20160299 Ver 1_R-2536 Supplemental Information_20160519

Carpenter,Kristi
From: Dilday, Jason L
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 9:51 AM
To: Wrenn, Brian L; '[e-mail]'
Cc: Shumsky, Michael J; Jim Eisenhardt ([e-mail]); Rivenbark, Chris
Subject: RE: R-2536 Supplemental information
Attachments: total take.pdf
Brian and Andy,
Attached is a summary of the wetland sites that were considered total takes with portions that were un un-
impacted. The total of the un-impacted area came out around 0.2 acre of wetland.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Jason
From: Wrenn, Brian L
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 1:23 PM
To: Rivenbark, Chris <[e-mail]>; '[e-mail]'
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Shumsky, Michael J<[e-mail]>; Jim Eisenhardt ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Dilday,
Jason L <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: R-2536 Supplemental information
Chris/Jason,
Do you have a timeframe on when the impact nos. for the un-impacted sites will be ready? I have two weeks before the
permit goes statuatory. If it's going to be next week, I will need to put the project on hold to stop the clock. Please let
me know as soon as possible.
Thanks,
Brian Wrenn
919-707-8792
From: Rivenbark, Chris
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 8:20 AM
To: Wrenn, Brian L <brian.wrenn@ncdenr.�ov>; '[e-mail]'
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Shumsky, Michael J<mshumsky@ncdot.�ov>; Jim Eisenhardt ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Dilday,
Jason L <ildilday@ncdot.�ov>
Subject: RE: R-2536 Supplemental information
Brian,
As Jason mentioned, we'll get per site impacts soon. Jim Eisenhardt (RK&K) had provided us with the sites below that
will have un-impacted wetland, considered as total takes.
Site 8
Site 23D
Site 38C

Site 81
Site 84
Chris Rivenbark
NCDOT-Natural Environment Section
[phone]
From: Dilday, Jason L
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 7:59 AM
To: Wrenn, Brian L <brian.wrenn@ncdenr.�ov>; '[e-mail]'
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Rivenbark, Chris <crivenbark@ncdot.�ov>; Shumsky, Michael J<mshumsky@ncdot.�ov>; Jim Eisenhardt
([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: R-2536 Supplemental information
I will contact our consultant who put the information together and have something for you guys shortly.
Jason
From: Wrenn, Brian L
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 7:56 AM
To: Dilday, Jason L <ildilday@ncdot.�ov>; '[e-mail]' <[e-mail]>
Cc: Rivenbark, Chris <crivenbark@ncdot.�ov>; Shumsky, Michael J<mshumsky@ncdot.�ov>; Jim Eisenhardt
([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: R-2536 Supplemental information
Jason,
Will you be sending out a table detailing the wetland impact sites where the 1:1 mitigation is proposed for the un-
impacted wetland portions? I'd like to have something to include in our records.
Thanks,
Brian Wrenn
919-707-8792
From: Dilday, Jason L
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:50 AM
To: '[e-mail]' <[e-mail]>; Wrenn, Brian L
<brian.wrenn@ncdenr.�ov>
Cc: Rivenbark, Chris <crivenbark@ncdot.�ov>; Shumsky, Michael J<mshumsky@ncdot.�ov>; Jim Eisenhardt
([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: R-2536 Supplemental information
Andy,
Attached are two documents pertaining to R-2536. One is a summary/history of impacts that addresses the LEDPA for
the project. The other is the construction consultation. This consultation, at the moment, is unsigned. They are
currently working to get the required signatures for the document. I will send along the signed copy when it becomes
available.
Also, as Brian has noted, there are minor discrepancies in our impact numbers between the permit application, permit
drawings and DMS mitigation acceptance letter. We are showing a difference of 31,990/31,992 If for stream impacts
and 6.43/6.44 ac. of wetland impacts between the various sources. It appears that in both instances the differences

were due to the rounding of numbers. Currently DMS is committed to 31,992 If of stream and 6.43 ac. of wetlands. So
potentially we are 0.01 ac. short of the needed mitigation for the project.
I know we had spoken previously about the wetland impacts and instances on the project where we claimed a"total
take" but portions of the wetland would not be impacted. It had been suggested that for the un-impacted portions of
these wetlands, we could possibly mitigate this at a 1:1 ratio. The consultants went back and looked through the project
and determined there were five sites that met this criteria, totaling approximately 0.1 ac. If it is acceptable, we would
like to pursue the use of the 0.1 ac. as an offset to the 0.01 deficiency in the DMS mitigation, if you are agreeable. If not,
I will request an adjustment to the DMS acceptance for the 0.01 ac.
Jason
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Site #
Site 8
Site 23D
Site 38C
Site 81
Site 84
Total
R-2536 Total Takes Wetlands Sites Impacted/Unimpacted
18-May-16
ID
WYY-AA
WA-AB
WU-B
W I-C
W K-C
Impacted Portion (acre)
0.1168
0.0454
0.0847
0.0195
0.0013
0.2677
Unimpacted Portion (acre)
0.0605
0.0187
0.1109
0.0113
0.0073
0.2087