HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160191 Ver 1_Public Notice_20160518Iml
US Army Corps PUBLIC NOTICE
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: April 22, 2016
Comment Deadline: May 23, 2016
Corps Action ID Number: SAW -2006-40466
The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) received an application from the
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), seeking Department of the
Army (DA) authorization to permanently impact 0.33 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and
2204 linear feet of jurisdictional streams associated with construction of a 12.3 mile
controlled -access freeway facility on new alignment from south of Old NC 11 to US 264
(Stantonsburg Road) in Pitt County, North Carolina. (NCDOT TIP No. R-2250)
Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached
plans. This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington
District Web Site at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latoI3 PermitPro am.aspx
Applicant: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Attn: Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M.
Natural Environment Section Head
NCDOT — Project Development and Environmental Analysis
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina
27699-1548
Authority
The Corps evaluates this application and decides whether to issue, conditionally issue, or
deny the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of the following Statutory
Authorities:
® Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344)
❑ Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403)
❑ Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972
(33 U.S.C. 1413)
Version 7.8.2014 Page 1
Location
Directions to Site: The site location is a 12.3 mile long corridor on new alignment from
south of Old NC 11 to US 264 (Stantonsburg Road) in Pitt County
Project Area (acres): 12.3 miles Nearest Town: Greenville
Nearest Waterway: Tar and Neuse Rivers River Basin: Tar and Neuse Rivers
Latitude and Longitude: Approximate center at 35.544765 N, -77.461248 W
Figure 1
Existing Site Conditions
The project is located in the Neuse and Tar Pamlico River Basins and lies within
Hydrologic Units 03020103 (Subbasin Lower Tar River), 03020203 (Subbasin
Contentnea), and 03020202 (Subbasin Middle Neuse). This is within the Middle Atlantic
Coastal Plain eco -region. The project crosses Gum Swamp, as well as several tributaries
to waters of the US, and one wetland. Land use in the project vicinity consists of
primarily residential, commercial, and agricultural uses along roadways and in uplands
and forested lands occupying stream corridors and other undeveloped areas.
The only stream within the project footprint with a surface water classification is Gum
Swamp. The Best Usage Classification for Gum Swamp is "C, SW, and NSW." There are
no waters within the project vicinity classified as High Quality Waters (HQW). Neither
Version 7.8.2014 Page 2
Water Supplies (WS -I: undeveloped watersheds or WS -II: predominately undeveloped
watersheds), nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.0 mile of the
project area. Streams within the R-2250 project area are not designated as North Carolina
Natural or Scenic Rivers, or as National Wild and Scenic Rivers. Additionally, these
waters are not listed on the 2014 303(d) list of impaired waters due to sedimentation or
turbidity.
A wetland identification and preliminary assessment analysis for the study area was
performed and wetlands were delineated based on the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual. An evaluation of the wetlands within
the preferred alignment was completed in November 2013 -January 2014 and reviewed by
USACE and NCDWR in November 2014.
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The purpose of the project as stated in the Record of Decision is to improve traffic flow
and congestion on Memorial Drive (NC 11) and Stantonsburg Road (US 264 Business)
within the project area; relieve congestion on NC 11 in Greenville, thereby improving
safety and reducing the potential for accidents; and improve regional travel along the US
264/NC 11 corridor.
Project Description
The applicant proposes to construct a new roadway from Memorial Drive (NC 11) in the
vicinity of NC 102, continuing northwest to connect with the existing US
264/Stantonsburg Road (US 264 Business) interchange. Project construction includes
interchanges at NC 102, Forlines Road (SR 1126) and US 13/US 264, several culvert
extensions as well as several new location culverts. The length of the project is
approximately 12.3 miles.
Avoidance and Minimization
All jurisdictional features were delineated, field verified and surveyed within the corridor
for R-2250. Using these features, preliminary designs were adjusted to avoid and/or
minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas. NCDOT employs many strategies to avoid and
minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas in all of its designs. Many of these strategies have
been incorporated into BMP documents that have been reviewed and approved by the
resource agencies and which will be followed throughout construction. All wetland areas
not affected by the project will be protected from unnecessary encroachment. Individual
avoidance and minimization items are as follows:
No staging of construction equipment or storage of construction supplies will be
allowed in wetlands or near surface waters.
The project was designed to avoid or minimize disturbance to aquatic life movements,
including the use of onsite stream relocations.
Version 7.8.2014 Page 3
• NCDOT and its contractors will not excavate, fill, or perform land clearing activities
within Waters of the U.S. or any areas under the jurisdiction of the USACE, except
as authorized by the USACE. To ensure that all borrow and waste activities occur on
high ground, except as authorized by permit, the NCDOT shall require its contractors
to identify all areas to be used to borrow material, or to dispose of dredged, fill or
waste material. Documentation of the location and characteristics of all borrow and
disposal sites associated with the project will be available to the USACE on request.
• Grass swale treatments have been incorporated in areas where flat slopes can be
maintained.
• Proposed box culverts will be buried 1 ft. to provide for fish passage.
• Cross pipes in jurisdictional streams will be buried 1 ft. for all pipes where possible.
• Sediment and erosion control devices will be utilized where appropriate.
• The use of hand clearing rather than mechanized clearing where possible.
• Bank stabilization at outlets of culverts will not impact the stream bed where possible.
• Considering environmental, hydraulic, and roadway perspectives, 3:1 slopes are
proposed within the wetlands where most practical.
• Shifted alignment of the project to avoid impacts to Wetlands B, C, D, E, F, G, and H
identified in the 2014 Delineation Update.
Compensatory Mitigation
The NCDOT has avoided and minimized impacts to jurisdictional resources to the
greatest extent possible as described above. The unavoidable impacts to Waters of the
U.S. will be offset by compensatory mitigation provided by the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)-Division of Mitigation Services (DMS).
Essential Fish Habitat
The project will not impact any Essential Fish Habitat afforded protection under the
Magnuson- Stevens Act of 1996 (16 U.S.0 1801 et seq.).
Cultural Resources
The potential effect of the proposed project on historic architectural resources was
evaluated in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of
1966, as amended. There were six properties within the Area of Potential Effects (APE)
which are either listed on the National Register of Historic Places or have been
determined to be eligible for listing on the National Register. The project alignment
avoids all of these resources with the exception of the Renston Rural Historic District in
which the roadway project would have an adverse impact. To complete Section 106
consultation, NCDOT, USACE, and HPO, along with the Renston consulting parties,
developed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) stipulating measures NCDOT will
follow during final design and construction of the Bypass to mitigate adverse impacts to
Renston Rural Historic District. The MOA was finalized and approval was received on
August 25, 2008.
Version 7.8.2014 Page 4
Endangered Species
Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Corps reviewed the project area,
examined all information provided by the applicant and consulted the latest North
Carolina Natural Heritage Database. Based on available information:
® The Corps determines that the proposed project would not affect federally listed
endangered or threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat for
the following species in Pitt County: Red -cockaded woodpecker, West Indian
Manatee and the Tar River spinymussel.
® The Corps determines that the proposed project may affect federally listed
endangered or threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat for
the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis).
The US Fish and Wildlife Service has developed a programmatic biological
opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA),
the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and NCDOT for the northern long-
eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina. The PBO
covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT
projects and activities. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the
NCDOT program is "May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect." The PBO
provides incidental take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all NCDOT projects
with federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Pitt County, where TIP R-
2250 is located.
❑ The Corps is not aware of the presence of species listed as threatened or
endangered or their critical habitat formally designated pursuant to the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) within the project area. The Corps will
make a final determination on the effects of the proposed project upon additional
review of the project and completion of any necessary biological assessment
and/or consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or National
Marine Fisheries Service.
Other Required Authorizations
The Corps forwards this notice and all applicable application materials to the appropriate
State agencies for review.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR): The Corps will generally not
make a final permit decision until the NCDWR issues, denies, or waives the state
Certification as required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The receipt
of the application and this public notice, combined with the appropriate application fee, at
the NCDWR Central Office in Raleigh constitutes initial receipt of an application for a
401 Certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur if the NCDWR fails to act on this
Version 7.8.2014 Page 5
request for certification within sixty days of receipt of a complete application. Additional
information regarding the 401 Certification may be reviewed at the NCDWR Central
Office, Transportation Permitting Unit, 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application
for a 401 Certification should do so, in writing, by May 23, 2016 to:
NCDWR Central Office
Attention: Ms. Amy Chapman, Transportation Permitting Unit
(USPS mailing address): 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Or,
(physical address): 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM):
❑ The application did not include a certification that the proposed work complies
with and would be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved
North Carolina Coastal Zone Management Program. Pursuant to 33 CFR 325.2
(b)(2) the Corps cannot issue a Department of Army (DA) permit for the
proposed work until the applicant submits such a certification to the Corps and
the NCDCM, and the NCDCM notifies the Corps that it concurs with the
applicant's consistency certification. As the application did not include the
consistency certification, the Corps will request, upon receipt„ concurrence or
objection from the NCDCM.
® Based upon all available information, the Corps determines that this application
for a Department of Army (DA) permit does not involve an activity which would
affect the coastal zone, which is defined by the Coastal Zone Management (CZM)
Act (16 U.S.C. § 1453).
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest.
That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of
important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors
which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects
thereof, among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental
concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain
values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shoreline
erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy
needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property
ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving
the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of
Version 7.8.2014 Page 6
the impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the
Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local
agencies and officials, including any consolidated State Viewpoint or written position of
the Governor; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate
the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the
Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for
this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered
species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other
public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an
Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are also used to
determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the
proposed activity.
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice,
that a public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings
shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a
public hearing shall be granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues
raised are insubstantial or there is otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
The Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District will receive written comments pertinent to
the proposed work, as outlined above, until 5pm, May 23, 2016. Comments should be
submitted to Mr. Thomas Steffens, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington
Regulatory Field Office,2407 West Fifth Street, Washington, North Carolina 27889, or
by phone at (910) 251-4615.
Version 7.8.2014 Page 7