20160433 Ver 1_401 Application_20160516

O�ot )NArERpc
Q �r
Office Use Only.
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1 3 De 20"80
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
3
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer,1h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Abbington Crossing
2b. County:
Wilson County
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Wilson
2d. Subdivision name:
NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
NA
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Donald Voss -inn
fa
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
2550/669
3c. Responsible Parry (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:-
p ER OUR
3e. City, state, zip:
4
3f. Telephone no. -
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address- -
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. 'Applicant is:
❑ Agent , ® Other, specify, Purchaser/Developer
4b Name:
George Coogle "
4c. Business name -
(if applicable):
Wilson Abbington Crossing, LLC
4d. Street address: -
2964 Peachtree Road; Suite 200
4e City, state, zip:
Atlanta, Ga_ 30305
4f Telephone no.
4g Fax no
4h Email address:
_
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)-,-.=
5a Name:
David Brame
5b Business name '_
(if applicable):
Pilot'Environmental Inc:
5c. >Street address:.
PO Box 128 ;
5d. City, state, zip: -
'Kernersville, NC 27285
5e. Telephone no
336.708.4617
5f. Fax no.:
5g Email address- '
[e-mail] =
Page, 2 of 12
PCN. Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version,
4�
1 ,
Page, 2 of 12
PCN. Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version,
4�
Page, 2 of 12
PCN. Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version,

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID).
3731-09-3538
Latitude: 35.720743 Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
77.889658
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
14.7 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to _
Toisnot Swamp
proposed project.
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
Class C, Sw; NSW
2c. River basin-
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains wooded land. The wooded land consists of young dense vegetation regenerated in a former
pasture/agricultural field. The site is located east of and in a developing area of Wilson. Surrounding properties contain
wooded land, a farm and commercial development. •
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property,
0 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
streams = 400 LF _
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide access to facilitate development of the site with a multifamily residential
development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of developing the site with 7 three story multi -family apartment buildings, a commons building,
a playground, associated driveways, parking lots and maintained landscaped areas. The site is located on a 14.7 acre
parcel. Only 6.64 acres are being considered for development. In order to provide access to the site, 97 linear feet of an
unnamed tributary to Toisnot Swamp will be impacted by a rodway that will afford permanent access onto the site. The
stream enters the site from an existing culvert under Lipscomb Road. The proposed culvert will connect to the existing
culvert. Sanitary sewer and water lines will be placed within the roadway footprint to avoid additional impacts. To
facilitate construction of the roadway and development of the site, clearing and grading the site will be necessary
Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used during grading and construction of the site.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the -
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes ❑ No ®Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental
Name (if known): David Brame/Bradley Luckey
Other:
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A verification has not been completed at this time.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. 'Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for '
ElYes ® No ElUnknown '
this,project (including all pnor phases) in,the•past?
56" If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. .
6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this a'phased project?
El Yes ®No r,
6b. If yes, explain:
The project is not part'of.a phased project. However, additional area that could be developed later is located to the east
of the proposed development Ampacts.to streams/wetlands, outside of,those proposed'in this appilication, are not
anticipated as a result of future development"
Page 4.of 42'
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply) -
El Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e
2f.
Wetland impact,
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: No wetland impacts are proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ®T
fill
unnamed
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
6
97/4
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
97/4
3i. Comments The stream is an unnamed tributary to Toisnot Swamp. The stream will be impacted by placement of a culvert
to allow for the roadway crossing and permanent access to the site. There will be 97 feet of permanent impact for the culvert
and 4 feet of temporary impact for the check dam during culvert placement
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c
4d
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments Open water impacts are not proposed
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: Pond or lake construction is not proposed.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no'
51. Expected pond surface area (acres):
51. Size of pond watershed (acres),
5k. Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other.
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
im act
required?
B1 ®P ❑ T
Road Crossing
UNT to Toisnot Swamp
® Nos
8,891
4,373
B2 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
F1 Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
8,962
4,238
6i. Comments: The project will require 97 linear feet and 0.30 acres of buffer impact within the Neuse River Basin. According
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

to 15A NCAC 02B .0233; Table of Uses: road crossings that impact greater than 40 linear feet but equal to or less than 150
linear feet or one-third of an acre of riparian buffer are allowable without requiring mitigation: Therefore, buffer mitigation is
not proposed.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Due to the proposed development, a road must be constructed to provide access to the site. An unnamed tributary to Toisnot
Swamp is located on the western portion of the site near Lipscomb Road, which affords access onto the site Culvert
placement and associated fill has been minimized to the extent possible to allow for construction of the new roadway and
placement of the culvert Sanitary sewer and water lines will be placed within the footprint of the road to avoid additional
impacts Additionally, the project has been designed to avoid impacts to remaining streams located on the site. The proposed
impact cannot be avoided and has been minimized to the maximum extent feasible. _ The initial site layout was altered to
eliminate buffer impacts from the stormwater pond discharge. The altered layout inlcudes a level spreader to maintain defuse
flow before discharge into Zone 1 or 2 of the buffer. Alternatives to the proposed action are limited due to the layout of the
property, specifically the width of the site along Lipscomb Road where the site is accessed The alternate placement of the
roadway further south is not a viable alternative due to roadway/sidewalk alignment, the preferred location of the turning lane
to DOT specifications and engineering constraints associated with the existing stream culvert. The proposed culvert will be
attached to the existing culvert via a junction box and associated manhole. The proposed action is the best alternative to
accommodate the roadway, turning lane, sidewalks and the proposed development.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked and silt fence will be used. Disturbance limits will be surveyed, staked and marked with high
visibility fencing. The stream has little to no flow except during periods of rain events Work will be performed during periods
of low flow. Following construction, disturbed slopes will be stabilized with a blended temporary and permanent seeding
mixture, matting and temporary slope linings as necessary Best management practices will be implemented during
construction activities to avoid sediment discharge into downgradient water bodies
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments. The site is located within the Neuse River Basin Buffer mitigation is not required based on impact by a
roadway of less than 150 linear feet and less than one-third of an acre of buffer impact.
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
® Yes ❑ No
Comments. Stormwater will not be discharged within Zone 1 or 2.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
49.1 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan -
A single aboveground dry extended detention pond and associated level spreader shall be constructed to manage all
design storm events according to City of Wilson regulations. The level spreader will be placed outside of the regulated
vegetated buffer. The plan has been prepared by Valor Engineering for submittal and approval by the City of Wilson
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other.
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply);
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
lb If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ® No
letter.)
Comments A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s).
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
We are not aware of additional development that will impact additional streams or wetlands.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Wastewater from the site will be disposed of by municipal sewer service into the City of Wilson treatment system. The
sanitary sewer line will be located within the proposed roadway to avoid additional stream impacts. Additional impact for the
sanitary sewer line is not required. No stream or wetland impacts will occur that are associated with sewage disposal and/or
installation of sewage lines
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts'?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
We consulted the Natural Heritage Program Website to determine if federally protected endangered or threatened
species inhabit the Wilson, NC Quadrangle (the quadrangle that contains the site) Federally listed Threatened and
Endangered species are not identified on the Wilson Quadrangle.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the construction of a stormwater retention pond will prevent sediment from entering down -gradient
waterbodies which may contain fish
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We reviewed the SHPO Map (http://gis.ncdcr gov/hpoweb/) to identify historic and/or archaeological resources of the site
The map does not identify historic properties on the site or adjacent properties. A copy of the map is included as an
attachment.
8. Flood Zone. Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Panel Numbers 3720372100K,
3720373100K and 3720373200K, Dated April 16, 2013
David S. Brame
4/27/16
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
v

AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes PEI to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and permitting.
Property Address: L'Psc-*Mo lip
z -7 3
Owner/Applicant Information:
Name: \A1t4.,5014 A(9&11V&-Toy �ZoSs/NCr,Lcc�
Address: -). 9 GY- 1?- c,y4H,—A t- RD
Scr rV 2 0-0
7-".vT/7, 6,47 30} o f
Telephone Number: I -21-2—T& 1- 09 3 ,( 705'
Fax Number: 4-0 y- - i- 50- q-oq I
E-mail Address: -Mey con & Li e— 6-1�1141 o- . C,D--i
Signature:
Date:__3 6 —

NCSH PO - Lipscomb Road
C
}
'r
WILSON
March 21, 2016
NR Points
• NR Individual Listing
0 NR Listing, Gone
x NRHD Center Point
NR Boundaries
F-1 National Register Boundary
1:9,600
0 0.075 0.15 0.3 mi
0 0.125 0.25 0.5 km
Sou mes: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
NRCAN'Esri Japan, MET), Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand),
Mapmylndia, ©OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
}
'r
WILSON
March 21, 2016
NR Points
• NR Individual Listing
0 NR Listing, Gone
x NRHD Center Point
NR Boundaries
F-1 National Register Boundary
1:9,600
0 0.075 0.15 0.3 mi
0 0.125 0.25 0.5 km
Sou mes: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
NRCAN'Esri Japan, MET), Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand),
Mapmylndia, ©OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

1�_'rob
�pfr �
V
A "
N�../
-� � � � `65,1 1f•• \
/ I
1 12J
mm
>
n
m
D
_
p
0
z
I -n
^�
^...I
m
to
f
m
CD
m
a
3
M
a
7°
a
A
O
Z
<
D
z
^
_
p
Q
v
c
to
Gi
°
e
o
S
of
J
7� Pig n 8 cs� 2
g°��g �.IT 0�°�Qy�$G°gm�f$ S
121
Z
,zzi
ifQYo °y
pa S5�FF
05�l�]a����� gCyF py����b����;`_
126 m$Cya°� �Y"��yQ�t�dfb�E�i� ppF�T
,77 / ian iF S'-ig�a G
128 SM rsr •' s® L'OS$
at II a $m E�
31
s '
I � I
I � I
z
I fin$ I
�_— ----- ---- --- j --- --
I r V/,c
:�7
I�
>
n
to
C %
G N
°
_
•
Zn
O•
v
to 0
1••r
a

W
LL-
��
V) Y ,.
LL
LL
D co z Q�w F
mLn m �zz zea., ��
i
rLL Y D Q Q a w cn a -w
N O U F-' m � ,i LL
LU a =gam LL �� LL
.1
Oziz p° Uac�n pz 0°00 mo+
o= wEn p wNH
••LL z uiZ
00 0LU< #U Nf O�
a
0a.z fu Qm LUQ oa
CL UJ pww fw 00 w
awOU
w P P 0 a
a� W., Ln M aW pz
aw
Ow oC
a O U)
LU
LU
CD
y

y Lipscomb Road
Approximate 16 Acre Tract
Wilson, North Carolina
PEI No. 1734

EA
0
Drawing 4 ttIVIH HKIVI
FEMA FIRM Panel Lipscomb Road
Numbers 3720372100K, Approximate 16 Acre Tract
3720373100K and 3720373200K, Wilson, North Carolina
Dated April 16, 2013 4ip PEI No. 1734
Not to Scale
n.
a

LEGEND FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
Site Boundary WETLAND FLAGS =
STREAM FLAGS =
Perennial Stream
Stream Flags = 5
Wetland Flags = 0
Non -Jurisdictional Ditch
Total Flags = 5
Wetlands
sai-s Flag Number
DP -1 O Data Point
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY
THE USACE AND/OR THE NCDENR-DWR. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED OR GEOLOCATED.
Drawing S Wetland Map
2015 Aerial Photograph Lipscomb Road
Google Earth and Approximate 16 Acre Tract
PEI Field Notes Wilson, North Carolina
PEI No. 1734
Scale: 1" = 200'

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site. Lipscomb Road City/County Wilson Sampling Date Nov 5, 2015
Applicant/Owner State INC Sampling Point DP -1
Investigator(s) dsb/bsl Section, Township, Range Wilson
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) swale Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave Slope (%) 3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR T (MCRA 152A, 1528, Lat 35°43'21 8" N Long 77°53'10 1" W Datum w s 8g- 4
Sod Map Unit Name Griftney NWI Classification none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod , or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
5UMMAKY OF FINUIN(i5 — Attacn site map snowing sa pling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland- Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply _
Surface Sod Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313) _
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Mari Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6) _
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Agwtard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_
X
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches).
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches) >12
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches) >12
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available.
Remarks

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point DP -1
3 Vitis rotundifolia (Grape,muscadine) 5 Y FAC
4
5 Hydrophytic
20 = Total Cover Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
50 % of total cover 10 20 % of total cover 4
photo numbers here or on a separate
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Dominance Test worksheet:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
1 – Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status _
Number of Dominant Species
10 20
20 % of total cover 8
1
Acer rubrum (Maple,red)
20
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
12
(A)
2
Ligwdambar styraciflua (Gum,sweet)
10
Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata
12
(B)
3 Linodendron tulipifera (Tree,lulip) 10 Y FAC
4 Pinus taeda (Pme,loblolly) 10 Y FAC
5 Quercus alba (Oak,white) 5 FACU
6
I
3
Polystichum acrostichoides (Fern, christmas)
5
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
100
(A/B)
7
8
5
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
55
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of
Multiply by
50 % of total cover
275 20 % of total cover
11
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
9
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
FACW species
X2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30
)
11
FAC species
X 3 =
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1
Ligustrum sinens_e (Privet, chinese)
20
Y
FAC
42
2
Acer rubrum (Maple,red)_
10
Y
FAC
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals
X4=
X 5 =
(A)
(B)
3 _Ilex op_aca_ (Holly,amencan) 10 Y FAC
4,
5
6
3 Vitis rotundifolia (Grape,muscadine) 5 Y FAC
4
5 Hydrophytic
20 = Total Cover Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
50 % of total cover 10 20 % of total cover 4
photo numbers here or on a separate
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
1 – Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
40
= Total Cover
_
X 2 –Dominance Test is > 50%
10 20
20 % of total cover 8
_ 3 – Prevalence Test is s 3 0'
Herb Stratum (Plot size- )
—Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
Arundinana gigantea (Cane,giant)
25
Y FACW
2
Ligustrum smense (Privet,chmese)
10
Y FAC
'Indicators of soil and wetland hydrology must
be disturbed
I
3
Polystichum acrostichoides (Fern, christmas)
5
FAC
resent, unless or probl uratic
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
4
Asplenwm platyneuron (Spleenwort,ebony)
2
FACU
5
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
7
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
8
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
9
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
10
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
11
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
12•
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
42
= Total Cover
50 % of total cover 21
20 % of total cover 84
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 )
3 ft (1 m) in height
1
Smilax rot_undifolia (Greenbrier, common)
10
Y FAC
2
Smilaxglauca (Greenbrier cat)
5
Y FAC
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height
3 Vitis rotundifolia (Grape,muscadine) 5 Y FAC
4
5 Hydrophytic
20 = Total Cover Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
50 % of total cover 10 20 % of total cover 4
photo numbers here or on a separate

SOIL
Sampling Point DP -1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
inches Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-4 10yr4/2 100 N/A N/A SL
4-18 7 5yr4/3 90 10yr5/6 10 C M SCL
'Type C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 'Location PL=Pore Lining, M=Matnx
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (Al)
_Hishc Epipedon (A2)
_Black Histic (A3)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_Delta Ochrnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
_Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
'indicators of Hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic
153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_Thin Dark Suface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F1) (LRR O)
_Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_Delta Ochrnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
_Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
'indicators of Hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic
153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No