Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170185_Other Documents_20160324� /�RC/�D I S �.Es,y„ � �0�,5�,�.���� Y ; for natural and i builtassets Mr. David Bailey US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Subject: Request for a Jurisdictional Determination of Waters of the United — Three Low Impact Bridge Sites, Rockingham County, NC. Dear Mr. Bailey: ARCADIS has performed a stream and wetland delineation at three low impact bridge sites in Rockingham County, NC for the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). NCDOT is proposing to replace these bridges. Information for each site, including a brief site description is attached. The three sites are: Rockingham County . Bridge 07 on SR 2427 (Benaja Road) over Benaja Creek (17BP.7.R.100) • Bridge 39 on SR 2316 (Bethany Road) over Jacobs Creek (176P.7.R.101) • Bridge 283 on SR 2686 (Richardson Drive) over Little Troublesome Creek (176P.7.R.104) This letter serves as a formal request for a Jurisdictional Determination for each site. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me either by phone or email. Sincerely, ARCADIS US �� /� �r � / Robert Lepsic, PWS Senior Scientist Copies: Nicole Thompson - NCDOT File Imagine the result ARCADIS US 801 Corporate Center Drive Suite 300 Raleigh North Carolina 27607 Tel 919.854.1282 Fax 919 854.5448 www.arcadis-us.com WATER Date: May 16, 2016 Contad: Robert Lepsic Phone: 919.415.2278 Email: robert.lepsic@arcadis- us.com Our ref: NC612002.00000 ARCADIS US D �C���V��j U MAY24 E016 DtiJR - WqTER Rc'SOURCES TRANSPORTATION PERMITTING UNIT Bridge 283 over Little Troublesome Creek on SR 2686 (Richardson Drive) 17BP.7.R.104 Bridge 39 is located in the Town of Reidsville near the Richardson Drive — South Scales Street intersection. There are one perennial stream and two wetlands located in the study area. Little Troublesome Creek (SA) flows roughly north to south across the study area. It has a narrow buffer due to maintained utility line ROW and maintained lawns. The banks are eroding downstream of Richardson Road because maintenance of a power line has removed all mature woody vegetation from the stream bank. WA is a depressional wetland within the floodplain. It is located between a hillside and a maintained sewer line. It is connected to SA via a ditch outside the study area. WB is also a depressional wetland within the floodplain. It receives flow from an adjacent parking lot. It too is connected to SA via a ditch outside the study area/ D�����%� D MAY 2 4 2016 D£ivR • WATER RESOURCES TRANSPORTATION PERMIITING UNIT . � 0h �,. 1`-'. '`-���4L� r'...,.i... Hc. �c x � �w i N ' ` �9 v> n m ` � w r � �` q� - x Q^ o w Y b Q�4 � N S t � � ScOtlS+ Sj�\\�' �, � � `� Fleld St J� O j3 d ., oU� �rib�� 0��ai St ir ' Carter 5t Roanoke N�. Jy � R�d9e St r� b/ a�kson St 2 z. ��,' MooreS� t^ _ � n ry� � 5psinK« St m t �'/y r� ibbs Rd ' �n E tpo�ehe�d `. dr i ��; •, -.� r-�.......� �-, � �r, v' S �Sl � a LyleSl - N A g.p� princesi Re�dsville _ � , � � N lindsey `-' ^ ay� � Jy�e. 1- '� N .., q �' Y+�'pn f' - " u � ^ N N' L� f .. �— 2 u Piedmont St n� u' �� y �, � � � � m'6 N u f�'�'HarrisonSt � � 3 v p Q N u % Easf St .. a � u � r _„� f�� �.� �, 3 R�ssell P�e Q y 'r � t�,s S u $ p` o m c x, e�i` � � � a �c� �� tz ._. �: ` V����� .6 J °%Q, yc. � RrrydSIN .yc �, r ��= Wolkcr St p � i, i!r tic gal R d � � 9e G� p� u wCf�ma,-���. � �.r 3 `ae 9 � O Rj '` .. � �i tra � ` �,� c�y J �, S��rt�l'Ues� 0� `� C�te� �.\\\c„". . _ �`t � � t rt p /\ C . l \ � Mf � ..�,.�,�r„ U. �' �, F�rrcose ParA , � .. " ' ,� _ j :ountryClub � ,� ,�� C 3`I ��`. d��p. � ���� Qa�� Tumer D� � �i 3'�°� Q �, i ' . r . , ,.� R d . 'P. p � p� -- . . " o „ N Drum Kri , �n y ot° c�1 '° 4 e � . � ao �i � Ga�P Q .� Little a o� . . ^�9P (� m� CypressD� Jtyceeer`,. .., , • . � � � � Fatit 11 � � �' ,� K u a � �_ ' ,�w � ASh��Oj�O�'�� O� � �,� . , r, J�i^ o Q7�r Bnarwoods� a c e � �.� 5 �� y D�r �� � G �` a � IP '�� +n a �{� �°e cgy� -c'' � .. � e� ; '2' i� s Or yc� � ',� i� '� ic �G� � 5 0 .�. .. � ,o ��wntlalEpr � . � � ,� Q-�i' �� Clar � \.�uF`N �d � a'Po. � 3 � � � k �ake /�d �p� �y GL ��� Legend � Fr�'a tG+ Y p� � Study Area ' � � N � �Me Kd �' N Projest NoVIC PI7 R.104 FIGURE 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 Feet Bridge No. 283 over Little Troublesome 1 inch = 3,000 feet Creek on SR 2686 1 Rockingham County, NC ' _ ���- � �.�. • � `J , �.� s� 1� � rs . t i! _ _ . .. 'r . •" � , ����rC�.:-... . .. � ' . �� � > � ti � . ri • j � • � .�---��•t _ , i „�:.� ;. � ,� � , �o�� sT : ,.,, —. _ _ , -, . � ,. - � � � `'� �., .. - , ; .�,�--.= - � -. - ;� ; �.,f ��"'` ;,;� - -- _ - � . o ,,,�• ,. .; . . ��� � .,� n; . � R�IDS�IILLE � ' �-� ' � � � .�. - �:-_-_.. � _. � . -�..�- � � � ,. .:�-- i�-- .� � ,,� '�4� m Pe�n emo�iia! j � � ` J� �a 4S �+� � � .....�--�a_ • � � _.. � ^.- — _ ,._ � �. � - � � �.H � �. . ; ,. -. -- ; �' j � �..� � ;y t. � �E { . j �;' ARMA�t � ,�r �� ' �� , ,',,�' . , ,;.� - ,, P,� �.,,�.-- ST- r,� ,,�.. - � �IP ? ° � - RCJ" A � ; . �� S ` ,.1__ _ ., - , � •__ ;. . �� ` — , _. ..,_. _ - _ . -.W.� . ��� ��.^� . � s � ' " °r - +_. _ .:. , ` t. �. -.. :,i . $��� � � t� _ i �! ' "1 � . . d " '" � a - � 1 Q � �� F � � ,j �f,'..� �' ;' . f+ .«. � � y} f� ..._..� �. �� .�Sr. . f' _' .�w ..��,�, _. ' "� ...' - f v-t Fa t, ��=-� ��, �� �, � - � i ',' � r•a -�� AVE + �`- ,,, �, i `'� � tF, �. �� � —__��� ;.,,,�e-� _. -- �� �Pf�� �� t • {� `�F� �-' � ` � a� � ' '--G `` , . -� , � � - � ? ``-._. _.��,. �' �, .�, , �r • � .,.— � ' �-= � ,,...ti d��=� �� �' . • ,'4 � ' � , � � r . . * • • ' w. � � ,�•�� , 1� b r_ _ . -, ' E , - - � • .. ...� �,� , _ � .,: � �, ' .r�� �"�; �, � � ` ` f � -- : =� - � . � _ ; .� � ---� .� ,-- �; . . �.- _� . ;; , , ,. � . 'y`' . � _ _.+� � , '�4 j----- :- -s ; ,.' •, , ;` �c-� -' . n.' r '�* �.....� .:c ' R %�' ;/ - �`� . .. . ., • - - : n, �� ai� T i c� � r� � " f�� , r � �_ . - __ �� _ . � . � ..� _ . _ � . . . � .: �" "� � . �...�� � .. � ��' :J� �' ` . . ��.. �. • fi'"+��' ,,�' � S . Y� ✓ .., . -- ,� .�,f ` � tr f Y J. �.�. �-.„_ �. .�; . , ! ' � .. � ; _ ,._._m; � i � � _ ,� `` . �` __ _ _ _ a_ � �,: r , r --.,k . _, � . , -. � �.^+iyr..., l'�' —. .. .=.e'�' � • • t - a.� fXi � / ` R - � �, � )j � � � � • 1� � � �.,..,e.,.y. � ' j ��� • / / • � �1 j w ,t �` , r � i� �l �� ` ' ♦' j � { � � ,,, « �, � �•;��' �," ��___,,..D f .'i�i�� • �. . . .,�%� � � ..h � s-��'J� - �-1� m�i,`�T / . • �� � � i' ; .�! • � '4 , f ��� ' . � • � �Pt r, � r �• • 'P}._� �� r � y' J.. � O� �I • - �, + �O t � � ..- ......, a i w .;� _;_j .�.. �;r�r- � R : " � '� � • . �i!✓"'" � # / • ) • . �,�� _ Gott Cou �se �.� R,�.� � . ,�► . . �� , . r �30 � � "'" ,,-�. • �',r. PP.. � :�.. . A: k , �,- -., � , � � � .. '� = " � � av � • .� �olt Course.. . � ,R - +'°, �. �� ...�'` �� ,� ;� .�,� I� � , � ,,; ;' � „4 - V -���� ' r • �'+� • • � ti� C`,�E SY�� •'� . ,, o : �. '� � , + -;— • �. ; • w ' � r _ � � • �1,� • • • • � . �., �+ „ . , . __ � . , , ; , ' ' i7r a "' . . ir .- ;i� • . : �,•.. ., � ,, .� _,. .. , , . .- �, f� �/ t� •�f 'r • � y , . - _ ` \' ♦, • '� • ' � 1� �C � ��A �� � : � r � ;:. . - • � _ _ +;/�� � 1P '1•� • _ . . . Y ; - � x .�� �' `�.,d� h 1. • � . � ~ ```��� �rv.,.4� ��!' ,�� . � �� � • , i .�� � `�• • � • „r . . i�. ,'f' ,/' , d :"` � � ! _ . � ti ;• " • .- .�. � • � �. �� ,�� . . •� • � � r, fA�.� • � �� • � . {.�� ..� 'y, � i�� i ?� M�' ' ��. ,� 1 Legend ' � ' � ' f � ' • . �� , , • f ": �E, t � �' *. � Z� . -._ � , i #•, ._ ..�L 1 • ♦. � ' •� -�..' . . ; ` _ : - Study Area 1 � ___ �,, � • - .:1 . ; � . �n� � _ f - ���., � ,;, . � . � �� � �1 SaQth P�rk � � �;�, � SITE LOCATION N Project No. 176P.7.R.104 FIGURE o �,000 2,000 Feet Bridge No. 283 over Little Troublesome 1 inch = 1,000 feet Creek on SR 2686 2 Rockingham County, NC a� � � , � � � . ��'� � ' � ' . '�. ' � � y �� . ,� �- }�� t� � ,. j+ '� „� hi y��,i' �y� �. �_�r � i '�erv � ;i°f � � `'�;u . �� � v � � -�. ���. �'+� � �, �� � ��, . � .;3 � �.`.- m - � `��. �s _�� � �� r�' � �a.�' ,�M.>��.�_ . � � �-� �` `j�,.. \ �,i � .�' � 4 ' ,.: � v. r� ,i �t �` ' ' i ' 1 � yy�� H d � ' i.-�� ��� � �� ,�+ 'e. +I� .... � . �� y (�' � h3 ,f7 T .��'� '�E i� � ' Y`�e ''yM'F❑� =� Fy: r �"t._ +' . �� .� �� +''�. � J4"� �yc r � ��7 � I�Sp .,,+ � _��"� k, • �� _ � `�'��� � �.� ���' �, �.��` � � � � '°�e` ,,,� � x� . ,�r}:� � i t .. � r /' -��-� �":* � ,�`: : �: ��,/`t�_ . �� � � � ��.�.- . �� '�a: a �.� �. :, � ,r , � ,� �c; . .� "w , � f� `>�' � .;,� ' � � .�� � -"� �,��'_' �`''�"' # � � .�°s� � "- � , �;` �� ,� � s x � �1 .�.� > « s •� ` t �• . ' -� ' _ �.0.15 �� -ro �µ 'r.� ,� ',.����, _ .,� � -.� . . �/M� � f� _ T'_ �'i`.'fi+ �,." : i- . . , . � ` � , T � - - �+`�. . - - � - t . .� '+� _ ,, � . � , . � � . - � r ' P ,. � '" r". .t� '=l.., � � . � .. � � ..�. . * � .. . � . .. .� J1y �. ��� ; ds�,3:, �� ��� �` 3 * � �'� 1 ',� . �, �!t` 1� O '; ' � " ' ; �"� �2 ; +�� y.l� i5�.` �:. .. . . � �Y��. .. �R' � }� _ , �3 - _`' � yi�. � . _ ��e� ,i"� . . _ � . . . ,r'' f' : s�. * � '`C.. ' .�' �" _ • � - . }, ` � �� , , . .'� st �, � : �,;. .� �y, {� .� �i�_ x_-'�� g� tY� r ,�,1' � yP,a.� f. . �I� \ ... 9 ��. \ � ' � � � n 1�\� � �d . � .e. -a. r' N � � � 4 � � ^�/ � ��,:' .d,�r JJa"-n<< �, , � . � ��� � . � .�.;�. �;��'� � ° � �'U � �,,r� �d��s� %� � f q '` ` .,�'� � �,s �� '' ? � � � � -��� .1 � ��� �� � r�-- ��� F+� �a `� U 0 - • . . � � `�,, .� � � ` . 9 w a (? 3 �" � . ' ` .P, � � _ � M . : , � ` . , : - at .,, � f � � . �i��` �'�-- wa-06 ,� ��er� �,y� �,�"° �w � � _ sa-0�b sa 02a 3 } ' �`Y -i r - �vda 05 Wa 04 � � °��'� 4 * y .' sa-03b /_. �'� �k �r��.�, i . �_ . � f� � .. •..Z . � - Q�`y� F �,.o �� /f�. " �' � � �.��� . _ ?�1. � � � 4 �A:3 J' k,-�Qy�\lJi: �7 � �`4 �� �� -1' � ��i � a .•:'.f �4'�+ �: .� Q tJ ` `_� � �� � " �q �+� lv�:r- l i 1�, . 1�• �" � . � hp/' �I� { . � ' _�Y" '• ^ .�. � � }v � f tr f: , t � r `'� tir.13,, 1 .� � � ��� ,' `�� 4 � � �` � s1�� � rti h "f �b U 5,� � � �i" ^�'' � �'" ,`. x '�-. � , my �� .�,.��;~. p (�,,,��,, (l ,�� "+�. .� �� .,.� .. � � ,� � :1::�' ,it�e . r +,� 3A f �+ 'Ak "M�y �,', �� I �� . � - .�'" �i� � �.:3 .. F � :.4 !4 •� �^ - p� ,� . �- " _ .�-� � ��� .:i � ._ -�i: .4�� L� . �'.i'� . � �' �. ��` .� " .•.1(� �`�� � f� �1t� �,p .. . � . * �� ��. �� �'.,,��� ,�J �;y���_ } � .+t �� r`,+r. l -' � ¢ � •� �y a � J'a x �' r�.1 � � � �y q y _ � � � ��� a � ��,. na�Y �[ �^� } �a do' ,, �• �+� » r ,,��c f �' . � � 4� �' ' �if Y; `` � � �''. �,��`l �-,� }p "'' t 3� �' . � �u � ,� �" .�. ��` . � - -r � � F�= • � psy� �,,� y '3l 2'` d' f `; 'x r � � �.. � . .= � - � .�. , � .,n .. � r k4 . . � .r , � : e ��� s � fii ... �tm`F :_ - �r1� �g�k � .� 4 � �^ . i� �. '� �� . � � r�. .�� '�� _ � � +/ e. :` �.`�l� - y _ . " \:.. � £4 ;s` ,.i ��� � f ,:r �� Y . �' ,n,_ y ♦, _f ,5 J)°� l�is } -e '-+ , ... � .� � � - � � / . � R �i ;� � -. .^A 'e -���J� � �� # •�' �'�'., � 1�.' ' ��.��� .��_ � , � � ��.�s� r�T{ � . ' '�}� ' - � � �r `� � � �� �'' � � � � . �" ' 4--�,� � 1� � ,4� _ .� ��' �. � ...II�-...�,s�7�-`e�... .,....... . d`"� .`�, �t- ♦ 3-��i� %���n�- �� � f' S.� t � -2+ . — �' - � � �t ` �; � .s� � ,"'6 ' Legend '���'� * • t ��a - ��-'" '� . r'�� #— Y i� F, . . , :� . .. �- , � � i9 •_ .. _.. . �+.x � Study Area . ���� � ��`�' � : } .,�,: ''�' ;� '4 � � r . � � ������� > � ���„ � '� . 3� �`� �r- Wetlands �•'�� ��: �° � #; t�.� � �� - s'�� . � ,� � . Stream ,� � . :,-'� ..a � � ' � - ,�a� :. "- �,, � � � . , w�' _:,� � = �• �'.; ` � AQUATIC FEATURES N o iso 30o Project No. 17BP.7.R.104 FIGURE Feet Bridge No. 283 over Little Troublesome 1 inch = 150 feet Creek on SR 2686 3 Rockingham County, NC t`� ��� �t ' � � F Rs� d � F ,_�.:. � �� � ,�• �. � , y �*�� ..�;�� � : i � .i ,6� �� s � �!' � �"�" '� =� � ��� ��� � ,� �� . A� t. ' � ! � a '* '� �'' �� i,�� _ , � '. � �r �. .� �� � �'-�� �' F_•. � � �'� � t� -� { � '.".1 �.. ..zy.. � s�� di'a. .� � �'i - , a � ,�p _ . +s y,, •,L1. .� 1�;• ...��� . . q ��� � �4�� � ���c' � *���'r-� � I ���.`ti ��� yy � ��t sR - '�'�,t;,� k '_` �*' � � �'i�`� 1�-�� �'�d B��".:. �#i, -.t��,+ a `.S' ���"� . + � � r� �� � � s'�;\� t � '� y- _ � . � � �� 1'�`� .,�� xA' � E $ '� ?�� �g�' .#� f�'� '� � �♦ �' 4�� 0, �4f � ,��',�� �� �- q,tl+ �'�" � a��' ,� f ` �k• . � N , � , : � �,y ' - ,� �r ;a4 � � � ' �� � .�: �.� �� t ,� � x �� ,�v` £-� 'f =� . x =. "� ' '°" � �' . pr. �y, h '� �.e� _ •r" g� }/�: .'�Y �,• 5 � �� , { �' .7 J ` �' �. j �� �. � �2_ ��1. ' � d. ,�P � �y/ � . a 4�7� r , ,� �" = -`� � �� �:� a�,�' . � _ � �, . ,. �� � '1 " t ��`'� � � ; "'�` f�. � �� _ .. � � ,-k/. � ;:�s;`� %�,. �.. a"/ ,^ { �.�, r . � d� ,: ' .., ��' s, yz r._ ,,�p : "� � . r � y�. �. .. � i� �� . ,_��' yF . - ,F a'P�. . � � .tifE'�� {`+�, � � � � e� �.A .�^ � �. � �� . . : �. , .. � f/� `{ � ' .: �- ` � '� � f���,+,�,;� � �+' ' , }• � "� g'�'ra 1"��5.._ yR y�L� _-�� �;-- '! � . i- �yt�'�` t'� T '�� ��:,. ... ,���. .fi. �,�* =:ti,F �i` � +� , . � � j �. �; �, J• � t,' �s�a. � #'4 �'� �t u�^` N � °� � 1 ,, ( `�� � � � . . `, �!,�!� :� F 3��� � ���:sa ;�' ir�. � s` . � :'ri�. � �,� • a ' ':�'� , .: ' �� � . �'.�J �� ' " .{ §�� s �.� � !� � "yE '� - �g � � � � _ � �,{� -Z ,'� � � ��+• 7� •�� ��°� p ! �y�! -� +�A� _ 1 � i l�yt� . ! s � �� � � �� r �� �� -. _ , ��� � ' � � � � ��� �� ,�� -- � 4 � . � � , r , t .., .• '�Si � An � ,e . . : .. � > � �i��' . •; . . 3 �.:. � '? ,�. ` ,��✓� � .�'�' �"i .f p� �� - �� d�l� 1 F �. - , _ _ �L,.. .S �3 ii � � �.�i ..s .� �..�P-,. , �' i '� �o r � ��^"� J�� �' } s?a. � ,, � � . ; � ��s __ 1Y. ` � L i 4 fF . V � �. � ' . �: ,� .� .. . ��'-d�..Y �'• „ ` .�� -.� . RA� �\ �, � 3�/b' 4 +� ' ; i/ � �, � Y J ,. __; As y .� r � % / � . �-s. � � > .a t*x � \ � _ i� ° -�'� � a -l',� . �.'� � � � K� - � � � a " �S' ,�' �� .,; �r '�`-`a{ _ — K-.., . � .. .: , � � �� �� . . � _ - � 4 � � .. � .. - �,�k � � �� �` ` �� � t�_ :(�a � � �� �.�d � ' ,� _ ,-,�t� „ ,. '�'� . � �'� � � _`a� ' �_`' �``� �,� � i °"r ,,,{ •:s � :. N'��"�a _ 1 :�F�� ,-`� i1��K'�.,i,� :� �`�► �"� �� �w. � ��� ¢: . s� , ,e} . �` r" y.a ...�t. �'�'�'". � ".;. �F 3R ,�F'. .i K � . C" � �S' -`� '�. - 'Y� "' • ax � ��T �-i , � '�� ` a� � �' "+ .�''�, < � � �� �' .� �,� �,�,f�'�',�,, `� '4� � �.�*� ���„� � � ,r"� �:n„'�, . � � 1� � �"f Y - . � ��`���„�,�•� X,e' � ` 's` � ..�''i'r �'P ,�`t 'c� . �J' � � � �,,, _ - � r� ,J��'. �i � �,� - ��' � � �r� f� _ - r ir ��" 4 ���� � �"' �f � `. . - f _ r,� j.,r- � e�, .z `' � � `� ,� �,r#�.s� -. £ r .. .` r � �� . � . ! � _ . . , � y,� �. �, f;�� � � _ � ��� +�„� � . � '��'�� ��# ,�.� �^' � � �, � *; U �-. ;� - y ., ''� � � / y� � . � � 'RS � -'� �:�", 's! -`r+� � A� �� .'�i� '"� � {� 1 .. � ! � � ' �•,$� �`� `� -� �' Y`,I '' +� r t. �� a � ..�r � .,,,� ,� ,Y � �" i f � +r - �•. � �� �* � lp�/ �" k , _ � � " � ,��g, ��'� �., . ,� . � :� t', ,a� l"� `���ay�' � �.E: � ����J �i ''y '�" ��`'� M „�' ��'- -� _s,�,¢� �� , d��� . p � � � �:_ )� l � . t.� *M��?! � � _ f . �h y Q . , �� . y��-"'� ' � ,�. ,,�p#��s�yy�'�� E.��:�... �� fi, �..����w�. � ,�,�-�` 4.Yi } y� , , - s�, � �2' _ .�% �¢ r . f �'� E �� iI'. �. t � ��� � �rt ,,r�r.. '� � . �' t ��}% . .. r�' �'"-' ���� � �{'�� �K:� - �� Le end �;IF"� s��+'�y�� � ���,s� - � � �.�-.��� � �le� . � � „ '!� f"_" �; . - �,� :��'�'��. r _ � _ ,�` � . �� � � Study Area �. � ,:;r� � � ; ,� `'� ,�. '�" `* �L � - '�� ` :��; Clifford-Urban Land � r�p`,"r k s >„s � .',`�„ �" �. °.'q� �ti - ,� + �� ,, .� �_ " x�, _ � �.� Codorus i � �` �. ; .� '. �, � a � r , ,,a � ' � ��'� r �� ' � ��r- '. ��.�`�k °' � ;� r �� � �� r_ .� . Hatboro +�? �� ` � ; �� ' �+. n �� r�r"'� E 4 r`� � S, r ,x` ";= � = �_.� - +p r r . � r , l �� �= = �` �_� ��.��_� SOILS N o 20o aoo Project No. 17BP.7.R.104 FIGURE Feet Bridge No. 283 over Little Troublesome � inch = 20o feet Creek on SR 2686 4 Rockingham County, NC WETLAMD DETERMIMATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: Bridge No. 283 on SR 2686 Richardson Drive City/County: Rockingham County Sampling Date: 03 May, 2016 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: N� Sampling Point: WA-04 up Investigator(s): R. Lepsic Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0'2 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 36.343135 Long: -79•678216 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓ Remarks: Upslope of WA between WA and Richardson Road HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required) Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired; check all that applv) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (64) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (69) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes . No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present7 Yes No ✓ includes ca illa frin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators not present. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15' x 15' � Acer rubrum 2 Liquidambar styraciflua 3 Acer,negundo q. Cercis canadensis 5. 6. 7. 8. ) % Cover Saecies? Status 40 Y • FAC 30 Y ..FAC 30 Y ' FAC 30 Y FACU Saalinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot'size: 15' x 15' � � Acer rubrum 2. Cercis canadensis 3 Acer negundo � - 4 Corylus americana 5. . � 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 130% . = Total Cover 30 Y FAC 25 _ Y FACU 20 Y FAC 5 N FACU 80% = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15' x 15' � �. Rosa multifloria 25 2. Rubus argutus 5 g. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 q, Acer rubrum � 15 5, Quercus phellos 5 , g, Quercus nigra 5 . �. Hemerocallis fulva 5 8. 9. . 10. 11. - 12. _ 75% 1Noodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' x 15' � �. Lonicerajaponica 2. Toxicodendron radicans 3. Vitis rotundaflolia q. Hedera helix . � 5 Campsis radicans g Parthenocissus quinquefolia � (Include photo numbers here or on a Small wooded area between WA and road. Plot size reduce. 15 20 10 20 10 5 80% Y N Y Y N N N, FACU FACU FAC FAC - FAC FAC FACU : = Total Cover Sampling Point: WA'04 up Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBE, FACW, or FAC: a (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 13 �g� Percent of Dominant Species That,Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 61.54% �p�g� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv: OBL species � x 1 = � FACW species � x 2= � FAC species � x 3 = � FACU species � x 4 = � - UPL species � x 5 = � Column Totals: � (A) � (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = � _ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) = Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Veqetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Saplirig/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. � Y FACU Y FAC N FAC Y FACU � N FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation N _ FACU_ Present? = Total Cover Yes ✓ No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point. WA-04 up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of, indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moistl % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks 0-2 10YR 3/2 100 silt clay many roots 2-12+ 7.5YR 4/4 80 7.5YR 5/2 20 C M loam large gravel 'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) _ Dark SurFace (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _.Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) = Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR M) = Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) = Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No � Remarks: Hydric soil indicators not present US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont ProjecUSite: Bridge No. 283 on SR 2686 Richardson Drive City/County: Rockingham County Sampling Date: 03 May, 2016 Applicant/Owner. NCDOT State: N� Sampling Point: WA=04 wef Investigator(s): R. Lepsic Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): �ncave Slope (%): 0'2 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P _ Lat: 36.343135 - � Long: .'79•678216 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus NWI classification: PF01 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? �Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .✓ No Depression in floodplain. Portion of weUand wooded and portion in grassed sewer ROW. This form covers the wooded area. Wetland connected to SA via ditch outside of study area. HYDROLOGY Wetiand Hydrology,lndicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum oftwo reauired) Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aoalvl _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ✓ Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ✓ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) ✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck SurFace (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ✓ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) - _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes . No ✓ Depth (inches): . Water Table Present? Yes ✓_ No .� Depth (inches): 11 Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No includes ca iila frin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: , Standing water within wetland. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. samPiin9 Point: �►A-oa wet Absolute Dominant Indicator pominanceTestworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' � % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species � Acer rubrum 40 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 2 Liquidambar styraciflua 40 Y FAC Platanus occidentalis 20 Y FACW Total Number of Dominant 10 3. Species Across All Strata: 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 90% 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv: 8. 100% = Total Cover �BL species � x 1= � Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' � FACW species � x 2= � � Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Y FAC FAC species � x 3= � 2. Quercus phellos 5 Y FAC FACU species � x 4= � 3 Acer rubrum 5 Y FAC UPL species � x 5= � 4. Column Totals: � (A) � 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Herb Stratum (Plot size; 30' x 30' � � _ Carex lurida 2. Impatiens capensis g. Cornus amomum q. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5. Quercus phellos � g Juncus effusus �. Persicaria pennsylvanica 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woodv Vine Siratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' � � Lonicera japonica 2 Toxicodendron radicans g Parthenocissus quinquefolia 4. 5. 6. Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate Wooded portion of wetland WA. 20% = Total Cover 15 10 5 5 5 5 5 Y OBL Y FACW N FACW N FACW N FAC N. FACW N FACW 50% - Total Cover 10 Y FACU 20 Y FAC 10 N FACU 40% = Total Cover (A) �B) ��B) �B) Prevalence Index = B/A = � Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ✓ 2 - Dominance-Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in'Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation St�ata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Herb —All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WA-04 wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features . (inchesl Color (moist) °/a Color (moistl % Tvae Loc Texture Remarks 0-7 10YR 4/2 80 . 10YR 5/4 15 D M silt clay 7.5YR 4/6 5 C PL � 7-12+ 7.5YR 4/4 60 7.5YR 5/1 40 D M clay loam large gravel present 'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) _ Dark SurFace (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) = Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) ✓ Depleted Ivlatrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark SurFace (F6) ' Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark SurFace (F7) = Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) = Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric SurFace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) - unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No . Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: Bridge No. 283 on SR 2686 Richardson Drive City/County: Rockingham County Sampling Date: 03 May, 2016 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WB'OS up Investigator(s): R. Lepsic Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0'2 � Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 36.342706 Long: -79.676794 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Hatboro NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) ' SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No . Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes . No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓ Area upslope from WB. Between WB and road. . HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum oftwo required) Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reouired; check all that applv) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) SurFace Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table,(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (616) Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of.Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck SurFace (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) . _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) _ Aquatic Fauna (613) ` FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Fieid Observations: • Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No- ✓ Depth (inches): � Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓ includes ca illa irin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: ' . . Wetland hydrology indicators not present US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. samPiing Point: �►►s-os up Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20' x 20' � % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species � Platanus occidentalis gp Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 2 Acer rubrum 20 _ Y FAC Li uidambar s raciflua 40 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant � 3. q � Species Across All Strata: q, Ulmus rubra 10 N FAC Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.43% 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total % Cover of: Multialv bv: 8. 150% = Total Cover OBL species � x 1= � Saalinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' x 20' � FACW species �� x 2= � � Ulmus rubra 10 Y FAC FAC species � x 3= � 2. FACU species � x 4= � g, ' UPL species � x 5= � 4. � Column Totals: � (A) � 5. ' 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 10% = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20' x 20' � . �. Rosa mulitflora 20 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ' 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. � Woodv Vine Sfratum (Plot size: 20' x 20'. � �. Lonicerajaponica 2 Toxicodendron radicans g. Parthenocissus quinquefolia q. Pueraria montana 5 Vitis rotundafolia g. Hedera helix Y FACU P�evalence Index = B/A = � (A) �B) ��B) iB) _ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3- Prevalence Index is 53.0� 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) — 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must — . be present, unless disturbed or problematic.. — Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: _ Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or — more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of _ height. —' SaplinglShrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less — than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. — Herb–All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless — of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 20°�a = Total Cover Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 40 Y FACU 60 Y FAC 10 N FACU 10 N UPL 5 N FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation 10 N FACU Present? 135% = Total Cover 2emarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Narrow upland area between WB and Richardson Drive. Plot size reduced to cover area.- Yes ✓- No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont –Version 2.0 - � SOIL Sampling Point: WB"08 up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features ,- (inchesl - � Color (moist) %a Color (moistl % Tvpe Loc Texture . Remarks 0-12+ 7 OYR 4/3 100 loam 'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: - Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (A1) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) ^ Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surtace (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) - _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark SurFace (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) . _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark SurFace (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric SurFace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): TYPe: Depth (inches): ' Hydric Soil Present? . Yes No � Remarks: ' . Hydric soil indicators not present US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern 11�ountains and Piedmont Project/Site: Bridge No. 283 on SR 2686 Richardson Drive City/County. Rockingham County Sampling Date: 03 May, 2016 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: N� Sampling Point: WB-08 wet Investigator(s): R. Lepsic Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 36.342706 Long: -79•676794 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Hatboro NWI classification: PF01 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No Remarks: Depression in floodplain. Wetiand connected to SA via ditch outside of study area. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reauiredl Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired; check all that applv) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ✓ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (614) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High WaterTable (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ✓ Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) ✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (616) Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (CS) Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (64) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (65) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ✓ Water-Stained Leaves (69) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches). Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No includes ca illa frin e ' Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Standing water within wetland. Not a sample point. Greater than 1 foot in areas. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WB-08 wet Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' � % Cover Saecies? Status Number of Dominant Species � Acer rubrum 2p Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A) 2. Acer negundo 60 Y FAC Platanus occidentalis 10 N- FACW Total Number of Dominant 8 3. Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75% (A/B) 6. � � Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. - � Tota6 °/a Cover of: Multialv bv: 8. 90% = Total Cover OBL species � x 1=_ � Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' � FACW species � x 2= � �. 'Acer negundo 70 Y_ FAC FAC species � x 3= � Z. Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC FACU species � x 4= � 3. Cornus amomum 10 N FACW UPL species � x 5= � 4. ' Column Totals: � (A) � (B) 5. ,. ' � ' 0 Prevalence Index = B/A = 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. - — ✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 9. _ — - 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 10. � 00% _ 4- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting = Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' � �. Rosa mulitaflora 5 Y FACU — Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 2. Impatiens capensis 15 Y FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 3• ' be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 4• Defnitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 5. 6 Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3_in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 7, height. 8. SaplinglShrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less 9. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. 10. 11. Herb–All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. � - 20% = Total Cover Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 30' z 30' height. Woodv Vine Sfratum (Plot size: ) �_ Lonicera japonica 40 Y FACU . 2 Toxicodendron radicans ' 15 N FAC � 3. Parthenocissus quinquefolia ,. 10 N FACU q Pueraria montana 30 � Y UPL Hydrophytic 5• Vegetation g, Present? Yes ✓ No _ - 95% = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont–Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WB"08 wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moistl % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks 0-7 10YR 3/2 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 D M silt clay 7-12+ 7.5YR 4/1 60 7.5YR 4/6 40 ' C PL clay loam 'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 �� �TLAND RATYIV� W�RK�HEET' Fourth Versfon ProjectName �^��« ,� d� vv<,r G,���y �✓�,,c�z:�.�.�Nearest Road %�r4G��;��sA�. 1��-,'✓c �J�a��� County j�,���.; :,.���� ,�. Wetland area �: 3� acres Wetland width �/vc� feet Name of evaluat r � / ���; ; �. Date � /3 // � Wetland locateon _ on pond or lake � on perennial stream _ on intermittent stream within interstream divide other: Soil series: G���,J s _ predominantly organic - humus, muck, ar peat � predominantly mineral - non-sandy _ predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors _ steep topography ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)` �/ Bottomland hardwood forest Headwater forest Swainp forest Wet flat Pocosin _ Bog forest Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) j� forested/natural vegetation � 5' % � agriculture, urban/suburban Bc7 % � impervious surface '� % Domin�/ant vegetation (1� /`f��✓ ���ivv�,.,, (2) C�r �t' .., �t1G �.,..fic. ✓ '-iT'V +rGG. i' �`J � tl i3) 7��G �.- �,�s ���:.•��. ��� � �� Flooding andl wehaess semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated seasonally flooded or inundated �C intermittently flooded or temporary surface water _ no evidence of flooding or surface water Pine savanna Freshwater marsh � Bog/fen _ Ephemeral wetland Carolina bay ` Other: ' The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels = Il Water storage � x 4.0� _� f A Bank/Shoreline stabilization Q x 4.00 =� �'etland � T Pollutant removal �_ `� x 5.00 =�/p rat�n � I Wildlife habitat A x 2.00 =� N Aquatic life value 1 x 4.00 =� �� ! G Recreation/Education f� x 1.00 =� � :** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint source disturbance within %z mile upstream, upslope, or radius � '6�'E�'�AND �TYI�tG WORI�S�E'T I'ourth Version Project Name �,^;� G � r�� v,r.�,i �; 3�� �� ���� ��.�. Nearest Road y�,�! � ,-�:,��. �►�,• -•� �51����� County ('�a� %5,�,,, �,� ,,,,.. Wetland area o/ acres Wetland width �lov feet Name of evaluator ; f � � � 5 •'� Date '; �3 ��i� �'etland locat�on _ on pond or lake �� on perennial stream on intermittent stream _ within interstream divide other: Soil sea�ies: ���bo,�� _ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat �C predominantly mineral - non-sandy _ predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors _ steep topography ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetl�nd type (select one)* � Bottomland hardwood forest Headwater forest Swamp forest Wet flat Pocosin _ Bog forest �ldj�cen# land use (within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius) � forested/natural vegetaxion i S % x agriculture, urban/suburban f�a % X impervious surface :^ % I)omin nt vegetat�o�a` (1) ��<r Hy A �,•d o (G> � L� K ✓ �fJ �3 F^f.� � (3) ' �1 ^/MN i Gc..��, -. CJC%wz'�'�"'+ � ` � Flood'ang and we�ess semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated seasonally flooded or inundated � intermittently flooded or temporary surface water _ no evidence of flooding or surface water Pine savanna Freshwater marsh Bog/fen _ Ephemeral wetland Carolina bay Otl�er: + The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels - - - - - - - ---------- .. _. . . .. - .._ . .----�--- - -- • --- — ------- - -- --�--�-- --�---•-- -- .. . - - - - •- . i R Water storage � x 4.00 = � ; V6'etland ; I A Bank/Shoreline stabilization d x 4.00 = 0 rating E i7' P o l l u t a n t r e m o v a l , '� x 5. 0 0 = f'� � ! I Wildlife habitat I x 2.00 = �' N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = ;� �� G Recreation/Education !� x 1.00 = 0 � '** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint source disturbance within %: mile upstream, upslope, or radius ? �� �, f�,%i,- ,�..k1 �..� �. NC Division of Water Qualihr -Methodology foP Identification of Intermi�tent and Perenriial Strearns and Themr Origins v. 4.11 NC DWQ Stream ldenii�acataom Fo�rm Version 4.11 Date: .- �r�• �,rS�ar 3 ProjectlSite;. f� , � r � f � Latitude:� ��a � � �� IC.•� ti . �r,a . :F- 'v^ ✓' ' o -. L ..� . Evaluator: ? � County:� � , � Longitude- ��. < �4, ,'� a� , � c� w. -�?S. ����v TOt�I �OIII�S: r �� Stream is at /eastinte�rrittent � Stream Deterre�ination (circle e Other �� �,,�, �� tlt ifz 19 ornerennialiiZ 30" `J� � Ephemeral lntermitten �' eren� e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = �� �) Absent Weak 11Aoderate Stroeeg 1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 2. Sinuosity of channel along thal�Neg 0 1 2 r'`�3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 � 3 ri le- ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 .!S 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 6. Depositional bars or berfches 0 1 �'� y3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 �.a 2 3 8. Headcuts - CD--' 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley • 0 0.5 1 �:5"=• 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 -� e'S'= 3,, ............. ..........� ..... ...,, ...._.., .,.,.. ..,.,.......,,...,� ,.. .,........., B. Hydrology (Subtotal = G. �` ) 12. Presence of Baseflow 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 14. Leaf litter 15. Sediment on plants or debris 16. Organic debris lines or piles 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? C. Biology (Subtotal = � � ) 0 1 2 � _"3 � 'Q� 1 2 3 1 0.5 0 Q ,5,.•° 1 1.5 0 Q.5 1 "'I, .5.. o=Q, Yes=3 18. Fibrous roots in streambed �;.,�` 2 1 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 2 1 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) b�„" sJ 0 � 2 21. Aquatic Mollusks �� 1 2 22. Fish °=-•0--� 0.5 1 23. Crayfish �-"1T� 0.5 1 24. Amphibians %�,: 0 0.5 �,.�� 25. Algae `� =-=: �._ �- 0.5 1 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 "perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See.p..35 of manual. Sketch: � r �c�" 1� � 0 0 3 3 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 0 � , •' i (' r �r �. �,:8. � ,. ._ . , ._-- - - - ---- __ ___ ____... — _ _.__. _ _.--- --.�__— _ . �-----_ --- -__...<- i USACE AID#__ ___ DWQ # ____ Site #____ (indicate on attached map) � i_ ---- - �f:� � d83 ;��,v STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET � . . � Provide the foilowiog information for the stream reach under assessment: 1. Applicant's name: /�'�J�D%' 2. Evaluator's name: . G.y �'G.. 3. Date of evaluation: 13 ?�0 4. Time of evaluation: �: c�o . 5. Name of stream: �.�?('l�� %. <.,�i.�s,., �.ac C✓'s�.�c. 6. River basin: ` r� � 3 R�' 02 � h 'l' j 7. Approximate drainage area: /�� 3�a�� v- •�� 8. Stream order: � 9. Length of reach evaluated: `10� � 10. County: ���. <�'�. �� � ..> 11. Site coordinates if known : refer in decimal de ees. 12. Subdivision name if an /r�J'`` � ) P 6�' �� Y)� t Laritude (ex. 34.872312): � � ��� �`.' Longitude (ex. -77.556611): " 7?, � � 4 r o �� Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheel Ortho (Aerial otolGlS Other CIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluadon (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): nx � /�5.,� 1'L �-.._ :/�. . � 5�,.,r�/ �..... .`', . . � ^- ( Y�.,.�/� �<S!' � ,)�)- lti Si ,�,� h . / ' ._._ �/' .'.• T�1,..Kr�.T��r1 14. Proposed channel work (if any):_ l5. Recent weather conditions: �, 16. Site conditions at time of � ,�''�,".. �_<_-� ��3 :����a ��� l7. Identify any special waterway classificatians known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters �Essential Fisheries Habitat �Trout Waters i0utstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters X Water Supply Watershed �(I-IV) 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surf'ace area: � 19. Does channel appear or_ ? TSCS quad map?'_`YFS NQ Z0� Does :hanne! appear on USDA_ Soil Surve;�?*'��-�'ATO 21. Estimated watershed ]and use: �f_�% Residential '� % Commercial �% Industrial �% Agricultural � f% Forested __,_ % Cleared / Logged _% Other ( i 22. Bankfull width: �- id 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): `� � 24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) lModerate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: Straight �C Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel Instructions for completioo of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, tenain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and ]00, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Tot� Score (from � � t ld �i-� � s�.e :C� t � Com/ments � LS'Ic a � r r. � Evaluator's Signatare IT��`4'7' �. ti..�— Date_� C� This channel evaluation form is in�ended to be used only as a guide to assist landowpers and en ironmental professionals in gathering the data required by tne United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -- version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26. -� j�o ,�: � �:.� �,� �:�l� ' �,,•..�:.x � �'3 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POYNT 12ANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain � Presence ot 11ow� / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 � no flow or saturation = 0• stron flow = ma�c oints 2 Evide�ce of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 3�`�� �' � ,•.c extensive alteration = 0� no alteration = max oints «•c.' lh�G�� Riparian zone '"��`"� �•-s 3 no buffer = 0• conti uous, wide buffer = maac ints �— 6 0— 4 0— 5 �, ,,,�; ,:, � f 4 Evidence of nutrient or chemicai discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 ✓�" extensive dischar es — 0; no dischar es = max ints �"`��"' ` � Groundwater discharge � .��,,� U� 5 no dischar e= 0• s rin s, see s, wetlands, etc. = m� oints 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4 � 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2 � y (no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max oints � � Entrenchment / tloodplain access 0— 5 0-- 4 0— 2 � s�5'��' �+ dee 1 entrenched = 0• fre uent floodin = max ints 8 Presence oi adjacent wetlands 0_ 6 0— 4 0— 2 ��� t'' ,�,1 no wetlands = 0; lar e ad'acent ��-etlands = max oints � ! 9 Channel sinuosity p_ 5 0— 4 0— 3 7 extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints `--� ' Sediment input �f<+�'�• . �';"� � 1� extensive de sition= 0• little or no sediment = max oints 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 � ,� ,,, �� I 1 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 �-� a fine homo enous = 0; lar e diverse sizes = max oints ^� ��� � 2 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— d 0— 5 �`"" "' � �+ dee 1� incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max oints b ��� E" Presence of ma or bank failures ` 5, �"" 13 � 0-5 0—S 0-5 ''� � severe erosion = o� no erosion stable banks = max ints ��{ b.�•' � �t� Root dept6 and density on banks �� '� -Q; 14 no visible roots = 0• dense roots throu hout = m� oints) 0— 3 0— 4 U— 5 ��,,, F � lmpact by agriculfure, livestock, or timber production 15 0-5 0-4 0-5 H� (substantial im act =0• no evidence = max ints 16 presence of riffle-poollripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 � �h,�` .,� � � no riffles/ri les or ols = 0; well-develo ed = max oints '` ,� Habitat complegity /�..... � 17 0-6 0-6 0-6 2�J� �,*y � � little or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = max ints � '� Canopy coverage over strearnbed 1 ��n� ���'" ) 18 no shadin ve etation = 0• continuous cano = max oints 0— 5 0— 5 Q— 5 or ��, 19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4 � dee I embedded = 0• loose structure = m� Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) � o��.f��* �y 20 no evidence = 0� common numerous t es = max oints �— 4 0— 5 0— 5 1`,,,, � 21 Presence of amphibisns Q_ q 0— 4 0— 4 �'� "' s��• ••'�'� O no evidence = 0• common numerous es = max ints '"� Presence of fish �Q 22 0-4 0-4 0-4 �> =` c � (no evidence — 0; common, numerous es = ma.�c oints 23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 4— 5 � `�� no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max ints � K ""b""��' Total Points Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) S?� * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. �r;. /�RV-���5 b��«asets"d PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Client Name: Site Location: Project No. North Carolina Department of Transportation Bridge 283 on SR 2686 (Richardson Drive) NC612002.B283 Photo No. 1 Date: � � ' ;:,� � � ';> � ' �� �� � 05/03/2016 �;; ` �� ;' � � �'- � � . }� ` '� - ..�.,. ��.> .� - � A: � � � f �� �� :.� ' '�. ; � 11�.� � Description: - • � � � ,�`' ,*{�' - �( r � � . � r� ,ts� t `/., .n��... i ,�-�. _ T: �_ � t J t 'e�� 9 j � � ����1 � ' � � 'r�� � � � � `" � ^_ WA t � . � ; �; ' r� �. � ,. , ; • "�' ;=�' � � ' '�'+� . '� y � : � i . j,�►' `� � _ it ' +, r�--' .. � . � ;. +� e � T , ' f � ���,` � ` �r�. � ,,t � � # � ,`� � f ��r +"��'�� ��� "�� ' �� ' � �0 . ''� � �` c ,� � � G.�h: • . � .. ' + (' � 1. . � � , p� 1i dr ''� I�`�'���� , F'�3. � F� � iY." � M .i' .�� _ '� �'�.�� � � �f 3'�b'y_�t„��q'/ �� �._ � ���5 f .Y:' i�,� . ;� �ti -^.•� p � � :-� Y" 1 ��Yt �# �' j,,�c �rt . . L� -�� 4,�.. ';�,� . � "'�,.q,� . . � "' ,.�...' r , ,�.n.. .• .a .-'�J , i `. .J � [ '¢ � .�✓ [ '�'`i '• E , � �� „5�� � � � ' �yr �� �.'^ti� _ : s' .. �rr�� �!�,'. l �^ y.- g �v., r =� �� � , � r � •. i r ������* .'� tt �, i:� 4F, 4 . .-t " r� �`�'� � �� � � '� � i �: �r' { � ��' p ',f�.�„. � �'� ` ' � � � t �- j � Y , ,... 9 I►7 ♦ � r � Y iy �.� xg r.- if i '4..' ^ _ �. � ; �� � , �. `��8ss��` �.��(r� :r ° .q„�i<S'_ f�-���1�t � � � 1'�� �'.7 'M'4��4'! ? n r a +i'f►$ - _ y t�o :. : }j� ea �+�`eq, !` +r, � ���: }p s rl - � �y�y . C � 's� i Y✓� � ^�� '. f �w!/ R��3 ' '4,'Fr �rpF � as '"t`.F '�"4ik���.� ;'� c �0� - �a, D . ! a 4'� ' �lK.r _ . A � � A y . - t^�, :;� �l . .`A � a . �,�'" .'<t, .a . � ,� `' ,� �'�� 4qet ' �� � %! '1�'� '� y�r '' �+a� * .k r jlh�f��{"1 € . i� `"` ` sa� � � � °� !�^`t # ,�;t�'y' ' .. �, < < ` � �, .r ' e ,�sR � � '�ka �, �1y� e ♦ ` 9 b� x��4���a �u. �. a�it . , .a,''��S' ._ +_ �_' ..�..�t' ir;`_ l �`. ` �. . �'�`�:�..'" °a'� . PhotoNo.2 Date: � '�,�� '` ,� � � � �....t��a >; , �` f � ` �`;�'. � . 05/03/2016 ��'� ¢ , i. �� t. r+"�. � i � ' � ; �,,: �'� ' ` �" 1'r �t °.�' _.��" ,�' f �'Y"` l � ,? r .t,; , , .*, Description: � ��1� .i; �� �LL = � ,, � � ��> , � ,. � � � . . �� � .� � '- ¢ •' , � i �k d �.' ' y ,�', � /r � s, � �a � � � ` ' "'�� : �� �� /�� - .b '� �� �.. ; , --f � _ � .,� �. , `u ' W B � : ;�� '�'� � • . i . ' �=,A � . > j�. . : � s ', -* �t �.:�1 �. { � � � �} _ '��r �. � .N . � � �'� ° �'.' .�• � '�. 7 � i7} , S . � �� ,A�� � � � � t �'4A ,riE ��� i . r ` , � . . b ,{ � + t i� . ,� �+ �� ����+4"-� � �{!� �', � �'• * . . _ � � f� +E�� � '�' ����� if 1 r „p�,g " . >. - . s` • =� � p �` ',.��!��i���,.' �. - ; r '� � � � :. �r � � 3 .. , _ y , �, �= l� s'� [ '� " t ,�' E. i�.�y i, Mi� � � • 9�4� �� � ` �¢ .4 ' '� 4 ` � r � ye .-� . �� s�f %� , .v� �$ '.� S i�' 'r> , { � j. -� �_... Qe�fz � . - ' +r 't'`� �'... - .t "'+ � p" 'i.' '-� y�`'� . 7 t (��,�' �d.��''+�'y��'�T��, ��' � • ' .T1f � . ^ ��i�.. +e" ' R 't yS��V� �!*+�,2+��, � _ F � y� � � �� . ,.,�j+ t� .C. sr�i 1 � _`'; � � j" � � ,�- . .,� r � '. . � � . � V• ' �' r ���`�� ,Y �..�y .r�� ?'� � y �� .� �' �" � i` -..- ,.. z .f �,�� '�- � - �. �-�. - � 1..�--:�'; �= �.� . F.. ..e t�-r�,� ' ��:�-�Y�� - � � ' � � J ' �i � � I �� •'%I� � �,'�I) �� �� �� � � � . . ' � -� �.' >�� �- '.+' . { . _ ,� i � nq� . '�Ypr, �t 'i�'r [�'ral`'ya ., "�S � . "k �° �6 a. �� � � � ��� «� ' , * ' - � � �r "`�� � �, . �!(.,�, '� � Y _ * / '�., s � r�� ; X"��,i .{ �.- � y �� l � '1 j � ��, � .�s�. ��. IE- � "!" �s ' . . j j� T + _ �, . ., ��, .. x -., . . ' t �� . ��. ��.� b�r� �,L���_ . . -l` v x �T l3 _A �-L G:\TRA\612002_NCDOT DIVONCALL2012_SUBTOHMM\HMM 16 BRIDGES DNISIOMROCKINGHAM\BRIDGE 283\283_PHOTOS\BRIDGE 283 PHOTOLOG.DOC Page 1 of 2 � l�RV���S fo�"a���a�a�d PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG built assets Client Name: Site Location: Project No. North Carolina Department of Transportation Bridge 283 on SR 2686 (Richardson Drive) NC612002.B283 Photo No. 3 Date: � ��.. ;� �� �.��` ''^ � ;�'a �?'��'.�:°r �-���� g'� �''�� 4 � � 05/03/2016 .� : ��.�; "� ����� , r ,�: � � � , '`��'` .}$1 �'� '� -� �.{,9 e�� �.�� � ��'F''i+� � � y �� � � �'� � ��R���� ' P 4� '�� �- ��� roe� '3.'a Description: i r ��� � #� � , � �' ��� � �: ��, } ' ��^,,,�.�,'" � k' � `:..`� ' `,� �k"` '��.�a%�'���� ` - ��'h r, ...7 �,��# � '" �r' � . � ` � y _..� � � .. � t - 'ri ~ � � '� � � �E ' �� r � . � 'c�r� SA upstream Bridge 283 � ' a �a �,� �xN�� "v�}.i 4 i �'���� � "��,-� �'` }�"/i k.,`. 1 ,�+��y�, �. � � �y °,n��' .��+ '^.rS�[�^�"��.. �._�^,� y�,.sr'�n.�r; ♦�t.. "..s:�. ,����� � �� .r - `�d i 1,° -: r�-� '�r `} t 1 � � i�',�8�� ':G' jl�u�'� � �� �a t5 ; �. t.i.� 'riR �' ��{ ''��:,w St� .� Y� � `k.-' t y.��' -i +`.,�� �""r'�. ��"�;''�.'r11`� ��,�"�z�44 ��:i��. +.;x� .. t �.�a �t �Y± } � � ���, �+`s'�' � �� A �1',.� Y t ��v:. `i11t w.�.: � ,c �.�; , r)a ,� ;� '. �.�'% � � . ��.s �� ��'�L � .i•. .: ' ' �.�, .f �,. � ^ � �. �-- �`���-� --- "'�'r � ��..�iE� � ��� ,��! �{ �.- . � � ' � �,�,. ��, , � ' T - 4 �4 ;�,�� ��' � �' �"'•�iiT �l � ��j A� - � �j •� � � s ' �} A* s � r , L' . � 1� '' k�, .�{:;� ,;� �r����{yr.f .� �" �.�� �'Y`�t, � ,� «�_ � �� � �'i �,i ' ' i � � ,.� �' �< �, �.� i'/' . }� �` "}��r�������.�<9 hr'�le':5....4 . �:t�,l�y -� r,S' . .._ , # .t �t ° " . �•.tv��t. , :-'Y,� ;a = ,�rs. - _ . �d � �/�«�� .+w� }�. � �. as�� z `� � � s ;'�I�''� � �1,� ~�� " � �, ,r M � :'�,�`F• � t � �„t� Photo No. 4 Date: " � .� ; � �'r ,,�..�`� �� '` ' � 1 05/03/2016 ��y,�. �-i �� . _�_t �,�v;.., � `��..:'�_ ;��u, 4 _� ; _ t__.._�--- - .-� - �� �. �,�� . �, fi ,� ,.- ___— h . 4 1 . ,� �s�,.,-� � Description: � � � -� � � �. *t ,v �b= �} � C �. „ _,��`+ ,�.'�t+ �.,a� g � � p, ? �^ ,. ���4 ' � S� z�, .� ., y� �� { �,� 2 x� �.'�p � � ���'4 '. �*f �: } Y� `" ' = R'x�'�•�� ,� �H.� `ar, is.�c1�F � � , '�A" i K�y% � Y`{..�. SA downstream Bridge 283 �; ; ., x � .,.4 ° �., ,i �,,, , � �� x_ < � � ; '��1 �"� ; ' � r� ��jF� r�y, 3�.,. ya ! �wL�.�4 "i. #'O :4Y L � ' � � L , �`ir'�4' �'1E � #.�++Ja -., 4 yva;, "'f. �.. � _ E'� �� � ��`"Y.�� � � � � {4 1 I �` � 1 ..{,ir".b . �e _�y � �_ik . /�ti f} � �.� t -. .. .. t, y�. . y '.. 4 a,, '.. a� x s" � � a. � r"= ,�� '� "y . -^'. �,-' �r'r:. � ����� ..�,� }�� i sr�`_. �`� f:'.` � .� �'` �;, . � � �. � 7 � �,� '3.'_. 1� 3 r � � � , i a. L 'w€�� � r � �r ,�,, ,,'k� � �7 4�'rr�.'��" � d �� r,�'�` `` �?�"��' � ' � � �` � '"d� �� .• ! �'' + x.��_l i - _ � <4 "' � � �.�' �-�. . e� +r +y � s y F � ..� .� S a'3M"'� ''Y�' _ '� 3� a'�4 y � � � � . _,� I� . �f 1 _ , n .'df'�'YO 6 � � Y,^F 'N=- �l. y _ y� �.�^ V+ �y � �y ' r.�...- , �. -� �d} ae. j. ''.y.� '��� �li+ �( : �Y _,.'�� � `f t.. �rid�. •���i .T y � '�" �Y�`�" � � 4 �� _ �j$�" . ` �'� �� ~' $.�.`1 ', �i,(C�' � � �.�0 � �j� �• . �� #'' � �.. Y �,F �., y .' � � w : 4rt f � "� , ��..� o� '� �y� '� � 1 .� ��''t' .k- + "- f }�y �. ��f� . ' .. '.� � S 4 §• � �j� .: @� � . q'��r �;. r.S- . . � ) w'� i � in C � ,LL� a.�"� ��� ��.a� Y"� t'P:/�C��- � . .��'�� f �� �', F � � : � ��4Y,S t�,`�, ��`���.+' .�.+r �,�.�, �F,? �;:� ��� a ,3�:.. X " « i � , + �a r ,• � ,j,.�s ��y�,* i ,s �, , , lS���!'^��i`"'�'IG.�..xi;'�a7�����.ti- •i.. �`t P,#�'�"+���if_e,� ��'�. F�� G:\TRA\612002 NCDOT DIVONCALL2012 SUBTOHMM\HMM 16 BRIDGES DIVISION\ROCKINGHAM\BRIDGE 283�283_PHOTOS\BRIDGE 283 PHOTOLOG.DOC Page 2 of 2