20160562 Ver 1_401 Application_20160616

LMG PAI®
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
Environmental Consultants
May 27, 27 2016 D � � L 0 LS
" D
TO: Ms. Jennifer Burdette JUN 0 1 2016
NC Department of Environmental Quality D
Division of Water Resources 2 0 1 6 0 5 6 2 4o a e FFR P R Irr� S
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
RE: 401 Water Quality Certification Application; Fayetteville Commercial Development
Cumberland County, NC
Dear Jennifer:
Enclosed is a 401 WQC application for your review. This application is submitted on behalf of CRP -
Fayetteville Ramsey, LLC for the construction of a commercial/retail center in Fayetteville, NC that will
contain approximately 113,000 square feet of commercial/retail space to include a grocery store, additional
retail space, and a gas station. Total proposed impacts are to 622 LF of intermittent stream and 0.01 acre of
404 wetlands. The project area is located within the Cape Fear River Basin and is 19.7 acres in size. Even
though stream impacts exceed 300 LF, it is our understanding that the USACE will process this application
request as a Nationwide Permit because of the low quality of the majority of the channel to be impacted. To
mitigate for impacts to the high quality stream (158 LF) and for the small amount of wetland impacts (0.01
ac), the applicant proposes purchasing stream credits from the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
at a 2:1 mitigation to impact ratio (316 LF of stream credit).
The PCN form, project narrative, associated maps, and site plan are enclosed for your review. The
DWR application fee of $570 is also enclosed. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for
your assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
K m Williams
Environmental Scientist
Encl
Cc: Mr. Jenkins Williamson, CRP- Fayetteville Ramsey, LLC
Mr. Chad Turlington, NC DWR
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15 a Wilmington, NC 28403

o�0F W ATFRPG
Office Use Only -
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
® Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
-
—
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
®Yes
❑ No
1 d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit -
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
N Yes
❑ No
1 g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
N No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project.
Fayetteville Commercial Development
2b
County.
Cumberland County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town.
Fayetteville
2d
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P or state
project no.
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
See Attached
3b
Deed Book and Page No.
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d
Street address
3e.
City, state, zip -
3f.
Telephone no. -
3g
Fax no. -
3h.
Email address -
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

i
_ r -
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is' ❑ Agent ' '. , ®Other, apecify..Apphcant is the developer and currently has the -
tracts under contract.,
4b., Name: Mr. Jenkins•Wdliamson
'4c' -Business name' =
(if applicable) CRP -Fayetteville Ramsey,. LLC
i ,
4d Stfeet address. A 645 St. Julian Place - -
4e. City, state, zip: :Columbia', SC 29204
•4f. Telephone no: (803)'782-5666 - ..
4g. Fax no..
4h , Email address. .„
-6.- , Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name _ " = Kim Williams'',; -
5b Business name
(if applicable):
Land Management Group, Inc. `
5c. Street address:` '',..�- 3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite,,15
5d City, state,�zip-, -Wilmir"
5e. Telephone.n ' '[phone] = _
, 5f. Fax no ., ,. �� [phone],
5g. Email add, ss.
^ 4
Page 2`of 12
'
,,[e-mail] _- -
i
_ r -
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is' ❑ Agent ' '. , ®Other, apecify..Apphcant is the developer and currently has the -
tracts under contract.,
4b., Name: Mr. Jenkins•Wdliamson
'4c' -Business name' =
(if applicable) CRP -Fayetteville Ramsey,. LLC
i ,
4d Stfeet address. A 645 St. Julian Place - -
4e. City, state, zip: :Columbia', SC 29204
•4f. Telephone no: (803)'782-5666 - ..
4g. Fax no..
4h , Email address. .„
-6.- , Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name _ " = Kim Williams'',; -
5b Business name
(if applicable):
Land Management Group, Inc. `
5c. Street address:` '',..�- 3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite,,15
5d City, state,�zip-, -Wilmir"
5e. Telephone.n ' '[phone] = _
, 5f. Fax no ., ,. �� [phone],
5g. Email add, ss.
^ 4
Page 2`of 12

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
See attached
Latitude: 35.146921 Longitude: -78.872431
1b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
(DD DDDDDD) (-DD DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
19.72 ac
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
McPherson Creek
proposed project -
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV; B
2c River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application -
Most of the project area is currently undeveloped and forested. However, there are a few structures present. A home
sales center is located at the corner of Shawcroft Road and Ramsey Street and several residential homes are located off
of Ramsey Street.
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
- 3.7 acres
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
-800 LF of perennial stream and - 750 LF of intermittent stream
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project -
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a commercial/retail shopping center to serve this section of
Fayetteville.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project includes the construction of a grocery store, gas station, and several smaller shops Site will be cleared and
graded. Stormwater facilities will be installed and roads/utilities will be constructed. Then building construction will occur.
Track hoe, loader, dump truck, bob cat, and other standard construction equipment will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments.
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
ECS
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
Brennan Dooley of the USACE approved the wetland and stream boundaries in the field on 10/27/2015. Chad Turlington
of NC DWR also verified the stream boundaries on the same date.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

° `-B. Project Information and Prior`Project,History'
6: L 'Futbie:Project,PlansY�;
'6a. Is this' a phased project
-��-�6ti.,lf�yes,,ezplain
'"• -
- - ._ _
_
-
}
.E_
Page'A of 12

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary '
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f."
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill for sloping
Riparian
®Yes
E]No
® Corps
®DWQ
0.01
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
El Corps
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
001
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ'— non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Fill/Reroute
UT of McPherson
Creek
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
® DWQ
10
622
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ElP ❑ T
❑PER
❑Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
622
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts NIA
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments.
5. Pond or Lake Construction N/A
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a
5b.
5c.
5d
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
number
of pond
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments,
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
51 Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) N/A
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a.
❑ Neuse [_-] Tar -Pamlico ❑Other'
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
F1 Yes
131 ❑P❑T
❑ No
❑Yes
B2 ❑P❑T
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i Comments
Page 6 of 12

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts were minimized as much as possible through careful site design However, the intermittent stream channel runs up
through the middle of the property and then parallels Ramsey Street. It was impossible to develop this tract without impacting
a large amount of this channel. This channel receives a great deal of stormwater from adjacent areas and is heavily incised
and undercut. The USACE evaluated the channel using their Stream Assessment Methodology (SAM) and found that the
majority of the channel to be impacted is low quality. The engineer has curved the roadway that connects into Shawcroft to
allow for additional queuing as warranted within the TIA and the stacking lengths for this signal. The wetland impact is needed
for grading down to the larger wetland area on the site. This would help avoid a retaining wall within this section as well as
maintain the area needed for stormwater retention.
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Silt fencing will be used during construction to reduce sediment from eroding into adjacent wetlands and streams
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
®Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank-
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Quantity:
3c. Comments-
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested.
316 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non-ripanan wetland mitigation requested.
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan N/A
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer• Rules) — required by"DWQ 'N/A -
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires,'
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of'impact to each zone of'the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Reason for',impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation ;=
Zone
(squa4feet)-.
,,(square feet) _
Zone 1
3 (2•f6r"Catawba)
Zone 2
6f.,'T6tal buffer,mitigation"required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what typd' of mitigation; is,proposed (e.g.; payment toprivate mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffe'r,restoeation;,payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). _
6h. Comments. �
-Page 8 of'12
l

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan NIA
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
55%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Project engineer is in the process of preparing a stormwater plan.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Fayetteville
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review N/A
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes E] No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review N/A
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
Yes
El No
letter.)
Comments: N/A
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)-
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project will not provide access or utilities to adjacent properties.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated by this project will tie into the local municipality's system.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program GIS layer was used to determine the presence of federally -listed species. Two current
occurrences (observed within the last twenty years) of rare species have been documented within a one mile radius of the
site The Southern chorus frog (Pseudacris nignta, State -listed SR) was last observed in 1995. The red -cockaded woodpecker
(Picoides borealis, Federally and State -listed E) was last observed in 2009. This RCW population is located approximately one
mile northwest of the site. There are also two historical occurrences of the red -cockaded woodpecker located approximately
0 5 mile northwest of the site No RCWs or RCW cavities were observed within the project area The site is mostly forested
and contains a mixed canopy of loblolly pines and hardwoods Although it is a walkable site, the understory and shrub layer
may be too dense for the RCW. Additionally, the site is surrounded by development and is likely too small and fragmented to
provide appropriate habitat for this species There is a great deal of development between the project area and the known
RCW cluster and it is unlikely that RCWs would travel to a noncontiguous area a mile away to reach this site.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat Mapper GIS program was used to determine the presence of Essential Fish
Habitat The project area is not considered EFH or HAPC for any species
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS mapping resource was used to determine the presence of
cultural or historic resources No cultural or historical resources were noted within the site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The NC Floodplain Mapping Information System
website was used to determine the boundaries of the 100 -year floodplain.
Kim Williams
��
5/27/2016
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Date
is provided
Page 11 of 12

LMG
L.LtiD \}AtiAGFti�Z C.R(}tfP e<
fn.,,on'rrma6 fen�u7tant�
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I/we, the undersigned, hereby authorize land Management Group, Inc. (LMG) to act as our
agent in the determination of jurisdictional wetland boundaries _on the subject
property, Ramsey Street; Fayetteville Project . By way of this form,
I/we additionally authorize access to the site by representatives of the US Army Corps of
Engineers (COE) and the NC Division of Coastal Management (NC DCM) for the purpose of
reviewing the flagged wetland boundary and providing a final jurisdictional determination.
Any questions regarding the jurisdictional determination should be directed to LMG.
0530-88-1694; 0530-78-8753; 0530-78-9323;
Please provide the following information: 0530-78-8283; 0530-88-0082; 0530-87-0859;
Property Address and Parcel ID Number: 0530-77-6890
Current Property Owner Name:
Owner Address and Phone Number:
Multiple owners
Please answer the following questions (circle Yes or No):
1. Are you the current owner of the property? Yes or 0�i_o_
2. If you are not the current owner, do you have a option to purchase or a contract to
purchase that allows for environmental due -diligence- -including the determination of
wetlands? es or No
3. If you answered no to the questions above, do you have an existing easement?
Yes or No
Name of Individual/Entity: �O�V` "J��• `iJ"��l4 t�� �'1��J LUC
Signature of Authorized Representative:
Date: d \2-� (0
nlv%v-lmbroupauet • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wribhts%ille Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, \C 28403

Fayetteville Commercial Development
Existing Property Landowners
PARCEL ID
ADDRESS
KINGS GRANT DEVELOPMENT CO
0530-88-1694
PO BOX 1741
0530-78-8753
FAYETTEVILLE NC 28302
DAWSEY, NANCY G.
0530-78-9323
8821 STILLWATERS LANDING DR
RIVERVIEW FL 33578
COOPER, REBECCA T, MILDRED POULIN &
CAROLYN MOREAU
0530-78-8283
600 SUGARIDGE LN
FAYETTEVILLE NC 28311
MET FUTURES LLC
C/O CAPE FEAR OTOLARYNGOLOGY
0530-88-0082
2053 VALLEYGATE DR
FAYETTEVILLE NC 28304
JOHNSON, JANET
0530-87-0859
7336 FAIRCLOTH BRIDGE RD
STEDMAN NC 28391
MASOURAS, REGINA M & DEAN J
0530-77-8982
6003 RAMSEY ST
FAYETTEVILLE NC 28311
BURD PROPERTIES FAY LLC
0530-77-6890
560 LYNNHAVEN PKY
VIRGINIA BEACH VA 23452

r
PROJECT NARRATIVE
May 2016
Fayetteville Commercial Development
CRP — Fayetteville Ramsey, LLC
Cumberland County, NC
INTRODUCTION
CRP -Fayetteville Ramsey, LLC proposes to develop a commercial/retail center off of Ramsey
Street in Fayetteville, NC that will contain approximately 113,000 square feet of commercial/retail
space and a gas station. Total proposed impacts are to 622 LF of intermittent stream and 0.01 acre of
404 wetlands. The project area is located within the Cape Fear River Basin and is 19.7 acres in size.
Even though stream impacts exceed 300 LF, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has agreed to
process this application request as a Nationwide Permit because of the low quality of the majority of
the channel to be impacted.
PURPOSE & NEED
The applicant's purpose and need for the project is to develop an economically viable regional
shopping destination located off of Ramsey Street in the northern part of Fayetteville, NC
(Cumberland County). The project will accommodate a grocery store, a gas station, and several
smaller retail shops. The project area is surrounded by residential development and a retail shopping
center of this nature is greatly needed.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The 19.7 -acre project area is located off of Ramsey Street in Fayetteville, NC (Cumberland
County) (Figures 1 & 2). The project area consists of eight (8) separate parcels. According to the
Cumberland County Generalized Soil Survey, uplands within the site are classified as Gilead loamy
sand, Blaney loamy sand, and Vauduse loamy sand. (Figure 3). Wetlands within the site are shown as
Johnston loam.
Most of the project area is currently undeveloped and forested. However, there are a few
structures present. A home sales center is located at the corner of Shawcroft Road and Ramsey Street
1

I
and several residential homes are located off of Ramsey Street. A site delineation of jurisdictional
areas was performed by ECS, Inc. and was approved by Mr. Brennan Dooley of the USACE in the field
on in October of 2015. Both Mr. Dooley and Mr. Chad Turlington of the NC Division of Water
Resources determined the limits of perennial and intermittent streams within the site. The site
contains one perennial stream near the northwestern project boundary. Three intermittent channels
extend off of the perennial stream. Additionally, 3.66 acre of wetlands exists adjacent to the
perennial stream. The 404 wetlands support a canopy of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) with water oak
(Quercus nigra) in the understory and shrub layer and switch cane (Arundinaria tecta) and catbrier
(Smilax spp.) in the herbaceous layer. Forested uplands support a canopy of loblolly pine, with sparse
understory and shrub layers of turkey oak (Q. laevis), water oak, and black jack oak (Q. marilandica).
Many of the pine trees have a diameter at breast height (DBH) of 12" to 20". Except for the
stream/wetland finger that runs through the northwestern part of the site, the project area is
surrounded by development. Single-family and multi -family neighborhoods surround the site, with
some retail shops and churches also located along Ramsey Street in this area. Highway NC 295 was
recently constructed less than 0.5 mile to the north of the site.
According to the topographic quadrangle for this area, the perennial stream located within
the northwestern portion of the site is McPherson Creek (Wooded Lake). This creek flows northeast
under Ramsey Street, connects into Carver's Creek, which then flows into the Cape Fear River.
McPherson Creek is classified by the NC Division of Water Resources as WS -IV, B. Class B waters are
protected for uses such as fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic life including propagation,
survival and maintenance of biological integrity, agriculture as well as both primary and secondary
forms of recreation. Primary recreational activities include swimming, skin diving, water skiing, and
similar uses involving human body contact with water where such activities take place in an organized
manner or on a frequent basis. Secondary recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses
involving human body contact with water where such activities take place in an infrequent,
unorganized, or incidental manner. Water Supply IV (WS -IV) is given to waters used as sources of
water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes where a WS -I, II or III classification is
not feasible. WS -IV waters are generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds or Protected
Areas.
2

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This site plan consists of constructing a total of 113,000 sf of leasable space including a
grocery store, gas station, and several smaller retail shops (Figure 5). The proposed layout offers the
least amount of impact while still maintaining the required access configuration and enough gross
leasable area (GLA) to render the project economically viable. The applicant has designed the site to
contain between 4 and 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of building, which is a typical required
minimum on retail developments of this size. The stormwater BMPS will be located in the northern
and western parts of the site, adjacent to the wetland and stream system.
Impacts were minimized as much as possible through careful site design. However, one of the
intermittent stream channels on site runs up through the middle of the property and then parallels
Ramsey Street. It was impossible to develop this tract without impacting a large amount of this
channel. The placement of the roadway that connects into Shawcroft Road was dictated by the need
for additional queuing as warranted within the TIA and the stacking lengths for the signal at
Shawcroft Road and Ramsey Street. The proposed wetland impact is needed for grading down to the
larger wetland area on the site. This will help avoid a retaining wall within this section as well as
maintain the area needed for stormwater retention.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Direct Impacts
The proposed project would permanently impact 622 LF of intermittent stream and 0.01 acre
of 404 wetlands (Figure 5). Using the Stream Assessment Methodology, the USACE determined that
464 LF of the channel to be impacted is classified as Low Quality and 158 LF of the channel is
classified as High Quality.
Indirect Impacts
Indirect impacts to wetlands and water quality will be minimized by the development and
implementation of a Stormwater Plan and a Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan. These plans will
reduce the potential for erosion or runoff into wetlands and other water bodies located off site.
3

Resources Affected
Tyler Crumbley and Emily Greer of the USACE evaluated the channel to be impacted utilizing
their Stream Assessment Methodology (SAM) protocol. The channel was divided into two assessment
reaches: Reach 1, which extended from the culvert under Ramsey Street to Survey flag SC10 (464 LF),
and Reach 2, which extended from Survey flag SC 10 down to the channel's confluence with the main
stem of McPherson Creek (245 LF).
Reach 1 was found to have an overall Low rating. The hydrology, water quality, and habitat
ratings were low, due to the large amount of stormwater run-off that the channel receives from
surrounding areas. This large amount of flow is causing the channel to become deeply incised (15+ ft
deep in sections). The bottom of the channel has been cut down to the groundwater. Additionally,
because of the high velocity of water moving through the channel, there is little aquatic in -stream
habitat available. Reach 1 did have a wooded buffer on both sides of the channel, so it rated high for
stream -side habitat.
Reach 2 had an overall High rating. Hydrology and habitat rated high, while water quality
rated medium. This reach is farther removed from source point of the stormwater, so it is less incised
than Reach 1. Evidence of sediment sorting was observed. Geomorphology, such as riffles and pools,
was observed and it was found to provide habitat for some aquatic fauna.
The flow that this channel receives will be rerouted to connect into the stormwater system on
site. After treatment, stormwater will outlet into the existing wetlands and stream system. Therefore,
a hydrologic connection to downstream waters will be maintained. As noted above, Reach 1 (the first
464 LF of the channel) does not provide aquatic fauna habitat. Therefore, none will be lost by
rerouting this section of the channel. Reach 2 does provide some aquatic fauna habitat and there will
be permanent losses to 158 LF of this section of the channel. Furthermore, the heavy stormwater
flow is continuously eroding the banks of the channel, and a great deal of sediment is being washed
downstream. Rerouting the flow to a stormwater pond for treatment will greatly reduce the
sediment that flows to McPherson Creek, which may have an overall beneficial effect on water
4

I
quality to this stream system. Based on this information, we believe that the proposed project will
have minimal adverse effects.
MITIGATION
The applicant has attempted to avoid and minimize wetland impacts as much as possible
during the site design. Because Reach 1 is considered to be a low functioning stream with no aquatic
fauna habitat and poor water quality, we believe no mitigation should be required for impacts to this
section of the channel. Furthermore, funneling water from the culvert under Ramsey Street into a
stormwater treatment system will improve the overall water quality of McPherson Creek. Reach 2
scored a high quality rating and does contain stream geomorphology and aquatic fauna habitat. To
mitigate for stream impacts to Reach 2 (158 LF) and for the small amount of wetland impacts (0.01
ac), we propose purchasing stream credits from the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services at a
2:1 mitigation to impact ratio (316 LF of stream credit).
5

'Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: ArcGIS World Street Map
Ramsey Street
Cumberland County, NC
LMG
www.lmgropp.net
January 2016 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 40-15-300 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
A USG3,-Intermap,
j China (Hong Kon
StreetMap contri4i
SCALE 1" = 1 mile
Figure 1
Vicinity Map

0
oundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: USGS Cumberland County Mosaic
SCALE 1" = 1000'
Ramsey Street 4LMG
Cumberland County, NC -.LAN��h F , �, 'k„
Figure 2
www.lmgroo.net USGS Topographic Map
May 2016 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 40-15-300 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

BaB
Illl��i'
GdB
.44
Legend
BaB: Blaney loamy sand, 2-8% slopes s, sr. Digit Glob"tGEye -Earthstar Geographics, CNES/
BaD: Blaney loamy sand, 8-15% slopes s, s us EX G trapping, Aerogrid, i G 'i opo, a d
GdB: Gilead loamy sand, 2-8% slopes t sous cam` nity ,
JT: Johnston loam
VaD: Vauduse loamy sand, 8-15% slopes
Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NRCS Soil Survey SCALE 1" — 300'
Ramsey Street LMG
Cumberland County, NC Figure 3
wwwamg-roup...rlet Soils Map
May 2016 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 40-15-300 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

I
40talGlit,
aqS, AEX, GE
4k
k
'Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 2014 GIS World Imagery Aerial Photography SCALE 1 300'
Ramsey Street LMG
Cumberland County, NC z Figure 4
www1rigroup.net Aerial Photograph
May 2016 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 40-15-300 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: 910.452,0001 Fax: [phone]

<
Q
Q
C)
Z
Q
Q
U
V
O
ri
U
Q
O
o
LL
JLL
J
J
LL
�f
N
N
CO
w
Lr)
CNN
J
Z
0
LU
(D
J
z
Q
O
W
:5W
w
U_
U)Q3w
0
~
W
CO
Q
U
Q
Q
W
W
O
z
W
U
jJ
a-
Q
::D
W
<?
O
z
Q
—
�
2
J
�
O
J
U
Q
O
<
Q
Q
C)
Z
Q
Q
U
V
O
ri
U
Q
O
o
U
Q
LL
�f
N
N
CO
w
J
Z
0
LU
(D
J
z
O
O
CO
:5W
w
U_
U)Q3w
0
w w
W
CO
Q
U
Q
O
�
O
U) 0
Z
W Q W Q Q
W J
Z F L~
LI
U)
H CD � n
w Z ~ z H
rW O a a
V W W
w a_
III
I
sim 4V CROFT R09D
jONG ® d.
�
\D 0 a 0•
Q � •
•
HI cn •••
~• ® RETAIL
Z
Q
O ' I .11 tNil u�4,0505E
' FF -
O F Q FF 148'x
F-
U C? 1,250 SF
CO
p -� K 1� W 1.250 SF_
2,800 SF
W J
W }j Z ' I PATIO
LU�
w
LU
JIt / I
i
\ � I
W+I
Q a p N
PEATA'OSS DRIVE
i`

user manual version A. a
NCDWR #
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and carcle the location of the stream reach under evaluation If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any supplementary
measurements were performed See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT / SITE INFORMATION:
1 Project name (if any) Harris Teeter Anchor Store 2 Date of evaluation 9 March 2016
3 Applicantlowner name George Rose/Jenkins Williamson 4 Assessor name/organization Tyler Crumbley/Emily Greer-COE
5 County Cumberland 6 Nearest named water body
7 River Basin Cape Fear on USGS 7 5 -minute quad Wooded Lake
8 Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach) 35 147239N, -78 873267W
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9 Site number (show on attached map) Reach 1 10 Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet) -250
11 Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet) -8 r- Unable to assess channel depth
12 Channel width at top of bank (feet) -15 13 Is assessment reach a swamp stream? ( Yes ( No
14 Feature type (' Perennial flow (a Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15 NC SAM Zone C Mountains (M) (' Piedmont (P) (: Inner Coastal Plain (1) C Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16 Estimated geomorphic
valley shape (skip for C a—�`-��— b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17 Watershed size (skip (e Size 1 (< 0 1 mi`) C Size 2 (0 1 to < 0 5 mi`) f Size 3 (0 5 to < 5 mi) C Size 4 (> 5 mi)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18 Were regulatory considerations evaluated? C Yes (- No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area
F- Section 10 water r Classified Trout Waters (- Water Supply Watershed ( (' I (` II f III (' IV r V)
F- Essential Fish Habitat r- Primary Nursery Area ]- High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
F- Publicly owned property F7, NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect r Nutrient Sensitive Waters
f- Anadromous fish r 303(d) List (` CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
F- Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area
List species
I- Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19 Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? C' Yes ("' No
1. Channel Water- assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Co- A Water throughout assessment reach
C B No flow, water in pools only
( C No water in assessment reach
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
( A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates)
( B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
(a A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples straightening, modification above or below culvert)
(- B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
(: A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances)
f B Not A
S. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, np-rap)
( A < 10% of channel unstable
(` B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
(: C > 25% of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction - streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
( A ( A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
r~ B ( B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])

C C C: C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplainlntertidal zone access
[examples causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors - assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
[� A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
r B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
(- C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
(- E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach Cite source in the "Notes/Sketch"
section
(" F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
r G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
(- H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc )
r I Other (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
r J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather -watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D7 drought or higher is considered a drought, for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought
C A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
(' B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C. C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream - assessment reach metric
t" Yes C• No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition)
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types - assessment reach metric
10a C: Yes (- No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, np-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
[- A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses v E j-" F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) F (" G Submerged aquatic vegetation
(- B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o in f H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation r r I Sand bottom
(v C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) r m r J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
f7 D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots U [- K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
r E Little or no habitat
REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS -
11. Bedform and Substrate -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
l la f Yes {: No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b Bedform evaluated Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
(✓ B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11 d)
r C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach - whether or not submerged
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) Not Present (NP) _
absent, Rare (R) =present but s 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70% Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
t- Boulder (256 - 4096 mm)
f C' li f C Cobble (64 - 256 mm)
f-' t- Gravel (2 - 64 mm)
C'-- C' Sand ( 062 - 2 mm)
C i" C: !' f Silticlay (< 0 062 mm)
Detntus
Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc )
11d !: Yes C No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a (-Yes C No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13 C` No Water C` Other
12b irYes C: No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check
all that apply If No, skip to Metric 13
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and 'taxa' for size 3 and 4 streams
F j- Adult frogs

F r Aquatic reptiles
(- (- Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
F- r Beetles (including water pennies)
r (- Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
Asian clam (Corbicula)
r j- Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shnmp)
F- [- Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
(- f- Dipterans (true flies)
F- r Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E))
F- (- Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
F- (- Midges/mosquito larvae
r F- Mosquito fish (Gambusra) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
r r Mussels/Clams (not Corbrcula )
(- Other fish
(- (' Salamanders/tadpoles
r r Snails
f f- Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
(- r Tipulid larvae
F- F- Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff
LB RB
r A Co- A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C' B f B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
( C C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include ditches, fill,
sod, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage - streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
t A { A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water Z 6 inches deep
( B t" B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
l: C Co C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach
LB RB
Y (' Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
C N (: N
16. Baseflow, Contributors - assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
F- A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
F- B Ponds (include wet detention basins, do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
(- C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam)
F D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
(r E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
[- F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors - assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
F- A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
(r B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex watertight dam, sediment deposit)
[7, C Urban stream (�! 24% impervious surface for watershed)
j' D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
i E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
(-` F None of the above
18. Shading - assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect Consider "leaf -on" condition
(i A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
(- B Degraded (example scattered trees)
t C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and
"wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated
Wooded
LB RB
LB RB
(: A C` A
(: A (' A
s 100 -feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
(' B ( B
(` B (' B
From 50 to < 100 -feet wide
C C ( C
{" C C C
From 30 to < 50 -feet wide
(` D C• D
(' D (a D
From 10 to < 30 -feet wide
E (' E
( E C E
< 10 -feet wide or no trees

20. Buffer Structure - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider
for left
bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB
RB
C: A
r A
Mature forest
(` B
( B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
(- C
(: C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
(` D
E^ D
Maintained shrubs
( E
C` E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet)
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: (�
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
C' A ( A C A (- A C A t- A Row crops
(' B ( B ( B C B (' B ( B Maintained turf
( C (' C ( C (' C (` C ( C Pasture (no livestock)/commeroal horticulture
( D C D f D r D ( D (' D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
(: A (' A Medium to high stem density
(-- B (: B Low stem density
(" C C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel) Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 -feet wide
LB RB
Q- A (i A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent
(` B ( B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent
(' C (' C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent
24. Vegetative Composition - First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat
LB RB
(' A ( A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions Lower strata composed of native
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse
(: B (i B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees
C C ( C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation
25. Conductivity - assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a (- Yes C• No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons (` No Water (' Other
25b Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter)
(` A <46 ( B 46 to < 67 (` C 67 to < 79 r D 79 to <230 (' E Z 230
Notes/Sketch
This reach is highly incised and the geomorphology is reversed (pools located where nffles should be) Channel bottom is cut down to groudwater Sedim

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Harris Teeter Anchor Store Date of Evaluation 9 March 2016
Stream Category Ibl Assessor Name/Organization er Crumbley/Emily Greer -C
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
Function Class Rating Sum
USACE/
All Streams
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA .
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
NA
Overall
LOW
NCDWR
Intermittent
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
YES
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW

FUKM
user ivianuai verswn c. i
I USACE AID # SAW -2015-02143 NGDWK # I
INSTRUCTIONS. Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs Attach a copy of the USGS 7 5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any supplementary
measurements were performed Seethe NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that maybe relevant
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/ SITE INFORMATION:
1 Project name (if any) Harris Teeter Anchor Store 2 Date of evaluation 9 March 2016
3 Applicant/owner name George Rose/Jenkins Williamson 4 Assessor name/organization Tyler Crumbley/Emily Greer-COE
5 County Cumberland 6 Nearest named water body
7 River Basin Cape Fear on USGS 7 5 -minute quad Wooded Lake
8 Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach) 35 147239N, -78 873267W
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9 Site number (show on attached map) Reach 2 10 Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet) -250
11 Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet) -2 F- Unable to assess channel depth
12 Channel width at top of bank (feet) -4 13 Is assessment reach a swamp streams C Yes f: No
14 Feature type (- Perennial flow it Intermittent flow C Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15 NC SAM Zone (` Mountains (M) ( Piedmont (P) t: Inner Coastal Plain (1) ( Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16 Estimated geomorphic /
valley shape (skip for t- a ���- c: b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17 Watershed size (skip r Size 1 (< 0 1 mi`) t- Size 2 (0 1 to < 0 5 mf) t" Size 3 (0 5 to < 5 mi`) r Size 4 (2 5 mi)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18 Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ( Yes r No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area
r Section 10 water r Classified Trout Waters r Water Supply Watershed ( (' I r 11 f III r IV r V)
(- Essential Fish Habitat (- Primary Nursery Area r High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
F— Publicly owned property r NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect r" Nutrient Sensitive Waters
(- Anadromous fish r 303(d) List r" CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
f Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area
List species
r Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19 Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? c Yes ( No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
(: A Water throughout assessment reach
f B No flow, water in pools only
C C No water in assessment reach
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
(' A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates)
t: B Not A
3 Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
(' A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples straightening, modification above or below culvert)
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
( A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances)
C: B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap)
( A < 10% of channel unstable
(' B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
(: C > 25% of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction - streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
(: A C• A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
C B (- B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])

( C 1- C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplainAntertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors - assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
F A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
[ B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
(" C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
r D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
(' E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach Cite source in the "Notes/Sketch"
section
(- F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
r G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
[ H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
(- I Other (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
F7 J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather -watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought, for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought
( A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
(` B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
ti C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream - assessment reach metric
(- Yes C• No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition)
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types -assessment reach metric
10a C• Yes C No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
(- A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses --1Oo E [- F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) [- G Submerged aquatic vegetation
(r B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o f H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation r r I Sand bottom
(J C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) t m (- J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
[ - D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots U (- K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
j— E Little or no habitat
REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS""
11. Bedform and Substrate -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
l la (' Yes (a No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
l l b Bedform evaluated Check the appropriate box(es).
(r A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
fV B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11 d)
[- C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
l lc In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach - whether or not submerged
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) Not Present (NP) _
absent, Rare (R) =present but <- 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70% Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 - 4096 mm)
C ( f ( f Cobble {64 - 256 mm)
Gravel (2 - 64 mm)
Sand ( 062 - 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0 062 mm)
c Detritus
(: (` ( {' ( Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc )
l ld (-Yes (e No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a T Yes (' No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13 (' No Water (-- Other
12b (e Yes (- No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check
all that apply If No, skip to Metric 13
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to 'individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and 'taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams
I-- I- Adult frogs

F- F- Aquatic reptiles
[- r Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
r- (- Beetles (including water pennies)
F- F- Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
r r- Asian clam (Corbicula )
F f- Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
(- [- Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
[- F- Dipterans (true flies)
r- r- Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
F- F- Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
F- r- Midges/mosquito larvae
F- r Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
r r- Mussels/Clams (not Corbicu/a )
F- F- Other fish
F- F- Salamanders/tadpoles
r F- Snails
(- j- Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
r F- Tipulid larvae
F- j- Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff
LB RB
(: A (: A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C' B r B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
f C C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include ditches, fill,
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage - streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
C A f A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water z 6 inches deep
(: B G B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
i' C F' C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach
LB RB
r' Y r' Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
(:N (:N
16. Baseflow Contributors - assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
F- A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
r B Ponds (include wet detention basins, do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
(- C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
r E Stream bed or bank sod reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F- F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors -assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
F- A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
[r B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex watertight dam, sediment deposit)
(J C Urban stream (2 24% impervious surface for watershed)
F- D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
(- E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
( F None of the above
18. Shading - assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect Consider 'leaf -on' condition
(: A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
f B Degraded (example scattered trees)
f C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
(: A (: A re A r., A Z 100 -feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
( B r' B r B r' B From 50 to < 100 -feet wide
C C r,, C C' C r', C From 30 to < 50 -feet wide
(' D C D r`. D r, D From 10 to < 30 -feet wide
r E r E (' E ( E < 10 -feet wide or no trees

20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider
for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB
RB
C: A
(o A
Mature forest
r B
C' B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
r C
(` C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet vnde
C D
( D
Maintained shrubs
( E
C' E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet)
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: it
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
( A (` A f A ( A ( A C' A Row crops
C B C' B ( B (' B (' B (' B Maintained turf
(' C (' C C' C ( C C' C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
C' D ( D ( D C' D C' D ( D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
R A (e A Medium to high stem density
C' B C' B Low stem density
C C C' C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel) Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 -feet vnde
LB RB
C: A (e A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent
C' B C B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent
( C C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent
24. Vegetative Composition — First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat
LB RB
( A ( A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions Lower strata composed of native
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse
(: B (a B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees
C' C (` C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a (' Yes C: No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons r No Water (— Other
25b Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter)
C` A <46 C" B 46 to < 67 C', C 67 to < 79 (' D 79 to < 230 (— E 2 230
Notes/Sketch
This reach encompasses the bottom of the 4th bend to the confluence with the mainstem This reach is significantly less incised compared to the upstrea

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Hams Teeter Anchor Store
Stream Category Ibl
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Date of Evaluation 9 March 2016
Assessor Name/Organization er Crumbley/Emily Greer -C
VFR
Nrl
�Mr_ ... 1.r_ .m
NCDWR
Intermittent
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NA
MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NO
NA
NA
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH
USACE/
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
(1) Hydrology
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
HIGH
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
NA
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology
HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
HIGH
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
NA
Overall
HIGH
VFR
Nrl
�Mr_ ... 1.r_ .m
NCDWR
Intermittent
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NA
MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NO
NA
NA
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH