Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130739 Ver 1_Emails_20160516 Strickland, Bev From:Wilson, Travis W. Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 11:28 AM To:Tugwell, Todd SAW; Dunn, Maria T.; Wheeler, Tracey L SAW; Barnes, Kyle W SAW; Haupt, Mac; Baker, Virginia; Hughes, Andrea W SAW Subject:RE: St. Clair Creek My thoughts aren't far off of Ginny's. I don't feel like the site should have over 50% of the credits released until the issues we noted are resolved. Either as the site matures or by remedial actions taken by the provider. However it would be reasonable to hold this year's credit until the provider takes action or provides a plan to address the issues the IRT identified such as flow gauges, monitoring wells, vegetation, downstream culverts, etc. Although I'm not as convinced the downstream culverts are a flow restriction. I think the water in this system is backing into the headwater valley I'm just not convinced it caused by the structures. If you look at aerials you can get an idea. It looks like water on both sides of the culvert get high, either wind tide or drainage. But in my opinion I think the hydrology that is feeding the lower portion of the site is water backing into the site primarily from the large canal on the perimeter of the site that we walked out on. I don't think the headwater valley is functioning the way we envisioned these projects to function. Instead of filling ditches and creating a swell with a watershed, it looks more like a P2 approach to an existing ditch network. Travis -----Original Message----- From: Tugwell, Todd SAW \[mailto:Todd.Tugwell@usace.army.mil\] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 2:53 PM To: Wilson, Travis W. <travis.wilson@ncwildlife.org>; Dunn, Maria T. <maria.dunn@ncwildlife.org>; Wheeler, Tracey L SAW <Tracey.L.Wheeler@usace.army.mil>; Barnes, Kyle W SAW <Kyle.W.Barnes@usace.army.mil>; Haupt, Mac <mac.haupt@ncdenr.gov>; Baker, Virginia <virginia.baker@ncdenr.gov>; Hughes, Andrea W SAW <Andrea.W.Hughes@usace.army.mil> Subject: FW: St. Clair Creek Importance: High All, I have been thinking about the best way to handle the situation at St. Clair. I think, given the issues out there, that some sort of credit hold-back is appropriate. Any thoughts? Thanks, Todd -----Original Message----- From: Schaffer, Jeff \[mailto:jeff.schaffer@ncdenr.gov\] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:19 AM To: Tugwell, Todd SAW <Todd.Tugwell@usace.army.mil> Cc: Miguez, Kristin <kristin.miguez@ncdenr.gov> Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] St. Clair Creek Importance: High Todd, 1 Just wanted to check in with you to see if you have had a chance to look at what you need to in order to decide whether or not credits will be released for St. Clair Creek. Is there any information you need from DMS and/or Baker to help you make your decision? If so, please let Kristin Miguez and I know as soon as possible so we can get that to you. Thanks! Jeff Schaffer Eastern Supervisor, Project Management Division of Mitigation Services (Blockedhttp://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep <Blockedhttp://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep> ) NC Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) (919) 707-8308 office (919) 812-2634 mobile Jeff.Schaffer@ncdenr.gov <mailto:Jeff.Schaffer@ncdenr.gov> 217 West Jones St., Suite 3000A 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. ________________________________ 2 Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 3