20120010 Ver 1_Erosion Control Klumac- U-3459_20160601

Wanucha, Dave
From:Euliss, Amy
Sent:Wednesday, June 01, 2016 10:28 AM
To:Wanucha, Dave
Subject:RE: Erosion Control Klumac- U-3459
I asked for some pictures when the water levels recede. I'll pass them along.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wanucha, Dave
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 10:27 AM
To: Euliss, Amy
Subject: RE: Erosion Control Klumac- U-3459

Hi Amy,
Thanks for the update.

Dave Wanucha
Division of Water Resources
Transportation Permitting Unit
NC Department of Environmental Quality

336-776-9703 office
336-403-5655 mobile
[e-mail]

NC DEQ Winston Salem Regional Office
450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston Salem, NC 27105

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties.

-----Original Message-----
From: Euliss, Amy
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 10:22 AM
To: Wanucha, Dave <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Erosion Control Klumac- U-3459

FYI
-----Original Message-----
From: Haff, Richard
1

Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 10:21 AM
To: Euliss, Amy; Suggs, Phillip H
Cc: Keen, Kiera T; Seitz, Phillip K; Steve Saunders ([e-mail])
([e-mail]); [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]
Subject: FW: Erosion Control Klumac- U-3459

Amy and Phil,

The contractor was able to get the sediment cleaned up yesterday. The total was about 4 - five gallon buckets of
material. The project had a rain event late yesterday afternoon and water is back in the same area. With the erosion
inspection this morning no material was noticed from the skimmer basin leading to the wetland. The water in the
wetland does look reddish do to the skim of material that was not able to be removed. We will check the wetland area
again after the water dries up.

Thanks
rich

-----Original Message-----
From: Euliss, Amy
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 11:29 AM
To: Wanucha, Dave
Cc: Haff, Richard; Suggs, Phillip H
Subject: FW: Erosion Control Klumac- U-3459

We lost sediment offsite on the Klumac Road Rail project in Rowan County. The sediment deposit in a wet area that was
beyond the limits of the project study area, so it wasn't delineated in the jurisdictional review. I visited the site today to
confirm whether the area was a wetland. It is, so we're reporting the loss. The area is greater than a 5 gallon bucket.
Its @1200 square feet of sediment. There's a natural berm isolating the area from the adjacent creek. I've instructed
them to remove the material from the wetland that was greater than a skim on the surface, once the water clarity clears
up in the wetland. We know this is greater than 24 hours; however, if they tried to clean it up right now, it would make
a bigger mess. I've attached 3 pictures. Image 460 shows the wetland. Image 461 is standing in the same spot and
looking at the basin. Image 462 is looking from the inlet of the basin toward the recently paved road.

The area draining to the basin had been recently paved, and the volume of water with the rains displaced material in the
basin. I've attached an email with Phil's recommendations and a copy of the NPDES inspection records for the week of
the event. Let me know if you have any questions.

-----Original Message-----
From: Suggs, Phillip H
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 7:19 AM
To: Haff, Richard; Keen, Kiera T
Cc: Steve Saunders ([e-mail]) ([e-mail]); Euliss, Amy;
Seitz, Phillip K
Subject: RE: Erosion Control Klumac

We need to review that and make sure it's not in a wetland area. I would recommend Kiera and I look at it first. With all
this rain predicted, it should probably be cleaned up instead of just seeded over.
Review the EC plan and make sure any TSD's are open and if there is PAM application on wattles or silt checks iit needs
to be in place. Contractor needs to make sure all runoff is directed to the EC devices and not everything is sent to one -
2

meaning that one. If it’s the only one for that area and receives all that flow, they should stabilize the areas up from it
to help reduce the silt load. The last rains had basins over topping everywhere.
Today I have a meeting in Albemarle but may can get thru there afterwards. Ill call you. If not, we can look at it
Monday.
Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Haff, Richard
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 4:37 PM
To: Suggs, Phillip H; Keen, Kiera T
Cc: Steve Saunders ([e-mail]) ([e-mail]); Euliss, Amy;
Seitz, Phillip K
Subject: FW: Erosion Control Klumac

Phil and Kara,

While our inspector Steve was doing the project erosion report after today's rain he noticed that we are having some
material settling in a low area between the skimmer basin and Town Creek.
The skimmer basin is located at the beginning of the project on the left hand side facing Martin Luther King Blvd. The
distance from the skimmer outlet to Town Creek is about 200 feet.
This basin was built about half way in the ground and half way above the ground.
The material does not look like it is more than 1/2 inch thick.

We recommend to seed and straw the material and to make the skimmer basin longer away from the discharge point.

Do you have any other recommendations of would you like to come down and see the site?

Thanks
rich

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Saunders \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 1:33 PM
To: Haff, Richard
Subject: Erosion Control Klumac

Skimmer basin ID 01 and area below in woods.

Steve Saunders
Transportation Technician

Email: [e-mail]
Work: 704.932.2122
Cell: 704.533.2184

Campo & Associates, PLLC
(an affiliate of Kisinger Campo & Associates Corp.)
305 S. Main St., Kannapolis, NC 28081

3

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This communication may be privileged and confidential. It should not be disseminated to
others. If received in error, please immediately reply that you have received this communication in error and then
delete it. Thank you.

________________________________

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.

4