20160454 Ver 1_401 Application_20160516

-40- WithersRavenel
1 / Our People. Your Success.
May 5, 2016
US Army Corps of Engineers NC -Division of Water Resources
Regulatory Field Office 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Mr. James Lastinger Ms. Karen Higgins
3331 Heritage Trade Drive 1617 Mail Service Center
Suite 105 Raleigh, NC 27699
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Legacy Wake Forest - NWP 29 PCN Submittal
Corps AID SAW -2012-01402
WR Project #02150116.00
Dear Mr. Lastinger and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of GCI Construction, LLC, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use NWP
29 for 18 If of permanent stream impacts for construction of the proposed project. We are also
requesting a 401 WQC from NCDWR for the above referenced impacts, as well as a Buffer
Authorization for 10,706 sf of permanent impacts to Neuse River Riparian Buffers.
The project is ±26.7 acres in size and is located west of the intersection of Debarmore Street and
Durham Rd (NC Hwy 98) in Wake Forest, Wake County (Latitude: 35.9739°N; Longitude: -
78.552°W). The project is located in the Neuse River basin and onsite waters drain to Horse Creek.
The Water Quality Classification for Horse Creek is WS -IV; NSW and the Stream Index Number is:
27-12-(2). The cataloging unit for the site is 03020201.
Proposed Project
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct an apartment complex to meet the demand for
rental housing in Wake Forest. The proposed project consists of the construction of nine apartment
buildings, an amenity center, parking, a greenway trail, utilities and stormwater management.
Project History
Onsite wetlands were delineated by WithersRavenel in April 2015, and James Lastinger reviewed
the delineation on 05/08/15. At the site review, Mr. Lastinger identified small pockets of wetlands
along the stream, which were delineated after the site meeting. The Preliminary JD Form,
wetland/upland data forms and JD Inventory Table have been provided as an Appendix. We are
requesting issuance of a Preliminary JD in conjunction with the issuance of the NWP 29.
NCDWR issued a Buffer Determination Letter for the project site on 05/12/15 (NBRRO #15-199),
which has been provided as an Appendix.
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403
t: 910.256.9277 1 f: 910.256.2584 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

Legacy Wake Forest
Wake Forest, Wake County
Proposed Impacts
10 WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
The proposed impacts consist of 18 If of permanent stream impacts and 10,706 sf of permanent
impacts to Neuse River Riparian Buffers.
The proposed 18 If of permanent stream impacts (Impact 1) are necessary for installation of a rip -
rap dissipator below the outfall of the offsite runoff collection system. Currently, offsite drainage
from Durham Rd (NC Hwy 98) drains into the natural crenulation above Stream 1, ultimately
flowing into Stream 1. Due to the volume of drainage coming from Durham Rd, this runoff could not
be captured in the stormwater management system, as this would have required significant
increases in the size of the BMPs, resulting in the loss of buildings and rendering the project
unfeasible. Therefore, the offsite drainage will be captured in a piped system, and will discharge
into the origin of Stream 1, which mimics the existing drainage conditions. The rip -rap dissipator
pad is necessary to dissipate energy and reduce flow to non-erosive rates to avoid erosion within
the stream.
Impact 2 (Z1: 1,121 sf; Z2: 2,389 sf) will result in riparian buffer impacts for construction of a road
crossing to access the eastern uplands and rip -rap dissipator pad. The road had been designed to
cross the buffers at a perpendicular angle, and retaining walls have been utilized to stabilize road
fill to minimize buffer impacts, as well as avoid stream impacts for the road crossing. The total
riparian buffer impacts are less than 1/3 acre, and therefore is Allowable.
Impact 3 (Z1: 1,390 sf; Z2: 854 sf) will result in riparian buffer impacts for a utility easement
associated with the construction of a perpendicular sewer crossing, which is an Allowable Use. The
sewer will be an aerial crossing over the stream, and will not result in stream impacts.
Impact 4 (Z1: 1,583 sf; Z2: 1,157 sf) and Impact 5 (Z1: 566 sf; Z2: 511 sf) consists of riparian buffer
impacts for construction of the high flow bypass channels for the bio -retention BMPs, which is an
Allowable use.
Impact 6 (Z1: 459 sf; Z2: 676 sf) will result in riparian buffer impacts for construction of a greenway
trail, which is an Allowable use. The greenway trail has been designed to cross the buffers at a
perpendicular angle, and an elevated pedestrian bridge will be used to cross the stream to avoid
stream impacts.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
Permanent stream impacts have been minimized to only those necessary for a rip -rap dissipator
below the outfall of the offsite stormwater runoff collection system. Additionally, all proposed
riparian buffer impacts are Allowable.
Page 2 of 3

Legacy Wake Forest
Wake Forest, Wake County
10 WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
The site plan has been designed to avoid and minimize impacts through the use of retaining walls to
stabilize fill and minimize impacts, as well as the use of an aerial sewer crossing and elevated
pedestrian bridge for the greenway to avoid stream impacts.
Mitigation
Since the proposed permanent stream impacts are less 150 If, no stream mitigation is proposed.
All proposed riparian buffer impacts are"Allowable" and therefore buffer mitigation is not required.
Stormwater Management Plan
The stormwater management plan consists of bio -retention BMPs which will provide TSS and TN
removal, and diffuse flow through level spreaders is not required. The stormwater management
plan will be reviewed and approved by the Town of Wake Forest.
The current request is for 18 If of permanent stream impacts and 10,706 sf of permanent impacts
to Neuse River Riparian Buffers (see the attached maps and PCN for details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
WithersRavenel
Troy Beasley
Senior Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• Wetland Delineation Exhibit
• USGS Quad
• Wake County Soil Survey
• NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter
• NCNHPT&E Project Review Letter
• Preliminary JD Info
• Impact Exhibits
Page 3 of 3

W�ATF�9QG
oNjiiW�"MWIIAMI-'<
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Legacy Wake Forest Apartments
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Wake Forest
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Liberty Investors, LLC & National Realty Investments, LTD
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Book: 016157; Page: 02038
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
25101 Chagrin Blvd, Suite 300
3e.
City, state, zip:
Beachwood, OH 44122
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Development Branch of Owner
4b.
Name:
Eric Bell - Manager
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
GCI Construction, LLC
4d. Street address:
25101 Chagrin Blvd
4e.
City, state, zip:
Beechwood, OH 44122
4f.
Telephone no.:
216-831-6100
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Troy Beasley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Withers and Ravenel
5c.
Street address:
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
5d.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e. Telephone no.:
910-256-9277
5f.
Fax no.:
910-256-2584
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1930194587
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.9739°N Longitude: - 78.5552°W
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
±26.7 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Horse Creek - Stream Index: 27-17-(2)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-IV; NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse River Basin (HUC: 03020201)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site currently consists of undeveloped woodlands. The general land use in the vicinity consists of a mixture of
residential and commercial land use.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
There are no wetlands within the project construction limits. There are extremely small pockets of wetlands located
intermittently along the stream bank. However, there are no proposed impacts to these areas for the proposed design.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
843 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct an apartment complex to meet the demand for rental housing in Wake
Forest.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of the construction of nine apartment buildings, an amenity center, parking, a greenway trail, utilities
and stormwater management. Standard commercial equipment and techniques will be used to construct the proposed
project.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: WithersRavenel
Name (if known): Martin Richmond
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
On 05/08/15, James Lastinger with the Corps of Engineers reviewed the site for preliminary approval of the delineation
(AID SAW-2012-01402). At the site review, Mr. Lastinger identified small pockets of wetlands along the stream, which
were delineated after the site meeting. The enclosed Wetland Delineation Exhibit depicts the delineation of the wetland
pockets identified at the site meeting. Additionally, the Preliminary JD Request Form, wetland/upland datasheets and the
JD Inventory Table have been provided in support of the delineation. We are requesting that the Preliminary JD be
issuing in conjunction with issuance of the NWP 29.
NCDWR issued a Buffer Determination (NBRRO#15-199) on 05/12/15 for the project area. A copy of the Buffer
Determination Letter has been provided as an Appendix.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number—
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
El Yes
El Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Impact 1
Rip -Rap Dissipator
UT to Horse
❑ PER
® Corps
6'
18 If
® P ❑ T
Pad
Creek
® INT
® DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
18 If
3i. Comments: The proposed stream impacts are necessary for a rip -rap dissipator below the outfall of the collection system
for offsite drainage coming onto the site.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
— Permanent
(P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑ PEI T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
Impact 2
Perpendicular
❑ Yes
®P E] T
Road
UT to Horse Creek
No
1,121
2,389
Crossing
Impact 3
® P ElT
Sewer Line
Corridor
UT to Horse Creek
ElYes
® No
1,390
854
Impact 4
® P [_1T
Greenway
Trail
UT to Horse Creek
ElYes
® No
1,583
1,157
Impact 5
BMP High
UT to Horse Creek
El Yes
566
511
® P E]T
Flow Bypass
® No
Impact 6
BMP High
UT to Horse Creek
❑ Yes
459
676
® P ❑ T
Flow Bypass
® No
6h. Total buffer impacts
5,119
5,587
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands
and "waters" could be minimized.
Permanent stream impacts have been minimized to only those necessary for a rip -rap dissipator below the outfall of the offsite
stormwater runoff collection system. Additionally, all proposed riparian buffer impacts are Allowable.
The site plan has been designed to avoid and minimize impacts through the use of retaining walls to stabilize fill and minimize
impacts, as well as the use of an aerial sewer crossing and elevated pedestrian bridge for the greenway to avoid stream
impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Retaining walls, aerial sewer crossing and elevated pedestrian bridge have been utilized to avoid impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h.
Comments:
Page 8of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The stormwater management system will consist of two constructed bio-
❑ Yes ® No
retention devices, which will meet TSS and TN removal criteria, and discharge at
non-erosive rates. Therefore, diffuse flow through level spreaders is not required.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
44%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The stormwater management system consists of two constructed bio -retention devices, which will provide TSS and TN
removal. The stormwater management plan will be reviewed and issued by the Town of Wake Forest as a delegated
municipality.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Wake Forest
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
El USMP®
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is located within a heavily developed area of Wake Forest, and is located on an oddly shaped
property that has significant design constraints. As such, this project is not anticipated to be a catalyst for future
development that could impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
City of Raleigh Sanitary Sewer
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/home to identify if
there were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of the NHP data
did not identify any occurrences of endangered species or critical habitat on the subject property or within 1.0 miles of the
project, see attached NCNHP project review letter. Site reviews did not identify any potential habitat for any federally
protected species known to occur in Wake County, except for the Northern Long Eared Bat.
Potential habitat for the northern Long-eared bat (NLEB) is listed as mature forest with trees over 3" dbh, which is used
for roosting during the day. Since the entire project area consists of mature forest over 3" DBH, there is potential northern
long eared bat habitat present. The USFWS Final 4(d) rule for the Northern Long -Eared bat specifies that tree removal
within the White Nose Syndrome (WNS) Zone is not prohibited as long as it occurs more than 0.25 miles from known
hibernacula and does not result in destroying known occupied maternity roost trees, or any other trees within a 150 ft -
radius from the maternity tree, during the pup season (June 1 — July 31). The proposed project is not located within 0.25
miles of any known hibernacula, nor is there any known maternity roost trees present on the project. Therefore, WR
concludes that the project "may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" the northern long-eared bat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters classified as EFH in Wake County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
W&R reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/, to
determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The
database review identified one historic structure within the vicinity of the project. Crenshaw Hall (WA 1446), located at
1009 Federal House Avenue, is ±500 If east of the project. Crenshaw Hall is an early 1820's home which has been
renovated as an event venue, including paved parking for events. There are forested areas within the Crenshaw Hall
property will provide a visual buffer, and Crenshaw Hall will not be impacted by the proposed project.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
70 Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com
Troy Beasley — WithersRavenel
Authorized Agent
05/05/16
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION

40 t
NI -0 Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned contract purchaser, GCI Construction. LLC (Client) does hereby appoint
WithersRavenel. Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate
local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC
Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for:
a) review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas
(wetlands, streams, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate
environmental permit applications/requests for the±26.68 acre Legacy Wake Forest oroiect
(PIN 1830194587) located south of Debamore Street, east of Durham Rd and north of Old
Falls of Neuse Rd in Wake Forest, Wake County.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
WithersRavenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary NC 27511
Tel. [phone]
Date: 4 / 11 I a
Signature of Client:
c�14L, a�
(Name - rint) (Title)
(Signaure
Mailing Address
`�2C4&I VV G8elk 0(f-
(1 Lf I ( -.2—
City State Zip
Phone: 6") Y-31 - (1 00
Email:
115 Macltenan Drive ` Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.33401 f: 919.467.6008 08 r+;;vt - :+;i(:Iiei sravF.nel.ee>rr ':: License No. C-0832
Cary I Greensboro 1 Pittsboro Raleigh 1 Wilmington

LTAWN I wilziplol A RIMU11161MATUI 1 0.1 ki

r,
GRAPHIC SCALE --
�
E'
o 00 200
1 inch = 200 ft.
r i
N
NOTES:
1) DELINEATION REVIEWED BY JAMES LASTINGER WITH CORPS OF
ENGINEERS ON 05/08/15 (SAW -2012-01402).
2) STREAMS LOCATION BASED ON FIELD SURVEY.
3) WETLAND LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GPS
LOCATION. WETLAND LIMITS HAVE BEEN ENLARGED TO MAKE
EASIER TO IDENTIFY ON EXHIBIT.
LEGACY WAKE FOREST
EW.KEEST WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
WETLAND LOCATION EXHIBIT
i
�I
% Mt y r T
� 4
WITHERS �(' RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
E�
�V
WETLAND LOCATION EXHIBIT
i
�I
% Mt y r T
� 4
WITHERS �(' RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

USGS QUAD &
WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1500 3000
Nrw rORFfF LN t. - 1
1 inch = 3000 ft.
G oQ i
TVNFWiND FO
_ _� I � o ', � o ,1, - ►1,�,:� '� � �'' � � � oar._"
WE
� � i` ♦ .. � -' O. !G AJy NTH<W CT r ��
\�-
rinkk
fYrM R !
1 -j lfFke"I � r-� — [sr •gyp Nr Re Bry
�F
1 -- •�..� 4.... �. fPRMSa vLONG
a,r�jJ\/J� I��ROSN�� ! y CrJ`HESti
RAff
TIORD 11",
Ile
D,
A
pp
p3I � � I \�J, lsq ��. I j/'•�� fJO.} lOpF rF
FH
Wyatt:'"
.amara r
v r'�� O ,✓ ' °. r i r � / 1 %G:% '�qy [ � •. � �, 1 � !.�✓ r vi
i
,i
3
COOT SP1tPFG RY d`�Y:--j` C ii' / Js �u�rN
dO DR
R e\V , �
.vt
LEGACY WAKE FOREST USGS QUAD - WAKE FOREST 1� WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
WAKE FOREST WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

v
Ao0
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400
1 inch = 400 ft.
0)�Jc
0
LEGACY WAKE FORESTII USGS QUAD - WAKE FOREST III 1� WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

• i '
•, CeC 2
1 I
1
1 CeC2
r
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400
1 inch = 400 ft.
nj u
_ .lAl
}. Ce B 2
46
r. cer
LEGACY WAKE FOREST WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY \/ WithersRavenel
SHEETS 10 & 14 Engineers IPlannersISurveyors
WAKE FOREST WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

Iz[44DATI/:7:11Jaa:1:79]:01:1Sullz/_NIEelz11:1aIA:i

A
�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
May 12, 2015
Carolina Princess, LLC
2109 Mountain High Way
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Determination Type:
Buffer Call , Isolated or EIP Call
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Subject: Buffer Determination
NBRRO#15-199
Wake County
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259) [I Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Determination
❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267)
Project Name:
L ocation/Directions:
Subject Stream:
Ci(71 Wake Fnrest
Property is located at the intersection of HWY 98 Bypass and Debarmore Rd
in Wake Forest, NC
Horse Creek
Determination Date: May 8, 2015
Staff: James Graham
Feature
Not
Subject
E/1/P*
Start@
Stop@
Soil
USGS
/Flag
Subject
To !j
Survey
Topo
To
Buffers
Buffers
A
X
I/P
AS Start
X
Intermittent Flag
ASI Start
Perennial Flag
Approx location
shown on maps
B
X
X
C
X
I
X
*E/l/P - Ephemeral/intermittent/t'erennral
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that ark 4hecked
Np Carolina
_- _. h7ntrirnl/i�
-- r ----------- il
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.org Location: 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

GCI Wake Forest
Wake County
May 12, 2015
Page 2 of 2
,'Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
This on-site determination shall expire give (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners Or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service c/o Karen Higgins DWR — 401 &
Buffer Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx,
etc.) Karen Higgins DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit 512 N. Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 2760.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Resources (Central Office) at (919)-807-6300, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact James Graham at [phone].
Respectfully, t
,p i
Danny SmithSupervisor Y
Water QualizRegional Operation Section
Raleigh Regional Office
cc: RR.O/SWT File Copy
Withers and Ravenel
Martin Richmond
115 MacKenan Dr
Cary, NC 27511

Ir
pill
1 Y
e Y
Perenrit stat

Ile
'000"
Eubject to buffers
.
El
kzs Slt A int AIL
A,
1�

Iz[a]z10012lQaIM63JMot I

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
Pat McCrory Bryan Gossage Susan Kluttz
Governor Executive Director Secretary
Clean Water Management Trust Fund
May 4, 2016
Troy Beasley
Withers & Ravenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
[e-mail]
RE: Legacy Wake Forest; 02150116.00
Dear Troy Beasley:
NCNHDE-1592
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources from our database that have been compiled for the project referenced
above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there
are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed
areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of
natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area
may not have been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for site-specific surveys
where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact
the NCNHP so that we may update our records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have
been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records
suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable
habitat exists and is included for reference.
Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the project area, if any,
are also included in this report. The location of the natural areas and conservation/managed areas can be
viewed online on the Natural Heritage Data Explorer found at: https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning,
project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory
decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written
notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications.
Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species are documented near the
project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact John Finnegan at john.finnegan e ncdcr.gov or 919.707.8630.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Page 1 of 3

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Legacy Wake Forest
Project No. 02150116.00
May 4, 2016
NCNHDE-1592
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Status
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004 -PRE Historical 5 -Very --- Significantly G5 S2?
Damselfly Low Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
Owner
Owner Type
Falls Lake
US Army Corps of Engineers
Federal
Falls Lake
US Army Corps of Engineers
Federal
Forest Ridge Park
US Army Corps of Engineers
Federal
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Local Government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Local Government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Local Government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Local Government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Local Government
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site
NC Department of Transportation
State
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on May 4, 2016; source: NCNHP, Q4 October 2015. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-1592: Legacy Wake Forest
May 4, 2016
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
E] Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
1:22,674
0 0.175 4.35 0.7 mi
0 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
Sources: Earl, HERE. Detor , Yntennap. increment P Corp, GE8CO.
USGS. FAO. NPS, NRCAN, GeoSase. IGN. Kadaster NL. Ordnance Survey,

PRELIMINARY JD INFO

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Troy Beasley - WithersRavenel
1410 Commonwealth Drive; Suite 101; Wilmington, NC 28403
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Located south of the intersection of Debarmore St and Hwy 98 Bypass (Dr. Calvin Jones Hwy) in Wake Forest
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake Co. City: Wake Forest
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.9739 ON; Long. -78.5552 OW.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Horse Creek (Stream Index: 27.12-(2)
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
±934 If linear feet: varies width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardln Class: Riparian Intermittent & Riparian Perennial
Stream Flow: Intermittent & Perennial
Wetlands: +0.261 acres.
Cowardin Class: Riparian
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:
1

E
REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
0 Field Determination. Date(s): 05/08/15
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
0 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: WithersRavenel
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
0 U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Wake Forest (2013) - 1:24K
✓❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Wake Co. Soil Survey - 1970
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: ❑✓ Aerial (Name & Date): 2013 aerials - NC oneMap
❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2
or

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later 'urisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
4
Zv�`�e�s�a vere_�
Signat re and date of 05/05/16
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

JD Inventory Table
Estimated Amount of
Class of Aquatic
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin Class
Aquatic Resource in
the Review Area
Source
Non -section 10
Wetland A
35.97288°N
-78.55497°W
Riparian
±0.004 acres
wetland
Non -section 10
Wetland B
35.97295°N
-78.55499°W
Riparian
±0.007 acres
wetland
Non -section 10
Wetland C
35.97322°N
-78.55493°W
Riparian
±0.001 acres
wetland
Non -section 10
Wetland D
35.97324°N
-78.55493°W
Riparian
±0.004 acres
wetland
Non -section 10
Wetland E
35.97325°N
-78.55491°W
Riparian
±0.0001 acres
wetland
Non -section 10
Wetland F
35.97335°N
-78.55485°W
Riparian
±0.006 acres
wetland
Non -section 10
Wetland G
35.73411°N
-78.55483°W
Riparian
±0.004 acres
wetland
Riparian -
Non -section 10
Stream 1- Int
35.97279°N
-78.55485°W
±308 If
Intermittent
Non -wetland
Stream 1 -Per
35.97344°N
-78.55492°W
Riparian -
±626 If
Non -section 10
perennial
Non -wetland

r,
GRAPHIC SCALE --
�
E'
o 00 200
1 inch = 200 ft.
r i
N
NOTES:
1) DELINEATION REVIEWED BY JAMES LASTINGER WITH CORPS OF
ENGINEERS ON 05/08/15 (SAW -2012-01402).
2) STREAMS LOCATION BASED ON FIELD SURVEY.
3) WETLAND LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GPS
LOCATION. WETLAND LIMITS HAVE BEEN ENLARGED TO MAKE
EASIER TO IDENTIFY ON EXHIBIT.
LEGACY WAKE FOREST
EW.KEEST WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
WETLAND LOCATION EXHIBIT
i
�I
% Mt y r T
� 4
WITHERS �(' RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
E�
�V
WETLAND LOCATION EXHIBIT
i
�I
% Mt y r T
� 4
WITHERS �(' RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

Print Form
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Legacy Wake Forest (GCI Wake Forest 1) City/County: Wake Forest - Wake Co. Sampling Date: 2016-04-22
Applicant/Owner: GCI Construction, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: DP -1
Investigator(s): Martin Richmond - WithersRavenel Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): HIII Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): >5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.9730°N Long: -78.5549°W Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: MdD2 - Madison Sandy Loam - 10-15% Slopes NWI classification: Headwater Forest
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes El No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 1E No ❑
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 ® No within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks
This sampling point is located within Wetland B, at Flag B-5. This sampling point also applies to Wetlands A, C, D, E, F &
G, as conditions were similar.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Qn Surface Water (Al)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
L.I High Water Table (A2)
® True Aquatic Plants (B14)❑I
Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
1J Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
® Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
® Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
® Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (B7)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑x Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑x FAC -Neutral Text (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes No ___0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes No Depth (inches): 8"
Saturation Present?
Yes No -0 Depth (inches): at surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? YesNo n
(includes capillary fringe)
_Q
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. None Present
❑
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
2.
3
®
Total Number of Dominant
2
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
❑
5.
®
Percent of Dominant Species
100%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
❑
7.
®
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species x 1 =
1 None Present
❑
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
2. ❑
3.
❑
FACU species x 4 =
4.
❑
UPL species x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
❑
7
❑
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
= Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1 None Present
❑
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
2
❑
— 3 - Prevalence Index is <_'3.0
3
❑
— 4 - Morphological Adapations' (Provide supporting
4
❑
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5.
❑
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6
®
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
®
7.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:5' radius )
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1 Juncus effusus
80%
x❑ FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
2 Microstegium vimineum
20%
x❑ FAC
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
3
❑
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
®
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
®
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
®
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
8
®
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
®
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
9.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
10.
❑
3 ft (1 m) in height.
®
11.
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
12.
100%
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1•None Present
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
®
5•
®
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover
Present? Yes ❑ No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/6 100%
Sand Alluvial
4-14+ 10YR 4/1 90%
7.5YR 4/6 10% C M Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) f] 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 0 Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑-H dro en Sulfide (A4)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
-❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) ® Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_� Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
—❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No ❑
Remarks:
Hydric soils were present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

Print Form
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Legacy Wake Forest (GCI Wake Forest 1) City/County: Wake Forest - Wake Co. Sampling Date: 2016-04-22
Applicant/Owner: GCI Construction, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: DP -2
Investigator(s): Martin Richmond - WithersRavenel Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): HIII Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): >5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.9730°N Long: -78.5549°W Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: MdD2 - Madison Sandy Loam - 10-15% Slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes El No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No El
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 1:1® No x Within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No El
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑x No ❑
Remarks
This sampling point is located within uplands adjacent to Wetland B at Flag B-5 and is representative of the uplands
adjacent to all onsite wetlands.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Qn Surface Water (Al)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
L.I High Water Table (A2)
® True Aquatic Plants (B14)❑I
Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
1J Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
® Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
® Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
J❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
® Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (B7)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
® Microtopographic Relief (D4)
® FAC -Neutral Text (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes No ___0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes No Depth (inches): >24"
Saturation Present?
Yes No __0 Depth (inches): >24"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_❑ No rxJ
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was not present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -2
Tree Stratum (Plot size0' Radius )
1. Quercus alba
Absolute
% Cover
20%
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
0 FACU
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
30%
E] FAC
3. Fagus grandifolia
30%
0 FACU
Total Number of Dominant 7
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
❑
5
6.
O
Percent of Dominant Species o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 28 /O (A/B)
7.
®
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
80%
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
1 Fagus grandifolia
60%
E] FACU
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
2. Lirodendron tulipifera 5% ❑ FACU
3.
®
FACU species x 4 =
4.
®
UPL species x 5 =
5.
®
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
❑
7
®
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
— 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
65% = Total Cover
Shrub StratumPlot size: 15' Radius
( )
1 Ilex opaca 15% FACU
2
3
4
5.
6
7.
Herb Stratum Plot size:5' radius
( )
o
15/o
®
❑
❑
®
❑
® Total Cover
=
— 3 - Prevalence Index is <_'3.0
— 4 - Morphological Adapations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree –Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1 Polystichum acrostichoides
10%
x❑ FACU
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
2.
3
4
5.
®
®
®
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
6 ®
7. ®
8 ®
9. ®
10. ®
11. ®
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius
10%
)
= Total Cover
1•Lonicerajaponica
5%x❑
FAC
2.
❑
3.
4.
5•
5%
®
®
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ❑ No E]
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation was not present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-14+ 7.5YR 4/6 100%
LC Loamy Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) f] 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 0 Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑-H dro en Sulfide (A4)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
-❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) ® Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_� Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
—❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
Remarks:
Hydric soils were not present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

II&I9MI9*A' 00110.1kW

PROJECT INFORMATION:
TOTAL ACREAGE: 26.69+/ -AC
REFERENCES: D.B. 016157 PG. 02038
PIN REFERENCES 1830194587
1. EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY
R.B. PHARR & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
DATED: FEBRUARY, 2015
INDEX
rmm06
PROPOSED IMPACT AREA
BUFFER IMPACT SUMMARY
MAP
IMPACT # BUFFER IMPACT
(AC) (SF)
A
2
ZONE 1 0.0257 AC 1,121 SF
ZONE 2 0.0548 AC 2,389 SF
B
3
ZONE 1 0.0319 AC 1,390 SF
ZONE 2 0.0196 AC 854 SF
C
4
ZONE 1 0.0363 AC 1,583 SF
ZONE 2 0.0266 AC 1,157 SF
C
5
ZONE 1 0.0130 AC 566 SF
ZONE 2 0.0117 AC 511 SF
B
6
ZONE 1 0.0105 AC 459 SF
ZONE 2 0.0155 AC 676 SF
TOTALS 0.2456 AC 10,706 SF
STREAM IMPACT SUMMARY
MAP IMPACT # PERMANENT
STREAM
IMPACT (LF)
TEMPORARY
STREAM
IMPACT (LF)
A 1 18 LF
---
TOTALS 18 LF
---
GRAPHIC SCALE
150 0 75 150 300
1 inch = 150 ft.
No. Revision Date Iv D-g,e Sate
TFVJ 1"=150' SYcci ll. .
D,—By D- LEGACY WAKE FOREST 1NithersRavenel
r� �05�16 OVERALL IMPACT MAP 1/ Engineers lPlannerslSurveyors �
checked By ton eo. WAKE FOREST, NORTH CAROLINA
OM 02150116 115 MxKenan Drive ICary, NC 27511I t:919.4693340license#:C-0632Iwvuw.withersraveneLcom

I
/
\ \ RETAINING I \
I / \ WALL I
' I STREAM \ {t I
\ I I IMPACT #2 z
\ \ ' 24x9 x24 THK ZONE 2
\ \ CLASS "I" RIPRAP APRON \\ \
I \\ \ \ SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET 2,389 SF
EXISTING 50' BUFFER \ \ / w, + + + 1`
t..... + + 20 + \
ZONE
2 \ \
IMPACT #1 E�, +++
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT ` Z + + \
18 LF
+ + + + I
>• + + + +
\ \ IMPACT #2 t.. µ::v' + >�++ + I I
\ ZONE 1
.\ 1,121 SF + +
+ + + + +
\ \+ + + +
+ .+ V
+
+ + + + + + + + + \ I
+ + + + + + + I
1
Sy \ ` / \
l� •• A\ O 1
I
\ \ \ \ s81, / / \ \ t•+ar1� :':.' GYM � �I
TOP ,t,l 11-V
TO MATCH
PRE—CONSTRUCTION
STREAM CONTOUR
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 10 20 40
1 inch = 20 ft.
ZONE 1 :;'. '«
ZONE 2 + + + + + +
+ + + + +
RIPRAP APRON DETAIL
NTS
N0. Revision Date I bV III Desi — I scale III I
rFw r' -2a• sheen No.
Drawn By Date LEGACY WAKE FOREST WithersRavenel
rFw oaosila I M PACTS # 1 & # 2 1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors A
che,kee By ion N., WAKE FOREST, NORTH CAROLINA
DM 02150116 IIS MxKenan Drive�Cary, NC 2)SS1I t:919.4693340 license#:C-0632�wvuw.with—r—nd—

I M PACT #3
ZONE 2 \
444 SF \ �� \ r IMPACT #3 I ,
\\ ZONE1 I I I I I
-� + \ 1,390 SF \ IMPACT #3 1 I 1 I
+ + + : •- ... \ \ \ ZONE 2 I I I I
Ss + + + + :�:' C•:::; 410 SF I I I
\ _ +/++ +O ++++
+ + + \+ + Q + + + + + I
1-
/ + S + + / I
+ + + + + / S
+ S
—T I I
—�—
I
1 20 I
301 1 1 I 1 I
i \ ZONE 2 RIP -RAP PAD INSTALLATION
ZONE 1 SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET
EXISTING 50' BUFFER
1 \ PERMANENT CHANNEL
\ SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET
20'x11'x8'x24"THK�\ + ++ �+ \ \ \ \
kSS "1" RIPRAP APRON
\ \+ + + I M PACT #6 \ \ \ \
\+ ZONE 1 STREAM
\ \
\ \\ +++. + 459 SF \ \
v \ \ + + IMPACT #6 A I
ZONE2
\ 676 SF \ \ \
\ \ \ \\ \ EXISTING 50' BUFFER \ \\ \\ 1 \\ \
F
0
z
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 10 20 40
1 inch = 20 ft.
LEGEND
ZONE 1
ZONE 2 + + + + + +
+ + + + +
RIP RAP TOP OF BANK
SWALE
IN. 6" ABOVE
STREAM
RIP—RAP PAD INSTALLATION DETAIL
NTS
LINE WITH CLASS B RIP RAP
(D50=6"), 12" THICK
1.5'
2' MIN.
$'
PERMANENT CHANNEL DETAIL
NTS
N0. Revision Date I 6 Deng scale III
rFw r' -2a• sn<ea No.
Drawn By Date LEGACY WAKE FOREST 010 WithersRavenel
rFw —-6I M PACTS # 3 & # 6 1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors B
cnerkee By ion e0. WAKE FOREST, NORTH CAROLINA
DM 02150116 IIS MxKenan Drive�Cary, NC 2)SS1I t:919.4693340 license#:C-0632�wvuw.with—ravenel—

1 � 1
\1
1 EXISTING 50' BUFFER
1 \^
\ \ +++��\
X\ ' 11\ \ \
\ \ \ STREAM
I M PACT #5
ZONE 1
566 SF
\ +
\ + + + + + + + RIP -RAP PAD INSTALLATION
\ \ \ + + + + SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET
\ \ + + + + + \
> \ \ \ + + + +
IMPACT #5
ZONE 2 I /
511 SF
20'x 11' x 8'x 24"THK
\ �\ CLASS "1" RIPRAP APRON \
+ ,
-+++1 \
+ + + +
\
\ \
+ + + + + ,::. ,. -.
+ + + + +...
+ + + + +
„:\.: > \ /
` PERMANENT CHANNEL
SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET
+
\
` \
IMPACT #4
+ +
ZONE 2
\ _
,� f.
I.'. -:+� +� t + +
698 SF
\ /
::/:::._:.::.,:: ;: + + + +
1
i�
+ + +
/ IMPACT #4 i l ZONE
ZONE 1
1,583 SF
Z
Mv
2�
'36.
' ZONE2 IMPACT #4
ZONE 2
459 SF
I
EXISTING 50' BUFFER \ MI
I
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 10 20 40
1 inch = 20 ft.
LEGEND
ZONE 1
ZONE 2 + + + + + +
+ + + + +
RIP RAP TOP OF BANK
/ SWALE I�
MIN. 6" ABOVE
STREAM
RIP—RAP PAD INSTALLATION DETAIL
NTS
LINE WITH CLASS B RIP RAP
(D50=6"), 12" THICK
1.5'
2' MIN.
$,
PERMANENT CHANNEL DETAIL
NTS
ME
Revision Date B D,,g"e, "ti
rFw sneer No.
Drawn By Dare 1•-2a• LEGACY WAKE FOREST WithersRavenel
rFw oaosiia IMPACTS #4 & # 5 1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors C
cneckee By ion No. WAKE FOREST, NORTH CAROLINA
DM 02150116 115 MxKenan DrivelCary, NC 2)SS1I t:919.4693340license#:C-0632Iwvuw.withersraveneLcom