20120904 Ver 2_Application_20160613

�J McADAMS
3436 Toringdon Way
Suite 110
Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
[phone]
McAdamsCo.com Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
June 10, 2016
Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Nationwide Permit 39/GC 3890
Southbridge Fellowship Church
Raleigh, North Carolina
SPEC -14810
Dear Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of Southbridge Fellowship Church, we are applying for a US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) Nationwide Permit 39 and an NC Division of
Water Resources (DWR) Water Quality Certification 3890 for proposed
impacts to jurisdictional waters associated with the project known as
Southbridge Fellowship Church. The subject property is located 10931
Glenwood Avenue in Raleigh, North Carolina. The project lies within the Neuse
River Basin. The following attachments are included as part of this permit
application:
• Signed Agent Authorization
Fig. 1 - USGS Quad — Southeast Durham
The John R. McAdams
' Fig. 2 - Wake County Soil Survey (Sheet: 17)
Company, Inc.
s Fig. 3.1 - Existing Conditions
• Fig. 3.2 - Existing Conditions with aerial
Raleigh /Durham, NC
2905 Meridian Parkway
a Fig. 4 - Overall Impact Exhibit (Insets 1-4)
Durham, North Carolina 27713
. Pre -Construction Notification
[phone]
• NC DWR 401 Water Quality Certification (DWR Project# 12-0904;
Charlotte, NC
received October 24, 2012)
3436 Toringdon Way
Suite 110
Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
[phone]
McAdamsCo.com Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities

Ms. Karen Higgins
Southbridge Fellowship Church
June 10, 2016
Page 2 of 9
USAGE General Permit Verification: NWP 39 (Action ID# SAW -2012-
00616; received January 4, 2013)
PROJECT LOCATION/HABITAT: The subject property is + 10.79 acres in
size and is located at 10931 Glenwood Avenue on the south side of U.S. Hwy.
70 east, just east of the Durham / Wake County line, in Raleigh, Wake County,
North Carolina. (PIN Numbers: 0759816493 & 0759825154). The subject
contains a residential structure and four (4) wooden sheds, all of which are in
degraded conditions. The majority of the subject property consists of forested and
cleared land. The subject property is bordered to the west, south, and east are
forested land and to the north by Glenwood Avenue
Approximately 20 percent of the subject property is comprised of forested areas
and would be generally characterized as a Dry Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest
(Schafale and Weakley, 1990), while 80 percent can be characterized as a
maintained/disturbed land. The property is located within the Triassic Basin, a
unique geologic area of the eastern Piedmont Region of North Carolina. The Soil
Survey of Wake County, North Carolina (Soil Conservation Service, 1970) lists
the soils within the subject property area as Mayodan sandy loam and Creedmoor
sandy loam (Figure 2). The proposed project drains to Little Brier Creek, a
tributary of the Neuse River Basin and a designated Class C/NSW, and subject
to the Neuse River Buffer Rules.
Land use within the vicinity of the project is a mix of retail/commercial, multi-
family and single-family residential, office, and natural forested areas adjacent to
the project area. RDU International Airport is to the southeast of the property
boundary.
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES: There is one intermittent tributary (Stream
A), which runs through the property for approximately 324 linear feet, and one
perennial tributary (Stream B) which runs for 47 linear feet across the northeast
SPEC -14810

Ms. Karen Higgins
Southbridge Fellowship Church
June 10, 2016
Page 3 of 9
corner of the property. There is also an intermittent tributary (Stream C) that
intersects an off-site sewer easement south of the subject property. Impacts
associated with the off-site will be included in this permit application. Streams
A, B, and C ultimately drain to Little Brier Creek and the Neuse River. Stream
Features B and C are depicted on the Wake County Soils Survey, and are
therefore subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. Stream Feature A
is not mapped on either the Wake County Soil Survey or the USGS 7.5 minute
quadrangle map, and is not subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules. Stream Feature
D is depicted on the DWQ Neuse Buffer Determination Letter dated August 21,
2012 (where it is referred to as "Channel C"), and was deemed an isolated
wetland feature (Wetland C: 0.01 acre). Stream Feature D is therefore not
subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules (NBRRO # 12-161). There
are two jurisdictional 404/401 riparian wetlands associated with this project:
Wetland A (0.05 acre) is at the head of Stream A, and Wetland D (0.25 acre) is
at the head of Stream C within the off-site sewer easement. There are also two
isolated 401 wetland pockets in the southern portion of the property: Wetland
B (0.03 acre) and Wetland C (0.01 acre). See Figures 1-3.
Streams A and B, and Wetlands A, B, and C were verified by Mr. Craig Brown
of the USACE on April 17, 2012, and a Neuse River Riparian Buffer
determination was conducted by Mr. Martin Richmond on April 17, 2012
(NBRRO # 12-161; enclosed). Stream C and Wetland D, which are associated
with the off-site sewer easement, have not been confirmed by the USACE or
DWR for this project.
PROPOSED IMPACTS: The proposed project consists of a church, a youth
center, associated utilities, parking, ingress, egress from the site, and other
improvements. The property is located in the Neuse River Basin, but not in the
Falls Lake Watershed. The proposed project will require permitting for impacts
with the North Carolina Division of Water Quality and US Army Corps of
Engineers. The proposed project will require a Stormwater Management Plan,
and therefore 85% TSS Removal for all impervious surfaces. Since the City of
SPEC -14810

Ms. Daren IIiggins
Southbridge Fellowship Church
June 10, 2016
Page 4 of 9
Raleigh is a delegated authority for NC DWQ Stormwater Management Plans,
the review and approval of the SWMP will be part of the City of Raleigh review
process.
Proposed Impacts:
Wetlands, streams, and Neuse riparian buffers do exist within the project area,
and while it is the intent of the church to avoid significant impacts to wetlands,
streams or other environmentally sensitive features, there are proposed impacts
to 0.04 acre of Isolated Wetlands, 0.021 acre of jurisdictional riparian wetlands,
26 linear feet of intermittent stream, 4 square feet of Zone 1 Neuse Buffer, and
1,216 square feet of Zone 2 Neuse Buffer associated with the proposed project.
There are no proposed impacts to perennial streams.
Inset 1: There is a retaining wall proposed in order to construct the driveway and
avoid impacts to Stream A. The driveway will provide access to the front portion
of the building and allow for ingress and egress of emergency vehicles. However,
there is a minimal amount of clearing and grading proposed along the edge of
0.02 -acre wetland A associated with the installation of the retaining wall (Fig. 4).
This wetland area is mostly shrub/herbaceous with a few larger trees, and has
likely been timbered in the last 30 years. It should be noted that the church is
proposing that at least one acre be dedicated to a tree conservation area on the
western end of the property.
Inset 2: There are 0.04 -acres of proposed impacts to two isolated wetlands
(Wetlands B and C) associated with a stormwater BMP and a small portion of
wetland C associated with providing access to the facilities. The proposed
development is located within the Neuse River basin and will be subject to the
stormwater management requirements set forth in Section 10, Chapter 9 of the
City of Raleigh regulations. Per City of Raleigh regulations, stormwater
management on this site shall address two primary issues: (1) peak discharge
rates and (2) water quality management. Stormwater wetland facilities will be
SPEC -14810

Ms. Karen Higgins
Southbridge Fellowship Church
June 10, 2016
Page 5 of 9
employed to meet these requirements. Since the site will be required to provide
85% TSS for all impervious surfaces, two stormwater management facilities are
proposed for the project: a constructed wetland for Sub -Basin 1, and a
bioretention area for Sub -Basin 2. While the discharge from the bioretention area
will be diffuse, diffuse flow was not addressed because it is not required for
isolated wetlands.
Inset 3: There are 261f of proposed impacts to Intermittent Stream A associated
with grading and the installation of a storm drainage pipe to extend the pipe
running under Glenwood Avenue. The grading is necessary to accommodate the
driveway that provides access to the site from Glenwood Avenue, and allows for
ingress and egress of emergency vehicles. Stream A is not subject to the Neuse
Buffer Rules; therefore, there are no proposed buffer impacts associated with the
impacts to Stream A.
Inset 4: There are 0.001 acres of proposed impacts to Wetland D and 4 sf to Zone
1 and 1,216 sf to Zone 2 of the Neuse buffers associated with the installation of
a sanitary sewer connection south of the subject property. This is necessary to
connect the proposed development to an existing City of Raleigh sanitary sewer
line. Impacts to streams, wetlands, and Neuse buffers will be minimized by
conducting much of the work within the existing sanitary sewer easement.
TOTAL PROPOSED STREAM IMPACTS:
SPEC -14810
Newly Proposed
Impact Location
Impact Type
(linear feet)
Inset 3 (perm.)
Fill (culvert)
26
TOTAL
261f of intermittent
SPEC -14810

Ms. Karen IIiggins
Southbridge Fellowship Church
June 10, 2016
Page 6 of 9
TOTAL PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACTS.
Impact Location
Impact Type
Newly Proposed
(acres)
Inset 1 (perm.)
Fill (retaining wall)
0.02
Inset 2 (perm.)
Fill (grading)
0.04
Inset 4 (perm.)
Fill (sewer line)
0.001
TOTAL
0.061 acres
TOTAL PROPOSED BUFFER IMPACTS:
AVOIDANCE and MINIMIZATION: Stream and Buffer impacts have been
avoided to the greatest extent practicable, while achieving a successful project.
Wetlands, streams, and Neuse riparian buffers do exist within the project area,
and while it is the intent of the church to avoid significant impacts to wetlands,
streams or other environmentally sensitive features, there are proposed impacts
to 0.04 acre of Isolated Wetland, 0.021 acre of jurisdictional riparian wetlands,
26 linear feet of intermittent stream, 4 square feet of Zone 1 Neuse Buffer, and
1,216 square feet of Zone 2 Neuse Buffer associated with the proposed project.
There are no proposed impacts to perennial streams.
There is a retaining wall proposed in order to construct a driveway and avoid
impacts to Stream A. The proposed driveway will provide access to the front
SPEC -14810
Zone I (square Zone 2 (square
Impact Location
Impact Type
feet) feet)
Inset 4 (perm.)
Fill (sewer line)
4 1,216
TOTAL
4 sq. ft. 1,216 sq. ft.
AVOIDANCE and MINIMIZATION: Stream and Buffer impacts have been
avoided to the greatest extent practicable, while achieving a successful project.
Wetlands, streams, and Neuse riparian buffers do exist within the project area,
and while it is the intent of the church to avoid significant impacts to wetlands,
streams or other environmentally sensitive features, there are proposed impacts
to 0.04 acre of Isolated Wetland, 0.021 acre of jurisdictional riparian wetlands,
26 linear feet of intermittent stream, 4 square feet of Zone 1 Neuse Buffer, and
1,216 square feet of Zone 2 Neuse Buffer associated with the proposed project.
There are no proposed impacts to perennial streams.
There is a retaining wall proposed in order to construct a driveway and avoid
impacts to Stream A. The proposed driveway will provide access to the front
SPEC -14810

Ms. Karen Higgins
Southbridge Fellowship Church
June 10, 2016
Page 7 of 9
portion of the building and allow for ingress and egress of emergency vehicles.
Construction of this retaining wall will result in 26 linear feet of impacts to
Stream A. Only the minimal amount of wetland area will be impacted for safe
construction and installation of the retaining wall, and temporary impacts to the
stream bed itself will be avoided during construction. This wetland area is
mostly shrub/herbaceous with a few larger trees, and has likely been timbered
in the last 30 years. It should be noted that the church is proposing that at least
one acre be dedicated to a tree conservation area on the western end of the
property.
MITIGATION: There are 4 square feet of impacts proposed to Zone 1 Neuse
buffers associated with the offsite sewer. Mitigation may be required for the
impacts to Zone 1, depending on interpretation of the alignment within the
existing easement. If buffer mitigation is required, we propose mitigation in the
form of payment to NC Division of Mitigation Services' in -lieu fee program.
DIFFUSE FLOW: Since the proposed project is located within the Neuse
River Basin, it is subject to the diffuse flow requirements, however neither
stormwater BMP outlets to or near a buffered stream feature. Stream A is not
subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules; therefore, while the discharge
from the bioretention area will be diffuse, diffuse flow was not addressed. The
constructed wetland BMP, outlets to over 500 feet of low gradient upland area
and into a ditch network along Hwy 70. Therefore, a diffuse flow plan is not
included.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: Since the site will be required to
provide 85% TSS for all impervious surfaces, two stormwater management
facilities are proposed for the project; a constructed wetland for Sub -Basin 1
and a bioretention area for Sub -Basin 2.
Constructed Wetland_ The proposed constructed wetland is to be along the east
property line and provide both peak flow rate detention and water quality (TSS
SPEC -14810

Ms. Karen Higgins
Southbridge Fellowship Church
June 10, 2016
Page 8 of 9
and N). The proposed facility has some walls to accommodate the grading. The
dam is proposed to have 3(H): I (V) slopes with a 10' top width. An access route
to the dam is provided from the south of the project. The spillway acts as both
a principal and emergency spillway system with just under a foot of freeboard
in the 100 -year, worst-case scenario. The proposed normal pool elevation is 395
with an orifice at invert 396 to accommodate the 1" runoff volume over one
vertical foot. The surface area of the facility was preliminarily sized based on
this one vertical foot ponding of the 1" runoff volume. Final grading, details,
and specifications will be provided through the City of Raleigh permitting
process for the facility.
Bioretention Area: The proposed bioretention area is located to the west of the
proposed entrance drive off of Glenwood Avenue. The facility is designed to
capture the majority of the driveway for N and TSS removal. The preliminary
sizing of the facility is based on the 1" runoff volume and a 9" ponding depth
for the water quality function. The facility is mostly in cut with a 5' wide berm
"top" provided. For this preliminary analysis, no peak flow rate detention
benefit was assumed for the bioretention area. Final grading, details, and
specifications will be provided through the City of Raleigh permitting process
for the facility.
A copy of the final stormwater management plan and approval letter from the
City of Raleigh will be provided to NCDWR upon approval.
Consideration of this project is greatly appreciated. If you should have any
questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me
at [phone].
SPEC -14810

Ms. Karen Higgins
Southbridge Fellowship Church
June 10, 2016
Page 9 of 9
Sincerely,
McAdams Company
Kevin Yates
Senior Environmental Consultant
Project Manager
Enclosures
09f4BLI.101
IKI
Environmental Consultant

J
McAnaMs
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Property Owner
Name: Southbridge Fellowship Church c/o Jon Culle_ n
Address: 8609 Jersey Court, Raleigh, NC 27617
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/Description: Southbridge Fellowship Church, Raleigh, NC
Project Number: SPEC -14810 Project Manager: I Ryan Akers/K_ _evin Yates
Date: June 8, 2016
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Ms. Tasha Alexander
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to act in my behalf as
my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward.
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation
and issuing a determination associated with Water of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only
for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by The John R.
McAdams Company, Inc. staff.
f
Print Property Owner Signa re
Raleigh-Durham Charlotte
2905 Meridian Parkway 11301 Carmel Commons Blvd., Suite 111
Durham, North Carolina 27713 Charlotte, North Carolina
[phone] [phone]
Designing Tomorrow's infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

N SOUTHBRIDGE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
ANWP 39/GC 3890 APPLICATION
FIGURE 1. VICINITY MAP
o 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet PROJECT #: SPEC -14810
l inch =2,000 feet RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA WAD A kl
J

WATER RESOURCE
FEATURE B
C
W
4¢ 4
SUBJECT PROPERTY
"> WATER RESOURCE
•y
_ FEATURE D
WATER RESOURCE
FEATURE C
.CrE
v =
MM -2 I
Wv'u3,4
U ; S R E 17, WAKE; C'[7i-i'� 11..`k )I"I I € f (' 1R s€.f`u;l
LAT: 35.923179 N, LONG: —78.799627 W
N SOUTHBRIDGE FE—14
LLOWSHIP CHURCH
ANWP 39/GC 3890 APPLICATION 21
FIGURE 2. SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT
0 150 soo 60o PROJECT #: SPEC -14810
Feet
€nen=3oofeec RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA' ��'� �

(E8 OYN) QltID �!
GRAPHIC SCALE
200 0 100 200 400
I inch = 200 ft.
UNBUFFERED JURISDICTIONAL
(401/404) f
INTERMITTENT STREAM A = 324 LF /
/
s'
/
/
/
/ r
STREAM B
47 LF /
fx r
t� 1 Ixf :fl11
I re
1 r{ fit q.1r1l..
" (4
o.'
Ir r 1
X1.11
�yl� 1q\'`.i 511ry vir li(51YY}`i 1i
'S+x� 1. aV�2iiiL Y
50' NEUSE
STREAM BUFFER
EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE
EXISTING STRUCTURE
ROPE
Sut��
LUMLEY ROAD
qo i1M1 ALEXANDER DRIVE
G
VIM= MAP
Q�
11rwn/rn/
ISOLATED WETLAND C
= 0.01 AC
ISOLATED WETLAND B
= 0.03 AC
yY�f 9iTr
-7-
'�i'- "�' �`Jill,a
��'r +, �r � 111 ISYa + \1ii111i1� Y �,�• a'1�
404/401 WETLAND A
= 0.05 AC
ZONE 2 NEUSE
BUFFER
ZONE 1 NEUSE-
BUFFER
404/401 WETLAND D
= 0.25 AC
EXISTING SEWER
EASEMENT (TYP.)
r1h
1 I i � N#� y• r i .� �: .
EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE
REMOVED
-x e r 11svr. l r 1 s
ssv I'.oi 1r'ip"rjfit r1
i r —4` �LIi-'f•i°�`rrx�r+I r{
Ir�1�11T19
.' • - .l
EXISTING BUFFER IMPACTS
IAfrR�;
L
��
! l
�� 14Y ,` a.\t � rir 11 •
7 JLa
�ryfT^�.'Lr{�. '7��
t `: 1 '. fir's'ts+ I
U+ r •
r1h
1 I i � N#� y• r i .� �: .
EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE
REMOVED
-x e r 11svr. l r 1 s
ssv I'.oi 1r'ip"rjfit r1
i r —4` �LIi-'f•i°�`rrx�r+I r{
Ir�1�11T19
.' • - .l
EXISTING BUFFER IMPACTS
EXISTING STREAM
L
EXISTING WETLANDS
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
STREAM IMPACTS
404/4D1 WETLAND IMPACTS
401 WETLAND IMPACTS
STREAM C
= 40 LF
50' NEUSE
STREAM BUFFER
SfRffm f %!mA1 p NG► a: _
1. USACE ON-SITE CONCURRENCE MEETING CONDUCTED WITH MR. CRAIG
BROWN ON APRIL 17. 2012.
2, NCOWO NEUSE RIVER STREAM BUFFER CONCURRENCE MEETING
CONDUCTED ON-SITE WITH MR. MARTIN RICHMOND ON APRIL 17. 2012.
3. JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) WETLAND A 2.390 SO FT (0.05 AC)
JURGOICTIONAL (404/401) STREAM A 324 LF
JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) STREAM B 47 LF
JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) STREAM C 40 LF
JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) WETLAND 0 11.009 SO ST (0.25 AC)
ISOLATED (401) WETLAND B - 1.299 SO FT (0.03 AC)
ISOLATED (401) WETLAND C . 277 50 FT (0.01 AC)
4. STREAM C AND WETLAND D NAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE USACE
OR DWR FOR THIS PROJECT.
5. IMPACTS TO WETLANDS A. B AND C WERE PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY
7AE USACE NWP39 (SAW -2012-00616) ON 01/0+/13 AND NCDWO
CC3390 AND FWCP100M (DWA PROJECT/ 12-0404) ON 10/24/12.
0
Cn

,.4
(FV GVN1 0:210 ON
GRAPHIC SCALE
200 0 S cU3 1'
I inch 200 ft.
UNBUFFERED JURISDICTIONAL
(401/404)
INTERMITTENT STREAM A = 324 LF
/
/
/
/
t
/
/
/ f
STREAM B f/
47 LF /
j .J•, f
1 rrl� �'y frf.
50' NEUSE
STREAM BUFFER
EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE
EXISTING STRUCTURE
Rop'D
LUMLEY ROAD
p
'IV ALEXANDERDR E
a�
Y 1cuaw i#i[ii'
Awa
ISOLATED WETLAND C
= 0.01 AC
ISOLATED WETLAND B
= 0.03 AC
r
r x
I
tltl 1�f rI r/ a �•�r �b�"��pS,'S�`� r +'[,r
� � ,}"y� ti a r' a .`>r ra ♦ � � � .., 'a- i� I ; v \rr r+d +, l rY
\t\t•��r�' aril � "ay .+f �¢,/ `�('�' � y � � i,�i, d �' _�E. � ���i� �FIt�}r.'� � ��1�1. .
11" I
7•i'C' 41 I 11�t - 1 I r 1 ` r l ~ IIIA! � �_ �r '�,`!
i rf
t
I
t `yl o
i r
`r. w
404/401 WETLAND A
= 0.05 AC
EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE
REMOVED
ZONE 2 NEUSE
BUFFER
ZONE 1 NEUSE-
BUFFER
404/401 WETLAND D
= 0.25 AC
EXISTING SEWER
EASEMENT (TYP.)
n
~.� ✓.'�'y" tar:' Jr ti.i-e+4+i-si.t s '-/.' • . '_
r ,'r fa. Jrf fr i i j r+ -r+ i+'il'"Fi rr krYy-."�.,_ra.a a � •w`
s
STREAM C
40 LF
J
/
50' NEUSE
STREAM BUFFER
1. USAGE ON-SITE CONCURRENCE MEETING CONDUCTED WITH MR. CRAIG
BROWN ON APRIL 17, 2012.
2. NCDWO NEUSE RIVER STREAM BUFFER CONCURRENCE MEETING
CONDUCTED ON-SITE WITH MR. MARTIN RICHMOND ON APRIL 17, 2012.
3. JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) WETLAND A - 2.390 SO Fr (0.05 AC)
JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) STREAM A - 324 LF
JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) STREAM B - 47 LF
JURISEHCTIONAL (404/401) STREAM C - 40 LF
JLpii501CT10NLL (404/401) WETLAND D - 11.009 SO S7 (0.25 AC)
ISOLATED (401) WETLAND B - 1,299 SO FT (0.03 AC)
ISOLATED (401) WETLAND C - 277 SO FT (0.01 AC)
4. STREAM C AND WETLAND 0 HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE USACE
OR DWR FOR THIS PROJECT.
5. IMPACTS TO WETLANDS A. B AND C WERE PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY
THE LSACE NWP39 (SAW-2012-OD616) ON 01/04/13 AND NCDWQ
OC3390 AND NIGPIDODDO (DWO PROJECT/ 12-0904) ON 10/24/12.
EXISTING BUFFER IMPACTS
EMSTING STREAM
EXIS71NG WETLANDS
I 1
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN
STREAM IMPACTS
Im404/401
WETLAND IMPACTS
Im401
WETLAND IMPACTS
1. USAGE ON-SITE CONCURRENCE MEETING CONDUCTED WITH MR. CRAIG
BROWN ON APRIL 17, 2012.
2. NCDWO NEUSE RIVER STREAM BUFFER CONCURRENCE MEETING
CONDUCTED ON-SITE WITH MR. MARTIN RICHMOND ON APRIL 17, 2012.
3. JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) WETLAND A - 2.390 SO Fr (0.05 AC)
JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) STREAM A - 324 LF
JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) STREAM B - 47 LF
JURISEHCTIONAL (404/401) STREAM C - 40 LF
JLpii501CT10NLL (404/401) WETLAND D - 11.009 SO S7 (0.25 AC)
ISOLATED (401) WETLAND B - 1,299 SO FT (0.03 AC)
ISOLATED (401) WETLAND C - 277 SO FT (0.01 AC)
4. STREAM C AND WETLAND 0 HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE USACE
OR DWR FOR THIS PROJECT.
5. IMPACTS TO WETLANDS A. B AND C WERE PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY
THE LSACE NWP39 (SAW-2012-OD616) ON 01/04/13 AND NCDWQ
OC3390 AND NIGPIDODDO (DWO PROJECT/ 12-0904) ON 10/24/12.

UNBUFFERED JURISDICTIONAL (401/404)
INTERMITTENT STREAM A = 324 LF
IMPACT = 26 LF
STREAM B = 47 LF
x !a! 1
• r t � x y l l l
x wxa
No
/
50' NEUSE
STREAM BUFFER
EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE
EXISTING STRUCTURE -
go,g
LUMLEY ROAD
T' ALEXANDER � DRIVE
Q�
vicnOrr nRnr
10411 i
In
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER E
IMPACT = 1216 SF
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER g�
IMPACT = 4 SF
404/401 WETLAND D�
= 0.25 AC
ISOLATED WETLAND C 404/401 WETLAND D (n
IMPACT = 0.01 AC IMPACT = 0.03 AC
STREAM C = 40 LF a'
ISOLATED WETLAND B
/ IMPACT = 0.03 AC EXISTING SEWER
EASEMENT (TYP.)
/ { 50' NEUSE �
STREAM BUFFER
PROPOSED SEWER
_ EASEMENT (TYP.)
INSETINSET
AA r t
, L ��1r
zms
19 ♦ l ` ,, ` H^ �_' w Yom— � �,�I/' % /(`
��• r�3,= `r � � �J ( x���Ili11 tib ! / ~~
/-fs`I Isfrl � i � y �.. l ;j _ � ••ii 1 �'� !r i 1;�1 rr�is+i (l.Rbb'� Ir�� / f / � �j �i
,x1 x. }'1 'r�r1 7- ,# `{ l x'xx .) _ \ ~` �X '-AIT: fry f • k? OM_N) 91HJ JN $
all A
��t's ,f v�:� :�,, �-`i -9IS \ r � � :ti.\., r r �\ `•'x i".r��...�,' f � a M� V! [r
EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED GRAPHIC SCALE a a Z
404/401 WETLAND A 200 0 100 200 400 S 0
0.05 AC - a
404/401 WETLAND A 1 inch = 200 ft. ° a
IMPACT = 0.02 AC ¢ 4d1
MGM
o
1r,.7.7171 . •I EXISTING BUFFER IMPACTS
PWPMFM IIPAM /WZTLWD NOMo r
1. USACE ON-SITE CONCURRENCE MEETING CONDUCTED WITH MR. CRAIG r EXISTING STREAM
4.3 ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT (SF) BROWN ON APRIL 17, 2012. w
2. NCDWO NEUSE RNER STREAM BUFFER CONCURRENCE MEETING }'
CONDUCTED ON-SITE WITH MR. MARTIN RICHMOND ON APRIL 17, 2012. EXISTING WETLANDSo.
1,216.3 LONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT (SF) c
3. JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) WETLAND A 2,390 SO FT (0.05 AC) /IWI►
JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) STREAM A 324 LF ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER t ;0
26 STREAM IMPACT (LF) JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) STREAM B 47 LF
JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) STREAM C 40 LF Cn
JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) WETLAND 0 - 11,009 SO ST (0.25 AC) ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
ISOLATED (401) WETLAND B - 1,299 SO FT (0.03 AC)
1,914,8 404/401 WETLAND IMPACT (SF) ISOLATED (4D1) WETLAND C - 277 SO FT (0.01 AC) #
4. STREAM C AND WETLAND 0 HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE USACE ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACTS p
1,576.0 401 WETLAND IMPACT (SF) OR DWR FOR THIS PROJECT. "' DDI 10
O p
5. IMPACTS TO WETLANDS A, B AND C WERE PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY W p p N
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
THE USACE NWP39 (SAWS -21512»00616) ON 01/04/13 AND NCDWO I N
.ff IMPACTS GC3390 AND TWGPIODDDD (DWO PROJECT# 12-0904) ON 10/24/12. U L) II p
_ w
STREAM IMPACTS En 0 1
L7 O
2,742.1 EXISTING SEWER EASMENT IMPACT (SF) ( z
404/401 WETLAND IMPACTS u
m r J
o a
401 WETLAND IMPACTS x
MMIA...

W
U
CO
O
fseUVN� LPN
O
tn
~V)
a
� z
4 W
m' n
cn
0
z
<
3
W
a
w
z
W
7
W
w
Z
<
2
W
`S
m
<
a
2
�
w
j
m
�
U
a
r
s
F
a
p a
a
J
z
3
C7
z
z
a
w
a
0
UQ }
�aU O N mpN �i•
n Q < o
LU N a
�N
ZJ O N r O=
Of Z O
O O
_ ,W, a r a z
r
3 z< r 0 o < ,y C/h
w V O O N< Q � N v o
LLj _ 4 �p
00 �� OOiJJ J�00 ZO O\0
O2 r1 O V WO
UzV NMv v�`r w a0ve
0 �a °nnnuma m WSW
WH <<m UOO�H Q 3f0 O'
2 a2 a<cI, z moa MTI
N2JW W WJ�N
m F d
z <� 3V)(nn0il3 n Ld II s �o0 1r �
Z NLLJ m U
z- w v v v Cl b_
tin v*000*033 wIn `„O1ja
J a. 1 vvvvv ;= F a 0
~ W O < < < < < ZpZ ~ W Z 3
ZZ WW OOOOO.�.�v QWO OF..I Z
0 0 Z b U U U V U p o V r<< V
y�Z 07 Cocoon �; �70F
U; 3:0 Vr In 0 0 MO U n
<o oz
uta coo »n»oo a!W a a.ML)
Dm Zc� ,��v_Iln No �r0
N M f N
G
O
z
vy
F-
_ U
F
w a � 1
2
0 Ln
r�
L Q Z W
W
U< a r V)
a a � <
= v oa W
Z 2
LU LLJ U 0 3
LL m m a 3 < u
QZZ a
N < O ?
ch
W �
Z En
y
d O O FO
Lo
I
I m O
F+1 OD O _ W W d II
M Fc ,o v,i
1, v a w co
^ o � a
6 En
Q d [ k o
PJ MCADAMS
ri
\ NLO
O
tn
~V)
a
� z
4 W
m' n
cn
0
z
<
3
W
a
w
z
W
7
W
w
Z
<
2
W
`S
m
<
a
2
�
w
j
m
�
U
a
r
s
F
a
p a
a
J
z
Z Z
r Fr
_Z
r
W
OZ
N
W
ZO
r
W
N
W
Z
2
w
tr
O y1
\ i
v
W W
W
N
N
N
N
N
O
0
UQ }
�aU O N mpN �i•
n Q < o
LU N a
�N
ZJ O N r O=
Of Z O
O O
_ ,W, a r a z
r
3 z< r 0 o < ,y C/h
w V O O N< Q � N v o
LLj _ 4 �p
00 �� OOiJJ J�00 ZO O\0
O2 r1 O V WO
UzV NMv v�`r w a0ve
0 �a °nnnuma m WSW
WH <<m UOO�H Q 3f0 O'
2 a2 a<cI, z moa MTI
N2JW W WJ�N
m F d
z <� 3V)(nn0il3 n Ld II s �o0 1r �
Z NLLJ m U
z- w v v v Cl b_
tin v*000*033 wIn `„O1ja
J a. 1 vvvvv ;= F a 0
~ W O < < < < < ZpZ ~ W Z 3
ZZ WW OOOOO.�.�v QWO OF..I Z
0 0 Z b U U U V U p o V r<< V
y�Z 07 Cocoon �; �70F
U; 3:0 Vr In 0 0 MO U n
<o oz
uta coo »n»oo a!W a a.ML)
Dm Zc� ,��v_Iln No �r0
N M f N
G
O
z
vy
F-
_ U
F
w a � 1
2
0 Ln
r�
L Q Z W
W
U< a r V)
a a � <
= v oa W
Z 2
LU LLJ U 0 3
LL m m a 3 < u
QZZ a
N < O ?
ch
W �
Z En
y
d O O FO
Lo
I
I m O
F+1 OD O _ W W d II
M Fc ,o v,i
1, v a w co
^ o � a
6 En
Q d [ k o
PJ MCADAMS
ri
\ NLO
O
v
aM
II
wo
w�
; II
3
<
II
ito
o vl
V
N
7,r
D
W
O
W
�
WW
W r
W
L,
W Z
m
m
z
D
0
UQ }
�aU O N mpN �i•
n Q < o
LU N a
�N
ZJ O N r O=
Of Z O
O O
_ ,W, a r a z
r
3 z< r 0 o < ,y C/h
w V O O N< Q � N v o
LLj _ 4 �p
00 �� OOiJJ J�00 ZO O\0
O2 r1 O V WO
UzV NMv v�`r w a0ve
0 �a °nnnuma m WSW
WH <<m UOO�H Q 3f0 O'
2 a2 a<cI, z moa MTI
N2JW W WJ�N
m F d
z <� 3V)(nn0il3 n Ld II s �o0 1r �
Z NLLJ m U
z- w v v v Cl b_
tin v*000*033 wIn `„O1ja
J a. 1 vvvvv ;= F a 0
~ W O < < < < < ZpZ ~ W Z 3
ZZ WW OOOOO.�.�v QWO OF..I Z
0 0 Z b U U U V U p o V r<< V
y�Z 07 Cocoon �; �70F
U; 3:0 Vr In 0 0 MO U n
<o oz
uta coo »n»oo a!W a a.ML)
Dm Zc� ,��v_Iln No �r0
N M f N
G
O
z
vy
F-
_ U
F
w a � 1
2
0 Ln
r�
L Q Z W
W
U< a r V)
a a � <
= v oa W
Z 2
LU LLJ U 0 3
LL m m a 3 < u
QZZ a
N < O ?
ch
W �
Z En
y
d O O FO
Lo
I
I m O
F+1 OD O _ W W d II
M Fc ,o v,i
1, v a w co
^ o � a
6 En
Q d [ k o
PJ MCADAMS
ri

c�, *.�l 9 � �- (E8 tivN) OlH� JN
\ 'Oi
74f
H MLS
a zo
2 aOI
M
Z d N
U �
zo
<n
LJ
3 N
r w II
g�
0-4 Q
Oa
j N 2
O
n
wr
CL
o2
N -
c
N
H
U
En
Q
U
U
F
I.-
L�
~z
U
(
z
J
Q
N
r
V
CL
O
a
J
~
W3
Q
a
Z
W
Wu
N
a
w
3
LLJ
v'
[7
Z
r
W
N N
Oc
i
w
a
CL
L.1
a
a
Ln
a
L.CL
O
>
>
2
2o
OD
F
Q
4:
JJ
N
LO
LJ
<
H
lwi c
F
VI
Ii
m
�"'s
Z
o
a
w
W
z
mCL
z z
z
r
N
N
i
O
W
W
W
W
W
\
in LnN
N
N
a
W W
W N
N
VI
\ 'Oi
74f
H MLS
a zo
2 aOI
M
Z d N
U �
zo
<n
LJ
3 N
r w II
g�
0-4 Q
Oa
j N 2
O
n
wr
CL
o2
N -
am I
l�
N U }
O
O N Q W O a
N U N
LO Z J O N F O z 0
O = p
_ ,~W, a t a z
wv� o mQa cSJi��o
_L) LLJ am o
07 K ZO o f J J � 0 0 z0 O\ I
z 7 i M O U w O
U= N N n 0 v z Cl- z
u z V M v vw O�
0 0 II II II II II to O 0 m ir^w
wo
r W~ a <cou CDN 0 3; p
w z 2 m 2 z N n z U-0 d
F W W W F N W O 1 0
w� 3 V�~iNN3 II II 2 a00
U
WN OC= ...._--mu pU m1v
L) V) 3 \\\\\ O x VI v Op
z� Cr LL) av vvvt-r a O 0
j
ZZ WW 00000�.�.r Qw0 0w z
cr
00 Z~ UUUUs:? U ~ a a
LLJ
03 3o NDNN VI~~ Q30 In
Q O O z WWWWWOO
w a w M
wx 00 D (AV) �� axc�
70D z �� ���NN �0 2
N M 4 N
M o O
Fye a
r�.1f N
cn
N�
Ao
A N
z
r••t
r0
M �
ON
0 2
00 I z f0
1 00 O
UII
W a. U
(n a o
o Vl
z
G g
z
a C y v
J MCADAMS
c
En
U
N
Q
a a
WLO
L. Li
m m
� NLAJ
.J.
Q
a`'
4
L�
~z
U
(
z
J
Q
N
r
V
CL
O
a
J
~
W3
Q
a
Z
W
Wu
N
a
w
3
LLJ
v'
[7
Z
r
W
N N
N
�
M o O
Fye a
r�.1f N
cn
N�
Ao
A N
z
r••t
r0
M �
ON
0 2
00 I z f0
1 00 O
UII
W a. U
(n a o
o Vl
z
G g
z
a C y v
J MCADAMS

!� � j iSB [IYNl UFN9 .7N
0
Ln
i
Opf \ +nwwstlll��i■
0)11
ra
N U }.
O N a W O Y,
^ Q L _ NU NJ
Z N Cl! ~ O z-
Z J O O 0 0
LLJ
"a a z
�a ~
0
W U0 O �QCA
Q W
U �y
_ � 00
07 �0 J J000 O WOO F�1
O U 2 N N^ O— 4 0 z a Z
U ZU_ r7vv W 0
C� U II II II II II N— LLJO m W. W
r WF Q amUOG) ~O 3�p00 �y
� I`z a<aa<`"-^ Wz Uoa
m W W W N > OO N O
fr/I Inn3 II II
U
.-.....i...mU pU mNCL
...
7 N V13 V YY Om QUS 00
z V w a s v v v r r a p"0
Wr
UJ inFE I a a33 wcnCL 0
~ate Wo «aa<-� o~ W3:
QZZZO O Za 3 �I, P"
CA
IZ WO 00000-- QWO OW Z
O O Z r U U U 0 0 0 0 U ~< a
Wz a c000O�_3w Vrn
U 33 0 V) V7 VI (n V) g g O U r7
a 0 O z aC O O at = U
VIUO »'»
7m M ZU 21 0
u
�x
w ~o
z
,a
o
V M
N /�
H
a.
u
v V) r
Z v V 4 r
F r Q ) Z F-1
W
a a r
as a U
v o a w
a ir
w � a r o
O 7 w Z w
m m _ < N
4
�Z N O lFl Z
LLJ O z LU
a' 3 N
O f- O O X "c
N N V) V, - Wg 0 2
NLo m
m
I
000
n m O U v II
w
M �d cc v v a W- mo
w a
N z V)
� g
m
M MCADAMS
N
r
U
acrU
a.
cl
WW
a
a
cn
L-
L,
a
0
m
Z
m
Nww
a
W
W
W
W
U
J
W
y�
o
a
m N
3
W
>
>
3
Z
z
m
m
Z Z
Z
N
N
O
I-- r
rZ
W
W
LLJ
It
ut VI
Ln
Z
a'
It
N
N
W W W
N
N
Vf
i
Opf \ +nwwstlll��i■
0)11
ra
N U }.
O N a W O Y,
^ Q L _ NU NJ
Z N Cl! ~ O z-
Z J O O 0 0
LLJ
"a a z
�a ~
0
W U0 O �QCA
Q W
U �y
_ � 00
07 �0 J J000 O WOO F�1
O U 2 N N^ O— 4 0 z a Z
U ZU_ r7vv W 0
C� U II II II II II N— LLJO m W. W
r WF Q amUOG) ~O 3�p00 �y
� I`z a<aa<`"-^ Wz Uoa
m W W W N > OO N O
fr/I Inn3 II II
U
.-.....i...mU pU mNCL
...
7 N V13 V YY Om QUS 00
z V w a s v v v r r a p"0
Wr
UJ inFE I a a33 wcnCL 0
~ate Wo «aa<-� o~ W3:
QZZZO O Za 3 �I, P"
CA
IZ WO 00000-- QWO OW Z
O O Z r U U U 0 0 0 0 U ~< a
Wz a c000O�_3w Vrn
U 33 0 V) V7 VI (n V) g g O U r7
a 0 O z aC O O at = U
VIUO »'»
7m M ZU 21 0
u
�x
w ~o
z
,a
o
V M
N /�
H
a.
u
v V) r
Z v V 4 r
F r Q ) Z F-1
W
a a r
as a U
v o a w
a ir
w � a r o
O 7 w Z w
m m _ < N
4
�Z N O lFl Z
LLJ O z LU
a' 3 N
O f- O O X "c
N N V) V, - Wg 0 2
NLo m
m
I
000
n m O U v II
w
M �d cc v v a W- mo
w a
N z V)
� g
m
M MCADAMS

9
W
cr ^
W
pQ
p
N
W V)
W N
a w�
O
_ a 1 rev GVN1� dl' 1� U nr
II
L�m
�t
Q
in
a4
gGi
mN
m II
^
F W
cr ^
W
pQ
p
N
W V)
W N
a w�
N
ulr
zrn
L�m
�t
in
!S0
gGi
mN
m II
O Z
°"X.
O Z
z2
�n
;n
�n
a
L)
V1
�rU
I.-
La CL
r O Q
W
VW1
W m
W
0
0 U
Ir
w
<
2
N a
W
t
d
Z�
Z
Ul
'�
u..
a
N
O
O
m
O
Q
m
W
J
lWi W
W
W
U
0:
to
j
Q
0
Z
CL
55!
trn
z
m
m
z z z
N
N
O
0 N
Ul
LLJ
Q
z
z
z
Z
0
a
N
N
W W
W N
N
N
^
F W
cr ^
W
pQ
p
N
W V)
W N
a w�
w
zJ)
zrn
L�m
�t
in
!S0
gGi
mN
m II
O Z
°"X.
O Z
z2
�n
;n
�n
�<
z
dW
V1
�rU
Wr
La CL
r O Q
W
VW1
W m
W
0
0 U
Z Q
Z
a
N a
O
t
Z�
Z
N
N
a
O U m Ilei
LIP
t` Q O NUN
CL; LO Z J N p Z 0 w
o =per g
°Wia r 7<Z 4
QMH C/9
j��
W U O N O
U Lu
70 AZO OOf JJJ000 U OON
7 M O
U UU NMcr
av^�`F W a0�
rr _
U U II II II II II �O m Wt0 W
Z W Z Q p rn N ~O 3 0
r r Q m U
LU z Z z N n Z U 0 a
W m Cr cr � N O N O
U m 3vlv~ic~i�31I
7�'tn3 vaa�a�� m QAo
Z^ trW vvvvvrr a p"O
J -0-0
W
V�'v) a aad33
ZZwcn aM0_ I"1
J a C
Lu a W O 6 «< Q 0~ W Z 3
NQ 0 o jZ w 3
Z Be 66000-- Q WO O W Z
00 ZrUUUUU0a U ~<Q
W Z C3:) 0 0 0 0 0 cr 3 j M
U3 30 DDD°n
QO OZ 0!0!a'wx W QW M
w UO »»>OO 0:m axU
Om Z V) V) NO
N M N
�1
v
eY
a
r1 z
z
p
v
a
U
EL
v v r
V) Z v W
H Q v
U W
a i
Qa a i U to
v O Q W 9 V{
a
Z F�
Ck:°' F�
L, U- <
D W a Z I� W u'
mm J N
N O Z
W W W \ N i
O O O O ) X E
N N N Y W n O
00 1
O Lo
I 00 O
I
W
d W - o
N N Q) 1( n u N d O
4 a m
a C ryi ri
°J McADAMS

0
'-k'Ar�°G
_'0A �
� r
-a
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 39 or General Permit (GP) number: GC 3890
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only
❑ Yes
for Corps Permit:
® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Southbridge Fellowship Church
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Southbridge Fellowship
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB: 14775 Page: 2010
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
c/o Jon Cullen
3d.
Street address:
8609 Jersey Court
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27607
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-789-9955
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different
from owner)
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4a. Applicant is:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Kevin Yates
McAdams Company
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
P.O. Box 14005
5d. City, state, zip:
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
5e. Telephone no.:
919-361-5000
5f. Fax no.:
919-361-2269
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
0759816493 & 0759825154
Latitude: 35.923179 N Longitude: - 78.799627
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
10.79 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
Little Brier Creek
C; NSW
Neuse River (03020201)
Page 3 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a.
... _...... -..._...... _
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
The subject property is + 10.79 acres in size and is located at 10931 Glenwood Avenue on the south side
of U.S. Hwy. 70 east, just east of the Durham / Wake County line, in Raleigh, Wake County, North
Carolina. (PIN Numbers: 0759816493 & 0759825154). The subject contains a residential structure and
four (4) wooden sheds, all of which are in degraded conditions. The majority of the subject property
consists of forested and cleared land. The subject property is bordered to the west, south, and east are
forested land and to the north by Glenwood Avenue
Approximately 20 percent of the subject property is comprised of forested areas and would be generally
characterized as a Dry Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest (Schafale and Weakley, 1990), while 80 percent can be
characterized as a maintained/disturbed land. The property is located within the Triassic Basin, a unique
geologic area of the eastern Piedmont Region of North Carolina. The Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina (Soil Conservation Service, 1970) lists the soils within the subject property area as Mayodan
sandy loam and Creedmoor sandy loam (Figure 2). The proposed project drains to Little Brier Creek, a
tributary of the Neuse River Basin and a designated Class C/NSW, and subject to the Neuse River Buffer
Rules.
There is one intermittent tributary (Stream A), which runs through the property for approximately 324
linear feet, and one perennial tributary (Stream B) which runs for 47 linear feet across the northeast corner
of the property. There is also an intermittent tributary (Stream C) that intersects an off-site sewer easement
south of the subject property. Impacts associated with the off-site will be included in this permit
application. Streams A, B, and C ultimately drain to Little Brier Creek and the Neuse River. Stream
Features B and C are depicted on the Wake County Soils Survey, and are therefore subject to the Neuse
River Riparian Buffer Rules. Stream Feature A is not mapped on either the Wake County Soil Survey or
the USGS 7.5 minute quadrangle map, and is not subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules. Stream Feature D is
depicted on the DWQ Neuse Buffer Determination Letter dated August 21, 2012 (where it is referred to as
"Channel C"), and was deemed an isolated wetland feature (Wetland C: 0.01 acre). Stream Feature D is
therefore not subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules (NBRRO # 12-161). There are two
jurisdictional 404/401 riparian wetlands associated with this project: Wetland A (0.05 acre) is at the head
of Stream A, and Wetland D (0.25 acre) is at the head of Stream C within the off-site sewer easement.
There are also two isolated 401 wetland pockets in the southern portion of the property: Wetland B (0.03
acre) and Wetland C (0.01 acre). See Figures 1-3.
Streams A and B, and Wetlands A, B, and C were verified by Mr. Craig Brown of the USACE on April
17, 2012, and a Neuse River Riparian Buffer determination was conducted by Mr. Martin Richmond on
April 17, 2012 (NBRRO # 12-161; enclosed). Stream C and Wetland D, which are associated with the off-
site sewer easement, have not been confirmed by the USACE or DWR for this project.
Land use within the vicinity of the project is a mix of retail/commercial, multi -family and single-family
residential, office, and natural forested areas adjacent to the project area. RDU International Airport is to
the southeast of the property boundary.
Page 4 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
404/401 Wetlands: 0.30 acres / Isolated Wetlands (401 only): 0.04 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Intermittent Stream A: 324 If / Perennial Stream B: 47 If / Intermittent Stream C: 40 If
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide a place of worship for the members of Southbridge Fellowship Church.
Page 5 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of a church, a youth center, associated utilities, parking, ingress, egress from the
site, and other improvements. The property is located in the Neuse River Basin, but not in the Falls Lake
Watershed. The proposed project will require permitting for impacts with the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality and US Army Corps of Engineers. The proposed project will require a Stormwater Management Plan,
and therefore 85% TSS Removal for all impervious surfaces. Since the City of Raleigh is a delegated authority
for NC DWQ Stormwater Management Plans, the review and approval of the SWMP will be part of the City
of Raleigh review process.
Proposed Impacts:
Wetlands, streams, and Neuse riparian buffers do exist within the project area, and while it is the intent of the
church to avoid significant impacts to wetlands, streams or other environmentally sensitive features, there are
proposed impacts to 0.04 acre of Isolated Wetlands, 0.021 acre of jurisdictional riparian wetlands, 26 linear
feet of intermittent stream, 4 square feet of Zone 1 Neuse Buffer, and 1,216 square feet of Zone 2 Neuse
Buffer associated with the proposed project. There are no proposed impacts to perennial streams.
Inset 1: There is a retaining wall proposed in order to construct the driveway and avoid impacts to Stream A.
The driveway will provide access to the front portion of the building and allow for ingress and egress of
emergency vehicles. However, there is a minimal amount of clearing and grading proposed along the edge of
0.02 -acre wetland A associated with the installation of the retaining wall (Fig. 4). This wetland area is mostly
shrub/herbaceous with a few larger trees, and has likely been timbered in the last 30 years. It should be noted
that the church is proposing that at least one acre be dedicated to a tree conservation area on the western end of
the property.
Inset 2: There are 0.04 -acres of proposed impacts to two isolated wetlands (Wetlands B and C) associated with
a stormwater BMP and a small portion of wetland C associated with providing access to the facilities. The
proposed development is located within the Neuse River basin and will be subject to the stormwater
management requirements set forth in Section 10, Chapter 9 of the City of Raleigh regulations. Per City of
Raleigh regulations, stormwater management on this site shall address two primary issues: (1) peak discharge
rates and (2) water quality management. Stormwater wetland facilities will be employed to meet these
requirements. Since the site will be required to provide 85% TSS for all impervious surfaces, two stormwater
management facilities are proposed for the project: a constructed wetland for Sub -Basin 1, and a bioretention
area for Sub -Basin 2. While the discharge from the bioretention area will be diffuse, diffuse flow was not
addressed because it is not required for isolated wetlands.
Inset 3: There are 261f of proposed impacts to Intermittent Stream A associated with grading and the installation
of a storm drainage pipe to extend the pipe running under Glenwood Avenue. The grading is necessary to
accommodate the driveway that provides access to the site from Glenwood Avenue, and allows for ingress and
egress of emergency vehicles. Stream A is not subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules; therefore, there are no
proposed buffer impacts associated with the impacts to Stream A.
Inset 4: There are 0.001 acres of proposed impacts to Wetland D and 4 sf to Zone 1 and 1,216 sf to Zone 2 of
the Neuse buffers associated with the installation of a sanitary sewer connection south of the subject property.
This is necessary to connect the proposed development to an existing City of Raleigh sanitary sewer line.
Impacts to streams, wetlands, and Neuse buffers will be minimized by conducting much of the work within the
existing sanitary sewer easement.
Typical construction equipment will be used such as a long-arm track -hoe, front end loader, and bush hog for
the initial clearing.
Page 6 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 7 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ElNo ElUnknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary ®Final El Unknown
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: McAdams Company
Name (if known): Kevin Yates
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
- NCDWQ Neuse Buffer On-site Meeting with Mr. Martin Richmond conducted on 04/17/2012
(NBRRO # 12-161 Surface Water Determination Letter Enclosed)
- USACE On -Site Concurrence Meeting with Mr. Craig Brown conducted on 04/17/2012
(No signed JD map)
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
• The NC DWR approved a 401 Water Quality Certification and General Isolated and Other Non -404 Jurisdictional
Wetlands and Waters Permit for the subject property in a letter dated October 24, 2012 (DWQ Project # 12-
0904).
• The USACE authorized a Section 404 NWP 39 for impacts to jurisdictional streams and wetlands on the subject
property in a letter dated January 4, 2013 (Action ID: SAW -2012-00616).
• The streams and wetlands associated with the proposed off-site sanitary sewer connection have not been
verified by the USACE or NC DWR at this time.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 7 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check
all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete
this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c. --
2d.
2e-
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Tempora T)
Inset 1
Wetland "A"
Fill
Riparian
No
Corps/DWQ
0.02
Permanent
Inset 2
Isolated
Wetland "B"
Fill
Non-Riparian
No
DWQ (Isolated)
0.03
Permanent
Inset 2
Wetland "C"
Fill
Isolated
DWQ (Isolated)
0.01
Permanent
Non-Riparian
No
Inset 4
Wetland "D" Fill Riparian
No
Corps/DWQ
0.001
Permanent
404/401: 0.021 ac
2g. Total wetland impacts
Isolated 401 Only: 0.04
ac
TOTAL: 0.061 ac
2h. Comments: Figure 4, Insets 1-4
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. ' 3b. 3c.
3d.
3e. 3f.
3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10 stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404, width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other) (feet)
feet)
❑ PER
® Corps
S1 ®P ❑ T Fill/Culvert Stream A
®INT
® DWQ
26
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
26
Comments: Figure 4, Inset 3
Page 8 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. upen vvater impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
— Permanent
(P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
N/A
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of , (acres)
number pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5E Total
N/A
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f,
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
(Tl
Sanitary
❑ Yes
B1 ®P ❑ T
sewer
Stream C
® No
4
1,216
connection
6h. Total buffer impacts
............
4
1,216
6i. Comments: See Figure 4, Inset 4
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
Page 9 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1. Avoidance and Minimization
_
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Stream and Buffer impacts have been avoided to the greatest extent practicable, while achieving a successful
project. Wetlands, streams, and Neuse riparian buffers do exist within the project area, and while it is the intent
of the church to avoid significant impacts to wetlands, streams or other environmentally sensitive features, there
are proposed impacts to 0.04 acre of Isolated Wetland, 0.021 acre of jurisdictional riparian wetlands, 26 linear
feet of intermittent stream, 4 square feet of Zone 1 Neuse Buffer, and 1,216 square feet of Zone 2 Neuse Buffer
associated with the proposed project. There are no proposed impacts to perennial streams.
There is a retaining wall proposed in order to construct a driveway and avoid impacts to Stream A. The proposed
driveway will provide access to the front portion of the building and allow for ingress and egress of emergency
vehicles. Construction of this retaining wall will result in 26 linear feet of impacts to Stream A. Only the minimal
amount of wetland area will be impacted for safe construction and installation of the retaining wall, and
temporary impacts to the stream bed itself will be avoided during construction. This wetland area is mostly
shrub/herbaceous with a few larger trees, and has likely been timbered in the last 30 years. It should be noted
that the church is proposing that at least one acre be dedicated to a tree conservation area on the western end of
the property.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and installation
as described in the Erosion Control Plan sheet reviewed and approved by the NC Division of Land Quality and City
of Raleigh. All work will take place during dry conditions and can be facilitated from high, non jurisdictional, stable
ground adjacent to the Neuse Buffer. The contractor shall install silt fence, inlet protection, sediment traps, diversion
ditches, tree protection, clearing only as necessary to install these devices. All erosion and sediment control measures
will be checked for stability and operation following every runoff -producing rainfall, but in no case less than once
every week. Any needed repairs will be made immediately to maintain all measures designed. An erosion control
inspections report is required and will be kept by the owner's representative.
The project will meet all relative requirements of Best Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control
Structures as outlined through State and Local Stormwater Rules.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply);
® DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type
Quantity
Page 10 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested; acres
4h. Comments: No mitigation credits have been requested at this time.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
F
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
Fill (new sewer line)
4
3 (2 for Catawba)
12
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
There are 4 square feet of impacts proposed to Zone 1 Neuse buffers. If buffer mitigation is required, we propose
mitigation in the form of payment to NC Division of Mitigation Services' in -lieu fee program.
6h. Comments: Mitigation may be required for the impacts to Zone 1 associated with the offsite sewer impact, depending on
interpretation of alignment within existing easement.
Page 11 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Since the proposed project is located within the Neuse River
Basin, it is subject to the diffuse flow requirements, however neither
stormwater BMP outlets to or near a buffered stream feature. Stream A is not
subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules; therefore, while the
discharge from the bioretention area will be diffuse, diffuse flow was not
addressed. The constructed wetland BMP, outlets to over 500 feet of low
gradient upland area and into a ditch network along Hwy 70. Therefore, a
diffuse flow plan is not included.
❑ Yes ® No
Page 12 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Stormwater Management Plan {
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? - 44%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes E] No
1111
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Proposed Stormwater Management Facilities
Since the site will be required to provide 85% TSS for all impervious surfaces, two stormwater management
facilities are proposed for the project; a constructed wetland for Sub-Basin 1 and a bioretention area for Sub-
Basin 2.
Constructed Wetland
The proposed constructed wetland is to be along the east property line and provide both peak flow rate detention
and water quality (TSS and N). The proposed facility has some walls to accommodate the grading. The dam is
proposed to have 3(H):1(V) slopes with a 10' top width. An access route to the dam is provided from the south
of the project. The spillway acts as both a principal and emergency spillway system with just under a foot of
freeboard in the 100-year, worst-case scenario. The proposed normal pool elevation is 395 with an orifice at
invert 396 to accommodate the 1" runoff volume over one vertical foot. The surface area of the facility was
preliminarily sized based on this one vertical foot ponding of the 1" runoff volume. Final grading, details, and
specifications will be provided through the City of Raleigh permitting process for the facility.
Bioretention Area
The proposed bioretention area is located to the west of the proposed entrance drive off of Glenwood Avenue.
The facility is designed to capture the majority of the driveway for N and TSS removal. The preliminary sizing
of the facility is based on the 1" runoff volume and a 9" ponding depth for the water quality function. The
facility is mostly in cut with a 5' wide berm "top" provided. For this preliminary analysis, no peak flow rate
detention benefit was assumed for the bioretention area. Final grading, details, and specifications will be
rovided through the City of Raleigh permittingprocess for the facility. _
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Raleigh
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached? A courtesy copy of the SW Management Plan will be provided upon
approval by the City of Raleigh.
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
® Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
Page 13 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
i
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes ®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is a single and complete project with appropriate land use control and stormwater measures in
place for specific areas which require them.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Waste water will be directed into an existing City of Raleigh maintained sewer line.
Page 14 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS web page (https://www.fws.gov/endangered/) and the NC Natural Heritage Database
(http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/database-search) was accessed on June 3, 2016 to determine if the project would impact
Threatened or Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat. Based on this research, the bald eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus — BGPA), dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon - E), red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis
— E), Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii — E) and northern long-eared bat (Myotis spetentrionalis — T) are federally listed
species that occur within Wake County. Based on field inspections, it is believed that no adverse impacts will occur to
Threatened or Endangered species and their known habitat due to the construction of the proposed project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
An interactive map located at http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/ was utilized on June 3, 2016 to
determine if the project will impact Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A review of the list of properties and districts in North Carolina entered in the National Register of Historic Places
(http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) was conducted on June 3, 2016 for Wake County. It did not reveal any listing within the
project area. It is believed that the proposed project will not occur in or near an area that has been designated as having
historic or cultural preservation status by the state, federal, or tribal governments.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? North Carolina Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 0759
(Effective Date May 2, 2006; Map Number 3720075900J) does not show 100 -year flood areas or floodways located within
the subject property.
o6110
Kevin Yates Date
Page 15 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

--------------------------- ------------------------ ___.......
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agenfs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page l6of16

OWER ((JJ
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Chuck Wakild, P.E Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
October 24, 2012
DWQ Project # 12-0904
Wake County
Mr. James Cullen
SouthBridge Church
9311 Focal Point
Raleigh, NC 27617
Subject Property: SouthBridge Fellowship Church
Briar Creek [030402, 23-33-4, C, NSW]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and General Isolated and Other Non -404 Jurisdictional
Wetlands and Waters Permit with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Cullen:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.01 acres of 404/wetland and 0.04 acres of Isolated and other Non -404
Jurisdictional Wetlands, as described within your application dated September 24, 2012, and received by
the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on September 28, 2012, to construct the proposed
SouthBridge Fellowship Church at the site. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the
404/401 impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3890 (GC3890). The
Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW39 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) and the State General Permit for Impacts to Isolated and Other Non -404
Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters (IWGP100000). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply
with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including
(but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non -discharge, and other regulations.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is
sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby
responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed
one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described
in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
Conditions of Certification:
1. Impacts Approved
i, -is. Buffets, alour.;af�•, reliance erld Penrn1lunJ I i,ill1%,V;?BSCaPa!
1^50 i;i ul :'ervlce .:enle, Pa:P,bl...
Phon^ , IJ
1n ,nl=_ hllp.i portal ncdt:.m ±id`:Ijwi ., s
.n E;ua'Ge,,i rily" lLiMAh'•:.-.l`:Q,_ .

SouthBridge Fellowship Church
Page 2 of 3
October 24, 2012
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
annroved including incidental impacts:
Type of impact Amount Approved (Units) Plan Location or Reference
404/Wetland 0.01 (acres) PCN pg 6 of 15
Isolated Wetland 0.04 (acres) PCN pg 6 of 15
2. Protective Fencing - The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction
corridor within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with
orange warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to
infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure
compliance with 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500;
Certificate of Completion:
3. Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the WEBSCAPE Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as
depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit and this
Authorization shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter and upon expiration of the Isolated
and Other Non -404 Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters as depicted in your application and as
authorized by this Permit, shall expire upon expiration of IWGP100000 (October 31, 2013) or unless
otherwise rescinded by the Director of the Division of Water Quality.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result
in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to
conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification shall
expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached Certification you must file a petition for an
administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the Office of Administrative Hearings.
You must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of
this notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings
during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm, except for official state holidays. The original and one (1)
copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings.
The petition may be faxed -provided the original and one copy of the document is received by the Office
of Administrative Hearings within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission.
The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: (919)-431-3100

SouthBridge Fellowship Church
Page 3 of 3
October 24, 2012
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Mr. William Cary, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Unless such a petition is filed, this Certification shall be final and binding.
Sincerely, `"
�4�4efim
Chuck Wakild, P.E.
CHS/ijm
Enclosures: GC3890
I W G P100000
Certificate of Completion
cc: USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Kevin Yates, EcoEngineering, P.O. Box 14005, RTP, NC 27709
Filename: 120904SouthBridgeChurch(Wake)401_I W

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS COPY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2012-00616 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -SOUTHEAST DURHAI+vI
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: Southbridge Fellowship Church
c/o James Cullen
Address: 9311 Focal Point
Raleigh. NC, 27617
Aenf: heJohn McAdams Com an Irzc.
c/o Kevin Yates
Address: Post Office Box 14005
Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709
Size and location of property: The project area is located 0.61 miles southeast of the intersex#ion of New Raleigh
lfi hwa (Glenwood Avenue anti Pa a Road Extension on the south side of New Raleigh Highway/Glenwood Avenue.
Latitude 35.9748 Loneitude 78.8017
Description of project area and activity: The rrroiect area contains 10.78 acres of forested land and one residential structure.
This verification authorizes the placement of till material into 0.01 acres of jurisdictional wetlands to facilitate the construction
of a church and associated attendant features.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Nationwide Permit Number: 39 Commercial and Institutional Developments
SEE ATTACHED NATIONWIDE AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS.
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions, your application dated September 24, 2012, and the enclosed plans dated November 14, 2012. Any violation of the
attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration
order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements. This
Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State or
local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact David L. Shaeffer at (9919) 554-4884 ext. 31,
q,nq,�war
jnuarr.a�xocoarataonau�
Alf. W,sn✓1lAUFSROA'llbiMi4/,idAOIOSI]
Corps Regulatory Official^ro^��,��,°nom Date: 1/4/2013
Expiration Date of Verification: 114/2015
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey.
Copy Furnished: Ian McMillan, NCDWQ

Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project
area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
C. ® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years fiom the date of this notification. The subject property
contains 0.05 acres of wetlands and 371 linear feet of stream.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID
Basis For Determination The site exhibits wetland and stream criteria as defined in 33 CFR 328.3 the 1987 Corps
Wetland Delineation Manual, the Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Regional Supplement to the 1987 Manual Version 2, the
Rnpanos-Carnbell Guidance and Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-05.
Remarks See the enclosed approved iurisdictional determination form dated November 29 2012.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of
Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be
valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program
participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B and C
above). This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to
this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find
a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination
you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M1
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 3/4/2013.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
6y..a.iy yyy 5144141{RbAYA,1,�uu1461iN]D
�4uW M��4Y �gt,yQye r.iMnL.w.Nh
Corps Regulatory Official: �••�1,ala�l=;
Date: 1/4/2013 Expiration Date: 1/4/2018

Action ID Number: SAW 201200615 County: Wake
Permittee: 5outhbrid a FelloivshiR Charch
Date Permit Issued: 114/2013
Project Manager: David L. Shsieffer
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: David L. Shaeffer
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
ECTI I: RACKG O RMATIO
A. REPORT COKPLE TION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): 11/29/2012
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Raleigh Field Office,Southbridge Fellowship Church,
SAW -2012-00616
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project site: is located 0.61 miles southeast ofthe
intersection of New Raleigh Highway/Glenwood Avenue and Page Road Extension, on the south side of NewRalcigh Highway/Glenwood
Avenue in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina. Wake County PIN 0759816591. Form is for all waters of the U.S. and isolated wetlands
on the subject property.
State:NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Raleigh _
Center coordinates of site (lat(long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.924958° N, Long. -78.8019580 NV.
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Little Brier Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW i into which the aquatic resource flows: Neuse River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03020201
2, Check if map/diagram ofreview area and/or potentiat jurisdictional areas islare available upon rcquest.
Ef Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
. Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
f geld Determination. Date(s): 4117/2012
SECTION II: SInigAM OF FIND GS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Appear to_ be no' "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in
the review area. [ReguireclJ
0 Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
p, Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are• "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [ReguireLA
Waters of the U.S. t
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
TNWs, including territorial seas
�] Wetlands adjacent to IN Ws
Relatively permanent waters (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Nan-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
�] Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
E] Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments ofjurisdieHonal waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 371 linear feet: 3 width (ft) and/or 0.02 acres.
Wetlands: 0.05 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
'Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
: For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months),
Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: Wetlands B and C meet the criteria for wetlands estballshed under the 1987 Manusl and Regional
Supplement to the 1987 Manual for Eastern Mountain and Piedmont v2. Wetlands B and C are located in small
topographic depressions. do not flow to any known RPW, and are not adjacent to an RPW .

SECTION III: OAVA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Sectinn 1II.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource Is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to'rNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanoshave been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or ]live continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is nota TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section IH.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flaw,
ship to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody; is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine irtite
waterbody has a significnnt nexus with n TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section M.II.l for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to Clint tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section M.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 6.99aeres
Drainage area: 6.99 -acres
Average annual rainfall: 40.91 inches
Average annual snowfall: 7.5 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with'iN
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW-
® Tributary flows through'$ tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 30 (o r more) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are I (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 20-25, aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TW: Intermittent Stream A flows northeast to UT (RPW) to Little Brier Creek, to Little Brier
Creek, to Brier Creek, to Stirrup Iron Creek, then to Lake Crabtree, then to Crabtree Creek, to TNW Neuse River.
° Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

Tributary stream order, if known: Intermittent Stream A is a first order tributary.
(b) Genarai Tributary Char cteristics ftwlleck i1 that n
Tributary is: Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 3 feet
Average depth: 1 feet —
Average side slopes: 2:1.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles 9 Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/0/6 cover.
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: fairly stable.
Presence of runlrifflelpool complexes...Exp] min: evidence of rifflelpool complexes.
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
'tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 4 %
(c) BON
Tributary provides for: $easunal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 11-20
Describe flow regime: intermittent; waiter was visible in early spring months.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: 6iserete_and"confined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: TlnitnuwK. Explain findings:
[:]Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
Bed and banks
OJW (check all indicators that apply):
clear, natural f ine impressed on the bank
f changes in the character of soil
❑ shelving
0 vegetation malted down, bent, or absent
�
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
sediment deposition
water staining
❑
❑ other (list):
71 Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to detcrminc lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑, Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line alongshore objects ❑ survey to available datum„
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/ohanges in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Charactorize tributary (e.g,, water color is clear; discolored, oily film; water duality; general watershed eharacteriistica, etc.).
Explain: Water was clear to slightly stairted with tannins from leaves.
Identify specific pollutants, if known- Pollutants likely just downstream of Int. Stream A, due to commercial and residential
impervious surface.
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): 10-50ft shrub scrub/int. forested areas.
® Wetland fringe. Characteristics: 0.05 acre.
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: aquatic ecosystem that has potential to support invertebrates,
amphibians, reptiles, and mammals.
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNR'
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: 0.05acres
Wetland type. Explain: Emergent Headwater .
Wetland quality. Explain: Irregularly saturated located on mineral soil with a predominance of riparian vegetation.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) general Flow Relationship withNon-Tidal:
Flow is: No Flue . Explain:
Surface flow is: at-Mscat
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow:,,Ya. Explain findings: saturared at 1-2" below surface adjacent to Seasonal flowing tributary.
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Admacencv Deferntination with Nan-TNW:
® DirectIy abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Pr xi it fi n hi to
Project wetlands are 30 (or more) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are i5.30; aerial (straight) mtles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland: to novigablc seaters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 5©0-year'or greeter floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: water is clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
• Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
® Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: !1
Approximately ( 0.05 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly shits? (YIN) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (insc
Wetland A - Yes 0.05
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: Seasonal and temporary flooding of this
wetland is at a frequency and duration sufficient to support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions for the uptake and transport of pollutants, nutrients, and carbon to downstream the TNW and supports wildlife diversity
for invertebrates, amphibians, reptiles, and mammals.
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section IIID:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IIID:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERSIWETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
E] TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
El Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Perrenial flow observed by the consulting firm.
f �( Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: Indicators of OHWM, Bed and Banks.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 371 linear feet 3 width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWs$ that now directly or indirectly Into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directlyabtttting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
[�{ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
ti Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.l7.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Wetland A (4.115 fie.), was delineated through use of the 1987 Wetland Delineation
Manual and the appropriate Regional Supplement and they directly abut streams located on the property which
are unanmed tributaries to Little Brier Creek.
Creek that typically flows seasonally.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section ITI.B and rationale in Section IIi.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNws.
�] Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or Indirectly into TN Ws.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments ofittrisdictional %vaters.s"
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑i, Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATItI WA'[`1 its, INCLUDING ISOLATE 1) wI:iLANT3S, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WMCII COULD AFFECT P=' STATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CJHCK ALLTHAT APPLY):lo
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
"see Footnote if 3.
a To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.b of the Instructional Guidebook,
j1 Prior to asserting or dMIntng CWeA. Jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described In (Tic Corps/EPA Memarnrirfrtnr Regnrefing CiYA lief Jurisdiction following Rapanos.

rF from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide esthnates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
�] Wetlands: acres.
NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
[] If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Welland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements,
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the .tan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWAKCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: .
❑: Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
® Wetlands:0.04acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a findisig is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e, rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
❑' Lakes/ponds: acres.
EJ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Fla Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
1Z Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑' Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
® US GS B and 12 digit HUC maps.
Z U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Southeast Durham Quad; 1:24,000.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Wake County; 1970 - Sheet 17.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable/supporting case law:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):

B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

ZONE 2 NEUSE
ZONE 1 NEUSE
404/401 WMMD D
y - ®.zs P
d
d
d
dISOLATED WETLAND C
d EXtONG SEWER
0.01 ACEASEMENT
e)
UN IFFERED JUR A 0324 4
TTENT STREAMLF
ISOLATED WETLAND 8
OM AC
,
I."i }`�
frxrJt� _f r 'r J , � r 1? -'i�-1-•-}- ---
,Fo t `fo��f f f 1 rrrr rr' ,✓" 1..� \ t}, ��� 7�t`�r� — ( � r
I
f fry i.,_t�--t-
-'
J.
d k k
�" Stn SSSS n.
i / /� ! / � �- r r .- `' .--' / r \ \ \ \ \ \ \r` � --t•� -- ..� \ � ,� �\ e \ t \ \ � , e f "'�' f (i �' � i Y
1ti�
\ �s !
1 \\ x 1
\ 1�\\�\ \ 1 e �r� I f tom...-a�"% I jlfrJrtf;fff! /t f
�l l f /} i r r f / - .� �� \�\--_ rnk1 \ \ \ \ \\e ♦ \ y\ \ \ \ \ 1 1 c \ r.}\-
.� � •---- �'` to � �� vi �.' •- } `� \ \ � 4 \ \ � \ V � V \ \ t �., � �' ��.....me
j \p1..JP' V \y l�'"".f°m-* `✓b ' rJ f1
�vtv v v vv �v�v 1 r( r
NJo
v
�y \ \ ll tl\ \ \� \\
-- lid` ee\ �ti \ 1itVo I \���\e\�\
t, -..Off `f..�r>�y.� �..~-� ' ��".� -._.�'� \ \ \\\t� } i\�11\1`\t i I I r + r J rf r % /r Off .-` �-•, ti � � \\� \�\ \`� \y \ ^.,; ,ti\=cif.( f,.,,�, -�4 r-��J'` ,� �.s\t�\� \\\�� l�\,�\ lam\ �\ i tt 1 d
✓ �.::;:? > jf,/ /' f r.: 4 `- i \ t \ \ 1 / / > s a '\ \\ \ \ \1' g 4" `` �F} \�1 \ \ o
,
\Ls"\lt!;�r�-
Y ✓ it isg `1\ \ \ t \ I {
\\\ ( ( \ } t < r r / ,f r` ✓` ti \\ \\ \yy� \ \ \I s o / rr r t \ \1 \ t {
lel
r,; r "' \\ ` \
\`\ \\
t $-�1/toff t,l, trrfr rrf A \1\li\l\\ll\ �1l\� 1 1 V I ( 1 {
l \ I r, ,r1 r .` 1 \ 1\\ t 1 tf
`J, r { t }(l �1. \\ - ill\\�N\ �e4( t \ ! r ®~ �� \\\ \ey��e y e1 ///
\\ y \\1,l { l , f .- �— f 1 �, e 1__
STREAM B
If '�jff/Ii jlff!~
�7 f
t I\ t
r" � f
�f 111 1 1 }til\ \\ \e l 1 t ! t / ( \\ r \y \ \ \ \ .`��\�� �Jtl�{Jlf t --= - .�
�t ice,..}{r�- tt ��r~•' l t \ ��tV i ( V�\\\�� \ \ t 1 ( { {..� \ r \`1 \ \ �\ \ \� ( fill
j f ' `�t-��r-J/ %ill�t f
<10 t\\ �t- > ! � .' it
�_
l\\ \\\t 1l\ \ i t.�' t l\ \ yy\ 1 i i i \
i 1 1 \ 1 i t \\ it jt /f r r I
' 1 1 \ \ i 1 1 t y \ , __- �} f i i
f if tf t x ar I\ 1 t \ \\\t / f f/ r s
a` __� \`\ -. V 1 1 \\ \ \ l 1 \\ \ 's �'�\� e\\ey \tt f
t I I I 11\
�f r{ ? t # 1 i \ \ i \, 1 1 \� \�\ e ��*
t ,i--
fdit t- l t
,`11�/lIs t i-\-t•t k -e� - r- c�s�7 -!�I �' a �)k{ _l /f,� \ ter ` �{��
It�l \ \ \ \ 4 �; ..., - SFr - t 1 �\ ?` i - r -=� = if l - -
iftt�(.rrj rf,_\�� \ \ \ \\1 i t t \ 1 ( 1 \ \ \ \ \ \, ( t 1 y a. 1 / s 7s` t �� _ t_
��
tl�,? l\`l y ! t i t ii��\1
NEUSE
STREAM BUFFER
EXISTING GRAVEL_ DRIVE 404/401WETnLMAND A
0.05 AC
EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING STRUCTURE
au
1. USACE —SITE CONCURRENCE MEEnNG CONDUCTEDMR. CRAIG
BROWN ON APRiL 17, 21312.
2. NCDWQ NEUSE RIVM STREAM BUFFER CONCURRENCE MEETING
CONDUCTED ON MR. MARTIN RICHMOND ON APRIL 17, 2012.
3. JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) D A = 2,390 SQ FT (0.05 AC)
JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) STREAM A 324 LF
JURISDICTIONAL ( /409). STREAM 8 - 47 LF LF
JUR C (404/401) WEnAND D - 11.009 SQ ST (0 AC)
IS (401) WEnAND 8 - 1,299 SO FT (0.03 )
ISOLATED (401) WETLAND C- 277 Sia FT (0.01 AC)
4. STREAM 0 AND WETLAND D HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE USACE
OR DWR FOR THIS PROJECT.
5. IMPACTS TO "WETLANDS A, B AND C WERE PREWOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY
THE USACE NWP39 (SAW -2012-00616) ON 01/04/13 AND NCDWQ
90 AND IWGPlOOOOO (DWO PROJECT#12-09") ON 10/24/12.
d`
d 50' NEUSE
STREM BUFFERd
r`
t,� tesrn (xan ss�
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
1 inc - 100 ft.
\lo
v f
STING BUFFER IMPACTS
LtIMtEt' RQAD
10101111111
EXISTING STREAM
p
Q
E)QSTING WETLANDS
TIN ALEXAA' a D
k
ZONEI NEUSE BUFFER
ZONE 2 N13UFFER
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
STREAM IMPACTS
\ti
404/401 WETLAND IMPACTS
401 WETLAND IMPACTS
ZONE 2 NEUSE
ZONE 1 NEUSE
404/401 WMMD D
y - ®.zs P
d
d
d
dISOLATED WETLAND C
d EXtONG SEWER
0.01 ACEASEMENT
e)
UN IFFERED JUR A 0324 4
TTENT STREAMLF
ISOLATED WETLAND 8
OM AC
,
I."i }`�
frxrJt� _f r 'r J , � r 1? -'i�-1-•-}- ---
,Fo t `fo��f f f 1 rrrr rr' ,✓" 1..� \ t}, ��� 7�t`�r� — ( � r
I
f fry i.,_t�--t-
-'
J.
d k k
�" Stn SSSS n.
i / /� ! / � �- r r .- `' .--' / r \ \ \ \ \ \ \r` � --t•� -- ..� \ � ,� �\ e \ t \ \ � , e f "'�' f (i �' � i Y
1ti�
\ �s !
1 \\ x 1
\ 1�\\�\ \ 1 e �r� I f tom...-a�"% I jlfrJrtf;fff! /t f
�l l f /} i r r f / - .� �� \�\--_ rnk1 \ \ \ \ \\e ♦ \ y\ \ \ \ \ 1 1 c \ r.}\-
.� � •---- �'` to � �� vi �.' •- } `� \ \ � 4 \ \ � \ V � V \ \ t �., � �' ��.....me
j \p1..JP' V \y l�'"".f°m-* `✓b ' rJ f1
�vtv v v vv �v�v 1 r( r
NJo
v
�y \ \ ll tl\ \ \� \\
-- lid` ee\ �ti \ 1itVo I \���\e\�\
t, -..Off `f..�r>�y.� �..~-� ' ��".� -._.�'� \ \ \\\t� } i\�11\1`\t i I I r + r J rf r % /r Off .-` �-•, ti � � \\� \�\ \`� \y \ ^.,; ,ti\=cif.( f,.,,�, -�4 r-��J'` ,� �.s\t�\� \\\�� l�\,�\ lam\ �\ i tt 1 d
✓ �.::;:? > jf,/ /' f r.: 4 `- i \ t \ \ 1 / / > s a '\ \\ \ \ \1' g 4" `` �F} \�1 \ \ o
,
\Ls"\lt!;�r�-
Y ✓ it isg `1\ \ \ t \ I {
\\\ ( ( \ } t < r r / ,f r` ✓` ti \\ \\ \yy� \ \ \I s o / rr r t \ \1 \ t {
lel
r,; r "' \\ ` \
\`\ \\
t $-�1/toff t,l, trrfr rrf A \1\li\l\\ll\ �1l\� 1 1 V I ( 1 {
l \ I r, ,r1 r .` 1 \ 1\\ t 1 tf
`J, r { t }(l �1. \\ - ill\\�N\ �e4( t \ ! r ®~ �� \\\ \ey��e y e1 ///
\\ y \\1,l { l , f .- �— f 1 �, e 1__
STREAM B
If '�jff/Ii jlff!~
�7 f
t I\ t
r" � f
�f 111 1 1 }til\ \\ \e l 1 t ! t / ( \\ r \y \ \ \ \ .`��\�� �Jtl�{Jlf t --= - .�
�t ice,..}{r�- tt ��r~•' l t \ ��tV i ( V�\\\�� \ \ t 1 ( { {..� \ r \`1 \ \ �\ \ \� ( fill
j f ' `�t-��r-J/ %ill�t f
<10 t\\ �t- > ! � .' it
�_
l\\ \\\t 1l\ \ i t.�' t l\ \ yy\ 1 i i i \
i 1 1 \ 1 i t \\ it jt /f r r I
' 1 1 \ \ i 1 1 t y \ , __- �} f i i
f if tf t x ar I\ 1 t \ \\\t / f f/ r s
a` __� \`\ -. V 1 1 \\ \ \ l 1 \\ \ 's �'�\� e\\ey \tt f
t I I I 11\
�f r{ ? t # 1 i \ \ i \, 1 1 \� \�\ e ��*
t ,i--
fdit t- l t
,`11�/lIs t i-\-t•t k -e� - r- c�s�7 -!�I �' a �)k{ _l /f,� \ ter ` �{��
It�l \ \ \ \ 4 �; ..., - SFr - t 1 �\ ?` i - r -=� = if l - -
iftt�(.rrj rf,_\�� \ \ \ \\1 i t t \ 1 ( 1 \ \ \ \ \ \, ( t 1 y a. 1 / s 7s` t �� _ t_
��
tl�,? l\`l y ! t i t ii��\1
NEUSE
STREAM BUFFER
EXISTING GRAVEL_ DRIVE 404/401WETnLMAND A
0.05 AC
EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING STRUCTURE
au
1. USACE —SITE CONCURRENCE MEEnNG CONDUCTEDMR. CRAIG
BROWN ON APRiL 17, 21312.
2. NCDWQ NEUSE RIVM STREAM BUFFER CONCURRENCE MEETING
CONDUCTED ON MR. MARTIN RICHMOND ON APRIL 17, 2012.
3. JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) D A = 2,390 SQ FT (0.05 AC)
JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) STREAM A 324 LF
JURISDICTIONAL ( /409). STREAM 8 - 47 LF LF
JUR C (404/401) WEnAND D - 11.009 SQ ST (0 AC)
IS (401) WEnAND 8 - 1,299 SO FT (0.03 )
ISOLATED (401) WETLAND C- 277 Sia FT (0.01 AC)
4. STREAM 0 AND WETLAND D HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE USACE
OR DWR FOR THIS PROJECT.
5. IMPACTS TO "WETLANDS A, B AND C WERE PREWOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY
THE USACE NWP39 (SAW -2012-00616) ON 01/04/13 AND NCDWQ
90 AND IWGPlOOOOO (DWO PROJECT#12-09") ON 10/24/12.
d`
d 50' NEUSE
STREM BUFFERd
r`
t,� tesrn (xan ss�
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
1 inc - 100 ft.

1. USACE ON-SITE CONCURRENCE MEETING CONDUCTED WITH Mk CRAIG
E)USTING BUFFER IMPACTS
BROWN ON APRL 17, 2012.
X NCDWQ NEUSE RIVER: STREAM BUFFER CONCURRENCE MEETING
LUmLEy ROAD
CONDUCTED ON-SFTE WITH MPL MARTIN RICHMOND ON APRIL 17, 2012.
moo=
EMSTING STREAM
3. JURWCT04AL (404/401) WETI-AMD A 2,390 SO Fr (0.05 AC)
JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) STREAM A 324 LF
E)USTING WEM-ANDS
JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) STREAM 8 47 LF
TIN ALEXA
JURISDICTIONAL (404/401) STREAM C 40 LF
JURISDICTIONAL WMAND 0 ll.OD9 SQ ST AC)
(404/401) (0.25
ZONE I NEUSE BUFFER
ISOLATED (401) WETLMO 8 = 1,299 SQ FT (0.03 AC)
ISOLATED (401) WETLMD C - 277 SQ Fr (0.01 AC)
4. STREAM C AND WETLAND D PAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE USAM
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
OR DWR FOR THIS PROJECT.
5. IMPACTS TO WETLANDS A. 8 AND 0 WERE PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY
r7777=
THE USACE NWP39 (SAW -2012-00616) ON 01/04/13 AND NCDWQ
LL,,
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACTS
=M AND IWGPIOOOOO (DWQ PROJECT# 12-0904) ON 10/24/12.
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
ONE
STREAM IMPACTS
404/401 WETLAND IMPACTS
401 WETLAND IMPACTS
17
o
ZONE 2 NEUSE
e --
a
Nt E BUFFER
STREAM C -
40 LF
BUFFER
ga
ISOLATED WETLAND C
0.01 AC
1,0
05
W-1
lk
A
n*N
-01
12
V,
`WETLAND,D-
25 A
--e "8-
-Z, ,
E
50' NEUSE
f@
UNBUFFERED JURISDICTIONAL (401/404) ffz,
INTERMITTENT STREAM A 324 LF ISOLATED WETLAND 8
0.03 AC
A -W
U.,
Z`77--z
Z-
A",
tt*
a",
0�
(TYP-)
STREAM BUFFER
3
'em,
Am
071
'Alp
Xx�
STREAM 8 47 If
--pp, -
1,3
I -E IN
N x
TZ,
g
vI
d&6
50' NEUSE
STREAM BUFFER
EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE 404/401 WETLAND A
0.05 AC
EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING STRUCTURE
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
1 inch 100 ft.

1 inch = 100 ft.
LEGEND
PROPOSED
1
s
DOSTING BUFFER IMPACTS
4.3
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT (
1. USACE —SITE CONCURRENCE MEETING CONDUCTED WITH MFL CRAIG
BROWN ON AFRI. 172012.
2 NC NEUSE BU CONCURRENCE MEETING
I:Ua�t� ROAD
STING S
1,29+3.3
ZONE 2 IMPACT (SF)
UC ON— MR. N L 17, 2012.
3. JURWCT04AL (404/401) 1NEIIAI•ID A ffi 2,390 SQ FT (0.05 AC)
CoQ
EXISTING NDS
STREAMDKIACT (LF')
JUR CTiO (404/401) STREAM A 324 LF
JUR GTI X47 LF
STREAMSTREAM
rw ALEXANDER4Rlye
o� fiy
CTIONAL /401) 8 40
JUR C (404/401) WEnAW 0 = 11.009 SQ ST (0.25 AC)
1
ZONE 1 NEUSE
1,914;8
f401 WEILAND IMPACT (SF)
! (401) WETLAND 0 - 1,29SQ FT (0.03 AC)
I (401) WETLAND C = 277 SQ FT (0.01 )
Q�
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
D IMPACT (
4. STREAM C AND WETLAND D HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE USACE
THIS PROJECT.
L --j
MPACTSTODS A,2012 c
5. IUlIMZED BY
PREVIOUSLY
39 ( 16) 1/04//3AND NCDWQ
Z 1 ®U IMPACTS
G 0 AND IWGPlO000O (DWQ PROJECT# 12-0904) ON 10/24/12.
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
2,742 9
E)QSTING SEWER EASMENT IMPACT (SF)
STREAM IMPACTS
/401 WETLAND IMPACTS
401 ND IMPACTS
SOLATED, WETLAND C
IMPACT 0a01
STREAM
ZONE 2 NEUSE
IMP = 1216
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
IMPACT= 4 SF
/401 WETLAND D
0.25 AC
/401 WETIAND D
IMPACT = 0.03 AC
EXISTING SEWER
C 40 LF
BUFFER
SF
kb
USE
UNBUFFERED JURISDICTIONAL (401/404)
INTERMITTENT STREAM A = 324 L
IMPACT = 2 LF
B . ` Mrs
77
!
f f f e i f s
I /
LA WETLAND G
4l�diP!'l6di 4J.I� !'�J
REM
r.
_
-- r e,.er- �, .�.
f4
EEM .)
r
PROPOSED SEWER
Gjyr76ilNG96.(
1 _ , � � � � 1
e
t'^� "�^ I� 7- 4--f
�' SIR50'S
BUFFER
�'f�
%//
ff
� � �,, �=
STREAM 6 47 LF
f tj
;` / /f11 {#. f h. t { A 1 � t � � 1 � � . A �. ,r -. � —. �
I t 4 i\ °`mo-"...
7���
{..I
r ;, \
ti ., �: � 11��
� � f� .. "`, •'. � 1`
_ s
-
MOM 4
t.4}�L��lt�
50° NEUSE
STREAM
EXISTING GRAVEL- DRIVE /401 WETLAND A
0.05 AC
EXISTING STRUCTURE /401 WETLMD A
IMPACT = 0.02 SF
EXISTING STRUCTURES TO
BE REMOVED
rac c1u� {x,�ta $s)
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
1 inch = 100 ft.