NCG030376 DMR SW (14)

Prysmian
Group
January 8, 2016
Storm Water Permitting Unit
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Attention: Bradley Bennett
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
Re: Storm Water Discharge Monitoring Report
Draka Elevator, Inc.
2151 Church Street
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
Certificate of Coverage NCG030376
Dear Sir/Madam:
V PRYSMIAN
-Q. Draka
2151 North Church Street
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
Operations Phone: [phone]
Operations Fax: [phone]
JAN 12 2016
Enclosed are two copies of the Storm Water Discharge Outfall (SDO) Monitoring Report for the Draka Elevator, Inc.
facility located at 2151 North Church Street, Rocky Mount, Nash County, North Carolina.
During the month of December 2015, tiered monitoring was conducted as required at Outfalls (OF) 001, 002, and
003 as well as at a background sampling point (BG001) for comparison. The table below summarizes the results for
this monitoring period. Exceedences of the BMV for Cu were detected in outfalls 002 and 003. Exceedences of the
BMV for Zn were detected at outfalls 001, 002, and 003 Please note that exceedences of the BMVs for copper (Cu)
and zinc (Zn) were detected at the background location, demonstrating that the source of elevated Cu and Zn may
not be the result of facility activities.
1 Exceeds BMV NS= Not Sampled for this Parameter
A comprehensive monitoring event for Cu, Zn, lead (Pb), oil and grease, total suspended solids, and field readings
of pH at outfalls 001, 002, and 003 will be conducted during January 2016 in accordance with Part ll, Section B of
the general permit. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at [phone], or our
environmental consultant, Rob Duffy of Antea Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
Wynne Ellis
Global Director of Operations
Draka Elevator, Inc.
Enclosures
Cu (mg/Q:
Zn (mg/L):
Sample
BMV=0.007
BMV=0.067
OF001
0.0062
0.1941
OF002
00193 1
0.2291
OF003
0.01361
0.1091
BG001
0.01091
0.1621
1 Exceeds BMV NS= Not Sampled for this Parameter
A comprehensive monitoring event for Cu, Zn, lead (Pb), oil and grease, total suspended solids, and field readings
of pH at outfalls 001, 002, and 003 will be conducted during January 2016 in accordance with Part ll, Section B of
the general permit. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at [phone], or our
environmental consultant, Rob Duffy of Antea Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
Wynne Ellis
Global Director of Operations
Draka Elevator, Inc.
Enclosures

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted January 7, 2016
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG03 0 3 7 6
FACILITY NAME Draka Elevator, Inc.
COUNTY Nash
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Charlie Dickens
LABORATORY Pace Analytical Lab Cert. # 40
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
JAN ' 2 2015
�s
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2015
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑ July-D`dd`
or X❑ Monthly' December (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW [—]Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow ❑Water Supply [:]SA
X]Other N; CSW
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
❑ No discharge this period a2
Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
'The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on-site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3
Outfall No.
Date Sample
1
24-hour rainfall pH,
Total Suspended Solids
Copper
Lead Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/ Total Toxic
Total Petroleum
Collected
amount, Standard units
Organics
(mo/dd/yr)
Inches3
Hydrocarbons
Benchmarks ==_>
-
- 100 mg/L or 50 mg/L4 6.0-9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L 0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L 1 mg/L
OF001
12/22/2015
0.48
0.0062
0.194
OF002
12/22/2015
0.48
0.0193
0.229
OF003
12/22/2015
0.48
0.0136
0.109
BG001
112/22/20151
0.48
0.0109
0.162
Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
'The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on-site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

4W Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement: NA
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
WW
�/_
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L" where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month. NA
n Nn disrharap this narinrl-,)2
Outfall No. Date Sample 24-hour rainfall
Collected' amount, Non -polar 0&G/TPH by
(mo/dd/yr) Inches3 EPA 1664 (SGT -HEM)
Total Suspended Solids pH
Benchmarks ===> _ - 15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L* 6.0 — 9.0 SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

4 Nate: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
e 2 EXCEEDANCES INA ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER ATTHE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART B SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES X❑ NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES X❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Regional Supervisor
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR including all "No Discharge" reports within 30 days of receipt of the lab results (or at end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Permittee)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017
IBIr
(Date)
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3