20171599_Jurisdictional Determination_20160603

f�.•
Transportation
May 27, 2016
Sarah f�air
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Coips of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: Preliminary JD Request for Division6 I3ridges,
Dear Ms. Hair:
PAT McCRORY
Governor
NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON
Secremry
o [�C�[�adL�
��,. � D
� 2016
?RANSPORTATIO P RMfTTING UNIT
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is submitting the enclosed preliminary
jurisdictional determination (PJD) documentation for five bridge replacement projects located in
Robeson, Columbus and Bladen Counties, NC. The bridgcs are identified as the followilig State
Transportation Itnprovement Projects (STIP): B-5702, B-5699, B-5694, B-5707, and B-5692.
NCDOT proposes to replace these bridges under a Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE).
The following enclosures for each bridge site are included: completed PJD request form, wetland and
stream data forms, vicinity map, project location map, topographic map, and jurisdictional features
maps.
The project limits have been delineated by Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI), and they will be
coordinating with you to arrange for a site inspection.
Thank you for your assistance and we look focward to meeting with you onsite.
Sincerely,
,�� ���. � �G�..�?�
Gordon E. Cashin
Enviromnental Program Consultant
Attachments:
PJD forms, vicinity maps, topographic maps, jurisdictional features maps
Cc: Amy Chapman, NCDWRNC Transportation: Letterhead Style Guide
�Nothing Compares�
Statc of North Carolina � Department of Tnnsportalion � PDL'A-Namral Enviromnent Seclion
1020 Birch Ridge Drive, 276I0 � 1598 Mail Service Ccnter � Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
919-707-6000T 919-212-5785 F

Jurisdictional Determination Request
i��#�- � S(��( �
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
SiTeet l�ddPeSS: Bridge No. 11 on Highway 53 over Ellis Creek
Clij�, Si1ie: North Carolina
CoUnty: Bladen
D1C0Ct10riS: Bridge No. 11 on NC Highway 53 in Bladen County, NC
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): NA
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION •
j�ap1e: NCDOT - Natural Environment Section
MaillIlg AdcII'ess: 1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
Telephone Number: s�s-�o�-s000
Electronic Mail Address 1:
Select one:
� I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant2
—I
�
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
NCDOT
C. PROPERTY OWNER IIVFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address3:
NCDOT- Natural Environment Section
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
� Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROP�RTY OWNER CERTIFICA�'ION`�
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilminb on District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Coips)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Property Owner (please print) Date
Property Owner Signature
E. JUIi�SDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This rec�uest does include a delineation.
� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identifed herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
� I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUSs and provide an approved JD for the property identifed herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
� I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and pro�ide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
� I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an �proved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

F.
❑�
Jurisdictional Determination Request
AI�L It�QUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
❑✓ Size of Property or Project Area 4_5
acres
� I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
� Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
� Project Coordinates: 34.6948 Latitude -78.6591 Longitude
Maps (no larger than l 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑✓
�
�
�❑
❑
Larae and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
Aerial Photography of the project area
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated lune 26, 2005
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable)�:
Wetlands:
� Wetland Data Sheets8
�
n
�
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
� USACE Assessment Forms
� Other Assessinent Forms
(when appropriate)
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Veriiication of a Delineation:
� Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Maps (no larger than l lxl7) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑
❑
❑
❑
Longitude
Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
Aerial Photography of the project area
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
� 1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
htto://www.usace.armv.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Re�ulatorvProsramandPermits/re� supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
httq://portal.ncdenr.ors/c/document librarv/�et file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&aroupid=38364and,
httq://www.saw.usace.armv.mil/Portals/59/docs/re�ulatorv/publicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
� Wetland Data Sheets9
❑�
u
u
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
� USACE Assessment Forms
� Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
u
❑�
Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also lcnown as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
Map(s) depicting the potential (or lacic of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMIIVARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Chris Rivenbark, NCDOT, 1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-
'1598
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CESAW-RG-
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
TIP: B-5692 Description: Bridge No. 11 over Ellis Creek
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Bladen City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 34.6948°N, Long. -78.6591° W �
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Ellis Creek �
Ideritify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 154„ linear feet: 50 width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowa�din Class: Riverine `
Sfream Flow: Perennial
� Wetlands: 0.2 acres.
Cowardin Class: Forested
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: N/A
Non-Tidal: N/A
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date:
� Field Determination Date(s):
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that� there may be jurisdictiona,l waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain ari approved jurisdictional tletermination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other�person who requested this

preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verificafion requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result, in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of,that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the '
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual pe�mit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form 'of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administ�ative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 G.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination wh�ether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an app�oved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on .the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
�

SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminaty JD (check a!I that apply
- checked ifems should be included in case file and, where checked and
�� uested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consuitant
(� Data sheets prepared/submitted by or an behalf of the
applicanticonsultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does nat concur with data sheets/delineafion report.
❑ Data sheets prepared bji the Corps:
❑ Corps pavigable waters' study:
❑ U.S, Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data. , .
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps�
[� U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: �: ayDad j�u��' �r � G
� USDA Natural Resources Conservation.Service Soil Sunrey
Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s};, Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: �
❑� 00-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum
, of � 929)
q Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date}:apf flar ❑ Other (Name &
Date): �
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
� Other information (please specify):
IMpORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarilv been veri�ed bv the Corps and should �iot be �elied upon for
later jurisdictional deierminations.
Signature and date af
Regulatory Praject Manager
(REC2UIRED)
t
. �
� -�S 1�a
5' nature and date of
rson requesting ' inary JD
{REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Estimated
Longitud Cowardin amount of
Site Name Latitude e Class aquatic Class af aquatic resource
resource in
review area
WA 34.6N945° �g,6591° PFO 0.01 acre(s) non-section 10 — wetland
W
wB 34.N45° �g.6591° PFO 0.1 acre(s) non-section 10—wetland
W
WC 34.6�940° 78.6584° PFO 0.01 acre(s) non-section 10 — wetland
W
SA 34.6N948° �g,6591° RIVERINE 154 linear feet non-section 10 — non-wetlan
W
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
�N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N _ °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal

NC DWQ Stream Identification I'orm Version 4.11 ��
Date: �� ProjecUSite: B-�s(p�� Latitude: 3� ���y�
Evaluator: ,, �I����- County: a1��� Longitude: " ��,� �Q �
Total Points: Stream Determination (cir e-aTte Other
Stream is at least intermittent �� s Ephemeral Intermittent ere ' I e.g. Quad Name:
ii>_ 19 orperennial if>_ 30'
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal =�) Absent Weak
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1
3. In-channei structure: ex. rifFle-pool, step-pool, � �
ri le- ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1
8. Headcuts 1
9. Grade control 0 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0
a artificiai ditches are not rated; see disc�sions in manual
B. H drolo (Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria �0 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0
C. Biolo Subtotal = �?. S
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks � 1
22. Fish 0 0.5
23. Crayfish � 0 0.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5
25. Algae 0 0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Ell� s <e� '. ;,�b. � ��rrr ' -,�esn4
Sketch:
� � 63
�
/� , �
�
Moderate Stro
2 3
2
2 3
/2 3
2
2
2
2
1
1
3
3
2 3
2 3
0.5 0
1 1.5
1 1.5
Ye,s''= 3
1.5
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
�
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

USACE AID#
�-z� a- s �ta
D�VQ # Site #_
S �4
(indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
� �y a.'. ,:�;
,,.,,
Provide the follo�ving information for the stream reach under assessment: �
1. Applicant's name: N C� �� 2. Evaluator's name: J��� �� D�'` r
3. Date of evaluation: a q 4. Time of evaluation: � O�
5. Name of stream: �� r 6. River basin: ���"�-
� `�� H
7. Approximate drainage area: Ll � �, m' ��S 8. Stream order: � ��
o' C� I�leh
9. Length of reach evaluated: S 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitudc (ex. 3-1.872312): � � � �� � � Longitude (ex —77.55661 1): �V ' f.G� �
1��lethod location deterniined (circle): GPS Topo She Ortlio (Aeri�l) Photo/GIS Other G1S Other_
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note i� ads and landmarks and attach map identifying
I_n�,�� o„� ��i,-.� �;� � �vC� S s�.. i3i�� �',�,�.
14. Proposed channel �vork (if any
(s) location):
15. Recent weather conditions: I ' w� f 6.; •� ...`�Y % h/ ' hi � /� "'. �= -
16. Site conditions at time of visit: ��5�
17. Identify any special �vater���ay classifications known: _Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES QIf yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map. YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soi( Survey. YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: p� �% Residential S% Commercial _°�o Industrial � S% Agricultural
� ��n % Forested p� �% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( ,
22. Bankfull width: �� 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): �
24. Channel slope do�vn center of streain: _Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends �equent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of ��orksheet (located on page 2): E3egin by determining the il�ost appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored usin� the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the ran�e shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or �veather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from re��erse): �� Comments:
t
Evaluator's Signature _�� c�• r � Date � ��/t�i
This channel evaluati n orm is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environ►nental professionals in
gathering the data r q�red by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The tot�l sc e resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USaCE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSH�ET = y ��. '
�COR�GION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERIST'ICS Co�stnt Piedmont 1�lountain SCORE
Presence of flow / persistenf pools in sh•eam �`, �
1 0 -5 0 -4 0-5 --,
(no flow or satliration = 0; stroi�� flo�v = max �oints)
� Evidence of past human alteration �
� (eKtensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints) 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 3
(no buffer = 0; conti uo�is, wide buiEer = maY oints
4 E��idence of nutrient or che►nic�l discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 a
(extensive dischai•Qes = 0; no discharees = max oints)
,,,� Croundwater discharge �
5 0-3 0-4 0-4
� (no dischar�e = 0; s�rinas, see �s, wetlands, etc. = max oints)
,..r Presence of adjacent tlooclpl;�in ' � -
� 6 (�io flood �lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max �oints) 0�- 4 0- 4 0- 2 �
,7', � E:ntrenchmeiit / floodplain access p- 5 0- 4 0- 2 �
�"' (dee 1� entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin� = max oints) �
Nresence of adjacent wetlands �
8 (no ��etlands = 0; lar�e ad'ace�lt �vetlands = max oints) 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2
� Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0-- 3 �
� (extensive channelization = 0; natw�al meander = m�x oints)
Sedimentinput �
l � (extensive de osition= 0; little or no seclimeilt = max oints) 0- � 0- 4 0- 4 �
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
�
� 1 (fine, ho�no�enous = 0; (ar�e, diverse sizes = max oints) NA 0- 4 0- 5
Evidence of channel incision or widening �
� 12 0-5 0-4 0-5
dee 1� incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints)
� P►�esence of major bank failures �
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = inax oints)
p Root depth and density� on banks
E`Z,,,, �� no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu�hout = max oints) 0- 3 0- 4 0- 5 ,�
� Impact by agriculture, livestod<, or timber production �
i� 0-5 0-4 0-5
substantial ini acY =0; no evidence = maa oints)
j� Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 �
E no riftleslri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = max oints)
�I� H�bitat complesity 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 �
�„� (little or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = max oints)
Q Canopy coverage over strea►nbed �
l8 O-� 0- S O-5
� (no shadin� ve etatio❑ = 0; continuous cano �= rnati �oiuts)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 —
(dee �l � embedded = 0; ►oose structure = i�iax)
� Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) �
20 0-4 0-5 0-5
� no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = n�ax oints)
� �� Presence of ampl�ibians 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 �
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = max oints) i
'"� Presence of fish �'1
O 22 0-4 0-4 0-4 ���
►-a (no evidence = 0; conunon, numerous t es = n�ax oints)
�" Evidence of wildlife use '�';
23 0--6 0-5 0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max oints) ���
Total Points Possibie � 100 100 100 �
� � � TOTAL SCORE (also enter on iirst page) "`�;} �;
* These cl�aracteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjecUSite: B-5692 City/County: Bladen Sampling Date: 2�9�2016
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: Iv c- Sampling Point: Wa2 up
Investigator(s): ESI Stuart Bryan, Jeff Harbour Section, Township, Range: --
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hlllSlope Local relief (concave, convex, none): ConVeX Slope (%)� 4-$
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 34.69454 �ong: -78•65914 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Centenary NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FIIdDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No .
HydricSoil Present? Yes No.
Wetland HydrologyPresent? Yes No,
Remarks:
W A� W� h�� ��. W e.,���
X Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes iVo X
X
��yp� �S �� � �-� �^n
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required• check all that applvl II Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1) �❑-f Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) 1u--f Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) � �uT Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) 1--� Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) � Dry-Season WaterTable (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) �1--r Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) � Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) u Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
� Algal Mat or Crust (B4) � Thin Muck Surface {C7) �, Geomorphic Position (D2)
Q, Iron Deposits (B5) � Other (Explain in Remarks) II Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑, Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) a FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑, Water-Stained Leaves (69) II Sphagnum moss (DS) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): NA
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): �20
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): '20 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30X30 � % Cover Species? Status
� Pinus taeda 10 Yes FAC
2 Acer�rubrum 5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 7•5
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30X30 �
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
� 5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3
50% of totai cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30X30 �
1 Arundinaria gigantea 24
2 Rubus argutus 18
g Taraxacum officinale 1
4 Pinus taeda 1
5 Dichanthelium scoparium 5
6.
7.
8.
9. _
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover: 24.5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30X30 �
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Yes FACW
Yes FAC
no FACU
no FAC
no FACW
49 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 9•8
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Roadside and powerline easement
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Sampling Point: Wa2 up
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 �q�g�
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multioly by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
II 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�✓ 2- Dominance Test is >50%
II 3- Prevalence Index is 53.0'
II Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation� (Expiain)
�Indicators of hydric soii and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Wa2 up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color lmoistl % Color (moistl % Type, Loc Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 3/3 100 sandy loam
5-14 10YR 4/3 100
14-18 10YR 4/4 100
sandy loam
sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
,Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
� Black Histic (A3)
Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
� Stratified Layers (A5)
� Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Q 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
D Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
D 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
� Thick Dark Surtace (Al2)
� Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
D Sandy Redox (S5)
� Stripped Matrix (S6)
,Q Dark SurFace (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Thin Dark SurFace (S9) (LRR S, T, U) u 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) �-�I Reduced Vertic (F1S) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) u Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) � � Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8) � Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (fVILRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: B-5692 City/County: Bladen Sampling Date: 2�912016
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: Wa2 wet
Investigator(s): ESI Stuart Bryan, Jeff Harbour Section, Township, Range: "
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): ConCaVe Slope (%): 4-$
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat. 34.69454 Long: -�$•65914 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Centenary NWI classification: PFO/PEM
Are ciimatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally probiematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUfVIMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X
Remarks: � � / � � a r� 5� � �
HYDROLOGY
No
No
No
v��,�i �d,�
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
-�p�%�ys����
Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applv) II Surface Soil Cracks (66)
�❑-✓,-� Surface Water (A1) 1❑-� Aquatic Fauna (B13) 0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
IJ High Water Table (A2) u Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U) ❑✓ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑✓ Saturation (A3) �1--f Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
0 Water Marks (B1) I--I Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) � Dry-Season WaterTable (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) �1--f Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) � Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
�✓ Drift Deposits (63) L-� Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) II Saturation �sible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
II Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) II✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
II Iron Deposits (B5) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) II Shallow Aquitard (D3)
r], Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) II✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Q✓, Water-Stained Leaves (B9) II✓ Sphagnum moss (DS) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1-4
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): surface
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): surtace Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes ca iila frin e '
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Point: Wa2 wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator pominanceTestworksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 � % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species
� Acer rubrum 8 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2 Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3• Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 �,q�g�
6.
� Prevalence Index worksheet:
$ Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of totai cover: ��•5
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 �
� Acer rubrum
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
23 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 4.6
2
50% of totai cover: �
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 �
� Arundinaria gigantea 28
2 Rubus argutus 5
3 Dichanthelium scoparium 3
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. _
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover: �$
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 �
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Yes FAC
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0.4
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
II 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
�, 3 - Prevalence Index is _<3.0'
❑, Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation� (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Yes FACW be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
no FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
no FACW '
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tali.
Herb-All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
36 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 7•2
50% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover: Present? Yes x Plo
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Wa2 wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moistl % Color (moistl °/a Type, LocZ Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 2/1 100 loamy sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Recluced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless othervvise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (LRR S, T, U) T❑-t 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2) ,Q Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR 5, T, U) LJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
� Black Histic (A3) � Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ,Q Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
� Stratified Layers (A5) � Depleted Matrix (F3) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
D Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) D Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
� 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark Surface (F7) � Red Parent Material (TF2)
II Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) � Redox Depressions (F8) _❑ Very Shailow Dark Surface (TF12)
� 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ,0 Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
,Q Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) � Depleted Ochric (F11) (NiLRA �51)
� Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
� Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ,Q Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) � Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Q Sandy Redox (S5) ,Q Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
� Stripped Matrix (S6) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
D Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present7 Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: B-5692 City/County: Bladen �. Sampling' Date: 2�9�2016 ,
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: N!� Sampling Point: W� up
Investigator(s): ESI Stuart Bryan, Jeff Harbour Section, Township, Range: '-
Landform (hillslope, terrace, efc.): hlllslope Local relief (concave,,convex,•none): C011vex Slope (o�o�: 1-4
Subregion (LRF2 or MLRA): P �at: 34.69408 Long: -78•65845 WGS 84,
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Lakeland . NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation �, Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes . X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present? ,
Remarks: '
HYDROLOGY
Yes X - No
Yes No X
Yes' � . No x
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: " Secondarv Indicators (minimum oftwo repuired)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required:•check all that applv) II Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
0 Su�face,Water (A1) .❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) � Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) �
� High Water Table (A2) � Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U) �, ❑ Drainage Pattems (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3),' , � ��-T ,Hydrogen, Sulfde Odor (C1) ` 0 Moss Trim�Lines (B16) ,
❑ Water Marks (61) IJ .Oxidized Rhizospheres.along�Living Roots (C3) ,� Dry=Season WaterTable (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) �1--f Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) '� 0 Crayfish�Burrovirs (C8) `
❑ Drift Deposits "(B3) I-=1 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q. Algal Mat or Crust (B4) � Thin Muck Su'rface (C7) II'Geomorphic Position (D2)
Q, Iron Deposits (B5) 0 Other (Explain in �Remarks) ' II Shallow Aquitard (D3) ,
[�, Inundation Visible on Aerial Image,ry (B7) . , II FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Q Water-8tained Leaves (B9) ' ��� Sphagnum moss (DS),(LRR T, U)
Field .Observations: • ' ' - � �
Surface Water Present? Yes No 'X Depth (inches); NA �
Water Table Present? Yes No . X Depth (inches): •'20 � �
Saturation Present? Yes No • X, Depth (inches): '20 Wetland Hyd�ology Prese�nt? Yes No X
includes ca illa frin e �
De"scribe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well,, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: �
Remarks: � � � � � � ' � � � ,
US Army Co�ps of Engineers ; � � Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regi;on - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree St�atum (Plot size: 30X30 � % Cover Soecies? Status
� Pinus taeda 8 Yes FAC
Z Quercus alba 20 Yes FACU
g. Liquidambar styraciflua 2 No FAC
4. �
5. . ,
6.
7. '
8.. _
50% of total cover: 15
Saplin4/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30X30 �
1 Symplocos tinctoria ,
2. . ,
3.
4. ,
5. .
6.� , .
7. '
8. � .
30 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
12 Yes FAC
�
= Total Cover
` 50% of total cover. 6 20% of total cover: 2•4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30X30 � � ��
�. Symplocos tinctoria � 6 , Yes FAC
2 Ilex coriacea � � 1 no � FACW
3 Ilex opa'ca . � ' 2 Yes . FAC .
4. , . � � , ,
5. � , . . ,
6. . ,
7. ..
8. � .
9. �
10. � �
11. ' .
12. . . .
' . ` � 9 ' = Total Cover "
50% of total,cover. 4•5 . 20% of total'cover: 1.8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: .30X30 � � '
1. . .
2.
3. ' , .
4.
5. �
, . , = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover. '
Remarks: '(If observed, list morphological adaptations below). '
US Army Corps,of Engineers , '
Sampling Point: W� �P
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW; or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5' (B)
Percent of Doininant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: $� (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: , Multiply by:
OBL sp'ecies '� � ' x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC'species x 3 =
FACU species � x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
�, 1= Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�✓ , 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑,� �3 = Prevalence Index is 53A�
[,�, Pro6leinatic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explainp
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, uriless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of•Four Vegetation Strata: �
Tree = Woody plants,'excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in�diameter at breast heigHt (DBH), regardless of
height: � � �� ' � �
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) talL �
Herb-All herbaoeous (non-woociy) plants, regardless
�of size, �and uvoody planfs less than 3.28 ft tall. '
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height. � � �
Hydrophy4ic '
Vegetation
Present7 . Yes X' No
Atlantic ahd Gulf Coastal Plain' Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WC4 up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth � Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moistl % Color (moisfl % Tvpe Loc Textu�e • Remarks
0-5 � 10YR 3/1 100 50 MS loamy,sand 50% uncoated' ,
5-18 10YR 4/3 � 100 . � sand
�
'Type• C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (A'pplicable to all LRRs, unless othervvise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': �
,� Histosol (A1) '� Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) � 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O),
�Histic Epipedon (A2) ,Q Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ' � 2 cm,Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) ,Q Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) , .� Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) '� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
� Stratified Layers (A5) „Q Depleted Matrix (F3) � Anomalous Bright�Loamy Soils (F20)
� Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536)
Q�5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) '� Depleted Dark Surface (F7) � Red Parent,Material (TF2)
D Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) � Redox Depressions (F8) �T-I'Ve'ry Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) � Marl (F10) (LRR U) � LJ Other (Explain in Remarks)
� Depleted Below Dark Surface (Q11) �.Q Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) , �
� Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses,(F12) (CRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic yegetation and
� Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ;Q Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) • wetland hydrology mu�st be present,
� Sandy Mucliy Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ,� Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) , unless disturbed o'r problematic.
� Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ,Q Reduced Vertic�(F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506) .
� Sandy Redox (S5) � � �I-� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) � � � ' -� � � � �
D Stripped Matrix (S6) L Anomalous Bright Loamy'Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
� Dark Surface (S7) (LRR F, S, T, U) ,� � �
Restrictive Layer (if observed): �' . � - � ' � - � � � ' . ` � � � ' �
Type: ` , '
Depth (inches): ' Hydric Soil Pre'sentl Yes, No X
Remarks: - ' - . . � � � �
�� � US�Army Corps of Engineers � � � � ' �
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2,0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: B-5692 City/County: Bladen Sampling Date: 2�9�2016
Appiicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WC4 Wet
Investigator(s): ESI Stuart Bryan, Jeff Harbour Section, Township, Range: `
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): ConCave Slope (%): 4"8
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat• 34.69408 Long: -7$•65845 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Lakelalld NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes X No is the Sampled Area
Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: SecondaN Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired; check all that applv) II Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surtace Water (A1) 1❑--f Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
❑ High Water Table (A2) �-1 Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑✓ Saturation (A3) � Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (B1) � Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) � Dry-Season WaterTable (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (62) 1❑--f Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) � Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) , t-1 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) � Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q, Algal Mat or Crust (B4) � Thin Muck Surface (C7) � Geomorphic Position (D2)
a Iron Deposits (B5) � Other (Explain in Remarks) II Shallow Aquitard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) II FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a Water-Stained Leaves (B9) II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): NA
WaterTable Present? Yes %� No Depth (inches): 8
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aeriai photos, previous inspections), if available: '
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. samPiiny Point: W� Wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Testworksheet: �
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30X30 � % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species
� Pinus taeda 20 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2 Persea palustris 5 no FACW .
g Magnolia virginiana 9 Yes FACW . Total Number of Dominant 6
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species �
5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 �,q�g�
6.
� � Prevalence Indez worksheet: • '
7. .
$ Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
34 = Total Cover OBL species x 1=
� 50% of total cover: �� 20% of total cover: 6•8 FACW species x 2= �
Saplin4/Shrub Stratum (Piot size: 30X30 � FAC species x 3=
� Persea palustris 2 Yes FACW FACU species x 4=
2 Magnolia virginiana 2 Yes FACW UPL species x 5=
, Column Totals:- (A) (B)
3. ' .
4• � Prevalence Index = B/A= '
5• Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6• II 1= Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�• � 2- Dominance Test is >50%
a• II 3- Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4'� = Total Cover a Probiematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover'. 2 20% of total cover:, '�•8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30X30 � ; 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
� Arundinaria gigantea ` 3 Yes FACW be'present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Persea palustris ' 1� no FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: . -
g Ilex coriacea 2' Yes FACW
.. , � Tree — Wootly plants, excluding vines, 3 in. {7.6 cm) or
4.�' more in diameteF at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5. height: ,.
6• Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
�: , than 3 in. DBH end greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall.
8• He�b — All herbaceous (non-woody) planfs, regardless
g, of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10. � � ,Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11. : � � heightr �
12 , '
6 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: �•2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot s`ize: 30X30 � � � � � �
1.
2.
3 `
4.
5. Hydrophytic
Remarks:
50% of total cover:
hological adaptations below).
= Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover: Present?
Yes X No
US'Army Corps of Engineers . Atlantic and-Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL , � Sampling Point: W� Wet �
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inchesl Color (moistl � % Color (moistl' % Tvoe Loc2 Texture Remarks ' �
0-18 10YR 2/1 � 100 � � " � sandy loam � � �
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix; MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless ofhervvise noted.) • Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
� Histosol (A1) � ,Q Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) -❑n 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
� Histic Epipedon (A2) .,,Q Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) TLJ� 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
,Q Black Histic (A3) ,Q ,Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) u Reduced Vertic (F,18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
,Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) .Q Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) � Piedmont Floodplairi Soils (F19) (LRR P; S, T)
,Q Stratified Layers (A5) ,Q Depleted Matrix (F3) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
D Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) ,Q Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) � ,
� 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) .Q Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
,a Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ,Q Redox Depressions (F8) � � Very' Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
II,1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) �.� Marl (F10) (LRR, U) � � Other (Explain in Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark SurFace (A11) ,� Depleted Ocliric (F11) (MLRA 151)
,Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � ,Q Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LI2R O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
�CoasY Prairie�Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ,Q Umtiric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, •
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) �,Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed o[ problematic. �
� Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ` • � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
II Sandy Redox (S5) � .0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) '
�� �Stripped`Matrix (S6) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) �
D Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) ' , �„
Restrictive Layer,(if observed): ` , � � - � • � � ' ' �
Type; � � �
Dep,th (inches): � , Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remark's: ' . � � " , � ` ' � '�_
�
US'Army Corps, of Engineer's , _� �� � �� � • � � Atlantic and Guff Coastai Plain Region — Version 2.0 '

-- _ _ _ _ / . r �
,� .. . `` .� __ --- -.
`�f � �� _ _ _� _...�..—__-- , l N
��,,�_ �---- , . _...---�-� ' � ,
� .-� °�� i: �. .�y� , � ,,/ ,,,,�.�: �-�'� .. �
�
�`::r__..)" , 1. `�'` .``' �'J� ��r� � Y�`
$S *'��- ' � � � ^J �; ; _ ..
.. �"R� . .. � . 9 ' ' °/' \� ��� . �;.
µ�i-' �, 1nrr, � � ♦ ^\ � \` .�- -�---, \ `\ y .,. - .. . . . . .
y�.r-�'�,1
\ ��,���;1 - :�� � � �• ,.. ._ ... -� ♦ ` � ' . `�
W o° 1 i
� � � � i :
�:�r . �iuSicin E `�. ' � � „",
•f �• .�_ ,. . �ti i �..�-Y YG J�NES t�WF
. ,�, • � . _`I �v,, . . _ �.`` j� ... �jt_. _ ;' ' i
� , , '` �._,_., . � � � � � � � t
,> ` 3 �"' ' � `� ; . •'�i33t J ! ' O s f � ,���r R��� Ei
� jry f�� fPj
r f V� ' , O �\ , k�ti � j� \ ��.' � � � `� 1
.., � .. `� � , 7�/� �� �`� �` ,`
�� '�' � ` �)` ~ I } J� �`�` `��_
`—. A � t � , , "� �
�`a ' - :Ce�, o �' � 'b '�% � f B L A D E IV �
�_ ,
-• v.
. � t .
' '� ` S J�i F 4
.. ,.
. -- E
: � _, �'
. _ _ . ,� . . T T
..- �. a F� +� � _ �
•-� tt �� •. t �` � r, �
� _ •� �� ' �-.C'' � �� � r`"
.. .. Jt e�' '� . � � �� . .. . .
D u b I i n ` -i ,s- �� • �` �� .�--^ , .
�_ � . � � �;
� , ....,,��`� - �
� � ��
.. . ; � '�_ '° �-
. �.
r ,
�, � a � �w✓ �f �y� i. �!Cem � � ',�� �
-�.'�.., �- � ._ _.1.,�i.. _-�.-.-_.._._._. ...___..�'�.``�...� `�'' �`'� t�� ' ,_
.
� � � � � .. . ._-,�..._� ._..
a �^ �� � • � 1, - 4 $ ,��.._ � \ . �1`-. .__ _ .-r...._... - ' "� � —, .. '
sa����� ��� Z C.,, ` ✓--�
',� �„�K., ;'.� ^.�. ` R � � ,�/� \'. �rc ���pe1 ���
..� �1 e u - — '- � . i�� ` y .
� Y..� � ` .fi � ...`r �: ....,�_ '!.!' `�
. � �\V i'\ \�l ����� � y` � `� ;���'� J,�
\�`�`� ` ` � :' ,
� `w.� �
j� �'"`, F� :� `� ��• ��,
t
e � ` �, ~) - , �} • 1``� 4`
i �
F
� ,
�l l`_r l"� � /f _ _ � �'\,JJ� _ !
1 `
j
\ 'L ..� . t T "�.` !"'� .' ., �ll
_ _.
_.. ,r
...._ ..__ . _ . .
- ,�£, �,.._. __� f __ #._ �
�r_
_ _ _.
• � ...__
� _ , ' .
, ; `; � �, � ,j �Ge�» �� `;,,� I':
. ,
- ,, . , • _
�
� , � . .� ,
,, , ,,� , , , , o �; �
� � .� 1 t Y � �` ,
, ; ,.
, ,y�r .f '�i^ i �, `��• �;� i /
��� Project Study Area '�.. �� � �,''� ` ', �,� ��. �; � � � �t..
�� e 1-�, L� , \ �.. 1 ..t t , \
♦:'
0 7.000 2.000 � , . �..�� 1 ^�'� !' i � �EWi. � ��° � � �� ��
��• � � �
` � k� � �
��� Feet �� .� ' \� -. $? -.. �
�� � �� � � '� � � 4 � � � ,� ��� .
� Sources 2011 Nahonal Geographic Society/ESRL. � f , ��� ,� �, t `�. ,. ,
i-cubed seamless USGS quatlrangles (Dublin, , `�� ; r.y � . `' i � .
NC)�.ProjectStudyAreaapproximatedbyESL '�,` � � - � �-'�-`"�� ''���,." 'j�,��� �4'�-� ^+?•%��a��i.Cfi�. � �'_G'�'�`.. ,
, . �n, �y .
..\ , � . - . � � , �: � .
�.scla�me Tne ��nfor,^.- �� tleG�c:ed � !��,s /gure s /cr � � `
m�ormauc al purposes a ly arA �vas t reparei fcr and '
�s not swtable lor lega! or englneenng perposes , �
,, �`.\ Cooynght:G 2013 Na?icnal Gecgrapfiic Society. i-cubed
. O� NCIITH �,�
4�
� �
� �
�NlOf 'A�Ng�
Path a�GecG�a'�P�c;ec!s'27^505249G;5ng_toFa_'ene; ,rxd �at� a'i�i2016 i0�23524���
Project: ER15052.06
Date: Apr 2016
Drwn/Chkd: DB/KT
Figure: 2

�. � �jy ' � . � � � . i �; � "°i� . � w . �y% e .� � � ...,�,� �,,. ' . . �
� : � � r �. ' �s .yf� : ik � �
:y ��,„ ��•r � �$��� �` s:
- ���1 '� _ r .�. `°r �� . . . ' , �.y�o�W a�C � �..r- � T `F� T �$� � 1� � � � ,.
� �'e 5 � ,+�'� :� r ,� �' '!Yt� ,, �'� �� . �s N
• +y ;�,,
J 4 .r s � t`� r. � � �,> .d �.� , .�} �`
'i� � ��$.� �M at,� a`� � ,; . � � c�� , � �'r,y�' ''1' /k� F?- $�a .�����?�.. "�• �" .q� �
�''�.- � � �ha1 �,-� �� ' ,t �r t . '� .'M� � a � P . /�� � r
,
� �
, •- :
, � � � ) ��
�-. q�t .; �.
• , , � � ,� ` 4 � � ' �� �� _ � � .�' �".� -� *°'��,�
�.� •"�: � . � & . � :� �`�� � .
�;, � � ,� `�' �� �� � p � ..� � �H, � �.�
. � � ,� � '�� „� �
�`� �'>, t � � -� � , ,r �. � � � .� �,� � �,:� ' , M � �, �►`. � n
:� ,_ •:
. ' �''
� • . ;'�. � � , ` � � *� � � 3 � s. � �,�'�'�. ' x � � �,� � .�� � s
` � ' �! �"> �.� � .� , �* � r:. . � "��'
�,�FF4 � / .'� �� �� .'� �� ' _' ��!��6°�K � i� �: n *
xt ;;.. �``� +����,��_ n� -`,�, `� � � ,� 1�' �� ��'��u
� �
• �,,. �� ��, �, �a � : � �' �"
� �,� ����:�°� r� s �., �,��. :,
� { h $ ,�, f ..� d�,; �yjy --r��,�� t h�k �'.:� .. � � .� � p ���� .
y�� F � �
y ��.i„ #t .'�11! .�"Y�' � � , �� �T� �'� 3{. e� ��� c' 'A�. � � �'s ,�''`4 .
,� ` j;:.`� "�T ♦�4 �.A+",r� ��_4t ; z� �� `'��� �'�.,����_� T�.�•� ����� .
� � � t.. � �� „�=�' ��L�� � �?:�i �A.T1 .;., ,�� �, a�°Ne�
� � 1 � �� '• • i::� 4A �' %�a ` K`Y r'� �a�'ff�. � �" t � .
4 , . a ��1 , , W B �j y * �`^ , � . '4 �..'� 'ryiS. ar �. , �F T� ��� a � ,4 � x
� �.
.X.�� �,� 'p��.,��`� 'i Y�� " *� _ �Y �,�7t� �y� y �y K £ ''�'
s �, . �. ,,a�.f . .. •�,�� yUt <�4 �"S" .` �p" �¢Z����'�!'r� ' '"'� � ,.•�!'�`�i t 3 ��.
1 ;t � . ry \ 9�r - '^ ����'K4_. �y ak'..,^N P� 4r. � {'y�YY[�:�" �-ei;, �.Y.�.�,<�
'�� �� aci..�, ".� � �.�.
;�, � -� .. . �,. ' � � � ,'� #� * � � �+� � � � z� .
� s;�.t i„�F tk No �. p;
� ��' � � � ,, � � �'* .. 7 �'.��,- ' , �-y� �� ' �+ �
:.. � �,�3 � }� ix . �� . I �S S � , i�; F +f. �,
� �d: � � �. t � a ` v, r �'t �°�1' r b °m- �, � �J' -y1�j ..
},i�y�� �F ry; 1 ' { _. R ��i r j-1 `� ��� � �`�`
��'., °' �YE`�� �., �,+ 'S++.f�.': t ✓ �t'�# T";":� t t- .
r� y � 'r . r`� �,�' 3 "£, 3�� ,y..� ..
n ��•�4�" ��_ � �+i�('V . `� .�` ��� � za�
P y.
� f f�' y _�' s�4 } � i � � ��ND. �_ .�� � '�. � �
� A ��
,. � �c-/.�. +� �+ � �
\ f � �JP'S � �: �'4 l- fM��� �0 M ` .. � y� �
y ��_���� 'd�u ,�.�� A.' � - `.;T x rii .5.. K� �fi � 'r�. i;q"tT
wq y� �,, `
i`F X �' � �a �� � t, i , t t�� i R��' A .tk� p" ��. � ,�:r..�.
,�., �Jt 5 -� �j ;
� , �, � � � � - � �
... ' _ ' Y _ -` ., � r �9 y `M.: ., � L �a�" � '�.
-e ;� i ?` �
r ����'��� {.C"�', i{._ � �t' . . , � 'T✓9'� ' a _.d "� � {: � '�{;��7
". � r � P � �� t � y��,# x� ,tI � �;€ . �� . ����x'� � �.
...� `��°". 'qy" �� r'� y 1t'�,A k �" d�.; : �:� . t q� �G s i'.;�` f�b, ,:-��•��".
f. P �
- �'.:� . � � .� � � �y�pb.��� �. :� �i .'s :Y �,�yy�.� �� � . �.b
** � a' r l,� � � <' � oF ,�f � ,,`� '�' WC�A � '�zc',aS �,,�� ��'',� $'s
s�,4 d fZ� �_ � � ,�a��� � � � �r , 4� Yk'�'. �� _ , .1 � :� �S {1 ,. �t.
��R..ir �K 6'. . .^s�iF7 k. .�!'��i � j g`4y 7i `^� � �•���� � a�"ER' #�`-
� q :: � �� P � Y. � F. av 't� � �' . SR.s Y y� �. fSr ,�
.. si t i _bF F �,� .S. w���
` � A+4#' .x ��^' �}� � ��`� } a'�� t� x :� v�` ` t`}�e s '� '�i,
E a R� �g, �g{ � . . -- . .
� .#..�: �'S�'Sff:' � _�f 4��R �� f l E 9� .`��' . j � ��1�� �� _I t � " .�}
��T yp�
, t t ��r i � � '� � tl' � �` °_,^ +f a � � a'
�'�� + � e�' ' ��tdj�. � `� t � ��� � �iy� �'�� �/ ,�X �.� � p�"�� �4* ��:� � y.� �� � 1��;K� :'��
. , `h ��r �' x� i��� � s: � .� rf'.i � � E_. a,�. i � '�y.iil� � y�'� n �4 �_ �'� �.y
� :
. t n ��
. ,� 'i:��'' *.�.,�.� � t1 ��> �a��+ v� �F ��"9�� �
.�
• ,�
��� � � � �r �
. �.; �� � .� �,
� �
�t f �T v -$ x� M„ � ' "1� `, + � 4 4,� '.�• �`a'� + ,-�.� � -� � r ,� -
� � � �+ ��t�� . t
�ProjectStudyArea ,�. �*j ���. �'�: � �; ������� ���k ���°� a.� � F� �
�� ";i ,�' j y,,� .�,�' � � ' i� � ,, ,��t� i ��a.��
d
�� ��o
�Jurisdictional Wetland � � � �� ��� � '�,fi`•�� �� '� � ��;� -�T �� �'���
Jurisdictional Stream ��: "� � .e �� i,�s ��` ���� k ��:`� * �'°�`4 � '��j i� !
* �1�, ' � �N3'�. �."��� .. �1 �p � =`x � - s� c 4� �-, .
0 700 200 � � � �ii �� �„7t', t . � �•�� ��� �� .'�':. �� ��Y�.,���� �� �
� .ry' � �C,� � �p a ` �`y�� ���y �� � � , 4�� " � a'�s i , : a'�4
;�"�►� •."�,.� ' s. d. i . .- �� ; . �� '! r. .. � � ��y,i •.i�i, -
�s J� . .
Feet T 3� T � nrr,. . ,.
�M�,'� ,,� �t �' � �e � < � ; � � � ,�' � ,.;N�-�, ,. E .` �,"�" g �
Source�High Resolu6on NC Stat2�vide ,y 3�� � � �. °'` � a . }` : �, - t r'�� �'
Orthoimagery, CGIA 2010�: � �? "' ' � � .,' ��� � `� �"` x � �'
� � � . - _� ., r.; � ii $? F� . • 4 =, � ��
Pro�ect Boundary approximated by ESI �;,��� �c .���,, ,..�y °� � ' .y��,� �F �� -r. ��'� .��f t ��,��' � �`M �. �
Os�a:mrThe:rformao.tlepcte�o�ths?�g�. f �+ a �_ _� � � � '4� < '�
5 fCr 1 I I P P es o I� d d , a. � :� P . � .�" �y .� �'�.2 �.
prepa etl f�t a.tl s ot ul3ble �o� egal ,�r ,� � i� } '. � � i f _( „y. � ��3 .q� � i
eng�nee. go�rocses � _3., ���vC6 ."�fi �� d �� OC'�� d;"ira�S�
� �_
� ,. � A � �� � � `�i`d �� ^ ' 'y.� .-�
` a Ncliry y
a`' �Y
� �
p2, �P�
��'FFTv�'ptt Sp
Pa_n P �ec.G���P �ec�s�2G'i ��0 ]_.GiS�. J��r _',ette�.T.xy �3.e 4� __ .'.'�]3�'�Vt
Project ER15052.06
Date: Apr 2016
Drwn/Chkd: DB/KT
Figure: 3