20051110 Ver 2_Application_20080221

ENGINEERS • PLANNERS SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
KCI Landmark Center II, Suite 220.4601 Six Forks Road • Raleigh, NC 27609 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]
ASSOCIATES of NC A
Date: February 21, 2008
Company: NCDWQ
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Contact: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
p5-lIto Y?
Job Number 12042643
Project: Richland Creek Stream
Restoration
Subject: PDN - 401 Permit Application
? In accordance with your request ® For your use/files
? For your review ? Please call when ready
® For processing ? Please return to this office
? Plans reviewed and accepted ? Approval requested
? Plans reviewed and accepted as noted ? Conference requested
? For revision by you at your convenience
Comments: KCI is re-applying for a modified certification/permit since the number of stream
impacts is different from the original application approved July 25, 2005. If you have any
questions , please call 783-9214 x 187.
cc: Files a 1=, U
i r]
DE WN
Lcadim, througlh Exccllcncr
44" 4t, F
Steven F. Stokes, LSS
Environmental Scientist/ Soil Scientist
WWW,KCI.COM

mnmmmib? ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
KCI Landmark Center II, Suite 220.4601 Six Forks Road • Raleigh, NC 27609 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]
ASSOCIATES of NC
February 21, 2008 .
?4
Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
1650 Mail Service Center 0 S O V
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
RE: Modified Permit for Richland Creek Stream Restoration Site
Town of Wake Forest, North Carolina
DWQ Project # 05-1110
Dear Ms. Karoly:
KCI is re-applying for a modified certification/permit since the number of stream impacts is
different from the original application. Previously, stream impacts were permitted for 2,417
linear feet of restoration in Section 1 (650 LF) and Section 2 (1900LF). Currently, the impacts
have been reduced to 1,900 LF since the Town was not able to obtain easements on Section 1.
Therefore the only difference is the number of linear feet has changed. We are ready to send the
plans to the prospective bidders in order to meet our summer construction deadline. If it is at all
possible, KCI sincerely requests this re-application to be acted upon at your earliest convenience.
f Respectfully Submitted,
?" fjo(Ae?
Steven F. Stokes, LSS
Licensed Soil Scientist
Cc: Eric Kulz
File all
FEB 2 1 2008
DeNR - wAt ER GUAW Y
WETLANDS AND STOROATER 8FA Ch
Lcadin; through Excelfcnce
WWW.KCI.COM
e'
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(It any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing P A I
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), ff N n n
II. Applicant Information FEB 2 1 2008
Owner/Applicant Information DENR - WRIER QUALITY
Name: Roe O'Donnell P E Deputy Town M#gW AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Mailing Address: Town of Wake Forest
401 Elm Avenue
Wake Forest, NC 27587-2932
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Steven F. Stokes
Company Affiliation: _ KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Mailing Address: Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609-5210
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
This modified permit and maps have been revised by eliminating the 650' stream section
(Section 1) by striking through the deleted portions with red ink.
1. Name of project: Richland Creek Stream Restoration Site
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Section 2-Tax Map-1841-59-5317, 1841-49-8213
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Town of Wake Forest
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): US 1 north to Stadium
Drive in the Town Wake Forest, turn right (east) onto Stadium Drive (SR 1930), and go
about 3600 feet to Richland Creek. The site begins at the bridge and extends 1900-ft
upstream to the north.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.9849 ON 78.519633 °W
6. Property size (acres): 4.4 acres (1900 LF x 100'Width)
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Neuse River
8. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgps/.)
Page 6 of 13
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Richland Creek flows predominately through riverine
woodlands. A sewer outfall lies adjacent to the site to the east.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
A D5 bulldozer , front end loader on tracks and /or trackhoe and dump truck will be used to
restore 1900 linear feet of stream channel.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Restore a section of degraded channel totaling
1,900 LF (Section 2 is 1900') within a 10,100 LF stream/riparian buffer preservation
corridor.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Renewal of COE Action ID 200521014 approved on August 2, 2005 and
DWQ Project # 05-1110 approved on July 25, 2005.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Section 1 an upstream 650 ft section needs restoration. At this time the easements have not been
obtained.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 13
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: This project will restore the
dimension, pattern and profile of Richland Creek. Reshaping the banks of streams at the
confluence with Richland Creek will also be necessary. KCI will monitor the streams and if
necessary to prevent headcutting will install the appropriate instream structures after
obtaining a new permit.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and floodinLy.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: Stream onl
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage. multiDly lenL7th X width. then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 Richland Creek Restoration P 25 1900 1.09

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 1900 1.09
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbodv Tvve of Impact Type of Waterbodv Area of
Page 8 of 13
Site Number
(indicate on ma) (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 1.09
Wetland Impact (acres):
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 1.09
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 1900
8.
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ? No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The restoration site will require some clearing to achieve the appropriate pattern outlined in the
design criteria Riparian buffers will be re-vegetated and monitored according to the restoration
plan to achieve a survivability 320 trees per acre.
Page 9 of 13
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
A mitigation plan is not needed for this exempt activity.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information: N/A
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): None
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): None
Page 10 of 13
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): None
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): None
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): None
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify See section VII )? Yes ? No ® Activity Exempt
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multi liers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Page 11 of 13
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Buffer impacts exempt, therefore no
mitigation is needed.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
None needed
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
None needed
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
No, this is just a stream restoration project to stop erosion and reduce sedimentation.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The original permit was approved for the restoration of Section 1 (650 ft) and Section 2 (1900 ft)
of Richland Creek. The CWMTF grant was approved in December 2007 for the construction
phase of only the 1900 ft section. Due to changes to the existing, Water Quality Certification a
modified certification/permit and additional fee is required by DWQ. The only changes is in the
linear feet of restoration from 2550' to 1900'. This site is ready to go to bidding for summer
construction once we have the new permit.
Page 12 of 13
`? r f o- d 2 - 21-0Y
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
0.1204.2643Richland CreekSR\2007 Proposal-Scope of Work\Revised PermitsWichland Creek PCNr3-05.v4
Page 13 of 13
XH CAROLINA
EOLOGICAL SURVEY
QT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
'21 32'30' '22
'23 1 652 500 METERS
WAKE FOREST QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA-WAKE CO.
7.5-MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
124 125 78180'

. ?
\

1 r
\ ?\ \.

?, i
lu I \
\ ?V 1
;., ?? ? ? .;• :A,

1'111 \
111 ?'
- - ?-- ? ??
\.

_ ??-. SMf\•
BUf@St? _C
.?? ?
?? ? ?-_ 1?,. ( ?
I .??s_
. • ' 1\
J ,-- .,
?i 1926
1 - ] /

_ / j?
?. ? 404 '.k\
C 11l"? 1 I.
_ l ?, h ? AIvv A`,? , ??
( f ??
"?? \ ` .\`_.
C~ 'ter: _?.) \\?. ??_

930 jam. ' ` ? •?''?
ice
, G i 1, HSs?ti

' P.ourse 11? ,?? n •:
?, '. / /
A?? r •r h i
y .`:;? 1193 ? ? r1
41
=-? J1r
? (?19?1? .C?°-__ r•

?' .1 `

_ 1 ate gM
{

,t?l M
r
•.•r.• -
•.

W

"I ;a

N

{

'

IL

•. 1
%
?
?
'
•

Q,

? p
8
4
,
?i_ ?
i
? '
- 1
_ •\M?? \` ,, .1, f / So?thea?te
? _ .11
T6eo1u81ca1 ??
24
M
192
\
• ?
-a-.••.• VF's ? r
'\ ?? ?
- ? / \ I?(?\ ?',?J? ? ? \ ?
=3? ? \ \^ i \.J ??l?j ?` -?q

•:•l.Em
??? 1 11 l ? 1 10 1 _ 1 1
r 1 I? J, I ? ?) 1 III -
J _

? --
,r _ .r 1 ? ?

1 1
? ?
?8
J ?

? q ,
X16. ?
?
S?E
•
?
?
?"J?' ? ?l ! , r , ?L
>
l
J
V I : _
Q r
_ "
_.
i
e _
_ ,
?-
C I v

Substa 1 _???y? 1 ?? \ 8

_ • :?', __-A ??

=
( ,
t
° ?
=- % "? z = \ ;? forelle
299 / -- ??
?

-? 407 I ?
) IL?_ ?8
.!
JJ

f y ti I

v a- ? 'T_
\ \
?? ] \f l 2049

?a
? h -
??I33? v
1` I '-
}

l { , ,!
\ \To

77 -?
1
6 ?
'
Golf
6°00
7 500
ETERS
7'30'
?xop rw PQaw by
-LL rcTroA) Z. qoo?

?. t? ( f(?'?Sir'?^' tr ??`P ?? d;C i ? ..t 'C j n'? ?;f??
-x i
1;?} r•ro <F -' J 7 ?, f 1 ?t911'tly e i „ l y x? 14' ' fi?,?'`^ ?.;: I ' i '(y
two
J 1?y IL a I\
d74 C " 51 t f a,
s^ ._ ?'- :r.- i d j ;? ?, \ I tw ' •+ r ! 1 ° r ' f n
y?? .?tf. .sue ?'/A"I ?r?`?vv`'. "? 1,?r?\'4•? e f fay'.fr 911; -AS
,?? ??1"`?,. s?? y/ ?? ??p ' 1 x ?°l{{V ??` f r f i. /r ?a •IJt ? .:.fit krt =-? '_ ?_?" .vim
y.,? l? .bti 1+. >Y6?, r _ ?^?,..+f tt '"?la •,r?'T '' 4
ifs yl
AAA_ '' .. v " • 1 + - U 1 lib /: 4 br -r ?^??+ r. !`x
a/ ? 4f '? '?'? l' J '° <)?iT t
11 i?yv
? IBM r 5
,v I1 d ti I ' ? '? iR 4' s .l ?? ??j J * r t ? ?
Iv ` {`72st! f 0 eq llsfy s f w t! 2 ?5 t
l < f i ^ P4 rs? '
%
1 .?c`f ., C 11 ? f ????*. ty Prr y! .G7'.? ! ? ?lJ arM + f .., { ,
(?}A_}?tT
d`??-r??"',?-,,'
N3yr a ,.{tom ? } 3"?A ?' ?,?/s :i 4aat - ,tn ?5
R, 5 i? " , v "1 ?lYl 4 rR ? ?y R 1
Ila
?. / !rh Jfy? ?f' I,iBi}os?l. 4 't,
?? r 14 r 6 rfwf
r • . ?.
J'31 o Court., North Carolina
% Figure L Site VicinitN Map P.- V
Site Lacati ota
K (1 Feet ?AO{?
A5?()c_;IATE? OF M: sk:,ae: i:za,aar:
S ? r re: U.iGS DRCi 1 hich =.1,000 Feet
Project Limits
'
Parcel Boundary
w
o

I
KC Wetland Presena(ion Limil,

Miles 0?5
?
r

01``1
:VY-,OC RTES OF ' - ----
Scale: 1:1 .840; jQj A t
Suture: t SD-1 ARS(' I Inch 1/4 Mile

June 17, 2005
(5" 4 C" newt
401 ELM STREET WAKE FOREST, N. C. 27587-2932
PHONE 919!554-6100 FAX [phone]
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Landmark Center 1, Suite 200
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609-5210
RE: Agent Authorization Form
KCI Job Number 12042643
I, Roe O'Donnell, Deputy Town Manager for the Town of Wake Forest, hereby designate and
authorize KCI Associates of North Carolina, P.A. to act in my behalf as my agent to escort the
US Army Corps of Engineers and the Division of Water Quality representatives as necessary,
onto the site for concurrence of our wetland delineation, for the processing of permit applications
and to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this
day forward. This I7u' day of June, 2005.
Sincerely,
Roe O'Donnell, P.E.
Deputy Town Manager
401 Elm Avenue
Wake Forest, NC 27587-2932
919/554-6121