20151279 Ver 1_More Info Received_20160503

�olsla�yp
4•
ANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL
April 29, 2016
Ms. Jennifer Burdette @ �/ 2
NCDEQ — DWR l5 D
512 North Salisbury Street MAY 0 3 2016 I
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Comment Response; Hathaway Switching Station (DWR # 15-1279)
Dear Ms. Burdette,
We are in receipt of your comments dated April 14, 2016. The following are our responses.
1. Title 15A NCAC 02H .0506 requires that a proposed activity has no practical alternative by
demonstrating that, considering the potential for a reduction in size, configuration or density of
the proposed activity and all alternative designs, the basic project purpose cannot be practically
accomplished in a manner which would avoid or result in less adverse impacts to wetlands.
Because the preferred alternative involves the greatest amount of wetland impact, the Division
cannot review this alternative until the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) determines that
this alternative is the least environmentally damaging practical alternative (LEDPA). Please
provide correspondence from the USACE indicating which alternative is selected as the LEDPA.
Response: The alternatives analysis is still under review with the USACE and all
correspondence will be provided by Angler Environmental as it is received.
2. Stream impact S3 — 5.48 linear feet is labeled as a temporary impact. This should be classified
as a permanent impact since the stream will be relocated away from this small section of channel
and it will no longer receive upstream flow.
Response: Stream impact S4 - 5.48 linear feet has been re -labeled as permanent on the
impact maps and PCN.
3. Stream impact S 1 — 462.2 linear feet is labeled as temporary. Since the channel will be filled,
this should be classified as a permanent impact. Relocation of the stream will be considered as
self -mitigating.
Response: Stream impact S1— 462.2 linear feet has been re -labeled as permanent on the
impact maps and PCN.
4. Grading and revegetation (fill) in Zone 2 of the buffer is an exempt activity that does not need
to be quantified. The stormwater discharge into the buffer from the stormwater BMP is an
allowable activity that requires the impact to be quantified for approval. Please remove B2
entirely and revise B3 to limit the impact to the stormwater discharge only.
613 Poole Drive, Garner NC 27529 1 P: 919-324-6342
www.AnglerEnvironmental.com

Virginia Electric Power Company
DWR # 15-1279
Comment Response Letter
April 29, 2016
Page 2 of 2
Response: Impact B2 was removed and impact B3 was revised to limit the impact to the
stormwater discharge only. These changes are reflected on both the impacts maps and
PCN.
5. Explain how erosion in Zone 1 from the SW discharge will be prevented. These types of
discharges are usually. connected to the stream channel unless the discharge is anticipated to be
non-erosive.
Response: The proposed stormwater management pond has been designed to detain the
1-, 10- and 25 -year flows to be less than the pre -developed conditions. Rip rap outlet
protection at the end of the primary outfall (SWM culvert) and riprap protection on the
emergency spillway have also been proposed to prevent stormwater discharge into Zone
1.
6. Add dashed outline of the existing road within the buffer to make the existing use clearly
discernable on the buffer impact map.
Response: A dashed outline of the existing road within the buffer has been added to the
impact map.
7. This Office has the following comments regarding the stream restoration design. Please feel
free to contact Mac Haupt at 919-807-6476 or mac.haupt a,ncdenr. ov if you have any questions
regarding the stream restoration design recommendations.
a. Green ash should be substituted for loblolly pine in the planning plan.
b. Proposed log sills should be installed with footers and/or matting to prevent piping and
eventual undermining.
Response: Green ash has been substituted for loblolly pine in the planting plan and footer
logs were added to the log grade control structures to prevent piping and eventual
undermining.
Based on the revisions displayed within the plan and/or the responses provided within this comment -
response letter, we feel that we have adequately addressed or responded to your comments presented
April 14, 2016. If there are any questions or further comments, please feel free to contact me to
discuss.
Sinnccerely,
Anna Reusche, PWS
Project Manager
CC: Amanda Mayhew, Virginia Power and Electric Company
Jean Gibby, USACE
613 Poole Drive, Garner NC 27529 I P: 919-324-6342
www.AnglerEnvironmental.com

ATTACHMENT
PCN FORM

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:X❑
Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: IP or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Hathaway Switching Station
2b.
County:
Nash
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Battleboro
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no. -
o:3.
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Virginia Electric and Power Company
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
701 East Cary Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
Richmond, VA 23219
3f.
Telephone no.:
804-771-6145
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Anna Reusche, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Angler Environmental
5c. Street address:
613 Poole Drive
5d. City, state, zip:
Garner, NC 27529
5e. Telephone no.:
919-615-0301
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
018274, 020042, 022200, 037306, 040250, 040252
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.0449 Longitude: -77.7524
1 c.
Property size:
37.010000 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Beech Branch
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c.
River basin:
Tar Pamlico
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is located approximately 0.3 miles south of the area known as Battleboro. A railroad easement serves as the eastern boundary of the site with
single family residences along Crepe Myrtle Street and Ethridge Street being the northern and western boundary and a tributary to Beech Branch
serving as the southern boundary. Land use in the vicinity of the project is primarily residential in nature.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 3.68
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 2,347
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Provide a new electrical switching station that will connect to existing circuits in order to provide additional reliability to the grid and comply with NERC
3e.
Construction
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
of 115 kV and 2130 kV switching station, BMP, and access road. Equipment includes, but not limited to, escavators, and dump trucks.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: JD pending
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
X❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Anna Reusche, PWS
Agency/Consultant Company: Angler Environmental
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
JD Requested 2015-08-07, NCDEQ DWR stream determination letter recieved 2015-09-08
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes Q No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
0 Wetlands Q Streams —tributaries X❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:'
1.0445
2h. Comments:
See attached table
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Fill
UT to Beech Branch
PER
Corps
4
462.2
S2 P
Road
UT to Beech Branch
PER
Corps
4
46.03
S3 T
Road
UT to Beech Branch
PER
Corps
4
17.29
S4 P
Road
UT to Beech Branch
PER
Corps
4
5.48
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
531
3i. Comments:
Permanent impacts to stream will result from the culvert installation associated with the proposed access road as well as
filling the channel for the relocation. Relocated stream to be installed west of existing stream channel approximately 100ft.
Proposed channel will tie into existing channel through double 24 inch culverts. Proposed channel will include several curves
around proposed substation, then follows the fall of the valley until it ties in again at the woodline in southwestern quadrant.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑X Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
UTto Beech Branch
Yes
1651
1466
B2 -
REMOVED
Yes/No
B3 P
UT to Beech Branch
Yes/No
0
192
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
1651
1658
6i. Comments: The proposed stream relocation design includes establishing Zone 1 and Zone 2 buffers. Both buffer areas will be seeded with
native species typical of coastal NC. Zone 1 to be planted with woody species.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant through this process has identified all environmental constraints including wetlands and streams and has taking steps to avoid and
minimize including proposing to relocate and restore the stream channel that would be impacted by the proposed lot fill
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
less impervious material, loose stone to allow GW infiltration reduce runoff, indirect avoidance not direct.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑X DWQ ❑X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑Q Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
39.8 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
1.035 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: Unavoidable impacts to wetlands and streams will be compensated through the purchase of mitigation credits
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
E] Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
The proposed relocated and restored riparian buffers will mitigate impacts resulting from the proposed access road and switching station. The
proposed riparian buffers would likely result in a functional uplift through an increase in native species as well as vegetative density compared to
existing conditions. Please see the stream mitigation conceptual plan for more details.
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
No. The proposed project will not result in any man-made ditches or conveyances.
❑ Yes X❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
66.4%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
0 Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The substation pad area will sheet flow to a stormwater pond to the south, which will outlet to the stream via a culvert. The area immediately west of
the substation will be uncontrolled and will sheet flow (it will not concentrate) to the stream. A stormwater management plan has not been submitted as
of the date of this report.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Rocky Mount
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
❑ Phase II
❑X NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes ❑X No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program, USFWS NC County List
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries and Essential Fish Habitat database
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
N.C. State Historic Preservation office database
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
_7 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Floodmaps Map No. 3720386300J, Panel 3863
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

ATTACHMENT 2
IMPACT MAPS AND IMPACT TABLE

ATTACHMENT 3
STREAM RELOCATION DESIGN PLANS

I INCH = 200 FEET
® 0 200 400 600
FEET
1W
LEGEND
L a J APPROXIMATE PROJECT LIMITS
F-1 ZONE I BUFFER (EXISTING)
T ­ of Wetland foresbdlYl(N)
-
STREAM LIMITS
ZONE 2 BUFFER (EXISTING)
B] Zone 1
PALUSTRINE EMERGENT (PEM) WETLAND LIMITS
[.' . ZONE I STREAM RELOCATION BUFFER (PROPOSED)
ki `
„$
®
PALUSTRINE FORESTED (PFO) WETLAND LIMITS
ZONE 2 STREAM RELOCATION BUFFER (PROPOSED)
FILL
®
- PALUSTRINE SCRUB SHRUB (PSS) WETLAND LIMITS ZONE I BUFFER IMPACT (PROPOSED)
0.0001
®
STREAM IMPACT
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT (PROPOSED)
FILL
pFo
WETLAND IMPACT
= = STREAM RELOCATION (PROPOSED)
= 0.0002 +/- AC (5.48 +/- LF)
W3Ip)BMP
PFO
Y
00336
4,,W2.
, PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (PEM -FILL):
= O.000 I +/- AC
np, PERMANENTWETLAND IMPACT (PFO -FILL):
= 0.0035 +/- AC
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (FILL):
= 0.0477 +/- AC (462.20 +/- LF)
3. BUFFER D1sTUR5AN,.I
ZONE 1: 0 SF
ZONE 2: 192 SF
W12. PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (PFO -CHANNEL):
=
0.0 1 43 +/- AC
W I G. TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT (PFO -BMP):
=
0.0123 +/- AC
W3. PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (PFO -BMP):
= 0.0336 +/- AC
W14. TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT (PFO -BMP):
= 0.04 1 +/- AC
W10. PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT(P55-FILL):
= 0.00 1 9 +/- AC
XI I . PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (PEM-FILI):
= 0.0 1 28 +/- AC
a
W4. PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (PFO -BMP):
= 0.2376 +/- AC
1
W5. PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (PEM -BMP):
= 0. 1005 +/- AC •
4N: 5. TEMPORARY WET,AND IMPACT (PEM PMP):
). ')338 +/- AC
W6. PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (PFO -FILL):
y
Wetland lmptl Nwnber
Type Pllmpxt
T ­ of Wetland foresbdlYl(N)
Areadlmpart
(59Pae Feeq
BI Zone 1
mvtnent IPI wierrpomry In
B] Zone 1
1,a66.LO
03 Zone 1
laoeP)
,1 Zone2
191.00
WIIP)
FILL
PEM
N
0.0001
W1Ip)
FILL
pFo
Y
00035
= 0.0002 +/- AC (5.48 +/- LF)
W3Ip)BMP
PFO
Y
00336
W41p)
BMP
PFO
y
023M
WS IPI
BMP
PEM
N
0.1005
W6Ip)
FRL
PFO
y
0®23
W)IN
FILL
PEM
N
0.1111
wBIPI
FILL
PFO
Y
0.2858
Ws 1pl
ROAD
PEM
N
00038
W10(p)
fill
Ps5
N
0.0019
W111P)
Fill
PEM
N
0. 0118
W121p)
[M1annel
vf0
Y
0.0143
W13IT)
ROA.
PEM
N
0.0025
W14IT)
BMD
pF0
Y
D.,
W15IT1
BMp
pEM
N
00338
w.,
imp
PFO
Y
0.0123
iod
1016
Average
ftm RAlPgt)
abase
sveam
Area Pf
Baeam btvan xunier
iYne of IRRI_
strewn Nary
alr2emdNrnt
weanwkiN
wry
impact
wrrrr..nt 0)ararpemry M
two
Oeetl
Phew
1-0
feet)
SIIPI
FILL
IT to Beecfi BranN
Perenn al
ON-Sft
O6i.2
0.011)
511 PI
ROAD
Dt to Bee[h BranrM1
Perenn al
4N -SN
0603
0.0026
S3 (T)
RDD
I1T to BeerM1 111.-
nn
Cry -SN
17.19
0.0012
64(p)
ROAD
Ll 1. Bee[M1 B,a
Perennal
1X-5'1
5,a
0.0002
Tobi
53f
MM17
01. BUFFER DISTURBANCE:
ZONE I: I ,G5 I SF
IZONE 2: 1 .4GG 5F
W9. PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT(PEM-ROAD,
= 0.0038 +/- AC
W 1 3. TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT (PEM-ROAL`.
- QOOZS +/- AC
F_
�4
'�-- 53. TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT (ROAD):
Area of gfUrrbaw
guxergsWrMaNumber guxerlare
(59Pae Feeq
BI Zone 1
1,651 m
B] Zone 1
1,a66.LO
03 Zone 1
0.00
,1 Zone2
191.00
01. BUFFER DISTURBANCE:
ZONE I: I ,G5 I SF
IZONE 2: 1 .4GG 5F
W9. PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT(PEM-ROAD,
= 0.0038 +/- AC
W 1 3. TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT (PEM-ROAL`.
- QOOZS +/- AC
F_
�4
��TLA!, D IMPACT (PFO -FILL):
= 0.2858 +/- AC
0
z
I •
0000 0
• /
00
0 0000,
NOTE5:
I . 5A5E MAPPING OBTAINED FROM ANGLER ENVIRONMENTAL.
2. LIMITS OF STREAMS AND WETLANDS WERE SURVEYED BY
DOMINION UNLE55 NOTED ON THE MAP.
3. WETLANDS ARE DELINEATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
ROUTINE DETERMINATION FOR AREAS LARGER THAN FIVE (5)
ACRE5 AS OUTLINED IN THE 19,57 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION MANUAL. OTHER WATERS
OF THE U.S. ARE DELINEATED BASED ON THE PRESENCE OF
AN ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK, A5 DEFINED BY THE U.5.
ARMY CORP5 OF ENGINEERS DEFINITION OF WATER OF THE
U.S.
z z
Z - }
Q
W � �
O5� 4rV'o Opo
o'
Wo wo
W
L:J S
z
Z
Y O Q
Q
z Q
O z
J
Q O
z
= U
Q F
LL z
�E- O_�
Q c(�
Qom_Lu/
_ D_ Q LLJ U
Q �> O
O
Q) LL
CLI
O
O
� v
PROJECT MANAGER:
AIR
DRAWN:
TD
JOB NUMBER:
4746.57
.REVISIONS:
NONE
'�-- 53. TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT (ROAD):
= 0.001 2 +/- AC () 7.29 +/- LF)
52. PERMANENT 5TREAM IMPACT (ROAD):
= 0.0026 +/- AC (46.03 +/- LF)
/��
a
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (ROAD):::
= 0.0002 +/- AC (5.48 +/- LF)
��TLA!, D IMPACT (PFO -FILL):
= 0.2858 +/- AC
0
z
I •
0000 0
• /
00
0 0000,
NOTE5:
I . 5A5E MAPPING OBTAINED FROM ANGLER ENVIRONMENTAL.
2. LIMITS OF STREAMS AND WETLANDS WERE SURVEYED BY
DOMINION UNLE55 NOTED ON THE MAP.
3. WETLANDS ARE DELINEATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
ROUTINE DETERMINATION FOR AREAS LARGER THAN FIVE (5)
ACRE5 AS OUTLINED IN THE 19,57 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION MANUAL. OTHER WATERS
OF THE U.S. ARE DELINEATED BASED ON THE PRESENCE OF
AN ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK, A5 DEFINED BY THE U.5.
ARMY CORP5 OF ENGINEERS DEFINITION OF WATER OF THE
U.S.
z z
Z - }
Q
W � �
O5� 4rV'o Opo
o'
Wo wo
W
L:J S
z
Z
Y O Q
Q
z Q
O z
J
Q O
z
= U
Q F
LL z
�E- O_�
Q c(�
Qom_Lu/
_ D_ Q LLJ U
Q �> O
O
Q) LL
CLI
O
O
� v
PROJECT MANAGER:
AIR
DRAWN:
TD
JOB NUMBER:
4746.57
.REVISIONS:
NONE

I INCH = 50 FEET
® 0 50 100 150
FEET
LEGEND
L_ J APPROXIMATE PROJECT LIMITS
= STREAM LIMITS
® PALUSTRINE EMERGENT (PEM) WETLAND LIMITS
® PALUSTRINE FORESTED (PFO) WETLAND LIMITS
PALUSTRINE SCRUB SHRUB (PSS) WETLAND LIMITS
® WETLAND IMPACT CHANNEL
ZONE I STREAM RELOCATION BUFFER (PROPOSED)
ZONE 2 STREAM RELOCATION BUFFER (PROPOSED)
- - STREAM RELOCATION (PROPOSED)
LINOI
I.
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM ANGLER ENVIRONMENTAL.
2. LIMITS OF STREAMS AND WETLANDS WERE SURVEYED BY
DOMINION UNLESS NOTED ON THE MAP.
3. WETLANDS ARE DELINEATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
ROUTINE DETERMINATIO N FOR AREAS LARGER THAN FIVE (5)
ACRES AS OUTLINED IN THE 1987 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION MANUAL. OTHER WATERS
OF THE U.S. ARE DELI NEATED BASED ON THE PRESENCE OF
AN ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK, AS DEFINED BY THE U.S.
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS DEFINITION OF WATER OF THE
U.S.
Document Path: Y:\GIS\GIS Work\Actllc Job5\474657 Nash\maps\474G57 Impacts_I I.17_Cha,i-112—J
W12. PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT(PFO-CHANNEL):
= 0.0 143 +/- AC
Dare
.,�f
..ung.-•ms®o.-a�
•
.`
s
f� fi
¢ Q
z z z z
U
W~�
Z> >
Q
�4W p z i
< Z.~ o z
_� off;
v$ Ze
L Q r� W M Lu f!
O 3�', QM o6
�o 0
— �7 3r c�
fi
z aM Zo
uj � �� °a
Fu
C O
� v
3 —
O
a �
c 2 �
O V ¢
V z
Z Q
O z
Q O
cri J Q
W U
Z
U z w = O
o
~ v
(s)L z
<li O
Q U oL cn
_ W V— >
=Q < < o
U — �
w O
OO
U
AR
TD
47a�.�7

I INCH = 50 FEET
® O 50 100 150
FEET
LEGEND
117. J APPROXIMATE PROJECT LIMITS
= STREAM LIMITS
® PALUSTRINE EMERGENT (PEM) WETLAND LIMITS
® PALUSTRINE FORESTED (PFO) WETLAND LIMITS
® PALUSTRINE SCRUB SHRUB (PSS) WETLAND LIMITS
® WETLAND PERMANENT IMPACT BMP
WETLAND TEMPORARY IMPACT BMP
ZONE I STREAM RELOCATION BUFFER (PROPOSED)
ZONE 2 STREAM RELOCATION BUFFER (PROPOSED)
- - STREAM RELOCATION (PROPOSED)
NOTES:
1. BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM ANGLER ENVIRONMENTAL.
2. LIMITS OF STREAMS AND WETLANDS WERE SURVEYED BY
DOMINION UNLESS NOTED ON THE MAP.
3. WETLANDS ARE DELINEATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
ROUTINE DETERMINATION FOR AREAS LARGER THAN FIVE (5)
ACRES AS OUTLINED IN THE 1987 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION MANUAL. OTHER WATERS
OF THE U.S. ARE DELINEATED BASED ON THE PRESENCE OF
AN ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK, AS DEFINED BY THE U.S.
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS DEFINITION OF WATER OF THE
U.S.
w
.mav ar.�
Document Path: Y:\G15\GI5 W-kVItive Jobs\474657 Na5h\mep5\474G57 Impacts_ I I x 1 7_BMF.mad
Date Saved: 4/29/201 G
W 14. TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT (PFO -BMP):
= 0.04 1 +/- AC
`
10
W3. PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (PFO -BMP):
= 0.033G +/- AC
F77RMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (PFO -BMP): _
♦ = 0.2376 +/- AC
W) 5. TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT (PEM -BMP):
= 0.0335 +/- AC
•
w
` h
� W5. PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (PEM -BMP): .
= O. 1 005 +l- ACI'
4-
_ fl
Q
z
z
i
z
_v
d
W
z
Z
rZ,
a7
ar
Fr
f
o
Lu
uza
N
z p
i
}
z =
�
Z
Q
O
z
�
Q
J
O
Q
U
zIn
=
z_
LLLJ
O
z
o
~ Q
L
z
O
= z,
W Q
>
= Q
<
O
a/-
YLL-w
�-
LL-
LL-1
0
0
CL
U
PROJECT MANAGER:
A
DRAWN:
TD
JOB �JUMBER:
4746.57
NONE

I INCH = 50 FEET
® O 50 I00 150
FEET
LEGEND
L.J APPROXIMATE PROJECT LIMITS
- STREAM LIMITS
® PALUSTRINE EMERGENT (PEM) WETLAND LIMIT5
® PALUSTRINE FORESTED (PFO) WETLAND LIMITS
® PALUSTRINE SCRUB 51111,1JB (PSS) WETLAND LIMITS
® STREAM PERMANENT IMPACT ROAD
® WETLAND PERMANENT IMPACT ROAD
WETLAND TEMPORARY IMPACT ROAD
® STREAM TEMPORARY IMPACT ROAD
ZONE I STREAM RELOCATION BUFFER (PROPOSED)
ZONE 2 STREAM RELOCATION BUFFER (PROPOSED)
- - STREAM RELOCATION (PROPOSED)
fJnr--f ParhYV;1I )\C -,IS JobM474C57 Nash\—,\ 74657 Impacts I Ix 17 R—A2_—J
NOTES:
I\
1. BA5E MAPPING OBTAINED FROM ANGLER ENVIRONMENTAL.
2. LIMITS OF STREAMS AND WETLANDS WERE SURVEYED BY
\
DOMINION UNLESS NOTED ON THE MAP.
WWz
3. WETLANDS ARE DELINEATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
ROUTINE DETERMINATION FOR AREAS LARGER THAN FIVE (5)
\
ACRE5 AS OUTLINED IN THE 1987 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF
z
ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION MANUAL. OTHER WATERS
/ 1
OF THE U.S. ARE DELINEATED BASED ON THE PRESENCE OF
/i
AN ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK, A5 DEFINED BY THE U.S.
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS DEFINITION OF WATER OF THE
�.
U.S.
fJnr--f ParhYV;1I )\C -,IS JobM474C57 Nash\—,\ 74657 Impacts I Ix 17 R—A2_—J
WWz
z
p
�Y
-
_;Y1
jr
W
pY
_
tea.
'f.
rra
Y
z
Q
O
z
Q
O
U
QDz
(f i
L.�
w
O
LL
V J
`l
z
O
O
LLJ
Q
Q
n
U
= Q
OO
U
LL -
0 O
OO
w
U
AK
-c
11�5 NI iMF FfR
474=.57

B3. BUFFER DISTURBANCE:
ZONE 1: 0 SF
ZONE 2: 192 5F
EXISTING ROAD
I
r
®INCH = 50 FEET
O 50 100 150
FEET
LEGEND
L_J APPROXIMATE PROJECT LIMITS
STREAM LI M ITS
PALUSTRINE EMERGENT (PEM) WETLAND LIMITS
® PALUSTRINE FORESTED (PFO) WETLAND LIMITS
PALUSTRINE SCRUB SHRUB (PSS) WETLAND LIMITS
ZONE I BUFFER (EXISTING)
ZONE 2 BUFFER (EXISTING)
ZONE I STREAM RELOCATION BUFFER (PROPOSED)
ZONE 2 STREAM RELOCATION BUFFER (PROPOSED)
- ZONE I BUFFER IMPACT (PROPO5ED)
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPAC (PROFO5E1))
)ocument Path: Y:\GIS\G15_Work�Actve_Job5\474657_Na5h\map5\474G57_Impacts_ I I x 17_Buffer.mxd - Date Saved: 4/29/201 G
BI. BUFFER DISTURBANCE:
ZONE 1: 1 ,G51 5F
ZONE 2: 1 AGG 5F
NOTES:
I . BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM ANGLER ENVIRONMENTAL.
2. LIMITS OF STREAMS AND WETLANDS WERE SURVEYED BY
DOMINION UNLESS NOTED ON THE MAP.
3. WETLANDS ARE DELINEATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
ROUTINE DETERMINATION FOR AREAS LARGER THAN FIVE (5)
ACRES AS OUTLINED IN THE 1987 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION MANUAL. OTHER WATERS
OF THE U.S. ARE DELINEATED BASED ON THE PRESENCE OF
AN ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK, AS DEFINED BY THE U.S.
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS DEFINITION OF WATER OF THE
U.S.
� N
J � M
1 N
N
a a
z
z
z
WZ>�
ZaM �M
�P
a—
o—
o�
Z am aMN
M
OF^
Z.
W
�
O
v
3
Lw
a z
o
z
p u
z
Q
O
z
Q
W
J
0
cf�
z
U
z
n NN
a--
Z
U z
~
uw W
LL-
L-
O
>1
>1O
_
-u-
�D
z
ct� o
LL -m
z
�~
0 �
o
�Q
Q U
ry
_
W
Q
Q
U
OO
Q
E_—
U
n
LL-
w
O
0
�
U
PROJECT MANAGER:
A
DRAWN:
TD
JOB NUMBER:
4746.57
REVISIONS:
NONE

PROTECT
SITE
LOCATION MAP
-P OF FORDECT
GRAPHICSCALE 1
o
1000
RR t
Battleboro �
,Battle
PC D.A— OF EATURAL ®S (DER)
CITY OF ROCOMOMIT
ZONING
A
QN (DOE
I x-��
p0
Reti3�FO3
0 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12
HATHAWAY SWITCHING STATION
PROPOSED STREAM MITIGATION PLAN
CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA
Awa JDb DA746 57 -Yam qsw do 8U­CADDFAe R.I.. v I. 8h.lA4540571 COVERSHMET. dAg, 4-0 PM—I,g, 11
STREAM MITIGATION PIAN GOALS/OBJECTIVES.
THE PROPOSED PROJECT « TEMPORARILY IMPACT 485LINEAR FEE OFPERENNKSTRN,MCEANNESE
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NE' S"HING STATION AND ILL PERMANENTLY IMPACT 4 1 LINEAR FEET OF
STREAM CHAN" a UNDER THE STAION AND TO MITIGATE FOR THE ROAD CROSSING IMPACT, THE APPLICANT
FIR OR OSES TO RELoCATE THE CHANNEL FROM UNDER THE STATION AND E ROAD
CROSSING DESIGN IMPACT, APPLICANT PROPOSES `oEFTxNBv;R;s�ESSTARNTH�TM�TOCw �NONOME
REFERENCE FEMA MAP. 37203863007
OWNERICLIENT/APPLICANT:
DOMINION NORTH CAROLINA POWER
CONTACT: AMANDA MAYHEW
701 EAST CARY STREET, 12TH FLOOR
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219
PHONE NUMBER: 804-771-6145
EMAIL: [e-mail]
PROPERTY INFO:
PARCEL IDS: 020042, 037306, 040250,
018274, 022200, & 040252 ON -PART)
CUMULATIVE ACREAGE: 3 7. 01 AC
ZONING: I-2 & A-1
SHEET INDEX:
L I ' UTAS
E2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
E3 STREAM GEOMETRY
E4 STREAM PLAN & PROFILE
E5 STREAM DETAILS
E6 STREAM CROSS-SECTIONS
E7 STREAM DESIGN NARRATIVE
E8 PLANTING PLAN & NOTES
E9 MONITORING & MITIGATION PLAN PROJECT STATUS
RELATED REQUIRED PERMITS
-P OF FORDECT
RRQD
N0TREQB
N
PC D.A— OF EATURAL ®S (DER)
CITY OF ROCOMOMIT
ZONING
A
QN (DOE
sopeWnlen'
COVER SHEET
E°oFE'ONLY EATEA—-ITCHINGSTA„ON
Elo E9

A wa J.—AH246 57- Ham q ­dSlanovLCABDFAe F.—I-1. Sheerst424057 2 HASTING CONDILONS BAY, 4rz 016 3:59. 12 PM. buatovg, 1 1
11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11!11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111
0 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12
LEGEND
PO'WER POLE
SANITARY NHoi­H
EXISTING CONDITIONS -©POST
— "• —'J ? / / N OW OR FORBN1Y
THEPROPOSER PROJECT WOULD IMPACT AN UNNAMED TRBUTARY'ro BEECH BRANCH. THE TRIBUTARY RON ROD SET
OF APPROXIMATELY 02 SQUARE M CAROLDLA STRESIA IRON ROD FOUND
OD GA WAS USED TO EVALUATE THE EFUNC'HON OANDHCONDITION OF THIS COASTALIRON PLPE FOUND
TRES"UE ToNDS SLOWLY TO STORM EVENTS.THE STREAM HAS THREE DISDNCT REACHES
fl/ /
REACH LEDTBHIaSoRW.CH CROSSES THE BASTING HIGH T A�Y AN ES ryESSION
U
YEGETATON AND LACKS WELL DERNED CHANNEL BED FORMS THE RRGHT OF AVAY IS PERDODICALLY FEFG, FLOODPLADH
PROBABLY DITCHED AS PART OF THE INSTALL ANoN OF THE EASUNGCE PAGTED BYTHEW_AND OPiPP01
LBUTS
o ENT�M,
Pw�SSTIN�CRUE SH
IPRRI WERAND LRS RU
BEDFORMS ARE POO SYS TH ONLY A PEW SH LOW RFRE SEGRaN2 AND LONG RAT �M LI S
--� +sl,-� ;_--s--- 1��� %� �� �/ POOLS THELE B NRISH�SHHFORESTEDANDTEROSIOND NDL LACKS MAT M022
ODN MUCH OF
�, , , • °�E R,��°ew�K,2� o�ER o � ° ���ow R �Eo w�°NEN°�SSER WooDs� �N
N LYSIS E THIS NOTES
1) �"NGTOPOG
--- - �TIG��O r ,, aNL PARCEL IF 04 owY
52
O 24, 20 15 AND ONSPTEMER3,ON 2015 IBROTE BY
-_- ,W SEPTEMBER
-_—L�� �,�A�TEDO�AIDGDRT2,
—= ����
,— RIG
— -�— y, �� / , —EW WELL 2o
NEDBEDELTARooGRO—OUT FIT THHANNa AN DONE
"" SCOUR POOL AT A LOG DROP THE SAM RESULTED w A FUNCRONAL EVALUATION OF HIGH�FOR s; gCRES wRRa
AREAS LARGER THAN FNE
71�'
"ED
i CHOERPUSSOF BNGLNEERS DEFWNION OF WATERO
)MS
ANGLBRwERESDRVEYED BY
DOrvEmoN.
i
I
— -/xei i -
RAN SI07NES
�
��
.� REACH l 20 ZONE2 _
30 ZONE 1 �
r� REACH 2 — REACH S
_� G4
B ES{ RN+cx 2. exo-ro of wvnsrve vecerAnoN REACH 2. exam of STREAM wasloN
ZONE 1 i'��
TARYTZS
20' ZONE 2
1 I
12
r (�
J
I REACH 3 REFERENCE REACH
FOR REFERENCE ONLY, PROJECT STATUS
r� NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE DESCRIPTION
----
I --- ----- -4/16 REAL DESIGN
I--
�� I /' x•� .�.ANc�
- —
'\
REALDRA oG EXISTING CONDITIONS
FOR
ROCKY MOUNT so�LY
1N°9
!BSIBW
—
0
0
Degigned OS 4/16E�ae
E
lo
\ GRAPHIC SCALE 1-50 FFe1MN
ReF2
LA�I 1— (1D,a
1TIea °° O11� e dl�o�
P F.—
A wa J.—AH246 57- Ham q ­dSlanovLCABDFAe F.—I-1. Sheerst424057 2 HASTING CONDILONS BAY, 4rz 016 3:59. 12 PM. buatovg, 1 1

A 11— j...AH 74s 17 - H—, F -Ah, AU..1CAeevsee- seeer14 74617 3 STa&U,.a cP-RTRY AAE, 42 1116 3:IS 14 eM buat— 1 1
11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11!11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111
0 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12
11ZRHNW TOPOGRAPHIC SUa WAS
AKOMNEPDHN,
cEOSEST"_Ec ON rvovemaER W,
C WE ANDS WERE e¢menTE ON AUGUST
ACCORD EE"TETTER° ° ;
(5)wRESASS�SeowTHSR9H UA FIVE
MAN
I G'
"HE
REA ICE
OF a" oHewAHeA_'.CARpNS OF H,6H�AYH�R s of
o EMEeHeTHEUHAE DEPIDATED HEUH
O ; % E°R ;�SoF -AEo °MDESTRTMSe Ae
NDS HVANGLE uveae suaveee
O
e� /
CONTROL
P/c 37 CAP 3Ei
RAID
�H o
fRC / E e3aeosAa
0 / X93.15
N2
1 "TTEL 105.51
0
' 11 T /// d A//C dC S
P
8Ei
P 137 OR 77
gGN E,L 2 141 1 2,36B.542,82 8.45'
1.
O v
�.. o 0
0
N \ &CAP SE
SE
N' 83776262
o / /FOe
—_ —._ _ —__—_ —_ —__ —- —- —-- _ _ —_ —_ —_ E: 2.368.1 ai.e e
1
ro —_ _ _ _ _ —_ —_ _ —_ _ —_ , EL 2.60
DO&SET
w `N AROAP 38,022 7
2.386 8 6 5 3 88
E / EL 119.84
STREAM THALWEG LINE / CURVE TABLE
N ­ER RADIUS LENGTH IRAPHORD DIRE -ON
IT
IS
PROJECT STATUS
DATE DEIIRIPHON
12/4/15 30SIDEAGN Hep
204/16 REAL DESIGN
r�LeGLM
�pe�InMn'
�N STREAM GEOMETRY
loH Hw
FIBRO 6 oNE3HATHAWAY AWITCHING STATION
CYTY OF ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA
d
A
=
E303 E9
GRAPHIC SCALE 1 30
— FTM N —
Riws�FFs
F— 1� e d�:o,
F A (Pie,) 11,,eomD.
N.
9
A 11— j...AH 74s 17 - H—, F -Ah, AU..1CAeevsee- seeer14 74617 3 STa&U,.a cP-RTRY AAE, 42 1116 3:IS 14 eM buat— 1 1

A--j.—AG746E, e,3„q —S<,n CADDA—Re—I-1.Sh-4,4as,-4-STREAMPLANIPROAEEawE4aaas1a4ee3aRED—E,11
11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11!11
0 1 2 3 4 5
11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11
7 8 9
11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111
10 11 12
—
—SIGN
LEGEND
I
1'I�
START
—moi i/
1 i
--
— _
eaoeosec suaaTnno"
ReeeR To ON,
"—IS To'
INDO—TON /
i
` RELOCATION , "w"xoEASEwe
0
FORx
RON RE SET
MONUMENT FOUNDES
"
3av 1
1 —° *� pTARYTO BE CH BRANC
TRS
CONTROLe4�
v 'ssIo"
OCR E.RHIDITT
0
D
ST ME
FEESS
— , �- ,
ELLANDEASTING STREAM eFea
FORESTED
o�
:� r LBUTS
o w E"T SEND
,PES) wEEE D L -SRS
I
STREAM
PROPOSED TOP OF
/ DP ER
,
_ oL
TRUCTURE
EAan"cTOPOGRAPHIC SUBY WAR
COMPLEED BYBOrANCONS"x
24 D,EADns�O"nEPnR3
` /'
\
— /'ExcEOSYNTE3O""OVEMBER16,
s
u— E50 OC
E0
BER
RDHEREewCOCANWTANDSE EAUGUST
AC"WERE£—
DBTEwm"nnoOR nRnainRCER MEAN �
reSouwSHWncRens EDEya,os
,
/0 ENG. ELLAND
/
OF AN ORDELARY HIGH AVATER MARK, ASSri weeRs oeFlmnorvown°E of xe us.
105
-LCJ
-
3) Awes OF wenn"DS AND STREAMS
105 MESIO"DES.ECTED BY . ""cies uveae suavexes BY
00
�.-.a..ce
100
11—
Ul
95
,�
95
90
55
H,ecmrr r se's_. —
-
-
-
90
b5
PROJECT STATUS
DATE DEscR�eno"
- 12/4/15 30EODESIGN REQ
W1+00
-4/16 REAL DESIGN -8/16 ADDRESSED DEeicm: corvm4Errrs
0+00
0+50
1+50
2+00
2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00
4+50 5+00
5+50 6+00
6-50 7+00 7+25
,,c, -ANGLER
�pe�InMn'
A" aEa STREAM PLAN & PROFILE
Do IEW
—PO O"Ex
STE VAR
d
o
=
E4o E9
eOAAEI TS AE
1 35 vER„A SCALE
1._ 3, mods
a1M tia.�,
4,
Rewsleas
Lill.11 1111 F-1
a� n 0e,) �1e�e41�,ed
11.No
A--j.—AG746E, e,3„q —S<,n CADDA—Re—I-1.Sh-4,4as,-4-STREAMPLANIPROAEEawE4aaas1a4ee3aRED—E,11

A I—jo AH74657- £,O q PAIS n,no CABDFA , Re -I-1. SIIA474857-5-STaEM EETAES BAY,-8a0I84 00 58 RED b o E,1 1
11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11!11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111
0 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12
STREAM MITIGATION SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
cIKODUCnory TH
SEQOE"OE EEOW FLOW " THE CHANNEL ° O"ST OW°"OFT°° "SAW°" CHANNEL S°� GENERALLY F° OwT°°
OUTTHE ALIGNMENT OF THE CHANNEL SHALL BE STIIED IN THE EE TODEMFMINEIF=ONoSRlRNEAND REVIE ED WTTE THE EHGEMER PRIOR TO
TTER joe TTo°o of° TMEDESIGNTOC R'RENTs RI SHOULD
TO GROUND DISTURBANCE, PERH,H7ER CONTROLS WILL BE -FAILED ON THE DOWNHILL
TEADDSESTTRDISTURBED AREA SPECLALAROUND� �
AEJACENWTLNSANBANTM
MILGATION STOCKH.LNEG�CLLEOAGRSMSD�GARBULEBTFoREEUSSMD SHERUBS DOCATE.D H. TE�°wT°�TsoFTE° M
"E AGAFE," PoOF'FEFTRH TOP SOS. FROM AREA TO BE GRADED, AND STOCKPE.E FOR REUSE ACROSS THE WENA"E FLOODPLAHN
A'oN
OF THE CHANNEL My MY ACC FULAH N o
FMERHW DEVICE ONTO A STSELLEYED AREA ENSURlNG NO EROSION OCCURS AROUND THE OUTRALL OF THE aTERHW DEVICE
"TALLAISOUN. o F LOG STRUCTURES USIG LOGS SALVAGED FROM SITE INkRING, STALL THE LOG STRUCTURES PER THE
AN NG THAT HE TOP S HVBN WELL THE DLVERT OF THE STRBAJA CHANNEL
PoSRK BN T OF THE ED . THE CHANNEL I
ONTR INGe o NN aVIE D MI AS REQU ED BYSALVAGED TwcPPTwasTo THE wens"E FTooEPLAw AND
ELCULNME TMFE M T G O" THE31SSIDE SLOPES OF THE BUFFER, OVEMAP 1 E T USED
SECUREN
TO COVER THE STREAM BANKS AND WENAND FLOODPLAD4, G THE MATHNG PER T E PROVIDED DETAILS
THE DIMENSIONS OF THE MSW"O STR MPLETE GRADING OF CHANNEL FROM SUR UAL M E ""E "ST L TOP SOE wE A"°SEE° "S A"E OIR MAlA "OTO STARE. E
THE CULVERTS, BNSURING T T THE CULVERT OUTLEDS ARE PROPERLY COUNTERSUN K INSTALL Top So. SEEDING AND _T`NW
°E° TECULVESTO"EAS INDICATED w THE "S. wSOM"O THAT THE SURFACE O
THE STONE hITCHES THE PRORLE ELEVATION
THEIIID RESED FEESBLOCK. TLE INS
mNEL
MA -NW IN THE APPROVED MA -NW SEASON, STALL THE WENAND FLOODPI. AND ..RFSN BUFFER PLANNNGS INCLUDED
THE SUANNEG MAN
LOG GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL M
INVERT OF LOG EVEN
WEECHANNEwOEET
CHANNEL /—�j
COIR FIBER MATTING DETAIL"'"
INSTALLATIONSTAKE
I
UPSTREPREDR
AM To
OFDOWNSTREAM °"S STAKE." EEOAcOP
L
13
TOP OF B K
— —G STAPLES
MAG
® ® ® z SPASLOG
cows STAccEREE MP ® ®
_'NW STAFF
KEYw BOTTOM a w °EFTS S M cE "" °" °ST°ENA°ES 4 O c
cE OOEMAP
oS
—
FOOTER
SALVAGED HARDWOOD LOGS—
8 �z DESES 1z 14 OS
VIEWHEADER LOG
WELLAN°FT OO°PEM"
HEALOS- 12 Mw
CHANNEL - - -FOOTER LOG ° ioG'�
WENAND FLOG IIAN
TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION GEOMETRY M
DO GRADE EX GRADE
TLE TO I GRADE
NE TO �EGRADE 4
11 F — z'
LIVE STAKE TYPICAL DETAIL
ADAPTED FROM USDA S oOO4I
OP r °'"
wLATERALJ'\,� I LE STAFFS SHALL Ee
GATDBo
BUD FE ETT T°es°xowTaEASEA
T MEMRI"TEE
-- TO EwBETS SEOFSs
S.EE°°A"cE
REMOBEE AT
WATERT K 8
ALLE
••-••••••• ••••••••••
BUFF END
SECTIO" VIEW
\
\v
CHANNEL DETAIL MTs ) 2 SALVAGED TOPSOIL
VAN
EOFFE°. w DISTURBED ESTHARUGH S
JUTE MATT9"G O" 3.1 SIDE -ORES WETLaLow sTAKe SEEEmcu"EERMATTwc A"o FLOOEPLAWjUTE M O Q AP, 1 DEAD R M "SSERE °LOW STAKE
_ OARM E"S O" OOEPLw EA"KFML N STAKE
-II II_
PROJECT STATUS
DATE DESCRIPTION
SACOEINc°Ee
12/4/15 30EODESIGN
DESIGN Eee coME"Ts
__
_'
III 11 111 111111 '11 11 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 Tl°S �ASEE I I I I I I I I I I III
-_ - - - _ -_ - _ - - ___ __ _ _ _ _ _ - - - -
=111= =111=1II-
III -III -III I -III -III -1 -III=III=III III=III= II III III III III III III II III I III -III II III=III= I III=11 =
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
— — — — — — — ---------— — — —
DEAD BLOW STAKE TYPICAL DETAIL
ESO"ALLTTO
NcT EEAEEL
_AiANGLER
�pn�InMn'
RE
FORREVIEW
OSES O"LT
STREAM DETAILS
CTLY OF ROCKY MOUNT N oRTH CAROLINA
E5oF E9
8vM � �
A
E
=
Re�91
am A (LTe.) 1sn,eom
1F�ea �� 411M e Q��o�
".4" -
A I—jo AH74657- £,O q PAIS n,no CABDFA , Re -I-1. SIIA474857-5-STaEM EETAES BAY,-8a0I84 00 58 RED b o E,1 1

Awa j.m Aw24G 57- Ham q ­dst ,ACADDAI.. a I..l I. Sh.lA424ss2-s-CRoss-SECTIONS awg 4rz 016 4:01:21 PM Au'- 1 1
11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11!11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111
0 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12
STREAM THALWEG CROSS-SECTIONS #1, STATION 1+50,0 STREAM THALWEG CROSS-SECTIONS #4, STATION 4+50.0
110 410 110 110
o
100 g,_ _ /j100 100 J 100
P canoe Ex. GRADE J — — — — — — — e:. canoe J
PROPOSED 90 90 90
90.
PROPOSED
GRADE
80 80 80 80
-20 -10 0 10 20 -20 -10 0 10 20
STREAM THALWEG CROSS-SECTIONS #2, STATION 2+50.0 STREAM THALWEG CROSS-SECTIONS #5, STATION 5+50.0
110 110 110 --1— - - —1-110
100 �m 100 100 1100
—GRADE
— Ex. GRADE Ex. — — —
0PaoGRADE 90 90 90
go
PROPOSED GRADE
'— - �80 80
80 - 80
-20 -10 0 10 20 -20 -10 0 10 20
STREAM THALWEG CROSS-SECTIONS #3, STATION 3+50.0 STREAM THALWEG CROSS-SECTIONS #6, STATION 6+50.0
110 110 110 — 410
100 0,100100 — 100
-- --- EX GRADE EA
-- oe� — — ---
PROPOSED
90 GRADE 90 90 90
PROPOSED
GRADE
80SU SU 80
-20 -10 0 10 20 -20 -10 0 10 20 PROJECT STATUS
DATE DESCRIPHON
12/4/15 30EODESIGN DEQ
2-16 REAL DESIGN
,ANGLER
�pe�InMn'
PHN STREAM CROSS-SECTIONS
DORF IHW
PURPORHR ONES
d
'
AI
S111 E9
-10
e1M N
V
Rei
a� A (11e,) «,eom
1P�ea h�d��o�ENS
a D,P
Awa j.m Aw24G 57- Ham q ­dst ,ACADDAI.. a I..l I. Sh.lA424ss2-s-CRoss-SECTIONS awg 4rz 016 4:01:21 PM Au'- 1 1

Aaaj.—AH74657 E,0„w„ s d� S: n CADDA­ Re—n-1. SHaaA4,405,-,-STREAM[ DESIGN NARRATIVE BAY, 4,28,20104 0148 PM, tAff­ 1 1
11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11!11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111
0 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12
R,
-..�.
....
133.9 AC -0.2 S•M Ln�
Q w
CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE'F;REA _ _
f
'.'• : ,•THE
- •1 ,I _ _ /
�r ,sem 7' 1
.•� i3 _;.+'
attlebom : ' Battl
J ,
• iii r •
�.f ! ,... • -
\
f � � • •
PROJECT vv Il
SITE r
DRAINAGE AREA MAP GRAPRGSGALL 1 E00
PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION DESIGN
THE "Toll"I OR THIS COASTAL
TARGET DESIGN CRTTERA. THE FOLLOWINGARE rcEY DESICI COMPOIEILS.
A coASTu eLAw 111—I EYDIIIC GEOMHTRY RIIIOISE1e IREGIOII CURII BASED Ox THE sT s
DR AGE AREA Io 2 SQUARE rvu'e THE STREAM WOULD HAVE A HnIrcRnL WIDTH OP A"RoAFGGESY s PT., A HAIrcRnL
REFER'CE REACH REACHT 'LLBEEG) AS A SCORED AS HIGH FUNcnON.G BASED ON"SAM T
SCOUR TO. --N A POOL DEPTH
TEATIS24wCHES DEETO C FEET WLDE AT TOP OF BANK, AND 4 6 —HES DEEP THE REFERENCE REACH GENERALLY LACKS WELL DERNE POOLS
PER To owcxESATRTA THHAN Txe ResETToPTnERNS ¢¢
HAS A 4 POOL HarroM ON WIDTH, WITH A DEPTH OPCH AND
o s FEET.
WITH 21 SIDE SLOPES THETOP wIDTE WOULD HE o FEET.
eao¢.e- Txe eaoeoseD cxAFm¢wnL HA' PLO SLOee oF-000'"(osW) wwcx Is coMPA'ELETnTHAcoASTu
SAID HED SYSTEM. THE SLOPE IS GOVERNED HY LIE IIVERL of c1nvERTU AL LHE LOP AID BOLTON oFLEE REAcx. HESIDxS
THE RFFLE AT THE OUTFALL OF THE CULVERT THE DESIGN OF THIS SAID HED CHANNEL DOES NOT 'CL DE CONSTRUCTED
RTIES AND PooLS. THESE FEATURES WUL DEVELOP OVER nME AS THE CHANNEL ExPERENCES STORM EVE LIS THAT SORT
HED MATERALS AND SCOUR POOLS PARTCULAKY AT THE LOG STRUCTURES (SEE DISCUSSION HELOw1.
EYE .................................................................................. ...........................
APE
CN COMPADHLE WITH A SAND HED SYSTEM. LL STO
. PER ECO D E DI SCHARGE IS COMPARABLE To THE REGIoNl CURVE PREDICTION OF DISCHARGE, ENLS WOULD
ACCESS THE WEnAND FLOODPLAw WHERE VELOCFY WOULD HE CONTROLLED THROUGH DENSE VEGETALIONPLANFORM THE PLANFORM FOR THIS STREAJA INCLUDES SEVERAL CURVES AROUND THE PROPOSED SUBS—ON, TH. THE
CHANNEL FOLLOWS THE FALL OF THE VICE MA L SCALE MEANDER PATTERNS WERE NOT INCLUDED D4 THE DESIGN SUCE
RECONNECTONVE—E, THE CHANNEL WUL DEVELOP A SMALL SCALE MEANDER
AND OR THE
STREAM TO DEVELPo"TOP AI APPHOPRALE EELL HEBANKS ADIUST. THE WIDTH OPTHE ROODPL eaovmxs suPPICIHIm AREA P
LDLE
WOOD HELPS PLINTY. POOL DEPTH THE DESIGN INCLUDES LOGS SALVAGED ON SELE AND STALLED APPROANLATELY
EVERY IODLIIR FEET THUSH 11 THE INVERT OFv�
DOWNSTREAM LHALwsncALESAxEADcvr. "OsoTHE PROVICHANNDE GRADE coILROoGS L Sxo1¢D LEERE HEAmSLURHAICE
WENAND FLOODPLIN ON EACH IDE OF THE RESTORED CHANNES, THE DESIGN INCLUDES A WENAND FLOODRAI WLTH A
MIDOLLES WIDTH OF 5 FEET THE WMANIS ONLY 0 1 FEET ABOVE THE INVERT OF THE STREAM CHANNEL SO
E SEED RUB ID
AN AN ES
AMOUNTHOFRo.MAT INTHE
CHMIEL WULHIG R YREDDGE HEVELOGI EHAHWELLASS PRODUCELARGERE
EAS WIL
RESEEDED HIA IDESPEGIESHE YPI OFCOASTALNORTHGAROLDLA THE ZONE 1 AND E I BUFFERWHLLBEIE 2 BUFFER TED ELH WOODY
wP ANDFoODPT�Mw°oNEo eo E o°oNNTeEw TEFoR of Naw OF ZONE RNTzo� WIDE
THE
EY"'I'll Hydrauic Geonietly RelationsFips
a c
1 , ,•�
,,.,.
iY
15
FOR REFERENCE ONLY, PROJECT STATUS
FOR CONSTRUCTION DALE DESGRIPROI
12,4,1E 30RDESIGN-USACOEINCDEQ
2,24.10 REAL DESIGN
-8/16 ADDRESSED GTTY COMMENTS
.4.eANGU R
VIRIIMEITIL
�pe�InMn'
REAL DRAWING STREAM DESIGN NARRATIVE
FOR REVIEW
PURPOSES ONLY
CTLY OF ROCKY MOUNT N oRTH CAROLINA
E70, E9
NTS
e1M Na.
crow xotmn ror ft.m.11
o„��„
HP_o
H c.T, _ •�
m _-
,m
r® -- i..
_
—
t
aim a6 wzo wzs
�"'
cross s.oeon ror 2 r..r stormPOOL
wwao �a+a.D
om wmI
a a.
��� .-1.
x
•w
I
Rao oa
cm- S..11—ft, 10 r..r storm
�Pmlar✓Ocrlplbn _
InEM xmre�iaroNw•
'I TNOT
�
— —
_
o
d
=
Rewsl005
am rye.) IP�e0I
w� s
Aaaj.—AH74657 E,0„w„ s d� S: n CADDA­ Re—n-1. SHaaA4,405,-,-STREAM[ DESIGN NARRATIVE BAY, 4,28,20104 0148 PM, tAff­ 1 1

AWdmaJnhmaswv¢ssv H,3, gSia�n,bnn+C,BDFA , Fa-bn—Sh-A47¢ss,-6-PINTINGPLANhNOTESBAY, ¢,26/201s¢0235RED -g,11
11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11!11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111
0 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12
�l —
/�� LEGEND
PO'TER POLE
ORE
SAN TARY MANxoLDSEwe
POST
J
x1 I Lo.Y
—AN-I,5OiVE 1\ �m \
p IN RTE' POTE
I Irl\' \ /
✓IR
/
"\ \ I l I _ ES
OVERHEAD rvEssloN
—
— eaoeosE SUBSTATION, / l PR OR MILLED
REFER T
— I"N Os off / CND
2 DRkWNc R FEMA GOODPF�
— — i - f�ELOCATION eR
START l mF'oRMATION / / ,f ' BUFF
— — - TeK (PFO)
RELOCATION ,� -—.0 ifs w ELLAND
NT
+ wp��w�Ty�oR�
sH
TIB
S
e.. �...
BEECH BRANCH ; ��.
Top OF BANK
NPROPOSED
AR TO / s U'+z
PROPOSED STREAM BUFF
AMED TR .
Loc GRADE co
CONTROL
ST.-RE
O
_ wN BUFFER e
/
r BUFFER
y�
WENAND oDeLUN
t FKANTING
n r
ewESNNG
r TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WAS
�. I�
ON lint
COMPLIED oaolTIorvAi
�
- L o PNS' ID
' r C � �
o / aoomeoBNYSceoSLItiNBTeo ory Nl0'lB eR 1G,
/ C�� /
Ell
e
2)W ANDS WERE DEFEMhTED ON AUGUST
TED ON zorve � IO zoos avArvGeew�rvML D4
ACcoaDANcewITx THe ROUTwe
x (5) ACRES wsrxeNeea THAN Fiv e
� � I\ � to j { zoN IA A -•. � .�� � '-
y oON of ENcmEEFs weAM
/ TION MANuu. oTxER WATERS of THE
Enlxixeoen servce
, s RwwaYcwnNrvwns
BY ARMN CORPS OF
NGNED
DEEMS
ENCINeeFS DEFINmoN OF
OF WATERY
/ ANGLERDs WEREAND
DOMNHON. P weN,ANsURveYE BY
I
Zone YA- Wetlantl FlbotlpWin Ptanting: Zone i8-Innee' Riparian Buffet -KN ­
PLANTING NOTES:
P onspor enoa v r acro
r root (waa nax ootw mnt9T, each nanq
—1 wenn T.1 EB11 1. PLANTS AND SEEDS SHAH BE OBTAINED FROM A CO—EFCIAL SUPPLIER. THE CONTRACTOR SHAH MAKE ARRANGEMENTS WITH RELIABLE SOURCES TO ENSURE THAT AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF THE REQUIRE PLANT AND SEED MATEFW.S is
sgenane Neme common ueme acawc. Size 5wek v° 'i, poemity nme comri�on (nal"caror size s"mak r. "aua'imy gVA4ABLE.
— --NH V_ 2 IEEIIToTVHEADT A PLANT OR SEED fPECI DED Is NOT COMMERCW.LY AVAILABLE THE CONTRACTOR MAY REQUEST A SUBS—ON w WR—G. ALL REQUESTS FOR sUBSTTMtONs SHALL BE MADE AT LEAST I MONTH PRIOR TO wSTALLAHON
f n«nam eN yq¢ ,run Swaez a Ae a,a amenw 'h
S HE, s : ¢i 'p W cueareeod sv, =,y 3 ALL PLANT MATERNts SCENE FROM COMMERCW. PUT PLIERS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT ISSUE OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIAHONs OF NURSERYMEN.
v rc'vnyNe-- caionwx C `- a " S -- xneNv. q,h nGw b,a' ee;xwd -s°h ,� 4 THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ALLPLANT MATE" IN THE APRRoawATE SEASON FOR EACH TYPE of STOCK. THE PLANTING SEASON FOR CONTAINER TREES SHRUBS TUEEIINGS CONTAINER SEEDLINGS AND LIVE SLAKE
S THROUGH MARCH I5. LIVE STAKES AND BAREROOT THE AND SHRUBS MUST BE INSTALLED w THE DORMANT SEASON. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE PLANTING SEASONS
—' t00% 5]8 '',vanu us +,remgryna Seann Cdtwvmotl LOU 812' eaemd to'r, ',, qp SHAH BE FROM NOVEMBER I THROUGH DECEMBER IS AND FEBRUARY 1'.
MAY BE MADE BY THE OWNER BASED ON SEASON. AND SLID CONDILONES
ZonetA-Wetland Floodplain Saetl Mix (t) ----- --- -SOMANSPLANTPLAN MY ALINFESTAOFFCK OR EFESIM EWFTUNHAAFTHYPLANT STOCK THE PLANT DISEASE, INSECT PEST EGGS, AND ALL
res 0.13 US AN F CCED
AplAicaoon Kate [IGS/ac] 25 Zone 18(2-Riperian ButtefSeetl Mix{1) T TIME FOR THE ROOTS TO HAVE DEVELOPED SUAREFFICIENTLY TO HUNACCEPTABLEOLD ANDTHE So.S TOGETHER WHEN REMOVE FROM THE CONTAINER.
Total Seed 3516' ll] OEF CTE�CIE
Application Rxte. LM'jPc) NOT BE ALLOWED IF THE SITE IS FLOODED, UNLESS DETERMW E OTHERWISE BY THE OWNER.
io,ai seed ND 'I'D,APHTDo K THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER A MINFvUM OF . HOURS P.OR TO THE
_AS LOCATION OF PLANTING ZONES, WIL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR WUL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPLANTMG OR RESEEDING ANY PLANT MATERIAL
LED WELHOUT PPR VAL OF THE OWNER
v us 54 _ -- 10. EACH CONTAINER PLANT SHAH E FERTII¢E WITH 20-10-5 CONTROLLED RELEASE TABLE'' FORMULATIONS VARY CONSIDERABLY BY MANUFACTURER, AND OTHER FORMULATIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE, PROVIDE THE TABLETS ARE NOT
S.— tau , 159n -
na mp:s --- --- ME THE TABLES SHAH BE BU PINTS Ro. SYSTEM THE PLANT STOCK SHAH BE FERT4¢ED AT THEFOILOWING FATES
.Gree na 'cape >er Nbd,;Yxens - taY- -� rex ? r° WATER-SOIU RIE NEAR THE
--
C-1ANI a smmN fo-urn i4 t_ STOCK TABLETS
- >W Va Wdtlrye Elymw wzwmous PLUGS AND QUARTS ONE 5 GRAM TABLE
."DN a - cnre.np:,-- a% - pY° BAREFOOT TUBEFUGS AND SEEUNGS ONE 10 GRAM TABLET PROJECT STATUS
_ _ _ ___ __ "'mH 'ma ,m a% ..
_ GRAM TABLETS
a Ne m aa� n% »1 CONTAINER TWO
fsrn R�eh DATE DESCRIPTION
.__ mem. lyrata »s coNTAweR Ywo 21 GRAM TABLers
emK aw .,x.x, ,a»
flex a: rdi _- __- til etno,rer cw.ro,,,,n knxe.a.+,a, zay.- 12/¢ns 3oN DeslcN-usgcoearvc Dep
-
nou; moYov xw 2rz¢ns LINAL DesICN
9xamp 6unAnwr ,u,vc.rgsstlohis 2:0 Pw -. — i oW 11. DURING PLANTING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER EACH PLANT WITH THE FOLLOWING NEN— QUANTITIES OF WATER UNLESS OWNER DETERNENES THERE IS SUFFICIENT SO¢ MOISIUE ON SITE. ¢TIg/16 ADDESSE DEICITY COMMENTS
IE ksnetl 'FNU eN imq sn ww-arc u t aN` TEE 1 GALLON OF WATER
o� - SHRUBS 1 GULON of WATER
wWremne -- sc mea nceePrx - -- °pP - PLUGS WNT OF WATER .�. ANGLER
12 HI BUFFER S
EED AS
ED BE ASA
iemner;,w,anax - +.,=a.°a,aM+i +.,.r .�. mm ENm oR ERmuIERls mo Be ADDS Am mxemmne oP seEINC. „r �pnnl�nNn'
w i" "' "'" SEE seEINC DATes seEINC RATes '""'"
_ -- _ _ _ JAN -MAY a AUG see e w RYE so LB/Ac
„pa .r '.- —S - GERMAN MILE MAYAUG20LBAc DRAWING PLANTING PLAN & NOTES
iarA. , A 2" LAYER SHALL BE PLACE IN THE WENAND FLOODPIIN PwOR pUp°NSE ' rvIY HATHAWAY SWITCH'T ST o
ro6EEINGASW LAS IN DIS EEBUFLEFAFI6F RE
A
=
ESeF°E9
GRAPHIC SCALE 1 -
-306/N Nx.
w
Rew31gp3
LAI, F- me,1
{pie{>b,cdJ
s.4€s
u
AWdmaJnhmaswv¢ssv H,3, gSia�n,bnn+C,BDFA , Fa-bn—Sh-A47¢ss,-6-PINTINGPLANhNOTESBAY, ¢,26/201s¢0235RED -g,11

AaaNa,—DA74GA7 HaN, q ­dh� SLl.NSCADDFA re F.I.-NIC. SBaaM,4746E7 9 MOMTONGMFHGAWON PLAN dAM 4T2-016 4 03 31 M,11111 1
11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11!11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 11 11 111
0 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12
LEGEND
ID'TER
POLE
Q--� MOVE f--.�,' MANHOLF5EW6
X51 1 1
Y
ROD
IRON
DO'
PR —' FN D MUMBXT FOUNDi
— — — — _ INFOwNATION / - P.ELOCA.ION
STAT ESolERHOLEFSATINES
RELOC&TI N �" I — > NussloN
-
STREALLUITCHLINE
T BASTING ER
E
PE—NENT 91� HIUSOORESTED
_ TFC
0
SECTION 2 enL¢`iIsANENNEEEVERe NT (PEND
iTS
Y TO BEECH BRANCH G N 0 "
% PLOJ FALSIFIEDSCRUB SHRUB
D TRI / ,.� AMe �. I /� I) WETLAND LES
PROPOSED STREAM BUFFER
T
I FOG GRAREE CONTROL
FIT FU
OUTER N BUFFER
ERY L'OIP.
EPARNNBUFFBR
Li/I'JLIx
yyyyy�y�
MANG FLOODPLAIN
ND
I ON
r��
�p NOTBS.
�00 -(� r! F/ IC EXISTNG TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WAS
I I I ( ON JULY
\ry' y
l� II °2Po1EANDAooI oNAL°ARD`¢"D.
r
I \ 040252 ON =DI BER3 20 5. D E
I V VEGEf ON -20LbIBBB BY 0B08YNTBC ON NOVEMBER 16,
\ I \ I \ o E SAMPLE PLOT ` - / Z WETLANDS WERE B¢NPATEB.N AUGUSTS
G E_ - { - )_ Y 1 y ^ 2015 ANB 9UPPLERLEMEIF F ON NOVEMB R
l IGT � VEGETATION/ i
i - - - - ACCOMDV oN POR`AR AF I'N ENTA
DBTB THAN FlVB
\
CRSS AS OUTLINER. THE 1987 U.S.
AABLE
OF ENGINEERS WANDUDISHARRED
/I EUY
lillicI OF GINEERS DENITION OF WATER OF THE U S DEERN'�'ER BY
ARMY COS O
THE S�RPFs
� f
s �
3) LDBTS OF WMANDS AND STRFAMS
BY ANGLER WERE SURVEYED BY
M.IODDBS­NED
.
MITIGATION PLANI THE CROSS SECTION SHALL SHOW WELL D 'I a oPED VEGETATION AND LATERAL STABDITY THE CROSS T ON SHALL REMP. RM—BLY CONSISTENT WITH THE
AS BUIT CROSS SECTION BUT MAY WE oW AGGRA (12 COMPONENTS OF A NAL MT­ PLAN, AS REQUIRED BY 2008 REAL MINGA'HON RULE) G ATAND NARROWING As THE CHANN¢ NNTURES.
TIO BH19 SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 2 AT ANY RIFFLE CROSS SECTION.
_ REs I.— OF COASTAL PIAN SANDBED STREAMS P E. SHALLOW
OBJECTIVES. THE PROPOSED STREAM BE'HGATION WILL COMPENSATE FOR 5NE.CoN MATS).O
HAVEA W1 IAC OF 'PARLANTMAND FLOODHE PROPOSEDPLAIMELENANoN AND RLPAA"RwN BUFL BE FER FlA E PROPOSED MILGA11ON PROJECT w¢R�'ROV AHANN¢ STAB¢Ir'TRoANDTED LF oPwN THE �RlRr PROECT SHALL R-N STABLE EAND ALL OTHER o RFORMANCEESTANDARDS SHALL BE MEE THROUGH 4 BANKFUI.I EVENTS OCCURRNG N SEPARATE YEARS
(742 HO WHICH WILL
CONNECTION COMPARED TO THE CONDITION OF THE EHSNG STRAIGHTENED, DEGRADED STREAM, AND PROVIDE MORE FORESTED RIPARN BUFFER THAN THE EHSTING YEARSOF MONFO RIXG
CONDITION ENTS COMPHANCE WELL THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS WOULD BE DETERNFNED THROUGH ANNUAL MONFORDXG AND REPORLNG
E IMPACTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF A sWITCH.G sTAllON. T EVEGEHTAlON s 1, 2, 3, 5 AND 7 POST CONSTRUCTION. VISUAL MONITORNG ONLY SHALL BE CONDUCTED . YEARS 4 AND
ROJECT Is AN ON-SITE R¢OCATION OF AN EHSTING sTRE4M CHANN¢ TO BME
TO a CL RESULTS ' CHAD FIT N ON A EAS PILL ETo THE IS A CT SEND THUS oST E T 6 NFL FELL SH DXCL HE OIL
WATERSHED THE AlIGNMENT OF THE RELOCATED STRBIA IS DKERhENED BY THE UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM TERhElff WHICH CONNECT TO THE EASHNG STREAM A AS BULLT SURVEYS AS BULLT SURVEYS SHALL BE SUBhETTED TO USACE WINED4 60 DAYS OF PROJECT CONSTRUCTION. SURVEYS
LLYERA D STRUCTURES, PLAN VIESS OUCHAs sTRE4M GAGES,DPE"RNNNEIT"SIKES, AND VEGETATION MOTS,,'ANDN
­S�DE OF T RES So UPAN SIR"EQUIREDTO RMOVED A ¢OCAOTE THEF Too STRBAMEl TCHANNEIWA FROM THE PROPOSED SUBSTADON, .TO AN AREAINTO ITSHAII ON OF ALLAISODOCUMENT THEIOCATION OF AIIMOMTNING EQNMENT SUCH
CROSS SECTIONS
ION. A CONSERVATION HASENTENT OR SDX.AR INSTRUMENT WILL BE PLACED OVER TH E LEVELS F T E BELL ON TREALS UFFERS B RHARLAN BUFFER VEGETATION MONFORHIG VEGETATION MONFORIXG SHALL BE CONDUCTED EI JULY 1 AND LEAF DROP OF EACH MOMTORHW YEAR. PLmTS
SHEET E2, DXCLU DXG IN TH PLAor sOE JURISDICHONAIIS PARLAN B DETERNEJATION FOR THE SITE AREA IoLLo . Fl
MUST BE I THE GROUND N THE Fl¢D. A NEIJIMUM OF 4 PIGTs WILL BETHE LOCATED, TWO ON FPCH SIDE OF THE sTRFPM. WITL BE HIN FPCH SK HE THE FOIIOWNG DATA
(RHO aSAMTOG.PHES OF ) EVALUATION THE NESJSED G STHEDOCUMENTSED TH aCONDITION OF oHE EhISRTINREL AN a G STREAM.E FNCDONAL CONDITION OF THE sTRFAM. A sTRFAM ASSESSMENT METHOD ED
L PR IF
RMS (3 1L SONO) CREDITST PROJECT T WILL PROVIDE FNCHONAI UPLIFT OVER THEF LONG WHICH IS RFNNON. CAPACITY OFTHAN THE LENGTH OF S'ITIE ENPACTED CHANN¢g"T'G a. UN Em THIS
AND STRAIGHTENED CHAPIN ERNNG ALONG THE BANKS NGSNG VERTICALLY, WHICH IS DISCONNECTED FROM THESHALL BE COUNTED AS A SINGLE STEPS REPLANTED STEMS MUST BE OVER 2 YEARS OLD
THE . STEN¢"(RPPCH Z) IS A DITOHED RESTED AND CONNSINS INVASIVE HERBACEOUS SPECCES BEFORE THEY IN BE COUNTED VOLUNTEER STEPS DATA MUST BE PRESENTED SEPARATELY FROM PLANTED STEM DATA INVA RVE SPECIES IDEPEN RED DUING
MONITORNG SHALL BE CONDUCTED As OUTI LED BELOW. A PROFIHE WOULD ONLY BE REQUIRE IF sIGNIRCANT CHANGES
DEFDX.LON, HYDROLOGY, HYDRAULICS, CHANNEL SFYDXG, AND STRUCTURE DETAILS AND NOTES, EROSION AND AL AND SEDEHENTA"ONAT DESIGN S(REFERT'O SEQUENoo° CONS-CHON ON"HELFF El,. FOR REFERENCE ONLY
AND PI-NW PLAN AND a. PROJECT STATUS
NT,MMUMENTEDCROSSSENONSWILBENSTALLEDNTHERED,ANDMASUREDACHMGNITGNGYEARTOBE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE DEsCRIPLON
ERIE CROPS SEED"' TW BUD
THE M_T`NXN CE S HALL "CLUD E P' oDIC INS E_ TYPI� I TWATERUPER YEAR, FOR DAMAGE TO THE SITE FROM STORMS, FLOODS, DROUGHTS AND OTHER C M AR TO THE AS
HE DESIGN FEATURES OF THIS Eo,EFT°REFDEoEEEoESREFaDEFR°IEMP� °a w °oFT"AN¢A ERGGNIFl NTSTGM NTS BASED ONT ASSE=L CH FIT. G HARTo K T E PLATUR TDo CHANNES, AND THE ALLTICHATED INCREASE ILL -4/16 REAL DESIGN TYPICALFREQDENGY AND DURA„GN OF FLOOD EVENTS DEQ
HABITAT F.TURES SUCH AS FFLES, POOLS, ROOT —, LEAF P CKS, AND WOODY DEBRES THE NORTH CARoLCXA ST — ASSESSMENT METHOD WILL BE USED
8............................................................. .....................................................................................DGG>n,_HONDH,GN6..........................................................................................
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••""''''""'"'""''''"'''"'"'''''''''"''"'"'''""'''''''""''''""''''''.•••••••V iMOttl VOCf11ENTA710NAMJ NSUAl'NPEC710N'ENE IIMA'CEAM1MEf SHAll'EE'MSPECTEE'RNV 4"WVQP UTU EtlCWV`?PS COND.ON AT LEAST TWICE PER
===RDS APPLY TO THIS nON PROIECT. HALL BE IDENnFlED
MOTANDSTR_ .i. ANGLER
A ORNIANCE STANDARD S PHOTOS SHALL ALSO BE TAKEN AT EACH CROSS SEC ON
MM M OF 2B0 sT¢ FlAGRE OF E .a. �pe�InMn'
YEAR LD PLANTED ST A BAR D AMI �l . YEAR 7 10 MANAGEMENT
`VILT"PROVIDE
b PLANTED VEGETATION ILL EACH PLOT MUST AVERAGE 7 FEE ILL HEIGHT AT YEAR 5 AND 10 FEE IN YEAR 7 THELONG
EQRED PEI OD DOMMON OR uaNUAL SET rvION"A"E"seECHOFF OFF'THEMENG-ON SEND TO moRE THAT THE"PROJECT
IS PLEBILMING PROPERTY ANMEREHASBE.oRRED
NO SINGLE SPECLES, R TED OR VOLUNTEER, SHALL COMPROSE MORE THAN BOX, OF THE TOTAL COMPO==Y OR 7 DT AT UN EPRG,E°TENETS REAL DRAWING MONITORING & MITIGATION PLAN
M PERT YEAR , AND No OTHER PROBLEMS HAVE T=R 3,
ANDARDS ABOVE ARE ACHIEVED THROUGH G OF THE SEND MAY 11 ADAP-EMANAGEMENTPLAN DOMMON SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN BASED ON SPECTIONS OF THE
o—CE ST APPROVAL OF THE USACE BUTGANoN
CBS E H WITTEN SFNBTH PERLACHEE SHALL TAKE CORREC11VE ACTIONS AS MIGHT BE NECESSARY TO DXSURE THE LONG TERM SUCCESS OF THE SITE FOR EW
HATHAWAY SWESCH'T G STATION
B PR�TTTOINSURETHATCoNSTRU"C ONIS o PD o" PURPOSES ONLYF RE K UN , NORTH VAR
ENCEEADJUSFEBENTS.GEOM'ETRYASTHECONSTRUCTED°HAANNELBECOMEINeEEITEE N,RNANTHE PERFOR CE STANDARDS EE°Ee REMENTSOFTHEMIT-ON"°ofT`WILBEDXCD"DED. THE ANNUAL OPERATION ANDNIANAGEMENTBUDGETFOR
=
E
MOoJECTINAND MCIPwESTHATTHECHAONao°oaE H"THESoENENT THES ITGH.GSTA GN E9oF E9
DROLOGY OF THE WATERSHED SUCCESS SHALL BE EVALUATED BASED ON BOTH PHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS AND VISUAL / PHOTOGRAPHIC BS
LOAReti3IRFA
SCALE 1 30 A
e/M N
a AGRAPHIC
(Fe,( m
l—, No
AaaNa,—DA74GA7 HaN, q ­dh� SLl.NSCADDFA re F.I.-NIC. SBaaM,4746E7 9 MOMTONGMFHGAWON PLAN dAM 4T2-016 4 03 31 M,11111 1