20160566 Ver 1_Major Variance_20160519

PLEASE IDENTIFY WHICH RIPARIAN AREA PROTECTION RULE APPLIES:
Neuse River Basin (15A NCAC 02B.0233)
Major Variance ❑ Minor Variance
❑ Catawba River Basin (15A NCAC 02B.0243)
❑ Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed (15A NCAC 02B.0250)
❑ Major Variance ❑ Minor Variance 9 2016
❑ Tar -Pamlico River Basin (15A NCAC 02B.0259)
DEQ -WATER RESOURCES
❑ Major Variance ❑ Minor Variance 401 & BUFFER PERMITTING
❑ Jordan Lake Water Supply Nutrient Strategy (15A NCAC 028.0267)
❑ Major Variance ❑ Minor Variance
❑ Goose Creek Watershed (15A NCAC 02B.0606 & 15A NCAC 02B.0607)
A. General Information
1. Applicant's Information(if other than the current property owner):
Name: Patterson Custom Builders LLC.
Title: Tony Patterson
Street Address: 817 New Bern Avenue, Suite 1
City, State & Zip: Raleigh, NC 27601
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
2. Property Owner/Signing Official (person legally responsible for the property and its compliance):
Name: Capital City Property Solutions, Inc
Title: Kristi Thayer, President
Street Address: 3200 Glen Royal Rd, Suite 104
City, State & Zip: Raleigh, NC 27617
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
FORM: VAR 10-2013

3. Agent Information:
3a. Name:
Company Affiliation
Street Address:
City, State & Zip:
Telephone:
E-mail:
Terry Thaver
Vice President
7823 Cape Charles Dr
Raleigh, NC 27617
919-697-9579
[e-mail]
3b. Attach a signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner.
4. Project Name (Subdivision, facility, or establishment name):
611 N. Elizabeth New Construction SFD
5. Project Location:
5a. Street Address: 611 N Elizabeth
City, State & Zip: Durham NC 27701
5b. County: Durham
5c. Site Coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.998153 N Latitude 78.890806 W Longitude
5d. Attach an 8 % x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the site.
5e. Attach an 8 % x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey Map depicting the
project site.
6. Property Information:
6a. Property identification number (parcel ID): 110654
6b. Date property was purchased: November 20, 2015.
6c. Deed book 7828 and page number 224
6d. Map book 1 and page number 155
6e. Attach a copy of the recorded map that indicates when the lot was last platted.
7. Is your project in one of the 20 Coastal Counties covered under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)?
❑ YES X NO
7a. If you answered yes above, in which AEC do you fall (30 ft or 75 ft)? n/a
7b. If you answered yes above, what is the total percent of impervious cover that you have proposed within the AEC? n a
FORM: VAR 10-2013 Page 2 of 8

8. Directions to site from nearest major intersection:
From Highway 147 Exit 12A, take Fayetteville street north until it turns into N Elizabeth Street continue north and property will
be on the left near the intersection of Canal Street and N Elizabeth Street
9. Stream associated with riparian buffer to be impacted by the proposed activity:
Name Water Quality Classification
Ws-IV;nsw
Unnamed Tributary to Ellerbe Creek
9a. For Goose Creek only: Is the buffer in the 100 -year floodplain? ❑ YES ❑ NO
10. List any permits/approvals that have been requested or obtained for this project in the past (including all prior phases).
Date Applied: Date Received: Permit Type:
1/27/2016 2/18/16 Single family dwelling new construction permit
B. Proposed Activity
1. Project Description
1a. Provide a detailed description of the proposed activity including its purpose:
Intention to build a single family dwelling for private one family residential use Obtained building permits that were
approved and issued by the City of Durham however during the course of construction it was brought to our and their
attention that the creek next to the property was an intermittent stream and that there were buffers that had to be
implied and we were in violation of the area required. This was brought to our attention after numerous site visits by
Durham storm water division to the site without response to the creek as well I don't believe anyone working ion this
project knew this was an identifiable stream and applicant was not informed by the City of Durham of this being an
identifiable stream or creek when the survey of the parcel was submitted to the City of Durham as a part of the building
permit application process.
1b. Attach a site plan showing the following items as applicable to the project:
0 Development/Project name
0 Revision number & date
0 North arrow
0 Scale (1" = 50' is preferred)
0 Property/project boundary with dimensions
0 Adjacent streets and roads labeled with names and/or NC State Road numbers
0 Original contours and proposed contours
0 Perennial and intermittent streams, ponds, lakes, rivers and estuaries
0 Mean high water line (if applicable)
0 Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
0 Location of forest vegetation along the streams, ponds, lakes, rivers and estuaries
0 Extent of riparian buffers on the land including Zone 1 and Zone where applicable
0 Location and dimension of the proposed buffer impact (label the area of buffer impact in ft' on the plan)
0 Details of roads, parking areas, cul-de-sacs, sidewalks, and curb and gutter systems
0 Footprint of any proposed buildings or other structures
FORM: VAR 10-2013 Page 3 of 8

0 Discharge points of gutters on existing structures and proposed buildings
0 Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, and pipe dimensions
0 Drainage areas delineated
C. Proposed Impacts and Mitigation
1. Individually list the square footage of each proposed impact to the protected riparian buffers:
Buffer Impact
Number'— Reason for Impact
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
Buffer Zone 1 Impact Zone 2 Impact
Mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Required
B1 - ® P ❑ T Building construction
X Yes ❑ No 230 660
B2 - P ❑ T Rain Garden
X Yes ❑ No
B3 - ❑P ❑T
❑ Yes ❑No
Total Buffer Impacts 2
'Label on site plan
2. Identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation from the table above. Calculate
the amount of mitigation required.
'For projects in the Goose Creek Watershed, list all riparian buffer impacts as Zone 1
and use Zone 1 multiplier.
Provide a description of how mitigation will be achieved at your site pursuant to the mitigation requirements of the applicable
river basin/watershed.
Applicant shall submit a landscape and reveRetation plan that uses a mix of species regardless of whether less than 20 trees are
determined to be necessary on the subject parcel. Applicant shall use as a guideline that Unified Development Ordinance for the
City of Durham as its foundation and include any and all required elements per Title 15A NCAC 02B et seg.,remedial measures
to maintain diffuse flow of runoff by dispersing concentrated flow. Applicant's plan is set forth in the attached Mitigation Plan.
which includes a Planting Plan.
3a. Is buffer restoration or enhancement proposed? X Yes ❑ No
If yes, attach a detailed planting plan to include plant type, date of plantings, the date of the one-time fertilization in the
protected riparian buffers, and a plan sheet showing the proposed location of the plantings. (SEE ATTACHED PLANTING
PLAN)
3b. Is payment into a buffer restoration fund proposed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, attach an acceptance letter from the mitigation bank you propose to use or the NC Ecosystem Enhancement
Program stating they have the mitigation credits available for the mitigation requested.
FORM: VAR 10-2013 Page 4 of 8
Required
Zone
Total Impact
Multiplier
Mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 11
230
3
690
(2 for Catawba only)
Zone 2
660
1.5
990
Total Buffer Mitigation Required:
1680
'For projects in the Goose Creek Watershed, list all riparian buffer impacts as Zone 1
and use Zone 1 multiplier.
Provide a description of how mitigation will be achieved at your site pursuant to the mitigation requirements of the applicable
river basin/watershed.
Applicant shall submit a landscape and reveRetation plan that uses a mix of species regardless of whether less than 20 trees are
determined to be necessary on the subject parcel. Applicant shall use as a guideline that Unified Development Ordinance for the
City of Durham as its foundation and include any and all required elements per Title 15A NCAC 02B et seg.,remedial measures
to maintain diffuse flow of runoff by dispersing concentrated flow. Applicant's plan is set forth in the attached Mitigation Plan.
which includes a Planting Plan.
3a. Is buffer restoration or enhancement proposed? X Yes ❑ No
If yes, attach a detailed planting plan to include plant type, date of plantings, the date of the one-time fertilization in the
protected riparian buffers, and a plan sheet showing the proposed location of the plantings. (SEE ATTACHED PLANTING
PLAN)
3b. Is payment into a buffer restoration fund proposed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, attach an acceptance letter from the mitigation bank you propose to use or the NC Ecosystem Enhancement
Program stating they have the mitigation credits available for the mitigation requested.
FORM: VAR 10-2013 Page 4 of 8

D. Stormwater
1. Provide a description of how diffuse flow will be maintained through the protected riparian buffers (e.g., re -planting vegetation
or enhancement of existing vegetation, gutter splash pads, level spreader to control of runoff from impervious surfaces, etc.).
Surface runoff will be directed thru protective piping and will lead into rain garden A relief swale will be constructed to
allow water back into stream from SMP/rain garden
1a. Show the location of diffuse flow measure(s) on your site plan.
1b. Attach a completed Level Spreader Supplement Form or BMP Supplement Form with all required items for each proposed
measure.
1c. Attach an Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Form for each proposed level spreader or BMP.
2. For Major, Catawba, and Goose Creek variance requests, provide a description of all best management practices (BMPs) that
will be used to minimize disturbance and control the discharge of nutrients and sediments from stormwater.
We will be constructing a 200 sq.ft. SMP/rain garden All surface runoff from structure will be directed thru rain garden
2a. Show the location of BMPs on your site plan.
2b. Attach a Supplement Form for each structural BMP proposed.
2c. Attach an Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Form for each structural BMP proposed.
E. Demonstration of Need for a Variance
The variance provision of the riparian bufferrules allows the Division or the Environmental Management Commission to grant a
variance when there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships that prevent compliance with the strict letter of riparian
buffer protection.
1. Explain how complying with the provisions of the applicable rule would prevent you from securing a reasonable return from
or make reasonable use of your property. Merely proving that the variance would permit a greater profit from the property
shall not be considered adequate justification for a variance. The Division will consider whether the variance is the minimum
possible deviation from the terms of the applicable Buffer Rule that shall make reasonable use of the property possible.
The subject parcel had a pre-existing residential home located thereon, and the neighborhood is a densely populated district
within the city limits of Durham, and within 1.5 miles of the central business district of the City of Durham. There are
residential homes located on all lots surrounding the subject parcel. The pre-existing home on the subject lot is located
within Zone 2 of the Neuse Riparian Buffer and its construction appears to have pre -dated the creation of the Neuse Buffer.
The issue in this request is not about whether the applicant will be able to secure the greatest financial return on its financial
investment, but instead is whether the applicant will be able to secure any return on its investment without approval of a
FORM: VAR 10-2013 Page 5 of 8

Major Variance. Applicant is a small, family run business and has operated within neighboring areas of 611 N. Elizabeth St.
within the city limits of Durham on more than 20 prior projects (get exact # building permits issued to CCPS). On each
project, applicant orders a lot survey with house location located thereon, and surrounding streams, creeks, lakes or other
waterways, which is sent to the City of Durham as a part of their building permit application. This is more than the City of
Durham requires, and in this case, the survey and plot plan provided to the city with the building permit application showed
the creek/stream location. The survey and plot plan were reviewed by the City of Durham along with the application, and a
building permit was issued without warning or notice of the Neuse Riparian Buffer zones located on the lot. Applicant was
not aware that the lot contained such a buffer and was never informed by any third party or city employee prior to receipt of
a letter and Notice of Violation dated April 14, 2016 from the State of North Carolina Water Resources and Environmental
Quality Department. W.C. Blalock, Chief Building Inspector,
Durham City -County Inspections Department, informed counsel for the applicant that "newer employees had reviewed this
permit application, and they paid more attention to the structure than to the creek located on the survey, and they missed
it." In addition, Mr. Blalock also stated that he had received more information from the lot owner than he normally receives
in the building permit application process, and that normally the City would not be provided enough information to be able
to determine whether there was an existing stream, creek waterway or a state mandated buffer zone; however, in this case,
the survey and plot plan provided to the City of Durham did, in fact, clearly show the path of the stream along the rear
property boundary of the subject parcel. Which put the city on notice of the stream prior to issuing a building permit. Mr.
Blalock's comment indicates that his staff should have determined the existence of the Neuse Riparian Buffer and that the
proposed structure would be violative of both Zones 1 and 2 thereof. Thus, the commencement of construction, to the point
of framing the structure in its entirety and installing a roof on the two story home had been completed prior to issuance of a
stop work order on this project. Oddly, photos attached to the letter were date stamped April 6, 2016, and the photos show
only the 1St story framed at the time, and would the lot owner have been provided with notice of an anticipated violation on
or before the time when the photograph was taken, there would have been significantly less expense involved in moving the
structure to a location within the footprint of the previous structure. At this time, the estimate of the cost to move the home
to another location on the lot is approximately $20,000.00, although the home would still be located within Zone 2, and
would require relief from the State of North Carolina in the form of a variance, to proceed with construction. As a result, the
applicant, which secured a mortgage loan to acquire the parcel and for construction of the residence to be located thereon,
and the lender, who has invested capital in this project and anticipated investing additional funds into future projects located
in the City of Durham, will lose money on this project and potentially impact the continued viability of the applicants ability
to continue in its current business — money that we believe would not have been lost had the City of Durham reviewed the
survey and plot plan submitted in the permit application process. It is the desire of the applicant to continue with this
project, with the understanding that it will undertake remediation measures to disperse flow of runoff and also to re -
vegetate the lot in a manner that complies with both 15A NCAC 02B, et seq., and the City of Durham Unified Ordinance.
Absent a major variance being issued, the subject parcel will not be a buildable parcel. With the area where the subject
parcel is located already being a densely populated city neighborhood, the best use of the parcel is for a single family
residential home, which is what the lot has always been used for, prior to the acquisition of the lot in November 2015 by the
applicant. Furthermore, the quality of construction that has been approved by the City of Durham for this lot is above that
which previously existed on the lot, and will benefit the neighborhood and the city in a significant manner, if a major variance
is approved and the project is completed, as planned, with remedial measures added to the project scope that will re -
vegetate the land in the affected zones and disperse concentrated flow of runoff to the stream.
2. Explain how the hardship results from application of the Buffer Rule to the property rather from other factors such as deed
restrictions or other hardships (e.g. zoning setbacks, floodplains, etc).
The parcel has always been used for residential purposes with a pre-existing home being located thereon when the current
owner purchased the lot in November 2015. Residential use in a city neighborhood that is densely populated with residential
homes on all sides of the lot make such continued use the best possible use for the lot Not only is there an extreme financial
hardship that would be created should a major variance not be granted but there is not other location on the lot where a
residential home could be constructed without issuance of a variance. There are also no other detriments to building on the
subject parcel but for the existence of the Neuse Riparian Buffer.
3. Explain how the hardship results from physical nature of the property, such as its size, shape, or topography, which is different
from that of neighboring property. (***Tony / Terry to add)
The stream running through the back corner and adjacent property limits our building envelope To the point where we
can't provide a desired dwelling footprint. The required city setbacks in conjunction with the state required buffers were not
compliant on the previous dwelling either. We attempted to turn in any and all pertinent data/information to the city for plan
FORM: VAR 10-2013 Page 6 of 8

review, including.a watershed map that didn't alert anybody at that time on the placement of the home on this lot In
conclusion, we could have done a better compliant placement of the dwelling had the city provided any knowledge of a possible
intermitted stream and buffer requirements. We would have been able to rectify the situation at that time by providing a more
compliant placement of the structure
4. Explain whether the hardship was caused by the applicant knowingly or unknowingly violating the applicable Buffer Rule.
Unknowingly. An initial survey and plot plan was prepared prior to requesting a buildjMg permit from the City of Durham
which showed the location of a creek running through a rear property boundary and corner of the subject parcel Applicant
was unaware of the existence of the Neuse Buffer being applicable to the creek referenced on the survey / plot plat and
after submission to the City of Durham the building permit was issued also without reference to the Neuse Buffer Zones and
the location of the proposed structure. The approved building permit was provided to the applicant after full disclosure of
the creek location, parcel identification information and survey/ plot plan but the City of Durham also failed to identify the
Neuse Buffer in their review. Applicant would have requested a variance or changed the location of the structure had it
known of the Buffer location in advance of being issued a building permit or after the request for a building permit was
made by applicant. However Applicant proceeded with construction upon being granted its building permit still without any
knowledge of the Neuse Buffer zones located on the subject property
5. For Neuse, Tar -Pamlico, Jordan Lake and Goose Creek only: Did the applicant purchase the property after the effective date of
the applicable Buffer Rule and then request a variance?
Yes. However, and as specifically stated above in Paragraph 4 an initial survey and plot plan was prepared prior to requesting
a building permit from the City of Durham which showed the location of a creek running through a rear property boundary
and corner of the subject parcel. Applicant was unaware of the existence of the Neuse Buffer being applicable to the creek
referenced on the survey / plot plat and after submission to the City of Durham the building permit was issued also without
reference to the Neuse Buffer Zones and the location of the proposed structure The approved building permit was provided
to the applicant after full disclosure of the creek location parcel identification information and survey / plot plan but the
City of Durham also failed to identify the Neuse Buffer in their review. Applicant would have requested a variance or changed
the location of the structure had it known of the Buffer location in advance of being issued.a.building pgrmit,or after the
request for a building permit was made by applicant However, Applicant proceeded with construction upon being granted its
building permit, still without any knowledge of the Neuse Buffer zones located on the subject property.
Explain how the hardship is rare or unique to the applicant's property, rather than the result of conditions that are widespread.
There was a prior residential structure located at 611 N Elizabeth Street at the time when applicant purchased the parcel in
November 2015. Applicant has exhausted significant financial resources in the beautification of the neighborhood where the
subject parcel is located in Durham by purchasing old homes and either re -building or tearing down and building a new
structure on site, all single family residences This has resulted in entire neighborhoods being rejuvenated by applicant in the
subject area. In this case since a home was located on site that applicant has later learned was also situated within the
Neuse Buffer, and since applicant was not informed by the City of Durham of the existence of the Buffer at the time of
requesting their building permit with an attached plot plan and survey, the issue raised in this request for a Major Variance is
unique to this parcel, and applicant does not believe that a building permit should have been issued since sufficient
identifying information and surveys were provided to the City in advance of issuance of the building permit Applicant has
previously been denied building permits on other parcels where the City of Durham finds such Buffer zones or other matters
that might prevent a structure to be located on the parcel and such did not occur for this parcel and would have prevented
the violation from occurring.
F. Deed Restrictions
FORM: VAR 10-2013 Page 7 of 8

By your signature in Section G of this application, you certify that all structural stormwater BMPs required by this variance shall
be located in recorded drainage easements, that the easements will run with the land, that the easements cannot be changed
or deleted without concurrence from the State, and that the easements will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
G. Applicant's Certification
I, Kristi Thayer, President Capital City Property Solutions Inc (print or type name of person listed in Section A, Item 2), certify
that the information included on this permit application form is correct, that the project will be constructed in conformance
with the approved plans and th the deed restrictions in accordance with Section F of this form will be recorded with all
required permit conditio s.
Signature:
Date: )
FORM: VAR 10-2013 Page 8 of 8

\
rc-
S975519
'
W
\
\ nm
i�O
SETBAC
i
N ( DNO If
i
ra��o�no
mx
r
z
m
�m
�l
h��
rn O /°�
0 4i
0n
rn
m
m
z
o a
OG
ZD
:a
z��maor
po_m o�~moo�z�o
Z=
D
�7
r
Z
A
tnm
H� m
eco
i
>
D
m
m
r �T7
rt
00
`
m
zAcoo��mo
6j- 6"
p
II Z�
�a
;rya o r ��..y•;
m
ti
0
n
c
H3 Cil W I^'^�.
z
Ss•09'17' ,w
co
A
Com:
�.�
TIE TO EIP1-1•
\
rc-
S975519
'
W
\
\ nm
i�O
SETBAC
i
N ( DNO If
C-)
p -i "-I V1
mx
r
z
m
_
—' ---
�l
h��
rn O /°�
_
---__ �-� -----
v
0n
rn
m
m
z
o a
OG
ZD
:a
z��maor
po_m o�~moo�z�o
Z=
D
�7
r
Z
A
tnm
11
O
O
N
>
D
m
m
r �T7
rt
00
`
m
zAcoo��mo
6j- 6"
p
II Z�
�a
;rya o r ��..y•;
PB IB PC 151=�-* A a o
0
0
c
o
o
z
W U1:D -
W O • t ;
co
A
Com:
I n
Ir�rr
W
rj
, PqY ......1...
rnn�
a
m z.E
cZi�� Q3
MONUMENT
a m S6'�15 QORWE
mato"z
5583'_
o
\
rc-
S975519
'
W
\
\ nm
i�O
SETBAC
i
N ( DNO If
C)
Gurley St Z
-I
m VLJI
-lizabeth St Z
O
0
� D O
n
Hazel St Ir
rn
0 O
53.70'
Ss'09'i rw
TIE TO EIP
20' \ -
,().0(;
N
o
m
N
L1 \
N. ELIZABETH ST. \
PER PB 1B PG 155
M
C-)
p -i "-I V1
mx
m
_
—' ---
W A
h��
rn O /°�
_
---__ �-� -----
v
m
A O f *1 P�
z
o a
OG
ZD
:a
z��maor
po_m o�~moo�z�o
Z=
mZ
z
A
tnm
11
N
a
m
r �T7
rt
00
`
o;
zAcoo��mo
6j- 6"
p
II Z�
�a
zo�am��s�o
O
PB IB PC 151=�-* A a o
0
0
c
o
o
z
�� r
co
A
Com:
I n
Ir�rr
W
rj
C)
Gurley St Z
-I
m VLJI
-lizabeth St Z
O
0
� D O
n
Hazel St Ir
rn
0 O
53.70'
Ss'09'i rw
TIE TO EIP
20' \ -
,().0(;
N
o
m
N
L1 \
N. ELIZABETH ST. \
PER PB 1B PG 155
M
C-)
p -i "-I V1
N
D _
-i {
_
—' ---
W A
h��
rn O /°�
_
---__ �-� -----
v
m
A O f *1 P�
z
o a
��
f A
z��maor
po_m o�~moo�z�o
Z=
0��%m
CD
Woj2
m''ocMvz`�
n
w 01 p (%)m
O
C N"-•00,0
�°io� o
ASONNm�A�IV*ly
m
_
moo Gl —z
N
vU
Ow
r �T7
rt
< so �b o<ti 9
,T,9on�,00zc
mo
D
S
zAcoo��mo
6j- 6"
p
II Z�
mo
m mnKAOPo
zo�am��s�o
O
PB IB PC 151=�-* A a o
0
0

T Q a y p N n 0
OO)
v
(zl���m��1
C)C
�r-
z _-zi 5 p z
I i
tai
... fin+ a
r
z
z
o
o rAa�n
cn m0nm
rC7 G)�v1C vlm�
;9!
m zmmOc
XF), r m �z
~=D�>J mlz�
@fin zz
�mmzO
c
0 z
w m
oAo
—0 n��
mNmyz � O rn
ayz no
O
C1 �7
Z z= m �7 Om z
zamn sz
-ate
N y
m cn'o
a im
i
7JETp
1'Sg
EIP
09'17-W
0
O
z
0 o
m
m
j
1.2o
rn a
lm c
m
1 w
mO
n�m�N h£ TOC
S6.15'ppRW£ �1�'" NT
a N-7:7 55`83
—40 e
� o o
o n
it
v
,-_53.7p°
S9 09'1 r W
TIE Tp C, v
\_J
e
pN o
OO)
v
25 . TgACK OLf)
r
C)C
..LA cn.
mm.�
0)Ln
;o
r
z
N D D
,-_53.7p°
S9 09'1 r W
TIE Tp C, v
\_J
e
pN o
r
O
]7 OE5
c ���-rt
C)C
znaiNo
m
m
m U,
A:
r
z
Q
V1
z�sm!�
s9�>m-+'�
m
rn
o
Co ,
L�
w m
Li
PB t8 PG 155
2$.38
ay
,-_53.7p°
S9 09'1 r W
TIE Tp C, v
\_J
e
pN o
w
]7 OE5
c ���-rt
znaiNo
m
nor..
r
z
m
z�sm!�
s9�>m-+'�
m
o
X
o 2 a O
V
m
PB t8 PG 155
x
�o
-'
D
Loz
z
(P Z m
28.29 O O -1
O D
N „ 20
OO y
1
--
PER P8 18 PG 155 o rD 1N RS`s N
O
z _
N V D
ZOpDAm�-C -
]7 OE5
c ���-rt
znaiNo
i
nor..
U' D
z�sm!�
s9�>m-+'�
O O z
o 2 a O
m 0
C
PB t8 PG 155
4rymGZl ~�G o
g
�o

o � C
cn
T;r
III
cni m d ¢ w nE TO cots
W S6'15'00 � 55h83'kT
5-�--83_
`" NO
No 0
voa�
aco
=o�
0
7"W
AO
a
o
IS9'09.17"
1�`
Z F� $ T
TIE 7 E1P
Qa�01-3
r
w
u
v®ZA
x
to <) o",
O
mu, C,IIImA
�o
�mrnn
nm
mQ
?
inn >x7
O�m�3>'O bpm P
to O
�
��
n
Z �xm AOcn
z �g
C �O'0�
co
O m
rn-
� _
o
m
°-'
o
0
m
O
O
III
cni m d ¢ w nE TO cots
W S6'15'00 � 55h83'kT
5-�--83_
`" NO
No 0
voa�
aco
=o�
0
7"W
AO
a
o
IS9'09.17"
1�`
Z F� $ T
TIE 7 E1P
Qa�01-3
r
w
u
v®ZA
x
N
�P60
0 t
Nim
Ul
0 o A co m K
co
--
A
Z
�
�'ooc s9`gy p^ci
6zzi �c v �N pR
C �O'0�
co
n�ODO �mva0
rn-
� _
o
m
°-'
o
0
m
x v�za ��m9
'
zano� �9
n-gixa—„cmo�
�
III
cni m d ¢ w nE TO cots
W S6'15'00 � 55h83'kT
5-�--83_
`" NO
No 0
voa�
aco
=o�
0
7"W
AO
a
o
N. ELIZAB
Z F� $ T
cn
" :cr7
r
w
Z
m
Pc 155w o
x
N
m
e
16 .n
0 o A co m K
co
--
A
Z
Z
m
�'ooc s9`gy p^ci
6zzi �c v �N pR
C �O'0�
O
n�ODO �mva0
os�^
NV, tOp
yyz-
m
x v�za ��m9
'
zano� �9
n-gixa—„cmo�
�
Z
c,
P8 I PG 155
s
a a A
x " S
0
N. ELIZAB
Z F� $ T
rtF�
46' R
PER P@ 18
25
ROT
Pc 155w o
0 o A co m K
co
2S m!, ,,
1 -FD S
�'ooc s9`gy p^ci
6zzi �c v �N pR
C �O'0�
n�ODO �mva0
os�^
NV, tOp
yyz-
Cis A
x v�za ��m9
zano� �9
n-gixa—„cmo�
P8 I PG 155
a a A
x " S
0

VICINITY MAP
Gray Ave
' O 508
BEARING
THIS PROPERTY IS IN A PREVIOUSLY RECORDED
SUBDIVISION AND IN THE INTERESTOF BEARING
L7
34'
55.83
CONSISTENCY WITH PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PLATS,
Canal St _
[T-� -
HEADWALL
O l.`! VOLUNTARY REFORESTATION
�p REPLANTING AREA TOP OF BANK /
-i4
EXIfiNG BEARIYG CONTROL WAS USED, FOR THE
PURPOSES OF 21HEAD 56.1602 UH SURVEYING
PROCEDURES Of THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND
/ N
SITE LU 506
h RD (10' FROM TOP OF BANK) C/I. STREAM-.�,, / ��
NF RELIEF SWALE FROM SMP/
^ iO v
h'
SURVEYING IN NORTH CARGUNA, EXISTING BEARING
® CONTROL AND TIES TO APPROPRIATE NATURAL
Z
Mallard
RAIN GARDEN TO STREAM—
p
'� ��
MONUMENTS REPLACE THE MANDATEDTIf 70 NORTH
Ave
�
C/L BTRE _ �� � �- - —
p 2
CAROUNAGRID.
.p
W
LEGEND OF
--� � ZONE I .
NOMENCLATURE
� 163 g4, o
IRON PIPE SETS
/
9'S 803'E ! /
SE_TEA
�- EXISTING IRON PIPE ROD
1 _
1� ET ADDRESS 3.0'
_ -^_ ` ZONE 2
u
LOT
BOUNDARY
/o
— ADJOINER OR R/W o ui
U
9162 SF NEW S 1lD
------ SETBACKS z
rr
r B'sE �n0.210 ACRES _ _R_
` u°
I
BUFFER
i G7c' ..... _- �� J
CID
w
rr'Oi
^
�DS �T _ _ �.aon -----
PROPOSED SMP RAIN CARD
AREA- 200 SF HOUSE
p
IIIYYYlll
611
611
m
W
SURFAGE-RUNOFF PROTECTION PIPING VARINCE AREA 16668"
�n
ti as
'..
ROUTED TO SMP/RAIN GARDEN ZONE 1= 230 SF N79'47'21"yy
VARIANCE AREA
W
O
rn
ZONE 2= 660 SF
d
f 1RRFNT INFORMATION.
CAPITAL CITY
NOTES: N'
��
LUC
i- ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND IN US I,
2�METHOD OFCOMPUTAEDN: AREA CALCULATED
U3 6091N I
Be 7828 PG 224
PB 16 PG 155
IS WITH CAD SOFTWARE
METHODS.
3 THIS PROPERTY 15 NOT LOCATED INA SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA.
R" 3
I PARCEL ID: 110654
PIN: 0831 -OS -28-2255
4 -SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OFA TITLE
COMMITMENT. THERE MAYBE EASEMENTS
'�-'O�
�CO
URBAN�DENELOPMEN i)iIER
a
OR ENCUMBRANCESAFFECNNG
THEPROPERTY THAT AAE NOT SHOWN HEREON.
5A THE STREAM WAS FIELD SURVEYED TO PRODUCE THE BUFFERS AND AREA
"'O�
tMmtnoNeu,r uwsarto ^
.........55EEo
ELLEAN CREEK WATERSHED
FALLS LAKE STORMWATER REGULATORY BASIN
CALCULATIONS BUT HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED BYAREGULATORY OFFICIAL
,"""".
CARp4°-.,
rd+ RE Y ❑AT
PSG
w vl
STREAM
STREAM SURVEY
}
LE
S_G _ _.yANCE
PREPARED FOR
_
HAYER CUSTOM HOMES
TY
TERRESTRIAL N FIC
y -p-11111 Ia dyd PFT d d-
SIA w "S t: L-4833 `: Y�7'- Bok 7828 o e 224) tr to P T <y s 1¢0000
o ed
d
OF DURHAM, D RHAM COUNTY, NC
CI DATE: 5/2/2016 SCALE: 1"=30'
Prof essioral Land Sur In / License C -2J03
y
32131JcotlD Drive l Raleigh, tdoRh Carol Ina
1 < = matin . e tame e ens sr St ward ofer,,,,,f
1, ;;(+ 9 : Land s rvey ng -n Norm C-1 oa (21 NCAC 56 1600).'
�.. c
D ,6
. 2791;
•p T-Xth day of XXX 2016.
SU�nA��P;=
p.919219A2781e, intoraTerlestri 11SJrveviITp cc
" HY
BAR GRAPH 1 inch = 30 /f.
P'", Proressbnai Land Suraeyor L-4833
ELIZABETHSTN-611-STREAM.DWG
LINE TABLE
LME
BEARING
LENGTH
L7
56' 15' 00"W
55.83

M' 59 56' N
35° W4TN
3 Soil Ma
� p—Durham County, North Carolina a
p
35" W W N
gC
F
i
i 35° . 49"N
°°ren' omniu oxxxx� 690030 690060 690090 690120 690150 690180 690210 690240 690270
3
3
Nbp Sole: 1:1,600 d printed on A landxape (lin x 8.5') sl e b
k
No 20 40 80 1205
0 50 100 200 300
Map projedw: web Mamtor caner mordinabm: WGS84 Edge 9a: UTM zone 17N WCS84
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/21/2016
2" Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3

Soil Map—Durham County, North Carolina
Map nit Legend
Durham County, North Carolina (NC063)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
Ur Urban land
—... _
0.31
2.8%
_ —...--
WsE White Store sandy loam, 10 to �
7.0
25 percent slopes
71.3%
1
WwC White Store -Urban land
2.6 1
25.9%%
complex, 0 to 10 percent
slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
9 8
— 100.0%
u UA wawrai mesources Web Soil Survey 4/21/2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

410 '`
v-
<4 �. t ,� Y � •, � ! � >SA.� 4 tt �,�.! '!� t! rjafr Wim" ` � * s= y .t e
� �,��� . {.bray.. ; �A�Yy��A •2'•, - a� ,,,�` r '14",. �a ° ` rpt - � j�, :.�a..
f..
'? %♦♦ ' ` e# arc." ' 7 4 - $! �tL. S fp
a
s
•i ri � 1 ;� .: � � �
z x�'
..v
-57 Pia t'tn
Y11 `.'5•„T �
A
v� o
II 'A
- � d
74. "2,y S ., /' Y�t��•'� .��" \+�-Soap:..., ._.- 5
e
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION
THEINFORMWION DEPICTFI) ON 1X13 MAPMO SUPPORTING
MCUMEATMONMEADAYNUIBLEINDIS79FOR TAT
HTTP://FRIS.NC.GOV/FRIS
{ WiNON Bau Fbod�evalbn lBFFj
(� WINBFEdr Depthzw., A0.Ax .was
SPFCNLFLOOU j ® Re111ab7Flaad.,
XAWN MF0.N I
0.2%Annual Chan. Food Hand, lbws
of 1%Mnual Chance Flaod nilh Average
Oeptb Less Than 0. Foot or Win, Drainage
A on-rLess Than One 3quan Mllo zorcx
— Fulum CondidoM 1%Annual
Chan. Flood Harald zanex
OTHERARM OF, An oRh Reduced Fbod Riskdueto Levo
FLOOD XAIARD' So. No., icnzx
ORM 1 Areas Dehrmbad ro M Oubitle the
.EASY 0.2% Annual CM.e Fbodphb zonex
-- Chanwl, CUM', or Storm S—,
»»� A.redAotl.Pmvisiowly Aoored'ed
.END Lewe,Ohe, or Flootlmall
STRUCNRER Non..=edited Lesee, Mc as Fbodsvall
ie NorO Caroli,,Geodetk S,r bewh,,,k
e a Conn Geo I N OSuesry belch m h
eon Cwirxtor Fst NCFMPSurveT bench maM
I Cross SooUons MM 1%Annua1 Chan.
W.WS... El—lon (BFE)
J- ---Ca lol Trans.
I'---""- cwehluans. Baselbo
— _ — Prefile B lin.
lyd.V phb Fe.hre
----- Um8 01 SludF
FEANIES __..... j.dMolbn Bou.q
NOTES TO USERS
w---••- b=it orModalala wa. Amon hiMwAT
ern lcaasl rvor[
®�CBRSM. vati.am. c Oth—he Protectod Mea
SCALE
1 BIM. Soo het 1:6,000
0 250 500 1,000
p�Fwl
Meters
0 TS 150 300
PANEL LOCATOR
WWWG iROGMM
O SURANCE WE
MA
FL000INSDRANCE RATE MAP
tip NORTH CAROLINA
�I
2-0831
w
a
S�T_t.11
V
-.`
Panel........
COMNOXO rry� 'Ol. PANEL SUfiU
rme .al I
y
_0
0
0
0
Z
>� "� dxioNUxsAER
- 3T2008310.
- _
""'
xaa:eFi�SEO
05/02/08

VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE
'
BEARING
LENGTH
L1
Gray Ave
' O
F5-0-8-1
THIS PROPERTY IS INA PREVIOUSLY RECORDED
SUBDMSION ANDIN THE INTEREST
3a
OF BEARING
CONSISTENCY WITH PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PUTS,
T h Canal St ..
® c -
OI i�W VOLUNTARY REFORESTATION
"� REPLANTING AREA
HEADWALL
TOP OF BANK
DUSTING BEARING CONIROLWAS USED. FOR THE
PURPOSES OF ZI NCACSS 1602 W SURVEYING
PROCEDURES OF THEAANDARDS OF
y
rj C'
h o (Io" FROM TOP OF BANK)
CA STREAM`/ I/
•�'a$
1 yu
PRACTICE FOR LAND
SURVEYING IN NORM CAROLINA DUSTING BEARING
SI w 506
yF RELIEF SWALE
FROM SMP/ 7/
n' -�
® CONTROL AND TIFSTOAPPROPAUTE NATURAL
MONUMENTS
.Hard Ave
RN GARDEN TO STREAM__-�-
AI�-
I
REPLACE THE MANDATED TIE To NORM
CAROUNAGRID,
STIR �- -
-
-
rUpo
I
'O.
SSES P--
-
A ILEGEND
OF NOMENCLATURE
_...
IRON PIPE SET
.............8'
-
S79'S ' •
__..E
SE 803
EXISTING IRON PIPE/ROD
1234 STREET ADDRESS 3.0'
_. -. � -
_ �' /
��qt±E.....
-�-
° Dr ZONE 2
f
L07 NUMBER
O
BOUNDARYADJOINER
Z`
�
— OR R/W9162
'^
SF
i
New NasE
�CBp,CK
_........... ... BACKS Z
.s,. 0 210 ACRES
TBA
-.. _ _ e 1 I
[~,
BUFFER........
o
J
ro'
PROPD SMP RAIN GARD _
AREA= 200_7
.........
3 c2
Ip
SURF9GE-RUNOFF PROTECTION PIPING
i
;
ROUTED TO SMP/RAIN GARDEN
VARIANCE AREA 6
ZONE 1- 230 SF N79'4721• "K'
.r1O
a
.-1
I
O F
VARIANCE AREA
ZONE 2= 660 SF
i
W w
d
CURRENT INFORMATION•
N
NOTES: I
-
�
I CAPITAL GTY PROPERTY x�
SOLUTIONS LLC
1 -NL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND IN USFC
2-METHDDOFCOMPUTARON:ARFA SCALNLATEOWITH
O 5Qg iNl
DB 77828 PC 224
PB 1B PG 155
GDSOFTWAAE
M.�'
PARCEL ID: 770654
3 THISPROPE0.7YENO TLOCATED INA SPFCML 8000 HAZARD AREA. 1
45URVEY WAS PERFORMED
kr3
pta,
PIN: 0831-05-28-2255
ZONING: RU -5(2)
WMfDVr THE BENEFIT OFA TIRE
COMFrTMENT. THERE MAYBE EASEMENTS OR ENCUMBRANCES AFFECTING
"OI
�
I URBAN DEVELOPMENT TIER
THE PROPFRTYTH47ARE NOi SHOWN HERE ON.
S -THE WAS FlDD SURVEYED TO PRODUCE THE BUFFERS ANOPAEA
,,,
�'
Fo^
ELLERBE CREEK WATERSHED
FALLS LAKE STORMWATER REGULATORY BASIN
CAILUUTIONS BUT RAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED BYAPFGUUi0RY0FFlCIAL
•�'•"'
• N CA
PRELIMINARY PLAT
STREAM SURVEY
j \
.Roy'
♦ ' oar' E ESSi �2
o �V-7
s" E5 0°'""�
PREPARED FOR
THAYER
F .�.�R�"�%ir7
ce dythatthismapwasd2wnuntlermysupervsonfromanactual
V.- rvey made under my supemaon(tleeddexrptonreoorded in Deed
•�� � L-4833`?Book 7826224ythatmepondonalacouracys1/20000.•and
CUSTOM HOMES
CITY OF DURHAM, DURHAM COUNTY, NC
ProfessionalLantlSurve in ! License
Surveying
,� r:
/A '-�:
A'-
page
?that this mapmeetsthe requre—N, of The Standards ofPractice
and Surveying n North Carol na (21 NCAC 56.1600)'
56,1600).-
for 30
I
DATE: 5/2/2016 SCALE: 1"=30"
0 13 30 60
I I I
3813WoodoWlDrive /Raleigh,North Carolina27613
p. 919.219.4278 / e. infoOTerrestrlalSurveying.com
Z)
° SUS
ThsXthtlayofX%X,2016.
I
" P' M"'•,•
Proksalonal
BAR GRAPH 1 inch = 30 /t.
Land surveror L-4833
ELIZABETHSTN-611-STREAM.DWG
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
LENGTH
L1
S6' 15" 00"W
55.83