Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160401 Ver 1_Public Notice_20160518M PUBLIC NOTICE US Army Corps Of Engineers Wilmington District Issue Date: May 11, 2016 Comment Deadline: June 10, 2016 Corps Action ID Number: SAW -2014-01633 TIP No. U-3301 The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application from the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) seeking Department of the Army authorization to permanently impact 4,033 linear feet of stream, 0.07 acre of wetland, and 0.10 acre of open water along 4.3 miles of NC 63/Leicester Highway in order to increase traffic carrying capacity and improve safety along this section of NC 63 in Buncombe County, North Carolina (TIP No. U-3301). Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached plans. This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site at http://www.saw.usace.anny.mil/Missions/Regulator_3 PennitProgram/PublicNotices.aspx Applicant: North Carolina Department of Transportation Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M., Natural Environment Section Head 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598 Authority The Corps evaluates this application and decides whether to issue, conditionally issue, or deny the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of the following Statutory Authorities: ® Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) ❑ Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403) ❑ Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1413) Location The project area is located in the Mountain physiographic region of North Carolina, in the unincorporated community of Leicester in Buncombe County, North Carolina, just beyond the City of Asheville's city limits. The proposed project is located along 4.3 miles of NC 63/Leicester Highway, from SR 1615 (Gilbert Road) to SR 1004 (Newfound Road). Project Area: 4.3 miles Nearest Town: Leicester Nearest Waterways: Sluder Branch, Newfound Creek, Gouches Branch, and Dix Creek River Basin: French Broad River Latitude and Longitude: 35.6207 N, -82.6540 W Existing Site Conditions The project corridor is surrounded by steep slopes as well as open, flat areas used for farming. NC 63 is a primary northwest -southeast transportation facility for Buncombe County, connecting Asheville to Leicester and the northwest portion of the county. It is designated as a major collector within the Leicester community, and a principal arterial closer to Asheville, on the North Carolina Statewide Functional Classification System. The corridor of NC 63 along the proposed project site currently consists of a 2 -lane, 24 -foot roadway section. The roadway has a slightly undulating vertical alignment, along with several large horizontal curves. Existing right- of -way along NC 63 within the project limits varies from approximately 35 to 100 feet. There is no control of access. According to the applicant, an examination of the Proposed Land Use Map within the Buncombe County Land Use Plan (2013) shows that the land adjacent to the project corridor is slated for low-density residential with a mixed-use node located in the established commercial `center' of Leicester in the vicinity of Alexander Road (SR 1620). Parcels in the project area are zoned as `Open Use' which is the least restrictive Buncombe County zoning classification. Furthermore, the plan contains additional maps that show pockets of privately -owned available land adjacent to the project corridor and that there has been recent scattered low-density residential development and very limited commercial development in the vicinity of the project corridor. Although some residential development will continue in the project area, the amount and density will be limited by the lack of water and sewer service, some topographical constraints, such as steep slopes and some flood hazard areas, and the presence of conservation properties and Voluntary Agricultural Districts (VAD). While properties enrolled as VAD's aren't afforded any special protections, it does demonstrate a commitment by the landowner/farmer to keep the land in agricultural use. Any development will be consistent with adopted plans and ordinances. N Jurisdictional features within the project footprint are located in the French Broad River Drainage Basin (United States Geological Survey [USGS] Hydrologic Unit Code [HUC] 06010105) in Buncombe County. Jurisdictional streams that would be impacted by this project include Sluder Branch (N.C. Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Classification C; NCDWR Index No. 6-84-5), Newfound Creek and one unnamed tributary (UT) of Newfound Creek (NCDWR Classification C; NCDWR Index No. 6-84), Gouches Branch and one UT of Gouches Branch (NCDWR Classification C; NCDWR Index No. 6-84-4), and Dix Creek and one UT of Dix Creek (NCDWR Classification C; NCDWR Index No. 6-84-7). There are no designated High Quality Waters (HQW), Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), Water Supply I (WS -I), Water Supply II (WS -II), or Trout Waters (Tr) occurring within 1.0 mile of the project area. No Anadromous Fish Spawning Areas or potential habitat areas are located near or within the project study area. There are no streams listed as 303(d) waters in the 2014 Final North Carolina 303(d) List of Impaired Waters of North Carolina for turbidity or sedimentation within 1.0 mile of the construction footprint. One natural forested community (Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest) occurs in the project study area, as well as one additional community (Maintained/Disturbed Land) that is the result of human activities. Applicant's Stated Purpose According to the applicant, the purposes of improving NC 63 are to (1) increase the traffic carrying capacity, and (2) improve safety along the subject section of NC 63, as both are needed to improve travel between Asheville and Leicester, as well as to decrease the crash potential along NC 63. Project Description NCDOT proposes to widen 4.3 miles of NC 63/Leicester Highway from SR 1615 (Gilbert Road) to SR 1004 (Newfound Road). The roadway would be a three -lane undivided facility from SR 1380 (Jones Road) to just east of Gray Fox Drive, then would transition to a four -lane divided facility with a 23 -foot median that runs to Newfound Road. The alterations in the roadway would result in the removal of several driveways and structures along the NC 63 corridor. Proposed improvements include flattening several curves along the project roadway by utilizing existing pavement and extending several existing culverts. The eighteen intersections that are currently located in the project limits would still exist after the road widening, but some would be realigned and/or widened, and the intersection of NC 63 and SR 1610 (Martin Branch Road) would be signalized to further accommodate traffic needs. The proposed improvements to NC 63 do not include provisions for a paved sidewalk since there would be 14 -foot wide outside lanes within the three -lane section and 5 -foot paved shoulders within the four -lane divided section to accommodate bicycle traffic along the roadway. The design speed of NC 63 would increase to 50 miles per hour (mph) due to the wider roadway and straighter geometry. The recommended posted speed would be 45 mph and 35 mph within the Leicester community. Construction of the project would require the following impacts to waters of the U.S.: • Permanent impacts to 4,033 linear feet (If) of stream, 0.07 acre of wetland, and 0.10 acre of open water (a pond); and, • Temporary impacts to 353 if of streams. Permanent impacts would result from the placement, replacement, or extension of culverts; bank stabilization; other placement of rip rap; embankment/road fill; and stream relocations. Avoidance and Minimization According to the applicant, avoidance and minimization measures have been employed in the project area to the maximum extent practicable. Listed below are some of the measures that would be implemented: • NCDOT's Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the Protection of Surface Waters will be enforced; • NCDOT's BMPs for Construction and Maintenance Activities will be utilized; • NCDOT will implement installation and maintenance of high quality erosion and sediment control measures; • Rip rap pads at drainage system outlets will dissipate flow and reduce velocities and erosive potential; • Unstable eroded stream banks will be stabilized with rip rap armoring; • Low flow conditions at culverts have been accommodated with the appropriate sizing, grade controls, burial, sills and baffles; • Where possible, streams were daylighted where existing pipe/culvert configuration existed. See Table 3 below for stream length quantities that would be replaced by pipe/culverts compared to ones replaced by open channel, and; • Existing drainage patterns have been maintained to the maximum extent practicable. The applicant has also incorporated site specific measures to maintain water quality which include constructing/installing grassed berms, grassed lined ditches, vegetated swales, energy dissipater basins, and preformed scour holes. Compensatory Mitigation While the proposed project would permanently impact 4,033 linear feet of cool water stream, 1321f of this would be due to bank stabilization. Total permanent impacts to streams, minus bank stabilization, equals 3,901 If. al The applicant proposes to purchase credits from the NC Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) as compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable functional losses to the aquatic environment resulting from 3,901 if of permanent impact to streams and 0.07 acre of permanent impact to riparian wetlands. NCDOT proposes to mitigate for the permanent stream impacts as follows: 3,2791f of good quality streams at a 2:1 ratio and 6221f of low quality streams at a 1:1 ratio. The applicant also proposes to purchase credits from NCDMS to mitigate the 0.07 acre of wetland impact at a 2:1 ratio. Essential Fish Habitat Pursuant to the Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, this Public Notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements. The Corps' initial determination is that the proposed project would not affect EFH or associated fisheries managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine Fisheries Service. Cultural Resources The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the lead federal agency for this project and approved a Categorical Exclusion (CE) on August 4, 2014. In 2000, NCDOT, for the FHWA, investigated historic architectural resources in the U-3301 project area and established the Leicester Historic District and the Harold Clark House as properties eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRNP). Project design refinements in 2004 placed the Harold Clark House outside the Area of Potential Effects (APE) thereby eliminating it from concern. Re-evaluation of the project area in 2006 in response to additional design changes concluded that the Leicester Historic District no longer met the criteria for NR eligibility due to significant loss of historical integrity. Two properties, the Dr. C.K. Hughes House and the Frisbee Store located within the former district, are individually NR -eligible. In 2007, NCDOT, the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NCHPO), and the FHWA agreed that the U-3301 project would not adversely affect these two individual resources; FHWA determined that 4(f) "de minimis" also applies. The "no adverse effect" finding for the Dr. C.K. Hughes House is contingent upon the development and execution of a landscape plan for replacement of trees along the right-of-way; this landscape plan is documented in the 2014 CE for this project. An archaeological survey was performed for FHWA's APE for the original widening alternative in 2001. The APE for this alternative is also appropriate for the currently proposed project, which is an updated three -lane to four -lane transitional facility minus the roundabouts. The 2001 survey relocated or identified three archaeological sites within the proposed APE. All three of these sites were recommended as not eligible for listing in the NRHP and no further archaeological work was recommended for this original alternative; this also applies to the current proposal. No further archaeological investigations are recommended for the original 2001 widening alternative or for the currently proposed project. 5 Endangered Species The FHWA is the lead federal agency for this project and approved a CE on August 4, 2014. NCDOT, for FHWA, determined "no effect' for all species listed for Buncombe County with the exception of the Northern Long Eared Bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis). Documentation to address the NLEB was submitted to the US Fish and Wildlife Service on February 26, 2016. According to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Biotics Database, most recently updated in October 2015, the nearest NLEB hibernacula record is 22 miles away and no known NLEB roost trees occur within 1/4 mile of the project. NCDOT has determined that the proposed action does not require separate consultation on the grounds that the proposed action is consistent with the final Section 4(d) rule, codified at 50 C.F.R. § 17.40(o) and effective February 16, 2016. Other Required Authorizations The Corps forwards this notice and all applicable application materials to the appropriate State agencies for review. North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR): The Corps will generally not make a final permit decision until the NCDWR issues, denies, or waives the state Certification as required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The receipt of the application and this public notice, combined with the appropriate application fee, at the NCDWR Central Office in Raleigh constitutes initial receipt of an application for a 401 Certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur if the NCDWR fails to act on this request for certification within sixty days of receipt of a complete application. Additional information regarding the 401 Certification may be reviewed at the NCDWR Central Office, Transportation Permitting Unit, 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for a 401 Certification should do so, in writing, by July 8, 2016 to: NCDWR Central Office Attention: Ms. Amy Chapman, Transportation Permitting Unit (USPS mailing address): 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Or, (physical address): 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM): Based upon all available information, the Corps has determined that this application for a Department of Army (DA) permit does not involve an activity which would affect the coastal zone, which is defined by the Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Act (16 U.S.C. § 1453). Con Evaluation The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines. Commenting Information The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and officials, including any consolidated State Viewpoint or written position of the Governor; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to NEPA. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing shall be granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing. The Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District will receive written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, until 5pm, June 10, 2016. Comments should be submitted to Lori Beckwith, Regulatory Project Manager, Asheville Regulatory Field Office, 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208, Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006, at (828) 271-7980. Comments can also be emailed to loretta.a.beckwithgusace.army.mil . 7 t ■1 0 V See Sheet I -A For Index of Sheets 63 BEGIN PROJ. e ei 1626 BYP ~ 251 63 ` a sus szo � 5 1220 n. eic ter a�iaea K 63 251'.. 1004 m�u , 25 694 m S � HEVIL � xao m 5m'tt� 6;d� 70 A4 END PROJ. s ^ ( 26 81��� s 40 19 23 ' THIS PROD SITE STATE OF NORTH[ C A �j� OLIN STATE STATE PR—REPERENCE NO SxeeT TOTAL. d/�`j�f�1�� PERMIT DRAWING NO. "eeT.` SHEET 1 OF 48 �o�o U-3301 I DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATePRUJNO 34909.1.1 STP -63(D PE B UNCOMBE COUNTY LOCATION: NC 63 (LEICESTER HWY) FROM SR 1615 (GILBERT RD.) TO SR 1004 (NEWFOUND ROAD) NORTHWEST OF ASHEVILLE TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, CULVERTS 'ETE PLANS t Rf W ACQUISITION ARY PLANS 'OR CONSTRUCTION ;O PLANS IRI ;R 2, 2015 Ji I L I J / I Jh —L— STA. 222+97 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD ?? GRAPHIC SCALES 50 25 0 50 100 PLANS 50 25 0 50 100 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) 10 5 0 10 20 PROFILE (VERTICAL) DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH ADT 2014 = 20,200 VPD ADT 2040 = 29,200 VPD LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT U-3301 = 4.431 MILES K = 9 %Q D = 70 % LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT U-3301 = 0.024 MILES T = 4 %Q * V = 50-60 MPH *TTST = 1%Q DUAL = 3%Q TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT U-3301 = 4.455 MILES FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION NCDOT CONTACT K. ZAK HAMIDI, PE PRINCIPLE ARTERIAL (4 LANE) MAJOR COLLECTOR (3 LANE) DESIGN BUILD PROJECT ENGINEER Prepared In the Office of; VA UGHN & MELTON, INC. 1318-F PATTON AVENUE ASHEVILLE, NC 28806 PRONE (828)253-2796 2072 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS REECE SCHULER, PE RIGHT OF WAY DATE. MARCH 16, 2015 PROJECT ENGINEER JOHN LANSFORD, PE LETTING DATE. MARCH 16, 2015 PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 5 P� PJUN/1\ '1 \ BUNCOMBE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION � 21 ®DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER ®DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER 4 GR JAMES ST T W Segs x 3( SITE 1 DETAIL 4 1S CHANNEL CHANGE INol I. Scale) 6 G—Fit D 1'F' Slope d GEOTEXTILE B Min. D= 4.0 Ft. ,..d= 4.0 FL 'When B is < b.D' B= 3.0 F. Type of Liner= Class I Il 6= 5.0 Ft. FROM STA. 26+50 TO STA. 27+50 -L- (LT) FROM STA. 28+50 TO STA. 29+13 -L- ILT) CONC JS SEE CHANGE\ \ {J — i NC 63 — —� 25'dS7 CONC H J DETAIL 5 JS CHANNELS CHANGE ° b F. Groan D 141. Slope d GEOTEXnIE g Min.O=d.0 Ft. d= Max. 4.0 F. B= 3.0 F. to 6.5 Ft. 6= 5.0 F. EST. DD -TBD CU. YDS.; EST, GEOTEXTILE=TBD SQ. YDS.; DEBRA B PATTON O 7 JS CHANNEL CHANGE SEE DETAIL 5 SITE 2 95x6 CMPA u.3"x1" C BANK STABILIZATION > SEE DETAIL 9 0 RADETCONAIL TROL FEATURE J DETAILqj�NNELCHANGE W S SEE DETAIL 4 / +\ T- -- \ + NNE B PUCKRIDGE .N48, v\\� 01F o / \ OtR C1111 15" CS "X 2 ELBOWS R COIyTtSk�0U5 51'� GGWWj�' / / EXTEf� E C AT INLET \ X\ (2) 7'X6' SDEGR -41V WIN ALL TO EIS NG Isg \ \ CLASS 'B' RR D(,E CB \ O KD \ GEOTEXT E57.7 SY RR EST.2 TIN CJ 36" 1 " RCP -II P \ \ E �\ F (2)7'x6' MI F \ SILLS LT BRL 10� CHAD A. SILVER H G / �k \ rT 5 \� ` ,JUDY hats ; j �% DAPHNA 8.5TILE5 SLUDER BRANCH-LDENLETTAIL 1CHANNEL TYPICAL (LT TO IT LOOKING DOWNSTREAM) / 5 )NOT TO SCALE) / EXCAVATED ' POST GV / PROPOSED WING WALVRETAINING -I �O IIF 30 0 PROPOSED FROM OUTLRCBC O /4 WALL l OF PROPOSED V = R2,0 9tiO OUTLET BED INV - 2,0]INLE F O \� 0 TO PROPOSED -L- RCB C INLET �'9( INV2,074.60' 9'�,FS SEPTIC VAR. O'to 1' WITHCLASS IRIPWITH GEOTEXTILE BENCH WIDTH CHANNEL WIDTH VARIES FROM VARIES PROPOSED -Y1- CULVERT BARREL (SEE PLAN VIEW) WIDTH TO PROPOSED -L- CULVERT Cl -AS IRIP RAP BARREL WIDTH (SEE PLAN VIEW WITH GEOTEXTILE MIN. O= 3.5 Ft. SEE PLAN VIEW FOR F%TEPITS DETAIL 9 N DETAIL 2 SLUDER BRANCH -L- OUTLET CHANNEL TYPICAL (LT TO RT LOOKING DOWNSTREAM) (NOT TO SCALE) EXCAVATE %O J DEPTH nIU�O TRANSITION FROM OUTLET VARIES - OF PROPOSED RCBC TO APE OX. 60' DOWNSTREAM :) OF OUTLET FROM OUTLET INV = 2,072.40 h, BED ELEV. = 2,0]1.56' CUSS RIP RAP WITH WIDTH GEOTEXTILE BENCH WIDTH VARIES B CHANNEL WIDTH VARIES FROM 0'TO 3.5' FROM BARREL WIDTH TO (SEE PLAN VIEW) PROPOSED CHANNEL WIDTH CLASS RIP RAP )SEE PLAN VIEW) WITH GEOTEXTILE B-60 F.AT CULVERT SEE PLAN VIEW FOR EXTENTS EST, DDE -93 CU, YDS.; EST. GEOTEXTIIE=222 SQ. YDS.; EST. RIP RAP=128 TONS CL I RIP RAP Vb R. -OLD -ER= i EST. DDE=62 CU. YDS.; EST. GEOTEXDLE=84 SQ. YDS.; EST. RIP RAP=38 TONS CL. I RIP RAP RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT \ X�X HTR GR F/ ti 3 GAL i I Not t° Sc°lel 15,min. Ditch Gr°d° GEOTEXTILE Type of Liner= 42 TONS,CL I Rip-R°p Ge°te.tile= 65 n -Y3- STA. 13+90(R71 3T. Lam` �T dNC®N�]�L]E DO NOT USE FOR PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. PERMIT DRAWING fLJJ121 5 SHEET 2 OF 48 RNW SHEET NO. _ SCALE 1" = 1 OOr ROAEN HENGINEERS IN ERSIGN Ci 00 Q Z DETAIL 15 GRADE CONTROL FEATURE INot to Sc°le) FOR PROFILE OF LINE -L- SEE SHEET 24 --°°d FOR PROFILE OF LINE -Yl- SEE SHEET 34 Dill, FOR PROFILE OF LINE -Y2- SEE SHEET 42 Grade ls'm°, FOR PROFILE OF LINE -Y3- SEE SHEET 34 Ls O.Oss "fit. m°. FOR PROFILE OF LINE DRI- SEE SHEET 40 GE.TEXTILE OR CULVERT PLANS SEE SHEET C-_ THRU C-_ Type of Liner= CLA55 I Ri Ra FROM STA. 14+05 TO STA. 14+50 -Y3- (RT) SITE 2 95x6 CMPA u.3"x1" C BANK STABILIZATION > SEE DETAIL 9 0 RADETCONAIL TROL FEATURE J DETAILqj�NNELCHANGE W S SEE DETAIL 4 / +\ T- -- \ + NNE B PUCKRIDGE .N48, v\\� 01F o / \ OtR C1111 15" CS "X 2 ELBOWS R COIyTtSk�0U5 51'� GGWWj�' / / EXTEf� E C AT INLET \ X\ (2) 7'X6' SDEGR -41V WIN ALL TO EIS NG Isg \ \ CLASS 'B' RR D(,E CB \ O KD \ GEOTEXT E57.7 SY RR EST.2 TIN CJ 36" 1 " RCP -II P \ \ E �\ F (2)7'x6' MI F \ SILLS LT BRL 10� CHAD A. SILVER H G / �k \ rT 5 \� ` ,JUDY hats ; j �% DAPHNA 8.5TILE5 SLUDER BRANCH-LDENLETTAIL 1CHANNEL TYPICAL (LT TO IT LOOKING DOWNSTREAM) / 5 )NOT TO SCALE) / EXCAVATED ' POST GV / PROPOSED WING WALVRETAINING -I �O IIF 30 0 PROPOSED FROM OUTLRCBC O /4 WALL l OF PROPOSED V = R2,0 9tiO OUTLET BED INV - 2,0]INLE F O \� 0 TO PROPOSED -L- RCB C INLET �'9( INV2,074.60' 9'�,FS SEPTIC VAR. O'to 1' WITHCLASS IRIPWITH GEOTEXTILE BENCH WIDTH CHANNEL WIDTH VARIES FROM VARIES PROPOSED -Y1- CULVERT BARREL (SEE PLAN VIEW) WIDTH TO PROPOSED -L- CULVERT Cl -AS IRIP RAP BARREL WIDTH (SEE PLAN VIEW WITH GEOTEXTILE MIN. O= 3.5 Ft. SEE PLAN VIEW FOR F%TEPITS DETAIL 9 N DETAIL 2 SLUDER BRANCH -L- OUTLET CHANNEL TYPICAL (LT TO RT LOOKING DOWNSTREAM) (NOT TO SCALE) EXCAVATE %O J DEPTH nIU�O TRANSITION FROM OUTLET VARIES - OF PROPOSED RCBC TO APE OX. 60' DOWNSTREAM :) OF OUTLET FROM OUTLET INV = 2,072.40 h, BED ELEV. = 2,0]1.56' CUSS RIP RAP WITH WIDTH GEOTEXTILE BENCH WIDTH VARIES B CHANNEL WIDTH VARIES FROM 0'TO 3.5' FROM BARREL WIDTH TO (SEE PLAN VIEW) PROPOSED CHANNEL WIDTH CLASS RIP RAP )SEE PLAN VIEW) WITH GEOTEXTILE B-60 F.AT CULVERT SEE PLAN VIEW FOR EXTENTS EST, DDE -93 CU, YDS.; EST. GEOTEXTIIE=222 SQ. YDS.; EST. RIP RAP=128 TONS CL I RIP RAP Vb R. -OLD -ER= i EST. DDE=62 CU. YDS.; EST. GEOTEXDLE=84 SQ. YDS.; EST. RIP RAP=38 TONS CL. I RIP RAP RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT \ X�X HTR GR F/ ti 3 GAL i I Not t° Sc°lel 15,min. Ditch Gr°d° GEOTEXTILE Type of Liner= 42 TONS,CL I Rip-R°p Ge°te.tile= 65 n -Y3- STA. 13+90(R71 3T. Lam` �T dNC®N�]�L]E DO NOT USE FOR ]E ]lDL.�I\i3 A W ACQUISITION ]EDIbELIIA'gbN 110 NOT USE FO ]I8� PLANS' CONSTRUCT30N WITH TO I ANNE B. PUCKRIDGE m I D 01 DAVE ISTD r J ' \ 50 A A IT K G I / � I FD 1 CSP /w ELBO I ARY LOU LONCLE g ACE OW�AR SS BROWN 14 I - ° 7 <\' O I DUE I I � I I� I I LOII J�t. HEIRS I 5 G� y 0 Y 13 �w 7 r1 I I I I I I I 4._ GRAPHIC SCALE SITE 1 \ RIP RAP NOT SHOWN � CONC + FOR CLARITY 2GI\ c 15' � O BST FS ap/p/l Ox. loc. / �\ T CONTINUOUS WINGWALL - Nc� (2)7'x6' SILLS LT BRL 11\ X N JS CHANNEL CHANG\ SEE DETAIL 4 \ F. 1S CHANNEL CHANGE SEE DETAIL 5 I lmm� m78.42 Rho, 13 1 074.5m 75.m9 Imme / 73.88 74.37 / / / CMPA . 3"xl" Cq ) / -4f-� i TB 48° CM SIG � � TB TB LT \ IS INR/W AT OUTL� ET 1 NID WD /(2)6'X6' RCI3 Ft. NC 63 'c SIG •❑ G XisT� I --_ x x R � colvc HW CB Som EXTE�b) E L I C AT INLE / END WIT (2) 7'X6' SK DEGRE \ \\ / SNG TO E T out �C ISBKD \ �\ � U � 2 7 55" MP \ \pUF \ / F // . --- — __ ONC `\ \ k \ 6 \ ®DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER ®DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER vyy�, BANK STABILIZATION SEE DETAIL 9 I00' 0' 100, mommol GRAPHIC SCA1_E PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. U-330/ 5 DETAIL RW SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER INCOMP LEE FE PLANS M OO NOT USE FOR lfW ACQUISITION �00 PRELIMINA. RY PLANS Q EO NOT USE F01 CONSTRUCTION Q Z PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 4 OF 48 SCALE 111=60' ®DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER ®DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER vyy�, BANK STABILIZATION SEE DETAIL 9 I00' 0' 100, mommol GRAPHIC SCA1_E z 0 11744 NC -63 12722 17300 478 700 ro � 18500 1456 1900 PLANS UONSTROCTION � I WO�3 I I 2015 36.N D WWD D `W q' 8 ESTIMATED 2035 7933 ADT 2600 tic. a SR -1378 OLD NEWFOUNDLAND RD EIP LARRY C FERGUSON �IIAR [/��� OEIPARPENNN�_ RY C. SH7 \ N7u 18 M. HEATHER McMULLEN So/=� I \ - 15HTR I € D CDNC GR I4 G. REE ------ \� OWN�I 500 GAL GEORGE R.4ANE' 6 \ ONK y \ DA �\ DI ,s -- __ _ FS GI \ i m p9E 50/L WDE.MTL J SPECIAL BACK OF CUB UT DIT I I -SEE DErAiL2_ _ 4 SP IA A - F UR CUT DITCH \ SEE DETAIL 11 -- MELISSA W. HERRON 1 ' 1 1 ®DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER F7, DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 7 OF 48 SCALE 1"=100' Z NO. LL..2,2lLL I O RM/ SHEET NO. _ ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC ENGINEER ENGINEER INCOMPL]E lE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR /W ACQU.ISMGN PRE➢ IMINRY DO NOT USE FO PLANS UONSTROCTION FOR PROFILE OF LINE -L- SEE SHEETS 24 G' 25 2 5 FOR PROFILE OF LINE -Y4- SEE SHEET 34 FOR PROFILE OF LINE -Y5- SEE SHEET 35 II ?X X 60' WD RAIL 1 JANE W. McMAHAN I I / X-�_ 2 3 \1 \+ a � ` CLASS B RR I I ¢O \ TNA HILL I r \ GEOTEKT EST. 5 SY [AGP I Imo, a l \ RR EST TN II I T I 5 ) CCN ti�Pe \ LP DTA KD S OII\ • - a' I NI� I I O NECT 12" HDPE I I o W ' Lt, O SYSTEM I 4 / 2.2 \. SPS 8 . 00 L, . _ I I z I \ a "RETAIN IIS' CMP15"/ N RCP -I I q 96 ST P Z COPS �EPS xlsrwc Riw pX� PDE 24 96•� m / OF E cwst�Nc /W WALL / S / Al,CIAL,UllTlA.CK CDIT HI4 l esr BLK \LKBUS I I / /� 4'O x SILVER r k AWS MAYRAO C3 \\ \ PETER MAYRAND 18 _cmpREMQ� � =. C NW LATERAL BASE DI' SEE DETAJL_6 C�FD Leo NAMES H. COMAN /'(B24 �X ,X- L ��.enrt 2SBK BELL M,I'N",D CHUR�H T 48CONC 2SISRECIAL TE I DITCH SEE L 5 BELL UNITED MET s �s KI 7} PDE—PDD —PDE HISTORICAL PROPERTY LINE nA G V 2SFD WO�3 36.N D WWD D `W q' 8 p K S � C X Q tic. a 27 JOSEPH W.SHEEHAN I ti 100' 0' b:.. GRAPHIC SCALE z Z 0 IFS DETAIL 5 LATERAL 'V' DITCH I Not to S-16) Nhw.l Fill Gand D 1"Rt. slope a Geo eM le Min. D= 1.0 H. Max. d= 1.0 Ft. Type f Liner= Cl— I Rip-Rop b= 5A Ft. FR0/.4 STA. 57+55 TO STA. 58+38 -L- (RT) LEICESTER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC GARY DONALD MEADOWS � II 11 \ `/LT GARY DONALD MEADOWS 'p2G �1 i` 31 w 0 w BECKY L. BRIDGES / BUS 1; Ib " P If Res°Nc I �8" RC IP-IjV C"1 ITr� REMOVE 15" CMP X CONCH / BST MONITOR W 24" L ---L PDE WALL II II � SITE 3 1 1 SBK BUS �I I I W BELLSOUTH TELLCO..INI ALEXANDER RD 2015 ESTIMATED SR -1620 2035 ALIT 4630 PLANS CONSTRUCTION 7000 QZ' 23 ds 3fpd. v= za rpe d= 1.2 It a I I I RUSSELL LEE GOFF = o:os Liner=CL 11 1-1 Stab li_ ion K P I - al 19332696 Fp _ Gd St.61+27 -LRT 4277 V 3.2 fps 260 II �00 12,722 13=485 18500 NC -63 20300 DETAIL 6 STANDARD BASE DITCH I Nof M -1.) Georea+ile� Min. D= 1.0 Ft. M—d= 1.0 Ft. B la , 6.0' 8= Var. to 4.0 Ft. 31 CU. YDS.; EST. GEOTE%TILE=48 SQ, YDS.; m GARLEEN BROWN 38 tt N� S SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' SEE DETAIL 2 STEPHEN K.SLUDER zsFp 3 6 I I I I I 1 II IIS HENRY FRISBEE I I A IIS 11 34 I 1 �ry 0 11 1= _I 25FD SF � lol C BUS I I DD =I �' 15" RCP -III P I E — RetainExangc Riw I BST— ME U\ 36" 36" RCP 36" RCP -I CMP BST F7 - DENOTES DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER ® DENOTES TEMPORARY 1 IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER I DETAIL 4 JS STREAM OUTLET PIPE PROTECTION IN— to —1.) Groun OAF a FJe�,oY' Groun (Rl d D d% Geotavtile B 1.5' O Outlet Pipe Min.D = Existing Ch Depth Mind = Ootlef Pilo Dia. V B= Existing Channel Bose :e Plon View for Length of Bank ProteRion e f Liner- 26 TON$ CL I Ri -R SHEET NO. LL=.2.2L1f I / RM/ SHEET NO. _ ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC ENGINEER ENGINEER INCOM P]L]E E ]PLANS DO NOT USE FOR /W ACQU.ISMGN PRELIMINARY DO NOT USE Ir0 PLANS CONSTRUCTION F \ GR I rP o Geotextile P 45 s 1a.e�r�IRT_T FOR PROFILE OF LINE L- SEE SHEET 25 FOR PROFILE OF LINE -Y6- SEE SHEET 35 1 ISF PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 12 OF 48 \ W SCALE 1"=100' ® II —X X 56' WOOD _ 36" RCP -III SYSTEM W/LT DI7 4y" / 36' CMP I 1 vPrGx' C 2GI-A � 56' W {� \----� RCP -III I I I 42" I MRCP -III BST Sus I I I VL —I SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' D TCF SEE DETAIL 3 I I I 33 L BLK J I I 1 MTL � Bus L---- c B. M. PONDE I 1 I SEA -NIC ENTERPRISES. INC. �I 1 Lx = x = I I -X- 3 7 I STE N G. MORGAN 1 i A LARRY W.FERGUSON \1s" RCP -III 39 DWAYNE GOSSETT \ I I T T I I I Q NNVvEES5 ' PROPERTiES.LNC I LT I \ \ /LT D / I � \ H BST W {� LEICESTER 1 METH. CHURCH 9G 15� � P 1 51GNA `02 /`w 1PDLEpm REMOVE o \\_c) - GLESIA CRISTIANA EBENEZER [am [am — — — — — — A / I I / EDI GR \ E REMOVE > F� MI II 4e�/\r\/\—_J &—LANDo CAAPI BST REMOVE— PD EMOVE-- \ PDE—PDE \� I \ ISMTL BUS \ \ I AC \ \ I I \\ I I PICOTS UNIT L GR SEPTIC GR \ \X I SEPTIC :H 42 i I \ TANK 44 _- \ SFO .qD SE DITCH xP I L.MCHAEL LUSK a I RD I I mI .tib I I I I 0 1 1 X AU I WELLS 0 LT 31 00 BST \ r W CONC o (� RCP -V W CGNC 9 D. OO �24" SRC 1 O PDE -F 4L 1 ��isnwc I 40 VE N BANK STABILIZATION WELL 100' OC' L%AE? J60 V MME GRAPHIC SCALE / 1 \v �� � `JS -L-RT FS.Q2 ^ STREAM I PIPE PROTECTION � SEE DETAIL 4 QZ' 23 ds 3fpd. v= za rpe d= 1.2 It J ----- I I I RUSSELL LEE GOFF = o:os Liner=CL 11 1-1 Stab li_ ion K P I - S Fp _ Gd St.61+27 -LRT 4277 V 3.2 fps S 0.06 Lner CL 11 Bank St.bilkp ion X v coac )aesT ORDON E. PINCZKOWSKI 'ALL 100' OC' L%AE? J60 V MME GRAPHIC SCALE z z O DETAIL 1 RIP RAP AT I EMBANKMENT Nof to SBA Oml.f Lo'min. I -- Pipe NWS GEOTEXPLE Type of Liner= " TONS,CL ile`9p 'p Geofexl= 43 zv -L- STA. 62+25(RT) -L- STA. 67+91(RT) \\ R P V 100 GAL CONC WALL LP TANK �_� C15EPTIC Z �2 O/ ISMTL h W BUS n / CONC 15" RCP -III CB (TO TIE IN BUSINESS ROOF x \ GR � F 1 W19" RC P III � CIA --_ _--_ --_ O O + b CB POSTS (60� _ _E_ F a BB �Il h STABILIZATION 1 , -_X48' X 2' 11 4,9 PT SIG. 63+f A-1 _CLASS RAP tp RAP A EM KM T — — _ GR SEE DETAIE 1 CONC ELK WALL 111 \ WALL 1 ITE WPL \ GON I UISFD I I ❑ - -, S 1 I —SPEQAL'6A K -OF CUR CUT DITCH G I WELL INSIDE —Sr�TAIC 2 z 5 BASEMENT 54 -,o I � W55SBKDG JJ EJ ISFD \ 1I 15�FdtCP I mll 60" CONC1 W 2 CO EXTE D a ISFD \ I E ;f r l E J c� s I I IRnrP E I.5". RCP-III 2G1 a' — u 3 BANK I I I STABILIZATJON I \I cPA� I I \ N CLASS I RIP RANAT EMBANKMENTJ SEE DETAIL 1 / 48" CHL � C � � � O ( �1 51 2 '+1 X X X3 4y 9 WW 148- DETAIL 6 JS STREAM OUTLET PIPE PROTECTION (Nmf fm S-1.1 urml POAos sma rvl N.1 er Ground d G.mf.xlfl. Omflef Pipe Mind = OWIef P'ip. Dim, See Plon V'rew for Length of Bank Prmt ion Type of Liner= 2 TONS,CL B Rip -Rap Geofe#ile= 7 zy -L- STA. 71+35 (RT) SITE DETAIL 5 JS STREAM OUTLET PIPE PROTECTION I Nof fm s�ml.l P a Lound d D Gaof.>nile ­10Pipe Min. D Ch Depfh Min. d ONIef Pipe Dim. B= Chmnnel 11— S.. PI.. View for Length of Bank Pro -ion Type of Liner= 51 TONS,CL I Rip -Rap Gii.t_le= 96 sy -L-STA. 70+80 (RT) -L- STA. 72+75 (RT) F 'DE - 0� \ IDE J � I I PDE 0DETAIL JS CHANNE SCE I STREAM OUTLET PROTECTION II I I I KO I I 56 I 5 II II I I II = II II � II 5 II II II II 0 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 15 OF 48 SCALE 1"=100' ®DENOTES IMPACTS IN �O6^- SURFACE WATER �V DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER PC Ste. 71+6633 i7 wo NO. U_ Q2.2UL O RW SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER INCOMPL]E lE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR /W ACOUISMGN PRE➢ IMIN DO NOT USE FO RY PLANS CONSTRUCTION FOR PROFILE OF LINE -L- SEE SHEETS 25 & 26 FOR CULVERT PLANS SEE SHEETS C- THRU C- / BDO /C C £� O -IV CB W H 0 0 k r / / d / ✓' V1 N \ � W iCPf,0E t0 D� '�y' 8, CMP , HV d11 1 1 OUTLETS PD JS_ PIPE PRQT�LTION SEE DETAI�6� PDE ,ham R N CMP i�/-- PDE PD— jI4�Il • CHA GE m BO H �1 \\ OIST 4 2� ll IO 1 JS TREAM OUTLET \ \ PIP PROTECTION 5.[l I I J 77 SE DETAIL 5 \ , 2SF0 i I HTR Z \I1\I 8 W c1 t) z O 1 ' pP F kr aSECTION A -A INEA PLAN VIEW NoT ®©SECTM TION B -B Im � 1 E 1aaa ETAIL 41 \ ELEONORE M•SHELTON GARY E. MONEYHAM. ET AL \\ DET? JS CHAN NE GEOTEXTILE Min. D= 2.5 Ft. Mox. d= 2.5 H. 8= 4.0 F. Type of Liner= CLASS I Rip -Rap b= 5.0 F. \ FROM STA. 82+22 TO STA. 82+75 -L- (LT) STANDARD BASE DITCH SEE DETAIL 4 )Length=37') � O MAHOLT JS CH SEE DEITT OGAIL K. MOORE BERM DITCH SEE DETAIL 1 'SFD C� v R CB_ — 15" — RCP -iv \—� TO $ / URI DOUGLAS A ROBERSON ILEI 5 / / F� C \ \ // {{rr11 E c SET F+ i CB CoNc HW C8 80+OMWOCB COL � CHANGE oo' o' oo' PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 18 OF 48 SCALE I"=100' GRAPHIC SCALE p-1 DENOTES PIPES REPLACED BY OPEN CHANNEL Q ®DENOTES IMPACTS IN �� Z SURFACE WATER X ®DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER LINDA W. CULBERTSON 4LAI E C. PRICE Q DAVID JACKSON C l�GII_� 77 p� S ITE 7 BANK \ 36=LMP/ I ' I I -J5 __ / , �/ I ,1/�---_ �'s--0--STABILIZATIOt, i \�\YAN �A DAROLD ROSE \\CET\C -NE yL_ SEE IL �C NO. U-330/ 1 9 RAN SHEET NO. _ ROADWAY DESIGN PLANS CONSTRUCTION HYDRAULIC ENGINEER ENGINEER INCOMPL]E )v PLANS DO NOT USE FOR t/W ACQUISITION PRE➢ IMINRY DO NOT USE FO PLANS CONSTRUCTION FOR PROFILE OF —L— SEE SHEETS 26 FOR PROFILE OF —Y7— SEE SHEET 35 FOR PROFILE OF —Y8— SEE SHEET 36 FOR PROFILE OF —Y9— SEE SHEET 36 FOR PROFILE OF—DR9REV— SEE SHEET 40 B / P,tdln- DEMETRE C. THEODOSSI _ s EP DI K _ _ BST �� o IS 005 E7END . D 7'X6' RCBC sow DIg51 CROSS \ � \ \ \ �ETAIL S Ah FJATAb / cq cs`3 P J I m — \C3 PLOWABLE FI I I ' FIR yo ((BERM DITCH SEE DETAIL I _ Retotn \ /\ ( / { KENNETH S.MCMULLEN �- / \ � / // — / � I JS CHAN ISEo EL C GE / / l ^� I SEE DETAIL NNETH S.MCIAX.LEN / /� / /tee SITE 6 _. HATTIE PONDER DETAIL 2 JS CHANNEL CHANGE ( Nor o stole) b RI Goren D 1"Ff. Slopa d GEOTEXTILE B Min. D= 2.5 F. Max. d= 2.5 F. B= 3.0 Ft. Type of Liner= CLASS I Rip-R,p b= 5.0 Ft. FROM STA. 78+50 TO STA. 80+60 -L- (RT) DAVID GOLDSMITH 7—/ A x JS E TA 2 \ \ \\Mete{a \ \ 1 I I ALBERT FREEMAN DETAIL 6 Ili 10INLET RT LOOKINLUCAL p w STREAM) ExcA ATE _ GRpGN C11 Sc[o?x[ni[ CBEES HANNE O , TIS GEOTEXT EST. 25 SY T EE PLAAYV PLAN RR EST. 17 TN SS F "" PLAN Vi for LxTFNis NOTE TRANSBIO O N%ISTI NTS 21 SLOPE SLOPE DETAIL 7 CHANNEL TYPICAL (LT To I LOOKINGx. sTREMy ceouNo EC' 'e vnTH .E _LE wTH cEOTExnLe Lvve.i To E.L.— BASE woolTil GEOTE%T EST. 170 SY (SEE PLAN Ewl RR EST. 120 TN S— PI,N View for Length NOTE TRANSTION TO FXISp E RAN2KSpLOTPC S I �j / / JAMES K. LANDOLF I II 11 1 1 �tG=1 DET L 2 CHA EL CHANGE o Scolel N lural N r.I Groun D �,� Goen d Geor ile B Min. D = 3.5 Ft. Max. d = 3.5 Ft. B= 3.0 F. T pe of Liner= Class I Rip -Rap FROM STA. 88+91 TO STA. 89+23 -1-- (RT) ut O 1� II BST V 73 REMOVE NEWFOUND BAPTIST CHURCH, INC. EXISTING �II SYSTEM SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITG SEE DETAIL 1 p W 15" RCP -III II AUE AlllE Retaln � a F x Z J' ZQ r I� r NEWFOUND BAPTIST CHURCH. INC. ©©� g 73 `-=-a— esr I I } NggRT� TND I CHURCH 1n1 6K I CEMETERY �a IIS I(I(/r 160^ c_Nc_ 48•CDNC W LT � CONC C3 � / LL \ K REMOVE 4 L.F.+/- Bsr 15" CSP W/1 ELB. X BST \ DWY. DI \ � C LT F xwD PGs �� ��� s• �� —�� JB it NcFH� OWABLE FILL REMOV F FU U FLOWABIL —'- -- - �_ FILL ASI R`/ ---- COLLAR D�ENC HW (location unknown) C3 ®DENOTES IMPACTS IN I ACOL.ISCfION PIS EI dhldN DO NOT USE FO SURFACE WATER F ®DENOTESTEMPORARY P Q, JS CHANNEL CHANGE SEE DETAIL 2 IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER Q Geotextlle B Min. D = 4.0 Ft. � �M BANK STAB I LI ZATI OI�-� (-22 Max. d = 4.0 Ft. I —x—x-1, AVEL C3 74 x Z J' ZQ r I� r NEWFOUND BAPTIST CHURCH. INC. ©©� g 73 `-=-a— esr I I } NggRT� TND I CHURCH 1n1 6K I CEMETERY �a IIS I(I(/r 160^ c_Nc_ 48•CDNC W LT � CONC C3 � / LL \ K REMOVE 4 L.F.+/- Bsr 15" CSP W/1 ELB. X BST \ DWY. DI \ � C LT F xwD PGs �� ��� s• �� —�� JB it NcFH� OWABLE FILL REMOV F FU U FLOWABIL —'- -- - �_ FILL ASI R`/ ---- COLLAR D�ENC HW (location unknown) C3 SITE KUM SIA BB+YI IV SIA 89+23 -L- IKII DETAIL 4 I ACOL.ISCfION PIS EI dhldN DO NOT USE FO I F JS REMOVE P Q, JS CHANNEL CHANGE SEE DETAIL 2 d D Q Geotextlle B Min. D = 4.0 Ft. BANK STAB I LI ZATI OI�-� (-22 Max. d = 4.0 Ft. —x—x-1, AVEL C3 74 + KA DAR 1 1 JS CHANNEL CHANGE IS O / SEE DETAIL 4 I JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOC. IS CHANNEL CHANGE SEE DETAIL 5 MICHAEL � �� DETAIL 2 IS CHANNEL CHANGE I Not to -1.)JAMES K,LANDOLF / N-4 N.—I d Geotexta.-7--jMin. D = 3.5 H. Max. d= 3.5 Ft. •when B is < 6.0' B= 3.0 Ft. SITE KUM SIA BB+YI IV SIA 89+23 -L- IKII DETAIL 4 I ACOL.ISCfION PIS EI dhldN DO NOT USE FO 1S CHANNECHANGE (N.—I'bmle) Ntrl Ntrnl Groon �,� Grown d D Geotextlle B Min. D = 4.0 Ft. Max. d = 4.0 Ft. •when R is a.g' B= 3.0 H. TWof Liner= Class Ri Ra OM STA. 90+65 TO STA. 91+50 -L- (RT) 4K STABILIZATION 2GI- PD �F 5 { IS ST AM OUTLET PIP ROTECTION �S S AIL 10 e5 7 61 � ITE A � S 7 DETAIL 5 IS CHANNEL CHANGE (NM to Scele) b Ntrl �— FII Groan d D 1"ht' Slope GEOTE%TILE E Min. D = 4.0 Ft. Max. d -4o Ft. 'When Bis < ao' B= 3.0 Ft. Type of Lim—Class I Rip-Rop b= 5.0 Ft. FROM STA. 91+50 TO STA. 93+55 -1- (RT) PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 22 OF 48 SCALE 1"=100' 100' 0' 100' GRAPHIC SCALE NO. u= z z ILfv RM/ SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER INCOMPL]E lE PL SNS DO NOT USE FOR I ACOL.ISCfION PIS EI dhldN DO NOT USE FO I8� Da L SNS CONSTRUCTION FOR PROFILE OF -L- SEE SHEET 26 & 27 FOR PROFILE OF-DRRT5- SEE SHEET 40 FOR STRUCTURE PLANS SEE S-1 THRU S- DETAIL 10 IS STREAM OUTLET PIPE PROTECTION (Not io Sr°lel / Nntumis �r�g Notuml Grown o�9 E*OpeY D Grown d Ge°teaile OB 1.5' utlet Pipe Min. D = Existing Ch Depth Min. d = Outlet Pipe D- 8- Existing Cha-18— S.. nelBaseSee Plan View for Length of Bank Protection / Type of Liner 22 TONS,CL I Rip -top Geole 44 s L 94 STA. 94+50 (RT) // MARE H. RLCKARO /11EM. CARV/�R. � SPECIAL LATERAL V DITCH 77 l SEE DETAIL 9 CLASS 'B' RR �1 .( EST. 10 5� RR EST1 U RR EST. 3 TN 1 2GI NC 63 26, BST B2 -------- --- 2GI— _ FS JG C _ '2GI-A 76 LARRY W,FERGUSON & JOE FERGUSON OF 3G1 -A V _ '� b I CLASS 'B' RR IR" Ria- GEOTEXT EST. 7 Sy RR EST. 2 TN IF 4 VANCE E.RANDALL E P :. LATERAL BASE DITCH UE(- SEE DETAIL 6 - _ STANDARD BASE DITCH I SEE DETAIL 7 / ho CLASS II RIPRAP AT EMBA ENT / SEE DETAIL B SITE 8 �! , BANK / STABILIZATION DETAIL 8 II \\ RIP RAPAT EMBANKMENT (Not io br°le) pitch 1.0'min. 2,0 \ Grode NMS \ \ GEOTE%IILE \ Type of Liner= 26TONS,CL II Rip -Rap I10 NEWFOUND ESTATES HOA. INC. \ \ Geotextile= 39 s \ -L- STA. 100+90(R7) 7 SICAypgE FARM, V�L LLC E E"71LEY��\ \ VS CONC.ISLAND 0 DETAIL 1 INLET CHANNEL TYPICAL ILT TOLOoa.SoNG.. WN51xEsv.I E—.E d�, GR `E-CNELIN19T6R)FS S ryv. -1915.7 WinSSo II RIP MP 0.1P FM -T VILE oTEmQ ARIFS CHANC FLMWINOTH IES -ILLI T-41 BASE Pwom EL CHANGE vmn ceorarl�ie o1sEe vury vle� FROM STA. 133+64 TO STA. 134+50 RT. DETAIL 2 1S CHANNEL CHANGE ( Not to Scale) \ \ b Nalurol ProposeSlope d Ground �1 \ X r— Fill y \ \ Min. Dt. E. Ft. �:r. Ch --1 \ \\ \ 6=5 Ft. \ ST. 134+50 TO STA.136+50 RT. V \ \\ \ SYCAMORE VALLEY FARMI \fes \\ N\\ 11 ♦4. SNELSON FARM LLC 90 CLASS B RR GEOTEXT EST. 3 SY RR EST.1 TN 130+00 N_ AUE OE D DI C�o TB 2G �o + —___ 0 2G1 15" 2/= F x rn L 15 _ 2GI L�-1,zy LIDO x / LATERAL BASE DITCH (SEE DETAIL 3) --7 F -X—X—X— X \ 48' WO RAIL 1, 3S8W I 2 _ \ 2'2� _ �S� 2GI // ' / f BERM DI F / / AIL 5) \ 9 O SNELSON FARM LLC r SITE 9 li3 ®DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER ®DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 26 OF 48 SCALE 1"=100' SNELSON FARM LLC 90 / JL IDS OS —X>95 Xk 45BW 2GI. 1 \ \ �i0 I'll"g1', 0 �C\ 1 \\ , F m o ` � /+ X 48• � 1 I I II 1 \+ 1 I 1 I X \ / I I 1 BERM BASE DITCH (SEE DETAIL 5) a BDO NO. LL=.zauc i Ij RM/ SHEET NO. _ ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC ENGINEER ENGINEER INCOMPL]E )E PLANS DO NOT USE FOR /W ACQUISITION PRE➢ IMIN DO NOT USE FO RY PLANS CONSTROCTION FOR PROFILE OF -L- SEE SHEET 28 FOR PROFILE OF -Y11- SEE SHEET 37 FOR PROFILE OF -Y11A- SEE SHEET 42 FOR CULVERT PLANS SEE C- THRU C -- C2? -0 2GI—A NC 63 LEICEA NWY 26 BST -- \C; 2GI—A w 0 7 � H + F I �1 � —15 N RR EST. 1 TN I �E E E—EJ I u DIS NOT � DISTURB TREE SNELSON FARM LLL IS X �\ 90 /\ \ 100' U' GRAPHIC SCALE CONC. ISLAND 0 z lO 11700 NC -63 12200 1800018900 300 800 400 1300 M I � I 2-0 ESTIMATED ADT 1100 1700 SR -1377 GOUGES BRANCH RD CTA 1—aa Y12 LT. DETAIL 1 JS CHANNEL CHANGE I Not to b Scale) Naf ral Proposed Gro=nd r�,,.ur„1 r_ Fill Slape j GEOTE%TIIE� B Min. D=2.5 Ft. Exist. Channel B=4 Ft. b=5 Ft. Type of Liner= Vegetation FROM STA.147+00 TO STA. 148+50 -L- LT. STA.150+50 TO STA. 151+90 -L- LT. ®DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER FROM STA. 148+50 TO STA. 150+50 -L- Lt. PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 30 OF 48 �oeN SCALE 1"=100' 100' 0' 100' GRAPHIC SCALE DETAIL 3 JS CHANNEL CHANGE ( Not to b Scale) Natural Pse ropod Ground �untl �— Fill d Slope D 1,�' R\ GEOTE%TILE B Min. D=3.0 Ft. Exist Channel 3.0 Ft. FROM STA. 151+90 TO STA. 152+25 -L- Lt. ROBERT HARRINGTON PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. U::jjQ1 14 RM/ SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER INCOMPL]ElE DETAIL 2 DO NOT USE FOR /W ACOUESmox JS CHANNEL CHANGE PLAMS CONSTRUCTION ( Not to Scale) b G—nd Ground -U' Slope d J GEorE%rRE B Min. D =2.5 FL Edst. Channel Mux. d=2.5 Ft. 8=4 Ft. Type of Liner=Class 8 Rip Rap b=5 Ft. FROM STA. 148+50 TO STA. 150+50 -L- Lt. PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 30 OF 48 �oeN SCALE 1"=100' 100' 0' 100' GRAPHIC SCALE DETAIL 3 JS CHANNEL CHANGE ( Not to b Scale) Natural Pse ropod Ground �untl �— Fill d Slope D 1,�' R\ GEOTE%TILE B Min. D=3.0 Ft. Exist Channel 3.0 Ft. FROM STA. 151+90 TO STA. 152+25 -L- Lt. ROBERT HARRINGTON PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. U::jjQ1 14 RM/ SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER INCOMPL]ElE ]SII,SNS DO NOT USE FOR /W ACOUESmox PR E➢,IMII8Y DO NOT USE Ir0 PLAMS CONSTRUCTION FOR PROFILE OF LINE —L— SEE SHEETS 28 AND 29 FOR PROFILE OF LINE —Y12— SEE SHEET 37 P,IH E S. CLAY ONCISLANC 0 l !2 6 PROJECT REFERENCEET NO. PERMIT DRAWING ®/g add E NO. SHLL_3�QL i7 SHEET 36 OF 48 RM/ SHEET NO. F® DENOTES FILL IN J. B. ARRINGTON ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS WETLAND OB 899 PG 429 SCALE 1q _ -100I / ENGINEER ENGINEER JUNIOR MOORE DENOTCLEARI H NIZED OB 860 PG 221,3 ,n, / Q// tii ti3 Q /sc23 x 6 36' CO NC �ti / y� CONC OADNLDOCK G _ r x xJ b Lx x� r coNc FOR PROFILE OF LINE -L- SEE SHEETS 30 fN 31 I 48' CHL ti } ��M BLK WALL I FOR PROFILE OF LINE -YI2A- SEE SHEET 37 - - --- SNELSON FARM, LLC J � k / sj/P re ousE °' CR I 8ST FOR PROFILE OF LINE -Y13- SEE SHEET 37 I �� 9fl Dol? 4 poo = 3 k / }ys I 105 I FOR PROFILE OF LINE -YI4- SEE SHEET 37 �QRE HIM PROF;'ERTIES. LC x x— / wM 107 98' CHL - X - / x / 3v Y c23JUNE BROOKSHIRE / �gPTCk FIELD E s CTION 10'Z OB 076 PG 711 - F�Sy AU SEE DETAIL 2 F �Y 2GI 5 , / / // ss\ LK WALL AUF w (CLASS B RIPC23- .. E F —� - h Q zL } \ ` C w \F L9 _ k - - E F _ Ta 21f \ REMOVE NC 63 _i O _- S7ER_yya h + TB -1 SIGN 2GI / ��I —g I /6Y CA EXIST- Riw GI I/ 2GI 2GI GI FS 2 PDE F V X (SEE DETAIL) Q! - v�, X X l \ I Do NOT HTR X 'CH _x DiS7UR � GLASS a RR EOTEXT EST. 14 SY Rip RAP � a 1 _ RR EST.5 TN oMH I RIP RAP IOO —__ KEVIN G. KING & W E S ITE 1 X \ y a� m _ — BRANDON J. KING-, I \ �� ��3 a a � Is � DB 4595 PG t �1 dNC®Nffh�]L]E ]E ]�II,.�NS DO NOT USR FOR d W ACQUISITION ]PIg]Ell,d�dN 118 F1L.�N5 DO NOT USE FO CONSTRUCTION L 2014 ESTIMATED ADT RAMSEY RD 2040 900 1500 100 700 300 1100 12200 NC -63 13100 18900 20200 IO� 400 700 600 a N � I M h � 600 800 BROOKSHIRE RD 102 ASS I. R JUNE BROOKSHIRE OTE EST. 17 SY OB 1376 PG 224 ES .7 TN I 11 I �I /+ Q II mIl II� 36° DOC 103 � II Ni 1. 1 CHRISTINE BROOKSHIRE* ACATHA JUNE BROOKSHIRE. 11 1 F MAXINE BROOKSHIRE 1 OB 1166 PG 729 1 1 1 - �1 oNc NORMAN G. HOFFM DB 3719 PO 895 �I1 1 111 11 111 11 1 / / 100' 0' 1 1 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PAINT STRIPING 1 1 1 CONC. ISLAND 0 i 1 WA DETAIL 5 OUTLET CtInYPICAL NOxoixil.. ntFl y aE sEv.= zozeo —7— o �Niuuijmwloi j .� n wren aEoixnu HORACE CONSTA14CE - - - >.e 100' 0' 100' GRAPHIC SCALE ( Nof to Scalal EPL SNS b NaNml f_ Ground 'I D Fill Slaps d GEOTWILE B Min, D= 1.5 F. Max. d= 1.0 Ft. •When B is < So' B= 5.0 Ft. Type of Liner= CL I Rip -Rap 6= 5.0 Ft. FROM STA.223+12 TO STA.224+50 -L- LT 'NOTE at STA 224+50 modify existing swale DETAIL 3 RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT I No110 Bcalel 10'min Ditch 1.0'min. 1.5 Grade DETAIL 7 LATERAL BASE DITCH I Not o Scolal b Gaan 7y •L.\ I"h1. Fill D Slope l a l Min. D= 1.0 Ft. I.J B= 4.0 H. b= 5.0 H. FROM STA. 222+14 TO STA. 222+34 -L- RT (24m RR; 33sy GF) FROM STA. 222+85 TO STA. 222+93 -L- LT IStn RR; 13sy GF FROM STA. 222+40 TO STA. 222+60 -L- RT I Im RR; 30sy G ) FROM STA. 223+00 TO STA. 223+12 -L- LT 03tn RR; 19sy GF) FROM STA. 226+00 TO STA 228+75 -L- LT 'NOTE at STA 226+50 modify existing Swale. DETAIL 8 LATERAL BASE DITCH I Not Smle) b Noluml �— Fill Groun D 1"?t. Slope d GEOTE.. g .in D= 1.5 F Max. d= 1.0 Ft. B= 4.0 Ft. Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip-Rnp b= 5.0 Ft. FROM STA. 228+75 TO STA. 231+50 -L- LT SOUTLET EE DETAIL 5NNEL , SITE SITE 13 DETAIL 4 INLET CHANNEL TYPICAL (a io Ri I ..I.G 1 R—) INC.= 'To I ExCnvwi E.o vo oEo wloE IsiN11 VLiNi� Etvl uiFs 1 [oiwiinw e To Al n4 PERMIT DRAWING col SHEET 40 OF 48 \"X\ O� Z 13A ®DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER SHEET NO. u=aauc I cv RM/ SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER INCOMPL]E EPL SNS DO NOT USE FOR !W ACOL.ISCfION Il�IS EI dhldN DO NOT USE FO I8� 1� L SNS CONSTRUCTION FOR PROFILE OF INE —L— SEE SHEET 32 �' - FOR PROFILE OF LDRRT8- SEE SHEET 40 SCALE 1 —100f FOR CULVERT PLANS SEE C- THRU C- ® DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND ®DENOTES TEMPORARY ® DENOTES IMPACTS IN IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER SURFACE WATER (POND) O C h a N CONC.ISLAND D SITE 13 -E Lu E OUTLET CHANNEL SEE DETAIL 5 SITE RIP RIP AT EMBANKMENT SEE TAIL 3 LATERAL BASE DITCH SEE DETAIL 6 E 13A\ JS STRE `�? L PIPE PR TB TI (SEE DETILA\ \V . s CL IRR �\ \ IGeotext est. 22 sy \ \ \ RR est. 11 to \ r \ dNC®ATIf�]L]E 00 NOT USE FOR FE PLANS 1 W ACQUISITION �Ig]Ell,dh'lIIN M1 NOT USE FO PROJECT REFE. NO SHEET NO. PERMIT DRAWING 20 20 DET DENOTES IMPACTS IN SHEET 42 OF 48 PW SHEET NO. — SURFACE WATER SCALE1" — 60' ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER HYDRAULICS ENGINEER DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER �11 DENOTES IMPACTS IN P SURFACE WATER �� (POND) Z DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND dNC®ATIf�]L]E 00 NOT USE FOR FE PLANS 1 W ACQUISITION �Ig]Ell,dh'lIIN M1 NOT USE FO ]I81<' l�]L.�NS CONSTRUCTION SITE 14 CL B RR1 �....� fli'�I �rrll�y I 6 A ' �....tir�ersr�'`.�ii�r�Rrrar•4 �4.�'�� DITCHLATERAL BASE fo RR est. 2 in SEE DETAIL 15" CSP V. s2rGriu�:t«ate -- I LEICESTER HWY 26' BST AW Jc:-- — spry+ i ii9r �r .�y.�A---`i �i1ti/►K96`�ie�RIII Ir��/N�� � .it Z� Elm Y.•L uw��'♦.'. �+�n".-�� _����•'���i "i1�i.ii il4L$t1�4'11;�.JIIi,. /Fw��. r �►� i,, r • J • �y , �