personal property, adjacent to the
subdivision. Construction of the proposed driveway crossing and personal residence
were not anticipated to require wetland impacts As the permitting process has taken
longer than anticipated, and cost more than originally thought, the Applicant is unable to
construct his personal residence at this time Economic hardships have limited the
Applicant to only constructing the subdivision Further down the line when the
Applicant is in a better economic position to construct his personal residence he will treat
any required wetland impacts associated with the driveway as cumulative with the
subdivision (as the driveway permit would have been contingent upon the subdivision
roads being constructed).
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The purpose of the proposed project is to create a low density, 10 lot minor residential
subdivision in a developing area of Pender County. Pender County has experienced
rapid development, therefore, undeveloped areas of town must be looked at for
development. The proposed location off Hoover Road is ideal, as this area is close to the
heart of Hampstead, but not located in an extremely rapidly developing part of town
This subdivision will provide additional housing in an area that has a need for new
residences.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Two environmental firms were hired to do the preliminary work on the project
The Clark Group, based out of Wilmington, was responsible for the wetland
delineation. Trigon Engineering Consultants Inc., were responsible for the
engineering of the project, as well as the submittal of the original Pre-Construction
Notification. The original permit application was subsequently withdrawn by the
Applicant's new agent, SEGi, on 19 November 2007
USACE Action ID #: 2006-32879-071 (issued 20 March 2007 by Mr Brad Shaver)
Stormwater Permit #: SW8 070533 (issued 13 June 2007)
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Permit #• Has been applied for by Tri on
Engineers, who are currently awaiting response.
Page 4 of 12
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no future permit requests anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Impact Area A: Excavation and fill are necessary to complete the proposed roadway, and
allow for the installation of water main below ground.
Impact Area B: Excavation and fill are necessary to complete the proposed roadway, and
allow for the installation of a water main below ground.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For
dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain (yes/
no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 Excavation & Fill P, FO-1 No 2,400 0.43
2 Excavation & Fill P, FO-1 No 1,200 0.06

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.49
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
39.31 acres (1,712,343.6 square feet)
Page 5 of 12
4. Individually list all intennittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify
temporary impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or
culverts, dam construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement
walls, rip-rap, crib walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream
relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the
original and relocated streams must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X
width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width

Before Impact Impact
Length

(linear feet) Area of
Impact
)
(acres)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) N/A N/A
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds,
Atlantic Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not
limited to fill- excavatinn dredaina flnnrl;na rlrn;,,? 1-11L-Ik-A? -+-
Open Water
Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)

Type of Impact
Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.)
Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6
List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the roiect:
Stream Impact (acres): N/A
Wetland Impact (acres : 0.49
Open Water Impact (acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) N/A
Total Stream Impact (linear feet : N/A
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ?D No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Page 6 of 12
Pond Creation: N/A
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):_
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):_
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Per the request of the Corps, additional consideration was given to avoidance and
minimization of this site, as that was one of the items addressed in the "request for
additional information" associated with the first PCN submittal (original PCN has since
been withdrawn). The Corps had requested justification for not locating the entrance road
further south utilizing additional uplands. Please see response below:
Using the same parameters of the roadway as proposed in it's original location SEGi
relocated the roadway to the southern property boundary, adjacent to the Quinn property.
Using AutoCAD to calculate the impact acreage, the relocated roadway would impact 0.26
acre of wetlands, and eliminate the use of Lot 10 as potential real estate. With the original
impact totaling approximately 0.49 acre and the proper selling for $50,000/acre the loss
of the almost five acre lot would result in the loss of nearly $250,000 in potential income.
The economic loss of Lot 10 financially is not a practicable alternative to the original
design.
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) essentially places a
monetary value on wetlands and waters of the State of North Carolina. According to their
schedule of fees, the amount of money it would take to off-set an impact of 0.20 acre of non-
riparian wetlands, at a 2:1 ratio, would be $7,338.00, a significantly less economic impact
than the loss of Lot 10, $250,000.
While it is true that the relocation of the proposed entryway would result in approximately
0.23 acre less of an impact than leaving the roadway in its posed current location, the
additional costs associated with said relocation would prove the project economically
unfeasible. Primarily, the relocated roadway would result in the loss of Lot 10 as a viable
Page 7 of 12
piece of real estate, automatically reducing the potential income generated by the
subdivision by $250,000. In addition the Applicant would be required to have all his
engineered drawings redrawn, in order to show the roadway in its new location Finally,
the applicant would have to apply for modifications to all his existing permits as well as
take his project through the Technical Review Committee (TRC) to receive approval All
of these aforementioned monetary issues factored in with the amount of time it would take
to obtain all of the necessary permit modifications and engineered drawings, versus the
reduction in wetland impacts on-site by 0.23 acre is not an economically viable option.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/
or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/
ncwetiands/stnnizide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Page 8 of 12
The Applicant is offering a combination of mitigation mechanisms to off-set
unavoidable wetland impacts:
-? First, minimization of impacts to wetlands was carried out by incorporating
a retaining wall on each side of the entrance road, where the bulk of the
impacts are proposed. By utilizing the retaining wall, impacts were reduced
by 0.09 ac. (4050.5 SF).
4 Second, the Applicant is offering to place a 25 foot buffer off the centerline of
Brick Run Branch. The Applicant is aware that the Corps feels an effective
water quality buffer should be at least 50 feet in width, but suggests that the
25 foot buffer would be sufficient, since the area adjacent to the buffer would
be yard and would assist in sediment removal.
4 The third component of the Applicant's mitigation proposal is to provide all
lot purchasers with a copy of the wetland boundary urvey, as well as a
separate document, which will inform potential buyers that an impacts to
wetlands will more than likely be reviewed under the Individual Permit
process and will have to be mitigated for. This will assist in making future
lot owners aware that impacts to wetlands will not be permissible without
appropriate regulatory approval.
4 Fourth, the Applicant is offering the preservation of approximately 8.85
acres of wetlands, found adjacent to the Hoover Road subdivision entrance
(up to the property lines of Lots 1 & 10). These wetlands will be protected in
perpetuity by the restrictive covenants associated with the subdivision In
addition to placing these wetlands into preservation the Applicant will
provide deed notifications on all lots with remaining wetlands on them The
deed notifications will inform future property owners that wetlands exist on
their lots, which are subject to regulations under the Corps and Division of
Water Quality.
4 The Applicant's final component of mitigation is to make Dayment to the
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) at 2.1 ratio for
non-riparian wetland impacts.
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Page 9 of 12
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0.0 .
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0.0 .
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.0 .
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres) 1.0 acre.
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.0
I. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No ?x
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
IX. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify)?
Yes ? No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Page 10 of 12
Zone* Impact Required
(square feet Multiplier
(s9 ) 1 Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
X. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide
calculations demonstrating total proposed impervious level
Existing impervious acreage versus total acreage on-site is 0%
Total on-site area = 76.72 ac
Total ISA =14.02 ac.
% ISA =18.3%
Stormwater controls for the site include: vegetated drainage swales leading to two wet
detention ponds. Please see attached Page 1 of stormwater permit provided by Trigon
Engineering.
XI. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will be treated via septic measures
II. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes O No FX1
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No R
Page 11 of 12
XII. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes O No ?X
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
This is an individual development which is not associated with any other development
plans. The completion of this subdivision would not result in development outside the
proposed project area and would have minimal impact on downstream water quality.
XIII. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose
to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work
schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
02-1 1 1 08
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
L
\ ? ` e\ \e I ?1 I ? Q \ ,,.
• Yom.).
E°"I ao
(tom, LL Cc or
9g W
i
ti \ \\\\`.
1
r
rr
,
,
j i
r
r ?
/ - 0 +1
i

Iz
W
l.L
li
m
Q
Ih
Q
Iy
LC)
N
M
0
r.
I 1
J 1 ?-
Li
1 ¢
I ? ,1
V z ¢
1 /l?
I 1
' J
t ?
{ I
/ I
i I
? I
r•
r
A
1 /

4) 3
VI
u
v
rj Z
k0
A I
lY \ ? I I
C ?? I I
\ I
1
I +1 ?r l
00 ?. 1•
I '. I .
Oil
' r7 f I,
------------------ ----------
- - - - - ------, , I
1
I U 1.1
L
?? .`
I'
I CfJ f is
I
----------__T
N Q
?\ D -H ---------------? ;
i?
W W
\ Lo M r , J
O CN i I
?C) Q ?? C)
\ Q 1
I
1 I ?N. 1 '
b 1
-?F %Vcy" , QI
Q I W
? I4-
1 ?I
Li.i /41 e e\ <1 VI)
Q h V r'?ee e Q?.
_ Q Q z 1
Z -H
\,? ? 1. I ?\ Q• ee I
<?,r?. /
w T-
z?
J ?
O
F- rs
W O
NO Z
Ch
W
wZ
Z W
U
W
l.?
Z
m
z
Q
Cy
d
N

x

e
U-J
IF
e ,I
e "
? i
e I ?
?- e
\ W Nip i
1 Qii
'T. I? NN N
Q -H
W N W N O N
Z N
? ? LD
CJ W
r- r-
?. I \ iu,
W
Z
LLI
cr
W
U)
Z
F
V)
0
U
9
f?
v

o
r
W
U
Z
a Li
? J
0. N
CL 0
Z Z
5 °
a J 0
L) L.1 LJ
W ZU O
n a W
z? Z
w O Z N
? = W Q
a V' Z w
F
Z w? N
W V U
O w W
Z pN ~
OO Z
O cr U m
cr Z p m
O Q
Ix z ui p
d Vw
-'
1-
Z O
W p0 Z
o ?
L QU W
Z U
-j LJ
d L` z
Co N W
O ? N m
- cy rri
V)
?I
00
cv7
0
II
Z
O

O
0
Z I-
<

2
q
? ?
W

I
LLJ ? 1
-
W
3 N
W
?CL

C5
Z O
0 F- 117 D
Q Z
?- Q
0 o

w CL
0 I-
W
:
J Z
U p
z
_ N =

?
J
m (n

2 ? Z
O
Y ca

Z

N m

Q

p

T
W L'i
Oa
<
W I
-
N
W Z
4
1-
N
? p O O l/l 4N1

W
W O
Lr) p
Z O
W
°
} U
W
?; OOp N W
O O
I- Lj Z = Z Z p ° U O
N
Z M Z WLX
a? O 11] Z Q Z
O
z
D C) a
Z u w
0
U a N O N 0
Z Z =
t= O
Q' U
`L t= o
al oz
°> aow
U°° 0
a 0 N
it •-
Z (N
°
C.)
Z Q
L?s
i ?W
Z a r
Lj
<
0 N
w
U N a z
a Lj
O v
LL'i
a- F-
?
_
aN0 a
O
W
a
°
O
Z
a
?o
?
NCC UJ
o

o
m
a- >
O
Q
W ,_-. 0 IX
0

J
Z
J m
x
J

W
C? 1- a I
F- 0 a IY

O N

Z
Z JW Li
p
W?O a Z I- O O p
a
0
' cr a
Oaam
Z °v o J w = LLJ
-

O -Z

N
U, 11
WO
W
a

0

W
Q
C)
>
N
O Q j o
V) t 0 = w
O Z
Z
O 20Wa O 0 z 5 w
? w 0
ry
O Oa D(,
Z
m Z
Q
J
a
N p
Z
Z w
>N
a

Z WO
l- pD
Z V) W
N
Z }
0>,-: aN
pW O
U C)
LL,
U?
p
Zp
< 00 W®
w m Q a W< Z -Q
Z

g LJ
w? pe
Z
?
Z
=
Z 2 O
a N?
O W
Z
N

4 t
1_1N
Z aQ
W Q
w } a
X L.
I
?
Z Z _
Z
W ?W N j Z=
Li W S
L
1 w
Z W O? Wiz J L p z z a .
d J
c? Zm
iJWCDm a
1-- -
LI)
O
O
xw
z
um
m ? O 0 u~-i LL j (J) !! a a a L. m 0 yr
•i ui t0 r-? Co 6 O N
S
1
77 Lf C?/ 1-1
° ?4
C^J tl
GV ? ?
M1' ? ? w
c!) Gz
%
$ ?-
w CD
v
^ Q
X
O Q x
?
z d Y C C 0.
I .-. L W a
i
I
y
,I
/"" \ 1 1 tK
ff ` ?l ? i ? W
C) x W
p ^?' LJ
// ? op tY? Q z
u
/ u, W
U7
o
M
/ • J \? ?? __I y ? V1
/ ? r- `!J w w
Q cv 3 s a?
z S z
LLJ
d O W ,'I \
/ vl _ •I
ti co c L
LLJ
2 z
Q! g
z
V) LLJ
L(I
_ Q 4+ t-15 GC X Z cn x
U u_I
_1`t??C wQ>Q wZ
?? d Zy,l S Gy Z Q G
>- o w d w Q
< Li
tz LO
LO V) Li
NI \ / w u?
U vj w Z ?? U p u) >
Q Z w0 i''A Q rr
1y Q? z r 2 Z¢° U?
\ cl? _? CY fl UU C3 it p ° r`1 G af
i VZ) 5, 2 ¢ ? vHr G T O fl
~w`' j Z z Q O U LJ U1 Cw7 Z z r' cr U
}? - 3 c7
1 a a ?z aoL, o a LO
?i uw w Y °> z rM 'z z
?o 0 0 ¢L ar w u" z °
?.! \\ w Oz an ° jp ?Gw G w <t w w w
ck: n? U, ° o G m a s
w Y
L, C)
w o w a= > O m ," ?_
Ift a / a v7 O _w w m ?-
{wjU Z _j W Gw00G z G G
j ° ?m = a C) , oaf w
G < w
\ z 0, ) G UR IL Z 4° w CL J ¢ U to
?j I Z G G Z m J r Q G G {=j m
?, G (Y (L' 2 d G U O
e I W Z U m G z> Z p z U 2
m w
k N? F GG O yr ?w ¢?o ° w G G
?C \ I zN ° G oa o°?GO_ a a n ° z >¢
\ CL 71W Z Z OO 0 ) In Z GW U UOC
G O F 9 Z G 0 0 M m d Q w Gl Z Fy {
b(? ` \ C7 z w e? 5< -
, 0 w z o n 0 CA ?, n
z 6,
z z z=
O- DGWa w ZN z a- T`4
Z Z +- w :- of _j w G q L Q
v i Z3 Z G w U w z U m Q> I.? z w m
+. vl- ! Z o z m m ?° GNwv) ? a a ci0 Ov,
w r i v ui cn
r-? C6 a;
A
S
r i. 4 L+ -J 1:4.1 1 tl ? 1 ir_--'+.. ,
?F DO
N
/{'0 co
IR9
:t
LU
0
.L
J
r-
d
p z >

V)
r-
r- w LLJ
Lill LK
C
J

z e-- z
L) d

LD
L
CD + r f
Lj +
tl Y i

J N-
Z
Q
U w
?
C3
Z r
V) Li

>

LLJ U
J
m T-

J
2 U X Z ' ?Q L7
W [Y

C7 C

Q
U)

Q
Qw
-a: ?
V ?
?` t
Y
U
O W
V)
ui

U
V) )
w Z
Z
cr U
W
z w
r ?Cr
~ °
OU? o d >
O a
d
> W - Vl
cS L) Z Z V) )-
`t C7 U O
°cf: J Z Q d CL M fY
(I
Cl. V) V)
_j
z LLJ rr

Q z

=
z
O
Z ? C) U C- V1 d z z ® U
Z O
(Y U m Z Z? z O
CL
LAJ J
ZV 0
o cr
a 6 Z
d Q O LiA
zLJ O C) 3
an Q
? Z
z cn
i _a w D W
_j 0LL¢ W U)
U w d : W
n
z?
z V)
w
? C
Q-m:2
d-
>
Q
°
?
>
Lr
LAJ 3 1-
®
LJ ¢ Z Ct.
?
? O
Cr o L
i
O a O
L- L
V) V
i
E LLJ
, -/?..
O Q+ V
L O
Z .J o
Lj Lj

d
z

(J) <D
w
w t
w C[

a
}

f
Q
M

?-
z ?f- d ?w oW°?O CL Z
- G Cp
L,j z7 w Q O [? S a o W O
U V
)
© J v', ,
W U
Z o
N CY
0 LLI
O V) Z W M
Q d X LLJ
? z L? Q -y J
Z OOZ O
z m Uf- 0W <:) O ° ? Qm
laJ wU m O zW z®wQ ® ? z D U')
za
O Z
(i o>
V) ?
? cl? O C.
o W o
Lw o
Y
Y
W F- Ud c? o 00_ nU'-z
) a J
d w °
z
Q t
L"V
'
C!1 Z Vi
o O L 0
` C Z
? W r O O Lj
CL f d 6 L o
LJm d a a L° Z -Q
O Z W z a ? ? T zc, ? Z '` ° LJLn
0 W Z
dQ z ¢ r
' zW
z
U ?W
d z +v
z woZ
zi`Cfa V; "- r-
--L?,
z1: ?
X
O JW `) - O ?0d L W 12 Z w

--
t- -
z
Zm
U
m
;
5
z ?
W
i I
in F
M
O V7 J
?
? LL-i 0
Z U) m m r C? in L-1 VD Z CL 4. tl 0 M- 0 u7

CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. OBTAIN GRADING PERMIT FROM NCDENR AFTER
SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
2. INSTALL ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN.
INCLUDING SILT FENCE, SILT FENCE OUTLETS
AND CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.
3. BEGIN CLEARING AND GRUBBING THE SITE
AS NEEDED.
4. BEGIN INSTALLATION OF STORM DRAINAGE
AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
5. MONITOR SITE AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY HAVE TO BE INSTALLE
TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING
CONSTRUCTION SITE.
6. ONCE UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE AND UTILITES ARE
IN PLACE, BRING SITE TO FINISHED SUBGRADE
AND PREP FOR STONE AND PAVING. CONSULT
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AS NEEDED TO ENSURE
PROPER COMPACTION IS REACHED FOR PARKING
SUBGRADE AND BUILDING PAD. PROOF-ROLL
BE REQUIRED.
7. INSTALL STONE BASE AND COMPLETE PAVING
OPERATIONS, STRIPING, ETC.
8. PROPERTY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL
DEVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION.
9. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEEDING OF DISTURBED
AREAS WITHIN 15 DAYS OF GRADING.
10. PERMANENTLY SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED
AREAS WITHIN 30 DAYS OF ESTABLISHMENT
OF FINISHED GRADES.
11. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES UNTIL
PERMANENT GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED.
12. ONCE PERMANENT COVER ESTABLISHED, REMOVE
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND STABILIZE
THESE AREAS.

t??T?''JC?Mrn17- ?-
PIPE #1 - AQUATIC WILDLIFE TRANSFER PIPE
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " = 2'
PIPE #1 CROSSING IS AT STA. NO. 14+36.45, TRENNEY LEA DRIVE
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. OBTAIN GRADING PERMIT FROM NCDENR AFTER
SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
2. INSTALL ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN,
INCLUDING SILT FENCE, SILT FENCE OUTLETS
AND CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.
3. BEGIN CLEARING AND GRUBBING THE SITE
AS NEEDED.
4. BEGIN INSTALLATION OF STORM DRAINAGE
AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
5. MONITOR SITE AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY HAVE TO BE INSTALLED
TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING
CONSTRUCTION SITE.
6. ONCE UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE AND UTILITES ARE
IN PLACE, BRING SITE TO FINISHED SUBGRADE
AND PREP FOR STONE AND PAVING. CONSULT
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AS NEEDED TO ENSURE
PROPER COMPACTION IS REACHED FOR PARKING
SUBGRADE AND BUILDING PAD. PROOF-ROLL
BE REQUIRED.
7. INSTALL STONE BASE AND COMPLETE PAVING
OPERATIONS, STRIPING, ETC.
8. PROPERTY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL
DEVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION.
9. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEEDING OF DISTURBED
AREAS WITHIN 15 DAYS OF GRADING.
10. PERMANENTLY SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED
AREAS WITHIN 30 DAYS OF ESTABLISHMENT
OF FINISHED GRADES.
11. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES UNTIL
PERMANENT GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED.
12. ONCE PERMANENT COVER ESTABLISHED, REMOVE
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND STABILIZE
THESE AREAS.
E
a
M
M
.-i
N
o?
3
.o
0
Cv
a
E
PIPE #2 - AQUATIC WILDLIFE TRANSFER PIPE
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1 2'
o PIPE #2 CROSSING IS AT STA. NO. 13+36.45, TRENNEY LEA DRIVE
0
x
n

0+00 0+50
\ CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. OBTAIN GRADING PERMIT FROM NCDENR AFTER
SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
2. INSTALL ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN,
INCLUDING SILT FENCE, SILT FENCE OUTLETS
\ AND CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.
3. BEGIN CLEARING AND GRUBBING THE SITE
\ AS NEEDED.
4. BEGIN INSTALLATION OF STORM DRAINAGE
AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
5. MONITOR SITE AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY HAVE TO BE INSTALLED
TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING
CONSTRUCTION SITE.
6. ONCE UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE AND UTILITES ARE
IN PLACE, BRING SITE TO FINISHED SUBGRADE
AND PREP FOR STONE AND PAVING. CONSULT
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AS NEEDED TO ENSURE
PROPER COMPACTION IS REACHED FOR PARKING
SUBGRADE AND BUILDING PAD. PROOF-ROLL
BE REQUIRED.
7. INSTALL STONE BASE AND COMPLETE PAVING
OPERATIONS, STRIPING, ETC.
8. PROPERTY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL
DEVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION.
ID
- 9. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEEDING OF DISTURBED
AREAS WITHIN 15 DAYS OF GRADING.
10. PERMANENTLY SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED
AREAS WITHIN 30 DAYS OF ESTABLISHMENT
OF FINISHED GRADES.
11. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES UNTIL
PERMANENT GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED.
12. ONCE PERMANENT COVER ESTABLISHED, REMOVE
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND STABILIZE
THESE AREAS.
M
IPE #3 - AQUATIC WILDLIFE TRANSFER PIPE
ORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20'
ERTICAL SCALE: 1 " = 2'
IPE #3 CROSSING IS AT STA. NO. 12+36.45, TRENNEY LEA DRIVE

1414a.Ghwr ot- Sc.
0+00 0+50
f- c?ac V-)V,e nk to
DRAFT COPY OF RESTRICTIONS
(Pertaining to Created Wetland Complex on South Tract)
The areas shown on the recorded plat (1'(/( ?t t i f y t h c p r t t b t/ t i l l s.
do t r a n d I c? o I'd i i i g d a f a) as conservation areas shall be maintained in
perpetuity in their natural or mitigated condition. No person or entity shall perform any of
the following activities on such conservation area:
a. fill, grade, excavate or perform any other land disturbing activities
b. cut, mow, burn, remove, or harm any vegetation
c. construct or place any roads, trails, walkways, buildings, mobile homes, signs,
utility poles or towers, or any other permanent or temporary structures
d. drain or otherwise disrupt or alter the hydrology or drainage ways of the
conservation area
e. dump or store soil, trash, or other waste
f. graze or water animals, or use for any agricultural or horticultural purpose
This covenant is intended to ensure continued compliance with the mitigation condition
of a Clean Water Act authorization issued by the United States of America, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, Action ID , and therefore may be enforced by
the United States of America. This covenant is to run with the land, and shall be binding
on the Owner, and all parties claiming under it. Modification of this particular Section _
of Article - will require express written consent of the United States Army Corps of
Engineers.
Permittee shall execute and cause to be recorded in the County Register of
Deeds restrictive covenants acceptable to the Corps of Engineers for the purpose of
maintaining the conservation areas, as shown on the recorded plat* (identify by
title, d a, t e , a 7z d recording data ), in their natural state in perpetuity,
prior to the sale or conveyance of any lots or other property within the subdivision. The
permittee shall enforce the terms of the restrictive covenants and, prior to conveyance of
the property, shall take no action on the property described in the covenants inconsistent
with the terms thereof. The permittee shall provide a copy of the recorded restrictive
covenants to the Corps of Engineers within 15 days of recording.
_ -- -- -?
21
o
JN 'CIb I LS?IY\I?'I [ - OJ a' UN3d `CfVOH HA1 OOH O
A(.l V V.N1 1.OQ
NOI1.bAH3S-JUd QNH'I:I,1A,\?`v
191Hx W?
°= '? 3
_, - r

?i
, 0.1
nlu, - '
' ? I oN 'I ?c
I
I
I
I __ I

?
?
? I I
?

I
I
I 7
?
J
tl
f
f
f
F
,
?
S
J
i
j
l . S w
,I
wry ul ?
? .
. -vi ,: u? , . ?
z 4 o
? f
? „
z L .
n u }
- S z xLs
2 I
C
Z w
°Ie
-

1 l

w

a O E7
oWO ? ,?v
haw haw ? '
°
s
?
r' i O ? o p ?w
E
c ?a < `ao2r"T?? uo? 3
a "moo°? wwW
? ? 3 ; Vl s°F No? t?'^m?i ?qU??e soh tl r,

n F U
3
o H z < i ??¢ i? o
z Oa?Z? ?Ou, tip _?rtir ??_?
o o
K w- o°, z a t n
?++
a
r
?
?O

J
Q M }}
p 0 u? ??? V o_ r S D
o T
u a
G ¢ r a 0 °S Zc d u, O< 4 0 7
W o
0
I
? 5 l' ter.
LI !?'
G iii°v? Cam` ? V e? ? >;n I'IIt

x \,A\
N \\ \ \\ \\ t\`p° \ \ :j
\\
C ??A g7%\
V ? ?;??`V\?A\?A
\VAA\ R>'
Nz,
NNM
\ 4
IYlp?.60SQ9? ¢s
Zltlil Y 1 - -- 3S 1? n1Y ?x ? I I
n - _ - _ 1§
?'? I u i yII 1
1y u - .. '
!, .I Ua ' '? --.. :Lfi'LV9 SL USXdri 3
71
G I t I
, r
I b I'
C4 68Z
At
I 1=I' r
I ??W
\ ?, Jc Y?? 1 ; iii I
/ - I3 •,? /, , ? ., ?.r ?;,/ Y III ??J
rr I
??-V ? ?' Itbl', . I
I!I
es\ e.
2 io /IFS
r I} ti ? ,lob
I - ? Ha
Eh \'ll MpU.
fi.
I \ 9Y yZx ?UI)Zx
I 14 Zfi N-?y? L6 ?,
? \ yu v9
-v!J?Nm ur
WuIQN
? °r 3 a
°?sx e
opo? ?o
o°
i?s? us

pav
°wug W'd
Woh N4Y
tv
Wo
p..
as _3 d..w
i
?a
00 0

ra
Q
U
rJ ?
a
C ?
a

Ou n

vy 4= J -
kee ??
ya oa
°p o c
rca G W
aa° ,
- w 3
g i 1? r n
as r,
z ?^?a wt o t
° 'IDG O# vi nn S
ry-
.-,
W 6a'-no 2j yr _ -
J Eu _ J WG jaw
iL'
si<
Q
H
o z
H w'o ? N
C:!Z:C YWZir.iZ'M,P'?cy-ZCUHUtl[UVCiZwgsUJ P.v?unuPx[CU5ubCU'.HwZiil?:+!orU.UACU'uY
??? L 1?rli'Yl?t
COMPLIANCE WITH NVETLAND S BUFFER REGULATIONS
In accordance with Title 15 A NCAC 2H .0500, the following DEED NOTIFICATION shall be recorded in the
County Registry prior to the conveyance of lots. Said Deed Notification shall apply to name of subdivision, lot numbers in
County, North Carolina as shown on plans titled (insert subdivision name) prepared by
_ (insert name of designer) dated date:
"A portion of this lot has been detennined to meet the requirements for designation as a wetland, stream or protected stream buffer. Any
subsequent fill or alteration of this area shall conform to the requirements of the state rules adopted by the State of North Carolina in force at the
tiine of the proposed alteration The intent of this provision is to prevent additional wetland, stream or buffer filling or draining, so the property
owner should not assume that a future application for filling or draining would be approved. The property owner shall report the name of the
subdivision in any application pertaining to said rules. This covenant is intended to ensure continued compliance with all rules adopted by the
State of North Carolina and therefore the State of North Carolina may enforce benefits. This covenant is to run with the land and shall be binding
on all Parties and all persons claiming under them".
Signature
Owner's name
Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Phone Number: (_)
STATE OF North Carolina
COUNTY
1, , a Notary Public of the State of North Carolina, County, hereby certify that owner
personally appeared before me this day and executed by above certification
Witness my hand and notorial seal, this day of _ 2003
Notary Public
My commission expires:
'Ecos stem
PROGRAM
January 9, 2008
Kenny Eason
Legend Builders C/o SEGI
5315 S. College Road Ste. E
Wilmington, NC 27412
Project: Hoover Road Subdivision

Expiration of Acceptance: July 9, 2008
County: Pender
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of
the issued 404 Permit/401 Certitication/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized
work. The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
fofowin table.
Cape Fear
3030007 Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I

(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II

(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impacts 0 0 0 0 0.477 0 0 0
Credits 0 0 0 0 0.954 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
Willi 7Gi1mLore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Ronnie Smith, USACE-Wilmington
Joanne Steenhuis, NCDWQ- Wilmington
Amanda Kolb, agent
File
R.e-stoYU29... E ... Protect Oar J'ta to
e';?
FICUM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

May-21-2007 12:39pm From-legend Builder's, Inc
9107909033 M31 P. 0021002 F-544
P7
U.S. ARMY COMPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINOTON DISTRICT
Action Id_ 2006 32879 071
County: Pender
U.S_Ci;.S. Quad: Topsail
JURISllTCTTONAL INFORMATION SHEET
Property Owner: Legend Builders Agent: The Clark (group
Address: 400 Carl Street atin: Byron Bateman
Suite 203 P.O. Box 10136
Wilmington, NC 28403 Wilmington, NC 28404
Size and location of property (waterbody, road name/number, town, utc_) The property is an undeveloped tract of land (76
acres) tiff Hoover Road in Hampstead.
In the wake of the recent Supreme Court decisions in United States P. Rapanos and United Stater v. Carabell, the U.S. Army
Corps of. Fnginecrs and the Environmental Protection Agency are examining the methods in which we describe and dotmmeat
jurisdictional determinations (JDs) pursuant to the Clean Water Act (MA). In order to allow the Corps and EPA to prepare and
issue substantive guidance, the Wilmington District is, in accordance with guidance from our Headquarters and to the extent
circumstances allow, delaying making 0NA jurisdictional determinations for areas beyond the limits of traditional navigable
waters (Section 10 waters) until new guidance is issued
1 am in receipt of the information you leave provided to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding CWA jurisdiction over the
property described above. Based upon the regulations and guidance available to this agency prior to the decisions in United Slates
v. Rapanox and United States Y. Carabell, it appears that the proposed jurisdictional boundarim you have provided to this office
arc accurate. However, until final guidance is 'issued, I will not be able to make a final determination of CWA jurisdiction on the
referenced property.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wedand4 without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311). If you have any questions regarding this information
sheet and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Brad Shaver at 910-2514611.
Remarks: The site was visited by Elizabeth Hair on 611312006.
Corps Regulatory Official: --luoAL64,
Date 3/20/2007
- `? °-- - ° h/ -
C
a
IT-
V
Ll•
cs
OAS - S.R. 1569 --- __\- ??
ViO0 ulluc a/W-
? V
6Y
Cb
Qs-

t? lp O- ?p CP

CJ ? ? N 11
.° _
IS)
11- ? ? I-I IO

C`6

i
?W
C'4 Z
0) a
u'),
n C,4
?z
w
m mV)
• U I
•- .
d o,vn . .? '?.,.
?. .........
?'... .''•'' - . . .'? I J
;• I I
,? I 1 °a O °m
r n I,.1
t LL!
n
3,: Lo' z
?,• •I os
.? € 1
? ?• .?. ?l a I I ?.
' .?
?. ,.,\
i• ,I I I 1;
o emu' ` /.? _.-t' i•^'Q' ') ??? ''?'•'?' ? ? ? I
as W ?•• •'• ? . ?.Q' •?. ,.
.n.?(NNNNNN?
? Y N
a
Cli
114
Li \; • • .
z r- +\
J ?
}r
r -
CL Lu
oZ
I.?
•.>
A?-H
a-J
a- ir •??

t OM

M

Z W 1 . O

Q ?

o c `O
? n 3
I ? -H
c
o 3 cv
N
v
O
z
Z m
\
/ w
fn ?

\ LLJ
a?
m

00 ?
DO Dc,
p .,
? 11 IZ

tPevsoha l Ries n cleh,c.e }fee
?t !D 3283 - ?2.- 232? -'o0 o? J?I,a 2 Pal s_
?j tGJOD
FENDER CQU?TY.NC
2- PIN t1 YD 83 _ Ga .a3??-mom
bATEi°' Z Z Lr7 fNT SC
This instrument drafted by: Robert G. Collins
B11325 8Pro 294
After recording, mail to: Collins & Collins Law Offices, PLLC
215 Racine Drive, Suite 101
V. Wilmington, NC 28403
North Carolina
Fender County
QUIT CLAIM DEED
This deed, made this a-D-day S u n *-- '2007 by Legend
Builders, Inc. a North Carolina Corporation, of the city of Wilmington, State of North
Carolina ("Grantor") to Kenny Eason and wife, Trenney L. Eason, of 400 Caral Street,
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403("Grantee").
WITNESSETH:
That said Grantgj,;,for and inconsideration of the sum of .10tr10 to them in hand paid, the
receipt of which is hereby owledged, has remised and ri1 aO?\ah6_py these presents does
remise, release, and forever qurto?ai,n unto 52, ?irs ?d assigns all right, title,
claim, and interest of the said Gr tef7in ce . at?rat or parcel of land lying and being in
the County of Pender a{sd bf in ??•
rg?pwnship, and more
particularly described ado 1 s: 1
BEING ALL of Tract 1, according to a plat entfiUa''r LOT SUBDIVISON"
Minor Subdivision Plat for Kenny .Cason, Legend Builders, duly recorded in
Map book 42, Page 85, slide 568, Pender County Registry, reference to which
is hereby made for a more particular description.
To have and to hold the aforesaid tract or parcel of land and all privileges thereunto
belonging to them the said Grantees and their heirs and assigns free and discharged from all
right, title, claim or interest of the said Grantor or anyone claiming by, through or under them.
In Testimony Whereof, said Grantor has hereunto set their hand and seal the day and year
first above written.
Legend Builders, Inc.
By:
(SE )
Tre ney . Eason, President
(SEAL)
Recorded Verified
Joyce M. wi egood
Register o Beds
Pcnder C unty, NC
14-ta M men ? / Z )--?j a Di?a2.,
S? bSeL-E. Tz4-t-ce t bcc ct
32-83- --1-WoIs-
?y P1N #3aY3.'7!-G?lB-oa??
DATE G' Z ?--?T J r-
??? ?? Irk
(i) Al",
22 Pry
??41.,t a?0
$C $ [iviL l;["!$
FF_NCi n rOUSTY, NC
RK3258'US296
This instrument drafted by: Robert G. Collins
After recording, mail to: ollins & Collins Law Offices, PLLC
v *15 Racine Drive, Suite 101
'ilmington, NC 28403
North Carolina
1 QUIT CLAIM DEED
Pender County ) oeCpjrledar,d V,n-
Yce M. Swicegood
Register ofDeeds
This deed, made this a a- day Mt n- p , 2007 by Legend ?d? Couah? N'C
Builders, Inc. a North Carolina Corporation, of the city of Wilmington, State of North
Carolina ("Grantor") to Legend Builders, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation, of 400 Carol
Street, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403("Grantee").
WITNESSETH:
That said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 to them in hand paid, the
4Z; Opt of which is hereby ackrxos & li} r mired and released and by these presents does
remiss Nftase, ands f ?u
a ii I %itg be Grantee and its heirs and assigns all right, title,
claim, a c(atYier?s4 o s3rl fior in and to a certain tract or parcel of land lying and being in
tj?p?n?t(ofll{erEd ani Stale q ?J?pspq(ina, in Township, and more
1 I tUIJ BEING ALL of Tract 1;46E iding to a plat entitled "2 LOT SUBDIVISON"
Minor Subdivision Plat for Kenny Eason, Legend Builders, duly recorded in
Map book 42, Page 85, slide 568, Pender County Registry, reference to which
is hereby made for a more particular description.
To have and to hold the aforesaid tract or parcel of land and all privileges thereunto
belonging to them the said Grantees and their heirs and assigns free and discharged from all
right, title, claim or interest of the said Grantor or anyone claiming by, through or under them.
In Testimony Whereof, said Grantor has hereunto set their hand and seal the day and year
first above written.
Legend Builders, Inc.
By:
(SE rTrenne L. Eason, President
OAU
(SEAL)
?1-
lama) zf?)1 03
W A T ?RQG
? r
C) Niii? -?"
,MIchaolI- Easley, Gayernut
William G Ross Jr , Secietaiy
North Caro Iina Dept tment of Gnvironn cnl and Natural Resources
Coleen N SLllins- Director
Division of Water Quality
June 13, 2007
Trenny Eason, President
Legend Builders, Inc.
400 Carl Street, Suite 202
Wilmington, NC 28403
Subject: Stormwater Permit No. SW8 070533
Hoover Road Subdivision
Low Density Subdivision Permit
Pender County
Dear Ms. Eason:
The Wilmington Regional Office received a complete Stormwater Management Permit
Application for Hoover Road Subdivision on June 12, 2007. Staff review of the plans and
specifications has determined that the project, as proposed, will comply with the Stormwater
Regulations set forth in Title 15A NCAC 2H.1000. We are forwarding Permit No. SW8 070533,
dated June 13, 2007, for the construction of the subject project.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to
the conditions and limitations as specified therein, and does not supercede any other agency
permit that may be required.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have
the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days
following receipt of this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. Unless such demands
are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please
contact either Chris Baker or me at [phone].
Sincerely,`"'r
Ed a ke c k
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
ENB/csb
cc:
o is
No; thcaroliua
,1'nlurnlly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet wsvw.rimatcrguality.orp Location: N. 512 Salisbury St Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Division of Cosstal Management
Chris Baker
Wilmington Regional Office
Central Files
?? l 4(J,21ejL
O
f L N
o 00
r ? O ? N
O 00 I?
J cn O M
wo a?? zoo
?U W O
> r71 00
N (.? W
G910 IHHHS
x a Q W
?z
E ?4 3
rliO
-0 t>
a 3 4 9 Lc)
Wp
y O?Cf)
y Q4 'U? < ?-
?u LEI LOS y
y Qo-?
+I?
I 11 O N
u NN
4 /? N _rnov II
/ o VO?O
° ? O O N
8J 3 ?Q r0 d //???? 3 u nm ° r
?W p 1
U /
LtJ O °ouu u
(n v 3 / -° nnn ° i
? O
-)u
X +1 po
-r- .j 11 0
j j
O r=
:2 N
y W
?- I rnrn
71J 0
y
E
N
'Y
i
71
Zf'L'8?g I I -
W - -
71
N U L?? Lj
L LJ ?-
m
-/L - - ?' 2 +1 z? m
N 00 I (1?
I N-)
I Fl- ' - Z LLI
o P -
Q
---------_?0_7`20222 -? E-
o ??
Lo

ul
21 f1
r astlu Biro, G,"V
N CULlll+l` C ILI
..t
Brown Tmvn

JnEjil Sr I:el-i!
5c It C141f)
B c I v u cl t'- ic
L. ciF ll y
it
F' w S S
I
Nt
r Yap?r1 t;r
f •_ 1
Re.ner rte- a
ky
17
i1, t, 1 e. .d:l
r?}y f•
j ?
i k=
Iit r+j,
Hampste`ad.;
f?,`'?•, _ _ ? r? fear,; _..{??,rlr

r
N