The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20171600_Jurisdictional Determination_20160603{"a ; :;� Transportation May 27, 2016 Sarah Hair Wilmington Regulatory Field Office U.S. Army Coips of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 Re: Preliminary JD Request for Divisio►i6 Bridges, Dear Ms. Ilair: PAT McCRORY Govemor NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON Secretary o L�c�L�aML� ��,� � D � 2��6 1'RANSPpRTAT10 P RMlTT NG UNIT The North Carolina Departtnent of Transportation (NCDOT) is submitting thc enclosed preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) documentation for five bridge replacement projects tacated in Robeson, Columbus and Bladen Counties, NG The bridges are identified as the followicig State Transportation Improvement Projects (STIf'): B-5702, B-5699, B-5694, B-5707, and B-5692. NCDOT proposes to replace these bridges under a Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE). The following enclosures for each bridge site are included: completed PJD request form, wetland and stream data forms, vicinity map, project location map, topographic map, and jurisdictional features maps. The project limits have been delineated by Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), and they will be coordinating with you to arrange for a site inspection. Thank you for your assistance and we look forward to meeting with you onsite. Sincerely, . �'t�� G�t�� Gordon E. Cashin Environmental Program Consultant Attachments: PJD forms, vieinity maps, topographic maps, jurisdictional features maps Cc: Amy Chapman, NCDWRNC Transportation: Letterhead Style Guide �Nothing Compares�..` S�ate oF North Carolina � Departmen[ of Tn�uportalion � PDL'A-Natural Enviromnent Seclion 1020 Birch Ridge Drive, 27610 � I S98 Mail Service Center � Raleigh. Nortti Carotina 27699-1598 919-707-6000 T 919-212-5785 F A. I::, � Jurisdictional Dete�rr�ination Request � �� PAR��I. INFOfl2MATION �tt'�et f�ddt'eSS: Bridge No. 435 on SR 2101 over Jackson Swamp Clty, State: North Carolina COUritj': Robeson D1PeCt10riS: Bridge No. 435 on SR 2101 in Robeson County, NC Parcel Index Nutnber(s) (PIN): NA fl� Q�JE S']C OI2 INFORIVIA'�' I Ol� Name: Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address � : NCDOT - Natural Environment Section 1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 919-707-6000 Select one: � I am the current property owner. ❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant2 ❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase � Other, please explain. NCDOT PI20P�laTY OWNEI2 IN�+'O�NdA'TYON Name: Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address3: NCDOT- Natural Environment Section 1598 Maii Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 ❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data) 1 if available Z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form 3 If available Version: December 2013 Page 3 Jurisdictional Determination Request D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION`' I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Property Owner (please print) Date Property Owner Signature E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE Select One: � I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein. This request does include a delineation. � I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein. This request does NOT include a delineation. � I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or absence of WoUSs and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation. � I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoLTS on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a sutvey plat). � I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not include a survey plat). 4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E. 5 Waters of the United States Version: December 2013 Page 4 F. ❑✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request ALL REQUESTS Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must cleat•ly depict the boundaries of the area of evaluation. � Size of Property or Project Area 4_5 acres � I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable. G. JD REQUESTS FROM CO1oTSULTANTS OR AGENCIES (1) Preliminary JD Requests: � Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6. � Project Coordinates: 34.6301 Latitude -7$'$774 Longitude Maps (no larger than l 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay: � ❑✓ 0✓ u � Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, to�vns Aerial Photography of the project area USGS Topographic Map Soil Survey Map Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps) 6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008 Version: December 2013 Page 5 Jurisdictional Determination Request Delineation Information (when applicable)�: Wetlands: � Wetland Data Sheets8 ❑� I- ❑✓ Upland Data Sheets Landscape Photos, if talcen Tributaries: � USACE Assessment Forms � Other Assessment Forms (when appropriate) Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes: ■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify) ■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches ■ Locations of photo stations ■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources (2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation: � Project Coordinates: Latitude Maps (no larger than l 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Longitude Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns Aerial Photography of the project area USGS Topographic Map Soil Survey Map � Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan, previous delineation maps) ' 1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at: , http://www.usace.armv.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Re�ulatorvProsramandPermits/re� supp.asqx Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at: http://portal.ncdenr.ora/c/document librarv/aet file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&�roupld=38364 and, htto://www.saw.usace.armv.mil/Portals/59/docs/resulatorv/publicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf $ Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetiand data sheet for each wetland/community type. Version: December 2013 Page 6 Jurisdictional Determination Request Delineation Information (when applicable): Wetlands: � Wetland Data Sheets9 ❑ 1— I� Upland Data Sheets Landscape Photos, if taken Tributaries: � USACE Assessment Forms � Other Assessment Forms (when appropriate) Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes: • All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify) • Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches • Locations of photo stations • Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only) �❑ 1— Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos Form(s)") Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s), adjacency, etc. to navigable waters. 9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type. Version: December 2013 Page 7 PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: Chris Rivenbark, NCDOT, 1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699- 1598 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CESAW-RG- D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: TIP: B-5702 Description: Bridge No. 435 over Jackson Swamp (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) . State: NC County/parish/borough: Robeson City: Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 34.6301°N, Long. -78.8774° W . Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: Jackson Swamp Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non-wetland waters: 155 linear feet: 50 width (ft) and/or acres. Cowardin Class: Riverine Stream Flow: Perennial� Wetlands: 0.3 acres. Cowardin Class: Forested Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as.Section 10 waters: ' Tidal: N/A Non-Tidal: N/A E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): � ❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date: ❑ Field Determination Date(s): 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the `permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) o� other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested ,an approved JD for the acfivity, the permit applicant iS hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a pe'rmit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps �has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity�in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as'soon as is practicable; `(6) accepting a pe'rmit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD �constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see�33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, �it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the, Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the subject project site, and �identifies all aquatic features,on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: . 2 SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all.that apply - checked ifems sFiould be included in case:�le-and, whe�e checked and �re uested, appropriately reference sourcesw.below): ; � � Maps, plans,�p(o#s or plat submitted�by o`r`on�`behalf of the � a plicanUconsultant . Data sheets prepared/submittetl by or on.,betialf of the - � p IicanUconsultant �_ � .. .� - � � � . � 0 O_ffice concurs with data sheets%delineation: report. � Office does not concur with�data `s.heets/delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the .Corps:,, ' - .F: �� . � Corps:�avigable waters' study: ',"_� �,�"�" _ . .. ._ ' ' Q U.S. Geological_Survey.Hydrologic At(as:'� _ D�USGS NHD.,data. � - � � � ? 0 USG.S 8 and 12 digit FiUC.ma�p`s,';� �~�.e`�� unn Nnf�-4,Pas+ �,Nw�.�a��vrt; U.S. Geological Survey map,(s).� Cite scale &�,quad name: I: a`1 , USDA Natural Resources,Conservation�Sejvice Soil Survey � Citation: �.' � � �. � - - - , ' � � � National wetlands inventory map(s): _Ci#e nam�e: , � 0 StatelL'ocal wetland inventory tnap(s): ;;y -' � 0 FEMAIFIRM rnaps: � �`. . , '�.� �� `'' ' ; ��100-yea'r Floodplain Elevation is: '. (Na#ional,Geodectic Vertical Datum ; . of_ 1929) ; . � . : , , : r�. -. . . Rhotograph5:�0 Aerial,(Name_&-Date):�-ad�'por'�;Other �(Name & , Date):- � . � .. - - : 0 Previous detemiination(s). File n_o. and .date of response letter: � �] Other info�mation (pleas.e' specify):. � � ' . � , . , . . r MPORTANT NOTE: The 'informafion recorded on:fhis form tias not � veri�ed tiv ihe �Co�ps �and:stiould .not be relied upon i � ��,..�.._.:,....::;.:,...,.. , , , - . , , , .�, _ , ,- _ Signature and date,of R'egulatory Project Manager (REQUIRED) � a � _ _ , � �,�� S' na;ture'and date�of rson re_quest'ing inary J0 (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the'signature is impracticable) Estimated Longitud Cowardin amount of Site Name Latitude e Class aquatic Class of aquatic resource resource in review area wA 34. N 10° �g g��o PFO 0.2 acre(s) non-section 10 — wetland W wC 34.6��301° �g g��4° PFO 0.1 acre(s) non-section 10 — wetland W � 34.6N293° �g 8772� PFO <0.1 acre(s) non-section 10 — wetland W SA 34. NO3° �g g��3° RIVERINE 150 linear feet non-section 10 — non-wetlan W °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W � acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N _ °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal °N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal WETU4ND DE'iERMINATION DATA FORM --Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regton ProjecUSfle; B"�� C(tylCourriy: Robeson Samppng Date: 21g�2��s Appiicanf/Owner. NCDOT 5tate: NC Sampling Pofnt: Wc3 up investigator(s): ESl Stuart Bryan, Jeff Harbour Sectton, Township, Range: `� Landform (hiiislope, terrace, etc.): SlOpe Lo�at relief (concave, convez, none): COnvex Slope (°�)� �'S Sub�egion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 34.63014 Long: '78.87740 Dalum. WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Bib� NWI Gassificatton: none Are climalic / hydrologic conditions on the s(te typlcal tor this time of year7 Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegefation , 5oil '_ , or Hydrology signiAcantly dislurbed7 Are 'Normal Circumstances" present7 Yes X No Are VegetaUon , Soil , or Hydrology naturally prablematic? (It needed, explain sny answers fn Remarks.} SUMMARY OF FINDING5 — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Irnportant features, etc. HydrophyUc Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soll Present7 Yes No x Wetiand Hydrolagy Pfesent? , Yes No X Raad shoulder on bridge approach HYDROLOGY Is the Sampled Area wtthln a Wetiand? Yes No x WA� W C JWD WeQand Flydrology Indlcators: - Secondarv Indicalors (minimum ot two reauiredl Primarv Indicatdrs (minimum of one is reaulred: check all that aoolvl ___ ❑ Surface Soil C�acks (B6} �Su�iace Waler (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna {B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave 5urtace (B8) MEgh Water Table (A2) Q Marl Deposits (B15f (LRR U) Drainage Paflems (B10) � 5aluratfon (A3) Q Hydrogen Sullide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (818) � Waler Marks (Bi) Q�T Oxidized Rhizospheres alang L{ving Raats (C3j ❑ Dry-Season Water Tahle (C2j �Sedlmeat Deposits (62) u Presence oi Reduced Iron (C4} ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Ddft Oeposils (B3) Q Recent Iron Reduciton fn 711led Soils (C6) ❑ Saturailon Vfsible on Aedat Imagery (C9) [1 Algal Mal or Crust (B4} ThIn Muck SuKace {C� ❑ Geamorph(c Pasilion (D2) a Iron Depos(ts (95} Other (Explafn In Remarks) ❑ Shal�ow Aquitard (D3) Q InundaUon Visi�le on Aerial Imegery (B7) [] FAC-Neutral Test (b� a Water-Stained Leaves (69) II Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U) Fietd Observations: Surtace Water Present? Yes No x Depth (Inches): Waier Table Present? Yes , No x Depth (fnches}: • Saturation Presenl7 Yes No x Depth (inches); Wetland Hydrology Prosant? Yes Na x includes ca Ilia frin e Describe Recorded Data (stream geuge, monttaring well, aerial"photos, previous inspections), i( available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gu1f Coastat Ptain Regfon— Versinn Z.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 2�� j °% Cover �pecies7 S�atus �, P(nus laeda 4 Yes FAC Z Plafanus oaidentalis 3 Yes FACW 3. 4. 5, 6, 7. B. � = Total Cover 50% af total cover: 3•5 20� oi tota� cover: �_4 �autlnalShr�¢i Stratum (Plot sfze: ) 1. 2, 3. 4. ' , 5. 6. 7. S. � = Total Cover 50°,6 of total cover: 20°� of total cover: Herb Stretum (Plot slze: 20�c20 T �, Festuca sp. ` � 1 Yes NI 2. 7araxacum oHic(nate 1� Yes FACU 3. Fragaria virglnlana 1 Yas FACU ' Q. Alllum canadense � 1 Yes FACU 5. fi. , , , , . 7. 8. 9. . 10. 11. 12. 4 = Tolal Cover 50� of total cover. � 20% of lotal wver: a•B Woody �ne Stratum (Plot size: 2�20 ) 1, 5milex bona-nax 1 Yes FAG 2. � 3. 4. 5. � = Tola! Caver 50°k of folal cover: ��5 20°� flf lotal cover: �•2 Remarks; (If observed, Ifst morphofogfca! adaplaUons below). Bare ground present, mowed maintained roadside Sampling PoInC W ^� �P Number of Dominant SpeGes That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number at Dominan! Specles Across A!I Strata: 3 �q� � {B) Percent of Daminant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 43°h t,q�g� Total % Cover oi: Muiilolv hv; OBL species x 1 = FACW species 3 x 2= 8 FAC species $ x 3= 15 FACU species 3 x 4=�Z UPL species x 5 = ColumnTotals: 1� (A) 33 {B) Prevatence Index = B!A = 3 Hyd�ophytic VegeWtton Indicators: ❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophyltc Vegetation a 2- dominance Test is >50°k ❑ 3- Ptevalence Index is s3.Q' a Prohfematfc Hydrophytic VegetaUon� (Expla(n) �Indicators ot hydr(c soil and welland hydroiogy must be presenl, unless disturbed or pro6lemalie. Dafinit(ons of Four Vegetatton 5trata: Tree'— Woody plants, exctudtng vines, 31n. (7.6 cm) or more tn diameter at breasl height (DBH), regardtess ot height. 5aplinglShrub — Woody piants, e�cciuding vines, less than 3 In. DBH and greater lhan 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. He�b —All herbaceous (non-woody} plants, regardless of size, and woody'plants less Ihan 3,29 fl lall. Woody vine — A!t woody vines greater Ihan 3.28 ft in heighG Hydrophytie VegetaUon Prssent? Yes No x US Army Corps of Eng(neets Atfantic and Gulf Caastal Plain Region — Verslon 2.0 SO{L Sampling Point: Wc3 up Proflle DescripNon: (Describe to the depth noedod lo document the Indicator or conflrm the absence o! Indfcators.) Deplh Matrix Redox FeSt re linchesl Color (rnolstl � Calor (molstl �_ Tyoe Lo�r Textu e Remarks 0-7 10YR 313 100 60 MS Loamy sand 40% uncoated 7-18 10YR 513 35 Loemy sand iOYR 3/1 35 l.oemy sand 10YR 5/4 30 �oamy saad �T e: C=Concentrapon. D=De lellon. RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grafns. =LocaQon: PL=Pore Un(n . M=141atrix. Hydria 5op Indiaatars: (Applicable to a1l LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators ior Pro6lemadc Hydrlc Solis': II Histosat (A1) D Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) jLRR S, T, Uy 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0) �Histfc Epipedon (A2) � Thin Da�k 5uriace (S9} (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black HIsUc (A3) Loamy Mucky Minerai (Ft) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (P16) (autstde MLRA 150A,8) L] Hydragen Sulflde (A4) D Loainy Gleyed Metrix (F2) �-r--1 Pledmont Floodplaln Soils (F19) (LRR P, S,'f) �StretlHed Layers (A5) Depleied Matrix (F3) � u Anomalous B�Ight Loamy Softs (F20} Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1538) �5 cm Mucicy Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depteted Dark 5udace (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U) � Redoz Depressions (F8) � Very Shallow Dark 5urface (TF12) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, 7) ,[] Marl (F10) (LRR U} D Olher (Explaln (n Remarksj D Depleted Be16w Dark Surface {At1) D Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLftA t51) !] Thiek Dark Surface (Al2) � Iran-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, � 'Indieators of hyd�ophylic vegetatian and �Coasl Prairie Redox (A78) (MlRA i50A) Umbdc Surface (F13) jLRR P, T, U) wetlartid hydrolagy mtsst be present, Sandy Mucky M(neral (51) (LRR O, Sy � Della Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless d(sturbed or problemali�. D Sandy Gteyed MaUix (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MI.RA i5aA,1506) j] Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain 5oils (F19) (MLRA 149A) D Stripped Mattiz (S6} Momafous Brfght Loamy Sofis (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, i53D) � Dark Surface (S� (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrlctive Layor(if obsanred): .�YPe: � . Oepth (Inches): kiydrio Soll Present7 Yes No X Remarics: ` roadbed fill; soil very disturbed US Army Corps of Engineers AtianNc and Gutf Coastal P1aln Reglon — Versien 2.0 WETi�1ND QETERMINA710N DATA FORM — Atlantic and GuOf Coastal Plain Region ProJecUStte: B"�02 CIty/Counly: Robeson 5ampling Date: y9�2016 AppficanUOumer: NCDOT 51ate� NC Sampling Poin4 wC3 Wet Investlgator{s): ESI, Stuart Bryan, Jeff Harbour Section, Townshtp, Range; Landfortn (hillslope, terrace, elc.): �oodplain Loral retief (concave, canvex, none): concave Slope (°�}: 1"5 5ubregfan (LRR ar MLRA): P Lat 34.63094 ��9; -78.87740 Datum: WGS 84 Sop �Aap Unit Name: Bibb NWI classification: PFO Are cAmatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lfine of yeatl Yes x No (If no, explaln in Remarks.) Are Vegetation . Sop , or Hydrology slgni(fc.antly d(sturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present7 Yes x No Are Vegetation , Sofl , or Hydrology naturally problematic7 (I( needed, explaln any answe�s in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF F(NDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations� transects, important features, etc. Hydrophylic Vegetation Presenl7 Yes x No !s the Sampled Area Nydric 5011 Present7 Yes X No yyithin a Wotland? Yes X No Wetland.Hydrology Present7 Yes X No Recent heavy rainfall resulting in high water conditions � VV � � W C � W O o..11 5 a� +v��., �' i v P� i nL 5 t�Q �-'� w 2��(s�.�.� HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indlcators: Secondarv Indicators_(minimum oJ two reauiredl Primarv Indicatora (mfnimum e[ ene Is reautred: check all that aaqlvl _ _ II Suriace SoU Cracks (B6) �Suriace Water (A1� � Aquattc Fauna (613} , Sparsely Vegetated Concave Suriace (98} � High WaterTabie (A2) II Marl Deposfts (815} (LRR Uj � Drainage Padems'(Bi0) �� SaluraUon (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ✓ Moss Trim Llnes (816) Wate� Marks (B1) IIt� Oxidized Rhizospheres along Llving Raots (C3) }(�� Dry-Seasan Water Table (C2) �Sedimenl Deposits (B2) tu—t Presence of Reduced lron {C4}, J..E CrayBsh Burrows (C8) Ddfl Deposits'(B3) u Recenl Iron R,educlion in Tltled Solls (C6} II Saturatlon Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9} Q Atgal Mat or Crust (64) � Thin Muck Surface (C7) j]✓ Geomor�hlc Positlon (D2} Q Iran Deposlts (B� Olher (Explain in Remarks} L] Shallow Aquftard (D3} a Inundation Vsible on Aedal Imagery (B7) , II✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5j Q 1Nater-5tained Leaves (B9) � � Sphagnum moss (OB} (LRR T, Uj Flald Observatlons: . Surface Water Presenl7 Yes x No Depth (tnches): � Water Table Presenl? Yes • X No Depth (inches)� su�taee Saturailon Present7 Yes x No Depth (inches): surface Wetland Nydro[ogy Present? Yes X No in�ludes ca Illa fri e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monftoring wetl, aerfal phatos, prevfous lnspecttons}, If availahle:' Remarks: US Army Corps oi Engineets Atlanlic and G�It Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 V�GETATION (Four Strata} — Use scientific names of plants, Tree Stratum (Plot'size: 3Qi�0- } ° v Snecies7 5tatus 1. Tazodlum dislichum 25 YBs �BL q. Nyssa biflora 10 Yes ' OBL 3. Ace� rubrum � 4 No FAC 4. � 5. . 6. 7. B. 39 = Total Cover 50�0 of total cover: � g•5 20°% of total cover. 7•8 5aaiir�q��ib St�tum (Plot size: 30x30 � � �: Nyssa biftora 3 Yes OBL 2. Acerrubrum • 2 Yes ,FAC'` 3. � ' a. , , . . 5. � 6. , 7. , 8. 5 = Total Cover Sampling Point: w� wel Number of Dominant SpecJes Tha( Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A) Total Number af Dominant Species Across AlI Strata: 7 (8) Petcent oi aominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �� (AIB) Tota�,% l;aver of: Mull(plv bv: OBL species z 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU specles x A = UPL. species x 5 = Calumn Totats: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = L✓,1 1- Rapid Test far Hydrophyllc Vegetatton ❑ 2 - Dominance Test Is >50%' ' II 3-•Preyalence index is s3.0' a Prablematic WydrophyUc Vegetation� (Explain) � 5096 of toial cover. 2•5 20°� of total cover: 1 � � Nerb Stratum (Plat size: 30x30 � , 'Indi�ators of hyddc saii and wailand hydrology must �. Arundtnaria gigantea ' � 1 Yes FACW be present, unless distu[hed or problematEc. 2, Fersea bor6oNa_ 1 Yes FACW, Detinitions o( Four Vegetadon Strata: 3• � � Tree — Woody'plants, excludfng vines,3 fn. (7.6 cm) or q. � more in diameler at breast hefght (DBH), regardiess o1 5. � , height. ' 6. ` SaplinglShiub -- Wondy plants, exctuding vines,, less � � � � ffian 3 in. �BH and gieater than 3.28 ft{i m) taiL B• Herb—All herbaceous (narrwoody) plants, regardless g, ' � � ' � ot size, and woody plants tess than 3.28 R tatl. ��• , , Woody vine —AI[woody vines grealer than 3.28 ft in 11. hefght. � 12. ' , x = Total Cover 56°r6 of iotal cover. � 20°� of total cover: �� Woodv Vine Strafum (Plot size: 30x3U �� , Sm➢ax bona-nox � 1 Yes FAC 2: 3. . 4. " 5. , � � � ' ' � �' � ' �� = Totai Cover , � 5096 of lotal cover fl•� 2d°� of totai cover: 0•2 Remarks; (If obsenred, lfst morphotogical adaptallons helaw). US A{my Corps of Engineers Hydrophytic Vegetatlon � Present7 Yes x No Atianl(c and Guif Caastal Piain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Polnt: wc3 wet Proflla Descrlptlon: (Descrlbe to the'depth needad to document the fndicator or coniirtn the absenee of Indlcators.) Depth MaMx Redox Fealures linchesl _ Cotor (mo(st1 '�_ Coior (mols� � Type Loci Texfure � Remarics 0-6 10YR 311 100 �oamy sand 8-20 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 5/6 1Q Sand 'T e: C=Concentration �D=De letlon, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Gralns. �Location: PL=Pore Linin M=Matrix. Hydrtc Soil Indfcators: (Appllcabla to all LRRs, unless otherwlse noted.) Indieators for Problematic Hydric SoIIs': D HI§tasol (A7) r] Polyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR S, T, U} 1 cm Muck (A9} (LRR Oj •� Hlstic Eplpedon (A2) � Thln Dark Surtaca {S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck.(A10) (LRR 5) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucfry Mlneral (F1) (LRR O� T� Reduced Vertfe (F1B) (outsida MLRA 15oA,B► Hydrngen Sulfide (A4) D Loamy Gleyed Matrtx (F2) u Piedmont Flaadplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, §, Ty Stratifled Layers (A� Depteted Matrix (F3) � Anornalous Bdghl Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1838� �5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (AB) (!RR U) � Redox Depressions (F8) �T1 Very Shallow Dark Suriace (TF12) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, Y} ,Q Mad (F10) (LRR U) y;� Other {Exptain In Remarks) D✓ Depleted Betow Darfc Surface (A11) � Depteted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151y � Thick Dark 8urface (Al2) n Iran-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 'tndlcators of hydrophyt(c vegetapon and �Coast Praide Redoz (A18) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surtace (Fi3) {LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, Sj � De11a Ochrtc (F1 �(MLRA 151) , unless disturbed or prablematic. � 5andy Gleyed Matrtx (S4) �] Reduced VeRlc (F78) (MLRA 150A,15o6) �Sandy Redox {S5) i�—{1 Pied�mont Floodplain Sails (F79) (MLRA 149A) Slripped Matrix (Sfi) J_i Anomalous Bdght Loainy Solls (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 153D) D✓ Dark Surface {S� (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrict(ve Laye� pf observed): , Type: • Depth {inches}: Hydrtc Soll Presont7 Yes X No Remarics: � US Army Corps of Englnee�s Ailantic and Gulf Coastat Piain Reglon — Version 2.0 NC DW �tream Identification Form Vcrsion 4.11 Date: a q t� P�ajecUSite: �� S�%D o� Evaluator: J, ��D� County: R,�,eso� Total Points: � � Stream Datermtnation (circl 5tream Is afleastlntenn;ttent Ephemeral Intermftten erenn if a J9 or rennia! if z 30 • A. Geomor halo Subtotal = i� Absent Uifeak 18� Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 3. In-channel slructure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, /„1 1 ri te- ool se uence ' L-�� 4. ParticEe sizs of stream substrate 0 � 5. Active/relict fiood lain 0 � 6, pepositional bars or benches o 1 7. Recent alluvial deposits fl � 8. Headcuts 1 9. Grade controf 0 0.5 10. Natural valley o �•� 11. Second or greaier order channel No = 0 arlificial ditches are not rated; see discusslons in manuak B. H drola Subtotal= � 12. Presence of Baseflow � � 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria � 14. Leaf litter �• � 15. Sediment on planls or debris 0 0.5 18, Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 17. Soif-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 C. Biolo Subtota{ = 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 i9. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and a6undance) 0 1 21_ Aquatic Mollusks � 22. Fish 0 �.$ 23. Crayfish 0.5 24. Amphibians d .5 25. Algae �•� Z6. Wetland plants in sVeambed FACW = 0.75; 'perennlal streams may atsa be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Sketch: � c°"" ��- � � .�-- �� por� �� Laticude:3 �, �y 3 (�� Long(tude: " �B�g?'� Other e.g. Quad Name: �L� �� 0 � � 1 1 1 =0 0 4 3 3 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 �� 8- s�oa sa USACE Albtt DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map) ;,�,; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET �, f r Providc tbc fol[owing informntion for thc strenm rcnch undcr assessment: 1. Applicant's name: �1� ii OT 3. Date oFevaluation: 07�4�/�0 5. Name of stream: ��.t�CS o+� Su��M(� 7. Approximate draina�e areu: � Sg. Mi �S 9. Length of reach evaluated: SD � 2. EvAluator's nnme; J. �i�Dcl�� 4. Time of evuluution: �D; 0 � G. River basin• LuA1 �D�'1 8. Stream order• -� 10. County: f�3�0'� 11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrecs. 12. Subdivision name (if any): N%� Letilude (ex 34 67231?): 3- t,(� 3 0 3 Longitucfe (ex -77 556611): ��'� 773 Method location determincd (circle): GPS o She Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Qther GIS Othcr t3. Location of reach under evaluation (note nea y roads and landmarks and attach� map �� entifying stream(s) location): G vw.d�.� �n M a�t c ti►.� M,' I I � ad � � �e �s,d�n �a.�.�l�, N�- 14. Proposed chnnnel work (i I5. Recent wcather condition 16. Site conditions At time of 17. ldentify any special wnterway classifications kno�vn: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Hnbitat �Trout Wnters _Outstunding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters �Water Suppty Wate�shed (t-IV) I8. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the valuation point? YES �O !f yes, estimate the water surface area: l9. Does chunncl nppenr on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channal uppenr on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO 2l. EstimAled watershed land use: % Resid$ntial �% Commercial �% Industria! �O,% Agricuttural � �% Forested �� % Clenred ! Logged _% Other ( ) � — 22. Bunkfull width: 3 v 23. 9ank height (from bed ta top of bank): � 24. Channel slope down center of streum: ✓lat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4°io} _Modetute (4 to 10°/a) _Steep {>10%} 25. Chnnnel sinuosity: Strai�ht _Occusiana) bends �equent meander _Very sinuous �Braided chnnnel lnstructions for completlon of �vorksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrnin, ve�etation, stream classification, etc. Every charncte�istic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to enclt characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores shoufd reflect an overall ussessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explunntion in the comment section. Where there are obvious chunges in the charecter of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into u forest), the strenm may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separpte form used to evnluate each reach. The total score ussigned Io a stream reuch must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Totnl Score (fram reverse): `�`� Comments: Evaluator'sSignnturc �' Dntc 1�d� Es This chunnel cvalunti n orm is intendcd to bc used only as a guidc to assist landotivners and cn �ronmentsl profcssionnls in gathering the dnta r ired by thc United Stntcs Army Corps of Engineers to mnke a prcliminnry assessment of strenm qunlity. The totnl score resulting irom the completion of this form is subjecl to USACE anprovAl und does not imply n purticular mitigntion ratio or requiremen� Form subject to change - version 06iO3. To Comment, please calf 914-876-8441 x 26. � � � 2 3 4 � S U v� 6 �' - a; � 8 9 l0 ll � l2 N '"� 13 � � 14 H v� 15 16 � 17 � � p l8 d � 19 20 � �' 23 � .__._ O 22 Aa�" 1 23 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET C`,HAR.ACTFR:ISTiCS �COREC�ION PO]NT RA.�tC4E � C�oastalJ Piedmont Mountain ---� _. _�-__------ __-------..__ - . ______ -- --__ �.---_�_ Presence of ilow / persisient pools in streum 0 5 0 4 0 5 _ no Elow_or saturation __ Oystron�flow _ max�ointsl__. �.,___�__ Evidence oC p»st human alteration p 6 0 5 0 5 T extensrve alteration_= Oino alterat�on = max�oints� ��__._ . --- -__ _ Ripuriun zone 0 6 0 4 0 S _ (no buffer = 0; conti�uous�wide buffer = ma� points _ Evidence of nutrient or chemicul discharges 0 5 4 4 0 4 _ �extensiye dischar�es =_O�no dischnr�;cs -_max �aints�_ __ ---.� � __ _ _ _...__�._-- ---- -- Groundwater dischArgc 0 3 0 4 0 4 Sno dischar�e = O�s�prin�sisee�s�wetlands�etc_= m�oints Presence ofadjncent floodplain 0 4 ` 0 a a 2 __.,(no floodPlain -_Oiextensive fiood�lam_ max�oints�____ .._.._�___ Entrencl�ment % i]oadpluln nccess 0 5 0 4 0 2 dee �entrenched - 0; frequent.floodin�= max naints�__ Presencc of adjacent wetlnnds p 6 0 4 0 2 __(no wedands fl; ia�e adjacent �vetEands.� max points� __ � __+ Chnnnel sinuosity 0 5 0 4 0 3 �c�ctcnsive channelization - 0; natural meander = max points) Sediment input 0 5 0 4 0 4 _ eMensiye de op sition= 0; littte or no sediment_ max.points�_ Size & diversity of channel bcd substrate tiA* 0 4 0 5 (fine, homo�:enous = 0; lar�e2 diyerse sizcs = max points _____ _ Evidcnce of cl�unnel incision or widening 0 5 0 4 0 5 �dee�� incised� Oistable_bed & banks - max_points _ Presence of major hank failures fl S� � 0 5 0 5 _�severe erosion = 0; no erosian, stable banks = maxpoints Root depth und density on banks � Q 3 0 4 0 5 (no visible roots = 0 dense roots throu tout _ max points Impact by agriculture, ]ivestock, or timber production � 5 0 4 0 5 {substantial imPact -0; no evidence = max points Presence af riffie-poo[/ripple-pool complexes (no riffles/ripples orpools = 0; well-develo�ed s max points� 0 3 0 5 0 6� Habitut complexity 0 6 0 G Q G 'li, ttle or no habitat =_03 fre_guent, varied habituts_ =max poin�s) Canopy coverAge over streambed 0 5 0 5 0-- 5 (no shading ve�etation = 0: continuous cano = max oints Substrnte embeddedness �A° 0 4 0 4 �_,�d$e�lv embedded = 0; loose structure = max�__ � Presence of streAm invertcbrntes {see page 4) � �� p S 0 5 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t��pes = max ints Presence of amphibians � _� no evidence = 0; common numerous t es � max�ointsl _ 0 4 0 4 0 4 A^_.__. _., �._. _.--,�----_ ._..._..,. _ � P _ . __._�.____... Presence of fish p 4 0�l Q 4 _�no evidence = 0; common, numerous lyPes =- max points) . Evidence oPwildlife use 0 6 0 5 0 5 no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = m�oints�� ,T____ __.. Totpl Points Possiblc I00 100 100 TOTAIa SCORE (also entec on first page} * These chnracteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. � ^� � �� SCOR� � � � 3 � _3 � � � � � 5 `� .� . � r �, , f -� �r ��;. i*t., t �"� , �T _��j�'. . •`,'� _ � r: :q - ,,.':= lY i r�' ��y' � J:r1T[�1S • y� � � � 1�� ` a�;� , ♦ � i ,,: " y ;��-: fas* . ' j �. �, � . r �.ti' j�y ' � toactc,,;, . , Z,� ..` TKanz r � � � � � ''.� , . � , � ,.? n` ^; ,, �,,� , �} . �. +'�'�" .�3J � `� � °. ._..�, , �-; � ..... . -«�_ -,a ; --" �._.... . _1 . . . . .� " ~t -._.��Y . _..�_. , . � . ' �m`e9t' ��i m`^.+-. , '�_�� " � Y�•" , ��.� • � : , ��`� ��'*� -�` '�,�! � � '�+ � � " �� . �� , -�- "C r _ '` � - , � � � t ` . , \�,?�f � f .+i 1 �;3 �^ �;, '� � '_ �-,,,�y ',�_4f; � � � � •� �,i , , y �', tw. Y .. 5 • � , � 1 • '* . `� J,�". i __— .. � � � � ' M1``;�Northea�st Lumbetton '� -- •� Tar Heel � �, � �� . � L .�s! � * t� � i ,,�, +; ''�,`; � � { � . � • �' _ _. ' , } �, � . � � �n � � � �' �': °-; . .,,�,,,,w,,} - -_ . . ..� . � . , . � � � 3: r� ' _ ; - _ _. - �.ti �- , - ,,� � � , �"`" � - � _ _ � '4x .. ; � � .� . ��W�,� ' � � a� � s � . �' � �M1 * � �i � �• ' �-� t �M ' " ;i{ ��. a �� - .. � J � �y �"a-,�.ti:� . . � '� T � Jl1 �1�i.�,.�' �.. , .. C � ;r� _. . a, ..� � �_ �,,____. _—_�L,_'` - - • E � . .: j� , �,.,,.;.,.... � k ___ . _. _.� , ,. . � �.. � �+i,. j �i .. . .. �.,.-f-sti �� . p�^.' - � ,... .5 S o� � � � ,+, � , i �-.•iI�!.,� . - � . y�'. t � .�'� aT v; J� '. • . :� ; �� # �� ,-�° �` �� • ��,,. .. �;% � � y�-' � � ;., " . � ,-�, � '. � � � �l.;i?i, r e ' . ,. �„'� _ ti"t'1.�.'"'�,,,.; "'��..,, '� �,r^. � -4..'�?' �� :t�� .�>� Y� a .� ._r� : °..� S7 � �i ,i+i C s . � . ` n q� ' "' Com Y �� . `� - ,,. `- �.i ,� � S�Ppt�•y .ra ' ' F �'`t _j . . '�, - . � ` , . . �,� - . � ` .. � � � �, �.� r� � ''.� . �- w , � ', . .� � �- . � . , , � . ,. - _ . ... . , a • �. .�� , , �ti , 4 , � � ._.� ._ _ _ �, . ,9 - , j \ _ _'* f +' ,� 4 4 , � •e ./ / ' �/ ,�%a1 � . .. ., t o -. �r � '4i _ <.� �...9 .�,. � [G� r"".°"r '��I � . � v ' , �► /;1A1 T�;� ,. . *q j, �.�� M �� . �'es*'� • ' ' `.-`, ,�, p � �," I ' �' � Soutyheast Lu.mbetr'ton � � " �' � ��' I � _ ��. , , , � . , , � � , . � .r. 3v , �Y� ~ ' . � * �. , _ : A � �~�� . - � �,�;�� _ /'' .� t� „ � 4 F �` � � r � . . r ! � a :i � � 4:� �. . 1 T.� � '.� ...} . � �, SieploK � �t -�,. .. �"�.. '�. �,;� Bladenboro .�� _ (ti , ; . �q.d. Ch ,x .. � c �'` ' � ,,, � � �, �_ .�. . ? ..�_ _. j''�L �.�... '� .. a Project Study Area � 3 - -� ; r *,.� � - � .,,,� �, . o i aoo 2 000 '` /,' '. . ��,y y ,.,,�.�.,�r- �-.-."' i ... .» .,w � " , � � � A f .,, "' �."� w Feet �. '� 3 � � � � � '}" � i, ,� -a, +�' � ��y` t �'�' »w ^", . � Sources.2011 Nahonal Geographic Society/ESRI. � � �� - '�' a�� '�.� f '� �.y�. y .- i-cubed seamless USGS quadrangles (Northeast `� . .� y �� Lumberton, NC); Project Study Area . � ,Y ` -�, � � �' � . :� � approximated by ESI. �' - . • - �� D:sclaimer The informa[�on d . � � � - �� ep�etae on s�.s G��.:re s � informat�.onal pur0oses on'�y antl was not preca�ei !o� and � y. f rsnotswtabie!orlegnlorengreer.ngparposes �.:�,� 7"�! . �� •�„� Copyright:�� 2013:Naticnal Geographic Society. i-cubed -•:�•� �-:�. Project: ER15052.06 .f�� r� Project Study Area ''' '' Bridge NO. 435 Date: Mar 2016 � � Robeson County, North Carolina Drwn/Chkd: DB/KT `°�1_�,�=`�'Y�, TIP No. B-5702 Figure: 2 Pa:h P`.GeoGralP�o�ects�201 SD52`O6'�.G!S'hg_topo_le:;e• mxd Date 32a'<0:6 9 20 CS AM1! . . '�t� ' � Y"w !' . 71. #- ^ � ��. � t � w ..� � .�,. N j. . "''"'�w ��r �' I► � � �' � �Rr �� '�� '�.� . '�,�� , � .,E . . - _ - �y w�4 � si ! �, �� . �r EK+F �4 . '�f � g r� °�,. �t; �. .9 �`� �` .�� . . . - ' � a., Y+Y. � " ��" � ��" �;� �� ' '` � � ��I ,� ��.� � �� ,�� ' a� �` �� `� � ' � ��"�y.i , � � �L� ��+�`� n'�; ,+, � ' � �° . � ,. � � � ,,;� �- °l�x �` - .. � .+2?;'� f � .�t � ¢- o: k � �. + +�h � - � � a �� .�:'� � +y � � -' -� � � ,- ...�.- � . . a ,S; {y � i � � ti '' � a- � ° � � - �. �;,., t� _= '. xi,39 :ew ir3��.15Ai t � ,� � ,�,� 1rt�' J '�F � Y M R` �°,� � �. S - '"4 � " k` ,��h q ,� k i �4 � ,. � x g�`� � + ..�.� ��,:. i � � � a�� .� n � c �, i . . v, " . � ,e ` fi � 9! 't� .,�. �� , m,r..,a' , Id, ��•4 . .F 4r� A •,:� �' �� ! " � � � � � '� , �� i, t �" *�,�Y, �p <is a ; ' + � �� _ +� � , { r.. � '�'i �A � s'� ; '� � i �� ', ,� i :� � S� ♦ � & � ' i.` w� � � ��' t � � ,E .ti•"F �t. .�,. - x �j a � k �� ""' ,�� -r f. ,��. � � a , � 3'�.-.`�, �" f� �{,�} Y b f��. �-R. z c, -z _��F iE� as� �_ �� .'=r �' .- � : ; � � � . �� t . " � j,� . . � . � ` e , i � �"- '� � ;�` � k ., ,�Y � 1I' } '� � �r � ��`j � # � � d � . � ^. �' s`� � �+' �,�' ; �4._ s & � 4x °� y �"' � � . �' � ; ° . '"' T � � ' �� 5 �, a " ' � � T'�: ''y�, ,��'- . �" � �'"� '*� � � ��µ � ,��- � � '' � � a, F,,, ,� � SWB � * ` y � r � '� � . , " �`� � w «� . e� # �,?4 a� i, � -�' � � ,,. � � �'"y� n .��'r'��rt�"` * �v•. �' � r � ; }Q� ;� �:a,.�Ar �.�.� # r '. 1 � .., � Y �, y �,� ,w �� . � - �: T � � � �.. . - ' , ., �- € .� �� ; i ��,,.p4 �{ � ,y, �F d+e -a� � H�� ,3 . ' �-'�"' , � t, : . � a, - ,,. � y. �.°'� �.� � 'ls.�. . r � $ �� '9 �. .�M'� � "� • . '�" '� '�-- ,� � � � �. 4 ,y � ; ; A � �; �k = F s� b x �.�,� .. y, �+ � 'x �!'F /v � `� � F , h �S- * 1� � �� -. . � t �-� �:'r � �,t. �. ' M *..dR' iF';' " i� . �<<'�' -.r -i �? _ 7► a ri � �-"� igF � � �4 ,��- a'; `� � �4 �+ "t ; �,9 �1u• �' �+ A ,�, ' t �,�' ��'k � .�'�d� x� r. �y,y ,w, ��"��i'� -+� � � �� . � � �4 - � „t' �`�i.r 'r �� .�°� � * t'" � `'' �* `�C�� ,�+.� ; ` � � �� " � � _Y .,.t �'��,'•. r , `� � s '�'� , *��, Ya� e �"�. «� � `• �"�� 5,, , �,'� ,+ j �� ''� � c > : {' l,. " 'w'¢ r~ �� a�� s � - uT f k � � �..] h � . �� * x �. " �.'.. � �` �+ , . �"" „ .,a•,� � ., � rt �:� ' �' � •a : , � C '` � • „ � � " �` ;'i �,=� � 4,.� �( � � �' . « � `�" �'�� ir '�r '�` � (t � � � ' 1 �� 6. � ., . 5�,� $ .�. %k� �"� '" .+, �- �,.� r 'il"*' sr` y. s �d.. F . � � ;`t� � _ ,� 4,,. �', .r�i .�� 7 . .ast•4 �a-� M -' iR'Z2 ,y � p • Y,�c„ , �� Y TM 1T4' � - �� a, � .�;�e . : ._ . ,,� ., � � : , � �� , �" �.� � �_;� .�;�, �� ;s. � �, �� <_ �; � � �� °� � x�,�� K -� �m t � y., � � � � '� 'F4�• �� ' � �� p �e' � �S'� � �_]yyr,,�'�,u �6� q . l g". . . .t' .. '�" �� ` j'� C % �, � M. . �' "C .t t.� �- t,� � �'� t��iy.,' i ." A C .f'� � � �� •��; }+ : � ` . �' � . � v .. . !� �� . i . � ��'a.s� � �k^ �� f, � �� 't � � � . �� t * � F`'• ` i 4 �j'�, � � „ G �i, � u �i, , �'^ jF,. , � sr � � ge ` �l . �r., �� °� ^ . . �� b � * , �� °� ��'��,Er' fi �,�� ik �P « �*'��"�R � ,�� 5 'i�^.� u ♦ 5� +�, `.�� . •� � ' - � q�il . # ��e �� f+� » p » �, �� : • . �` � � �ir,. �y�',�� . z . ll' 4�i .'� r �' . 'i +.� a a � a� � -. � , ..M �m� A�� x ,�� `� :1,. ' �� ,�� Lyik 'R � • �' � • +p �� -� �� . r �,�r�.,,,: : � '.:,� Y'A `� - t �, . , � '��' � �4 ��i J- ,s�. ProjectStudyArea j � �" � "�. ti" �� y t P ; . , ,. ' a �`�` '^� `�` yag'� 't"�,:, Surface Water f ��' �� ; .�s �,,.� �'+ ��3` � . � � Jurisdictional Wetland ' r &��', 5'�e'"�� '� '�"�� '$� �Yt3; 9 q x .�: -?k 3 ., �� -- • Jurisdictional Stream A '; �' ! �' ` �"�c.,,.. � ��;�''� �` �y � k . � �,�� , �(£ � <, „� � � +�� :�•� � 'IQ� 2�� , f�2.� �} .�. ��i { C �` Ot� d `. � ,i a • ,s '+� k s : k" *.�+'s �" '� � , x �' � =.P ' st R �� Feet ---. � � �''�' $ � .�'� ,� � d f`��*, � " � Source:High Resolution NC Statewide � � �� i Y �� y� �� ` �,� �" � � �` "� b �� ` � ` Orthoimagery CGIA 2010 ' ` � . ' ie "� r � w�� ,. '� ''�" Prc�ect Boundary approximated by ESi ,.� � ,_. - �• � € ��„�# �:� ,.� a e�so�a� Tna ror. e p� ea on th r.9 . t . �M4 . � � i� y L' ". �� fi �. x :s!o. f .. t� naip p s so ,y d a � `.. ' . t. �� - � 1 �' � � %lp., �, �.,3 � . �� pre ]f n7�s..ots��,tateoreya'�� ; .y, � ' � 7 { y e�3�,e,��,� Pos>s �` �, . s N; On��.?ap,�N s C2nte��[ Geog�-�,�ti,�2l,n�orm�tion arid�„naly5 s,�y,�,.��. �r . , „ ,; , ;� 91? B�ard � s- ;_ �. `; , �;;�R:„_ Project ER15052.06 .� `` ��. Jurisdictional Features a` s..4 Date: Apr 2016 Bridge No. 435 '� � Drwn/Chkd: DB/KT � Robeson County, North Carolina �'_Mny*''�' TIP No. B-5702 Figure: 3 Pa!:� P\Geo��3�Pro�ec[520i`�C52'Co'GIS`figJur�.s_',eY.e��-.0 D3'e 4,^'20',5542�224M