20061376 Ver 1_401 Application_20060926

MULKEY
P^ Box 331 27
RALEIGH, NC 27636
PHONE: [phone]
FAx: [phone] Cv^ Ob ~ '~~~
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: Lia Myott Date: September 25, 2006
NC DENR/Division of Water Quality,
Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
From: Harold Brady **HAND DELIVERY**
[phone]
Re: Novartis 404/401 application
Job No.: 2006274.00
I am sending you the following item(s):
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
'~>f" 9/25/2006 Novartis 401/401 revised permit application.

These are transmitted as checked below:
® As requested ® For your use
^ For approval ^ For Signatures
^ For review and comment ^
Remarks:
Lia,
Enclosed is a totally revised 401 permit application. This includes materials that we have generated after
our meeting on Friday, September 15. Please contact me if you have any questions or further concerns
with this permit submittal.
Harold Brady D ~ ~ ~ a V
Q D
S E P 2 6 2006
DENR -WATER QUALITY
1NETLANDS AND STORFAWATER BRANCH

~c~c~ad~D
F P 2 6 2006 M U L K_E Y
D~N~t • WATER QUALITY
US Army Corps of Engineers WEtWrDSANDST(N~11WAT~RDRANCFt
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
ATTENTION: Mr. Monte Matthews
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Representative
DATE: September 25, 2006
SUBJECT: Proposed Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Facility Holly Springs,
Wake County, North Carolina
Please find attached the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
for the referenced project. Novartis has proposed to construct a new pharmaceutical
facility with associated access roads and parking areas. This work will result in 288
linear feet of unavoidable impacts to one jurisdictional stream channel (an unnamed
tributary of Utley Creek) and 0.38 acres of isolated wetlands. The purpose of the project
is to facilitate industrial development in Holly Springs, North Carolina. The anticipated
let date for this proposed project is October 2006.
Arrangement of the proposed facility with all the buildings and parking areas was
studied and several versions were produced. However, the production line requires a
specific set-up of building locations with parking arranged around the building instead of
all located at one end. After the building arrangement had been decided upon, the
location of Phase 1 needed to be planned such that there was plenty of land on the
property left for Phases 2 and 3 if needed; while keeping in mind the avoidance and
minimization of stream and wetland impacts. In an attempt to avoid wetland and stream
impacts on the southern portion of the subject property the final design of Phase 1 was
located as far north as possible. The limiting element on the north side of the property is
a severe slope associated with another perennial stream which had to be avoided for
construction purposes. Though we were not able to completely avoid impacts to
wetlands and streams with the Phase 1 layout, these impacts have been minimized to the
greatest extent practicable and still meet the needs of the project.
Portions of the existing stream depicted in Figures 2, 2A, and C-JSK-6 as Stream
SD and the isolated wetland WD are proposed to be filled. There is no outfall pipe
proposed, instead the waters that would enter the stream will be diverted along the toe of
the proposed fill slope crossing an access road and emptying back into the original stream
downstream of the proposed earthen slope.
In order to meet the purpose and need of the proposed project it was not feasible
to entirely avoid wetland or stream impacts. Abridging alternative was studied;
however, due to the severe valley slope the bridge would need to be approximately 80
feet long and take up considerable land area needed for the parking and access roads
which would result in increased stream impacts in another location within the subject
property. This would not leave enough land area to build the potential Phase 2 and 3
MULKEY INC. 6750 TRYON ROAD GARY. NC 2751 1 P^ BOX 33127 RALEIGH, NC 27636 PH: 919-BS 1-1912 FAX: [phone] B WWW.MULKEVINC.COM

portions. Another alternative suggested was the use of a concrete retaining wall;
however, according to Jacobs Engineering, the wall would have created approximately
the same amount of impacts as the earthen slope due to the nearly 27 feet of fill required
to bring the site to grade.
The design presented in this permit application was proposed by Jacobs
Engineering and Novartis during meetings attended by agents from the USACE and the
NCDWQ conducted the week of July 14 at the Town of Holly Springs municipal
building. Stream mitigation will be required by these regulatory agencies for this
proposed project at varying ratios. Impacted peremnial streams require compensatory
mitigation at a 2:1 ratio for the USACE, while NCDWQ requires compensatory
mitigation for perennial streams at a 1:1 ratio. Streams determined by the USACE to be
intermittent-important require a compensatory mitigation ratio of 1:1. NCDWQ does not
require compensatory mitigation for intermittent streams. For this project there are 107
linear feet of perennial stream proposed to be impacted and 181 linear feet of
intermittent-important stream proposed to be impacted. These individual regulatory
agencies do not require separate mitigation; therefore, once the compensatory mitigation
is sufficient for the USACE (which requires higher mitigation costs) then NCDWQ
requirements generally have been met as well. Therefore, the stream compensatory
mitigation will be for 395 linear feet of stream. In addition, 226 linear feet of
intermittent-isolated stream channel and 0.38 acres of isolated wetlands will be impacted
by the proposed project. These waters are solely under the jurisdiction of NCDWQ and
are below thresholds requiring compensatory mitigation.
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) has agreed to
provide Novartis up to 580 linear feet of stream mitigation upon approval of
environmental permits and submittal of fee. In summary, 395 linear feet of stream
channel will be directly mitigated for by EEP. Attached is a copy of the letter from the
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) granting Novartis the
opportunity to pay into their in-lieu fee mitigation program for anticipated stream impacts
as a result of this proposed project.
The project is located within the Cape Fear River subbasin 03-06-07. There are
seven jurisdictional streams within the 167.0 acre subject property; however, there is only
one jurisdictional stream (UT to Utley Creek) within the 51.0 acre Phase 1 area. The UT
to Utley Creek is not depicted on the USGS Apex, NC topographic quadrangle map, but
has been confirmed to be jurisdictional by the USACE and the NCDWQ because the
stream displays signs of subsurface input and an uninterrupted bed and bank among other
attributes. The concurrence field meetings were conducted on June 16, 2006 with Mr.
Monte Matthews (USACE) and with Mr. Ian McMillan (NCDWQ) on June 9 and 30,
2006. Utley Creek flows into White Oak Creek approximately 3.0 miles southwest of the
project area. NCDWQ has assigned a best usage classification of "C" to Utley Creek and
a stream index number is 18-7-(5.5). The USGS hydrologic unit is 03030004. There are
no high quality waters (HQW), outstanding resource waters (ORW), drinking water
supply waters (WS-I and WS-II), or 303(d) listed streams within aone-mile radius of the
project study area. An area of isolated wetlands is located above the jurisdictional
stream, and is proposed to be impacted by the proposed project.
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has identified three
Endangered (E) species (red-cockaded woodpecker, Michaux's sumac and dwarf wedge

mussel) and one Threatened (T) species (bald eagle) for which occurrences have been
recorded in Wake County. The land that will be impacted as a result of this project
consists ofpine-hardwood forest, with an existing maintained sewer line easement, and a
significant network of dirt access roads. No suitable habitat is available within the
project area for any of the protected species, except Michaux's sumac.
• Bald eagles are year-round, transient species in North Carolina. Suitable habitat
for the bald eagle consisting of large areas of open water is not present within the
subject property. An area of open water, Thomas Mill Pond, is located several
hundred feet south of the southern property boundary; however, no nests were
observed near the pond. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP)
maps were reviewed on June 14, 2006 to determine if any bald eagle populations
have been identified at or near the project study area. This map review confirmed
that no bald eagle nests or individuals have been reported within aone-mile radius
of the project site. Proposed project construction will not impact this species.
• Suitable habitat for RCW does not exist within the project area since there are no
pine dominated stands of appropriate diameter or age present. The pines that are
present are young (less than 30 years old) and are within thick stands of
hardwoods. NCNHP maps were reviewed on June 14, 2006 to deternine if any
RCW populations have been identified at or near the project study area. This map
review confirmed that no known RCWs are located within aone-mile radius of
the project site. Proposed project construction will not impact this species.
• Suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac consisting of sandy or rocky open woods or
open areas of periodic disturbance is present in the project study area. The project
study area is dominated by clayey textured, thickly vegetated areas. However,
there are several locations throughout the subject property that contain more
rocky soils that contain significantly less vegetation. These areas tend to be along
the existing dirt roads, sewer line easements, as well as areas that were formerly
used for logging decks. A plant by plant survey for Michaux's sumac was
conducted by Mr. Tom Barrett and Mr. Scott Hunt, PE within the project study
area on May 2, 2006 for approximately 8man-hours. No Michaux sumac
individuals were observed during this survey. In addition, North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP) maps were reviewed on June 14, 2006 to determine
if any protected species have been identified at or near the project study area.
This map review confirmed that no populations of Michaux's sumac are known to
occur within aone-mile radius of the project site. Proposed project construction
will not impact this species.
• Suitable habitat for the dwarf wedgemussel consisting of nearly silt-free streams,
with slow to moderate currents within the Neuse or Pamlico river basins is not
present within the project study area. Several freshwater mussels were observed
in the perennial stream in the northern portion of the subject property (Stream
"SA"); however, due to the subject property's location within the Cape Fear River
basin no dwarf wedgemussel are anticipated to be present. NCNHP maps were
reviewed on June 14, 2006 and this map review confirmed that no populations of
dwarf wedgemussel are known to occur within atwo-mile radius of the project
study area. Proposed project construction will not impact this species.

Following your review and concurrence with the proposed action, please issue a
NWP 39 that will authorize construction activities associated with the filling of
jurisdictional stream channel and isolated wetland and stream areas within the proposed
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics facility. If you have any questions or comments
concerning the project, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for your
assistance.
Sincerely,
~~
Harold M. Brady
Staff Scientist
Attachments
PCN and PCN addendum
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
Figure 2 Streams and Wetlands (w/ aerial overlay)
Figure 2A Streams and Wetlands (w/o aerial overlay)
Figure 3 Soils Map
Figure 4 Wake County Soil Survey Map
Town of Holly Springs agent authorization letter
Novartis agent authorization letter
NCDWQ Express Review Acceptance
EEP Acceptance
Permit Drawings (00-C-60-99-02, C-JSK-6, C-JSK-8)
Alternative Analysis Drawings
Protected Species Technical Report
Stream and wetland forms
cc: (5 copies w/ stormwater plan and earthen slope engineering design)
Ms. Lia Myott, NCDWQ-Wetlands Unit, Express Review Project Manager
cc: (single copies of submittal)
Ms. Heather Keefer, Town of Holly Springs, Environmental Specialist
Mr. Amer Takieddine, Jacobs, Inc.-Cincinnati, Project Manager
Ms. Deana Dearborn, Novartis, Project Manager
Mr. Vance Holt, Jacobs, Inc.-Raleigh, Senior Engineer

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ~~ ~ ~ ' ~ 3 ~ ~
lIf any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ® Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ® Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check her ~ ~ ~ ~ nM ~ D
L! V
II. Applicant Information
SEP 2 6 ~00~
1. Owner/Applicant Information psNh - wash ~1WI,-1`Y
Name: Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics - Jen°yHoekwater USFCC proj~{M['1ali~tl~N~T[It~MNCFI
Mailing Address: 4560 Horton Street M/S Z-100
Emeryville CA 94608
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: Deana Dearborn(a,chiron.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Harold Brady project scientist
Company Affiliation: Mulkey Engineers & Consultants Inc.
Mailing Address: 6750 Tryon Road
Cary NC 27511
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: hbrady_(a)mulkeyinc.com
Page 1 of 10

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Novartis USFCC Holly Springs Facility
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics; PIN#
0639928228.
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Holl~prings
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
From US Highway 1 in Raleigh take NC Highway 55 South toward Holl~prings (take the
bypass) for approximately 4 0 miles. Turn right onto New Hill Rd. and take the first left
approximately 500 ft) onto Irving Parkway. Take the first ri hg t (approximately 700 ft.)
onto Thomas Mill Rd. Continue until road dead ends. This is the edge of the project area.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35° 39' 03.93" °N 78° 51' 53.91" °W
6. Property size (acres): 167 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Unnamed Tributary to Utley Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 2 of 10

9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The property is currently forested with a sewer line
easement traversing the southern edge of the property. There is a significant network of
maintain dirt access roads with locations of old logging decks througihout. Undeveloped
forest land adjoins the subLect property to the north, west, and south. The existing Corrgated
Container facility is adjacent to the su~ect property to the east with a moderate density
industrial park beyond
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Approximately 51.0 acres will be graded for six buildings connected by a spine building.
Standard rg ading and construction equipment including a pan, dump trucks, excavators, and
a crane will be used to grade the land construct the buildings and associated parking, access,
and stormwater control facilities.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To provide industrial facilit~o produce
vaccines and other pharmaceuticals.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. There have been no~revious environmental permits (applied for or
otherwise) associated with the subiect property that Novartis, Mulkey Engineers, Jacobs, Inc., or
the Town of Holly Springs has knowledge of. The USACE and NCDWQ have conducted a field
verification meeting concerning the streams and wetlands on the subject property and have seen
the mapping• however these mks have not been formally si ng ed by the USACE due to internal
issues within the USACE.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
This permit application deals specially with Phase 1 of the Novartis V&D Holl~prings
pro~Lam; however, there are two additional phases that could possibly be constructed within the
next ten e~ if growth in the industry continues. These additional phases are included with this
permit package to demonstrate future potential impacts to jurisdictional waters; however, the
designs for these other phases will likely change as needed or may never occur.
Page 3 of 10

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The existing stream and isolated
stream and wetland will be filled for the access road and parking facilities. Water within this
draina¢e area will be redirected to either the stormwater detention pond or through a ditch
which will traverse along the toe of the proposed fill sloe via a ditch and empty into the
floodplain of the subject stream downstream of the impacts. These actions will permanently
impact 107 linear feet ofperennial stream channel 181 linear feet of intermittent-important
stream channel 226 linear feet of intermittent-isolated stream channel, and _0.38 acres of
isolated wetlands.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact

Site Number
(indicate on map)

Type of Impact Type of Wetland

(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

1
Fill
Isolated forested headwater
No Adjacent to
isolated
stream
0.38

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.38
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.96 acre
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
Page 4 of ] 0

construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
2 UT to Utley Creek Fill Intermittent
- Isolated 3 feet 226
3 UT to Utley Creek Fill Intermittent 3 feet 181
4 UT to Utley Creek Fill Perennial 4 feet 107

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 288 linear
feet (non-
isolated
stream)
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative im act to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the ro'ect:
Stream Impact (acres):
Wetland Impact (acres): Isolated 0.38
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres): Isolated 0.38
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 288
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ®Yes ^ No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Page 5 of 10

The USACE has determined that the wetlands that are proposed to be impacted (Wetland
WD -located immediately north of the end of the UT to Utley Creek) are isolated due to a
si¢nificant break in the intermittent channel in which nearly all characteristics of the stream
channel are lost Due to the intermittent nature of the isolated stream it is not currently
regulated by the USACE or NCDWQ However the isolated wetland immediately above the
nick point of the isolated stream is regulated by NCDWQ. The isolated headwater forested
wetland comprises proximately 0.38 acre and is planned to be filled entirely for
construction o~arkin~ areas and an access road. Water that would have entered this stream
and wetland will b cy onveyed through both stormwater pipes to awet-detention pond and
through a drainage ditch located near the toe of the proposed constructed fill slope emptying
into the UT to Utley Creek downstream of the proposed impacts
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ®uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): The wet-detention ,pond will be excavated near the
southwestern corner of the~ro~osed facility and will use to collect and treat stormwater
runoff prior to entering any streams or wetland areas.
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): State stormwater requirements
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: undeveloped forested land
Size of watershed draining to pond: 26.2 acres
Expected pond surface area (permanent pool): 18,988 ftZ
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The stream and isolated wetland proposed to be impacted can not be completely avoided and
still achieve the goals of the~roject Desi ng attempts were made to avoid impacts to the stream
by bridging and by use of a concrete retaining wall However due to the steep nature of the
valley the bridge would need to be approximately 80-feet long which would not leave enough
space for the all of the proposed buildings Use of a concrete retaining wall was considered, but
was determined to~rovide only minimal (10 to 15 ft.~benefit in avoiding stream impacts. It was
decided that the best and safest option would be to construct a standard wrapped face earthen
slope with a 2.1 tiered slope Engineered design drawings are included with this permit package.
Impacts to the stream have been minimized by locating the proposed facility as far north on
the ~ropert~possible without impacting the perennial stream (Stream SA) or its associated
floodplain located near the northern~roperty boundary Impacts to the perennial stream (Stream
Page 6 of 10

SD) have been further minimized by adjustment of the proposed access road. This adjustment
involved curving_the proposed roadway at the location of the stream crossing.
A draft of this proposal has been previously presented to the USACE and NCDWQ during
initial project discussions
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc. us/ncwetlands/strm~ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Page 7 of 10

Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 395 linear feet (107 linear ft. (c~ 2:1
ratio and 181 linear ft (a~ 1.1 ratio)
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement program (NCEEP) has agreed to accept this
project into its in-lieu fee compensator~tig_ation program. Payment will be made to the
EEP for all of the required compensatory mitigation including 107 linear feet of perennial
stream channel at a 2:1 ratio and 181 linear feet of intermittent stream channel at a 1:1 ratio.
The acc~tance letter from NCEEP is attached.
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Page 8 of 10

Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendiculaz from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone l .
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. This proposed project is not located within
a river basin that requires basinwide NCDWQ stream buffers.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. '
There is currently no impervious surface within the proposed Novartis site. The estimated
impervious surface that will be generated as a result of this project is 14.3 acres of the 51.0 acres
that will be cleared and graded Stormwater runoff will be collected via curb and gutter or other
Stormwater drain devices and will all be conveyed to a Stormwater retention pond approximately
one acre in size located near the southwest corner of the proposed facility. The attached
Stormwater mana~~ement plan follows the NCDWQ guidelines. No direct discharges into
streams will result from the~roposed design.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater produced by the proposed facility will_all be collected and conveyed off-site via
the Town of Holl~prin sg managed sanitary sewer system. Any chemical byproducts produced
during the manufacturing process (including fire water) will be processed and treated prior to
entering the sanitary sewer.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Isthis anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
Page 9 of 10

XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
This project will currently involve the construction of six buildings with a seventh building
acting as a connector to the other six. Access to the facility will be from Thomas Mill Road. For
this project Thomas Mill Road will require upgrading which will involve paving and widening to
a two-lane facility and will end at the front entrance of the facility. All potential wetland and
stream impacts associated with Thomas Mill Road have been avoided, and is being constructed
by the Town of Holly Springs, and is therefore been considered a separate project.
Future development of the Novartis property will be conducted to the west of the proposed
Phase 1 facility. This growth will be limited to only two more additional phases, all associated
with Novartis' Vaccines and Diagnostics program. No additional perennial of intermittent-
important stream channel impacts are anticipated and the anticipated wetland impacts would be
minor (keeping within the thresholds of a Nationwide Permit). Thomas Mill Road has been
proposed to provide access to these additional facilities• however, this will be the extent of the
road There is no planned road fur cul-de-sac or dead end to provide for potential
development to the north south or west of the subject property. In addition much of the
adjacent land is owned by Progress Energy (associated with the Sharon-Harris facility) and there
is therefore there is no anticipation for development within this adjacent property. If any of the
adjacent properties were to be developed those facilities would be required to generate their own
separate access roads All stormwater for Phase 1 and the potential future phases of the Novartis
campus will be collected and conveyed to stormwater retention ponds and treated before being
released into Lurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
Given all of this information this proposed project should not cause any reasonably
anticipated future impacts to water quality in North Carolina.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
A draft of this proposal was presented at meetings during the week of July 14 2006 with
avoidance and minimization comments attempted and where workable integrated. The requested
NWP 39 deals ~ecifically with the 288 linear feet of stream impacts. The requested isolated
waters permit deals specifically with the 0.38 acre of isolated wetland impacts.
ti~v-~~ G~ 9 Z ~ /Zoo 6
AppGcant/Agent's Signature ~ Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of l0

Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc.
4560 Horton Street
Emeryville, California 94608-2916
`I N O VA RT I S Tel [phone]
www.novartis.com
August 11, 2006
Harold Brady
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
6750 Tryon Road
Cary, NC 27511
Re: Section 401/404 Permit Application Process
Proposed Novartis USFCC Facility, Phase 1, Holly Springs, NC
Dear Mr. Brady,
Please accept this letter as authorization for Mulkey Engineers & Consultants to act on
behalf of Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics in the Section 401 /404 permit application
process for the above referenced project.
Sincerely,
~~ti ~ ~~~-
Jerry Hoekwater
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics
USFCC Project Manager

~~ ~a; ~
uj~`u:
`-
,~1,~ ~,,tl-,-
Tlit: TOWN OF
_~0~~~
~~1"tr1~S
P.O. Hnr. 8
I26 S. Main Str¢t
!lolly Springs, !s'.C. 27540
wqw. hol lyipr i ngsnc.w
(91U)ii2-6221
Fax (91Y) i52~5569
August l 1, 2006
Harold Brady
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
6750 Tryon Road
Cary, NC 27511
~Re: Section 401/404 Permit Application Process
Proposed Holly Springs Novartis site, Phase 1
Dear Mr. Brady,
Please accept this letter as authorization for Mulkey Engineers &
Consultants to act on behaif of the Town of Holly Springs in the Section
401/404 permit application process for the above referenced project.
Sincerely,
-,~
5~~`~. Sudano, PE
Director of Engineering
Icc: Heather V. Keefer, CFM, Environmental Specialist
Project File
Correspondence # 50283
6favor's Office Faa:
(Y 19) 552-0654

AUG-25-2006 17:28 FROM:DWQ-WETLANDS 9197336893
c7~a~ ~Ar~RQG
~ ~
Q "~
August 25, ~OOG
Ek'1hl?,ESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE .)GETTER
l+tQVattis Vaccines and Diagnostics
A,tfi: lVl,s. Deanna Dearborn
4560 Horton Strcct, MIS Z-100
Emcryvillc, CA 94608
Dear 1VIs. Dearborn:
Plroject Name: Novartis V&D Holly Springs, North Carolli>aa. S>Ete
Wake County
017. Au,,guct 25, 2006, the 401 t'~versighU>Jxpress Pecnai.tt7xtg Unit of the Iivision of Water Quality received a
regtitcst from Mr. Harold Brady of Mulkey Enginecxs and Consultants, regarding. a project known as " Novartis
Vl~':D Holly Springs Site" for acceptance into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your
project will be accepted into the Express Review Program once the following items are received:
1) The application fee of $3,000.00 for 401 Water Quality Ccz~tification + Isolated Wetlands Permit], made
payabl.c to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality];
2) Five (5) complete and collated copies o£ the PCN Application Form;
3) One (1) copy of the Addendum to the PCN;
4) liivc (5) copies of all site plan information pertaining to this project (please refer to the Addendum
http://le2o.enr,sl:ate.lae.us/ncwet3ands/annadd5.~d ~;
5) If your project requires a stormwater managexncnt plan (30% impervious st.trface area or above), you are
required to subutit those plans along with the application package
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
xlxc clocl~ >`'or this project will hot start until receipt of. the completed application package and required fee are
rccc;,vcd. If the impacts arc greater than indicated ont the Initial Interest Form and/or the services are different,
you znay be required to remit an additional fee.
Tf' ypu kia~°e any questions or ~+vish to discuss these matters further please dq apt heaitnte to call M3.. Li>;s Myott at
91'9-733-9502 or. I7r. Cynthia Van Der Wiclc at 919-715-3A~73.
Sincerely,
~.
C.yndi Karoly, Manager
~01JExpress R,evicw Oversize Unit
Cl3TCJcrydw
cc: Fi.lc copy
4010vArslghl! Express Revlciu Permltting Unit
1650 Mall Si?rv~e Center, Ralaigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Sulfp ?,50, Raleigh, North Carolina 27664
Phon®; 919.733.1766 f FAX 919-733$893! lntemet httn:+/h2i~.cttr:,rL~JC,ua~!nrwetlands
T0:9B511918 P:2~2
Michael 1'. F.aalcy, ['mvcmnr
William (;. kcss Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Uepartmcnt of ?:nvimnmcnt and Natuinl Resources
Alarf W. Kiimck, p.F. [hreetnr
Dlvisiun uL Wuter Quality
1~~1tCazol' na
~1JaCrrral~U
An Equal OppOrtunlly~AffirmativeAdion Emplayar-50Ya Reoydedfl0% PostConsumer Paper

08-21-'06 13,09 FBOM-DENF? EEP 917152001 T-143 P02 U-631
~yi i J~
E~ ~a eme~.t
PRQ(3ti/1M
August ? 1, 2006
Darold Brady
Mulkey Engineers
6750 Tryon Road
Cary, NC 27511
Project: Novartis Holly Springs Site County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina 1/casystem Enhvrcement Program (NC I;EI') is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment wilt be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. Tt is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EE,P will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for si7C months from the date of this letter. If we have nut received a copy of the issued 404
]PermiU401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/LAMA permits to N'C E>~P. Once NC 1r]/P receives a copy of the 404 Fermit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
13ased on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River 13asin Wetlands Stream Suffer Suffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear )~eet) Zone 1 zone 2
Unit (Sq. )~,t.) (Sq. F`t-)
Ri arian Non-Ri arian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Cape Fear 0 0.38 0 0 0 290 0 0
03x30004
C7pon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation far the permitted itnpacts
up to a 2:1 mitigation-to-impact ratio, (buffers, Zone l at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the
compensatory mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Qualiry Certification, and/or
CAMA Permit. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the IYlemorandum of Understanding between the N- C,
l5epartment of Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Cops of Engineers dated November 4, 1998,
If you have any questions or need additipnal information, please contact David Robinson at [phone].
Sincerely, (~
\__
' iam U. Gilmore, PE b~~
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, 'Wetlands/401 Unit
Monte Matthews, U5ACE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ-Raleigh
Nile
Rx~oru~t9... fFCka,~~,.. Pro>!~;ciC Dur Stag

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.ncQep.net

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERNIINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjecdSite: ~ ~"'C%~1 P.('i~' !'C G~ T"r3l ~~i'I.1~ h"
ApplicauUOWner: I U .~ ~ (,) •" ~ P
Im~estigator(s): l ~ (.t d~ '~' ~ ~ `
Do No[mal Circumstances exist on rite site? Yes No
Is the site signilicanlly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No
Is ibis arru a potential Problem Area? Yes No
cxptom on
Date r Z~D
County: 1~= (,( ~„ ~?
State: North Carolina
Counmmity ID: ~~C"~~~-n r.'~
Transecl LD: ,r~/t~
Plot ill: ('1~~ ~-
VEGI+;1'ATIUN
Dominant Plant Sp
cies 5tratun~ In
icafo [dominant Plant Species Stratum IndicLttirl
1. e
~U t"t ~ u 5 e '1"~V 5 V 5 T .~~.1 S 1~, S,
t" ~ C~ W 9.

2.
~i'D~•~1}~'9QYt(.~, C`~~,s^.ri~:r~
CYh ' ~r_ t~J
~
10.
3. ~GL ~~, ~ i1~i r~+,; ~~ ~...t t
l~~ (.7 Y~ ~.- 11.
4. (
t.,~1a `~~f' k ~ U i~ ` G~ -; (
.~ n Gd ft ~('
_~_ ~ f~ 1;... ~ - l 2.
5. 13.
G. 14.
7. 15.
g• t6.
Perc:enl of Dorrunant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). ~ ~~~~ ~~~'
Remarks:
HYDROLOGI'
_ Recorded Dnta (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
1 / Otbcr
V No Recorded Date Available 1Vetl;utd I~ydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
humdntect
~$aWratcd in Upper 12 inches
_\1'ater Mazks
Drift Lines
ediment Deposits
Field Ohsen~ations: ~ rainagc Patterns in 1Vctlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Deptb of Surface Water: fd (in.) / Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 ]nchcs

~ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to free Water in Pic
(in.) I-ocnl Soil Survey Datn

D
h
S
il
~ _FAC-Neutral Test
ept
to
aturated So
:
(inJ _Other (Explain in Remarks)
Rcrnarks:

SOILS
blap Unit Name `' ' } '~}
(Series and Phase) YV G ~ £ t~ Gt rs, „>tr^.. r~,,-~~~ f t,~lR &y1 Drainage Class: I_ C~ p f
Feld Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) ~~! t`-~ `G ~. r+ f~ 0 a ~ U U 'k'~ ~ Confirm Mopped Type? Yes No
Profile Desc[tp-ion_:
T~cpth
(inchesl ~PtIZ4J1
~~
Matrix Color Mottle Colors
(Moose[] Moisl) (Munsell Moistl

Molth: Texture, Concretions,
Abundunce/Contrast Structure, etc.
.~ ; f ~~.~ C.~~ t. a ~ ~ (.~ rv
-_ __
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol -Concretions
_
_Hixtic Epipedon _ FIigh Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
_Aquic Moisture Regime ^Listed on Local Hydric Sails List
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National I ydric Soils List
~I rleyed or L,ow-Chroma Colors / Other (Explain in Remarks)
c 4
Remarks: ~~~~i (,~. ~, ~ ~ ~~,( i.. t~L;t '~ {,` {r', ~ + t- ~~~ !, a
WETLAND DETERII'1INATION __
h{ydrophytic Vegetation Present? ~Y~esl No
Wetland Hydrolo;y ['resent? ~ Y~~ No
Hydric Soils Present? ~Ye~ Nn
is this Sampling Point \Vithin a Wrtland? ~ Ycs. ~ No
Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: r' Y-U 1 i::('i~" ~'CG~,r""f?1 ~ tf2~r ~ Date: r ~ ~~j
Applicant/Owner: U I 7 r County; ~~;~, ~,; (;
Investigator(s): t , C.~ "~~• •~ a r ~ ~ State: North Carolina
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Ycs No Community ID: ~~ (~"~'`' ' ' `'
Is the site significantly dismrbcd (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect [D: '~"~ l'.
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Ycs No Plot ID: ~ ~'GI. Y' ~'P'J ~~ ~' ~!~
(If needed, ex lain on reverse)
VEGETA 1'IUN
Dominant Ylani_,Spec„ies Stra o , Gulicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum indictgoC
t
t. r-a 2. t1,.S..:.,. , •.;
~f', stir
x- ~ G
q.
2. (~+l~~~n r~, .~. - y,., , j= MFG lo.

7. ~). ~.
50,.1'h 1'S L' C V 5
5. CGtr,C=cat"r~
'l~rtl- y-
f"-~~I'V
I3.
6. ~ Z7t,~~C:"f ~t{s ^-+t`~ _.1 ~~iltr ~~~(/ ... lA.
C V~.`It'~ r l,~h

/~
R. l~Ctw YvI2Y,~~.~
~~C~.
°~~(,.~
16.

Percent of Dominant Species that ace OBL, PACA', or FAC
(excluding FAC-). r~
«°"~ ~-'
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Reca•ded Dxta (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, I,al:e, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
/ Other
~Y No Kecorded Data Availahlc Wetland Hydrology lr,dicmors:
Primary h,dicaiors:
_ Inundated
Saturated in Upper l2 tnches
_ Water A7arl:s
Drift I.incs
-Salimcnt nuposils
Field Obsen'ations: Draina¢0 Fattems in Wetlands

~ _
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surfarc Walcr: r
~ (in J -Oxidized Root Channels in lJpper 12 Inches
1Yater-Stained leaves
ncpth to Prec Water in Fit: iJ ~~ (in.) Loe:al Suil Swvey DATA
PAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Satw-aced Soil: N~(in.) _
-Other (L'xplnin in Remarks)
Remarks: ~ ~ - 1 { ~; . .i ;~ ~-,°
~ i~ ~~~t ou ~~ ~~~Pr Yo ~~t~ c _, t•.

SOIIS
Map Unit Na~nc ,., X27 ~ ~~ ,'. ~, ;;:` ':~' *; ~N
(Series and Phase) ~ (° Drainage Class: '~'
"J"' Field Ubsen°alions
Taxonomy (Suhgmup) .^ + ~! tr ~' ~ ~~, ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '"1 ~ ~ ~` Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descri ption:
Depth
~~.
Horizon
~~ ~
S- 12 ~~'
Mntdx Color Mottle Colors Mottle Textuoe, Concretions,
(Munsell Moistl fA4unsell Mnistl Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
~b +~/~ 5 g Sl~r.tra(t~~UCals~
i
~01'r2 5~ ~ ~.%t,, ~~ ~~' ~ir,~
Hydrio Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
_
_Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _Urganic Streaking in Sandy Suits
_
_Ayuic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydrio Soils List
-Reducing Condiuons
C
l
Ch
d
L Listed on National Hydrio Soils last
Other (Explain in kemarks)
ors
ow-
o
roma
~_Gleyc
or
Remarks: A ~p~i ~.~,., _ I r~r•~ r ~~ rC~ +~t- i, ~~, .. ~ ~ ra., r~

WETLAND DETERII'IINATION
Ilydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
1Vetland Hydrology Present? Ycs No
'~
Hydrio Soils Present? Ycs ~ Nn~ Is this Sampling Puinl VJilhin a Wefland?
Yts No
Remarks:

DATA FORA'[
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Projcct/Site: +Pc-e~'1£?,t'i"~ rC('L~f"c.~' G't21'~ ~ Date: ,~ ~ C1~
Applicant/Owner: , (i 1~ ~ ~ r_ ~ ~ ~ County: 1~~f~ J_',{?
Investigator(s): I ~ (.t ' +~ i?: r .• + 'tr ~' State: Notch Carolina
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community !ll: W t ~ rx.,~ rk ~j
Ls the site significantly disturbed (Aq~pical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
is this area a potential Problem Arca? 1'cs No Plot ID: 1'`~ G
If needed, ex lain orl roverse)
VEGF,TATION
nom
innnt Plant Species a u i
eac pominant Plant St>ecies Slratmn Indicator
}}
1. F'1C..f'r` r`~J ~Y ilrrl ..i .s'._r,' {.. l
Ti~~ ,
t" ~ (.- 9.

2. ~ ~ ~ ~ ', Y` t' t' T'~ ;-t G' Ill.
~
~~ ~ )~ j" ~i ty
,
,,
3. i 1.
r
4. ~ilr`~Ci,' c ~~?qtr: Li _'--' 1
'i;';r~ ~..~ r~ )rJ
1?,
11
5. f,~pf ~t'~Itl'':r~ I
f.` i.)
,~ t; c°'/)
13.

7. I5.
B. 16.
Percent of Donunanl Species that are OBL, FACW, or PAC (excluding FAC-).~'"' ~~
Remarks:
HI'DROLOC~Y
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, [al;e, or lido Gauge
Aerial Photographs
/ Other
~/ No Recorded Pata Available 1Vetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
/ Inundated
t! Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
-'Drift Lines
Scdina;nl Deposits
Pield nhservations: 1/ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
~
' "" ~ Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water:
(inJ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

~ wAICI'-SIRinCd l.caves
Uepth to Free Water in Pit:
(in.) Local Soil Survey DaIA
FAC-Neutral Tcst
Depth lu Saturated Soil: ~ (inJ _
_Othet (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Narnc ~~
(Series and Phase) tl ~

Taxonomy (Subgmup) ~~l (
t ff ,, i
t~rh f•.,, .rG~*~.,;~; . , l CJ Gt w;

~ ~ `" ~' `"`~~ ~ ~ "'s„ t + lJ ~ ~-_S
t,J _
Drainxgc Class: ~ nb P ~d
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
'Lrpfile Uescriotion:
Depth
Matrix Color
Mottle Colors
Mattlc
Texture, Concretions,
inche fi4SlZ9Il tMUnsell Moistl (Mansell Moist). Abundnttce/Contrast Structure, etc.
i ~ .~ ~.
~ ~a Y~. ~ z. L~ ~. r~,
_ /

HydiSc Snil Indicators:
Histosol _Concretions
^Histic Epipcdon _.[iigh Organic Contcut in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil:
Sultidic Odnr rOrganic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
lAquic Moisture Regime _Listcd on [.neat Hydric Soils List
_Feducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List
/Glcyed or Low-Clurnna Colors _Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
-;
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ~ No
Wetland hydrology Present? Yes No
'"'""'i°
Hydric Soils Present? Ycs No Is this Sampling Point Withiu a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

DATA rORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COi~ Wetlands Delineation Manual)
I'rojc.eUSite: ~ i"C1'1 ~ ('i"~ /"C G~i, f tz' ~/t`l l~ ~ Date: ~ ~ L~ C~
A IicantlOwner: ~ )
PP (U lj ~ ' ~ (~'.'' County: ~ (i ~ P
Investigator(s): ~'. .t_'"~f t?~ ' l~ State: North Carolina
1 fi A
Do Notmal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID; ,~ t~ ~ t5'.r~ r A ' 1~ a;~+~
Is the site signiCtcantly disturbed (Atypical Situetion)T Ycs No Transco ID: W 13
15 this area a potential Problem Areal Yes No Plo[ ID: 1~~~ c ,• I,AJ ~;
([Cncrded, explain on reverse)
VEGETATION
Dnminant Plant Species Stratum ndicator
l )7un:rinr<nl Plant Spe:cics Stratum d'catn
1. {
l)t"rt".t.J S Cl.St~".1~(~I,
~ i 1~{, f' G
l
)
~I"~~~ ~J 9.
2. /
~
1'.r^ y~~tt t~)Y';in1
f"~~ :i(' ~.
r~ ]0.
( ~
r,n','YL Y

5. ~_
~
~~ S j~
r r't: +-~~.=: (•.Jr=

~T~d r r
r
f ' ~~l._.-

13.
1
~. j Y' l0 ~, t r fJl ~ol~
t
~
~
' j''
~ ~
G. ~
+ v (
. td ~ 'S4! r tt- t f ~ t 14.
~. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are ORT, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). ~
Remarks:

IIYllKOI.,C.>GY
_Fecorded Data (Describe in Remnr}s)
Stream, Lrrke, or tide Gauge
Aerial Phnlographs
Other
11 No Recorded Data Available 11'ettand Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
Sawra[cd in Upper 12 Ltchcs
_ Watrr Marks
Drift Lines
_
Sediment lleposits
^
Field Observations: Urainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more: ruptired):
Depth of Surface Water. F~ ~ (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
~
I 11'ater-Stained Leaves
^

Depth to Frec Water in Pit: c
,l
~ ; f (in.)
-
Local Soil Survey Data
-
~ _FAC-Ncutrnl Tcst
Depth to Saturated Soil' ~~ j (inJ _Other {Explain in Remarks)
Reutrrrks: //
I~ b 6~~V IUll~1 4 ! j
t,~I ~7~ ~ ~„r'•t~.~,

SUILS
Map Unit Nnme ~ ' r_ c+ ~ r i
(Series and Phase) s « ~ , a r cn ''`~"t G.'". Drxinagc CJass: r~~~~".
(~ I 1. i;reld Observxuons
Taxonomy (subgroup) '^~` i ~' ~',, ' `~ ~ yU ~'~ V ~ ` Confirni Mapped Type? Yes No
,~
Profile Descri tlt ion
Dcpttt
finches!
~ -~ 1
~~-
~w
horizon
~~
j ~ ~l. <?
Matrix Color Mottle Colors
!Mansell Moist! (1,lunsell Moist!
~ v Y~ 3
~~Y~~ 1
~~~'Y~ ~
2.5Y ~~~
Mottle Texture, Concnaions,
Abundance/Contra~t Structure, etc.
G~~Ar~
~~~r~tl Lv~.~
t;; ~cx~~ log ~~a
L.~-.t.~ ;it. r't.-r
Hydric Snil Indicators:
Histosol yConcreUnns
-~ Histic Epipedun ^ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _Organic Stn:uking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed on Local I{ydric Soils List
i
_Rcducing Conditions rL~stcd on Nmionnl Hydric Soils Lis[
_Cileyed or Low-Chrome Colors _Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERA!fINAT1UN
Ifydrophytic Veoelxt.ion Prescnt? Yes No
1Yetland hydrology Prescnt? Yes No
~-,
Ilydric Soils Preseht? Yes No~ Is this Sampling Point Within e 1Vetland?
Yes No
Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINA'TIUN
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Msnual)
1
Yroject/Site: ~i~o t r ~.~§ ~ ar ;~~.Uc+r ~:-
~.i ~,,..
Applicattt/O~t7tar; ~i h v.l.~. ~ • f t: (~~ ~ (.. ~;;,Y `~.
1,
Investigator(s): ~ .n;~ y ~~~s~` I'~+ ~~
,~~°~ ~
Do Normal CircuntsiAnces exist on the site? ~ Yes ~ No
Is the site signiGcnrttly disturbed (At}'picAl Sihiatinn)? Yes j " No.1
Is this Wren A potential Problem Areal 1'es ;; No~
...,~~.
on

T71te: I
.,
o % :r.A t1G
County: a''•~~ j' ~'
State: It~ (,:
Community lll: ~.~ c { (r.A~+~
Trattsect ID: ~'J ~
Plot 1D: W ~~ `.~
VT.CT'T'.TATiON
Domn~utt Ylnnt._SPecies Stratum ln~icator t)n,ninant_I?,la..gZ Speci tratt IItdICAIOi
1. ~ ~ht a r~,~~r, l r r~,, (; /)~i t i. r~ t?f. s:.- 9.

I /(

5. !3.
G. 14.
7. I ~
S. 16.
Percent of Dnminnnt Species that aze OBL, FACE'.', or FAC (excluding FAC- ). ~ fj
Itemnrks:
HYDROLOGY
____ Recorded Data {Describe in Remnrks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Pltotogrnphs
Other
No Recorded Delfl Avnilnhle V1'etlattd Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
htundated
V SAiurnted in lJpper I2 Inches
_ ~'~'Atcr MArks
DriIl Lines
~ediment Deposits
Field Obsen~ntions: Drainage Patterns in l4retlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of 5urtnce ~Vnter: ~'~ ~ (in.) Oxidized Rnot Chatmels in Upper I2 Inches
ld'ntcr•S[Ained LeAt'es
Depth to Free \~'ater in Pit: -~' (in.) Local Soil Surr'ey' DAta
/ AC-I~tCUlr31 Te$t
R
k
l
i
i
Depth to Saturated Soil: (D (in.) emar
s)
Other (Exp
a
n
n
Remarks: ~~ yam, ~,~~•.~~ .
~
~
~
~
~~ ~~

cnTT .~
Mnp tinit Nnmc f
(Series and Phase} ~~1
tlt~5'~,+'-~"~ C~-'^~~^-~ j c'a.'""'
Drainnac Clnss: DOS' ~~,
~^
-~'' t~ Field Observations
'Taxonomy (Subgroup) I ~- '~ C- ~~ r`~
~? ~ ~' U ~ ~ `~. ~ Confinn Mapped Type? Yes ?`o
Profile Descri tp ion:
llepth
A4ntrix Color Afiottle Colors
Mottle Tcxlure, Concretions,
(inchcsl iim,zc~.u (Munsell Mcistl (M~inse Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.

,,. (.~ ~.~+^ ,~~~ .~~'~ "~ ~ ~.. f t~ ~/>, ~ S~a;. F .., t 'C/n C. t c%~ a ~S ~..,;F ~~--,eQry ~ ~ ~"~^"
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
_
H istic Epipedon ,High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_
Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Snndy Snits
_
Aquic Moisture Rcgimc ! [..fisted nn Locat I ydric Soils List
_
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on Nnrionzl Hydric Soils List
_
r~/ Gleyed or L.ow-Chroma Colors _Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
UVTi'TT AN71 T1T.TTrRMTN4TT(lN

Hydroph}Kic Vegetation Frescos? Yes \n
R'etlnnd Hydrology Present? 'es No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point 1Vithin a \'~'etland? ~'es~ No
Remarks:
e ~~~,,...~i Lv tr

DATA FORM
ROUTINE ~'VETL.AI~~ DETEKR4INA'I'ION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation M~tuttnl)
j i
Prgjeet/Site: ~fi) ~' c1 '""Y~r'~~ tam ~ (c_
ApplicantlO~a~ner: ~'t) ' ,.),n r- ~, t (n 1 ~ ~ . ~ b Y `~ ~. ,~
Investigator(s): _. I•~~ %~` .`~ ~
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? 1'es ~ No
1s the site significantly disturbed (At}'pical Situation)? 1 es ~ moo' ?
•,
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes \n,~
(If needed, explain on reverse)

T)nte: 1

L-
ice- j -r.~ , <

Slate: !~-1~
A ,.~
Community lll: 1./~F I,~-+-~~ ~,.'1~ t2 ~,-
Trtutsecl ID: ~r~ ~~ Y
Plot ID: VJ ~ Sts'
VEGETATION
ngminant Plant Species r n a or Domingnt Y1nnLSpecies 3 ~ ndic t o

I.
~T V ~1y~ frra,.)%,-e, --r^
t4"~G f ~
~C V
9,
i _ -~~''~~ ~ ~

i, 13.
6. 14.
7, 15.
S. 16.

Percent ofUominattt Species that arc OBL, FACVI', ur FAC (excludine I~AC- ~ ~ t,.,
).
Remarks:
AYDROLO(GY
Recorded Datu (Describe in Remnks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X L'o Recorded Data .4vnilable 11'elland hydrology Indicators:
Primary Lidicators:
_ Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper l2 Inches
_ ~1'atcr Marks
Drill Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
F'icld Ohscn•ntions: _Drainnge Patterns in 1'1'ctlands
/ Secondmy Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: ' 1
,~
(in,) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
~
_ ~~~atcr-Stained Leaves
Depth to Frce 1Vatt:r in Pit: tJ .; (in.) Local Soil Survey Data

/ _FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: Pr (in.)
t1 _Other (Explain in Remarks)
P.emarks:
~~0 'Q~.~~'-~~~ S (,~ ~
tih,..~~.,•',, ~7~ ~, ~
., ~~ ..
"~

son's
A4ap lJnit Name
(Series and Phase) Gt9~

Taxonomy (Suhgroup) } ~,J p ~
1 c+d' ~ `iC-~ ~ ~ `~ ~ E7a~'~'^'

'; ~al~ ~y Q,V 1 "~~ ~~,
Drainage Class:
Picld Ohsert~ations
Canf'irnt Mapped T}~~c? Yes No
Profile Descrinti~n.~
Depth
Matrix Color h'lottle Colors
Mottle
Tcx~nire, Concretions,
(incltee~ Horiztm >~ttj7ce11._MglSt) (Mansell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, ctc.

~~
>~~,~nt,,-. ~~
[-Iydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol
_Iiistic Epipcdon
_Sulfidic Odor
_Aquic 1`4oisture Regime
_Roduoing Conditions
_Glcycd or Low-Chroma Colors
_Concretiats
-High Organic Content in Surface Layer ut Sandy Soils
-Organic Streaking itt Sandy Soils
_ Listed on Local Iiydric Soils List
Listed ou Natirntal Hydrie Soils List
~Othcr (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERII'ITNATION
Hydroph}Kic Vegetation Present? 1'es ~r~
,.~--.
Wetland Hydrology PrescntT I'es (~ too ,~
Hydric Soils Presort? Z'L5 ~?~`~..~~
Is [his 5mnpling Point 1~Jithin a 1'iretlattd? 1'es N~
Remarks:

USACE AID#
+
DWQ#
STREAM QUALITI' ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Pro~'ide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
!' !~ ~I
1. Applicant's name: -Tp+~J~1 0•~ + ;2~ ~ ~-~ Jr9+"%r~; ~ c
/ t ~ ~.
3.Date of evaluation: ~ ! i ~'~ ~~
5. Name of stream: ~~ °"" ~~• ~`'~
7. Approximate drainage area: ~ ' w,~ ~ t^~ `~ t ~~~
9. Lcugth of reach evaluated: ?- ~ ~(~{~ ~
2. Evaluator's name: ~ ' ~•~ ~v~~~~
4. Time of evaluation:
~~
6. River basin: '~w~'
(indicate on attached map)
1 ~~ ~'l. !^..
8. Stream order: ~n~ ~ ~ ~14'~f'i'''~~~f ~E
10. County: ~"~~~ ~t~
11. Site coordinates (if ]mown): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.372312): v'- ~ . (~ S,~ ! a ~ .'~~ Longitude (ex. -77.556611): r ~ • ~ o "~'' •''~ -~' ~ Lam!
Method location deterntitted (circle): GPS ~ 1'opo Sheet ,! .Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation nn a nearb .ttis'ai5i~landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): N O i'~ i~
., -- ~ .._
15. Recent weather conditions: ~ V r~ ~! ~ 7 ~ ~ ~` ~ ' -
16. Site conditions at time of visit: S~ ~i 1J
17. Identify any special waterway classifications hno~+m: Section 10 -Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
"!'rout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters ______Nutrient Sensitive ----Waters Water Supply tiTttatershed (I-N)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ~~ if yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey'? -YES NU
21. Estimated watershed land use: ~C? % Residential r'~1 % Commercial .'_~_~ °~, Industrial % Agricultural
r-; ~ % Fotested ~`A~F % Cleared /Logged % Other
-._22._Bankfitll width: -----_~3.-Bank-height-(from bed to top of-ban}:):-_
24. Channel slopt; down center of stream: _ Flat (0 to 2%) ~ Gentle (2 to 4°~) ^ Moderate (4 to 10°!0) _ Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _5traight -Occasional bends ~/ Frequent meander `-Very sinuous ----Braided channel
Insh•uctioms for completion of worksheet pocated on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. )f a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must ranee between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): W ~ _ Comments:
Evaluator's 5ignhture~ --•i1rt~.~;~~.^~F~'::~iwv1 __ Datc ;"-t` P / L1 /+
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
qutility. The total score resulting from llte completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does nat imply a
particular ntitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject tochange-version 06/03. To Comment, please ca11919-876-8441 x 26.
Site #
_ __

STREAM QLIAI,ITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
# CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POIN T RANGE SCO]
- - Coastal Piedmont i1'lountain
1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5
no flow or saturation = 0• stran flow = max Dints
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-S 0-5 ~
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max Dints
3 Riparian zone 0-6 U-4 0-5 ,~
no buffer = 0• Conti uous wide buffer = max Dints -
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 u
extensive dischar es = 0• no dischar es = max Dints 1
5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4
a
-~ no dischar e = 0; s rin s, see s wetlands etc. = max .Dints
~ 6 Presence of adjacent lloodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2
~' no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain = max Dints
•-~- '7 Entrenchment / floodplain access U-5 0-4----- ----0-2- •• -~
dee I entrenched = 0• fre vent floodin = max points
-•.~ _g._. .. _ _.. __^___Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 --0-4.---- _- 0-2 /
no wetlands = 0; tar a adjacent wetlands = max Dints
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3
extensive channelization= 0• natural meander = max Dints
l p Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 t.,
J
extensive de osition = 0' little or no sediment = max Dints
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate N/A* 0-4 0-5
fine homo emus = 0• tar e, diverse sizes = max Dints
-- 12 B,vidence of clrannel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 U-5 ..-,
dee 1 incised = 0• stable bed 8c haiils = max Dints -"°~'
~ l3 Presence of major bank failure U-5 0-5 0-5
,
a severe erosion = 0• no erosion, stable bans = max points
14 Root depth and. density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 -~,
no visible roots = U; dense roots throu hout = max Dints
E,,,
- 15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0-5 0-4 U-5
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max Dints ____
16 Presence of riffle-poallripple-pool complexes U-3 0-5 0-6 r--
~
noriffles/ri les or Dols = 0; welt-develo ed =rnax amts
E'' 17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6
little or no habitat = 0; fre cent varied habitats = max .amts
18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0-5
no shadin ve elation = U• continuous cano = max Dints
19 Substrate embeddedness N/A* 0-4 0-4
dee 1 embedded = O; loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 _-U_5_. 0-5 •~
"•"~
no evidence = 0; cammon, numerous cs = max otnts

.~
~'` 21 Presence of amphibians "'- -" " "----- 0-4 0-4 0-4
~
p no evidence = 0• common numeraus l ~ es = max Dints
.a 22 Presence offish 0-4 0-h 0-4 ~
no evidence = 0; common numerous t es = max Dints
23 Evidence of wildlife nse 0-6 0-S 0-5 ~
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence =rnax Dints
Total Points Possible 1.00 100 100

TOTAL SCORE (Also enter on first Uage)
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID#
DWQ#
Sits #
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment;
1. Applicant's name: ~v~~J~, ~~~ ~ ~~~~~-i J?~~r'~%
J tom- ..r
3.Date of evaluation: r~! / U (~
~. Name of stream: 1,.~ "~ ~ ~ ~°
©y ~ -f
7. Approximate drainage area: -~'~ •1%
(indicate on attached map)
Z. Evaluator's name: <~ ~ ,~~cL r r ~' { `
4. Time of evaluation:
6. River basin: ~,.~1_~?t~ ~'"~_~a,~
8. Stream order: ~ ~.r.t ~'`_ ~j '`:r"r• ~ c:-,.
.J
9. Length of reach cvaluatcd: ~~ / ~ ~ p ~- ~ 10. County:

11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. I2, Subdivision name (if any):
i,ati[ude (ex. 34.872312): v J ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ I~ngitude (ex. -77.SS6611); ~ ~ ° ~ "~ C~; -`~ `' a ~
Method location determined (circle): CPS ~ Topo Sheet,~~ .Qrtho (Aeria1~7 Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
1.3. T..ocation of reach under evaluation no e nea~~ls'~nd landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location);
14. Proposed channel work (if any): !J n f!
15. Recent weather conditions: ~ V lit t,! `{ `? 5 -- 5' ~ `~ ~•'
1G. Site conditions at time of visit: Sty N iJ
1.7. Identify any special +vaterv,~ay classifications known: Section 10 -Tidal «'aters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Maters Outstanding Resource \\'aters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Rater Supply \Vatershed (I-IV)
1S. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? 1'ES ~` O~ if yes, estimate the water surface azea:
19. Does channel appear on tISGS quad map?` 7~S NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Sun~ey? ~ ~ NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ~ % Residential t'p ~/o Commercial ~ °lo Industrial ____%u Agricultural
6 ~ '9o Forested ~ `9o Clcarcd / Logged - ~7o Other
--...._.22.-Baril~nll width: ~3.-Rank-height-(from bed to top of-bank):--
24. Cha[tnel slope down center of stream: _ I1at (U to 2~1e)Gentle (2 to 490) Moderate (4 to 10~Ic) ____. Steep (>103'0)
25. Channel sinuosity: -Straight -Occasional bends 1! Frequent meander -Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
)ocation, terrtin, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic +vithin the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of tow to revie+v the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect. an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be cvaluatcd due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in [be
comment section. ~\'ltere there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more ~bntinuity, and a sepatxte form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range bel+veen 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):
~a
Comments:
);valuator's Signature Date _~_ ._. t.~ ~•
This chamrel evaluation form is intend o be used only as a guide to assist lando~+~ners and envi onrfiental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United Stales Army Corps of )Jngineers to make a prelinunary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change-vrrsion 06/03. To Cotnrnent, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
_ _
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREG
ION POINT
RANG1
# tain
M
._. Coastal Piedmont oun
1 Presence of flaw /persistent pools in stream 0-S U-4 0"5
no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max Dints
6
0
0-S
0-5
2 Evidence of past human alteration -
extensive alteration = 0' no alteration = max Dints
6
0
0-4 U 5 `'
/
g Riparian zone - ,
(no buffer = 0• Conti wows wide buffer = max Dints S
0 0-4 0-4 ~

4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
- 1
extensive dischar es = 0• no dischar es = max Dints 0
4 0-4
5 Groundwater discharge 0 3 -
U no discharge = 0' s rin s see s wetlands, etc. = max Dints 4
0 0-4 0-2
6 Presence of adjacent flaodplain -
,~
~ no flood lain = 0• extenstve flood lain = max Dints
5
0
U-4-'
-'--0 2-"
"f
:. ~_ ~ Entrenchment / floodplain access -
dee 1 entrenched = 0• fre vent floodin = max oink
6
0
0-
0-Z
_ ---.Presence of adjacent wetlands - - - l
- no wetlands = 0; lar a adjacent wet]ands = max Dints
0
S
0-4
0-3
q Channel sinuosity -
extensive channelization = 0' natural meander = max Dints 0 4 0 4 •-
1 p Sediment input 0-5 ~
(extensive de . osition = 0• little or no sediment = max . Dints
5
0
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate N/Am 0-4 -
fine homogenous - 0• lame, diverse sires = max points)
0
S
0-4
0-S
-
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening -
(deepiy incised = 0• stable bed & baiilcs = max Dints
0-5
i
0-
0-5
13 Presence of major bank failures -
~ severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = mnx Hints 3
U 0-4 0-5
14 Root depot and density on banks -
H no visible roots = 0• dense roots throw hour = rnax Dints
S
0
0-4
O-5
- l5 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production - ~.1
(substantial impact =U• no evidence = max Dints
5
0
0-6
16 Presence of riffle-pooUrtpple-pool complexes 0-3 -
no riffles/ri les or Dols = 0' well-develo ed = max .Dints 0 6 0-6 0-6
~ 17 Habitnt complexity
little or no habitat = 0• fre wen vaned habitats = max Dints
5
0
0-5
0-5
p l g Canopy coverage over streambed - 1
Q~., no shadin ve station = 0• continuous cano = max Dints
N/A~`
0-4
0-4
i q Substrate embeddedness '
dee 1 embedded = 0• loose structure = max 4
0 0
5 0-S
20 Presence of slreatn invertebrates (see paDe 4) - :
-._
_ _
no evidence = 0• common, numerous t es = max Dints
~'~ ~ -
0-4
0-4
0-4
~
~ 21 Presence of atnpltibians ~

~ no evidence = 0• common, numerous t es = max Dints ~ 4 0-4 0-4
22 Presence of fish
~ no evidence = U; common numerous t cs = max oi.nts
6
U
J 0-S
0-5
~ 23 Evidence of wildlife use - ~
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max Dints 100 100 100
'T'ot al Poit tts Possible

TOTAL SCORE Also enter on first a e
_,
"These charactertsttcs are not asscsscu ~„ .,~a,.~, ~u+.au~o.

USACT ATD#
DW Q# _
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide flee follo~ti•ing information for the stream reach under assessment:
_--"
1. Applicant's name: Ir~w', o-~ ~.~7~1/t~ ~i~t'%>,.,-r
3.Date of evaluation: ~ ~2iri'~~%f
r
i
S. Name of stream: ~ ' /IJT
7. Approximate drninage area: ~ ~' / r^ ' ~
9. Length of reach evaluated: --! ~D ~- ~
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
12.5ubdivisiou name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): ~ J . ~ ~ ° 1 9 a /J Longitude (ex. -77.556611): ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "% 1-l' of"'~ _~
Method location determined (circle): GPyC ~ Topo Sheet~rl "nrtho {Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby`r"ond nand ]andmnrls flnif attach map identifying stream(s) location): _
14. Proposed channel work (if any): P.f pIJ~
15. Recent weather conditions:
Site #
(indicate on attached map)
2. Evaluator's name; ~ ^? ^~~~ `^z~~'~- _
4, Time of evaluation:
6. Rivcrbasin: i ~',.-lc, ~~`r"ati.
8. Stream order: ~ .i. ~c'u y -~" -_-~ t~~ -___ _-- -
l0. County: t" / ~-
a
16. Site conditions at time of visit: ~~ +'f ~•~ )f
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 -Tidal Waters essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive \~'aters Rater Supply \~ratershed (I-1V)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on t1SG5 quad map? YES !1`O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ~~ % Residential ~ra % Commercial ~ ~ % Lrdustrial _% Agricultural
% Forested ~ ~ % Cleared 1 Logged _ % Other ( _ _)
-...22._Bankfull width: ~._..___-__ __23.-Bank-height{from bed to top of-bank):--. I "'~ ~-
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ~ Flat (U to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) ~ Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _5traight -Occasional bends . ~ Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel.
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or wcathca conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Vdhere there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasttrrc
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score; assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of ]00 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Tow1 Score (from reverse):
t-~
Comments:
)'evaluator's Signature ~u Date Z ~+
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and em ronn ental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of F,ngineers to make a prelinunary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACL approval and does not imply a
particular nutigalion ratio or requirement. Form subject to change-version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMF,N`I' WORKSIIEE I'
# CHAI2AC'I'L+'RIST'1C5 ECORE GION POIN T RANGE SCt
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 L
no flow or saturation = 0• strop flow = max Dints /
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max Dints
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5
no buffer = 0• Conti uous wide buffer = max Dints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 U-4 0-4
extensive dischar es = 0• no dischar cs = max Dints
~~' S Groundwater discharge 0-3 U-4 0-4 ~
~ no dischar e = 0• s rip s see s wetlands etc. = max Dints _
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2
~ no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain = max Dints ~
~ i 0
5 0-4 - - - - 0-2
-
- - 7 n access
Entrenchment / floodpla -
a* points
dee I entrenched = 0• fre vent floodin =max
_$ . -
_._._ .._ .__.... _._ .Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 --0-4---- - 0-2 ~
acent wetlands= max Dints
no wetlands = 0• tar a ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max Dints `-
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 ..~
extensive de osilion = 0• little or no sediment = max Dints
11 Size & diversity of cha[[nel bed substrate N/A* 0-4 0-5 .,_,
5
fine homo enous = O; tar a diverse sizes = max Dints -
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 Z
~•, dee I incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max Dints
~"'., 13 Prescnce of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 U-5 ~
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max ioints
14 Root depth and density an banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 2
, no visible roots = 0' dense roots throughout = max.. Dints _
E.,
~ ~ 15 Impact by agriculture, Livestock, or timber production 0-5 0-4 0-5
substantial itn act. =0• no evidence = max Dints
_ 16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6
no riffles/ri . les or orals = 0; well-develo ed = max Dints
~
H 17 Habitat complexity 0-6 U-6 0-6 ,?
tilde or no habitat = 0• fre went varied habitats = max Dints _ _
_ f-•-
18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 -
~
nn shadin ve elation = 0• continuous cano ~ = max Dints -
19 Substrate embeddedness N/A* 0-4 0-4
dee ] embedded = O; loose structure = max •
20 Presence of scream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 .. - _0-5~. 0-5 ~
=
no evidence = 0• common numerous t es = max Dints '
'
~
~ 21 Prescnce of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 /
p no evidence = 0• common numerous t es = max Dints
22 Presence offish 0-4 U-4 0-4
~
q no evidence = 0• common numerous t ~ es = max Dints
23 L"vidence of ~sildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 •~,
y
uo evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max Dints "'
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
~
TOTAL SCORE (Also enter on first papa) __ •
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USAGE AID#
DWQ# _
Site #
STREAM QUALI'T'Y ASSESSMEN`1' \'VURKSHEET
Yroride the following information fnr the stream reach under assessment:
,l
1. Applicant's name: ~v+~J+^, o ; ~ ;7J ~ :..r J;~~'~:'= >
/ , ~:
3.Date of evaluation: •~ / i I6 ~
5. Name of stream: C' ~ P ~'
2
7. Approximate drainage area: '~ O ~ ~ f')~ i
9. Length of reach evaluated: -%-~-C) L'^ ~
(indicate on attached map)
~~> - ;~
2. )/valuator's name: (':~.r,,,7,.~,.;-_
4. Time of evaluation:
G. Aivcr basin:
8. Stream order:
lt). County:
~ r,,,.
Z r, ~ o r ~-i~~-
t;'r iy.
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (cx. 34.872312): v J ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;'~,/ Longihrde (ex. -77.556611): ~ • `~ ' 1 F; ~ .:}e J trd..!
.r__~--
Method location determined (circle): ~ GPS ` Topo Sheet`' .Ortho (Aerial} Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evahiatioi~no a acerb r lids a'n'd landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed charu~el work (if any): l~Id r~~ l~
~~ ~r ~, ~ ,, 1.,.
15. Recent weather conditions: S V f~ r.! + :~ ~ .:
_ __ __ __ _
lh. Site conditions at tune of visit: SU N L)
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section ]0 _'1'idal Raters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout 1Vaters Outstanding Fesource Waters Nutrient Sensitive -Waters Water Supply \Vatershed (I-IV)
•--~.
lfi. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ~NO~ Il yes, estimate the water surface area:
_ .. _ ~., m...
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 20. Does channel appear on USllA Soil Sure+cy? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land user % Residential !~ °I+ Commercial /~ % Industrial rYo Agriculttrral
~ ~ % Forested (~~ % Cleared !Logged _ % Other ( )
-, ~ /
--.._22. Barrkfull width: _ ~ 23.-Ban}:-height-(from bed to top of-bank):----
24. Channel slope down center of stream: r Flat (0 to 2~/,) Gentle (2 to 4%,) A4oderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ---.-Straight ___Occasional bends ~Frequenl meander --...---Very sinuous ~_Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located nn page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate eeoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same eeoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the eeoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream mach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot he evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. \'r'here there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may he divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a str~cam of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ~ + Comments:
Evaluator's Signature ~~"'~"-"~''~ Aate ~ ~ ~ ~~
This channel evaluation form is intended to he used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering fire dale required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a prelinunary assessment of stream
quality. 1'he total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular n»tigation ratio or requirement. Form subject tochange-version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUA1.,T'i'Y ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
# CIIARACTERISTICS I'sCORE GION POIN T RANGE 5C0}?
-- Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence offlow /persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 ~ t
`7
no flow or saturation = 0• strop 17ow = max Dints)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-b U-5 0-5 ~.-
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max Dints
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 L_t
7"
no buffer = 0' Conti uous wide buffer = max Dints
4 L+'vidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 -~~
extensive discharges = 0• no dischar es = max Dints
g Groundwater discharge '- 0-3 0.4 0-4 ~
~
~ no dischar e = 0; s rip s see s wetlands etc. = max aint<s
~ ~ Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2
`" no flood lain = 0; extenswe flood lain = max Dints
..~.. ~ _
Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4-- -- ----0-2-- -•-~-
dee 1 entrenched = 0• fre vent. floodin = max points
__.__.._ ~_presenee of adjacent wetlands 0-6 -0-4-- _. 0-2
_ _, i
t
d
j
n
s
s = max D
acent wetlan
no wetlands = U; tar a ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 U-3 -~
(extensive channelization = U• natural meander = max Dints •--~
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4
extensive de osition = 0• little or no sediment = max points
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NIA* 0-4 0-5 L
fine hotno enous = 0• ]ar a diverse sizes = max .Dints
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
~.
H
l3 dcc 1 incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max Dints
Presence of major banlt failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points
~ 14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 .~
ms no visible roots = 0; dense roots tluoughout = max Dints
E
,,
~' t5 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0-5 0-4 U-5 t)!
""I'"
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max Dints
16 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6
(no riffleslri les or Dols = 0• well-develo ed = max Dints
H 17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6
little or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = max Dints
~ l 8 Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0-5

~" no shadin vegetation = 0• continuous cano = max Dints
'"
~
4
0
ly Substrate embeddedness N/A 0-4 -
dee 1 embedded = 0• loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 ._0_5_ 0-5 Z
no evidence = 0; common numerous t cs = max Dints _~_
~ 21 presence of amphibians --'- 0-4 0-4 U-4
(no evidence = 0• common numerous t ~ es = max Dints
4
0
22 Presence of fish U-4 0-4 - F
f
no evidence = 0; conunon numerous t ~ es = max oink i
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 U-5 0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points
'lot alPointsPossible 100 100 ]UU
~L
T(-1TAT, R('.(1T2E (Also enter on first UaQe)
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID#
DW Q# _
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALIi'Y ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
~ '"'
1. Applicant's name: ~y!~J~'1 0.1- ~ }~i~ ~ ~~ ~,~r"u' -;5 2. L-valuator's name: Y--, • •~-~='-"'~`•'t
r
3.Date of evaluation: ~/T~/y ~ 4. Time of evaluation:
1 t~I T~ r ~
5. Name of stream: ~ ~"' 6. River basin: ~,d f ~t'f Y'" ti {''•,•'
7. Approximate drainage area: `~ ~, ~ ~ t ~ 8. Stream order: ~ 5 `~'"'
9. Length of reach evaluated: -- ~d~-- ~.-.-~ I0. County:

11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision Warne {if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.8723] 2): y J r~ ~ ~~ + '~ ~ ~'~ Longitude (ex. -77.556611): ___! ~ • '~ ? "' -' °"'
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet J ~Ortho Aerial Photo/GIS Other GIS Other _
13. Location of reach under evaluation n to nearb} ad~"and~landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
o U,~
14. Proposed channel work (if any): N t7 ~'f ~~
~, .,
15. Recent weather conditions: S V !~r fJ ~ t :'i -- ~ ;;
IG. Site conditions at time of visit: Sv N tJ `j
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 -Tidal 1§'aters Essential Fisheries Habitat
'T'rout Waters Outstanding Resource \~raters Nutrient Sensitive _VVaters Water Supply 1'~'atershed (I-IV)
I8. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? 1'E5 NO~ Tf yes, estimate the ~watcr surface area:
].9. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES ~1\O 20. Does channe[ appear on USDA Soil Survey?' YES NO
21. Estimated watershed ]and use: ~° %, Residential 1 ° °!o Commercial ~~ % Industrial % Agricultural
~O ~ % Forested j(Il7 "lo Cleared /bogged _ % Other (__ )
--.r22._Bardd'ull width: ~3.-Bank-height-(from bed to top of bank):-._
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) ~~ Gentle {?_ to 43'0) _ DQoderate (4 to 1 U`7c) ._ Steep (> 1 U%)
25. Channel sinuosity: -Straight v OCCaSIUnaI bends ----Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of rtirorksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within [hc range shown for the ecoregion. Pate 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should ref]ect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter U in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the sUCaut tray be divided into smaller reaches that display more i`bntinuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between U and 100, with a score of 10U representing a stream of the
Highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): l(J tD Comments:
Evaluator's Signature ~'"F%"~1'~.-~~''1 ______„_ Date .`~ /
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used onl y as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to US.ACE approval and does rot imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Porm subject to change-version UG/03. '1'o Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 2b.

STREAl~7 QUALITY ASSL+'SSMENT WORKSkIEET
# Ci3ARACTERISTIC5 ECOREGION POIN T RANGE SCO
-• Coastal Piedmont 11~Iountain
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 Y.~
no flow or saturation = 0• siron flow = max Dints '
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5
extensive altcratiott = 0• tto alteration = max oink
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 D-5 /J
_
no buffer = 0• Conti uaus wide buffer = max Dints !
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical. discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4
extensive dischar es = 0• no dischar es = max Dints
a 5 Groundwater discharge '' 0-3 0-4 0-4 f
1-
~ no dischar e = 0; s . rin s see s wetlands etc. = max Dints
„ ~, (> Presence of adjacent floodplain D-4 0-4 0-2 /
~' no flood lain = 0; extensive flood taro = max Dints
..~.. '7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 - - -0-2- -
2"
a dee 1 entrenched = 0• fre uent floodin = max .amts
_$_.. ___--._____presence of adjacent wetlands 0-G ---0-4 0-2 ~^
/
C
no wetlands = 0; large ad•acent wetlands = max Dints .
y Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 1
extensive channelization = U• natural meander = max Dints
10 Sediment input 0-5 D-4 0-4 , ,
extensive de osition = 0• little or no sediment = max .amts '~
11 Sizc & diversity of channel bed substrate N/A* 0-4 0-5
fine homy enous = 0• lar a di~~ersc sizes = max Dints
12 1?,vidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
+ dee 1 incised = 0• stable heel 8c banks = max Dints
~
mot"'„ 13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0-5 / t
"1
severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks = max Dints
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 U-5 .~-;~
throughout = max Dints
no visible roots = 0; dense roots `~"
E-,
'n ` 15 _
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or titrrber production U-5 0-4 0-5 / j
/
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max amts
16 _
Presence of riffle-poaUripple-pool. complexes 0-3 U-5 0-6 ,,
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; welt-developed = max Dints ~-•`
F 17 Habitat complexity D-6 0-6 0-6
H little or no habitat = 0; fre uent varied habitats = max Dints
ig Canopy coverage over streambed D-5 0-5 0-5 ~~•.~
no shading ve etation = 0• continuous cano = max points ~-'
l y Substrate embeddedness N/A* 0-4 0-4 ,•~
r
(dee ~l embedded = 0; loose structure = max `
"`
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 __0.5__._ (1-5
no evidence = 0• common, numerous t ~ es = max Dints
~ 21 Presence of amphibians ° - " [--4 0-4 0-4
p (no evidence = 0• common numerous t es = max Dints
22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 f
no evidence = 0; conunon, numerous t es = max Dints ..~
23 Evidence o£ wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 -;;.
uo evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max Dints '~°""'
Total Points Possible lOQ l00 100

TOTAL SCOKE (Also enter on first pale) __ _
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID#
DVJQ#
Site # _ (indicate nn attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMCNI' '4'VORKSHEET
1't•ovide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: '
1. Applicant's Warne: -T , r i t ~ i
t U~JI~, o-. ~-,T~ ;.a Ji:'~'..'y 2. Evaluator's name: ~` i ~. t ('r•~,-{
t--~-= ~ ----
3.Date ofevaluation: ~`~" :~~ ' ~'~ ~" 4. Time of evaluation:
S. Name of stream: ~ - ~"~ ~" tw
7, Approximate drainage area: ~ ~ ` r ri~ i 2
9. Length of reach evaluated: ~ ~-~-~ ~--
,~~
6. River basin: ! ~; ~-''~ t"'`~ ~~ `~
8. Stream order: ~ S'~'
10. County: ~~t'- ESE''
l 1. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): v r r, ~ ~~ ! it ° :"'~j L"ongitude (ex. -77.556611): +` ~ • '~ ~ r~ ~'% ' (,rw1
Method location determined (circle): Gl'S ~ T'opo Sheet ~rtho fAerial~ Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation no e nearb Sods nn landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): fJ 01`j ~~.
„.-. ~a..
15. Rcccnt weather conditions: :a V I`t t.,' ~{ r = ~ ~ w :'~
I6. Site conditions at time of visit: Su f~ IJ ~
l7. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 -Tidal Raters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource \'~raters _._ Nutrient Sensitive ~~+'alers Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
~.
18. Ts there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE5 = NO ~ U yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on liSllA Soil Survcy:~b~ NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: s ~ ~/o Residential j ~ % Commercial f ~_ °h Industrial _% Agricultural
~? ~ yo Forested `~ g'o Cleared /Logged ._ ofo Other ( )
--.,22. Bankfull width:-.. _,_-________ ?3.-Baril:-height-(from bed to top of-bank):--.-.
24. Chaturel slope down center of stream: _ 1'7at (U to 2~/0) _ Gentle (2 to 4~/0) ___,_ Moderate. (4 f0 1 O%n) _ Stccp (>10%n)
2:i. Channel sinuosity: -Straight -Occasional bends Frcqucut meander ................Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located ou page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. livery characteristic must. be scored using the same ecoreg,ion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecorcgion. 1'agc 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, cuter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Wlrere there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more`c~ntinuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. Tire total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 represcnting a stream of the
highest quality.
'Total Score (trorn reverse)
Comments:
Evaluator's Signature <-:~'.~~'r^~/l _ _ Datc ~ r a / d (r~
This channel evaluation form is intended fo be used only as a guide to assist landowners and envir~rn ental professionals in
gathering the data required try the United Stales Army Corps of P;ngineers to make a prelinunary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change-version 06!03. To Comment, please. ca11919-87G-8441 x 2b.

STREAM QUALITY A55ESSMEN'T ~~VORKSHEET
# CHARACTERISTICS ~ ECORE GIUN P(?IN T RANGE 5C'
-- Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5
no flow ar saturation = 0; strong flow = max Dints
2 Evidence of past human alteration. 0-6 0-5 0-5
extensive alteration = U• no alteration = max Dints
3 Riparian zone U-6 0-4 0-5
no buffer = 0; Conti uous v++ide buffer = max Dints _
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 ~
extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es = max Dints _
$ Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4
a no dischar~c = 0• s rings see s wetlands etc. = max Dints
U
-,~ 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 /
~ no flood lain = 0; extenstve flood lain = max Dints
.,~~.. 7 Entrenchment/floodplain access 0-5 0-4--••- -----0-2 .-
~ dcc 1 entrenched = 0; fr uent floodin = max Dints ~
g
. ___Iresence of adjacent wetlands
.-_ U-6 -0-4--- -- 0-z
4 _
_ _
no wetlands = 0• tar a adjacent wetlands = max oink
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 U-4 0-3
extensive channelizatiou = 0• natural meander = max .Dints
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 ~
extensive de osit.ion = 0; little ar no sediment = max Dints v
_
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate N/A"~ 0-4 0-S ;,
'
fine hotno enous = 0' lame diverse sizes = max aoints `"
12 E~ddence of channel incision or widening 0-5 U-4 0-5 ~
dee 1 incised = 0• stable bed Rc banks = max .Dints
~
H 13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0-5 j-
a severe erosion = 0• no t;rosian, stable banks = max Dints
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 U-5 --
no visible roots = 0' dense roots throe hout = max Dints ~
f,,,
- 15 impact by agriculture, livestock, nr timber production 0-5 U-4 0-5 L
~7
substantial im act =0; no evidcncc = max oink _
16 Pretence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6
no riffles/ri ]es or Dols = 0; well-deve]o ed = max Dints
17 Habitat complexity U-6 0-6 0-6 1
H little or no habitat = 0' fre vent varied habitats = max Dints
l g Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-S 0-5 ~
no shading ve elation = 0=continuous cano = mnx Dints
lg Substrate embeddedness N/A* 0-4 U-4
dee 1 embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 ___._0-5.___ 0-5
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points
~
. ~ 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 U-4
p no evidence = 0; common numerous t • es = max .Dints -
~ 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4

(no evidcncc = 0• common numerous t • yes = max Dints ~
~
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-S -
dence = 0• abundant evidence = max points
no ev
i
_
_
Total Points Possible 100 l0U 100
'1'O'I'AT, SCORN; (Also enter on first page) ___ ~
*'I'hese charactct•istics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID#
_ DVJQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: ~~.,~,-~
1. Applicant's name: ~TOiJ~; r~ ~ i a7~(~.~-1 ~~i~'!r`.='> 2. EvalUa[OC'S name: ~~ L;>G-Vr ~ '~, ij
f • ti•
3.Date of evaluation: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4. Time of evaluation:
5, Name of stream: ~ a..
7. Approximate drainage area:
~~r
~o.~ rn~~
9. Length of reach evaluated: - - ~-~
7
6. River basin: ~,,4't.ifC- ~~ c~ i
8. Stream order: __ __~S
10. County: ~~~- ~~~='
11. Sike coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): _~
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): _3 ;~_. ~_. ~~ 5 ~ ~ ~ p ~ 't~ _ Longitude (ex. -77.556611): ^_/ ~ • ~ > ~ -'~ "`'
A4cthod location determined (circle): GPS T~ opo 5hcet~~ ho Aerial Photo/GIS Other G1S Other _
13. Loaadon of reach under evaluation note nearhy`~'O~ds end landmarlts and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): _._.._..._.__..._~~~d ~'`~ ~.__...__.__
15. Recent ~ticather conditions:
1.6. Site conditions at time of visit:
SvN~J`!
l7. Identify any special watettivay classillcalions known: -.---Section ]0 ---.---Tidal V,'aters __~ Essential Fisheries habitat
Trout Waters Outstandin; Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive _Vdatcrs Water Supply ~'~'atershed (I-IV)
r•'~+-.
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? Y"ES = NO) If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS yuad map? YES NO 2U. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: )~ % Residential ~ °Ic Commercial 1 ~ % Industrial ;'° Agricultural
r> % Forested r'~ ol° Cleared /Logged % Other ( )
-..~22~Dankfull width: ~. 23.-Bank-height (Gum bed to top of-bank): - - _
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) / C,cntlc (2 to 4'70) _ Moderate (4 to 1 U'Yc) ~ Steep (>10'90)
25. Channel simrosity: -Straight / Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, remain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream maybe divided into smaller reaches that display more~ntinuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between U and 100, with a score of ] OD representing a stream of the
Highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ~ ~ Comments:
L+'valuator's Signature '"t ~ ` :~ llate Cl
This channel evaluation or•m is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and et •ironmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Arrny Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approvnt and does not imply a
particular rrutigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to channe-version 06/03. '1'o Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
c~ ~~~

S`~REAI12 QUALITY ASSF,SSIVIENT ~'4'ORKSHEET
# CHARACTERISTICS ECORE GION POIN T RANGE S
• Coastal Piedmont 1\Zountain
1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5
no slow or saturaUOn = 0; strong flow = max oint~c
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max Dints
3 Riparian zone U-6 0-4 0-5
no buffer = 0• Conti uous wide buffer = max x~ints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 U-4 0-4
(extensive dischar es = 0• rio dischar es = max Dints '
5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4
a
~C no discharge = 0• s rin s see s wetlands, etc. = max Dints
~ 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2
_
,
~ (no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain = max Dints
2
0
.-~_ ~ Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4---- -
-----
a dee 1 entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max Dints
_.. _ __ _ . _Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 -0- - 0-2
no wetlands = 0• lrtr a ad'acenl wetlands = max Dints
y Channel sinuosity 0-5 (1-4 0-3
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max Dints
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 U-4
extensive de asition = O; little or no sediment = max Dints
I 1 Size ~: diversity of channel bed substrate N/A* 0-4 0-5
firm homo~euous = 0• tar a diverse sizes = max points
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening U-5 0-4 0-5
Glee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max Dints
13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 U-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max Dints
'
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5
no visible roots = 0• dense roots throu hoot = max Dints
H
~ -
15
Impact by agricul ore, livestock, or timber production
0-5
U-~l
0-5
(substantial im act =0• no evidence = max Dints)
16 Presence of riffle-pooUripplc-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6
no riffleslri les or Dols = 0; well-develo cd = max Dints
F 17 Habitat comptes]ty U-6 0-6 0-6
little or no habitat = 0• fre bent varied habitats = max Dints
] g Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0.5 0-5
no shadin ve elation = 0• continuous cano = max Dints
]9 Substrate embeddedness N/A* 0-4 0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20 Presence of'stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 __0.5_ 0-5
no evidence = 0• common numerous t • es = max Dints
~
. ~
21 _
Presence of amphibians •°- ~ -
0-4
0-4
0-4
na evidence = 0• corrunon numerous ty es = max Dints
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
O (no evidence = 0• common numerous t es = rnax oink
~ ~3 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max Dints
Total Yoints Possible 100 100 100
T(~TA~. SCORE iAlso enter on first pa];e) ____
`'These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

_ ..._ _._
USACE AlD#
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREA117 QUALITY ASSESSMENT ~'VORKSHEF,T
Provide the following information for t1-e stream reach r
n it ~
1. Applicant's name: ~D!f:J,R, ~- -;*~(; ~, s~~+"%r:-~~
3.Date of evaluation: ~ ! ~ ~~ Ij ~/
5. Name of stream: ~ °" ~~ f
7. Approximate drainage area: '~ ~'' ~ ~ tti'i ~`
9, Length of reach evaluated: ~ ~d ~--~
trader assessment: r
2. F,valuator's name: ~ f.il~ i' r C , / .~
4. Time of evaluation:
(~~ ^ ° r~
G. River basin: ,,, ;'+..~.'t,.- f'~`'t~'"
8. Stream order: 1 a '~""
10. County: ~~- (;mot:..
71. Site coordinates (if }mown): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision Warne (if any): _.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): v j ~.~ :-~ ~~ / ~ o ~~'+~ Longihide (ex. -77.556611): ~' ~~ • '~ o ~ ~ `"
A4ethod location dctcrntined (circle): LGPS w Topo Sheet ~Qrtho fAerial~ Photo/GIS Other GIS Othcr_
13. Location of reach under evaluation no a nearb ~td~ar5d landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
~~
14. Proposed channel work (if any): l~)b f~~ l
15. Recent weather conditions: ~ V 1~' !.I ~'~ ~ a '" .1 ~ ,3
I6. Site conditions at time of visit: 5u N tJ
17. Identify any special u~atenvay classifications known: Section 10 -Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries llabital
'Trout 1','aters Outstanding Resource Waters ----Nutrient Sensitive -Waters Water Supply Rratcrshed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES t N If yes, estimate the water surface area:
_._ . ~.
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YT:S NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ~n % Residential _/t} % Commercial t f~ % Industrial ~% Agricultural
~~' % Forested ~~~} % Cleared /Logged _ % Other ( )
-.w:.22..Bankfull width:--_.-._ ~3.-Ban}:-height-(from bed to top of-baitk):__._
24, Channel slope down center of stream: _ Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4°!n) Moderate (4 to l0%) -Steep (.10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight Occasional bends ~Frequeut meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the ~~-orksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section.l4~here there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. Ttre total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream o[ the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ~ ~ _ Comments:
__--.____.._-_---_. ~. k ~ __ __ ' f
Evaluator's Signature C'""1/ !//` ~"~C.t~ , ~, ;~.%~wn.~: _ _ Date ~.:~' ~ t
This channcI evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environrr' cntal professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of F,ngineers to mttke a preliminary assessment of stream
goality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACL approval and does not imply a
particular ttutigafiou ratio or reyuiremnenL Form subject to change-version 06/03. 'To Conuuent, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEI+~'I'
# CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POIIV T RANGE St
- Coustal Piedmont A'lountain
1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5
no flow or saturation = 0• strop flow = max Dints
2 Evidence oC past human. alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max Dints
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 D-5
no buffer = 0; con.ti uous, wide buffer = max Dints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chenucal discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4
extensive dischnr es = D; no dischar es = max Dints
a 5 Groundwater discharge '- 0-3 0-4 0-4
d no dischar e = 0• s rip s see s wetlands etc. = max .Dints
~ 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2
.
~ no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max Dints
..~- '7 F;ntrenchmeut / floodplalu access 0-5 0-4--- -- -----~0-2--
a dee 1 entrenched = 0• fre cent 17oodin = max . Dints
...., . _H_. _..~~-Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4_ 0-2
no wetlands = 0• tar a ad•acent wetlands = max Dints
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3
extensive channeliz:ation = D; natural meander = max Dints
!0 Sediment input 0-5 U-4 0-4
extensive de osition = 0• little or no sediment = max Dints
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate N/A'~ D-4 0-5
fine, hnmo enous = 0' tar a diverse sizes = max Dints
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
dee l incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max Dints
_
13 Presence of major bank Cailures U-5 0-5 0-5
severe erosion = 0• no erosion, stable bans = max points
14 Root depth and density on bunks 0-3 U-4 0-5
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throunhout = nklx Dints
~ - 15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0-5 0-4 0-5
substantial im .act =0; no evidence = max Dints
__ • 1 G Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6
no riffles/ri ]es or Dols = 0• well-deve)o . ed = rnax >Dints
H
~ 17 Habitat complea-ity 0-G 0-6 D-6
E- little or no habitat = 0• fre uent, varied habitats = max .Dints
•,~
~ 18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0-5
~ no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy= max Dints
19 Substrate embeddedness N/A* U-A 0-4
dee al embedded = 0; Loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 _~0.5._. 0.5
no evidence = 0; conunon, numerous t es = max Dints
~
~ 21 Presence of amphibians -" ! - 0-4 0-4 0-4
p no evidence = 0• common numerous t ~ yes = max Dints
22 Presence of fesh U-4 0-4 0-4
no evidence = 0• conunon numerous t ~ es = max Dints _
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max Dints _
Total Paints Fossible 1 DO 100 ] 00
TOTAL SCORE (Also enter on first pale)
*These characteristicsare not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE A1.D#
D~~JQ#
S1te # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following in!'ormation for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: w!J_~_ o- ~ ~G~ ~ ~r ~;1~"%;''S 2. Evaluator's name: f r t,/C•+. r",~ p •~' ~••'
i
3.Date of evaluation: _~ / ~ /n ~ 4, Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: ~-'~" "" 1 !`~ ~ (, River basin: rJ7.',
.Z ,
7. Approximate drainage area: "~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: --- ~ ~~ ~ ~ 14. County:

IT, Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude ex. 34.872312: v' 3 ~ ~ ~ r' i ° .''>> ~; ~ ~ .=,' ~' ~ (~tJ
( ) __._ Longitude (ex. -77.556611): !'
~--~-~, r-~^",~ -
A4elhod location deterrnined (circle): G' PS 1 Topo Sheet fl h~ Photn/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation no a ncarb r ads anil landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): ___._-.._.._
14. Proposed channel work (if any): hf D 1'f ~~ __._..__~
15. Recent weather conditions: a U!~t tJ `( -3 ~ ~ r~
I6. Site conditions at time of visit: Sv
I7. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _..______Section 10 -Tidal 1Vaters Essential Fisheries ITabitat
"Trout Waters __`__OuLclanding Resource Rraters Nutrient Sensitive _SVaters Water Supply 1Vatershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lal:c located upstream of the evaluation point? 1'ES sNO~ if yes, estimate the water surface area:
1.9, Does channel appear on USGS quad map? IES 1\0 24. Does channel appear on liSDA Soil Survey?~ NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ~p %a Residential ~~ %Commercial ~~ %Tndustrial _io Agricultural
% Forested 1 ~ °Jo Clcarcd /Logged _ % Other ( )
--.,._22~T3ankfull width: - 23.13ank-height-(from bed to top of-ban}:):--- _
24• Channel slope down center of stream: ~ Flat (0 to 2%) _ Gentle (2 to 4%) _._ Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%a)
25. Channel sinuosity: -Straight .)/,-,Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous --.-Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by dctcnnining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet, Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the sco-ing box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. ~Vltere there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review {e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more cbndnuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between b and 100, with a score of ]00 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):
~~
Comments:
Evaluator's Signature ,~~ ~f ~+s1.~e.tlj Date ;.~ / 2.- /K7.G
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as n guide to assist lando~t°ners and enti•t nn cntal professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make n prclintinary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject. to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular nutigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change-version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x ~6.
it t+R t.~,r,...
j T

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT ~'VORKSHEET
# CHARACTERISTICS ECORE GION POIN T RANGE S
-•- Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5
no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 U-5
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max Dints
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5
no buffer = 0• Conti uous wide buffer = max Dints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges U-5 0-4 0-4
extensive dischar es = 0• no dischar es = max Hints
5 Groundwater discharge '' 0-3 0-4 0-4
no dischar e = 0• s . rip s, see s wetlands etc. = max Dints
. ~. 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2
~ no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain = max oiuts
r+
.•~.•
~
Entrenchmentlfloodplainaccess
0-5
0-4---•
----0-2
a dee) entrenched = 0• fre vent floodin = max Dints
___.g.__. ._ -.___Presenceofadjacentwetlands 0-6 -0- - 0-2
no wetlands = O; lar a ad'accnt wetlands = max Dints
g Channel sinuosity 0-S 0-4 0-3
(extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max Dints
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4
extensive de osition = 0• little or no sediment = max .hints
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate N/A* 0-4 0-5
fine homo enous = 0• lar e, diverse sizes = max Dints
J
12 1?vidence of channel incision or widening 0-S 0-4 0-5
dee 1 incised = 0• stable bed & hanks = max hints
~.,
~'' 13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0-5
,,
{
~ severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable banks = max Dints
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5
no visible roots = 0; dense roots tluouahout = max Dints
H
~ ` IS Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0-5 0-4 0-5
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max Dints
16 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 U-5 0-6
no riffles/ri > >les or Dols = 0' well-dcvclo ed = max Dints
H 17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6
little or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = max Dints
1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0-5
no shading ve elation = 0• continuous cano = max Dints
19 Substrate embeddedness N/A"` 0-4 0-4
dee 1 embedded = 0; loose structure =maxi
20 Presence of stream uivertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 _...._._0-5_..__ 0-5
no evidence = 0; common mm~erous t ~ es = max Dints
~
~ 21 __
Presence of amphibians "'- ~ - 0-4 U-4 0-4
p no evidence = 0• common numerous t ~ es = max Dints
22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4
no evidence = 0; common numerous t ~ es = max Dints
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-b 0-~ 0-5
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max Dints
Total Paints Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (Also enter on first page)
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1

Date: ,y I ra t~
Project: AGtrdllq,r~. 0
Latitude: ~ ~ (~ ~ !~ 1 ~' ;~i
Evaluator ~.,E <°, , . Site: }-i;pl~ 5 r^t ~ s
P Longitude: ; ,~ , ; ~ - °~,~
•
Total Points:
Snzmni is at leas! bileruriRC:~1 r-
~~
County:
Q~~ Other

A ~ x
Q
d N
!(~9 or iereuninJ r~ ~D
• ~ e. g.
ua
ame:
,-, , r
A. Geomor holo Subtotal = ~ `"~ • V Absent
_. Weak
__ _ . _ _ .... Moderate
_ ___.... _._..... II Stron
1~ _.~.~
1~. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 '` 3'
2. Sinuosit 0 1 2 3 ;7
3._ In-Channel structure: -riffle-pool sequence ___ _ __ _ 0 ~ 1 2 3;~
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sortin 0 ~ 1 2 r° 3'
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 ;~' _
6. De ositional bars or benches _ 0 1 2 ;"~'~''~
7. Braided channel (0 ' 1 ~ 2
8. Rerentalluvialde osits 0 1`~ 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 t' 1 2 3
10. Headcuts _ _ . 0 ? 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 f~ 0.5,,) '1 1,
12. Natural valle or drainayewa 0 0.5 1 +~ 1.5 '';j
13. Second or c3realer order channel on existing
USGS or NRGS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0 "~
4 Yes 3
`~---------~
_ swan-mace aitcnes are not rates; see aiscussrons in manual.
B Hydrology (Subtotal- ~ ~ Absent Weak Moderate Strong
14, Groundlvater flow/dischar e 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 4t3 hrs. since rain, or
Water in channel - dr or rowin season 0 1 2 ~3")

_~..
. _
_
_ 1 G. Leafliiler __ _
1.5 i` _ _ _
0.5
0
17. Sediment on !ants or debris 0 0.5 1 ~ .5
18. Or anic debris lines or files Wrack lines) 0 ~ 0 5 1 _~ 1.5 .1
19.~dric sotls (redoximor hic features resent? ___
No - 0 ,Yes = 1.5
C. Blnl~y taSubtotal
/• ~.~ )
= Absent Weak ~ Moderate Strong
~
__
_
2 .Fibrous roots in channel 3 2~ 1 0
.._ _..., b.._... _ .-_._.. _.
21 . Rooted !ants in channel
3
`2`
1
0
22. Cra fish b ~7 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0`i 1 2 3
24. Fish "l~' 0.5 1 1.5
25. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance ~ 0 0.5 1 ~ 1.5
_ 27. --Filamentous algae; ~eri~yton t ~0 1 ~2 3
28. Iron Oxidizin bacteria/fun us 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC=0.5; FACW=0.75;-OIL=1.5; SAV=2.0;
__ -`Other=0.1
".Items 2U antll1 tocus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or tvetlanci
plants.
Notes: (Uso back sido of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

sTIZE f}r'-1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date:~~""' I ~ ~ Project: Aq„rdVa,rk.. Latitude: j ~j , ~~ ~ ~ `a ` J
Evaluator: ~, Crr~•~~"(i~ Site: }-~o't, Spri ~ S Longitude: -7~„ rs ,; ~~ ~~ '`-
Total Points:
Sr~•rrunrsrdlerrsriurernrrrreur ~Q ~
(~ ~
~
'
'
County: `rJ~~C Other R~~

e.g. Quad Name:
9 or ererurinl i/
~0
!/
~
A. Geomor holo Subtotal = ~ `-"~ • Q Absent Weak Moderate Stror
1. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 ~ 3
2. Sinuosit 0 1 2
3. In-Channel structure: riffle- ool se uence 0 1 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sortinc,~_~_~~__~~ 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain
_ 0 _ _ 1 ____ 2 3
_^__________,_,J~
6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 ~ 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits _0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees _0 1 3
10. Headcuts 0 1,1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valle or draina ewa 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No - 0 ,,r------~
+ Yes = 3~
'~
-- _
a Man-made ditches are not rated; so©discussions in manual.
B H drolo Subtotal = ~ Absent Weak Moderate Stror
14. Groundwater flow/discharge _ __ 0 1 2
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs. since rain, or
Water in channel - dr or rowin season 0 1 2
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5
17. Sediment on plants or_debris _ _ _ ~ 0__ _ __ __ 0.5 ____ 1 _ 1.
18. Or anic debris lines or files Wrack lines 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features resent? No = 0 'Yes = 1.5 ,
C. Biolo Subtotal = ~A ~ Absent Weak Moderate Stror
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
-~. -
21 . Rooted ~lanls in channel
2
1
0
22. Cra fish 0.5 1 _ ____1~5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Am hibians 0 _ _ 0.5 _ 1 _ _ 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous al ae; eri h ton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron Oxidizing bacteria/fungus
29 .Wetland plants in streambed 0 0.5 1 1.5
FAC=0.5; FACWw-0,~7;~:~~L=1.5; SAV=2.0
Other=Q.
.Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on tho presenco of aquatic or wetland
plants.
Noses: (Use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

~7 ~ ~:-A_r,„ C -- ~ ~ i
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: l.• / Pro'ect: nn ~ lr_
~ /i~t~ /c.v ~ Latitude: ~ , (S~c~ f ] n/
J~

,,
Evaluator: .~- ,~ rr~-a.i-- Site: Lr I. `; fir' :.

~ ~. Longitude: 7~ ~ ,° ;,, ~;"..,,.~ ;>tr~
Total Points: Other

r rte'
.57r,rnnrismlcnst;,rtcrn,irrc,u ~•°' r-^
~,
' County: ~. /

,, fit,,r. j,
. ;
-
e. g. Quad Name: f r !~?~.

.
J o,• >crc,nrinl ij ~t0
!j ~
A. Geomor hology (Subtotal = ~ t~, )
1 a. Continuous bed and bank Absent
0 Weak
1 Modera_te_ Strong
3
2. Sinuosit 0 1 ?_ 3
_
3. In-Channel structure: riffle-pool_sequence_
_. _ 0 1:• 2
_ 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 : ? 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 ___ 2 3
6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
___ _ _
8. Recent alluvial de osits 1 2 3
9 . Natural levees 0
_-- 2
- 3
_-
10. Headcuts 0 _
,.a __ __ 2.~_ _ 3
_ _ _
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
____ _
12. Natural valle or drains ewa 0 <`"U:•5''` __ 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. ~`"°JT
No = 0 -~---^•~
[r Yes~3,-~
Maw n-made ditches-are not rated; see discussions in manual.

B H dr01o (Subtotal = ~l.~ )
Absent
Weak ----. _...
Moderate ...---- g
Stron
14. Groundwater flow/dischar e 0 1 2 3
__--
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs. since rain, or
Water in channel - dr or rowin season
0
C1
2
3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1,- 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5, 1 1.5
18. Or anic debris lines or files Wrack lines 0 0.5 1 5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 'Yes - 1.5
C. Biology {Subtotal = Absent Weak Moderate Strong
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2~ 1 0
__
22. Crayfish 0 _„ .5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish Q 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note___diversity and abundance 0 _ _ 0'.a ___ 1 1.5
27. Filamentous ai ae; eri h ton D 2 3
28. Iron Oxidizing bacteria/fungus 0
__. 0.5 1 1.5
_ _
29r'. Wetland plants in streambed .
FAC=0.5; FACW= 1Z~; QBL=1.5; SAV=2.0;
_ Other=0~
.Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presen'ce'~Sf aquatic or wetland
plants.
Notes: (Use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
-~
~r :f "~ ~
r ±'.
~C. - f `<.

sr~E~-~
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: -,,~,, f ~~ ~, Project: /-~q,rd Vq,rk Latitude: ,w~ a a ~,, 5 ~~ ' ~ ~ ~
~
Evaluator: ~,~I ~.
a ~~1~ ~~ site: ~p~,y Spri ~ S Longitude `7-~_ ,;, .,~ 4` '`
Total Points:
S1,rrru, is Ott least iHteru,rflc+,t
~~• ~ /~ V,r
County: wI'S'~`~ l~ Other A
' `~~
e. g. Quad Name:
!l ~~ or e,-e,u,;o! r/ :~o
A. Geomor holo Subtotal = ~ ~~• ~ Absent Weak Moderato Stroi
1. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosit 0 1 2
3. In-Channel structure: riffle- ool se uence 0 1 2
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sortin. 0 1 2 ( 3
5. Active/relic flood lain ~,__~.... ...____ _. _:.._ 2
G. De ositional bars or benches 0 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial de o~sits _ _ 0 1 2 3
9. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts i) ~ 1 ., 2 3
11. Grade controls
_
..
___. ..__.. _.__~.__._..~. . 'x,,0.5 __ 1
_
..
__
12. Natural valle or drains ewa 0 0.5 1 ~1..`
13. Second or greater order channel nn existin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence..
No = 0
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual.
B H drolo Subtotal = ~ Q ~ ~ Absent Weak Moderate Stroi
14. Groundwater flowldischar e __ 0 _ _ _.__ _i _ ___ 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs. since rain, or
Water in channel - dr or rowin season 0 1 2 ~".~
~..-.
16. Leaflitier 1.5 ) 0.5 0
17.~Sediment on lants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.F
18. Or anic debris lines or files Wrack lines 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 {Yes = 1.5
C. Biolo Subtotal = 1 ~ • ~ Absent Weak Moderate Stroi
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 2 1 0
21 . Rooted lants in channel 3
__ ----- 2 1 0
22. Cra fish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Am hibians 0 _ _
.......... _ 0.5
. 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 0.5 1.5
27. Filamentous al ae; eri h ton 0 2 3
28. Iron Oxidizin bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
~..--
29 .Wetland plants in streambed FAC=0.5; FAC =Q~~,~;,QBL=1.5; SAV-2.C
_ Other=0 '°'y
.Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland
plants.
Notes: (Use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

srl~~l~r-~ ~ ~. r~tr
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: ~-~r ~ ~ ~, ~;
Evaluator: '~", S~,rr r r~~, •3~ ~.-
Total Points:
Srrenn+ is nt /cost inrer•n+itlenr ~7 ~ ~ ~l
IT ~9 or nerenninl i(=30 G• (J
Project: /-~q,rd VOlrl=
Site: }••~p~~~/ Spri rl~S
County: 1r`IA~C
Latitude: ,:~ ~y . ~ „;~ ~'r? / Itii
Longitude: <~~a i ?, ' '' °,J
Other A-~~
e.g. C~uad Name:
A. Geomor hology Subtotal = I U • ~ ) Absent _ Weak Moderate Strong
1". Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sirruosit 0 1 2 3
3. In-Channel structure: riffle- ool se uenco
. _-- 0 (1 2 3
.
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 r' 1 2 3
G. De ositional bars or benches 1' 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
__
8. Recent alluvial de osits ___
0 '~ 1 2 3
9d. Natural levees w_ 0, 1 2 ~ 3
10. Headcuts tf 0) 1 2 3
11. Grade controls _( 0). 0.5 1 ,_1..5
12. Natural valle or drainagewa 0 0.~ 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existinci
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. ,~--
No = 0 ~~
Yes = 3
° Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual.
B H drolo Subtotal = ~`~' ~ ~~ ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
__
14. Groundwater flow/dischar e 0 1
......_........1 2
....._-- 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs. since rain, or
Water in channel - dry_or growing season 0 (` 1~ 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 i., 0.5 0
__ __ __
17. Sediment on /ants or debris 0 (Q.. 1 1.5
18. Or anic debris lines or files Wrack lines 0 0.5
.. 1,.~,...~-- 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5

C. Biolo y {Subtotal = n j _._.
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong

b
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 r 1 0
21 . Rooted /ants in channel 3 2'~ ~ 0
22, Cra fish ~~) 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves ' 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0,) _ 0.5 1 1.5
25. Am hibians 0 0- _ __.._.._<:,.x..} ......... ...........1.5-._.
2G. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance Q i 0.5 1' 1.5
27. Filamentous al ae; eri h ton _ ~Q 1 2 3
28. Iron Oxidizin bacteria/fun us 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC=0.5; FACW ~Q.7_a; OBL=1.5; SAV-2.0;
Other=0 '
"Jtems 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 Focuses on the prese7~cmot^agGatic or wetland
plants.
Notes: (Use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

.~r~~~-~
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3,1

Date: ~,,~.' j ~ ~
Project: /-~a,rd~/q,rk ---
Latitude: ; ~~ ~ , ~ 5~ i ~? Q
Evaluator. ~
~
~
. Site: }-~ o ~ I Sp,rl n s Longitude: ~'r~, y; •_;~ r3 ~ ~"
,
,
,, .
; , ~
Total Points:
S'nraurisnr(enstinlermirreer ,71 ~ Q~
' 1
County: Y~~~t/ Other
e.g. QuadNarne: ~~X
zip
/~ z(9 or c+•enrrinl i/
A. Geoinor hold (Subtotal = ~ ~ ~ / ) Absont Weak Moderate Stro
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2. Sinuosity__w,______ 0 1 2 ~ 3
3. In-Channel structure_ riffle-pool sequence _ 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sortin 0 1 ~ 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 ~` 1-- 2 3
6. De ositional bars or benches 0 2 3
7. Braided channel __ _
_` `~ 1 _ 2 __ 3
8. Recent alluvial de osits b_ 1 2 3
9". Natural levees
~ ~` Q'• 1 2 3
_...._ .....................__...._.._ _.....__._.......................-_..
t
0
ontrols
. G ade c
11 ...0~ O _......_.._..... . _._...._...1.._.,..._~_,. ._m__.131
12. Natural valle~or drainagewaY_-..._......._-........_._.___._.........._......_.._........... 0 __0.5 1 t. 1.
13. Second or greater order channel on existin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual.
B H drolo Subtotal = ~ • U Absent Weak Moderate
- S_tro
~
14. Groundwater flow/discliar e 0 1 2 3
15. Water in chanr~e( and > 48 hrs. since rain, or
Water in channel - dry_or growing season __ 0 1 2
,~ ~--.,„,,. ~ 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 ~ 1 0.5 ` 0
17. Sediment on lants or debris 0 0.5 1.!
18. Or anic debris lines or Iles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5

1,
~.,,.
19. Hydric soils (redorimor hic features resent? No = 0 ~" es = 1.5 ~
C. Biolo Subtotal = . ~ ,,,T„_,) _ Absent Weak Moderate Stro
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 1 0
21 . Rooted lasts in channel 3 __ _
2 _
9 _.
0
22. Cra ish ~ ',, 0.5 1 1.;
23. Bivalves ''0' 1
.................
._......
. 2
-.
._-._ 3
_..-
24. Fish ~ . J
~ ~ 1.!
25. Am hibians 0 0;5 1 1.:
26. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 _ _ 0.5 1.:
27. Filamentous al ae; eri h ton 0 2 3

28. Iron Oxidizin bacterialfun us
~~,~.f
0.5
1 r
1..
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC=0.5; FACW=„0,~;..QBL=1.5; SAV=2.i
(`Other=0
.Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland
plants.
Notes: (Use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

sTPEr+~ L~~w iiv7" ''.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: ~ ~' i ~~ ~ {~, Project: ~10.~ dt/A,r~'- Latitude: ~~.`a , J~ ~-~ ~ ! ~i ~ r'til
Evaluator: (r,/, r~•t,~ s1 Site: }-~p~l, SPA"i h S Longitude: ,r~~. ~ .; ~ ~, '' j;i
Total Points:
Slreant rs of lcnsl ilVernullen! ~ d-'
"~ ~ ' ~
County: r
~i~lr Other

e.g. Quad Name: ~~~
1/~9nr ~rrenuinfif~0
A. Geomorpholo Subtotal = / ~ ' U ) Absent Weak Moderate ~ Strong
1~. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 ~._,~"___ _ _3 _
2. Sinuosit _
0 1 ~ 2 s 3 `)
3. In-Channel structure: riffle- ool se uence 0 1 '~ 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
5. Active/relic flood lain 0
0 1
1) __ 2'
2 3
3
6. De ositional bars or benches 0'. 1 2 3
7. Braided channel t' 0, 1 _ _ 2
--_ - --- _ 3____
8. Recent alluvial de osits 0 i,.1. 2 3
9~. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 °'1,1. 2 3
11 Grade controls
12. Natural valle "or drains ewa 0
0 C, 0.~ ___
0.5 1
1 1 a
1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. ,,-" ~~ "- ~;,
t~~ No = 0~
~`~-~"~'
Yes = 3
d Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual.
B H drol0 Subtotal = ~- ~ Absent Weak Moderate Strong
14. Groundwater flow/dischar e 0 1 I 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs. since rain, or
Water in channel - dr or rowin season 0 1 ~ 2") 3
__
1G. Leafliiter 1.5 1 .0.5„ 0
17. Sediment on lants or debris 0 0.5 C_.~.,7 1.5
18. Or anic debris lines or Iles Wrack lines 0 0.5 ~,.~,1...7
. 1.5
.....,
19. H dnc soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5'~
C. Biology (Subtotal = _ .~ . S
Absent ~ Weak ~ Moderate (Strong
20 . Fibrous roots in channel ~ 3 2 ~` 1 0
21''. Rooted lants in channel + 3 2 _ 1 0
22. Cra ish { 0;: 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves
- (0 1 2 3
- _.
24 Fish _ . _ _
~ .Q~.~
0.5
1
1.5
25. Am hibians 0 0.5 (µ1 1.5
2G. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance) 0 ~.O.,i) 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton i, 0.J 1 2 3_
28. Iron Oxidizin bacteria/fun us `µ 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FA =0.5; FACW=0.75;~.OI~L=1.5; SAV=2.0;
ether=0
°.Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the prese~7tce of"~giiatic or wetland
plants.
Notes: (Use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

sTRE~+-
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1

__.
Date: ~ t U ~, Project: AA.rat/a,rk. Latitude: ? rj , ~ ~ C) i
Evaluator:
W ~',~I,~"t
Site: ~o~l Spri ~ S
Longitude: f ~. ~ -?,
Total Points:
Sn~eau+isnrleasri,+rermrrre+rr ~ ! ~
+
' n~
County: W~'s~/C Other
9 A~}(
e. .Quad Name:
2f 9 or cre++urnl if
~0
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = ~ ~ ' ~ j _Absent Weak Moderate Str
_ _
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2. Sinuosit 0 1 2
3. Jn-Channel structure: riffle-fool sequence_ _„ 0 2
4. Soii texture or stream substrate sortin 0 1 !" 2
5. Activelrelic flood~lain__ 0„~ ~, 1 2
6. De ositional bars or benches 0"
__.. 1 2
7. Braided channel t"0 1 2
8. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2
9a. Natural levees ~' Qi 1 2
10. Headcuts 0 1. _ ._ ~ ?'
11. Grade controls 0 ~ 0.5~ 1
12. Natural valle or draina eway __ ~ _ _ __ ___0___ _ 0.5 1 ( '
13. Second or greater order channel on existin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual.
B H drolo Subtotal = ~• ~~ Absent W k Moderate Str
14. Groundwater flow/dischar e 0 2
_
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs, since rain, or
Water in channel - dr or growing season~____ p 1 2
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5
17. Sediment on lants or debris 0 t;~ 0.5,E '
18. Or anic debris lines or files Wrack lines 0
.__..__ 0.5 ~..9~,~~.-.,~ . ..'
19. Hydric soils (redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 ~`'~ Yes - 1.5
C. Biolo Subtotal = {t+ • ~~? Absent Weak Moderate Str
20 . Fibrous roots In channel 3 2 1
21 . Rooted lants in channel 3 1
22. Cra fish D.5 1 1
23. Bivalves 0~ 1 2 _
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1
25. Amphibians 0 0. 1 1
26. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 0.5 1 1
27. Filamentous al ae; eri h on 1 2 __
28. Iron Oxidizin bacteria/fun us ~Q~ 0.5 1 1
_...... n............
29 . Wetland plants in streambed
FAC=0.5; FACW=O.7..5;.-Q„BL=1.5; SAV=~
(O her=0
.Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Hem 29 focuses on the prese`t~e-of~quatic or wetland
plants.
Notes: (Use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

sTR~~+rtit ~' - ~~1'T"'
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: S !G /C ~ Project: Aot.rdVA.rk Latitude: ~,~. (~ S~} [~ ° j~
Evaluator: ~ , ~57~ Yir,..~ Site: }~ p I ~ Spri h S Longitude: 7~j, ~ ~ {~ ~ ~- ~/
Total Points:
S~r~mn Ls nt level irriermiur•nt ~~~ '~ ~
COUnty:
~~~ Other -~^~.

e.g. Quad Narne: A r C. X
lj ,~r9 nr reranrrinl rf ~ 30
A. Geomorpholo Subtotal = ~.~ • ~-~ Absent Weak Moderato Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank
_ 0 1 2' 3
2. Sinuosit 0 1 2 3
3. In-Channel structure: riffle-pool sequence _ 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sortin 0 1 2 3
5. Activelrelic flood lain __ 0 1 2 3
6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial de osits
-..P __.__......._._..,.._.........__..._-...___.._ 0 1 ,~ 2 3
9a. Natural Levees 0 ~ 1 2 3

10. Headcuts
0 __ ___
-_. _ .. ..
2
3
11. Grade controls 0 ,.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valle or draina ewa 0 ~ 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existinq
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
w----~---~~°"
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; ses discussions in manual.
re
B H drolo Subtotal = ~ ->
9Y_ .-- _ Absent Weak Moderate Strong
14. Groundwater flow/dischar e 0
_.
...
..._
- 1 2 3

15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs. since rain, or
Water in channel - dr or rowin season .
__..
o
-_... .------- 1 --_ -___ 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on lants or debris 0 0.5 "'°"I' 1.5
18. Or anic debris Tines or Iles Wrack lines 0 .5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 es = 1.5

C. Biolo Subtotal = ~a • ~ ~~~ Absent Weak Moderate Strong
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted lants in channel 3 2 0
22. Cra ish
--.._ . 0.5
...................
---- 1
-
- 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 ~ -.
--2 __._ 3.._.
24. Fish 0 0.5 1
25. Am hibians 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance _ 0.5 1 ~"`
_ 27. Filamentous al ae; eri h ton 0 2 3
28. Iron Oxidizin bacterialfun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC=0.5; FACW=0,75• BL=1.5; SAV=2.0;
er=0
".Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland
plants.
Noles: (Use back side of Ibis form for additional notes.) Sketch:

Wc~7"~/~~1b ~ P1
tiVF.TI,AND I2ATI\G WORKSHEET (4th VERS101\)
Project Name: ~A+'Uva TOIn/n o ~ ~-bj~~ SP~,~S~ County: 1V aK G
Nearest Road: 'j3Q.I)~-f;nc. ,~''i'~ef 1=x~ens)~ ~ Uate: 5 2 b
1Vctland Area (ac): O. I6 1Vetland Width (ft): /d .-. /oa f
Name of Evaluator(s): j ' ~,o r~r f ~1-
1VETLAND LOCATION:
on sound or estusuary, pond or lake
-~`-on perennial steam
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other
SOILS:
Soil Scrics: Wors~tAM
predominantly organic (humus, muck or peat)
predominantly mineral (non-sandy)
predominantly sandy
HYDRr~ULIC FACTORS:
freshwater
brackish
steep topography
ditched or channclized
total wetland width >- 100 feet
WETLAND TYPF,: (select one)'
:1DJACENT LAND USF.
(within 112 mile upstream, upslopc or radiu
forested/natural vcgctutivn 7S °~
agriculturth urbanized /a 4~0
impervious surface ~~_ ^/„
Adjacent Special Natural Areas
DOt1d1;VANT b'ECE'CA'I'IUN:
I 7vHtus e~~5vs
~ee(~rnevtu ~~thct!.r1~0.
3 S n t~ra
~ ~+^~><~~ r 1 d a
FLOODING AND WF..TNF..SS:
semipemtancntly to pcrmcncntly Hooded or inundated
~/' seasonally Flooded or inundated
~/ intermittently flooded yr temporary surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Bottondand Hardwood Forest Bog/Fcn
Swamp Forest Headwater Forest
Carolina Bay Bog Forest
Pocosin Ephemeral 1Vctland
Fine Savannah Other:
Freshwater Marsh
* The rating system cannot be applied to salt an d brackish marshes yr stream channels.
llElYt RATING
WATER STORAGE ~ h 4,00 = J Z.
BANK, SHORELINE STAB1LlLATIUN ~' X 4.OU = ~~
POLLUTANT REMOVAL ~_ * ~ 5.00 = Z
p
WILDLIFE HABITAT _~ X 2.U0 = r
t7
AQUATIC LIFE 1iABITAT 3 X 4.U0 = ~ Z.
RECREATION/EDUCATION ~ ;~ 1,00 = Z
'f07'AL WETLAND SCORE _ ~
'~ Add one point if in sensitive watershed and > l0% nonpvint disturbance within I/2 mile upstream, upslopc, or radius.

\'V1i,TI,AND RA'CINC ~VORKSHEF.T 04th V ERSIO~
Project Name: v VQ ~ rUn oi' F ~ ~ rl ~ Cuunty: ~~
Nearest Road: ~~ S' ,rf• r„ Date: ~O ~
Wctland Area (ac): p. •~,! Wctland Width (ft1: /o Go
Name of [evaluator(s): -)", ~ja.-rc++
WETLAND LOCATION:
on sound or estusuary, pond or lake
on perennial steam
/ on intermittent stream
within intcrstrcam divide A
other~~~,~r/rr,,.aAxefuQ Q,r-tat.
SOILS:
Soil Series: Wo,ryhotrn
predominantly organic (humus, muck or peat)
~predominttntly mineral (non-sandy)
predominantly sandy
IIYDRAiILIC FACTORS:
/ freshwater
brackish
steep topography
ditched or chnnnelized
total wetland widih >= l00 feet
1i'E'I'LANU'TYPE: (select one)*
ADJACF.N'T LAND USE
(within 112 mile upstream, upslopc or radius)
forestcdJnatural vegetation ~ 5 %
ab*riculturaV urbanized /d
impervious surface ~ "!°
Adjacent Special Natural Areas
DOMINANT VEGE'fA'T'IUN:
I 1vnCU5 e•~-~ust,s
2 c r"~ 6r'v M
3 n ha f er,y,y~-(.v s aCGT Gh A. ~S
4 Raehrner'2a otrliw>'rtL4Y
FLOODING AND WETNESS:
semiperntancntly to pcnnencntly flooded or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
_~/ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Bottomland Flardwood Forest Bog/Fen
Swamp Forest 1-Leadwater Forest
Carolina Bay Bog Forest
Pocosin ~ Ephemeral Wctland
Pine Savannah Other:
Freshwater Marsh
* The rating system cannot be applied to salt and brackish marshes or stream channels.
DEi~I RATING
WATER STORAGE ~_ X 4.00 .- ~ ~-
BANK, SHORELINE STABILIZATION 2. X 4.00 a g
POLLUTANT REMOVAL ,~ ' X 5,00 = ~~
WILDLIFE HABITAT ~, X 2.00 = ~

AQUATIC LIFE liAB1TAT
I
X 4.00 ° ~
1
I
~ ~
RECREATION/EDUCATION X I.QO =
'
'
" ~~//
'
"
T
OTAL WE7
LAND SCORE - T
T
* Add one point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within I/2 mile upstream, upslopc, or radius.

W~7~..A'NIJ~ ~
~~'ETI,AI\rD RATI)\`(T «'()ItK~I-LH:E"I' (4th ~'l]kSION)
Project N;nnc: ~r'Ol4b-r {G C'rot•..tn of uv+,y slrl~-ets County: wP1,~C.
Nearest Road: 1/r,•. ~n~. Sf+-uf ~-xfrhsl~^ Date: G ~ 06
1Yctland ,4rea (ac): t7 , 3 L 11'ctland 1\'idth (fi): as'- 7s ~
Name of Cvahrator(sj: -7; i3otr.C~f~'
N'L:TLANU LUCA'I'IUN:
on sound or estusuary, pond or lake
nn perennial steam
on intermittent stream
within intcrstream vide '/
other l5..~~ wer(~~
SUI LS:
Soil Scrics: Mtiy o v\a~. /6(,/ays ~a~.,
predominantly organic faunas, muck or peat)
1/ predominantly mineral (non-sandy)
preduminantly sandy
Ill'DRAULIC Fr1CTORS:
(resh,vatcr
brackish
steep topography
ditched or channclized
total wetland tvidih >= 10(l legit
4D.lACEN"1' LAND USE
(within 12 mile upstream, upslopc or radius)
foresicdrnatural vegetation 75"
agricuhurnl/ rtrhanircd _~ ",~o
impen iuus Surface /.S" %
Adjacent Special Natural Areas
DOt\IIN.4NT VEGETATION:
I ~Sw1va.Pa ruga~ts
__ __
2 S`.~.ll~k ro•fyh~1~o Iq
A ~,. r u },rv,..
4
F'LOOUINC AhD ~1'F•.TNF.SS:
scmipcn,,;n,ontly to pcrntencutly flooded or inundated
seasonally flooded nr inundated
_~/ intcrmiucntly tioudcd or un,porary surface water
nu evidence of Hooding or surface water
\1'E'1'1,,\ND'FYPE: (select ane)*
Dattontland Hardtt'ood Forest f3o~%Fcn
swamp Fnrest I-Icadt+atcr Furest
C<uolina 13ay Bog Forest
Poeosin ~ Ephcmcrall4'etland
Pine Savannah Other:
Freshtvater n-farsh
* The ratin,+; system cannot be applied to snit and brackish marshes or stream channels.
UE11 R:\Tlt\`G
\h'A"CER S"fOR.AGG ~- ~ 4.(10 =
DANK, SIIORELINE. S'CA131LI7,A'1'ION ~. X ~l.(t0 8
' ~ * ~
~
,4L
POLLUTANT RE~•10\ X i.00 -

\1rILULIFE HARIT.4T
z--
X 2.(10 = t
~
,
T
IJ
DIT
4"1'
"fIC LIFG II 2 0O -
\ 4
,
AQ
,\
r1 .
j
R1=CR(;.4TION!CDUCATION ~ N 1.0(I _
TOTAL \\'CTLAND SCORE _ ~ /
~' ;\dd one point if in sensitive watershed and >10",~ noupvint disturb:utrc within I%2 mile upstream, upslopc, or radius.

Protected Species Technical Report
"Aardvark" Property Development Project
Town of Holly Springs
Wake County, North Carolina
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Mulkey, Inc. (Mulkey) has been retained by the Town of Holly Springs to prepare a Protected
Species Technical Report as part of the environmental studies for a proposed development project
in Wake County, North Carolina. The "Aardvark" property was surveyed for rare, threatened, and
endangered species during May 2006 (Figure 1). The threatened and endangered species survey
focused on threatened and endangered species listed by US Fish c`3c Wildlife Service (USFWS) as
occurring in Wake County, North Carolina as of March 9, 2006. Afield investigation was
conducted to determine the presence or absence of the species within this tract. The project study
area was found to contain suitable habitat for only Michaux's sumac. Surveys were conducted for
Michaux's sumac; however, no individuals were found within the project study area. Project
construction will have No Effect on the federally threatened or endangered species listed by the
United Sates Fish and Wildlife Service (USh~X/S) for Wake County, North Carolina.
INTRODUCTION
Some populations of fauna and flora have been, or arc in the process of decline due to either
natural forces or their inability to coexist with humans. Federal law (under the provisions of
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act [ESA] of 1973, as amended) requires that any action likely
to adversely affect a species classified as federally-protected be subject to review by the USFWS.
Prohibited actions that may affect any species protected under the ESA are outlined in Section 9 of
the Act. Species may receive additional protection under separate federal or state laws.
Species which are listed, or are proposed for listing, as endangered or threatened are recorded in
Section 4 of the ESA. As of March 9, 2006, the USFWS identified three Endangered (E) species
(red cockaded woodpecker, dwarf wedgemussel, and Michaux's sumac) and one Threatened (I)
species (bald eagle) known to occur in Wake County. As defined by the Act, an endangered species
is any plant or animal which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its
range within the foreseeable future. A threatened species is any species which is likely to become
an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its
range.
The survey was undertaken to determine if threatened and endangered species are present on the
proposed "Aardvark" development property located approximately two miles west of downtown
Holly Springs. The subject property is approximately 160 acres and located entirely within the
Cape bear River basin. The dominant vegetative community on the subject property is mixed
pine/hardwood forest found throughout the subject property. I"he existing dirt roads, abandoned
logging decks, and the sewerline easement are the only open areas present within the subject
property. ~1'he streams and wetlands on-site have been delineated and are being coordinated with

the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USl1CE) and the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ) for certification.
METHODS
The subject property was visited by two staff ecologists from Mulkey Engineers & Consultants in
May 2006. All forest stands and other habitat types on the property were visited during the survey.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) maps were reviewed on June 14, 2006 to
determine if any protected species have been identified near the project area. This map review
confirmed that no species classified as Endangered or Threatened by the USFWS have been
identified within a one mile radius of the project study area. The following species are identified as
federally protected for Wake County. Table 1 shows the federally threatened and endangered
species listed for Wake County. Table 2 (attached) lists all of the federal and state protected species
for Wake County.
.Table 1. Federally. Protected. Species for Wake County
Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status
Bald eagle Haliaeetu.r lezrcocephahrr Threatened
Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoide.r borealis Endangered
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
Michaux's sumac Rh~~s nzicha~~xii Endangered
RESULTS
Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
Federal Status: Threatened (Proposed for delisting)
The bald eagle is a large raptor that ranges in size from 32 to 43 inches tall and has a wingspan
averaging 6 feet. These predators weigh an average of 10 to 12 pounds. adult body plumage is
dark brown to chocolate brown with a white head and tail, while juveniles are brown and irregularly
marked with white until their fourth year. 'T'hey are primarily associated with large bodies of water
where food is plentiful and suitable nesting sites are typically found within 0.5 miles of the water.
Nests arc made in the largest living tree within the area, with an open view of surrounding land and
a clear flight path to water. Nests can be as large as 6 feet across and are made of sticks and
vegetation. These platform nests may be used by the same breeding pair for many years. Breeding
begins in December or January and the young remain in the nest at least ten weeks after hatching.
Bald eagles eat mostly fish robbed from ospreys or picked up dead along shorelines or other
carrion. They may also capture small animals such as rabbits, some birds, and wounded ducks
(USI'WS, 2003).
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Bald eagles arc year-round, transient species in North Carolina. Suitable habitat for the bald eagle
consisting of large areas of open water is not present within the subject property. An area of open

water, Thomas Mill Pond, is located several hundred feet south of the southern property boundary;
however, no nests were observed near the pond. NCNHP maps were reviewed on June 14, 2006
to determine if any bald eagle populations have been identified at or near the project study area.
This map review confirmed that no bald eagle nests or individuals have been reported within aone-
mile radius of the project site. Proposed project construction will not impact this species.
Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
Federal Status: Endangered
"This bird is a small, 7 to 8-inch tall woodpecker with a black and white barred back conspicuous
large white cheek surrounded by a black cap, nape, and throat. Males have a very small red mark at
the upper edge of the white cheek and just behind the eye. Red-cockaded woodpeckers (RCW) are
found in open pine forests in the southeastern United States where they use open old growth
stands of southern pines, particularly longleaf pine, for foraging and nesting habitat. A forested
stand optimally should contain at least 50 percent pine and lack a thick understory. The RCW is
unique among woodpeckers because it nests almost exclusively in living pine trees. These birds
excavate nests in pines greater than 60 years old that are contiguous with open, pine dominated
foraging habitat. The foraging range of the RCW may extend 500 acres and must be contiguous
with suitable nesting sites.
Living pines infected with red-heart disease (Formes pint) are often selected for cavity excavation
because the inner heartwood is usually weakened and therefore easier to excavate. Cavities are
located from 12 to 100 feet above ground level and below live branches. "These trees can be
identified by "candles," a large encrustation of running sap that encrusts the tree trunk. The sap
encrustation selves as a deterrent for predatory species such as snakes and may be used by the
RCW as a visual indicator of nesting or foraging territories. Colonies consist of one to many of
these candle trees. The RCW lays its eggs in 11pri1, May, and June; the eggs hatch approximately 10
to 12 days later (USFWS, 1992).
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for RCW does not exist within the project area since there are no pine dominated
stands of appropriate diameter or age present. The pines that are present are young (less than 30
years old) and are within thick stands of hardwoods. NCNHP maps were reviewed on June 14,
2006 to determine if any RCW populations have been identified at or near the project study area.
This map review confirmed that no known RCWs are located within none-mile radius of the
project site. Proposed project construction will not impact this species.

Dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon)
Federal Status: Endangered
The dwarf wedgemussel is relatively small, rarely exceeding 1.5 inches in length. The shell's outer
surface is usually brown or yellowish brown in color, with faint green rays that are most noticeable
in young specimens. Unlike some mussel species, the male and female shells differ slightly, with
the female being wider to allow greater space for egg development. A distinguishing characteristic
of this mussel is its dentition pattern: the right valve possesses two lateral teeth, while the left valve
has only one. This trait is opposite of all other North American species having lateral teeth. This
mussel inhabits creeks and rivers that have a slow to moderate current with a sand, gravel, or
muddy bed. These streams must be nearly silt free in order to support dwarf wedgemussels.
The dwarf wedgemussel is considered to be a long-term brooder, with gravid females reportedly
observed in fall months. Like other freshwater mussels, this species' eggs are fertilized in the female
by sperm that are taken in through their siphons as they respire. The eggs develop within the
female's gills into larvae (glochidia). The females later release these glochidia, which then attach to
the gills or fins of specific host fish species. Based on anecdotal evidence, such as dates when
gravid females are present or absent, it appears that release of glochidia occurs prvnarily in April in
North Carolina. While the USFWS notes that the host fish species is unknown, evidence indicates
that an anadromous fish which migrates from ocean waters to fresh waters for spawning may be
the likely host species. However, recent research has confirmed at least three potential fish host
species for the dwarf wedgemussel in North Carolina: the tessellated darter, Johnny darter, and
mottled sculpin. These fish species are found in Atlantic coast drainages of North Carolina;
however, the dwarf wedgemussel is only found in the Neuse and Pamlico river basins (Moser
1993).
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the dwarf wedgemussel consisting of nearly silt-free streams, with slow to
moderate currents within the Neuse or Pamlico river basins is not present within the project study
area. Several freshwater mussels were observed in the perennial stream in the northern portion of
the subject property (Stream "SA"); however, due to the subject property's location within the
Cape Fear river basin no dwarf wedgemussel are anticipated to be present. NCNHP maps were
reviewed on June 14, 2006 and this map review confirmed that no populations of dwarf
wedgemussel are known to occur within atwo-mile radius of the project study area. Proposed
project construction will not impact this species.
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxit)
Federal Status: Endangered
Michaux's sumac is a rhizomatous, densely hau-y shrub, with erect stems from one to three feet in
height. The compound ]eaves contain evenly serrated, oblong to lanceolate, acuminate leaflets.
Most plants are unisexual; however, more recent observations have revealed plants with both male
and female flowers on one plant. The flowers are small, borne in a terminal, erect, dense cluster,
and colored greenish yellow to white. Flowering usually occurs from June to July; while the fruit, a
red drupe, is produced through the months of August to October. Only 36 extant populations are
known, with 31 in North Carolina, three in Virginia, and two populations in Georgia.

Michaux's sumac grows in sandy or rocky open woods in association with basic soils. It spreads by
producing cloning shoots from the roots of mature plants. Apparently, this plant survives best in
areas where some form of periodic disturbance provides open areas. At least twelve of the plant's
populations in North Carolina are on highway rights-of-way, roadsides, or on the edges of
artificially maintained clearings (USFWS 1993).
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac consisting of sandy or rocky open woods or open areas of
periodic disturbance is present in the project study area. The project study area is dominated by are
clayey textured, thickly vegetated areas. However, there are several locations throughout the
subject property that contain more rocky soils that contain significantly less vegetation. These areas
tend to be along the existing dirt roads, sewer line easements, as well as areas that were formerly
used for logging decks. A plant by plant survey for Michaux's sumac was conducted by Mr. Tom
Barrett and Mr. Scott Hunt, PF within the project study area on May 2, 2006 for approximately 8
man-hours.
NCNHP maps were reviewed on June 14, 2006 to determine if any protected species have been
identified at or near the project study area. 'T'his map review confirmed that no populations of
Michaux's sumac are known to occur within atwo-mile radius of the project site. Proposed project
construction will not impact this species.
CONCLUSIONS
Mulkey conducted a survey for federally protected threatened and endangered species during May
2006 on the "Aardvark" property in Holly Springs, Wake County, North Carolina. '1"he subject
property consists primarily of mixed pine/hardwood forest with several well-maintained dirt roads.
During the protected species investigation, suitable habitat was only observed for 1Vlichaux's sumac
(Rhr~.r michaua~ii). Michaux's sumac grows on rocky upland areas that receive full sunlight and
contain little vegetative competition. Suitable habitat exists within the subject property at areas
along the existing dirt roads throughout the subject property, especially at former logging deck
locations. A plant by plant Burney was conducted for Michaux's sumac within the subject property;
however, no individuals were found.
REFERENCES
Moser, G. Andrew. 1993. "Recovery Plan for Dwarf Wedgemussel (A/a.rnzido~ata heterodo~r)." United
States Fish and Wildlife Service, Annapolis Field Office. Annapolis, Maryland.
Radford, A. E., H. E. Ahles, 8c C. R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. The
University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill, NC. 1183 pp.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 1992. Endangered and Threatened Species of the
Southeastern United States (I'hc Red Book), Region 4. Departlncnt of the Interior, Division
of Endangered Species.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 1993. Recovery Plan for Michaux's suamc (IZ/~~.~.r
nzic%aar.~ii). Southeast Region, Atlanta, GA. 35pp.
United States Departincnt of the Interior. 1999. Proposed Rule to remove the bald eagle u1 the
Lower 48 States from the List of Endangered and Threatened Species. Federal Register 50
CFR Part 17, July C, 1999. Washington, D.C.

~ ~ IAI 0E iEfAINED IN CONFIDENCE: (S) NOI BE
m ^ ^ 1
~ ~ ,~ ~1

...
a
X
~~ 1 ~
~ ~~~
~~' o ~
~ ~ ~~~ a
~~
~ o~
~~
ma ~
> m n
o
m I m ' n ~ r.
~~ ~ wo
:~~ J I~
~~ !
,,
,, ~~
,>
~ ~ ~
~~ ~°
~~
o ~.
' i~
l~
-- ~1
^
1
rr
~ ~~
~~
i
cry `~~~ ~ ii
~ ~ OQ
,~ ~
~ ~
9~~~ O~6'
~~
o m M n m

l;~

~'. ,:
.- /~
,_ ~ ~
\\
~'~ ~ ~~N
\.
~~.
PLAN NOTES
O 2H:1V REINFORCED EARTH SLOPE
SEE DRAWING
00-C-60-99-02
NOTE:
STREAM & WETLAND DELINEATIONS SHOWN
RECEIVED 7-13-06 AND PREPARED BY
MULKEY ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS.
SURVEYED BY RONALD L. NESARY PLS
N0. NC L-4535.
VQ
~ o ~
~ ~
~ ~~
(~~ N ,~
~ 3a
ci' i
o
R1Nf
~~
o ~~ ,~ ,~
,~
~ ~~ i
~ ,.
\`~
~~ ~' ,--

.
- -
,. .

,. __
-
- \~ ~
~.., ~` ~~
Ro. REVISpNS oA~E
A gSUE FOR 101 91f2

z°
°
a
~
°~n
W~h
-~~
Z i
nn
~ ~J~
W
~ W
pN Q~~
H
W °G a a
O
~ ~~

uF
;z
~
~
az ~=
'~ W ~ a

~~
I~ ~nm
~ ~
~
d'Np
A ~
~
m 0~
aHn
^^
N~
~o
m 0~~
~ °~
O a~ z
~
~~
0~
t~
OW
~W

leas
a dQ'~'

C-JSK-6
PROPOSED DRCR TO
PERENNIAL STREAM

PLAN NOTES
10 2H:1V REINFORCED EARTH SLOPE
SEE DRAWING
00-C-60-99-02
NOTE:
STREAM & WETLAND DELINEATIONS SHOWN
RECEIVED 7-73-06 AND PREPARED BY
MULKEY ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS.
SURVEYED BY RONALD L. NESARY PLS
N0. NC L-4535.
O
OO~o
~"/ co
N
~ ~~o
~~~
o~
•`~
Pvxr
TRUE p~
0 60' 120' 180'
FEET
N0. REVISIONS DATE
A ISSUE FOR 101 9122

z
°
a
~
°rH

Y
Z ~
~
~

~ _
_
~ ~
W
tAW °
pN acv
F
W ~a

Z
0
p0 a
z
~F

Z 3=
~z
7W ~~

~ e, a
~
o
~ ~
m
0 ~?

r ,
N
i..~
tt d'
W
tC
~/J O
W OT
~ a ~ ~
X01 ZJ~(

NW
WO OFLL
ra

O t- ~ Q
~v =

~1 F J ~
~~
O~
W
~
W
taaD
LE
••ea-0-
R
N
PC

MEET
C-JSK-6
PROPOSED DROX TO
PERENNUL STRFAY

X11 I. ~ ,i~ r: _ ~ w ~ wv\v ~ '~ I Y ~~- ~ _ ~_ ~ _ , ~ v~ ~~j
I I 11 ~ - '" '. ~ ~ I ` - -- ~ ' 11.
;l~ ~ ~~~ I
~' ~I
- ~ 1 r , ~ _ ~ ~~ ~~ , , -- ~ ~- ,
~ ~ ,
N.
I
__
~ ~ 11 \ I ~ ~ 1u I
~.
`'
i 1 I ~ ~ I ~ ~ A l ', ~1 ~ ~ ~ v 1 ~, I.
. ~' ;
~'
I ~ ~~Y : . ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~ v 1
11
_.
,;
1
t ~ I
Il ~ l I I '; A f ~ ~~ - I Il~~i
l`
~. _
l ,
j'I.R I ~i I ~ ~111~ ~~~ .C ~ ~~~ ~~~ _` ~~ ~ _ ~ ~ Il~~l1 ,~ '~~I
1.11 ~`~I ; ~ ~ ` l ~ ~ "~~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ;. r " 1 lil ~~
I
1' '
.lid ~,~,~,,~ ~l!. ' ' ~ z'~ _ ~ ~, ~~ ~; _,I i ._ ~ ~`~~ ~( ~, ;, ~~ ~1,~~i
~_ , .
f \ I ~ ` ~ lg \ \ \ \ \
' ~ n,I j .
,i'~
,~ ~, .:~ ~ l ,~
llllll .. ,~~ ,~1. ~ - - ~ a 11 I , ~ t , ~ ~ _
1 i,.
1 I ~ r 1
. I'
may, ~ -~
llllll ~ ~,\_.,'. ~ .. ~ 1. 1:,, ,; ;\ -. , i!lll~ ,~, ~ .~I I, ~l; ~t111, 1 , _
1
llllll ~ _1_
'.
111 ll ll 1, ~L, ' ~ ,,.... / ',, .i ~: .:'~ r;~ 't -.: _ ',.~~..< ', ~ _~
'~ ~ ` \
I l l I l l 1 l '~, '•,; Y ,;' ; ~ ,rr 1 ~ I - \. \~ `` ` jt~ \ I
`` ~ r ~ ~_.
\'I _
~""'~ ~ . .
~ ~ :~ ~ ~ ,
111111111 1i,~ '(l ~/ / ~/,. i.t ~; ~~I '~ ~; ~ 111`~I ~ '•, ~~ ~ ~` 1. _ l
I l l I l l l l l I , ,I` 1 `t ~ X11 1, I ~ , I ~ ~ , {, - "\ \ ,~, ~~ ~ ' i \~ Ik\ ~~' ~\~ •' ~ I 1 ..
.,
' r
I ,',~ 1111,A~~''' ~~; '~ a~. ,;. ~ ~~~. ~`,~ ~ ~I ~~ the ~~~ (~ ~'~` ~'~ ~"~~~~~~
l I 1 l l 1 l l ~ Y~ , ,, ~. ", \, ~ `I I _ ` ~~ ~ , ~Y \ r ~, _ ~ , II \...,,.
ill l l l l l l l l 1 1 ` 1~I1 l ~.._ ,, ~ ,, \, ,~ ' • \~ ~ , ~ I
~ -' ~, I
__. `' 1 .
,, .,
- .'
l ~
1
_" a' ill ~ vA,~ ~ ~v ~ ~~ ( ~ t~~ ,.,
y `~~
d l \I
,-
.,
_ ,_
1 _,_ •. 1 ~ ~~ ~ ,.1 III
,.
_
>~ .
lily ~ --' ~`' ~ \ 4 ' ~ ~~ ~ ~ 11 ~` I i` III j
\ ~ ~' ~ I
,.
y - ~ ,. ~ ,
~~
.,
,•
-~
* "~ ~
,,. ,
I ~~
. ~ ~ ,
i•
... .. ~' •
~~ I > ~:
`l
,
., ,
.~ ~ ~~. i
~.
~. I. ~ ~ ' II'''
,~,~, ~ ~ _.. ~ ; ` ~~ ~,~, ~ ~ 1.1 ;~ ,;,
r ~ t ~1, 'd I /f 11,, .
i ;
la, (il r_\ ~ ~ ~, _. i, 1 ,.~ -1 I~~ Ire
~ I i III ~~~. ~ ..;. ,;' .. ~:~ .. ;-p _. .~ ~ i~~ I .~i r ~~~ ~-~~ i I i
r ~ -~ ~1.
ii ill 1, ilil ~ ~ i ~ i ,-~ -- ~ _ .. _ h~. `. " / ~ '1 ~ `~:, ~1 ~~ 111! il'
-~ C ~!1 1'~/ I-
,.
u ~~\ i
jl , i ~' I- Y ,~\ - .- _ '' II ~ ~ 11 I , ~ I •,i•I
i,~~~ Il __. ~ ~/, ,`y ~ ~ ;1 III I ~', jl ~'I ,I", II,~
~,
'i ~
1 I f ~~ ~ ri", - 1 1 ~' ~, ~~ i
I 1. -- I i~ ll`~i
~'~ i1 ~ I ~ i '/ - M+..V' ~lil i~
1 j', / / , ~ 1 ~ll~ II. ~ ~ ~ ~"!j ,1 r _ 1 1111 ~:II "
' , i ~, '~, ' I' II I 1, I ;I l I-~'
1'~I' ~ / 1 S I j ~ ~~ 11 I I I ~~ I I ` ~ .~.\ ~ \~ , III rl " j... . ~ X111 III i II ~ I~/ ~ (i' '11.'. 1 I I I I~ I I I~1
-,. ',
/~(~~'III ~~ Il~l1' ICI I ;J ~. '~I~j ~\, 1~ I1 t( II 11 iIIIlI1I1 !~h ~ j;I l• 1 f/ I ~ II'Yi,`~\ 1 tI 11i ~ l .,\
,, e
~;-, ~ II III I~ I I ~ III , l , ~1, , ,~ , , III ;, •~ I ~ . ~, , !
,„ ,, ; ,;, ~ /~, ,~ 1 ~;1
,' ,;
~,
\ '~ I.
.. , ,,--)j~l,l~,, , „ ,
..,
i' 1~111Y1~11~~ I ~..,~ 1,. ,,.~-. .1 ~ ~~~ I ~ I I'I i (~~~, 1';!l '' 11i.
I ~ j,,1 I;~~I~l, 1, ~, , ,
',
~~ ~~ ~ I• ~~ ~~~~
~ t ~~ l~ _ ~) ,~ r_ I i~' - 1 ~ I , ~ t' ~ ~~ii
~ - ~~i~~~s III ~ ~` I I~~ ' ~ ~~~~~
~I~I1`~~ t r' ill ~ ~i i Iii' ~I ~ ~11~ III 11~ I ~~~' ~.11 111' .I~"~i ~ /~ .'1 111~~1" ~ I. ~ tq ',~, 4~ li%:'~
i I I} !'~ ~ ~~I III I 1~~ 1~~~ ~~ f ~ ~ ~ r/ ~j Il~ ~ ~~ 11j ,~ ~. I • I
1 I~! I~~I I 11.V , l,1 ~1j{Il~l.i ~ 11~ ~~~ ~' 111 ~I ~ ~ ~ -~ I ~ 1, A 1 ' A ~' ~,
- ~k. ~~.( ~~1 1",11 i 1 III~~~~-.111,,,,,, ~/ III I,' I I ~I
Il ~ 11 ~~, I ~ ~ ~ ~,,. ~, ~ it ~ ~~~ ~ ~~1 ..~ ~, , ~ I- I
,.
I ~. ~ ~~1~ 1 ~,~ ,il lylll"~ i~llll I~Ij jl ;~ ~ ~, ~'" ',~ I l !(~~~~
;~ ~ 11'``1 II l jl ,'1 ~Illjl~l,l, 1, '`'. ~~ ~,~ ~ ~~ i tl~~
)` , 'I ~ ~~~ ~ 1 ;' l
1 I t I li. \ ~. ~ \ ~ ~ I tl1 f 1, F
.. G ,,
\~ ~:. ~ I I ' ~ I ' ; l 1 ' - ~~ ~ ~. ~ III{ 411 . j \ `
' ,,v I ' ~ 1~i I Il ~ ~l , ~1 ~ ~ ~j I. 'v ~~ ,~ --- ~ _ ~ i 111'_ 11~ \I,I~I
1 ~ ~~ I i I~' ~ I I .v ~ ~.. v 1i ~' ~~ 11 li
„~.~
~ ~ ~ Iii( If ~, ~- ~ ~ ! ., ,,..~ t i~ ~~',III '
~) I ~ ,, I ~ ~ ~ A I 1 _.v^t yYi I ,1 ,I III
1i ~ ~: I \ ~ I I I i I I ~, I , !
;~ ~~ 1 ~1 ~ Y~ II 1~!
I
), ~:.' CN 1l ~,~ II ~~ \- ~c-, ~ ~ 1~ _~; ~. ~ "_.~ /1 1,; , ~1 1 ill i
~~~
, ~
~ j ~ ~ ~ ; jl I , , j ~I ~ ,~> ,~ jI~ ,
1 'i:I ~INy .~~ _ I I,, v ~ ; ; -~ 1 ~ ~,~ 1 ~,~ III ~I \
~~ ~ - . ~' I I ~~ ~~.
` ,
•
11~ 1 ~ ~ I1`,i Y ilf,~ a. ~~~ II ~1~
~ I
_. -
_ _
~,~ , - 111 - - ~ ~~~ ~, ~ 1 t
~ .
;.. , i ~ ~ ~ ~ 11 ti '111 ~ ~, i - - `1 ~' l ~' I ~ I ~~ 1
~ ~,,
,,
,
~. ,,
J ~ __ _ _ I
l ~1 / 1 I
~' ~ ~ I
1~"~' i i 1 ~ i i - ~ ~;
~,.. / ~ ~•.I ~ I I ~~ 1 I I ~ I ~ 1~
/ ~~ ~ ~ YII` ~~I I I \ 1 ,'ll~ a II '. I I _ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ li I')1 1 1 '11 I it
~i ~ 'II Il I~~' 1 ~;II Ill~l ~~ ~ ';/ 1~~I~ijllli~ ~'.-'.1 I~I'•l ~ `~III~ (I,Ir' 1, ~ I`II1 ~I
1111`1 I1 ~ ~ I I ' II i ~ ' ~1'1 1~ ~1~ `, 1 ' / ill I~il'. Y /' ~ \ I"~~ \~\~". I ``till III1 ~I ,// ~ 1 ~~lY i~~ ~ 1~
~i 1 I I~ ! ~ ~' ~\ .1 ~) I I1 "~~~I j i / I A , ~ ~~~ ''~111~ i i i I I \
., i,
il.I `' ~ IIII :1i ~ ;'' I ~ i~~ ~~ ~ ~~ _ ~ '~ ,t1 I~ VIII I :I`
i,-'.\~ Y ..11 / ;, II(l iI i~ ~~~Il ( - /t~t I ~// 11 1 / IL T----•--,.,,.'_ _ - - ! ~ `j l~._. ~`
~ ~ 111 I l ~ I ~ ~ I
` \ 1 I n ~~ .t I I ~~\ ~fI(' ..
,~\ ~ ~~ \I IIII III .. J I `{~1 ~ 111 ~ll ill I II `\ '`)li. - \` \ I Ill \.,\
it 1 '~~ - I ~I I 111 Y "I ~i~~ ~ 11 ... r ~'~ ~ V ~ji lY ~ ~ I;l~ 11?.
,,r 1~,
`,~~ 1~ 1 .1 ~ ~ ~j11~ ~,\1,11
~ ~/ /, (~ i i I "' ~I I ~lY III" 1~ 11 ~ f'% 11 ~ ~;> ~llll "1' i ~1~ l~ 1 __r.~ 1 ~.~ I ~~; , 1 ~`
i; _ ~i I~~Lr~ ~' ~ VIII I Ij~l, ~ ,, ,i.i,l,i ~'1 _~'I1~~ ,~ ~~~~, .,.1 ,~,(\ ~ ~I,; ~ 1,~~;i
:~,~/~~~I(.- 11,'1 I~ ~ _~'j I~I ~i 11 I'll '" /l1 I~I~i'•.,~ ~/: \:,\ \,`~', '. \ ( \, \1 ., lY. l / ip~I i
. -, , . I ~ i ~ I I :-~4-s.~=. ~' II ~ ~I '~I"\ / I ~ i:..~ ` .\ ! 1 1,,, 1 I: ~ 1 l ', III
0
g Q ~~^r.7
~ ~ ~ ~ D~~
m ~ ~ 5EP D
z
~ ~ zoo6
~'H'u yrrER o~,~~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ JACOBS ' °
~~ ~ ~ ~
~ N O yA RT I S
w ~ ENGINEERING ~ ~
W
~

~ 4560 HORTON ST. MSZ-100
EMERYVILLE, CA 94608-2916
1880 WAYCROSS RD.
~
CINCINNATI, OH 45240 $

/iy~ CONTACT: DEANA DEARBORN
(TEL) 510-923-3568 CONTACT: AMER TAKIEDDINE
W (FAX) 510-652-6059 (TEL) 513-595-7402
(FAX) 513-595-7909
~ ~
~

e
° o ~
a °
0
ti
~ o
o ~ rr
P ,
0~
A
D ~~~~ v
D
SAP 2 6 2006
~~~~
~.
.~

-- i
'`` \
1~1~ ~ -
i,~~, ~,
\t1 ~
e°
~ .,
l
~ I ~
/ ~~
~ t ~ ~ .
,~ .
~ ~.
~ .~
4
a oo `oe /'r
be ~o o '
o~
1 o e
e
a ~ ~~
~ se e ~;;' ~~.
O oe ~'
0
r
1

- - ~~~ -

~~ ~, ice- 'r-.
_ ~ y _
----r- i ~ ~.. ~ ~- _ -.--.~ `.~ ~\
~~~.
_ -._ _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ -~-.. __

~ ,~
~~ ,e-~ ~ ~~ ~ _.
T~
~
~

~
~ ;---
~
~
~, , ,; ~ ~
; ~
i
;. , ~ ,
.
~
r_~

I

~
, i
f
~// / j~ /~// \ Yom/
II
I
r.r-
____
l ___ ___ _
~ ~~~ --
_ - _~
., ~~
,~^L_~ J ~= i~
,,
r ~~, ` j'i
~ `~ : '=;
,~ , ~,
~~ ~ ~ _/
r _ _ ~ %%
~, --~'
'~ ;;
-- !`~. ~~
~~
!; ~ ~ ,
' / i ~/ ~~
~~', ~ - ~ ~
~~
~ ~~~=,
~ -_ I,
\~~
~ /~~~_~
~ % ~ ~
PROJECT AW2DVATdC U.S. FiuCC FACILITY 14 DULY O6
WETLANDS STUDY -ALT 1 scar =1:300
~~, ~~r~~~~nr~c .lA~

- i

1
~~
~~
sip OV
2g ~"
%=~ 1a0
~ ~~~~ 6
~-i,-. -
~ JACOBS

` c I ill ;jr a+ 1 /, ' I ~ I I/I~ I
\, `~ ~ (
1~~~~ ~~`~ I ~ / ~ ~ - - ~ I ~ J r
QI/ ~ r ~ ' 1 , • , / , M' I
,, \' ,
r/ ,~ I+ I ~.. ,I I 'ec- ,., ' ~".\ r (i,~ I~\'ii ~i\ t!• b ~ ~ N OoLL ~
I. I,I `\ It 1~, .lye. ,,'•r , • ~~ i rr (I Il ,~:I1 ' i ~~_ ~ ~ (p 1-
,I \\\
-. ~ ,
_ ..~ / ~ g
.,~
\_.~
•' ' ~4 , Irl% ~ - I I "~ a .... ~ ~.. -zC `:.,1,~,-"; I- I ,• i •/ } 1 `-~ r~ ^ / ,(~~•\_~` ~ to =
„~ . 1
~ ^r .
\,' \ Ybt nb illl ° a. I I ~ .r •, \' I ~ ",~ mrf^'.~ -'-~ti oo O Z
t ~ q _r,.,, I. 1 ~' M N
( T r..i^ ~
`, • .'/l / ~'.(' ~ °• • ..' /! ` I~ A ~.^ ,ter... _. ~; t~~: ~~~5 ~'
\ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;~~{~~~ ~\~ ~/ ~ ~ II e ~ ~ ~ ~, •}'' ~~ it Z r 11
'// III` / (llll~/J ~ - ~. ,p I ~ ~;~ \, -~ ~L?> ,'a, ~' !11J~' ~ ~1 r \, /'' ,
~.
J Mr. '-. .'~•- t Y
/~ l t` . "I 1 I . (! , '~ .\ I r I I \ \I• f ~ ~ `4~ 4 1I~ ~ .O
~.J : ~i ~~~ ~'' a I. II ,1, LI11 I I~- I ,t - (~ /r i ' I °., r/~'q~, "I rl' ~ / .;/ ` .C V
/ 1 _ l I ~ ~ 1, ! ~ •.~!. I' \ t ` _ s'a y / t ICI ~ ~ ~ ~~ /\ : Q ~ tom' 'C
l--a fl ., e ~ t rl ~ ,. ~ ¢ o
-t ~~ ~/ - - ~/ Il; ~~~ ~_~. ~ - ~ ( ~ ..b~~4 ,'' y ~tvl,+, , r I,,' 1 ~ ^\., ~ 1r ~ V y~ ~
•~ ~ i I C-.11 .. ~~ ~I 1\ ')J,l, '`u' I ~ r )~~ } +f''\ ~'I i /rI) ,~'+^ ~\ rM,r ,~.i ~ Q ~ 0
\I ~ I ~ I \ ! Ir r! ~t S
• ~,, I I, I , ~' 1. , 1/ •! I ~ p / ;, .I }~ / J \ ~ ,
-`~\ \ j/ ~Q+,r-~.~ \ (,~ {l ~. I+ I, cr i;,l r1~.. a , •,\I •`1-' La ~\\~) tl \~ ~ ~ ~ iii/n1~,~~_~ ~ ~/'~\~ \ J ~-'~ "1'I I/ j -
.ti ~ ~ -J~ ` .,~~! r 1, lir q/ !i_?` ,j)\;,.'\\~q;\~~,r1 :~ J ~ ~+ i/i~'h..\ ~'+4/~/sc \`:~~ ~ '~\ ~' G..
( I
'J.f ~ r X -;F ,~ ~ ~ I Itft' ~ (t r '. l %, \ t? \ o\ •_'\ + ` I) `j i'~ ~/ ~ j ~~// /r _ 'K~~`1~- \~~ (~ ~'
,'~I ` ', ^ 1\ I - /I ~+ '' -~ "!t ~'_ ~ \\\. ~~~. +.aie ~~ i I ` ` ( , ~(~' ~ 4?`'/'._ ~ .:. \ \~....~\•.. rj1..., ~, } 51 ~. O
•~. \•\' 1`~ ~ N,I / `•-l4 ~ ,\' •/~ ~r~l!'I/, ~/ ~//1\ ~I •l ~'•~ \I r~f•~~11 _~~ i :`_'.~-.J\ , F:_a.r'r~~~`.\~ ~+`" -\\++0~' ~~ ~``I / ~:~;:\~'~' a•~ L r--. . .~
1 \ \.. \ - I I ,~.I /~ i (^ I I ~ s _ ___ '-~. t _ ~^-..1 (h ) ~1~'1~ ± . • _. _` F.' ~ i~-I
t~ (I\ ~\`. \ \ \: /J ~ - _ 11J i { 1 . - +l'I ,` ; .= .} ~.,F =~~~' \ • 1 ` , ~l1 ~' y \ + _ .'`` ~.. \ ,(O 1 ~ p
1*~1! (l ~ .?f ``'~T~~\ - r1 { ~•' Ji ` f /r,~ll `Jil .,\ `/ i l',i~.5`=~,~- - / i i /// J~" 1. F,`./ f`' i,,'l` \ ~` f\,~`, \ \'" ` ~ \` .a Ir..+.l d
ah ,
\•.~'\~ \\ ~.(Q ' ' ~ D•\J.• ./ '~ _ / , , J i'i'i /'. ,/c. - \ ~~\\\ -~-./y /,~'~ Jl~l;' r t`.~~ /f '+~ ~ J~ \~ 1w~..a'1 \-- \\. d t" VJ
.!,,f r Oy wit\~\ \ \ '~~~-1` /I, i \ ;.(: (~5{~.~, ,. f \~\.)~ Jf ~~ C./ f~I~~, r,\;.: JJ`...1~~1-~ :`\ ' tt\~iv,, ~~ `1 I L
J ea ~ _ `\ '~' t\~ , ~~ l1~ ,~~ 1'-/`','''' ~ °-~i„~ St \ C~-:-~ ~ l\ / /( l~ ~~~~ ~ i ~.!r/~ffc ~~~~(`~,Z{`~l\I+ `\.,,~JC ±i ~,t, G~ F
- \ \, i~1 N ,~~ I ~.~>~ _,.e~~ ri ~~ - 3?a- _ \ (,~\~\Q~r ~i / ` !,/r (.I~ t`• 1!(•\C:-.,, ' ~• ~ ? ~ CG
i ~ ./ : 1 ~/'-`/~•`\ Y• - ~~ "~r,•~ I 4.._:~~/!~ '' ( i; { +A" .. ~ i ~ ~1..') ! ~ `_.it ~ ../\ ~ i $`~ ~_f~~~\ Ir/~? ` \ a I ~
\ t/{~~ ~ ~ / (J~, ---L .-.'- `~ .,~`J rl \ t \ .~ ~! '~` JI/ 11 ~,j J r.•• 1 ) .i L/, ~ J ti -' `,~\~J \~~ \~,/ ~~~( d
I i/~(T,~) ~ , ~1 r • l~A ~ ~> \ f~ ~1 ~~-\ 1 11 '/ r : ~ ~, c._.--,~~ } C~ ~__` ~~~~ . • `' \'~\ ~t1J \ \ ~~~._ .3
~~ l L~F II ~, }I- (?i ~ ~~ 1.,~I ~ ~1 _ •,~ ~ , \t , ~ / I :' ~,,-: 1. \ \! `I \_i: , `~ ~~ (~i.. % .~~ ''~,~ _/ Sr~ \~ '~~ ~ y1 ~,;J
- (
'\ ,} _
I'/~' ~ \t' -~' ~ \ l / iii' ~ ~, '..~. T -. ~/% ''nrr'. ~ JI-\ ~(/ I ~) ~ I I ~I. ~ `-~ ~)\ ' 11~~ I~~(~// ~ \\ - •~\ ~}~~ (~~r.~ '
;•• .~
p ~ t ~ r--. ~ l~
..'%" ~ , f\, f ; 1 -__ Ll,.ti os, __ _-\ .. i _~., ~ -: ~\ 1,'_ tc_-,! '~ \`- J~J/~ -../CI\~I~1~ _ rl \t\ m
` '~ I ~ \~ ..":l.>, i ~ , _ ? / -- \\ 1 .~':~ r~ „•`\ , _ \~. ~~~~~~ `- ~~:'~,~ .~~ `, •~.l (/ ~~~ I ill ~'~ 1` `~ '~ ,~/ ~ `,\ ( Z
~~ , , -- \ ~~•„~' ,~ \ `' \ r i.f \ ;~, ) 111 ,. -«-"~ " ~f .• ~~j j ~ ~
I'. G _ .~,~' r- ,~ ~ ~--' ~'.^ ~/ `~ , _i I ~ `I 1 \ '•_1 \ }~~ lll~i i. ~ r~ r1 ~ / ~ f'~r. t Y J!/ iy a
.;gay 'N y~ _ ~ ~(,J,~1f:- ) Y (,.;`_:'~ ~ _ ~_~..-', _:'--,_,'~~ t~~,`;,.•~-~~{ rJ.l,ll`n \l-.\~~~I ~ 1 (_~\ WIn
'isF~ i~ 1 ; Q'\ / • r' ~ l ~ ~~`- /r' ~ `:4+`~I• . t`~) ! ~1 `.p~4 +. 1 t( ! + ~ r : ~. _ll J Z
._ 4
- -_.
r .- --.. _ -- .. - _. -. _ •
. l
- _ ~ ,, .- 1 C~ ~ a
.. ~ )• 1 / ._ t ~~ ` to ''• i~`
• ~ 1 j ) ~~i ,• ~ { - I Ct \~1\rl~ / - J / ~~{' a~,~l j I Op ) } rf - •.\ ~\ ~ -~ ! ..~ -tiJ \_ \~\r .^~ %~~' \ ~ W
+/ * I
,,
_j~ ~, _ _ r Z
.,,`^~w'^``Eyr \ ) ~•~ y I~ ~ -~-"-'^-~!f i tl II~1 oA ti`. / \..._. ~ ~ ~7 .\~il `.,,+~ 1 1 Z
.., -
a!a s { _
•.~ ~ ~,, ~ ,\ ~ _./-;=- 1 ~ ) ~`. `.' Wit.. ' l I.l
'~~~. 1 I' F ~ v/, i / ~ :-\ ri_ + r. i I ~ / ;!!i l ~ r~,,~,,,,..i \ 111 \ i(.i' ~ ~•.-.. ~•~~/ ~~ ~%~~-~'
r`t\\ ;: 1 ~ .. '~ ~.>?~. ~.,..k .-_\+, \.,`\_.. 1 I{ ~6+s j /--- ;. `r.•• // '•1!'\~F J,'. / ~/; ` ~ :;~j/` ~ ~_~~ti'~\ ~ '~~ ..~ ~,!` ~,mM
.; `i 11 ~ `,l ,;~ ~ ~ ~ J CtV4^ ., _ ~~ I. // I C,~-` ~~,. ~ /~ /: / / r:( %~ -~),) ~I /'" \ -) /~:r../ ~'~ ~ 1 1 1. , ~ ~ li; ~iv
•
~ •' , 1
,.
/ '...- Y, \ \.` _-. I ~~, ~. g } -i+. o_ _. c _. ._-. ' ~~ ` J _. r 'iF'c •.. /I!.-. ..\~f~ x'°11
-+. S "J~SI i l °y~' \ l` ~` ./ r )r` ~\ 1. '~ i \~( r'-~F') ,•~r ~._ ~ //J~S` (l//~/11 ! ^\___,~` `' ~iv// ,~ 1~ ~\
J 1 / \ // Cf J /
_. '• tt.. r ' ~ • ( I /_- ~~' " ,~. ~ F% ~ I ~ / / lam'-''~ -~ I, \ -~
l n'1 ~) ~' f+~ I, ~ \ l ~ j I i ~ \ :~~ /I~ i ~ ~ •.,_r-.f ~ ~ll^~J`~--- ~ .~-- ._~.M S C~ ~,` ~.'1. •j I /~ (/' J//f/ ./ / /'h ~ ~' .~ ...
` /i
p .•. /; ``. I S 'it ,\ ~\•~ ,. I I. 1, \\~,ilr~ \ '/`•-I I ` h _ ~J~~~ '~:..1 ` -11 ~ _ r~ ` ~ ~ , '~ ~\ !~ R.`~
1{ .~ \ \.. ` ,!1 1f I ~ \ l ~\+ i \~` ~ I ~ 1/'. '\.,~ \ •\ \ I! Q `\-~.~ l\\ `~..•'`..\ -.. .J~~ ~ .~sIS~• ? ) % .~ 1 [/~~ J ~.,~ I ~i! \ •,\ ~ \
'~L -•~ `~{„ r ;~"~.~ IC\~ ;l ~~(!l\~.V_ --'..I1~~\il I~\`\ J` r•Ir\~_ -~/~C ~"• t~--\~ ~i •-.'~ '~._l, n n', ~ ~ J"-.
~~ ~ j~ ~~ 1 I v~ ~,. ~r~i,. 4~ ~t~ ~1~ ~~ V ~~• l ~ ~i (\~ ~~ 'v .'" ~/~' '~ ~ +_ 1~V --v A J - ~^ ~1 v
f ;,~ ~. I _ `li ~~` I ~I {l .,+ I\ ~ 1 ~ _ / ~ ~! ~f .~..~... ~'-: ~ __ `'-tea...;...'
'a` _/~ \ ~•~j-1h ^` ~'\ `~` ~" -•--'I t ~,/' 1,'~t•,~ I(1`~` j f .~;i:~ ~+' `~, ~/ t~ 1' I ~"`'/.-`,•-l. c,~~i~ ~ .':.~.

~~~z .~ ... '6
~MULKEY
ENGfNEERS & CONSLJ LTA NTS

Prepared For:
T~ Town ofr
Holly
Spnngs
lYORTH CAHOLIIiA

STREAM AND WETLANDS
Project Aardvark
Town of Holly Springs
Wake County, North Carolina
Prepared: June 30, 2006
N 1 inch equals 400 feet 1:4,800
0 4oa ~o ,,~o Figure
Feet
Source: Maptech Terrain Navigator Pro Version 7.01 2
Apex SW - 2002

Legend
Perennial Streams (5,694 LF)
Intermittent Important Streams (1,198 LF)
Intermittent Unimportant Streams (1,386 LF)
Isolated Streams (226 LF)
~' Wetlands (0.57 Ac)
Isolated Wetlands (0.38 Ac)
~~ -
Parcels
Pipes
NOTE: Wetland "VNC"and the portion of Stream
"SG" associated with Wetland "WC" have been
previously verified by state and federal agencies.
s
-'-~MULKEY
E'JGIN EERS & CCN SJ LTANTS
Prepared For:
THE TOWPt OF
Holly
Springs
WORTH CAROLINA
STREAM AND WETLANDS
Project Aardvark
Town of Holly Springs
Wake County, North Carolina
Prepared: June 30, 2006
N 1 inch equals 400 feet ~;q,800
a 400 ~ ,,~ Figure
~ Feet
Source; Maptech Terrain Navigator Pro Version 7.01 2A
Apex SW - 2002

-- - - q., _ _.. ..__ f v .___
MYC' {` M1L'f' ~. ~ 1 ~ / 1 - j Au ~ , ..I r ~` \
~, ~~
i-•.,. MYD WY~ ~i ., / ,f AYD I , /. ,. ~ \`'~ ~ \_~,~ri ~ , 1`~ MfE . M D ,, \ .\ I
Y
le i\ "
,MYB2 ~~_ \ ~'~ ,, r r Cp ~ - ~.', 7
Wh ~ j CP - Au f / fA C `J ~ \ ~\~~
r. ~MYO,;k;,,,,. ~ WY y ~ I Y o MYC MYB ~, ~
_~ // \ f
MyB2 '' f ~ •,~ MsC •'D.. , '~~~
~~~0 v . ~ ~ f WY .j • .MgC M¢C2 1 MpC2 N'~ ;\ Wy K ~ .....~„•,.,,,
~• ~ MfE •~ MYD Cf
AfA f°° B2 lat •
~1. 'MYB
~,OI ~'~ Cr» ~ / g ~ i II b ~ ~~ ~ MYD '•-
a \ ~ ~ MCi ~~ I ~4+ ~,~
Au ` J yQ' f.. \ f MyC as ~~e° •,` W16G ,` ~
o MYD,,' yB
j F. .~ ~'~ • / ~ ~ ~ \ ~> f M6C ~ MYD+,,
f ~ ~ MYD;/e M¢B2 `~~ MfE •~^
`` I ~~ f MYD + '/ ~~~...`
,~ My~ t MfE oa MYC MYD ~ ~~. MyD ~ '•~ 2'yC
.~f ~-- (~.. ~_ .. __ a a X01 ° R , , _ .__ ~ 9.
•-.~ ~,•,, f y.~-. ~ ~ MYC ~ "~.. ~ M~~` MgC
a '`
•~tiCm~ / , ~ MY /' ° U ~ ~ '\ ~- f tiJ M¢C2 % ~wti ~ M`
.
MY ~..,, M tt~
D ~~" ~e
' ' ° MYB ° / ~_ , • Y ~-
~, ( °° ~,. ''• MYC ,. ~°`6 ° -~.. MSC MgC
/, ~ MYB , I ;'~, j ~ ~~
` ~~- ~.~ MvD wy,` ~ ~~ ~ ~~ aw 1I
~ F~~~ _ _ , •~ . ---r . • , . ~.. • -.., '' MYC.,+' i ~ . . •' .?
~__,.,
x i ~"~ Mi +,?~ ~,. .~ h : '` MgC ; ~~~' ~ / 'V
~~~^ ~ ~ FeB •~ ~'.i~ ~~' MYD ° - ~ `~ -. _MaB1 MfD2: ~., ~
t ~~'",~' r' ~ ,~Y ~~ c M¢Cy .~ .,- ~,I'6 ~ °d qC2 I ~ M ~'. ~ ~C t~2' ~ ` Wy
~., ~. °a Mac ,~ a° __ =: .__~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~-
'~* ~.' ~; ~, °°, ~ M¢BZ SITE ~ • M~C : ~ fl_~
.~!.~-' MYB MYD ~' M -~,~ ~ ~ MfE~+~_ uo~,
~~ ~~ *' M¢02 /~ /~ ~ Mfh2 h1yD v ',
. f ~ ~' ~
' y /' ~; MYB ,~ .MaC2 ~ ~'ti
"~,'~;~`_ ~ ~~y. ~a ~ •\MYD / ~~ ~I •/ ~ p,la; a° `~ "o /~
i F My off` "' ° n ~ ~, / ~% ~: n a d , ~ J ~ ;:
~ ,~ M C MYB ~ ~ `~ '~ MYb ~> / •\ ~' 7
A y °. ° ry % ~ ° ~ f~ ~ I , ,.~"'~ MyC J'' ~ D 1 I r
,..~- a~ U °a~ 1l . Q'• ~ WY. MfB2 I ~ 'Mfr,C
~,', l
/ ea Myg ~ alp '• s~ _~ l f' OZ
f~ l MYC I o WY ~~~ ~C / fE ~I --- o
o:° MYD ~'+ : a~ ~-~~ `~' MyC°•.~i elua .Q 1 ~~' 1;f1 ~~b'r
Wv \ v
MYB2 0 .1 ~ ~O „a ~ i ~ ~/ M c l 1 `S~ ~ 'MgC ,~ ~ Cc0
•~ ' ~ 1~ M¢B2 GG/ ~O/ o°a ` °" MSC ' j ~ g .~M +~'~`` rS,
'~'? ~ ` ° T ~ MYC O :/ °~ ' °' ., MYC W ;~:. ~+-. f~'f c;n ,~.~,r,• ~
r 4r.." ~S
r i ~ ~ M ~ .: ' 'J I ' ~ Myo- MyD . ~. ; r,t r ~ r• i ,~ ~ ~...
cal. i ~ ~ C7 ~ r I , Y ~. ~ i f - ~ j ~ '.
~~ ~~, MYC2 \MyC dW ! ~' ~ M 1 M 2 PAP,' M B H~ -~,;, J PkF Pk l,/ PkF I
' Au ~ AfA ~ Au YO i Y CP ~ A~ 1
' ' Cp Y AfA ' ~'~
{~ MyB A fA ~.'-. i, ~- •Y~... .~~ "~-'~~ PkC ~ N~Q?
it
Y ~ `.,, PkF PkF
..,
~' HrC/
.~ PkF~ '~ PkF '' I M36 / .
... ~. n ---_.. _...__._. _ _ _._ .
Wake County Soil Survey Map
M U L K~E Y Figure No.
Novartis V & D Holly Springs site
1. N G I N E E R 5 & CONSULTANT 5 Wake Count ,North Carolina
1:15,840
Feet
C~ 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
Wake County Soil Survey, 1970