20131200 Ver 4_Application_20160613

June 10, 2016
Mr. Steve Kichefski
CLear aLer
C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
www.cwenv.com
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-2638
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street, 9h Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
FuJ
JUN 1 3 2016
$ PAID
RE: Request to Modify Corps Permit Application and DWR 401
Certification
Tryon International Equestrian Center
Polk County, North Carolina
Action ID SAW -2013-00262; DWQ Project # 13-1200 v3
Mr. Kichefski and Ms. Higgins,
Please reference the permit application dated June 24, 2016 and the NC Division of
Water Resources' 401 Water Quality Certification dated February 2, 2016 associated
with the project known as the Tryon International Equestrian Center (TIEC) owned by
Tryon Equestrian Partners, LLC and represented by Mr. Jeff Brown. The permit
application requested written authorization for impacts associated with development of
the TIEC. The 401 Water Quality Certification authorized 723 linear feet of permanent
stream impacts, 0.02 acre of permanent wetland impacts, and 120 linear feet of temporary
stream impacts. The DWR required a total of 495 linear feet of stream mitigation. The
applicant/permittee requests to modify the permit application and 401 Water Quality
Certification as follows.
Modification to Site Plan and Impacts
The permittee/applicant would like to modify the project site plan to eliminate the
following impacts:
Impact
Linear Feet
Acres
RCI
91
0
RC3
64
0
RC4
62
0
RC5
60
0.02
Total
277
0.02
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, IAC 28801
828-698-9800 Tel

Mr. Steve Kichefski
06.10.16
Page 2 of 2
The above crossing locations would be spanned using arch culverts that would not impact
jurisdictional waters.A modified site plan is included for review (Figure 1). Total'
impacts at TIEC would be 446 linear feet of permanent stream impacts and 120 linear
feet of temporary stream impacts.
Modification to the Mitigation Plan
The original permit application included mitigation in the form of preservation and
payment into the Division of Mitigation Services' (DMS) in -lieu fee program. The DWR
authorized payment to DMS in the 401 Water Quality' Certification. The resource
agencies would not approve the on-site preservation plan as proposed. The
applicant/permittee would like' to modify the Mitigation Plan to include off-site, in-kind
mitigation in the form of enhancement and restoration at the site known as the Harmon L
Dairy Stream Mitigation Project Site. The site would provide 1,122 linear feet of stream
mitigation credits which accounts for mitigation of previous and proposed impacts at
TIEC at a 2:1 ratio. The proposed Mitigation Plan is included for review (Attachment
A). The proposed mitigation would also include 0.003 acre of wetland impact (165
square feet) in the floodplain of Marys Branch. The proposed Conservation Easement
was submitted to Mr. Carl Pruitt of the US'Army Corps of Engineers on May 17, 2016.
The applicant respectfully requests that the permit application and 401 Water Quality
Certification be modified to reflect the above changes. Should you have any questions or
comments concerning this project please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-698-9800.
Sincerely,
Rebekah N. Reid R. Clement Riddle, P.W.S.
Senior Project Manager Principal
Cc: NC Division of Water Resources - Jennifer Burdette
NC Division of Water Resources — Zan Price

fD
N , D
z n pj
o �
o
D T
cD
CID
rD
� �v
N
00
00
O
51
v
O
O
O
I
uo
�Q
CD
1.
A
Y
�, '�!�. \ _ ,•:�- ,+~, _ ill
r
m
CD
a�
N a
3
g
$
m
�
i
O
O
O
I
uo
�Q
CD
1.
A
Y
�, '�!�. \ _ ,•:�- ,+~, _ ill
I<
O
s
x
N a
a
z
m
z
�5 z
O
Gy�C1 robropro�
C
•�
O O . 6 6
go
3 y
CA
pApy N
ppOH�
yyO
Ow.�� ON AAA
A a
kA
o.
rt n c ee
�-
z
�7 a
I<
O
s

lo
Attachment A_,
Proposed Mitigation, Plant%
(dated June,=10,-'2016)'
4
' 1

'�•:'`t;'awl .,, '1:.` •.^-�t.�- �.�'
_ :TG•:YY� qGa •�T77j���
.w
_..:.s,.� 'aeyt,.�"�: •y ' _ _I � Irl
r� .. F.i'1 .- ._ .a-"�vY9"' �r�•:1h __'� :'iii ��.'rtJC.1'f,.l;l::�.�:.[! moi. L:. .. �i -
Ah

Table of Contents
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY..........................................................................................1
1.1 Project Objectives..............................................................................................1
2.0 SITE SELECTION.................................................................................................1
3.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT.................................................................. 2
4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION................................................................................ 2
4.1 Location...............................................................................................................2
4.2 Existing Site Conditions..................................................................................... 2
5.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS...................................................................... 4
6.0 MITIGATION WORK PLAN AND MANINTENANCE PLAN ....................... 4
6.1 Design Approach................................................................................................ 4
6.2 Construction Schedule....................................................................................... 5
6.3 Erosion and Sediment Control Measures........................................................ 5
6.4 Stream Bank and Floodplain Re -Vegetation ................................................... 6
6.5 Invasive Species Control.................................................................................... 6
6.6 Maintenance Plan............................................................................................... 6
7.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS.......................................................................... 6
8.0 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS..................................................................... 7
10.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN.................................................................. 8
11.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES............................................................................... 8
12.0 REFERENCES.......................................................................................................9
APPENDIX A: FIGURES
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2. USGS Topographic Quadrangle
Figure 3. Aerial Map
Figure 4. Stream and Wetland Delineation Map
APPENDIX B: CONSERVATION EASEMENT
APPENDIX C: GEOMORPHIC DATA
PHOTOGRAPHS
CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX D: RESTORATION PLANS

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
Tryon Equestrian Partners, LLC (TEP) is proposing to enhance and restore 1,383 linear feet (LF) of
stream channel at the Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project site (site) in Polk County, North Carolina
(Appendix A, Figure 1). The proposed project would generate 1,122 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs).
Restoration would offset environmental losses resulting from unavoidable impacts associated with the
proposed Tryon International Equestrian Center (TIEC) in Polk County.
1.1 Project Objectives
The resource functions of the proposed stream restoration project address needed improvements to the
watershed in several ways. The existing stream at the site is degraded due to prior channelization,
habitat alteration, excess sediment from bank erosion, limited riparian buffers, and livestock trampling.
The proposed project would address these impairments and improve watershed functions by restoring
approximately 1,122 linear feet of an unnamed tributary (UT) to Mary's Branch.
The primary goal of the stream restoration project would be to return the project reach to a stable, well -
vegetated, and naturally functioning condition. Specific stream restoration objectives include:
improving bank stability, enhancing aquatic and terrestrial habitats, removing invasive exotic plant
species, and establishing more robust and wider vegetative buffers.
2.0 SITE SELECTION
The applicant has chosen off-site, in-kind mitigation in the form of restoration to fulfill mitigation
requirements associated with development of the TIEC. The project site was selected because it has a
high likelihood of success based on a number of factors, including: landscape position; absence of
significant constraints; and conservation protection. There are no approved mitigation banks in the
watershed.
The watershed of the proposed project reach is approximately 181 acres and over 1,000 linear feet of
stream channel would be enhanced or restored, and preserved. Establishing upland riparian buffers
around stream resources would limit indirect and cumulative impacts associated with the ongoing dairy
operation. Streams on site would have no protections should the mitigation plan be determined
unacceptable. Restoring or enhancing streams now is more beneficial than funding large-scale
restoration at a later date. Streams would also be preserved. Although mitigation provided by a
mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program would provide mitigation within the same watershed, stream
reaches used for mitigation could be many miles from the permitted project site. The Harmon Dairy is
approximately 5 miles from the TIEC.
Permittee responsible mitigation is an accepted means of providing compensatory mitigation. When
properly designed and implemented, and appropriately monitored, this approach offers a predictable and
tested way of achieving compensatory mitigation as well as the opportunity to protect unique, natural
features. Mitigation activities are justified because of the degraded nature of the existing stream and the
plan to restore the UT to Mary's Branch to an ecologically self-sustaining stream.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Plan 1 June 2016

3.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
A Conservation Easement (CE) on the property would be held by the Polk County Soil and Water
Conservation District (SWCD) to protect in perpetuity the improved aquatic habitats and riparian buffers
of the stream restoration project and restrict future activities that may compromise the functions and
services of the aquatic resources (Appendix B). The permanent conservation easement would extend at
least 50 feet beyond the top of both banks. Within the conservation easement, the riparian buffer would
be planted with native trees and shrubs, as well as live stakes or live whips and transplants, to provide
post -construction bank stability, erosion control and riparian habitat enhancement.
All site protection instruments require 60 -day advance notification to the US Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) and the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) prior to any action to void, amend, or modify
the document. No such action would take place unless approved by the Corps and DWR.
4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION
4.1 Location
The proposed site is located in the Piedmont physiographic province (NCGS 2004) in Polk County,
North Carolina. The proposed site is accessed from NC Highway 9 in the town of Green Creek
(Appendix A, Figure 1). The proposed site is bordered by Mary's Branch to the west, and stream and
wetlands on site are UTs to Mary's Branch in the Broad River basin (HUC 03050105).
To access the site from Asheville, take Interstate 26 East for 36 miles to Exit 67. Follow US -74 East
toward Columbus. Take Exit 167 and turn south onto NC Highway 9. After approximately 7 miles, turn
right onto Harmon Dairy Lane. Harmon Dairy Lane ends at the dairy. The project reach is located to the
west of the diary barns.
4.2 Existing Site Conditions
The watershed of the UT to Mary's Branch measures approximately 181 acres and is primarily used for
pasture (Appendix A, Figure 2 and 3). Land use in the project area is predominantly pasture with
pockets of mixed hardwood/pine forests. The surrounding land use is similar, but also includes
residential home sites.
The project reach was apparently channelized, straightened, and moved to the edge of the valley in order
to maximize usable pasture land. The upstream end of the project reach has been trampled by cattle
over the past several decades and fine sediment has covered the native gravel bed materials. The
downstream reach is undergoing an incision process as the channel profile adjusts to the steeper grade
imposed by straightening and by its connection to Mary's Branch, which is also incised. Banks are
nearly vertical with raw soil and evidence of active erosion. The project reach can be characterized by
Stage III (degradation) in the Simon Channel Evolution Model. The upstream reach can be classified in
the Rosgen classification system as an "F" while the downstream reach can be classified as a "G" or
"E"
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Plan 2 June 2016

The riparian buffer that exists along the left bank of the project reach is dominated by Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), with some Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) and multi -flora rose (Rosa
multiflora). Native tree species include maple species and American beech (Fagus grandifolia).
Photographs of the site along with geomorphic and sediment data are included for review (Appendix Q.
A stream and wetland delineation map is included in (Appendix A, Figure 4). Baseline information and
attributes are summarized in Table 1 below.
N/A - Noi Applicable
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Plan 3 June 2016
Table 1. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Harmon Dalry Stream Mitigation Project
Project Information
Project County
Polk
Project Area (acres)
3.8
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35.201888,-82.064722
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
River Basin
Broad
USGS H drolo is Unit
8 -digit: 03050105
14th t: 03050105150020
DWQ Sub -basin
03-08-06
Project Drainage Area (acres)
181
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<10%
CGIA land Use Classification
Forested (53%), Cultivated Crops and Hay (33%), Grassland (11%),
Developed(2%), Impervious <I% , Barren <I%
Reach Summaloformation
Parameters
UT Mary's Branch UT Mary's Branch
Reach 1 Reach 2
Length of Reach Qinear feet
152
900
Valley Classification
VIII
VIII
Drainage Area (acres)
102
181
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
C
C
Morphological Descn tion (Stream T
F
E
Evolution Trend
F -E
E -G -F -E
Underlying Mapped Soils
RnE
Drainage Class
Well Drained
Soil Hydric Status
No
Slope
1.7%
1.1%
FEMA Classification
Zone X
Zone X
Native Vegetative Community
Riparian
Riparian
Percent Composition of Exotic Invasive Vegetation
—300/a
—30%
Wetland Summary Information
N/A
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable
Resolved -Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Yes
No
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Yes
No
Endangered Species Acts
No
No
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
No
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) / Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) No
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
No
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A - Noi Applicable
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Plan 3 June 2016

5.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS
Mitigation credits presented in these tables are projections based upon site design. Upon
completion of site construction, the project components and credits data would be revised
to be consistent with the as -built condition.
N/A - Na Applicable
6.0 MITIGATION WORK PLAN AND MANINTENANCE PLAN
6.1 Design Approach
The restoration plan (Appendix D) provides for restoring bank and bed stability,
promoting sediment transport equilibrium over a range of discharges, and improving
aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Establishing and maintaining a native forested riparian
buffer along the stream banks would help improve bank stability and reduce water
temperatures as the canopy matures. Land uses in the conservation easement areas would
be restricted to protect planted vegetation and ensure long-term recovery of riparian
functions. Changes in hydraulic geometry features, such as the creation of riffles and
pools, would enhance habitat function and contribute to an overall improvement in
habitat diversity.
Stream restoration and enhancement would be accomplished using a natural channel
design approach to restore appropriate channel dimension, pattern, and profile. These
improved conditions would promote water and sediment transport equilibrium between
the stream and its watershed, reconnect the stream to its floodplain, and promote healthy
in -stream and riparian habitats. Proposed restoration involves on-line restoration of
channel dimensions and in -stream structures in the upstream reach, and excavation of a
new, off-line channel over the downstream reach. The proposed project would also
include removing invasive plant species and planting native riparian buffer vegetation.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Plan 4 lune 2016
Table 2. Projected M stion Credits
Harmon Dalry Stream Mitigation Pro ed
Mlftllidon Credit Summaries
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Riparian
Wetland Buffer
Nitrogen Nutrient
Offset
Phosphorous Nutrient Offset
Overall Credit
1,126
N/A
I N/A I N/A
N/A I N/A
N/A
Project Components
Project Component or Reach
ID
Stationing
Pre -project --Restoration
Footage or Footage or Restoration
Acreage Acreage Level
Restoration
or Rest
Equiv.
Mittgatio
n Ratio
Mitigation
Credits
Notes
UT Mary's Branch Reach 1
1+66-3+18
152 152 E2
E
2.5:1
61
UT M s Branch Reach 2
3+18-13+83
900 1,065 R
R
1:1
1,065
-
Lengill and Area Summations
Restoration Level
Stream (Linear
Feet)
Non -
Riparian Wetland (acres) riparian
Wetland
Buffer (Square feet)
Upland (acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration
1065
Enhancement
152
- - -
-
N/A - Na Applicable
6.0 MITIGATION WORK PLAN AND MANINTENANCE PLAN
6.1 Design Approach
The restoration plan (Appendix D) provides for restoring bank and bed stability,
promoting sediment transport equilibrium over a range of discharges, and improving
aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Establishing and maintaining a native forested riparian
buffer along the stream banks would help improve bank stability and reduce water
temperatures as the canopy matures. Land uses in the conservation easement areas would
be restricted to protect planted vegetation and ensure long-term recovery of riparian
functions. Changes in hydraulic geometry features, such as the creation of riffles and
pools, would enhance habitat function and contribute to an overall improvement in
habitat diversity.
Stream restoration and enhancement would be accomplished using a natural channel
design approach to restore appropriate channel dimension, pattern, and profile. These
improved conditions would promote water and sediment transport equilibrium between
the stream and its watershed, reconnect the stream to its floodplain, and promote healthy
in -stream and riparian habitats. Proposed restoration involves on-line restoration of
channel dimensions and in -stream structures in the upstream reach, and excavation of a
new, off-line channel over the downstream reach. The proposed project would also
include removing invasive plant species and planting native riparian buffer vegetation.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Plan 4 lune 2016

r
The design approach for restoration would be mainly a -Priority I, with Priority II
elements at the , upstream and downstream ends of the project reach. The Priority I
approach raises the stream to its original floodplain elevation, abandoning the old
channel. The Priority II approach involves creating a new stream channel and floodplain
at the current channel elevation. In both cases, when abandoned, the old channel would
be filled with spoil produced by the excavation of the new channel and floodplain.
Stream restoration measures have been designed using a combination of analytical data
and reference reaches from stable reaches found with a similar valley type. The project
design also incorporates natural materials, such as gravel, cobble and logs to improve in -
stream habitat and provide lateral stability. Bioengineering measures would be installed
on restored stream banks, particularly at the outside bends where stresses are high, in
order to promote bank stability and quickly establish a near -bank vegetative cover.
Sediment transport competence analyses have been performed to check that the designed
channel would transport the size of sediment available within the watershed. The
analyses, summarized in Appendix C, indicate that the design stream reaches would have
bankfull shear stresses capable of mobilizing the larger fraction (D84 to Dtoo) of the bed
materials sampled at the site.
Bankfull dimensions and estimated bankfull discharge were evaluated based on site
surveys, regional hydraulic geometry relationships, and hydraulic modeling. The design
bankfull dimensions, slope, and discharge match regional relationships well.
6.2 Construction Schedule
Construction is estimated to last from two to three months, depending upon weather.
Installation of live stakes, live transplants, and all riparian tree and shrub planting would
be performed during the dormant winter months, regardless of when construction is
completed. Construction is planned to begin within two months of final design approval
and receipt of permits.
6.3 Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
Construction phase erosion and sediment controls would be implemented in accordance
with state standards to ensure sediment resulting from project construction would remain
on site. The contractor would be instructed to disturb only as much ground as necessary
to complete the active phase of work. Silt fences would be placed around all temporary
stockpiles. A pump -around flow diversion would be employed in order to minimize
downstream migration of fine sediment from work areas.
Erosion control matting composed of natural biodegradable coir fiber would be installed
along the constructed channel or herbaceous cover would be established before water is
turned into the new channel. The erosion control matting would extend to the top of bank
and would be secured with wood stakes and live stakes. Immediately following any
ground disturbing activities, both a temporary cover seed mix and a permanent native
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Plan 5 June 2016

seed mix would be sown to provide immediate ground cover and stabilize exposed soil.
The newly constructed channel would be stabilized with native herbaceous vegetation
and live stakes after construction.
6.4 Stream Bank and Floodplain Re -Vegetation
The vegetative components of this project include stream bank and floodplain planting.
Any areas of the site that are disturbed, lack diversity, or might be adversely impacted by
the construction process would also be replanted. A buffer of woody and herbaceous
species would be established within 50 feet from the top of the newly constructed bank
using a native seed mix, bare -root seedlings, live stakes, and live transplants.
Planted trees and shrubs would provide a diversity of forest structure, forage value,
filtering capacity, soil stability, and riparian habitat. Planting zones on the site would
mimic natural stream bank and floodplain communities and would consider the frequency
and magnitude of flows experienced by the project stream. Planting would commence in
the dormant season after project construction is completed to ensure that species are
planted in suitable hydrologic regimes.
6.5 Invasive Species Control
Invasive non-native species, primarily Chinese privet, are present within the proposed
conservation easement. Invasive species would be cut and treated with herbicide prior to
grading or completely removed during grading. In areas where grading operations would
remove individual invasive plants, follow-up treatments would be implemented as
necessary to eradicate any new invasive populations. Invasive plants would be replaced
with native trees and shrubs.
6.6 Maintenance Plan
Maintenance of the newly constructed channel and all structures associated with the
restoration would be accomplished by TEP if the restored stream exceeds the range of
natural variability established during the 7 -year monitoring period. Replacement planting
would be performed by TEP if stem counts fall below 320 stems per acre during the first
3 years, 260 stems per acre through year 5, or 210 stems per acre through year 7. If any
portion of the mitigation project fails to meet the specified performance standards in a
monitoring year, the reasons for this failure would be determined and a corrective action
plan (which includes proposed actions, a schedule, and monitoring plan) would be
prepared. If it is believed that corrective action to a problem area is not warranted, the
corrective action plan would state the reasons. Continued monitoring of the problem area
may be required.
7.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
In accordance with the provisions in CFR Title 33, "performance standards that will be
used to assess whether the project is achieving its objectives... and should relate to the
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Plan 6 June 2016

objectives ... so that the project can be objectively evaluated to determine if it is
developing into the desired resource type, providing the expected functions, and attaining
any other applicable metrics ".
Table 3 below lists proposed success criteria for each proposed ecological service
enhancement. While some success criteria are quantitative (e.g. bank height ratio) and
others are qualitative (e.g. observations of fine sediment deposition on the floodplain),
each is measurable. Year to year comparisons for the various parameters would allow
adaptive management to be implemented early on in the monitoring period if necessary in
order to reduce the risk of widespread problems.
Table 3. Performance Standards
Parameter
Metrics/Success Criteria
Frequency
a. Entrenchment ratio for reaches where ER is corrected through design
Parameter
and construction shall be no less than 2.2.
Channel Stability
b. The stream project shall remain stable and all other performance
standards shall be met through two separate bankfull events, occurring
in separate years, during the monitoring years 1 through 7.
a. Density of 320 live, planted stems/acre at year 3; 260 live, planted
Riparian Buffer Vegetation
stems/acre at year 5; 210 live planted stems/acre at year 7.
Pattern and Profile
b. Less than 15% cover of exotic/invasive species.
As -Built
a. 100% of fencing and signage to remain intact. No encroachment on
Project Boundary
the easement.
8.0 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Environmental components monitored in this project are those that allow an evaluation of
stream stability and vegetative survivability. The success of stream stability and woody
vegetation plantings would be evaluated for 7 years per the proposed guidance set forth
by the North Carolina Interagency Review Team's (NCIRT) "Monitoring Requirements
and Performance Standards for Compensatory Mitigation in North Carolina" — February
8, 2013 (USACE 2013).
Table 4. Monitoring Requirements
Required
Quantity
Frequency
Notes
Parameter
Pattern/profile survey will extend for
As per North Carolina
at least 20 bankfull widths per reach.
Pattern and Profile
Interagency Review
As -Built
Annual profile surveys only required if
Team's Requirements
channel instability is observed.
As per North Carolina
As -Built,
A minimum of one representative
Dimension
Interagency Review
Years 1, 2,
riffle and pool cross section will be
Team's Reguirements
3, 5, and 7
surveyed per 1,000 linear feet.
Surface Water
I As per North Carolina
Annual
A crest gauge will be installed on site;
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Plan 7 June 2016

Hydrology
Interagency Review
the device will be inspected on a semi -
Team's Requirements
annual basis to document the
occurrence of bankfull events on the
project.
As per North Carolina
As -Built,
Vegetation will be monitored using a
Vegetation
Interagency Review
Years 1, 2,
standard sampling method.
Team's Requirements
3, 5, and 7
Exotic and nuisance
Annual
Locations of exotic and nuisance
vegetation
vegetation will be mapped.
Locations of fence damage, vegetation
Project boundary
Annual
damage, boundary encroachments, etc.
will be mapped.
Reference photographs will be made at
PhotographsAnnual
selected overviews and near -stream
locations.
9.0 LONG TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon close out by the Corps, the site would remain owned by the Harmons and the
conservation easement would be held by the Polk County SWCD. The designated party
would be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required
in the restrictive covenant document(s) are upheld. Endowment funds required to uphold
restrictive covenants would be negotiated prior to site transfer to the responsible party.
10.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Project maintenance would be performed as described above. If, during the course of
annual monitoring it is determined the site's ability to achieve site performance standards
is jeopardized, the applicant would notify the Corps and DWR of the need to develop an
Adaptive Management Plan. Once the Adaptive Management Plan is prepared and
finalized the applicant would:
1. Notify the Corps and DWR.
2. Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring
requirements as necessary and/or required by the Corps and DWR.
3. Obtain other permits as necessary.
4. Implement the Adaptive Management Plan.
5. Provide the Corps and DWR with documentation of corrective action. This
report would depict the extent and nature of the work performed.
11.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
TEP will provide a Surety Bond to ensure a high level of confidence that the project
would be successfully completed:
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Plan 8 lune 2016

12.0 REFERENCES
NCGS (North Carolina Geological Survey). 2004. Physiography of North Carolina.
Map compiled by the Division of Land Resources. Raleigh.
Rosgen, Dave. 1996. Applied River Morphology, Wildland Hydrology.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, and North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality.
Wilmington, North Carolina.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2013. Monitoring Requirements and
Performance Standards for Compensatory Mitigation in North Carolina. North
Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT).
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Plan 9 June 2016

-A
_ pendix`A'
Figures`-`
r

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project (+/- 3.77 Ac;)
1
c I I
/ I
� / I
I I
c \
/ I
o'
Marys Branch
r \
1 \
Boundary
Y
1 / \
� � I
\ 1
\ T /
Legend
CE Boundary
— — — Streams
Drawn by: RNR 06.06.15; CEC Project# 747
,6
Did Melvin 0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
Polk County, CLearWater Site Vicinity
North Carolina Figure 1
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
r,h4
I
I
1
c I I
/ I
� / I
I I
c \
/ I
o'
Marys Branch
r \
1 \
Boundary
Y
1 / \
� � I
\ 1
\ T /
Legend
CE Boundary
— — — Streams
Drawn by: RNR 06.06.15; CEC Project# 747
,6
Did Melvin 0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
Polk County, CLearWater Site Vicinity
North Carolina Figure 1
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project (+I 3.1 ( ACS)
A,

a
fir.' •T��" °� 4
r
`!�� + - � W'-. �" � � - - - � see. ''� 'Y ♦ ! ,.T, '� •-'�• a '$ W
*,V tar�1. � � ��:e� � i v y f � � s r ; ... , c. y� w- 1 x j„li.,y •y ..
' 3 `6 ,+fie �tr�_' a.+i r S,r . '�° e 4 i . �x ' `;f'� _ ,y 41. �r.r°.. P �.+ y'•��. ' f�'y'� �'T �'tr
i°X x .xi P. ....yx-` $.e'y�..�'� �,e f -. y'y t �.13•< t
h � - �� $C 4F .� + a �C;' y _ :. !.`ti,.:q , t rs q �"�' : ¢ .k.e. �g P��..'A+`�•i
'iii
T "�� W t •er`" -y"1 -
*'
Au
y7,4,4­
y}
• 6*._ .. x � }y,� � ♦~ T.A 1. P.-.fi ` ,-k ,y '
Me
s 3r s a •.F ��"1#
g. {r;• Y �++. '1 C. _ as a; k.
Legend
Qin y ,
1 250 500 1111
Y; CE Boundafy
Y °
s F_
'�ea �.y.�°r e��r .;'5.��,-�x;..�`-. _ ee , ..:t c..'C�.�,..LY.X ,• �, q� � A� ..,.C�`+.

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Site (+/- 3.77 AC)
01
I I
Wetland 4 Continues
t Off Property
\X10
Jurisdictional wetlands and waters identified on this map have been located within sub -meter
accuracy utilizing a Trimble mapping grade Global Positioning System (GPS) and the
subsequent differential correction of that data. GPS points may demonstrate uncorrectable
errors due to topography, vegetative cover, and/or multipath signal error.
Note: The illustrated wetland and stream locations are approximate. These areas have
been flagged in the field; however, they have not been surveyed. Although Clearwater
Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is confident in our assessment, the US Army Corps
of Engineers (Corps) is the only agency that can make final decisions regarding jurisdictional
wetland and waters of the US delineations. Therefore, all preliminary determinations are
subject to change until written verification is obtained. CEC strongly recommends that
written verification be obtained from the Corps prior to closing on the property, beginning any
site work, or making any legal reliance on this determination.
t
This map was prepared by CEC using the best information available to CEC at the time of
production. This map is for informational purposes only and should not be used to determine
precise boundaries, roadways, property boundary lines, nor legal descriptions. This map
shall not be construed to be an official survey of any data depicted.
Source Data: Preliminary Harmon Easement is from Wildlands Engineering. S3 was drawn
(1i via aerial imagery (NCCGIA 2015).
Potential) Ja1640iaeal wmle
Weliand(AQ
Stream(IF)
WI
0.W6
SI
1.077
W2
0.01
S2
133
W3
a008
S3 (Not Delineated)
2,569
W4
0.35
Tata)
0374
Told
39779
Legend
Data Form / X \ ti
Stream
Wetland
Contours
125 250 500
— - — - Preliminary Harmon Easement �.
Drawn by: KAY 5.13.16; CEC Project #747 Douglas Harmon ,
: \ Feet
ru earWater Stream & Wetland
Polk County, Delineation Map
North Carolina 32 Clayton Street Delineated May 13, 2016
Asheville, NC 28801 Figure 4

r
-'Appendix` B
Conservation Eas"e,ment
t
4y ,a
� ' ri

Polk County Soil and Water Conservation District
When Recorded Mail to:
Polk County Soil & Water District Office
Courthouse Annex, PO Box 236
Columbus, NC 28722
AMENDMENT TO DEED OF AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT TO DEED OF AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION
EASEMENT (the "Amendment") is made by Douglas Harmon and James Alan Harmon at 335
Harmon Dairy Lane, Columbus, North Carolina 28722, ("Grantors"), to Polk County Soil and
Water Conservation District ("Grantee" or "District"), a body politic and corporate organized and
existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina and having a principal place of business in
Columbus, North Carolina;
WITNESS THAT:
WHEREAS, Grantors are the owners in fee simple of the certain real property in Green Creek
Township, Polk County, North Carolina, more particularly described as Tax Parcel P 119-4,
Deed Book 08-E Page 231 and Deed Book 143 at Page 73 in the Polk County Registry, herein
referred to as the "Property;"
WHEREAS, Grantors and Grantee entered into a Deed of Agricultural Conservation Easement
on the Property recorded in Deed Book 404 at Page 927, Polk County Registry;
WHEREAS, Grantors now desire to do stream restoration work on a portion of the Property
consisting of approximately 1122 linear feet of an unnamed tributary to Mary's Branch;
R&S 16190011

WHEREAS, the stream mitigation is being pursuant to an individual permit (the "Permit")
issued by the United States Army Corps of Engineers ("USACE") and a 401 Water Quality
Certification issued by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality ("NCDEQ");
WHEREAS, USACE and NCDEQ require, as a condition of the Permit, that the mitigated
portion of the stream and a buffer on either side of the stream be protected by a Permanent
Conservation Easement;
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee have considered the proposed stream restoration project (the
"Project") and agree that the Project is not inconsistent with the purposes of the Deed of
Agricultural Easement and that paragraph 3. Of Exhibit B to the Deed of Agricultural Easement
allows for the "repair or improve[ment ofJ unstable ... streambanks." 3.
WHEREAS, Paragraph 16. Of the Deed of Agricultural Easement allows for amendment of the
Easement so long as the amendment is consistent with the Grantee's amendment policies and
complies with section 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code;
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that the Stream Restoration Project and the imposition
of a Permanent Conservation Easement on 1122 linear feet of a tributary to Mary Branch's
together with a buffer on either side of the stream is consistent with the purposes of the Deed of
Agricultural Easement, the Grantee's Easement Amendment Policies and Section 170(h) of the
Internal Revenue Code;
WHEREAS, It is the intent of the Grantor and the Grantee to Amend the Deed of Agricultural
Easement to allow for the placement of a Permanent Conservation Easement on approximately
1122 linear feet of an unnamed tributary to Mary's Branch together with a buffer on either side of
the unnamed tributary;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and representations contained
herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which
is hereby acknowledged, Grantors hereby unconditionally and irrevocably grant and convey unto
Grantee, its heirs, successors and assigns a Conservation Easement of the nature and character
and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over the Property described on Exhibit A, together with the
right to preserve and protect the conservation values thereof, as follows:
ARTICLE I
Duration of Easement
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation Easement is an
Easement in gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor, Grantor's
personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and licensees.
ARTICLE II
Prohibited and Restricted Activities
R&S 1619001_1

Any activity on , or use of the Property inconsistent with the purpose of this Conservation
Easement is prohibited. The Property shall be preserved in its natural condition and restricted
from any development that would impair or interfere with the conservation values of the
Property.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses are
expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder.:
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment
of the natural features of the Property or any introduction of non-native plants and/or
animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building, mobile home,
asphalt, or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display, antenna, utility
pole, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock, or any other temporary or permanent structure
or facility on or above the Property.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or
commercial activities, including any rite of passage for such purposes are prohibited.
D. _Agricultural Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal husbandry,
and horticultural use of the Property are prohibited, except that Grantor may draw
water from the unnamed tributary for agricultural use and for grazing animals.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming, cutting or
mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation on the Property.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails, or walkways on the
Property; nor enlargement or modification to existing roads, trails or walkways.
G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted or over the Property, except the posting of "No
Trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation values of the Property, signs
giving directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the Property
and/or signs identifying the Grantor as owner of the Property.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery, or hazardous substances or toxic or
hazardous waste, or any placement of underground or above ground storage tanks or
other materials on the Property is prohibited.
I. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling, excavation
dredging, mining, or drilling,; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, mines
or other materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any manner on the
Property, except to restore natural topography or drainage patterns.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or altering, or
tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the
restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. In addition, diverting or causing or
permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into, within, or out of the
easement areas by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into
waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticides or biocides is prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or
extinguished by the Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a
R&S 1619001_1

transferable developments right scheme or cluster development arrangement or
otherwise.
L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all -terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited.
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Property which is or may
become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant, the preservation of the Property
substantially in its natural condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is
prohibited.
ARTICLE III
Grantor's Reserved Rights
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs, successors
or assigns, the right to continue the use of the Property for all purposes not inconsistent with this
Conservation Easement, including but not limited to, the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the
Property, the right to sell, transfer, gift, or otherwise convey the Property, provided such sale,
transfer, or gift conveyance is subject to the terms of, and shall specifically reference, this
Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its successors
and assigns, the right to construct wetland and stream mitigation on the Property, in accordance
with the Stream Restoration Plan attached hereto as Exhibit B.
ARTICLE IV
Grantee's Rights
The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the Corps, shall
have the right to enter the Property at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting said
Property to determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns,
is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation
Easement. The Grantee shall also have the right to enter and go upon the Property for purposes
of making scientific or education observations and studies and taking samples. The easement
rights granted herein do not include public access rights.
ARTICLE V
Enforcement and Remedies
A. To accomplish the purposes of the Easement, Grantee is allowed to prevent any
activity on or use of the Property that is inconsistent with the purposes of this
Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Property that
may be damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this
Conservation Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the
Grantee shall notify the Grantor in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have
30 days after receipt of such notice to correct the conditions constituting such
breach. If the breach remains uncured after 30 days, the Grantee may enforce this
Conservation Easement by appropriate legal proceedings including damages,
R&S 1619001_1

injunctive relief and other relief. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee,
reserves the immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining
order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of the tem of this
Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the
benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee
acknowledge that under such circumstances damage to the Grantee would be
irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of the
Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other
rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation
Easement. The costs of a breach, correction or restoration, including Grantee's
expenses, court costs and attorney's fees, shall be paid by Grantor, provided,
Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The Corps shall have the
same right to enforce the terms and conditions of this easement as the Grantee.
B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision hereof
shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or
provision hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a
subsequent breach or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement hall be construed to entitle
Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the Property
resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation,
fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God or third parties, except Grantor's lessees or
invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by Grantor under
emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life,
damage, to property, or harm to the Property resulting from such causes.
ARTICLE VI
Miscellaneous
A.Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants, and represents that it owns the Property in fee
simple (except as previously described herein), and that Grantor either owns all interests in the
Property which may be impaired by the granting of this Conservation Easement or that there are
no outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances or other interests in the Property which have
not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation Easement. Grantor further warrants that
Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived from and arising out of this
Conservation Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the Property against the
claims of all persons.
B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this
Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any interest in all or a
portion of the Property. The Grantor agrees to provide written notice of such transfer at least
thirty days prior to the date of the transfer. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this
Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the
Property or any portion thereof and shall not be amended, modified, or terminated without the
prior written consent and approval of the Corps.
R&S 16190011

C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement
are in gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees that
in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the
interest will be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. 121-34 et seq. and Section 170(h) of the
Internal Revenue Code and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the
transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in
perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document.
D. Entire Agreement and Severability. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement
of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior
discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to the
Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a
court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in force and effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes,
assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the
Property free of any liens or encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor.
Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the
ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as
expressly provided herein. Nothing shall relieve the Grantor of the obligation to
comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to
the exercise of reserved rights.
F. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the
continued use of the Property for the conservation purposes, this Conservation
Easement may only be extinguished, in whole, or in part, by judicial proceeding.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have executed this Amendment to Deed of Agricultural
Conservation Easement this day of , 2016.
Grantors:
M.
Douglas Harmon, Grantor
James Alan Harmon, Grantor
R&S 1619001 1

Accepted by Grantee:
Polk County Soil and Water Conservation District
By: f
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF POLK
l I, a Notary Public in and
for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that Douglas Harmon (Grantor), personally
appeared before me this day and acknowledged the'execution of the foregoing instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto''set my hand arid-Notary'Seal this the day of
, 2016.
[SEAL]
Notary Public
My commission expires _
R&S 16190011

` - __: '�'• �
* \
'^1:
s � _
- - .
� -
nom'•
. _ �r - _.'�-
\
Appendii, C- _ '
'6eoinoip4ic Data, Photographs;}and
Calculations
v-
'
_a
�
:tel
" � .. � {n;..jL . : f I • '
' , �
� - � ; �. _�- " I 't,::
11 41
"
;; } '

94.5
94
93.5
0
93
0
92.5
a�
W 92
91.5
91
riffle
0
2 4
6 8 10 12
14 16 18 20
Width (ft)
Elevation (ft)
Bankfull
Dimensions
Flood Dimensions
Materials
8.0
x -section area (ft.sq.)
19.4 W flood prone area (ft)
— D50 (mm)
11.9
width (ft)
1.6 entrenchment ratio
— D84 (mm)
0.7
mean depth (ft)
--- low bank height (ft)
29 threshold grain size (mm):
1.2
max depth (ft)
--- low bank height ratio
12.5
wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6
hyd radi (ft)
17.7
width -depth ratio

94
93.5
93
92.5
0
92
a�
W 91.5
91
90.5
pool
0
2
4 6 8
10 12 14
Width (ft)
Bankfull
Dimensions
Flood Dimensions
Materials
15.1
x -section area (ft.sq.)
-- W flood prone area (ft)
--- D50 (mm)
11.9
width (ft)
--- entrenchment ratio
--- D84 (mm)
1.3
mean depth (ft)
--- low bank height (ft)
52 threshold grain size (mm):
2.3
max depth (ft)
--- low bank height ratio
13.2
wetted parimeter (ft)
1.1
hyd radi (ft)
9.4
width -depth ratio

x
C
2
d
w
96
95
94
93
92
91
riffle
90
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
Bankfull Dimensions
8.2
x -section area (ft.sq.)
5.3
width (ft)
1.5
mean depth (ft)
2.1
max depth (ft)
7.8
wetted parimeter (ft)
1.0
hyd radi (ft)
3.5
width -depth ratio
Width (ft)
Flood Dimensions
20.0 W flood prone area (ft)
3.8 entrenchment ratio
--- low bank height (ft)
--- low bank height ratio
Materials
-- D50 (mm)
--- D84 (mm)
47 threshold grain size (mm):

UT to Mary's Branch - XS1
Particle Class Size (mm)

UT to Mary's Branch - XS2
Zigzag Pebble Count Particle Distribution
SiIt/Cla
Y ._
—_
n0 I Sand + Gravel
B
I
{ -- - Cobble Boulder r
Bedrock
i i
I �
v 60
OR
41,1
RJ 10
Fl -
20
1
1
u
I
I
i
i
di—
i11 1 1 10 FRI lirip) 11l()(H)
Particle Class Size (min)

SIEVE ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Largest Particle Size: 35 mm
Refer to ASTM D 422-63 'Standard Test Method for Particle -Size Analysis of Soils'
L:\Aclive Projects\005-20285 TIEC Stream Mitigation\Harmon Dairy Site\sediment\SIEVE ANALYSIS bar sample As, Data 6/3/2016
WEI PROJECT NO. 005-20285
SITE OR PROJECT:
Harmon Dairy
REACH/LOCATION:
Bar at XS2
DATE COLLECTED:
4/25/2016
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
SEG
DATA ENTRY BY:
SEG
Largest Particle Size: 35 mm
Refer to ASTM D 422-63 'Standard Test Method for Particle -Size Analysis of Soils'
L:\Aclive Projects\005-20285 TIEC Stream Mitigation\Harmon Dairy Site\sediment\SIEVE ANALYSIS bar sample As, Data 6/3/2016
RETAINED ON SIEVE
PARTICLE CLASS WEIGHT (9)
Class
Cumulative
MATERIAL
PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
SIEVE SIZE (mm)
SIEVE NUMBER
Raw
Tare
Net
%
%
Silt / Clay
< .063
1945.4
367.2
1578.2
38%
38%
Very Fine
.063-125 .125
0.063
#230
0.0
0%
38%
•'i $•'i t'L
Fine
.125-25 .25
0.125
#120
0.0
0%
38%
SAND
Medium
.25-50 .50
0.25
#60
0.0
0%
38%
i; t t ►4 i;
'L
Coarse
.50 - 1.0
0.5
#35
0.0
0%
38%
lY; � s,•i;Y
Very Coarse
1.0 - 2.0
1.0
#18
1057.3
479.1
578.2
14%
51%
Very Fine
2.0-4.75
2.0
#10
1149.3
494.6
654.7
16%
67%
Fine - Medium
4.75 - 12.5
4.75
#4
1375.3
513.0
862.3
21%
87%
GRAVEL
Medium - Coarse
12.5.25
12.5
1/2 IN
1072.4
541.0
531.4
13%
100%
Coarse
25-45
25
1 IN
0.0
0%
100%
Very Coarse
45-64
0.0
0%
100%
Small
64-90
0.0
0%
100%
Small
90-128
0.0
0%
100%
COBBLE
O
Large
128-180
0.0
0%
100%
CLarge
180-256
0.0
0%
100%
Small
256-362
0.0
0%
100%
BOULDER
Small
362-512
0.0
0%
100%
Medium
512-1024
0.0
0%
100%
Large - Very Large
1024-2048
0.0
0%
100%
BEDROCK
Bedrock
> 2048
0.0
0%
100%
Total
6599.7
2394.9
4204.8
100%
Largest Particle Size: 35 mm
Refer to ASTM D 422-63 'Standard Test Method for Particle -Size Analysis of Soils'
L:\Aclive Projects\005-20285 TIEC Stream Mitigation\Harmon Dairy Site\sediment\SIEVE ANALYSIS bar sample As, Data 6/3/2016

R c
L'' P
y
F
- 5r

UT to Mary's Branch Typical Section Design
RIFFLE SECTION Regional Curve Estimate to d/s end
Right Bank Slope, x:1
2.5
DA (sq. mi.)
0.27
Left Bank Slope, x:1
2.5
NC Mountains (area)
8.871195
Max Depth (ft)
1.2
NC Mountains (discharge)
37.2055
Bottom Width (ft)
4
Area
8.4
NC rural Piedmont (area)
8.797303
Bankfull Width (ft)
10
NC rural Piedmont (discharge)
34.68703
Bankfull Depth (ft)
0.84 1.428571
W/D ratio
11.90
USGS 2 year discharge
Ave Width (ft) =
NC Hydro Area 2
40
Discharge Calculation overall reach
Q = 1.49/n R213 s'n A
SEDIMENT DATA
WP (ft)
10.46
WEI bar sample 1
R (ft)
0.80
de4 =
10 mm
design slope
0.810
dloo =
35 mm
Channel n
0.035
Q (cfs)
31
WEI zz 1
WEI zz 2
R (power)
1.93
ds4 =
57 mm dB4 = 36 mm
d,o = 110 mm d,00 = 80 mm
yRs =
0.50 psf
grain diam, Shields =
30 to 90 mm

10130
100
E
P
M 10
C
0.1 r--
0.001
1
G T/
Q :GtA °
m
4 0
R �
O 0 c7
00
tir
0
U n i� �~ O
�C� coq c
Q Q GOC
O
i 4 +�-I I-- ---F- --I- 4 4-H 4+}--- -+--- F - {-i-444�
0.01 01 1 10
Critical Shear Stress ilbs/sq ft}
range of mobile grain
diameters at 0.5 psf;
30mm to 90 mm
A Rocgo n'c Date- Colorado, USA,
greveFbed streams
C ShleldsData-misc.labarotoryand
field sources
• ShIelOSCUNB10f Thresholdol Mulon

Appendix D�
Restoration Plan
r
f
•�

TE90-A ON •SUPII WJIJ
90EE ZEE90L ■•i
LKS•OLL 8Z8 •NL
9088Z JN'•106oIR'
Ppb PpMNH B-L9T
7 N I M l l NI')Nl
SQKY'TQ'iIM
�
U
M
CV
Z
►-�
cC�
�
M
.-r
0
"i
•r.
G
C
U
ri
tV
T'M
�
61
U
•ct
Z
C'
�
w
W
R
O
b�A
(1J�`
m
Eu
0RU
DN'A4unOD 110d
JZZ 'ja;ua' uLu
4sanbg jeuopeuua4uI uoAj,L zo3
u01.4uio4sag uzeai}S AMG uouueH
IN.
ov +p+w3 wPu
sm-M �
•10A"'• 94R'6 --f uea
V)
sko
a�
N
a
Z v
c
3
W
CL
G1",
_QW
3QZ_
W
�mJ3
J. W
x
W F
ccW
OAZ�n
LL
WHO~
mQV
z
M
CV
M
I?
M
.-r
1i
"i
•r.
G
C
C
ri
tV
T'M
�
61
C'
W
R
O
m
Eu
�
Q
Q
a
3
°
v'
v~ao0
a,
o
w
609 0.
cu. gu si
o
a
w z ^�
A- mw�'r
8 N o o6
�
G'
w3.a °aaGo
v',
V)
sko
a�
N
a
Z v
c
3
W
CL
G1",
_QW
3QZ_
W
�mJ3
J. W
x
W F
ccW
OAZ�n
LL
WHO~
mQV
z

SEBO-i ON 0Sue311 W4i
90EE ZEE VOL .Kei
L09S ILL Sze lel
90882 3N'e11"OV
P-8 POO -MN e-L9t
;]NIMllNCTT I AA
19Nl
OZa1901d PUP UeId SSW
niatnaanp
JZZ '.zaluaJ uuu}sanbg jeuotjeuialuj uoAjl zo3
u0ReJ04sag urea-% AateQ uouuuH
-4aP.0
mf As 10
BV —41.3 wild
GVZM�m -.q.."gw
ecAre 9LUZ 16"af -w0

IE90•i *ON asuaDII WJIJ
90EE ZEE VOL xai
LKS I'LL 9Z9 4al
9099Z ON'aI11Na4stl
Pro9 P -"NIH 9•L91
•0141 h I I N IV NI
SCTNV TCT'fiM
z
r.
O
1'rV
r.
0
Le
SaWN
JN'A4unoJ IIod
JZZ 'Ja;ua:) uuu4sanbg jvuopLuia4uI uoAZ io3
uop��o�sag ui�az;si�Q uouu�H
6M
7S aaWWMJ
9V �«ulal3 wkw
ivm-m �w
9102.6 MR( ala
Y
O
F
Y L
W W N
W V} QW v Q ¢ ` m CO
} ¢ Y W J~ O Y Z = C
W Oz QZ�u °CO W QO W¢ Sj+ p
o�0¢xv a `o_J�3z Z'na ��o lay,
� r A
41
z6zowzaLOZ <az m3 i"'1 2rl 7., g1.( A'I ..
Oa V1 Y00 v0¢ W Q Z z aS um yni >^yI 9u l^ 9M
Z J Z Z¢ F¢ Oz�Z J W QO �Q Y QW Y 4 Y 1Q1 y
otvi pOO�OQ EnO=ZU z ¢ WLL
_ lJ {/1 U O Q_ _Z C U� m N N N G N N
¢300a ROUFX aw0 O `X ox 6JI a`IYn dv.
W W y Z t�t I O Z Z J G ((If.�' F- Z Q O.
ZZJUOLZ¢ JO W �Q O{AO Z5
QQ2oc�Qluvf J,, Q2O aW
�L O= r N Z Z W W L d Q W (� OOC Z =_ rp � _
QO�1-a U' gOpcHact ZLLQ ~y lllllll taa II—I
�uoww< wzodzor W< -j 0.
lllllll aaa
Z Z Q 3 J W F a 3 W 3 Z O Q Z 1111111 a a a I IIIII
Z— ZQ�UO� ZFO Q W zz /�i� 1111111 a a•
�N�OyQCZWQQ w0¢¢ �aQk F'-0 1111111 aaa III
<UU5 UJcz{o�w`�C vOwO O aQ. �� 1111111
N W 2!2z p ow -,A W wWL�O
W�°m°°raN0zXL-U= agOQ~Q
�-d moj�00L.v1 azo
¢¢ ¢ W Z J WyJV
uj
Z=WNW ZUJQ.20i
OoQ��u
0¢O�=,.-2
OU9U N¢7O
Cy—-6 O
-1
I.-�UjI—? aa
f.D VIO —{NHW O
WW EY
ZzpO00s2Q<�n�pOJZ�zOJ¢�� e
cr
W .-i N ai 4 vi lC ri v
1•r�•� yu° � '� I�il m
rt+ Y Y 9G1 Y y
O
tl
o
¢¢ Z_ j a 4 I I
aQ Q"
u 2
of > 0
O O
aZ zZ > z
Q 0 O J z W
Mm G>Zko3
$W a9 o
00E 9�m=
J W U p ~
¢ O W a 0= m Y
Z0ZO�yj W c
W W d O W~ Y
U, �( IA ¢ Q Y J O C C
<Luw%n� 2 « 0 °-° Ice
c cJs: <�+ V V
4aocouzr y
V C O W W O O W p O O y Y A =
zaCio°DCLL�zO
Q Y0.
N
Z �ui ?~ w
W
z o o o o� 2
., U¢NQOF W
cc 3:! ag CO
soa&Jaaa
H'z-=o I-2 cg
cc
N 1 OW W
H Z 2¢ C V m I I I ICT 1
W O .' I I� •I
Q
zafm�cra ��
goosoozza
W1..:1.:{A000o� I I I I
W I I I
W N N M
1

W-4S
TE90EE IEE W 'l,U!"i �'O OZaI�3o�d P Mid S8ZOZ T •
L►es ►LL Sze 101 S EJTdLt l-
90eei j Z
peoy pooOR"MeH G-L9-L9I 'f
:3NINl l-0.3
s cr KC1'[ r nn q' so'�'o 'aa ua ueu sanb euoi euua u uo� .zo M �°�'
4� o JZ'I } J i } } I Z d
BV �.wnw3 wlol.
w uoRezOIsag urea-IIS AlleQ uouueH�
•10I�'•YIUi'6 a3n( .x0
I
I
I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
3D- 33- 33 I I
I 1
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
- 3]- 37 377
I I
I I
I
I
I 1
I < I
I
I
s I
I I
I I
I
I ,
I <
I I
I
I
o � I
Q f W Z
5�WFA I
v II �
r �
o I
IF 00 i
I o. o
II �
I o
I W 3JI I
I �31a u
g I ago m I
>ga II
I �• I I s
I I
I
I c II
d lu
LL �i I
Z
g I
a g '
o ,
ac '
a '
I
I
p , 1
Z ' '
Q '
W s 10,
o ���
Q ix= o gz�, o
0 x °d z u' 0 rd a jS] _y �r z oda
>� g ao
a
o
Z
N ,z
W
Q 0 I�1
�
Q 0.0.
LLJ
D CC-4 N
W Q a ao Q
N d Q` 4 ; urns
• u�o� a¢ o
OI— Q � (f) z � Z 37 - 37 37 -I
I I z
W Q
N eN-I Q i I
W z �
0 00 W
F—Z
Z ,
N
N
Q Z
z� o g '
0 _ d
Z 0 m c i
g °CF- O s
CL W Q W
cc1
O m
YQ M o
H F
Q Z W W LLJ W
QLn
I
(y 7 V)>_ N
W a < J W
>tii
I
I I
91C96

TE90EE ZEE WL X11 13
LUSS ►LL SZe lei
+O
ahold pue ueid
+
EO ZES -A313
1"4S .
T .
906eZ 3N'in 1WVsV
V -S Poo -►N S -M
Oz ►e+S • Yu
d�7
DN L4uno,110d
I-
S R ISI V'I R T I M
M
2 VVV�,• J
x�' `r0 �O
9Z e9+S • WS
' uoAJ .IO
J,l.I ,�a�uaJ u�u�sanbg j�uoi;�u�a�uI Z 3
nor DS ��-•��
"1
�.
\!
uope.I04sala urea -14S AJIeQ UODUeH
N
J i
1
EO ZES -A313
s
/�g
\ ,
•'� r 1 I
� 1 �
\,�
1
P
i
% �t
a Tu 06 SMS • VIS
1 u
EL TEB • A373
00 T6+V - YlS
1
'1 ;� � �•
,
j
�11 g 1 8
EE LE8 -A313
OZ 9L+► • VIS
1 X
l�/�����i I
��
'A
ES ZES -A313
1•�•� •`,••`
OCSS+V - Vis
1 \
1
I 1
SO ZES -A313
-
I
OL 9►+► - YLS
1
SZ ZEe •A313
ry
OL 9E+V - YLS
,
b
c
//
I
/0,
EO ZES -A313
Oz ►e+S • Yu
1
St IES •A373
M
9Z e9+S • WS
�t
19 TES •AM
"1
SZ'SS+S - Yu
\!
N
J i
1
EO ZES -A313
TZ TE+S -YtS
\ ,
•'� r 1 I
� 1 �
\,�
1
P
oll EI ZES -A313
% �t
a Tu 06 SMS • VIS
1 u
EL TEB • A373
00 T6+V - YlS
1
'1 ;� � �•
,
j
�11 g 1 8
EE LE8 -A313
OZ 9L+► • VIS
1 X
��
'A
ES ZES -A313
1•�•� •`,••`
OCSS+V - Vis
1 \
1
I 1
SO ZES -A313
-
OL 9►+► - YLS
1
SZ ZEe •A313
ry
OL 9E+V - YLS
,
1 at
1
EL ZES • A313
`I
09"61+►•Vis
n R
CO EE9 -A313
"
to W
OZ -86+E • YLS
Ilk
ZS ZES • A313
\ o�
09 TS+E - YLS
[T EES • A313
99"TL+E - VIS
y
1
I 1
It
1
I
1 I 1
1
I Ii
OL
g2
EES =A373
--�
22
19 LE -E • YLS
I
1
3a
�P
I'
8o
i
gi
1
'
1
a
�Z
1
l
61 SES • A313
j
=
IS SZ+Z •
G
VIS
1
a
1
I
1
I
/0,
�
•'� r 1 I
\,�
1
I
A
�
Ili �°
W `--I
'1 ;� � �•
,
�11 g 1 8
�•1 •` �
111
1i �
1•�•� •`,••`
1 \
1
I 1
-
0
Vai
\_
1
\ o�
r
11 \
Y
I 1
It
I
1 I 1
1
I Ii
1
I

TEBO•i ON asua3n wAi'r
90EE ZEE VOL ,@i
LUSS I'LL SZB 'I•L
o
ASIA
i
ai!3O=d p old
i A4unoJ)IIod
• �
• (,,
.A
909OZ 3N'•luf-•4sV
d'
1�
DN
/
P -H P0�•H B•L91
O
"t',y,
/
'JNIMIINI•JNl
S cr tv d'r cr'r I M
-biJ
q'�oo
<1
D-1-1 Iialua' usu�sanbg i�uot}�uza4uI uofa .103
"•."W
8e
•
u0W'-104sag IULa.14S AJieQ uOuuL'H
'• '
I�
1 A
EZ BIB = A313
raw
9�•6aun1 ••0
0
1
a
O
1
ASIA
i
.A
/1
1�
h
i0 O
/
•'\
O
�
/
VlOZ'6
I
F5
It
1�
J
�
T
<1
8e
•
'• '
I�
1 A
EZ BIB = A313
OS'TO+OT • VLS
tx
i A
iX
EB US • A313
W V9.6 • VLS
� �
,r'llrq
•.
1
i
i
3 �
I
EI' BIB - A313
1
I ,
'
OS 99+6 • VIS
EL BZB • A313
1 z
OL EW6•V1S 1
Zig
o r
`, o I
/a
EZ BZB =A313
Of 9Z+6 • WAS
1
ES BZB • A313
OL PT -6 • VLS
1
E06EB =A313
08 SB+B • Yu
,i
Er6ze •A313
�
06'9S•9 - VIS
E6 BZB • A313
09 LV+8 -VIS 1
EMS -A313
~•
Of 9E+B • VIS
1
i
E6 6Z8 • A313
'
OB 017 Vu
•;
n
EE 6Z8 • A313-
09 L6 -L • VLS
ES'6ZB • A313
1
EI OEB • A313
08 99•L • Vu
1
^'m EV OES -A313
u OS OWL • V15
/
EO OES • A313 1
00 EZ.L • VLS i
E90EB =A313
OS Sac • VLS
�_,�
3
_
0
O
i!
EE IEB =A313
06 SS+9 • VIS
i
'
r
1
E6 OES • A313 i
ti
00 6E+9 - WS
1
M
ES TE8 =A313
OZ ZZ+9 • VLS
=
OR
•
VlOZ'6
I
F5
It
�
•
'• '
I�
1 A
r
tx
i A
� �
,r'llrq
•.
i
i
3 �
I
I ,
ql
1 z
Zig
o r
`, o I
/a

TE80•i ON asuigl OUli
90EE ZEE VOL ■vi
LOSS OLL 828 PL
90882 JN'OIMOOV
PGOB POOMAIH 8.1.91
•JNIMIINI•JNl
SRMV TQ'iIM
+
p
-biJ
" w
J
ap4oid PUU uuId
JN LLUunoJ )Itod
'Z1 lialuaJ uuu4sanbg jLuopLuzaluI uoAjZ io3
WWJ049ag wLa4S A"RG u0uu9H
§2
It
I
It
os �4p-,-o
AuAg-4
9tl �-M�-3 P•P4
SBLII lwgw
mq�.•� VLOZ'6-n( •MO
W
J
°
a
Q
O
Q
a
_
o�
a
,4
I
o
/I
1\
4
I
,
4-
J
g
`'
ti$
4
c
4
ST SIB • A313
0Z'OT+ET • US
S9319 -A313
!
,�
06 CWT-VLS
1
1 9
S2 SZB = %313
OL a+2T - Vu
;
g I
a
! Aw
^
,+,I m SS SZB • A313
08 6S -El - VLS
1
n
ST'SZ9 -A313
! / p
00 WIT • VLS
!
SC S28 - A313
j
�
00 EZ+ZT • VLS
N
YOOI
m
4
S8 SZB - A313
01.11-11•Vis
D
<�
z=
S► SLB • A313
y
OL Z6+TI-VLS
1
SO 928 - A313
Of OL+TT - VLS 1
SZ 9Z8 = A313
OT'BS+I I - VLS
1
SL Sze • A313 !
'"
08 WIT • VLS
S6 SZ8 -A313 i !
Z
06 SETT - VLS
1
�
1
SS 928 - A313
OL ET+TT - VLS
�
1
N
^
SO 928 -AM
o
02 E6+01 • VLS
OS 929 • AM 1
�i
OL
VLS
OT LZ8 • A313 ,
$ ^
OZ 9L+OT -VLS
In u
a m
1
i �••,
Of LIS -A313
OV 19.01 • tlls
�W
06928 -A313
02 LOOT • VLS
E8 LZ8 -A313
—09 ZE+01 • VLS
2
i'
Cam m
I
It
os �4p-,-o
AuAg-4
9tl �-M�-3 P•P4
SBLII lwgw
mq�.•� VLOZ'6-n( •MO
W
°
a
Q
O
Q
a
_
R
a
,4
I
/I
1\
4
I
,
4-
J
g
`'
ti$
4
c
4
°
a
Q
O
Q
a
/
a
,4
/I
4
4
c
4

[EBO-i ON xaa3ll oWi
90EE ZEE VOL ni
LUSS VLL Sze lei
.1-
' Y
0
S��aQ
i
iaays
908Bi oN 'VIIMWN
PEo11 Po—LtH B -0I
am
d"n �J-
g�
DN ,tii0:p1lod
�P
a �1
�
7 NIM liNl�j N1
S Gd� �r r AN
�
O
Q,soo�
:)-j-1zaluaD ueu4sanbg puoputua4ul uoAjs Jo3
'
M
'
a
UOW-1o1sag urea-% AJiPQ uouuVH
8 0
e�w>,�
s �.VW^N WI
Nx
w
.AI,..,,
ylur•bw�r ..a
?
° p0.
mm&
1 u
y m o p o
g h. F
=m�oG I� 07 V°� 8
1
�� �p W zz
Rid-oS
9"",-Y0
0
1i`u`' Si$gg;m 9o=Wapm
1 .
oS go 52i X$Og: Z
am
z YuQ
2�Zt76Om m°o
.42�z
x
a p m Q t W m 4 a
SsOi p665M6 4 5 D1 15
\\
1 J
6Q'"5<='�� ����� spm
1 \ FFQ
.\F 2
z
.. n T O N O
SNOW IS 1K3Idu
J bad HLGIM
W OLLOO 31JAJH
z
�o
am
g�
li
�P
a �1
�
YLLR
A
g'
u
D J
u
O
12
v
m
�Im
NIW .Li
JO
J
0,
a F
o � J
o n
m p
O =
;.-2 5 9pi >m n RZ2
gmm 0x i r c_
O s t
R� W
zZ.A C 2
3: !8
i�p-MM-St5 ggiW �o
O-2i2o� GaY�m t7 m
21°i0
�"'7icami��i mad
z�g�o�o = ���?
1)21om
2 n m a � to n
LA
,O
VJ
�
m
�
3
g
a
8 0
C] Z
Nx
o � J
o n
m p
O =
;.-2 5 9pi >m n RZ2
gmm 0x i r c_
O s t
R� W
zZ.A C 2
3: !8
i�p-MM-St5 ggiW �o
O-2i2o� GaY�m t7 m
21°i0
�"'7icami��i mad
z�g�o�o = ���?
1)21om
2 n m a � to n
LA

IEWJ ON eseegl WJIJ
aY WP.Y7
iB
90EE ZEE VOL M
a�
�l
LKS VLL•9Ze lel
z$IqYao
ma
P -H ZPOO-AeH B 9I
'JNiMaINI`JNl
S Q MV IT CI "i i M
Y'-O/j.Q�^ /��
'IYYY'ILY��VO {�OJ
ml
C
0 A
m
z
S
aY WP.Y7
iB
AS --a
a�
aR
t g
z$IqYao
ma
1.2
SIMPIQ
JN IA4unoJ )Hod
JZZ'za}ua' ueuIsanbg jeuopLuiajuI uoA.zZ zo3
uORM04saH TMMI4S AteQ uOuuLH
O �
z p
O W
3 _ = mzz
v QO=
fifi
L
W�
aY WP.Y7
9 a�
AS --a
ev
x••1.3.3 wl-4
UW=-"
� 0 1J•
=3
m
.r0
E
S.1
ml
C
0 A
c
�C
<i
SC
C
a
3_" a
�
m�
�-- z
Y L �r
0
G
y5�
M
E
a
1ROZ
$0A
�zzx
14WJi 26
ma=Q
!I
N
IX
ZOE
aY WP.Y7
6J
AS --a
ev
x••1.3.3 wl-4
UW=-"
+-V1 WV.1
0144..3 VKZ 6-1
.r0
S.1
ml
C
0 A
c
�C
<i
SC
C
a
3_" a
�
C^
ti
O �
�ry�W
N„ryl
m0
zJi°�
°:
a
W
r
<S
zIN1.,.1
az
y5�
M
E
a
1ROZ
$0A
�zzx
14WJi 26
ma=Q
!I
N
IX
ZOE
O
z
°
H1d30.0-,Z
L LSOd 13315
0.
aY WP.Y7
6J
AS --a
ev
x••1.3.3 wl-4
UW=-"
+-V1 WV.1
0144..3 VKZ 6-1
.r0
O
z
°
H1d30.0-,Z
L LSOd 13315
0.
v
v
S.1
C
0 A
r1 2
�C
<i
SC
C
E _
3_" a
O_ W
C^
ti
O �
�ry�W
N„ryl
m0
zJi°�
<S
zIN1.,.1
az
94
O C
zt;
hl

IE80-i ON acua0ll Will
90EE ZEE vu X•i
LOSS eLL ate 'lei
9088Z 7N'elIIA94SV
Peou PeO*AeH a- 91
'>NIMaINI•J Nl
SR PI�"7R'iiM
11
oWy1e
m ZF
F o ��
s zo ,lila
0 o z�
f W °
0
oNQ am
om ,�=9
=Q�=oo'
o
3�8EM M
o�0 Z
O�GS�a
�I �to�l�tso<
P
W
W Or
0 4
8
a
m m
� C
a
7 W
LL
z
z a
d o
928
g�mf
a N <
W
3Q.
xl 1~vl'Z7a9i°JI
CO
s��e;aQ
DH 'LC;uRO, 110d
JZZ lialua' umj4sanbg iauopetua;uI uoAZZ zo3
uop�.zo�sag uieal4s AZteQ uouuL'H
W
O
ZR
R
R
R
R
o
0
S
a�
�gi
of Wig.
Cpa
C
a
a
g
w
yy
E�
@q@
Y
o
E
o
a-�as
E
i
e
pp
Fj
a
a
CO
s��e;aQ
DH 'LC;uRO, 110d
JZZ lialua' umj4sanbg iauopetua;uI uoAZZ zo3
uop�.zo�sag uieal4s AZteQ uouuL'H
W
to5
m
O m��
J' lal
O
ZR
ofy
<_`+
�=w�
0 CH
_�
3
a gm;
�
S
a�
�gi
of Wig.
Cpa
C
�
a
g
w
yy
E�
@q@
Y
o
E
o
i
a
6
f
i
•
�
d
�
�
6
d
'w
�
�
d
w
3
�
�
1
1
�
�
r
8
C
>A
to5
m
O m��
J' lal
v= og7 Wq� m
zz ml�7�mf �N1~Ji
ZR
ofy
<_`+
�=w�
0 CH
_�
3
a gm;
�
S
a�
�gi
of Wig.
Cpa
C
�
a
g
w
yy
E�
@q@
Y
o
i
6
v= og7 Wq� m
zz ml�7�mf �N1~Ji
0
zz
z
3
Z•E
as W1>•.O
MI Q-0
tlV +wMh3 Y�Io4
Yw11V•tl VIM 6-1 �•0
L]
�I
�YYw
V!
1010110e ltl 03U3dtl1
3aY1S W X oi.Z
• a
o�
�o
z
G
f
8
ZR
ofy
<_`+
�=w�
0 CH
_�
3
a gm;
�
S
a�
�gi
of Wig.
Cpa
C
��o
0
zz
z
3
Z•E
as W1>•.O
MI Q-0
tlV +wMh3 Y�Io4
Yw11V•tl VIM 6-1 �•0
L]
�I
�YYw
V!
1010110e ltl 03U3dtl1
3aY1S W X oi.Z
• a
o�
�o
z
G
f
8