The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20160576 Ver 1_Application_20160608Transportatton May 26, 2016 PAT McCRORY Gavernor NICHOLASJ.TENNYSON Secretary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regulatory Field Office 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 ATTN Dear Madam: Subject: Ms. Elizabeth Hair NCDOT Coordinator Notification for Nationwide Permit 23 (Approved Categorical Exclusion) NCDEQ 401 WQC 3891 Safety Improvement Project-SR 2252 Cumberland County State Project Number: 45336.1.21/W-5206U The North Cazolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to reconfigure the intersection of Chicken foot Road (SR 2252) with Sandhill Road (SR 2238) and Braxton Road (SR 2242) in Cumberland County. Total project length is 0.45 mi. Impacts to jurisdictional waters will occur and the following is a tabulation: Crossin Roadwa Station Existin Culvert Pro osed Culvert Permit Site #1 Sta. 19+83 -L- 55 LF 60" RCP 66 LF 60" RCP Permit Site #2 Sta. 23+54 -Y1- NA 2(76 LF 78" RCP) Permit Site #3 Sta. 27+03.68 -Y2- 56 LF 48" CMP 72 LF 60" RCP New Stream Impacts = II S linear feet Wetland Roadwa Station Wetland Im acts Permit Site #1 Sta. 18+50- 21+40 -L- 0.04 acres Permit Site #2 Sta. 22+25- 25+10 -Y1- 0.72 acres (Fill) Permit Site #2 Sta. 22+25 — 25+10 -Yl- 0.14 acres (Mechanized ( New Wetland Impacts = 0. 90 acres Crossing Roadwap Station Existin� Culvert Proposed Cul� Permit Site #1 Sta. 19+83 55 LF 60" RCP 65 LF 60" RCP New Surface Wuter Impacts = 0.001 acres �Nothing Compares�_. SfateofNorthCarolina � Departmen[ofTransportation I Divisio�6 P.O. Box II50 I Payetleville � NC,26302-1150 9704370207 T Construction of this project will require impacts to the waters of the United States in the Cape Feaz River Basin. The project is located within the 03030004 Hydrologic Unit, sub basin 03-06-15. All Permit Sites are tributaries of Grays Creek (B). Concerns for traffic safety has made it necessary for NCDOT to review and modify the Chicken foot Rd (SR 2252) traffic pattern East of its interchange with I-95 (Exit 40). The intersections of Sandhill Road (SR 2238) and Braxton Road (SR 2242) with Chicken foot Road (SR 2252) are currently controlled with stop signs. With the current traffic volumes, the intersections at peak hours operate at unacceptable levels of service. A shopping plaza has been proposed at the Eastern quadrant of Chicken foot Road and Bralcton Road; necessitating a traffic signal due to the additional volumes. Sandhill Road has its own traffic issues with a Walmart distribufion center and high density residential development that access Chicken foot Road. Sandhill Road also connects between NC 87/ NC 59 (Chicken foot Road just West of I-95) and I-95. Permit Site #1 will incur surface water, stream and wetland impacts. At Station 19+83 -L- there is an existing 60" RCP. Upstream 0.001 acre of surface water impacts shall be incurred from the addition of 10 LF of 60" RCP. Downstream 11 LF of stream impacts will result from the addition of 11 LF of 60" RCP. Both up and downstream culverts will have concrete headwalls. Temporary impacts shall result from dewatering the sites and will include: 0.001 acres upstream and 10 LF downstream. From Starions 18+50- Station 21+40, 0.04acres of Bottomland Hardwood forest wetlands will need to be permanently filled in order for guazdrail to be placed. In addirion, 0.08 acres will be hand cleazed. Permit Site #2 nroposes wetland and stream impacts. From Sta. 22+25 - Sta. 25+10 -Yl- 0.86 acres of Bottomland Hardwood forested wetlands will be impacted. While 0.72 acres will be filled, 0.14 acres will be Mechanize cleared. The mechanized cleazing has been increased through discussions with the US. Army Corps of Engineers and the NC Deparhnent of Environmental Quality-Division of Water Resources. Since the area under the proposed roadway is unsuitable, Geotechnical Analysis specified that the entire area be undercut 3 feet and then brought up with select backfill material. The stream channel that flows through the wetland is a perennial channel. Twin 76 LF 78" RCP's will be installed with one pipe placed in-line with the UT of Gray's Creek while the second pipe will be installed to the side of the stream channel with a 1.Oft sill at the up/downstream ends. A 12LF stone outlet pad will be installed from the outlet invert of the pipe to the natural invert of the UT to Gray's Creek; resulting in permanent impacts. The stone outlet pad will be formed so as to not restrict aquatic life movement. When installing the twin pipes, the UT to Gray's Creek will be blocked off up and downstream of the work area with an approved imperious dike in accordance with the NCDOT BMP Manual. Flows will be diverted azound the construction area via a Fabric lined diversion ditch. �Nothing Compares�_ SleceofNotlhCarolina � Departmen�ofhensportation � Division6 P.O. Box I150 � Fayetteville I NC. 28302-I150 910 437 0207 T Wetland floodplain pipes are proposed at Sta. 22+50 and Sta. 24+60. T'hese pipes will be 24" RCP's laid at the natural grade of the wetland. Permit Site#3 is located along Braacton Road. Dude to the realignment of Braacton Road, the existing 56 LF 48" CMP will be replaced. A 72 LF 60" RCP will be installed within the intermittent UT to Gray's Creek. Temporary impacts will occur over 20 LF of channel for dewatering purposes. RESOURCESTATUS In general, there will be minor impacts proposed as a result of the replacement of the culverts and wetland fill at project W-5206U in Cumberland County. A Nationwide Permit #23 / NCDENR 401 WQC 3891 is required for the project. Endangered Species: Plants and animals with Federal classification of Endangered (E) or Threatened (T) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Secrion 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of December, 26, 2012, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lists seven (7) federally protected species for Cumberland County. Federall Protected S ecies for Cumberland Coun SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS Alligator mississippiensis American alligator T(S/A) Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker g Neonympha mitchellii francisci St. Francis satyr butterfly E Schwalbea americana American chaffseed g Rhus michauxii Michau�c's sumac E Lyimachia asperulaefolia Rough-leaved loosestrife g Lindera melissifolia Pondberry g Myotis septentrionalis Northern Long Eazed Bat E "E" denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range). T(S/A)- Threatened due to similarity of appearance, a species that is tlu-eatened Due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its Protection. These species ue not biologically endangered or threatened and Are not subject to Section 7 consultation. �Nothing Compares�.� SqteofNorthCarolina � DepartmentofTronspoNe[ion � Division6 P.O. Box 1150 � Fayetleville � NC, 28302-I150 910 437 0207 T A biological conclusion of "No EffecY' was reached for all species, with the exception of the Northern Long Eared Bat during the June 16, 2014 survey for protected species. Protected species were not identified, nor, was the general habitat for each species identified. The USFWS has developed a Programmaric Biological Opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and NCDOT for the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentriolalis) in Eastem North Carolina. The PBO covers the enrire NCDOT program in Division 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activiries. The programmatic determination for the NLEB for the NCDOT program is May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect. The PBO provides incidental take coverage for the NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Division 1-8, which includes Cumberland County, where W-5206U is located. This level of incidental take is authorized from the effective date of a final determination through Apri130, 2020. REGULATORY APPROVALS Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 23 / NCDENR 401 WQC 3891 as required by the above-described activiries. This project is subject to the compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended and implemented by the Advisory Council of Historic Preservation Regulations for compliance with Section 106 codified at Title 36 CFR part 800. Historic Architecture NCDOT Human Environment Section, under provisions of a Programmatic Agreement with FHWA, NCDOT, HPO, OSA and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (effective July 1, 2009) reviewed the proposed project and determined that `no survey' is required (letter dated 10/31/12). Archaeology NCDOT Human Environment Section, under the provision of a Programmatic Agreement with FHWA, NCDOT, HPO, OSA and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (effective July 1, 2009) reviewed the proposed project and determined that a survey was required. NCDOT surveyed the projects Area of Potential Effects (APE) and reported that no azchaeological sites were recorded and a finding of `no historic properties affected' is appropriate for W-5206U (letter OS/30/2014). The project impacts are minor in nature and should not remove or degrade existing water quality uses. By utilizing the erosion control measures, downstream water quality standards will be protected. All appropriate BMP's will be utilized during construction. �Nothing Compares�� S�a[eofNorthC.amlina � DepartmeMofl}ansportation � Division6 P.O. Box ll50 � Fayetteville � NC, 28302-1750 910 437 0207 T Attached is a Preconstruction Notification Form, plan sheets, marked county road map, quad location map and photographs. If you should have any questions, or need additional information please contact James J. Rerko, PWS at (910) 437-0207. S'ncerely, (.�s.�� /�a � Jame J. Rerko, PWS Division 6 Environmental Officer ATTACHMENTS Cc: Amy Chapman, Division of Water Resources (Electronic copy) Mason Hemdon, Division of Water Resources (Electronic copy) Greg Burns, P.E., Division Engineer �Nothing Compares�..�_ SfeMofNorthCarolina � DepartmrntofTcansportetion � Division6 P.O. Box I150 � Fayetteville I NC, 28302-I150 910 437 0207 T y2�/F W� �ATF9OG �0�� Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. A licant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 23 or General Permit (GP) number: 3891 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Sand Hills Rd (SR 2238) and Chicken Foot Rd (SR 2252) 2b. County: Cumberland Counry 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Fayetteville 2d. Subdivision name: NA 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 45336.1.21/ W- 5206U project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NA 3b. Deed Book and Page No. NA 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if NA applicable): 3d. Street address: NA 3e. City, state, zip: NA 3f. Telephone no.: NA 3g. Fax no.: NA 3h. Email address: NA Page 1 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: � Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: Greg Burns, P.E.INCDOT/Div 6/Division 4c. Business name NCDOT /:F ......I:....11�\. 4d. Streetaddress: PO Box1150 4e. City, state, zip: Fayettevifle, NC 28302 4f. Telephone no.: (910) 486-1493 4g. Fax no.: (910) 486-1959 4h. Email address: gburns@ncdot.gov 5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: James J. Rerko, PWS 5b. Business name NCDOT/Div 6/Division Environmental Officer (if annlir.ahlal• 5c. Streetaddress: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: PO Box 1150 Fayetteville, NC 28302 (910)437-0207 (910) 486-1959 Page 2 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA Latltude: Longitude: - PS#1: 34.9291 'N -78.9136 'W 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): PS#2: 34.9293'N -78.9111 'W PS#3:34.9262'N -78.9174'W (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 6.7 acres 2. Surtace Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Grays Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: B 2c. River basin: Cape Fear 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The surrounding area consist of a mix of commerical, agricultural, residental and heavy logistics. A portion of the Sandhills Road relocation is a mix of upland/ wetland forest. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.90 acres 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent aml perennial) on the property: 1151inearfeet 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of this project is to align the intersection of Sandhills Rd and Braxton Rd with Chickenfoot Rd in order to facilitate a traffic light controlled intersection. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Chickenfoot Rd will have turn lanes and a traffic light installed to direct and control vehicle movements. Sandhills Rd and Braxton Rd will be relocated to control ingress/ egress onto Chickenfoot Rd. Typical consVuction equipment will be utilized such as; trackhoe, dump Vucks and motor grader. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � prelimina Final of determination was made? ry� 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: NA Name (if known): NCDOT Other: NA 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. Page 3 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 4 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): � Wetlands � SVeams-tributaries ❑ Buffers � Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction Page 5 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type ofjurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem ora T W1 � P� T Fill Bottomland � Yes � Corps 0.04 acres Hardwood ❑ No ❑ DWQ Fill & Culvert/ gottomland � Yes � Corps 0.72 acres W2 � P � T (Mechanized Hardwood Clearing) ❑ No ❑ DWQ (0.14 acres) W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P 0 T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0.90 acres 2h. Comments: PS#1: 0.06ac Hand clearing, PS#2: 0.04ac Hand clearing 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent(P)or intermittent DWQ—non-404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 � P� T Culvert UT Grays Creek � PER � Corps 3 ft �10LF ❑ INT ❑ DWQ � Temp) 76 LF S2 � P� T Culvert UT Grays Creek � PER � Corps 3 ft TemLF ❑ INT ❑ DWQ p� 12 LF (Rip Rap) S3 � P� T Culvert UT Grays Creek � PER � Corps 3 ft ( OLF � INT ❑ DWQ Temp) S4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 115 LF 3i. Comments: At each site Temporary impacts are associated with dewatering both up and downstream. With the exception of Permit Slte #1, which has surface water impacts upstream. Page 6 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number— (if applicabie) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (Pl or 01 � P� T UT of Grays Creek Culvert 02 ❑P�T 03 ❑P�T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: Only upstream at PS#1 surface water impacts are incurred temporary impacts for dewatering. 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed then complete the chart below. 5a. I 5b_ 5 Pond ID proposed use or purpose number of pond P1 NA P2 5£ Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? 5i. Expected pond surtace area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: c. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream I 0.001acres (0.001 ac Tem � 0.001acres he addition of 10LF of RCP. 0.001 ac of 5d. 5e. Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Flooded I Filled I Excavated I Flooded I Filled I Excavated � Flooded ❑ Yes � No If yes, permit ID no: Page 7 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T im act re uired? B1 ❑ P❑ T NA ❑ Yes ❑ No 62 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 63 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts' 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The wetland/stream crossing along Sandhills Rd was designed as a 2:1 side slope and will be rip-rapped for stablilization. Additionally, the roadway was designed to cross the wetland area at iYs most narrow location. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Appropriate Erosion Control measures shall be in place so that the surrounding Wetlands are not disturbed. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 26. If yes, mitiga[ion is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ � Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity Page 8 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. �� Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 4h. Comments: 1151inearfeet � warm ❑ cool ❑cold squarefeet 0.90 acres acres acres 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigatlon plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. Zone Zone 1 Zone 2 Reason for impact Total impact (square feet) 6f. Total buffer Multip�ier 3 (2 for Catawba) 1.5 requi{ed: 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: NA Page 9 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identlfied within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included7 If no, expiain why. Comments: 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this projecY? 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes ❑ No 33 °/a � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Please see attached Management plan 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local govemmenYs jurisdiction is this project? 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that appiy): 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management P�an with proof of approval been attached? 5. 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Certified Local Government ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit NA ❑ Phase II ❑ NSW ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: ❑ Yes ❑ No � Yes ❑ No � Yes ❑ No Page 10 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? � Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes � No 1 c. If you answered "yes° to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ietter.) ❑ Yes Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surtace Water or WeUand Standards, ❑ Yes or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ No ►/ . ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Wili this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The project is one which qualifies as a 23 CFR 771.117. As such, the project is in a category of projects that add either no or a minor amount of new impervious surface directly, indirectly or cumulatively. Consequently, the project will not result in cumulative impacts that cause or will cause a violation of downstream water quality standards. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Page 11 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Fieid Office you have contacted. ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No ❑ Raleigh ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? USFWS Endangered Species website (list by county), Preliminary Ground Survey, Natural Hertiage GIS layer. The US Fish and Wildlife Service proposal for listing the Northem Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) as an Endangered species was published in the Federal Register in October 2013. The listing became effecitve April 2015. NCDOT is working closely with the USFWS to understand how this listing may impact NCDOT projects. NCDOT continue to corrdinate appropriately with USFWS to determine if this project will incur potential effects to the Northern Long-eared bat, and how to address these potential effects, if necessary. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitaY? I❑ Yes 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? USFWS website- http:l/www.Tws.gov/nc-esffish/fish.html 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resaurces (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? ❑ Yes �/ . ►� . 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NCDOT Cultural Resources office preformed an internal review through the Programmatic Agreement between State Historic Preventation Office and NCDOT. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA.designated 100-year floodplain? 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NA ❑ Yes � No 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping website (Tile #0422 ) Greg Burns, P.E. � May 26,2016 Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name ApplicanUAgenPs $ignature Date (AgenPs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant - is provided ) Page 12 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version � ��}- I�. i �Y � � `��, ♦ l )! %.�-'� �- � - i— _` ��M �. /f�� ._ _��\• \".` �\ � .�'�. ��m� �1� —� ',�� — �� / � / � F ---�� ?`'��o , % i � � �, i/� ; � / `� ^. . �; � ��', • , �, . ,�, � _ _ � ,. '� , ! r �,�� ,� � � � � - � — > > , ~� .fs- _ . 1 - /��, � ` �� _ J � � / //i�'G'� � cl � �,.;; ,. _ _ �- . . l� � ,/ '� _ ' o`�'�'�-, � ` ��n -` �' !.^.h��, �-. %�� . \ ��. f �I-- � ��6 � ^ �, � • (� _iah'`' �j_� ��.�� .�., \ -tr . =�� ^ . ' .-, �� I � ti� �' � �(, /��' �� l '� � `�� L' ' � t.��} -r�. �'� ��5��- � . \� ,. � � /' ' �j �,�.. —_ � ... ��.s�� '' �''�� ii�1�., �-�-, /I ,.1 .`r\'/ i� -'--{� i �U_ . .- ,-��,,` p b I =� h�2, , 11ji `"`n0 �. . �/ � . �r '� , -.I � � t=,-.= '_'�,°- �� `` \ { � ) i .7 � Hrymmd /r f ' ��e I 1'-�/�J . ��vly Ji '.\ V/�-/ ,-.y �-� \ ,�.�'1\ „ � 4/ 'sa f �� r� �k� � Permit Sde #1 � l j- .. \ �__ � '� � '`\ � \ -p�`�, , � 4 _� � � ��'� S�fj-��y `��};� � �—��;� .1 ��' �'�t��.\ ._� �. %fi��,.,� `_.J,� `- . _,J ^ ."� � I � " ?� _C� � �S� \ � �' p��.��,� -, i' >, � �1 _ L� �.`' � . lrryft: �T �-' ' �.�. '�/�'�--?-z^f- ,'iar "�� 1—'T-T �-.\�}-+� �; m �r'\\� A % �"` . �� / ' �v r� '4 � � . /! �� r �' � � � �._� h��. � u < _ J . . . � L • �� . ;� � �ir� 7 . \ �' � ;a r `�> 1 _ � � ` _. , � ✓) �-'`»e� 71�� t [ � �v � � � . � " � � �/`� i' � - � � , t. )�,�_ � ,t '\�� .i-�. . � / d��i '�. ^� � � � � • � � \��.i �. �� .. \ . / ��: �. i .�� V�J��i I � � ( � �l yJ,�'_ . �. ...� � �( �/�/ . �i ' ( Vq _�,y PermdSite#2 �� <<� � � � � � , �� v, � -e y � � J �� el � �Q�.A� v� '�� A . :; \ � ! ti ' ,; ` •�"J r ��'F. .�,t �,� M1p ' ��\ ��_i' � j ` i 1 � : � </ Q ' ��= -- ' : r � '.� `� ' � , � � ; � ,� ,� , � �; i L.�� . , , � �� . ; Y f '„�_.� � Permit Site #3 'F!-� �a.-- •- � �� a -��_ � 0 � � �—�, _ �;;�'_� � \� �\ �i � � � �� — �ou�E� s� �, f �� : ti ! _ �, .; �r � !�� s. � , �, � � � 1 � �'� —F- �� , ��:�'!1 t�`�� . / J � �I � I \ `�` . i �, �.;: _ (: � � _ �.. �=C°m ' � � iF� � �� `• � %�� l h��/4.�. � -� , �� , , . � ��\J l , s� _ , � , �� , ; , , �� -.. �� ,. ' --------_ " ; -_ �` �$ � :\ \ �`l� `� ` � t � � f� ��N '� . � . �. - —, ---- — � � ` �� - r `'f'' � � /,� \`�-� ` l �'� � ( Y �� ` �" �� '-' y�� , � , � . � �\� , A � � .�� ;.�. �� v � j � ; � ,I � -- 11I �tiI�..� , '' - �' � (1• r!\ 1 f� } �\ �„�J '��-'�1f3 � n�. �f �c E r �__ � ��o •, � , M1�"}'.��4 � i� ;--� i \ S A \ .�:� .\� \'�i; t✓ �� ` �` 1 1 l/ ��l\y� ' �li � 5��. � � � � ; � `; I i �.F-'-f ` , t �� \ l �"ti,' •� y \�'` 'C. � 5� ��`;(�,� � � < ,'� : t> � ,`, _' ,� ��"� �� Z � � , � 1_ �� ,�;i � ,` � � , � , � � � r'rr�/ ti��.�� ; �� ,-��- -----J _ ` __ � ' � . r� ��i �.. � ,�.r -i �i , r'��.. — `�`� � / �;'- > ; :�. lE� ` � �� f� . , - ,' / �� ,�-�' \ /'y ' ,rL, ��- �i� /. � _' J i , � A N �,� -,. _�,. \l ,._ i �' � �;��, W E 1=-`L_��-�G� '�,�� S -� � Site Information 0 900 1,800 3,600 Feet Sand Hill Rd/ Chicken Foot Rd State #: 45336.'I 21 TIP #: W-6206U Cumberiand County 1 inch = 2,000 feet NORTH CAROLINA CUMBERLAND COUNTY 4 W-5206u PROJECT LOCATION Sand VICINITY MAP DATE: 12-29 -14 SCALE: 1 "=2500' N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT: 45336.1.21 (W-5206U) CHICKENFOOT ROAD (SR 2241) & BRAXTON ROAD (SR 2242) & SANDHILL ROAD (SR 2238) SHEET 1 OF 13 HOPE MILLS, N.C. QUADRANGLE 2013 > ..M i,��iQ .,�s�2 ..t cipl � '` rcy'c : � �i-�.y� r`�` .. � PERMiT �; S1TE 1 �'�r %-�, � r� ' �/ ° �'r.a I �'�5�. „ "; ;____---!' ,,PERMIT.._ __A. .-�" SITE 2 - iR� .� � �._._� ->,,.w �,.. \'£. � SITE MAP N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATIO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT: 45336.1.21 jW-5266U) CHICKENFOOT ROAD (SR 2241} & BRAXTON ROAD (SR 2242) & SANDHfLL ROAD (SR 2238) DATE� 12-02-14 SCALE: 1"=500' I SHEET 2 OF 13 1 a BARKER �ALL6ERRY FpRM . LLC O.B.907 PG. 56d �� i REMOVE x I • EXIST. HW d` i dW� .0£� �t P RAP-�"� �, , i fAM )" RCP-111 �WALL ' �� z --30" RCP-III -SPECIAE LATERAL BASE DITCH O DETAIL "B" q n � PREWITT LAND Ct?MPANY, 4LC � DB 7767 PG 322 . . � —____ -rwcey 19+00 a i� ��' � � . C� �y�i �' `•� ��%i �� r �E` : � .� : • �i r--x '�;�+r�4 m � �`''`., , ��GI i �•. 'd ' -�-••.: r � —_. iN n.,. ' _, ' .,�\'�".�'� d •~� � 1 PERrMIT SITE NUMBER 1 PLAN �s� DENQTES FILL IN WETLAN� L�1�11l111 DENOTES HAND CLEARING v��CLLC� DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER (/,y7'//�'^ OENOTES STREAM L�Ill1ll� IMPACTS QATE: 12-29-14 SCALE: 1 "=50' +e � V � BIRCHWtpOD FARM5, INC. D9 3702 PG 877 21+0�' � . � . • , _� � . � � N m� ;.. 3� \� � 0 25 b0 700 18+00.00 EL =158.91' 'i 70 19�*OO.QO EL = 158.17' PROPOSED GRADE- OVERLAYAND WIDENING OF EXISTWG ROADWAY 20+00.00 21+OO.QO 22�-00.00 EL = 158.91' EL = 159.71' EL = 160.21' � �Q � - - .�-_ �.. _.. � APPROX. ELEV. OF LEFT � i�` �"" "� +� .,,, ,� � TOE QF SLOPE AT LIMITS �, � �" OF FILL 150 `''`---- ��..�` r ��.r�..��.�r' o �EXTEND EXIST. 60" RCP Z WITH HEADWALLS ¢ � � F ELEV IN. = 14820 � � 140 � g ELEV OUT =146.55 � � � �' J � � -�- STA. 19+83.91 I 1 �s+oo ��+ao 20+00 2�+00 22+00 PERMIT SITE NUMBER 1 S.R, 2252 CHICKENF�OT R4AD -L- PROFlLE DATE: 12-2-14 SCALE: 1"=50'(HflRiZ) 170 160 150 140 N. C. DEPT. QF TRANSPORTATIC DN1510N OF HIGHWAYS CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT: A5336.1.21 {W-52Q6U) CULVERT ON GRAYS CREEK UNDER S.R. 2252 {GHlCKENFOOT ROAD) SHEET 4 OF 13 ��0 -----------------------------------�L---��-�$3-p9�--------------------------------- �70 is5 ------------------------------ -------� --- - ----------- � 160 --------------------------------r�-----------� ---------� 155 -----___ -------------- ---- ------------------ - --',' CONC. HEADWALL -------------------- - -------------------- - EXiST 60" RCP EXTEND lc'jQj ----------------------- --__aANdCONST.NEADWAlLS , ECEviro =-raa.2o------- - --- i ELEV OUT = i48.55 .��.�._..�_.._..�.._� =__-===-=o_��c===av� � 145 -------------------------- --- --- — -----,�---�---------- ------------- FLOW ---------- 140 ------------ -------------- SURF. WATER- STREAM �MPACTS IMPACTS PERMIT SITE NUMBER 1 S.R. 2252 CHICKENFOC�T ROAD SECTlON VIEViI 7R��r---------------------165 n6rw rL --- -EXIS7..EIl�-----��---- 160 CONC. HEAOWALL l �X]ST 30'CMP -- -- �- T0.eEbA1x l55 r-�===___�_' l ��_��_� � --- -�--„-�_�-�--------G---- 1�30 ----;�------ -- 145 ------------- � EXIST, RIP RAP TO REMAIN T_#.t - 140 ------------------------- 0 10 20 40 � SCALE: 1 "=20' (HOf2IZ) 1"=10' (VERT) _ N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRQJECT:45336.1.21 (W-5206U) CULVERT QN GRAYS CREEK UNDER S.R. 2252 (CH(CKENFOOT ROAD) DATE: 12-29-14 I S1-lEET 5 OF 13 � 78" RCP-III �,. W/1' SEAL 23+00 � OHEADWALL �" ■ x BIRCHWOOD FARMS, INC. �°` m DB 3702 PG 877 �* � �" �=-- � � 24+00 � WETLAND 37 452 SF � FILL 0.�22 ACS �'` � MECHANIZED 5933 SF CLEAR�NG 0.736 AGS ,� 2 rJ -I- �� ' 1 � 3 �� x � WlB _ ._ _. ._ _ ._ ._ � HELEN C. CASHWELL, TRUSTE OF THE HELEN C. CA�HWELL TRUST 8 8905 PG 849� 103 PG 37 * � \� � x HEADWALL � � � -r�_ -' "=0 �-- - --- i'jl�i��r`•-�a��A �;��°ya➢i� �, � � �rFar/;r,�� . I�%:4i!'' <.��: , �. . ' • � • ��r'�� i�� r � ,.��;�� ► �l�� .. =9�":'�� 'i�� APPROX. 3 TONS , _ � � I CLASS B RIP RAP � � 2 SY FILTER FA�IC r. / � 83 99' +6 .81 PERMIT SITE NUMBER 2 PLAN � DENOTES FILL IN W ETLAND * * * * * DENOTES MECHANIZED * * * * * CLEARING � DENOTES HAND CLEARING � DENOTES STREAM IMPACTS DATE: 12-29-14 SCALE: 1 "=50' REVISED 5-17-16 64.52 +Fift AI DIVERSION �" O � BIRCHWOOD FARMS, � INC. DB 3702 PG 877 -� � � � ^ � — E � ��B � \ � � . CLA55 B RAp S9ti ` 6 SY FILTER F IC 0 5 fi0 �ni N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATIO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT:45336.1,21 (W-5206U) CULVERT ON GRAYS CREEK UNDER -Y1- S.R. 2238 (SANDHILL ROAD) SHEET 6 OF 13 �+OO.dO EL = 153.90' 160 150��.�`` . � 140 z �� 13Q � 22�+40 23+00.00 EL = 9 52.26' 24" RCP ELEV IfJ. = 148.06 ELEV OUT =148.Q6 ___--,,,� � 24+OO.QO 25+00.00 26+OO.OQ EL = 151.71' EL = 152.24' EL = 153.87' DBL 78" RCP W/ HEApWALL5 24" RCP ELEV IN. = 141.40 ELEV IN. =148.06 •� ELEV OUT =140.50 ELEV OUT =148.06 .-r, i'� — STA. 23+54.43 STA. 24+60.0 ' r��` �� . � �+s.a 2�°��''�9aoo°%'_ ��,� �+)3. �'� •. _ ,....... --'_ _ "'� � 140 P� = 2a+oo.00 g F EL = 146.$2' w g VC = 6OO' � � � � 23+04 24+00 PERMIT SITE NUIVIBER 2 S,R. 2238 . SA(VDHILL RD, -Y1- PROFILE DATE: 12-2-14 � � 130 25+00 26+QQ SCALE; 1"=50' (HORIZ) 1"=10' (VERT) N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DiViSION OF HiGHWAYS CUMBERLAND CQUNTY PROJECT: 45336.1.21 (W-5206U) CULVERT ON GRAYS CREEK UNDER S.R. 2238 (SANDHILL ROAD) SHEET 7 OF 13 -Y1- 23+54043 OBL 76 LF - 78' RCP 160 ---------------------- M►�1'SILL IN OFF-LINE BARREL ---------------------� - EtHV'"I�7.-=Y�1:40---------------------160 EL�V DUT - t40.50 � ST .23+54.43 155 -------------------------------------------'" - -- -----------------------------------155 12' I50 IZ'RIP RAP�DUiLET ------- -- — -- - ----------- - --------- -- ------------------------150 OI55IPATOR ON FABR[C _ _ CUNC. 145 ---------------- ---- ---- - � � -------- --- pEaDw�.r -- ---------------------t45 ---._....__.._.r_...�.. , H�DWTLL—_ ------- --�....� 140 --------------------- 135 ----------------------- PRDVIDE Y S[LL AT-� E�FFRADFFE�INE P1PE ----------------------- - -------------� — — — 14e ------------------F�ow-------------------------------------135 PERMIT SITE NUMBER 2 S.R. 2235 SANDHILL RD. sECT�orv viEw U 10 20 40 _—� SCALE: 1"=2Q' (HORIZ) 9"=10' (VER'f� N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION D1VISfON OF HIGHWAYS CUMBERLANQ COUNTY PRpJECT: 45336.1.21 (W-5206U) CULVER7 ON GRAYS CREEK UfYDEft S.R. 223$ (SANDHILL ROAD) DATE:12-2-14 I SHEET 8 oF 13 i / KENN 8. BELL AND W1FE, ELIZABETH A. BELL D8 6338 PG 604 MB 68 PG 29 APPROX.70 TONS CLASS 7 RIP RAP 70 SY FILTER FABRIC (BANKS ONLI� /�E � ��/ ,� �-r�'i '�� :� � .', il/.l /�� .•-/! /' % /� � '��- '� � � � "� ' ��' `/ ''' � ''' �'' < � % �,,�-"�avam ' 1. /_--'"� �. �-��/ � / � ��"'� �_-�''�'/%� � ' TREMAYNE. T, THURMAN AND W1FE, SHANNA 5. THURMAN � OB 8287 PG 298 MB 115 PC 164 � MB 115 PG 199 �� PERMIT l3 3 v v ;� �v °' o A N ➢� ° z� � � n m N � m� ..� z � —�m ta I � \�\\ � \\\�� C P.R. BARKER y�\ � \ �B 6436 PG. 516 s \ \ DB 927p PG. 576 \� MB 68 PG 2g ��5� � W �.E� O3 � Y ' \\ � O9 � BARKER GALLBERRY F 0 � o /3Atl°a �a�� -'-\.y� FARMS, LLC "� aoaM DB 9079 PG. 564 � �r� � � � v ,� N � d. 1 N 1 SITE NUMBER 3 PLAN � DENOTES STREAM IMPACTS DATE: 12-29-14 SCALE: 1 "=50' ND T OMAS AND 1NFE, \ ESP�RANTA THOMAS `r DB 8279 PG 770 ,rS. �� MB N5 PG 164 �� MB t15 PC 199 �a � �Py� , F,, v 9 F c�, F si• \ >- s� 9sFy � F so .^�� s �. 0 25 5o jo� N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUMBERLAND GOUNTY PROJECT:45336.1.21 (W-5206U) CULVERT ON TRIBUTARY TO GRAYS GREEK UNDER -Y2- S.R. 2242 (BRAXTON ROAD) REVISED:5-17-16 � SHEET 9 OF 13 PI = 24+00.00 -Y2- POT STA 24t9578 = -Y5- POT STA /Of00 '� 8� PI = 25+50.00 K = 149 170 EL=165.80' VC = 2(l0' --- -----•_..� PI = 28+00.00 P1= 27+00.00 EL = 166.65' EL = 167.15' VC = 100' VG=100' K=87 K=71 {-)0.5000% �— �"""�DITCH LT DITCH LT �...r.._.._.._.,_.......,......�.....-.•.�..�b=�:s: _,y .,.'.._.._.._.._. 160 -" � ,. �„�---- PROPt�SED 60" RCP WITH HEADWALLS ELEV IN. =158.5� ELEV OUT =158.0 � 'rjQ -Y2-STA.27+03.68 � � � � 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 PERMIT SITE NUMBER 3 S. R. 2242 BR,AJCTON RD. -YZ- PROFILE :i 170 •� E 150 29+00 SCALE: 1"=50' (HORIZ) 1"=10' (VERT) N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPOR7ATIC DIVfSION OF HIGHWAYS CUMBERLAND COUNN PROJECT:45336.1.21 (W-5206U) CULVERT ON TRIBUTARY GRAYS CREEK UNDER -Y2- S.R. 2242 (BRAXTON ROAD) DATE: 92-2-14 � SHEET 10 OF 13 -Y2- 27+�3068 1s0---------------------------------------------------o- ---------------------------------------------1s0 o� PROP. 72 LF - 60" RCP � 175 --------------------- EL�V-li�t. ='158:62--------------- `" ------------------------------------------------ 175 ELEV OUT = 157.99 STA. 27+03.88 170 ------ --------------------------- — — - -------------- - -----------------------------------------------17m CONC. _. ` 165 -------- tIEADadALL� - - --{------------------ �- �----- -- --- �_- � -------- CONC. ----------165 F ' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' ' _ _ _ ' _ _ _ ' _ _ _ ' ' EXIST 48°CMP � HEADWALL 16ID -------------:---a�._._--_ ------ ------��-----io-sE -RErvtevED--------_ �� --------------- 16� 155 ---------------------------------�------------------ ' -------------- �- -155 FLOW------------------------- PERMIT SITE NUMBER 3 S.R. 2242 SECTIQN VIEW DATE:12-29-14 REVISED: 5-17-16 0 10 20 40 � SCALE: 1"=20' (HORIZ) 1"=10' (VERT) N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGNWAYS CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT:45336.1.21 (W-5206Uj CULVERT ON TRIBUTARY GRAYS CREEK UNDER S.R. 2242 (BRAXTON ROAD) SHEET 11 OF 13 q� a . . _.-- _. ' .�`�?�-�'2�?w j � E� ��• b+'�+� -' �`" _ r;� = � F ^ . : r �,�.�' ca'°�.�e P'a .:..`4.�� ..."4. - .-�:w ., . -�. y _ " . . .-_ ..�_.__ ..-. ._ .�_� 1:. ;:'s'' .i�`w'-.D W-5206U Permit Site #1- Chicken Foot Rd Upstream Y��«.� e',I� � ..n�. � . _'�. W- 5206U Permit Site #1- Chicken Foot Rd Downstream _. . '�er � � -, .-. e:r�l c.4' �• , 4 - � y i>J� u y�',1. , },;. � t...� � � � �" �. �E ~ . �' y � ' �}�� L 1 _�� e �.e:: S Ai .,� ` ' " i � � l�� . , t„ } 4e.-.,- m�_ ,�; * � '�t �, �., � � ; r � �`- = 9 +� �}�, 5 A� .� f � 4 � 'iC�� `� � ''��. .. n� ,�,�. i. �� '� � �:_ '?" , . ti t fi.:�. _ : `'., , 1�T�T:. �'� r, A,. �1�� .. , — � � �7; '. �` % �,� ;�.� y �V�-'�.. .,: , �� -��: N � � i .; : b � �. '� i'� i,� . . � o?.% ". ' B / �. - '. �.- j � i7: ry.- _ "'�.� i .... � 'y�j: �� . t c.�, � p al�. �.� ti.: �'�'a�h,y\ If�G ¢ .�._f��$.}t".L.. W-5206U Permit Site #2- Sand Hill Rd Upstream v,,:`n myt ��_.. .v-.— s � .s, � � �� -. ,; ,� � � y �� .� 4 f � I 1�,. � . �+2 �o,l p � �4 a� ��av�6 � �aFy'd�.;. � � . �� (� a� � g; > » ilu�A� r . _ .. . .. ... ,� ;� - � aF.. - ` ^ � � , ° '� t . S ,..,; ,�. " \ � �', � � , a� � 4� � �s � �t� . ( - I , ' � ^ • � � ��\ 1 .#' � t; .,�irF ., -.` . � _, � .. _ / � ' i' .r lu _ p �. � � �, � 1: 1 �,�r. � .. . c� -:�� I� .. 1 � ... .. ak� � i t� _ .r. [ � '� � �� 1," , " i °��..�f_� �� , ae� � , � �.s , � � �; �, , '� , � �� , "' �.;' ' � � � � � _ ` � "'� � � .li'�1 ' � , .Y l ) ' ' ` '. :'�r `t R��. -34K��' 1� ' M a � � J, � ; r ._ y&� •. „ � f .-..-. (A� t � �'� y �}f '�,"W � �N¢'. t ,y� �• 1� � � `� i �.ff � C�. ` � + { �4 � Z�� 1-c a..y '�i...A : R'�]�i�. . � a i `!.^ �'� � �/ `w W-5206U PermitSite#2-SandHillRd Downstream � -.,.e; , ,. , - r �: ;^�� •� � - ::.: r. - .- , �-.� >. �.:� — �;,��- W-5206U Permit Site #3- Braxton Rd Upstream �� s ! �F f��. . , �. , ; ; ;, . 4� �V /, _ f / ,..� C � . �r' '��. ��' � � V � . - � ;. ! ` �' �S � '-1' fe�� R �' � . ) s._ � s �i � . � sR .. y ^c 'z y�{' � F . a y �� 1 a} + "t � t� �� , 7C' � _. �. � � � - ��r 4 � `Y _ � FF��i ��tS�� i.._ Y� ?�. . � ^r � ,• ,.-. +�w� �. r 'r N 1:. � �y ..� . ] J �}� + � l' f. � - ��• .,iY �,j� ��. � _•�� 5. ,�3P' -a"- `�nr.- � ._a � .' � � � 2 s�� # i 4 - �.'L+'$ l� .+Y { iqy_. � l 1 � M � i :q� Ab' v _ 'R�� .� ! �' ,_�.,, �u. ..+,� p7 � i _ �i', d' • ,� ' 'r � ,� .�r'». ;'.. � � `� ay ,�« -- ' � � � �� Fµ �. ` � '� o L� .ak - '. _ , -� / , ' � .:';r r.,...y � _ .,_..�'-. ,/; ,�� , . „ - � r � � _ �,: � $'{ �'� f�k . I( ^ ` Jtl 9 J �`i ' p- - . Sc ..� "k ,. �� .a ,� .s c� e � 's � s t l _' �'�!`i .�c, � rr.< �e T ..,r �.,3,s �;;a � �"e+. , a� �,=E .C. <c �� .� �m f � s' e � _ r.c � rtT r� � �f , � _. .� , ; ' '. � , ^ `' . E f i t . - J y � 3 � _" i i: 'l .' l �t y t�+s `-�'� - , t „ ' b r � �� b Jd'�`v. ,r � : T-1 '� ' ( ,y k+�' �.u-' �� ` I iRl �K e y j x 2�N �t j � � ' � � ° � � �� F � :. �' � e 1 Pe'2T' � x m � �� . �, .:� A / � ca � 1,� �,� �,� . y �.4 � � _ l + � r�.f. m �N 9 >� ,"" , � � �� , Ah fp '� za a � . �y F: ,y� � e' '7w W:'Sn�,; �g,',i_ er �'=,.�e... ,< r Y1 �", t,:. � . :,, '4 . _ �-x �/... � r..� �x �.e� ii'�'`.a � R �r °v'�i.{' j � � � � ' .^+., �. ��\ .. __ . . �1.,... .a3 . . _ ��EP�._. _.._ _ . . . __ . 4. '. _�d.` : ..� _ n _-�: W- 5206U Permit Site #3- Braxton Rd Downstream Ii7},+1Ra.t� NorthCarohnaDepartmentotiransportatrtn � � ( " !+t� i� �tlt3'��tc�1' Highwa� Srormwaker Proqram �� STORMWATER MANAGEMENTPIAN (Veralon 9.2, Relcasad JuiY ��tYj FJR LINEAft ROA[iWAY PkO.IEC i5 Pro ecVTIP No.: W-5206U Coun ies' Cumberland Pa e i of 2 Geneni Pro7ect Informat�on Pro ect No.: W-5206U Pra ectT e: Roedw Widenin Da[e: 1/6/2015 NC�OTContact: SeanP.MaNszewski CantractoNDesi ner. RiversAndAssociates Addreas: Dwision 6 Design antl ConsVuctlon Address; 5808 Farringdon Piace PO Box 1150 Suite 203 Fa ettevill, North Camllna 28302 Ralei h, North Camlina 27609 Phone: 910-037-2811 Phone: 919-848-3347, 6ct 6257 Email: s matuszewskl ocdot. ov Email: dsmith riversandassoGates.com Ci lTown: Spnn Lake Count ies : Cum4edand River Basin s: Ca e Fear CAMA Coun 7 No Primary Receivin Water: Gra s Creek NCDWQ Stream Index No.: 18-35 (� NCDWt] SurFace Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water Prima : Class 6 Su lemental: Other Stream Classification: 303 d Im a7rments: None BuRer ftules m Effect N!A Pro eCt �e5cnphon Pro ectLen th lin. Miles 6rFeet � fi,200 FT Surraundin Lantl Use: Predommataiy Rural RasidentiaVAgnculWral Pioposrd Pro�ec� Ekisbn Site Pro'ect Builbll on Area ac. fi 70 ac. 260 ac. Typicai Cross SecVon Oescription: Three Lane untlroided raatl with shoulder section Twa lane undivitled road with shoulder sedion Average �aity Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 20 500 Existin : 11,000 General Pmject Narra[ive. The W-5296U is a safery projec[ intended to improve the alignment and traffic fiow at the intersection of Chicken Poot Road (SR 2241) and 6raxtoNSandhili Roads (SR 2242 & SR 2238). The current configuration consists of twu tee mtersections to be replaced by one 4-way signalized intersecGon vnth turn lanes. The mtersection low�ion was 5hifted toward the south east alony Chickenfoot Road to provide for a perpendicular crossino oi the main wetland feature along Grays creek. The roadway cnnsVuction is rypical �f a�uraVemarging urban roatl with shoulder section throughout and 6mRed curb and gutter The exs6ng road pavemant was u6lized along Chckenfoot Road where feasable. . References TIP W-5206U Cumberland County PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUNDINFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: James J. Rerko, PWS NCDOT Box 1105 Fayetteville, NC 28302 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:0.85 mile south of the interchange of I-95 and SR 2241 along SR 2241. (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State:NC County/parish/boroughCumberland City: Hope Mills Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 34.9293° Pick List, Long. -78.9111 ° Pick List. Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: Grays Creek Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non-wetland waters: :115 ft.width (ft) and/or Cowardin Class: Riverine Stream Flow: Perennial Wetlands: 0.90 acres. Cowardin Class: forested Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: Non-Tidal: E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: ❑ Field Determination. Date(s): 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicanYs acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWAjurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation ofjurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there `inay be" waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): 2 � Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the a ppl icanUconsu Itant: . � Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant. ❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: . ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: � U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . ❑ USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. � U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Tabor City, NC. ❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): . ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: . ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): . or ❑ Other (Name & Date): ❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: ❑ Other information (please specify): . Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager (REQUIRED) 3 ignatur�'dn8 date'of erson �questing preliminary JD REQU ED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) W-5206U Cumberland Count Estimated Site Cowardin amount of Class of number Latitude Longitude Class aquatic aquatic resourcein resource review area PS#1 34.9291 -78.9136 Riverine 11LF Non-section 10 — non-wetland PS#1 34.9291 -78.9136 Riverine 0.04 acre Non-section 1 - wetland PS#2 34.9293 -78.9111 Riverine 88 LF Non-section 10 — non-wetland PS#2 34.9293 -78.9111 Riverine 0.86 acre Non-section 10 — wetland PS#3 34.9262 -78.9174 Riverine 16 LF Non-section 10 — non-wetland WETLANp �ETERMINATION DATA FORM -Aflantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region i �i , ProjecVSfte: ✓Q:�(, . IS T ��<�/•r., G CitylCauMy r l:ii'pCa�i, .-� SamplingDate: `' /.�v�'—... %WPlicanUOwner: � [ -+- " . . . , .�� S4te: ' ' Sampling PoinC � f � �' /�f � Investigator(s): f�.�:� :' � ' SeAton, Township, Range� T:S� ;>� `� ,y Landform (hillslope, ter2ce, a[c.): �. �" ! � � ' Local relief (concave, convez, none)::} + � � �� ` Slope (%): 3ubregion (LRR or MLRA): 1 Lat: `,��-� •� � � ' Long: ,-� G � �� .., pa�m: ','�_ ; SoilMapUni[Neme:_ J f �io�,^$tGY' NWIclassification: /J':'- '.;f>:/ i Are climstic / hydrologic condftlo�s on the sfte typical for tfils time of yea(7 Ves _ No _ Qf �o, explain in Remarks.) ^' Are Vegeqfion _, Soil � or Hydrology _ signiFlcantly disturbed7 Are Vepetation J Soil __, or Hydrology natu211y problamatic? Are "Normal Circumstances" present9 Yes '� No (If needed, explain eny answers irt Remarks,) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc. Hydiophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present7 Wefland Hydrology Resent? Remarks: J�i�L� %! i� C( � �' � , , � NYDROLOGY Yes= No= I Is4he5ampletlArea Yes i No Yes _ No _ `�"thin a Wetlantl? 7(�v/.%✓�v.; `J: . .' � / (' , ''� � �G""P��(. F ci,: �� .E=�'".:.% ; Yes � _. No Welland Hydrologylndicators: Sacondarv Indicators lmintmum of hv r iredl Pdmarv Indicetors (minimum of one i reouired-ch ck aFl that aodv) _ Surface &oil Crecks (BB) '� Surtace Water (At) �YVaterStained Leaves (69) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (88) _ High WaterTa6le (R2) _ Aquatic Fautre {B73j _ �2inage Pettems (610) ! Saturation (A� _ Mad beposits (61� (LRR U) � Moss Trim Lines (818) = WaterMarks(Bi) _ HydmgenSW(deOdor(C1} _ �ry-3eason WaterTable(C2) Sedirrrent �apos'Rs (82) _ O�cidized Rhizospheres on Liviqg Roots (C3J _ C2yfish Burtowa (CS) _ �rift �eposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Ira� (G4) _ SahraBo� Vsi61e on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat ar Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Retlucflon (n Tllied Soils (CB) _ Gaortrorphic Position (D2) L Iron Deposfts (B5) _ Thin Muck SuRace (C� _ Shellow Aquitard (D3) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B� _ Ofher (Ecplain in Remarks) _ FAC-Neutral Test (DS) Fleld Observations: _/ SurFaca Water PreseM? Yes `� No _ Depth (nches): n' / WaterTa6lePreserrt? Yes ✓ ` �� No__ �epth(inches): � ��. Saturatioo Preseni? Yes � No _ Depth (inches): n Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No mciudes p illa fri e) -- Desaibe Recorded Da� (stream geuge, mon�rmgwep, aeriai phofis, previous inspecNons),'rfavailable: ' „/�'-. Remarks: /.� � .i � . :'' �.. ' � _ � . ./: , /� . . , . . , . , , .. a� , . ' l . .. . � . ' ,( � . .. ' . � � , / � 1 /.�y. % . ,J'.i'i' � . . ' � � . . . � � , � ` ' t . ' � US Army Corps of Engineers Atlandc and GuH Coastal Plain Region — IMerfm Version VEGETATfON - Use scientific names of plants. TresStraNm (Pbts¢er. .��( )/-� %Cover Soecies7 SFatus 1. �'i�hC.i- �1�rTr"' �7,t.QG/i/`N/)0..,� �s ,��/� �'C 2. i �' � � Gt_ ,./' ��- D 50 --4- �{ 3. �/i fi,� ",[17�,c�J� '..(� : : � PiAO / � {.'> I ' � � _� C W 4. 5. 6. 7. �0 �j� �_= Total Cover Seolina Stramm (Plot size: � i ) L Q..%GtPl7 C-(-S.ai ✓hA i t!� a�, 4� � z �_'la��..j%� �.��. �, � �� RtrJ 3. ��/'/��c� 'l�n`�� "'ni 4 , 5. 8. 7. � _��=TotalCavet Shm6St2tum (Plotsize: j \' 1. �.Q /n'�.�.1^ f"r,r � -.,r . F-�j(1 7 '�! �.'✓ 2. C' n�='� , � r. • 3� � .,, �; i 3. 4. 6. 7. ,� 5 ('i �= To41 Cover HerhStratum (Plotsize: "�P� ) ...-'----�- . �y �� 1. r`� i'. ! ..a .,.i�. :i� ' t:/✓ �_ '!!G!A 2. (�Cf�a�hWctn.�r�. �R�� Q �`^� �� /v� �_ �,�,., 3. 5 Q,7�il Lr � t. � fi ' C' '� , "ti� = L_ t%✓ ��- 4. %�AQX'A�wa �,,' ry i f , . ; l nri . ✓ � _ ..�i '� r.�. 5. � 6. 7. 8. 9. 70. ��. 12. �e�' !" H _.J = Total Cover Wood Une Stratum (Plot size: ��" ) �j�, {✓ i. ..��e /�-' li' �� -f�'/`P%��_._L �/ 'Gq. 2. .SM / /O✓K �l.." � : � S r.+Z.� _L c��Y. 3. 4. 5 �' � = Tofal Cover SamplingPoint: ✓ /e�!'./rr� NumberofDominaotSpecles E ro ThatMe OBL, FACW, or FAC: �J �q� 7o41Numberoi�ominarit r� saa�es noross AI� strea: �B) Percent of OominaM Species �D � That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ (,q�g� Total%Covarof' Mu��__ OBL speeles X � _ FACWspecies %z= FAC species x 3 = F4CU species x q = UPLspecies %$_ Column Tofals: �q� �6� Prevalanae Index = BlA= d Dominance Test is>50% ,_ Prevalenca index is 5d.0� _ Problematic Hytlwphydc Vegetation� (Expla��) 'IndfoWrs of hydric spj� and wetiand hydrobgy must 6e present, unleu disturbed or prablematic. Tree- Woody pianb, exduding woody vines, approximately 20 R(8 m) or more in heigM and 3 in, (f.8 an) or lart7er in diametar at hwas[ height (OBH). Sapling - Woody plants, ezcluding woody vines, appro�rirtwtaly 20 ft(6 m) or mora in helght and fess tha� 3 in. (7.6 cm) OBH. Shrub - Woody plaMs, axdud'mg woody vinas, appro�clmately 3 to 20 ft(7 to 6 m) in heigM. Herb-AII herbaceous (non-wootly) pian�, indudi�g herbaceous vines, regardless ofsiz�_ lncludes woody plarrts, ezcepf woody vmas, less ihen appro�dmately 3 ft('I m) irt height Woody vine- PJI woody vv�es, regardless of he�ght. Hydrophytic / Vegeqtbn � PresentT Yes__ No__ US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guif Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: W��l � U Profile bescription: (�escribe to the depth neetled to document the Ind(cator or confirm the absence of indicators.) DepHt MaMX Rednx Fsatures finchesl Cobr(mois[) % Cobr(moistl °4 TVoe Loc Texture Remarks b r.� 0`2' = --- � � ` ��' l3-��,-� r,y� �,�_ � C�:�a� S'a.ho! 'T pe_ C=Concentreiio�, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrbc, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. �Location: PL=Pore Lirring. M=Matrix. Flyriric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': HlsWsal (A1) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) �Histic Epipadon (A2) _ Thin Oark SurFace (S9) {LRR 5, 7, U) 2 cm Muck (A70) (LRR 5) _ Black Hist(c (A3) Loamy Mucky Miha�al (F7J (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F78J (outs{de MLR.4ISOA,B) _ Hydrogen Su�de (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Ma(rix (P2) FiedmoM Floodplaln Sols (F19) (LRR P, S, TJ _ Stretified Layers (A51 _ Depleted MaMx (F3) _ Momalous Bdght Loamy Sails (F20) _ OrBanic Bodies (AB) (LRR p, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (dILRA 1538) . _ 5 cm Mucky Minsrel (An {LRR P, T, U} Deplated Oark Suffaca (F� Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (ip12) �I,RR T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Mad (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Expiain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Daffc S�rfaw (A7 t) _ Oep�eted Ochric (Ft 1) (MLRA 15ij _ Thick Dark Surtace (A'12) tron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR D, P,'n 'Indiptors of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Coast Pmide Redoz (At6) (MLRA 150q) _ Umbric Surteca (F73) (LRR P, T, U) wetla�d hydrology must be preserrt, _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S7) (LRR O, 5) DeBa Ochric (F1� (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or probiematic. _ Sandy Gleyed Mahir (S4) Reduced Vedic (F18) {MLRA 150A, �608) _ Sandy Redox (5� _ Piedmont Floodplain So7s (F19) (MLRq 149A) _ Stripped Matra (SB) ,_ Anomalous 8right Loamy Soils (F2� (MLRA 149A,153C, �53D) _ park Surtace (S� (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive layer (if observed); Type: �� / / � / `( , � / Oepth (Inches): V � Hydric Soil present? Yes ✓ No Remarks: -- /. / c�11��- :/1 ��°��OS/?r i, � ` � �i �', . � � -:j � . . G/;`? ,� 'G '. .. / � �. . . ��. ' -�3�� . US P,rmy Corps of Engineers � Aflantic and GuN Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version WETLAN� DETERMINATtON DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Ptain Region Pro cUSke: �.�.y" : . / �..( � . ,. /'� : E� � . _ � �, . / / / 1 � � )e • - ` Cfty/County_,�:..,. -; �.,. c i Sampling Date; Ja /�/ �`�- AppCcantlWmer. �'�= -3 I � � / �n 3�te� c%ir �✓ Sampling Point: �/%t. SCG � Imestigator(s): �Y'�.i�L' /' ' � ' Lrl �-- Sectlon, Township, Range: ' ;,C. � . C �~ Landtotm (hillslope, terraa, etc.): � < . , Locel relief (concave, convex, nanep)t � , ��{r _ Siope (°,6): Subreglon(LRRorMLRA): Lat. _5 �-� � - Long: �-'C1� S�f`{,`� Datum: /`��.�� Soii Map Unit Name: ' 1 r �"J -�Gi � c� 'q ( �j: � r � � i NWI classlficetion: .,fi i� G- i„] �� Are climafic / hydrologic cand'Rions on the sde typical for ihis time of year7 Yes= No _ Qf no, explain fn Remarks.) Are VegeYafion _, Soil � or Hydrology _ sign'rficaritiy distu�bed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present7 Yes _ Na _ Are Vegetation _� Soll __, or Hydrology _ naturally pmblemetic? Qf needed, explain any enswars in Remarks.) SU MMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophylic VegeTatlon Present? Yes_ No � HydncSoilPresent? Yes No � Wetlantl Hydrology Resent? Yes No l Remarks: � . � Gt/�Gl i %�!Li: ' �� HYdROLOGY Is the Sampletl Area wfthin a Wetland? Yes ''Y' � ; i av _ . ', ✓ No � � ��, •' . _ ^ Wetlantl Hydrnlogy Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minfmnm oftwo re'r d) P[Imarv Indicators (minimum of one is oui ed� h k all fhataoolv) _ Sutface Soil Crsdcs (B6) _ Sudace Water (A7) _ Wqte�Stained Leaves (69) _ Sparsely Vegeteted Concave Surtace (BB) ,_ High Water Tahte (A2) _ qquatic Fauna (613) _ Drafrcage Pettems (B70) _ Saturetion (A� _ Marl Deposits (B15J (LRR tn _ Moss Trim Lines (Bi 6) _ WaterMarks(Bt) _ HydmgenSulFldeOdor(Ct) _ Dry-Season WaterTable (C2) _ SedimeM �eposits (B2) _ Onidtzed Rhizospheras on Living RooGs (C3) _ Cra�sh Burtows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (63) _ Presence of Reduced Imn (C4) � Satu2tion Ysible on Aeriai Imagery (Ce) _ Algal Met or Cmst (B4) _-Recent Iron Reduction in Tpled Soils (C67 _ Geomorphie Posdion (D2) _ Iron �epasits (B� _ Thin Muck SurFace (C� _ Shallow qquilard (D3) _ fnundation Visible on Aeriai Imagery (B7) _ Other (Bcplain in Remarks) FAGNeutrel Test (OS) Field Observations: Surface VJater PreseM7 yas _ No � �epth Qnches): WatarTabloPresenY? Yes`Na=Oepth(�ches): Saturafion Reunt? Yes_ No= Depth QnchesJ: Wetland Hydmlogy PreseM7 Yes__ No �'� mcludes cao��a fi e) — Desaibe Recorded Data (stream gauge, rtonih�r'mg we11, aeriaf photos, previous fnspectfons), if availa6(e: ;�. / ✓ ; /.i Remarks � i ��.��j � �.�i.• `��).��-i _ �'/� �/j. . � - ' . / � , J US Army Corps ot Engineers ptlantic and GuH Coastel Plein Ragion - Interfm Version VEGETAT(ON — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Tree Stratum (Plot s¢o: . 7J %( ) °h Cover Soecias? Status Number a( Dominent Spectes 1, That Are OBL, PACW, or FAC: z. r�� sc� c�v c� J�. �� Tofal Number ot Oomina nt 3� Species Across A11 SVata; 4� Percent of �ominant Spacies `'- ThatAre OBL, FqCW, or FAC: 6 Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 (� �= Total Cover Total %Caver of. Muttiolv hv� Baoi"na Shafum (Piot size: L)� � OBL species X �_ 1, ��- V: F'UCOS �/1C"1(JY'l.. `�.h ,� ^,�t:s FACWspedes X2- y, FAC species x 3= 3, FACU speWes x q> 4. UPL species x 5= 5, Column Totals: (q) (B� 6. ' Prevalencelndex = BIA= Shrub Stratum (Plot shzer ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Her6 Sfrat�m (Plot size: j 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. :.� �% = Totai Cavet . =TotalCover 12. � f =TatalCover Woodv Vine Stratnum (Plot size: ) �r 7. f �' f I , i C i�` �„i �, � 'C n .i. ' . / C. G�Y . _ 2. 3 4. 5. % } =TotalCover l�� , t �l r ��c P,r g • i t �d ! � ( � . � �. � � !.. � _ Dominence Test is>5�% _ Prevalance Intlez is 53.0� _ Pfo61Ema6c Hydraphytic Vegetation� (Ezpiain) �Indicators of hydric sal andv�etland hyd�logy mus[ be presarR, unless disfurbed or problemaNc. Tree - Nkndy plaMs, exduding woody vines, epproximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in hegM and 3 in, (T.6 an) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plan�, ezcluding wuotly vi�es, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more i� height and Iess than 3 in. p.6 cm) �eH, Shrub - Woody phan6, ezduding wvedy vi�es, approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in treight. Herb-Ail her6acoous (non-woody) planYs, inGudtng herbaceaus Wnas, regardless oFs¢y. Inciudes woody ptards, ezcept woody vines, less than approxirtrdtely 3 ft(t m) in height Woody vine-Ail wnodyvmes, regardless of height. Hydrophyfic Vegetaiion - Present? Yes __ No!�� 1/ � y�'i �✓$ �: b�J�� US Army Corps of Englneers Atlantl< and Gulf Coastal Plain Rogion - Interlm Version SOIL Samp)ing Point � ^� � Profile Description: (Descri6e to the depth needed ta document the mdicator or wnfirm Yhe absence of indica`.ors.) Depth Matriz Redox Features (inches) Colarfmoistl °h Cobr(moistl % Tva Lo� Texture Remarks o - y roY�z "i � — — — � ' �"-�'J- lU"r:�f�— -- �. —� C. �T e: C=Conwntration, D=De ktioq RM=Reduced Matr'�, CS=Covered or Coeted Sand Grains. 'Loptioo: pL=pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil lndicators. indrators forProblematic Hydric Soils': _ Hlstosol (A7) _ Polyvalue BelowSuriaca (S8) (LRR 5, T, Uj _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR p) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin �ark Surfaw (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (q10) (LRR S) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F7) (LftR O) _ Reduced Vert'rc (F78) (outside MLRA 76DA,8) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A� _ Loamy Gleyed MaMu (F2) piedmont Floodplaln Suls (Ft�J) (LRR P, 5,'� _ Stratfied Layers (A� _ Depleted Matriz (F3) _ Momaious 8tlght Loamy Soils {F20) _ Organic Botlies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark SurFace (FB) {MLRA 753B) _ 5 un Mucky Mineral (A7} (LRR P, T, ll) _ pepleted Dark Sutface (Fn fted Perertt Material QF2) _ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ RetloX Depressions (F� ^ Very Shailow �ark Surface [fF12) (LRR T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P,'n _ Mad (F10) (LRR U) _ pther (Expiafn in Remarks) _ OoplatadBelowDarkSurface(Ai1) OepletedOchric(Ft'1)(MLRA951) _ Thick Dark Surtace (Al2) _ Iron-Manganese Masses (Ft2) (LRR 0, P, T) �Indiq}nrs of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Goast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150q) _ Umbric Surface (F73) (LRR P, T, U) wztland hydrolagy must 6e present, _ Sandy Mucky Mineret (51) (LRR O, 5) Delta Ochric (F17j (MLRA 151) uolass disturbed or pro6lertratic. _ Sandy Gleyed MatrtK (S4) Reduced Vertic (FiH) (NILRA 150A, 1608) ._ Sandy Redox (5� Piedmortt Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148A) _ Sfipped Mstr6c (56) _ Momalous Bdght Losmy Soils (F20) (NIIRH �49A, 1S3C, 9530) Dark SurFaw (S� (LRR P, 5, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if o6served): Type: R i Depth Qnches): � Hydric Soil PresentT Yes _ No � Ramarks: ��G( (��.i�' 1� �! �/.i o' .'�__ d�' .i✓,_,. . _ �.�.. / �. . �'.: %t _C,•• i .. �' . . . � . � � /� ' . . _ .. . .. i ' ' .. ' :� n L US Army Corps of Enginaers � Atlantic and Gult Coastal Plam Region — IMerim Version WETLANQ DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region , L q ProjecVSite: �C{��(� �yV��' �� °E �M'/i�"-v+'E'ZQ?�1 CitylCaunty: C:l VN.�J�PiY I `� `' %. Sampling �ete: � I � / ApplicanUOwner: l�i�. ti�)T /_7 �, ./.L State,:( �,l�`�,,�i Sampling Polnt: ��"',(•t.�" �� r(31Jf' ,.%v� l � Investlgator(s): � e�•.9^/� �i�. .4-( Section,ToWnshlp,Range: ✓� �` I1�" �— Landform (hilisiopa, terrace, etc.): 1�0. / tu-��yi ,Ltacal relief (concave, convax, none)G: G6V�. ��lQ� Slope (%): Subreglon (LRR orMLRA): l Lat: 3l �� %L�� Long. �� O• =� � 3 S Oatum: ��IL� � SoilMapUnitName: J�� JOhY1��,tN� NWiclassification: 1�� Jik O`%� fve climatic / hydrologic cond"Rfons on the sde 1 typical for this lime of year? Yes � No _ pf nq ezpiain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation _� Soil � or Hydrology _ signiCcantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No , Are Vegeta5oo _, Soil _, or Hydmlogy � naturaliy problemetic7 (tf needed, explaln any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplirtg point locations, transects, impo�tant features, etc. HydmphyFic Vegetatio� Present? Yes S� No _ �s tfie Sampted Area HydricSoilPresent7 Yes �' No_ ,�,�hinaWefland? Yes �- No WeUand HYdrology Resent? Ves,_;,._� No — Remarks: n �lLQ�� .r,_2 �t �� . - �nr� ��'.'U"S - , r�� ,, N)' n ; ` , � �o�l�` /�-�1��! �:�,�- _ HYDR6LOGY Wetla�d Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators [minimum othvo reauired2 Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check all ihat aodv) _ Surface So0 Crecks (86� ✓SuAace Water (At) ✓VJeterStained Leaves (B9) ✓�-parsely Vegetated Conwve Sorface (BB) ✓High VJater Ta61e (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (Bt3) Orainage Pattems (B'10) ✓Satu2tion (A3) _ Mad Oeposits (695} (LRR U) �oss Trim Lines (676) _ WeterMerks (B1J _ Hydrogeo SulFde Odor (C1) _ pry-Season VYaterTable (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Ozitlized Rhizosphares on Living Roots (C3} _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drik Daposits (63) _ Presence of Reduced Imn (C4) _ Saturation Ustble on Aerial imagery (C9) Algel Mat or Cmst (64) _, Recerrt Iro� Reduction in Tiiled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) �on Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surtaw (C� _ ShalloW Aquilard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aedal Imagery (8� Other (Explam in Remarks) FAC-Neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: / Surfaca Water PreseM? Yes `� No _ Dapth Qnches): �' WaterTeble Present? Yes ✓ No �epih Qnches). %�Q /� / SaturationPresenf? Yes� No_ Oepth(nches): � WetlandHydmlogyPresentl Yes l/ No_ mclutlesca illa fi e) Dascribe Re<orded Qata (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial phofns, previous inspeciiore), itava0able. h/' . J `/ �`_. Romarks, /�� ; � . .�- �. � /2CLVP J w1XC!/J._ � �!%YI C�l%i� l„C<..*� ��(�� L��' ,fGL."%G, _v. ��i i U r ` / / /,.� j � ��M.oss -�-n�-,�F� t.U�o�y �'�;��,a.t:, �-..�. n..��a�i.a.^.�, �:� �ti , _ . � / v W1.G�-ei%'� �h- , ��'��.r � il�' - , ��a��,' '%'�..0. �1"A. ... • % �. -"'i �/✓GC."-x'L. .�L'�&Q,�� G'i nG1y�C�� . . iY' '✓K... �.'�/ o., � /.;'!.} � f QJt��. l'�!� � /`/ "n r , � ... � ^_ i i r �,,,�,' !, iLG G( ✓U ✓l'�.d-,��D Q'_ �1l l-'' a�,:.r�.�_Q y�,G;p � . C /il US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coas[ai Plain Regian — Interim Version VEGETATION - Use sciantific names of plants, i. z. 4. 5. 6. 7. Sampling point�� c�:�� Absolute Dominant Indicator pominanceTestworksheet: (Plot size: ��/ ) % Cover Species7 Status Numher ot Dominaot Species yI/- '/l,,.G�u4 4: P,�7(II�' �� Ss � D _� � ThatAre OBL, FACW, or FAC: ( �q� >• e - � %� . %ce. tj �u � � �q Total Number of Oorrunant /� Species Across Nf Strata: �g� Percent of Dqminant Spedes Q That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: IU� �a (qlB) Saolina Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. �= Tofai Cover To41 % Cover af. Multiolv 6v' OBL specles X � _ FACW species X y = FACspecies x3= FACIJ species X q � UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: �q� �g� ( ^�� ' = ToffiI Cover Shr�b SVatum Piot size: �J n 1. LP.t.f, i� �� }l. � l+�C? 8`Yb C' f'� A� i" �� 1' 2. 3. 4. 5. 7 WB =TotalCover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 7. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 11 72 = Total COVer Woodv �ne Stratum (Plot s¢e: � � � a, � ) � ,� 1. � '� •1��,�. !, .. P � ! Cr 4' - , t , n .. � � JL� x 2. V/ �j S S�%J f'.5 1` �� 3. 4. 5 � � = TOWI CoVer �,1:� 7�i''-r�, ��a.,-� S'Gcn�r�-i C� ,.�� ^ � %�L�k � Cwv�.�,� _ �,r� � �4- �b �:- :". ; Prevalence Index = BIq= ✓�omt�ance Test is a50 b _ Prevalence Index is 53,0� _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vagetation' (E�cplain) 'Indicabrs of hydric sotl antl wttland hydrology must be present, unless disNr6etl of pra6lematic. Tree- Waody plants, excluding wondy vFnes, epproximatefy 20 k(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger m diametar at breasf haight (DBH). Sapling - Woody p�aMs, exduding woody vines, appmximatety?A ft(6 m) or rtrore in height and less than 3 in. Q.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody planfs, exGuding woody vines, epproximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in height. Her6-AII herbaceous (non-woody) plants, inciuding herbaceous vines, regardless of size. includes woody plaMs, excepiwoodyvi�es, less than approximately 3 ft('1 m) in height. Woody vine-fUl wnodyvines, regardiassof height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_^ No_^ / � • � � �9a�..t/d-cc...2 l� ay(�<^�.2 C2.q.G� �O("i'r�-. �/ ��n2.ec. ry� �4 ,a r-- P� 1.��-e.-, � US Army Corps of Engineers Atlentic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: ;�[.�'U/�"GC Profile Description: (Describe to the depth neetled to document the Intlicator or confirm the a6sence of Ir.dicators,) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inchesl Color(moistl % Cobr(rtwisfl 95 Tvoe� LoT TeMure Remad<s G -2 IoY(ZZi 2 /noi� _ � �a_�- ,3 - 9 /o /L2 /�o�, — Samd.�, /Yw� /o -!� lv u � 3/3 /�u Samd: lSe-/b' 1U723�3 q0°ra b�1/��/ l�%a C$ r�G- �a �i� _ �;nr.�'�, �Ty : C=Canwntration, �=Deplation, RM=Reduced Maha, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. �Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Metrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils : Histosoi (A7) _ polyvaiue Below Surtace (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck {A9) (�RR O) ✓Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thi� Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (At�) (LRR 5) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (P7) (LRR O) Retluced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA � 50A,6) _ Hydrogen SuiFide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Mafnx (F2) Piedmorit Fioodplain Soils (Fi9) (LRR P, S, TJ _ Stratified Laye�s (A5) _ �epleted Matrix (F3) _ Momaious BriBht Loamy SoOs (F2o) _ Organic Bodles (A6) {LRR P, T, lJ) _ Redox Dark 9urtace (F6) (bILRA 1538) _ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U} Dapleted Oark Suriace (F� Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Muck Presenw (A8) (LRR UJ _ Redox �epressions (FSj . _ Very Shallow Dark Surfaw (TF12) (LRR T, U) _'I ctn Muck (A9) (LRFZ P, Tj Mad (Fi� (LRR U) _ Other (Huplain m Remarks) _ Oepieted Below Dark Surfaca (A'N) Oepleted Ochric (Fi'I) (MLRA 151) _ Thlck DarkSudaca (Al2) _ Iron-hAenganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, n 'Indicators of hydrophy[ic vegetation antl _ Caast Prairie Redox (A18) (MLRA i50A) _ Umbric Surtace (F73) (LRR P, T, U) waBand hydmfogy must he present, _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, 5) Delfa Ochric (Ft� (MLRA 161) unless disturbetl or probiematic. _ Sandy Gleyed Matri�c (S4) ^ fteduced Vartic (F18) jMLR4160A,'I506) Sendy RedoX (5� Piedmont Fioodplam Soiis (F18) (MLRA 149A) _ Stripped Matrtt (S6) _ Anomalous Bdght Loartry Soils (F20) (MLRA 749A, 153C, �83DJ �ark Surface (57) (LRR P, S, T� U) Restrictive Layer (if o6served): TYPe: n � / Oepth (inches): �N/' `. Hydric Soil Present7 Yes V Na Rematks: J� � -�y �i ��J� lQ �.Q ... !�!' �P�` �j I ' !/l v. '� �� O�..y!l i'.�. 'n � n .' �.� 9�v" . � � `�-.i?r�'�.,:.:, l..G.^.-:.- l,��G � , . ^� s. ��_�� . -, / USArmyCorpso(Eng)neers � AtlanHcandGultCoastalPlainRegion—InterimVersion u NC Division of Wafer Q uality -Methodology for ldenf ificallon of IntermE�ten t and Perennial Streams_and Their Origins v. A.0 rac uwc� szream �aentification Form Version 4.0 Date. �� (� �� ! 7 ProjectlSite: �; , ,�,: �, � �- Latliude: , . ! Q Evaluator: // ,' �� /�`� � / �P1'�'r �.-4��X.F:.�.... County ' ,., � /� Longitude: � �� 9/ .3(9 ' Cl[�/r -:�' .ir- Total po7nts: WlthTenia Streamisatleastintermr(tent StreamDeterminationj,cir-cFe- e) Other � 0!' �f>_ 19 or e�enniaf if>_30' �-/� Intermitfent EFferennial: � e,g, Quad Name: ��,i�: 1y� .. x� � � A. Geomor holo (Subtotal= ) Absent Wz�k t /arge,greyi 1e'Continuityofchannelbedandbank �oderafe Strony lenlodes � 1 2. SinuosRy of channel along thalweg p � 2 � 3i � 3 In-channel structure: ex. nffle-pool, step-pooi, 2 3' � n le- ooise uence '"� � 2 3/ 4. Particle size of stream substrate � 5. AcGvehelict 800dplain `j' Z 3 0 � Z �1 6. �epositionai bars or 6enches Q � 1 7. Recent alluvlal deposits Z 3 :�aneFl 8� HeadcuGs � � Z 3 Larva 9. Grade control � � Z 3 10. Natural valley �� 5 � �,5 � 05 � 15 11. Second or greater order channei � ' No = 0 -- a aNficial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual � Ye$ � 3 B. H drolo Su6total = -�- i2 Presence of Baseflow � � 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria z � 3, 14, Leaf litter ,�� z . 3v 15. Sediment on plants or debris � � 5 0 :tle-Like o `p 5� � _ 16. Orga�ic debris lines or piles Q ,6 S� 1.5 17. Soilbased evidence of higfi water table� � 1.5 6�d: ! N° " � Yes � a SQ C. Biolo Subtotal= 18. Fibrous roots in stream6ed Z 19. Rooted plants in streambed � 0 � � 2 � 0_ Z0. Macrobenthos (nats diversity and abundance) � 21. Aquatic Mollusks � Z 3 22. fish Z 3 Pr��J 23. Creyftsh �� 5 � 1.5 �� 24. Amphibians p 0.5 � � 5 OS �J 1.5 25. Algae 0 �,O.S 26. Wetland planfs in streambed � 1.5 FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Othe� 10 _ 'perenniai streams may also 6e identified using other methods. See p 34 of manuaL _ Sketch: � �ryemi .,/r . . - �� .. � , ��, `spinet , , . �; �i G7. . � � -�, � �. .� •, i l f . �1`'-',(.'�� a � Y. +� , . � �`, ; ' _ � -3- ��_ '�� )oS� 40 La 0^� $ ��SC��@ (VC Division of YVaier Quality -Methodology foe Identificaf'son of tneermdttent ar,d Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4,0 �_ NC DINQ Si;eam ldentification Forrn Version 4.0 �ate: ��, �j�. Pro�ect�Site: / � , . ,�y,�,,,� . µ �, Latituc;e: q � - ' ! a� � � � Evaluator: ' - � _ , . . � � :. -------__ �_ County: �� , J Longitude: �,�-rx Total Poinis: %� e t� � e' ^ Wi�hTenfe St�eam!satleas�inte�miGent -� . Stre mation(circleone) Other � - Of� if>_igorperennralif>30• �� Intermitient PerenniaY: e.g.4uadName: �: 1 �� _ A. Geomorpholo (Subtotal = ` � Ahsent Weak `/ large, g�ey i 1a' Contlouity of channel bed and oank ` J ., �� noderate Sfrong lenlqdes � I 2 3 - 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg Q ` �� 3 In-channel structure: ex. rifFle-pool, step-pool, r� � 2> 3 ri pie-pool se uence �-✓ � Z 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate p '� 5. Adive/relict floodplain 4 2 3 0 � 6. Depositionatbarsorhenches Q �� z �3�_ 7. Recent alluvial deposits � Z 3 Crane FI 8- Headcufs � �} Z 3 � � Z 3 �aryq 9. Grade control �..0_) 0.5 1D Natural valley � � i.5 � �5 � 1 a c�� i t Second or greater order cfiannel � �- a artificiel ditches are not ratetl; see discussions in B. H dralo Subtotal� 12, Presence of Baseflow 13. Iron oxidizing bactaria 14. Leaf litter � :ei�e-Like �5. Sediment on planfs or debris �� 16. Organlc debris lines or piles 17. Soil-based evidence of high watertable7 bOff� C. Biolo Subtotal = ' � 18. Fibrous roots in streambed � �' 19. Rooted olants in sEreambed 20. MactoBenfhos (note diversit antl ab d No�O � 0 � 0 � 1 0 ,0; � 0.; No-O 3 2 � � Y un artce 21. Aquatic Moliusks � s� � 22. Fish Prs.�. 23. Crayfish � 0.5 �� 24. Amphi6ians 0` 0.5 25. Algae �0 0.5 26. Wetland p�ants in siream6ed FAC = 0.5; FAC,W = p] _ `perennfal slreams may alsa be Identified �sing ather metnods. See p. 34 of manual. �argemi SketCh: "spinel • � - , /7/ . 7� ..r'/�rJ Gs�'��: �, ,. , ��i '�''� � , . �-, w i. ' �� D0;! 40 LP Y-�__ Z 3 2 3 0.5 p � 1.: 1 �; Yes=a ; 0 3 3 1.5 . L-6 � � i i . "' ' .. �(� . � '1 + h' � CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM TIPProjectNo. w-52o6v State Project No. 45336 , i. 21 FederalProjectNo. H�uut-2238(1) A. Project Description: (Include project scope and location and refer to the attached pro�ect location map.) The purpoae of this project ia to align the interaectione of 3R 223B (5andhill Road) and SR 2242 (Braxton Road) with 9R 2252 (Chiakenfoot Road) 3n Cwnberland County. A traffic signal is proposed. SR 2238 will be relocated 1139 feet to the eaet while SR 2292 will be relocated 497 feet to the east. The raloaation of $R 2238 will impact upon 85 LF of etream (UT to Grays Creek) and 0.56 acre of jurisdietional wetlands, while the relooation of 3R 22A2 will impact upon 12 LF of stream (UT to Grays Creek). Lana improvements along SR 2252 will y3eld 28 LF of stream impaats (UT to Grays Creek) and 0.03 aare of jurisdictional metlands. The projeet length is 0.45 raile. Traffic mill be maintained throughout construation. B. Purpose and Need: This projeat was identified as a Safety Improvement Project by the NCDOT Area TrafFic Engineer. The project will a.mprove the safety along 8R 2252 by combining the intersectiona of SR 2238 and SR 2242. C. Proposed Improvements: Circle one or more of the following Type II improvements which apply to the project: 1. Madernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking, weaving, turning, climbing). a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing pavement (3R and 4R improvements) b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding fhrough lanes c. Modernizing gore treaUnents d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes) e. Adding shoulder drains f. Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, iniets, and drainage pipes, including safety treatments g. Providing driveway pipes h. Pei%rming minor bridge widening (less than one tlu�ough lane) 2. Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the installation of ramp metering contro( devices and lighting. a. Installing ramp metering devices b. Installing lights c. Adding or upgrading guardrail d. Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier protection e. Installing or replacing impact attenuators f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers g. Improving intersections including i�elocation and/or realignment h. Making minor roadway realignment i. Channelizing traffic j. Performing ciear wne safety improvements including removing hazards and flattening slopes k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid I. Installing bridge safety hardware including bridge rail retroFit 3. Bridge rehabilitation, i�econstrucfion, or replacement or the construction of grade separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings. a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks c. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour repair, fender systems, and minor structural improvements d. Replacing a bridge (structure a�id/or fill) 4. Transportation corridor fringe pazking faciliHes. 5. Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas. 6. Approvals for disposal of excess right-of-way or for joint or limited use of right-of-way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse impacts. Approvals for changes in access coutrol. 8. Conshvction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used predomina�itly for industrial or transportation purposes where such construction is not inconsisteut with existing 2oning and located on or near a street with adequate capacity to handle anricipated bus and support vehicle traffic. 9. Rehabilitarion or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users. ] 0. Gonstruction of bus transfer facilities (an open azea consisting of passenger shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street improvements) when located in a commercial area or other high activity center in which there is adequate street capacity for projected bus haffic. 11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such conshuction is not inconsistent with e�cisting zoning and where there is no significant noise impact on the surrounding community. 12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protecGve purposes, advance land acquisirion loa�is under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and protective buying will be partnitted otily for a particular parcel or a limited number of parcels. These types of land acquisition qualify for a CE only where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives, including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may be required in the iVEPA process. No pinject development on such land may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed. D. Special Project Infarmation: (Include Environtnental Commitments and Pern�its Required.) The impacts to the environmental reaources total 0.59 acre of juriadictional wetlanda aad 125 LF of stream impacts. It ie expected that the Corps of Engineera Nationwide Parmit #23 (Categorical Exclusion) would be utilized for the project. All impacts have been avoided and minimized. NCDOT had delineated all of the juriadiational metlanda in the corridor to identify the LEDPA. As designed, the wetland aroasing is at the moat narrom location whiah yielded the least wetland i.mpaeta. The US Axmy Corps oP Engineers and NCDENR Division of pater Resources were consulted on the deeign location. Additionally, the oulvert ia proposed to be aligned with the stream channel whiah will reduce stream impacts. Fioodplain pipes are proposed to continually provide overbank Plooding hydrology to the wetlanda downstream oP the arossing. Side slopea have been deaigned at 2:1 in order to reduce wetland impacts. And, the qrass lined-awales have been eliminated from the typical roadway seation to reduce wetland impacts. EEP will be uaed for the project mitigation. E. Threshold Criteria The following evaluation of tltreshold criteria must be completed for Type II actions ECOLOGICAL Will the project have a substantial impact on any unique or important natural resource? Does the project involve habitat where federally listed endangered or tlueatened species may occur? Will the project affect anadromous fish? (4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of permanent and/ar temporary wetland taking less than one-third (1/3) of an acre and have all practicable measures to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated? Will the praject require the use of U. S. Forest Service lands? Will the quality of sdjacent water resources be adversely impacted by proposed construction activities? � NO � X � X � X � � X � X Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding Water a Resources (OWR) and/or Righ Qualiry Waters (HQW}? Will the project require fill in waters of the United States in any of the designated mounia3n tmut counties7 Does the project involve any known underground storage tanks (UST's) or hazardous materials sites7 PERMITS AND COORDINATION (10) If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the project significantly affect the coastal zone andlox any "Area of Environmental Concern" (AEC)7 (11) (12) (13) Does the project involve Coastal Bazrier Resources Act resources? Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required? Will the project result in the modification of any exisGng regulatory floodway? Gf � � YES (14) Will the projeot require any stream relocations or channel changes? SOCIAL ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES (IS) (16) Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned growth or land use for the area? Will the project require the relocation of any family or business7 (1'n Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effect on any minority or low-income population? If the project involves the acquisitia� of right of way, is the arnount of right of way acquisition considered minorl Will the project involve any changes in access control? Will the project substantially alterthe usefulness andlor land use of adjacent property? Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? (22) Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is, therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of ] 990j7 (23) Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in h•affic volumes? � X YES NO � X Xa � X � X a X x � � X (24) Wlll trafFic be maintai�ied during construction using existing ❑ roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? x (25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, wilt the bridge be repfaced at its existing location (along the existing facility) and will all construction proposed in association with the ❑ bridge replacement project be contained on the existing faci(ity? wA (26) i27) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or environmental grounds concenvng the project? Is the project consistent with all Federal, Stata, and local laws relating to the enviromnental aspects of the project? � X � (28) Will the project have an "effect° on structureslproperties eligible for or listed on the Nationel Register of Historic Places? x (29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are ❑ important to history or pre-history? X (30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(fl resources (pubiic parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(� of the U. S. Departinent of Transportation Act of 1966)? x (31) Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public recrearion sites or facilities to non-recreation uses, as defined by Section 6(� of the Land and Water Conservation Act ❑ of 1965, as amended? X (32) Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent to a river designated as a component of or proposed for inclusion in the Natural System of Wiid and Scenic Rivers? F. ing au unxavorable responses m Part �: should be provided supporting documentation may be attached, as necessary.) 4. Sqetland impacts will be 0.59 acre. The area mas delineated to identi£y the least environmentally damaqing alternative. Impacts have heen avoidad and minimized. A Section 404 permit will be obtained from the tJ3 Army Corpa of Engineera with a NCDENR 401 Water Quality Certification. •'_ .i�� ar�rii 77FPro,jecrhto. ►r-5sacrr State PxOjeet No. 16386. 2. �i Pederai-AiaProject o. m�t�2aset�S _ 1�roiect I)esrrisation� (Snclude pmjxt scopa end locatiot�. At�adt locgtion map.) �dhr pu�ow o3' Yhi� psojla� S� to aliQn tho lnt�r��ctions a! 8R 4298 (t�rMhili Roadj �np lYR 2Z42 (Bra�ton lwad) ritE� 8A 2252 (ChiolunY'twt Ra�d f.n Ctwbaxlasd C.ounty. �J.s'�l..L .i ..:t.�i i7:+� : 1 .:.1�� r , ri' � • � ►: T Ror Tyqse TYPE II{A} �� TYFE R(B} ��r� j�'i vtl�tniriretox —� � FederdHtghweyAdminiauaHon Traasportadon PAT McCRORY Governor NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON Secretary North Carolina Department of Transportation PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION FORM I. GENERAL INFORMATION a. Consultation Phase: b. Project Description: a WBS Element Number: d. Documen[ Type: II. CONCLUSIONS I.D. No. W-5206U Right-of-Way / Construction Realign intersections of SR 2241 (Chickenfoot Road & SR 2242 (Braxton Road) & SR 2238 (Sandhill Road) W-5206U Programmatic Categorical Exclusion The above environmental documen[ has been evaluated as required by 23 CFR 771. It was determined that the proposed action is essentially the same as the original action. Proposed changes are noted below in Section IIL It has been determined Yhat anticipated social, economic, and environmental impacts were accurately described in the above referenced document, unless otherwise noted herein. Therefore, the original Administrative Action remains valid. III. CHANGES IN PROPOSED ACTION AND ENVIItONMENTAL COSEOUENCES The changes depicted in the following paragraph to the proposed action have occurred since ihe approval of the Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE). As a result, minor additional environmental consequences are anticipated from the proposed action. Permanent wetland impacts have increased on the project. The original permanent wetland impact at Permit Site #2 was increased from 0.60 acre with 0.08 acre of Temporary Hand Clearing. The Hand Clearing was revised to Permanent Mechanized Clearing which is necessary to install Erosion Control Devices. The Permanent Wefland Impact for the project is 0.90 acre which includes 0.14 acre of Mechanized Clearing. The Division of Mitigation Services will provide the necessary mitigation for the proj ect. At Pennit Site #3, the original design required the removal of a 56LF 48" CMP under SR 2242 and replaced with a 72LF 60" RCP. A minor shifr in the alignment of SR 2242 that was required as a result of the Right-of-Way negotiaTions. �Nothing Compares��_. S�ate ofNorth Carolina I Deparhnent ofTra�spolta�ion I Division 6 1000 Trensporlatian Drive Fayetteville, NC 28302 910 437 0207 Water Resources The water resources impacted for the W-5206U project aze located in the Cape Fear River Basin, Hydrologic Cataloguing Unit 03030004. Jurisdictional resources in the project azea include the two un-named tributaries to Grays Creek and two wetland areas along the floodplain of the UT to Grays Creek. Neither High quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-1, undeveloped watersheds or WS-II; predominately undeveloped watersheds) nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.0 mile of the project study area. None of the project azea streams are listed on the Division of Water Resources 2012 303(d) list of impaired waters nor are any listed within one mile downstream of the project area. Table 1. W-5206U Water Resource Im acts Stream Name Stream Class Permanent UT to Grays Creek Permit Site #1 C;Sw UT to Grays Creek Permit Site #2 UT to Grays Creek Pernut Site #3 Protected Species 11 LF / 0.001 ac. 88 LF 16 LF Plants and auimals with federal classification of Endangered €, Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered (PE), Proposed Threatened (PT), are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of January 14, 2014, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFW S) list seven federally protected species for Cumberland County, NC (Table 2). Since the PCE was signed, a United States Fish and Wildlife Service proposal for listing the Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) as an endangered species was published in the Federal Register on October 2013. The listing became effective Apri12015. Furthermore, this species is included in the USFWS's current list of protected species for Cumberland County, NC. The USFWS has developed a Prograimnatic Biological Opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Fedenl Highway Administration (FHWA), US Army Corps of Engineers (LJSACE), and NCDOT for the Northern long-eazed bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Cazolina. The PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities. The programmatic determination for the NLEB for the NCDOT program is May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect. The PBO provides incidental take coverage for the NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Cumberland County, where U-5206U is located. This level of incidental take is authorized from the effective date of a fmal determination through April 30, 2020. Habitat for the bald eagle (Haliaeetus Zeucocephalis) primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to lazge bodies of open water for foraging. Large, dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 mile of open water. Suitable habitat for bald eagle does not exist within the study area and to a distance of 660 feet on all sides. Therefore, no surveys were conducted. Table 2. Federall Protected S ecies for Cumberland Coun Common Name Scientific Name Habitat Status Biolo 'cal Conclusion American alligator Alligator mississippiensis No T S/A) Red-cockaded Picoides borealis No E No Effect Wood ecker St. Francis satyr Neonympha mitchelldi No E No Effect ancisci American chafFseed Schwalbea Americana No E No Effect Michaux's sumac Rhus michauzii No E No Effect Rough-leaved Lyimachia asperulaefolia No E No Effect loosestrife Pondberry Lindera melissifolia No E No Effect Nor[hem lon -eared bat Myotis se tentrionalis Yes E MALAA IV. LIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS NCDOT will implement all practical measures and procedures to minimize and auoid environmental impacts. V. COORDINATION The Division 6 Environmental Officer has discussed current project proposals with the others as follows: Division 6 Engineer: Greg Burns, P.E. OS/25/16 Date FHWA Engineer: Ron Lucas OS/25/16 Date Division 6 Project Engineer; Scott Pridgen OS/25/16 Date VI. NCDOT CONC � NCE � lV Division 6 Project Engineer v��i� Date s - Z s_/� Date