20120997 Ver 1_Closeout Report_20160523

UT TO HAW (BECKOM)
DMS ID (92694)
USACE ACTION ID # SAW2009-02212
DWQ 404 #
CLOSEOUT REPORT: STREAM AND WETLAND PROJECT
Project Setting & Classifications
Meeting XY Coordinates: 360 09'09.15"N; 790 27' 38.89"W
County
Alamance
General Location
— 5 miles northwest of Burlington
Basin:
Cape Fear
Physiographic Region:
Piedmont
Ecore ion:
Southern Outer Piedmont
USGS Hydro Unit:
03030002030010
NCDWQ Sub -basin:
03-06-02
Wetland Classification
Riparian Riverine
Thermal Regime:
Warm
Trout Water:
No
Project Performers
October 2014
Source Agency:
NCDMS
Provider:
NCDMS
Designer:
Axiom Environmental
Monitoring Firm
Axiom Environmental
Channel Remediation
NA
Plant remediation
Riverworks
Approved for Transfer
to Stewardship
Pending
Stewards
NCDEQ
Overall Project Activities and Timeline
Milestone
Month -Year
Project Instituted
January 2008
Permitted
NA
Construction Completed
January 2011
As -built survey
January 2011
Monitoring Year 1 (2011)
October 2011
Supplemental Planting
November 2011
Monitoring Year 2 (2012)
August 2012
Monitoring Year 3 2013
September 2013
Monitoring Year 4 2014
October 2014
Monitoring Year 5 2015
November 2015
Closeout Submission
February 2016

Proiect Setting and Background Summary
The UT to Haw (Beckom) Stream and Wetland Site is located within NCDMS Targeted Local Watershed
03030002030010 and was identified for preservation as part of Site 15 (Travis & Tickle 15.2) in the 2008 NCEEP Little
Alamance and Travis and Tickle Creek Local Watershed Plan (PTCG 2008, pages 72-73). Site activities included fencing
out livestock and planting with native riparian vegetation. An approved jurisdictional determination is included in Appendix
C. In 2011, herbaceous grasses within the Site, primarily tearthumb (Polygonum sagittatum) and rushes (Juncus spp.) in
wetter areas and fescue (Festuca sp.) in drier areas, were vigorous and overtopping many of the smaller planted trees. As a
result some of the smaller trees died due to grasses and some of the larger trees died over the summer of 2011 from dry, hot
conditions. The Site was replanted as part of the planting warranty on November 1, 2011 including 369 bare root seedlings
planted in Swamp Forest areas and 28 bare root seedlings planted in floodplain areas of the Site. Beaver activity was
observed in the upstream portion of the Site during MYl-MY3. Beaver controls were implemented on an as -needed basis
throughout the remainder of the monitoring period. Many of the planted stems in this area were stunted due to competition
with herbaceous species after removal of beaver. Currently, these trees are vigorous and are expected to continue to thrive
unless beaver activity resumes. There is no known beaver activity onsite.
Goals and Obiectives
The goals of this project focus on improving water quality, enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring aquatic and riparian
habitat and include the following.
1. Reducing nonpoint sources of pollution by 1) fencing livestock from stream channels, buffers, and wetlands; 2)
ceasing the application of agricultural herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers; and 3) providing a vegetative buffer
adjacent to streams and wetlands to treat surface runoff prior to entering Site streams and ultimately the Haw River.
2. Reducing sedimentation/siltation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by a) reducing bank erosion
associated with livestock hoof shear on Site streams, b) filtering surface runoff and reducing particulate matter
deposition into tributaries, and c) providing a forested vegetative buffer adjacent to Site streams and wetlands.
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation and improving stream stability by revegetating Site floodplains to reduce
floodwater velocities through increased frictional resistance on floodwaters crossing Site floodplains.
4. Providing increased habitat for aquatic wildlife by 1) increasing organic matter, carbon export, and woody debris
in the stream corridor and 2) restoring shade to Site open waters.
5. Providing wildlife habitat including a forested riparian corridor within a region of the state increasingly dissected
by residential/agricultural land use.
6. Protecting a Site identified in the 2008 Piedmont Triad Council of Government Little Alamance, Travis, and Tickle
Creek Watersheds Restoration Plan (PTCG 2008) for preservation due to its location within a remote, rural area
with increasing development pressure and appeal to developers.
Page 2 of 20

Success Criteria
Success Criteria
Measured Parameter
Criteria Met
Stream Enhancement
1) 5 vegetation plots
Yes — Success criteria were met
1) success of riparian
2) Crest gauge and photo
throughout the monitoring period
vegetation
documentation of bankfull events.
with a total of 7 documented bankf ill
2) documentation of two
events with at least one event
bankfull channel events.
documented in each monitoring year.
Vegetation
1) 5 vegetation plots
Yes — Success criteria were met
1) 260 stems/acre surviving
throughout the monitoring period
in year 5
based on planted stems alone
(excluding livestakes) in each
individual plot.
Wetland Hydrology
NA
Yes — Site activities enhanced and
NA
preserved jurisdictional wetlands.
Page 3 of 20

Asset Table:
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Riparian
Wetland Buffer
Nitrogen Phosphorus Nutrient
Offset Offset
Type R RE
R
RE
--
Totals 1173 SMUs
0.88 WMUs
--
Project Components
Project
Component/ Reach
ID
Station/Location
Existing Footage Ap roach
Restoration
or Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Footage/
Acreage
Mitigation
Ratio
1550
Enhancement Level H)/
1550
2.5:1
Main Channel
635
Preservation
635
5:1
15 --
Enhancement (Level II)
15
2.5:1
UTI
665 --
Preservation
665
5:1
UT2
635 -
Enhancement Level II
635
2.5:1
UT3
165
Preservation
165
5:1
Wetland 1
1.15
Enhancement
1.15
2:1
Wetland 2
0.25
Enhancement
0.25
2:1
Wetland 3
0.05
Enhancement
0.05
2:1
Wetland 4
0.15 --
Enhancement
0.15
2:1
Wetland 5
0.05 --
Enhancement
0.05
2:1
Wetland 6
0.10 -
Enhancement
0.10
2:1
Wetland 7
0.01 -
Preservation
0.01
5:1
Wetland 8
0.04 -
Preservation
0.04
5:1
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream (linear footage)
Riverine Riparian Wetland
(acreage)
Planted Riparian Buffer (acreage)
Enhancement (Level II)
2200
Enhancement
1.75
Preservation
1465
0.05
Totals
3665
1.8
5.1
Mitigation Units
1173 SMUs
0.88 WMUs
--
Page 4 of 20

Page 5 of 20
KRJ
AxWnI
ASSET MAP
218Snow Ave.
pigivcarr�n
'sIf3
LJT TO HAW BE CK DIM SITE
Alamance County, North Carolina �r 2016
12-004.Q5
Page 5 of 20

� r
00,
d
In,
Legend
=^t= Y9 acnes �
0 275 550 1.100 1,650 2,200
fi Feet
6v�rt. By: FIGURE
AC 1o€o EnvIrorro efllal. Inc. TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE AREA KRJ
218 5!14W Mende C ate:
ftaMkP.. W2276da UT TO HAW (HECKOM) SITE (DMS# 92694) Feb2.016
J919',216-1693
Alamance County, North G�rCarolinaProject: 12-004.05
Page 6 of 20

Page
Page 7 of 20
KP.J
_.Vronrn itaI
SOILS MAP
' 9wAVIR
-;. WC3T6G3
-2151693
Adams AvsWl. A -
UT TO HAVV BECK0M SITE
y Feb 2:'. =
Alamance County, North Carolina
creme
Page
Page 7 of 20

e7nn. by �vv .L
KRJ
Axkrn Erwironnle til REM E❑ IAT I O N MAP c
218.Smw Ave. UT TO HAW BE CK OM SITE ".
zd NC27603
9199)2115-1633 Alamance County, North Carolina
�iyna�n
Alae ■aivw�l, iia
12-044.{i5
Page 8 of 20

Verification of Bankfull Events
UT to Haw (Beckom) Site, DMS Project No. 92694
Verification of Bankfull Events
UT to Haw (Beckom) Site, DMS Project No. 92694
Date of Data
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo (if
Collection
available)
September 30, 2011
June 28, 2011
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after a total of 2.83
--
inches* of rain reported to fall over 2 days (June 27-28, 2011)
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after a total of 3.61
September 30, 2011
September 24, 2011
inches* of rain reported to fall over 4 days (September 21-24,
--
2011) with an additional 0.85 inches* of rain the following 3 days
(Sept 25-27, 2011)
July 18, 2012
July 11, 2012
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after a total of 4.84
inches* of rain reported to fall over 3 days (July 9-11, 2012)
Crest gauge data as well as visual observations of wrack lines and
July 11, 2013
June 31, 2013
sediment deposition indicates a bankfull event after 14 days (June
1-2
25- July 8) of heavy rainfall totaling 6.27 inches.
August 13, 2014
September 1, 2013
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after a total of 2.56
--
inches*of rain reported to fall on September 1, 2014
August 13, 2014
May 15, 2014
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after a total of 2.74
--
inches* of rain reported to fall on May 15, 2014
September 25, 2015
July 19, 2015
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after a total of 2.50
inches* of rain reported to fall on July 19, 2015
* Reported at KBUY Weather Station in Burlington.
Bankfull Event Photos 1 and 2
showing wrack lines resulting
from an overbank event
Page 9 of 20

Planted Woody Vegetation
UT to Haw (Beckom) Site, DMS Project No. 92964
Vegetation Association
Piedmont/Mountain
Bottomland Forest*
Piedmont/Mountai
n Swamp Forest*
Stream -side
Assemblage"
TOTAL
Area acres
2.5
1.5
1.1
5.1
Species
Number
planted
% of
total
Number
planted
% of
total
Number
planted
% of
total
Number
planted
Swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii)
400
20
200
20
--
--
600
Cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda)
400
20
200
20
--
--
600
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
400
20
100
10
--
--
500
American elm (Ulmus americana)
300
15
-
-
-
--
300
Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
400
20
100
10
--
--
500
Willow oak (Quercus phellos)
--
--
200
20
--
--
200
Overcup oak (Quercus lyrata)
--
--
200
20
--
--
200
Silky dogwood (Cornus amomum)
100
5
--
-
900
30
1000
Black willow (Salix nigra)
--
--
--
--
900
30
900
Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis)
--
--
--
--
600
20
600
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis)
--
--
--
-
600
20
600
TOTAL
2000
100
1000
100
3000
100
6000
* Plant communities (Bottomland Forest and Swamp Forest) were planted at a density of 680 stems/acre.
** Stream -side assemblage was planted at a density of 2720 stems/acre.
Page 10 of 20

Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Year
DMS Project Code 92694. Project Name: UT Haw (Beckom)
PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Page 11 of 20
Baseline
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
PnoLS
T
PnoLS
T
PnoLS
T
PnoLS
T
PnoLS
T
PnoLS
T
Plot
971
971
931
931
809
809
769
769
728
728
728
769
Plot
890
890
688
1700
486
2266
405
890
364
688
364
728
Plot
688
688
567
607
809
1174
809
890
769
769
728
1012
Plot
850
850
728
890
769
1133
809
971
688
688
647
647
Plot
971
971
526
1335
809
2995
7691781
769
1578
728
1093
YearlyAverage
874
874
688
1093
745
1683
712
1060
664
890
639
850
PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Page 11 of 20

DMS Recommendation and Conclusion
DMS recommends that UT to Haw (Beckom) be closed out as proposed to generate 1173 Stream
Mitigation Units and 0.89 riparian Wetland Mitigation Units. The vegetation survey results
indicated an average site density of 639 planted stems per acre (excluding livestakes) surviving in
year five with each individual plot meeting success criteria based on planted stems alone. Invasive
species have been effectively managed throughout the life of the project and do not pose a threat
to planted vegetation. In addition, seven bankfull events were documented throughout the course
of the monitoring period with at least one event occurring in each monitoring year.
Contingencies
No contingencies are proposed for the UT to Haw (Beckom) Site.
Page 12 of 20

Pre -Construction Photos (taken January 2011)
Page 13 of 20

# ... F
K
\•
d i
� �1 if i �
�^
s
x
R
\�
_••..
� � v
�i..�
int

Appendix A Watershed Planning Summary
UT to Haw (Beckom)
Watershed Characteristic Overview
The UT to Haw (Beckom) stream (3,6651f) and wetland (1.8 acres) enhancement and
preservation project is located in the Little Alamance, Travis and Tickle Local Watershed Plan
area, within the Cape Fear River Basin in Alamance County. According to the 2009 Cape Fear
River Basin Restoration Priorities Plan the Travis and Tickle Creek watershed (HU
03030002030010) is characterized by 38% agricultural land use, 40% forested, and 4%
impervious. There are five other DMS project in this watershed.
Little Alamance, Travis and Tickle Creeks are all identified as impaired on the 2012 NCDWR
303d List. As noted in the LWP, challenges within these watersheds include poor water quality,
degraded biology, loss of riparian vegetation, bank erosion, and urban and agricultural runoff.
The watersheds in the Travis and Tickle watershed are largely rural making it likely that
agricultural sources are the main source of stress. Areas of land clearing and poor riparian
management were also observed. These watersheds, and specifically the UT to Haw (Beckom
project) drain to the Haw River, a major recreational and cultural asset for the region, and
subsequently to Jordan Lake, a drinking water supply also classified by DWQ as a Nutrient
Sensitive Water. The UT to Haw (Beckom) site was identified as a priority site during the
development of the LWP. It was highlighted for its proximity to the Haw River, the existing
wetlands and buffer onsite and the potential for degradation from the highly erodible soils.
Links to Watershed Goals and Objectives
The table below summarizes the major LWP-identified stressors in the Little Alamance, Travis
and Tickle Creeks LWP area, recommended management strategies, and stressor -related
objectives achieved by the UT to Haw (Beckom) project.
Stressors and Issues
Management Strategies
UT to Haw (Beckom)
Stream bank erosion
Stream restoration, riparian buffers,
Livestock have been fenced from stream channels
livestock exclusion
and buffers re-established
Lack of adequate forested buffer
Streamside buffer ordinances,
Re-established riparian buffers onsite
stream restoration, riparian buffers,
livestock exclusion, reduced
herbicide use, forestry BMPs
Livestock access to streams
Livestock exclusion
Livestock have been fenced from stream channels,
buffers and wetlands.
Nutrients
Illicit discharge program, ag BMPs,
1) Fenced livestock from stream channels, buffers,
riparian buffers, watershed
and wetlands; 2) ceased the application of
education program, stormwater
agricultural herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers;
BMPs, additional studies
and 3) provided a vegetative buffer adjacent to
streams and wetlands to treat surface runoff prior
to entering project streams and ultimately the
Haw River and 4) improved flood attenuation.
Fecal coliform bacteria
Retrofit wastewater collection
1) Fenced livestock from stream channels, buffers,
system, agricultural BMPs, illicit
and wetlands and 2) provided a vegetative buffer
discharge program, watershed
adjacent to streams and wetlands to treat surface
education program, stormwater
runoff prior to entering project streams and
BMPs
ultimately the Haw River.

Watershed Context Summary
In addition to the UT to Haw (Beckom) project there are five additional DMS projects and one
CWMTF project (a planning project). The DMS sites include Aycock Springs (Construction),
Glen Raven (Long Term Management), UT to Haw River (Monitoring Year 5), UT to Haw
(Gwynn) (Closed out in 2015) and UT to Altamahaw (Monitoring Year 5).
2016 DMS Project Closeout: UT to Haw (Beckom)
I
UT to
Altamahaw
UT to Haw 4
0-i (Gwynn)
Lit to Haw
(Beckom)
Aycock Tki Ie, T-5.
Springs —d Littie
Alamanre LVVP
Site
UT to Haw
River
Glen
Raven f
�• 1`� ¢i6s. -c
j`i} fJ i
,-•
I Tick L-. T- W /
end Little
Alemanoe UNP
201E Closeout Prat
DMS Projects U "
CWMTF Projects i
Target Local Waters
Local Watershed PI f f t
Municrpal Bounaries 0 1 2 4
County Boundary htllles

Appendix B: Property Ownership & Protection
The site protection instrument for this mitigation project includes the following document(s), available
at the specified County Register of Deeds office, and is linked to the property portfolio at:
http://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/Mitigation Services/Document Management
Library/Property/Property Portfolio/92694 UTtoHaw(Bechom) PD 2008.pdf
Project Name IMS County Grantor Property Rights Deed/Page Plat/Page Area
UT to Haan {Beckom} 92694 Alamance Jerry and Betty Beckom CE 2742/711 72/389 10.2
Long-term stewardship of this property is managed by the NC DEQ Stewardship Program.

Appendix C: Permits & Jurisdictional Determinations
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id, SAW2009-02212 County: Alamance U.S.G.S. Quad: Lake Burlington Quad
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Agent: Jerry Beckom Applicant: 1—g— Corson
Address: 3172 Mansfield Road 1652 Mail Service Center
Burlin ton NC 27217 Raleiffh, NC 27699
Telephone No.: 336-227-1365 9I9-715-1954
tea,,
Property description: %' >
Size (acres) -10 acres Nearest Town Burlington!
Nearest Waterway Flaw River River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030002 Coordinates N-79.46467 W 35.15165
Location description The site is located approximately 8 miles northwest of the town of Burlington and is situated west of
Mansfield Road rouEbN 1 Chile from its intersection with Greenwood Drive in Alamance County. It is located at
approximately, the following oeo ra hie coordinates 35.15165 and -79.46467 (NAD83h and as shown on the;;ao submitted 9
March 2010. The approximately Iff acre easement is for wetland and stream preservaIionlenhancement. This form is for
streams NA NB NE NF and wetland lines SA SR SC, SD SG GA GB GC GD GE GF GH SH.
Indicate Which of the Followin Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have this
property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional
determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters ofthe United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 ofthe Cleat} Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date ofthis
notification.
X There are waters ofthe U.S. including wetlands on the stove described project area subject to the permit requirements of section
404 ofthe Clean Water Act (CWAX33 USC § 1344). Unlegs there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the waters cf the U.S. on your project area delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or
our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X ,.The waters ofthe U.S. on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in rbe law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory
Official identified below on Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the [late of this notification.
There are no waters of rhe U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC, at [phone] to determine their requirements,
Page 16 of 20

Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Anny permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this determination
andfor the Corps regulatory program, please contact Steve Kiche rski at 919-554-4884 ext. 35.
C. Basis For Determirtatiort
There are four perennW streams and 11 abuttin2 wetlands. The four pevennial streams are unnamed tributaries to the Haw
River and are relatively permanent waters (RPW). The unnamed tributaries flow to the Haw River, a traditionally navigahle
waterTiYW which is a tributary to the Cape Fear Rivera navigable water of the United States. The Ordinary High Water
Marks OHWMs of the streams were indicated by the following h vsical characteristics: Sed and banks, clear natural line
impressed on the bank changes in the character ofthe soil leaf litter disturbed or washed awav, sediment detiosition, water
stainine, the presence of wrack lines and sediment sorting. The wetlands meet the h •dro h •tic ve etation wetland h drolo
and hydric soil criteria of the 1987 Car s of En ineers Wetland Delineation Manual and are contiguous with the unnamed
tributaries on the site .
D. Remarks
Site is to be used for Stream and Wetland Enhancement/Preservation by the EEP. Andy Williams and I met Grant Lewis of
Axiom Environmental Inc. on-site for the Jurisdictional Determination. Updated ma reviewed March 9. 2010 for the
arwrostimate locations of Jurisdictional Waters described in this determination. Short portion of stream channel NE splits or
was excavated and runs riarallel to stream in the northern portion of the mroiect area only_one side is iurisdictional counting
towards credit.
E. Appeals Infortnatiott (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Steve Kichefski, Project Manager,
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CER part 33I.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by June 25, 2010.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Diistrict Office ifyou do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: t r/
Date April 26, low Expiration Date April 26, 201
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at �tcp:liregulatory.usacesurvey.com; to complete the survey
online.
Copy furnished:
Sue Homewood Grant Lewis
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Division of Water Quality 20 Enterprise Street 47
585 W'aughtown Street Raleigh, NC 27607
Wiaston-Salem, NC 27107
Page 17 of 20

SECTION I -The following identifies .your rights and options regarding an adrninistrative appeal of the abave
,des sign. Add tietW iriFbmation may be found at"ht ' :f . ..usace.tt=.rnillinetllz.tricti nslcwlceco to ,Or
,poi 's re 'latians af33 CFR Pmt 33.1.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit,
• ACCEPT. If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. Ifyou received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you aceept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object io the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section Il of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some ofyour objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: if you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section It ofthis form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days afthe date of this notice,
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DE'T`ERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JI), you may appeal the approved JD umder the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
Page 18 of 20
�idhFiCATIO"N,QT ADM NJSTRA'1`I frE API?EAL OPTIONS ANI P OOI?SS :-,m a.'
Applicant: Jerry Beckom-Landowner File Number: SAw2009-02212
Date: April 26, 2010
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of
etirtission
A
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I -The following identifies .your rights and options regarding an adrninistrative appeal of the abave
,des sign. Add tietW iriFbmation may be found at"ht ' :f . ..usace.tt=.rnillinetllz.tricti nslcwlceco to ,Or
,poi 's re 'latians af33 CFR Pmt 33.1.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit,
• ACCEPT. If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. Ifyou received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you aceept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object io the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section Il of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some ofyour objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: if you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section It ofthis form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days afthe date of this notice,
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DE'T`ERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JI), you may appeal the approved JD umder the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
Page 18 of 20

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETER'N21NATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also ,you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION 11- REQUEST FORAPPEAL or OBJECTIQNS TO AN INTITLAL PROFFEREII PERMIT,
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meetin,and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the Administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POiNT'OFCONTACT FOR QUESTIONS DR INFORMATION: -:
If you have questions regarding this decision
If you only have questions regarding: the appeal process you
and; or the appeal process you may contact:
may also contact:
Steve Kichefski, Regulatory Project Manager
Mr. Mike Bell, :`administrative Appeal Review Officer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
CESAD-ET-CO-R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M 15
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn:Steve Kichefski, Project Manager, Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office, 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105, Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
For Permit denials and Proffered Permits send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Mike Bell,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-ET-CO-R, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 91115, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8801
Page 19 of 20

Mitigation Project
DMS IMS ID
River Basin
Cataloging Unit
UT to Haw (Beckom)
92694
CAPE FEAR
03030002
Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 05/19/2016
L
E 2
L
E m
E
LrC
E E
O
E
L
Lm_ io
m o
O
m E
O
C L
`mia
C
`m
L
w
C C
N L
i m
N
N L
N L
m
m
L
m
m
v
o_.
d
c
a m
d
dm
a u
L
2.
m
m o
�a 10
y
m c
is m
N N
d
N O
L
N M
y N
`1
_a
N
O-' d
d
K U
_a
O
0.' L
N
Q.' d
C N
O N
C
O U
C@
O z
C N
O d
N UI
t6 N
N d
IO U
N A
f0 L
N N
,p d
L
W
c
W
o
K
L
W
a
z(z
z
z L
W
z a
o it
U
o
U
o L
U W
o a
U
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
2,200.00
1,465.00
1.75
0.05
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
880.00
293.00
0.875
0.010
NCDOT Pre -DMS Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
DMS Debits (feet and acres):
DWR Permit No
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
NCDOT TIP R-2635 - Western
2007-1470
2007-02903
Wake Expressway, Wake County
1,050.00
1.751
0.050
NCDOT TIP P-3414 - Graham -
Saw RR Relocation, Alamance
2005-21270
County
1,425.00
415.00
NCDOT TIP U-2524C/D -
Greensboro Western Loop,
2013-0223
2001-21125
Guilford County
775.00
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
I
1 0.001
0.001
0.00
0.00
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
I
1 0.001
0.001
0.0001
0.000
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 05/19/2016