20041701 Ver 2_401 Application_20080215

~-1 ~ 5l ° S
1~-~ S-~-a-~ , ,
n . v l~ ~.e-s rr~-s
.~- ~ carp 5~ ~C GtosS~
~ W of ~ ~ ~.- ~ ~M~~
~ ~ b ~ ~~~ ~-I ~
~ ~~ , `~ . s
~ AEI o~~ ~~~ Q.r~~.
~~~`~ ~- ~~s~~ o~ ~ ~ . ~s r ~~
'~,,-Q_ I ri--~,"J ~ ate- Harz r~o.-~ l~ 3~~4~ M`°`'~ n ~ fr~.~.
~~~ ~ are-"~-4- s°~n^~-• _ -~. -...~~2~ ~.~Q c~~2~
C~~
~,)~r ~ ~~ ~~ ~~
asi i r~-~( ~v~ ~S ~~~
~.-~ ",~ `~-Q- °J ~''~ l^ rte, ~~
nUa ~ ~~-~- ~S ~ G'zJ'e. V~-tS'~ Y ~" 1 ~J
r~ ~
`1
i~.w.l
_,~
~~ad~ o
o~
F EB 1 5 2008
DD ~oS oR~ ~R~~
Y~~

CAMA and NC Coastal Counties
Division of Coastal Management
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Beaufort Chowan
Bertie Craven
Brunswick Currituck
Camden Dare
Carteret Gates
Hertford Pasquotank
Hyde Pender
New Hanover Perquimans
Onslow Tyrrell
Pamlico Washington
Western Piedmont Region Coordinator
3855 Idlewild Road
Kernersville, NC 27284-9180
Telephone: [phone]
Mountain Region Coordinator
20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expressway
Waynesville, NC 28786
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
NCWRC and NC Trout Counties
Alleghany Caldwell
Ashe Mitchell
Avery Stokes
Burke Surry
Buncombe Henderson
Cherokee Jackson
Clay Macon
Graham Madison
Haywood McDowell
Watauga
Wilkes
Polk
Rutherford
Swain
Transylvania
Yancey
APPLICATION FORM BEGINS ON PAGE 5. PLEASE DO NOT SUBMIT PAGES 1 - 4.
Page4ofl2 ~'

Office Use Only:
Fonn Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
IL
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
^ Section 404 Permit ~ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ~ Isolated Wetland Permit from DW
®401 Water Quality Certification Q
^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:__~~p ~ ~-
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment int® the. North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4); and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
Applicant `Information D ~ ~ ~, IJ~] l5 D
1. Owner/Applicant Information ~/
Name:_ ~ ~Ipyl NIAfS~.~rjt-.f~ r^ ~--,f~~,,~ ~g,~~ ~ral fn~K~~
Mailing Address._ (oA p 1 l ~ 1/e wt.. r~ r~ __..r, ,a~~rcu n~
Telephone Number:_ 3l0 - 3q pp Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultaut Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached, if the A ent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: '
Company Affiliation: ,~
Mailing Address: ~ ~
..
Telephone Number:
E-mall Addrecc• i/1•
Fax
~(n -
+~;
Page 5 of 12
,,_..

III. Project Information
oW
6. Property size (acres): ~~ QC
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water:_ ~p~t~ Ci'~~ ~...
River
Attach a vicinity map cleazly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow.. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USAGE requires information to be submitted on sheets no lazger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however,. DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: ~~~~Jl~( ~Vi511~-/~
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): ~?(o`ZQ310~~ I ~
4. Location , +~_;~w - L _
"County: ~!~[.. Neazes Town: T~
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):_~,
Directions to site (include road numbp$rslnames, landmark etc.)•
c~ ,~~glti%C' --- -
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line,
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): ~~ °N
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins.
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe. the existing conditions on the site and
at the tim~'of this atin~cat3on: nr ~ ~- i~..11 ~
land use in the vicinity of the

Page 6 of 12
attach a sheet that
The
1
~25nq

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:, ~ ~ `~,..~
~ i ~ i ~~ i G. nom.. 1 Thn-~ 1` 1}~GC.~ o~_U-
11. Explain1he purpose of the proposed work:
C~
O
~~
IV.
V.
VI.
Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have. been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. roject, along with
construction schedule . ~~S ~ ~..1 b ~.,{pb;.~. ~ o
b~iG~~ L~2Cr~-1t~ ~~~ Dfb~.~- 4f - 1~113I ~^ .2rx~1
Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and prgvide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream chanmmis assc~iated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and. waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown bn a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and strum ~ evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written desk ription of the proposed impacts:

Page 7 of 12
.. ;.
f

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list 1mnaCtS due te) hnth stnict„re and flnnrlina
Wetland Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
T e of Im act
YP P Type of Wetland

(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-yeaz
Flood lain
P
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream

linear feet Area of
Impact

(acres)
C~s~ w s - S In x.03

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. ~.ist the total acrea a (estimated} of all existing wetlands on the property:''r-~~-±1~. ~~iC~1
-nct,~~ r~e.~~ ''''~.J~.r`-r,.N ~ ~g ; „~ ~~rs ~- UPS
4. Individually list all intermittent add perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included.°To calculate acreage mnlt;nly IPnoth X unrt+l, khan .i;~,;,ao h., AZ c~l1

Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma

Stream Name ---- ------ -, ------

Type of Impact -- - -~-~- ..~

Perennial or
Intermittent? .. ~..ua, uavaa µa
Average
Stream Width

Before Im act rauv vy -r/,/
Impact
Length

linear feet vv.
Area of
Impact

acres
' 0,~
P~(~ .~

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) ~ ~ D- ~~
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation.`dred~in~. flooding rlrainauP hiillrhaarlc r t~

Open Water Impact
Site Number

indicate on m - .. ~ - -

"Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) -- ~ -------a-e .,».a..

TYPe of Impact .»...,, .......
Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.
Area of

Impact
(acres

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
~,,
Page 8 of 12

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the proiect:
Stream Impact (acres): ,Q
Wetland Impact (acres): ,p
O en Water Im act acres
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): ~ QQ
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ~ No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic; trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraint's such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
-~ I ~ ~ ~
- ~ - - ---
L~ w ~ ~, rJ
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
r
Page 9 of 12

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect .open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http:!/h2o.enr.state nc us/ncwetlandsistrm 'd~ e lltinl.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g,, deed restrictions, conservation easement, e1c;.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by~payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP), Please note it is trle applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at httu://h2o.enr.state nc us/«~-p/index hhn. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
~:~,
Page 10 of 12

IX.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federaUstate) land? Yes ^ No ~(
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call- the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No [~]
X.
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC. 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers. •- -
Zone* Fact
s uare feet
1 ~S~rS
2 21~ 9~
Multiplier
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
from the top of the near t
Required
Total I ~ 4
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendici
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
of channel; Zone 2 extends an
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
~f
Page 11 of 12

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. .'~' t S~Yr~ - Le4~ ~ .Li.. /L,.L• 1,. ~. ~ I
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater ~enerated from the proposed protect, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ We and Rules (15A NCAC 2 050 ) or any Buffer R es?
Yes ^ No ~ - 5 I~Q, ~/1 ~QK~ CSl2,t2, lS~
P
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No ~ - ~~ ~ 1'~t'~"' ~ ~ /l~~Q
XIV. C~xmulative Impacts'(required by DWQ) 5~ n'`.~P"'-- ~,-a `~[~ 1~r
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.eur.state nc us/ncwetlands If no, please provide a s~iort narrative description:
~d1u~ - --
XV. O her Circ~um`Zsta ces (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
~~_ .~ ~
Apphcat'nt/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

Page 12 of 12

oovr+~+~a~a~ ~ ~ ~" 3
.,_,_
^ 5 ~ ~~`~,^ ^ ~
if .~ ~!
~` ~I
11
-~
`~ ^
t~
. !~
.
_ _ ~ 11
^ ~ ~!
l
^ `~`'1t ^
^ q ~.,.
^ ~~/ -
~ f~ ~~ ~
,,~ ~ ~
fi ~ !f
~ ~~ ~ `~~
,.. y ~~
~` ~Z\
~~
~,*
0 0.1 4.2 4.3 0.4 0.5 km
0 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 mi
35.7278°N, 78.4562°W (NAD83/WGS84)
USGS Clayton (NC) Quadrangle
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum
,G
M=-8.924
G=1.486
of 1 1/28/2008 11:43 AM

FP:~ 1~~1 PHONE N0. AF~r. 1 ~ ~'~~6 ~6: 43Hi''1 P2
- ~~{ ''f~ 1~ ~~`~ ~2iCi•:acl [~. SasICV, C iwcrnur
`~~ ~~. William C.. GLOSS h'., :s'ACrz.t~1~ Y
fi; fir. Norti: C_arnlin:t lae~+z rtmcnt uC Citvirnnmeni atld Naturt;l RCSOUrc:::s
p „~ Alt:~~ `N. Y.limnk, T'.T:. I}irc~ctu:'
)jivisian of ~i`ale~ (~uailt;'
,~.prl ~, 2006
CFIRTIF'1~,)C} 1'VIA.IL
~'I'Ui7N 1RECE)<P"!' ~()1r'F'~'CLtI3
KirL~y A4arshbui'n.
69x1 L2rltie Myra Road
Wetac~all, NC 2'1591
subject: Nt7T1C'1~ +(3F ~'ICl-1,A'~'~~N :and
iEbEC(31~tV~E1VIt~,7It7l~l' l'CClit~ Fl'1F4RC':~1Vl:~N'1 .. _,
. - - LTrYnazxYed Tributary of ~'oplar Crcclc,
St4aIC'~~'3ter• ~11bd1visaozY, '~i%ale Cotanty, i`3C
~~'al~.e C~LUaty
Project No.~4-1701
Dear Mr. fvi;af'Shbuttz:
On Friday', Febrttaly ?4, 20t?b, Vicki Fuentes frurra lkac T.iivisian of Water Quality (DWQi) Raleiu'~ Regional
O.ff ice, conduCt~cj i~ sAte inspcc#iuu <>j` tlxw g7rol~erty paid an tTtat7,~t'~led ttibutary of 1•'oplar Creek at The ~tozarwater
`subdivision in z~~tlke County, IvT4rt'r1 Ca,.rulina. The hzbtat~ry lies just beytrnd tha irztersactic~n of Carl t7J'illiarns lyoad
and Stoney Oak i=.anc. Additicioalty, sYlr, l~il~~c ~I4ran of 17~'V;i, Raleigh 11;egional Office, c~nducten a site
insgccti4n i>f the Same sci;tion of Ll~.s tributary uu Fcbt'uaty 9, 2C}~F;.
~W~t conducted a file revicrv and cola#zl~t7ed th;.~t ,;~. 401 Water Quailty ~:ertif..tcatinn, Prujcet Nc~, f)4-1741,
eras issued ata Octor_7er 27, 2.04. 't'he approved impACt3 listed Il] t11C 4t~'l. Water Qiaality (;ert~~cation were streatrz
imgacts of 12U luirar J.CCC ft'QIn caft;.cn fill and culvert instal.ltttion to the subject tributtzty in the NeaYSc Rivet• basin.
During the 2/24i{)tJ SItC J13ats 'ti'TtS. Puente: to4lc plratc~graphs and turzdu {?k~set'vati4ns ~f 19U lzzear feet cf stream
il~gact5 that includt;d rip-;'ap fit! yvathi-~ tlZe strualta chaz:,nel as Well as sedimentzaiiur,..
"tlYis office is glraruling to resric~=~r L~is'isaott of i.,ant~ Rcsouroes fzles and your resgc~nsr.; !x~ T..has
c4rcespoiadelaea. Afrer the- c;vstxgleizon of this nivcatiguticrn, a civil pen:3lty ass4fisnxezlt xeL*ardtng, the violsti4ta;:
encouYZtu~red may bN F~~:Waz~ded. A.uy liYrzrc an~~lc~r ContinuCd vialaticstls Wtll also 17e considered fcr an erlfurcenaert
reroxumetad:~tiort.
Acc.arclitlglS', the i:ngacts I.o tTte ripariazZ bttffer, inzgztaks i.U tlY>r stream beyond ti~rl:at was autlxolized iY~ the:
4U! birater Quality Ccrtificali<>zx, ~iti<1 the sedilrentatinn i~xzf3Ct3 repr:sent ~ti stet Qute.Izty ~SLaricla.ed ViOInta41]a, A5 a
res'ult of the site insgectian and file rey.},,~,., tl3c fo114';vinl; violat..i.nzYS ac•e noted:
1) Prectasion of Bs:st Usage
2`t Neuse ~uf'fer Trnpacts
3} Additi4nai ~'.ozYditi:,n #1 nf401 ti~'atttr QuY~lzty Gertificatian (#04~I7U1}
4) t~ailm•e to Comply with C:crnditinn l1 of Gencrt~I Wa.tcr Quality Certificat!oal 3404
lYt~hw.4711'Qi:
f1 a~urnlr
NOPfh C:a,elir~s Division of IG17 M;~it 5crrf~c f:cntcr Ftalci~h, Nr Z7699-1617 X+hcsrtp (y19) 733-7~1I S Customer Service
'ri'oter Duality iscation: 512 N. Salistsury St, Kttleigh: lvTC' 27(i()d Fax t919) ?:i3-Zd9C, 1-h77-623-67RF
Int?rritet; ~hM'~u,itLw~att`rtluslitl.o~
Ar, equal Gppc~-iunitiAf{irrndGve Aaiun En2ployer - 5Q% Re;yded~' i0% Rost Consumer Paper

FRt~M PHOhJE h10. Fiar. 17 2flfl6 ~1ti:44Ah1 P.
tfexra t. 1?t•cc9usicxn vi jie,~,t L'sa~e
A DWQ site visit and file review confirxncd that stream impacts occurred to an unztamcd tri`outary to I'aplar
C~reck, Clrass C,; hISVi% waters,m t~~e Neuse River Basin. Impacts to strearrts hsvc accurzed at tflis tract fram rite-rap
irli in the stream and :35 well as front seduru;nta.tion. Thcsc itrrpacts beyond what wa3 authorized in the 401 Water
(~u4tity Certification rzpt'aseut a wAter quality~standard violation donned as preclusion of best usage. Spcciiz::aliy,
15p NGAC 2~ .0211 ('a} requires that "'i'he water's shall tie suitable far aquatic rife prol~agatiazl atxd xnainterzance of
triola~ical ixitet~rit}', wildlife, &tcaxxdary recreation, snr`M a~ricultuYe; saurec:s of ~~~ater pnUutiort which ptee:lude any of
these uses art eitl.cr a shirt-term axe lcrng~tarra basis." Please see the Requested 1Zespa7nse section zar details
coxzcarning ho~v to achieve rorYapliaucc at the site.
ttexn 2, Netrse Buffer Yiolatirrn
Tlae Neixse River T3asin is a river: basin that is suk~ject to ripariaY~ (streatnside) suffer rules. TJae purpose o;`
these i?rlcs is to protect and pxeServe riparian buffers ul the Neese 12ivcr Ba3i». "i''l:at is, these zvles help'~tx r~ixatairs
_the.nutrient rzmoval,fzaraykiutis of the strr.,~tzrz5ide areas necessary to~rotect surface ~vat:x~. 4pecifically, tLais Rule
€rpplies to thy. 50-foot wide rip3riaaa buffers tlirGCtly adjacent to surface: waters (t.ntermit(ent streams, prrcnxtial
streams, lakes, par:3s, and rrstxx~u'ies). p'urthzr. the pretcete4'i rzpurian buffer has two zan~s as fallaws: (a} ~ozte t
~nzeasured from top of stream baxzl: lan~~:v;tr:~. for 3G feet] sl~ail consist a! a ve€etatcd flrea that is undisht~'bed e~ctept
for uses px'ovided for in Su3~paraaraph (ti) of i .5e~ hTCAC 2F3 .U?_33, and (b) Loxte 2 [the outor 20 feet, landw<tz'd fram
tl~e outer 3G foot edge of zone rJ shall consist of stable vegetated axea that is unciistusbed exoepC f'ar activities axed
uses prc?'vided for in Sttbparagraphg {4} and (,6) of 15A NC..~tC 2B .!)233.
train 3 ~-.+uditiaR-fl1 f'cantlitiva ~I tat 4tD4 Watery Q~1$tiky Certiticatit-.~t (#04-Y'~41)
Adr~itianal ~.:andition 1. of the 4()1 ZVatcr Quality Certification (~rQf=;l you ware issued on C?ctober 27,
2UU4, states that:
1. inxpacts ,~,pproveci
The following impa~,;ts are hereby approved a. long as a.11 of the other spcc~c and general conditions of
this Certification (ar Isolated Wetlarxd Pcrn~it} are met. No other irzapacts are approved including incidental
unpacts;
A~2otxxxt Approved ((lniisl
~trearxx 1.20 (feet)
4Q4JCANLA WetJsnds 0.0~ (acres)
Buffers ~, 130 (square ft.)
fJn Fel3ruary 24, 20Uti, Ms. Fuentes ninasureti appraxirnatciy 11~J linc;Er feet of stream impacts. ;C.he
additional 7U linear feet exceeds the arnaunt ix-. the W('~C you were issued.
Xn addition, 9,13U square feet of impacts tv riparian buffers «~erc authorized in the l frJ27J04 WQC. Un the
day of his inspectiari 1V,fr. iiaran incasuted an additiaxtia1400 square feat of ixxtpaots to the riparian buffex.
Item ~. general l~xtter 174rality ~'ertit`xcatiaxx 3404
Authorix~ti ~x8erit Neal Floyd subnuttcd ~. Prc-Canstructiun Notification (TtC~'} on C3cxol;er 12, 2004 on
behalf of a~vner!applicant Kirby lvlar.shburn. The impacts were requested raider U.S. Army Carps «f ~aagi;neers
l~'aiiaxxwxde }~errut(s} i4, and the correspa;nrlinb General V4=atcr Quality Certifications. DVdQ issued an approval
letter for the irnpa;:ts on O;:tober 2i, 2p()4.
2

FRlJf9 PHOt~IE f~Ci. Apr. 17 2QQE. Q6:45AM P4
The alrproval letter specifies that the. activities must follow the conditions listed in the General V4'ater
Quality CertificatiUZxs, as well a.s a.dditioiul cotzditinns listed in the lctte:r. General Water Quality Certification _404,
Conditioiz l :states the follawitzg:
I?[acemcnt of culverts axed other stn~c:CUZ'es in waters, stz'eams, aad ~x'etlands znusC be placed below the elcvatioz-
of the strcamb?ci to allow low flow passage o; water and aquatic life unless it can be Shawn to U'Vi~Q that
grovidin~ passage vc-ould be impactiaal. Dcsigta and plademez~t of cttlveirts uacludin~ open bottom or bratton~less
arch culvet~s and other ytz'uctures including temporaiy erasion eontxol measures shall net 3e conducted in a
manner that tray result in aggz'adation, degradation or significant ih&rzges to hy~lroiagy of wctl~szYds 4x stream
beds or batiks, adjaccut to or upsireazxt and dovt'e stream of the above stnlctUYes. The applicant is required to
gros-ide evidence that the; c:cluilikiritml shall be maintai,-tt:d i.f ~°equestecl to do sa ai writieg by LtWC~.
$ase<l on il>c obsGrvaticsns inadc durih~ the site inspectian the cxisti~rg culverts do rJ,ot meet this rcquiteznent.
I7eclue5ted Response
This Office requests that you respond to this letter in Ftiziling within ZU ilays of Receipt of this Notice.
Xour responst:"5houtd he sent to tkic follawzn~: ._ .
• Xiok.i Fuentes, Dcparut~ent of finvirazxment and Natural Resoiucns,-D W Q, 3fi00 Barrett z°~rive,
Ra1_ci~h; P~(C 27Gt}9; and to
• Shelton Stil.livan of the DWQ N'I'S Assistziarce and Cotnpliane:.e (~versi~ht Unit &t 1617 ?1~a2]
Service Cezater, kalcigh, NC 27b99.1617.
Your respot~e slxould address the following items:
1. Please explain how these unauthorized impacts occurre[i.
2. 1'lcasc prvviclc a map diak dcta.ils amount and locution rrf stream itnptlcts and the total area (c'lepict the
footpz'tnt) of the riparian streatnsidc buffer that was iartprtcted.
3. Please cl~.arly indicate vvitat efforts you have taken to temporarily stabilize the ciisturberl areas to prevent
off site sedinzcntation, 'ibis issue shuttld be addressed immediu.tely in order t.o help avaid additional
&treaon 4tand:rrd't~i4lAtions.
4. Please provide a riparian buffos resto+•ation plan that will .achieve diffuse flow as req~ured by Neese River
Buffer Rrile 1~.A. NC.:AC ZB .4233.
5. If you chose to modify your existing 4U 1 Water Quality Certification for the unauthorized stream impacts,
then minimization, and possible mitigative fns these impacts maybe requuUd.
__ - _. -... ' 6._...Tease submit.Restoratioz>; •1'lt~.s tp this affice.(see.lstterhead'} for rc~-ievv a~ci.apprnual,'a's vvell• as to_D~nu~. -
Smith of the L7Vr'Q Iti'PS Assistance anti Compliance Oversight Unit at 1617 !Mail Service C.,enter, Raleigh,
lyC 27599-1 G17. The Rcstoraticn Plan should addxass the. following. ~Nute: ;it is the recam:ncndst8on of
BWtZ staff thstt yc,u secure a consultant t.o assist :vaa 'c'vfth these cffnrts_]
a.) Strc:zrrz - lz~. flats pla:~ you should explain how you will zcstozc the pattern, profile, and dimension of
stream channel. The streambed zxzust be restored to the ordinal c;levatiort (the oulvez't pipes cannot be
perched above the level of the stream bed and, u~ fact, rniist be btaried at least 20°lo a~ the width of the:
pipe). This plan intt<t include the final Plantla~; Plan and Physical Monitoring Plop.
b.) Riparian Buffer restoratiozz..
c.) I~.iparian zone p1'rntin,~: A planting plan. zr.~ust: be developed and implemented in order to ensure ttzat at
least two native tree species err planted at a density sufficient to provide 320 trees per acre at ma~riry.
3

FROf~ PHOhdE I~{0. Apr. 17 2at=16 ~6:45AM P5
This drzz:~;ty is usually achieved by planting approximately 435 treeslacrc Una ]0 x TO &. ~`ri:l az' Gfl
tceesJacrc Uri asw ~ x 8 ft. grid, Please sec the CcaRdeliner fo~• Xi,~czria~t Bufft'T 11CG'SIOi"CT11QSZ (Jrtnt:~ry 2{)01,1
f'or assistance ixr dcveiUping your plan (available on the Fveb vitE at
http:l/i12U.cxx,State.nc.us!v~~ipdf/buffers.pdf), Tla.is plan must include the types of zzGtive wttUdy
vegetation selected, mcthodolUgy UZ planting, anc'1 a Site map indicating the locatiorA of the raplantitig,
efforls.
:l.) The plan must a.ddxess the nicASUxes that will be used for temporary stabilizatioxa,~seditnent contrUl
wlliie this work is under way.
c.) Please indicate in your' resgonsc a r".etailed schedule with dates explainizig when the restoration will be
accalnpl.ighrd..As a part of thi schedule ybu Bhauld detaiUinClude a three-year mozzitnxing plan
incluciing tpeciiicatiUt35 for lhysicai and biological nxUriitorzig. This mUi]ltoring r€gort should be
prUVided wifh. a writte.rz report to the )2egianal U!'I'iUe by June 1 of cash yeas).
$_ It is rpCUtxtznendcd thaC yUk contact thr Fti€ileigh Regional Q~'ice of the Divisionz cif Lanai Resources at 919-
791-4200, and the: U.S. Army Corps cif Engineers at (9I9)-$76-8441 to costae that your efforts are in
cvrzaplianec with Division of Lanai 13.esources and Section 404 of the CPeazi Water' Act r,gtzirements.
_ __ . ._.. ~!• __Z~inallv~,plcssc expiain haw ycnl ps~ipUSc t~~ prevent tlzdse problems. ti;4JJl.rc.~CCLLr: ing car,. fiiture projects...
't'hank you for your attention to ttris matter. This Off cc is cUr~idering sending a recr>mt2rcndatian fvr
errforctrrzetit t0 the I3ixector Uf the %~Li,ion of Vdatcr Qtrali.tz,~ regarduzg these isstres and any firtur'eieontxnued
violatlozts that may be eriUOUZatered. Yotu above-rxzentiot~ed response ±o this correspondence will be considered in
this proacss. This U:~ce requires that llxe v.laYlatlt?t3S, as detailed above, be al7ated izrsrncdiately. `t'hese violatiUns and
azsy future violatiUns are sabject to civil gcna.lty a;~sessrnent of ug to $25,0011.0U per dsry for each violataoa. Should
you have any q'uestiozzs regarding; tE~cse raattCrs, please contact Vicki Fuentes at (fit 1.9) 79 t-4254 ar Shelton. St:llivan
at 919-733-083 x44.
SiriGerely,
~ .
~yrl Nicely
Acting WatcA c~utr.lity~ Regional Supervisor
c~;: File Copy
U$ Army CUZps of Begin€::rs -Raleigh Office
Al.lt Raleigh Regional {Jtl?.ce
Darury Smith - L~`«~C? 1`~a Assistance and ~:gDCAplzance Oversight Unit
441 VG'ctlands Perzr2.itting Unit - Pro;cct: 0~-17U1

l~l~{S8~?t~ ~~ I~J~7E~ t~UAL6°I•Y • t_~"~Et, SPR~A~'BR ~~RKSHE~`~ (1i2ttt?]')
1. PFtQJE~7 iN~O~h~~Tt~E~ (please complete the fallowing information}:
Project iVarne : ~-Tra~~~l~~°~_~~~t~ t ~i'(~ i c~rdf _ _.
Contact Person °~"~_Rrr=,.~~~~ .~ ~.~,~ ~ r Phone ivum~er: ~I~~} ~' 3~ - ~??,r ~
t.evei Spreader iG: _ ~~~ ____.
t_evel Spreader length __~G' _~ i#. perpendic~s!ar to fioty
urainage Area ~. ~~ ac. (un-site and otf-site drainageto the level spreader)
impervious Area _ cam- ;~~. ac. (an-site and off~siie drainage to the level spreader)
Forebay Area ~~.:~~ ft.~ (G.?~%c o€ the contrinutincg impervious surface areal
Y~axirfum Filter Strip;Bufi`er Siofae _ ~~ _.___ ~/~ (5°ib fo< forestedlleaf littler cover, 8~~e for grasslihick cover}
iblax. ?~iscnarge frurn 1"ter Storm __.~ ~ ~ f
+1~ax. C)ischarge to revel Spreader
Filter Strip! Zone 1 E:~ufter Veyetatian ir'r_ r~°
o=iEter 5tripl Zone ~1 buffer VUidtt; 3 .
Filter Strip/ Zone 2 t3uffer Vegetatian~r,~~ ~r~.
Filter Stripi Zone 2 Buffer UVidth __„~
___ cis
____cfs (~isch~irye rate Tram extended detention wetland ar pond)
r~~ ~,,,rass~i-rick ground c.-over or Ferestedj
ft.
~.r~9~-
- ft.
t~yfpass ivlethcd Used ~":~ Please include a worksheet far this.
9i. ~kt~t~t~B~ !~'Et~'tS ~H~Ci~LlSi'
Irjitiai in ti7e space provided to indicate the fallo~Fai+~g des"sgn requirements have been met and supporting documentation is
atfiached. li a requirement has riot been met, please exp;ain thy. ~?t a rroinimum, a complete storrnwater management plan
submitta{ includes a worksheet for eaci~ BithP, design calculations, plans ar;d spacificatioris showing all BMPs and outlet
structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. Art irseumplete
su+bn~ittal parkac~e wilt result in a reguest fur acfdr`ricrat informafion and w,~ll strbsfanfiaily delay .rtr7ai revia~v ~snd appre;vai of
fhe prajecf.
~9icants initials
~.~.~' Project cite was vEsite~ ~r~ior fa +~esign'trtg ~~vei apread~r ~y~terra.
.-~%_'~ .~ Date of ihte Site visit. Piea~e at;taclro tsr~e•d~#ed rtigital phoios cst` esxl~tartg buffer conctitiarzs.
Level spreader length is at least: 1:~ ft. per cfs for (hick ground cover /grass; ~R ti5 ft per cfs far 50-
fooi canopied forest with leaf litter; 50 it per cfs far 100-foot forested buffer; 4Q ft. per cfs far 150-fast
forested buffer; OR a weighted average of the two vegetation types within il~e buffer/filter strip).
/~~~_ Aii ground saver types and their widths have been labeled on the constructiorj plans.
-~~ .Ali contours have been depicted on the construction plans.
_~~ No structures are lecated in protected buffers (must meet na praeticat alternatives criteria).
-~" No d raves are located in the buffer or filter str'sp in the vicinity of the proposed level spreader.
~.,~-~ _ Construction details for fhe level spreader have bean provided.
~""~ ~ _ The operation and maintenance agreement signed arrd notarized by the responsible par#y is provided.
_,3t/..~ Na pro; ticai alternatives explanation * Variance reguest. (~evei Spreaders in Series only}.
Bypass r~~ethod used:
~,~~` Bypass conveyance mefhod is specified and construction details and calculations are provided.
~:r~.~ Alternative design option is specified and plan details and calculations are provided.
~/-~' Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from tf~.e
bypass CtiSCharge.
~/~ Constr uciion details for the bypass and or~tlets are provided.

~~~3 sl~t~ Ot~ ~R i ER Qt~AL4T`i - LE'JE~ ~t~~EAl7~~ Yt1L7i~tfSFd~~7 ~'i/~~~y)
t. PRt}JECT ttgF~IZN~ATt~~t (pleasa complete the following infarmatian):
PIGJeCt l~farne : ~ %r~,A/.~ G~,~-r~.~- ~r~~ I u` r ~ rc:~r~
CGntact Person: ..~r~ _-=--~7~_.Lv.~,~2.i f}f~Gne Ntirv~ber:
Level Spreader iC}: _.:~` °~
1
Level Spreader Length r~~.. ft, {per~perdiGUlarta flow}
~rairiage Area /~,1'`- t'~ ac. {Gn-site and oft-site drainage to the ieve4 spreader)
Impervious Aran ~:~~ _ ac. (anasite «~?d ofif-site arainage io the ievc~i spreader)
Forebay Area _~~` ~_~' .~~- eft" {~.2°,~ff L`F tl~r8 contributing impervious surface area)
svtaximum Filter StriplSuf;er Slope ~ ______ % {6~1a for fGrestedileat~ littler cover, b°ro for grasslthick ;,over)
l~alax. L~ischa:~ge from .°ii°fr Storm A~ t ~. c;is
tvSax. f~ischarge to Level Spreader _~ r "~'~ cfs {Dischz7rge rate iron extended detention vvetiarrd ar pond)
Filter Strip/ Zone 1 Buffer Vegutaiion ra~~. ~ e-~_ °~ r~ {Grass~'i~~ick gra!snd Dover or Forested)
t=filter Strip! Zone i c",ufier 'b'~'idth ?~ ~ f(.
Fiiker Stripl Zone 2 Holier Vegekation ~,~. ~~ ~.~~~~.
Filter Strip/ Zane 2 ~utfer ~fdidth ~ -~,~ ft.
~3ypass #N~ethod Used _ t~~f,~ Please include a worksheet for this.
t!o ~4~Ut€~Elr3 l~'~~t~ CH~CKL4ST
Initial in the space provided to n~dicate the fallowing design requirements have been rrtet and supporting documentation is
attached. tf a regcrirement has nut beers net, please explain why. At a minimum, a campleke starrrtwater management plan
sa~bmittal includes a worksheet far each ~Iv;P, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all f3MPs and ou(le(
structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete
scrbmittai package wilt result in a request fia; addriiona! iniormafian acrd t~/j6I su6sfantrally defay frna( review and approval of
the project.
Applicants Initials
__~---
.~,.
~~
Rr'ojec~t ~tke eras visike~ prior' fo destining tevel ~pre~a~er ~yafena.
Bate of the Cite visit. Ptease attach kir~e•datod dtgit:al ~911(3~t}5 0~ ext~ttr~g ~U~f°~r GtYildttt4~r1~.
tevei spreader length is at least:13 ft, per cfs far trick graurrtt cover; grass; aR G~ ft per cfis far 50-
faot cariapiea forest w,tith leaf fitter; 5d ft per cfs for 10d-foot forested buffer; 4Q ft. per cis for 15g-foot
forested buffer; OR a weighted average Gf the two vegetation typal vritl~in the btifferif;lter strip).
Ail ground cover types and their widths have been tabeled on the construction plans.
All contours have been depicted an the construction pans.
No structures are located in protected buffers (must meet no practical alternatives criteria),
No draws are located in the buffer or filter strip in the vicinity Gf the proposed level spreader.
Construction desalts for the level spreader have been provided.
The operation and rrraintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
No practical alternatives r~xplanatian + Variance request. (Level Spreaders in Series only).
l~yksass r~eti~od rased.
,~~--~ bypass conveyance rnethad is specified and construction details ar;d calculations are provided.
.~ ~L~ Alternative design option is specified and plan details and calcutations are provided.
_~-~ i~ischarge to level spreader and subsequent f+iter strip is hydrauiioaiiy and spatially separate from the
t~ypass discharge.
!/~.~` CanstructiGr7 details fGr tale bypass and outlets are provide:!.

DtVtStON OF WATER ta:UALITY ~ LEVEL SPREADER {NOEZKSHEET (1/2007)
t. PROJECT INF®RMATt®N (please complete the following information):
Project Name : ~"fan~ ~../,4?~.,~? , s,r,r ~,t~ t /r s t on!
Contact Person; -~,4~,~r -~T ~-r~c,e.~-- Phone Number:
Level Spreader !D: ~#'.3
Level Spreader Length ~~ ft. (perpendicular to flaw)
Drainage Area /~ oS ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the Pavel spreader)
impervious Area o - 2 __~ ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Forebay Area 2,~ ~ ft,~ (0.2°~, of the contributing impervious surface area)
Maximum Fitter Strip/Buffer Slope i~ % (6°1° for forestedlieaf littler cover, 8% for grass/thick cover)
Max. Discharge from 1"/Hr Storm _ /_ ~~:a cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 3 - ~ cfs
Filter Strip/ Zone 1 Buffer Vegetation -1t,~K ~-,~ c~~
Fitter Strip! Zone 1 Buffer Width ~s ft.
Filter Strip/ Zone 2 Buffer Vegetation rR,rc G~j~v.r~-jz
Filter Strip/ Zone 2 Buffer Width 2a ft.
(Bischarge rate from extended detention wetland or pond)
(Grass/Thick ground Dover or Forested)
Bypass Method Used ,.tl/,4 Please include a worksheet for this.
tt. REd~UIRED tTENt :CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the fallowing design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is
attached. If a requirement has not been mef, please explain why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan
submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet
structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete
submittal package wi/! result in a request for additional informafion and will substantially delay frnal review and approval of
the protect.
~fcants lnifials

_ Protect Site vvas visited prior to designing level spreader system.
Date of the Site visit. Please attach tune-dated digital photos of existing buffer conditions.
Level spreader length is at least: 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover /grass; OR 65 ft per cfs for 50-
foot canopied forest with leaf litter; 50 ft per cfs far 100-fioot forested buffer; 40 ft. per cfs far 150-foot

~~ forested buffer; OR a weighted average of the two vegetation types within the buffer/fllter strip).
All ground cover types and their widths have been labeled on the construction plans.
Ali contours have been depicted on the construction plans.
~ _~~_
_ ,~'~.~_ No structures are located in protected buffers (must Wiest no practical alternatives criteria).
No draws are located in the u er or filter strip in the vicinity of the proposed level spreader
~~~ '~~~'
.
Construction details for the level spreader have been provided. r5 [~° uPS~Dtb
o~ 'U~ u~~~--
Theoperation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
1s~,~9 No practical alternatives explanation + Variance request. (Level Spreaders in Series only). .
t3ypass mettrod used:
~sl/~ Bypass conveyanoe method is specified and construction details and calcutatians are provided.
~/,4 Alternative design option is specified and plan details and calculations are provided.
iu_/~ Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
~~ Construction details for the bypass and outlets are provided.

-_- ~ _~.
_~
{ ".
i -,..
3lf~ -'
L

~TCR~VI~I~TER CC?~iTRt~L S~`RIJCTURE LE~6E~. ~PREl~t3ER NIAINI'EIVf~I~CE
~CREE~~EF~~
P'RC?JEC f: `=; r~+tl~G~.i.~J~~-`~'~`~.{~.1 ~°/.S
RE sPOi~~ci~3LE P'~RTV: ~! t ~'r3`~' I~„j'~s-~~ts
~~~ G~
1. Afiter ever heavy rainfall forfir:s: ~ months following construction:
1. Gheck r`or and repair arry channeiizatitin or erosion that has occurred in the filter' strip. The level
spread:.°r will fail if water exits frort~ it as ehannelized flow.
2. inspect ti ~e level lip fcr settling, erosion, or concentrated fl~7w.
Once a month and after every heavy rainfall (greater than 2 inches}
1. Inspecf the forebay and along level spreader. Glean and make repairs. Look for:
- Sediment in forebay and along level spreader tip;
- Trash and/ar leaf buildup.
- Scour, undercutting of level spreader.
- Settleinenf of level spreader structure (no loneQer level; you see silt down hill below level
spreader)
- Fallen trees on the level spreader.
- x#57 ,-tone washing downtiili.
lll. Once a year.
1. Remove any weeds or shrubs growing on level spreader or in Swale.
i, ____._ _ __ ,hereby acknowledge that I am the financially responsible party for maintenance
of this impoundme . i v±rAl perform them intenanee as outlined above, as part of the Gerificate
Signature: ~ ~ , ~" L=-~,C1ate:_,~~~ ~~
1, ~/-ir~t~ ~..,C. %~,,,~,P , a iVotary Public for the sate ofd. C , Gounty of-tj~ ,~rG,,,~,;y a~ hereby
certify that _~~.t ~~ ~. r~~` ~ ~-,,,r per`sonaliy appeared before me this ~,~~ _ day oft
200 and acknowled~ due exerr~°#ion cf the foregoing insfrument. Witness my hand aril official se f
~e~yga~hs r-^uey,gert
FaPoS ~ R4, ~ ~ ~ ad5
e~,p r~
a 4a~~ ev®~ya.a ovm~~ 7 ~~A~1
i a m~+ ~ ~
Seal y~l.°'NCTq~y~~~
~ ,
~~m
~~ ~;y tl Ft i 1 C"' ~' ~.
~~^/,.
Y ~ a~
M r ~j qq•~~~~YYO ~ ~«
1 p r~ j/q_.~p.yg to ' ~ V ~
qu 'M1F
My eomrnission expires: ~~`~,~~~,,,p~

ta~~t~i~t~ ~~ v~Ar~~ c~u~t.~~Y - !_~v~~. s~t7~~r~~~ wt~~t~~~~~~ (1f2var)
t. P~tgJEt.;T Itd~~t7P~rATt~3f~ (please complete the following information):
Prc:jeci Narrze : ~-T©,~.~~-.I~,~'F~- ~u~3t~ t y'/ s~oro/ _.__ _
Contact Person: --~~?.~~r~.,~-' ~-~~..ic;rr~~ Phone Number: ~//,~~"1 5~~~ - 7`~,~ ~
LrvLI Spreader iD: _~ _,.
~evei Spreader ! ength ~}~ ft. (perpendicularta flaw)
Cra!nage Area ~• ~~,'G' ar,. (on-site and off-site drainage to the Ieve! spreader}
impervious Area c~- ~~ ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
t=urebayArea ~,~. ~~ rft.~ (0.2°I° of tl~e contributing impervious su~~face area)
lUlaximum r=iitc~r StripiBuffer 5fope ~~ % (6°l° far forested/leraf !iffier cover, $G/° fior grassitiiick cover)
Pb1ax. rJiscnarge (corn f "iNr Storm r~ • ~3 f _cfs
Sfax. Discharge to LevQi Spreader "aa - ~ ~ cfs (Discharge rata Pram lxtensed detention vvetlarut ar pond)
I=filter Sfript Zone 1 Buffer Vegetation '.,%f~~ ~~. , p.~~ c~%;'rass/Thick ground cover ar Fore;sted)
f=filter Strip! Za~~a 'I Huffer i,'Vidth ___,_ : tt.
Filter Strip! Zone ~ Buffer Vegetation~rir~ r~~n ~~~~
Filter Stripi Zone ~ Buffer rlVidth ~_~ ft.
i~ypass Me'~had Used ~~.~_ Please include a worksheet #or this.
ii. @~E(~t~tRki~ 9`fklVfS ~i~ECI~i,IBT
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been rnet and suppartirrg dacumentafion is
attached. If a requirement has no# been net, phase explain, why. At a minimum, a complete storrnwater management plan
sut~mittaf includes a worksheet for each Bt~iP, design calculations, purrs and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet
structure details, a detailed drainage pia~~ and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. !~n incomplete
szpbn~iital package gill resr;lt.in arequest far addifianal information and will substanftalfy delay finaf rev6ew and approval of
ttie project.
A licants
~Initia!s
-,
~~~ Wroject Bite was visited prior to designing t'ra~el spreader sysEstm.
,%.~5 ~~ hate of the Site visit, Prase attach tirre•t~dt~Ct ~IC~iC~I Rf3QtAS ~f ~EXtS~~16DC~ ~Cdf'~~r C®P1C~it10i7S.
-'~' Level spreader length is at least: 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover /grass; OR 65 ft per cfs for 50-
foot canapiedforest with Leaf iitfLr; 50 it per cfs for 100-fact forested buffer; 40 ft. per cfs for 150-foot
forested buffer; QR a weighted average of the t4U0 vegetation types within tt~e buffer/filter strip}.
~__ All ground aver types and their widths have been labeled on the construction plans.
~~ ;S? T All contours have been depicted on the construction plans.
~'~~ _~.~_ PJo structures are located in protected buffers (must meet no practice( alternatives criteria).
~%~'> _ _ i~Jo d caws are heated in the buffer or filter strip in the vicinity of the proposed level spreader.
_G Construction detai{s for the (eve! spreader have been provided.
-`' The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarizes by the responsible party is provided.
. ,nII.~ PJo practical alternatives explanation ~ Variance request. {t_evei Spreaders irr Ser12S Orilyt.
~yp~s~ Y81B1~i1t9L1 tJS~d:
__L~,~ Bypass conveyance method is specified and construction details and calculations are provided.
~.~/.•{ ~ Alternative design option is specified and plan details and calculations are provided.
~1~` Discharge to level spreader and subsequent flier strip is I~ydra!~!icaiiy and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge,
e~•/-~~ Construction details for the bypass and outlets are provi~Jed.

€3~Rf35}~}~ OF ~T~~ Ctt3ALi~`Y - l_EVEIr ~P~E~iDEI~ VtiOC{KS~iEE7 ir112047)
i. f'F~~JE~T il~iFt?t~F~~~t~`i~i~ (please compete the fo€iowing infarmatian):
projectNarr~e: ~'ic~r/.~t-~//~~~~ ~~~~p~t~tonC _-- -
Contact person; ~~r~ ~^~~/~~., Phone Number: f, 1:'~') ~'~~° - `7'.i /~
Level Spreader }D: ` ~..
Leve} Spreader Length Lx,2., ft. {perpendicuiartof!ow)
t~rainage Area ~' ac. (en-site and aff-site drainage to the level spreader]
Impervious Area ~~ ~ ~. _ ac. (on~site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
l=orebay Area _~~, ~-~ x-ft` (0.2% of fhe cantributing impervious surface area)
Ciaximum Fi}ter StriplBuffer S}ape _ f ~__ % ~ {6~/a far tarestedl€eaf }itt}er cover, ~% far grassJthick cover)
ivtax. Discharge from 1°INr Starn~ ,~P ~ I cfs
tviax. Discharge to Level Spreader '~t °7 ~ rfs i- ischarge rate frarra extended detention wet€and ar pond)
1•i}ter Strip! Zane 1 But#er Vegetatian a~,?,r=. ;.~;e~, ~~ ~~.. (Grass/Th€ck ground cover ar Farested)
~i}tar 5tripl Zane 1 ;3uffer VVidt}~ ~ ~~~~ ft.
t=i}ter 5tripl Zone 2 Buffer Vegetation ~~- ~~ c~v'~~-
~dter Str€p/ Zane 1 Bufaer Width ____ 2~ ft.
Bypass lvtethad Used _ t,~J,~_ _ P€ease inc€ude a worksheet for this.
ii. ~E~tt1i~EL 6TE~lS GHEDtCLt~T
€nitia} in the space provided to indicate the fallowing design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is
attached. tf a regcrrrement has not bean met, please explain Urny. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan
submittal inc}udes a ~~~orksheet far each BIv;P, design ca€cu}ations, plans and specificat}ens showing a€€ C3MPs anti outlet
structure details, a detailed drainage p}an and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An irrcorrrplete
submittal package will resalt in a request far addiiianat inFarrrratian and wiPt su6sPanfiaNy delay Etna! review and approve! of
the pr©ject,
A licants lnifiais
~-
~:~ ~~
Pro~ea:t S€xe was visited prier to designing level spreader system.
Date of the Site v€s€t. 'tease attach time-dated digital photos ot; existing buffer conciltions.
Leve! spreader length is at least:l3 ft. per cfs for thick ground aver !grass; OR 65 ft per cfs for 50-
footcanopied forest iA~ifh leaf }fitter; 5g #t per cts far 1(lQ-foot forested buffer; ~~ ft. per cfs for 150-fact
forested buf#er; OR a tiveighted average of the two vecuetatian types witfrin fhe buffertfi€ter strip).
Ail ground cover types and their widths have been labeled on the construction plans.
A}I centaurs have been depicted an the construction plans.
No structures are located in protected buffers (must meet no practical alternatives criteria).
Na d rawas are located in the buffer or filter strip in the vicinity ofi the proposed €evei spreader.
Construction details far the €evei spreader have been provided.
1'he operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
!va practica€ a}terr7atives explanation + Variance request. (Leve€ Spreaders it Series only),
Bypass method used.
_ ~.1~/~ _ 5ypass conveyance method is specif}ed and construction detai€s ar~d calculations are provided.
~G-4 A€ternative design option is specif}ed and plan details and ca}culations are provided,
_~.~ rischarge fo level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
~ Construction deiaiis fort};e bypass and outlets are provided.

DfViSfQf~ OF VffATt:R QUALITY -LEVEL SPREADER WQigF(SHEET (1/Zd07)
I. PRpJECT IlVFQF~f~ATIQfV (please complete the folloving information};
Project Name : ~,~,,~~~
Contact Person: t wr s
'~`~°'~ c' ~' ' -ti-' Phone Number. l`"j'r~') cd~~ _ ~'7 ~ .7
Level Spreader IQ: ----.~_
Level Spreader Length---~-____ ft.
Drainage Area /, ~~
Impervious Area ac.
ForebayArea `~" ~ ~' ac.
Maximum Filter StriplBuffer Slope ~ ~ ft,~
Max. Discharge from 1"/Hr Storm ,: ~ ~,
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 3 ~ cfis
Titer Strip/ Zone 1 Buffi;r Vegetation ~____ ~,~~,, t~
Fitter Strip/ Zone 1 Buffer VYidth ~ ~ tt
Filter Strip/ Zone 2 Suffer Vegetation. 7?7,~c ~~-~cov~
Filter Strip/ Zone 2 Buffer V4'idth ~
2r~ ft.
{perpendicular to fow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the levelspreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
{0.2°~ of the contributing impervious surface area)
(t3% far forested/leaf littler cover, $% for grass/thick cover)
(Discharge rate from extended detention wetland or pond)
(Grass/Thick ground cover or Forested)
Bypass Method Used
"`"`T Please include a worksheet for this.
ft. i~EQUIRED iTEft7S CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documen
attached. If a requirement has Trot been rnet, p/ease explain why At a minimum, a complete stormrvater mans ement I
submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifcations showin ail BMP tatron is
structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An i pan
9 sand outlet
submittal package wi/! result in a request for addifiona! information anr! wilt su5sfantialfy delay frna/ review and a r
the project ncorr-piete
pp avai of
ARralicants Initials
--~_ ~__,___. Project Site was visited prior to designing level spreader system.
-~ _ Date of the Site visit. Please attach Time-dated digital photos of existing buffer conditi
Level spreader length is at least: 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover /grass; OR 65 ft per cfs for-50-
foot canopied forest with leaf litter; 50 ft per cfs for 100-foot forested buffer; 40 ft. per cfs for 150-foot
forested buffer; OR a weighted average of the two vegetation types within the buffer/fliter strip),
_ Ali ground cover types and their widths have been labeled on the construction plans.
All contours have been depicted on the construction plans.
~ ~~~ No structures are located in protected buffers (must meet no practical alternatives criteria .
~~~_._ No draws are located in the bu eror filter sfnp in the vicinity of the proposed level spreader. ~~~, -~
Construction details for the level spreader have been provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.u~~
No practical alternatives explanation + Variance request. (Level Spreaders in Series only),
Bypass method used:
'~'W Bypass conveyance method is specified and construcfion details and calculations are provided.
'uf~ Alternative design option is specified and plan details and calculations are provided.
~-~._._. Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
~'`'~ Construction details for the bypass and ouflets are provided.

53
='.
,~
t
~,
I .- _

~l"~3f2>~'Ifli~T~~ C~~Y~t'~L sYf~UCI'Ui~>C L~VLL aP~~1~i~E~2 l~Ie~,II`1T'~hl,+~tVC~

L-. t~Gr ~ ~
t~fter ever heavy rainfall far first b montf~s f ollowing construction:
~ . Check for and repair any chanr~elization or erosion that has occurred in the filter strip. -ftte level
spreader will fail if water exits fror7t it as channeiized flow.
2. irvspect the leve# lip for settiu:c;, erosion; or concentrated fio~V.
Gnce a month and after every heavy rainfall (greater than 2 inches)
~ . inspect the forebay and along level spreader. Clean and rr~ake repairs. Look for:
Sediment 6n farebay and along lave! spreader tip;
"rash andlor leaf buildup.
- Scour, underoutting of level spreader.
Settlerrienf of level spreader strEtcture (no longer level; you see silt down hill below level
spreader)
- Fallen trees on the level spreader.
X57 stone washing downhill.
Ili. Qnce a year.
~ . Remove any weeds ar shrubs growing on level spreader or in swaie.
1, ___- ,hereby acknowledge that l am the financially responsible party for maintenance
of this impoundrne . t t!yill perform them intenance as outlined above, as part of the i/erificafe
Signature: - ' '" `=-~Date:~_~~~~'~
i, ~/~dr~t~ ~- ~- ~ .~: a Notary ~'ublic for the sate of •
certif • that ~ ~=_.___> County of ~r2~~rYr;i o hereby
y ~ ~ ii_..1 .~~ ~h..•.,r personally appeared before me this ~~ _ day o~{~~z~z.~
2oD;~and acknowledge due execution of the foregoing instrument. 1Nitness my hand and official se
~~r$~Q' ~~ RQ j.~j°'~a
Seal ° ~ ~ p~ ry ` pd
w ~ tV 4 T ,~ ~ `~ e
m ~ 8r ~ 9
t "'V • r f ~V i
} ~ ~
i
A. ~ o~ l~ }~ 4, t ~ ~
°P s~
~~
$y
fVly commission expires: ~~~ ~/oT~~

1)tiit~le'~l~! ~~ ~fSaTE~ 4~t}ALiTY - LfCVEL SF'Ftlr~i3E~ Y~ORI~SHEET (1t2Cfa7)
f. P~tAJECT 1NP*D~ft~~7[Qty (please complete the following information}:
i'roject Name : .~~-;o,~. "'~LdC~ J2" ~u ~t~ t y'l ~ r ntdl ----
t,antact Parson: _ ~~-~.~.~' ~'t~ta~T Phone Number: t/1~1.}~~ - 7?/ ~
Level Spreader iE7: _ ~ ! __
Level Spreader Length ~.~ __,_. ft. (perpsrdicular to flow)
Drainage Area ~• ~~ ac. (an-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area ~~ •~2 ac. (an-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Forebay Area .~. °r~ eft ` (C.2°io of the contributing impervious surface areaj
~aximusn Fitter Strip,Buffer Slope t~ °a (~°r~ far forested/leaf littler caver, ~°ro for grasslthick cover)
trlax. Discharge from 1"/fir Starrn __ ~_ . ~~~_ cfs
lVax. (discharge to level Spreader ~a • ~ ~ ~ cfs (€~ischarge rate from extended detention ~vetland or par~~dj
Filter Strip! Zone 1 Buffer Vegetation e i~,,~ ~,~v,~~ c~v~rass(~fhie€c ground cover or Parceled)
rifler Stripl Zone 1 duffer Width p ft,
Filler Strip! Za9ie 2 E3uffer Vegetation~rc~~r~v~„"~ ~,~~~.
Filter Stripl Zane 2 Buffer Width ~~ ft.
>3ypass fvtethod Used r~,?~ Please include a worksheet for this.
@t. ~E~f#iFi~~i !~'~S CH~Df6LfST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the folla~~ding design requirements Dave beet? met and supporting documentation is
attached. if a requirement has not been me#, please explain v~h}~. At a minimum, a complete stormwatsr management plan
submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BP1iPs and Duffel
structure details, a detailed drainage plan Ind a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete
submiita! pacfrage ~viit rescrlt ire a reques# far addifional information and wUi substantral#y defay frnal review and approval of
the project.
Applic-ants I~itiafs
:,~%%~.~ Project Site was visiied prier to desicdning level spreader systerr~.
.,%~~~ Date of the Site visit. Please aitach time-dated digital pl~~tos of existing buffer vanditiflns.
%,~'„~' Level spreader length is at least:l3 ft. per cfs far thick ground caver f grass; Qf~ 65 ft per cfs for 50-
foot canopied forest witty 6eaf Iitter;.50 ff per cfs far 100-fact forested buffer; 40 ft. per cfs for 150-foot
#aoested buffer; OP. a weighted average of the two vegstaticn types within the bufferlfilter strip).
_%'~ All ground caver types acid their widths have been 4abeled on the construction plans.
,~: Aii contours have been depicted on the construction plans.
Na structures are located in protected buffers (must mast na practical alternatives criteria).
--`~" ~" Na draws are heated in the buffer ar filter strip in the vicinity of the proposed level spreader.
,~~` Construction details far the Isvel spreader lave besrt provided.
-'' ~ 1"he operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
/ ~/.~ ~~ No practical alternatives explanation + Variar~cs request. (Leval Spreaders in Series only}.
tsypass rt~etht~a used:
>~ Bypass conveyance method is specifiied and construction details and calculations are provided.
Alternative design option is specified and plan details and calculations are pratided.
.^~/.~ Discharge tc level spreader and subsequent filter strip is 13ydra~alicaliy and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
~,j-~ Constructlan details far the bypass and outlets are provided.

iia Y~~~S:3~ ~f' St6~A~~9~ eati3~e i_i~F L~jY ~L ~t"~~~`titt~F§ Y~tl+ed~lE~33 rE~t ~17~VVC~
t. P~~.d~Cl" tt~9~t}1~EtirfA~°i~ (please complete the following information):
Project Marne : C,~-- tc~n/~ 1-J.~-~"~~? ~ r ~,~ 1 v't5 ro~C --
Contact Person: -~-~'~~~~~ F--F-~,1,~~.i °hone Number: (~i ) ~'~~ - 7'~'P~ -
i_evel Spreader lD: .~'
ZevelSpreader t.ength ~~.. ft. (perperdicuiartaflaw)
Drainage Area /t~ ac. (en-site and aifi-site drainage to the level spreader}
Impervious Area cam. ~ ~.. ac, (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Forebay Area ~~ ~ 2-~ T_ft~ (0.2% of the contributing impervious surface area)
d~laximum Filter Strip/{;offer Slope ~ _ % (0°l° far forested/leaf littler cover, i1°I° far grassltf pick: cover]
l~eiax. Discharge tram 1"lHr Storm ,~ ~~ I __ cfs
fvtax. Discharge to i_evel Spreader ~ ~ `7 ~ cfs (Discharge rate frofn extended detention wetland or pond)
Filter :trip/ Zene 1 Bulfer Vegetarian .e~,~ ~=~~- (~rass~hick ground cover ar Forested]
Filter Strip! Zone 1 puffer y"didtl~ ?.~ ~ ft.
Filter Strip! Zone 2 Suffer Vegetation ~,~ z~~c, ~~V'~Iz-
F~Iter Strip/ Zane 2 Buffer rrJidth _ ?~ ft.
Bypass Method Used ~~,~ Please include a worksheet for this.
!t. REr~tJt~ED lTES Di-t~CKLI~T
Initial in tare space provided to indicate the fallowing design requirements have bean met anal supporting documentation is
attached. if a requ/rearent has riot been rne~ please explain why, At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan
subrr?ittal includes a worksheet far each E3NlP, design calculations, plans and specifications sl-owing all BMPs and varlet
structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation anti maintenance agreement, Ctrl incvrnpleie
submittal pacdrage avilt result in a ; e;,7uest far addrrrona! inivrmatian and will subsiantiafly delay final review and approval of
fire project.
,~ dicants Initials
~~-!~'
Project bite eras visited prior to desis~ning level spreader system.
Date of the Site visit:. Pilease attach tirrre•dated digital photos of ex'sstlo~~ huf$er crsnditiorrs.
t_evel spreader length is at least:l3 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover l grass; aR 6b ft per cfs for 50-
fvaicanopied forest writh leaf fitter; 50 ft per cfs far 100-foot forested buffer; 40 if. per cfs for 150-foot
forested buffer; OR a weighted average of the two vegetation types within the buffer/f+lter strip].
All ground cover Types and their widths have been labeled on the construction plans.
All contours Dave been depicted an the construction plans.
iqo structures are located in protected buffers (must meet no practical alternatives criteria).
tdo d raves are located in the buffer ar fil"ter strip in the vicinity of the proposed level spreader.
Construction details for the level spreader have been provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible palsy is provided.
No practical alternatives explanation + Variance request. (Level Spreaders in Series only).
Bypass r~~etha~d used:
._._~~~ _ Bypass conveyance method is specified and construction details and calculations are provided.
.r__ A{ternative design option is specified and plan details and calculations are provided,
_ ~.~.~ _ 17isvharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
`.~ ____ Cvnstructicn details for the bypass and outlets are provided.

Dtilifilf3iV OF WATER QtJALi1'Y ~ LEVEL SPf2EADEFd Wt?RKSFtEET (1I20Q7}
1. PROJECT iNFC11ti~ATtt}riP (please complete the following information):
Project Name : ~T n~~ l./~-r~.,~ su ~r~ t /t s f r~nl
Contact Person: -,ctl®,Sr ~?'~t,~T Phone Number: (~'~ ~32„~ 77 /~7
Level SpreaderlD: ~'3
Level Spreader Length ~® ft. (perpendiculartoflow)
Drainage Area /~ oS ac. (an-site and off site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area o- .2~ ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Forebay Area 2~ ft.~ (0.2°~6 of the con#ributing impervious surface area)
Maximum Filter Strip/buffer Slope ~v % {6% for forestedlleaf littler cover, 8% for grasslthick cover)
Max. Discharge from 1°IHr Storm f- caLP cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader ~ -'7~' cfs {Discharge rate from extended detention wetland or pond)
Filter Strip/ Zane 1 Duffer Vegetation ~,~ ~ ~~ (GrasslThick ground cover or Forested}
Filter Strip/Zone 1 Suffer Width '~ ft.
Filter Strip/ Zone 2 Suffer Vegetafion ~,~,~ cave
Filter Strip/ Zone 2 Suffer Width 2v ft.
Bypass Method Used qtr'/.¢ Please Include a worksheet for this.
tt. I~EC~UIftEL) ITEr~NS CfiECKLiST
initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting "documentation is
attached. if a requirement has not been met, please explain why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan
submittal includes a worksheet for each SMP, design calculafions, plans and specifications showing ail BMPs and outlet
sfructure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete
submittal package will result in a request for additional information and will substantialfy delay final review and approval of
the projecf.
Applicants Initials
~~~_Q Project Site was visited prier to designing level spreader system.
_ Date of the Site visit. Please attach time-dated digital photos of existlrtg berffer conditions.
Level spreader length is at least: 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover !grass; OR 65 ft per cfs for 50-
foot canopied forest with leaf litter; 50 ft per cfs for 100 fioot forested buffer; 40 ft. per cfs far 150-foot
forested buffer; OR a weighted average of the two vegetation types within the bufl'erffllter strip).
_ Ali ground cover types and their widths have been labeled on the construction plans.
Aff contours have been depicted on the construction plans.
,~~„~s
'~- ,;~f~',~_ No structures are located in protected buffers {must meet na practical attematives criteria). ~~~ ~~~~
No draws are located in the u eror fitter s#rip in the vicinity of the proposed level spreader. ps ~, ~~r,b
Construction details for the level spreader have been provided. o°F t~~~>z- "
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
,~',~9 No practical attematives explanation + Variance request. {Level Spreaders in Series only).
k3ypass rnethod used:
~s1/~ Bypass conveyance method is specified and construction details and oalculations are provided.
~/.~ Alternative design option is specmed and plan details and calculations are provided.
~,%4 Discharge to level spreader and. subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
~~ Gonstruction details forthe bypass and outlets are provided.

f ~
~ .~~ ~
., S

,u~c _ _
4y
~•
,
~

sTt)I~IVI'I/VAT~1~ C~PI'~1"I~t~L ~~'RUCTIJI~~ L~!!~L SI~I~Ed~,L7EFt I~I~,IN~~NIaNCfE
ACI~Ir~1~ti~N~'
I:tE~PC3NSIIBl.~ ~'r4(~Tl(: 1Gr,Q~~/ ~I2~~-t~~
PrIC)N~: X22' - 15~~
i..tJ7Gc G~
~,iter ever heavy r~ainfa(1 for alrst 6 rnortt"t~s follcwirtg construction:
1. Check for and repair any channelization or erosion that has occurred in the filter strip. The level
spreader will fail if wafer exits from it as channeiized flow.
Z. lrispect the level tip for settling, erosion, or concentrated f1o~J.
Once a month and after every heavy rainfall (greater than 2 inches)
1. Inspect the forebay and along level spreader. Clean and make repairs. Look for:
- Sediment in forebay and along level spreader tip;
- Trash andfor leaf buildup.
- Scour, undercutting of level spreader.
- Settlement of level spreader structrire ~ no longer level; you see silt down hill below level
spreader)
- l=al6en trees on the level spreader.
- #57 stone washing downhill.
ilE. Once a year.
1. Remove any weeds or shrubs growing on level spreader or in Swale.
~, ___. _ ,hereby acknowledge that E am the financially responsible party for maintenance
of this impoundme .twill perform tfre m intenance as outlined above, as part of the Cerificate
Signature:- `'' ~Z~-~Date:~~~~~
1, ~/~u~t~~~.. ~. !~~,~~ , a Notary Public for the sate of ~. C e ,County of _~j~,g,~j~,t.,',i o hereby
certify that ~ ~,1 .~~ ~(~;,.,~ personalty appeared be#ore me this ~~ day of
200,7and acknowled e due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official se ~
fie!. `~ ~ ~„ ~ ~dJ~
ySrJp
d MS~~ se egYee ov•Ae~ I d~~i1
• "
Seal ~'~ ®®
:tvcr,~
a ~'1 y '° ~
a
R.~ y a,.
~~
I,~~'!'~ .,~e ~,
;~~ir ~~
Yy " .... r
My commission expires: n~~~/a-.~- ~Z?~
i

_ __
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY -LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET (1I2t}l)T)
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : ~-TO~l~l~ Q ~cr 3D t y'/ s r orl
Contact Person: -~ ~Yv~ ~E~/~~~ Phone Number: tom//~ g32- ~7/ ~
Level Spreader ID: ~' /
Leve( Spreader Length ~Z ft. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area o• SIC' ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area cam- Z2 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Farebay Area 20. 2S oerft~ (0.2% of the contributing impervious surface area)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope ip % (6% for forested/leaf littler cover, 8% for grass/thick cover)
Max. Discharge from 1"/Nr Storm o • 9 / cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 3.2 3 cfs (Discharge rate from extended detention wetland or pond)
Filter Strip! Zone 1 Buffer Vegetation LrFic,~ G~us~a ~~rassfl'hick ground cover or Forested)
Fitter Strip/ Zone 1 Buffer Width ~o ft.
Filter Strip/ Zone 2 Buffer Vegetation~ic~~zzov~ ~~~~
Filter Strip! Zone 2 Buffer Width Zo ft.
13ypass Method Used i,C/~{ Please include a worksheet for this.
It. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
!Witte( in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is
attached. !f a requirement has not been met, please explain why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan
submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet
structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete
submittal package will result in a request for additional information and will substantially delay Erna! review and approval of
the project.
A licants Initials
Project Site was visited prior to designing level spreader system.
Date of the Site visit. Please attach tfine•dated digital photos of existing buffer conditions.
-~,~ Level spreader length is at least:13 ft. per cfs far thick ground cover I grass; OR 65 ft per cfs for 50-
foot canopied forest with leaf litter; 50 ft per cfs for 100-foot forested buffer; 40 ft. per cfs for 150-foot
forested buffer; OR a weighted average of the two vegetation types within the bufferffilter strip),
All ground cover types and their widths have been labeled on the construction plans.
All contours have been depicted on the construction plans.
No structures are located in protected buffers (must meet no practical alternatives criteria).
No d rows are located in the buffer or filter strip in the vicinity of the proposed level spreader.
Construction details for the level spreader have been provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
iY/4 No practical alternatives explanation + Variance request. {Level Spreaders in Series only).
Bypass method used:
N.~ Bypass conveyance method is specified and construction details and calculations are provided.
,c~/.~' Alternative design option is specified and plan details and calculations are provided.
~~~ Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
~/fl Construction details for the bypass and outlets are provided.

i31VISI0N OF WATER QUALITY -LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET (4/2007)
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : ~on/~!~/.4-T~jL ~1 bbl v'rs ronC
Contact Person: ;~~-'~~'~u`~y~C_ ~~/~~ Phone Number: l?/~) PAZ - -7'7/
Leve! Spreader ID: .~ 2.
Level Spreader Length GPZ ft. {perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area /~ 5D ac. (an-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area o. ~Z.., ac. (on-site and off-site drainage fa the level spreader)
Forebay Area Zo . Z.5 as.ft z (0.2% of the contributing impervious surface area)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope LP _ % (6% for forested/leaf littler cover, 8% for grass/thick cover)
Max. Discharge from 1°/Hr Storm / cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader -~ cfs (Discharge rate from extended detention wetland or pond}
Filter Strip/ Zone 1 Buffer Vegetation 'T,r. ~,~, ~„~Tz (Grassfi'hick ground cover or Forested]
Filter Strip/ Zone 1 Buffer Width a o ft.
Fitter Strip/ Zone 2 Buffer Vegetation Y,~ c,~, rov'e:lz.
F~Iter Strip/ Zone 2 Buffer Width 7© ft,
Bypass Method Used f`t/f~ Please include a worksheet for this.
ft. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is
attached. If a requirement has not been met, please explain why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan
submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet
structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete
submittal package will result in a requesf for additional infornation and will substantially delay frnal review and approval of
the project.
A licants Inif+als
Project Site was visited prior to designing level spreader system.
Date of the Site visit. Please attach time-dated digital photos of existing buffer conditions.
Level spreader length is at least: l3 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover /grass; OR ti5 ft per cfs for 50-
footcanopied forest wifh leaf litter; 50 ft per cfs for 100-foot forested buffer; 40 ft. per cfs for 150-foot
forested buffer; OR a weighted average of the two vegetation types within the buffedfilter strip).
All ground cover types and their widths have been labeled on the construction plans.
All contours have been depicted on the construction plans.
No structures are located in protected buffers (must meet no practical alternatives criteria).
No draws are located in the buffer or filter strip in the vicinity of the proposed level spreader.
Construction details for the level spreader have been provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
~/4 No practical alternatives explanation + Variance request. (Level Spreaders in Series only).
Bypass method used:
~/~ Bypass conveyance method is specified and construction deta'sls and calculations are provided.
~lf-4 Alternative design option is specified and plan details and calculations are provided.
~/-~l Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatialiy separate from the
bypass discharge.
~.~ Construction details for the bypass and outlets are provided,

DMSK)N OF WATER QUALITY -LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET {112007}
L PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : STon~i./.4~,~L sLlbyt/-s-onl
Contact Person; -~,~.v~osi ~ ~,.~et~~-- Phone Number. Iy'FJ 1$32 - 77 /
Level Spreader ID: _~#'3
Level Spreader Length ~o ft. (perperxiicularto fbw)
Drainage Area /. 05' ac. (onsite and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area o • ZCP ac, (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Forebay Area Zr~- sg ft.Z (0.2°~ of the contributing impervious surface area)
Ma~amum Filter Strip/Buffer Sbpe [~ °~ (6°,6 for forestedAeaf fiftier cover, 8°~ for grass/thick cover)
Max Discharge from 1"/Hr Storm /. vl..P cfs
Max, Discharge to Level Spreader 3 --7~ cfs
Filter Strip/Zone 1 Buffer Vegetation 7lrK ~c~,~€~z
Fitter Strip/Zone 1 Buffer Wrdth 3y ft.
Filter Strip! Zone 2 Buffer Vegetation 1A,~ ~cov~l~
Ffter Strip/ Zone 2 Buffer Width 20 ft.
Bypass Method Used ,tl/,¢
I[. REQUIRED ITEM5 CHECKLIST
(Discharge rate from extended detention wetland or pond)
(GrasslThick ground cover or Forested)
Please include a worksheet for this.
Initial in the space provided to indicate the folowing design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is
attached. !f a requirement has not been met, please explain why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan
submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet
structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. M incomplefe
submittal package will result in a request for additional information and will su6sfantiatly delay final review and approval of
the project.
lira is Initials
Project Site was visited prior to designing level spreader system.
Date of the Site visit. Please attach time-dated digital photos of existing buffer conditions.
Level spreader length is at least:13 fL per cfs for thick ground cover /grass; OR 65 ft per cfs for 50-
foot canopied forest with leaf sitter; 50 ft per cfs for 100-foot forested buffer, 40 ft. per cfs for 150-foot
forested buffer; OR a weighted average of the two vegetation types within the bufferffllter strip). i
All ground cover types and their widths have been labeled on the construction plans.
All contours have been depicted on the construction plans.
No structures are located in protected buffers (must meet no practical alternatives criteria). ,
No draws are located in the u er or filter s#dp in the vicinity of the proposed level spreader. ~~ '~
r5 [~ ul~sAgrb
ConsVuctfon details for the level spreader have been provided. ~ ~~l#$1Z- ,
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided. a
No practical alternatives explanation + Variance request. (Level Spreaders in Series only).
Bypass method used:
~sl,W Bypass conveyance method is specified and construction details and ca~ulations are provided.
~/~ Alternative design option is specifed and plan details and calculations are provided.
~/s~ Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filler strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
~~ Construction details forthe bypass and outlets are provided.

<:. L ~.
. ~
't
p~y~ Sx1~~5 ,.~ ~viM.'l~`'"+1.3.'nt+r'ait~e u'C~174~.t ,~R,~'A ,j~S&`~ J1 ~~.G-ASV _
RG r _ - _
~
/ ~ ~ i
H
_
''
,,,(a'~4 f kr w~ "~ ~ 1 ~'~vs'Y ~~r:
~I ~
~+
Y ~ P' ~
~'
? ~
r a
_ .+..,.r7'~ d 'fm
f ~
.
„rj l.V"L~ ~. 1~t. °
M
o .''.~ ~' '~.'~„
w
w +ry~
t
~" Y ~~ ,-1

yw,1 ~: ~. ~~ .1 1 ."~.
v~ ~i .tau W is ^ i~_ :9f
LEVEL SPREADER #2
h~,~~.. ~ , _.~,., ~~ . ~ w_r _i N
~~

~; ,

i ;f
'
' ' ~ ~ -, µ y
i ,
~
I
. v p
y ~
1
2~ ~ s
~
_
d .
f
~5: f -e ~ ~'S L~
~
#
~
a
`~ r ~
1
v~j,t '3
~f.1 1 ~ _,I~r~`I ~ ~ S 1,F.,y~, X~
~
Ky F ~ l~-,,~.+
a
~
y~y~(

to.

~ ~
~ - t
~ ~-
H.
:,
.. _ }~ ~
F '~

LE1lEL Si'REARER #1
~~c+#y,3p~1, , ~ ,~ • IIht~r4 , ,

STORMWATER CONTROL STRUCTURE LEVEL SPREADER MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT
PROJECT: ~%~~.i<wA?~,~- ~~~,6! v'/S
RESPONSIBLE PARTY: )Grt~~ l~~s~~t-r
PHONE: X22 - y5~~
ADRESS: C~9o! ~.,a ~~ t'-~Y~'.4 ~ .
Gp
After ever heavy rainfall forfirst 6 months following construction:
1. Check for and repair any channelization or erosion that has occurred in the filter strip. The level
spreader will fail if water exits from it as channelized flow.
2. inspect the level lip for settling, erosion, or concentrated flow.
Once a month and after every heavy rainfall (greater than 2 inches)
1. Inspect the forebay and along level spreader. Clean and make repairs. Look for:
- Sediment in forebay and along level spreader tip;
- Trash and/or leaf buildup.
- Scour, undercutting of level spreader.
- Settlement of level spreader structure (no longer level; you see silt down hill below level
spreader)
- Fallen trees on the level spreader.
- #57 stone washing downhill.
III. Once a year.
1. Remove any weeds or shrubs growing on level spreader or in swale.
I, ,hereby acknowledge that I am the financially responsible party for maintenance
of this impoundme . I ill perform them intenance as outlined above, as ~pya. rt of the Cerificate
Signature: r Date: - ' ~Q
I , ~~~~ ~ ~. `~¢~ ,ds , a Notary Public for the sate of ~tl . G ~ ,County of ~f~~~.:r.~~°~i o hereby
certify that ~ ~---. s personally appeared before me this i! day of j
200 °and acknowled a due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official se ,
,,.- -.
Vv s I'
4 ~ ~N
V ;
Seal ~~ t N ~ T ~ O~ My commission expires: ~~i~( iD~
:,
a ~ :~ v'rd
~~PU~t• tCr~,;
~ ~~'°.~
+~•. ~~~~ ~R,.
ff ~e~~.r.•, .„-ese

http://>maps.co.wake.nc.us/imaps/p1-intmap. asp?pin=1729029232&pine.
~-
Y~' G~u~ d~HC"1'NH CITY OP rtatEiott WAKE
.,;-
Stonewater
°arcel Number: 1729029232-000

REID:
0171811 Streets
! lakes
OWNERI: WOHLERS, CARL H 8
LINDA C ~ Parcels

ADDR1: 1200 KINGS GRANT 3ecunq $0fB8"
DR Zoos 8lVY

ADDR2: RALEIGH NC ~`eioa1tltO~0~
~~'" ~ sae}
27614-9353
Map created on 1/28/2008 12:07:42 PM.
Copyright 2008. City of Raleigh, Wake County.
ADDR3:
DEED BOOK:
DEED PAGE:
DEED DATE:
DEED ACRES:
BLDG VAL:
LAND VAL:
BILLING CLASS:
DESCRIPTION:
MAP NAME:
PIN NUM:
PIN EXT:
CITY:
TOWNSHIP:
YEAR BUILT:
SALEPRICE:
'.TYPE USE:
'DESIGN STYLE:
UNITS:
LAND CLASS:
ZONING:
OLD PARCEL
NUMBER:
ADDRESS
ST NUM:
ST MISC:
DIR PREFIX:
ST NAME:
ST TYPE:
DIR SUFFIX:
0 ~-.--=.~ 1733 ft
05553 Zoos caor orttws:
Cou~g~vida (xaom to
0198 sea}
4/1 /1993
1.84 ~ Wake Courrty
e
u
~
567844 o
r
ry
240000
INDIVIDUAL
L042 RIVER OAKS
SUB BM1988-837
172903
1729029232
000
BARYONS CREEK
1989
475000
6/16/1989
Single Family
Conventional
0
RESIDENCE-< 10
ACRES-HOME SITE
R-SOW
262-00000-0122
1200
KINGS GRANT
DR
of 1 1/28/2008 12:04 PM

July 2, 2007
2801 Sandia Drive
Raleigh NC 27607
Ian McMillan
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit Division of Water Quality
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Stonewater Subdivision 401 Permit revision and Restoration Plan
NOV-2007-PC-0241
DWQ Project No. 20041701
Wake County
Dear Ian Mc Millan:
The purpose of this letter is to submit a request for approval of the attached stream
restoration plan for impacted area of stream channel associated with the revised
Stonewater Subdivision 401 permit that Mr. Neal Floyd is submitting to your office in
connection with NOV-20070PC-0241.
We are in the process of requesting a revision to the previously approved 401 permit
for Stonewater Subdivision from the previously approved 120' of stream impact to 149.5'
which is less than the maximum threshold of 150'. This is an effort to address additional
impacts in excess of the requested revised 401 permit and bring the site into compliance.
Total impacts stream impacts are 180 feet. We would ask that you approve this stream
restoration plan in excess of the maximum stream impacts allowed by the 401 permit
knowing that the extra impacted stream area was a result of the severe erosion that
occurred during a heavy rain event (8" in a 4 hour period) and Wake County's
Environmental Services staff demand that Mr. Marshburn add rip rap to all the eroded
area in the stream and buffer to achieve immediate site stabilization. The additional area
was cleared during the installation of this rip rap.
Proposed Restoration Plan
The original construction plan called for a piped stream crossing of 100 feet plus
headwall wings and a 40 foot long dissipater required by Wake County Environmental
Services. In addition a heavy rain event occurred during the installation of the cross
drainage pipes and the subsequent stabilization efforts impacted another 36 feet for a total
impact of 180 feet Our plan is to revise the original permit ftom the approve 120 feet to
149.5 feet and restore the balance of the impacted stream to a natural stabilized channel.
We would propose a plan to return the 31 foot portion of the stream in excess of the
requested 149.5 feet to a stabilized channel naturally vegetated stream. The proposal is to
remove any rip rap from the stream channel in excess of the 149.5' requested impact and
to restore the stream banks and channel to a stabilized corridor to facilitate the passage of
aquatic life. The Wake County Environmental Services approved construction plan
requires a velocity dissipater for the twin RCP culvert pipes of 40 foot wide by 40 foot
long and 27 inches deep of class one rip rap. The current pipe crossing from outside the

edge of the upstream wing wall to the edge of the down stream headwall is 104 feet.
Adding the 40 foot dissipater from the invert out of the pipe (edge of head wall) would
bring the impact to 144 feet. The rip rap at that point is about 12"deep. The rip rap will be
removed from the channel for another 5 feet progressively being thinner until it is at the
elevation of the original stream channel bottom. This will be at a point within the revised
149.5 foot 401 permit. The channel from that point to the existing undisturbed channel
will be restored. Bio-degradable rolled erosion control matting installed below the water
level to temporally stabilize the area and prevent channel erosion until vegetation
establishes in the stream channel to stabilize the area. The bank side slopes will be
seeded with a native riparian seed mix and stabilized with a bio degradable coconut fiber
erosion control matting (North American Green C-350).The area will be monitored for
stabilization and corrective actions taken if any bank erosion occurs.
Summary:
We would ask that you approve this proposal to facilitate bringing this area into
compliance and stabilizing the stream channel. Considering the situation and the end
result of a stable section of stream we would ask for your approval of this restoration
plan. Any guidance for site compliance would be appreciated. Please let us know in a
documented response as to any issues you have with our restoration efforts.
Sincerely,
Jake Taylor, CPESC #3602
Pollution Monitoring Services Inc.
CC: Kirby Marshburn
Neal Floyd

Stonewater Subdivision Stream Impacts (site plan #2)
This site plan shows the roadway, NCDOT r/w, headwalls, riparian buffer, stream and
stream banks associated with the piped stream crossing at Stonewater Subdivision with
the 40' x40 `velocity dissipater and the limits of the requested revised 401 permit. This
also shows the areas of the stream and stream banks that are to be restored.
Scale is 1" = 30 feet.
o~a~~ c/~ sra~,r ~
180.81 tF STRBAM IupAC.r

Proposed new limits of impact
velocity dissipater
4 stream bank to be restored
evcrr oo' RiPARtAN BUFFER
~~ ~ ~
+~• ~.~
+~ ++~ /

June 4, 2007
2801 Sandia Drive
Raleigh NC 27607
Vicki Fuentes
Division of Water Quality
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Addendum to Stonewater Subdivision Restoration Plan
NOV-2007-PC-0241
DWQ Project No. 20041701
Wake County
Dear Vicki Fuentes:
The purpose of this letter is to submit a revision to the previous submission to the
response to NOV-20070PC-0241 addressing efforts to restore the Stonewater site to
stormwater compliance. After discussion with NC DWQ staff it has become evident that
part of the request could not be considered as it conflicted with DWQ policy.
The previous response for site compliance on Item # 4 on Notice of Violation #
2007-0241 was as follows:
Item# 4: The stream impacts beyond what was authorized in your 401 Water Quality
Certification, must be restored to the original pattern profile and dimension. Otherwise
you must request that your 401 Water Quality Certification be modified.
How Item # 4 is to be addressed:
• Mr. Neal Floyd is currently pursuing the requirements for the revised 404 permit
thru the Corp of Engineers and the revised 401 permit thru Division of Water
Quality staff for Mr. Marshburn. This request will be asking for revised maximum
stream impacts allowed. Miti a~payment review will be requested for any
additional impacts over the allowed maximum stream impacts.
• The 12 foot well easement impact to the upper stream channel has been returned
to the original profile and efforts to stabilize the area are in progress (see above).
Replanting of the buffer easement (approximately 18 trees) will have to wait until
this fall for survival. Currently volunteer trees are covering most of the area as the
well easement was abandoned over a year ago.
• The impacted stream and riparian buffer will be monitored for the next several
years to make sure the vegetation survives and is replanted if necessary, the level
spreaders function properly, and the area is stabilized.

After discussion with NC DWQ staff it has become evident that a request for the
partial mitigation for the 30 feet of impacted stream in excess of the maximum 150'
feet allowed by 401 permit approval would not be considered. Below is the proposed
revision to that response dealing with issues addressed in the first bullet:
Addendum:
Item # 4 states that the "The stream impacts beyond what was authorized in your 401
Water Quality Certification, must be restored to the original pattern profile and
dimension. Otherwise you must request that your 401 Water Quality Certification be
modified."
We are in the process of requesting a revision to the previously approved 401 permit
from the approved 120' of stream impact to 149.5' which is less than the maximum
threshold of 150'. Mr. Neal Floyd will be pursuing this revised permit with Mr. Ian
McMillan.
We would then propose a plan to return the 31 foot portion of the stream in excess of
the requested 149.5 feet to a stabilized channel naturally vegetated stream. The existing
stream channel has vertical walls with eroding banks as the stream is trying to resize
itself because of increased storm water runoffs. It would be impractical to return the
stream impacts to that design as it would not be stable and would continue to erode like
portions of the existing channel. The result would be continued stream decay and
sediment deposition in the stream channel.
DWQ allows stream restoration projects under Certification # 3495 to convert
unstable and degraded stream corridors to natural stable conditions. We understand that
this Certification does not usually apply to sites under violation, but we would propose
restoring the section of impacted stream channel to a more stable stream corridor than the
existing degrading upstream channel. The restoration of the stream channel would
involve a transition of width and bank slope from the approved impact stream area to the
existing stream corridor profile with a more stable channel design. This would not be to
the original profile and dimension of the original stream profile as it was unstable and
decaying. The end resulting restored channel in the impacted transition area would have a
wider flood plain with a sinuous vegetated stream channel and flatter bank slopes and
would remain stable in heavy storm events.
Currently the channel has rip rap in the stream bed for most of the impacted length. In
the 30 foot area upstream of the culvert headwall, rip rap will be removed manually to
below the water elevation with minimal disturbance to the newly re-established
vegetation. The stream banks have already been stabilized with matting and a riparian
seeding. In the down stream section of the impacted area below the headwalls rip rap will
be removed below the velocity dissipater. Rolled turf reinforcement matting (North
American Green C-350) cross vanes and log J-hook vanes would be incorporated into the
design as the channel is transitioned into the existing stream channel. We would prefer
installing offset rock vanes instead of the log vanes, but are unsure that you would allow
the use of rip rap to build these structures. The entire area will then be seeded with a

natural riparian seed mixture obtained from Mellow Marsh Farm. Any exposed area will
be reinforced with the C-350 matting which would have the same shear stress of class 2
rip rap. Log vanes would be installed over the matting to dissipate the stream flow and ad
sinuosity to the stream channel. This would improve the quality of that section of the
stream channel, slow the stream velocities and hopefully stop some of the downstream
incising of the stream channel. A small temporary rip rap check dam (several courses of
class 1 rip rap) would be placed at the downstream edge of the impacted area to help
stabilize the area until stream channel and bank vegetative growth is established. When
the stream bed is stabilized with deep rooted vegetation this in stream check dam would
be removed.
Summary:
We would ask that you approve this proposal knowing that the extra impacted stream
area was not planned but done as a result of the severe erosion that occurred during a
heavy rain event (8" in a 4 hr period) and Wake County's Environmental Services staff
demand that Mr. Marshburn add rip rap to all the eroded area in the stream and buffer to
achieve immediate site stabilization. The additional area was cleared during the
installation of this rip rap.
Mr. Marshburn did not plan the additional stream impacts and has gone to great effort
to bring the site into compliance. Considering the situation and the end result of a stable
section of stream we would ask for your approval of this restoration plan. Any guidance
for site compliance would be appreciated. Please let us know in a documented response
as to any issues you have with our restoration efforts.
Sincerely,
Jake Taylor, CPESC #3602
Pollution Monitoring Services Inc.
CC: Shelton Sullivan, NonPoint Source Assistance and Compliance Oversight Unit
Ian McMillan, 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Kirby Marshburn
Neal Floyd