20200355_General Correspondence_20160519

R-5020 — Merger Application
US 701 Bypass
From South of SR 1166 (Pleasant Plains Road)
To North of US 74-76 Bypass in Whiteville
Columbus County
STIP Project R-5020
INTRODUCTION
Page 1 of 16
o C C� L� Q M LE�
D
MAY 19 2016
DENR • WATER RESOURCES
TRANSPORTATION PERMITTING UNIT
The proposed project involves widening US 701 Bypass (James B. White Road / South Madison
Street / J. K. Powell Boulevard) in Whiteville to a multi -lane facility from south of SR 1166
(Pleasant Plains Road) to north of US 74-76 Bypass. The proposed typical section is a four -lane
median divided facility with curb and gutter and wide outside lanes to accommodate bicyclists.
The total length is 5.1 miles. The proposed project is included in the approved 2016-2025 State
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The location is shown in Figure 1.
NEPA DOCUMENTATION
The environmental assessment for the project was approved by FHWA on June 3, 2015. The
environmental assessment has been distributed to federal and state agencies for comment.
PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED
The purpose of the proposed project is to increase the traffic carrying capacity and safety of
US 701 Bypass within the project limits.
The proposed project is intended to address the following needs:
Traffic Carrying Capacity
Existing US 701 Bypass does not provide adequate capacity for future traffic volumes in the
project study area. The 2012 average annual daily traffic (AADT) volume along
US 701 Bypass in the project area ranged from 8,800 to 21,700 vehicles per day (vpd). By
the year 2035, traffic volumes along US 701 Bypass in the project area are forecast to range
from 12,600 to 31,800 vpd. The mainline capacity analysis indicates all sections of
US 701 Bypass within the project area operate at level of service (LOS) D or better for
existing (2012) conditions. However, with no improvements, US 701 Bypass is projected to
operate at LOS E along the two-lane segments under future (2035) conditions. The proposed
four -lane median divided facility would improve the overall mainline operations to LOS C
with 2035 traffic volumes.
Safety
The current crash rates on US 701 Bypass within the study area exceed the statewide average
and critical crash rates for similar facilities for every crash type analyzed, with the exception
of the critical fatal crash rate. The highest percentage of vehicle collisions along
US 701 Bypass in the project area over a recent five year period was frontal impact collisions
(including angle, head-on, and turning crashes). The existing four and five -lane sections with
a center turn lane, combined with numerous driveways, are contributors to these crash types.

R-5020 — Merger Application
Page 2 of 16
The proposed median divided facility would provide better access management by
channelizing left turn and side road through movements, and would potentially reduce frontal
impact crashes along the corridor. Rear-erid collisions were the second most common type
of crash. Additional lanes, in conjunction with reduced congestion, will assist in addressing
rear -end type crashes.
There were also 14 bicycle and pedestrian crashes that occurred within the study area,
including one crash that resulted in a pedestrian fatality. The majority of the pedestrian
crashes occurred while the pedestrian was trying to cross the five -lane road section.
Removal of the existing center turn lane and installation of a divided median will not only
redirect turning vehicular traffic and reduce frontal impact crashes; it will also provide a safe
refuge for crossing pedestrians. The preliminary design also includes 14 -foot -wide outside
lanes to accommodate bicycles.
COST ESTIMATES AND SCHEDULES
For construction purposes the project is broken into two parts,
R -5020A from SR 1166 (Pleasant Plains Road) to SR 1437 (Virgil Avenue)
R -5020B from SR 1437 (Virgil Avenue) to north of US 74-76 Bypass
TABLE 1 Cost Estimates and Schedules
0a
Co"
st=Estimate l
S*du
R -5020A — SR 1166 (Pleasant Plains Road) to SR 1437 (Virgil Avenue)
Right -of -Way Acquisition
$248,000
Unfunded
Construction
$17,808,000
Unfunded
R -5020B — SR 1437 (Virgil Avenue) to north of US 74-76 Bypass
Right -of -Way Acquisition
$2,307,000
FY 2018
Construction
$6,056,000
FY 2020
Total Estimated Project Cost $27,049,000
0a

R-5020 — Merger Application
Page 3 of 16
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
A. Travel Demand Management
Travel Demand Management (TDM) involves programs to encourage travelers to use
alternatives to driving alone, and, in some cases, to encourage travelers not to travel at all. A
major purpose of TDM is to reduce the number of single -occupant vehicles on the road
during peak travel periods when roads are most congested. These programs can include
van/ car pools, flexible work schedules, telecommuting programs, and park & ride lots.
The proposed project does not include any TDM measures, most of which must be
undertaken at the local government level or by the private sector. TDM improvements alone
would not increase capacity or improve levels of service enough to prevent the two-lane
segments along US 701 Bypass from operating at an undesirable LOS E in the future design
year -2035. Therefore, the TDM Alternative does not meet the purpose and need for the
proposed project and was eliminated from further consideration.
B. Mass Transit
The project study area is not currently served by mass transit. A mass transit alternative
would only minimally address the current traffic flow problems in the study area. In
addition, it would not be a reasonable alternative because of dispersed residential areas and
employment centers, and diversity of trip origins and destinations. The Mass Transit
Alternative does not meet the purpose and need for the proposed project and was eliminated
from further consideration.
C. Transportation Systems Management
Transportation Systems Management (TSM) involves modest physical and operational
improvements to enhance traffic performance, safety, and management. These measures can
include ramp lengthening, construction of auxiliary lanes, construction of new interchanges,
improved signing and lane markings, and improved shoulder illumination. TSM
improvements alone would not increase capacity or improve levels of service enough to
prevent the two-lane segments along US 701 Bypass from operating at an undesirable LOS E
in the future design year 2035. Therefore, the TSM Alternative does not meet the purpose
and need for the proposed project and was eliminated from further consideration.
D. No -Build Alternative
Under the No -Build Alternative, the proposed project would not be constructed, and no
transportation improvements would be made on US 701 Bypass in the project study area
beyond routine maintenance. The No -Build Alternative does not provide additional traffic
capacity that would improve traffic flow and level of service on US 701 Bypass in the project
area. It also does not provide improvements that are expected to enhance the safety of the
roadway. The No -Build Alternative would avoid the environmental impacts anticipated to
occur as a result of the proposed project, but would not meet the purpose and need for the
project. Therefore, the No -Build Alternative has been eliminated from further consideration.
E. Widen Existing Roadway
One build alternative is under consideration for the proposed US 701 Bypass widening .
project: widen US 701 Bypass to a four -lane divided facility with a 23 -foot -wide raised
median. With the Build Alternative, there were two options under consideration in the
vicinity of the existing US 701 Bypass grade separation over the Carolina Southern Railroad
3

R-5020 — Merger Application
Page 4 of 16
and Main Street in Whiteville. The At -Grade option would remove the existing structure
over Main Street and lower the grade of US 701 Bypass in order to construct an at -grade
intersection at Main Street and an at -grade rail crossing. The Grade Separation option would
replace the existing structure with two new bridges to carry the proposed four -lane US 701
Bypass over Main Street and the rail line. The rail line is currently rarely used. It has been
inoperable because some of the bridges carrying the railroad tracks on the.line are in need of
repair. However, RJ Croman Railroad Company purchased the rail line from Carolina
Southern in January 2015, and has indicated they intend to upgrade and re -activate the rail
line. Table 2 presents the anticipated environmental effects of the project.
- TABLE 2 Summary of Anticipated Effects of Proposed Project
Feature
Impacts
Project Length (miles)
5.11
Residential
14 (6)
Business
20 (3)
Relocations
Non -Profit
0
Total Relocations
34 (9)
Minority / Low Income Populations -
Disproportionate Impacts*
riO
Historic Properties (adverse effect)
None
Community Facilities Impacted**
1 Synagogue
Leder Park
Section 4(f) Impacts
De minimis impact to Beth Israel Hebrew
Center
Noise Impacts (impacted properties)
47
Prime Farmland (acres)
6.2
Forest (acres)
10.6 (At -Grade)
12.6 (Grade Separation)
Wetlands (acres)
6.9 (At -Grade)
8.7 (Grade Separation)
Streams (linear feet)
831
Floodplain (acres)
11.9 (At -Grade)
14.7 (Grade Separation)
Federally -Protected Species
No effect
Potential UST/Hazmat Sites (no.)
29
`Impact calculations are based on preliminary design slope stake limits plus an additional 25 feet.
21mpacts are the same for crossing Main Street and the railroad unless otherwise noted.
3Numbers in parentheses indicate minority-owned residences or businesses. I
4

R-5020 — Merger Application
WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
Page 5 of 16
Water resources in the study area are part of the Lumber River Basin (U.S. Geological Survey
Hydrologic Unit 03040206). There are nine streams, one pond, and 23 wetlands in the study area
as shown in Figure 2.
A. Streams, Rivers, and Impoundments
The physical characteristics of the nine streams identified in the study area are summarized in
Table 3, along with anticipated stream impacts for the preliminary design. As shown in the
table, the proposed project would impact seven streams for a total of 831 linear feet.
TABLE 3 Physical Characteristics of Study Area Streams
`Stream Name °Ma 1U ``c:
�. P r
use No:
-Bank <
:Ilei yhf - °
g..
:(feet)`
Bankfull,:;.
'Widths -y'
feet
s(_ ) `: _ `
=
'Water''
De `th':`
P_, r
inclies
,::(, - _
'S m`_
trea'
G-'
:T,'
Len 't'
g.-= x
;Stud^,
Y,+.,
-
(linear
Agticipated
3m" acts
P
_
-
UT to Deep Branch, SA (2A)
1.5
8
12
Perennial
434
92
UT to Richardson Swamp, SB (213)
3.5
6
6
Intermittent
223
49
UT to Richardson Swamp, SC (213)
4
7
6
Perennial
225
82
UT to Richardson Swamp, SD (2B)
2
8
12
Perennial
207
52
UT to Mollie Branch, SU (2E)
5
8
12
Intermittent
186
18
UT to Richardson Swamp, SV (2B)
4
8
12,
Intermittent
180
25
UT to Deep Branch, SX (2A)
1
3
6
Intermittent
339
0
UT to Deep Branch, SY (2A)
2
5
6
Intermittent
865
513
Soules Swamp (2C)
12
100
72
Perennial
558
0
Total
3,217
831
1 Impact calculations are based on preliminary design slope stake limits plus an additional 25 feet.
2 Stream impacts are the same for both options for crossing Main Street and the Carolina Southern Railroad.
One pond (PZ) is located in the study area, shown in Figure 2A. This pond consists of an
artificially excavated pit that is sustained by high groundwater levels. It has, no surface water
connection to any jurisdictional stream features. The proposed project would not impact this
pond.
There are no designated High Quality Waters (HQW) or water supply watersheds
(WS -I or WS -II) within one mile downstream of the study area. All of the streams within the
5

R-5020 — Merger Application
Page 6 of 16
study area have a best usage classification of C; Sw. No streams within the study area, or
within one mile downstream of the study area, are identified on the North Carolina 2014
Final 303(4) list of impaired waters. In addition, there are no designated anadromous fish
waters or Primary Nursery Areas present in the study area.
No benthic sampling stations or fish monitoring data is available for any streams in the study
area or within one mile of the study area.
B. Wetlands
Twenty-three jurisdictional wetlands were identified within the study area. Wetland
classification and quality rating data are presented in Table 4, along with anticipated wetland
impacts for the preliminary design. As shown in the table, the proposed project would
impact 12 wetlands with the At -Grade option (6.9 acres) and 11 wetlands with the Grade
Separation option 2 (8.7 acres). The temporary detour with the At -Grade option would also
impact 1.4 acres of wetland WL. All wetlands in the study area are within the Lumber River
Basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03040206).
TABLE 4 Jurisdictional Wetlands in Study Area
0
-
Amici 'atedIi
P.; =n acts'
=�Wetland_ID';
NCWAIVI -
;Hydrologic'.
=
NCI)WIP:,�
Wetland
-Area
(acres)
_ (Figure No:) r _
acatimi
etassif, -
C `
�lassigication
=
i acnes
_
_ -
Rating,
,:.•{'
At -Grade.
;Grade -
�iSeparatiow,
Bottoraland
WA (2A)
Hardwood
Riparian
62
0.5
0.1
Forest
Bottoraland
WB (2A)
Hardwood
Riparian
58
0.2
<0.1
Forest
WBB (2E)
Headwater
Riparian
50
0.2
0.0
Forest
Bottornland
WC (2A)
Hardwood
Riparian
58
0.3
0.1
Forest
WCC (2E)
Headwater
Forest
Riparian
50
0.2
0.0
WDD (2E)
Headwater
Riparian
50
0.4
0.0
Forest
Bottomland
WF (2B)
Hardwood
Riparian
60
0.3
0.0
Forest
WG (2B)
Basin Wetland
Riparian
16
0.1
0.0
WH (2B)
Headwater
Riparian
31
0.1
<0.1
Forest
Bottoraland
WI (2B)
Hardwood
Riparian
58
0.3
0.2
Forest
WJ (2B)
Basin Wetland
Non -Riparian
16
0.3
0.3
0

R-5020 - Merger Application
TABLE 4 Jurisdictional Wetlands in Study Area continued
Page 7 of 16
Impact calculations are based on preliminary design slope stake limits plus an additional 25 feet.
2 Impacts are the same for both options for crossing Main Street and the Railroad unless otherwise noted.
3 Impacts to wetland WL for At -Grade option do not include 1.4 acres of temporary impacts associated with detour.
NCDWR
Anticipated Impacts
Wetland 1D
NCWAM
Hydrologic
Area
(acres)2
(Figure No.)1
Classification
Classification
Wetland
(acres)
Rating
At -Grade
Grade
Separation
WL (2C)
Riverine
Swamp Forest
Riparian
78
23.6
5.83
7.6
WN (2E)
Headwater
Forest
Riparian
34
1.2
0.0
WO (2C)
Riverine
Swamp Forest
Riparian
48
0.8
<0.1
0.0
WP (2C)
Riverine,
Swamp Forest
Riparian
59
0.3
0.0
WS (2B)
Headwater
Forest
Riparian
16
0.1
0.0
WU (2B)
Riverine
Swamp Forest
Riparian
62
0.1
0.0
WV (213)
Riverine
Swamp Forest
Riparian
52
0.3
0.1
Bottomland
WW (2A)
Hardwood
Riparian
54
0.1
0.0
Forest
Bottomland
WX (2A)
Hardwood
Riparian
54
0.2
<0.1
Forest
WY (2A)
Headwater
Forest
Riparian
12
0.1
0.0
WZ (2A)
Riverine
Swamp Forest
Riparian
70
0.5
0.3
Bottomland
WZZ (2B)
Hardwood
Riparian
16
0.4
<0.1
Forest
Total
30.6
6.9
8.7
Impact calculations are based on preliminary design slope stake limits plus an additional 25 feet.
2 Impacts are the same for both options for crossing Main Street and the Railroad unless otherwise noted.
3 Impacts to wetland WL for At -Grade option do not include 1.4 acres of temporary impacts associated with detour.

R-5020 — Merger Application
Page 8 of 16
C. WETLAND AVOIDANCE, MINIMIZATION AND MITIGATION
During the development of the preliminary design, efforts were made to avoid and minimize
impacts to wetlands and streams wherever practicable. The proposed curb and gutter was
extended to avoid impacts to a cemetery adjacent to the existing road (Figure 2A), which also
reduced impacts to wetlands in this area.
Onsite mitigation will be used as much as possible. The NC Division of Mitigation Services
will be used for remaining mitigation requirements beyond what can be satisfied by on-site
mitigation.
RARE AND PROTECTED SPECIES
A. Federally Protected Species
As of March 9, 2015, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries lists eight federally -protected species for
Columbus County (see Table 5.
TABLE 5 Federally -Protected Species Listed for Columbus County
'•.Comoro- -
- n`,N"ame
�ScierititicNam
edera 1�
- `-�Ha�
6itaf:;°"
Biolo f 'cal4�.,`
_,,
-
Sd u's.',
-
'.Fres' erit_� "
-Gonclu'sion
American alligator
Alligator mississippiensis
T (S/A)
Yes
Not Required
Atlantic sturgeon
Acipenser oxyrinchus
oxyrinchus
E
No
No Effect
Shortnose sturgeon
Acipenser brevirostrum
E
No
No Effect
Waccamaw silverside
Menidia extensa
T
No
No Effect
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis
E
No
No Effect
Wood stork
Mycteria americana
T
Yes
No Effect,
Cooley's meadowrue
Thalictrum cooleyi
E
Yes
No Effect
Rough -leaved loosestrife
Lysimachia asperulaefolia
E
Yes
No Effect
1_. — 1-10alg-W.- 1 — 1neatened; 1(,/A) —Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance
The' American alligator remains on the protected species list due to its similarity in
appearance to the Endangered American crocodile. Species listed as threatened due to
similarity of appearance do not require Section 7 consultation with USFWS. Suitable habitat
for the "American alligator is present within the study area. A review of North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) records, updated November 2014, indicates no known
American alligator occurrences within one mile of the study area
E:3

R-5020 — Merger Application
Page 9 of 16
Suitable habitat for Atlantic sturgeon, Shortnose sturgeon, Waccamaw silverside and Red -
cockaded woodpecker does not exist within the study area. A review of NCNHP records,
updated November 2014, indicates no known occurrences of these species within one mile of
the study area. Due to the lack of habitat and known occurrences, it has been determined this
project will not affect these species.
Suitable foraging habitat for wood stork is present in Soules Swamp in the central portion of
the study area. However, a review of NCNHP records, updated November 2014, indicated
no known occurrences of wood storks within one mile of the project area. No wood stork
individuals were observed during the course of field work. As a result, it has been determined
this project will not affect this species.
Suitable habitat for Cooley's meadowrue exists within the study area in powerline
rights-of-way, roadside ditches, and woodland clearings that are spread throughout the study
area. However, a review of NCNHP records, updated November 2014, indicated no known
occurrences of Cooley's meadowrue within one mile of the study area. In addition, no
individuals of Cooley's meadowrue were found during pedestrian surveys of the study area
conducted on June 26, 2013. Due to lack of recorded occurrences and lack of observed
individuals in the project study area, it is expected the proposed project will have no effect on
this species.
Suitable habitat for rough -leaved loosestrife is present within the study area in the roadside
ditches, powerline rights-of-way, and disturbed edges near the forested wetlands throughout
the study area. However, a review of NCNHP records, updated November 2014, found no
known occurrences of rough -leaved loosestrife within one mile of the study area. In addition,
no individuals of rough -leaved loosestrife were found during pedestrian surveys of the study
area conducted on June 26, 2013. Due to lack of recorded occurrences and lack of observed
individuals in the project study area, it is expected the proposed project will have no effect on
this species.
Although not specifically listed for Columbus County, the northern long-eared bat (Myotis
septentrionalis) has been listed as threatened by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. The Fish
and Wildlife Service has developed a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction
with FHWA, USAGE, and NCDOT for the northern long-eared bat in eastern North
Carolina. The PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all
NCDOT projects and activities. The programmatic determination for the northern long-eared
bat for the NCDOT program is "May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect". The PBO
provides incidental take coverage for the northern long-eared bat and will ensure compliance
with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all NCDOT projects with a
federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Columbus County.
B. Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act
The bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed (de -listed) from the Federal List of
Threatened and Endangered Species effective August 8, 2007. The bald eagle remains
federally -protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act)
(16 U.S.C. 668-668d).
Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to large bodies of
open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are used for nesting sites, typically within one
mile of open water.
L9

R-5020 — Merger Application
Page 10 of 16
An assessment of the study area, as well as the area within a 1.13 -mile radius (one mile plus
660 feet) of the project limits, was performed on November 5, 2013, using 2012 color aerial
photography. No water bodies large enough or sufficiently open to be considered potential
feeding sources were identified. Since there was no foraging habitat within the review area,
a survey of the study area and the area within 660 feet of the project limits was not
conducted. Additionally, a review of NCNHP records, updated November 2014, revealed no
known occurrences of this species within one mile of the study area. Due to the lack of
habitat and known occurrences, as well as the minimal impact anticipated for the proposed
project, impacts to bald eagles are not expected.
C. ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT
No designated essential fish habitat exists in the project area.
D. ANADROMOUS SPECIES
There are no designated anadromous fish waters or primary nursery areas present in the
project area.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
The proposed project is subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,
as amended and implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106, codified as 36 CFR Part 800.
A. Historic Architectural Resources
NCDOT conducted reconnaissance surveys of the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the
proposed project in July. and August 2013. Two properties, the Beth Israel/Whiteville
Hebrew Center and the Williamson House, were recommended as eligible for listing in the
National Register of Historic Places. The State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
concurred that the Beth Israel/Whiteville Hebrew Center and the Williamson House are
eligible for listing in the National Register in a memorandum dated March 25, 2014.
Beth Israel/Whiteville Hebrew Center
This property is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of West Frink Street and
US 701 Bypass (North J. K. Powell Boulevard). Built in 1959, the Beth Israel/Whiteville
Hebrew Center is a one-story, flat -roofed concrete block building with brick veneer and
modest Modernist styling. The Center is recommended eligible for the National Register
under Criterion A for associations with the history of the religious community in Whiteville,
and Criteria Consideration A (religious properties) as it derives its significance from
architectural and historical importance.
On January 13, 2015, HPO concurred the proposed project will have "no adverse effect" on
the Beth Israel/Whiteville Hebrew Center based on the condition that a landscape plan for the
portion of the property along US 701 Bypass is created and implemented in coordination
with the property owner.
Williamson House
This property is located on the south side of Washington Street, approximately 380 feet west
of the intersection with US 701 Bypass (North J.K. Powell Boulevard). Built around 1954'
the Williamson House is a one-story, flat -roofed, dwelling with an irregular footprint and
10

R-5020 — Merger Application
Page 11 of 16
modest modernist detailing. The Williamson House is recommended eligible for the NRHP
under Criterion C for design and construction as a modernist house.
The Williamson House is located several hundred feet away from US 701 Bypass.
No right-of-way or easements will be required from the Williamson House property, and no
construction is proposed adjacent to the property. The proposed project will have no effect
on the Williamson House. The HPO concurred with this finding on January 13, 2015.
B. Archaeological Resources
In a letter dated May 15, 2012, the State Historic Preservation Office indicated no known
archaeological sites exist within the project study area and recommended no archaeological
survey be conducted for the project.
C. Section 4(f) /6(i) Resources
Section 4(f) of the US Department of Transportation (USDOT) Act of 1966, as amended,
specifies that publicly owned land from a public park, recreation area, wildlife and waterfowl
refuge, and all historic sites of national, state, and local significance may be used for federal
projects only if there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of such land and the
project includes all possible planning to minimize harm to 4(f) lands resulting from such use.
Section 6009(a) of the 2005 Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) amended Section 4(f) legislation to simplify the
processing and approval of projects that have only de minimis impacts on lands protected by
Section 4(f). This revision provides that if a transportation use of Section 4(f) property
results in a de minimis impact on that property, analysis of avoidance alternatives is not
required and the Section 4(f) evaluation process is complete.
Three properties protected by Section 4(f) exist in the project area: the National Register -
eligible Beth Israel/Whiteville Hebrew Center; the National Register -eligible Williamson
House; and Leder Park (Figure 2D). The proposed project will require the use of land from
two of these properties. The proposed project will require a temporary construction easement
from Leder Park and permanent right-of-way from the Beth Israel/Whiteville Hebrew Center.
The temporary easement required from Leder Park is considered a temporary occupancy of
the property, and -is not considered a Section 4(f) use.
As discussed, it was determined the project would have no adverse effect on the
Beth Israel/Whiteville Hebrew Center. In accordance with Section 6009(a) of SAFETEA-
LU, a no adverse effect determination for a historic site is considered a de minimis impact
and no further evaluation is required under Section 4(f).
Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 stipulates that property
acquired or developed with the assistance of the Fund may not be converted to a use other
than public recreation unless suitable replacement property is provided. No properties
acquired or developed with the assistance of the Land and Water Conservation Fund exist in
the project area.
MINORITY / LOW-INCOME POPULATIONS
Title VI and Environmental Justice considerations promote the fair treatment and involvement of
all people, regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to development,
11

R-5020 — Merger Application Page 12 of 16
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws and regulations.
Executive Order 12898 requires each federal agency, to the greatest extent allowed by law, to
administer and implement its programs, policies and activities that affect human health or the
environment so as to identify and avoid "disproportionately high and adverse" effects on
minority and low-income populations.
Census data indicate a notable presence of both minority and low-income populations, and
minority and low income communities were observed within the study area during the site visits.
However, the percentage of minority individuals within the demographic study area
(DSA) (46.4 percent) is only slightly greater than that of Columbus County (38.5 percent). The
percentage of persons below the poverty level within the DSA (32.6 percent) is also greater than
for the county (23.0 percent). Many of the neighborhoods on the west side of the US 701 Bypass
corridor are low income and/or minority communities.
While minority and low income populations are present, no notably adverse community impacts
are anticipated with this project; thus, impacts to minority and low income populations do not
appear to be disproportionately high and adverse. Of the 14 anticipated residential relocations,
only six are minority-owned. In addition, of the 20 anticipated business relocations, only three
are minority-owned. Benefits and burdens resulting from the project are expected to be
equitably distributed throughout the community, and no denial of benefit is expected. However,
if temporary accommodations for pedestrians and bicyclists are not provided during construction,
then potential impacts to minority or low income populations could occur since these populations
comprise the majority of pedestrians and cyclists in the area. NCDOT's Policy on
Accommodating Pedestrians and Bicyclists within Work Zones will be followed during project
construction in order to maintain pedestrian and bicycle accessibility to the maximum extent
possible. Existing sidewalks along US 701 Bypass disturbed by project construction will be
replaced with new five -foot -wide sidewalks and new sidewalks can be provided in areas where
none currently exist if the City of Whiteville will agree to participate in the construction cost and
accept maintenance and liability for the new sidewalks. Existing crosswalks and pedestrian
signals along the project corridor will also be replaced. The preliminary design also includes 14 -
foot -wide outside lanes to accommodate bicycles.
Public involvement and outreach activities have provided for full and fair participation of all
potentially affected communities in the transportation decision-making process. Through the
public involvement program, coordination with local officials, and accommodation of local
development plans, the public has been kept informed of the proposed project.
There are no Limited English Proficiency (LEP) populations meeting the U.S. Department of
Justice LEP Safe Harbor threshold. However, Census data indicates a Spanish-speaking
population exceeding 50 persons within the DSA. This population was considered for language
assistance.
PRIME AND IMPORTANT FARMLAND
It is anticipated the proposed project will impact soils recognized as important farmlands by the
Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS). As required by the Farmland Protection
Policy Act, a preliminary screening of potential farmland impacts was completed. Part VI of
NRCS Form CPA -106 was completed according to FHWA guidelines. The total point value of
the screening was 20 points, which falls well below the NRCS minimum criteria (60 points) for
12

R-5020 — Merger Application , Page 13 of 16
completion of Form CPA -106, and the project will not be evaluated further for farmland impacts.
Impacts to prime and important farmland soils are estimated to be 6.2 acres for the preliminary
design. Columbus County adopted a Voluntary Agricultural Districts Ordinance on November 3,
2008. There are no Voluntary Agricultural Districts in the project study area.
FLOOD HAZARD EVALUATION
The City of Whiteville and Columbus County are both participants in the National Flood
Insurance Regulatory Program. There are two major stream crossings for the proposed project.
Table 6 shows the anticipated floodplain impacts for the proposed project.
TABLE 6 Floodplain Impacts
100 -Year Floodplain Impacts (acres)'
Build -Alt
At'Grade' `.'
11.9
�radeSeparation
14.7 (0.9 temporary)
'Impact calculations are based on preliminary design slope stake limits plus an additional 25 feet.
In accordance with Executive Order 11988, the Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the NC
Floodplain Mapping Program (FMP), the delegated state agency for administering FEMA's
National Flood Insurance Program, to determine the status of the project with regard to
applicability of NCDOT's Memorandum of Agreement with FMP (dated April 22, 2013), or
approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR).
This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to FEMA -regulated streams.
Therefore, NCDOT Division 6 shall submit sealed as -built construction plans to the Hydraulics
Unit upon completion of project construction, certifying the drainage structure(s) and roadway
embankment located within the 100 -year floodplain were built as shown in the construction
plans, both horizontally and vertically.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
A geo-environmental impact evaluation was conducted to identify properties within the study
area that may be contaminated and might result in increased project costs and future
environmental liability if acquired.
The geo-environmental impact evaluation identified a total of 29 known and potential hazardous
materials sites within the study area (Figure 2), including 23 sites that may currently contain, or
formerly contained, petroleum USTs and six auto repair facilities. No hazardous waste sites and
no landfills were identified within the study area. In addition, no potential Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) or Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) sites were identified within the study area.
13

R-5020 — Merger Application
Page 14 of 16
Table 7 lists these 29 known and potential hazardous materials sites, as well as the anticipated
level of geo-environmental impact potential for each site. The level of geo-environmental
impact potential refers to the potential for future environmental liability if the property is
acquired, as well as the anticipated risk of a substantial increase in project costs and/or delays
associated with affecting the site. Sites with low geo-environmental impact potential 'are
anticipated to have little to no impacts with respect to these issues. All 29 sites listed in Table 7
are anticipated to have low geo-environmental impact potential on the proposed project. The
discovery of additional sites not- included in the GIS database and not reasonably discernible
during the field reconnaissance could occur later in project development.
TABLE 7 Known & Potential Hazardous Materials Sites
SiteName
'Addres§`Status
-
-;Geo-Envronmeritah.'
Impact E®tential
Southeast Farm
3897 James B. White
Former V & M Supply site; 2
Equipment
Highway South
USTs were closed and removed in
Low
1993; GWI # 11604 and #12149.
Currently operates as a
Trade Wilco #1907
2001 S. Madison St.
convenience store and gas station;
LOQ'
4 USTs are currently in use at this
site.
Whiteville Janitorial
Former Gabby's service station.
Supply
1942 S. Madison St.
USTs are possible, removed in
Low
2000.
Ronald's Tire and Brake
1936 S. Madison St.
Auto repair shop.
Low
Automotive Electric
1933 S. Madison St.
Auto repair shop.
Low
Tyree Upholstery
1930 S. Madison St.
Auto & furniture upholstery.
Low
D&F Paint & Body
1926 S. Madison St.
Auto paint & body shop.
Low
Formerly Whiteville Auto Glass.
Signs and Designs
1917 S. Madison St.
Possibly an old convenience
Low
store/gas station.
Discount Tire Mart
1863 S. Madison St.
Auto repair & tire shop.
Low
T & E Auto Sales
1833 S. Madison St.
Currently a used car lot.
Low
Currently a ceramic tile shop.
M&M Ceramic Tile
1823 S. Madison St.
Possibly an old convenience
Low
store/gas station.
Shell Rapid Lube
4 Whites Crossing Ln.
Auto oil change facility.
Low
IER

R-5020 — Merger Application
Page 15 of 16
Site 1Vaane
Address
Status
deo=Environmental,
I4Ra t potential
Currently operates as a
Kangaroo Express
1730 S. J.K. Powell Blvd.
convenience store and gas station;
Low
3 USTs are currently in use at this
site.
SE Cain Machine and
Welding
1724 S. J.K. Powell Blvd.
Possibly an old gas station.
Low
Campbell Oil and Gas
1476 S. J.K. Powell Blvd.
Campbell Oil Bank Facility. GWI
Low
#32298 (heating oil).
Former Elliotte Implement Co.
Tint Wizard
1400 S. J.K. Powell Blvd.
GWI #19918. One 550 gal tank
Low
closed in 1991.
Possible former Location of
Industrial Warehouse
300 Magnolia St.
Moore's Building Supply. One
Low
500 gal tank, temporarily closed.
DBA Laundry Center
419 S. J.K. Powell Blvd.
Laundry. Old convenience
Low
store/gas station.
Currently operates as a
Home Run Food Store
#2
416 S. J.K. Powell Blvd.
convenience store and gas station;
Low
3 USTs are currently in use at this
site.
Franklin Baking Co.
410 S. J.K. Powell Blvd.
One tank closed in 1994. GWI
Low
#13072.
701 Auto Sales
106 S. J.K. Powell Blvd.
Closed gas station.
Low
Possible location of former
Pigsfords Restaurant
103 S. J.K. Powell Blvd.
Whiteville Washerette. Four
Low
USTs were closed in 1996.
Former location of Coca Cola
Waccamaw Bank
110 N. J.K. Powell Blvd.
Bottling Co. GWI #10486 and
Low
#15751. Closed in place 1988.
Currently operates as a
Trade Wilco #1874
207 N. J.K. Powell Blvd.
convenience store and gas station;
Low
4 USTs are currently in use at this
site.
Four tanks closed in 1987. One
Crossroads Amoco
709 N. J.K. Powell Blvd.
tank closed in 1988. Three tanks
Low
closed in 2004. GWI #32173.
15

R-5020 — Merger Application Page 16 of 16
Site Name
-Address
- Status
Geo=Envii'oninental
,
s.
pact-Po'tential`.
Location of former Dawsey's
Hardees
265 Washington St.
Exxon. Two tanks closed in 1994.
Low
GWI #32173.
Currently operates as a
Time Saver 1
802 N. J.K. Powell Blvd.
convenience store/gas station; 5
Low
USTs are currently in use.
Former location of Pantry #439.
Walgreens
803 N. J.K. Powell Blvd.
Currently a Walgreens drug store.
Low
3 USTs closed in 2004. GWI
#5381 and #32153.
Minuteman #20 Food
Currently operates as a
Mart
1105 N. J.K. Powell Blvd.
convenience store/gas station; 4
Low
USTs are currently in use.
Because the 29 known and potential hazardous materials sites are located along existing
US 701 Bypass, the roadway widening associated with the preliminary design for the Build
Alternative would impact all 29 sites. Preliminary site assessments to identify the nature and extent
of any contamination will be performed on any hazardous materials sites impacted prior to
right-of-way acquisition.
LOGICAL TERMINI / INDEPENDENT UTILITY
The proposed project has logical termini and independent utility. The limits of the project extend
through the most heavily travelled section of US 701 Bypass in the Whiteville area. The proposed
project will not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable transportation
improvements in the area. This project would be a reasonable expenditure of capital even if no
additional transportation improvements were made in the area.
16

1 0.5 0 1
Miles
North Carolina Department of Transportation
f% Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
US 701 Bypass from South of SR 1166 (Pleasant Plains Road)
to North of US 74-76 Bypass in Whiteville
Columbus County
TIP Project R-5020
Figure 1

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Form Approved
FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB No. 0710-0003
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R. Expires: 30 -SEPTEMBER -2015
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission
of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and/or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application
that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BYAPPLICAN7)
5. APPLICANTS NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First - Robert Middle -P Last - Hanson First - N/A Middle - Last -
Company - NCDOT-Project Development & Environmental Analysis Company - N/A
E-mail [e-mail] E-mail Address -N/A
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS: 9. AGENTS ADDRESS:
Address- 1548 Mail Service Center Address -
City - Raleigh State - NC Zip -27699 Country -USA City - State - Zip - Country -
7. APPLICANTS PHONE NOs. WAREA CODE 10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. WAREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
919-707-6024 919-250-4224
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. 1 hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
NCDOT STIP Project R-5020 widen US 701 Bypass in Whiteville, from south of SR 1166 to north of US 74-76 Bypass
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if. applicable)
Lumber River Basin, Geological Hydrological Unit 03040206 Address
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude: -N Longitude: <W City - State- Zip -
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions) D 2
State Tax Parcel ID multiple Municipality Whiteville (`—rte' v D
Section - Township - Range - MAY 19 2016
ENG FORM 4345, DEC 2014 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. DENR -WATER RESOURCES Page 1 of 3
TRANSPORTATION PERMITTING UNIT

117. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
See attached vicinity map
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
STIP project R-5020 involves the widening of US 701 Bypass to a four -lane divided facility with a 23 -foot -wide raised median. The
proposed project will extend from south of SR 1166 (Pleasant Plains Road) to north of US 74-76 Bypass in Whiteville, in Columbus
County.
19: Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
The purpose of the proposed project is to increase the trdffic,carrying capacity and safety of US 701 Bypass within the project limits.
USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Wetlands and streams will be impacted by the construction activities and the widening of the road.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
Not yet available
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres See attached information
or
Linear Feet
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions)
See attached information.
ENG FORM 4345, DEC 2094
Page 2 of 3

24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? ❑Yes QX No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
a. Address- See attached mailing list
city - State -
. Zip -
b. Address -
City - State - Zip -
G. Address -
City - State - Zip -
d. Address -
City - State - Zip -
e. Address -
city - State - Zip -
26. List of Other Certificates or Approvals/Denials received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL" IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NUMBER
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I ossess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant
2016-05-02
SIGNATOR OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
FNM Fn AM eoRa ncr 9n4w
Page 3 of 3