Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160404 Ver 1_Buffer& Nutrient Viability Letter_201604287irlh7p" 1 Water Resources ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY April 28, 2016 Scott Hunt Water & Land Solutions, LLC 11030 Raven Ridge Rd, Suite 119 Raleigh, NC 27614 (via electronic mail) PAT MCCRORY Governor DONALD R. VAN DER VAART Secretary S. JAY ZIMMERMAN Director DWR Project #: 2016-0404 Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — Edwards/Johnson Properties Located near the intersection of Lake Wendell Rd and Wendell Rd in Wendell, NC Johnston County Dear Mr. Hunt, On April 8, 2016, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), assisted you and others from Water & Land Solutions, LLC at the proposed Edwards Johnson Mitigation Site (Site) in Wendell, NC. The Site is located in the Neuse River Basin within the 8 -digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201. The Site is being proposed as part of a full -delivery stream restoration project for the Division of Mitigation Services (RFP #16-006477). The Interagency Review Team (IRT) was also present onsite. At your request, Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of features onsite to determine suitability for buffer and nutrient offset mitigation. Features are more accurately shown in the attached maps signed by Ms. Merritt on April 26, 2016. If approved, mitigating this site could provide stream mitigation credits, riparian buffer credits and/or nutrient offset credits. Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features from Top of Bank (TOB) out to 200' for buffer and nutrient offset mitigation pursuant to Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015) and Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0240 is provided in the table below: Feature Classification 15ubiect Adjacent Land uses 36uffer 2Nutrient Mitigation TVpe/Comments to Buffer Credit Offset Viable Rule at 2,273 Viable lbs acre R1 (below Stream w/ Yes Native hardwood Yes3 Yes, but only Forested areas = Preservation per 15A wetland to riparian (stream forest, closed in fields & NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5) confluence wetland only w/ canopy; Adjacent outside of the Fields = Restoration w/ R4) complexes start & fields are in active buffer *stream determination from DWR is throughout stop row crop agriculture mitigation recommended for start and stop points points area *No buffer credit within or around needed) wetlands R3 (start @ Stream w/ Yes Native hardwood Yes3 Yes, but only Forested areas = Preservation per 15A R1 and R4 riparian (stream forest, closed in fields & NCAC 02B.0295 (o)(5) confluence wetland only) canopy; Adjacent outside of the Fields = Restoration to wetland complexes fields are in active buffer *stream determination from DWR is near throughout row crop agriculture mitigation recommended for start and stop points Buffalo area *No buffer credit within or around Creek) wetlands State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources 1617 Mail service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 919 807 6300 Edwards Johnson Mitigation Site April 28, 2016 Page 2 of 2 R4 (where Stream w/ Yes Native hardwood Yes3 Yes, but only Forested areas = Preservation per 15A shown on man-made forest, closed in fields & NCAC 0213 .0295 (o)(5) figure 9) impoundment canopy; Adjacent outside of the Fields = Restoration field is in active row buffer *stream determination from DWR is crop agriculture, in- mitigation recommended for start and stop points line impoundment to area *No buffer credit within or around be removed wetlands; Subjectivity calls were determined using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS 2For nutrient offset viability to be determined, the landowner must provide proof in writing that the land is being used for agriculture or has been used for agriculture previously (prior to rule baseline). Dates, supported by photos or other written records, must be included to confirm that the uses of the open fields onsite are/were for hay crop cultivation/row crop/cattle. 'The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5). Site cannot be a Preservation only site to comply with this rule. Maps showing the project site and the features are provided and are signed by Ms. Merritt on April 25, 2016. This letter should be provided in all future mitigation plans for this Site. In addition, all vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset credits. Where buffer and nutrient offset credits are viable in the same area, only one credit type is allowed to be generated for credit, not both. For any areas depicted as not being viable for nutrient offset credit, one could propose a different measure other than riparian restoration/enhancement, along with supporting calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to determine viability for nutrient offset according to 15A NCAC 02B .0240. Please contact Katie Merritt at (919)-807-6371 if you have any questions regarding this correspondence. Sincerely, —� Karen Higgins, Supervisor 401 and Buffer Permitting Br ch KAH/kn Attachments: Site Aerial Map, USGS Topographic Map, cc:File Copy (Katie Merritt) DMS — Jeff Schaffer (via electronic mail) 1%WWWWWOMMew .q Legend "`�.---••- .�,.`�-- -� Flowers Quadrangle Conservation Easement �"""�`"'�"�. Fl North Carolina - Johnston Co. qLWr tO e ¢ � 4C( ! .. 2 - r yT� Rq 0 500 1,000' + _' Feet �' • j _ M Copyright:© 2013 Nation ;�J Geographic Society. i-cubed USGS FIGURE 4WATER & LAN6 Edwards-Johnson Topographic SOLUTIONS Mitigation %Project Map NAD 1983 2011 State Plane 2