20080284 Ver 1_401 Application_20080208

1
1
1
1
1
1
1

i...
EEB I 1 2008
~~t
~~[ a ~ V
D
FEB .~ ~ 2Q~8
WETLAPtDS AND STORAIWATER fiRANCH
R ~ ~,~p E
s~
~i ,_
~1~~ ~ ~ ~(i~U
t~l~7i1~NDS AN!~ S"fvRM9`'A~ER ~''.t'11~ ~;~
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION
SEWER-LINE EASEMENT CROSSING
MYRTLE GROVE ROAD
WILMINGTON, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

Pre-Construction Notification
Sewer-line Easement Crossing
Myrtle Grove Road
Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina
CLIENT
Ms. Susan Fritzen
Biltmark Builders, Inc.
PO Box 1229
1510 A South Third Street
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
SUBMITTED BY
ECS Carolinas, LLP
7211 Ogden Business Park, Suite 201
Wilmington, North Carolina
PROJECT No. 22-13349B
January 11, 2008

^ - -7rai
~~~~ ECS CAROLINAS LLP
' i ~
~ _~ .o~. Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities
^
January 11, 2008
^ Ms. Kim Garvey
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
' Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
' RE: Sewer-line Easement Crossing
Myrtle Grove Road
' Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina
ECS Carolinas, LLP Project No. 22-13349B
' Dear Ms. Garvey:
Please review the attached material for aPre-Construction Notification for the above-
' mentioned property. The subject site is a sewer-line easement located to the west of
Myrtle Grove Road and south of Faulkenberry Road in Wilmington, New Hanover
County, North Carolina. The easement is associated with the Biltmark Builders
' development "Myrtle Landing" at 7220 Carolina Beach Road. As shown online at the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA), Enviromapper website, the site is
located in the Lower Cape Fear River Basin (HUG Code 03030005). The sewer-line will
' cross a drainage ditch/relatively permanent water (RPW) which drains into an unnamed
tributary of the Intracoastal Waterway.

1

On the behalf of our client, Ms. Susan Fritzen of Biltmark Builders we are enclosing the
following materials for the Pre-Construction Notification of the sewer-line construction
project:
• Pre-Construction Notification application
• Property owner's signed letter of authorization for allowed site visits;
• Driving directions and map to the site;
• Map showing the location of the site (Figure 1), an aerial photograph of the site
(Figure 2), a USGS Quad map with site boundaries depicted and the coordinates
for the center of the site shown in deci-degrees (Figure 3), the New Hanover
County Soil Survey map with the site depicted (Figure 4); the site plan (Figure
5); and the erosion control detail sheet (Figure 6).
• Jurisdictional Determination Package
7211 Ogden Business Park • Suite 201 • Wilmington, NC 28411 • [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.ecslimited.com
Asheville, NC • Charlotte, NC • Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC • Raleigh, NC • Swansboro, NC * • Wilmington, NC
* testing services only

' Pre-Construction Notification January I1, 2008
Sewer-line Easement Crossing
Myrtle Grove Road
Wilmington, North Carolina
' ECS Carolinas, LLP. Project No. 22-13349E
' Thank you in advance for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or
need additional information please contact Ms. Kristen Rose at [phone].
' ECS Carolinas, LLP
Kristen Rose Cheryl J. Moody, REM, CIEC, CMRS
Project Wetland Scientist Principal Scientist
Enclosures:
' A. Pre-Construction Notification application
B. Property Owner's Letter of Authorization
C. Driving Directions to site
D. Figures:
Figure 1. Location Map
' Figure 2. Aerial Map
Figure 3. USGS Topogaphic Map
Figure 4. Soils Map
' Figure 5. Site Plan
Figure 6. Erosion Control Detail Plan
E. Jurisdictional Determination Package

1

~ _

JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW
SEWER-LINE EASEMENT CROSSING
MYRTLE GROVE ROAD
WILMINGTON, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT N0.22-13349B
TABLE OF CONTENTS
• APPENDIX A -Pre-Construction Notification
• APPENDIX B -Property Owner's Letter of Authorization
• APPENDIX C -Driving Directions to the Site
• APPENDIX D- Figures
^ Figure 1. Location Map
^ Figure 2. Aerial Map
^ Figure 3. USGS Topographic Map
^ Figure 4. Soil Map
^ Figure 5. Site Plan
^ Figure 6. Erosion Control Detail Plan
• APPENDIX E- Jurisdictional Determination Package

APPENDIX A
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION

~ ,~
~ ..
tributary then heads southwest towards the development. The easement area is forested and
surrounded by residential development.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: As shown
on Sheet 6, the sewerline will be constructed within the easement ri t-of--way which will be
cleared for construction and future maintenance. A trench will be excavated and the
sewerline will be buried in it. A new lift station will be constructed and the existing lift
station by Faulkenberry Road will be abandoned. The sewer-line will need to cross the
drainages four times as shown on the site plan. Crossings are necessary to re-route the sewer-
line from the existing lift station to the new lift station, and to connect the Myrtle Landing
development and a nearby development into the system. The portion of the drainages to be
crossed will be protected using a check dam as detailed on the plans, Sheet 15. The profile of
the ditches will be restored after construction, and excelsior matting will be applied over
seed. Each ditch crossing is anticipated to take one day to complete, so the duration of
impact will be minimized. Erosion control measures will remain in place until vegetation is
established.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to tie municipal
sewer service to the proposed development of Myrtle Landing.
Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
A jurisdictional determination request was submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers on
December 14, 2007. Please see the attached Jurisdictional Review report. The drainage ditch is
considered a Relatively Permanent Water (RPW), therefore the US Army Corps of Engineers has
jurisdiction over the ditch.
Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
This project is associated with the Myrtle Landing Subdivision which has permit applications
forthcoming. However, it is necessary that the sewer-line project proceed immediately in order to
construct the new lift station that will affect other existin developments in the area.
Page 7 of 13

1

i

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs maybe included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed temborar~mpacts
involve excavation across ditches that drain to an unnamed tributary of the Intracoastal
Waterway for the purpose of a sewerline installation. The ditches will be excavated the
sewerline will be buried and the profile of the ditches will be restored. The construction area
will be protected by erosion control measures as shown on Sheet 15. After construction
excelsior matting will be placed over seed and the~rofile of the drainage ditches will be
restored. Erosion control measures will remain in place until vegetation is established.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and fleedin~_

t

Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: none
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Page 8 of 13

1

Average
Stream Width
Stream Impact
Perennial or Before Impact Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? (as measured Length Impact
(indicate on map) from top-of- (linear feet) (acres)
bank to top-
of-bank
Temporary 20 feet
1 Unnamed ditch dredge/fill Intermittent 19 .009
2 Unnamed ditch Temporary Intermittent 20 feet 12 .006
dredge/fill

3
Unnamed ditch Temporary
Intermittent 14 feet
24
.008
~-edge/fill
4 Unnamed ditch Temporary Intermittent 14 feet 23 .009
dyed e/fill

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 78 feet .032 ac
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation. dred~in~. flooding. drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of

Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the protect:
Stream Im act (acres): .03
Wetland Impact (acres):
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) .03
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 78
7. Isolated Waters
' Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.

' Page 9 of 13

8. Pond Creation N/A
' If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
' Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
' Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Mininuzation)
' Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the ro osed im acts. It ma be useful to r v'
p p p y p o ide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
' techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Temporary impacts to the ditches are necessary to construct the sewer-line within the existing
easement. The unnamed tributary has been avoided by the alignment of the sewer-line However
the drainaee ditches cannot be avoided. The duration of construction for the ditch crossin s has
been limited to one day and the ditches will beprotected by erosion control measures as shown
on Sheet 15. The existing profile of the ditches will be restored after construction is complete
1 and .the disturbed areas will be seeded and covered with excelsior matting Erosion control
measures will remain in place until vegetation is established
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
' Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
1 aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
' and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
' Page 10 of 13

1
1
1
' ~x.
1
1
1
1
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o. enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Since the proposed project involves minimal temporarypacts (78 linear feet) and the ditch
will be restored to its original condition, mitigation is not proposed for this project.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
Page 11 of 13

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multivliers.

XI.

Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within I SA NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
Impervious surfaces will not result from this project.
' XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
' wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
' Page 12 of 13

The purpose of the project is to provide municipal sewage disposal via asewer-line forcemain
' for the Myrtle Landin d~ evelopment.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
' Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
' Cumulative impacts are not anticipated as a result of this project.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
' It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the ap lication sufficiently in advance of desired
p
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
' Com feting construction during current drought conditions will minimize potential impacts to
surface waters in the project area. After construction is complete, vegetation will have time to
become established before high water flows are expected.
~- ~ ~ f ~
' Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

1
i Page 13 of 13

1

APPENDIX B
OWNER AUTHORIZATION

1
1
December 17, 2007
Ms. Jennifer Frye, Project Manager
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Reference: Site Access Authorization from Ms. Susan Fritzen
Myrtle Landing Permitting
Wilmington, New Hanover County North Carolina
Dear Ms. Frye:
As the property owner, I am hereby authorizing you and/or other employees of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USAGE), Wilmington Regulatory Field Office and the North Carolina
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality (NC DENR
DWQ) to enter and inspect the above-referenced project site as necessary. I understand that this
site inspection will result in determination of the jurisdictional status of the property's
wetlands/surface waters under the USACE/NC DWQ's Section 404/401 Regulatory Program.
Please contact me if you need additional information.
~' r
n
~---~~'` (Owner Signature) (Print Name) (Date
~ G~r~r,~ 2k ~ v i ~d~~S .~~-~
/57a ~7 ~'u~, '~Y~,r-U' ,s T
~.,2 .5'- yG Z
(Address)
~/a- ~-~~--x377
(Phone No.)

APPENDIX C
DRIVING DIRECTIONS
1

69 Darlington Ave, Wilmington, NC 28403 to Myrtle Grove Rd & Sunrise Ln, Wilmingto... Page 1 of 1
Start 69 Darlington Ave Get Google Maps on your phone
~~~ ~~ Wilmington, NC 28403 ~ Te~ttr~word~MnPS"to466453
~_~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ End Myrtle Grove Rd & Sunrise Ln
Wilmington, NC 28409
Travel 11,5 mi -about 21 minx
j 69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, NC 28403
Drive: 11.5 mi -about 21 mins
1. Head south on Darlington Ave toward Metting Rd
IE 2. Turn left at Covil Ave
0.4 mi
1 min
0.3 mi
1 min
20 ft
0.9 mi
2 mins
1.6 mi
4 mins Start
' ~ 3. Turn right toward Independence Blvd
1- 4. Turn left at Independence Blvd
~ 5. Turn left at Oleander Dr/US-76
' ~ 6. Slight right at Pine Grove Dr
7. Turn right at Masonboro Loop Rd
' ~ 8. Sli ht left at M rtle Grove Rd
9 y
' Myrtle Grove Rd & Sunrise Ln
Wilmington, NC 28409
2.1 mi
4 mins _ ~~:
3.5 mi '.
5 mins
2.7 mi ~ f~
5 mins
These directions are for planning purposes only. You may find that construction
projects, traffic, or other events may cause road conditions to differ from the map
results.
Map data ©2007 NAVTEQT"'
End
N
~8*~
~~~
"st
_I~~,-
Pimd Af
~~,,
~'S ? 1/U'4118
~d~r
~~~ _ ..
- __
/~
i
_ Ja1en~. C~uedc R4~ ~
Map data ©2007 NAVTEQ
Overview

APPENDIX D
FIGURES

., 4~.~~'~.'Vr
t~f ~'
f+
lfX~~ ~1
r
~~
~'' ~
r~~
i~

,~ i ~
4(
!~
~'~
,~~!
.'~,~~k~
,, ti
.~ ~ w
.;~h,
t

s~a~e: Nat to scare FIGURE 1: SITE LOCATION MAP N
Source: Yahoo Maps at Yahoo.com, accessed on December 14, 2007.
Sewer-line Easement Crossing ECS Project No. 22-13349B
Myrtle Grove Road
Wilmington, North Carolina ,- ~~~ December 2007

l~d7;tE7~51`E~
{ t~rrw~y
~~a~3~f1~~6~iL~~

Approximate Scale: As Shown FIGURE 2: AERIAL MAP N
Source: New Hanover County Online GIS Mapping, accessed on December 14, 2007.
Sewer-line Easement Crossing
Myrtle Grove Road
Wilmington, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 22-13349B
December 2007

Approximate Scale: 1"=a,ooo° FIGURE 3: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP N
Source: USGS Carolina Beach, North Carolina Quadrangle, 1970
Sewer-line Easement Crossing '~ `
M~~rtle Grove Road ECS Project No. 22-13349B
Wilmington, North Carolina ~~.~ December 2007
Irv,.
G~~3®1d~9~Ge3~

~~
n Rm,
Ce
. ..BP I~I
Y
~~
.-
Kr
t
y
~~
~~'^~,, ~ Rm
U
LE _ - mC.
O` ~ -
BP
Sewer-line Easement Crossing
Myrtle Grove Road
Wilmington, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 22-13349B
December 2007
~~
Approximate Scale: lin. = 1,320 ft. FIG V ~ 4: SAILS IVI1~P ~T
Source: Soil Survey of New Hanover County, North Carolina, 1977. 1

SEE BffET 7 FOR CONTNVIJATION OF EROSION CONTROL PLAN
_ ~ ,
• ~-
! Q I ! I ~ ~ ~ ~ rRnAra ~~ a ~fiou.. ~ C ~ ~ (II ~~ i ~.
i I Y ~ A~
~ ~ ~m ' ""~"~a ~r;i ~ ~ ~I ~ 'I 1~1~
1 ~ ~ lPo ~ snu ~ 4 ~ ~ (:'
._ _ ._. _ ~ ~ 1 r Promo-am-oaaam t
w` ~ ~ ) I scov~151'P ~~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~~!~` ~ ~ 1~
j ~ ! n c'x~`cNV ~ i I ~ ~ ~ I
a
_ _ -- , _ -- _ - _ J tro a aEUam1 Axo , ~ ~ , ! I J\3 I I ! I
RF-LACFD Y/%'PCP `'\~' I ~~ \ ` I I ~ \1 I
f I AIID SER1Gl ILGlwENr.) ! t• ; ~~~~ \ ~ ~ ~ 8a
M j ~ / I AP>Ee aaawnox trw ~' I I ` \`', ~.
' ~ G 0 ~' I b \~,~ ` :,_,{1{~ auwn sups i {'~
m i3; w
t
\ ~ I , ~ i
- -~ -'- - - _ ~ .i I 1 q ~\ r. ~ °W ~ ~ ar4i'~oEtA~L Ss I I ~ : 1 v
l°,
I R00100-LOS-050-001 ~ III I \I l• ~ \ ~ 1<i ~ SII@AY CA059 I ~ I' - ,
IFNUX. 39 R ~ I `- 006+010-OW ~ t `'. ` ~1 .
' aAE Jb 4
M
"~ `
b_ _ I __ _ _. _ _ i it ~~ ..~ ~ i, l 1 \\
` __ _~. I I i ~_ ~ lro6?oo-aotae-aoi \ ._ ~I \ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ I ~ I, ~ {:'~ ~ = r ~ s,_, 1 `~..,,
I I ~ I i l ;i
. - ~ ~ ~ -~-- ~ ~ ~ ~~~ I~Ij /r ~ ~ 1 A
[- ! ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ 1 I
amN owaRU
- { ~ I CR NAi1M0 Y ~ ~ / t l \ 1 ,)
i ~ ~ re I ~'' I x~na of ~ ~! ~ '-jr - llf~ ~) 1~~ ,'~ '~ ~~~.~+\
~~ a ! I ~ a¢sAU Ra
` ~~ ~ ~ 1 ` ( ~ !~ ~
` ,
~t~ . ~ 'tom ~ I Po6zcc.ao:-osc-om ,~ ! ~ ~,i I (..~ \ ~ t I +p° ' ~ ~ ~-- ~~ 1 ~ ~ v ~~ ~
_ ,
`~ ~A~` ~> ~~. i PDBdLA01-055-OW ~ ~ ~\ ~ I i `- r ''4 t, ` /~~ ~~ ` ) \ `\ --~•~~l ',%
,, ~ ,
~~ &,
y lOC' '
. =t>~ i ~ ~ i li 'I ~ l 1 -`\ L~?A 6agnu6~SY~j, ~ /P` ~-
nuns a coxsrwclrox ~p1
~ \ ~~ ` '~
\ (~ ~~ \ `'~` i ~ \~\ \ ~ / i ~ ~ OEi~1.aLi RRllg ` . ~ lr ` \ ~~ ` a1~AC1Y I
A09mp-0Ot-O61-ON
` \~ _
~~ r~
~ ~ POPLM~2-U62-000 ~ ~: ! - ~~ ~ PL CN 01L ~ ~ } ~ ~ Di SP - ~. ~ ~~
~'i ~ ~~ rum ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ A~ ~ ~ ~; I ~~ , sE~ xr~i : ~e ~ ~ _
) ~ ~~t ~ ~~ calsmuona+dmwc~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~, 4t \\"a \ ~ BFE OE6AIt; SxFEi ,S ~ ~~ 1 ~ '.
~~ b
1~1 I ~ i
,1 1 ~! 1 -~'k` ~ ~~ ~ "s( ~ ~ ~ ~ A . ~ - 1 ~ ~ ~-t°°-' ~ ~~~ t ! ,6wwsYr onnsa ara `~ ~
.`r `\
!~ ~ ~ ~a - ~ Y. tW` ~ ~~ ~. pg ~ $ ' aoma-wro-am-ooo
( ~ t at0.ti tM ' ~tq~ ~ I \ g ~ i
, ~ 1 i 1\
` `~ ` ` "[ `` I \\\
UER[CNE[fb PL4N CPRTffICASfON: {~ ` ,\ / \ ~ ' l ~ - ~~~
"llre3rb 0m e0a has ken amvdr~wifh Melear New limow3 ~~ ~ I `-
Y~H Flan Pik
Caimry Or3inmusa3~5ro MameL" ` ~ bh ~ ~'~ -~ ' ~~ ~ I !
.-roc ~TC2.. ~ '~
RLiml N3mu arW TWe {Pte•`u,.21116tY mn ~ - ~~ ~toti ta. ~~ 11 \`\
Datr !L~-.~ I I I ~ ~ ~.` '~t0.a' Ito Ltd ~\'~'\
kPg~atrasoaNuffiw P sss; 5y ~ ~ l ~'7~ ` +a .. ~\,
ago- 4 ~\ `~~~t~` t~ _
P&OPP&IY OwNFIPCERT[hIUIION. E SFAL 1
" 025503 ~ ~ ~•~ 'too- -.
1lw~ne~rteu;Muuf1(»a)am(~dwourmuow,~xtuYpn,ac~ f I I ~I
reurpt oi'AVUmIv33u,bCmsbucPany deartlg. grad g,mmrm~ br, i 7
wlllkpedovnxdN aaadmeewkb6hipunwmiTal tlmepph tl I I
NewHa3maCaanry, the5Wre0fNOwfiCmaWmdUe(edeolgavesrmrenlrod Nagmaes ~ I I i !...
wmmare>~eeymaaap~3waa6p>m3AaR3eOw6vr,u6re)aaPFewlmapol~buxgru3me I
tvulnialmsd Ppe20mmdmak3mmAe0(Rie pwpnedfxfRNnl(we)wIDmtaManp to ~ I I ~ .
trmuer dt6 ap~witAoac clan wtlsdmdm stNew Name G,udp." !.
~~ 1 I 1
s!gnama
P3wadNa¢emdrue ~ ~~ ' ~
UPN ) a i I ~ I I ,
I~
60' 0 6a' 12a'
SCALE, 1"=60' (Horiz.)
uvxna wswc reo,ecr muxa,ar - - - -
1E49LRARY C[wanlxCllpN kNIPPNCE
IIMns a caa"murnaa --7nc-
POAO P3rRANlE
idP 9lr rFNCE -
ii.1ENParAPV assPZOx arn, .--~_
sra+e aECx oAx
PAOP6aEp AOAO 6AAM fl£VAOW 0 I6.i0
mPU onnPCm wu . m.ce AuEs
NOIL 1XEAE MRL B NO Orl'AtE SmOaRWC Of
EACAVAiEO wA1eAlAL
+,-_ 4AL may,
wCa„yM
SEAL 243 North Front Sireet
-`" 0255035 ; Wilmington, North Carolina 28401
c axs ra awn usrns;aNww uo ac rau3
aAe/xo1 Phone:
o rsa6o rw nm Aa sav rtma Nnlur) 1~~~~ F [phone] ,fax: [phone]
ro5.mM9nk 31WW¢6 ttam P(x/1wr ~wROxA~ •a AA0001661 ERE000691
M6NG OE50@PBM CAR nr IiP,,,
www.mckimtteed.can
I ~ saE osvul~ siazi u
~ !'~ ~ ~ '~ ~I ~ 1{ ~ "1 1
! ~ ~ ,
.~ ~ _~ t ~11~ I 1~ J ~
Is( I i i /
aoreao-me-aro ~ 1 ', \ ~ j 'I I~~~ I I '~
~ RO)am-OOfi-005-00 I 1 1 ~\ ~ L,..,~ I I II~ ' ~~~\
i `(
y\ ~ 1
) . aalaao-S1o6 oa~~'~ i ~I :I
i II 111._.1 I
_ V sx ~ ~ If ! ~ ~ " V '1
,
~..~ `~' ~ 1111 ' \, l
_..'~ "~ ~ ! y 1
~'` CQ'SAWCTai En !
... _-..1... SFF OEiAa; SNEET IS
1 \ ~ T. ,
! - _ ~
I /.
.__ ~z
1 'I C~ 1.1 M
i Ili,~l~ ~\1 ~~ A
~'~ ~ ~ ~ t;l ~ ~ 1~r~,~ vv
1 ~!~ ) ~ ~; 1~ X1111 i t ~ - ...._..
1 i • ~ i 7 1~~"('
I ~ `1, 1111 `'' ,`
t
i i h ~ U~,~11 lil(~I,II I,

MYRTLE VENTURES LLC MYRTLE LANDING
New Hanover Count NC

1 °niE: ~~°ECEM9ER2007 SCALE ~~"^~
M~~a a °°~°-~ cG-poi
x°Rizaliu:
°Rnwx wx wec.wera
~1 pnV M
P.O, ~X 12~ oeOSNE° RAC f • sE'
~RE~A<, 6
WILM~IGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402
PH. (910)-251-5030 SITE GRADING, DRAINAGE
AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN CMECxE° RAM
FROd. MGR. RAM NA
51APU5:
ISSUED FOR PERfr11T'fING ~
p
~1
ti
~./
~I

~~~~ ~~
5
8
@~
gg3
~4
R

°~.
~~~~~~:
~^'~C ,TIT K
Mxx ? ~~,~;,"
... I r+'aalamorxry-ww Vy~
CONSTRUCTION I. nEAx n¢ exIRANa Aw EMl AREA N Nl IE°xTn1wN
SPECIFICATIONS: u ° °TRR oa~rnoxAdE MAiEgIPL .wo PRNEIAr
7 LAx n¢ aav¢ m ne ~ GRPDE Mn nuFN9oxs
5. PRDWE diM R(5~10 WRY WghR m°A 80MG'i IRM DA
onwR 9.ArPMx amer.
A 16E CF°Ifd14E fAB9GS eET.WSE IIEY PRADVE 61ABIUIY M
IK FOWOARd M Ltl'.g51tu5 98J:Ci TD SFPFE( 00.1NDH
WATER iAelE
MAINTENANCE: I. xMHgw ixE duv¢ P.o w A mxonla+ To FpEgyi xuo
cR snuExr nd L[AWND me caxslRUCnd miE refs uqr
RdAPE PpMOG 10P-pAE596 Myl t-gNp °F /~~ SINE
A10.CR E4d RWFM1. MSFEti MT $iAUtMM IRED m iPM
SEAMEN PND LiBgx R OUi P NCFtSSARY, MNFpV,m1V
PFxdrE PIL OBUECndYPBE YARBI0.3 SRyE9, WA91~9, DP
M41NfF0 Mi0 PIMLN RDnDW4Y5.
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
NUT TO SCPI.E
j r mow.
---=-_____ ~N
v, :_-. ~s
L MNIL RN4E WCX@ n811 DFSIGN.W° gypgtf MM Ieh46
n ws6TM.cod FaLarrA'x dJeAGRD PBQ NASr ex Ai
x LLaa~ S°QIaTICEN~I uE~i. mgvxpPrPO~'
] CdSRxti ni TENS dV CtEW dli MID PECRAEwL.
DYM8IAEPM 9DP V qly.
TEMPORARY DITCH PLUG DETeu
MOTTO BfAlE
-~
Aww nand
';.may-'' ~'3a+W-vit~'at_Rei<.~_
-r_~f ~ _ L
i°~ra¢N~o Mwwu H
wtix n
m'~rr ~~" '~ ~,
~><~~ ~~~
GUIDELINES TOR TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
NOT TO SCALE

DEPTI AS SFEpFICO i VEGEG7E EN71RE BWALE
,~ NS7ALL tEMPCRARY VNEN ON BGi1W
CN CHART / AND UP gDESLCPES ro fLDW DEPTH
I / (SPEC!FlED ON CHAAiI
EXISTING
~ II E%L511NG
CAAOE ] i ppADE
I
5 I
Lr_ 2.0• ~I
I. OVER-E%CAVTE CFIANNEL CEPM C5 70 ALLOW FOR
SOIL UAKAVG (D'JAIkO gEDBEO PREP)
VUO 3. THE iEMPCRARY UNEA SHALL g A gMGLE NEi
.
SOO/YEGEiATVA PCWMULATGN. WDVFV EKC51gCR OR STRAY! MATDNG
Z. `ffirc iAlE SWgLES ACCJHOINC !O SL'DINi.
SCHEpU!F IM1rt;FDIaiELY UPON CO:~PLEODN. a FOL!OW NANUF4GiURFRS INSiRUCnONS 3'MEx
WBTPIWIG TEGPORARY LINER.
J. THE iEMPCgARY LINEfi SHALL BE PUCEC ON IRE
BOiT,'W. ANC OF il@ gpE511PE5 70 iME S
PEpFIEp
FLOW DEPTH; MULCH ACCOflpNG W SEEDING
S yEGETATED SWALE
CHEDULE ABDIq THAT HEldi. gpYro~ --
RISER 6iHUCNRE W/GRATE (4. OPENING: 1RAg{ RACK)
T__ __ OVERFLOW/IOp EL
WOR HEIGHT
~~IL wFJR OPENING r5 REBaR S' D.C. ~~
WEIR-INrRT _E;~ T" ~ 4" SCH d0 PV'C lN7N
I 45 DEG RENO CAPPED
I"- IWDDi .~ 1nT1 OR61CE OPENfiVu
DRNlEp IN CAP
O Ip,(M-L_. ~j~ ORif7CE FL
•- ~ ~ I+TT{M~~IN)-",~+~~-~~/~.~~
( OV ILEI `I VIII'-'I" -_
( NARAEL
\ r I I WTLET BARREL B FME1
~ ~/ MVER1
FRONT
PRE Ofl DI7CH
BOUARE PREFOANED,~~
SCWR HOLE (PSH)
PLAN y1FW
BBIIS
THE FREGOPoNED SCWP xpE AND IEVti.
I SPREADER AAtO4 M167 BE M$iAlLEO W
VNdSi11ftBED, NATAL. mIL.
2. ixE OU1ER UP CF THE LEVEL SFREAOEF
APRpN SHALL BE N6TALLED LEVEL ANC
FLUSH MTH NAURAL DNOUNp
1 4~AD, BE $T~ALLEO UNpy ni[TENiIRE LEVF.I.
SPREADER APRON,
M1. THE LCvEL SPREADER APRON /FIRM SHAY.
BE VEC:TA7FD (PER gEdNC SCNECUIEJ Ai
INSTAI.Lg110N
c. THE WIDTH 0.F THE LEYE1 SPREACEA AI'gON
SHALL 6E ~ {MW) OR TiE SinNOgFm WID1H
OF 1HE PiRM
f NRF
MATDNG (PiRM)
SIXIgRE PREfORMEp
rT~'~ SCOUR HOLE (PSli)
__.NgT7LftAL~W - ~._ DEPTH - 2' /'~'(P7RM)
cRDMND - -- - / ~T
UNER:CLA65 B PoPR?P / ~- 4.5' -
I' TNIIX YAM F0.7ERJ ~ I~ /
FABRN NCN
SECTION A-A
PTREFORMED SCOUR HOLE WITH LEVEL SPREADER APRON
OV:RFLOw SIRUCNRE
(SV. DETAIL) SOC THE WSIDE SLCAE Q DIE
T F~ EMBANNNENT. VEGETATE RENAMING
D J PORTIONS DF iHF EMBANMENT PER
/ II T gSONC SCHEDULE IMNEDIAIEI.Y UPM
mMw.EP.a+ aF mNSmucnDN
4~ CLA RCP y 4S'x PREFgWED SCWR
NOTE 8 I£1fL
~pEi~M6)~
CONSTRUCTED WETLAND EMBANKti~NT 5ECTION
NOf 108CM.B
7 TOP of DAa
0.455 B RR-RAPJ - L i TH ~ `S% I WAY HY
/~ e ,~

ROCK CFECX DAM
Nor ro scALE
ne
C - ~ r~ ~eraaawq~~
w ate.' rur..°..a°aia~
RP RAP APRON 0 F1'A
NOT TO SCALE
nIRR.aP8D71LTP0.0TA('Ildx ..
YgDIN LFIknR nRCU nsARi
OuEItT Tin n,<c MI
MaP91 5 9 B
n s curse u
CWwle3 9 V Cure 18
ei I3 !1 [Wle le
&-
~_mouSOloPNa )MVP ••
N°rz5 I
1 r2 aE9t•11W nLIER 9WL eE A nMMt'M d' 5°' LdW uEASURFD
o-FgPENOKIAM iRDU M UP tF nW IEall 6wMPDER 1° TIE i6Y
' wKK Q of RFLFINIG SmE+u <A rE1LN8.
5 ~ 3fCE1Nn9 MIFR 91x19[ x5 WIX NS RE U:Nit YiWACER
dxwv {ID' unuAll.
5. 1xE 9uPE xqv BF N° BpPTER IIMN SR
1. nl'kt[(PME PA}5R uPY BE xPnIPAI, VNdSNefifl1 YE[EfAnd ti
n4 AKA c°x1xx5 DdSE nd-INw1GUL cnx55 ME a4tiAnd,.
5 v xATAx tE°ElPnpv 6 Nor ngieeLE KGETNm F¢TA (PER
srmlxG spP.dAC! eA'EdNmY IRd °drslRUtrmx
oe61L,T16R6 PLW 6AriFlpgnON
9Hm.YAmHh MM P%phnds4mp~CeihawdmaHNfie Md New Hmr
Carry tr4eunm NSmmlwearDeHSnMwuNl'
N~tasno" RMN,.TP 6s~.PPPRWH
Eem
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY sECnoN 9Pamrt / _
PrLatl NxPeud Tye
Nsrros;a,E DMe
MYRTLE LANDING
MYRTLE VENTt~IES LLC New Hanover County, NC MQ °=°l ~=~ ~"" cD-sm
~j~~ ~~ P,O. BOX 1229 DRAWN ,,,, Hd62tx1N: „~
rr1~nWG70Nl NORTH CAFi0L~T1A °DSND wx ~6
GRADING, DRAINAGE AND ~ ~ "~`"~ ~
~' (9101• EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
CONCRETE CURBING AND
LEVEL SPREADER LIP
(OS GRADE - I£It1)
}Q~Q
Png
~~
$•
' m'~
s
ny
~~
~'+
LEVEL &REM'IER CHANNEL
E CHANNEL LEVEL ~~~ UP
TEFb LMEa (T~ a cuAeNC)
1
_ //~
A. .. 3
' °`.:x
L) 1 ' ~~ac
't~ea~rW'~m.~.°•a.",mom
' 't~drnce°rat4,~at~~:~°. ':~.ax.~
A~ ~ w ~~
- ' ~' '~R1AB749°.r~w..
~t1W1. __ i.+o.r<.em.
5158! °F 0.' IGNEp°kBfpPNp~°xEw~Wl EAEdi
SYNTHETIC EROSION CONTROL MATTING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
A
467A STONE
OR CLA55 8 RIP-RAP p'
p67 STAVE SPP.LWAY
TEMPORARY PERIMETER DIKE
NOT TO SCALE
Tempo rary P erim eter Dike Calculations
7FNPORIRYAOCK GNEdieAAfB
Perm OIM '
M°~ .. LpW1H
Ft NIBN LWf P1&ATON BIpPE Ve~CRY BBW CXECK EAM xUM6ER NlMept
qIP. LDIrKa n BPACINO
NEWAA®
P~YH15t
iwl >au Tsro Isao lam v~+ s,e, t ows: nom Ta ] 6
1
I
FLOW
AL
' _ UNOISiIIRBED
SUMP BOTTOM 2 CHANNEL BOTTOM
PLAN II
4 W ~{ r 1
3 ' I - Iz'
w
SECTION A.A
RLTER CFECIC DAM DESK~J
NCT TC SCALE
NOTF9:
i. F81ER CHECH DAN WILL BE CW-I57RUCTED FlRSi, SUMP SECONDLY,
Z. FILTER CHECK DAM HEIGHT TO BOTTOM OF SPILLWAY. WILL BE NO LESS THAN 2 FOOT.
3. SPN-WAY DEPTH SHALL BE 7 F00T.
<. FlI.TER STONE FACE SHWID BE NO LE55 THAN S INCHES MEABUREO PFRPENDIWUALY
5. DEP OFF SEpINENT~ SUNp INLL BE~CHECKED AFTER EACri 610RM. SEDWENi VnLL BE
DEmCE MIEN STORAOEO CAPAGS~N HNAS BEEN APPROXMIATELY Sp% FILLED.ETHE~SEDI ENT
T OF~iHE RLSFR CaA'rELTMLLEBE CLEANEpLOR REPLACED RW11EN 7HEZSEDWENT POOL
6. REM04AL O`R RLTENRSCHECN DAMY NRL BE GONE IN SUCH q WAY AS TO UMI7 SILTATION,
N.4E1 S
I. ENSURE THAT 1HE SPAEgpER L8 1S WSigUED AT OS
CRAOE (lFVaL) FLq MNIFDIiM SPREADING OF $FORu
RUNOFF.
2. [ONSiRUCi 7XE LEVEL $PREADEA ON UNDISNRBF.O
SqL (NO7 CN RLf
7. SE1 THE LR pF M LFKL BPREADER I-J' ABOVE
P!E OONNSTREAM wASHEp STONE io 4Vp0 BIOC%AGE
a. THE CVABWC~EVEl. SPREApEA SHALL BE
mxsrNUCrm ax 2° {LnwLwM) pF ratavEL eqg.
5. GfiADE t4E LEVEL g+RFAOEq pUWNEL TC FCACE ALL
REOUIRF BERMWC UP THE gOL3ADANpDREAR OFNTHE
LEVEL $PRElOEA CNAIMEL.
6. ALL RUNOFF MUST ROW OVER THE LEVEL SPREADER
UP NAECILY TO a 5p' VEGETATED MTFq.
], u<GE7ATE iNE LEVEL SPREADER CHANNEL PER ME
SEEOWG SWEOtAE IMMIDIAIELY UPpN COMPLETdA OF
LON6IRUCIpN
8. THE LEVEL gIiEADER CHANN}:L g1ALL BE CINVNECTED
f0 7HE PIr<FORM[D 6CpA HQE IAA .q IF. VEL,
RIP-RAP LINED, a.5' Ld10 9SE'LF.
9. TxE LEVe"L SPREADER{CNMWEL SHOUtD FOLLOW THE
CON7pW a NATURAL GRMINC - li NAY 3_ FInIER
NRY}D OA SiRAKRIT.
~I,Y RWUS
CWT ,.
r w8~
w~ '~ ~I/6' P<9eA
/ S'-6
~GIIRBMG
OETAR
J 50' VEGETATVE FlLIER
ISEE OaETAR)
J ,'(=,,
W RB
~, ~ 4" - N0. S7 MABHi:p ETOVE
MNH NONWOVEN GfOTEk71LE
~I~rv UNOEANEAM
CONCRETE LEVEL SPREADER DETAL
Nxto6cMB
:x
,, I
~~,
R '"
r ' '
' ~
~J(~~~TAA'
~
~
•
fo
.'
, s,
C /
D
CLLTI
C
7l.1~IG1J
4
e
'
1
v
Y
1
1
`
025503
{,'A
i L
J
v
NwN
7
F
ran
1
S
(r
VAImNBIaI RMh C°rd'm° 28401
PhMe:
yy p_ ~ a (91C)343-f 0a8, Fua (BID)251-8282
HlmMb T40n
A n
IiuNW 5ePl
xx'.rMxuncreWQc°m
Y'°"°9
~-al awE w,x7 .
fBGA-gGBDY ~ WM'a'~ nwa-w alw
~am~w cw~a`s`
uP9.NL m5 NcNME wryF Ib=-
i~l Iwy
~~ .
EWL~y
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
NOT T06G1E
~ ) ~ ISSUED FOR PERFdfTI1rIG 4C J
2' MIN
DNpacTEE
_ _____ _ te' ______,N~,.,A~E
SIEFP NI DR ~ '~Iry~'1~7'
FlL GLNE
2:1 SLOPE (MAk)
PBOPFA'fYUwNalC61LT1FIGi]ON:
V ("E)isNbfineFytlVAIIw)n(salweavnNOxeemtlaplNpeerynd Wlapa
aarLa•AUOmrmm m ~IINw~~rFI~M wsPaml «aa~xWPWaI,
wl>k p,rmxa m xmwNm xlm oIM p.,m mN a W rpeemma maaere WIN we d
NeW IluNre almuy, Ms Sue a xwn rrmmWe eW rerm gP~ae w4 e.
a+amaemty.mePenanmpr, beae.n,l(xdmFliyMrsAVmmeyr
~eWIAMOnad aPaN6aatwMmuad6xpnpayVe(Lgea ljae)wBlnxHnmpln
Waly Ays mpaWWNLy x9NPm romudo®tlmofNewxu+n+rGlnuY.•
h
N
A
rMr
Q
U
q
.~
0
W
d
LEVEL SPAEADEA
GIANNFI MAY E%IENp
ON EITXEA OR BOM
SIDES OF 7HE PSH
CONSTRUCTED WETLAND OUTLET STRUCTURE
rarroecAte
xores

1

APPENDIX E
' NRISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION PACKAGE

T ha
' LL~ ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
~~®~e~~~ Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities
• December 14, 2007
Ms. Jennifer Frye
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
' Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
' RE: Sewer-line Easement Crossin
g
Myrtle Grove Road
Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina
ECS Carolinas, LLP Project No. 22-13349B
' Dear Ms. Frye:
' Please review the attached material included for a jurisdictional determination for the
above-mentioned property. The subject site is a sewer-line easement located to the west
of Myrtle Grove Road and south of Faulkenberry Road m Wilmington, New Hanover
' County, North Carolina. The easement is associated with the Biltmark Builders
development on 7220 Carolina Beach Road. As shown online at the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA), Enviromapper website, the site is located in the Lower Cape
Fear River Basin (HUC Code 03030005). The sewer-line will cross aditch/relatively
permanent water (RPW) which drains into an unnamed tributary of the Intracoastal
Waterway.
' On the behalf of our client, Ms. Susan Fritzen of Biltmark Builders we are enclosing the
following materials for a jurisdictional review of the RPW:
' • Property owner's signed letter of authorization for allowed site visits;
• Driving directions and map to the site;
' • Map showing the location of the site (Figure 1), an aerial photograph of the site
(Figure 2), a USGS Quad map with site boundaries depicted and the coordinates
' for the center of the site shown in deci-degrees (Figure 3), the New Hanover
County Soil Survey map with the site depicted (Figure 4); and the site plan
showing surface waters (Figure 5);
' • Jurisdictional Determination Forms; and
• Applicant/Address.
Ms. Susan Fritzen
' Biltmark Builders
Post Office Box 1229
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
7211 Ogden Business Park • Suite 201 • Wilmington, NC 28411 • [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.ecslimited.com
Asheville, NC • Charlotte, NC • Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC • Raleigh, NC • Swansboro, NC * • Wilmington, NC
* testing services only

ECS Carolinas, LLP
~(~~~
' Kristen Rose
Project Wetland Scientist
Jurisdictional Review
Sewer-line Easement Crossing
Myrtle Grove Road
Wilmington, North Carolina
ECS Carolinas, LLP. Project No. 22-13349E
December 14, 2007
Our objective is to have a final determination by your office as to the jurisdictional
boundaries of the surface waters on the site. Thank you in advance for your assistance
with this project. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact
Ms. Kristen Rose at [phone].
Chery J. ody, , CMRS
Principal Scientist
' Enclosures:
A. Property Owner's Letter of Authorization
' B. Driving Directions to site
C. Figures:
Figure 1. Location Map
' Figure 2. Aerial Map
Figure 3. USGS Topographic Map
Figure 4. Soils Map
Figure 5. Surface Water Location Map
D. Jurisdictional Determination Form

' JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW
SEWER-LINE EASEMENT CROSSING
MYRTLE GROVE ROAD
WILA~IINGTON, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
' ECS PROJECT N0.22-13349B
' TABLE OF CONTENTS
' • APPENDIX A
P
t
O
'
ti
L
tt
f A
th
i
-
roper
y
wner
or
on
s
e
ers o
u
za
' • APPENDIX B -Driving Directions to the Site
:• APPENDIX C -Figures
• Figure 1. Location Map
^ Figure 2. Site Map
^ Figure 3. USGS Topographic Map
' ^ Figure 4. Soil Map
^ Figure 5. Surface Water Location Map
' •'• APPENDIX D -Jurisdictional Determination Forms

1

APPENDIX A
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION

' Fror~: Q7/Q6I2G06 11: '~ 1 #~Sk F. da3 '°
~~I /00,~
E7 ~ .. ..
~~~
EC;~ Carolr~e, :~.
Geotechnical ®Construction .h~terials m Environmental =
' ~ ~
r
'ter
July ~, 2006
llRs. JcnniferFiye, Project Ivfanager
` Wilmington Regulatory Field office •
U.S.•Ar~ny Cores aft
• Pont Office Boy 1829
Wi~sningtonj North Carolina 25402-1890
'~ • Reference: .
7220 Carolina Beaoh Road ~~ Wetlaad Delineation
Wiimi3ngton, N~%w ~ianov~r County, North Carolina
'~~ Dear: RIs. Frye: ~ '
~ ~ l~~p~y owner, I aro hereby A„fi~,~;~:„g y~.aud7or other employees of the U.S. Army
Carps of~gineers (USAGE), W~n Regulatory Field Oice and the Nc~xth Carolina.
Depaxtment of Euvironan~al..anti Natural ltssouroes ~~Division ' of Watcr• Quality (l`TC ~I7~EIVR
DWQ) to enter end iaspect the abav~~~ Protect site as nooessary. Z undet~end tha# this
site inspection will t in the det~aiaation of the jurisdictional status of the p~et'ty's
wetlamds/sarface waters under the USACE/NC DWQ's Section. 404/401 Regulatory Program.
Please contact me if you need additional informetiQn,
. ~~~
(owner Signature} ~ (Print Nam®) ,~P~~iv ~~ . ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~)
J r,-mr.~,c~~ _s ~~ue. pia °- ~~/-x;377
~~ . Lr~' ~`"'~ ~T (Phone No.) .
(~)~~ z

7211 ogden Business park ° Sulfite 20X ° Wilmington, isC 28411 ° (9i0) 686-9114 °Fax,[phone]
.. ... :.

APPENDIX B
DRIVING DIRECTIONS

1

1
69 Darlington Ave, Wilmington, NC 28403 to Myrtle Crrove Rd & Sunrise Ln, Wilmingto... Page 1 of 1
Start 69 Darlington Ave Get Google Maps on your phone
~~ Wilmington, NC 28403 : ,, TextthewordMGMAPS"to466453
~-~~~~ End Myrtle Grove Rd & Sunrise Ln
Wilmington, NC 28409
Travel ~(1,5 mi -about 21 mins

69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, NC 28403
Drive: 11.5 mi -about 21 mins
1. Head south on Darlington Ave toward Metting Rd 0.4 mi
1 min
~ 2. Turn left at Covil Ave 0.3 mi
1 min
3. Turn right toward [ndependence Blvd 20 ft
1- 4. Turn left at Independence Blvd 0.9 mi
2 mins
~ 5. Turn left at Oleander Dr/US-76 1.6 mi
4 mins Start
'~ 6. Slight right at Pine Grove Dr 2.1 mi
4 mins
t_-- 9i`.
7. Turn right at Masonboro Loop Rd 3.5 mi
5 mins
6,
~ 8. Slight left at Myrtle Grove Rd 2.7 mi t.:. ~~
5 mins
' Myrtle Grove Rd & Sunrise Ln _
Wilmington, NC 28409 ~ ,
i
' These directions are for planning purposes only. You may find that construction
projects, traffic, or other events may cause road conditions to differ from the map End
results. ___._
Map data ©2007 NAVTEQrr~n

~~~
i
f~
,~~
l ~~f
,I fir
Pond Ar
~,;
1~o t U~1s~ia
j~.~1,
_ _ .. - ~T~
r
J..
~ ,
Map data 02007 NAVTEQ
1
Overview

i

1
1
APPENDIX C
FIGURES

,. ,~
+ b~
~~ r
~r
a`~ ~l
`e r~k
r ~f
~t
6 ~
r
to F
w ~
,~
.. ; ~F ~,-~ ~ ~
>~ _
VY
~ ,' ~~
~f
_. - _ ~,.
._ .. _ ~
,~..., ~ - . .,~ r'
-
.•~~~~.
IIy a r~
~e+, `
~ ~ i t~ _ k, ~ r dr
t ' ~` ' , ~ J 6,~Y
_ ~
i ~ ~,
,E ! t
~~
r` ~
>~
~' ''
i
r°-'-°
r~ ~

!,.-~ ilt~~t?~.51
{~t71'~~"t?
~~~
some: Not to scale FIGURE 1 ~ SITE LOCATION n'IAP N
Source: Yahoo Maps at Yahoo.com, accessed on December 14, 2007.
Sewer-line Easement Crossing
Myrtle Grove Road ECS project No. 22-13349B
Wilmington, North Carolina ------ - ~j ~Gi December 2007
~~.~~3 fl~9 fr'~G~~

`~ ~
/ 1
~
_ \
I/' : -
_ ~ I
,\ ~ ._I Q
%
/
i /
I C
i 1.
~
1
III1 ..,.
~IR4~ In-5 in ll~c'ol
'

\~ h
1
/ ~ko:+~s...~ ~~ c-.moo aHn e~ Nwe.

_
..

+

~
I \
1
•~ h // t~ ~
1. I
~
N.C. (%RN - NP-'83

-\
v
i _
`
~d I 1 I ~ -"~C"
I `I
µ~~
~ ~~~
4
g
Y
O 1 ® i~~

-:. ~

~A I.,.
s.-
I

I I
I
{
~
,~
~~
~
I I "O .~,~ ~ yph, 4 I~t
\ ZS a
l

~ o I ,ww. I

~

~

- ~+

~
~~~
y5 I I
g
.I 4~ W .,
~.
~ o - orm coce -
voo ,>s
1_ y _
~~ w .
~
I I
-
~__ ~` it '
~~~
~ ~

F
------_-
____
1
- ~ ~
r
~ ~~

....- I I.. ..
I 1 ~ua€
may.-. E .y¢-. w.- ~.~ i
~~
~
~
~~~.
~DD'J~
~ 1
m,w
u I 1
~~
¢ . c
1
m eml _
® I~ ~ ~ I.
~ _ I I .. _. I ~ ~jl
". ~
~ x
~

12.1
- .
my ®!°mLLV

I ~
'a

y .

I
I.. .L. 1

I a oo /
0 1 e
I- ~ I

~
4`
~ \i
Is1
\e
`
+

Q
~~+'
°
d~aF`
'
I _
I I
f~
6~
I ,2 I .°..I ~ 1 _r _
I 6" 9 kX~ ~ 71i'
w svav
o I y I ~ ~tF
~
\
vr~ , 1
-,.' ~ ~ ~y^--•
r
l~
~
- '1"dW'
~
.
~
,
u`wm.
u
~~ ~ a
~
..

. I
£ I ®eyl
.
.
~ y
o r
.-,
,
-"--'.-.a
~ r
wen
~1°~"

- ~ , I
I.. ~
1 I
1 I _
i
~
~
~ 4
~ -'.-~
e~
~

. -.~ m \
~r
,ul
~ wn em
l,vo~wx
µ
,

. I
~: I 1 gi£B
gB
1 9~

1
? G C
I ~
o °c
'' - ~ ~~ I ~
=
51
T l l
"G.,= ~ f
~
5
7pY~~ ~I __-_- _. _... -. .._
~
- ..-._
~
~.: _f I i
~~' ,.
A I ...
~
~
ly aj4 / ~v,~(IW,u.
-.i+""r Wtl l1+~.
1.

\ \E ~B _ . I I
'" ~. ~
o
1~
~ ~~ 1 ~.1 i G f wxRr... I r.l ~ !

1 t~'J l~ -~

I uuu wm na~rnzYnw
~
,» ~ j I
~ ~~
: i ; k ~~
~~ I j . ~
~~~~u, 11,
~ I ~~,,
~,~ ~.,. «own, ~.. i I ~ ~ .
I

..

° rtetC~GU1W IMIO aNtrce -1m~1 ~ (AO _
° . ~"""°~°~
I

-F2AINAG'E, UTILITY e

~.

I~
f
I

~

~~ wn
- . ~ -
aoR,c -
_

. vas, „
~, NNW

°" "
-41~.~ w`~m.l°'ue".I:w+wm~."`.
o
°mMa ~~m ~,aN~~w~
~,~:~
~~

~5~'.. '~
- EASEl4IENT

~
duQ.
~ k'

I
~o ~~~ . ~~ _

I ~.cm.;iy sr re
~
~ a
oul
emw
r -X) " ~--
~ m
SANt'fe[RY" SEWER. .
~"I , ``
.
1~
_ ,
°°~~~ 5 2, s,
i `
wwm ~
~' PUMP STATI(1N SI~'E EASEMENT z
_ I 4
- ~~-' ) I ~~ -1`•-~
`
y ~
,~ xm°rt ranvn E~x=I
®
R ~"~" XQ`'~"'~N10-,. aw
-~ I ol" ~ FEDERAL POINT TOWN~-Ilf' NEW HANOVER. COUNTY
NOR[H :aROLINA YYaltt-~_~~

-
R~ I
s '
l d
R
~
~ _

_~- - g ~~: ~~ ~..
~"'~ - ~ ~. ""°` rAfO°`

~~
_ SCALE i ~ 7 GCTOBER 16. 2004
RLYIS U OC-iOBER 20;-2004

~

1
.._ ...
_ 5R 14sp
~
~
~~~. 1
~_'~u.c ~sro„
.dw '
-

" _. ~ ~
~ I~ Y
-. ._ ~~
Iw Iw
...
.a_ ~waa-m ~--
g'~+Mw 1__-n
~ F
~~ -
-
y
/ ~ LEGE )
-. ;
f ND _ ,
SHLRWIN' U
D
CRIBB ><
~'°1
„~. w, s ~~ ~ ~
WO~RE .n "-
.
.
„ , ;_ .• N.c. PROfESS1uNAL I:NUD suRVEYOR- L-lose n
~~ _"~ DEVELOPED
,MYRTLE VENTURES
LLC

_.-
i
I
~-oaur .. ic --`1Oh°I°`1 _.
1749 SNIPYARU BLVD
WILMIIJCTDN, NC .28412
O u umin usornr
1~"'~~"~"-'~ ~- mawcc, urnm umlwr-
- ,
.
_ -
P.O. 60% 13Y9 -

-'~
_ ~iG-%9i-GU80 - WILMINGTON, N.C. 28409-1229 ~~
(2,a,~
ll
fY1ap- ~onK' [#']
' - (9l0)~ 251-5030- ~ Q
_ .,
.
.- _ _,S" ~-2t1G~l0al3_~i4i

..-
_ - -Ln~ln r, nc~y ~F.t?r err-FQ,,.~~
--,. _- .._ ~ _.__
.. ..._ ~ - .... Rqs-.7L -

APPENDIX D
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section N of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION BATE FOR APPROVED JURISBICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish borough: New Hanover City: Wilmington
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 340610.95N° dick List, Long. 775313.91 W° ~iek List.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Unna-ned tributary
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows: Intracoastal Waterway
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03030005 Lower Cape Fear River Basin
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
:_ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date: December 14, 2007
Field Determination. Date(s): December 6, 2007
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S" within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
', Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There "waters of the U.S."within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required)
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in re~~iew area (check all that apply): t
~= TNWs, including temtoria] seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
+'~ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
`~f Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: Approximately 800 linear feet: 4 width (ft) and/or .07 acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: ~'
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictions] waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
~ Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section IILA.1 and Section IILB.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IILA.1 and Z
and Section IILD.1.; otherwise, see Section IILB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanorhave been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section ITI.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JB will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.l for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
' L Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: unkno~~~n j'ick List
Drainage area: unknown .Pick Lis(
' Average annual rainfall: 53 inches
Average annual snowfall: 2 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
Q Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through ~ tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are l (or less) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are ~ (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters area (or less} aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
i, Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWS: RPW into unnamed tribuarty nito lntracoastal Waterway.
' Tributary stream order, if known:
° Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply:
Tributary is: ^ Natural
^ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
® Manipulated (man-altered). Explain: Ditch into channelized stream.
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 4 feet
Average depth: 3 feet
Average side slopes: ds1.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
^ Silts ®Sands ^ Concrete
^ Cobbles ®Gravel ^ Muck
^ Bedrock ^ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
^ Other. Explain:
Tributary conditionistability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: stable.
Presence of run/riflle/pool complexes. Explain: none.
Tributary geometry: Relatively"$traight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 5
(c) Flow:
__
Tributary provides for:
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:
Describe flow regime: Seasonal flow expected during high precipitation events.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is:
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: ' Vii. Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
^ Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
^ changes in the character of soil
^ shelving
^ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
^ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
^ sediment deposition
^ water staining
^ other (list):
^ Discontinuous OHWM.~ Explain:
^ the presence of litter and debris
^ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
^ the presence of wrack line
^ sediment sorting
^ scour
^ multiple observed or predicted flow events
^ abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
[~ High Tide Line indicated by: ^ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
^ oil or scum line along shore objects ^ survey to available datum;
^ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ^ physical markings;
^ physical markings/characteristics ^ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
^ tidal gauges
^ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., wa+er c~lar is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: - Water is clear in the stream.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: unknown.
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
^ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
^ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is ~~s. Explain:
Surface flow is: ~ck;LiS1
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: _rt _ , ~;: Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
^ Directly abutting
^ Not directly abutting
^ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
^ Ecological connection. Explain:
^ Separated byberm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationshin) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are ;Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from:Pick List..
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick Lfst floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; genera] watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
^ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
^ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: ~'Ick List
Approximately ( )acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/Nl Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/Nl Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NE%US DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLI~:
1. TllTWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check al] that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
[~ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
~]' Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
~] Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: Seasonal flow is expected during high precipitation events.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 800 linear feet 4width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
~".' Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an 13PW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an ItPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an 12PW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an 12PW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
C] which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could betaken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
$See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on tl-is category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLI~:
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
[;~ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
^ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
'udgment (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
[3 Lakes/ponds: acres.
© Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
i Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Bata reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
^ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
^ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
^ USGS NHD data.
^ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Carolina Beach Quadrangle 1"=2000'.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Soil Survey of New Hanover County, 1977.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ®Aeria] (Name & Date):New Hanover County Online GIS Map accessed on December 14, 2007.
or ^ Other (I~Tame & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: